Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | Title | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|
ML20207E005 | 2 March 1999 | Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl | Missed surveillance Fire Protection Program |
ML20236H938 | 30 June 1998 | Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl | Safe Shutdown Half scram Foreign Material Exclusion |
ML20198P300 | 4 November 1997 | Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs | Safe Shutdown Temporary Modification |
ML20141K380 | 27 May 1997 | Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities (Effective Immediately) for Dr Baudino for Period of Five Years | |
ML20080A608 | 24 October 1994 | Refers to Pierce Actions Re Util Failure to Provide Adequate Training or Guidance Concerning Applicability of Doa 300-12 While Expert Present Directing Control Rod Movements | |
ML20070B008 | 20 June 1994 | Response to Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities.* Informs That Order Will Have Negative Impact on Health & Safety of Public | |
ML20059C235 | 17 December 1993 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication | |
ML20245J019 | 14 April 1989 | Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20235T966 | 1 March 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Will Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators | |
ML20235T825 | 28 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rules Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety | |
ML20235T870 | 28 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rule Will Cause Career Stagnation & Animosity Among Operators | |
ML20235S824 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Proposed Rule Alternatives Would Reduce to Nothing Reactor Operators Advancing to Senior Operator | |
ML20235T155 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Education & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternative Provides No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Will Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators | |
ML20235T123 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators | |
ML20235S979 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Eventually Reduce to Nothing Reactor Operators Advancing to Senior Operator | |
ML20235S837 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20235T838 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20235T136 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternative Provides No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Will Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators | |
ML20235T795 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Both Alternatives Do Not Provide Enhancement of Reactor Safety | |
ML20235T704 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20235T091 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators | |
ML20235T046 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Reduce Number of Reactor Operators Advancing to Senior Operator to Nothing | |
ML20235S954 | 22 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators | |
ML20205T089 | 28 October 1988 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Proposed Rule Unnecessary as Utils Have Effective Fitness for Duty Program | Fitness for Duty |
ML20205N094 | 24 October 1988 | Comments on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-50 Re Authorization of Reactor Licensees to Depart from License Conditions & Tech Specs in Emergency Situations.Young Criticism of Inerting Practices at Plant W/O Credence | |
ML20155A659 | 3 September 1988 | Comment Supporting Petition to Rescind Paragraphs (X)(Y) of Section 10CFR50.54 Re Cases of Hazardous Practices Including Util Authorizing Senior Operator to Turn Off Safety Sys in Emergency Before Sys Has Finished Job | |
ML20247N753 | 28 July 1988 | Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons | |
ML20207T235 | 16 February 1987 | Endorsement 16 to Maelu Policy MF-114 | |
ML20207T228 | 28 January 1987 | Endorsement 21 to Nelia Policy NF-277 | |
ML20213D350 | 11 August 1986 | Endorsement 95 to Nelia Policy NF-187 | |
ML20213D349 | 11 August 1986 | Endorsement 94 to Nelia Policy NF-187 | |
ML20213D346 | 11 August 1986 | Endorsement 78 to Maelu Policy MF-54 | |
ML20213D342 | 11 August 1986 | Endorsement 79 to Maelu Policy MF-54 | |
ML20213D351 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 179 to Nelia Policy NF-43 | |
ML20213D352 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 153 to Maelu Policy MF-22 | |
ML20213D359 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 154 to Maelu Policy MF-22 | |
ML20213D368 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 73 to Maelu Policy MF-64 | |
ML20213D379 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 178 to Nelia Policy NF-43 | |
ML20213D376 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 84 to Nelia Policy NF-201 | |
ML20213D369 | 8 August 1986 | Endorsement 72 to Maelu Policy MF-64 | |
ML20063M306 | 1 September 1982 | Response Opposing Reopening of Record Re Comm Ed Use of 9-ton Auxiliary Hook of Main Overhead Crane Sys During 1981 Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Incident Not Relevant to Proceeding.Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence | |
ML20063A255 | 18 August 1982 | Response to ASLB 820728 Order.Requests Leave to Withdraw Application W/O Prejudice.Need for Transshipment in near- Term Reduced Due to Approval of Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Certificate of Svc Encl | |
ML20055B452 | 20 July 1982 | Transcript of 820720 Hearing in Bethesda,Md Re Spent Fuel Pool Mods.Pp 1,192-1,284 | Safe Shutdown Safe Shutdown Earthquake Design basis earthquake Earthquake |
ML20055A668 | 14 July 1982 | Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl | |
ML20054L937 | 8 July 1982 | Memorandum in Response to Applicant Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Notice of Hearing Re Issue of Whether Spent Fuel Pool Floor Can Withstand Loads Imposed by New High Density Fuel Racks During Seismic Event | |
ML20054K651 | 1 July 1982 | Response Supporting Applicant 820616 Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Notice of Hearing.Aslb Should Render Final Decision on Basis of Supplemental SER & ASLB Former Findings.Certificate of Svc Encl | Earthquake |
ML20054L959 | 1 July 1982 | Testimony of Oo Rothberg & G Harstead.Spent Fuel Pool Expansion for Full 33 Rack Installation Is Acceptable.Spent Fuel Pool Floor Can Withstand Impact If All 33 Racks Tip During Seismic Event | Earthquake |
ML20054G005 | 16 June 1982 | Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Hearing Scheduled for 820713 by ASLB 820609 Notice of Hearing. Further Evidentiary Sessions Unnecessary & Improper.Final Decision Proper.Certificate of Svc Encl | |
ML20054F539 | 9 June 1982 | Notice of 820713 Hearing in Bethesda,Md,To Continue to 0714 If Necessary.Evidence Relevant to Issue of Whether Spent Fuel Pool Floors Can Withstand Loads Which Could Be Imposed by New Fuel Racks During Seismic Event Will Be Taken | |
ML20054F715 | 7 June 1982 | Testimony of DB Davidoff & LB Czech on Commission Questions 3 & 4.NY State Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan Discussed.Certificate of Svc Encl |