ML103410313

Final QA Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML103410313
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	09/14/2010
From:	Operations Branch I
To:	Public Service Enterprise Group
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML100560172	List: ML102290400 ML102600032 ML102600038 ML102600044 ML102600053 ML102600085 ML102600125 ML102600129 ML102600138 ML103410313
References
TAC U01788, 50-354/10-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-354/10-301
Download: ML103410313 (23)

Text

Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES*201*1 C<<,4<-Date of Examination:

10) applications audited to qualifications

/ eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; If -7 Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines with facility licensee -rf' -7 Approved job performance measures, and distributed to NRC examiners -rf

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case basis in coordination with the facility

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the ES-201, Page 24 of 27 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES*201*2 Facility:

Hope Creek Generating Date of Examination:

08/23/2010 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical S and major Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule M L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested at least one new or Significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the 1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form at least one task is new or significantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is Ensure that KiA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. L e. Check the entire exam for balance of Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*) c. NRC Chief Examiner d, NRC

-Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines CO\U If'! Nf2C ES-201 Examination Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date g/23110 of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e,g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowled g", I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Sh1JO . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME DATE NOTE , c;;.,__Gf/",,_._19. f Yo x....P 7,"'..\o'1.... P"'M"'!"'f Nfli'iiH'!r:m!\O\M s/t;pp 11-___. .. _

.#It. ;,:;;;;jI y, '::--"0/ ..-. -. -IY ---I'A -..-***",,0 -","" , m.... 7='"" ,e'L :.A:""""r' PI.,. I L) __ ... ...--..... . "";':"'1_ .

ES-201, Page 27 of 28 ES..201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES ..201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not n authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

t will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 2. _________________________________________________________________________

__ 3. ________________________________________________________________________ 4. _________________________________________________________________________

__ 5. ______________________________________________________________________

__ 6. ____ 7. ___ 8. ____ 9. ____ 10. ____ 11. ____ 12. ____ 13. ____ 14. ___ 15. ____ NOTES: ES-201, Page 27 of 28 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s} of as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of K/.,.,/rIJ . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

'\/3 A 0

.,-/D (J Il'1 J:-a ttl" fltt< t<< --()PS ZNSTRfUj;OR

' f-/C o?5 4q1iO----Opr. 5:tI\$-I-.r., *. \-.......-:r...:rI--.1-r J D dif l't1A e-"rI4.-if!....r rD 7:l!:: "'/ c.-/2<.1"

• '0 tff s: T .1:0.)" V; == ---------------------

---

==-------

---

._---------------

---

---

---

---

TQ-AA-201 Revision 15 Page 22 of 30

• ATTACHMENT 5 EXAM SECURITY BRIEFING RECORD Pa e 1 of 1 Name of Authorized Person Date Briefed New Authorized Person's Initials Exam Author's Initials Operating Test Quality Checklist Form Date of Examination:

8/23/10 Operating Test Number: NRC2010 Ie Hope Creek Initials 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c# The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

a e.? V ff There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this ti'IJ -rf The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a). flV'J' "V-Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. -1,7' z.... ry It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. G.fi/ "V"' 'ff' _.2. WALK-THROUGH

--Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions initiating references and tools, including associated

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific rf designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that

-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and

-system response and other examiner -statements describing important observations to be made by the

-criteria for successful completion of the identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

-restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the a.",1 '2" (f criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. SIMULATOR

-The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with .y'" Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

atl j. " Printed cr:1L.. a. Author c.c.llut' It $/1,1110 b. Facility Reviewer (*) L"r",vt])

S';;..cialY

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) -rOl>b fl SH I S(;rJ.l'i 1'1 /0,..d. NRC Supervisor A,VlSl!/( .A' --I!!!D ?Lr2//O./ NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c H ; chief examiner concurrence is ES-301, Page 24 of 27 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301*4 Date of Exam: 8123/2010 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test NO.:2010 NRC QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES i Initials a b' C# The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out -z....of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected Tf The scenarios consist mostly of related events. a? 'Z.--(y Each event description consists of

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction( s) that are entered to initiate the event

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the iff

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable) No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario V {f without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6#J '2" tr Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain v complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

