ML072410249: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML072410249
| number = ML072410249
| issue date = 09/10/2007
| issue date = 09/10/2007
| title = Braidwood, Units 1 and 2, Environmental Assessment, Issuance of Environment Assessment Exemption Request Related to the Use of Areva Np Inc. Advanced Mark-BW(A)
| title = Environmental Assessment, Issuance of Environment Assessment Exemption Request Related to the Use of Areva Np Inc. Advanced Mark-BW(A)
| author name = Kuntz R F
| author name = Kuntz R F
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2

Revision as of 09:08, 10 February 2019

Environmental Assessment, Issuance of Environment Assessment Exemption Request Related to the Use of Areva Np Inc. Advanced Mark-BW(A)
ML072410249
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2007
From: Kuntz R F
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
To: Crane C M
Exelon Generation Co
kuntz, Robert , NRR/DORL, 415-3733
References
TAC MD3083, TAC MD3084
Download: ML072410249 (7)


Text

September 10, 2007Mr. Christopher M. CranePresident and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OF ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT RE: EXEMPTION REQUEST RELATED TO THE USE OF AREVA NP INC. ADVANCED MARK-BW(A) FUEL ASSEMBLIES (TAC NOS. MD3083 AND MD3084)

Dear Mr. Crane:

Enclosed is a copy of the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impactrelated to your application for an exemption dated September 26, 2006, as supplemented on August 8, 2007. The proposed exemption would allow the use of AREVA NP Inc. modified Advanced Mark-BW fuel assemblies.The assessment is being forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register for publication.Sincerely,/RA/Robert F. Kuntz, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457

Enclosure:

Environmental Assessmentcc w/encl: See next page

ML072410249OFFICELPL3-2/PMLPL3-2/LADLR/REBAOGCLPL3-2/BC NAMERKuntzEWhittEBennerRGibbsDATE8/31/078/31/078/31/079/4/079/10/07 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:Document Control Desk - Licensing via e-mailMr. Dwain W. Alexander, Project ManagerWestinghouse Electric Corporation via e-mailMs. Bridget Little RoremAppleseed Coordinator via e-mailHoward A. LearnerEnvironmental Law and Policy Center of the Midwest 35 East Wacker Dr., Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60601-2110Braidwood Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission via e-mailMs. Lorraine CreekRR 1, Box 182 Manteno, IL 60950Illinois Emergency Management AgencyDivision of Disaster Assistance &

Preparedness via e-mailCounty Executive via e-mailAttorney General500 S. Second Street Springfield, IL 62701Plant Manager - Braidwood Station via e-mail Site Vice President - Braidwoodvia e-mailSenior Vice President - Operations Supportvia e-mailChairman, Ogle County BoardPost Office Box 357 Oregon, IL 61061Manager Regulatory Assurance -Braidwood via e-mailDirector - Licensing and Regulatory Affairsvia e-mailAssociate General Counselvia e-mailSenior Vice President - Midwest Operationsvia e-mailVice President - Regulatory Affairsvia e-mailManager Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle via e-mail 7590-01-PUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONEXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLCDOCKET NOS. STN 50-456 AND STN 50-457BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OFNO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTThe U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of anexemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 46, andAppendix K to Section 50, for Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77, issued to Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), for operation of the Braidwood Station (Braidwood), Units 1 and 2 located in Will County, Illinois. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTIdentification of the Proposed Action:The proposed action would allow the use of AREVA NP Inc. (AREVA) modifiedAdvanced Mark-BW fuel assemblies.The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's application dated September 26, 2006, as supplemented by letter dated August 8, 2007.

The Need for the Proposed Action:The proposed action would allow up to eight AREVA modified Advanced Mark-BW fuelassemblies to be placed in nonlimiting Braidwood, Unit 1 core locations. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, "Specific Exemptions," the licensee has requested an exemption to 10 CFR 50.46, "acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light-water nuclear powerreactors," that requires, among other items, that "each boiling or pressurized light-water nuclear power reactor fueled with uranium oxide pellets within cylindrical zircaloy or ZIRLO cladding, must be provided with an emergency core cooling system (ECCS) that must be designed so that its calculated cooling performance following postulated loss-of-coolant accidents conforms to the criteria set forth in paragraph (b) of this section." Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50, "ECCS Evaluation Models," requires, among other items, that the rate of energy release, hydrogen generation, and cladding oxidation from the metal/water reaction shall be calculated using the Baker-Just equation. The regulation at 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix K, make no provisions for use of fuel rods clad in a material other than zircaloy or ZIRLO. The licensee will irradiate eight assemblies using fuel rods clad with AREVA's M5 alloy in Braidwood, Unit 1.

Since the material specifications of the M5 alloy differ from the specification for zircaloy or ZIRLO, a plant-specific exemption is required to support the use of the eight assemblies.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action:The NRC has completed its safety evaluation of the proposed action and concludes thatapplication of 10 CFR 50.46, and Appendix K to 10 CFR 50, is not necessary for the licensee to achieve its underlying purposes.The details of the NRC staff's safety evaluation will be provided in the exemption thatwill be issued as part of the letter to the licensee approving the exemption to the regulation.

The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents.

No changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released off site. There is no significant increase in the amount of any effluent released off site. There is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed action does not have apotential to affect any historic sites. It does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant environmental impactsassociated with the proposed action.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action:As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denial of the proposedaction (i.e., the "no-action" alternative). Denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources:The action does not involve the use of any different resources than those previouslyconsidered in the Final Environmental Statement for Braidwoood NUREG-1026, dated

June 1984.

Agencies and Persons Consulted:In accordance with its stated policy, on August 29, 2007, the NRC staff consulted withthe Illinois State official, Mr. Frank Niziolek of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no

comments.

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTOn the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposedaction will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the licensee's letter datedSeptember 26, 2006, as supplemented by letter dated August 8, 2007. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do nothave access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or send an e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of September.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Robert F. Kuntz, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation