Text

Forwards line-by-line Descriptions of Changes in Amend 85 to FSAR
	ML20097A362
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	05/29/1992
From:	William Cahill; TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	; NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
	TXX-92239, NUDOCS 9206020298
	Download: ML20097A362 (126)
	v • d • e

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

n "E

Log # TXA-92239

~~

File # 10010 d

Ref.

10CFR50.34(b) r r

10CFR50.55(f)

TUELECTRIC wmum J. cam. Jr.

May 29, 1992 armva rnae U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 FSAR AMENDMENT 85 DESCRIPTION Gentlemen:

Amendment 85 to the CPSES FSAR was transmitted to you under a separate cover letter TXX-92238, dated May 29, 1992.

The attachment to this letter provides line-by-line descriptions of the changes in Amendment 85.

FSAR pages which do not have technical changes but are included in the amendment (because they are the-opposite side of the sheet from a page that was changed, because the change shifted the existing material to another page or because only editorial changes were made on these pages) are not discussed in the attachment.

As has been the TU Electric practice in the past several FSAR amendments, all changes described in the attachment have been evaluated for relative significance (i.e., the group number 1, 2, 3 or 4 following each change justification as discussed in TV Electric letter TXX-88467 dated June 1, 1988).

In addition, all changes applicable to CPSES Unit 1 have been reviewed under the TV Electric 10CFR50.59 process and found not to include any "unreviewed safety questions."

Amendment 85 includes the_following changes previously transmitt d to the NRC as advance FSAR submittals:

1) Unit 2 updates to Chapter 15 descriptions of large and small break lOCA and the Boron Dilution Event, as transmitted in TXX-92119, dated March 17, 1992;

2) Use of Seismic Category 11 piping in a Non-Seismic building, as transmitted in TXX-92063, dated March 4, 1992;

3) Removal of inline review of nonconformance reports by the Nuclear Ovcryiew Department, as transmitted in TXX-92064, dated March 3, 1992, and subsquently approved by the NRC in a letter dated March 18, 1992; L'bOCUO h

9206020298 920529 DR ADOCK 0500 5

p p,

gg I

i

TXX-92239 i

Page 2 of 2

4) Revision to the maximum one hour fire rated cable size, as transmitted in TXX-92163, dated Ma*ch 31, 1992; and

5) Revision to the separation criteria for larger power cable, as trarsmitted by TXX-92164, dated April 10, 1992.

Also contained in Amendment 85 are extensive changes to Chapter 11 (and related sections of Chapter 9, 10, and 15).

These changes update various tables and text to reflect actual operational data whcre they previously contained projected data, and make the FSAR consistent with current radioactive waste management procedures and practices.

In this and the next several amendments, the responses to NRC questions, currently contained in FSAR volumes XV, XVI and XVII, are being incorporated into the FSAR text.

The incorporation process is being performed in support of the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) and generally takes the form of one (or a combination of) the fnllowing: 1) The response is replaced with a reference to an FSAR text section'where the information already exists; 2) The response is relocated to an appropriate FSAR text section (not necessarily verbatim) and a reference to that section replaces the previous response; or 3)

A statement is added to the existing response indicating that the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text (appropriate justification for option 3 is provided in the attached detailed description).

Sincerely,

/

?

19

,/-

/

,,p VA

([tf William J. Cahill, Jr.

SSD/bsd Attacnment c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Resident inspectors, CPSES (2)

Mr. T. A, Bergman, NRR Mr. B. E, Holi6n, NRR

- - _ - -.- - =__ - -- _-..- - =-_

Attachsent to TXX 92237 May 29. 1992 Page 1 of 124 CPSEO FSAR AMENDHENT 85

-DETAILED DESCRlrTION FGAA Page (Al AmelghtO Drtcdplign 1A(B)-39

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Remove Specific Reference to the DNBR of 1.30 Justification:

Each occurrence of "DNBR is less than 1.30" (departure from nucleate boiling ratio) has been replaced with a generic term, "less than the limit value" because the CNBR is different for each unit and may changt in the future if the fuel typo changes, or if a diffm ent Analytical method is used in the analysis.

This change does not have a material effect and has been made tn preclude repetitive changes in the future.

The DNBR limit is listed in Technical Specification 3/4.2 for each unit.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-165.10 SEFJSSER 1mpact: No 1A(B)-52

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Haximum cable size for one hour fire rated cable

,1cs ti f i c a ti on :

Maximum cable size for one hour fire rated cable is being changed from #1/0 AWG to #8 AWG cable. Vendor testing demonstrates that the #8 AWG cabic is an acceptable une hour fire barrier. Specific details regarding the contruction and specific use of this cable is described in a previously submitted FSAR advance change via TXX-91248, dated July 29. 1991.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-631.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)

Description:

(Clarification)

Clarify that the piping and components for the storage and day tanks are not missile protected but the missile protection requirements are satisfied for the vent path without a vacuum relief valve.

Justification:

The vent piping or components (including the flame arrestor) may be-exposed to externally generated missiles.

Although the flame arrestor is not protected from vertical missiles, the vent _ path has been analyzed for the potential for crimping as a result of missile.

The flame arrestor is constructed of cast iron which while rugged. is also extremely brittle and thus crimping is not considered a credible failure mode.

The existing arrangement satisfies tornado missile protection requirements without the use of a vacuum relief valve.

The existing vacuum relief is being

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 2 of 124 FSAR Page (11 asfDdad)

DescriDtiRD retained as defense-in depth.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 603.4 Related SER Section: 9.5.4:

SSER24 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.2-5

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Add Seismic Category 11 Piping in a Non-Seismit Build-ing to Structures and Systems of Hixed Category Justification:

Adaed to this paragraph because the combination of seismic piping in a non-seismic building is a new combination not addressed in this paragraph.

Grou.n: 1 F3AR Cb9nge Request Number: D1-z01.01 Related SER Section: 3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.2-12

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Add Seismic Category !! Piping in a Non Seismic Build-ing as an Exception to Class 5 Piping in Seismic Cat-egory I Structures Justification:

The specific excepticn concerning the Steam Generator Blowdown piping in tne Turbine Building has been added.

The Steam Generator Blowdown piping has been reclassi-fied as Class 5 and redesignated as Seismic Category 11 to eliminate an unaccepttble interaction postulated for a high energy line break.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-201.02 Related SSER Section: SSER14 APP-A-31 SER/SSER Impact: No SSER 14 states that seismic analyses would not be acceptable for use in the turbine building based on the turbine building failure assumption duiing a safe shut-down earthquake.

3.3 10

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Add a new paragraph to FSAR Section 3.3.2.4 to incorporate the last sentence of O&R 010.12.

Justification:

i This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR i" prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-16.2 Related SER Section: 3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No i

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 3 of 124 FSAR Page (At.#efDitd)

EclitiRiiOR 3.4 3 Descr1ption: (0&R Incorporation)

Add new paragraph 3.4.3 titled " Flooding from Tank Rupture" and incorporate the information from the response to 0010.9.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared Group: 4 FSAR Chance Request Number: 92-13.3 Related Si.R Section: 3.4

)

SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.4-1 See Sheet No(s): Sheets 1 through 3.

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Add new Table 3.4-1 to Section 3.4 by relocating the information in 0&R Table 0, 010.9-1.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSA1 is prepare (.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-13.4 Related SER Section: 3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-10

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to 0210.008 into the FSAR text.

Justification:

Q&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updatsd Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Chbnge Request Number: 92 581 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER22 3.6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-56, 60

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to 0010.034 into the FSAR text.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Oudated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-042 Pelated SER Section: 3.6.2:

SSER22 3.6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.78-42

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Add Discussion of Seismic Category 11 Piping in the Turbine Bui. ding to the Discussion of Interaction of Non-Category I Structures with Seismic Category 1 Structures Justification:

The specific exception concerning the Steam Generator Blowdown piping in the Turbine Building has been added.

.~.i.

s --

~

g9wi

_ _ -. =

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 4 of 124 FSAR Page j

(Al Aan ditd)

Dejligr_lRiign The Steam Generator Blowdown piping has been reclassi-fied as Class 5 and redesignated as Seismic Category 11 to eliminate an unacceptable interaction from a postu-lated high energy line break.

Analyses have been per-formed that demonstrate that the non Category I struc-tures and components within the Turbine Building will not unacceptably interact with Steam Generator Blowdown piping during and after a seismic event.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-201.03 Related SER Section: 3.7; SSER22 3.7 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 4.3-33. 74

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Expand discussion to recognize that operations support is required in addition to testing and to identify that NRC approved TV Electric methodology is employed for both testing and operation support.

Justification:

HRC has approved TU Electric Control Rod Analysis methodology for generic application.

The TU flectric Steady State Physics methodology has been approved for use on Unit 1.

The FSAR has been revised to reflect the intent to apply the methodology to Unit I reload cycles and Unit 2 initial startup and reload cycles.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes Safety evaluation written by NRC on TV Electric Steady State Physics topical only identified applicability to Unit 1.

Applicability is being expanded to include use on Unit 2.

Table 4.3-2. B See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Correct Nuclear Design Parameters Justification:

The boron coefficient for boron dilution was not re-analyzed for a change in the Unit 2 shutdown margin until after Amendment 84 was incorporated into the FSAR.

This number is being corrected for the reanal-ysis.

In addition, a typographical error was corrected for neutron lifetime (20.7 microseconds vice 21,7).

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.35 SER/SSER Impact: No

.~

Attachment to TXX 92239 May L9, 1992 page 5 of 124 FSAR page (A1 AmE!ded)

ReitdPliAD 4A-1, 2

==

Description:==

(Update)

See also pages 3. 4, S. 6, 7, 8, 9. and 10.

Justification:

Chapter 4 describes the initial cycle and typical reload cycles.

Specific information relating to the update of cycle specific information has been included into appendix 4A of chapter 4 Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-513 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 4A 1

==

Description:==

(Update)

Justification:

See description for page 4A-1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 613.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 4A-2

==

Description:==

(Update)

Justification:

See description for page 4 A-1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-613.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 4A-3

==

Description:==

(Update)

Justification:

See description for page 4A-1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 613.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 4A-1

==

Description:==

(Update)

Justi fi catior,:

See description for page 4A-1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-613.4 SER/SSER Impact: No i

figure 4A-2

==

Description:==

(Update)

Justification:

See description for page 4A-1.

Group: 3 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-613.5 l --

SER/SSER Impact: No I

l Figure S.1 1 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Revision) l Corrects drafting errors made to FSAR Figure S.1-1, sheet 1.

Justification:

Drafting errors were made to the FSAR figure when

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29. 1992 Page 6 of 124 FSAR Page (M Mmted)

Descripl19.0 CPSES drawing M1-0250 CP 16 was simplified for use as FSAR Figure 5.1 1.

This is an drafting correction to the FSAR figure.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-589 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 6.2-95

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Adds a reference to Table 17A-1 in Section 6.2.4.1.5 to describe the design requirements for the Process Sampling System tubing, fittings, valves and supports.

Justification:

This.s a correction to the FSAR text to make the affected sections consistent with a prior approved change to the FSAR (Figure 9.3-4).

Refer to the justification for F9.3-4 submitted in Ar.endment 76.

/

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-168.1 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-111

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Add the information contained in the response of QAR 022.15 which indicates that the Containment Hydrogen Honitorin; System does not rely on the hydrogen recombiner installation or operation. Add the 0022.15 reference to the affected text.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Sect. ion for deletion when the updated FSAR is pr2 pared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-70.E Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 6.2 144

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Revise FSAR Section 6.2.6.2 to incorporate the response to Q&R 022.17 and add the 0022.17 reference to the related text in Section 6.2.6.2.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-72.1 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 6.2.1-6 See Sheet No(s):1.3.4

==

Description:==

(Revision)

The passive structural heat sinks denoted in item #2 and 11 thru 14 are revised to reflect the updated inventory inside Containment.

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 7 of 124 FSAR Page

( Aft Mendgd)

Dentintion Justification:

The passive heat sink values have been re evaluated to mitigate the net effect of the following changes on the accident pressure and temperature of the containment.

1. A 5% reducticn in the Containment spray flow rate due to an assumed degradation in CS pump performance not previously considered.

b. An assumption of 15% reduction in CS effectiveness due to nozzle blockage.

c. The effect of the increased heat load from restoring the Spent Fuel Cooling within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after a LOCA to preclude approaching pool boiling temperature (based on maximum decay heat load).

The results from the analyses indicate that the values for containment pressure and temperature do not change significantly from those previously analyzed.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-164 Related SER Section: 6.2.1:

SSER22 6.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4 1 See Sheet No(s):7

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Replaces the line size for item 74 from "3/4" inch to "3/8" inch.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 6.2-95.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 188.2 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3 1 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Moves the LC-2 (locked closed for Unit 2) designation from 2!1G-0042 (F. 10.4-18) to 151 0154.

Adds a note to F. 6.3-1 SH 5 " Locked closed for Unit 2 Construction".

Justification:

Facilitates the completion of activities on Unit 2 SIS Accumulators by supplying N2 gas from Bulk Storage with minimal 1" pact to Unit 1.

Group: 2 FSAR Change "equest Number: 92-628.1 Releted SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6,3 1 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes U2 drain valve from each accumulator injection line drain line.

Adds a note to F6,3-1. SH 5 " Valve I

deleted for Unit 2 only."

Justification:

. ~

L

.ittachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page e cf 124 e

FSAR Page (11 AmtD42d)

DCIEf_lP119D The bases and criteria in ANSI N18.2-1973. N18 2a-1975, and 10CFR50,2 Section V. Para. 211 (various editions) all specify that for r change from Safety Class 1.

reactor coolant pressure boundary. to any lower safety class, two normally closed valves are required.

In the case of a drain valve between the accumulator injection check valves, the first normally closed valve is the check valve closest to the loop piping.

The second normally closed valve is the manual valve in the drain line.

Therefore, the use of one isolation valve in the drain line is acceptable, and the transition from Safety Class 1 to NNS is at (and including) the dr.in isolation valve.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-596 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-26

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Periodic testing of the diesel generator Justification:

FSAR text incorrectly describes the dieso! generator (DG) post 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months load test. Following the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months test, a loss of offsite power (LOOP) only is simulated ins ead of an LOOP in conjunction with a safety injection actuation signal (SIAS). Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.108, which is the basis for the diesel generator surveillance, requires LOOP and SI signals be simulated to demonstrate that the DG is capable of auto-starting, achieving rated voltage and frequency within a specified time frame, and demonstrate the shutdown-loading-sequence to shutdown-load requirements. (See RG position C.2.a.5 in conjunction with C.2.a.1 and C.2.a.2). Per FSAR Table 8.3-2, an LOOP is the most limiting event resulting in an approximate load of 6240 kW. Simulation of an LOOP in conjunction with an 51 following the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months load run, is consistent with the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specification.

However, Unit I was licensed with the simulation of an LOOP only. It appears that simulation of any of the OG a

autostart signals would satisfy the intent of the post 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months load run test. Therefore, this change is being made to be consistent with FSAR Section 1A(B) and the Unit 1 Technical Specifications.

Groun: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-050 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attachmet to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 9 of 124 FSAR Page

( M.4mCn @ iD DejiCtiplign 8.3 71

==

Description:==

'"orrection)

Electricai paration for large power cables Justification:

The FSAR is being revised such that for 6.9LV and

4/0 AWG and larger 480V cable, a minimum of 1" and two barriers separation is required. Test conducted for Beaver Valley Vuit 2, conducted by Wylie Laboratories on #6 AWG cable determined that a minimum of one inch and one barrier would provide adequate prctectio'i. The

6 cable was selected since it was determined to generate the highest surface temperature. Analysis by TV Electric determined that the above test is applicable to CPSES cable cc..rigurations. However, for additional conservatism, a second barrier will be employed between redundant large power cables, except when the condu:+ is non-safety relattd or the conduit elevation is below a power c6ble tray side rail or cable in air; in which case, one inch end one barrier is required. See SSER 22 Section 8.4.4 for NRC acceptance for the above exceptiora.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-632 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 8.3-78

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Maximum cable size for one hour fire rated cable Justification:

Maximum cable size for one hour fire rated cable is being changed from #1/0 AWG to #8 AWG cable, Vendor testing demonstrates that the 48 AWG cable is an acceptable one hour fire barrier. Specific details regarding the contruction and specific u'a of this cable is described in a previously submitted FSAR advance change via TXX-91248, dated July 29, 1991, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 631.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3 S See Sheet No(s):01, 02

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletion of the Bentley Nevada Hodule setting from the one line diagrams.

Justificatinn:

The Bentley Nevada Hodule setting information has been deleted from the electrical one line diagram. The settings are more approp;iately located on plant drawings. Therefore Note 14 on the one line diagram is being revised to describe the circuitry and remove the setting informatior Group: 3

Attachment to TXX-9223?

Hay 29, 1992 Page 10 of 124 FSAR Page (a1 ame.!1ded)

Descript_lgn FSAR Change Request Number: 92-516 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.1-13 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Correct figure to show drain valve downstream of Train A Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Water Pump as " Closed".

Correct figure to show isolation valves for strainer inlet pressure indicators to be closed.

Justification:

Drain valves must be closed to prevent system inleakage This change corrects a drafting erroc which showed these as being normally open.

The isolation valves to the temporary strainer inlet pressure indicators must be closed, as pressure indic-ators are temporary (used for flushing operations) and can be removed.

Group: 3 FSAR Changa Request Number: 92-289 Related SE4 Section: 9.1.3:

SSER22 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2-25

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Revise Section 9.2.2.3 to incorporate the information contained in the response to 9010.4 and add the 0010.4 reference to other related paragraphs.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-10.2 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER lipact: No 9.2-59, 60 See Page No(s):61 thru 64

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Miscellaneous changes to the Waste Water Management System to reflect the as-built condition intiuding deletion of total retention of low volume wastewaters, clarifier sump wastes, oil, grease and pH monitors and their auto function.

