ML21265A512

11-STP-2021-07 Public Forms

ML21265A512
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	07/29/2021
From:	Operations Branch IV
To:	South Texas
References
Download: ML21265A512 (24)

Text

6/28/2021 Heather Gepford

Heather Gepford 6/28/2021

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination: July 2021 Item Task Description Initials a

b*

c**

1.

W R

I T

T E

N

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES401 or ES401N.

DY NA TF

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES401 or ES401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

DY NA TF

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

DY NA TF

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

DY NA TF

2.

S I

M U

L A

T O

R

a. Using Form ES3015, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

DY RF NA TF

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

DY RF NA TF

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES3014 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES301 (including overlap).

DY RF NA TF

3.

W A

L K

T H

R O

U G

H

a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES3012:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and inplant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.

(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).

(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

(5) The number of alternatepath, lowpower, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.

DY NA TF

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES3011:

(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

RF NA TF

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

DY NA TF

4.

G E

N E

R A

L

a. Assess whether plantspecific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

DY RF NA TF

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

DY RF NA TF

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5.

DY RF NA TF

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.

DY RF NA TF

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

DY RF NA TF

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

DY RF NA TF

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Printed Name/Signature Date

a.

Author Rodney Fanner /

David You /

4/13/21

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

N/A NA

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

Thomas Farina 4/13/21

d.

NRC Supervisor Gregory E. Werner / Gregory E. Werner 4/21/21

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.

Rev. 2 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Exam: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

Crew A E

V E

N T

T Y

P E

Scenarios 1

4 5

T O

T A

L M

I N

I M

U M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION R

I U

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

RO SRO-I4 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 3,5 2,3, 4,5, 7,8 14 4

4 2

MAJ 5

6 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,3 2,3, 4

5 0

2 2

RO SRO-I9 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 3,4, 6,7 2,3,4

,5,7, 8

2,4 12 4

4 2

MAJ 5

6 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,4, 5

3 0

2 2

RO-4 SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,4, 8

2,4, 7,8 3,5, 7,8 11 4

4 2

MAJ 5

6 6

3 2

2 1

TS 0

0 2

2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Exam: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

Crew B E

V E

N T

T Y

P E

Scenarios 1

3 4

T O

T A

L M

I N

I M

U M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION R

I U

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

RO SRO-I7 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,4, 8

2,3, 4,6, 7,8 2,3, 4,5, 7,8 15 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 3,4 2,4, 5

5 0

2 2

RO SRO-I8 SRO-U RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 3,4, 8

2,4, 7,8 13 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,3 2

0 2

2 RO-3 SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 3,4, 6,7 2,6, 7

3,5 9

4 4

2 MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 0

0 2

2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Exam: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

Crew C E

V E

N T

T Y

P E

Scenarios 3

5 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION R

I U

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

RO-1 SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,6, 7

2,4 5

4 4

2 MAJ 5

6 2

2 2

1 TS 0

0 2

2 RO-2 SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 3,4, 8

3,5, 7,8 7

4 4

2 MAJ 5

6 2

2 2

1 TS 0

0 2

2 RO SRO-I SRO-U1 RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 2,3, 4,5, 7,8 12 4

4 2

MAJ 5

6 2

2 2

1 TS 3,4 2,3, 4

5 0

2 2

Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Exam: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

Crew D E

V E

N T

T Y

P E

Scenarios 1

3 4

T O

T A

L M

I N

I M

U M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION R

I U

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

RO SRO-I1 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 2,6, 7

3,5 11 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,3 2

0 2

2 RO SRO-I3 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 3,4, 6,7 3,4, 8

2,3, 4,5, 7,8 13 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,4, 5

3 0

2 2

RO SRO-I5 SRO RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,4, 8

2,3, 4,6, 7,8 2,4

,7, 8

13 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 3,4 2

0 2

2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Exam: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

