RA-09-038, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, January 1 - December 31, 2008

From kanterella
(Redirected from RA-09-038)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, January 1 - December 31, 2008
ML091330704
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/30/2009
From:
Exelon Nuclear, Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RA-09-038
Download: ML091330704 (140)
v • d • e


Text

Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2008 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Exekn.

Nuclear Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2009

Table Of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusions ........................................................................................... 1 II. Intro d u c tio n ........................................................................................................................ 2 A. Objectives of the REM P ................................................................................... 2 B. Im plem entation of the Objectives ..................................................................... 3 C. Discussion ......................................................................................................... 3 Ill. Program Description ..................................................................................................... 6 A. Sam ple Collection .............................................................................................. 6 B. Sam ple Analysis ................................................................................................ 8 C. Data Interpretation ........................................................................................... 8 D. Program Exceptions ...................................................................................... 10 E. Program Changes ....................................................... ,....................................... 11 IV. Results and Discussion ............................................................................................. 11 A. Aquatic Environm ent ...................................................................................... 11

1. Surface W ater ....................................................................................... 11
2. Drinking W ater .......................................................................... 12
3. Fish .................................................................. .................. 13
4. Clams and Crabs ......................................... 13
5. Sedim ent ........................................................................ ..... ....... 14 B. Atmospheric Environm ent .................................................................... 15
1. Airborne ...................................................................................... .......15
a. Air Particulates .......................................................................... 15
b. Airborne Iodine .......................................................................... 16
2. Terrestrial ............................................................................................. 17
a. Vegetation ................................................................................. 17 C. Am bient Gam m a Radiation ............................................................................ 18 D. Land Use Survey ........................................................................................... 18 E. Errata Data .................................................................................................... 19 F. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ........................ 20 V. References ...................................................................................................................... 21

Appendices Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for the Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection &

Analytical Methods Tables Table B-i: Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Table B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Table B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Figures Figure B-i: Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station.

Figure B-2: Locations of REMP Stations within a 1 to 5-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station.

Figure B-3: Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the Oyster Creek Generating Station.

Appendix C Data Tables - Primary Laboratory Tables Table C-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-I1.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-I1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

ii

Table C-II1.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder (Fish) Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-III.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations (E-3 pCi/cu meter) in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-V.3 Concentrations of Strontium in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-V.4 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-VII.1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-VIII.1 Quarterly TLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-VIII.2 Mean Quarterly TLD Results for the Site Boundary, Intermediate, Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table C-VIII.3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Figqures Figure C-1 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Clams Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1983 - 2008.

Figure C-2 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2008.

Figure C-3 Mean Cesium-137 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2008.

Figure C-4 Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Figure C-5 Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2008.

iii

Figure C-6 Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Figure C-7 Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1990 - 2008.

Appendix D Data Tables - QC Laboratory Tables Table D-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity Of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table D-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table D-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table D-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table D-111.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table D-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table D-V.1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Appendix E Errata Data Appendix F Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Tables Table F-1 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2008 Table F-2 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2008 Table F-3 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2008 Table F-4 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2008 Table F-5 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Environmental, Inc., 2008 iv

Appendix G Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR)

V

1. Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon Nuclear covers the period 01 January 2008 through 31 December 2008. During that time period, 1372 analyses were performed on 1165 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, it was concluded that the operation of OCGS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.

Surface and drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium and no fission or activation products were detected in any of the surface or drinking water samples collected as part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program during 2008.

Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No OCGS-produced fission or activation products were detected in fish, clams, crabs or sediment.

Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides. Cosmogenic Be-7 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected.

High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable activity.

Strontium-89 and strontium-90 and gamma analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. All strontium-89 and strontium-90.results were below the minimum detectable activity.

Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, strontium-89, and strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. All strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity. Strontium-90 activity was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years at both control and indicator stations, and can be attributed to historical nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident.

Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Similar to previous years, there was no indication of an increase in offsite direct radiation dose rates with the exception of a few locations at or near the site boundary where public access is restricted.

The maximum dose to any member of the public attributable to radioactive effluents and direct radiation from the OCGS was less than the 25 mRem/year limit established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

1

II. Introduction The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon, is located on the Atlantic Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles south of Newark, 9 miles south of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from Barnegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in Ocean Township. Access is provided by U.S. Route 9, passing through the site and separating a 637-acre eastern portion from the balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about 11/4 mile west of the highway and 11/4 miles east of the Garden State Parkway. The site property extends about 21/2miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile. The site location is part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography ,and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands. The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side.

A preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for OCGS was established in 1966, and continued for two years prior to the plant becoming operational in 1969. This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), Global Dosimetry, and Environmental Inc.

(Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2008 through 31 December 2008.

A. Objectives of the REMP The objectives of the REMP are to:

1. Determine whether any significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in major pathways.
2. Identify and evaluate the buildup, if any, of radionuclides in the local environment, or any changes in normal background radiation levels.
3. Verify the adequacy of the plant's controls for the release of radioactive materials.
4. Fulfill the obligations of the radiological surveillance sections of Oyster Creek's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).

2

B. Implementation of the Objectives The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:

1. Identifying significant exposure pathways.
2. Establishing baseline radiological data for media within those pathways.
3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.

C. Discussion

1. General Program The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established in 1966, three years before the plant became operational. This preoperational surveillance program was established to describe and quantify the radioactivity, and its variability, in the area prior to the operation of OCGS. After OCGS became operational in 1969, the operational surveillance program continued to measure radiation and radioactivity in the surrounding areas.

A variety of environmental samples are collected as part of the REMPat OCGS. The selection of sample types is based on the established pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to humans. The selection of sampling locations is based on sample availability, local meteorological and hydrological characteristics, local population characteristics, and land usage in the area of interest. The selection of sampling frequencies for the various environmental media is based on the radionuclides of interest, their respective half-lives, and their behavior in both the biological and physical environment.

2. Preoperational Surveillance Program The federal government requires nuclear facilities to conduct radiological environmental monitoring prior to constructing the facility. This preoperational surveillance program is aimed at collecting the data needed to identify pathways, including selection of the radioisotope and sample media combinations to be included in the environmental surveillance program conducted after facility operation begins. Radiochemical analyses performed on the 3

environmental samples should include not only those nuclides expected to be released during facility operation, but should also include typical radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing and natural background radioactivity. All environmental media with a potential to be affected by facility operation as well as those media directly in the major pathways, should be sampled on at least an annual basis during the preoperational phase of the environmental surveillance program.

The preoperational surveillance design, including nuclide/media combinations, sampling frequencies and locations, collection techniques, and radioanalyses performed, should be carefully considered and incorporated in the design of the operational surveillance program. In this manner, data can be compared in a variety of ways (for example, from year to year, location to location, etc.) in order to detect any radiological impact the facility has on the surrounding environment. Data collection during the preoperational phase should be planned to provide a comprehensive database for evaluating any future changes in the environment surrounding the nuclear facility.

OCGS began its preoperational environmental surveillance program three years before the plant began operating in 1969.

Data accumulated during those early years provide an extensive database from which environmental monitoring personnel are able to identify trends in the radiological characteristics of the local environment. The environmental surveillance program at OCGS will continue after the plant has reached the end of its economically useful life and decommissioning has begun.

3. Consideration of Plant Effluents Effluents are strictly monitored to ensure that radioactivity released to the environment is as low as reasonably achievable and does not exceed regulatory limits. Effluent control includes the operation of monitoring systems, in-plant and environmental sampling and analyses programs, quality assurance programs for effluent and environmental programs, and procedures covering all aspects of effluent and environmental monitoring.

Both radiological environmental and effluent monitoring indicate that the operation of OCGS does not result in significant radiation exposure of people or the environment surrounding OCGS and is well below the applicable levels set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Environmental Protection Agency 4

(EPA).

There were no liquid radioactive effluent releases from the OCGS during 2008. Utilizing gaseous effluent data, the maximum hypothetical dose to any individual in the south-east sector of the plant (sector of predominant wind direction) during 2008 was calculated using a mathematical model, which is based on the methods defined by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

These methods accurately determine the types and quantities of radioactive materials being released to the environment.

The maximum hypothetical calculated organ dose (thyroid) from iodines and particulates to any individual due to gaseous effluents was 3.58E-3 mRem (0.00358 mRem) which was approximately 0.00024 percent of the annual limit. The maximum hypothetical calculated whole body dose to any individual due to gaseous effluents was 4.22E-4 mRem (0.000422 mRem) which was 0.000084 percent of the annual limit.

The total maximum hypothetical organ dose (thyroid) due to all radiological effluents of 3.58E-3 mRem (0.00358 mRem) received by any individual from gaseous effluents from the Oyster Creek Generating Station for the reporting period is more than 83,000 times lower than the dose the average individual in the Oyster Creek area received from background radiation, including that from radon, during the same time period. The background radiation dose averages approximately 300 mRem per year in the Central New Jersey area, which includes approximately 200 mRem/year from naturally occurring radon gas.

During 2008, the maximum direct radiation dose potentially attributable to the operation of Oyster Creek beyond the site boundary in the southeast sector, as shown by offsite thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) readings, was 1.8 mRem/year at Station 109. Therefore, the maximum combined direct radiation and whole body effluent dose potentially attributable to Oyster Creek in the south-east sector during 2008 was 1.800422 mRem, or approximately 7.2 percent of the 40 CFR 190 limit of 25 mRem/year.

Additionally, comparison of environmental sampling results to iodine and particulate gaseous effluents released, showed no radioactivity attributable to the operation of OCGS. Both elevated and ground-level release paths were considered in this review, with total iodines released of 1.58 mCi and total particulates with half-5

lives greater than 8 days released of 0.339 mCi. (1 mCi is one/one-thousandth of a Ci).

Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the OCGS REMP were collected for Exelon by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, Incorporated. This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS REMP in 2008. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables B-1 and B-2, and Figures B-i, B-2, and B-3, Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3.

Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, drinking water, fish, clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon water samples were collected monthly from two surface locations (33 and 94), semiannually at two surface water locations (23 and 24), and quarterly from four drinking water wells(l, 37, 38, and 39). Control locations were 94 and 37. All samples were collected in plastic bottles, which were rinsed at least twice with source water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of two groups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannually at three locations (33, 93 and 94 (control). Clams were collected semiannually from three locations (23, 24, and 94 (control)). One annual crab sample was collected from one location (93). Sediment samples were collected at four locations semiannually (23, 24, 33, and 94 (control)).

Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of air particulate and airborne iodine. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed weekly at eight locations (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, and 111). The control location was C. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

6

Terrestrial Environment The terrestrial environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of garden vegetation.

No commercial dairy operations and no dairy animals producing milk for human consumption are located within a 5 mile radius of the plant.

Therefore, vegetation samples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples were collected, when available, at three locations (35, 36, and 66). Station 36 was the control location. All samples were collected in 18" x 24" new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using Panasonic Model 814 calcium sulfate (CaSO 4 ) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The TLDs were placed on and around the OCGS site and were categorized as follows:

A site boundary ring consisting of 19 locations (1, T1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 112, and 113) near the site boundary.

An intermediate distance ring consisting of 31 locations (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 22, 46, 47, 48, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99, 100, 101,102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 109, and 110) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-in population.

Special interest stations consisting of 9 locations (3, 11, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, and 92) representing special interest areas such as population centers, state parks, etc.

Background (Control) stations consisting of two locations (C and 14) greater than 20 miles distant from the site.

Indicator TLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station in each of 16 meteorological compass sectors in the general area of the site boundary. TLDs were also placed in each meteorological sector in the 3 3/4 to 5 mile range, where reasonable highway access would permit, in areas of public interest and population centers. Background locations were located greater than twenty miles distant from the OCGS and generally in an upwind direction from the OCGS.

Two TLDs - each comprised of three CaSO4 thermoluminescent 7

phosphors enclosed in plastic - were placed at each location approximately three to eight feet above ground level. The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to Global Dosimetry for analysis.

B. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2008. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:

1. Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates.
2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface and drinking water, fish, clams, crabs, sediment, air particulates, and vegetation.
3. Concentrations of tritium in surface and drinking water.
4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges.
5. Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation.
6. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the OCGS.

C. Data Interpretation For trending purposes, the radiological and direct radiation data collected during 2008 were compared with data from past years. The results of environmental sampling show that radioactivity levels have not increased from the background radioactivity detected prior to the operation of OCGS.

The operation of OCGS continues to have no measurable radiological impact upon the environment.

Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation 8

represents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.

2. Net Activity Calculation and Reportingq of Results Net activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity, which results in a negative number.

An MDC was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.

Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:

For surface and drinking water 12 nuclides, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.

For fish eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.

For clams eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.

For crabs eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-137 were reported.

For sediment seven nuclides, Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.

For air particulate six nuclides, Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-134, and Cs-1 37 were reported.

For air iodine cartridges one nuclide, 1-131 was reported.

For vegetation seven nuclides, Be-7, K-40, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, 9

Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.

Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.

D. Program Exceptions For 2008 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%.

Exceptions are listed below:

1. Only two fish samples were available (3 samples are desired, but not required) for spring collection for the following period and location:

04/15/2008 - 04/16/2008, Location 33

2. Air particulate and air iodine samples were not available because the main fuse box had been turned off (vandalism suspected) for the following period and location:

01/09/2008 - 01/16/2008, Location 20

3. Air particulate and air iodine sampler lost power for a portion of time due to a blown breaker. Sampler did not run long enough to constitute a valid sample for the following period and location:

06/25/2008 - 07/01/2008, Location 73

4. Air particulate and air iodine sampler pump was not running for a portion of time. Although the hour timer was still running, it is not known how long the pump ran. Air sample was collected, but should not be considered valid for the following period and location:

10/15/2008 - 10/22/2008, Location C

5. No broadleaf vegetation sample was collected due to seasonal availability for the following periods and locations: *NOTE 06/08/2008, Location 35 06/08/2008, Location 36 06/08/2008, Location 66
6. A cabbage QC sample was collected in September to replace a sample collected in August that did not arrive at the primary lab:

08-09/2008, Location 36

7. One of the two TLDs at Location 98 was missing during collection (vandalism suspected, the remaining TLD was available for analysis) for the following period and location:

07/1'6/2008 - 10/08/2008, Location 98 10

8. Both TLDs were missing during collection for the following periods and locations:

01/08/2008 - 04/16/2008, Location 6 04/16/2008 - 07/16/2008, Location 105

  • NOTE: Per the Oyster Creek ODCM, if garden vegetation samples are unobtainable due to any legitimate reason, the missed sample will be documented in the annual report, with no further actions necessary.

Program exceptions are tracked and investigated to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors are reviewed with the personnel involved to prevent recurrence.

The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation.

E. Program Changes Air sampling Station 111 was added to the REMP during the first quarter of 2008.

TLD sampling Stations 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 109 and 110 were added to the REMP in the first quarter of 2008.

TLD sampling Stations 112 and 113 were added to the REMP in the third quarter of 2008.

IV. Results and Discussion A. Aquatic Environment

1. Surface Water Samples were taken via grab sample methodology at two locations (33 and 94) on a monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples were collected semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24). Of these locations 23, 24, and 33, located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:

11

Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. Data from this year indicates that surface water tritium concentrations remain very low and not significantly different from recent previous years.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.

Surface water sampling began in 1966, and the samples were analyzed for tritium as well as other radioactivity. During this preoperational program, tritium was detected at an average concentration of 1.05E+3 pCi/liter. At that time, counting instrumentation was not as sensitive as it now, and the minimum detectable concentration was 1E+3 pCi/liter versus 2E+2 pCi/liter used today. By comparing the 2008 sampling results to the decay corrected average preoperational concentration reported in the 2007 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (11.11 E+2 pCi/liter), it can be seen that the inventory of tritium in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testin.g and Chernobyl, and is decreasing with time.

2. Drinking water Quarterly samples were composited from monthly grab samples from four drinking water wells (1, 37, 38, and 39). Station 1, because it is located on the OCGS site, could potentially be affected by radioactive releases from the plant. Station 38, the Ocean Township Municipal Utility Authority Well, could potentially be affected by effluent releases from the OCGS. Given its distance from the facility (1.6 miles) and depth (approximately 360 feet),

however, the probability of any OCGS related impacts is very small.

Stations 37 and 39, Lacey Township Municipal Utility Authority wells, are not likely to be impacted by effluents from the OCGS.

These wells are located generally up-gradient of the regional groundwater flow direction (southeast). In addition, because of their depth (> 200 feet) and distance from the site (2.2 and 3.5 miles respectively), they are unlikely to be affected by OCGS operations.

The following analyses were performed:

12

Tritium Quarterly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected.

Gamma SpectrometrV Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.

Drinking water was sampled during the preoperational program and throughout the 38 years of the plant's operational program. Tritium sampling results during the preoperational years, yielded results all less than the minimum detectable concentration of 1E+3 pCi/liter.

2008 results are all less than the current MDC of 200 pCi/liter.

3. Fish Fish samples comprised of American eel and flounder (bottom feeder) and striped bass, bluefish, sea trout, and perch (predator) were collected at three locations (33, 93, and 94) semiannually.

Locations 93 and 33 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry The edible portions of fish samples from three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.1, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 3,080 to 5,340 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.

No fish were sampled during the preoperational sampling program for OCGS.

4. Clams and Crabs Clams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94) semiannually. Crabs were collected at one location (93) annually.

Locations 23, 24, and 93 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

13

Gamma Spectrometry The edible portions of clam samples from all three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 1,610 to 2,320 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in Figure C-1, Appendix C.

Preoperational clam sample results for potassium-40 ranged from 600 to 9,800 pCi/kg wet, which are consistent with current sample results.

The edible portions of crab samples from one location were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at a concentration of 2,730 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.

Crabs were not sampled during the preoperational years of the OCGS environmental monitoring program.

5. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24, 33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and 33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry Sediment samples from all four locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C). The only radionuclide detected was naturally occurring K-40.

Potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 505 to 15,100 pCi/kg dry. No fission or activation products were found.

Figure C-3, Appendix C graphs Cs-137 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2008 and figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2008.

While aquatic sediment sampling was part of the preoperational program, samples were not analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides 14

until 1981.

In conclusion, the 2008 aquatic monitoring results for surface water, drinking water, fish, clams and crabs, and aquatic sediment showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of OCGS, and with levels measured in past years. No radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any aquatic samples during 2008 and no adverse long-term trends are shown in the aquatic monitoring data.

B. Atmospheric Environment

1. Airborne
a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from eight locations on a weekly basis. The eight locations were separated into three groups: Group I represents locations near the OCGS site boundary (20, 66 and 111), Group II represents the locations at an intermediate distance from the OCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group III represents the control and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (C and 3). The following analyses were performed:

Gross Beta Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-V.1 and C-V.2, Appendix C).

Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the three groups aids in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of OCGS. The results from the Site Boundary locations (Group I) ranged from <6 to 29 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 15 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The results from the Intermediate Distance locations (Group II) ranged from <7 to 30 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 15 E-3 pCi/m . The results from the Distant locations (Group Ill) ranged from <7 to 35 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 15 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The similarity of the results from the three groups indicates that there is no relationship between gross beta activity and distance from the OCGS. These results are consistent with data from previous years and indicate no effects from the operation of OCGS (Figures C-4 and C-5, Appendix C).

15

Air sample filters have been analyzed for gross beta activity since the inception of the preoperational environmental monitoring program in 1966. The preoperational data values ranged from 1.90E-2 to 2.77E-1 pCi/m 3 . 2008 gross beta activity values ranged from <6E-3 to 35E-3 pCi/m 3 . The 2008 results are consistent with historical operational data (Figure C-5, Appendix C) and fall within the range of results observed during the preoperational period.

Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-V.3, Appendix C).

No strontium was detected in any of the samples. These results are consistent with historical operational data. The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of air samples for strontium-89 and strontium-90.

Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.4, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in all samples. The values ranged from 37 to 128 E-3 pCi/m 3 . All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

These results are consistent with historical operational data.

The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of air samples for gamma emitting nuclides.

b. Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from eight (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, 111 ) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-VI.1, Appendix C). Consistent with historical operational data, all results were less than the MDC.

The preoperational environmental monitoring program for OCGS did not include analysis of air media for iodine-1 31.

In conclusion, the atmospheric monitoring data are consistent with preoperational and prior operational data and show no long-term trends in the environment attributable to 16

the operation of OCGS.

2. Terrestrial
a. Vegetation Samples were collected from three locations (35, 36, and 66) when available. The following analyses were performed:

Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Vegetation samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VII.l, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less than the MDC. Strontium-90 was detected in 32 of 35 samples.

The values ranged from 2 to 37 pCi/kg wet, which is consistent with historical data. The mean strontium-90 concentration at control location 36 (15 pCi/kg wet) was higher than the mean concentrations observed at indicator stations 35 and 66 (12 and 10 pCi/kg wet respectively).

These results indicate that the strontium-90 detected in vegetation samples is attributable to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident.

Gamma Spectrometry Vegetation samples from locations 35, 36, and 66 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII.l1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 1,840 to 5,300 pCi/I. All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

Preoperational vegetation sample analyses did not include strontium analyses, or gamma spectroscopy.

In conclusion, terrestrial monitoring results for vegetation samples during 2008 showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl.