Justification:

Specific sampling requirements are based on the Texas water commission and EPA-NPDES permits. The LVW treatment facilities are not designed for total retention of low volume wastewaters. Clarifier sump waste is not required in this section as it may change with modifications of the Surface Water Pretreatment System. Oil and grease monitors and pH monitors are not reliable and have 1.npeded proper operation of the system within required wastewater guidelines. Equipment e-_ --

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 11 of 124 FSAR Page Las Amended)

Dricr.iplign failures tend to shut off discharges well wichin permit limits. Since the waste water holdup tanks are sampled and released on a batch basis, no possibility of pH or oil and grease levels exceeding permit limits exists at this release point. The limits for radiolog-ical discharge are established in the Radiological Effluent Controls Program required by the Technical Specifications rather than FSAR Section 11.5.3.2.

The LVW Batch Neutralization System and Oil / Water are inadequate and have been abandoned in-place.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-597 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revise figure to show Component Cooling Water (CCW) drain valve on the shell side of CCW heat Exchanger (CP1-CCAHHX-02).

Justification:

The drain valve is located on the shell side of the CCW heat exchanger and this change reflects the as-built configuration of the CCW system.

Group: 3' rSAR Change Request Number: 92-565 Related SER Section: 9.2.2:

SSER22 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-4A See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Update)

Deletes four manual valves in the Surface Water pretreatment system.

~

Justification:

Valves XWT-1199.1202.1210 and 1213 are deleted from the figure to reflect the as-built design, These valves are either drain or sample valves.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 01-117 Relcted SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2 4A See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises figure to include minor changes which reflect the as-built design.

Justification:

Revise the figure to reflect the as-built design of the Surface Water Treatment System. The Surface Water System is a non-safety related system and the minor changes will not impact the safety of the plant.

Group: 3

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 12 of 124 4

FSAR Page (as amended)

Dgscription FSAR Change Request Number: 91-121 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-4A See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises figure to include minor changes reflecting the as-built design.

Justification:

Revise the figure to reflect the as built design of the Surface Water Treatment System. The Surface Water System is a non-safety related system and the minor changes will not impact the safety of the plant.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-122 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-5 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revises figure to add piping to the vacuum deaerator vacuam pump seal water recirculation loops.

Justification:

Addition of the piping and flow devices will improve the low flow conditions in vacuum deaerator pump seal water recirculation loops and improve the overall system operating efficiency.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-610 Related SER Section: 9.2.3; SSER22 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9,3-21, 23 See Page No(s):26 and 27

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Miscellaneous changes to-the Equipment and Floor Drainage System to reflect the as-built condition, including provisions for routing of relief valve discharge from potentially radioactive fluid tanks to the Liquid Waste Processing System.

Justification:

Minor changes to the Equipment and Floor Drainage System to reflect the system as-built condition. Also aerated tritiated drains of reacter coolant quality are collected in waste holdup tank for treatnent, recycling or disposal.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-601 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239-May 29, 1992 Page 13 of 124-FSAR Page (11 AmertdeJ)

Descriptior) 9.3-84, 85 See Page No(s):86, 87 and 89 thru 94

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Hiscellaneous minor changes / clarification to the Poron Recycle System (BRS) to reflect as-built conditio.

including the BRS collection criteria for excess Reactor Coolant, clarification to the BRS description, and operation of the BRS.

Justification; Minor changes / clarification to reflect the as-built condition of BRS. Clarification to the description and operation of the BRS allows flexibility to reuse / cycle of the effluent, pass the effluent through the demineralizer or through the waste processing system before release through the final discharge point.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-602 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):08,11

==

Description:==

(Update)

-Revise the *igure to correct and clarify minor changes to the Instrument Air System.

Ju sti fi ca ti or. :

Minor changes in the Instrument Air System reflect the as-built configuration of the Instrument Air distribu-tion System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-183 Related SER Section: 9.3.1:

SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):10

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Corrects the Instrument tag no from X LT-5282 to X-LY-5282 for Liquid Waste Processing System, to reflect the as-built design of the plant.

Justification:

Level transmitter is an electronic device which does not require an air supply. Instrument X-LT-5282, which converts milliamp output from the-level transmitter to a pneumatic rignal, needs instrument air supply.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-607 Related SER Sectior; 9.3.1:

SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Inpact: No Figure 9-3-10 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Ramove the locked closed designation from CVCS mix bed demineralizer drair' tank header isolation valve.

Justification:

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 14 of 124 FSAR Page (Al Amended)

Descrinti,_gn Removal of lock close designation is consistent with other CVCS valves and is consistent with CPSES valve locking criteria, Removal of the mechanical device for this valve allows greater flexibility in positioning the subject valve. The removal of the locked closed designation will not impact the safety of the plant.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-088 Related SER Section: 9.3,4:

SSER22 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

.9.4-27

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add back-up Air-conditioning unit to the thyristor voltage regulator room.

Justification:

Addition of the back-up unit to the TVR room will adequately maintain the required temperature for operation of the TVR solid state electronics equipment.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request N;mber: 91-176.1 Related SER Section: 9.4:

SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Clarify the existing note on figure regarding air flew rates (based on standard conditions ano design conditions).

Justification:

The flow rates for-the safety related fan coil units were depicted without parentheses, which could be interpreted to be standard CFM. These flow rates are based on calculations where the flows were assumed to be leaving the coils to cool the pump rooms when the pumps operate (accident conditions). Since this assump-tion is based un accident conditions, tne flew rates are not at standard conditions (70 degree F and normal plant operating temperatures). By clarifying this note on the figures, the flow rates depicted for the safety related fan coil units will be addressed correctly.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-568.1 Related SER Section: 9.4.5:

SSER22 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Corrects Unit 2 instrument tag numbers (Temperature Switches) for the CVCS anu CCW pump rooms fan coil units.

Justification:

Corrects the Temperature Indicating Switches to Temper-

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 15 of 124 FSAR Page (31 Apended)

Description ature Switches for the CVCS and CCW pump romm fan coil units, which were incorrectly depicted on the figure.

This change reflects the as-built design of the plant.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-595 Related SER Section: 9.4.5:

SSER22 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):04

==

Description:==

(Update)

Justification:

Changes to this figure are editorial.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-629 Related SER Section: 10.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-3

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add new Air-conditioning unit to the thyrister voltage regulator (TVR) room and keep existing unit as a spare.

Justification:

Addition of the new unit to the TVR room will adequat-ely maintain the required temperature for operation of the TVR solid state electronics equipment. Also spare A/C unit will provide flexibility in operation and maintanance.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-176.2 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-4 See Sheet No(s):02:03

==

Description:==

(Clarifica. on)

Clarify the existing note on figure regarding air flow rates (based on standard conditions and design conditions).

Justification:

The flow rates for the safety related fan coil units were depicted without parentheses, which could be interpreted to be standard CFM. These flow rates are based on calculations where the flows were assumed to be leaving the coils to cool the pump rooms operate (accident conditions). Since this assumption is based on accident conditions, the flow rates are not at standard conditions (70 degree F and normal plant operating temperatures). Ey clarifying the note on the figure, the flow rates depicted for the safety related j

fan coil units will be addressed correctly.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-568.2 Related SER Section: 9.4.5; SSER22 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 16 of 124 FSAR Poge.

(11 _ amended)

DJscription Figure 9.4-12 See Sheet No(s):02.03

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add 1/2" vent valves on the safety chilled water coils for venting the air in the cooling coils.

Justification:

Installation of the vent valves on the top of the safety chilled water cooling coils will increase the units efficiency by bleeding the air out of the coils and of the system and filling the coils with water.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-598 Related SER Section: 9.4.6:

SSER22 9.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4C-1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Correct the Diesel Generator Equipmerit Room f rom 129.2 deg. F to 130 deg. F during Emergency conditions when Diesel Generator is operating.

Justification:

The project calculations justifie a temperature of 129.2 deg. F in the Diesel Generator Equipment Room during emergency conditions with the diesel gener-ator operating. This temperature is rounded to the 130 deg. F, which is consistent with the Plant Technical Specification 3/4 7.11 Table 3.7-3. This change is a minor change, to be consistent with the existing Tech Spec and the Calculation.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-189 Related SER Section: 9.4.5:

SSER23 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4E-2, S See Page No(s):8

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Changes the operational control of the second L.

system from flow element to pressure differential instrumentatinn.

Also various editorial changes.

Justification:

This change makes the FSAR section consistent with the FSAR figures and the as-built design of the Plant Ventilation Chilled Water System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change-Request Number: 92-619 Related'SER Section: 9.4:

SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992

'Page 17 of 124 FSAR Page (as Ameaded)

DSstr_iption 9.5-142, 144

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Clarifies the seven day diesel oil capacity required to run the diesel generator for emergency operation.

Justification:

The seven day requirement for the diesel generator is the total capacity both from reserved capacity in the storage tank and portion of the day tank capacity which is consistent with the plant Technical Specification-and meets the requirement of the NRC R.G. 1.137 and ANSI N195.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-603.1 Related SER Section: 9.5.4:

SSER24 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-144

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Clarifies the safety classification of the Fuel Oil and Storage System components to be safety class 3 except as noted on Table 17A-1.

Justification:

The Fuel Oil and Storage System components are in conf-ormance with the ANSI N18.2 as endorsed by NRC R.G 1.137 and ANSI N195. These components are Safety Class 3 except as noted on Table 17A-1 of the FSAR.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-603.2 Related SER Section: 9.5.4; SSER24 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-54 See Sheet No(s):01,02

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Revise figure to reflect the chemical addition point for jacket water makeup.

Justification:

The figure has been revised to show the chemical addition location for the chemical discussed in section l

9.5.5.2. The flow direction arrow is removed to reflect the line can be used to either fill or drain the stand pipe. The addition of chemicals to the jacket water system controls the corrosion and fouling in the system Group: 4 L

FSAR Change hequest Numbe.r: 92-566 Related SER Section: 9.5.5:

SSER22 9.5.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.2-37

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to 0&R 040.135 to the FSAR text.

l Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR l

for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

l Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-291 l

Attachmont to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page'18 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description Related SER Section: 10.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.2-41

==

Description:==

(0&R Iricorporation)

Relocates Item E f ro.a 0124.1.

Justificatien:

O&R relocation is required as part of the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-330 Related SER Section: 10.2.2 SSER22 10.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.3-9

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to Q&R 212.139 to the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-206 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-S, 6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes reference to the salinity t vugh conductivity meters and aads reference to sodium analyzers.

Justification:

The salinity trough conductivity meters do not provide reliable indications of conductivity and thus are not useful-for indication of condenser tube leakage.

Condenser tube leaks are monitored using existing hotwell conductivity monitors and sodium analyzers located at various points in the concensate system (e.g., hntwell. condensate pump discharge and polisher outlet).

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-611.1 Related SER Section: 10.4.1:

SSER22 10.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 22 indicates that condenser tube leakage will be detected in the salinity troughs.

10.4-6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes discussion of tt.e capability of the Condensate Cleanup System.

Justification:

The Condensate Polishing System has been found to be

(

capable of reducing dissolved and.uspended solids but l

is not capable of maintaining the condensate /feedwater quality within T10.3-10 limits with a 6 gpm cooling water inleakage.

Actions taken to maintain condensate chemistry within required limits (or mitigating actions

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 19 of 124 FSAR Page

( Al amq0jigd)

Descriptiq11 should limits be exceeded) are in accordance with plant procedures.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-613.2 Related SER Section: 10.4.1:

SSER22 10.4.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 10.4-6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes periodic hotwell sampling as a method for detecting condenser cooling water inleakage.

Justification:

The installed sodium analyzers with high level alarm provide a superier method for monitoring of condenser inleakage.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-611.1 Related SER Section: 10.4.1:

SSER22 10.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER indicates that periodic sampling of the hotwells is performed to detect condenser tube leaks.

10.4-66

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates a portion of the response to 0210.5, related to Feedwater Isolation Valve interlocks, into the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-579 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-82

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates a portion of the response to 0210.5.

related to steam back-leakage through the Auxiliary Feedwater nozzle, into the FSAR text.

Justification:

Q&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (ObAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-579 l

Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 10.4-82

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Clarifies the AFW flow requirements for the Main Feedwater Line break sccident.

Justification:

The original FSAR description was not clear with regard to AFN flow requirements for tha above accident in i

that it only provided a discussion of flow provided at l

Attachment-to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 20 of 124 FSAR Page (An Amended)

DeicripU,gs the initial stages of the accident development.

It did not discuss the additional AFW flow provided later in the progression of-the scenerio.

A reference to the accident scenerio described in Section 15.2.8 is now added which provides this information.

Grcup: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-593 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 10.4-20 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes reference to the salinity trough conductivity meters.

Justification:

See description provided for page 10.4 5.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Requert Number: 92-611.1 Related SER Section: 10.4.1; SSER22 10.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-4 See Sheet No(s);01

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Justification:

Editorially corrects figure to delete drain valve on turbint gland steam system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 629 Related SER Section: 10.4.3 SLR/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-4 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Adds loop seal isolation valve to the turbine gland steam system.

Justification:

Restoration of the 01/U2 cross-tie between the turbine gland steam exhaust and the Aux. Building ventilation system requires this valve to isolate loop seal until the U2 gland steam system is in service.

Group: 3 FSAR Change-Request Number: 92-629 Reiated SER Section: 10.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-5 See Sneet Nc(s):04

==

Description:==

(Update)

Removes blank flange in the U1/U2 circulating Circulating Water cross-tie.

Justification:

A blank flange was installed to permit U2 construction while U1 was operating. With the completion of U2

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 21 of 124 FSAR Page (A1 amended)

Description construction activities the system drawings are updated to show the operative cross-tie.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-200 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s): 01

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Removes test connections on either side of condensat-system valve LV-2211/12.

Jus ti fi ca ti on :

These test connections were subject to vibrations which caused 'he weld connections to weaken and potentially crack ad leak. Their removal eliminates this potential.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-600 Related SER Section: 10.4 7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Shee' No(s):04

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a two inch bypass line with isolation valves around each Unit 2 Feedwater suction valve.

Justification:

The bypass line assists in filling and venting the feedwater pumps and associated piping and reduces the potential for waterhammer.

The revision currently applies to Unit 2 only but it is anticipated that the same modification will be performed for Unit I at a later date.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-627 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-16 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Update)

Removes Note 13 which previously indicated that the 01/U2 auxiliary steam cross-tie isolation valve is locked closed to prevent a potential high energy line break.

Justification:

The valve was originally required to be locked closed for construction of U2 auxiliary steam system while U1 was operating. With the completion of U2 construction activities the normal two valve protection is sufficient for HELB protection and the locked closed single valve is no longer required.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-003 l

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 22 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Deicription Related SER Section: 10.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-18 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Moves LC-2 (locked closed for Unit 2) designation from 2NG-0042 to 151-00154 (F. 6.3-1 SH 5).

Includes editorial corrections to the reference arrows on Figure 10.4-18 LOC: G-1.

Justification:

See justification for Figure 6.3-1 SH 5.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-626.2 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-1 Descriptior: (Editorial)

Addition of prime to "B"

in numerator of equation.

Justification:

The change corrects typographical error.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.1 Related SER Section: 11 1; SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Adds that shielding design source terms are conservatively based on recycling wastes within the plant.

Justification:

This change is added for clarification only.

Although the waste streams are processed and no longer recycled.

this conservative aspect of the design is not necessary to be changed.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.7 Related SER Sectic:.: 11 ':

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-1, 3 See Page No(s):S

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Addition of reference NVREG-0017 [6]

Justification:

NUREG-0017 is the basis for the effluent release analysis and notes recent operating data / refers to ANS standard.This change is only fer clarification.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.6 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to 1XX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 23 of 124 FSAR Page

( A1 astrid.ed)

Descrip. tion 11.1-3

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Char es " range of" to " nominal".

Justifi.ation:

ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984 provides only nominal values, not ranges.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.17 Related tER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-4

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Addition of past tense to shielding design source terms.

Justification:

These source terms were used ' tor the original design per DBD-ME-025 Rev. I and WCAP-7664 Rev. I dated 10/1972: revised source term data is currently used for shield design.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-600.8 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-5

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise gas decay tank switching interval from " every day" to " regularly".

Justification:

This change will provide increased flexibility for system operation and reduce operator exposure time.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.2 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-5

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Additi'n of "in" for clarity.

Justification:

This change is simply editorial.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.5 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.1-5

==

Description:==

(Ciarification)

Replaces percent stripping efticiency with volume control tank purge rate.

Justification:

Basis for activities is no longer stripplng efficiency.

Refer to DBD-ME-025 Rev.

1.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 605.9 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1

Attachment to TXX-92239

.May-29. 1992 Page 24 of 124 FSAR Page (n.amendeaj)

Doss _tiption SER/SSER Impact: Mo 11.1-6

==

Description:==

(Update)

Update reference to revised ANS standard.

Justification:

Effluent release calculations have been revised to include current source term data per ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984 (ref. DBD-ME-025 Tables 5-6A,6B).

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.15 Related SER Section: 11.1; SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-3 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Corrects CPSES parameters and concentrations used for effluent release calculations per NUREG-0017 and plant operating practices.

Justification:

Effluent release calculations have been revised to include current source term data per ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984 (ref. DBD-ME-025. Tables 5-6A.6B). Data has been adjust-ed within GALE code but not fully to std.

guidance.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.12 Relateu SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-3 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise ratio of condensate demineralizer flow rate to total steam flow rate.

Justification:

New value calculated per calculation ME-CA-0000-3160.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.16 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-4 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Adds note "a" to indicate that the values are provided from ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984.

Justification:

Values f cr N-16 and H-3 concentrations are f rom the referenced standard N-16 was not used in determining liquid effluent releases. Values of tritium are in Ci/yr.See NUREG-0017 Revi or HE-CA-0000-3160 calc.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.10 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to YXX-02239 May 29, 1992 Page 25 of 124 FSAR Page (Aft Angfldgd) priqripli911 Table 11.1-4 See Sheet No(s):1.2

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Corrects CPSES parameters and concentrations used for effluent release calculations per NUREG-0017 and plant operating practices.

