Text

Core Spray/Auto Depress'N System Relay Logic Panel
	ML13120A187
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	10/10/2012
From:	Stephen Baker, Etre M; Exelon Generation Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	RS-12-177, RA-13-022, RS-13-065 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev 1
	Download: ML13120A187 (225)
	v • d • e

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: *-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-87

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-ER-18A Rev 1 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-88

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ER1 8A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Photos I_

MG 0907 MG_0908 MG_0910 C-89

12Q0O108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 14 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-90

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-FN-56-0004 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-91

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Photos MG_0981 MG_0982 C-92

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-93

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-94

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IMG_1001 C-95

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-96

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

UISS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-97

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo M1G_1002 C-98

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-99

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-100

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IG_1005 C-101

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-102

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification. C-1 302-251-5320-009, Dated 6/11/1984.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-103

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Photos MG 1246 MG_1247 MG_1 248 C-104

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-105

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Supports are consistent with Calculation C-1 302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Surface Oxidation on Bolts at the Base Plates. The degraded bolts had previously been identified in 2000 and is being tracked by IR 1403183. Gusset plates were added to the Heat Exchanger base to make up for the deficient bolts. The gusset plate modifications are detailed in Calculation C-1302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Movable security barrier adjacent to the Heat Exchanger is chained to the column and chalked.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-H-21-001A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-106

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-2 1-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Photos MG 0704 MG_0706 MG_0711 MG_0720 C-107

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-108

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IP-4, Rev 000 Verification of anchorage by feeling bolts in Unistrut Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-109

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Photos MG 0883 MG_0884 MG_0885 C-110

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W SQUGSEWS SQUG SEWS EBASCO TWO SERVICES INCORPORATED WOrd TNado Cenler.NewYork.N.Y. 0G045 E CC 4

April 29, 1981 CPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter,20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our 0 involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin G Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-111

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-112

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IT-4A Rev 0 Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-113

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Photos I

MG_0888 MG_0891 MG_0893 C-114

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 SQUG SEW EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Tvo World Tade Cerer. New York. N.Y 10048 4

April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar '/

Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wo C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-115

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [7] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-18-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-116

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-1 8-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-Line/Free Standing See VM-OC-0157 Rev 4 Dresser Part Number 60-1379AS-021 15 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-117

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-1 8-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Photo MG_1229 MG_1231 C-118

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-119

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-120

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-121

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-122

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-123

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See VM-OC-5740 Rev 1 Mercoid PG-3-P1 Evaluated by: / Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-124

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: E-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Photos MG_1237 MG_1238 C-125

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-1OB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-126

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: / Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-127

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo 1MG_1 141 C-128

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-129

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-1OC Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-130

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo IMG_1141 C-131

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-132

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-LSP-1A2 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-133

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Photos Photos MG 1009 MG 1010 MG_1011 MG_1015 C-134

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-135

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-136

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-137

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [f N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 C-1302-157-5320-006, Rev. 0 qualifies the unanchored Diesels.

Base Corrosion is being tracked by the Plant.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-138

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Photo IMG_1134 C-139

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: P-18-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-140

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-16 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See drawing W-65107-R4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-141

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-1 8-1 B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Photo MG_1255 C-142

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-143

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification. C-1302-251-5320-008, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-144

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Photos MG 1290 MG_1291 MG_1293 C-145

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-146

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-147

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: - N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Photos MG 1021 MG_1023 MG_1024 C-148

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-149

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-150

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Photos Mn 10391 MG_1023 MG_1024 C-151

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-152

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-002A Rev 1 Anchorage details shown on drawing 4074-4 Rev. 4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-153

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Photos MG 0663 MG_0670 MG_0671 C-154

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: I- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): IS, 6.00 ft, 04 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-155

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Proximity to handrail is not a seismic interaction issue due to the relatively low mass of the handrail.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-P-3-003A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-156

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Photos P-3-3A

Ii I MG_1215 MG_1217 MG_1221 C-157

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-158

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-159

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Photos MG_1175 MG_1178 C-160

