ML16138A106

2016-05 Draft Outline Comments

ML16138A106
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	05/04/2016
From:	Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV
To:
References
Download: ML16138A106 (2)

Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS South Texas Project, Facility: First Exam Date: May 4, 2016 Units 1 and 2 Written Exam Outline (Revision 1)

Comment Resolution RO Exam Outline Tier 1/Group 1, Question #7: Before the Licensee staff performed this verification.

K/A statement is changed, verify whether Based on the review, there are no internal there are any reporting responsibilities to organizational reporting requirements 1

internal organizations that a RO may associated with the RO position. Therefore, have. This is part of the scope of the the proposed change in the written exam original K/A statement (G2.4.30). outline is acceptable.

Tier 2/Group 1, Question #53: Editorial - Outline editorial change made.

2 In the Form ES-401-4, the As in the K/A statements discussed should be Ks.

Tier 2/Group 2, Question #61: Do ROs Based on licensee review, there are no RO have a responsibility to monitor remote responsibilities with this task. The licensees handling or operations involving maintenance department has responsibility 3 containment iodine filters? Recognize for this activity.

there may be no tasks in the control room, but are there oversight The proposed written exam outline change is responsibilities of others? acceptable.

Tier 3/Category 2, Question #68: Do Based on licensee review, there are no job ROs have any responsibilities with task responsibilities for ROs on this topic.

preparation/evaluation of risk Transmission dispatcher coordination is 4 assessments, work prioritization, or handled at the SRO level.

coordination with transmission system operators? The proposed written exam outline change is acceptable.

SRO Outline Tier 2/Group 2, Question #18: Area The subject matter for this proposed K/A radiation monitoring is addressed in closely matches that of Tier 2/Group 2, Section 12.3.4.1 of the UFSAR. It says Question #10. It would be best to develop a that the Reactor Control Building high question on another topic.

range radiation monitors are safety-related for their post-accident monitoring The outline was changed to match G2.2.38 capabilities. They are discussed in with Tier 2/Group 2, 068 Liquid Radwaste.

UFSAR Chapter 15. Other area 1 radiation monitors are given in tables associated with Section 12.3.4.1 as well.

It is unclear if the credited ventilation radiation monitor for control room ventilation is within this group as well. If it is, this is controlled within the Technical Specifications (TS 3/4.7.7). OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1

Are there any of these that have conditions/limitations associated with the facility license?

Tier 3/Category 1, Question 19: In most Based on secondary licensee review, the cases, ROs make the plant licensee will return back to writing a question announcements. However, do SROs based on the original K/A statement (2.1.14).

evaluate criteria that require them to direct others to make announcements?

If so, the existing K/A statement may be used.

Administrative JPM Outline Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.

2 3

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.

2 3

4 5

6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1