Justification:

Effluent release calculations have been revised to include current source term data per ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984 (ref. DBD ME-025. Tables 5-6A.6B). Data has been adjust-ed within GALE code but not fully to std. guidance.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.13 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER impact: No Table 11 1-5 See Sheet No(s):5-Description- (Editorial)

Correction of data pertaining to specific source strength for consistancy with WCAP-7664 Rev.1.

Justification:

This change corrects values which were listed erroneously due to typographical error.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.4 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-5 See Sheet No(s):6

==

Description:==

(rlarification)

Change the word " monitor" to " evaporator" in the filter description for clarity.

Justification:

This change clarifies the identification of the subject filter.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.3 Related SER Section: 11.1:- SSER22 11.

SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.3-7 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Adds note "a" to indicate that values are provided from ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984.

Justification:

Values for N-16 and N-3 concentrations are from the referenced standard. N-16 was not used in determining liquid effluent releases. Values of tritium are in

=C1/yr.See NUREG-0017 Rev1 or ME-CA-0000-3160 calc.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-60S.11 Related SER Section: 11.1:

SSER22 11.1

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 26 of 124

-FSAR Page (a1 amended)

Description SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-7 See Sheet No(s):1.2.3

==

Description:==

(Correction) l Corrects CPSES parameters and concentrations used for effluent release calculations per NUREG-0017 and plant operating practices.

Justification:

Effluent release calculations have been revised to include current source term data per ANSI /ANS-18.1-1934 (ref. DBD-ME-025. Tables 5-6A.6H). Data has been adjust-ed within GALE code but not fully to std. guidar:e.

Group: 2

)

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.14 i

Related SER Section: 11.1; SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-7 See Sheet No(s):1.2.3 i

==

Description:==

(Correctica)

Changes the tit 1 7 the table to accurately reflect the data containej.n the table.

Justification:

Effluent release calculations have been revised to include current source term data per ANSI /ANS-18.1-1984 (ref. DBD-ME-025. Tables 5-6A.68). Data has been adjust-ed within GALE code but not fully to std. guidance.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.19 Related SER Section: 11.1; SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-7 See Sheet No(s):3

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletes moisture carryover in steam data, Justification:

Information not used.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-605.18 Related SER Section: 11.1; SSER22 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Deletes the last sentence to Section 11.2.1.1 which was a discussion on processing to-limit quantities to normal operation.

Justification:

This statement appeared to contradict the design intent as specified in the previous 'entence.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: ?2-GC7.1 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No w

l l

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 27 of 124 t

FSAR Pa (ap, A:;2L Description 11.2-2. 3

==

Description:==

(Clar fication)

Changes Section 11.2.1.2. item 1 " Radioactive Release" to read as "10 CFR Part 20 - Maximum Permissible Concentrations": deletes the table of major isotopes:

and clarifies the definition of concentration limits.

Justification:

The table of major isotopes was deleted due to inade-quacies of the list; the tables in Section 11.2 will reflect actual calculations. Additions to the Concen-tration Limit definition enhances the description by adding the requirement for summing the ratio of nuclides and clarifies specific release points.

i Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.2 Related SER Section: 11.2 r

SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Removes reference to the Reverse Osmosis equipment and changes the description of Recycling capability fo" control of releast to include limitations on recycling (Section 11.2.1.3).

Justification:

The laundry Reverse Osmosis system has been abandoned in place.

The limitations are in place to ensure proper Chemistry and ALARA contros programs can be satisfied.

Group: 3 a

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.3 Related SER Section: 11.2 i

SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-4

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Removes unnecessary details on usage of spare pumps from Section 11.2.1.5: and deletes the paragraph on maintaining the level in Reactor Coolant Drain Tank.

Justification:

Tank recirculation is not for maintaining level but rather for cooling of the liquid.

Additional discus-sion on the RCDT is provided in Section 5.0.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Imp?ct: No 11.2-5

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Removes the statement "If an odministrative release is necessary" from Section 11.2.2.1: and restated the use of the Boron Recycle System (BRS) on processing RCS liquids.

Justification:

Attachment to TXX-92239-Hay 29. 1992 Page 28 of 124 FSAR Page (ai amended)

Dgscription Due to Chemistry and ALARA programs most waste waters are discharged to the Circulatory Water System.

RCS water may be processed through the Liquid Waste cruces-sing System during times of system upsets and refueling outages.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.5 Related SEn Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-6

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Changes the general description of Section 11.2.2.2.

LWPS design, to include flexibility of the system; and includes the Auxiliary and Safeguards Building floor drains.

Justification:

With administrative controls in place system flexibil-ity is utilized.

This flexibility enhances purifica-tion by util' #ng equipment best suited for cleanup.

The building drains added were initially included in discussion.

Group: 4 FSAk Change Request Number: 92-657.6 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11'.2-6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds the capability of 50.gpm processing rate through the Filter Demineralize Skid in Section 11.2.2.2, and relocates the third paragraph from.Page 11.2-7 to Page 11.2-6 as new item 7 in Section 11.2.2.2.

Justification:

This section was changed to reflect the installation of a modification which installed a Filter Demineralizer System (FDS).

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.7.

Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-7

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes the statement in Section 11.2.2.2 from."over three million gals / year through the waste evaporators" to read as "all anticipated inputs to the system".

Justification:

Current operating philosophy does not include use of the Boron Recycle System (BRS) evaporator as a backup for Liquid Waste Process.

Currently Boric Acid is re-cycled and the use of evaporator as backup for Waste Processing would preclude reuse of Boric Acid due to chemical contaminatior.,

Group: 4

~_

Attachment to TXX-92239 May-29, 1992

-Page'29-of 124-FSAR Page (At ag_ndad)

Description FSAR Change Request Nurber: 92-657.8 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-7

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletes the paragraph in Section 11.2.2.2 describing exceptions to upper limit capacity of the LWPS.

Justification:

Current operating philosophy does not include use of the BRS evaporator as a backup for Liquid Waste Pro-cess.

Currently Boric Acid is recycled and the use of the evaporator as backup for Waste Processing would clude reuse of Boric Acid due to chemical contomina-tion.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.9 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-7

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes Section 11.2.2.2 subsection 1 wording from "This liquid is processed by the BRS for reuse..," to "this liquid may be processed by the BRS Justification:

Current operational constraints (no steam) does not allow for use of evaporators during plant outage condi-tions: therefore, water may be processed using the Fi"-

ter Demin. System in the LWPS.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.10 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-8

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revises Section 11.2.2.2 to delete discussion on Recycle Holdup Tank level and return of fluid to Reactor Coolant Drain Tank.

Justification:

The discussion was incorrect Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.11 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-8

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Removes reference to "two" hydrogen gas bottles in Section 11.2.2.2.

Justification:

The number of bottles of hydrogen can vary and is con-trolled by operating conditions and procedures.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.12

Attachment to TXX-92239

.May 29, 1992 Page 30 of 124 FSAR Page (gji amendg_d)

DescriDtioD Related SER Section: 11.2 4

SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-8

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes Sect (on 11.2.2.2, item 2.b from " Sample room sink drains (to wasto holdup tank: excess primary sam-pie volume only)" to " Sample room sink drains (to waste holdup tank)".

Justification:

Other waters are discharged into sample room sink such as Demin. Water, etc.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.13 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2 8

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds the option of processing of liquids from the Waste Holdup Tanks using the Filter Demineralizer System (FDS) in Section 11.2.2.2.

Justification:

A plant modification added the ability to process this source of water through the FDS.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.14 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-9

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes wording in Section 11.2.2.2 to include use of FDS which will allow discharge and no air removal capa-bility.

Justification:

Plant modification allows the Waste

<aporator feed pump to be directed to the FDS.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.15 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-9

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Adds the ability to transfer water from the Waste Evap-aporator Condensate Tank to the Waste Monitor Tanks end the Laundry Holdup Honitor Tanks in Section 11.2.2.2, subsection 2.

Justification:

Plant modification includes the capability to transfer Waste Evaporator distilla:e to the monitor tanks in the even water is not to be reprocessed or reused.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Reauest Number-92-657.16 Related SER Section: 11.2

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29. 1992 Page 31 of 124 FSAR Page (11 amended)

Description SER/SSER Impact: No 11,2-9

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a description which states that effluent from the FDS will be directed to the Waste Monitor and Lanudry Holdup Monitor Tanks in Section 11.2.2.2, subsection 2.

Justification:

Plant modification provided a clean pathway for Drain Channel "A"

through the FDS.

This change will clarify the modification's operational implementation.

^roup: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-6E7.17 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

-11.2-9

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a paragraph to Section 11.2.2.2, subsection 2 that the Waste Evaporator will provide backup to the Boron Recycle System.

Justification:

Current operating philosophy utilizes the Waste Evapo-rator.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-6S7.18 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11,2-10

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a statement in Section 11.2.2.2 which states that Floor Drain Tank #3 is utilized as a batch tank for FDT

1 and FDT #2.

Justification:

A representative sample would be required before pro-cessing to determine proper purification methods and

. proper resin usage.

Due to the large volume capacity and the isolation capability of FDT #3, it was there-fore selected as the batch sample tank.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657,19 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i

11.2-10

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes the description of the flow paths for labora-tory sinks and samples and deletes a statement regard-ing segregation of rinse water and samples. (Section i -

11.2.2.2) l Justification:

Due te equipment design and being manpower intensive, sample wates are not segregated.

Instead sample wastes are analyzed prior to admission into the waste process-ing system.

1 Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 32 of 124 i

FSAR Page (as amended)

Description Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.20 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-10

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes a Section 11.2.2.2. subsection 3 statement to use Floor Drain Tank #3 as a sample batch tank for de-termining type of processing required; add water inven-tories as criteria for recycle; and delete the state-ment "for recycle to the secondary system".

Justification:

Due to ALARA and Chemistry requirements processed water will not be recycled back to the secondary system and FDT #3 will be utilized as a batch sample tank.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.21 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No.

11.2-11

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the-general description of the floor drain waste flow paths that includes use of the Filter Demin-eralizer Skid, and deletes the ability to direct effluents to secondary system makeup.

Justification:

Plant modification provided a flow path that allows purification of Drain Channel "B" waste through FOS.

ALARA and Chemistry concerns prevent use of waste effluents as makeup to secondary system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.22 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-11

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Changes Section 11.2.2. 2, subsection 3 to delete the sentence in the second paragraph which states that the valve described in this section closes automatically.

Justification:

This is a redundant statement: the following sentence states also that the valve will close.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.23 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-11

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes plant laundry and adds vendor laundry as an in -

put into Drain Ch 7nel "C" equipment in Section 11.2.2.2 subsection 4.

Justification:

Attachment to TXX-92239

-Hay 29, 1992 Page 33 of 124

.fSAR Page (as angnded)

. Description The plant laundry has been removed and laundry services as required will be provided by vendor services.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.24 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-11

==

Description:==

(Revisioni Deletes the Reverse Osmosis System as Drain Channel "C"

equipment from Section 11.2.2.2. subsection 4.

Justification:

The Reverse Osmosis System has been abandoned in place.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.25 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-12

==

Description:==

(Update)

Reduces laundry and hot shower waste volume to 20.000 gals /yr in Section 11.2.2.2, subsection 4.

Justification:

Reduced volume results from use of offsite vendor ser-vice for most laundry cleaning requirements.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.26 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-12

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a statement to Section 11.2.2.2, subsection 4 that states "With-the use of the Filter Demineralizer System the Laundry Holdup Honitor Tanks may also receive effluent".

Justification:

Plant modification provided a flow path that will allow cleanup of Drain Channel "C" wastes through the Filter /

Demineralizer Skid.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657 7.7 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-12 Descriptior: (Clarification)

Adds the word "normally" to Section 11.2.2.2. sub-section 5 in the statement that Spent Re-in is trans-ported and stored in the Spent Resin Storage Tank, Justification:

Plant modification provided the ability to bypass the Spent Resin Storage Tank which allows transporting to vendor supplied waste processing equipment.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Nurnber: 92-657.28

Attachment to TXX-92239 May: 29,1992-Page 34 of 124 FSAR Page De.gr_iplion (M amendgs!)

s Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-13

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a statement to Section 11.2.2.2, subsection 5 that the Steam Generator Blowdown System (SGBS) resin hand-ling is physically separated from primary system resin.

Justification:

Plant modification implementation resulted in a physi-col separation of the two piping systems.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.29 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-13

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes the requirement to treat powdered resin as rad-ioactive waste, due to primary secondary leakage as specified in the Radiological Effluent Control Program.

(Section 11.2,2.2, subsection 5)

Justification:

This change more accurately references plant licensing documents that contain specific requirements for pow-dered resin disposal.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.30 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-13, 14

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes Section 11.2,2.3 subsection 2 to specify that the Turbine Building sumps should be diverted when rad-ioactivity is present as a result of a primary to se-condary leak: and deletes the word automatically in from the same statement.

Justification:

This change reflects compliance with other licensing documents.

Licensing docuements allow for manual diversion for periods when the reference monitor is inoperable.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.31 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No 11.2-14

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes the last paragraph of Section 11.2.2.3 to indi-cate that samples will be analyzed for radioactivity and "if required" treated for conventional pollutants.

Justification:

Statement clarifies the waste stream will be analyzed for radioactivity and also that waste stream may not

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29. 1992 Page 35_of 124-FSAR Page (a1 amended)

Description require treatment if sample results indicate no treet-ment is required.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.32 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-15

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Adds to Section 11.2.2.4.2. subsection 1.b the state-ment "...or Filter Demineralizer System...".

Justification:

Plant modification implementation provided a flow path from the Waste Evaporator Feed Pump to the FDS.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.33 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-16

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Adds to Section 11.2.2.4.2, subsection 1.d the state-ment "...and the Filter Demineralizer System...".

Justification:

plant modification implementation provided a flow path from the floor Drain Tank pumps to the FDS.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.34 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-16, 17

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes Section 11.2.2.4.2 subsections 1.f and 1.g to reflect that the Reverse Osmosis System has been abandoned in place.

Justification:

The Reverse Osmo:

System was removed from service and abandoned in place.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.35 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-17

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes the description of the Laundry Heidup and Hon-itor Tank pumps in Section 11.2.2.4.2, subsection 1.h.

Justification:

This description was reworded to correct grammar and clarify the description.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.36 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impa:t: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29.-1992-Page 36 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description 11,2-17

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Adds recirculation ability and changed liquid transfer path to the Waste Condition Tank in Section 11.2.2.4.2, j

subsection 1.1.

Justification:

Current operating practice and design changes allow only pumping for recirculation and path to the Waste Condition Tank, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.37 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-19

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes Section 11.2.2.4.2, subsection 2.e to include Filter Demineralizer Skid ef fluents to the Waste Moni-tor Tanks: deletes recycling to the secondary system:

and deletes the refet ance to suf ficient tankage which would allow a three week inflow.

Justification:

Plant modificatian provided an FDS effluent path to the Waste Monito Tanks.

ALARA and Chemistry requirements will not allow water to be recycled to the secondtry system.

Operational experience has indicated that this holdup time can vary from one day to orie week; there-fore, the statement was incorrect.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.38 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-19

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the reference _to laundry drains from Section 11.2.2.4.2. subsection 2.f.

Justification:

The laundry system was removed: therefore, it does nc+

provide input to the atmospheric tank.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.39 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-20

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change Section 11.2.2.4.2. subsection 2.h and 2.1 to state that the tanks have been abandoned in place.

Justification:

The Reverse Osmosis System has been abandoned in place.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.41 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to YXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 37 of 124 FSAR Page (Al aMcEltd)

M R riotion 11.2-20

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletes the paragraph in Section 11.2,2,4.2. sucsection 2 9 which refers to tankage large enough to allow for a week inflow, Justification:

Operational experience has indicated that this holdup time con vary from one day to one week; therefore, the statement is incorrect.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.40 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No 11.2-21

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Replaces the word " tritiated" with "and radioactive" in Section 11.2.2.4.2, subsection 2.k: and deletes the balance of the description "..since no more than 1000 gal / year...".

Justification:

Laboratory wastes are not only tritiated, but also cen-tain other "adionuclides.

Operating experience has indicated that input flow into the tank varies from 100 to 1000 gallons per week; therefore, the statement is incorrect, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-a57.42 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No e

11.2-22

==

Description:==

(Clarificat'on)

Deletes wording " hydrogen-tsdroxyl-form nuclear grade" from Section 11.2.2.4.2, subt.ection 3: and deletes

" mixed bed" from subsection 3.a and 3,b.

Justification:

Varied contaminants in waste streams may dictate use of other than hydrogen-hydroxyl-form resin to effectively clean up waste stream.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.43 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-22

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes reference to recycling back to the plar on-dary cycle from Section 11.2.2.4.2. subsectit nd

+

3.b.

Justification:

Due to Chemistry and ALARA requirements, processed water will net be recycled back to the secondary system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.44 l

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29 1992 Page 38 of 124 FSAR Pdge

( A$ omende.d)

DeltElpU U11 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-23

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes three sentences of the descri tion of filter element changeout operation from Section 11.2.2.4.2, subsection 4; and changes the statement "...rather than high radiation levels" to read as "...or high radiation levels".

Justification:

The first change removes unncessary detail from the description of the filter element changeout.

Current Radiation Protection philosophy requires that the red-iation level described al so be a changeout criteria.

Group: 3 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.45 I

Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No 1.1.2-24

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the last sentence of Sectiot. 11.2.2.4.2, sub-section S.b.

Justification:

Removes unnecessai'y details in the description of Laun-dry and Hot Shower strainer cleanout operation.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.46 Related SER Section: 11.2 l

SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-24 Descriptien: (Revision)

I Deletes r eference that the Boron Recycle Evaporator is identical to the Waste and th: Floor Drain Evat + itor from Section 11.2.2.4.2. subsection 6.