V Cues are given. The simulator modeling is not altered. "V if The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated V \F to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. v \F All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

4'7-y ¢ Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 'V' tf specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

"1 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew

'V \f'"'1 Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

--! Total malfunctions (5-8) 8/ 7 / 8 (If:Y V I i 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3/ 2 / 3 GO "Z---' '\Y Q."l "\,.... LF 3, Abnormal events (2-4) 4/ 4 / 3 ii 4, Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 / 1 Q,.,. -z... "(f EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/ 2 / 2 air} 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions 1 / 0 / 1

'V'" {f'.7. Critical tasks 2 I 3/3 4,,/

f Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:

Hope Creek Date of Exam: 8/23/2010 Scenario Numbers: 4/5-Spare Operating Test NO.:2010 NRC QUALITATIVE Initials a b* C# The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out 't,...of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected (it 1-1Y The scenarios consist mostly of related events. avr '2..-Each event description consists of

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ,f* the expected operator actions (by shift y

• the event termination point (if 0I{f No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. O"r V' The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. (tS1'" 'V \f Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

fA. 1.1--z..... If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

6.(1-v Cues are given. The simulator modeling is not altered. a,,, v \f The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated

'2,....to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

&£'1 'l..r \f All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). -z.. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

0.£1' -V \f The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

(1£1 1..-\f Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes

---

'l,...Total malfunctions (5-8) 6/ 5 / flt;,-y Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 1 / Q{r 'l-1r Abnormal events (2-4) 3/ 4 / G.f1 "2.-Iff Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 / (Ur -Z-11'f EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 2 / Q.f"Y -v--11"f Qrr; -z.,... IlfEOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 / 1 / 1/ Critical tasks (2-3) 3-4 / 3 / ti.i-?

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Date of Exam: 8/23/10 A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S B A R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C p T 0 T A L R M I N I M U M(*) I U E RO RX 0 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 1 C I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U IKI MAJ 7 2 2 1 TS 3,4 0 2 2 RX 1 0 RO 0 NOR 1 1 SRO-I D I/C 7 4 4 2 SRO-U IKI MAJ 8 2 2 1 TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 RO 0 1 0 D SRO-I 1 1 C SRO-U 3,4,5, 6,10 5 4 4 2 IKI 7 2 2 1 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 0 I/C SRO-U IKI MAJ TS Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:

Hope Creek Date of Exam: 8/23/10 Operating Test N A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P T 0 T A L R M I N I M U M{*) I U E RO IKI SRO-I D SRO-U ;::: MAJ 1 1 3,6,8 7 +H3,7,9 .. 8 "'J (,":' .*... J 1 1 6 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 2 0 1 2 1 In TS .:c".: .. , :;i' " 0 0 2 2 RO IKI SRO-I ,-, RX NOR IIC '.:':.': 1 3,6,8 ',", .. '. '" . '

':. ",,::::,,'" ...*::.:" .. '7: 1 : ..... 3,5,6, 8,9,

{ .. ..... 1 1 9 1 1 4 1 1 4 0 1 2 -SRO-U .. : :" .

10 :...*.. } " 1:--: MAJ 7 I ;{., . .; ,', ." . 7 j , ;> 2 2 2 1.. " . , .1'---' TS .;,:X J --

..... 0 0 2 2 ...." :' RO RX 1 ---1 1 1 0 " IKI NOR ---: . .... .\ 2 1 1 1 1 SRO-I .: I/C 3,6,8 4,5,7, 7 4 4 2 D .......*.*..

,., ; .'i' Ir":f: . 8'.; ,,';;SRO-U MAJ 7 .. ,,,,}' 6 2 2 2 1 D .,' .,' 'ii.;",,*,.'