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-161

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-162

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Photo 1MG_1161 C-163

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-164

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-165

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Photos MG_1166 MG_1167 C-166

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 02 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-167

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-M-39-002 Oil leak is Yellow tagged.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-168

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Photo IG_1205 C-169

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: IiZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-170

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments US Guage CO. Figure 1980 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-171

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instr uments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMEI` *ITED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Photos MG_1315 MG_1316 C-172

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-173

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J- Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-174

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photo

-IMG_0752 C-175

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-176

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-177

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photos MG_0778 C-178

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): TB, 36.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-179

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-180

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-I Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Photos MG_1103 MG_1106 C-181

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 8-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-182

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-18-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments B070 BARKSDALE CONTROL MODEL D1T-M18SS Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-183

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 8-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NNO1-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Photo MG_1304 C-184

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-185

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 J Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-186

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-187

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: [-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-188

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-189

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-190

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-191

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-PS-RV0046A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-192

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Photo IMG-0685 C-193

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-194

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-195

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-196

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRCN PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 Missing bolt is addressed in SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) and determined to be seismically adequate in the current configuration.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-197

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRCN PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Photos MG 0679 MG_0680 MG_0694 C-198

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): OB, 35.00 ft, 05 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-199

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ]-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Horizontal restraint modification is consistent with SQUG SEWS and drawings identified within SEWS.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-ROTARY INVERTER\AC Nearby masonry block Wall is braced. Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-200

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Photos MG 1113 MG 1115 MG_1116 MG_1118 C-201

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-202

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-203

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG-0755 C-204

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-205

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-206

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG-0762 C-207

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-208

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: 1-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-209

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Photo AG_0817 C-210

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-211

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-212

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Photo IMG-0802 C-213

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-214

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-215

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG_0756 C-216

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: i-l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-217

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-218

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Photo OG_0822 C-219

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-220

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-221

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121 \06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo MG_0760 C-222

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-223

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-224

12Q0108.80-R-OO1, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo

.IMG-0763 C-225

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-226

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-T-39-002 Rev 1 Evaluated by: 01T'HO Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 j Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-227

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Photos MG_4172 MG_4174 C-228

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Pni inmanf I-ac,-rinfinn-DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Mr. 4175 MG_4178 MG_4179 C-229

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-230

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J 'le Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-231

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Photos MG_1137 MG_1138 C-232

12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-233

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-234

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Photos MG 1153 MG_1155 MG_1157 C-235

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (BIdg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-236

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-237

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI- 18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Photo MiG_1294 C-238

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-239

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with BS&B Service Instruction Manual for Diaphram Control Valves NS 106 page 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0120 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-240

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Photo MG_0834 C-241

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-242

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with Flowserve Drawing 94-16252 Rev D See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0133 Rev 0 RTD for V-6-2917 touches valve V-1 5-133. Not an operability issue due to the relative low mass od V-6-2917 and the brass piping which is highly ductile. IR 01403039 Documents- Seismic interaction between valves V-15-133 and V-6-2917.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-243

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 5-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Photos MG 0714 MG_0715 MG_0716 C-244

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mul N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 38.00 ft, 22 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-245

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP 'A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Drawing 93-14360 Rev c Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-246

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG_4182 MG_4183 MG_4184 C-247

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 23 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-248

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments SEE CONVAL DRAWING 10G2-105 REV B Evaluated by: O)A" Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-249

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Photos MG_4194 MG_4195 C-250

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-251

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-252

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Photo Photo VG_1308 C-253

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-254

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: LY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

3" Globe Valve Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-255

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Photo 1258 C-256

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-257

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-258

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EIY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Photos MG_1264 MG_1265 C-259

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-260

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-261

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Photos Photos MG_1300 MG_1302 C-262

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-263

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-264

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Photo Photo MG_1251 C-265

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-266

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-267

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Photo 1249 C-268

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-269

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-270

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Photos IMG_1296 IMG-1297 C-271

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-272

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-273

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Photo IMG_1313 C-274

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-275

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-276

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Photo IMG 1306 C-277

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-278

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-279

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Photo IMG 1319 C-280

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-281

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Leakage is tagged.