Justification:

Plant modification changed control functions and added instrumentation and controls only to the Boron Racycle Evaporator.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.47 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-24

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the phrase "under emergency conditicc " from the discu'sion of 'he interchangeability of all evapo-rators in Ne' tion 11.2.2.4 subsection 6.

Justification:

Current operating philosophy Fas ded'cated the sf the Waste and Boron Recycle Evaporator-for clen. p of Recycle Holdup Tank liquids.

Group: 3

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 39 of 124 FSAR Page (B1 Anende_d)

Dgtcrip11.90 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.46 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-25

==

Description:==

(Revision) t Deletes the last sentence from Section 11.2.2.4, sub-section 6.

Justification:

Current operating philosophy allows fluctuation of processing rates which subsequently change the CCW load factor for the evapo.ators.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.49 Related SER Section: 11.2 SEP/SSER 1mpart: No 11.2-25

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the first paragraph in Section 11.2.2.4.2. sub-section 8 and changes the last sentence to indicate that the Reverse Osmosis System is abandoned in place.

Justification:

The Reverse Osmosis System has been abandoned in place; therefore, the description is no longer at licable.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.50 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11."-26, 27

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Adds to Section 11.2.2.4.2, new sebsection 10 which provides a system description for the Filter Demineral-ization System (FDS).

1 Justification:

Plant modification allowed the installation of the Fil-tor Demineralization System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.51 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The SER/SSER does not contain a discussion or evalua-tion of the filter Demineralization System (FDS).

11.2 28

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes the word " scintillation" to " radiation detec-tors" in Section 11.2.2.5.1.

l Justification:

Instrumentatior to measure radioactivity in releases is not restricted to the use of scintillation detectors.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.52 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

a.

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 40 of 124 FSAR Page

( An Aegnied)

DeurhLlon 11.2-30

==

Description:==

(Revision) i Changes Section 11.2.2.6, subsection 2 to reflect that RCDT venting is automatic to the Waste Gas Processing System; and deletes the description of the hydogen bottle changecut.

Justification:

This change reflects actual operating conditions which vents to the Waste Gas Processing System and that a bank of bottles are available to supply hydrogen to the tank.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.53 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-30

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Replaces the phrase "an evaporator startup" with " waste processing" in Section 11.2.2.6. subsection 3.

Justification:

The statement indicated that only the evaporator is used as the cleanup method; however, other methods such as Filter Demineralization may be used.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.54 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-30

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Deletes the statement that provides an example for surge capacity of the Waste Holdup Tank from Section-11.2.2.6, subsection 3.

Justification:

The example given does not provide any input to the tank surge capacity validity.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.55 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact; No 11.2 30

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises Section 11.2.2.6, subsection 3 to change the description of Waste Evaporator distillate flow paths l

that include bypassing the demineralizer and that the liquid may be sent also to the Waste Monitor Tanks and i

Laundry Holdup Honitor Tanks, Justification:

System design allows flexibility to dischargo effluent to all monitor tanks.

During periods of excessive input, all tanks are utilized.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.56

- - _ ~ -

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 41 of 124 FSAR Page (A1 AM!1dt!D D#1Cr_iption Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i

11.2-30

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the statement referring to re evaporation using i

the Boron Recycle Evaporator from Section 11.2.2.6.

subsection 3.

i Justification:

Current operating philosophy is such that if bottoms are not suitable for recycling they wou'd be diluted and processed through the FDS and then discharged or sent to the Waste Conditio1 Tank for subsequent solidi-fication.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.57 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2 30

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes the concentration of bottoms from 12 percent to 4 to B percent in Section 11.2.2.6. subsection 3.

Justification:

Design limitations, primarily heat tracing capability, does not allow concentrating to 12 percent.

Group: 3 FSAP Change Request Number: 92 657.58 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-30 Desc-iption: (Revision)

Deletes the discussion of when evaporator bottoms can be recycled from Section 11.2.2.6. subsection 3.

Justification:

Normal operational mode is to recyc1t all evaporator bottoms.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.59 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-30

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds a statement to the end of Section 11.2.2.6. sub-section 3 which states that the' Waste Holdup Tank can be processed through the FDS with effluent directed to discharge monitor tanks.

Justification:

Plant modification provided a ficw path to process the Waste Holdup Tank through the FDS.

Group: 3 l

l FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.60 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

- ~.

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 42 of 124

.FSAR Page (11 Aarndid)

Ottigrjption 11.2

Description:

(Revision)

Revises the description of the processing of Drain Channel "B" waste to include use of the Filter Deminer-1 alizer System and to use the FDT #3 as a batch tank for processing.

Justification:

Plant modificatio. allows the FDS processing capabil-ity; and operating philosophy currently uses FDT #3 as a batch tank.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.61 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2 31

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the description of Drain Channel "B" effluent flow paths in Section 11.2.2.6, subsection 4 to state that Drain Channel "B" effluents will primarily be dis-charged into the Circulating Water Tunnel, Justification:

Due to current chemistry and ALARA requirements, pro-cessed water will not be recycled back to the secondary

system, in addition, the radiation n.onitor has been abandoned in place and is deleted from the description.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.62 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2 32

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes references to the totalizer and valve RV-5252 from the last paragraph of the Section 11.2.2.6, sub-section 4.

Justification:

System design does not include a totalizer and valve RV-5252 and associated radiation monitor have been abandoned in place.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.63 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-32

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes Section 11.2.2.6, subsection 4 discussion of Drain Channel "B" interconnection, with Drain Channel "C",

to delete discussion of the Reverse Osmosis System L

ind discusses the flow path from the Laundry Hot Shower l

Tank Filter to the Waste Honitor. Tanks, l

. Justification:

The Reverse Osmosis System nas been abandoned in place but the flow path from the Laundry Hot Shower Tank to u

~. -

_ - - _ ~

- - _ - - _. - - -..~

Attachmont to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 43 of 124 FSAR Page (A1 Am1Ddid)

EtKCfation the Waste Monitor Tanks is available.

3 Group _

92-657.64 FSAR Change Request Number:

Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.'i-32

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes the last paragraph of Section 11.2.2.6, sub-section 4 to state that all finor drain tanks are con-netted to the Waste Condition Tank for processing and subsequent disposal.

Justification:

This change reflects actual operating capability.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 oS7.65 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2 33

==

Description:==

(Clariiication)

Revised Section 11.2.2.6. subsection 6.b to remove details of pump operatior, and highlight resin sluicing operation.

Justification:

Removes unnecessary details of operation and provide a description of resin slu cing operation.

i Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.66 Related SEF. Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.2-34

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revised Section 11.2.2.6, subsection 7.a to change the

. description of bypassing Drain Channel "A" subsystem by including the processing of the Waste Holdup Tank util-izing the Filter Demineralizer.

Justification:

Plant modification provided flow paths that will allow l

bypassing the Waste Evaporator and demineralizers in order to process through the Filter Demineralizer Sys-tem Group: 3-FSAR Change Request Number: 92 657.67 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-34

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revised Section 11.2.2.6, subsection 7.b to change the description of bypassing Drain Channel "B" sybsystem by including the processing of the Floor Drain Tanks utilizing the Filter Demineralizer System.

Justification:

Plant modification provided flow paths that allow

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 44 of 124 FSAR Page (11 Astuded)

EtifE1D119D i

bypassing the Floor Drain Evaporator and demineralizers in order to process through the Filter Demineralizer System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.68 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Inpact: No 11.2-35

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revised Section 11.2.2.7. subsection 2, discussion of a one gallon leak into the Waste Holdup Tank, to reflect the increase load on the Filter Demineralizer System.

Justification:

Plant modification allows processing the Waste Holdup Tank through the Filter Demineralizer System: the load will subsequently increase on the Filter Demineralizer System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-657.69 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-36

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Delete reference to Westinghouse Survey on liquid di: charges.

Justification:

This is a trivial change as the information provided was not relevant: liquid discharges depend on site specific plant operations, w

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.1 Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No i

11.2-36

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise expected volumes and collection times of liquid waste.

Justification:

Values are based on 1991 plant operating data.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.s Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No o

11.2-36

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise-expected releases, process parameters and tank inventories.

Justification:

Effluent releases have been revised based on the revised source terms in the GALE computec program (NUREG-0017)- revised calculations and revised plant operating parameters.

Attachment to TXX 92239 Hay 29, 1992 Page 45 of 124 FSAR Page (al Amended)

DesCrIIttdpD Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-665.7 Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-37

' Des c ripti on : (Clarification)

Revise 110w diagram reference.

Justification:

The LWPS flow diagrams are shown in several figures in section 11.2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.3 Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No Table 11.2 1

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise expected volumes and collection times of liquid waste.

Justification:

Values are based on 1991 plant operating data.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.6 Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.2-2 See Sheet No(s):1 thru 10

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise expected releases, process parameters, and tank inventories.

Justification:

Effluent releases have been revised based on revised source terms in the GALE computer program (NUREG-0017) revised calculativas and revised plant operating parameters.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.8 Related-SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.2-2 See sheet No(s):1 thru 10

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Delete reactor coolant drain tank (RCDT). Waste evapora tors condensate tank, floor drain tanks I and II.

chemical drain tank, laundry and hot shower tank.

laundry holdup and monitor tanks, spent resin storage tnk RD concentrates ink end laundry H2O bd.tnk.invntry.

Justification:

RCDT enveloped by the recycle holdup tank activities:

the WECT enveloped by the waste monitor tank; the FDT I &lI enveloped by FDT 111 acLivities. CDT by waste holdup activities ETC.

Group: 2

..m Attachmont to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 46 of 17.4 FSAR Page (11 Aman.dgd)

Dngripligg FSAR Change Request Number: 92 669.11 Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 11.2 6

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise expected releases, process parameters, and tank inventories, j

Justification:

Effluent releases have been revised based on revised source terms in the GALE computer program (NUREG-0017) revised calculations and revised plant operating i

parameters.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.9 Pelated SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.2-7

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletes references to Westinghouse Survey on liquid discharges.

Justification:

This is a trivial change as the information provided was not relevant: liquid discharge depends on site specific plant operations.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.2 Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 11.2-8 See Sheet No(s):1.2,3

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Delete reactor coolant drain tank (RCDT), Waste evapora tors condensate tank, floor drain tanks I and 11, chemical drain tank, laundry and hot shower tank.

laundry holdup and monitor tanks, spent resin storage tnk,RD concentrates tnk and laundry H2O hd.tnk.invntry.

Justification:

RCDT enveloped by the recycle holdup tank activities:

the WECT enveloped by the waste monitor tank; the FDT I &ll enveloped by FDT !!! activities, CDT by waste holdup activities ETC.

Group: 2

.92-669.12 FSAR Change Request Number:

Related SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 11.2-8 See Sheet No(s):1,2,3

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Revise tank inventories and release concentrations.

Justification:

Design values are revised based on plant operating parameters assuming design basis-primary coolant

Attachment to VXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 47 of 124 FSAR Page (As ampndc3D Dftscrip1Lon j

concentrations (DMB-ME-025).

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 669.13 Related SER Section: 11.2; SSER22 11.2 j

SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 13.2-9 See Sheat No(s):1,2,3 Descriptier,: (Correction)

Revise expected release concentrations.

Justification:

Effluent releases have been revised based on revised source terms in the GALE cor.puter program (NUREG 0017) revised calculations and on revised plant operating parameters.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-669.50 Reldted SER Section: 11.2:

SSER22 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpart: No Table 11.2-10 See Sheet No(s) 1,2 Description- (Correction)

Revise design release concentrations.

Justification:

Design values are revised based on plant operating parameters assuming design basis primary coolant concentrations (DBD ME 025).

Group: 2 FSAR Changa Request Number: 92-669.14 Related SER 3ection: 11.2:

SSF122 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: 30 t

11.3-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes normal venting of all evaporators to the Auxiliary Building vent rather than the Gaseous Waste Processing System (GWPS).

.lusti fi ca t i on :

Design / operational problems prevent venting of the waste and recycle evaporators to the GWPS during most system operation.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 6S8.1 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No i

11'3-3, 13

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises discussion of the Waste Gas Decay tanks to indicate that gaseous waste will be contained as long i

as practical (rather than indefinitely) which may I

result in inf requent discharges to the environment (where it previously implied na discharges).

Justification:

Although the tanks were designed to contain gas waste

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 40 of 124 FSAR Page (A1.a9tuded)

Ocsstjp(j#9 for the life of the plant, industry experience has found that there may be conditions when venting of the tanks may become necessary.

For example, during tank maintenance, venting of residual pressure (usually less than 2 psi) is required prior to tank entry.

Also, during operation ofthe gaseous waste system, especially during plant startups and shutdowns, the potential exists for inadverttnt inleakage of oxygen or nitrogen.

This can lead to an eventual over accumulation of gas which may necessitate venting (albiet very infrequently).

Should venting to the environment be required, as discussed in FSAR Section 11.3.3.1, it would only be permitted under controlled conditions subject to the limitations of 10CFR20, 10CFR50 Appendix I and ALARA.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 658.1 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER impact: Yes SER indicates the gases a stored for reuse but does not address releases.

11.3-6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes flow path of the Gas Decay Tank drain pump from the Volume Control Tank (VCT) to Waste Holdup Tank Justifications the water from Gas Decay Tank may be contaminated with iron and other minerals.

Chemistry limitations prevent direct discharge to the VCT.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-658.1 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.3 9

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes reference to continuous hydrogen addition and gas venting of the VCT.

Justification:

Due to ALARA concerns, gas analyzer reliability and required analyzer surveillances, venting of the VCT is no longer continuous but performed regularly as needed (approximately 12 houis per week),

Group: 3 FSAR Change Reque3t Number: 92-658.1 Related SER S' lon: 11.C.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.3-10

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes specific switching time for the Gas Decay Tanks and replaces it with switched at " regular" intervals.

Justification:

AttachmGnt to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 49 of 124 FSAR Page (Al ausnled)

Deigrjntion New c6*culations have revised the switching intervals..

It is not necessary to include the specific interval in the FSAR.

i Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 658.1 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.3 11

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Replaces the word "is" with "should be".

Justification:

This clarifies that some gain or loss of gas in the shutdown tank due to plant or operational conditions is possible.

Gas may fluctuate between the shutdown and startup tanks.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-658.1 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 11.3 3

==

Description:==

-(Revision)

Revises the isotopic content and activity of the design basis accumulated radioactivity of the Gaseous Waste Processing System.

Justification:

This reflects e revised :alculation of gaseous wastes.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-658.1 Related SER Socieun: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impac'

.o 11.4-1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes description of " reverse osmosis wastes".

Justification:

The reverse osmosis unit is no longer used and is abandoned in place.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.1 Related SER Section: 11.2 FER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER references reverte osmosis waste.

11.4 1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Changes the words "which ever is appropriate" to "in accordance with CPSES Process Control Program".

Justification:

Clarifies that the PCP establishes requirements for dewatering or solidifying wastes.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.2 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

~

Attachment to TXX 9/239 May 29, 1992 Page 60 of 124 FSAR Page (11 ##ttdtd)

Rtitrinil9B 11.4 1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Chunges the words " spent resin transfer system " to "NSSS spent resin transfer system ant ' team generator blow own spent resin transfer system *.

d Justification:

The eesin transfer header has been modified to split NSSS and steam generator blowdown resins.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Raquest Number: 92-594.3 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER lapact: No 11.4 1 De:cr'ption: (Clarification)

Inscets the words "which may be used" in the descrip-en of the waste baler.

Justificat on:

Clarifies that the baler is available but not necessa'11y always used.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 594.4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER indicates that dry waste is compacted by the waste baler.

11.4-2

==

Description:==

(Revisien)

Changes the words " disposable container" to " suitable container" and " compressed into drums" to " compressed into containers suitable for disposal".

Justification:

Incompressible waste need not be placed in disposable containers if it is shipped to an offsite processor.

Drums are not the only sultable disposal container.-

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.5 Related SER Section: 21.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER indicates that dry waste is compacted _in 55 gallon drums.

11.4-3

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Removes che detailed discussion of the use of the iilter transfer cask.

Justification:

The discussion is too detailed and not necessary for inclusion in the FSAR.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.6 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

,. ~ - _ _ _. _

Attachmont to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 51 of 124 i

FSAR Page (AA AmtDdad)

PRCription 11.4-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the discussion of alternate methods for filter removal.

Justification:

The filter transfer cask is used for high dose rate filters.

When dose rates permit, other quicker methods may be used to handle filters.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.7 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.4 4

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the description of the baling subsystem to indicate that waste may be compacted using the Fuel Building baler or may be shipped offsite for processing.

linnecessary detail regarding baler operation is removed.

Justification:

Change clarifies current practices for processing compactible wastes.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.8 Reloted SER Section: 11.2 SEPdSSER Impact: No 11.4 5

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds words indicating that waste is not compacted in containment and that the containment compactor is abandoned in place.

Juttification:

Change reflects current practice for processing compactible waste.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.9 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No 11.4-5 Description; (Revision)

Revises description of containers used for packaging radioactive wastes.

Justification:

Reflects current practice.

Containers used for packaging waste sent to an offsite processor need not meet burial site requirements.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.10 Related SER Section: 11.2

Attachmont to TXX 92239 Hay 29. 1992 Page 52 of 124 I

FSAR Page (aft Amtfldtd)

D.CRtiR119D SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The SER discussion does not reflect an offsite processor, 11.4 5. 6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the words " shipping shields" to " storage shields".

Justification:

The shleiding casks currently used at CPSES are only used for handling and for temporay storage of waste.

They are not suitable for shipping.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.11 Related !ER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.4

Description:

(Editorial)

Removes details regarding the filter transfer cask and flatbed cart.

Justification:

This level of detail is considered unnecessary.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.12 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.4-7

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes statement that compaction of waste is performed after an amount of waste sufficient to fill a drum has been accumulated.

