ML23088A191

E-mail: Draft Safety Evaluation Associated for EPRI Technical Report 3002018337, Use of Data Validation and Reconciliation Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Recaptutopical Report

ML23088A191
Person / Time
Site:	Electric Power Research Institute
Issue date:	05/05/2023
From:	Lois James Licensing Processes Branch
To:	Crytzer K Electric Power Research Institute
References
EPID L-2021-TOP-0006
Download: ML23088A191 (1)

Text

From:

Lois James To:

kcrytzer@epri.com Cc:

Lois James; Joshua Kaizer; Scott Krepel; David Rahn; Jason Paige; Gerond George; Ed Miller; fap@nei.org; Kent Howard

Subject:

Draft Safety Evaluation Associated for EPRI Technical Report 3002018337, Use of Data Validation and Reconciliation Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture: Topical Report (EPID No. L-2021-TOP-0006)

Date:

Friday, May 5, 2023 8:52:43 AM Mr. Kurtis Crytzer, Program Manager Electric Power Research Institute 1300 West W.T. Harris Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28262

Dear Mr. Crytzer,

By letter dated January27,2021 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.ML21053A027), Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) submitted EPRI Report 3002018337, "Use of Data Validation and Reconciliation Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture: Topical Report, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for review and approval. EPRI Report 3002018337, November 2020, presents a process for using a mathematical Data Validation and Reconciliation (DVR) method for monitoring core thermal power and use of the methods for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR) Uprates.

A copy of the draft SE has been placed in the box.com folder. Ms. Francis Pimentel and yourself have been given access to the folder. The draft SE is being provided for a proprietary information review. If EPRI provides comments on other areas, the NRC staff will exercise its discretion on whether to address those comments.

Pursuant to Section2.390 of Title10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR), we have determined that the draft SE may contain proprietary information. If you believe that any information in the draft SE is proprietary, please identify such information line-by-line and define the basis pursuant to the criteria of 10CFR2.390. Use double brackets and yellow highlight to identify any ((proprietary information)). Your response is due back to the NRC no later than 90days from the date of this email.

Your response must be via a letter from an authorized individual. In addition, please provide an electronic redline/strikeout Word version of the SE either via email or the box.com folder. It helps expedite the NRC staff response to comments if EPRI provides in the formal transmittal and in a separate Word file, a table with the following columns: Comment No., Page No., and Line No., Comment Type (if comments other than proprietary information are provided (i.e.,clarity, accuracy)), Suggested Revision, and a blank column NRC Disposition. However, EPRI may provide its comments in any format it chooses. The final SE will be issued after making any necessary changes.

Note that at this stage of the process, the NRC staff has completed its review of the submitted information and will not entertain technical arguments. The staff conclusions and conditions will not changed unless new information is provided that was not available during our review.

If EPRI would like to discuss the draft SE in detail, we can do that in a noticed meeting that can be closed if proprietary information will be discussed.

Both this email and the draft SE have been placed in ADAMS and made Official Agency

ML23088A184 (pkg); ML23088A191 (email); ML23088A192 (draftSE)

• via email NRR-106 OFFICE DORL/LLPB/PM DORL/LLPB/LA DSS/SFNB/BC DEX/ELTB/BC NAME LJames DHarrison*

SKrepel JPaige DATE 4/10/2023 4/10/23 03/27/2023 03/28/2023 OFFICE OGC (NLO)

DORL/LLPB/BC DORL/LLPB/PM

NAME AGhoseNaber*

GGeorge LJames

DATE 05/03/03 05/05/2023 05/05/2023