U-601226, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1988 for Clinton Power Station,Unit 1

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for June 1988 for Clinton Power Station,Unit 1
ML20151E550
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/1988
From: Spangenberg F
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
U-601226, NUDOCS 8807260115
Download: ML20151E550 (7)


Text

. . -. . -. .. ... . .. ,

, 1 s .- Pags 1_-of 6.

.Attschu nt.to U-601226 CHALLENGES TO' MAIN STEAM SAFETY / RELIEF VALVES.

Month June 1988 None s

6 I

e

.l I

I k8 .; r S Qh i

\

\ l I

Pggs 2 of.56- ,

L Attachment ' to -

U-601226 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT' FORMAT AND' INSTRUCTIONS AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL DOCKET NO. 461 UNIT Clinton-1 DATE 06/30/88~

COMPLETED BY F. A.-Spangenberg TELEPHONE (217) 935-8881' X3400 .

MONTH June 1988:

DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) .(MWe-Net) 1 911 17 916 2 914 ~18 915 3 914 19 876 4 -917 20 910 5 771 21 909 6 911 22 911 ,

7 910 23 911' 8 914 24- 839 -

9 924 25. 0 10 915 26 53  ;

11 889 27 477 l 1

12 701 28 644 l 13 787 29 731 -l 14 891 30 873 15 906 31 N/A 16 914 INSTRUCTIONS i On this form list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

These ' figures will be used to plot a graph for each reporting month. Note that when maximum dependable capacity is used for the net electrical rating of the unit, there may be occasions when the daily average power ^1evel exceeds the 100% line (or the restricted power level line). In such cases, the' average daily unit power output sheet should be footnoted to explain the apparent anomaly.

Paga 3 of 6 Attsch:snt to U-601226 OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO. 50-461 UNIT Clinton 1 DATE 06/30/88 COMPLETED BY F. A. Spangenberg TELEPHONE (217) 935-8881 X3400 OPERATING STATUS

1. REPORTING PERIOD: June 1988 GROSS HOURS IN REPORTIN, PERIOD: 720
2. CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED POWER LEVEL (MWt): 2894 MAX. DEPEND. CAPACITY (MDC)

(MWe-Net): 930 DESIGN ELECTRICAL RATING (MWe-Net): 933

3. POWER LEVEL TO WHICH RESTRICTED (IF ANY) (MWe-Net): None
4. REASONS FOR RESTRICTION (IF ANY): N/A THIS MONTH YR TO DATE CUMULATIVE
5. NUMBER OF HOURS REACTOR WAS CRITICAL... 690.9 3282.5 4180.8
6. REACTOR RESERVE SHUTDOWN HOURS......... 0 0 0
7. HOURS GENERATOR ON LINE................ 680.9 3187.5 4085.8
8. UNIT RESERVE SHUTDOWN HOURS............ 0 0 0
9. GROSS THERMAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH)..._ 1,843,235 8,535,203 10,680,703
10. GROSS ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH) 606,214 2,839,247 3,555,897
11. NET ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH).. 576,581 2,708,080 3,392,183
12. REACTOR SERVICE FACTOR................. 96.0% 75.2% 79.4%
13. REACTOR AVAILABILITY FACTOR............ 96.0% 75.2% 79.4%
14. UNIT SERVICE FACT 0R.................... 94.6% 73.0% 77.6%
15. UNIT AVAILABILITY FACTOR............... 94.6% 73.0% 77.6%
16. UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR (Using MDC)....... 86.1% 66.7% 69.3%
17. UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR (Using Design MWe) 85.8% 66.5% 69.1%
18. UNIT FORCED OUTAGE RATE................ 5.4% 4.4% 3.5%
19. SHUTDOWNS SCHEDULED OVER NEXT SIX MONTHS (TYPE, DATE, AND DURATION OF EACH): N/A
20. IF SHUT DOWN AT END OF REPORT PERIOD, ESTIMATED DATE OF STARTUP: N/A

'1. UNITS IN TEST STATUS (PRIOR TO COW 4ERCIAL OPERATION): FORECAST ACHIEVED INITIAL CRITICALITY 2/27/87 INITIAL ELECTRICITY (Synchronization) 4/24/87 COMPLETION OF WARRANTY RUN 10/09/87

Page 4 of 6 Attachment to '

U-601226 ,

UNIT SHUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS DOCKET NO. 50-461 UNIT Clinton 1 .