Justification:

l This change is necessary to reflect clerent radwaste handling practices Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.13 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.4-7

==

Description:==

(Revision) l Revises statement regarding waste processing vendors

documentation of compliance with 10CFR61 stability requirements.

Justification:

Not all testing for 10CFR61 stability requireuents is documented in topical reports, it is acceptable to use processing methods provided that the vendor has i

appropriate documentation.

l Group: 3 l

FSAR Change Request flumber: 92-594.14 Related SER Section: 11.2 i

i SER/SSER 1mpact: No l

Attachmont to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 53 of 124 FSAR Page

( As Amended)

Deletiation 11.4-7

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Adds discussion of the purpose of the CPSES Process Control Program (PCP).

Justification:

Provides more detailed information related the NRC question 0321.8.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 594.22 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.4-8

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Revises discussion of requirements associated with packaging of radwaste.

Justification:

There are more requirements applicable to packaging radwaste than 49CFR173.

It is not practical to list all the specific details of each applicable requirement.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 594.15 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.4 8

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Revises de.cription of the storage capability to indicate storage " equivalent" to 144 55 gallon drums.

Justification:

It was not the intent of the original statement to indicate the exact type of waste container but to describe the available capacity.

1 Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 594.1C Related SEP. Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.4-9

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises discussion of temporary storage (pending shiprent) of radwaste outside the fuel building.

Justification:

The change reflects current practice based on the creation of the materials handling and staging area in a previout plant modification.

Group: 3 FSAP Change Request Number: 92-594.17 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

m Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 54 of 124 ISAR PaDe

( Al Amt04td)

EcicrJPlipu 11.4-10 Description (Revi; ion)

Revises discussion of redwaste shipment requirements to delete reference to the Environmental Survey of Transportation of Rad. Haterials to and from Nuclear Power Plants, and the Draft ENV. Statement Concerning Proposed Rulemaking Action.

Justification:

The above requirements are no longer current.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 594.18 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 11.4 1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Adds information clarifying the basis for radwaste projections.

Justification:

Anticipated volumes are based on industry averages and may not reflect actual volumes generated.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.20 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER-Impact: No Figure 11.4 2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises figure to reflect that the containment balers are abandoned in place, and that waste may be shipped to an offsite vendor for processing rett er than compacted and shipped for burial, Justification:

This change reflects current CPSES practices.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-594.21 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No 11.5 1

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change the word " ensures" to " aids in ensuring".

Justification:

The change providies a more accurate statement of the general design bases and achievable function of the system.

l Group:.4 l-FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.1 Related SER-Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-3

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words " Turbine Building drain" to " Turbine Building sump".

Justification:

Clarifies the description of the subject effluent

~..

,,..v--_.

%w.

,..,_..,4._,_p__.._-,-m.

,y,. - - - -... - -. -.,,,

7-,

y

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 55 of 12t FSAR Page (eli AmCitdtd)

DCEGrip.t19D monitors.

Group: 4 FSAR Chan)e Request Number: 92-588.2 Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5+4

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change the words " backup monitors" to " process monitors" and delete general reference to diversity of monitor type used.

Justification:

Wording more accurately identifies the monitors being described. Deleted general reference to diversity of monitor type as unnecessary / redundant: specific descriptions of monitor locations, type, etc. are are provided in FSAR Table 11.5-1.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5 5

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words " Turbine Building drain" to " Turbine Building sump" and " Low Volume Waste Treatment Facilities" to " Low volume Waste Pond".

Justification:

Clarifies the description of the effluent stream being discussed and where it is released to.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-5 Descriptions (Revision)

Revise item 3 of the Process Radiation Monitor System design criteria which describes how detected radiation levels of monitored process and effluent streams may be accessed by operations personnel.

Justificaticn:

Change description to more accurately reflect actual system capabilities.

Group: _3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.5 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5 6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise item 10 of the Process Radiation Monitor System design criteria which describes monitor placement with respect to radiation detection.

Justification:

Change adds additional consideration for best locating

mA++

.a su---

4 4-w---4 5.-

v.-

$a L_-i_AA.a+*h-t-.-_w

'4----

g.

,.4~,-_.*J

_Aya A-a,

--w

+

c-4

. j

.4 Attochment to TXX 92239 May 29. 1992 Page 56 of 124 FSAR Page (M amended)

D_. gig r_ipij_pn these monitors in the plant, e.g., detection sensitivity considerations.

Group:. 3 i

FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.6 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5 7

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words " regulated by necessary" to " based on" Justification:

More accurately describes the use of the subject on-line monitors.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.7 Related SER Sect 4on: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-10

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete item 2 report processor computer and related periphals, and item 3. report processor terminals from the system component list of the Radiation Honitoring System (RMS}, Renumber the remaining list itemt 1-5.

Justification:

The report, processor computer (RM-21) was removed and upgraded under plant Design Hodification OH-90 221.

The RM 21 report process-computer and data link to the RMS were obsolete and not used in the function of of the RMS. Appropriate function and description of the replacement report computer as used for the HET System are discussed in FSAR Section 2.3.3.2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.8 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-10

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change the word "information" to " data are" in the discur icr. of what is returned to the RM-11 consoles.

Justification:

Better description of what is transmitted to the RM-11 consoles.

Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.9 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l

11.5-13

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words " averages are stored" to " averages continue to be updated and stored" and " loss of-those l

averages".to " loss of hourly averages" in the j

discussion of data stored at local individual monitors, l

Justification:

i i '

j.

- _ - - - - -... -.. -. - -. - - -. -.. ~ - -...

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 57 of 124 FSAR Page (a_1 amended)

Reasdpitan Clarifies the system description and capabilities.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.10 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-13

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Remove the detailed discussion of hardwire related to the microprocessor at rediation monitor assemblies Justification:

The discussion is too detailed and no. necessary for inclusion in the FSAR.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-586.11 Related SER Section: 11'.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-13

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Delete the word " initial" in the discussion of parameters that control each monitor channel.

Justification:

Provides a more accurate statement of what is provided in the microprocessor database.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.12 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-15

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete the words "and report computer" from the decription of the control room _ consoles.

Justification:

The report processor computer (RH-21) was removed and upgraded under a plant Design Modification. The RM-21 report processor computer and data link to the RMS were obsolete and not used in-the function of the RHS. Appropriate function and description of the new replacement report computer as used for the HET System are discussed in FSAR Section 2.3.3.2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.13 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-15

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Remove the unnecessary detailed description of

. hardware related to the RHS Control Room consoles, e.g.

computer model number.

Justification:

'The description is too detailed and not necessary for inclusion in the FSAR.

Group: 4

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 58 of 124 FSAR Page (A1 amended)

Descriplion FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.14 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-16

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove reference to the report computer and unnecessary details regarding communications between the consoles and the monitors.

Justification:

The report processor computer (RH-21) was removed under plant Design Hodification DH-90 221; det.'ils regarding communications between the consoles and the monitors are not necessary for inclu lon in the FSAR.

FSAR.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.15 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-16, 17 See Page No(s):18

==

Description:==

(Clorification)

Change " microcomputer" to " minicomputer".

Justification:

Clarifies description of the subject computers, i

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.60 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER impact: No 11.5-17

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete the description of the report processing computer as related to the Radiation Monitoring System (old Section 11.5.2.5.4).

Justification:

The report processing computer and data link to the P.MS were obsolete and not used in the function of the RMS.

The report processing computer was removed under plant Design Hodification DM-90 221. Appropriate function and description of the new replacement report computer as used for the HET System is discussed in FSAR Section 2.3.3.2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-5B8.16 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-18

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change the words " technical specification limits" to

" Technical Specification and Radiological Effluent Controls Program Limits" Justification:

Change more accurately references plant licensing

_ ~ _ _ _ __.

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 59 of 124 FSAR Page (gg amended)

Description bases documents (programs) that contain effluent release limits and requirements for effluent monitor setpoints.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.17 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-19

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change the discussion of logging alarm conditions at the RM-11 consoles by deleting the words "for a permanent record".

Justification:

This change is made to reflect actual operational practices. Alarm history printouts are available-for review by operators, but are not retained as permanent records.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.18 Related SER Section: 11.S SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5 19

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words "the programmed hysteresis" to "a programmed dead band" in the discussion concerning when channels in alarm return to normal.

Justification:

Clarifies the measures provided to avoid repeated alarms from count rate statistical fluctuation near the alarm setpoint.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.19 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-21

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Remove unnecessary detailed discription of the Containment Air-Monitoring System.

Justification:

The discussion is too detailed and not necessary for inclusion in the FSAR.

. Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 02-588.20 Related SER Section: 11.3 L

SER/SSER Impact: No-11.b-22

==

Description:==

(Clarification) l Change the descriptive wording of" Containment monitors" and " moving filter paper" to " Containment Air monitors" and "a particulate filter". respectively.

Justification:

L Change provides a more accurate description of the

~

l Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 60 of 124 FSAR Page (31 amended)

Egicription monitors and filter involved.

Group: 4 i

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.22 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5

Description:

(Clasification)

Change descriptive wording from "to sample both during normal and accident conditions" to "one for sampling during normal conditions and one for accident conditions".

Justification:

Change provides better description of the function of-each WRGHs two isokinetic nozzles.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.23 Related SER Section:-11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-24

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise the discussion of the function of the waste gas monitor.

Justification:

Revision necessary to state that the waste gas monitor is only used for determination of gross gasesous activity, not gas distribution among the GWPS tanks.

Gas distribution is determined by grab samples.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.24 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER impact: No 11.5-26

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change the word " Details" to " Description" and revise the description of liquid process monitors by deleting

-reference to "in-line" type sample monitors.

Justification:

j A plant design modification converted "in-line" liquid monitors to "cff-line"; therefore, liquid "in-line" monitors are no longer used in the Process Radiation Monitoring System.

Group: 3 92+588.25 FSAR Change Request Number:

Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-30

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add the words "if the distillate is aligned to the RMWST" in the dise (sion of monitoring the boron recycle evaporator distillate.

Justification:

Clarifies the condition under which the channel y9)' 7 r- ?

3-?-=

ry*g

?D-t v-t-Mwe--et'umm-

-u pay-;-

qT ev<

gig im 1muhMr-e-g T

t uaf'-w

-t--'-1lFe'g ub-m,+t=-

it'--FN--

T-

Attochment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 61 of 124 FSAR Page (Ag amended)

Descrip11pn monitors the evaporator distillate.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.26 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-31

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words " Turbine Building Drain Monitors" to

" Turbine Building Sump Honitors" and " Low Volume Retention Pond" to " Low Volume Waste Pond".

Justification:

Clarifies the description of the subject effluent monitors and pond.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.27 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER-Impact: No 11.5-32, 33

==

Description:==

(R? vision)

Change " National Bureau-of Standards (NBS)" to

" National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)"

Justification:

The referenced federal agency changed its offical name.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.28 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-33

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change the list that specifies-the frequency of subsequent calibrations to include the " Radiological Effluent Controls Program".

Justification:

Change more accurately references plant documents (programs) which specify the frequency of subject calibrations.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.30 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l-11.5-36'

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change wording from." sampling are determined _in" to

" sampling requirements are discussed in".

Justification:

Clarifies what is actually discussed in the referenced FSAR Sections.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588 31 Related SER Section: 11.3

-SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachmont to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 62 of 124 FSAR Page

( Ali Auf!1dftd)

DgLcriplim!

11.5-38

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove the words "f?d to a central cenputer that stores the data and may be used to print". The description was changed to state that the data is used to generate the required reports.

Justification:

A plant design modifcation (DH-90-221) removed the referenced report processor computer. Data is now collected and manually input into a stand.alone computer that generates reports. This computer is act part of the Process Radiation Monitoring System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.32 Related SER Ser.tlon: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-38

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove the words " to unrestrict*.d areas" in the discussion of meeting the discharge limits for all potentially radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent paths.

Justification:

Revision made because per UDCH Radiological Effluent Controls, gaseous discharge limits sre applied at the site boundary, not the unrestricted eraa boundary.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.33 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-38, 39

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise to add reference to the Radiological Effluent Controls Program.

Justification:

Change more accurately references plant licensing documents (programs) that contain effluent release limits and sampling monitoring requirements.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.35 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER impact: No 11.5-39

==

Description:==

-(Clarification)

Insert the words " gamma isotopic" and "for difficult to measure isotopes (i.e.. alpha emitters and pure beta emitters)" to the discussion on measurements made on each batch of l'. quid effluents released.

L Justification:

I Change provides clarification of sampling and analysis requirements for liquid effluents.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.36

_ ~ -. -.. -. -

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29. 1992 j

Page 63 of 124 FSAR Page (M AmtRded)

ReifflP1140 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5 39

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise discussion of when the Waste Water Holdup Tanks (WWHis) are discharged to the Circulating Water Discharge by changing wording to "when activity levels exceed limits for discharge to the LVW Pond specified in the Radiological Effluent Controls Program".

Justification:

Chacia more accurately references plant licensing documents (programs) that contain effluent release limits and sampling monitoring requirements.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.37 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Itapact: No 11.5-39

==

Description:==

(Revisio7)

Change the words " required due to the presence of radioactivity" to " required by the Radiological Effluent Controls Program" and " Low Volume Retention Pond" to " Low Volume Waste Pond".

Justification:

Changes reference the applicable plant licensing document (program) that contain effluent release limits and sampling monitoring requirements and clarify what pond the tanks may be discharged to, respectively.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.38 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-40

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the words " Low Volume Rotention Pond" to

~

" Low Volume Waste Pond".

Justification:

I Clarifies the description of the subject pond.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.39 Related SER Section: 11.3 i

SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-40

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete the words "on-a batch basit to the Circulating Water Discharge" in the discussion of diverting the discharge from Turbine building Sumps to the Low Volume Waste rond.

Justification:

Change made consistency with FSAR Change Request Number 92-500.37 above which allows for WWHT releases via the Circulating Waster Discharge or the LVW Pond.

l

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 64 of 124 FSAR Page (At ame11dcd) p.g5 gI_lJ.1190 depending on activity level.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.40 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSFR Impact: No 11.5-40

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Add the sentence " Additionally. Low Volume Waste Pond discharges to Squaw Creek Reservoir are sampled for final accountability of radioactive materials that have been released to the pond."to the discussion of continuous releases (11.5.3.2 (li; Justification:

Provides additional description of sampling and analysis measures taken as required by the ODCH.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.41 Related SLR Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5 40

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change the words " Low Volume Retention Pond" to " Low Volume Waste Pond" and " sampled prior to release to determine if detectable quantities of radioactity are present" to " sampled in accorde :e with the Radiological Effluent Contro rogram".

Justification:

Change clarifies the subject pond description and provides reference to the applicable plant licensing document (program) which contains effluent release limits and sampling monitoring requirements.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.42 Relatad SER S. tion: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5 40

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete the words "on a batch basis to the Circulating l

Water Discharge" in the discussion of effluent release from the Waste Water Holdt.p Tanks (Section 11.5.3.2(2))

Justi fication:

Change made for consistency with FSAR Change Request Number 29-588.37 above which allows for WWHT releases via the Circulating Water Discharge or the LVW Pond, depending on activity level.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.43 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

A~ctachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 65 of 124 FSAR Page (Al DmCRdfd)

EtitElPilRD 11.5-41

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add the words "for noble gas isotopes" to the discussion of sampling and analyzing the plant vent sta ks.

Justification:

Provides clarification of sampling and analysis requirements for collected gaseous effluent samples.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 588.44 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-42

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove Nal detectors. rom the description of equipment used for radiological analyses of process and effluent semples in the laboratory by gamma spectrometry.

Justification:

Nal detectors have poor resolution relative to HP(Ge) detectors and are not used for laboratory radiological raalyses at CPSES.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.45 Related SER Section: )).3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5 42

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete the words " gross beta and" from the discussion of analyses of liquid effluent and process samples.

Justification:

Gross beta analyses are not performed on the subject liquid samples.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.46 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mract: No 11.5-43

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove the words "by passing the samples through mixed bed ion exchange columns" f rom the discussion of purifying liquid samples for tritium analysis.

Justification:

Distillation is normally the only process used at CPSES for purification of liquid sampler, for tritium analy,s.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588 47 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No i

~. -

Attachment to TXX 92239 Ha'y 29, 1992-Page 66 of 124 FSAR Page (A1 Am_tndid)

DescriDtioO n

Table 11,5-1 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change the top end of the nominal instrument range for Stack PIG Noble Gas Channels (X RE-5567 A & B) from 4E-2 to 1E-2.

Justification:

The value stated in tae FSAR is in error. The correct value is publishad in Design Basis Document DBD-EE-023.

Rev. 3 as 1E-2 Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.48 Related SEP Section: 11,3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-1 See Sheet No(s):2,3.4

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add "in-line" for Channel X-RE 5702 and "off-line"

.r Channels 1/2-RE-5566, X-RE-5895 A & B and X-RE-5896 A & B.

Justification:

Change made for clarification with the descriptive information provided for other DRMS channels in Table 11.5-1. This information had been omitted from the FSAR.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.49 Related SER Section: 11,3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11,5-1 See Sheet No(s):3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changed alarm setpoint basis for the Containment Air noble gas channels (1/2-RE-5503) from " Note 7" (RCS leak detection) to " Note 2" (Effluent requirements),

tification:

High alarm setpoints for 1/2-RE-5503 are based on effluent release limits for containtnent purges and vents. The setpcint is not used for RCA leak detection.

Group: 3 F5AR Change Request Number: 92-588,50 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11,5-1 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

In Table NOTES 5 and 7, change the words " based on verification of containment integrity" to " based on indication of containment integrity" and " based upon leakage detection" to." based upon RCS pressure boundary leakage detection", respectively.

Justification:

Changes clarify the note entries.

f.

Attachm@nt to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 67 of 124 FSAR Page (n Aminf Ld)~

Description n

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.63 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER impact: No Table 11.5-3 See Sheet No(s):2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove the table entry for channels X-RE-5251 and X-RE-5252, liquid waste process monitor.

