SBK-L-06176, Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report

Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report

ML062490495
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	08/31/2006
From:	St.Pierre G Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SBK-L-06176
Download: ML062490495 (15)

Text

FPL Energy Seabrook Station FPL Energy P.O. Box300 Seabrook, NH 03874 Seabrook Station (603) 773-7000 August 31, 2006 Docket No. 50-443 SBK-L-06176 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Seabrook Station Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.71(d), Enclosure 1 contains the FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report. This report includes data from January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006.

Enclosure 2 contains revised Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty Reports, beginning with the purchase of Seabrook Station by Florida Power and Light in November 2002, and includes the five reporting periods from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2004. An internal audit in January 2006 identified that For Cause tests were overstated. Dilute samples were typically recorded as For Cause when in actuality they do not constitute For Cause tests as discussed in 10 CFR 26.24(a)(3).

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed report, please contact Mr. James M.

Peschel, Regulatory Programs Manager at (603) 773-7194.

Very truly yours, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Gene St. Pierre Site Vice President cc: S. J. Collins, NRC Region I Administrator G. E. Miller, NRC Project Manager G. T. Dentel, NRC Senior Resident Inspector an FPL Group company

ENCLOSURE 1 SBK-L-06176 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 FPL Enemy - SeabrookSt 06/30/2006 Company Six (6) Month Ending Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 /

Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 /

Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) .04% /

LICENSEE LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM TESTING LICENSEE TEMPORARY CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR RESULTS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL Average Number with Unescorted Access 646 0 212 178 TOTAL: 1036 CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE Pre-Access 108 0 0 0 0 0 106 3 TOTAL: 214 1

Post 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 For Accident Cause 3 Observed 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Behavior Random 195 0 0 0 64 0 41 0 TOTAL: 300 Follow-up 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 TOTAL: 12 Other 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: 4 TOTAL 534 317 0 0 0 65 0 152 3

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 6 Month Report Ending: 0613012006 CATEGORY: Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol Refusal to Test Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Licensee Temporary Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long-Term Contractors 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short-Term Contractors 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBK TOTAL 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 tests in the "Other" category were for no-temp, single specimens sent to the lab. All had an observed retest.

FFD Performance Data ReviewlComments:

1. Were any programmatic weaknesses identified: No

2. What management actions have been taken or initiated? If any, explain: Not Applicable

3. Notate any specimens that were adulterated and substance detected: None

4. 2006 Percent of Random Population Tested: 28.8% for the period of 1/1/2006 through 06/30/2006

ENCLOSURE 2 SBK-L-06176 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 FPL Enermy - Seabrook December 31, 2004 (Revised)

Company Six (6) Month Ending Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)

Cutoffs: ScreenlConfirmation (ng/ml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 /

Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 I Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) .04% /

TESTING LICENSEE LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM RESULTS EMPLOYEES CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL Average Number with Unescorted Access 644 0 487 TOTAL:

CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE Pre-Access 14 1 0 0 224 1 TOTAL:

For Post 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cause Accident TOTAL: Observed 0 0 0 0 19 3 Behavior Random 169 0 0 0 125 5 TOTAL:

Follow-up 21 0 0 0 10 0 TOTAL:

Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 205 1 0 0 378 9

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 6 Month Report Ending: December 31. 2004 Refusal CATEGORY: Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol tofTst to Test Licensee Employees 1 1 Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors 4 5 TOTAL 4 1 0 0 0 5 0 Total

__ ___ ___ __ I ___________ _________ __________ 1 FFD Performance Data ReviewlComments:

1. Were any programmatic weaknesses identified: An internal audit in January, 2006 identified that For Cause tests were overstated. Dilute samples were typically recorded as For Cause when in actuality they were not.

2. What management actions have been taken or initiated? If any, explain: Reviewed diluted and for cause tests since FPL became owners (November 1.

2002) and resubmitting the numbers to the NRC.

3. Notate any specimens that were adulterated and substance detected: No changes from original.

4. 2004 Percent of Random Population Tested: No changes from original

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 FPL Energy - Seabrook June 30, 2004 (Revised)

Company Six (6) Month Ending Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)

Cutoffs: ScreenlConfirmation (ng/ml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50115 Amphetamines 1000/500 Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 /

Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) .04% I TESTING LICENSEE LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM RESULTS EMPLOYEES CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL Average Number with Unescorted Access 643 0 441 TOTAL:

CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE Pre-Access 23 2 0 0 244 6 TOTAL:

For Post 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cause Accident TOTAL: Observed 1 1 0 0 8 3 Behavior Random 178 0 0 0 110 0 TOTAL:

Follow-up 36 0 0 0 7 0 TOTAL:

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 3 0 0 367 9 TOTAL

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 6 Month Report Ending: June 30, 2004 Refusal CATEGORY: Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol tofTst to Test Licensee Employees 2 Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors 5 2 2 1 TOTAL 7 2 0 0 0 3 I Total

______________ ________I

________I_____ I________ 13 FFD Performance Data Review/Comments:

1. Were any programmatic weaknesses identified: An internal audit in January, 2006 identified that For Cause tests were overstated. Dilute samples were typically recorded as For Cause when in actuality they were not.