Crew E E

V E

N T

T Y

P E

Scenarios 1

3 4

T O

T A

L M

I N

I M

U M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION R

I U

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

RO SRO-I2 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 3,5 14 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,3 3,4 4

0 2

2 RO SRO-I6 SRO-U RX 1

1 1

3 1

1 0

NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 3,4, 6,7 3,4, 8

2,3, 4,5, 7,8 13 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 2,4, 5

3 0

2 2

RO-5 SRO-I SRO RX 1

1 2

1 1

0 NOR 0

1 1

1 I/C 2,4, 8

2,6, 7

2,4

,7, 8

10 4

4 2

MAJ 5

5 6

3 2

2 1

TS 0

0 2

2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Rev. 2 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 APPLICANTS - Crew A RO SRO-I4 SRO-U RO SRO-I9 SRO-U RO-4 SRO-I SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1u 4a 5u 1b 4u 5a 1a 4b 5b Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 1,3, 5

2,3, 4,5, 7,8 1,3 2,3, 4,5, 7,8 1,2, 4

1,2, 4

2,4 1,3, 5

Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

All 1,3, 5

All 1,3, 4,6, 7

All 1,2, 4

1,2, 4

2,4, 7,8 1,3, 5,7, 8

Operate Control Boards (2)

N/A 1,3, 5,6 N/A 1,3, 4,5, 6,7 N/A 1,2, 4,6 1,2, 4,5, 8

2,4, 6,7, 8

1,3, 5,6, 7,8 Communicate and Interact All All All All All All All All All Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

All N/A All N/A All N/A N/A N/A N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 2,3 N/A 2,3, 4

N/A 2,4, 5

N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 APPLICANTS - Crew B RO SRO-I7 SRO-U RO SRO-I8 SRO-U RO-3 SRO-I SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1a 3u 4u 1u 3a 4b 1b 3b 4a Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 1,2, 4

1,2, 3,4 2,3, 4,5, 7,8 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 1,3, 4

2,4 1,3 1,2 1,3, 5

Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 1,2, 4

All All All 1,3, 4,8 2,4, 7,8 1,3, 4,6, 7

1,2, 6,7 1,3, 5

Operate Control Boards (2) 1,2, 4,5, 8

N/A N/A N/A 1,3, 4,5, 8

2,4, 6,7, 8

1,3, 4,5, 6,7 1,2, 5,6, 7

1,3, 5,6 Communicate and Interact All All All All All All All All All Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

N/A All All All N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

N/A 3,4 2,4, 5

2,3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 APPLICANTS - Crew C RO SRO-I SRO-U1 RO-1 SRO-I SRO-U RO-2 SRO-I SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 3u 5u 3b 5a 3a 5b Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 1,2, 3,4 2,3, 4,5, 7,8 1,2 1,2, 4

1,3, 4

1,3, 5

Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

All All 1,2, 6,7 1,2, 4

1,3, 4,8 1,3, 5,7, 8

Operate Control Boards (2)

N/A N/A 1,2, 5,6, 7

1,2, 4,6 1,3, 4,5, 8

1,3, 5,6, 7,8 Communicate and Interact All All All All All All Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

All All N/A N/A N/A N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 3,4 2,3, 4

N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 APPLICANTS - Crew D RO SRO-I1 SRO-U RO SRO-I3 SRO-U RO SRO-I5 SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1u 3b 4a 1b 3a 4u 1a 3u 4b Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 1,2 1,3, 5

1,3 1,3, 4

2,3, 4,5, 7,8 1,2, 4

1,2, 3,4 2,4 Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

All 1,2, 6,7 1,3, 5

1,3, 4,6, 7

1,3, 4,8 All 1,2, 4

All 2,4, 7,8 Operate Control Boards (2)

N/A 1,2, 5,6, 7

1,3, 5,6 1,3, 4,5, 6,7 1,3, 4,5, 8

N/A 1,2, 4,5, 8

N/A 2,4, 6,7, 8

Communicate and Interact All All All All All All All All All Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

