Search results

Washington, D. C. 20545 , j j AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO THE V/ M 'Ib' ' APPLICATION FOR A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR THE HANFORD NO. 2 REACTOR Washington Public

1984 amendments to the two Midland construction permits. This application supersedes the application for amendment to Construction Permit No CPPR-82 filed

_ . . . . . . . _ ,. e CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY APPLICATION FOR REACTOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND OPERATING LICENSE DOCKET NO 50-329 DOCKET NO 50-330 AMENDMENT

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY APPLICATION FOR REACTOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND OPERATING LICENSE DOCKET NO 50-329 DOCKET NO 50-330 AM2IGIENT NO 73 Enclosed herewith

issued before November 30, 1984. Therefore, in order to ensure that the carrent construction permit does not expire prematurely, we request that our November

transmitting Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-99 and CPPR-100 (b): R. S. Boyd letter to B. Lee, Jr. dated ' May 31, 1978 transmitting extension to Construction Permit

it difficult to raise the huge sums needed on reasonable teres to =aintain the previous construction schedule. Delaying the construction schedule for McGuire

Station Units 1 and 2, which are under construction pursucnt to Constructica Permit Nc - CFPR-83 and -84. This letter is to . provide additicnal inforc.r h n

Unit 2 Construction Permit CPPR-127 be amended to reflect the above partial exemption upon its issuance. Paragraph 3 of the Construction Permit states

completion of construction. That amendment request sought an extension to June 1,1986 for the latest construction completion date. ) Subsequent to the filing

amends its above-numbered application by submitting herewith Amendment No. 6. This amendment eets'forth further details with regard to the earthquake design

Additional time to complete the facility is also necessary to correct matters reported to the NRC (e.g., pursuantj [ to 10 C.F.R. S50.55(e)) and to be responsive

reliable opsration. TUGC0 proposes to replace the automatic (hydraulic) actuators with manual operators in order to eliminate the potential for problems

Amendment of Construction Permit No. CPPR-137 In. letter U-0286, August. 31, 1981,-I111nois Power requested an. extension of Construction Permit CPPR-137 and

dual requirement of flexibility to resist relative motions corresponding to a fault motion of up to 3 feet, and strength to resist the forces accompanying

appeals (two to the NRC Appeal Board and one to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. 4 Circuit) relating to the request to extend the construction completion

FES-CP identified the following four major impacts and effects due to construction: a. Construction-related activities on the site were expected to disturb

CPPR-160, and CPPR-161. Attached please find CP&L's application to amend the SHNPP Construction Permits to reflect the inclusion of North Carolina Municipal

hereby requests that Construction Permit (CP) Nos. CPPR-128 and CPPR-129 be amended to reflect the above stated partial exemption to GDC-4. Enclosed in accordance

that paragraph 3.C of the Construction Permit be revised to read as follows: This construction permit authorizes the applicant to construct the facility described