DATE 06/30/88 COMPLETED BY F. A. Spangenberg TELEPHONE (217) 935-8881 X3400 REPORT MONTH June 1988 METHOD OF TYPE SHUTTING DOWN F: FORCED DURATION THE REACTOR OR NO. DATE S: SCHEDULED (HOURS) REASON REDUCING POWER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS / COMMENTS 13 880605 S 0 B: Reduced power to 1: Manual insertion Reason approximately 80% of control rods of rated reactor power and reduction A-Equipment Failure to perform surveillance in reactor (explain) testing and repair a recirculation B-Maintenance or Test minor steam leak flow C-Refueling D-Regulatory Restriction 14 880611 S O B: Reduced power to 1: Manual reduction E-Operator Training &

approximately 75% of in reactor License Examination rated reactor power recirculation F-Administrative to perform surveillance flow G-Operational Error testing (explain)

H-Other 15 880624 S 0 B: Reduced power to 1: Manual insertion approximately 60% of of control rods Method rated reactor power and reduction to perform surveillance in reactor 1-Manual testing and a control recirculation 2-Manual Scram rod sequence exchange flow 3-Auto Scram 4-Continued

Prga 5 of 6 _

Attschment to '

U-601226 ,

UNIT SFUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS DOCKET No. 50-461 UNIT Clinton 1 .

DATE 06/30/88 COMPLETED BY F. A. Spangenberg TELEPHONE (217) 935-8881 X3400

' REPORT MONTH June 1988 METHOD OF TYPE SHUTTING DOWN F: FORCED DURATION THE REACTOR OR NO. DATE S: SCHEDULED (HOURS) REASON REDUCING POWER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS / COMMENTS-16 880624 F 39.1 A: After having placed the 3: Automatic Scram "A" & "B" Reactor Feed Pumps in Manual to allow for automatic flow control, the "B". pump was being controlled from the Startup Controller.

The Startup Controller malfunctioned causing a reactor water level transient which resulted

'in a reactor scram at-level 3 l

e-Pegi 6 of 6 Attichm:nt'to U-601226 REFUELING'INFORMATION 1)' Name of facility Clinton Iower Station

2) Scheduled date-for next refueling shutdown January 3, 1989
3) Scheduled date for restart following refueling March 12.-1989 .
4) Wil.1 refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a Technical Spec.fication change or other license-amendment? Yes If Yes, list in general what these will be:

An Operating License and Technical Specification change in response to the Reduced Feedwater Temperature Analysis, and Maximum Extended Operating Domain (MEOD) Analysis, j 5) Have the reload fuel design and core configuration been reviewed by the I Facility Review Group (FRG) to determine whether any unreviewed safety questions are associated with the core reload? No l if no such review has taken place, when is it scheduled? August, 1988

6) Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting information: ,

The reload license amendment is scheduled to'be submitted on l

September 2, 1988.

7) List any important licensing considerations associated with refueling l e.g., new or different fuel design or supplier, unreviewed design or l performance analysis methods, significant changes in fuel design, new operating procedures.

MEOD Anlaysis. G.E. "Barrier Fuel" will be used to replace discharged fuel.

l

8) Number of fuel assemblies a) in the core 624 b) in the spent fuel storage pool 0
9) The present licensed spent fuel pool storage capacity 2,672 l l 1 The size of any requested or planned increase in licensed storage I capacity 0 (number of fuel assemblies) l
10) The projected date of the last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool, assuming the present licensed capacity 2010 .

i l

I l

.. . :s ,

~

<- U-601226

. L30-88 @7 -12)-LP '

1A.120 ,

ILLIN0/S POWER' COMPANY i IP CLINToN PontR $7ATION. P.O. BOX 678, CLINTON, ILLINots 61727 1

' July 12,'1988. l l

10CFR50.36 -l RG 1.16 .I i

l i

.l

. l Docket,No. 50-461 l l

Document Control Desk l U.S.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Clinton Power Station, Unit l' -

June 1988 Monthly Operating Report NPF-62

Dear Sir:

l Please find enclosed the Honthly Operating Report for Clinton_ Power Station, Unit 1, for the period ending June 30, 1988.

Sincerely yours, s)./ M&

F. A.-Spangenberg III l Manager - Licensing and Safety GSL/kra i

Enclosure l I

cc: Regional Administrator, Region III, USNRC  ;

l i

l

') i l

I