Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | Title | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|
ML20202D230 | 24 November 1997 | Comment Opposing Proposed Change to 10CFR50.55a(h) to Incorporate Requirements of IEEE Std 603-1991,effective 980101 | Backfit |
ML17309A616 | 19 June 1997 | Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. | Shutdown Margin Backfit |
ML17263A953 | 28 February 1995 | Comments on Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 Re Reduction in Seismic Hazard to Majority of Us NPP | |
ML20077M807 | 3 January 1995 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors | Time to boil |
ML20059F681 | 28 December 1993 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Clear Definition of Commerical Grade Items | |
ML20091Q866 | 31 January 1992 | Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting | Unanalyzed Condition Preplanned Activity |
ML17309A471 | 29 January 1992 | Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73. | Safe Shutdown Unanalyzed Condition Time of Discovery Packing leak Ultimate heat sink Grab sample Stroke time Hydrostatic Condition Adverse to Quality Missed surveillance Integrated leak rate test Earthquake Fuel cladding Fatality Unidentified leakage Overspeed trip Water hammer |
ML17262A231 | 24 October 1990 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS | |
ML17262A211 | 12 October 1990 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal | |
ML20245K878 | 25 April 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Urges NRC to Consider Allowing Sufficient Time to Assess Impact of Current Maint Upgrade Efforts at Plant | |
ML20235V664 | 1 March 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Proposed Rule May Be Detrimental to Safety by Discouraging Potentially Superior Maint Practices | Backfit |
ML20206M786 | 21 November 1988 | Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Re Substance Abuse.Urges Commission to Adopt Suggested Specific Changes Indicated by NUMARC Comments | Fitness for Duty |
ML20154H457 | 30 March 1988 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Alternative Method for Leakage Rate Testing.Suggests That Rulemaking Should Simply Establish Acceptability of Mass Point Method & Allow Analysis of Data to Determine Length of Testing |