The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured in past years, and no radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any terrestrial samples.

The terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-term trends in the terrestrial environment.

17

C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Panasonic Model 814 (CaSO 4 ) thermoluminescent dosimeters. Sixty-one TLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of non-background corrected TLD measurements are summarized in Tables C-VIII.1 to C-VIII.3, and Figures C-6 and C-7, Appendix C.

The non-background corrected TLD measurements ranged from 11.7 to 23.7 mR/standard quarter. In order to correct these results for background radiation, the mean of the dose rates measured at the background TLD stations (C and 14) was subtracted from the dose measured at each indicator station. The maximum annual background corrected dose was 18.5 mR/year at Station 55, located near the site boundary, 0.3 miles west of the OCGS. This TLD is located in an area where public access is restricted. All background corrected TLD measurements were less than the 40 CFR 190 limit of 25 mR/year.

Similar to previous years, there was no strong relationship between dose measured with TLDs and distance from the OCGS, and the mean background dose exceeded the mean indicator dose in three of the four quarterly monitoring periods during 2008.

The preoperational environmental monitoring program utilized film badges, the results of which are not comparable with the doses measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters during the operational REMP.

In conclusion, the 2008 TLD results are consistent with past operational measurements of direct radiation, and demonstrate that the OCGS continues to be in compliance with the 40 CFR 190 limit on maximum dose to the public.

D. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey, conducted during 2008 around the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates, Inc. for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey was, in part, to determine the location of animals producing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS. None were observed. Another purpose of the survey was to determine the location of gardens greater than 500 square feet in size producing broad leaf vegetation, as well as the closest residence within each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. The distance and direction of 18

all locations from the OCGS Reactor Building were determined using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of this survey. The results of this survey are summarized below.

Distance in Miles from the OCGS Reactor Building Sector Residence Garden*

(Miles) (Miles) 1 N 1.11 1.3 2 NNE 0.6 1.8 3 NE 0.7 1.0 4 ENE 1.1 3.1 5 E 1.2 None 6 ESE 0.7 0.4 7 SE 0.6 0.4 8 SSE 0.9 1.0 9 S 1.6 2.1 10 SSW 1.7 4.3 11 SW 1.7 1.8 12 WSW 2.3 None 13 W None None 14 WNW None None 15 NW 5.3 None 16 NNW 1.5 2.7

TLD data has historically been reported as mR/standard quarter in the AREOR. In the AREORs for 2006 and 2007 however, the TLD data in Tables C-VIII.1 through C-VIII.3 were inadvertently reported as mR/total exposure period, not corrected to mR/standard quarter. The corrections for this deviation involve the following sections in the 2006 and 2007 AREORs:

Appendix A - Summary Table A-1, TLD results Appendix C - TLD Table C-VIII.1 Appendix C - TLD Table C-VIII.2 Appendix C - TLD Table C-VIII.3 Appendix C - Graphs C-6 and C-7 Text - Ambient Gamma Radiation section IV.C 19

The corrected pages for the 2006 and 2007 reports are contained in Appendix E of this report.

F. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix F). The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc.,

Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:

1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of TBE's result and Analytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.
2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, NELAC, state specific PT program requirements or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.
3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.

The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag =

"A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value.

Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% <

bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

20

For the primary laboratory, 16 out of 18 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. Two samples did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's Analytics December 2008 Sr-89 in milk result of 18.0 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 12.6 pCi/L, resulting in a found to known ratio of 1.43. NCR 09-02 was initiated to investigate this failure.
2. Teledyne Brown Engineering's Analytics' ERA Quik Response water sample January 2008 Sr-89 result of 37.33 pCi/L exceeded the upper acceptance limit of 25.2 pCi/L. No cause could be found for the failure. Studies bracketing these results, RAD 71 and RAD 72 had acceptable Sr-89 results. NCR 08-03 For the secondary laboratory, all 15 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria.

In conclusion, the Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program provides evidence of "in control" counting systems and methods, and that the laboratories are producing accurate and reliable data.

V. References

1. Exelon Nuclear. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual for Oyster Creek Generating Station, Procedure CY-OC-170-301.
2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position, An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.

3 Pre-Operational Environmental Radiation Survey, Oyster Creek Nuclear Electric Generating Station, Jersey Central Power and Light Company, March 1968.

21

APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER H-3 28 200 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)

GAMMA 28 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 15 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER 1-131 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)

CS-1 34 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 Ili BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 DRINKING WATER H-3 16 200 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)

GAMMA 16 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 15 <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS DRINKING WATER FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)

CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS- 134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS- 137 18 <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS DRINKING WATER BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)

LA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 BOTTOM FEEDER FISH GAMMA 7 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 4537 4395 5020 33 INDICATOR 0 (3/3) (4/4) (1/1) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (4160/5020) (3350/5340) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS BOTTOM FEEDER FISH CS-1 34 100 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

CS-137 100 <LLD <LLD 0 PREDATOR FISH GAMMA 14 n (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 4078 3778 4244 33 INDICATOR 0 (10/10) (4/4) (5/5) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (3680/4580) (3080/4970) (4010/4580) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS.

PREDATOR FISH CS-134 100 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

CS-137 100 <LLD <LLD 0 CLAMS GAMMA 6 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 1933 1655 1965 24 INDICATOR 0 (4/4) (2/2) (2/2) BARNEGAT BAY (1610/2320) (1630/1680) (1610/2320) 2.1 MILES E OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 NA <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS CLAMS CS-1 34 100 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

CS-137 100 <LLD <LLD 0 CRABS GAMMA 1 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 2730 NA 2730 93 INDICATOR 0 (1/1) (1/1) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD NA 0 CO-58 130 <LLD NA 0 FE-59 260 <LLD NA CO-60 130 <LLD NA ZN-65 NA <LLD NA

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS CRABS CS-134 100 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/KG WET)

CS-137 100 <LLD NA 0

> SEDIMENT GAMMA 8 o (PCI/KG DRY) BE-7 NA <LLD <LLD 0 K-40 NA 1661 13450 13450 94 CONTROL 0 (6/6) (2/2) (2/2) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR (505/4920) (11800/15100) (11800/15100) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 150 <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT CS-137 180 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG DRY)

AIR PARTICULATE GR-B 406 10 15 15 16 C CONTROL 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) (293/303) (99/103) (50/51) JCP&L OFFICE - COOKSTOWN NJ (7/30) (8/35) (8/35) 24.7 MILES NW OF SITE SR-89 31 10 <LLD <LLD 0 SR-90 31 10 <LLD <LLD 0 GAMMA 31 BE-7 NA 74.8 71.5 87.5 73 INDICATOR 0 (19/23) (8/8) (3/4) BAY PARKWAY - SANDS POINT HARBOR (37/128) (40/115) (64/128) 1.8 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD 0

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICULATE CS-134 10 <LLD <LLD 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

CS-1 37 10 <LLD <LLD 0 AIR IODINE GAMMA 406 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) 1-131 70 <LLD <LLD 0 VEGETATION SR-89 35 25 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

SR-90 35 5 11.2 14.7 14.7 36 CONTROL 0 (21/23) (11/12) (11/12) U-PICK FARM - NEW EGYPT NJ (2/27) (3/37) (3/37) 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE GAMMA 35 BE-7 NA 222 178 256 35 INDICATOR 0 (14/23) (7/12) (6/12) EAST OF RT 9 AND NORTH OF OCGS DISCHG (63/511) (61/571) (76/511) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE K-40 NA 2807 3587 3587 36 CONTROL 0 (23/23) (12/12) (12/12) U-PICK FARM - NEW EGYPT NJ (1930/4870) (1840/5300) (1840/5300) 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY 238 NA 15.8 17 21.6 55 INDICATOR 0 (MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD.QTR.) (230/230) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (11.7/23.7) (13.5/21.3) (19.5/23.7) 0.3 MILES W

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYTICAL METHODS

TABLE B-i: Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Sample Medium - APT = Air Particulate Clam = Clam AIO = Air Iodine TLD = Thermoluminescent DW = Drinking Water Dosimetry VEG = Vegetation Fish = Fish SWA = Surface Water Crab = Crab AQS = Aquatic Sediment Station Code - Station's Designation Distance - Distance from the OCGS in miles Azimuth - Azimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees Description - Meteorological sector in which the station is located and a narrative description B-i

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Latitude Longitude Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description North West SW of site at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 1 0.4 219 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 44.8 Seconds 26.8 Seconds On-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees W 1 0.1 209 O48 Minutes 12 Minutes 44.8 Seconds 26.8 Seconds 0.2 DW1 349 On-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees DW . 3948 Minutes 12 Minutes 44.8 Seconds 26.8 Seconds 39 APT, AIO, East of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State Park 48 Degrees Minutes 74 Degrees 5 Minutes TD36.0 97 48 Minutes 5 Minutes TLD 12.7 Seconds 39.1 Seconds TLD 4.6 TL 213 SSW of site, Route 554 and Garden State Parkway, Barnegat, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees

.62345 Minutes 15 Minutes 34.4 Seconds 9.30 Seconds North of site, at Garden State Parkway Rest Area, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 5 4.2 Nh o52 Minutes 12 Minutes 27.9 Seconds 51.7 Seconds NNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 6 2.1 13 50 Minutes 11 Minutes 38.2 Seconds 46.1 Seconds South of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 8 2.3 177 S46 Minutes 12 Minutes 52.2 Seconds 12.5 Seconds TLD 2.0 TL 230 SW of site, where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meet, Waretown, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees

.02047 Minutes 14 Minutes 47.4 Seconds 42.7 Seconds APT, AIO, C 24.7 313 NW of site, JCP&L office in rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJ 40 Degrees 74 Degrees TILD C 47333 Minutes 32 Minutes 30.9 Seconds 45.6 Seconds SSE of site, 80th and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 11 8.2 152 42 Minutes 8 Minutes 27.3 Seconds 4.3 Seconds North of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJ 40 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 14 20.8 2 6 Minutes 11 Minutes 51.9 Seconds 24.5 Seconds APT, AIO 20 0.7 AP, IO 2 East of site, on Finninger Farm on south side of access road, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 07 548 Minutes 11 Minutes 47.5 Seconds 30.7 Seconds SE of site, on Long John Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 22 1.6 145 47 Minutes 11 Minutes 39.6 Seconds 19.7 Seconds

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Latitude Lon-gitude Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description North West 23 3.6 64 ENE of site, Barnegal Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of 39 Degrees 74 Degrees SWA, "FlshngLiht1"49 Minutes 8 Minutes CLAAS 3 .664 CLAM, AQS "Flashing Light 1" 59.2 Seconds 46.8 Seconds SWA, East of site, Barnegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of "Flashing Light 3" 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 24 2.1 101 48 Minutes 10 Minutes CLAM,AQS 35.6 Seconds 6.2 Seconds 33 0.4 123 ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge in OCGS Discharge Canal 39 Degrees 74 Degrees SWA, AQS, Minutes 11 Minutes FIH 3 0.1348 FISH 42.6 Seconds 58.5 Seconds ESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees VEG 35 0.4 ill11 48 Minutes 11 Minutes NJ 43.6 Seconds 56.1 Seconds NW of site, at "U-Pick" Farm, New Egypt, NJ 40 Degrees 74 Degrees VEG 36 23.1 319 4 Minutes 29 Minutes 19.0 Seconds 32.8 Seconds 2.2 18 NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJ 3950DegreMinutes 7411DegreMinutes DW 37 42.2 Seconds 30.9 Seconds 38 1.6 194 SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown, 3947DegreMinutes 7412 DegreMinutes DW NJ 31.3 Seconds 45:4 Seconds North of Site, Trenton Ave. off Lacey Rd, Lacey Twp. MUA Pump Station, Forked 39 Degrees 74 Degrees DW 39 3.5 353 River, NJ 51 Minutes 12 Minutes 54.6 Seconds 49.6 Seconds TLD 46 5.6 323 NW of site, on Lacey Road, adjacent to utility pole BT 259 65, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 52 Minutes 16 Minutes 44.7 Seconds 5.5 Seconds NNE of site, Route 9 and Harbor Inn Road, Bayville, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 47 4.6 26 N52 Minutes 10 Minutes 26.9 Seconds 0.6 Seconds 48 4.5 TL 189 South of site, at intersection of Brook and School Streets, Barnegat, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 8 .

1944 Minutes 13 Minutes 58.8 Seconds 12.5 Seconds North of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 51 0.4 358 49 Minutes 12 Minutes 12.1 Seconds 18.1 Seconds NNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 52 0.3 333 49 Minutes 12 Minutes 5.6 Seconds 28.8 Seconds NW of site, at sewage lift station an the access road to the Forked River site, Forked 39 Degrees 74 Degrees T4LD 53 0.3 309 N River,ite, NJ ao 49 Seconds 0.1 Minutes 12 Minutes 33.8 Seconds

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Latitude Longitude Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description North West 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 54 0.3 288 WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 56.3 Seconds 41.8 Seconds West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 55 0.3 263 Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 50.1 Seconds 39.3 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGS TLD 56 0.3 Switchyard, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 46.4 Seconds 37.8 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 57 0.2 206 SSW of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 41.0 Seconds 27.4 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 58 0.2 188 South of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 40.4 Seconds 23.0 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 59 0.3 166 SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 37.1 Seconds 15.2 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 61 0.3 104 ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 46.9 Seconds 0.0 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 62 0.2 83 East of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 53.6 Seconds 3.5 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees ENE of site, on Route 9, between main gate and OCGS North Gate access road, TLD 63 0.2 Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 56.2 Seconds 4.2 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 64 0.3 42 NE of site, on Route 9 North at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJ 49 Minutes 12 Minutes 1.6 Seconds 6.9 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 65 0.4 19 NNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJ 49 Minutes 12 Minutes 11.2 Seconds 9.7 Seconds APT, AIO, SE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge Canal, inside fence, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD, 66 0.4 133 Waretown, NJ 48 Minutes 11 Minutes VEG 37.0 Seconds 57.5 Seconds West of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 71.7, Lacey Township, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 68 1.3 266 NJ 48 Minutes 13 Minutes 46.1 Seconds 46.9 Seconds APT, AIO, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 71 1.6 164 SSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJ 47 Minutes 11 Minutes TLD 28.7 seconds 50.3 Seconds

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Latitude Longitude Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description North West 39 Degrees 74 Degrees APT, AIO, 72 1.9 25 NNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJ 50 Minutes 11 Minutes TLD 17.7 seconds 24.4 Seconds APT, AIO, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 73 1.8 108 ESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJ 48 Minutes 10 Minutes TLD 20.9 Seconds 21.3 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 74 1.8 88 East of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 10 Minutes 55.3 Seconds 13.9 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 75 2.0 71 ENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maui Drive, Forked River, NJ 49 Minutes 10 Minutes 26.0 Seconds 10.9 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 78 1.8 2 North of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJ 50 Minutes 12 Minutes 36.7 Seconds 31.5 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 79 2.9 160 SSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive, Waretown, NJ 46 Minutes 11 Minutes 31.2 Seconds 12.1 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 201 SSW of site, on Rose Hill Road at intersection with Barnegat Boulevard, Barnegat, TLD 81 3.5 NJ 45 Minutes 13 Minutes 57.0 Seconds 41.2 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 82 4.4 36 NE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor, NJ 51 Minutes 9 Minutes 53.9 Seconds 26.7 Seconds NNW of site, on Lacey Road, 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on siren 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 84 4.4 pole, Lacey Township, NJ 52 Minutes 14 Minutes 16.2 Seconds 34.7 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 85 3.9 250 WSW of site, on Route 532, just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown, NJ 47 Minutes 16 Minutes 46.4 Seconds 27.9 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 86 5.0 224 SW of site, on Route 554, 1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway, Barnegat, NJ 45 Minutes 16 Minutes 49.7 Seconds 16.7 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 88 6.6 125 SE of site, eastern end of 3 rd Street, Barnegat Light, NJ 45 Minutes 6 Minutes 43.8 Seconds 18.3 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 89 6.1 108 ESE of site, Job Francis residence, Island Beach State Park 47 Minutes 5 Minutes 11.5 Seconds 49.3 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 90 6.3 75 ENE of site, parking lot A-5, Island Beach State Park 50 Minutes 5 Minutes 12.4 Seconds 23.8 Seconds

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Latitude Lonnitude Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description North West 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 92 9.0 46 NE of site, at Guard Shack/Toll Booth, Island Beach State Park 54 Minutes 4 Minutes 14.8 Seconds 53.4 Seconds FISH, WSW of site, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees 93 0.1 Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes CRAB 47.7 Seconds 27.3 Seconds SWA, AQS, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees CLAM, FISH 94 20.0 198 SSW of site, in Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor 34 Minutes 19 Minutes 16.5 Seconds 14.5 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 98 1.6 318 NW of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 73, Lacey Township, NJ 49 Minutes 13 Minutes 51.7 Seconds 29.3 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 99 1.5 310 NW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJ 49 Minutes 13 Minutes 41.4 Seconds 33.2 Seconds NE of site, Yacht Basin Plaza South off Lakeside Dr., Lacey Township, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 100 1.4 49 Minutes 11 Minutes 43.8 Seconds 14.9 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees NE of site, end of Lacey Rd. East, Lacey Township, NJ TLD 101 1.7 49 49 Minutes 10 Minutes 47.6 Seconds 53.7 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees NNW of site, end of Sheffield Dr., Barnegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJ TLD 102 1.6 344 50 Minutes 12 Minutes 13.7 Seconds 49.2 Seconds NNW of site, Llewellyn Pkwy., Barnegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 103 2.4 337 50 Minutes 13 Minutes 44.1 Seconds 21.4 Seconds SW of site, Rt. 532 West, before Garden State Parkway, Ocean Township, NJ 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 104 1.8 221 47 Minutes 13 Minutes 40.1 Seconds 40.7 Seconds SW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 69.6, Ocean Township, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 105 2.8 222 NJ 47 Minutes 14 Minutes 3.4 Seconds 28.1 Seconds NW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.2, Lacey Township, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 106 1.2 288 NJ 49 Minutes 13 Minutes 10.6 Seconds 39.2 Seconds NW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.5, Lacey Township, 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 107 1.3 301 NJ 49 Minutes 13 Minutes 26.5 Seconds 37.5 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees SE of site, Lighthouse Dr., Waretown, Ocean Township, NJ TLD 109 1.2 141 47 Minutes 11 Minutes 59.8 Seconds 27.2 Seconds

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Latitude Longitude Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description North West 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TILD 110 1.5 127 SE of site, Tiller Dr. and Admiral Way, Waretown, Ocean Township, NJ 48 Minutes 10 Minutes 3.4 Seconds 59.2 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees AP/A 'I'll 0.3 64 ENE of site, Finninger Farm property along access road, Lacey Township, NJ 48 Minutes 11 Minutes 58.3 Seconds 59.8 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 112 0.2 178 S of site, along southern access road 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 38.3 Seconds 19.1 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD 113 0.3 90 E of site, along Rt. 9, North 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 50.7 Seconds 1.6 Seconds 39 Degrees 74 Degrees TLD Ti 0.4 219 SW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ 48 Minutes 12 Minutes 44.8 Seconds 26.8 Seconds i3

TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Drinking Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples ER-OCGS-10, Collection of well water samples 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis composited quarterly for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection gamma spectroscopy procedure - well water Drinking Water Tritium Monthly samples ER-OCGS-10, Collection of well water samples 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-13 analysis by liquid composited quarterly for radiological analysis scintillation CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct procedure - well water method)

Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of surface water 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Surface Water Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of surface water 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-13 analysis by liquid samples for radiological analysis scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

Fish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples ER-OCGS-14, Collection of fish samples for 250 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis 00 collected via hook and radiological analysis line technique and traps Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Clams and Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual ER-OCGS-16, Collection of clam and crab 300 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Crabs samples collected using samples for radiological analysis clam tongs and traps. Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by I_ gamma spectroscopy Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab ER-OCGS-03, Collection of aquatic sediment 1000 grams (dry) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis samples samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy

TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Air Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha and/or beta activity in various continuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters matrices) through glass fiber filter weekly) paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite of TBE, TBE-2023 Compositing of samples 13 filters TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis each station (approximately 4000 Env. Inc., AP-03 Procedure for compositing air cubic meters) Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by particulate filters for gamma spectroscopic gamma spectroscopy analysis Air Particulates Strontium-89/90 Quarterly composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 13 filters TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchange each station particulate samples for radiological analysis (approximately 4000 cubic meters)

Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis continuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters through charcoal filter weekly) Env. Inc., 1-131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal canisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method)

Vegetation Gamma Spectroscopy Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis growing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Vegetation Strontium-89/90 Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchange growing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis TLD Thermoluminescence Quarterly TLDs ER OCGS-02, Collection of thermoluminescent 2 dosimeters Global Dosimetry, Inc.

Dosimetry comprised of two dosimeters (TLDs) for radiological analysis Panasonic 814 (containing 3 each CaSO 4 elements)

Figure B-1.

Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-10

Figure B-2.

Locations of REMP Stations within a 1 to 5-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-11

Figure B-3.

Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the Oyster Creek Generating Station B- 12

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES PRIMARY LABORATORY

TABLE C-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 23 24 33 94 PERIOD 01/09/08 - 01/09/08 178 < 175 02/14/08 - 02/14/08 165 < 164 03/12/08 - 03/12/08 163 < 164 04/15/08 - 04/15/08 < 184 < 185 169 < 171 05/07/08 - 05/07/08 169 < 173 06/11/08 - 06/11/08 178 < 174 07/01/08 - 07/01/08 166 < 168 08/06/08 - 08/06/08 177 < 181 09/03/08 - 09/03/08 132 < 132 10/08/08 - 10/08/08 < 134 < 134 127 < 128 11/05/08 - 11/05/08 177 < 178 12/03/08 - 12/03/08 176 < 174 MEAN C-1

TABLE C-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 23 04/15/08- 04/15/08 <3 <4 <9 <3 <8 <4 <8 <15 <4 <4 <34 <10 10/06/08- 10/06/08 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <14 <1 <1 <20 <7 MEAN 24 04/14/08- 04/14/08 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <7 <15 <3 <3 <29 <10 10/06/08- 10/06/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <13 <1 <1 <16 <4 MEAN n) 33 01/09/08 01/09/08 < 3 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <7 <8 <3 <4

  • 22 <6 02/14/08 02/14/08 <4 <4 <9 <4 <9 <5 <6 <7 <4 <4
  • 20 <6 03/12/08 03/12/08 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <6 <4 <6 <6 <3 <3 <18 <4 04/02/08 04/02/08 <7 <7 <15 <8 <17 <6 < 14 <10 <7 <8 < 34 < 11 05/07/08 05/07/08 <4 <5 <8 <4 <9 <5 <8 < 13 <4 <5
  • 30 < 10 06/11/08 06/11/08 <6 <5 <12 <5 < 12 <6 <9 <11 <4 <5 < 25 <11 07/01/08 07/01/08 <2 <2 <5 <2 <5 <3 <4 <6 <2 <2 < 15 <5 08/06/08 08/06/08 <5 <6 < 14 <5 < 12 <5 <9 <9 <5 <6 < 27 <7 09/03/08 09/03/08 <1 <1 <4 <1 <3 <1 <3 < 12 <1 <1 <18 <5 10/08/08 10/08/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 13 <1 <1 < 15 <3 11/05/08 11/05/08 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 11 <1 <1 < 47 < 15.

12/03/08 12/03/08 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <7 <8 <4 <4 < 22 <6 MEAN

TABLE C-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 94 01/08/08 01/08/08 <4 <4 <9 <5 <9 <5 <8 < 12 <4 <5 < 24 <9 02/14/08 02/14/08 <4 <4 < 10 <6 <10 <5 < 10 <9 <4 <5 < 27 <8 03/12/08 03/12/08 <4 <4 <9 <5 <11 <4 <7 <8 <5 <4 < 24 <7 04/02/08 04/02/08 <6 <6 < 10 <6 < 13 <6 < 12 < 11 <6 <7

  • 27 <8 05/07/08 05/07/08 < 7 <6 < 15 <7 < 13 <6 < 12 < 15 <5 <6 < 33 < 15 06/11/08 06/11/08 <5 <5 <10 <6 <12 <7 <11 <11 <5 <5 < 23 <8 07/01/08 07/01/08 <2 <2 <6 <2 <5 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <15 <5 08/06/08 08/06/08 <6 <5 < 10 <6 <9 <5 <9 <8 <5 <6
  • 27 <8 09/03/08 09/03/08 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 12 <1 <1 < 16 <5 10/07/08 10/07/08 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <14 <1 <1 < 18 <5 11/05/08 11/05/08 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <8 <1 <1 < 43 < 15 12/03/08 - 12/03/08 < 3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <3 <6 <7 <3 <4 <17 <5 MEAN

TABLE C-I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 1 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/08/08 - 03/11/08 < 168 < 164 < 163 < 162 04/08/08 - 06/25/08 < 176

  • 167 < 169 < 168 07/09/08 - 09/12/08 < 138 < 145 < 146 < 142 10/10/08 - 12/10/08 < 181 < 183 < 183 < 182 MEAN C-4

TABLE C-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 1 01/08/08 - 03/11/ 08 <2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 < 21 <7 04/08/08 - 06/25/ 08 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 11 <2 <2 < 20 <5 07/09/08 - 09/12/ 08 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 11 <1 <1 < 16 <5 10/10/08 - 12/10/ 08 <3 <3 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 13 <2 <2 < 24 <4 MEAN 37 01/23/08 o0/18/08 <3 <5 <9 <4 <8 <5 <8 < 12 <4 <4 < 28 <8 04/30/08 06/25/08 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 11 <1 <1 < 17 <6 07/23/08 09/17/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 < 10 <3 10/29/08 12/17/08 <2 <3 <5 <2 <5 <3 <5 <7 <2 <3 <17 <7 MEAN 38 01/23/08 - 03/18/08 <5 <5 <12 <4 < 10 <6 <8 < 15 <4 <4 < 33 <10 04/30/08 - 06/25/08 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 14 <1 <2 < 21 <7 07/30/08 - 09/24/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <2 10/29/08 - 12/17/08 <4 <5 <8 <4 <8 <5 <8 <14 <4 <5

  • 29 <9 MEAN 39 01/23/08 - 03/18/08 <4 <4 < 10 <5 <9 <5 <8 < 14 <4 <4 < 30 < 10 04/30/08 - 06/25/08 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 14 <1 <2 < 20 <6 07/23/08 - 09/17/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1
  • 10 <3 10/29/08 - 12/17/08 <3 <4 <8 <3 <6 <4 <6 < 10 <3 <3 < 25 <7 MEAN

TABLE C-II1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR AND BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-i 34 Cs-137 PERIOD 33 PREDATOR 04/15/08 4170 +/- 1080 < 65 < 82

  • 160 < 57
  • 135 < 62 < 55 04/16/08 4010 +/- 748
  • 51 < 64 < 124 < 48 < 99 < 57 < 57 10/07/08 4300 +/- 894 < 48 < 51 < 121 < 60 < 106 < 44 < 48 10/07/08 4160 +/- 768
  • 46 <64 < 139 < 43 < 107 < 48 < 52 10/07/08 4580 +/- 1170
  • 67 < 80 < 250 < 26 < 123 < 71 < 62 MEAN 4244 +/- 428 33 BOTTOM FEEDER 10/07/08 5020 +/- 964 < 66 < 73 < 175 < 55 < 129 < 56 < 59 MEAN 5020 +/- 0 -

93 PREDATOR 04/15/08 3950 + 647 < 37 < 34 < 96 < 33 < 74 < 32 < 40

+/-

04/15/08 4140 707 < 42 < 40 < 77 < 36 < 73 < 36 < 41

+/-

04/15/08 3900 677 < 37 < 41 < 82 < 43 < 78 < 29 < 39

_+ 972 130 10/07/08 3890 < 55 < 52 < 149 < 33 <

  • 42 < 41 10/07/08 +/-

3680 1210 < 52 < 74

  • 154
  • 69 < 161
  • 63 < 50 MEAN 3912 +/- 328 93 BOTTOM FEEDER 10/07/08 4160 +/- 757 < 50 < 61 < 173 < 55 < 104 < 40 < 44 10/07/08 4430 +/- 778 < 35 < 47
  • 92 < 40 < 62 < 38 < 38 MEAN 4295 +/- 382

TABLE C-I11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR AND BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 94 PREDATOR 04/16/08 3120 +/- 746 < 35 < 45 < 101

  • 36 < 101 < 46 < 47 04/16/08 3940 +/- 753 < 40
  • 42 < 101 < 31 < 85 < 35 < 44 10/07/08 3080 +/- 812 < 44
  • 65 < 64 < 45 < 98 < 47 < 50 10/07/08 4970 +/- 901 < 49 < 57 < 157 < 50 < 99 < 40 < 53 MEAN 3778 +/- 1777 94 BOTTOM FEEDER 04/16/08 4570 +/- 1120 < 72 < 75 < 205 < 63 < 139 < 61 < 73 04/16/08 3350 +/- 596 < 40 < 43 < 100
  • 36
  • 90 < 33 < 41 10/07/08 4320 +/- 1110 < 75 < 94 < 197 < 79 < 127 < 56 < 68 10/07/08 5340 +/- 1020 < 59
  • 68 < 220
  • 58 < 109 < 55 < 58 MEAN 4395 +/- 1642

TABLE C-III.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 CLAMS 04/14/08 2080 +/- 535 < 37 < 32 < 88 < 30 < 59 < 29 < 31 10/06/08 1720 +/- 538 < 50 < 68 < 137 < 54 < 96 < 53 < 50 MEAN 1900 +/- 509 -

24 CLAMS 04/14/08 2320 +/- 489 < 31 < 34 < 76 < 46 < 69 < 36 < 31 10/06/08 1610 +/- 731 < 48 < 51 < 136 < 49 < 79 < 45 < 43 oc MEAN 1965 +/- 1004 -

94 CLAMS 04/16/08 1680 +/- 450 < 32 < 36 < 81 < 26 < 64 < 33 < 37 10/07/08 1630 +/- 792 < 56 < 63 < 140 < 49 < 120 < 48 < 62 MEAN 1655 +/- 71 -

93 CRABS 10/01/08 2730 +/- 706 < 51 < 61 < 137 < 49 < 109 < 42 < 50 MEAN 2730 +/- 0

TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 04/14/08 < 443 1720 +/- 529 < 39 < 43 < 34 < 38 < 36 10/06/08 < 406 1360 +/- 451 < 28 < 36 < 30 < 27 < 32 MEAN 1540 +/- 509 24 04/14/08 < 363 842 +/- 376 < 28 < 35 < 30 < 30 < 29 10/06/08 < 490 617 +/- 418 < 36 < 44 < 37 < 39 < 41 MEAN 730 +/- 318 33 04/14/08 < 403 505 +/- 379 < 33 < 27 < 36 < 29 < 38 10/08/08 < 626 4920 +/- 988 < 54 < 45 < 56 < 43 < 62 MEAN 2713 +/- 6244 94 04/16/08 < 328 11800 +/- 908 < 36 < 40 < 36 < 31 < 34 10/07/08 < 621 15100 +/- 1310 < 50 < 60 < 50 < 43 < 59 MEAN 13450 +/- 4667

TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP 1 GROUP 11 I GROUP III 111 71 73 C-PERIOD 66 72 3 c 01/02/08 - 01/09/08 20 +/- 5 23 +/-5 12 +/-5 21 +/- 17 +/-5 22 +/- 22 +/-5 01/09/08 - 01/16/08 (2) 15 +/-5 14 +/-5 13 +/- 15 +/-5 12 +/- 16 +/-5 01/16/08 - 01/23/08 20 +/- 5 14 +/-5 20 +/-5 16 +/- 16 16 +/- 19 +/-5

+/-5 01/23/08 - 01/30/08 28 +/- 6 29 +/-6 13 +/-5 28 +/- 20 24 +/- 29 +/-6 (1 +/-5 01/30/08 - 02/06/08 21 +/- 5 19 +/-5 16 +/-5 16 +/- 18 17+/- 17 +/-5 (1 +/-5 02/06/08 - 02/14/08 19 +/- 5 17 +/-4 20 17 +/- 20 15+/- 17 +/-5 02/14/08 - 02/20/08 15 +/- 6 17 +/-6 15 +/-6 19 +/- 18 +/-6 22+/- 17 +/-6 02/20/08 - 02/27/08 11 +/-5 11 +/-5 10 + 13 +/-5 11+/- 13 +/-5 10+/- 10 +/-5 02/27/08 - 03/05/08 19 +/-5 17 +/-5 13 +/- 19 +/-5 17+/- 14 +/-5 15 12 +/-5 03/05/08 - 03/12/08 17 +/-5 19 +/-5 18 +/- 21 22+/- 16 +/-5 22+/- 23 +/-5 03/12/08 - 03/18/08 14 +/-6 15 +/-6 11+/- 5 10 +/-6 10+/- 14 +/-6 11+/- 14 +/-6 03/18/08 - 03/26/08 18 +/-5 16 +/-5 15+ 12 +/-4 12+/- 16 +/-5 11+/- 16 +/-4 03/26/08 - 04/02/08 17 +/-5 16 +/-5 14+ 14 +/-5 18+/- 12 +/-5 12+/- 14 +/-5 04/02/08 - 04/09/08 7+/-5 8 +/-5 14+/- 9 +/-5 10+/- 10 +/-5 10+/- 14 +/-5 04/09/08 - 04/16/08 8+/-5 9 +/-5 <6 <7 8+/- <7 8+/- 11 +/-5 04/16/08 - 04/23/08 19 +/-5 19 +/-5 18+ 15 +/-5 16+ 15 +/-5 12+/- 22 +/-5 04/23/08 - 04/30/08 15 +/-5 15 +/-5 18+ 15 +/-5 18+ 14 +/-5 12+/- 16 +/-5 04/30/08 - 05/07/08 14 +/-5 15 +/-5 16+ 15 +/-5 15+/- 16 +/-5 16+/- 15 +/-5 05/07/08 - 05/14/08 13 +/-5 11 +/-5 11 12 +/-5 12+/- 10 +/-4 15+/- 12 +/-

05/14/08 - 05/21/08 13 +/-5 14 +/-5 11+ <7 11+/- 9 +/-5 10+/- 9 +/-5 05/21/08 - 05/28/08 8+/-4 8 +/-4 14+ 7 +/-4 8+ 9 +/-4 8+/- 12 +/-4 05/28/08 - 06/04/08 12 +/-5 10 +/-5 17+ 12 +/-5 12+ 13 +/-5 12+/- 8 +/-4 06/04/08 - 06/11/08 11 +/-5 19 +/-5 13+ 15 +/-5 15+/- 12 +/-5 15+/- 11 +/-5 06/11/08 - 06/18/08 11 +/-5 10 +/-5 10+/- 12 +/-5 14 +/- 14 +/-5 14+/- 15 +/-5 06/18/08 - 06/25/08 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 14+/- 18 +/-5 12 +/- 15 +/-5 13 +/- 14 +/-5 06/25/08 - 07/01/08 17 +/-6 14 +/-6 16+ 12 +/-6 15 +/- (2) 19 +/- 17 +/-6 07/01/08 - 07/09/08 16 +/-5 11 +/-4 10+/- 15 +/-4 16 +/- 12 +/-4 15 +/- 17 +/-4 07/09/08 - 07/16/08 13 +/- 5 10 +/-5 9+ 14 +/-5 11+ 9 +/-5 13 +/- 11 +/-5 07/16/08 - 07/23/08 19 +/- 5 20 +/-5 20 23 +/-6 20+ 22 +/-5 15 +/- 22 +/-5 07/23/08 - 07/30/08 21 +/- 5 17 +/-5 11+/- 16 +/-5 14+/- 10 +/-5 14 +/- 17 +/-5 07/30/08 - 08/06/08 22 +/- 5 24 +/-5 23+/- 19 +/-5 16+/- 14 +/-4 14 +/- 17 +/-4 08/06/08 - 08/13/08 18 +/- 5 19 +/-5 13+/- 14 +/-5 12+/- 19 +/-5 18 +/- 14 +/-5 08/13/08 - 08/20/08 14 +/- 5 17 +/-5 12+/- 17 +/-7 19+/- 11 +/-5 15+/- 15 +/-5 08/20/08 - 08/27/08 16 +/- 5 15 +/-5 12+/- 19 +/-5 12+/- 14 +/-5 12+/- 14 +/-4.

08/27/08 - 09/03/08 15 +/- 5 18 +/-5 15+/- 14 +/-5 15+/- 16 11+/- 18 +/-5

+/-5 09/03/08 - 09/10/08 18 +/- 5 19 +/-5 15+ 20 +/-5 18+ 16 15+/- 18 +/-5

+/-5 09/10/08 - 09/17/08 13 +/- 5 10 +/-5 13+ 9 +/-5 11+/- 9 8+/- 16 +/-5

+/-5 09/17/08 - 09/24/08 12 +/- 5 15 +/-5 12+/- 9 +/-5 15+/- 14 9+/- 16 +/-5

+/-5 09/24/08 - 09/30/08 8 <8 9+/- 8 +/-5 10+/- 11 <7 <8

+/-5 09/30/08 - 10/08/08 14 +/-5 18 +/-5 12+ 14 +/-5 11+/- 15 11 +/-4 14 +/-4

+/-5 10/08/08 - 10/15/08 23 +/-5 18 +/-5 21+ 21 +/-5 22+ 24 15 5 24 +/-5

+/-5 10/15/08 - 10/22/08 12 +/-5 16 +/-5 12+ 18 +/-5 15+/- 13 10 +/-5 (2) 10/22/08 - 10/29/08 12 +/-5 8 +/-5 7+ <7 <7 <7 +/-5 <7 12 +/-5 10/29/08 - 11/05/08 15 +/-5 18 +/-5 18+/- 16 +/-5 15+ 17 17 5 21 +/-5

+/-5 11/05/08 -. 11/12/08 15 +/-5 9 +/-5 8+ 9 +/-5 11+ 10 10 +/-5 13 +/-5

+/-5 11/12/08 - 11/18/08 12 +/-5 9 +/-5 <7 10 +/-5 10+ 11 <8 11 +/-5

+/-5 11/18/08 - 11/25/08 13 +/-5 10 +/-5 12+ 15 +/-5 11+/- 13 15 +/-5 12 +/-5

+/-5 11/25/08 - 12/03/08 18 +/-5 17 +/-5 16 +/- 18 +/-5 16+/- 18 19 +/- 5 16 +/-4 12/03/08 - 12/10/08 17 +/-5 17 +/-5 19 + 13 13+ 22 +/-6 14 +/- 5 17 +/-5

+/-5 12/10/08 -12/17/08 12 +/-5 15 +/-5 12 +/- 12 14+/- 13 +/-5 12 +/- 5 13 +/-5 65 12/17/08 -12/23/08 17 +/-6 22 +/-6 20 +/- 20 15+ 23 +/-6 14 +/- 6 24 +/-6

+/-6 12/23/08 -12/30/08 26 +/-5 27 +/-5 22 +/- 27 27+/- 30 +/-6 23 +/- 5 35 +/-6 MEAN 16 +/-9 15 +/-9 14 +/-8 15 +/-8 15 +/-9 15 +/-9 14 +/-8 16 +/-10

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION (2) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION c-i1o

TABLE C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONS GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+

PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD 01/02/08 - 01/30/08 < 34 29 21 +/- 11 01/02/08 - 01/30/08 12 28 17 +/- 9 01/02/08 01/30/08 12 29 20 +/- 11 01/30/08 - 02/27/08 10 21 15 +/- 8 01/30/08 - 02/27/08 11 20 16 +/- 6 01/30/08 02/27/08 10 22 16 +/- 8 02/27/08 - 04/02/08 11 19 16 +/- 5 02/27/08 - 04/02/08 10 22 15 +/- 7 02/27/08 04/02/08 11 23 15 +/- 9 04/02/08 - 04/30/08 <6 19 14 +/- 9 04/02/08 - 04/30/08 < 7 18 13 +/- 7 04/02/08 04/30/08 8 22 13 +/-9 04/30/08 - 05/28/08 8 16 12 +/- 5 04/30/08 - 05/28/08 7 16 11 +/-6 04/30/08 05/28/08 8 16 12 +/- 6 05/28/08 - 07101/08 10 19 13 +/- 5 05128108 - 07/01/08 12 19 14 +/- 4 05/28/08 07101/08 8 19 14 +/- 6 07/01/08 - 07/30/08 9 21 15 +/- 9 07/01/08 - 07/30/08 9 23 15 +/-9 07/01/08 07/30/08 .11 22 15 +/- 7 07/30/08 - 09/03/08 12 24 17 +/- 8 07/30/08 - 09/03/08 11 19 15 +/- 5 07/30/08 09/03/08 11 18 15 +/- 5 09/03/08 - 09/30/08 < 8 19 14 +/- 7 09/03/08 - 09/30/08 8 20 12 +/-8 09/03/08 09/30/08 < 7 18 14 +/- 8 09/30/08 - 10/29/08 7 23 14 +/- 10 09/30/08 - 10/29/08 < 7 24 17 +/- 9 09/30/08 10/29/08 < 7 24 14 +/- 10 10/29/08 - 12/03/08 <7 18 13 +/- 7 10/29/08 - 12/03/08 9 18 13 +/- 6 10/29/08 12/03/08 < 8 21 15 +/- 8 12/03/08 - 12/30/08 12 27 19 +/- 10 12/03/08 - 12/30/08 12 30 19 +/- 13 12/03/08 12/30/08 12 35 19 +/- 16 01/02/08 - 12/30/08 < 6 29 15 +/- 9 01/02/08 - 12/30/08 < 7 30 15 +/- 9 01/02/08 - 12/30/08 < 7 35 15 +/-9

