ML072060688: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:July 25, 2007MEMORANDUM TO:Luis A. Reyes Executive Director for Operations FROM:Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary/RA/ | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-07-0096 - POSSIBLEREACTIVATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND LICENSING ACTIVITIES FOR THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2The Commission has approved the staff's recommendations for the licensing and inspectionprogram approach to be used for Watts Bar, Unit 2 if the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) decides to reactivate Unit 2 construction, subject to the comments noted below.Should TVA decide to reactivate its Operating License application for Watts Bar Unit 2, the staffshould issue a further notice of opportunity for hearing on the application.The staff should keep the Commission informed of any significant issues that arise concerningthe implementation of the Commission policy on deferred plants. The Commission supports a licensing review approach that employs the current licensing basisfor Unit 1 as the reference basis for the review and licensing of Unit 2. Further, TVA and the NRC staff should review any exemptions, reliefs, and other actions which were specifically granted for Unit 1 to determine whether the same allowance is appropriate for Unit 2. | |||
Significant changes to that licensing approach would be allowed where the existing backfit rule would be met or as necessary to support dual unit operation. The staff should encourage the licensee to adopt updated standards for Unit 2 where it would not significantly detract from design and operational consistency between Units 1 and 2. There are current generic safety issues at the resolution stage, such as GSI-191 or securityissues, that will be much easier to resolve before plant operation. The staff and TVA should, during the licensing period, look for opportunities to resolve such issues where the unirradiated state of Watts Bar 2 makes the issue easier to resolve than at Watts Bar 1. cc:Chairman Klein Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Jaczko Commissioner Lyons | |||
OGC CFO OCA OPA Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail) | |||
PDR}} |
Revision as of 22:06, 10 November 2018
ML072060688 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Watts Bar ![]() |
Issue date: | 07/25/2007 |
From: | Vietti-Cook A L NRC/SECY |
To: | Reyes L A NRC/EDO |
References | |
SECY-07-0096 SRM-SECY-07-0096 | |
Download: ML072060688 (1) | |
Text
July 25, 2007MEMORANDUM TO:Luis A. Reyes Executive Director for Operations FROM:Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary/RA/
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-07-0096 - POSSIBLEREACTIVATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND LICENSING ACTIVITIES FOR THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2The Commission has approved the staff's recommendations for the licensing and inspectionprogram approach to be used for Watts Bar, Unit 2 if the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) decides to reactivate Unit 2 construction, subject to the comments noted below.Should TVA decide to reactivate its Operating License application for Watts Bar Unit 2, the staffshould issue a further notice of opportunity for hearing on the application.The staff should keep the Commission informed of any significant issues that arise concerningthe implementation of the Commission policy on deferred plants. The Commission supports a licensing review approach that employs the current licensing basisfor Unit 1 as the reference basis for the review and licensing of Unit 2. Further, TVA and the NRC staff should review any exemptions, reliefs, and other actions which were specifically granted for Unit 1 to determine whether the same allowance is appropriate for Unit 2.
Significant changes to that licensing approach would be allowed where the existing backfit rule would be met or as necessary to support dual unit operation. The staff should encourage the licensee to adopt updated standards for Unit 2 where it would not significantly detract from design and operational consistency between Units 1 and 2. There are current generic safety issues at the resolution stage, such as GSI-191 or securityissues, that will be much easier to resolve before plant operation. The staff and TVA should, during the licensing period, look for opportunities to resolve such issues where the unirradiated state of Watts Bar 2 makes the issue easier to resolve than at Watts Bar 1. cc:Chairman Klein Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Jaczko Commissioner Lyons
OGC CFO OCA OPA Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)