In-line equipment.

See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J 'W Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-282

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-I18-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Photos MG_1261 MG_1262 C-283

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-284

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0012 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-285

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Photo MG_0657 C-286

12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-287

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Minor leakage.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0015 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-288

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A"CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Photo 1MG_0655 C-289

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A"SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-290

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing 2065-5 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-291

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Photos MG_1029 MG_1032 C-292

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 19 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-293

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing W8321853 Rev A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-294

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Moto r-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAIINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Photo AlG_1041 C-295

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDGI PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-296

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-297

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG_1 173 C-298

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Fli N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-299

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-300

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1 172 MG_1173 C-301

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: rY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-302

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-303

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Photos IMUi.41b( IMG_4169 C-304

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-305

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: jT] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-VACP-1, Rev 0 Anchor bolts behind panel verified by touch.

Above panel is far enough away and has rigid enough support to preclude interaction.

Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-306

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Photos MG_0929 MG_0931 C-307

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-308

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-VACP-1 XFMR, Rev. 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-309

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Photos IMUN UzU IMG_0921 C-310

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ SQUG SEWS EBASCO SERVICES INcORPORATED Two World Trace Center. New York. N.Y 10048 April 29, 1981 CPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter,20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our 0 involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin C Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-311

Text

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: *-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-87

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-ER-18A Rev 1 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-88

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ER1 8A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Photos I_

MG 0907 MG_0908 MG_0910 C-89

12Q0O108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 14 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-90

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-FN-56-0004 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-91

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Photos MG_0981 MG_0982 C-92

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-93

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-94

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IMG_1001 C-95

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-96

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

UISS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-97

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo M1G_1002 C-98

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-99

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-100

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IG_1005 C-101

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-102

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification. C-1 302-251-5320-009, Dated 6/11/1984.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-103

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Photos MG 1246 MG_1247 MG_1 248 C-104

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-105

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Supports are consistent with Calculation C-1 302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Surface Oxidation on Bolts at the Base Plates. The degraded bolts had previously been identified in 2000 and is being tracked by IR 1403183. Gusset plates were added to the Heat Exchanger base to make up for the deficient bolts. The gusset plate modifications are detailed in Calculation C-1302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Movable security barrier adjacent to the Heat Exchanger is chained to the column and chalked.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-H-21-001A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-106

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-2 1-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Photos MG 0704 MG_0706 MG_0711 MG_0720 C-107

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-108

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IP-4, Rev 000 Verification of anchorage by feeling bolts in Unistrut Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-109

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Photos MG 0883 MG_0884 MG_0885 C-110

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W SQUGSEWS SQUG SEWS EBASCO TWO SERVICES INCORPORATED WOrd TNado Cenler.NewYork.N.Y. 0G045 E CC 4

April 29, 1981 CPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter,20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our 0 involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin G Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-111

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-112

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IT-4A Rev 0 Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-113

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Photos I

MG_0888 MG_0891 MG_0893 C-114

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 SQUG SEW EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Tvo World Tade Cerer. New York. N.Y 10048 4

April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar '/

Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wo C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-115

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [7] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-18-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-116

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-1 8-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-Line/Free Standing See VM-OC-0157 Rev 4 Dresser Part Number 60-1379AS-021 15 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-117

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-1 8-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Photo MG_1229 MG_1231 C-118

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-119

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-120

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-121

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-122

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-123

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See VM-OC-5740 Rev 1 Mercoid PG-3-P1 Evaluated by: / Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-124

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: E-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Photos MG_1237 MG_1238 C-125

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-1OB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-126

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: / Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-127

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo 1MG_1 141 C-128

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-129

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-1OC Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-130

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo IMG_1141 C-131

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-132

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-LSP-1A2 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-133

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Photos Photos MG 1009 MG 1010 MG_1011 MG_1015 C-134

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-135

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-136

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-137

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [f N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 C-1302-157-5320-006, Rev. 0 qualifies the unanchored Diesels.