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 STC COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 PERIOD PERIOD 3 01/02/08 - 04/02/08 <9 <4 72 01/02/08- 04/02/08 <8 <4 04/02/08- 07/01/08 <7 <3 04/02/08- 07/01/08 <5 <3 07/01/08- 09/30/08 < 26 <2 07/01/08 - 09/30/08 < 31 <2 09/30/08 - 12/30/08 <9 <4 09/30/08 - 12/30/08 <5 <2 MEAN MEAN 20 01/02/08- 04/02/08 8 5 73 01/02/08 04/02/08 7 <4 04/02/08- 07/01/08 8 3 04/02/08 07/01/08 6 <2 07/01/08- 09/30/08 24 2 07/01/08 09/30/08 26 <2 09/30/08 - 12/30/08 5 3 09/30/08 12/30/08 6 <3 MEAN MEAN 66 01/02/08 04/02/08 8 3 111 01/02/08 04/02/08 (1) 04/02/08 07/01/08 5 2 04/02/08 07/01/08 <6 <2 07/01/08 09/30/08 32 2 07/01/08 09/30/08 < 27 <2 09/30/08 12/30/08 6 2 09/30/08 12/30/08 <6 <2 MEAN MEAN 71 01/02/08 04/02/08 9 5 C 01/02/08 04/02/08 <8 <4 04/02/08 07/01/08 6 3 04/02/08 07/01/08 <4 <3 07/01/08 09/30/08 31 2 07/01/08 09/30/08 < 29 <2 09/30/08 12/30/08 6 2 09/30/08 12/30/08 <7 <3 MEAN MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-12

TABLE C-V.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 3 01/02 - 04/02/08 Z I1 < L < 2 < 2 04/02 - 07/01/08 115 +/- 42 <4 <5 <5 <4 <4 07/01 - 09/30/08 88 +/- 43 <3 <6 <4 <3 <3 09/30 - 12/30/08 53 +/- 25 <3 <2 <3 <4 <4 MEAN 78 +/- 58 20 01/02 04/02/08 65 +/- 18 <2 <2 <2 <2 <1 04/02 07/01/08 62 +/- 25 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 07/01 09/30/08 < 99 <4 < 10 <4 <4 <4 09/30 12/30/08 37 +/- 15 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 MEAN 55 +/- 31 66 01/02 04/02/08 87 +/- 23 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 04/02 07/01/08 < 54 <3 <5 <3 <3 <3 07/01 09/30/08

  • 112 <4 <8 <4 <5 <4 09/30 12/30/08 57 +/- 27 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 MEAN 72 +/- 43 71 01/02 04/02/08 97 +/- 22 <3 <3 <3 <2 <3 04/02 07/01/08 66 +/- 33 <4 <6 <1 <3 <3 07/01 09/30/08 102 +/- 49 <4 <6 <3 <3 <3 09/30 12/30/08 65 +/- 25 <3 <4 <4 <4 <4 MEAN 83 +/- 39 72 01/02 04/02/08 78 +/- 20 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 04/02 07/01/08 105 +/- 51 <3 <5 <4 <4 <3 07/01 09/30/08 84 +/- 37 <3 <7 <3 <3 <2 09/30 12/30/08 42 +/- 24 <3 <4 <4 <3 <3 MEAN 77 +/- 53 73 01/02 04/02/08 64 +/- 15 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 04/02 07/01/08 128 +/- 39 <3 <.5 <3 <3 <3 07/01 09/30/08 71 +/- 46 <3 <6 <3 <3 <2 09/30 12/30/08 < 35 <4 <4 <3 <3 <2 MEAN 88 +/- 70 111 01/02 04/02/08 (1) 04/02 07/01/08 89 +/- 32 <3 <6 <4 <4 <4 07/01 09/30/08 57 +/- 40 <3 <6 <2 <3 <2 09/30 12/30/08 65 +/- 21 <3 <4 <1 <4 <3 MEAN 70 +/- 34 C 01/02 - 04/02/08 60 +/- 19 <2 <3 <2 <2 <2 04/02 - 07/01/08 97 +/- 46 <3 <6 <4 <4 <3 07/01 - 09/30/08 62 +/- 32 <3 <4 <3 <3 <2 09/30 - 12/30/08 40 +/- 19 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 MEAN 65 +/- 47
  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-13

TABLE C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008.

RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP I GROUP 11 GROUP Ill PERIOD 20 66 71 72 73 3 C 01/02/08 -01/09/08

  • 26
  • 26
  • 26
  • 25
  • 26 < 24 < 24 01/09/08 -01/16/08 (2)
  • 30
  • 30
  • 29
  • 29 *<28 < 28 01/16/08 -01/23/08
  • 23
  • 24
  • 24
  • 24
  • 16 < 29 < 30 01/23/08 -01/30/08
  • 33
  • 33
  • 33
  • 31
  • 33 < 30 < 30 01/30/08 -02/06/08
  • 33
  • 34
  • 34
  • 33
  • 33 < 32 < 33 02/06/08 -02/14/08
  • 56
  • 58
  • 57
  • 49
  • 57 < 47 < 48 02/14/08 -02/20/08
  • 41
  • 42
  • 42
  • 45
  • 41 < 43 < 44 02/20/08 -02/27/08
  • 35
  • 36
  • 22
  • 33
  • 36 < 31 < 32 02/27/08 -03/05/08
  • 29
  • 30 ( 1)
  • 18
  • 39
  • 29 < 37 < 39 03/05/08 -03/12/08
  • 29
  • 29
  • 22
  • 70
  • 29 < 70 < 67 03/12/08 -. 03/18/08
  • 57
  • 57
  • 29
  • 41
  • 56 < 41 < 40 03/18/08 -03/26/08
  • 35
  • 36
  • 36
  • 18
  • 33
  • 35 < 34 < 20 03/26/08 -04/02/08
  • 53
  • 53
  • 23
  • 61
  • 53 < 61 < 59 04/02/08 -04/09/08
  • 40
  • 40
  • 55
  • 22
  • 39
  • 40 < 38 < 37 04/09/08 -04/16/08
  • 66
  • 67
  • 69
  • 64 *<67 < 65 < 62 04/16/08 -04/23/08
  • 57
  • 40
  • 41
  • 57
  • 40 *<57 < 55 04/23/08 -04/30/08
  • 48
  • 61
  • 62
  • 48
  • 61 < 48 < 46 04/30/08 -05/07/08
  • 45
  • 24
  • 46
  • 43
  • 45 < 43 < 42 05/07/08 -05/14/08
  • 13
  • 13
  • 59
  • 13
  • 13
  • 12 < 13 < 12 05/14/08 -05/21/08
  • 24
  • 43
  • 44
  • 24
  • 43 < 24 < 23 05/21/08 -05/28/08
  • 48
  • 55
  • 56
  • 49
  • 55 < 48 < 46 05/28/08 -06/04/08
  • 24
  • 24
  • 23
  • 15
  • 34
  • 24 < 35 < 33 06/04/08 -06/11/08
  • 34
  • 48
  • 46
  • 49
  • 34
  • 48 *<34 < 33 06/11/08 -06/18/08
  • 38
  • 40
  • 38
  • 40
  • 38
  • 40 < 38 < 37 06/18/08 -06/25/08
  • 45
  • 38
  • 37
  • 39
  • 44
  • 38 < 44 < 43 06/25/08 -07/01/08
  • 43
  • 24
  • 23
  • 25
  • 43 (2) < 43 < 42 07/01/08 -07/09/08 *24
  • 26 *25
  • 26 *24 *25 < 23 < 23 07/09/08 -07/16/08
  • 31
  • 40
  • 39
  • 40
  • 31
  • 39 < 30 < 29 07/16/08 -07/23/08
  • 46
  • 43
  • 41
  • 44
  • 46
  • 43 < 47 < 45 07/23/08 -07/30/08
  • 60
  • 60
  • 58
  • 34
  • 45
  • 60 < 45 < 44 07/30/08 -08/06/08
  • 28
  • 38
  • 36
  • 39
  • 28
  • 38 < 28 < 27 08/06/08 -08/13/08
  • 50
  • 43
  • 42
  • 44
  • 49
  • 43 *<50 < 48 08/13/08 -08/20/08
  • 43
  • 46
  • 45
  • 61
  • 42
  • 46 < 42 < 41 08/20/08 -08/27/08
  • 27
  • 26
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 26 < 27 < 26 08/27/08 -09/03/08
  • 53
  • 55
  • 53
  • 56
  • 53
  • 55 < 53 < 51 09/03/08 -09/10/08
  • 39
  • 44
  • 43
  • 45
  • 39
  • 44 *<39 < 38 09/10/08 -09/17/08
  • 38 *38
  • 37
  • 39
  • 37
  • 38 < 37 < 36 09/17/08 -09/24/08
  • 50
  • 65
  • 62
  • 66
  • 49
  • 64 < 53 < 48 09/24/08 -09/30/08
  • 58
  • 54
  • 53
  • 55
  • 57
  • 54 < 56 < 59 09/30/08 -10/08/08
  • 61
  • 62
  • 60
  • 64
  • 61
  • 62 < 60 < 56 10/08/08 -10/15/08
  • 36
  • 33
  • 31
  • 33
  • 36
  • 32 < 36 < 35 10/15/08 -10/22/08
  • 47
  • 56
  • 54
  • 57
  • 58
  • 56 < 58 (2) 10/22/08 -10/29/08 *61
  • 56
  • 54
  • 57
  • 61
  • 56 < 62 < 59 10/29/08 -11/05/08
  • 41
  • 46
  • 44
  • 46
  • 41
  • 45 < 41 < 39 11/05/08 -11/12/08
  • 70
  • 58
  • 56
  • 59
  • 69
  • 58 < 69 < 67 11/12/08 -11/18/08
  • 52
  • 54
  • 52
  • 55
  • 52
  • 54 < 53 < 50 11/18/08 -11/25/08
  • 56
  • 47
  • 45
  • 48
  • 56
  • 47 < 56 < 54 11/25/08 -12/03/08
  • 38
  • 64
  • 62
  • 66
  • 38
  • 64 < 38 < 37 12/03/08 -12/10/08
  • 57
  • 64
  • 62
  • 65
  • 56
  • 64 < 57 < 54 12/10/08 -12/17/08
  • 68
  • 67
  • 64
  • 68
  • 70
  • 67 < 70 < 67 12/17/08 -12/23/08
  • 40 *38
  • 36
  • 38
  • 40
  • 38 < 40 < 39 12/23/08 -12/30/08
  • 59
  • 59
  • 57
  • 30
  • 35
  • 59 < 52 < 50 MEAN- -

(1) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION (2) SEE PRGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-i14

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 35 07/16/08 Cabbage < 14 13 +/- 2 < 80 2500 +/- 194 < 45 < 7 <8 < 78 < 22 07/16/08 Collards < 10 17 +/- 2 < 77 2320 +/- 118 < 46 < 8 <7 < 83 < 25 07/16/08 Kale < 13 17 +/- 2 < 89 2270 +/- 162 < 53 <9 < 8 < 90 < 30 08/12/08 Cabbage < 6 9 +/- 1 319 +/- 182 2520 +/- 323 < 40 < 18 < 22 < 508 < 115 08/12/08 Collards < 7 16 +/- 1 511 +/- 197 2890 +/- 325 < 46 < 15 < 18 < 427 < 150 08/12/08 Kale < 8 20 +/- 1 233 +/- 193 2570 +/- 334 < 44 < 18 < 20 < 513 < 118 09/09/08 Cabbage < 15 4 +/- 2 76 +/- 60 2760 +/- 140 < 47 <4 < 28 < 68 < 18 09/09/08 Collards < 17 17 +/- 7 < 63 2270 +/- 145 < 59 < 5 < 25 < 89 < 22 09/09/08 Kale < 15 13 +/- 6 < 50 1930 +/- 111 < 44 < 4 < 25 < 58 < 17 10/16/08 Cabbage < 16 5 +/- 2 < 82 2360 +/- 211 < 56 < 6 < 7 < 78 < 24 10/16/08 Collards < 24 8 +/- 2 155 +/- 117 2340 +/- 224 < 57 < 6 < 6 < 84 < 26 10/16/08 Kale < 20 7 +/- 2 243 +/- 53 3610 +/- 142 < 57 < 5 < 19 < 75 < 21 MEAN - 12 +/- 11 256 +/- 300 2528 +/- 843 - - - - -

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 36 07/16/08 Cabbage < 11 3 +/- 2 < 53 2330 +/- 121 < 31 < 5 < 5 < 54 < 14 07/16/08 Collards < 11 5 +/- 1 < 45 2460 +/- 95 < 26 < 4 < 5 < 45 < 13 07/16/08 Kale < 15 37 +/- 2 61 +/-46 3810 +/- 142 < 28 < 5 < 5 < 54 < 15 08/12/08 Cabbage < 7 8 +/- 1 < 195 2520 +/- 273 < 38 < 14 < 15 < 409 < 103 08/12/08 Collards < 7 24 +/- 2 262 +/- 148 5060 +/- 408 < 49 < 17 < 18 < 510 < 103 08/12/08 Mustard Greens < 25 13 +/- 1 571 +/- 227 5300 +/- 426 < 50 < 16 < 17 < 476 < 100 09/10/08 Cabbage < 16 4 +/- 2 < 68 1840 +/- 122 < 59 < 6 < 6 < 88 < 22 09/10/08 Collards < 25 14 +/- 2 72 +/- 64 3620 +/- 135 < 58 < 5 < 6 < 82 < 23 09/10/08 Kale < 16 10 +/- 2 88 +/- 58 4270 +/- 160 < 46 < 5 < 5 < 68 < 16 10/16/08 Cabbage < 21 < 3 < 80 2220 +/- 178 < 57 < 7 < 8 < 99 < 31 10/16/08 Collards < 23 28 +/- 3 114 +/- 37 5100 +/- 107 < 48 < 4 < 4 < 67 < 20 10/16/08 Kale < 22 15 +/- 3 78 +/-45 4510 +/- 126 < 56 <4 <5 < 73 < 18 MEAN - 15 +/- 22 178 +/- 373 3587 +/- 2535 - - - - -

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION* SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 66 07/16/08 Cabbage < 18 27 +/- 2 120 +/- 110 3870 +/- 297 < 53 < 8 <9 < 97 < 22 07/16/08 Collards < 21 9 +/- 3 63 +/- 36 2360 +/- 117 < 29 < 4 < 5 < 53 < 14 07/16/08 Kale < 20 10 +/- 3 102 +/- 75 2780 +/- 170 < 45 < 7 < 8 < 84 < 25 08/12/08 Cabbage < 12 3 +/- 1 < 189 2730 +/- 285 < 45 < 12 < 16 < 382 < 101 08/12/08 Collards < 9 15 +/- 2 < 262 2310 +/- 299 < 46 < 17 < 19 < 456 < 147 08/12/08 Kale < 10 13 +/- 1 232 +/- 207 2790 +/- 285 < 45 < 15 < 17 < 443 < 145 09/09/08 Cabbage < 15 <3 < 44 2320 +/- 131 < 42 < 4 < 5 < 64 < 18 09/09/08 Collards < 19 4 +/- 2 216 +/- 74 3250 +/- 183 < 59 < 5 < 22 < 88 < 23 09/09/08 Kale < 11 2 +/- 1 159 +/-56 3380 +/- 136 < 50 <4 < 5 < 70 < 18 10/16/08 Collards < 22 6 +/-2 325 +/- 48 3560 +/- 103 < 54 < 4 < 5 < 73 < 19 10/16/08 Kale < 23 < 3 348 +/- 72 4870 +/- 158 < 52 < 4 < 4 < 73 < 20 MEAN - 10 +/- 16 196 +/- 207 3111 +/- 1569 - - - -

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VIII.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH CODE +/- 2 S.D.

1 16.2 t 3.7 16.5 +/- 1.2 13.8 +/- 0.6 18.3 +/- 1.5 16.2 +/- 1.8 3 14.6 t 4.2 15.9 +/- 2.1 12.3 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 0.9 13.5 +/- 1.5 4 15.3 t 3.9 17.7 +/- 1.5 12.9 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 1.2 15.0 +/- 0.6 5 20.6 t 4.3 22.5 +/- 3.0 18.0 +/- 1.2 22.2 +/- 2.7 19.8 +/- 2.1 6 14.1 t 2.7 (1) 12.6 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/- 1.5 14.4 +/- 0.9 8 16.1 t 3.7 17.1 +/- 3.0 13.8 +/- 1.8 18.0 +/- 0.9 15.6 +/- 1.2 9 14.0 +/- 2.8 15.0 +/- 1.2 12.0 +/- 0.9 15.0 +/- 4.2 13.8 +/- 1.5 C 15.8 +/- 3.7 18.0 +/- 1.5 13.5 +/- 1.8 15.9 +/- 2.4 15.9 +/- 0.9 11 16.3 +/- 4.0 17.4 +/- 1.5 13.8 +/- 0.9 18.3 +/- 1.8 15.6 +/- 1.5 14 18.2 +/- 4.6 21.3 +/- 1.5 16.2 +/- 2.1 18.3 +/- 0.6 16.8 +/- 1.5 22 14.8 +/- 3.2 15.6 +/- 1.8 12.6 +/- 1.2 14.7 +/- 0.9 16.2 +/- 4.2 46 14.4 +/- 3.8 15.0 +/- 1.2 12.0 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 0.9 47 15.9 +/- 4.1 17.4 +/- 0.9 12.9 +/- 1.5 16.5 +/- 2.4 16.8 +/- 2.1 48 15.8 +/- 3.1 16.8 +/- 1.8 13.5 +/- 0.6 16.8 +/- 1.5 15.9 +/- 2.1 51 17.0 +/- 3.5 18.3 +/- 1.8 14.4 +/- 2.1 18.0 +/- 3.9 17.1 +/- 0.9 52 19.9 +/- 5.3 21.3 +/- 2.4 16.5 +/- 2.4 22.5 +/- 4.5 19.2 +/- 1.8 53 18.3 +/- 4.4 19.2 +/- 2.1 15.6 +/- 3.3 20.7 +/- 2.1 17.7 +/- 1.5 54 15.9 +/- 3.8 16.5 +/- 1.8 13.5 +/- 1.2 18.0 +/- 1.2 15.6 +/- 0.6 55 21.6 +/- 3.6 22.2 +/- 0.9 19.5 +/- 3.0 23.7 +/- 2.1 21.0 +/- 3.3 56 19.7 +/- 5.0 21.0 +/- 1.8 16.2 +/- 1.2 21.9 +/- 0.9 19.8 +/- 2.7 57 16.4 +/- 4.3 17.1 +/- 1.8 13.8 +/- 2.1 18.9 +/- 2.4 15.9 +/- 0.6 58 16.4 +/- 3.7 16.2 +/- 1.5 13.8 +/- 0.6 18.0 +/- 1.2 17.4 +/- 1.5 59 16.9 +/- 4.1 17.7 +/- 1.8 14.1 + 1.8 18.9 +/- 1.5 16.8 +/- 1.2 61 15.4 +/- 3.6 16.2 +/- 0.9 12.9 + 0.6 17.1 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/- 1.5 62 15.6 +/- 3.8 16.2 +/- 1.2 12.9 + 0.9 17.4 +/- 2.7 15.9 +/- 2.7 63 16.2 +/- 3.8 16.8 +/- 1.2 13.5 +/- 0.9 18.0 +/- 0.9 16.5 +/- 2.1 64 15.5 +/- 3.8 16.2 +/- 1.2 12.9 + 0.9 17.4 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/- 1.8 65 15.8 +/- 2.3 15.9 +/- 1.2 14.1 +2.1 16.5 +/- 2.7 16.5 +/- 1.8 66 14.9 +/- 2.5 15.3 +/- 0.9 13.2 +/- 1.5 16.2 +/- 2.1 14.7 +/- 0.6 68 13.7 +/- 2.6 14.1 +/- 1.5 11.7 + 0.9 14.4 +/- 1.5 14.4 +/- 1.5 71 15.7 +/- 3.0 16.8 +/- 1.8 13.5 +2.1 15.9 +/- 0.9 16.5 +/- 1.2 72 15.8 +/- 3.0 17.7 +/- 2.4 14.1 + 1.5 15.9 +/- 1.8 15.3 +/- 0.9 73 14.8 +/- 4.1 16.8 +/- 2.1 12.0 + 0.9 14.7 +/- 0.9 15.6 +/- 2.1 74 14.9 +/- 4.6 16.8 +/- 1.2 11.7 + 1.2 16.2 +/- 2.4 15.0 +/- 0.9 75 16.5 +/- 3.6 17.7 +/- 1.5 13.8 + 0.9 17.4 +/- 1.8 17.1 +/- 2.1 78 15.4 +/- 3.2 17.4 +/- 1.5 13.5 + 0.6 15.3 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/- 0.9 79 16.2 +/- 4.5 18.0 +/- 2.1 12.9 + 0.9 17.1 +/- 2.7 16.8 +/- 2.1 81 15.5 +/- 4.7 17.4 +/- 2.1 12.6 + 0.6 17.4 +/- 1.5 14.7 +/- 0.9 82 16.3 +/- 5.4 19.2 +/- 2.4 12.9 + 0.6 17.4 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 2.4 84 16.0 +/- 4.9 17.7 +/- 1.5 13.2 + 1.2 18.3 +/- 2.1 14.7 +/- 1.5 85 14.3 +/- 3.3 15.9 +/- 0.6 12.0 + 0.6 15.0 +/- 3.6 14.1 +/- 1.5 86 15.2 +/- 3.7 17.1 +/- 2.1 12.9 +/- 1.2 16.2 +/- 1.5 14.7 +/- 1.5 88 14.5 +/- 3.3 16.8 +/- 2.1 12.9 +/- 0.6 14.1 +/- 1.2 14.1 +/- 1.8 89 14.6 +/- 3.4 17.1 +/- 2.1 13.5 +/- 1.5 13.5 +/- 1.2 14.1 +/- 0.9 90 14.6 +/- 3.1 16.8 +/- 2.4 13.2 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 1.8 14.1 +/- 1.8 92 16.2 +/- 2.8 18.0 +/- 2.1 14.7 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 2.1 98 15.0 +/- 2.0 16.2 +/- 0.9 13.8 +/- 0.6 15.0 +/- 1.2 15.0 +/- 2.1 99 15.5 +/- 2.5 16.8 +/- 3.3 13.8 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/- 1.5 100 14.2 +/- 2.4 13.5 +/- 2.1 13.2 +/- 1.8 15.9 +/- 1.8 14.1 +/- 3.6 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-18

TABLE C-VIIIA QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH CODE +/- 2 S.D.

