ML13080A408: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML13080A408
| number = ML13080A408
| issue date = 03/20/2013
| issue date = 03/20/2013
| title = Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2 - Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000275-13-003, 05000323-13-003) and Request for Information
| title = Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000275-13-003, 05000323-13-003) and Request for Information
| author name = Gaddy V G
| author name = Gaddy V G
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB

Revision as of 06:17, 8 February 2019

Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000275-13-003, 05000323-13-003) and Request for Information
ML13080A408
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/20/2013
From: Vincent Gaddy
Operations Branch IV
To: Halpin E D
Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
IR-13-003
Download: ML13080A408 (7)


See also: IR 05000275/2013003

Text

UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511

March 20, 2013

Mr. Edward D. Halpin

Senior Vice President and

Chief Nuclear Officer Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Diablo Canyon Power Plant

P.O. Box 56, Mail Code 104/6

Avila Beach, CA 93424

SUBJECT: DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NOTIFICATION OF

INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000275/2013003,

05000323/2013003) AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Halpin:

From May 20-24, 2013, inspectors from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC)

Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Diablo Canyon

Power Plant Units 1 and 2, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, "Licensed Operator Requalification Program." Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive

inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your sta

ff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for

documents needed for this inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.

The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the

inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of the enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that

all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. John Becerra of your training

organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Thomas Farina at 817-200-1117

(thomas.farina@nrc.gov) or Brian Larson at (817) 200-1172 (brian.larson@nrc.gov

).

E. Halpin - 2 -

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Offi

ce of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control

number. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electr

onically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document

system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/ Vincent Gaddy, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 05000275; 05000323 License: DPR-80; DPR-82

Enclosure:

Biennial Requalification Inspection Document Request

E. Halpin - 3 -

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Robert.Lewis@nrc.gov) DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Deputy Director (Michael.Scott@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov) Acting DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Thomas.Hipschman@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Laura.Micewski@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/B (Neil.OKeefe@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Michael.Bloodgood@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/B (David.You@nrc.gov) DC Administrative Assistant (Madeleine.Arel-Davis@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) Project Manager (Joseph.Sebrosky@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)

SUNSI Review Completed: ___Y___ ADAMS: Yes No Initials: VGG

_ Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

ML13080A408 SOE:OB C:OB TFarina VGaddy /RA/ /RA/ 3/20/13 3/20/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

S:\DRS\REPORTS\Reports Drafts\DC 2013 BRQ RFI Letter.docx

- 1 - Enclosure BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

From: Thomas Farina

Operations Engineer, NRC RIV

817-200-1117

To: John Becerra Exam Development and Simulator Support

Supervisor, Diablo Canyon Power Plant

805-545-4006

Subj: Information Request to Support May 20 - 24, 2013, Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection (IP 71111.11B)

A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module

(ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or

hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than May 10, 2013.

  • Electronically to: thomas.farina@nrc.gov

cc: brian.larson@nrc.gov

duane.strickland@nrc.gov

  • Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011

ATTN: Thomas Farina

General Requests:

  • List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
  • Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR evaluators identified)
  • Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training

program up to date

  • List of outstanding LOR program changes
  • List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

  • Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator requalification training program
  • Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes

02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality

  • The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
  • The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.

- 2 - Enclosure

  • All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and including the week before the inspection team is onsite. This will need to have adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via

regular mail per NUREG-1021.

  • The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)

02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality

  • The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of May 20, 2013.
  • The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of May 20, 2013.
  • Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
  • All of the previous year's NRC required annual operating tests.
  • Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)

02.05: Licensee Admin of Requal Exams

  • All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
  • All procedures used to assess operator performance
  • All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
  • All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

02.06: Requalification Examination Security

  • Submit any tracking tools that you use

as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a periodic basis.

  • Submit any tracking tools that you use

as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc) on a periodic basis.

  • All Procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations

  • List of all Condition Reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to examination security and overlap

02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program

  • List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam cycle) * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance

documentation)

- 3 - Enclosure

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
  • All Procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for section 02.05 above.
  • Simulator Discrepancy Report

summary list for all open DR's. For closed DR's, summary list for those items closed between April 8, 2011 and May 19, 2013.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the

control room

  • Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues

B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on May 20, 2013.

02.02: Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Quality

  • All Operating tests (JPMs & scenarios)

to be given in all subsequent weeks after

onsite week

  • All results up to the day the team leaves the site.

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • Access to licensed operators' records (operating and staff crews)
  • Access to licensed operators' training attendance records
  • Access to licensed operators' medical records

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • Simulator discrepancies (DR's) from April 8, 2011 to May 19, 2013. This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the documentation/justification for closure.
  • Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at the time of acceptance (as available).
  • Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and neutronics models, to the actual plant.
  • All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator (any documentation on this)
  • Summary list of modifications from April 8, 2011 to May 19, 2013.
  • Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due date from April 8, 2011 to May 19, 2013.
  • Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to May 19, 2013).

- 4 - Enclosure

  • The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include the

test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.

  • All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and

the acceptance criteria with results.

  • All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.
  • Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room

C. Diablo Canyon Power Plant is required to send the final results summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional

office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the

Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the

inspection.