Base Corrosion is being tracked by the Plant.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-138

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Photo IMG_1134 C-139

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: P-18-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-140

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-16 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See drawing W-65107-R4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-141

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-1 8-1 B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Photo MG_1255 C-142

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-143

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification. C-1302-251-5320-008, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-144

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Photos MG 1290 MG_1291 MG_1293 C-145

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-146

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-147

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: - N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Photos MG 1021 MG_1023 MG_1024 C-148

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-149

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-150

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Photos Mn 10391 MG_1023 MG_1024 C-151

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-152

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-002A Rev 1 Anchorage details shown on drawing 4074-4 Rev. 4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-153

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Photos MG 0663 MG_0670 MG_0671 C-154

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: I- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): IS, 6.00 ft, 04 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-155

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Proximity to handrail is not a seismic interaction issue due to the relatively low mass of the handrail.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-P-3-003A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-156

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Photos P-3-3A

Ii I MG_1215 MG_1217 MG_1221 C-157

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-158

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-159

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Photos MG_1175 MG_1178 C-160

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-161

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-162

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Photo 1MG_1161 C-163

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-164

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-165

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Photos MG_1166 MG_1167 C-166

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 02 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-167

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-M-39-002 Oil leak is Yellow tagged.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-168

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Photo IG_1205 C-169

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: IiZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-170

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments US Guage CO. Figure 1980 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-171

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instr uments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMEI` *ITED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Photos MG_1315 MG_1316 C-172

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-173

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J- Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-174

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photo

-IMG_0752 C-175

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-176

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-177

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photos MG_0778 C-178

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): TB, 36.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-179

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-180

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-I Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Photos MG_1103 MG_1106 C-181

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 8-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-182

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-18-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments B070 BARKSDALE CONTROL MODEL D1T-M18SS Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-183

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 8-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NNO1-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Photo MG_1304 C-184

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-185

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 J Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-186

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-187

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: [-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-188

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-189

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-190

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-191

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-PS-RV0046A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-192

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Photo IMG-0685 C-193

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-194

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-195

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-196

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRCN PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 Missing bolt is addressed in SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) and determined to be seismically adequate in the current configuration.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-197

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRCN PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Photos MG 0679 MG_0680 MG_0694 C-198

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): OB, 35.00 ft, 05 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-199

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ]-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Horizontal restraint modification is consistent with SQUG SEWS and drawings identified within SEWS.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-ROTARY INVERTER\AC Nearby masonry block Wall is braced. Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-200

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Photos MG 1113 MG 1115 MG_1116 MG_1118 C-201

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-202

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-203

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG-0755 C-204

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-205

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-206

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG-0762 C-207

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-208

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: 1-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-209

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Photo AG_0817 C-210

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-211

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-212

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Photo IMG-0802 C-213

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-214

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-215

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG_0756 C-216

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: i-l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-217

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-218

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Photo OG_0822 C-219

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-220

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-221

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121 \06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo MG_0760 C-222

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-223

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-224

12Q0108.80-R-OO1, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo

.IMG-0763 C-225

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-226

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-T-39-002 Rev 1 Evaluated by: 01T'HO Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 j Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-227

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Photos MG_4172 MG_4174 C-228

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Pni inmanf I-ac,-rinfinn-DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Mr. 4175 MG_4178 MG_4179 C-229

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-230

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J 'le Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-231

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Photos MG_1137 MG_1138 C-232

12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-233

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-234

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Photos MG 1153 MG_1155 MG_1157 C-235

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (BIdg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-236

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-237

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI- 18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Photo MiG_1294 C-238

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-239

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with BS&B Service Instruction Manual for Diaphram Control Valves NS 106 page 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0120 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-240