2. What management actions have been taken or initiated? If any, explain: Reviewed diluted and for cause tests since FPL became owners (November 1.

2002) and resubmitting the numbers to the NRC.

3. Notate any specimens that were adulterated and substance detected: No changes from original.

4. 2004 Percent of Random Population Tested: No changes from original

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 FPL Enerov - Seabrook December 31, 2003 (Revised)

Company Six (6) Month Ending Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais ___ (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) Appendix Ato 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 /

Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 /

Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) .04% I TESTING LICENSEE LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM RESULTS EMPLOYEES CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL Average Number with Unescorted Access 729 0 428 TOTAL:

CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE Pre-Access 14 0 0 0 904 13 TOTAL:

For Post 0 0 0 0 2 0 Cause Accident TOTAL: Observed 0 0 0 0 12 7 Behavior Random 198 2 0 0 140 0 TOTAL:

Follow-up 54 0 0 0 6 0 TOTAL:

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 266 2 0 0 1064 20

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 6 Month Report Ending: December 31, 2003 FFD Performance Data Review/Comments:

1. Were any programmatic weaknesses identified: An internal audit in January, 2006 identified that For Cause tests were overstated. Dilute samples were typically recorded as For Cause when in actuality they were not.

2. What management actions have been taken or initiated? If any, explain: Reviewed diluted and for cause tests since FPL became owners (November 1.

2002) and resubmitting the numbers to the NRC.

3. Notate any specimens that were adulterated and substance detected: No changes from original.

4. 2003 Percent of Random Population Tested: No changes from original

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 FPL Energy - Seabrook June 30, 2003 (Revised)

Company Six (6) Month Ending Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 /

Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 /

Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) .04% /

TESTING LICENSEE LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM RESULTS EMPLOYEES CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL Average Number with Unescorted Access 730 0 263 TOTAL:

CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE Pre-Access 21 1 0 0 149 1 TOTAL:

For Post 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cause Accident TOTAL: Observed 1 0 0 0 2 0 Behavior Random 190 1 0 0 64 TOTAL:

Follow-up 65 1 0 0 0 0 TOTAL:

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 277 3 0 0 216 1 TOTAL

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 6 Month Report Ending: June 30, 2003 Refusal CATEGORY: Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol tofTst to Test Licensee Employees I Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors TOTAL 2 I 0 0 0 I 0 Total

_______ ____I________I II____ ____ 4 FFD Performance Data ReviewlComments:

1. Were any programmatic weaknesses identified: An internal audit in January, 2006 identified that For Cause tests were overstated. Dilute samples were typically recorded as For Cause when in actuality they were not.

2. What management actions have been taken or initiated? If any, explain: Reviewed diluted and for cause tests since FPL became owners (November 1.

2002) and resubmitting the numbers to the NRC.

3. Notate any specimens that were adulterated and substance detected:. No chances from original.

4. 2003 Percent of Random Population Tested: No changes from original

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 FPL Energy - Seabrook December 31. 2002 Revised)

Company Six (6) Month Ending Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 /

Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 /

Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) .04% /

TESTING LICENSEE LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM RESULTS EMPLOYEES CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL Average Number with Unescorted Access 797 1 474 TOTAL:

CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE Pre-Access 8 0 0 0 97 1 TOTAL:

For Post 0 0 0 0 1 0 Cause Accident TOTAL: Observed 3 1 0 0 3 0 Behavior Random 213 2 0 0 79 1 TOTAL:

Follow-up 58 0 0 0 1 0 TOTAL:

Other 0 0 0 0 2 0 282 3 0 0 182 2 TOTAL

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10 CFR 26 6 Month Report Ending: December 31, 2002 Refusal CATEGORY: Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol tofTst to Test Licensee Employees 2 Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors 2 TOTAL 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 Total

_______I____ I____

_ ___ ___ _____ ____ 5 FFD Performance Data ReviewlComments:

1. Were any programmatic weaknesses identified: An internal audit in January, 2006 identified that For Cause tests were overstated. Dilute samples were typically recorded as For Cause when in actuality they were not.

2. What management actions have been taken or initiated? If any, explain: Reviewed diluted and for cause tests since FPL became owners (November 1.

2002) and resubmitting the numbers to the NRC.

3. Notate any specimens that were adulterated and substance detected: No changes from original.

4. 2002 Percent of Random Population Tested: No chanaes from original