Justification:

Waste water is not reprocessed. These monitors were abandoned in place per plant design modification.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Nunber: 92-588.51 telated SER Section 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add the word " reprocess" to the decription of the sample process for the Recycle evaporator concentrates.

Justification:

Change made to clarify the possible dispoaitions of recycle evaporator concentrates.

Group: A FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.52 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Tabic

.5-4 See Sheet No(s):2 l

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise the table column entry under " Expected Sample Concentrations" for the Waste Holdup Tank and Waste Evaporator Distillate.

Justification:

Revised estimates ara referenced information in FSAR Table 11.2-2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.61 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER.SErR Impact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):3

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add the word " recycle" to the description of the l

sample process for the Waste Evaporator concentrates.

Justification:

Change made to clarify the possible dispositiens of Waste evaparator concentrates.

Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.53 l

Related SER Section: 11.3 l

Attachment to TXX-9:239 May 29. 1992 Page-68 of 124 FSAR Page (n amendea) llundp1 lod SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revised table entries under the column " Expected Sample Concentrations" for all sampling locations listed on subject sheet.

Justification:

Revised information in refarenced FSAR Table 11.2-2, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.62 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):4

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove the table entry for " Waste Monitor Tanks (WMT).

and revise the entry under the column " Expected Sample Concentrations" for the sampling location

" Downstream of waste monitor tank demineralizer".

Justification:

Waste Monitor Tanks are relisted on Table 11.5-4 under the sample process of of tluent sampling (see sheet 7 of 8). The referenced column datt was revised due to revised estimates and informati)n FSAR Table 11.2-2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588 F4 Related SER Section: 11.3

.SER/SSER 4mpact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):4

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change sampling location description " Primary Water Storage Tank" to " Reactor Hakeup Water Storage Tank".

Justification:

Change made for consistency with plant nomenclature.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Reque;t Number: 92-588.55 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impaet: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the sampling location description of

" Pressurizer relief-tank (PRT) vapor space" to

" Press"rizer relief tank (PRT) vapor space and/or Pressurizer vapor space".

Justification:

Change clarifies the sampling location.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Reyaest Number: 92-588.56

)

i Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 69 of 124 FSAR Page

_(As amendqd)

Description Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Change the sampling location description of "CVCS holdup tanks" to " Recycle Holdup Tanks" and the sample process description of "... to GCW" to "... to GWPS".

Justification:

Change made for consistency with plant nomenclature.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.57 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):7

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add "(Waste Monitor Tanks and Laundy Heidup & Monitor Tanks)" to rad-waste processing system discharges.

Justification:

Change made to clarify actual sample points.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.58 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):8

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add table entries for " Low Volume Waste Pond" and

" Waste Water Holdup Tanks,"

Justification:

The additions are made for consistency with sampling requirements given ia the Radiological Effluents Controls Program given'in 'hc ODCH.

l Group: 3 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-588.59 i

Related SER Section: 11.3 l

SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-1

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Change the words " ingestion of crops" to "ingsstion of goat milk or crops" in the discussion of what l

activities on irrigated land are not considered i

significant pathways in evaluating the radiological impact of the plant.

Justification:

l Performed updat9c evaluations and revised calculations to estimate doses from routine plant operations.These activities identified significant and nonsignificant l

pathways as potential contributors.

[

Group: 3 1

l-

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page.70 cf 124 FSAR Page (at ausrtdtd)

DqscriptiQD FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.1 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11A-1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete the reference to making conservative dose calculations to demonstate the maximum potential dose impact for ingestion of goat milk or crops cultivated on irrigated land.

Justification:

Reevaluation indentified these pathways as nonsignificiant: dose calculations showing insignificant results were detarmined to be unnecessary / superfluous.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.2 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-1

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add description that water from Squaw Creek Reservoir is not used as drinking water supply and therefore ingestion of reservoir water not considered to be a realistic exposure pathway.

Justification:

TV Electric controls access /use of Squaw Creek Reservoir and allows recreation use only.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.3 Reluted SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete reference to the ingestion of water in the discussion of primary sources of exposure from the l

liquid pathway.

Jua.ification:

TV Electric controls access /use of Squaw Creek Reservoir and allows recreation use only. The use f actor for ingestion of water from Squaw Creek i

j is realistically - 0: exposure from other reservoirs is l

negligible.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise the quantity of water (acre-feet) released from Squaw Creek Reservoir (50R) into Squaw Creek; delete reference to specific quantity which may be pumped as

" blow down" f rom 50R to ' ake Granbury; revise quantity

Attachment to TXX-92239 May-29, 1992 Page 71 of 124 FSAR Page (al _ amended)

Description pumped from ',ake Granbury to 50R for level control.

Justification:

Revised parameters and mathematical Lake Model.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.5 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11A-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Change description of flow in lakes to state that flow in Squaw Creek Reservoir was assumed to be completely mixed (i.e, not plug flow).

Justification:

Revised the mathematical lake model used to calculate radionuclide concentrations due to norms 1 releases in surface water bodies.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.6 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-7

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Add the words "as applicable to Squaw Creek Reservoir, Lake Gradbury, or Whitney Reservoir" to the discussion of doses to individuals from potentially significant liquid pathway *.

Justification:

Provides clarification with respect to if calculations were to be performed.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.8 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-7

==

Description:==

_ (Correction)

Delete the sentence " Water will be withdrawn from Squaw Creek Reservoir for use in the plant surface water treatment system and used as potable water."

Justification:

The plant potable water comes from wells and not from Squaw Creek Reservoir.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.9 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11A-7

==

Description:==

(Revision) y Remove the reference to Squaw Creek Reservoir with regard to estimating dose due to ingestion of lake source drinking water.

Justification:

TU Electric controls access /use of Squaw Creek l

l

~.

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 72-of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description Reservoir and allows recreation use only: use factor for drinking water is realistically - O therefore no dose contribution from this source.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92+606.10 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11A-3,4,5. 6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Modified the description of terms and/or equations used in the mathematical lake model.

Justification:

Revised the mathematical lake model used to calculate radionuclide concentrations due to normal releases in surface water bodies.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.7 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impset: No 11A-8.9

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Upated the predicted estinated doses to individuals in the local environs of the plant from significant liquid pathways.

Justification:

Revised calculated values using updated parameters and revised lake model.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.11 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l

Table 11A-1 See Sheet No(s): 1.2.3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Updated table valaes for quantity of radionuclides annually released and expected long term concentrations in subject lakes.

Justification:

Table' values revised due to use of updated parameters and revised lake model.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.12 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l

Table 11A-2 See Sheet No(s):1,2,3,4

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Update table entries summarizing the calculated dose to individuals from various significant liquid pathways Justification:

Table values revised due to use of updated parameters and revised lake model.

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 73 of 124 FSAR Page (n Amende )

pngription j

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.13 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11A-5 See Sheet-No(s):1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Update table entries summarizing the total cairulated dose from all significant liquid pathways considered.

Justification:

Table values revised due to use of updated parameters and revised lake model.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.14 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11A-2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise figure parameters for lake flows and add footnotes.

Justification:

Parameters revised due to revision of lake model:

footnotes added to clarify parameters and flow paths.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.15 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11A-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Update figure to show revised terms and considerations in modeling dispersion of radionuclides in normal liquid _ releases to surface water bodies.

Justification:

Revised the mathematical model (lake model) used in estimating the concentrations of radionuclides in local lakes due to normal liquid releases from the plant.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-606.16 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.4-1, 2

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocate response from 0&R 331.3 to FSAR Section 12.4.3.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-284.2 Related SER Section: 12.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992

-Page 74-of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description 13.1-4

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises responsibilities of the Group Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Operations to delete the Manager Safeteam as a direct report.

Justification:

The Manager Safeteam now reports to the Manager of Regulatory Affairs.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No I?

'-4

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the Manager, Safeteam as a direct report to the Group Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Operations.

Justification:

This position has been relocated under the Manager of Regulatory Affairs.

Group; 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1-5, 6 See Page Ho(s):09, 15, 20, 21, 22

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes the position of Hanager of Nuclear Operations Support.

Justification:

As part of the CPSES organizational evolution-to improve the efficiency of manpower utilization, the position of Har.ager of Nuclear Operations Support has been eliminated.

The organizations previously reporting to this position now report as follows:

-Plant Engineering - reports to the Chief Engineer; Hanager, Plant Support - reports to the Plant Manager:

Emergency Planning Manager - reports to the Hanager.

Plant Support.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The CPSES organization no longer reflects that l

described by SSER 22.

13.1-8

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Relocates the discussion of the responsibilities of the Manager, Administrative Services (formerly the Director of Management Services).

Justification:

l This position has been retitled and relocated under l

i f

~ - - -

l Attachment to TXX-92239 i

Hay 29, 1992 Page 75 of 124 FSAR Page (as Amended)

Descriptf o.1 the Chief Engineer.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1-9 D?scription: (Revision)

Adds the position of Manager. Plant Eng!.dering to the organi;ations reporting to the Chief ingineer.

Justificaticm See desc iption provided for pace 13.1-5 Group: 3 FSAP, Change Request Nur ber: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The CPSES orgaaization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

13.1-10. 11

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises title of the Hanager of Nuclear Licensing to be Mariager of Regulatory Affairs.

Also adds the Manager, Safeteam as a direct report.

Justification:

Routine organizational chenge.

Group: 3 FSAR Chunge Request Number: 92-645 Related SER Section 13.1; SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes e

The organizational structure rio lenger reflects the version in the latest SSER to address the subject SSER-22, 13.1-14

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Pelocates the discussion of the responsibilities of the Hanager. Aaministrative Services (formerly the Director of Management Services).

Justification:

Thl: position has been retitled and relocated under the Chief Engineer, p~

Group: 3 F5AR Change Request Number: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1-15. 16

==

Description:==

(Revision) l Revises the discussion of the Operating Organization l

to reflect the elimination of Nuclear Operations l

Support organization.

Justification:

See description provided for page 13.1-5.

Grcup: 3 l

FSAR Change Request Numb (r.92-645 1

4 Attachmont to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 76 of 124 FSAT. Page (al Amendgd)

Description j

1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impa-t: Yes The CPSE.c

'anization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

Table 13.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Revi* ion)

Makes the B.S. degree for the Manager. Startup (Unit 2) a recommended option rather than a mandatory requirement.

Justification:

The NRC position related to qualitication requirements for startup testing personnel such as the Manager.

Startup was provided in O&R 423.7.

The revision to Table 13.1-1 requirements is consistent with the NRC requirements and is also consistent with RG 1.8.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-620 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 13.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises table to reflect the elimination of the position of Manager of Nuclear Operations Support.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-5.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number:-92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13,1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The CPSES organization no longer reflects tnat described in SSER 22.

Figure 13.1-2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises figure to reflect the elimination of the Nuclear Operations Support organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-5.

Group: 3 FSAR-Change Request Number: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The CPSES organizatico no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

Figure 13.1-3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises figure to reflect the elimination of the Nuclear Operations Support organization and tne positions of Director of Management Services and the Director of Engineering Adainistration.

Justification:

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 77 of 124 FSAR Page laJ auttded)

Ducfjpiipn See justification provided for page 13.1-5 and 13.1-14.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The CPSE5 organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22, 13.1A-1, 2 See Page No(s):5, 6, 7, 8, 48, 49, 50, 51 and 54

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises resumes to reflect personnel changes and position / title changes.

Justification:

Normal personnel changes.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645.1 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1A-20, 21

==

Description:==

(Update)

Updates the resume for the Unit 2 Manager, startup.

Justification:

Normal resume update due to persennel change.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 02-620 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.2-1

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to 0441.002 into the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-553 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l

13.1-2

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to 0441.003 into the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-554 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l

i r

Attachmont to TXX-92239 May-29, 1992 Page 78 of 124 FSAR Page (aJ M ind_itd)

Dg,qdpliga 15.0-12

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Correct Statement Concerning Axial Power Shapes Justification:

In Amendment 84,-changes were made to reflect the Unit 2 differences, but a statemcnt concerning the axial power shapes used in the DNB calculations was not changed to reflect Unit 2.

The Unit 2 analyses do net ust a 1,55 chooped cosine shape.

The axial power shapes for each unit are discussed in section 4.4.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Requo3t Number: 91-141.05 SER/SSER Imoart: Ne Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):3 Descriptian: (Correction)

Correct Reactivity Coefficients Used in -'e Rod hithdrawal at Power Accident Justification:

In Amendment 84, the reactivity coefficients were mod-ified to reflect the Unit 2 analyses and.the reanalyses associated with the change to a positive moderator co-efficient in Unit 1.

The value for the moderator den-sity coefficient was inadvertently left out of the Amendment. The correct value of +,43 delta k/gm/cc has been added to the Table for the Rod Withdrawal at Power Accident.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.05 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0 2 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add' Unit 2 Computer Codes and Initial Conditions for the Large and Small Break Loss of Coolant Accidents Justification:

Table 15.0-2 summarizes the Computer Codes and the range of initial conditions assumed in the analyses.

The Table has-been revised to include the Unit 2 codes-and initial conditions.

Group: 2 l-FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.05 l

SER/SSER Impacti No l

l Figure 15.0-2. B

==

Description:==

(correction)

Correct Doppler Power Coefficients Used in the Accident Analysis Justification:

In Amendment 84, Figure 15.0-28 was inserted for the doppler coefficients used in the Unit 2 analyses.

The Figure inadvertently inverted the upper and lower dop-pler curves. A new Figure 15.0-2B has been provided.

l Group: 2 i

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Dage 79 of 124 l

l FSAR Page (a1 amendid)

Description FSAR Change Request Number 91-141.05 SER/SSER impact: No Table 15.1-3 See Sheet N0(s):3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Darameters for Postulated Main Steam Line Break Accident Justification.

The Unit 2 parameters have been added to Table 15.1-3.

Unit 2 hus a different parameters because the steam generators are different from Unit 1.

The parameters have also changed fnr Unit i because of a change in the relief valve setpoint.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 SER/SSER. Impact: No 15,4-33, 34 Tee Page No(s):37, 38 description: (Addition)

Add Unit 2 Parameters and Results for Boron Dilution Event During Startup and Power Operation Justification:

The Boron Dilutior Event has bee reanalyzed for Unit 2.

The Unit 2 input parameters (e.g.,

RCS volume, boron boron worth, etc.) and results (e.g., time for operator action, etc.) have been added to the discussion.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.52 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4-61

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Iodine and Noble Gas Inventory Used in Assessing the Radiological Consequences of the Rod Ejection Accident Justification:

Regulatory Guide 1.77, " Assumptions Used for Evaluating a-Control Rod Ejection Accident for Pressurized Water Reactors" and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800) state that for ananlyzing the radiological consequences of the Rod Ejection Accident 25% of the iodines and 100% of the noble gases will be assumed to be available-for release from the containment and for releases from the secondary systemss, 50% of the iodines and 100% of

_the noble gases are released to the primary coolant.

These assumptioi were used in the dose calculation, but the wording in rhe text does not differentiate between the percentages-used for the release from the contain-ment and the release from the secondary systems. The wording has been changed to reflect the difference in these percentages.

Group:-3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-604.2

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 80 of 124 FSAR Page D scriplion (n cuendqd)

J Related SER Section: 15.4.2:

SSER22 15.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.4 1 See Sheet No(s):4. 5

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Sequence of Events for Boron Dilution Event During Startup and Power Operation Justification:

The Boron Dilution Event has been reanalyzed for Unit 2.

A new coiumn has been added to Table 15.4-1 to add the times for the Boron Dilution Event during startup and power operation.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.52 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.4-4 See Sheet No(s):2

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Iodine and Noble Gas Inventory Used in Assessing the Radiological Consequences of the Rod Ejection Accident Justification:

Regulatory Guide 1.77. " Assumptions Used for Evaluating a Control Rod Ejection Accident for Pressurizea Water Reactors" and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800) state that for analyzing the radiological consequences of the Rod Ejection Accident 25% of the iodines and 100% of the noble gases will be assumed to be available for release from the containment and for the releases through the secondary systems.

50% o' the iodines and 100% of the noble gases are released-to the primary coolant. These assumptions were used in the dose cal-culations, but the wording in Table 15.4-4 does not differentiate between the percentages used for the release from containment and the release from the sec-ondary.

The wording has been change to reflect.the difference in these percentages.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-604.1 Related SER Section: 15.4.2:

SSER22 15.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.6-14

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Remove Specific Reference to the DNBR of 1.30 Justification:

Each occurrence of "DNER is less than 1.30" (departure from nucleate boiling ratio) has been replaced with a generic term. "less than the limit value" because the DNBR is different for each unit and may change in the future if the fuel type changes, or if a different analytical method is used in the analysis.

This change does not have a material effect and has been made to

1 Attachment to TXX-92239

' Hay 29, 1992 Page 81 of 124 FSAR Page (At amended)

Dgscription preclude repetitive changes in the future.

The DNBR limit is listed in Technical Specification 3/4.2 for each unit.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 SER/SSER Impact: No 15,6-22, 24 See Page No(s):26 thru 35

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Assumptions, Initial Conditions and Results for the Large and Small Break Loss of Coolant Accidents Justification:

The Large and Small Break Loss of Coolar.t Accidents were analyzed differently for Unit 2.

The Large Break LOCA was analyzed using the approved 1981 ECCS evalua-tion model, The Small Break LOCA was analyzed using the Hay, 1985.NOTRUMP ECCS evaluation model.

The assumptions, initial conditions and results, which are different for Unit 2 have been added.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.01 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.6-32

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes to Peak Clad Temperature (PCT) Penalties and Final Limiting PCT for Unit 1 Large Break LOCA Justification:

An error in the ECCS calculation for Unit I resulted in a PCT penalty of 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F) which increased the total PCT penalty to 55 degrees F and the final limiting PCT to 2065.7 degrees F.

The 7.2 degree F penalty was for steam generator tube collapse due to concurrent seismic and LOCA loads.