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Photo MG_0834 C-241

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-242

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with Flowserve Drawing 94-16252 Rev D See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0133 Rev 0 RTD for V-6-2917 touches valve V-1 5-133. Not an operability issue due to the relative low mass od V-6-2917 and the brass piping which is highly ductile. IR 01403039 Documents- Seismic interaction between valves V-15-133 and V-6-2917.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-243

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 5-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Photos MG 0714 MG_0715 MG_0716 C-244

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mul N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 38.00 ft, 22 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-245

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP 'A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Drawing 93-14360 Rev c Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-246

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG_4182 MG_4183 MG_4184 C-247

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 23 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-248

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments SEE CONVAL DRAWING 10G2-105 REV B Evaluated by: O)A" Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-249

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Photos MG_4194 MG_4195 C-250

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-251

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-252

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Photo Photo VG_1308 C-253

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-254

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: LY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

3" Globe Valve Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-255

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Photo 1258 C-256

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-257

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-258

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EIY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Photos MG_1264 MG_1265 C-259

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-260

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-261

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Photos Photos MG_1300 MG_1302 C-262

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-263

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-264

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Photo Photo MG_1251 C-265

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-266

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-267

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Photo 1249 C-268

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-269

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-270

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Photos IMG_1296 IMG-1297 C-271

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-272

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-273

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Photo IMG_1313 C-274

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-275

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-276

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Photo IMG 1306 C-277

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-278

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-279

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Photo IMG 1319 C-280

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-281

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Leakage is tagged.

In-line equipment.

See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J 'W Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-282

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-I18-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Photos MG_1261 MG_1262 C-283

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-284

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0012 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-285

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Photo MG_0657 C-286

12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-287

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Minor leakage.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0015 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-288

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A"CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Photo 1MG_0655 C-289

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A"SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-290

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing 2065-5 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-291

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Photos MG_1029 MG_1032 C-292

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 19 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-293

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing W8321853 Rev A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-294

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Moto r-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAIINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Photo AlG_1041 C-295

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDGI PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-296

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-297

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG_1 173 C-298

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Fli N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-299

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-300

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1 172 MG_1173 C-301

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: rY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-302

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-303

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Photos IMUi.41b( IMG_4169 C-304

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-305

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: jT] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-VACP-1, Rev 0 Anchor bolts behind panel verified by touch.

Above panel is far enough away and has rigid enough support to preclude interaction.

Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-306

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Photos MG_0929 MG_0931 C-307

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-308

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-VACP-1 XFMR, Rev. 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-309

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Photos IMUN UzU IMG_0921 C-310

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ SQUG SEWS EBASCO SERVICES INcORPORATED Two World Trace Center. New York. N.Y 10048 April 29, 1981 CPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter,20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our 0 involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin C Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-311

Text

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: *-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-87

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-ER-18A Rev 1 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-88

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ER1 8A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Photos I_

MG 0907 MG_0908 MG_0910 C-89

12Q0O108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 14 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-90

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-FN-56-0004 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-91

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Photos MG_0981 MG_0982 C-92

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-93

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-94

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IMG_1001 C-95

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-96

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

UISS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-97

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo M1G_1002 C-98

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-99

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-100

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

Description:

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IG_1005 C-101

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-102

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification. C-1 302-251-5320-009, Dated 6/11/1984.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-103

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Photos MG 1246 MG_1247 MG_1 248 C-104

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-105

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Supports are consistent with Calculation C-1 302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Surface Oxidation on Bolts at the Base Plates. The degraded bolts had previously been identified in 2000 and is being tracked by IR 1403183. Gusset plates were added to the Heat Exchanger base to make up for the deficient bolts. The gusset plate modifications are detailed in Calculation C-1302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Movable security barrier adjacent to the Heat Exchanger is chained to the column and chalked.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-H-21-001A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-106

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: H-2 1-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Photos MG 0704 MG_0706 MG_0711 MG_0720 C-107

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-108

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IP-4, Rev 000 Verification of anchorage by feeling bolts in Unistrut Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-109

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W Photos MG 0883 MG_0884 MG_0885 C-110