All N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A All N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 2,3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,4, 5

N/A 3,4 N/A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

Rev. 2 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination: 7-12-21 Operating Test No.: LOT 25 APPLICANTS - Crew E RO SRO-I2 SRO-U RO SRO-I6 SRO-U RO-5 SRO-I SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1u 3u 4a 1b 3a 4u 1a 3b 4b Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 2,3, 4,6, 7,8 1,2, 3,4 1,3, 5

1,3 1,3, 4

2,3, 4,5, 7,8 1,2, 4

1,2 2,4 Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

All All 1,3, 5

1,3, 4,6, 7

1,3, 4,8 All 1,2, 4

1,2, 6,7 2,4, 7,8 Operate Control Boards (2)

N/A N/A 1,3, 5,6 1,3, 4,5, 6,7 1,3, 4,5, 8

N/A 1,2, 4,5, 8

1,2, 5,6, 7

2,4, 6,7, 8

Communicate and Interact All All All All All All All All All Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

All All N/A N/A N/A All N/A N/A N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 2,3 3,4 N/A N/A N/A 2,4, 5

N/A N/A N/A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

1. Candidates Exam Week Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt #

RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned 06/06/2021 South Texas Project / 05000498, 05000499 /

2021301 CAC #: 000956 FB-OR-ONSITE VALIDATI ON OF INITIAL LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV)

Farina, Thomas Bloodgood,Michael Doyle,Matthew Farina,Thomas You,David 07/11/2021 South Texas Project / 05000498, 05000499 /

2021301 CAC #: 000500 6

0 9

1 FB-OR-INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)

NNN Farina, Thomas Bloodgood,Michael Clayton,Kelly Doyle,Matthew Farina,Thomas Hayes,Mahdi Kirkland,John Osterholtz,Clyde You,David Page 1 of 4 7/7/2021 3:04:13 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: STP Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 06/01/2021 to 07/31/2021

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief:

TJ Farina Facility:

STP 7/29/2021 U/I:

Start of Op Test:

7/12/2021 7/19/2021 Due Date Date Complete Initials 11/9/2020 09/09/2020 TJF 12/14/2020 09/09/2020 TJF 12/14/2020 09/09/2020 TJF 12/14/2020 09/09/2020 TJF 12/14/2020 09/11/2020 TJF 12/28/2020 09/20/2020 TJF 2/8/2021 02/23/2021 TJF 2/22/2021 03/15/2021 TJF 4/26/2021 05/14/2021 TJF 5/3/2021 n/a n/a 5/24/2021 06/10/2021 TJF 6/7/2021 n/a n/a 6/7/2021 06/10/2021 TJF 6/14/2021 06/01/2021 TJF 6/7/2021 06/07/2021 TJF 6/21/2021 06/14/2021 TJF 6/28/2021 06/23/2021 TJF 7/5/2021 06/30/2021 TJF 7/5/2021 NA NA 7/5/2021 07/06/2021 TJF 7/5/2021 07/07/2021 TJF 7/5/2021 07/07/2021 TJF 7/12/2021 07/12/2021 TJF 7/26/2021 07/20/2021 TJF 8/18/2021 08/11/2021 TJF 8/26/2021 08/13/2021 TJF 8/26/2021 n/A N/A 9/2/2021 08/13/2021 TJF 9/9/2021 08/24/2021 TJF 9/16/2021 08/24/2021 TJF 9/16/2021 09/02/2021 TJF 9/16/2021 09/02/2021 TJF 10/7/2021 09/23/2021 tjf 10/14/2021 09/16/2021 TJF 10/21/2021 na 11/18/2021 09/23/2021 TJF Rev. 9 Post exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)

Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results 1 proposed denial letter mailed.

SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5)

RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed Branch Chief review of exam results completed On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee Rolling review of NRC questions with licensee, starting Dec 2020 and ending May 2020 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 Feedback approved by Branch Chief Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee Rolling review of NRC questions with licensee, starting Dec 2020 and ending May 2020 Date of Written Exam:

Description Notes Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials End of Op Test:

Written Exam Developed By: NRC Operating Test Developed By: NRC NRC examiners and facility contact assigned Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 Corporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 No informal review submitted to region by 9/22 Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed Request facility licensee management feedback on the exam Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee Feedback from licensee on proposed op test outlines.

Peer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9 Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and reference materials due.

Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by BC and forwarded for facility licensee review Written exam and operating test reviews completed Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief Administer Operating Test

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination

^1

^t^*^

Lords'

^dt^-1

+/- c^

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s)oft7/u +>> ^ /3^^'93( as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. ^~~

2.

Ppst-Examjnatjon

^ To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of '7/u-ixs '^*? -^"'*l From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

N)0 PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILIT/

.&5w^ l-s^t^_M'T'_^,-^-l<^oi\\' K<o^^-

fc\\°-/h A-^W-/

SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

^'^*a-f.^'v DATE NOTE as^cJ!k^

CtAWffi-5.-m>>c-w-<e\\<^rc^

6.-P^/,'T> C-iQCT/ViM' 7.J6H^ SA6ti./^k-S.'TA.s^^C De^C 9.'.^..c'y 7r ' fi<y6s^

io.iW>///:x-5/-.)ig/iK 11./fer>>'i<

S^penu^ir^ fifeA T^-M S^ >w\\i\\.Vti-Co-.'vr^^-VtCyC'

<<^ <; i&^ A^ ^ ^^<j;--jr<:'

• S~i\\ m^l'a^-r ^SLrsCiA/g^e.

5/^/^rj'n-rt / eyf fSe^

-~C,< S'X^y^ l.i/-'*"/>*..:"-

f^--^T.,--^£ i.2.ad

13. MicVL^

^)/>>/,*.*-,A/^/X'^

^^^Hif

^yw^{^/^

• za^c if'r^

14.P>>yi>s Oem M(TK~~my

<<^\\;<--1 etv\\\\.-\\.rf&r / ^v^>>rT'

^ " >y

/AR- ^'n. Oo/\\ A^Ca/"

ZWtXW^

_2T2j

• ^ ~. -^"',...^^' <-f-O^L^J' ^TQi S-JIS^( fs n^t-\\ ^c^2^

NOTES: 0.^ ^^-^U4 1^4^-h-r.y.F^r^-^.^i^^Wfe^

ES-201, Page 31 of 32 4if-jt-s ^ ^ {^ -f^te^ 'f/7/L/

^Si^^^ -ti^ S/5Z/^^

T^^jL^d^-^^-

ifaa^ s.^^ pe^ ^ejecy^

.^*fc.^ S'(y^^t^ p^ ^eJ^S^"1 ^" -<$*>>

-ffi ^^i ^ /e.f^^ft f-^

-}a -2^)

• 2^1

• ^{

AA.

^

r ftHf ^ t^^A per s>fl^T^F^7

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination

^-& 3A r^

ft0-fit

^ of -1 I acknowledge thqt I hg,ye aqquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(fe) of 7/it." ^S /s^i/ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

N30 Post-Examination ^ ^^'^

^3 To the best of my knowledge,^! d^d not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7//z-- 'lyfLa^ From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

n co (Q

(D u

9, GO PRINTED NAME 1._

2.Veyo-rt'.ti

3. H *<,4$ >>4 A^

r $*'kfa^.

e^C4<<i 4.J^

5.ASh(&

6:f-f2<<sJte "AN* E>>k Tcrn^

'A^-t-8.14o<rrl^ ^*fi^

9. ?SAH/I is &<<>Jts.u(c£^

10.KJ^y^/l?^?S(^ys H.^oU.vt /l>f^ltt<\\

12jc.^<q--r<4 ft^i^C 13-rWfw cwsTuXo U.'SbC^u^U-15.UM6 A/fcrAIUtvT NOTES:

JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILIT>>'

SIGNATURE (1)

DATE DATE NOTE

^tsi.sf^B-^^^ _ (A^ S^itTi/i&or

%Q-3.0 SIGNATURE (2) n'yw G^2^J,J^ iT^u.