101 14.9 +/- 3.6 15.3 +/- 1.8 12.3 +/- 1.5 16.5 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/- 1.8 102 15.3 +/- 3.7 15.3 +/- 2.7 13.2 +/- 1.8 17.7 +/- 2.4 15.0 +/- 1.5 103 14.9 +/- 3.4 14.7 +/- 3.0 12.9 +/- 0.9 17.1 +/- 0.9 15.0 +/- 1.5 104 15.7 +/- 4.9 14.4 +/- 1.5 13.8 +/- 3.3 19.2 +/- 4.8 15.3 +/- 1.2 105 15.4 +/- 5.1 14.4 +/- 2.4 (1) 18.3 +/- 2.1 13.5 +/- 1.8 106 14.8 +/- 4.7 15.0 +/- 3.3 12.0 +/- 1.2 17.7 +/- 2.7 14.4 +/- 2.7 107 15.0 +/- 3.2 15.9 +/- 1.8 12.6 +/- 1.2 15.9 +/- 1.2 15.6 +/- 0.9 109 15.7 +/- 4.9 14.1 +/- 5.7 13.5 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 1.2 16.2 +/- 0.6 110 14.5 +/- 3.0 15.3 +/- 1.2 12.3 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 2.4 14.7 +/- 1.8 112 17.1 +/- 1.7 (2) (2) 16.5 +/- 5.1 17.7 +/- 0.9 113 14.1 +/- 2.5 (2) (2) 13.2 +/- 0.9 15.0 +/- 1.5 Ti 16.2 +/- 2.5 16.5 +/- 1.2 14.7 +/- 0.9 17.7 +/- 1.2 15.9 +/- 0.3 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION (2) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-19

TABLE C-VIII.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN PER STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD JAN-MAR 17.6 +/- 4.2 16.3 +/- 3.6 17.1 +/- 1.2 19.7 +/- 4.7 APR-JUN 14.4 +/- 3.4 13.0 +/- 2.3 13.4 +/- 1.5 14.9 +/- 3.8 JUL-SEP 18.4 +/- 4.9 16.7 +/- 3.3 15.8 +/- 3.3 17.1 +/- 3.4 OCT-DEC 16.8 +/- 3.4 15.3 +/- 2.4 14.8 +/- 1.9 16.4 +/- 1.3 TABLE C-VIII.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/- 2 S.D.

SITE BOUNDARY 72 12.9 23.7 16.8 +/- 4.9 INTERMEDIATE 122 11.7 22.5 15.3 +/- 4.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 12.3 18.3 15.3 +/- 3.4 CONTROL 8 13.5 21.3 17.0 +/- 4.6 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1, Ti, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 112, 113 INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 22, 46, 47, 48, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99,100, 101,102,103,104,105,106,107,109, 110 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 3,11, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-20

FIGURE C-1 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMS OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 - 2008 20

-- INDICATOR STATION

--- BACKGROUND STATION 515 - -- -- --- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - -- --- -- -- --- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - - - - -- -- --- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- --- -- -- --- -- - -

n) .20 5

0 enIVN - t 00 00 V\ 00 = = -ýoU n e t 1 k = a\e 00 00 00 00 O ON O

00 ON 00 O

00 ON 00 ON 00 ON 00 OIN 00 OIN 0ýO ON

~

ON N

ON ONC ON N

C" ON C

ON N

ON ON C

ON N

ONý ON V,

ON N ON C"

ON O 0 0 0 YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year.

FIGURE C-2 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2008 350 ............................................................................................................................

INDICATOR STATION MEAN 300 -----------------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND STATION MEAN 250 -- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

20 4ý &

200 15 --

YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year.

FIGURE C-3 MEAN CESIUM-137 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2008

- INDICATOR ML 'P AClW1CDt'TT~f 600 --------------------------------------------------------- .

0. S400 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------................

0

  • 200 C CC 0

0 el YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year.

FIGURE C-4 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 o INDICATOR

  • BACKGROUND 0.04 0.03 n) wi, I-0.02 0.01 0

00 0 00 00 0

0 00 0

- 00 e'i Date

FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2008 0.18 CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT 0.16 - -----------........ ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... . IN DICATO R STATIO NS B-9-BACKGROUND STATION *

. 0.14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. 0.12 ........... .....................................................................................................................

a 0.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q.

S 0.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

~. 0.04 "C 0.06- ------ L-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------....

= , 0 .0 26L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .

0 . .0 . . 0.................................... .

oo oo 00 00 oe ON 00 0a,0 0 0 YEAR

  • Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996

FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 18 . .................................................... .................................................................... ..

S 14 - .----- .. ............................

S 10 - - - - -. . . .... ...................

bON" 12 16... - ------- ....---------

8 . ..... ...............................

106 - - ................ .-.-------.

2 4 ------ ........ - - - - -- - --------- - -

26 .............. ................

2 - - - - - i - - - - - - - - I ---

0 TO 2 MILES 2 TO 5 MILES OVER 5 MILES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT

  • 1Q08 0 2Q08 N*3Q08 *4Q08

FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1990 - 2008*

25 1 ........................................................................................ -IND CATOR M AN ............

0 BACKGROUND MEAN]

20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-

105 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Co rjr

,q Year

  • Harshaw Model I110 TLI~s were used during the first quarter of 200 1. Panasonic Model 814 TLI~s were used in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2001.

APPENDIX D DATA TABLES QC LABORATORY

The following section presents the results of data analyses performed by the QC laboratory, Environmental, Inc. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and the QC laboratory. Comparison of the results for most media were within expected ranges.

D-1

TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 24 QCA QCB PERIOD 04/14/08 < 185 < 185 < 180 10/06/08 < 134 < 137 < 159 MEAN - - -

D-2

TABLE D-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 24 04/14/08 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <7 <3 <3 <29 <10 10/06/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1 <16 <4 QCA 04/14/08 <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <5 <3 <3 <24 <7 10/06/08 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1 <13 <4 QCB 04/14/08 <2 <1 <7 <2 <4 <7 <3 <4 <4 <12 <2 10/06/08 <2 <1 <3 <2 <4 <4 <2 <3 <2 <9 <2

TABLE D-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION QCA QCB PERIOD 01/08/08 - 03/11/08 < 168 < 168 < 172 04/08/08 - 06/25/08 < 176 < 170

  • 149 07/09/08 - 09/12/08 < 138 < 142 < 162 10/10/08 - 12/10/08 < 181 < 175 < 138 D-4

TABLE D-1I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 1 01/08/08 - 03/11/08 <2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 21 <7 04/08/08 - 06/25/08 <2 <2 <4.5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 20 <5 07/09/08 - 09/12/08 <1 <1 <2.8 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1 < 16 <5 10/10/08 - 12/10/08 <3 <3 <4.5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <2 <2 < 24 <4 QCA 01/08/08 - 03/11/08 <2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <2 < 25 <8 04/08/08 - 06/25/08 <2 <2 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <2 < 22 <7 07/09/08 - 09/12/08 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <1 <1 < 20 <6 10/10/08 - 12/10/08 <2 <3 <6 <3 <5 <4 <5 <2 <3 < 30 < 11 QCB 01/08/08 - 03/11/08 <2 <2 <5 <2 <5 <4 <3 <2 <3 < 15 <2 04/08/08 - 06/25/08 <2 <2 <6 <3 <4 <3 <3 <3 <3 < 34 <7 07/09/08 - 09/12/08 <2 <3 <6 <3 <6 <4 <3 <2 <2 < 20 <7 10/10/08 - 12/10/08 <4 <3 <5 <2 <5 <6 <4 <2 <4 < 24 <3

TABLE D-1I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 PERIOD 24 04/14/08 2320 +/- 489 < 31 * < 34 < 76 < 46 < 69 < 31 < 31 QCA 04/14/08 2670 +/- 561 < 37 < 39 < 93 < 35 < 86 < 30 < 32 QCB 04/14/08 1734 +/- 218 <8 <6 < 12 < 10 < 17 < 11

TABLE D-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs- 134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 Th-232 PERIOD 24 U4/14/U0

  • 363J 84 +/- 376
  • 28S < 35 < 3u < 3u
  • 29 < 642 132 +/- 484 < 169 10/06/08 < 490 617 +/- 418
  • 36 < 44 < 37 < 39 < 41 < 914 90 +/- 68
  • 195 MEAN* - 730 +/- 318 - 111 +/- 59 QCA 04/14/08 < 584 < 313 < 42 < 58 < 39 < 39 < 41 < 1160 193 +/- 90 < 242 10/06/08 < 507 799 +/- 430 < 39 < 51 < 40 < 40 < 43 < 753 149 +/- 55 168 +/- 99 MEAN* 799 +/- 0 171 +/- 62 168 +/- 0 QCB 04/14/08 < 158 639 +/- 262 <8 < 16 <9 < 16 <10 < 363 < 977 NA 10/06/08 < 151 507 +/- 173 < 12 <9 <8 < 12 <12 512 +/- 154 < 926 NA MEAN* 573 +/- 187 512 +/- 0
  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE D-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/-2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba -140 La-1 40 PERIOD 77=

36 CABBAGE AUGUST < 7 8 +/- 1 2520 +/- 273 < 38 < 14 < 15

  • 409 < 103 COLLARDS AUGUST < 7 24 +/- 2 5060 +/- 408 < 49 < 17 < 18 < 510
  • 103 MUSTARD GREENS AUGUST < 25 13 +/- 1 5300 +/- 426 < 50 < 16 < 17 < 476 < 100 MEAN* - 15 +/- 17 5180 +/- 339 - - -

CABBAGE SEPTEMBER < 16 4 +/- 2 1840 +/- 122 < 59 < 6 < 6

  • 88
  • 22 MEAN* - 4 +/- 0 1840+/-0 - - -

00 QCA COLLARDS AUGUST < 21 21 +/- 1 5290 +/- 450 < 42 <16 < 17

  • 481 < 123 MUSTARD GREENS AUGUST < 15 13 +/- 2 5170 +/- 355 < 40 < 14
  • 14 < 414
  • 90 MEAN* 17 +/- 10 5230 +/- 170 QCA CABBAGE SEPTEMBER < 16 2 +/- 1.3 2010 +/- 138 < 51 <4 <5 < 73 < 18 MEAN* 2+/-0 2010 +/- 0 QCB CABBAGE AUGUST <2 <1 1960 +/- 280 < 15 <8 <7 < 41 < 10 COLLARDS AUGUST <6 6+/-2 4930 +/- 420 < 15 < 12 <9 < 59 <8 MUSTARD GREENS AUGUST <5 <2 4400 +/- 400 <17 < 16 <11 < 53 < 11 MEAN* 6+/-0 3763 +/- 3168 QCB CABBAGE SEPTEMBER < 2 < 1 1770 +/- 320 < 36 < 17 < 14 < 54 < 11 MEAN* - - 1770 +/- 0 -
  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

APPENDIX E ERRATA DATA

Corrections to the 2006 AREOR E-1

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2006 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN* MEAN* MEAN* STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION 1-131 60 68 39 84 66 INDICATOR (PCI/KG WET) (0/11) (0/9) (0/7) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG

(<19/<155) (<20/<54) (<26/<155) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE CS-134 60 24 12 29 66 INDICATOR (0/11) (0/9) (0/7) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG

(<7/<55) (<5/<23) (<9/<55) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE tm CS-137 80 28 13 33 66 INDICATOR (0/11) (0/9) (0/7) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG

(<7/<63) (<5/<26) (<11/<63) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE BA-140 N/A 412 194 516 66 INDICATOR (0/11) (0/9) (0/7) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG

(<49/<1040) (<46/<532) (<68/<1040) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE LA-140 N/A 130 57 166 66 INDICATOR (0/Il) (0/9) (0/7) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG

(<14/<404) (<13/<182) (<22/<404) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY 184 N/A 15.2 15.9 21.4 55 INDICATOR (MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD.QTR.) (176/176) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (9.3/22.5) (13.8/18.0) (20.7/22.5) 0.3 MILES W

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE C-VIII.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH CODE +/-2 S.D.

1 16.0 +/- 2.0 15.0 +/- 0.9 17.4 +/- 2.7 15.9 +/- 0.7 15.6 +/- 0.9 3 14.3 +/- 1.3 13.8 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 1.2 4 14.0 +/- 1.3 (2) (2) 13.5 +/- 0.8 14.4 +/- 0.9 5 20.1 +/- 2.5 (2) (2) 19.2 +/- 0.4 21.0 +/- 1.2 6 15.3 +/- 1.8 15.3 +/- 0.6 16.2 +/- 1.5 14.4 +/- 0.9 (1) 8 15.2 +/- 3.0 15.3 +/- 0.9 17.1 +/- 0.6 13.5 +/- 1.2 15.0 +/- 1.8 9 13.9 +/- 1.2 13.2 +/- 1.2 14.4 +/- 1.2 14.4 +/- 0.3 13.5 +/- 0.9 C 15.2 +/- 1.9 13.8 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 1.5 15.3 +/- 1.3 15.6 +/- 0.6 11 13.9 +/- 4.1 13.8 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 0.6 11.1 +/- 9.8 14.7 +/- 0.9 14 16.7 +/- 2.3 15.3 +/- 1.2 18.0 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.2 17.1 +/- 1.2 22 14.8 +/- 2.1 13.5 +/- 1.5 15.9 +/- 0.9 14.4 +/- 1.0 15.3 +/- 1.5 46 14.3 +/- 1.3 (2) (2) 13.8 +/- 0.6 14.7 +/- 1.5 47 15.5 +/- 1.3 (2) (2) 15.0 +/- 0.7 15.9 +/- 0.9 48 16.7 +/- 2.1 (2) (2) 17.4 +/- 6.2 15.9 +/- 0.9 51 17.0 +/- 1.0 16.8 +/- 2.1 17.7 +/- 1.5 16.5 +/- 2.3 16.8 +/- 1.5 52 18.2 +/- 1.7 17.7 +/- 1.2 19.5 +/- 0.9 17.7 +/- 1.6 18.0 +/- 0.6 53 17.4 +/- 0.8 17.1 +/- 1.5 18.0 +/- 1.5 17.4 +/- 1.7 17.1 +/- 0.9 54 13.6 +/- 5.8 14.1 +/- 0.9 15.6 +/- 0.9 9.3 +/- 9.1 15.3 +/- 1.5 55 21.4 +/- 1.6 21.0 +/- 1.5 22.5 + 2.4 20.7 +/- 1.2 21.3 +/- 1.8 56 19.2 +/- 2.0 18.0 +/- 2.7 20.4 +/- 2.1 19.2 +/- 1.3 19.2 +/- 0.9 57 14.9 +/- 6.6 15.0 +/- 0.3 17.7 +/- 1.2 10.2 +/- 9.2 16.5 +/- 1.5 58 15.5 +/- 2.3 14.1 +/- 0.9 16.8 +/- 2.1 15.9 +/- 0.8 15.0 +/- 1.8 59 16.3 +/- 2.6 14.7 +/- 0.6 17.7 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 1.9 16.8 +/- 0.9 61 14.6 +/- 2.3 13.5 +/- 0.3 15.6 +/- 1.2 13.8 +/- 1.1 15.6 +/- 0.6 62 15.5 +/- 2.3 14.1 +/- 1.8 16.8 +/- 1.2 15.0 +/- 1.3 15.9 +/- 1.2 63 14.3 +/- 5.0 14.4 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 1.2 10.8 +/- 9.0 16.2 +/- 0.9 64 15.9 +/- 1.3 15.9 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 1.5 15.3 +/- 1.1 15.6 +/- 0.9 65 15.5 +/- 2.1 14.4 +/- 2.7 15.9 +/- 0.9 14.9 +/- 0.7 16.8 +/- 0.9 66 14.3 +/- 2.3 13.5 +/- 1.2 15.6 +/- 2.7 13.2 +/- 0.8 15.0 +/- 0.9 68 13.4 +/- 1.8 12.9 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 1.5 12.3 +/- 1.7 14.1 +/- 2.4 71 15.7 +/- 1.3 15.0 +/- 0.9 16.5 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/- 1.8 15.9 +/- 1.5 72 15.5 +/- 3.1 14.7 +/- 1.2 17.4 +/- 1.5 13.8 +/- 0.2 15.9 +/- 0.9 73 13.9 +/- 2.0 12.9 +/- 0.9 15.0 +/- 0.9 13.2 +/- 1.8 14.4 +/- 3.0 74 14.4 +/- 2.3 13.2 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 1.5 13.8 +/- 0.4 14.7 +/- 1.5 75 15.7 +/- 1.8 14.7 +/- 1.5 16.5 +/- 1.2 (1) 15.9 +/- 1.2 78 15.2 +/- 2.3 14.1 +/- 0.9 16.8 +/- 1.8 15.0 +/- 1.4 15.0 +/- 1.5 79 15.8 +/- 1.9 14.7 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 0.6 15.3 +/- 1.4 16.2 +/- 2.1 81 14.9 +/- 2.7 13.2 +/- 0.9 16.5 +/- 1.5 15.0 +/- 1.1 14.7 +/- 1.5 82 15.5 +/- 2.5 14.1 +/- 0.9 17.1 +/- 2.4 15.6 +/- 1.4 15.3 +/- 1.2 84 15.3 +/- 2.0 13.8 +/- 1.8 15.9 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 0.7 15.6 +/- 0.6 85 14.4 +/- 2.5 13.2 +/- 0.9 16.2 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 0.4 14.1 +/- 1.5 86 15.1 +/- 3.2 12.9 +/- 0.9 16.5 +/- 0.3 15.0 +/- 0.5 15.9 +/- 1.2 88 13.4 +/- 2.5 12.0 +/- 1.5 14.4 +/- 0.6 12.6 +/- 1.6 14.4 +/- 0.9 89 13.9 +/- 2.4 12.9 +/- 1.2 15.3 + 0.9 12.9 +/- 1.4 14.4 +/- 1.5 90 13.9 +/- 1.8 12.9 +/- 0.6 15.0 +/- 1.8 13.5 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/- 1.8 92 15.3 +/- 2.1 14.7 +/- 2.1 16.8 +/- 1.2 14.4 +/- 1.4 15.3 +/- 0.6 98 14.3 +/- 2.2 13.5 +/- 1.2 15.9 +/- 1.2 13.8 +/- 0.5 14.1 +/- 0.6 99 13.7 +/- 3.0 12.3 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 0.9 12.6 +/- 2.6 14.1 +/- 0.6 Ti 16.1 +/- 2.3 15.3 +/- 1.8 17.7 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 0.7 15.3 +/- 0.9 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION (2) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION E-3

TABLE C-VIII.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN PER STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/-2 S.D.

JAN-MAR 15.6 +/- 4.1 13.5 +/- 1.6 14.0 +/- 2.1 14.6 +/- 2.1 APR-JUN 17.5 +/- 3.8 16.0 +/- 1.7 16.1 +/- 2.1 17.0 +/- 3.0 JUL-SEP 15.1 +/- 6.2 14.8 +/- 3.8 14.0 +/- 2.3 15.9 +/- 1.7 OCT-DEC 16.7 +/- 3.3 15.4 +/- 3.5 14.8 +/- 1.3 16.4 +/- 2.1 TABLE C-VIII.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/- 2 S.D.

U SITE BOUNDARY 64 9.3 22.5 16.2 +/- 4.8 INTERMEDIATE 51 12.3 21.0 14.9 +/- 3.4 SPECIAL INTEREST 61 11.1 17.7 14.7 +/- 2.6 CONTROL 8 13.8 18 15.9 +/- 2.6 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 4, 47, 48, 5, 68, 73, 74, 75, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 22, 3, 46, 6, 71, 72, 78, 8, 81, 88, 89, 9, 90, 92, Ti CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C E-4

FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2006 20 -...............

t 18 ...............................................................................................................................

S 16 - .---... ......................

12 - --- - - --- - - ............... .. . .. . .

'2 2 - ................. ..............

