ML18163A355: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
| docket = PROJ0689 | | docket = PROJ0689 | ||
| license number = | || license number = | ||
| contact person = Golla J | | contact person = Golla J | ||
| document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | | document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | ||
| page count = 10 | | page count = 10 | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Draft ISG-06 Revision 2 Alternate Review Process Tabletop Material Pareez Golub EXCEL Services Corporation June 13, 2018 1 | ||
Tabletop Goals & Objectives | |||
* To pilot certain draft ISG-06 R2 Alternate Review process-unique items to ensure common understanding between industry and NRC | |||
* To exercise portions of the ISG-06 R2 Alternate Review process for the type and level of detail of information 2 | |||
Tabletop Goals & Objectives (contd) | |||
* To help inform ISG-06 R2 industry guidance content and scope 3 | |||
Considerations | |||
* There is no intent to change ISG-06 R2 during the Tabletop | |||
- There may be opportunities for clarification to be provided during the public comment period | |||
* Some Tabletop material may be included in an industry guidance document as examples 4 | |||
Tabletop Material Basis | |||
* Diablo Canyon LAR & SER | |||
* Hope Creek PRNMS LAR & SER | |||
* Oconee LAR & SER | |||
* Tricon, NUMAC, ALS, and Spinline 3 Topical Reports and SERs Note: all material is non-proprietary 5 | |||
Tabletop Content | |||
* Lessons learned from Oconee / Diablo Canyon and Safety Function Summary Table (Section D.2.3) 6 | |||
Tabletop Content (continued) | |||
* C.2.2.1 Vendor Oversight Plan (VOP) draft LAR description | |||
* AR Process sample SER Inspection items | |||
* C.2.2.3 Sample Licensee Commitments in Consideration of Early License Amendment Issuance | |||
* D.5.1.2 Resolution of Topical Report Plant-Specific Action Items - presentation and LAR statements 7 | |||
Tabletop Content (continued) | |||
* D.2.2 New System Architecture | |||
* Human Factors Engineering | |||
* D.4 I&C System Development Processes | |||
* D.8 Secure Development and Operational Environment 8 | |||
Tabletop Content (continued) | |||
* C.2.3 Pre-Application Coordination Meeting presentation 9 | |||
Tabletop Outcomes Define the specific outcomes and consensus: | |||
* The level of detail is sufficient for the NRC to reach a safety conclusion | |||
- Identify unnecessary information | |||
* Vendor technical oversight - scope and intent | |||
* AR process inspection space - define areas for NRC-industry workshop | |||
* NRC expectations for licensing commitments and conditions | |||
* Inform industry guidance 10}} |
Latest revision as of 22:27, 20 October 2019
ML18163A355 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
Issue date: | 06/13/2018 |
From: | Golub P Nuclear Energy Institute |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Golla J | |
References | |
Download: ML18163A355 (10) | |
Text
Draft ISG-06 Revision 2 Alternate Review Process Tabletop Material Pareez Golub EXCEL Services Corporation June 13, 2018 1
Tabletop Goals & Objectives
- To pilot certain draft ISG-06 R2 Alternate Review process-unique items to ensure common understanding between industry and NRC
- To exercise portions of the ISG-06 R2 Alternate Review process for the type and level of detail of information 2
Tabletop Goals & Objectives (contd)
- To help inform ISG-06 R2 industry guidance content and scope 3
Considerations
- There is no intent to change ISG-06 R2 during the Tabletop
- There may be opportunities for clarification to be provided during the public comment period
- Some Tabletop material may be included in an industry guidance document as examples 4
Tabletop Material Basis
- Tricon, NUMAC, ALS, and Spinline 3 Topical Reports and SERs Note: all material is non-proprietary 5
Tabletop Content
- Lessons learned from Oconee / Diablo Canyon and Safety Function Summary Table (Section D.2.3) 6
Tabletop Content (continued)
- C.2.2.1 Vendor Oversight Plan (VOP) draft LAR description
- C.2.2.3 Sample Licensee Commitments in Consideration of Early License Amendment Issuance
- D.5.1.2 Resolution of Topical Report Plant-Specific Action Items - presentation and LAR statements 7
Tabletop Content (continued)
- D.2.2 New System Architecture
- Human Factors Engineering
- D.4 I&C System Development Processes
- D.8 Secure Development and Operational Environment 8
Tabletop Content (continued)
- C.2.3 Pre-Application Coordination Meeting presentation 9
Tabletop Outcomes Define the specific outcomes and consensus:
- The level of detail is sufficient for the NRC to reach a safety conclusion
- Identify unnecessary information
- Vendor technical oversight - scope and intent
- AR process inspection space - define areas for NRC-industry workshop
- NRC expectations for licensing commitments and conditions
- Inform industry guidance 10