Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
ML20212K87130 September 1999Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirements for Noncombustible Fire Barriers Penetration Seal MatlsFire Barrier
ULNRC-04117, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.7322 September 1999Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.73
ML20217M20919 March 1998Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds Amended Requirements. NRC Justification for Avoiding Backfit Analysis,Nonstantial.Backfit Analysis,As Required by Law as Mandatory for Proposed Rule ChangesStroke time
Nondestructive Examination
Through-Wall Leak
Backfit
ML20148N05119 June 1997Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems
ML20140G1696 June 1997Requests Extension of Comment Period Expiration Date from 970619 to 970719,for Comments on Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20077E9042 December 1994Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re TS Improvements. Advises That PSA Portion of Fourth Criterion Should Be Clarified to Include Only Those Equipment Items Important to risk-significant Sequences as Defined in GL 88-20,App 2
ML20071L19521 July 1994Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Urges NRC to Revise Scope of 10CFR26 to Limit Random Drug & Alcohol Testing to Only Workers Who Have Unescorted Access to Vital Areas at NPP
ML20065D38522 March 1994Comment on Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Systems, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73
ML20113H42823 July 1992Comment Commending Proposed Suppl One to GL 83-28 4.2.3 & 4.2.4 Closing All GL 83-28 Actions for Callaway But Staff Conclusion Should Be Expanded
ML20101P40926 June 1992Comment Supporting low-level Radwaste After Treatment to Reduce Volume & Represents Safest,Most Cost Effective Solution
ML20091F9502 December 1991Submits Comments Opposing Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73. Licensee Feels That Changes to Intial NUREG-1022 Increases Util Expenses W/O Improving Public Health & SafetySafe Shutdown
Unanalyzed Condition
Time of Discovery
Missed surveillance
Fuel cladding
ML20058D27415 October 1990Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License RenewalLicense Renewal
ML20058N9891 August 1990Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40 & 70, Notifications of Incidents. Language of Rule Should Be Clarified by Referring to Applicable Reporting Requirements of 10CFR50.72 & 73 for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20063Q1776 July 1990Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to Fsar.Revs Should Be Driven by Circumstances Rather than by Arbitrary Time Schedule
ML20235V93027 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NUMARC Comments.Major Concern Is Lack of Demonstrated Need for Rule Since Most Utils Already Have Effective Maint ProgramsBackfit
ML20235T79020 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Establishment of Programs for Operators to Earn Degress Would Be Expensive
ML20235T70117 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Which Require Degrees of Senior Operators & Shift Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Contribute to Lower Morale Among Reactor Operators
ML20195J31925 November 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Policy of Yearly Testing & Testing for Cause,Backed Up by Training for Drug Prevention SupportedFitness for Duty
ML20195E85628 October 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Renewal of LicensesBackfit