0 1 1 0 TO 2 MILES 2 TO 5 MILES OVER 5 MILES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT E Apr-06 0 Jul-06 E Oct-06 U Jan-07

FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1989 - 2006*

20 1[........................................................................................... G 0 INDICATOR MEAN 0 BACKGROUNDWA 10

.- 5 0

Year Harshaw Model 110 TLDs were used during the first quarter of 2001. Panasonic Model 814 TLDs were used in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2001.

concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VII.l, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less than the MDC. Strontium-90 was detected in eight of twenty samples. The values ranged from <2 to 124 pCi/kg wet, which is consistent with historical data.

Gamma Spectrometry Vegetation samples from locations 35, 36, and 66 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table'C-VII.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 1,930 to 8,480 pCi/I. No Cs-137 activity was detected in any routine REMP samples. (See Section III.D.4.) All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

Preoperational vegetation sample analyses did not include strontium-89, strontium-90, or gamma spectroscopy.

In conclusion, terrestrial monitoring results for 2006 of vegetation samples, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl.

The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured in past years, and no radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any terrestrial samples.

The terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-term trends in the terrestrial environment.

C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Panasonic Model 814 (CaSO 4 ) thermoluminescent dosimeters. Forty-nine TLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-VIII.1 to C-VIII.3, Appendix C.

All TLD measurements were below 23 mR/standard quarter, with a range of 9.3 to 22.5 mR/standard quarter. 2006 gamma radiation data from the control location were plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance, and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-6, Appendix C). Historical ambient gamma radiation data from the control location was plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance and 19 E-7

Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-7, Appendix C). In conclusion, the 2006 TLD results are proportionally consistent with preoperational and past operational measurements of direct radiation.

D. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey, conducted during 2006 around the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates, RMC Environmental Services Division for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey was, in part, to determine the location of animals producing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS. None were observed.

Another purpose of the survey was to determine the location of gardens greater than 500 square feet in size producing broad leaf vegetation, as well as the closest residence within each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. The distance and direction of all locations from the OCGS Reactor Building were positioned using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of this survey. In conclusion, the results of this survey are summarized below.

Distance in Miles from the OCGS Reactor Building Sector Residence Garden*

(Miles) (Miles) 1N 1.1 1.3 2 NNE 0.6 1.8 3NE 0.7 1.5 4 ENE 1.1 3.1 5E 1.2 -

6 ESE 0.7 0.4 7 SE 0.6 0.4 8 SSE 0.9 1.3 9S 1.6 2.1 10SSW 1.7 4.3 11 SW 1.7 1.8 12 WSW 2.3 -

13W 14WNW -

15 NW 5.3 -

16 NNW 1.5 2.7

  • Greater than 500 ft2 in size producing broad leaf vegetation 20 E-8

Corrections to the 2007 AREOR E-9

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2007 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2007 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN(M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN(M) MEAN(M) MEAN(M) STATION #

  • NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY 195 NA 16.6 17.5 22.0 55 INDICATOR 0 (MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD.QTR.) (187/187) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (12.6/24.0) (14.7/21.6) (21.0/23. 1) 0.3 MILES W

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE C-VIII.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2007 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH CODE +/-2S.D.

16.6+/- 2.5 16.2 +/- 1.2 17.7 +/- 3.0 17.4 +/- 1.5 15.0 +/- 1.2 3 15.5+/- 2.7 15.9 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/- 1.8 17.1 +/- 4.2 13.8 +/- 1.5 4 15.7 +/- 3.3 15.3 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/- 0.3 18.0 +/- 3.0 14.1 +/- 1.2 21.4 +/- 4.0 20.7 +/- 2.1 21.6 +/- 3.0 24.0 +/- 0.9 19.2 +/- 2.1 6 15.8 +/- 1.2 15.6 +/- 2.4 15.3 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 2.1 (1) 8 15.7 +/- 2.5 15.3 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 1.5 17.4 +/- 1.5 14.4 +/- 1.5 9 14.7 +/- 0.8 14.7 +/- 1.5 15.0 +/- 1.2 15.0 +/- 1.2 14.1 +/- 1.5 C 16.4 +/- 3.5 15.9 +/- 1.8 16.2 +/- 0.9 18.9 +/- 1.5 14.7 +/- 1.2 11 16.0 +/- 2.1 15.6 +/- 0.9 17.1 +/- 3.0 16.5 +/- 1.8 14.7 +/- 1.5 14 18.5 +/- 4.2 18.0 +/- 2.4 17.7 +/- 1.5 21.6 +/- 1.5 16.8 +/- 0.6 22 15.4 +/- 2.8 15.3 +/- 2.4 15.9 +/- 0.6 16.8 +/- 1.5 13.5 +/- 0.6 46 14.8 +/- 4.4 13.8 +/- 0.9 15.0 +/- 0.9 17.7 +/- 1.8 12.6 +/- 1.5 47 16.7 +/- 3.2 15.6 +/- 1.2 17.7 +/-1.8 18.3 +/- 0.9 15.0 +/- 0.6 48 17.3 +/- 6.6 15.3 +/- 2.1 16.5 +/-2.1 22.2 +/- 14 15.3 +/- 0.9 51 18.2 +/- 2.5 17.7 +/- 0.9 18.3 +/-1.2 19.8 +/- 2.4 16.8 +/- 1.8 52 19.3 +/- 3.2 20.1 +/- 0.9 19.2 +/-2.1 20.7 +/- 1.5 17.1 +/- 0.6 53 17.9 +/- 2.0 17.7 +/- 1.2 18.6 +/-3.0 18.6 +/- 2.1 16.5 +/- 1.2 54 15.8 +/- 1.3 15.6 +/- 1.5 16.5 +/-1.5 16.2 +/- 1.5 15.0 +/- 2.1 55 22.0 +/- 1.8 22.2 +/- 2.7 21.6 +/-1.2 23.1 +/- 2.4 21.0 +/- 1.5 56 20.3 +/- 1.7 19.2 +/- 2.4 20.4 +/-0.9 20.4 +/- 1.5 21.3 +/- 2.1 57 17.7 +/- 1.6 17.4 +/- 1.5 17.4 +/-1.8 18.9 +/- 1.2 17.1 +/- 1.2 58 16.8 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/-1.8 17.7 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.2 59 17.9 +/- 2.0 17.1 +/- 0.9 17.1 +/-1.5 19.2 +/- 0.9 18.0 +/- 2.7 61 16.3 +/- 1.3 15.3 +/- 1.5 16.5 +/-0.6 16.8 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.2 62 16.8 +/- 0.8 16.8 +/- 4.8 17.1 +/-1.5 17.1 +/- 1.2 16.2 +/- 0.9 63 17.2 +/- 1.7 16.2 +/- 1.5 18.0 +/-1.8 17.7 +/- 1.8 16.8 +/- 1.5 64 17.3 +/- 2.9 16.5 +/- 1.8 16.5 +/-2.4 19.5 +/- 2.1 16.8 +/- 2.7 65 17.3 +/- 2.9 15.9 +/- 2.4 16.5 +/-1.2 19.2 +/- 4.2 17.4 +/- 1.8 66 15.8 +/- 1.6 14.7 +/- 1.8 16.2 +/-1.2 16.5 +/- 2.4 15.9 +/- 2.4 68 15.5 +/- 1.8 14.7 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/-1.2 16.8 +/- 1.8 15.3 +/- 0.6 71 17.3 +/- 2.8 15.6 +/- 1.2 17.7 +/-2.1 18.9 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 0.9 72 16.4 +/- 2.5 15.0 +/- 0.6 16.2 +/-0.6 18.0 +/- 1.2 16.2 +/- 2.1 73 15.5 +/- 1.7 14.4 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/-1.2 16.5 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 1.2 74 15.6 +/- 2.9 15.0 +/- 1.8 14.4 +/-0.9 17.7 +/-1.8 15.3 +/- 1.2 75 16.5 +/- 2.9 15.6 +/- 0.3 15.6 +/-0.9 18.6 +/-1.8 16.2 +/- 0.6 78 16.5 +/- 3.0 15.6 +/- 0.9 15.3 +/-0.9 18.6 +/-2.1 16.5 +/- 1.8 79 16.6 +/- 2.4 15.6 +/- 0.9 17.1 +/-6.6 18.0 +/-2.1 15.6 +/- 2.1 81 16.4 +/- 2.7 15.6 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/-1.8 18.3 +/-1.2 16.2 +/- 0.9 82 16.9 +/- 2.8 15.9 +/- 1.8 15.9 +/-0.9 18.9 +/-1.2 16.8 +/- 0.9 84 17.0 +/- 1.9 16.2 +/- 4.5 16.5 +/-1.5 18.3 +/-1.8 16.8 +/- 0.9 85 15.8 +/- 2.3 15.3 +/- 1.5 14.7 +/-1.8 17.4 +/-1.2 15.9 +/- 0.9 86 16.2 +/- 3.3 15.9 +/- 1.5 15.3 +/-1.5 18.6 +/-1.5 15.0 +/- 2.1 88 14.8 +/- 4.0 13.8 +/- 0.9 14.4 +/-1.5 17.7 +/-1.5 13.2 +/- 1.8 89 14.7 +/- 3.3 15.0 +/- 0.9 14.1 +/-0.9 16.8 +/-1.8 12.9 +/- 0.9 90 14.5 +/- 2.8 14.1 +/- 0.3 14.1 +/-1.5 16.5 +/-1.8 13.2 +/- 1.2 92 16.4 +/- 3.4 15.6 +/- 0.3 16.8 +/- 2.4 18.6 +/- 1.5 14.7 +/- 0.9 98 15.2 +/- 3.0 14.7 +/- 1.2 15.6 +/- 1.5 17.1 +/- 1.5 13.5 +/- 1.2 99 15.3 +/- 2.5 15.0 +/- 1.5 15.6 +/- 0.9 16.8 +/- 0.9 13.8 +/- 1.2 Ti 17.1 +/- 2.4 18.0 +/- 0.6 17.4 +/- 0.9 17.7 +/- 1.2 15.3 +/- 1.8 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION E-1 1

TABLE C-VIII.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2007 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN PER STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD + 2 S.D.

JAN-MAR 17.2 +/- 3.8 15.7 +/- 3.0 15.3 +/- 2.0 17.0 +/- 3.0 APR-JUN 17.8 +/- 3.1 16.2 +/- 3.5 15.7 +/- 2.2 17.0 +/- 2.1 JUL-SEP 18.7 +/- 3.6 18.5 +/- 4.1 17.4 +/- 2.0 20.3 +/- 3.8 OCT-DEC 17.1 +/- 3.5 15.6 +/- 2.8 14.5 +/- 2.8 15.8 +/- 3.0 TABLE C-VIII.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D.

SITE BOUNDARY 64 14.7 23.1 17.7 +/- 3.7 INTERMEDIATE 60 13.5 24.0 16.5 +/- 4.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 63 12.6 18.9 15.7 +/- 3.0 CONTROL 8 14.7 21.6 17.5 +/- 4.3 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 4, 47, 48, 5, 68, 73, 74, 75, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 22, 3, 46, 6, 71, 72, 78, 8, 81, 88, 89, 9, 90, 92, Ti CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C E-12

FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2007 20 ..............................................................................................................................

. 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... ... ... ... ..

16 . ... .-.. .. .. . ...................................................

14 - . .

S12 - -------- -- --------------- ......

  • 2 S 10 - ---- .........

j* 6 0

4 ---- - ............... -- ----------- -

2 - ----- - - - - - .. . . . . . . ...............

0 TO 2 MILES 2 TO 5 MILES OVER 5 MILES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT N Apr-07 0 Jul-07 E Oct-07 U Jan-08

FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1989 - 2007*

25 ........................................................................................... INDICATOR M EAN U BACKGROUND MEAN

'-15------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------

ca10 Yea 5

0 0n rq 'IT tfl 1z N- C0" C - en 1ý '0 \O N-00 ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ONa,0 0 ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON 0 0 0 0 Year Harshaw Model 110 TLDs were used during the first quarter of 2001. Panasonic Model 814 TLDs were used in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2001.

Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Vegetation samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less than the MDC. Strontium-90 was detected in 23 of 30 samples.

The values ranged from 3 to 37 pCi/kg wet, which is consistent with historical data.

Gamma Spectrometry Vegetation samples from locations 35, 36, and 66 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 1,690 to 4,890 pCi/I. All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

Preoperational vegetation sample analyses did not include strontium-89, strontium-90, or gamma spectroscopy.

In conclusion, terrestrial monitoring results for 2007 of vegetation samples, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl.

The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured in past years, and no radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any terrestrial samples.

The terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-term trends in the terrestrial environment.

C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Panasonic Model 814 (CaSO 4 ) thermoluminescent dosimeters. Forty-nine TLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of non-background corrected TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-VIII.1 to C-VIII.3, Appendix C.

All non-background corrected TLD measurements were below 25 mR/standard quarter, with a range of 12.6 to 24.0 mR/standard quarter.

Subtracting the appropriate background gives a range of 0 - 5.5 mR/standard quarter. No location exceeded the 40CFR190 limit of 25 mRem/year.

2007 gamma radiation data from the control location were plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance, and Outer Ring 17 E-15

Locations (Figure C-6, Appendix C). Historical ambient gamma radiation data from the control location was plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-7, Appendix C). A review of the TLD data from 2005 through 2007, showed three step-change biases attributable to processing, two of the biases were in the positive direction (adding dose). One of these was in 2006 and one was in 2007. These account for the slightly higher doses seen in Figure C-7.

In conclusion, the 2007 TLD results are consistent with preoperational and past operational measurements of direct radiation.

D. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey, conducted during 2007 around the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates, RMC Environmental Services Division for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey was, in part, to determine the location of animals producing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS. None were observed.

Another purpose of the survey was to determine the location of gardens greater than 500 square feet in size producing broad leaf vegetation, as well as the closest residence within each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. The distance and direction of all locations from the OCGS Reactor Building were positioned using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of this survey. The results of this survey are summarized below.

18 E-16

APPENDIX F INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM

TABLE F-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2008 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value(a) .Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation(d)

March 2008 E5847-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 83.5 95.8 0.87 A Sr-90 pCi/L 13.9 12.9 1.08 A E5848-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 57.3 60.0 0.96 A Ce-141 pCi/L 229 249 0.92 A Cr-51 pCi/L 336 359 0.94 A Cs-134 pCi/L 106 125 0.85 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 141 146 0.97 A Co-58 pCi/L 71.8 70.8 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi/L 98.1 94.2 1.04 A Fe-59 pCi/L 102 102 1.00 A Zn-65 pCi/L 135 137 0.99 A Co-60 pCi/L 230 236 0.97 A E5850A-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 163 157 1.04 A Cr-51 pCi 233 227 1.03 A Cs-134 pCi 72.6 79.0 0.92 A Cs-137 pCi 98.3 92.0 1.07 A Co-58 pCi 46.7 44.7 1.04 A Mn-54 pCi 69.8 59.4 1.18 A Fe-59 pCi 72.2 64.5 1.12 A Zn-65 pCi 106 86.4 1.23 W Co-60 pCi 156 149 1.05 A E5849-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 65.5 60.1 1.09 A June 2008 E5971-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 83.9 85.0 0.99 A Sr-90 pCi/L 14.4 15.8 0.91 A E5972-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 70.9 71.4 0.99 A Ce-141 pCi/L 157 174 0.90 A Cr-51 pCi/L 159 138 1.15 A Cs-134 pCi/L 69.7 76.7 0.91 A Cs-137 pCi/L 115 116 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 59.1 61.9 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi/L "139 135 1.03 A Fe-59 pCi/L 98.4 91.7 1.07 A Zn-65 pCi/L 129 127 1.02 A Co-60 pCi/L 101 104 0.97 A E5974-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 206 207 1.00 A Cr-51 pCi 173 164 1.05 A Cs-134 pCi 95.9 91.0 1.05 A Cs-137 pCi 142.0 138.0 1.03 A Co-58 pCi 72.0 73.4 0.98 A Mn-54 pCi 180 160.0 1.13 A Fe-59 pCi 108.0 109.0 0.99 A Zn-65 pCi 159 150 1.06 A Co-60 pCi 129 124 1.04 A F-i

TABLE F-11 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2008 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

June 2008 E5973-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 73.8 84.1 0.88 September 2008 E6284-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 76.2 73.9 1.03 Sr-90 pCi/L 12.3 11.0 1.12 E6285-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 65.7 67.9 0.97 Ce-141 pCi/L 145 161 0.90 Cr-51 pCi/L 406 421 0.96 Cs-134 pCi/L 196 232 0.84 Cs-137 pCi/L 147 162 0.91 Co-58 pCi/L 167 179 0.93 Mn-54 pCi/L 165 166 0.99 Fe-59 pCi/L 161 144 1.12 Zn-65 pCi/L 305 319 0.96 Co-60 pCi/L 218 234 0.93 E6287-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 79.5 76.3 1.04 Cr-51 pCi 208 199 1.05 Cs-134 pCi 106 110 0.96 Cs-137 pCi 79.3 76.7 1.03 Co-58 pCi 87.7 84.4 1.04 Mn-54 pCi .90.3 78.6 1.15 Fe-59 pCi 81.7 68.3 1.20 Zn-65 pCi 144 151 0.95 Co-60 pCi 111 111 1.00 E6286-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 93.2 90.0 1.04 A December 2008 E6415-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 98.4 91.9 1.07 A Sr-90 pCi/L 18.0 12.6 1.43 N (1)

E6416-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 69.2 79.9 0.87 A Ce-141 pCi/L 177 191 0.93 A Cr-51 pCi/L 231 246 0.94 A Cs-134 pCi/L 117 134 0.87 A Cs-137 pCi/L 119 120 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 104 104 1.00 A Mn-54 pCi/L 153 152 1.01 A Fe-59 pCi/L 99.6 100 1.00 A Zn-65 pCi/L 177 183 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 133 133 1.00 A E6418-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 148 146 1.01 A Cr-51 pCi 202 187 1.08 A Cs- 134 pCi 103 102 1.01 A Cs-137 pCi 95.4 91.2 1.05 A Co-58 pCi 81.4 79.2 1.03 A Mn-54 pCi 113 116.0 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi 76.5 76.4 1.00 A Zn-65 pCi 122 139 0.88 A Co-60 pCi 108 101 1.07 A F-2

TABLE F-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2008 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

December 2008 E6417-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 65.8 74.1 0.89 A (1) NCR 09-02 initiated to investigate the failure.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reportedresult.

(b) The Analytics known value is equalto 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation basedon TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning. Reported result falls within 0. 70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable. Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and > 1.30.

F-3

TABLE F-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2008 (PAGE 1 OF 1)

Identification Reported Known Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Control Limits Evaluation (c)

January 2008 Quiktm Response Water Sr-89 pCi/L 37.33 19.0 11.8-25.2 N (1)

Sr-90 pCi/L 40.40 42.7 31.5 -49.0 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L 87.8 90.5 76.2 - 99.6 A Cs-134 pCi/L 80.67 88.9 72.9 - 97.8 A Cs-137 pCi/L 222.33 231 208 - 256 A Co-60 pCi/L 98.9 101.0 90.9-113 A Zn-65 pCi/L 352 350 315-408 A Gr-A pCi/L 13.0 12.7 6.02- 18.7 A Gr-B pCi/L 32.7 36.2 23.8 - 43.8 A H-3 pCi/L 11100 11300 9840- 12400 A January 2008 RAD 72 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 69.0 65.3 53.0 - 73.4 A Sr-90 pCi/L 35.6 41.4 30.5 - 47.6 A Ba-133 pCi/L 25.9 25.7 20.0 - 29.5 A Cs-134 pCi/L 86.5 92.6 76.0- 102 A Cs-137 pCi/L 155 158 142 - 176 A Co-60 pCi/L 16.0 14.4 11.4-18.7 A Zn-65 pCi/L 214 204 184-240 A Gr-A pCi/L 13.3 14.8 7.15-21.2 A Gr-B pCi/L 21.2 22.5 13.7-30.6 A 1-131 pCi/L 22.8 23.6 19.6-28.0 A H-3 pCi/L 3390 3540 3000-3910 A April 2008 Rad 73 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 65.47 60.4 48.6 - 68.2 A Sr-90 pCi/L 39.80 39.2 28.8 -45.1 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L 59.63 58.3 48.3 - 64.3 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 45.00 46.6 37.4 - 51.3 A Cs-137 pCi/L 97.97 102 91.8-115 A Co-60 pCi/L 75.47 76.6 68.9 - 86.7 A Zn-65 pCi/L 109 106 95.4- 126 A Gr-A pCi/L 41.03 50.8 26.5 - 63.7 A Gr-B pCi/L 50.20 51.4 35.0 - 58.4 A 1-131 pCi/L 26.67 28.7 23.9 - 33.6 A H-3 pCi/L 11633 12000 10400 - 13200 A (1) Couldfind no cause for Sr-89 failure. Sample sent to outside lab for verification, but the outside laboratorywas unable to confirm our numbersor ERA numbers. Studies bracketing these results, RAD 71 and RAD 72, had acceptable Sr-89 results. NCR 08-03 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurementsmade during standardpreparation.