TV Electric noti-fled the NRC that the total PCT penalty exceeded 50 degrees F, in accordance with 10CFR50.46, via letter TXX-91230 dated July 31, 1991, and provided a schedule for reanal:> sis.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 Related SSER Section: SSER23 15.3.8

~SER/SSER Impact: Yes The Large Break PCT is stated as 2058.5 degrees F.

15.6-32

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes to Peak Clad Temperature (PCT) Penalties and Final Limiting PCT-f or Unit 2 Large Break LOCA Justification:

Errors in the ECCS calculation for Unit 2 result in a total PCT penalty which exceeds 50 degrees Fahrenheit (F).

TV Electric notified the NRC that the tota' PCT penalty exceeded 50 degrees r, in accordance with 10CFR50.46, via letter TXX-91270 dated July 31,

Attachmont'to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 82 of 124 FSAll Page (at amended)

Description 1991. and provided a schedule for reanalysis.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.6-34

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes to Peak Clad Temperature (PCT) Penalties and Final Limiting PCT for Unit 1 Small Dreak LOCA Justification:

A correction to the ECCS calculation has been made to account for zirconium-water reaction, and safety in-jection and auxiliary feedwater flow adjustment.

The correction increases the total PCT penalty to 247 de-grees Fahrenheit (F) and the final limiting small break PCT to 2035 degrees F.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 Related SSER Section: SSER23 15.3.8 SER/53ER 1mpact: Yes The Small Break PCT is stated as 1895.5 degrees F.

15.6-49, 50 See Page No(s):51

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 References to the Reference List Justification:

The source materials for the Unit 2 analyses have been added to the reference list.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.02 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 15.6-1 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 06 Descript;on: (Addition)

Add Unit 2 Times to Sequences of Events for the Loss of Coolant Accidents and Steam Generator Tube Rupture Justification:

The Loss of Coolunt Accidents have been analyzed for Unit 2.

A new column has been added to Table IE.d-1 for the Ualt 2 sequence of events.

The times for the Steam Generator Tube Rupture event are identical to Unit 1 because the same analysis is used for both units.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.04 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 15.6-1 See Sheet No(s):5

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Table 15.6-1. Time Sequence of Events for Decrease in Reactor Coolant Inventory Justification:

Incorrect duplicate entries have been removed for the 3

r.

1 1

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 83 of 123 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description inch break.

Duplicate entries for Accumulator Injec-tion, Peak Clad Temperature, and Top of Core Covered, stated times which were the times for the 6 inch break.

Group: 3 FSAl, Change Request Number: 91-141.99 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.6-5

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Parameters and Results of Loss of Coolant Accidents to Table 15.6-5 Justification:

Table 15.6-5 summarizes the input parameters for the LOCA analysis.

The Large and Small Break LOCAs have been analyzed differently for Unit 2.

The input pa-rameters for Unit 2 have been added to the Table.

Note that footnotes "c" and "d" were inadvertently switched in the advance submittal of this change which was sent to the NRC on March 17, 1992.

The footnotes have been corrected.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Nunber: 91-141.45 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.6-5

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Table 15.6-5 Input Parameters Used in the LOCA Analysis Justification:

1he LOCA analyses are run at 3651 megawatts for the thermal hydraulic analyses and at 3411 megawatts to determine the cladding heatup.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.99 SER/SSER Impact: No I

Table 15.6-6 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Parameters and Results-for Large Break LOCA to Table 15.6-6 i

Justification:

Table 15.6-6 summarizes the input parameters and re-suits for the large Break LOCA analysis.

The large Break LOCA was analyzed differently for Unit 2.

The Unit 2 input parameters and results have been added to the Table.

Note that the "Results" title on sheet 2 of the Table has been corrected to " Unit 2."

The advance submittal of this change sent to the NRC on March 17, 1992 had this title incorrectly labeled as " Unit 1."

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.45 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239-May 29, 1992 Page 84 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description Table 15.6-7

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Small Break LOCA Results to Table 15.6-7 Justification:

Table 15.6-7 summarizes the results for the Small Break LOCA analysis.

The Small Break LOCA was analyzed for Unit 2 with a different methodology.

The Unit 2 re-sults have been added to Table 15.6-7.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.45 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-6

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figure for Small Break LOCA Computer Crde Justification:

The Unit 2 Small Break LOCA analysis uses the NOTRUMP code.

Figure 15.6-6 has been changed to reflect this difference from Unit 1.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-7, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

-The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-7, B

==

Description:==

(Editorit.)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit-1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added.for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55

_SER/SSER Impact-: No Figure 15.6-7, A Descriptisn: (Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure, A figure depicting th.. same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

. ' ~ +

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29.1992 Page 85 of 124 FSAR Page (Al angfided)

Descripl193 Figure 15.6-7, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit i figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 ' 1.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-8, A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-8, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-8, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-8, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" rigure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

-Attachment to-TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 86 of 124 FSAR Page Las immded)

DeJeription Figure 15.6-9, A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 j

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No 1

Ficure 15.6-9, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure j

Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Char.ge Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.5 9, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR thange Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 15.6-9, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-10. A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No i

Attachment to TXX-92239 May.29, 1992 Page 87 of 124 FSAR Page (es amended)

Description Figure 15.6-10, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figurc depicting the same piant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Grcup: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 10, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justificaticn:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the some plant parameters has been aaded for Unit 2, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 10. O

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been edded for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 11, A

==

Description:==

(Editorial).

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-11, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant-parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to'TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 88 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

-Description Figure 15.6-11. C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-11, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 12. A

==

Description:==

-(Editorial)

Changa " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added'for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-12. B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-12, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

l Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 89 of 124 FSAR Page (AA amended)

Description Figure 15.6-12, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

. Figure 15.6-13. A

==

Description:==

(Editorial) ohange " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justificatien:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15,6-13, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the sama as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been addti for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-13. C

==

Description:==

(Editorip')

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-13 D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure L

Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

' Attachment to TXX 92239-May 29, 1992 Page 90 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description Figure 15,6-14. A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same es the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR rhange Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

-Figure 15.6-14, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure, A figure depicting the same plant parameters t.as been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-14, C

==

Description:==

(Fditorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added fo Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-14, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-15, A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure ta a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The

..it 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 91-of 124 FSAR Page (n amended)

Descripl19D Figure 15.6-15. B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depict 4nn the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-15, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and

?"

Figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as tb Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-15. D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-16, A'

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Fi ure to a " Unit 1" Figure Jussification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has Deen added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-16, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 92 of 124 FSAR Page (As autridtd)

Deicrintion Figure 15.6-16 C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been addej for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141,55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-16, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-17, A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-17, 8

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-17, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for linit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No

' Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 93 of 124; FSAR Page-l (aj.Amendqd)

Degr_ipfion Figure 15.6-17 D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the sami as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-18, A Description; (Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figuia to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER tmpact: No Figure 15.6-18. B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change'" Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit i figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No 1

Figure 15.6-18, C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Fiqure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as_the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Croup: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure '15.6-18, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to-a " Unit 1" Figui e Justification:

The Unit 2 figure i', not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attachment to TXX 92239 Hay 29. 1992 o

Page 94 of 124 FSAR Page 4

(M #*tUdtd)

Ef1CI.lRLL93 Figure 15.6 19. A Jescription (Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to e " Unit 1" Figu e Justification:

ihe Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure, i

A figure depicting the same plant pa.ameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change ReqJest Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-19. D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

-Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-19. C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 19 D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to 1 " Unit 1" Figure

-Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is' not the sarau as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number-91 141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15;6-20. A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The. Unit 2 f':gure is not the same as the-Unit 1 figure.

A figure _ depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

caroup; 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141,55 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 95 of 124 FSAR page (M 9M!Lded)

Des tiplign Figure 15.6 20, B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depictirig the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-20. C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 1ER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 20, D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-21 A

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is net the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 21. B

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figuie depicting the same plaat parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Gr oup: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 96 of 124 FSAR Page (Al A*CJ1ded)

DMILIMion Figure 15.6-21 C

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Chr.nge " Unit 1 and 2" figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

lne Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the s me plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER impact: No

~

Figure 15.6 21. D

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

~

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 fSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER impact: ho Figure 15.6-22 Dt s s ri p',i c n. (ED Leria')

/

Change " Unit I and 2" figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 tigure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: [1 141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-23

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Jus ti f i cati on :

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-34

==

Description:==

(Editorial) i i

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as tha Onit 1 f4 Jure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 1

f Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 97 of 124 FSAR Page (M APtnded)

DigrJption Figure 15.6 35

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 36

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER' Impact: No figure 45.6 3/

Descriptica: ;E61iocial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 38

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to c "Jnit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

L Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No figure 15,6-39

==

Description:==

(Editorial) l Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure L

Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No i

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 98 of 124 FSAR Page (11 Am_tDAed)

(Leagjlption figure 15.6-40

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the saw.e as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change. Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i

figure 15.6 41

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

C.inge " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" figure Justificatien:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

4 A figure depict,ng the same plant parameters has been added for Unit..

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-42

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-43

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is -ot the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 l

SER/SSER Impact: No l.

Figure 15.6 44

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit I and 2" Figure to a " Unit-1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

A. figure depicting the same plant pararoeters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER Impact: No l

l

. +.. - -.

l Attachment to TXX 92239 i

Hay 29. 1992 Page 99 of 124 FSAR Page (Al AmtDdcd)

DescriptioD Figure 15.6-45

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit I figure.

A figure depict:ng the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.56 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-46

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justi a+1on:

o r*e is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

Tce W.

u A li; u e

-ti the same riaat parameters has been at 't;d t ar V

.2 3

Group: 1 FSAR Change i aquest Numbe;r: 91 141.55 SER/SSER Impitt: No F;gs:a 1E.6 47, ( A&E)

Jcstr4ptico- (Pe.v tiin) d Update Existing Safety injection Flow Rate Figures Justification:

The Safety "njection Flow Rate Figures for the large and Small Break LOCAs have been updated to account for plant changes to the Residual Heat Removal system.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-48

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Change " Unit 1 and 2" Figure to a " Unit 1" Figure Justification:

The Unit 2 figure is not the same as the Unit 1 figure.

'. figure depicting the same plant parameters has been added for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.55 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 49

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-49. A

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47

_ - =.. -. _. -. - -.. -. - - -

- ~ _ _

~

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 100 of 124 i

i FSAR Page

-(n omendcII)

Dessdplign i

SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6

Description:

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

i Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-51

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 15.6*51. A Description (Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 52

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-52, A

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Nuneber: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 53

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 15.6-54

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No l

i Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 101 of 124 FSAR Page (Al AMRadRd)

DRIGElptl9D figure 15.6 54. A

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141,47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-55

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification l

l Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i

-Figure 15.6-56 Descriptions (Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA i

Justification:

Group: 2 i

FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47

'SER/SSER 1mpact: No 1

Figure 15.6-57

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-58

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-59

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l~

Figure 15.6-60

==

Description:==

(Addition) l Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA L

Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No l

L l

l-

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 l

Page 102 of 124 i

FSAR Page (at amended)

Reicilplio_n Figure 15.6-61

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for large Dreak LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-62

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 8

Figure 15.6+63

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-64

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-65

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-66

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.17 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 67

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures f or large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: ?

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 103 of 124 TSAR Page (Al Amended)

Desfriplign Figure 15.6 68

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSLR Impact: No I

Figure 15.6-69

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-70

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-71

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 iER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-72

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 73

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6-74

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No

-~~.e

+

~

Attachmont to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 104 of 124 FSAR Page (Al A#1!Ldtd)

Des crip_ tion Figure 15.6 75

==

Description:==

(Addition)

A6d Unit 2 Figures fer Large Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 15.6-76

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break (OCA Justification:

Groupt-2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-77

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 78

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47-SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 79

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure'15.6-80

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

-Figure 15.6-81

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures f or Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No L.

A.cchmont to TXX 92239 hay 29, 1992 Page 105 of 144 FSAR Page (Al fmtfldtd)

OcicLil!(1on Figure 15.6*82

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA I

Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 83

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

L Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 84

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 85-

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.6 86

==

Description:==

. (Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2

-FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6 87

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures f or Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.6-88

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit. 2 Figures f or Small Break LOCA Justification:

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER Impact: No

~.

_ _. ~, -

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 106 of 124 FSAR Page (a1 amended)

Description I

i Figure 15.6 89

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 Figures for Small Break LOCA Justification:

Croup: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 141.47 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 15.7 2, 3

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes in the Source Terms Used for Calculating the Radiological Consequences of a Waste Gas Tank Rupture and Elimination of the Daily Requirement to Switch to a Different Waste Gas Tank Justification:

Westinghouse has revised the source terms which are used in calculating the consequences of a waste gas tank rupture.

Using the revised source terms, the dose at the exclusion-area boundary was recalculated.

The new dose of 0.25 rem is still within the 0.5 rem value stated in Branch Technical Position ETSB 11-5.

In addition, the methodology for switching the gas de-cay tanks has been changed. When an alcrm is received in the Control Room, the online tank is not necesarily isolated.

Instead, the alarm is addressed logically.

In some cases, the alarm could indicate a high activity level in the tank, in which case that tani would be isolated and another tank placed in service.

In other cases, the alarm could be the result of a normal evolution such as venting the Volume Control Tank, in which case the in-service tank may not be switched.

Additionally, when tanks are switched, the tank placed in service may not be the tank with the lowest curie content.

Instead, the tanks will be periodically rota-ted for surveillances, which will satisfy the need to equally distribute the gaseous activity among all of the tanks.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-639.1.

Related SER Section: 15.4.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The whole body dose at the exclusion area boundary and the requirement to swi'ch waste gas tanks is not consistent with the change.

Table:15.7-1 See Sheet No(s);2

==

Description:==

(Revision) i Changes in the Source Terms Used for Calculating the Radiological Consequences of a Waste Gas Tank Rupture Justification:

Westinghouse has' revised the source terms which are l

used in calculating the consequences of the postulated-tank rupture.

Using the revised source terms. the dose at the exclusion area boundary was recalculated.

The

,__ __ _...._._. -. -~.

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29 1992 Page 107 of 124 FSAR Page (al amended)

R m.tlp1 Lom new value of 0.25 rem is still within tne 0.5 rem value stated in Branch Technical Position ETSB 11 5.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-639.2 Related SER Section: 15.4.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The value for the whole body dose at the exclusion area boundary listed in the SER is not consistent with the new value.

Table 15.7-2 See Sheet No(s):1 and 2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Changes in the Source Terms Used for Calculating the Radiological Consequences of a Weste Gas Tank. Rupture and Elimination of the Daily Requirement to Switch to a Different Gas Decay Tank Justification:

Westinghouse has revised the source terms.which are used in calculating the consequences of the postulated tank rupture. With the exception of the Kryton 85 term, the source terms are all higher than originally estimated.

The radio iodines have been removed from the list of source terms, which is consistent with Dranch Technical Position ETSB 11-5.

In addition, the assumptions have been changed to state the online tank will be switched at regular intervals rather than every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Further analysis has shown that daily swit-ching of the tanks is not necessary for the doses from a tank rupture to be within the regulatory guidelines.

Switching the tanks less frequently will reduce the radiation exposure of the' plant operators.

Groups.3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 639.3 Related SER Section: 15.4.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The values for the source terms listed in the SER are not consistent with the new values.

17.1-25

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Deletes reference to a functional group called project management.

Justification:

This is an archaic-term which is no longer used at-

CPSES, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 645 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No-

. _ - _ _. ~ -,.

.. -... - ~

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29. 1992 Page 108 of 124 FSAR Page (a.] eended)

Ong_lp.t_i 93

-Figure 17.1 6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises figure to reflect the elimination of the Nuclear Operations Support organization and the positions of Director of Management Services and the Director of Engineering Administration.

Justification:

See justification provided for pages 13.1 5 and 13.1 14.

Group. 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 645.2 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The CPSES organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

17.2-3 Description (Revision)

Revises responsibilities of the Vice President.

Nuclear Operations to reflect deletion of the Nuclear Operations Support organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-5.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 17.2-4

==

Description:==

.(Revision)

Revises responsibilities of the Plant Manager to reflect deletion of the Nuclear Operations Support organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-5.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-645 Related-SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 17.2-7

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Justification:

Clarifies the responsibility of Nuclear Overview for emergency planning.

Group: 3 FSAR Change-Request Number: 92 645 Related SER Section: 17.2 SER/$$ER impact: No e

17.2-15

==

Description:==

.(Revision)

Revises responsibility of the Chief Engineer to reflect the deletion of the Manager. 0perations Support.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-5.

l

. _ _.. - =

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 109 of 124 FSAR Page (M ang_n_d.cd)

Dustip_ tion Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 645 Related SER Section: 17.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 17.2-34, 35

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove Inline Review of Noncorformance Reports by Nuclear Overview Department Justification:

Currently, independent inline review of nonconformances is performed by the Nuclear Overview group, This re-view is performed at the closure of the nonconform6nce document to independently determine whether the docu-mentation reflects completion of the corective action and that the form is properly completed.

This is not a technical review and is redundant of actions performed by the Manager in whose area of responsibility the nonconformance was identified.

An evaluation of the closure review process has concluded that the noncon--

formance process and adminsitrative controls, admints-tered by the cognizant manager, have been effective in appropriately correcting and documenting identified nonconformances.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-191.01 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 17.2-36 Description (Revision)

Re-assigns responsibility for development of procedures and instructions to implement the management requirements related to 0A records from the Vice President, Support Services to the Chief Engineer.