<4ltlu -/yz.^^~- ihy i.sa-i.l^-^i""

/t0 5^0 -ijlm+ S'ai&^VItfcV

~^0" zo

^ftn -u<?

/-L<<M/^.

US /L-Of<

Cd^iTftAfcT-C.^^fC^^f-asf*<-rAt<.-r<,^

^<T

'^SA SA%\\K-T m

- us A-o H'/t^l ^W%

t-e./"

<<.<-ct/

ES-201,Page31 of 32 5>> ijl^!"^

^^ $(-^^A^\\ c-'/H^tf

/ >1 T/7/H

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination

^

^-^

f?^-

,*? 1 I acknowledge that I the week(s) of f^rz.

have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for tA. "7/^^^'§&fafthe date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination m

co N)0

-a 03 CQ (D

u Q

h Cd To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of'?/a Jo ^ ^^. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILIT/

r4^.^

lO.A^a^d^c 11.-

12._

13._

14.

15._

NOTES:

SIGNATURE (1)

<^4^

SIGNATURE (2)

.^^L<^

DATE NOTE

^^>f->>tC rf^.^fn/^/4-A)

• fi^^'l^s

/^**0~ L^->'<S-s^-

ES-201, Page 31 of 32 ^ <lj^i RC^ e-M^ I ^ /^/?-4

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examinatjon i-ff ')

v^ xj} ie -e,%^

f^e ^ ^ "1 I acknowledge tha^l have^Qqujred specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7',11' ~~7/^-^ ' 'as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who' have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Exammatjon

[^ To the best of my knowledge, I did^no^divdge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered

^ during the week(s) of 7/11- - '^/^f "iProrn the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

M0

-D cu CQ (D

03 Q

u

\\._L PRINTED NAME DV-..A-.

2. J^S^' T^.J(^-

3. <IC<<)AC) i..>>,itn ^i,^<U;..

4.A7/>^ Lac.be^

5. $KA*>>*>><aA ^kSA

6. Do AM 5 7.^Sh£lki K.7k.

A//O-/-X'

9. VePNdi ^K^/'^y 10.Jo>>^>><J VJWtiVl-fF

\\\\.^r(Hch ^it/U/

12^-...- ^.'jLC'ff 13-ZAft,<2.<C 0Urxa.Mt4l u./^/.^f ^^

15. M,i_. r^WFx <

u*<r-

• ^_

NOTES:

JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILIPi"

^T^J i^str^^/

><<-<< J-^-/--m'"^~~

^^aesr^e.eK Se&.w^s-ttoAeat-

':5c. ^es(-y <'f /C("S J^r^nly SIGNATU

?^/<^-^

\\^(^^-

/^

iSL l//r&.

^f^-fitO Sr^^~

Cf-i-OjMg; sTo'y hl-ry

^p^t

^^~w^

,"5t-i,AHx-rt;~

~^7 5^kr^ F-

^^^^.&.^~^

^?7 $Lr/)t.-~A&fl%n^.

.5-T-y4.ri-.W-s DATE SIGNATURE (2)

^^^'^^ ^9-^-

V^/7,^W,^7^

Z^ y^M.'JKLf^^-

^^,^-7^2-<

w^^__,.

TTTiTzT^^^ ^

• 4^2Ai£..t....^-^ '"5>/3.t /2'(

C-^Mc? T/-7/^(

ES-201,Page31 of 32

^Jl^^^

• ^^s^^pe^f^e-fl^^j V?/2-/

^^^ ^^^tf^Mf-^^ T/uy4^

S.^s.