'" TS ---itt: I ;'f' :.,,' ,:"1: -0 0 2 2 RO RX t.:; %:'iii: , -1 1 0*'t! ... &; ....D NOR .,: '[;, --1 1 1 SRO-I I/C : <"lltf

---4 4 2 D

!;Ft';, .. i MAJ , ""': .*:. :1:\'0 ,,' ii1i: ---2 2 :

""'. : f" ..'..*...*.I.; I*'."" ---0 2 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

o Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. 2 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:

Hope Creek A E P V P E L N I T C A T N Y T P E RO [g] SRO-I D SRO-U MAJ TS RO [g] SRO-I -SRO-U MAJ TS RO RX [g] NOR SRO-I I/C D SRO-U MAJ D TS RO RX D NOR SRO-I I/C D SRO-U MAJ TS Instructions:

1 S A B R T o o C P Date of Exam: 2 S A B R T o o C P 8/23/10 Scenarios 3

S A B R T o o C P 2 4 T CREW POSITION 0 T A S A B L R T o o C P Operating Test No.: NR M I N I M U M(*) R U 1 0 4 2 2 2 2 0 4 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES*301*5 Facility:

Hope Date of Exam: 8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 A E P 1 3 4 T M P I 0CREW CREW CREW CREW L N T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I I A M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C PN Y R U T P E RO RX 0 [8] NOR SRO-I I/C D SRO-U 2 2 1 0 2 2 RO 1 0 [8] NOR SRO-I 4 4 2 C SRO-U 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 RO 1 0 [8] NOR SRO-I 9 4 4 2 D SRO-U 10 7 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 4 2 2 1 0 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers tor each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-ot-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

It an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-'1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES*301*5 Date of Exam: 8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 A I E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S R o A T C B o P 2 CREW POSITION S R o A T C B o P 3 CREW POSITION S R o A T C B o P 4 CREW POSITION S R o A T C B o P T o T A L R M I N I M U M(*) I U E RO RX o SRO-I NOR rKI I/C 3,4,5 6,8,9, SRO-U 10 ,...---, 2 2 2 1 2 o 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 ..*.** 10 4 4 2 1= 2 2 2 o 2 2 1 2 RO 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 . .' r..S','. 1 1 rKI 3,4,5 10 4 4 2 SRO-U 10 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Date of 8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 A Scenarios P V 1 2 T M P I 0 CREW CREW CREW L N T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I I T A MS A B S A B S A B S A B L U R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A M(*)0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R UT P E RO 0 D NOR SRO-I IIC 4 4 2 IKI SRO-U 2 2 0 2 2 1 0 RO D NOR SRO-I 4 4 2 IKI SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 2 2 RO 0 D 1 1 SRO-I 10 4 2 IKI SRO-U MAJ TS RO 0 D NOR D SRO-I IIC 4 4 2 SRO-U 2 2 1 0 2 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Date of Exam: 8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P T 0 T A L R M I N I M U M(*) I U E RO C SRO-I [8J SRO-U C RX NOR I/C MAJ TS ;: ,),:,,; .' 1 3,6,8 7 ;:/ .,. :*. ' ;;!¥ ifl ..... ... 1:( :' .' . 2 3,4,5, 6 7 3,4 .....:: ... :', 0 '::"':, '0' '.c; :\,.. I.',;'" ...

...* :.. 1 1 7 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 4 4 2 0 2 2 RO RX l***.. .. 3 '.: ......... , ........ .: 1 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I [8J SRO-U 0 MAJ'; TS [i I, 5,6, 7,9 8 :.;; 1***.i.* .. 2 3,4,5, 6 7 3,4 :.. <.. ' ,

• "'tl, .

  .; , .;

';'0:;:;;.:

• 2 8 , 2 ;2 1 4 2 0 1 1 4 2 2 1 212 RO ,-, -SRO-I RX NOR ...... ; " : ........... 2 ." 1 Bffi3E1 [8J SRO-U [J RO D SRO-I D SRO-U .'---' I/C MAJ TS RX NOR I/C MAJ TS

• L...* .....,. :.:<iii ai" .. 'y ... .. z>. ; :: CDs.. : ,.< , , ....... :...... .;' ..... : .... ',' :' .. ( 3,4,5, 6 7 3,4 ,. ',." .*..... ., . ;;';, ., ;:.. ....... ',. ..<. .' 3,4,5 6 -1': ;; :,.,'J I " .. ,'z, .... : g, ;;;;;;;.... , ..... , .;;.... 7 2 2 4 2 0 1 1 4 2 0 4 2 2 1 1 4 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or control/ed abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements speCified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I J:"",,,;I;h