(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.

F-4

TABLE F-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2008 (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

January 2008 07-MaW1 8 Water Cs-134 Bq/L -0.26 (1) A Cs-137 Bq/L 0.029 (1) A Co-57 Bq/L 21 22.8 16.0 -29.6 A Co-60 Bq/L 8.2 8.40 5.88- 10.92 A H-3 Bq/L 473 472 330-614 A Mn-54 Bq/L 12 12.1 8.5 - 15.7 A Sr-90 Bq/L 10.70 11.4 7.98- 14.82 A Zn-65 Bq/L 15.6 16.3 11.4-21.2 A 07-GrW18 Water Gr-A Bq/L 1.4 1.399 >0.0 - 2.798 A Gr-B Bq/L 3.06 2.43 1.22 - 3.65 A 07-MaS18 Soil Cs-134 Bq/kg 790 854.0 598-1110 A Cs-137 Bq/kg 568 545 382-709 A Co-57 Bq/kg 424 421 295-547 A Co-60 Bq/kg 2.307 2.9 (2) A Mn-54 Bq/kg 611 570 399-741 A K-40 Bq/kg 6.09 571 400-742 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 454 493.0 345-641 A Zn-65 Bq/kg 0.162 (1) A 07-RdF18 AP Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 2.73 2.5200 1.76 - 3.28 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 2.88 2.7 1.89 -3.51 A Co-57 Bq/sample 3.493 3.55 2.49 - 4.62 A Co-60 Bq/sample 1.357 1.31 0.92- 1.70 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 0.006 (1) A Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.61 1.548 1.084 - 2.012 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 2.59 2.04 1.43 - 2.65 A 07-GrF18 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.131 0.348 >0.0 - 0.696 A Gr-B Bq/sample 0.261 0.286 0.143 - 0.429 A January 2008 07-RdV18 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 5.25 6.28 4.40-8.16 A Cs-137 Bq/sample 3.13 3.41 2.39 - 4.43 A Co-57 Bq/sample 6.837 6.89 4.82 - 8.96 A Co-60 Bq/sample 2.44 2.77 1.94 - 3.60 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 4.45 4.74 3.32 -6.16 A K-40 Bq/sample 61.3 (1)

Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.33 1.273 0.891 - 1.655 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 0.085 (1) A August 2008 08-MaW19 Water Cs-1 34 Bq/L 17.1 19.5 13.7-25.4 A Cs-137 Bq/L 21.4 23.6 16.5-30.7 A Co-57 Bq/L -0.044 (1) A Co-60 Bq/L 10.8 11.6 8.1-15.1 A H-3 Bq/L 334 341 239-443 A Mn-54 Bq/L 13.0 13.7 9.6- 17.8 A Sr-90 Bq/L 6.55 6.45 4.52- 8.39 A Zn-65 Bq/L 16.5 17.1 12.0-22.2 A F-5

TABLE F-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2008 (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

August 2008 08-GrW19 Water Gr-A Bq/L 0.0612 <0.56 (3) A Gr-B Bq/L 0.222 <1.85 (3) A 08-MaS19 Soil Cs-1 34 Bq/kg 546 581 407-755 A Cs-137 Bq/kg 2.52 2.8 (2) A Co-57 Bq/kg 340 333 233-433 A Co-60 Bq/kg 157 145.0 102-189 A Mn-54 Bq/kg 460 415 291 -540 A K-40 Bq/kg 650 571 399-741 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 1.40 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/kg -1.53 (1) A 08-RdF19 AP Cs-134 Bq/sample 2.46 2.6300 1.84 - 3.42 A Cs-137 Bq/sample 0.0063 (1) A Co-57 Bq/sample 1.36 1.50 1.05-1.95 A Co-60 Bq/sample 0.0143 (1) A Mn-54 Bq/sample 2.70 2.64 1.85 - 3.43 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.42 1.12 0.78-1.46 W Zn-65 Bq/sample 0.975 0.94 0.66- 1.22 A 08-GrF19 AP Gr-A Bq/sample -0.0037 (4) A Gr-B Bq/sample 0.540 0.525 0.263 - 0.788 A 08-RdV19 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 4.36 5.5 3.9 - 7.2 W Cs-137 Bq/sample -0.03 (1) A Co-57 Bq/sample 6.72 7.1 5.0-9.2 A Co-60 Bq/sample 4.04 4.70 3.3 - 6.1 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 5.22 5.8 4.1-7.5 A K-40 Bq/sample 64.4 (1)

Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.62 1.9 1.3-2.5 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 6.160 6.9 4.8 -9.0 A (1) Not evaluated by MAPEP.

(2) Reported a statisticallyzero result.

(3) Designed to test the Safe Drinking Water screeninglevels. Labs reportingvalues less than ref values were found to be acceptable.

(4) False positive test.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurementsmade during standardpreparation.

(c) DOEIMAPEPevaluation:A=acceptable, W-acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

F-6

TABLE F-4 ERA (a) STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2008 (Page 1 of 1)

Concentration (pCi/L)

Lab Code " Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control d

Result c Result Limits Acceptance STAP-1 143 03/24/08 Co-60 650.72 +/- 3.00 730.0 565.0 - 912.0 Pass STAP-1 143 03/24/08 Cs-1 34 467.50 +/- 5.53 523.0 341.0 - 647.0 Pass STAP-1 143 03/24/08 Cs-1 37 1375.90 +/- 25.41 1450.0 1090.0 - 1900.0 Pass STAP-1 143 e 03/24/08 Mn-54 0.00 +/- 0.00 0.0 0.0 - 10.0 Pass STAP-1 143 03/24/08 Sr-90 157.60 +/- 7.70 152.0 66.9 - 236.0 Pass STAP-1 143 03/24/08 Zn-65 889.90 +/- 15.90 872.0 604.0 - 1210.0 Pass STAP-1 144 03/24/08 Gr. Beta 99.90 +/- 3.09 92.2 56.80 - 135.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Ac-228 1269.02 +/- 36.81 1180.0 757.0 - 1660.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Bi-212 1407.10 +/- 56.64 1360.0 357.0 - 2030.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Co-60 5219.70 +/- 90.30 5130.0 3730.0 - 6890.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Cs-134 5427.30 +/- 102.94 5640.0 3630.0 - 6790.0 Pass STSO-1.145 03/24/08 Cs-137 6346.60 +/- 201.80 6010.0 4600.0 - 7810.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 K-40 11052.70 +/- 181.80 11000.0 7980.0 - 14900.0 Pass STSO-1 145 e 03/24/08 Mn-54 0.00 +/- 0.00 0.0 0.0 -10.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Pb-212 1198.20 +/- 96.58 1080.0 697.0 -1520.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Pb-214 2253.30 +/- 291.60 2020.0 1210.0 - 3010.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Sr-90 6407.00 +/- 277.00 5360.0 1940.0 -8750.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Th-234 2421.80 +/- 321.00 2030.0 644.0 -3870.0 Pass STSO-1 145 03/24/08 Zn-65 2936.20 +/- 73.50 2660.0 2110.0 -3570.0 Pass STVE-1 146 03/24/08 Co-60 912.41 +/- 13.59 888.0 600.0 - 1280.0 Pass STVE-1 146 03/24/08 Cs-1 34 1547.70 +/- 38.81 1540.0 882.0 - 2130.0 Pass STVE-1 146 03/24/08 Cs-1 37 1163.80 +/- 20.62 1100.0 807.0 - 1530.0 Pass STVE-1 146 03/24/08 K-40 22186.00 +/- 339.40 24600.0 17700.0 - 34800.0 Pass STVE-1146 e 03/24/08 Mn-54 0.00 +/- 0.00 0.0 0.0 -10.0 Pass STVE-1 146 03/24/08 Sr-90 3825.90 +/- 140.66 4130.0 2310.0 - 5480.0 Pass STVE-1 146 03/24/08 Zn-65 1676.80 +/- 43.00 1430.0 1030.0 - 1960.0 Pass STW-1 147 03/24/08 Co-60 1430.00 +/- 33.33 1420.0 1240.0 - 1680.0 Pass STW-1 147 03/24/08 Cs-134 730.18 +/- 33.39 751.0 555.0 - 862.0 Pass STW-1 147 03/24/08 Cs-137 1947.80 +/- 13.80 1990.0 1690.0 - 2380.0 Pass STW-1147 e 03/24/08 Mn-54 0.00 +/- 0.00 0.0 0.0 -10.0 Pass STW-1 147 03/24/08 Sr-90 512.03 +/- 43.37 512.0 325.0 - 684.0 Pass STW-1 147 03/24/08 Zn-65 708.90 +/- 29.00 694.0 588.0 - 865.0 Pass STW-1 120 03/19/07 Zn-65 2009.00 +/- 36.40 1910.0 1600.0 -2410.0 Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing administered by Environmental Resources Associates, serving as a replacement for studies conducted previously by the Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML).

b Laboratory codes as follows: STW (water), STAP (air filter), STSO (soil), STVE (vegetation).

' Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the'mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.

d Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as provided by ERA.

e Included in the testing series as a "false positive". No activity expected.

F-7

TABLE F-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)a ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2008 (Page I of 2)

ConcentrationD Known Control Lab Codec Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STW-1 137 01/01/08 Co-57 23.80 +/- 0.60 22.80 16.00 - 29.60 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 Co-60 8.60 +/- 0.50 8.40 5.88 - 10.92 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 Cs-134 -0.021 +/- 0.10 0.00 -1.00 - 1.00 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 Cs-1 37 0.00 +/- 0.10 0.00 -1.00 - 1.00 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 H-3 515.10 +/- 12.70 472.00 330.00 - 614.00 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 Mn-54 12.90 +/- 0.80 12.10 8.50 - 15.70 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 Sr-90 12.00 +/- 1.50 11.40 7.98 - 14.82 Pass STW-1137 01/01/08 Zn-65 16.90 +/- 1.40 16.30 11.40 - 21.20 Pass STW-1138 01/01/08 Gr. Beta 2.30 +/- 0.15 2.43 1.22 -3.65 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Co-57 3.90 +/- 0.07 3.55 2.49 - 4.62 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Co-60 1.43 +/- 0.07 1.31 0.92-1.70 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Cs-1 34 2.59 +/- 0.16 2.52 1.76 - 3.28 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Cs-137 3.05 +/- 0.12 2.70 1.89 - 3.51 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Mn-54 0.43 +/- 0.58 0.00 0.00 - 1.00 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Sr-90 1.30 +/- 0.27 1.55 1.08 -2.01 Pass STAP-1 139 01/01/08 Zn-65 2.36 +/- 0.18 2.04 1.43 - 2.65 Pass STAP-1 140 01/01/08 Gr. Beta 0.34 +/- 0.04 0.29 0.14 -0.43 Pass STVE-1 141 01/01/08 Co-57 8.30 +/- 0.18 6.89 4.82 - 8.96 Pass STVE-1 141 01/01/08 Co-60 3.03 +/- 0.13 2.77 1.94-3.60 Pass STVE-1 141 01/01/08 Cs-1 34 6.53 +/- 0.29 6.28 4.40 -8.16 Pass STVE-1 141 01/01/08 Cs-137 3.90 +/- 0.19 3.41 2.39 - 4.43 Pass STVE-1 141 01/01/08 Mn-54 5.43 +/- 0.21 4.74 3.32 -6.16 Pass STVE-1 141 01/01/08 Zn-65 0.033 +/- 0.10 0.00 0.00-1.00 Pass STSO-1 142 01/01/08 Co-57 483.00 +/- 3.00 421.00 295.00 - 547.00 Pass STSO-1 142 01/01/08 Co-60 3.00 +/- 0.80 2.90 0.00 -5.00 Pass STSO-1 142 01/01/08 Cs-134 896.50 +/- 7.40 854.00 598.00 -1110.00 Pass STSO-1 142 01/01/08 Cs-137 624.40 +/- 4.10 545.00 382.00 - 709.00 Pass STSO-1 142 01/01/08 Mn-54 667.20 +/- 3.80 570.00 399.00 -741.00 Pass STSO-1 142 01/01/08 Zn-65 0.093 +/- 0.91 0.00 0.00-1.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Co-57 353.02 +/- 2.01 333.00 233.00 - 433.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Co-60 151.99 +/- 1.58 145.00 102.00 - 189.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Cs-1 34 499.72 +/- 2.65 581.00 407.00 - 755.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Cs-1 37 2.54 +/- 0.25 2.80 0.00 -5.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 K-40 643.94 +/- 15.50 570.00 399.00 -741.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Mn-54 452.14 +/- 2.96 415.00 291.00 -540.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Sr-90 1.95 +/- 2.04 0.00 0.00 -5.00 Pass STSO-1 158 08/01/08 Zn-65 0.10 +/- 2.04 0.00 0.00 -5.00 Pass F-8

TABLE F-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)a ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2008 (Page 2 of 2)

Concentration "

Known Control Lab Codec Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STVE-1 159 08/01/08 Co-57 8.52 +/- 0.23 7.10 5.00 - 9.20 Pass STVE-1 159 08/01/08 Co-60 5.08 +/- 0.19 4.70 3.30 -6.10 Pass STVE-1 159 08/01/08 Cs-1 34 5.26 +/- 0.18 5.50 3.90 - 7.20 Pass STVE-1 159 08/01/08 Cs-137 0.01 +/- 0.14 0.00 0.00 - 1.00 Pass STVE-1 159 08/01/08 Mn-54 6.39 +/- 0.28 5.80 4.10 -7.50 Pass STVE-1 159 08/01/08 Zn-65 7.73 +/- 0.45 6.90 4.80 - 9.00 Pass STW-1 162 08/01/08 Co-57 0.03 +/- 0.16 0.00 0.00 - 5.00 Pass STW-1 162 08/01/08 Co-60 11.27 +/- 0.23 11.60 8.10-15.10 Pass STW-1 162 08/01/08 Cs-1 34 17.93 +/- 0.52 19.50 13.70 - 25.40 Pass STW-1 162 08/01/08 Cs-1 37 23.72 +/- 0.43 23.60 16.50 - 30.70 Pass STW-1162 08/01/08 H-3 385.15 +/- 8.93 341.00 239.00 - 443.00 Pass STW-1162 08/01/08 Mn-54 13.87 +/- 0.37 13.70 9.60 - 17.80 Pass STW-1162 08/01/08 Sr-90 6.49 +/- 1.12 6.45 4.52 - 8.39 Pass STW-1162 08/01/08 Zn-65 17.64 +/- 0.61 17.10 12.00 - 22.20 Pass STW-1 163 08/01/08 Gr. Beta 0.12 +/- 0.05 0.00 0.00.- 1.85 Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Falls, Idaho b Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).

c Laboratory codes as follows: STW (water), STAP (air filter), STSO (soil), STVE (vegetation).

d MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP.

F-9

APPENDIX G ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR)

Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report 1 January Through 31 December 2008 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ExelIqo'pn S Nuclear Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2009

Table Of Contents I. Summary and Conclusions ........................................ 1 I1.Introduction .................................................. 2 A. Objectives of the RGPP ................. .................................. 2 B. Implementation of the Objectives ............................... 3 C. Program Description ..................... .................. 3 D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3) ....................................................................... 4 II1.Program Description ............................................ 5 A. S am ple Analysis ............................................................................................. .. 5 B. Data Interpretation ......................................................................................... .. 5 C . Background Analysis ....................................................................................... .. 6 IV. R esults and Discussion ........................................................................................... .. 9 A. Groundw ater R esults ....................................................................................... ..9 B. Surface Water Results .................................................................................... 10 C. Drinking Water Well Survey ............................................................................ 10 D. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ....................... 11 E. Leaks, Spills, and Releases ............................................................................ 11 F. T re nd s ............................................................................................................ . . 11 G . Inve stig atio ns ................................................................................................ . . 11 H. Actio ns T a ke n ................................................................................................ . . 12 V. R e fere nce s ...................................................................................................................... 12

Appendices Appendix A Location Designation Tables Table A-i: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Figqures Security-Related Information: Maps of the Oyster Creek Generating Station have been withheld from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 and N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1 Appendix B Data Tables Tables Table B-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium and Strontium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table B-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table B-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium and Strontium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

Table B-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008.

ii

Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon covers the period 01 January 2008 through 31 December 2008.

In 2006, Exelon instituted a comprehensive program to evaluate the impact of station operations on groundwater and surface water in the vicinity of the Oyster Creek Generating Station. This evaluation involved numerous station personnel and contractor support personnel.

This is the second in a series of annual reports on the status of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) conducted at the Oyster Creek Generating Station. This report covers groundwater and surface water samples collected from the environment, both on and off station property in 2008. One hundred and sixty-seven (167) analyses were performed on 81 samples from 35 locations.

Gamma-emitting radionuclides associated with licensed plant operations were not detected at concentrations greater than their respective Lower Limits of Detection (LLDs) as specified in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) in any of the groundwater or surface water samples. In the case of tritium, Exelon specified that its laboratories achieve a lower limit of detection 100 times lower than the drinking water limit specified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (200 pCi/liter versus 20,000 pCi/liter).

Tritium was not detected in groundwater or surface water samples at concentrations above the LLD of 200 pCi/liter. These results are consistent with historical background tritium levels in surface water and groundwater at the OCGS.

Strontium-90 was not detected in any groundwater or surface water sample during 2008.

In assessing all the data gathered for this report, it was concluded that the operation of the Oyster Creek Generating Station had no adverse radiological impact on the environment, and there are no known active releases into the groundwater or surface water at the Oyster Creek Generating Station.

II. Introduction The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon, is located on the Atlantic Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles south of Newark, 9 miles south of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from Barnegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in Ocean Township. Access is provided by U.S. Route 9, passing through the site and separating a 637-acre eastern portion from the balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about 11/4 mile west of the highway and 11/4 'miles east of the Garden State Parkway. The site property extends about 21/2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile. The site location is part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands. The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side.

This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected in 2008.

A. Objectives of the RGPP The long-term objectives of the RGPP are as follows:

1. Identify suitable locations to monitor and evaluate potential impacts from station operations before significant radiological impact to the environment and potential drinking water sources.
2. Understand the local hydrogeologic regime in the vicinity of the station and maintain up-to-date knowledge of flow patterns on the surface and shallow subsurface.
3. Perform routine water sampling and radiological analysis of water from selected locations.
4. Report new leaks, spills, or other detections with potential radiological significance to stakeholders in a timely manner.
5. Regularly assess analytical results to identify adverse trends.
6. Take necessary corrective actions to protect groundwater resources.

B. Implementation of the Objectives The objectives identified have been implemented at the Oyster Creek Generating Station as discussed below:

1. Exelon and its consultant identified locations as described in the Phase 1 study. Phase 1 studies were conducted by Connestoga Rovers and Associates (CRA) and the results and conclusions were made available to state and federal regulators as well as the public on an Exelon web site in station specific reports.

http://www.exeloncorp.com/ourcompanies/powergen/nuclear/Tritiu m.htm

2. The Oyster Creek Generating Station report describes the local hydrogeologic regime. Periodically, the groundwater flow patterns are updated based on ongoing measurements.
3. The Oyster Creek Generating Station will continue to perform routine sampling and radiological analysis of water from selected locations.
4. The Oyster Creek Generating Station has implemented new procedures to identify and report new leaks, spills, or other detections with potential radiological significance in a timely manner.
5. The Oyster Creek Generating Station staff and independent consultants, including a hydrogeologist, assess analytical results on an ongoing basis to identify adverse trends.

C. Program Description Samples for the OCGS site were collected for Exelon by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, Inc. This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS RGPP in 2008. Sample locations can be found in Table A-i, Appendix A.

1. Sample Collection Groundwater and Surface Water Samples of water are collected, managed, transported and analyzed in accordance with approved procedures following EPA methods. Both groundwater and surface water are collected.

Sample locations, sample collection frequencies and analytical frequencies are controlled in accordance with approved station procedures. Contractor and/or station personnel are trained in the collection, preservation management, and shipment of samples, as well as in documentation of sampling events. Analytical laboratories are subject to internal quality assurance programs and industry cross-check programs, as well as nuclear industry audits.

Station personnel review and evaluate all analytical data deliverables as data are received.

Analytical data results are reviewed by both station personnel and independent consultants, including a hydrogeologist, for adverse trends or changes to hydrogeologic conditions.

D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3)

Tritium (chemical symbol H-3) is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. The most common form of tritium is tritium oxide, which is also called "tritiated water." The chemical properties of tritium are essentially those of ordinary hydrogen.

Tritiated water behaves the same as ordinary water in both the environment and the body. Tritium can be taken into the body by drinking water, breathing air, eating food, or absorption through the skin. Once tritium enters the body, it disperses quickly and is uniformly distributed throughout the body. Tritium is excreted primarily through urine with a clearance rate characterized by an effective biological half-life of about 14 days. Within one month or so after ingestion, essentially all tritium is cleared. Organically bound tritium (tritium that is incorporated in organic compounds) can remain in the body for a longer period. Tritium atoms can exchange with any hydrogen atom. If the hydrogen atom is part of an organic molecule, the tritium becomes 'organically bound' and is transported with the molecule rather than moving freely like water.