7-/<r-jl

ES-201

-a M

(Q (D

co s,

LJ Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examinatjpn 0

^5 p^

5 ^ 1 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 -1^-2.1 ^>\\ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these ticensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination

^ To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered

,(, during the week(s) of 7-ii 2-9 '"?<-¥:rom the date that I entered into this security agreement untii the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME 1^/TrU^>.

<Anl 2.Tno-<<<<<)

2 f.^y<i,

/^a\\.->>£-

JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITf U'S'TiZUi-^farA-E(1)

DATE NOTE f/^

ZK^vufc-jA- /W^u-rs^erer

3. c'.ner^ m&x^v i^co^^ '^v^c^w^T 4.<"3<<&>t ^VJl^ ' <:r^^U^ ^^psr-^-

5./Wc^a.e /' /S"A</"

6.Jchh 5hCi^

C TO-<<sfcSfc~~'"^

-(VM-U~b^ uV^-^7 T~L LOT 9\\^'wLvi. $o^

'5^^a^f -^

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

/S-JU^>>( ^^

^-i5--3l ^yw-ryw ^. M-.^t-M*.. 2-? 0 1 - i 5-u v' M ^-^i /.\\N\\a.^z-

-f/^/7./ /*"

TYl;-^

>0~ ^ZX-A-O-ky^

7^/2-, '^2--L^^^<^

^7^7 TR?

fp?

^-

'^^1^

(7)^p

<^5--'1 tt-e'uu

9. S*ev< 5'f*b nvf r u<<-t-7 3S JnS-ft'<<.c*>><r / f^f/sn^/

CT 7./. 2.( -^ ^^f<<,

11, 12, 13.

14.

15.

?-33 ^

NOTES: ^) V&^,. i^ {^{^ ^\\^.A ^c^t-y ^f^^-^ 7-iA-^l< ^ ^^o.^ ^<. "T^^ ^^ /*'k-^

©^ ^A-4 ^ ^:^U 5'^^ ^ r<?^^ ^ 7-^ -A /. ^yr^^j f^... At c r-a ?^<

^) ^^5^ ^^^ ^,,^ ^.^^-^^^.^^z^ ^^ p^^-^^ g/3^

-K^ si^ip^e-m^/ ct/^f^

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination 0

^*5 f3^^ G c-f ^

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s)of 7-y.-h "l-y']-^-^ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

co Post-Examjnation m

co 100 n

Q?

(0 (D

C*3 To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7-iJ. -A> '~('^-y-^t From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITf SIGNATURE (1)

SIGNATURE (2) i.A-frt^ fy^ ^.r^^ £/S 2.

3._

4._

5._

6._

7._

8._

9._

10._

11._

12.

13._

14._

15.

DATE NOTE

-T//^^/ ([.

'f & ^."l Ae <^<?-1> 'd-

£v<t-^ *^i-c^riY <3-*~^- r-e-^/'&u--^ ^-QT ^ 'E'r-^w. /i^-s^^-t

^4 U.4- +T>>vi<- A< r^^d^v^ ^ i-s^^ ','kd-^-^

^o-y \\^jf ? 'H/Y,. & I y\\v*r i/Y\\ ^ w^- ty^/ ^ C \\ f^ * -" N^' v^~'r >>*.

-t-Mj; S<S <.->-.4^ A.; /--<.^A^-, /ic,'^^--a< ^o <;^p.^kw-5 <~<;^ A<!^'T^c^^e^-<.3<5?,.$^v< <?-i<:l-- 5-£^i

/' " ' ^S-201,Page31 of 32 NOTE6r70^,l ^c^ -^^s ^r?<<^eJ- </~^ ^-r 2y £-w ^

OA ^-iH--^jL.\\ <?-fct-y v^itk. 6-t-L-s^' M&v^^r^ s^^'s

't-U^ *s'ls t-C-r *'^ "A>>,~^fM^. ^- In i-..-w £_,/-A-- ^>';

/

rt^ i; AM ^^.

r^-