• Hope Creek Date of Exam: 8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P T 0 T A L R M I N I M U M(*) I U E RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 1 1 [8] I/C 3,6,8 3,4,5, 7 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 7 6 2 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 3 1 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I [8] I/C 5,6, 7,9 3,4,5, 7 9 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 8 6 2 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 2 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 1 1 [8] SRO-U I/C 5,6, 10 3,4,5, 7 7 4 4 2 D MAJ TS 7 6 3,4 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 D I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES*301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

Hope Creek Date of Examination:

8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 APPLICANTS RO [g] RO D RO D RO SRO-I SRO-I [g] SRO-I 0 SRO-I SRO-U C SRO-U D SRO-U [g] SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO i SCENARIO I SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 i 2 3 I 4 1 2 3 4 InterpreUDiagnose Events and Conditions 1 3 ,4, I 5,6, : 7,8, 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, All 3,4, 5,6, 7,8, 2,3, I 2,3, 4,5, 4,5, , 6,7, 6,7, All 3,4, I 5,6, 7,8, 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, All 9,10 8,9 8,

• 9,10 i 8,9 8, 9.10 8,9 8, 9,10 9,10 I 9,10 Comply With and All All All AU , All I All All All All All All All Use Procedures (1) i i Operate Control Boards (2) 1,2, 3,5, 6,7, 1,3, 5,6, 7,8, All All 1,2, 5, 6,7, 1,3, 5,6, 7,8, All All 1,2, 3,5, 6,7, 1,3, 5,6, 7,8, All All 8, 9 8, 9 8, ! 9

• 9,10

• 9,10 9,10 , i Communicate I All All All All All , All All All All All All All I I, and Interact i 1 I Demonstrate I Supervisory Ability (3) NA I NA I NA I NA 1,3, 4,5, 6,7, : 'j , -, j, 4} 5) 6,7, 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, All 1,3, " 4,5, 6,7, 'j ,-,.), 4,5, 6,7, 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, All I i I 8, 9,10 8,9 , 8,

• 9,10 '. 8, 9,10 8,9 8, 9,10 I Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) NA I :-lA NA NA 3,4 2,4 I 3,4 3,4 3,4 : 2,4 i 3,4 3,411 I i Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. I (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicants'license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Competencies Checklist Form ES*301-6 Facility:

Hope Creek Date of Examination:

8/23/10 Operating Test No.: NRC2010 APPLICANTS

____

____

__

____

RO SRO-I [R] RO SRO-I [R] RO SRO-I 0 0 RO SRO-I SRO-U n SRO-U D i SRO-U [R] SRO-U Com pete ncies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 5 I 5 I 5 I I ! I InterpreUDiagnose Events and Conditions 1,3, 4,5, I: 1,3, 4,5, I' I' \,3, 4,5, I' I ________________

Comply With and All I, All I \ i All I I Use Procedures (1) I I All Operate Control All Boards (2) All All Communicate and Interact II Demonstrate I 1,3, : 1,3,1 , 4,5, ' ill' 4,5, , Supervisory Ability (3) 6, II 6.7 , NA 3,5 Comply With and I II 3,5 I Use Tech. Specs. (3) 1 I Ii iI Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicants'license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:

Hope Date of Exam: August 2010 Exam RO& Level: SRO Initial 1. Item Description Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility.

a b* c# .1f II 2. a. NRC KJAs referenced for all questions.

b. Facility learninq obiectives referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4. The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL ProQram Office) 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or the examinations were developed independently, or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or other (explain) Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified);

enter the actual RO 1 SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. Between 50 and 60 percent of the question on the RO exam are written at the comprehensionl analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at riqht Bank Modified New -\r 51 1 18 2 / 0 22/7 lor... "L-rMemory CIA 34 I 3 41/ 22 References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are deviations are . 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B . The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; total is correct and agrees with value on cover Printed Name 1 Date a. 8/16/10 T /J/l Facility Reviewer (*) 8/16/WlI NRC Chief Examiner (#) Bh'rMI NRC Regional Supervisor yl 111/(

• The facility reviewer'S initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Supplement 1

Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: q I c'ICDIO Exam Initials Item Description a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

TF 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified -rp 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date 0, I rR./w.b a. Grader b. Facility ,I f{1I>/6 c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 2t q/ld;u d. NRC Supervisor

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5