Tritium is produced naturally in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays strike air molecules. Tritium is also produced during nuclear weapons explosions, as a by-product in reactors producing electricity, and in special production reactors, where the isotopes lithium-7 and/or boron-10 are activated to produce tritium. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in 1986. Like normal water, tritiated water is colorless and odorless. Tritiated water behaves chemically and physically like non-tritiated water in the subsurface, and therefore tritiated water will travel at the same velocity as the average groundwater velocity.

Tritium has a half-life of approximately 12.3 years. It decays spontaneously to helium-3 (He-3). This radioactive decay releases a beta particle (18.6 keV low-energy electron). The radioactive decay of tritium is the source of the health risk from exposure to tritium. Tritium is one of the least dangerous radionuclides because it emits very weak radiation and leaves the body relatively quickly. Since tritium is almost always found as water, it goes directly into soft tissues and organs. The associated dose to these tissues is generally uniform and is dependent on the water content of the specific tissue.

Ill. Program Description A. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP in 2008.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:

1. Biennial concentrations of gamma emitters in groundwater and surface water.
2. Biennial concentrations of strontium-90 in groundwater and surface water.
3. Semi-annual concentrations of tritium in groundwater and surface water.

B. Data Interpretation The radiological data collected prior to Oyster Creek Generating Station becoming operational, as well as background data from publicly available databases, were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared. For the purpose of this report, Oyster Creek Generating Station was considered operational at initial criticality. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.

2. Laboratory Measurements Uncertainty The estimated uncertainty in measurement of tritium in environmental samples is frequently on the order of 50% of the measurement value.

Statistically, the exact value of a measurement is expressed as a range with a stated level of confidence. The convention is to report results with a 95% level of confidence. The uncertainty comes from calibration standards, sample volume or weight measurements, sampling uncertainty and other factors. Exelon reports the uncertainty of a measurement created by statistical process (counting error) as well as all sources of error (Total Propagated Uncertainty or TPU). Each result has two values calculated.

Exelon reports the TPU by following the result with plus or minus

(+/-) the estimated sample standard deviation, as TPU, that is obtained by propagating all sources of analytical uncertainty in measurements.

Analytical uncertainties are reported at the 95% confidence level in this report for reporting consistency with the AREOR.

C. Background Analysis A pre-operational radiological environmental monitoring program (pre-operational REMP) was conducted to establish background radioactivity levels prior to operation of the station. The environmental media sampled and analyzed during the pre-operational REMP were atmospheric radiation, fall-out, domestic water, surface water, marine life, and foodstuffs. The results of the monitoring were detailed in the report entitled, Pre-Operational Environmental Radiation Survey, Oyster Creek Nuclear Electric Generating Station, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, dated March 1968.

This report contains analytical results from samples collected from both surface water and groundwater.

Monthly surface water sampling began in 1966, and the samples were analyzed for tritium as well as other radioactivity. During the preoperational program, tritium was detected at an average concentration of 1.05E+3 pCi/liter, indicating that these preoperational results were from nuclear weapons testing and are radioactively decaying as predicted. At that time, counting instrumentation was not as sensitive as it is now, and the minimum detectable concentration was 1E+3 pCi/liter versus 2E+2 pCi/liter used today. Gamma isotopic and radio strontium analyses results average concentrations were all greater than radioisotope analyses results from operational data.

1. Background Concentrations of Tritium The purpose of the following discussion is to summarize background measurements of tritium in various media performed by others. Additional detail may be found by consulting references.
a. Tritium Production Tritium is created in the environment from naturally occurring processes both cosmic and subterranean, as well as from anthropogenic (i.e., man-made) sources. In the upper atmosphere, "cosmogenic" tritium is produced from the bombardment of stable nuclides and combines with oxygen to form tritiated water, which will then enter the hydrologic cycle. Below ground, "lithogenic" tritium is produced by the bombardment of natural lithium present in crystalline rocks by neutrons produced by the radioactive decay of naturally abundant uranium and thorium. Lithogenic production of tritium is usually negligible compared to other sources due to the limited abundance of lithium in rock. The lithogenic tritium is introduced directly to groundwater.

A major anthropogenic source of tritium and strontium-90 comes from the former atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons. Levels of tritium in precipitation increased significantly during the 1950s and early 1960s, and later with additional testing, resulting in the release of significant amounts of tritium to the atmosphere. The Canadian heavy water nuclear power reactors, other commercial power reactors, nuclear research and weapons production continue to influence tritium concentrations in the environment. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in 1986.

b. Precipitation Data Precipitation samples are routinely collected at stations around the world for the analysis of tritium and other radionuclides. Two publicly available databases that provide tritium concentrations in precipitation are Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP) and USEPA's RadNet database. GNIP provides tritium precipitation concentration data for samples collected world wide from 1960 to 2006.

RadNet provides tritium precipitation concentration data for samples collected at stations throughout the U.S. from 1960 up to and including 2006. Based on GNIP data for sample stations located in the U.S. Midwest, tritium concentrations peaked around 1963. This peak, which approached 10,000 pCi/liter for some stations, coincided with the atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons. Tritium concentrations in surface water showed a sharp decline up until 1975 followed by a gradual decline since that time. Tritium concentrations in precipitation in New Jersey have typically been below 100 pCi/liter since around 1980. Tritium concentrations in wells may still be above the 200 pCi/liter detection limit from the external causes described above. Water from previous years and decades is naturally captured in groundwater, so some well water sources today are affected by the surface water from the 1960s that was elevated in tritium.

c. Surface Water Data Tritium concentrations are routinely measured in large surface water bodies, including Forked River and Barnegat Bay. New Jersey surface water data were typically less than 100 pCi/liter.

The USEPA RadNet surface water data typically has a reported 'Combined Standard Uncertainty' of 35 to 50 pCi/liter. According to USEPA, this corresponds to a +/-70 to 100 pCi/liter 95% confidence bound on each given measurement. Therefore, the typical background data provided may be subject to measurement uncertainty of approximately +/- 70 to 100 pCi/liter.

The radio-analytical laboratory is counting tritium results to an Exelon specified LLD of 200 pCi/liter. Typically, the lowest positive measurement will be reported within a range of 40 - 240 pCi/liter or 140 +/- 100 pCi/liter. Clearly, these sample results cannot be distinguished as different from background at this concentration.

IV. Results and Discussion Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:

For groundwater and surface water 14 nuclides, Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Nb-95, Zr-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140 and La-140 were reported.

A. Groundwater Results Samples were collected from on-site wells in May, September and October in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. In addition to the wells sampled during 2007, a groundwater sample was also obtained from lysimeter CST-9, located near the Station's main condenser discharge, during the fall 2008 sampling event. As reported in CRA's 2006 Hydrogeologic Investigation Report and previous groundwater investigations at the Station, groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Torus Water Storage Tank and the-Condensate Storage Tank is towards the intake and discharge structures. Groundwater accumulating in the vicinity of the intake and discharge structures is directed into the discharge canal via a system of gravel drains installed during Station construction. Lysimeter CST-9 is positioned to intercept this flow.

Due to the limited amount of water available from this lysimeter, the sample was only analyzed for tritium. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below.

Tritium Samples from 31 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-1.1 Appendix B). Tritium was not detected at a level above the LLD of 200 pCI/liter.

Strontium Strontium-90 was not detected in any location sampled in 2008.

Gamma Emitters No gamma emitting nuclides, other than naturally occurring potassium-40, were detected in any of the samples analyzed during 2008. (Table B-1.2, Appendix B).

B. Surface Water Results Samples were collected from on-site locations in May, September and October in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below.

Tritium Samples from three locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-11.1, Appendix B). Tritium was not detected at a level above the LLD of 200 pCI/liter.

Strontium Strontium-90 was not detected in any location sampled in 2008.

Gamma Emitters No gamma emitting nuclides, other than naturally occurring potassium-40, were detected in any of the samples analyzed.

(Table B-11.2, Appendix B).

C. Drinking Water Well Survey A drinking water well survey was conducted during the summer of 2006 by CRA (CRA 2006) around the Oyster Creek Generating Station. CRA reviewed the New Jersey Geological Survey Bureau of Water Allocation Database Search included in the report entitled "Remedial Action Work Plan - Non-Radiological GPU Nuclear, Inc.; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Route 9 Forked River New Jersey" (URS GWC, 2000). The database provides a list of permitted wells within a 5-mile radius of the station and includes private, public, and industrial water supply wells and monitoring wells. The database indicates no public water supply well permits exist within a 0.5-mile radius of the center of the station (i.e., Reactor Building).

In addition to the two domestic water supply wells located on the OCGS site, the database indicated that there were three individually owned locations permitted for a water supply well within a 0.5-mile radius of the station.

In addition to the water supply wells identified in the database, there are seven wells located on the property to the west of the station (i.e.,

combustion turbine facility). These seven wells supply water for fire protection (4 wells), process water for the combustion turbine system (2 wells) and one domestic water supply well.

D. Summary of Results - Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program results for TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) are presented in the 2008 Oyster Creek AREOR.

E. Leaks, Spills, and Releases The OCGS records inadvertent releases of radioactive liquids in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(g). As part of the hydrogeologic investigation associated with Exelon's fleet wide assessment in 2006, a third party environmental engineering firm was contracted to evaluate historic releases, if any, and determine if a potential pathway to the environment existed. Those releases that were determined to have potentially impacted groundwater were subsequently investigated as part of the fleet wide assessment. The hydrogeologic investigation determined that there were no radiological impacts to groundwater at the Oyster Creek Generating Station.

There were no inadvertent radiological leaks, spills, or releases during 2008, other than one actuation of the Isolation Condensers. The Isolation Condensers were actuated during a reactor scram on November 28, 2008, resulting in a ground-level release of approximately 4.57 microcuries of tritium. Based upon the results of historical groundwater monitoring at the OCGS, this release is not expected to have any impact on groundwater quality.

F. Trends No trends have been identified.

G. Investigations Conclusions from the Phase 1 report have been made available to state and federal regulators as well as the public on an Exelon web site:

http://www.exeloncorp.com/ourcompanies/powergen/nuclear/Tritium

.htm H. Actions Taken

1. Compensatory Actions There have been no station events requiring compensatory actions at the Oyster Creek Generating Station.
2. Installation of Monitoring Wells No new wells were required to be installed.

J

3. Actions to Recover/Reverse Plumes There have been no station events requiring actions to recover/reverse any plumes.

V. References

1. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, Fleetwide Assessment, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 045136(18), September 2006 APPENDIX A LOCATION DESIGNATION

TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 Site Site Type Location CST-9 Monitoring Well Onsite LW-3 Monitoring Well Onsite LW-4 Monitoring Well Onsite MW-15K-1A Monitoring Well Onsite MW-16D Monitoring Well Onsite MW-1A-2A Monitoring Well Onsite MW-11-1A Monitoring Well Onsite MW-1 1-2A Monitoring Well Onsite NORTH DOMESTIC Monitoring Well Onsite WELL SOUTH DOMESTIC Monitoring Well Onsite WELL SW-1 Surface Water Onsite SW-2 Surface Water Onsite SW-3 Surface Water Offsite W-10 Monitoring Well Onsite W-12 Monitoring Well Onsite W-13 Monitoring Well Onsite W-14 Monitoring Well Onsite W-15 Monitoring Well Onsite W-16 Monitoring Well Onsite W-1A Monitoring Well Onsite W-2 Monitoring Well Onsite W-20 Monitoring Well Onsite W-24 Monitoring Well Onsite W-2A Monitoring Well Onsite W-2B Monitoring Well Onsite W-3 Monitoring Well Onsite W-31 Monitoring Well Onsite W-4 Monitoring Well Onsite W-4A Monitoring Well Onsite W-4B Monitoring Well Onsite W-5 Monitoring Well Onsite W-6 Monitoring Well Onsite W-7 Monitoring Well Onsite W-9 Monitoring Well Onsite A-1

APPENDIX B DATA TABLES

TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE PERIOD H-3 SR-90 CST-9 09/12/08 187 _ 107 CST-9 10/01/08 < 150 LW-3 05/07/08 < 174 LW-3 05/07/08 < 175 LW-3 10/01/08 < 153 < 1.7 LW-4 05/07/08 < 168 LW-4 10/01/08 < 147 < 0.8 MW-15K-1A 05/06/08 < 188 MW-15K-1A 09/10/08 < 164 < 1.7 MW-15K-1A 09/30/08 < 147 < 1.7 MW-16D 05/06/08 < 190 MW-16D 10/01/08 < 151 < 1.4 MW-IA-2A 05/06/08 < 196 MW-IA-2A 10/01/08 < 144 < 0.9 MW-1i-1A 05/06/08 < 188 MW-II-1A 09/10/08 < 163 < 1.0 MW-lI-1A 10/01/08 < 148 < 1.1 MW-i I-2A 09/10/08 < 167 < 0.9 MW-i I-2A 10/01/08 < 146 < 0.9 NORTH DOMESTIC WELL 05/05/08 < 190 NORTH DOMESTIC WELL 09/30/08 < 141 < 1.2 SOUTH DOMESTIC WELL 05/05/08 < 185 SOUTH DOMESTIC WELL 09/30/08 < 153 < 1.1 SOUTH DOMESTIC WELL 09/30/08 < 153 < 1.5 W-10 05/28/08 < 188 W-10 10/01/08 < 150 < 1.6 W-12 05/06/08 < 174 W-12 05/28/08 < 189 W-12 05/28/08 < 190 W-12 10/01/08 < 152 < 0.9 W-13 05/06/08 < 169 W-13 09/30/08 < 153 < 1.3 W-14 05/07/08 < 170 W-14 10/01/08 < 153 < 1.0 W-14 10/01/08 < 155 < 1.2 W-15 05/07/08 < 172 W-15 10/01/08 < 143 < 0.9 W-16 05/06/08 < 173 W-16 10/01/08 < 155 < 1.2 W-IA 05/05/08 < 188 W-IA 10/01/08 < 150 < 1.0 W-2 05/06/08 < 184 W-2 09/30/08 < 148 < 1.5 W-20 05/07/08 < 174 W-20 10/01/08 < 154 < 1.0 W-24 09/30/08 < 150 < 1.4 W-2A 05/28/08 < 190 W-2A 10/01/08 < 153 < 1.0 W-2B 05/05/08 < 169 B-1

TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE PERIOD H-3 SR-90 W-2B 10/01/08 < 15:2 < 1.0 W-3 05/06/08 < 18 7 W-3 09/30/08 < 14i6 < 1.1 W-31 10/01/08 < 15i3 < 1.2 W-4 05/06/08 < 18 4 W-4 09/30/08 < 14 7 < 1.2 W-4A 05/06/08 < 18*8 W-4A 09/30/08 < 14.4 < 1.0 W-4A 09/30/08 < 14' 6 < 1.0 W-4B 05/06/08 < 19 W-4B 09/30/08 < 15[0 < 1.3 W-5 05/06/08 < 18.4 W-5 09/10/08 < 16'0 < 1.0 W-5 09/30/08 < 14:8 < 1.7 W-5 09/30/08 < 15:2 < 0.8 W-6 05/06/08 < 18:5 W-6 09/10/08 < 16:3 < 0.9 W-6 09/30/08 < 14:2 < 1.0 W-7 05/06/08 18 5 + 113 W-7 05/28/08 < 19' 0 W-7 05/28/08 < 18 7 W-7 09/30/08 < 14 8 < 1.2 W-9 05/07/08 < 17:5 W-9 10/01/08 < 14:3 <1.1 B-2

TABLE B-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD LW-3 10/01/08 < 23 < 43 < 2 < 3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <12 <2 <2 < 21 <7 LW-4 10/01/08 < 17 < 17 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 *16 <5 MW-15K-lA 09/10/08 < 45 < 38 < 5 < 5 <10 <4 <9 <6 <9 <18 <4 <6

  • 32 <13 MW-15K-1A 09/30/08 <17 72+/-26 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 <16 <6 MW-16D 10/01/08 < 37 < 27 < 4 < 4 <8 <3 <7 <4 <7 <21 <3 <4
  • 36 < 11.

MW-IA-2A 10/01/08 < 32 < 26 < 3 < 3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <6 <17 <3 <3

  • 30 < 10 MW-1I-1A 09/10/08 < 49 < 43 < 5 < 5 < 10 <4 <9 <6 <9 <24 <4 <5 < 41 <11 MW-1 I-1A 10/01/08 <19 <37 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 < 19 <6 MW-1 I-2A 09/10/08 < 36 < 82 < 4 < 5 <10 <4 <10 <4 <9 <13 <4 <5
  • 30 < 11 MW-1 I-2A 10/01/08 < 22 < 47 < 2 < 3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <11 <2 <3 < 22 <7 NORTH DOMESTIC WELL 09/30/08 < 27 < 49 < 3 < 3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <5 <18 <3 <3 < 30 < 10 SOUTH DOMESTIC WELL 09/30/08 < 36 < 74 < 3 < 4 < 10 <3 <7 <4 <7 <23 <3 <3 < 38 <13 SOUTH DOMESTIC WELL 09/30/08 < 22 < 41 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <14 <2 <2 < 24 <7 W-10 10/01/08 <18 <16 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 < 18 <6 W-12 10/01/08 < 38 < 30 < 4 < 4 <10 <5 <8 <4 <7 <22 <3 <4 < 35 <14 W-13 09/30/08 < 42 < 29 < 4 < 4 < 10 <4 <6 <5 <8 <24 <4 <4 < 45
  • 14 W-14 10/01/08 < 29 < 24 < 3 < 3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <6 <17 <3 <3
  • 28 < 10 W-14 10/01/08 < 35 < 31 <3 < 4 < 10 <4 <7 <4 <7 <21 <3 <4 < 37
  • 12 W-15 10/01/08 < 38 < 86 < 4 < 5 <10 <3 <9 <5 <8 <23 <4 <4 < 45 <15 W-16 10/01/08 < 44 < 30 < 4 < 4 <10 <4 <8 <5 <8 <26 <4 <4 < 44 < 12 W-1A 10/01/08 <19 <17 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 <17 <6 W-2 09/30/08 < 42 < 75 < 4 < 5 < 11 <4 <8 <5 <8 <23 <4 <4 < 41 <12 W-20 10/01/08 < 35 77 47 < 3 < 4 < 10 <4- <7 <4 <8 <22 <3 <3 < 39 <13 W-24 09/30/08 < 34 < 69 <3 < 4 <10 <4 <7 <4 <7 <23 <3 <4 < 39 <10 W-2A 10/01/08 < 33 < 38 < 3 < 4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <7 <16 <3 <3
  • 31 < 12 W-21B 10/01/08 < 39 < 82 < 4 < 4 < 10 <4 <9 <5 <8 <21 <3 <4
  • 38 < 13 W-3 09/30/08 < 33 < 56 < 3 < 3 <9 <3 <7 <4 <6 <18 <3 <3 < 31 <12 W-31 10/01/08 < 30 < 29 < 3 < 4 <6 <3 <5 <3 <5 <19 <3 <3 < 31 < 10 W-4 09/30/08 < 36 < 36 < 4 < 4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <8 <21 <3 <4
  • 38 < 11 W-4A 09/30/08 <20 <15 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 <14 <2 <2 < 21 <6 W-4A 09/30/08 < 39 < 40 < 3 < 4 <8 <3 <8 <5 <8 <22 <3 <4
  • 38 < 13 W-4B 09/30/08 < 32 < 26 < 3 < 3 <7 <3 <6 <4 <6 <17 <3 <3
  • 32 <9 W-5 09/10/08 <51 <48 <5 <5 <9 <5 <9 <6 <8 <24 <4 <5 < 41 < 12 W-5 09/30/08 <21 <19 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 < 22 <7 W-5 09/30/08 < 40 < 73 < 4 < 4 <9 <4 <7 <5 <7 <22 <3 <4 < 38 < 11 W-6 09/10/08 < 43 < 35 < 4 < 4 < 10 <3 <7 <4 <8 <15 <4 <4 < 30 <8 W-6 09/30/08 < 38 < 73 < 3 < 4 <8 <3 <6 <4 <7 <21 <3 <4 < 36 <9 W-7 09/30/08 <18 <15 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 < 19 <6 W-9 10/01/08 <20 <19 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <21 <6

TABLE B-1I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE PERIOD H-3 SR-90 Sw-1 05/05/08 < 186 Sw-i 05/28/08 < 192 SW-1 05/28/08 < 184 Sw-i 09/30/08 < 153 < 2.2 SW-2 05/05/08 < 174 SW-2 10/01/08 < 151 < 0.9 SW-3 05/05/08 < 165 SW-3 10/01/08 < 149 < 1.6 B-4

TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2008 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD sw-i 09/30/08 < 39 280+/- 63 < 4 <4 <10 <4 <7 <5 <7 < 26 <4 <4 <40 <13 SW-2 10/01/08 < 37 291 +/- 58 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <7 <4 <6 < 21 <3 <3 <36 <11 SW-3 10/01/08 < 38 < 30 < 3 <4 <9 <3 <6 <4 <8 < 21 <3 <4 <40 <11

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=RA-09-038,_Annual_Radiological_Environmental_Operating_Report,_January_1_-_December_31,_2008&oldid=2563395"