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 - 208/120V,3PH,4W SQUGSEWS SQUG SEWS EBASCO TWO SERVICES INCORPORATED WOrd TNado Cenler.NewYork.N.Y. 0G045 E CC 4

April 29, 1981 CPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter,20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our 0 involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin G Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-111

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-112

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IT-4A Rev 0 Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-113

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Photos I

MG_0888 MG_0891 MG_0893 C-114

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 SQUG SEW EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Tvo World Tade Cerer. New York. N.Y 10048 4

April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar '/

Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wo C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-115

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [7] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-18-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-116

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-1 8-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-Line/Free Standing See VM-OC-0157 Rev 4 Dresser Part Number 60-1379AS-021 15 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-117

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LI-1 8-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Photo MG_1229 MG_1231 C-118

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-119

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-120

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-121

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-122

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-123

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See VM-OC-5740 Rev 1 Mercoid PG-3-P1 Evaluated by: / Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-124

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: E-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Photos MG_1237 MG_1238 C-125

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-1OB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-126

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: / Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-127

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo 1MG_1 141 C-128

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-129

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-1OC Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-130

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo IMG_1141 C-131

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-132

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-LSP-1A2 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-133

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Photos Photos MG 1009 MG 1010 MG_1011 MG_1015 C-134

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-135

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-136

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-137

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [f N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 C-1302-157-5320-006, Rev. 0 qualifies the unanchored Diesels.

Base Corrosion is being tracked by the Plant.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-138

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Photo IMG_1134 C-139

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: P-18-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-140

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-16 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See drawing W-65107-R4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-141

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-1 8-1 B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)

Photo MG_1255 C-142

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-143

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification. C-1302-251-5320-008, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-144

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)

Photos MG 1290 MG_1291 MG_1293 C-145

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-146

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-147

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: - N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Photos MG 1021 MG_1023 MG_1024 C-148

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-149

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-150

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Photos Mn 10391 MG_1023 MG_1024 C-151

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-152

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-002A Rev 1 Anchorage details shown on drawing 4074-4 Rev. 4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-153

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Photos MG 0663 MG_0670 MG_0671 C-154

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: I- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): IS, 6.00 ft, 04 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-155

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Proximity to handrail is not a seismic interaction issue due to the relatively low mass of the handrail.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-P-3-003A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-156

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Photos P-3-3A

Ii I MG_1215 MG_1217 MG_1221 C-157

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-158

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-159

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Photos MG_1175 MG_1178 C-160

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-161

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-162

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Photo 1MG_1161 C-163

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-164

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-165

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Photos MG_1166 MG_1167 C-166

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 02 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-167

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-M-39-002 Oil leak is Yellow tagged.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-168

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Photo IG_1205 C-169

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: IiZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-170

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments US Guage CO. Figure 1980 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-171

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instr uments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMEI` *ITED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Photos MG_1315 MG_1316 C-172

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-173

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J- Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-174

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photo

-IMG_0752 C-175

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-176

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-177

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photos MG_0778 C-178

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): TB, 36.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-179

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-180

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-I Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Photos MG_1103 MG_1106 C-181

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 8-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-182

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-18-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments B070 BARKSDALE CONTROL MODEL D1T-M18SS Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-183

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-1 8-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NNO1-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Photo MG_1304 C-184

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-185

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 J Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-186

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-187

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: [-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-188

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-189

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-190

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-191

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-PS-RV0046A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-192

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Photo IMG-0685 C-193

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-194

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: [Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-195

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-196

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRCN PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 Missing bolt is addressed in SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) and determined to be seismically adequate in the current configuration.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-197

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRCN PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Photos MG 0679 MG_0680 MG_0694 C-198

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): OB, 35.00 ft, 05 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-199

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ]-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Horizontal restraint modification is consistent with SQUG SEWS and drawings identified within SEWS.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-ROTARY INVERTER\AC Nearby masonry block Wall is braced. Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-200

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Photos MG 1113 MG 1115 MG_1116 MG_1118 C-201

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-202

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-203

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG-0755 C-204

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-205

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-206

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG-0762 C-207

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-208

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: 1-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-209

