ML17205A285: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO ÉSRO X Item Description lnitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading RTV h 2 Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                       Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility                             Date of Exam:           Exam Level: RO       É SRO X Item Description                                       lnitials a         b       c
("",'a)Lr+^,-r 3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading R TV              h 2
K(4 TL_/4.Grading for all borderline cases (80 x2o/o overall and 70 or 80, as appicable, +4o/o on the SRO-nly) reviewed in detail (^"n")w TL/5. All other faili/ur"justified ng examinations checked to ensure that grades (^.,"f It-,.,+rL-t 6.Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants
3.
(^u+")tt+TL/I Printed Name/Signature Date R t c/¿r/r-r a. Grader Ro^l"rt c.o b. FacilityReviewer(*)
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented       ("",'a)
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)7 6l,l>u,-d. NRC Supervisor
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors Lr+
(")t ,\.(.)The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}
                                                                                          ^,-
r (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)                     K(4         TL_ /
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 x2o/o overall and 70 or 80, as appicable, +4o/o on the SRO-nly) reviewed in detail (^"n")
w TL               /
: 5.       All other faili ng examinations checked to ensure that grades
        /ur"justified
(^.,"f                                             It-,.,+     rL -t
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants (^u+")           tt+       TL     /
I Date Printed Name/Signature
: a. Grader                      Ro^l"rt c.                o    R   t                   c/¿r/r-r
: b. FacilityReviewer(*)
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)                                                                     7
: d. NRC Supervisor (")                   t           ,\.                             6l,l>u,-
(.)       The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}

Latest revision as of 01:50, 30 October 2019

2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
ML17205A285
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/2017
From: Jesse Seymour
Operations Branch III
To:
Point Beach
Shared Package
ML16319A340 List:
References
Download: ML17205A285 (1)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO É SRO X Item Description lnitials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading R TV h 2

3.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented ("",'a)

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors Lr+

^,-

r (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations) K(4 TL_ /

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 x2o/o overall and 70 or 80, as appicable, +4o/o on the SRO-nly) reviewed in detail (^"n")

w TL /

5. All other faili ng examinations checked to ensure that grades

/ur"justified

(^.,"f It-,.,+ rL -t

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants (^u+") tt+ TL /

I Date Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader Ro^l"rt c. o R t c/¿r/r-r
b. FacilityReviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 7
d. NRC Supervisor (") t ,\. 6l,l>u,-

(.) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.