Justification:

Routine 0+gsnizational restructuring.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 645 i

Related SER Section: 17.2 l=

SER/SSER impact: No l

Figure 17,2-2

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises figure to reflect the elimination of the Nuclear Operations Support organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-5, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 645.2 Related SER Section: 13,1:

SSER22 13,1,2 l

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 110 of 124 FSAR page

(#1 ingnded)

Dticr_intion I

SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes 1

The CPSES organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

17A-2 Descriptions (0&R Incorporation)

Relocates information contained in the response to 0421.18 to the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 502 Related SER Section: 17.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 17A 1 See Sheet No(s):11, 33

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Adds the design requirements for the Process Sampling System tubing, fittings, valves and supports to item Number 8 in Table 17A-1.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 6.2 95.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-188.3 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 17A 1 See Sheet No(s):14

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Add Note 81 to List of Quality Assured Structures, Systems and Components Justification:

.The specific exception concerning the Steam Generator Blowdown piping in the Turbine Building has been added to Table 17A-1 via Note 81.

The quality assurance re-quirements for this piping will be the same as for any Class 5, Seismic Category !! piping except that the pi-sf ping is not-located in a Seismic Category I structure.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request humber: 91 201.04

'SER/SSER Impact: No

Table-27A 1 See Sheet No(s):16

-Description: (Clarification)

Clarify the. safety classification of the fuel Oil and Storage System components being-safety class 3-except as noted on Table 17A-1. Add Safety classification for the vacuum relief valves and flame arrestors as NHS.

Justification:

The Fuel 011 and Storage System components _is in conf-ormance with tbc ANSI N18.2 as endorted by NRC R.G 1.137 and ANSI N195. These components ara Safety Class

i Attachment to TXX*92239 May 29, 1992 Page 111 of 124 F5AR page (Al nMnded)

Rentipl[pn 3 except as noted on Table 17A-1 of the FSAR.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 603.3 Related SER Section: 9.S.4:

SSER24 9.5.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 17A-1 See Sheet No(s):19 and 60

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Remove Code Classification of Emergency Diesel Generator Exhaust Piping Justification:

The piping and supports for the Diesel Generator ex-

' haust piping. located inside the Diesel Genrator build-ing, were designed, analyzed, installed and inspected to the requirements of ASHE Section, including Code Case N 253 2.

Code case N 253-2 was oeveloped to pro-vide rules for elevated temperature service such as that found in the Diesel Generator exhaust.

The NRC approved use of this code caso for Comanche peak in 1988.

However, the Diesel Generator exhaust piping and supports were not Code stamped during installation and inspection.

Due to this lack of stamping, " Code Class 3" has been removed from Table 17A-1.

This declassifi-cation does not affect the Safety Classification or Seismic Category of this piping and supports.

Group:. 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 162 Related SER Section: 9.5.8 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER states that the exhaust system piping is Class 3, which has been corrected in this change.

Table 17 A 1 See Sheet No(s):60

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Add Note 81 to List of Quality Assured Structures,-

- Systems and Components Justification:

The specific exception concerning the Steam Generator Blowdown piping in the Turbine Building has been added to Table 17A 1 via Note 81.

The quality assurance re-quirements for this piping will be the same as for any Class 5, Seismic Category !! piping except that-the pi-ping is not located in a Seismic Category I structure.

Group: 1 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 201.055 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 010-0

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the response to 0010.4 and change the response to reference revised FSAR Section 9.2.2.3.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section q

t e Nev.

scm---Mi*iaug

,p.m,

.p

,m,wp, gy y

'ts'P'M W

r w

WS-"*"-

ems'"-

= = = ' *NNwfa D'F'Tf'M-Wm3 gm W4#WW 'mt-'Pa$

E'MTW*r STTT"YP

- * = * * ~MP+

p b TFF

_ ___ _._. _ _ _ _...__ _ _ _ _ _. _ _. _.m _ _ _ _.

..m Attachmant to TXX 92239 Hay L9. 1992 Page 112 of 124 FSAR Page (al emended)

Etscription for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 10.3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SiER Impact: No i

O&R 010 9

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds-note indicating that the response to this Q&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Also adds reference to FSAR text location containing information relating to turbine missile analysis.

Justification:

0010.5 requests a description of the turbine missile protection provided for the condensate storage tank.

The response indicates that none is provided and discusses the basis for that response.

Since this-response merely negates the original question, the specific discussion of the Condensate Storage Tank will not be incorporated into the FSAR text.

Instead a reference is provided to a general discussion of turbine missile analysis.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-011 Related SER Section: 3.5.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 010-16

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the response to 0010.9 and change the response to reference revised FSAR Section 3.4.3.

Justification:

-This is an editoria1' change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-13.1 Related SER Section: 3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 010-19

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporat ci,)

Delete the response to 0010.12 and change the response to reference revised FSAR Section 3.3.2.4 and 3.5.1.4.

Add the 0010.12 reference to the related FSAR pages.

Justification:

l This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section foradeletion when the updated FSAR is prepared, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-16.1 Related SER Section: 3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 1:

L

~..

- _,. ~. - -..,.

Attachmont to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 113 of 124 i

FSAR Page (M 5"10ded)

EnitjE11911 0&R 010 24

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0010.017 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-029 Related SEP Section: 3.S.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 010 25

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the response to 0010.18 and change the response to reference the FSAR Table 14.2 3, sheet 18.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-30 Related SER Section: 14.0 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 0&R 010 62

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to O&R 010,31 stating that the information contained in the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text (USAR) and includes references to the related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report (FPR) where the informatin is contained.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

The Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis described in the FPR did nct take credit for repair procedures to achieve hot standby conditions.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request NJmber: 92 39 Related SER Section: 9.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 010-66

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0010.034 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 042 Related SER Section: 3.6.2:

SSER22 3.6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 114 of 124 FSAR Page

( Al 1*t!HIRO E110.dAL1911 O&R Table 010.9-1 t

Sheet Wh!.s): Sheets 1 through 3 b,

ription: (0&R Incorporation)

Delete Table 0. 010.9-1 sheets 1 through 3 from the response to 0010.9 and relocate the table to FSAR Section 3.4 as new Table 3.4 1, sheets 1 through 3.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-13.2 Related SER Section: 3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 022 40

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete tne firt,t paragraph to the response of O&R 022.15.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR. Change Request Number: 92-70.1 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

.0&R 022 42

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the response to Q&R 022.17 and add a reference to revised FSAR Section 6.2.6.2.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-72.2 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 040-137

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0040.102 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

Q&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 L

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-173 L

Related SER Section: 10.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 040-179

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0040.134 and adds reference to the l

FSAR section where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

v Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 i

Page 115 of 124 FSAR Page (Al Amendgd)

Descr_iR119D 0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FGAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

The automatic turbine tester r.easuras valve closure times, a feature not required by the SRP, but can result in early warning of impending valve malfunctioning, thereby allowing valves to be tested less frequently.

The staff agreed in SER 10.2 and considered biweekly testing of the above valves to be acceptable in this Case.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 290 Related SER Section: 10.2.1

-SER/SSER Impact: No 1&R 040 180

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates response to 0&R 040.135 to the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Saftty Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-291 Related SER Section: 10.2 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 124 2

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes a portion of the response to 0124.1 and adds a reference to the FSAR text location where the updated information is located.

Also adds note indicating that items A, B, C and D would not be incorporated into the FSAR text for USAR, Justification:

L Relocation of 0&Rs is required for tb2 Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Informattor, contained in item F of the response is no longer current.

The updated information (which was accepted in SSER 22) is now i

referenced.

The response to items A. B C and D will not be incorporated into-the FSAR tert since they contain information which-is beyond the level of detail appropriate for that FSAR.section.

Also this information is no longer necessary since the initial

.NRC concern was resolved (SSER 22).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-330 Related SER Section: 10.2.2:

SSER22 10.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l

u;R 210-1

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this 0&R will not be incorporeted into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

By letter TXX-4471 dated Hay 2, 1985, TU Electric

3 Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 116 of 124 FSAR Page (31 ctrnded)

Ecscription requested the elimination of the requirement to postulate arbitrary intermediate pipe breaks in the CPSES design.

In support of the evaluation of this i

request the NRC issued the 210 series of questions.

Questions 1, 2, 3, 4. 9 and 10 were exclusively directed to this issue.

Subsequently, the NRC issued Generic letter 87-11 which generically removed the requirement to postulate arbitrary intermediate breaks, with a specific exception related to environmental l

qualification.

As a result the issue became moot and was accepted in SSER 21.

The subject responses i

contain such a level of detai? on this issue that inclusion into the FSAR (as part of the 0&R relocation) is inappropriate.

FSAR Section 3.0D was previously revised to remove reference to the arbitrary intermediate breaks.

Restoration of that information into that FSAR section would be inappropriate.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-574 Related SSER Section: SSER21 3.6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 210-2

==

Description:==

(u&R Incorporation)

Adds note' indicating that the response to '.R210.002 will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety I

Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

See justification provided for O&R page 210 1.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-575 Related SSER Section: SSER21 3.6.2 SER/SSER Impact: 'No 0&R 210-3

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to 0&R210.003 will not be incorporateu into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR)..

Justification:

L See justification provided for Q&R page 210-1.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 576

.Related SSER Section: SSER21 3.6,2 SER/SSER Impacti No O&R 210-5

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to 0&R210.004 will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justi f.i ca ti on:

See justification provided for O&R page 210-1.

. Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-577

.--,.-~<.,-,-r,

,e

,y2,-m.,,-,

.u.,,-,-,.<,,,,-_,n,yem w

-v,+,,,,,....,.

,m--

,--r rr,, -.,,,, -,,,,

-,,,r--

-,~y,,+

o-%7,rm,,

y-w,,,

_ -.~,

_m_._

. tachment to TXX+92239

'.oy 29. 1992 Page 117 of 124 FSAR Page (n amended) pgscriplign Related SSER Section: SSER21 3.6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 210-6

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0210.005 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:-

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR),

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 579 Related SER Section: 10,4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 210-8

==

Description:==

(0&R incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to Q&R210.006 will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR),

Also adds reference to FSAR text location containing the feedwater/SG waterhammer test requirement.

Justification:

The response to the 0210.6 merely explains why a separate feedwater waterhammer test was not required by referencing the basis for a single auxiliary feedwater/

main feedwater waterhammer test.

The NRC staff accepted this response in SSER 21.

Responses related to why equipment / analyses / tests /etc.

are not required are not appropriate for inclusion into FSAR text.

Grouca 4 FSA; Change Request Number: 92 578 Related SER Section: 10,4.7; SSER21 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 210-10

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this 0&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justi fi cation:

The response to 0210.7 is specific to information relating.to plant procedures for the then ongoing (but now hist'orical) piping stress reanalysis being performed by Stone &LWebster. Since this information is specific to a subject which is now historical and no longer relevant, it is not appropriate for inclusion into the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-580 SER/SSER Impact: No

.~

-- -.-_- - - - - - - ~. - - - - _ - -. ~. -. - -

Attachment to TXX 92239 I

May 29, 1992 Page 118 of 124 FSAR Page (n amended)

DngrjptLos O&R 210 11

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0210.008 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-581 i

Related SER Sections 3.6.2; SSER22 3.6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Q&R 210-13

==

Description:==

(OSR incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to 0&R210.009 will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

See_ justification provided for 0&R page 210 1, Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 582 Related SSER Section:.SSER21 3.6.2 SF.R/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 210 14

==

Description:==

(Q&R' Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to 0&R210.010 will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justificationt See justification provided for O&R page 210-1.

Group:'4 FSAR Change Request Numbers.92-583 Related SSER Section: SSER21 3.6.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i

Q&R 212-154.

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to 0212.089 will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

The response only corrects an NRC misinterpretation of two unrelated steam pressure drops in two FSAR

-sections.

Group: 4 FSAR-Change Request Number: 92-055 SER/SSER Impact No 0&R 212 212

==

Description:==

(0&D !.ucesoration)

Deletes resp 9nsa ?.o QE12.119 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

Q&R relocation is-being performed to prepare the FSAR y

m.

em-.~,-,__

_--o,----

_. - _ ~. - - - _. - _

. - - -. -. - -- - ~ -. -

1 Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29. 1992 Page 119 of 124 FSAR Page (as amended)

Description for the Updated Safety Analysis Pe--

.AR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-206 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 331-1. 2 See Page No(s):03 thru 10

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes outdated information and adds note indicating that other information will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Rer. ort (USAR).

Also adds reference to FSAR text location containing l

the current relevant information.

Justification:

The information requested related to ALARA design review process. Specifically: Item a. requested the title of individuals responsible for ALARA design review.

That information is now deleted since the information is outdated and no longer relevant. A reference is provided to existing FSAR text which contains current relevant information.

Item b. requested information related to radiation protection personnel involved the design reviews.

The existing response is deleted because it is dated and no longer relevant.

A reference is provided to FSAR text relating to personnel involved in ALAR:1 design review.

Item c requests procedures for assuring adequate ALARA reviews.

This response is also dated and is deleted.

A reference is provided to FSAR text which provides the current related information.

Item d requt-ts examples of dose reducing changes resulting from ALARA design reviews.

A reference is provided to the text section where one of the examples mentioned is listed. The remaining exsmples will not be relocated to the FS/R text since the information is more detailed than is necessary for this section. The specific examples provided are only part of the changes made as a result of the radiation protection design reviews.

The referenced FSAR Section (12.1.2) provides the desiga considerations for ensuring ALARA occupational exposures.

Group:-4 FSAR Change Request-Number: 92-282 Related SER Section: 12.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 331-12

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete response to 0&R 331.3 and add reference to-FSAR Sections 12.4.3 and 12.4.4.2.

Justification:

L This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section u

~.

_,. _, ~

l l

Attachment to TXX 92239 l

May 29, 1992 Page 120 of 124 FSAR page (31 emended)

Description for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 204.1 Related SER Section: 12.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 4 21-19

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0421.018 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the 4

response is located.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-502 Related SER Section: 17.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 422 9

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this 0&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

The information provided in this response was provided as a point-in-time description of individual position assignments with resumes.

It was only current as of Amendment 76 and was not expected to be maintained current.

The information will therefore not be added to the FSAR text.

Individuals in positions where resumes are required to be maintained are located E

in Appendix 13.1A.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-256 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 422-10

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicatino that the response to this 0&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

The information provided in this response was provided as a point-in-time discussion of engineering assignments.

The response provided only general information and is not appropriate for inclusion into the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-461 Related SER Section: 13.1 4

SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX 92239 May 29, 1992 Page 12) of 124 FSAR Page (Al evended)

Description O&R 422 11 Descriptio : (0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this 0&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

The information provided in this response was provided as a point-in time discussion of engineering assignments.

The response provided only general information and is not appropriate for inclusion into the FSAR text.

Group:-4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-552 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i

0&R 422 12

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

[

Deletes response to 0422.005 and adds reference to the FSAR secti.ons where the current information requested by the NRC question is located.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

The maintenance organization has been revised since tne response was provided.

The updated organizational responsibliities are now referenced.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 008 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Inpoct: No 0&R 422-17

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to item 2 of 0&R 422.9 will not be incorporated into the Updated

. Safety Analysis Report.(USAR),

Justification:

Item 2 response updated a previously provided esponse indicating that' organizational changes had eliminattd the position of Chemistry and Health Physics Engineer.

The response referenced an FSAR text sectica where the cualification requirements for the Radiation

.rotection Manager-(the subject of the NRC's concern in this Q&R) are met.,Since this information is-already in the FSAR text.^the-remaining clarifying portion of the-response to item need not be incorporated.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Regaest Number: 92-015 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No a.-

-- ~

~

Attachment to TXX 92239 May-29, 1992 fage 122 of 124 FSAR Page (31 amended)-

p_qsSdplion 0&R 422-19

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note. indicating that the response to this.0&R will not be incorporated into t!.e Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification The inforniat 'on provided in this response was provided as a point-in-time discussion of licenced operator manning levels.

The response indicated that the information was current as of Amendment 76 and would not be updated unless specifically requested.

The response will therefore not be included in the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Ch nge Request Number: 92-527 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&' 422-20

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this 0&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

0&Rs 422.11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 relate to a 1983 (now historical) submittal concerning the CPSES Procedures Generation P6ckege (PGP). The information provided in the submittal was part of an ongoing NRC review under THI I.C.1 (and later unde I,0.1).

The review involved multiple submittals and the information contained was referenced in SSERS 6, 12 and finally closed in SSER 22.

Due to the ongoing.and preliminary nature of the information provided in the 1983 submittal (the subject of the 0&Rs) it is not suitable for incorpocation into the FSAR text for the-Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 492 Related SER Section: 22:

SSER22 22

-SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 422-23 Descrirtion: (0&R Incorporation).

Adds note indicating that the response to this Q&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

See justification provided for page 422-20.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-569 Related SER Section: 22:

SSER22 22 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92239 May 29, 1992 Page 123 of 124 FSAR Page

@ amended)

D_cs_crintion Q&R 422-24

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this Q&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAP)

Justification:

See justification provided for page 20.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-570 Related SER Section: 22:

SSER22 22 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 422-26

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this Q&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

See jusi. :fication provided for page 422-20.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-571 Related SER Section: 22:

SSER22 22 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 422-28

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note indicating that the response to this O&R will not be incorporated into the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Justification:

See justification provided for page 422-20.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-572 Relatcd SER Section: 22:

SSER22 22 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 441-1

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0441.001 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

Q&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-567 Related SER Sectien: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 441-2

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to G441.002 and adds reference to the g4 FSAR section where the information contained in the response has been rel(cated.

I __ _- _ _ __

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis R port (USAR).

- Attachment to TXX-92239 Hay 29.'1992 Page 124 of 124 FSAR Page (Al 3 mended) pf g rintian Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-553 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R'441-3

==

Description:==

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0441.003 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the response has been relocated.

J";t!fication:

CLR relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR

.for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-554 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No

- 0&R 441-4

==

Description:==

_ 0&R Incorporation)

(

Deletes response to 0441.004 and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

OsR relocation is being perturmed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-555 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 4

?

a

-

TXX-9223, Forwards line-by-line Descriptions of Changes in Amend 85 to FSAR

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Navigation menu

TXX-9223, Forwards line-by-line Descriptions of Changes in Amend 85 to FSAR

Text

SUBJECT:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Navigation menu

Search