ML112370085: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/24/2011
| issue date = 08/24/2011
| title = Email, Peer Check Evaluation of Leakage Test Results
| title = Email, Peer Check Evaluation of Leakage Test Results
| author name = Burford F G
| author name = Burford F
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| addressee name = Wang A B
| addressee name = Wang A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| docket = 05000416
| docket = 05000416

Revision as of 10:56, 29 June 2019

Email, Peer Check Evaluation of Leakage Test Results
ML112370085
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/2011
From: Burford F
Entergy Operations
To: Wang A
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Wang, A B, NRR/DORL/LPLIV, 415-1445
References
Download: ML112370085 (1)


Text

From: BURFORD, FRANCIS G [FBURFOR@entergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 2:35 PM To: Wang, Alan Cc: BURFORD, FRANCIS G; MILLAR, DANA; BROADBENT, GREGORY E; ANDERSON, KENNETH

Subject:

FW: peer check, please The information below provides a summary of the evaluation we had mentioned in our conversation with SCVB (Ahsan). If he has any questions, please let us know.

Thanks Jerry From: BROADBENT, GREGORY E Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:50 AM To: BURFORD, FRANCIS G Cc: ANDERSON, KENNETH; THORNTON, THOMAS W

Subject:

RE: peer check, please Thanks Kenny.

Jerry, below is what we suggest you transmit to the NRC regarding Pa.

- Greg

An evaluation was performed to confirm that leakage test results based on the former Pa would still be expected to satisfy the appropriate acceptance criteria when tested at the new higher Pa. Basically, the leakage was scaled by a factor of 1.134 based on the relationship of the leakage rate to the square root of the pressure. A review of the testing results at GGNS demonstrates that substantial margin exists between the extrapolated results and the relevant acceptance criteria. All the increased leakage rates were found to comply with the current Tech Spec requirements that include margin to La. Thus, adequate margin is still available for the higher test pressure. A summary of key results from that presentation is presented below.

Test Units Measured @ 11.5 psig Predicted @14.8 psig Limit Basis for Limit Type A wt%/day 0.2100.2380.51150.75La per Tech Spec SR 3.6.1.1.1 Type B+C wt%/day 0.1600.1820.40920.6La per Tech Spec SR 3.6.1.1.1 Type A+B+C wt%/day 0.3700.4200.682La per Tech Spec SR 3.6.1.1.1 MSIV (Worst-Case MSL) scfh 76.787.0100Tech Spec SR 3.6.1.3.8 MSIVs (All MSLs) scfh 166.3188.6250Tech Spec SR 3.6.1.3.8