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Photo AG_0817 C-210

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-211

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-212

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Photo IMG-0802 C-213

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-214

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-215

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG_0756 C-216

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: i-l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-217

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-218

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Photo OG_0822 C-219

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-220

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-221

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121 \06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo MG_0760 C-222

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-223

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-224

12Q0108.80-R-OO1, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo

.IMG-0763 C-225

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-226

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-T-39-002 Rev 1 Evaluated by: 01T'HO Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 j Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-227

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Photos MG_4172 MG_4174 C-228

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Pni inmanf I-ac,-rinfinn-DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Mr. 4175 MG_4178 MG_4179 C-229

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-230

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J 'le Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-231

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Photos MG_1137 MG_1138 C-232

12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-233

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-234

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Photos MG 1153 MG_1155 MG_1157 C-235

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (BIdg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-236

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-237

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TI- 18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Photo MiG_1294 C-238

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-239

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with BS&B Service Instruction Manual for Diaphram Control Valves NS 106 page 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0120 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-240

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Photo MG_0834 C-241

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-242

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with Flowserve Drawing 94-16252 Rev D See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0133 Rev 0 RTD for V-6-2917 touches valve V-1 5-133. Not an operability issue due to the relative low mass od V-6-2917 and the brass piping which is highly ductile. IR 01403039 Documents- Seismic interaction between valves V-15-133 and V-6-2917.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-243

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 5-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Photos MG 0714 MG_0715 MG_0716 C-244

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mul N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 38.00 ft, 22 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-245

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP 'A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Drawing 93-14360 Rev c Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-246

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG_4182 MG_4183 MG_4184 C-247

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 23 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-248

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments SEE CONVAL DRAWING 10G2-105 REV B Evaluated by: O)A" Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-249

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Photos MG_4194 MG_4195 C-250

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-251

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-252

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Photo Photo VG_1308 C-253

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-254

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: LY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

3" Globe Valve Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-255

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Photo 1258 C-256

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-257

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-258

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EIY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Photos MG_1264 MG_1265 C-259

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-260

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-261

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Photos Photos MG_1300 MG_1302 C-262

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-263

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-264

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Photo Photo MG_1251 C-265

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-266

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-267

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Photo 1249 C-268

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-269

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-270

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Photos IMG_1296 IMG-1297 C-271

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-272

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-273

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Photo IMG_1313 C-274

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-275

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-276

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Photo IMG 1306 C-277

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-278

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-279

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Photo IMG 1319 C-280

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-281

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Leakage is tagged.

In-line equipment.

See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J 'W Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-282

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-I18-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Photos MG_1261 MG_1262 C-283

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-284

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0012 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-285

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Photo MG_0657 C-286

12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-287

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Minor leakage.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0015 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-288

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A"CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Photo 1MG_0655 C-289

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A"SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-290

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing 2065-5 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-291

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Photos MG_1029 MG_1032 C-292

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 19.00 ft, 19 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-293

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing W8321853 Rev A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-294

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Moto r-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAIINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Photo AlG_1041 C-295

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDGI PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-296

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-297

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG_1 173 C-298

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Fli N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-299

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-300

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1 172 MG_1173 C-301

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: rY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-302

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-303

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Photos IMUi.41b( IMG_4169 C-304

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-305

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: jT] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-VACP-1, Rev 0 Anchor bolts behind panel verified by touch.

Above panel is far enough away and has rigid enough support to preclude interaction.

Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-306

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Photos MG_0929 MG_0931 C-307

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-308

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-VACP-1 XFMR, Rev. 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-309

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Photos IMUN UzU IMG_0921 C-310

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ SQUG SEWS EBASCO SERVICES INcORPORATED Two World Trace Center. New York. N.Y 10048 April 29, 1981 CPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter,20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our 0 involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin C Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-311

RS-13-065, Core Spray/Auto Depress'N System Relay Logic Panel

Text

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Dear Leon:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Dear Leon:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description: