ML21294A153
Text
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 Start Historical 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The Susquehanna SES is located on the west bank of the Susquehanna River in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania with additional recreational and agricultural lands located on the east bank of the rivers in Conyngham and Hollenback Townships.
It is four miles south of Shickshinny and five miles northeast of Berwick. The nearest village is Beach Haven on the southeast edge of the main station site.
The Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates for the center point between Susquehanna SES Units 1 and 2 reactors are 4,549,300 meters north and 403,800 meters east, Zone 18.
These correspond to 4105'30" north latitude and 7608'55" west longitude and are also equivalent to the Pennsylvania Coordinate System (PCS) Coordinates 341,175 feet north and 2,442,025 feet east respectively. The PCS is used throughout this report.
The portion of the site in Salem Township is about 1,574 acres, which includes the property on the flood plain and agricultural land to the west of Confers Lane (Township Road T-438). The main station site area within the security fence is approximately 230 acres. An additional 717 acres of land on the east bank has woodlands, farming, reaction, etc.
Topography in the site vicinity ranges from relatively flat flood plains to gently rolling hills.
Elevations range from 500 feet to 1,600 feet above mean sea level (msl). In an east-west direction, the site is essentially flat from the river to U.S. Route 11 and is 530 ft above mean sea level. Elevation increases sharply to the west from U.S. Route 11 to the station site, rising from about 530 feet (mean sea level) to about 700 feet (msl) in the station area (see Figure 2.1-21).
Continuing to the westerly edge of the site, the land is relatively flat and at about the same elevation as the main station buildings. In a south-north direction, the site rises gradually from about 650 ft (msl) on the south boundary to about 900 ft (msl) on the north.
The main station buildings are located on a terrace above the flood plain approximately 4000 feet west of the Susquehanna River in Salem Township (see Figure 2.1-22). The land around the main station buildings is relatively open with trees on the steeper slopes. It was formerly under cultivation for farm and orchard crops and is slowly reverting back to woodlands.
2.1.1.2 Site Area Map A map of the site area including major structures and facilities is provided as (Figure 2.1-22). In addition to the site property in Salem Township the Licensee owns 717 acres of recreational land on the east side of the river in Conyngham and Hollenback Townships.
The exclusion area as defined in 10CFR100 (Ref. 2.1-1), is a circle of radius 1800 feet with the center at the common release point. Radiation dose limits at this location are regulated by FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-1
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 10CFR50.67, Accident Source Term. The coordinates of the common release point are N341,175 and E 2,441,970.5. Aside from transit through the exclusion area, there are no activities permitted within this zone other than those related to station operation. There are no residences within the exclusion area.
Roads that traverse the site are:
a) On the north - Beach Grove Road (T-419) which is approximately 1600 ft. from the center of the exclusion area and approximately 500 ft. from the nearest vital structure. (Salem Township) b) On the west - Confers Lane (T-438) which is approximately 2000 ft. from the center of the exclusion area and approximately 1400 ft. from the nearest vital structure. (Salem Township) c) On the south - Bell Bend (T-456) which is approximately 1800 ft. from the center of the exclusion area and approximately 1600 ft. from the nearest vital structure.
(Salem Township) d) On the east - U.S. Route No. 11 which is approximately 2600 ft. from the center of the exclusion area and approximately 2500 ft. from the nearest vital structure.
(Salem Township) e) On the floodplain on the east bank - Route 239 is located approximately 7,100 feet from the center of the exclusion area. (Conyngham Township).
Railways that traverse the site are:
A rail line owned by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania traverses the flood plain. It is operated by the North Shore Railroad Co. and is located approximately 2,700 feet east of the center of the exclusion area. This line is exclusively used by the Licensee. The section of the line north of the site is not being used at present. An access spur from the main line of the railroad onto the site permits rail service to the station.
The Susquehanna River flows from north to south separating the site from recreational lands on the east side of the river. The river is navigable only by small pleasure and fishing boats because of shallow water and obstructions in the vicinity of the site.
2.1.1.3 Boundaries for Establishing Effluent Release Limits The exclusion area is the area within a radius of 1,800 feet from the common release point of both reactors, (Figure 2.1-22). The distance from the gaseous effluent release points to the boundary is at least 1,800 feet. The station liquid effluent release point is located at the river approximately 4,000 feet from the common release point. See Section 2.1.2.3 for arrangements for traffic control.
2.1.2 EXCLUSION AREA AUTHORITY AND CONTROL 2.1.2.1 Authority FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-2
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 PP&L owns the entire plant exclusion area (except for Township Route T-419) in fee simple and, therefore, has complete authority to regulate any and all access and activity within that area.
Minimum distance to exclusion area boundary is discussed in Subsection 2.1.1.2.
2.1.2.2 Control of Activities Unrelated to Plant Operation The only area within the exclusion area in which activities unrelated to plant operation may or will occur is Township Route T-419. See Section 2.1.2.3 for traffic control arrangements.
The location of this area within the exclusion area is shown in Figure 2.1-22. The exclusion area outside the protected area fence will be posted and, with the exception of the township route, will be closed to persons who have not received authorization to enter the property.
PP&L normally will not control passage along Township Route T-419 within the exclusion area although the Emergency Plan provides for execution of control over passage in the event of emergency conditions at the plant.
2.1.2.3 Arrangements for Traffic Control PP&L has made arrangements with the Salem Township Supervisors and with the Pennsylvania State Police for control of traffic on Township Route T-419 in the event of an emergency. In addition, Pennsylvania, Luzerne County, and Columbia County Emergency Management Agencies have incorporated traffic control in their emergency procedures.
2.1.2.4 Abandonment or Relocation of Roads Approximately 0.25 mile of Township Road T-419 was relocated approximately 250 feet south to improve the grade and lessen the number of curves. This road was relocated on property owned by PP&L. Access to the plant by a rail spur was also improved through this area.
2.1.3 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION The population in the vicinity of the Susquehanna SES is sparsely distributed. The steep sloped ridges and the prevailing land use, agriculture, combine to yield a low population density outside of the communities. Table 2.1-33 indicates a decline in total population of counties within 20 miles of the site between the years 1950 and 2000. There was a decrease in population of about 111,000 people or 15.7% (Ref. 2.1-2 and 2.1-3). Between 1990 and 2000 in these counties there was a decrease in population by about 7,800 people or 1.3%. Sullivan County had the greatest percentage increase (7.4%) and Luzerne County had the greatest percentage loss (2.7%) in population (Ref. 2.1-4). The nearest major populated area, the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton corridor, is 15 to 30 miles northeast of the site.
Definitions for urban and rural areas changed in 2000 and, therefore, it is difficult to compare growth trends. For example, in 1990 urban and urbanized areas had population densities as low as 1,000 persons per square mile and in 2000 this definition decreased to 500 persons per FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-3
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 square mile. The changes in urban and rural populations listed in Table 2.1-34 from 1990 to 2000 may only reflect the changes in definition and not major population shifts from urban to rural areas or vice versa (Ref. 2.1-5 and 2.1-6).
Transient populations were considered in calculating the population distribution in the site vicinity. Variations in the transient population occur from 30 to 50 miles away from the site.
This subject is discussed in greater detail in Subsection 2.1.3.3.
Population projections are based upon U.S. Bureau of Census projections for the nation (Ref. 2.1-7). These projections are stepped-down to the local level by a ratio technique. The U.S. Census projection series for the nation is based upon fertility assumptions. For the projections used in this report, two basic fertility assumptions are made; one is that the completed cohort fertility is 2.7 children per woman, which is characteristic of a growing population, and the other is 2.1 children per woman, which is characteristic of a replacement population growth. In 1990 the 2.1 completed fertility generates birth rates were comparable to national birth rates experienced in 1970-1974 (Ref. 2.1-8). It is reasonable to assume that the 2.1 completed fertility rate applies to the site area. The U.S. Census projections virtually assume a closed population. That is, on the national level migration of persons into or out of the U.S. is considered negligible. However, such a situation does not exist for the Pennsylvania area. For example, between 1980 and 1990 the U.S. population increased by 9%; however, Pennsylvanias population increased by less than 1% (Ref. 2.1-9). These figures indicate that Pennsylvania experienced out-migration. To include migration in the projections, the trends established in the 1960 to 1970 decade were projected out to the years 2000 to 2020 (Ref. 2.1-10 and 2.1-11). The results of these projections are given in Tables 2.1-35 through 2.1-38 and Figures 2.1-23 through 2.1-26.
2.1.3.1 Population Within 10 Miles The population within 10 miles of the site was sparsely distributed in 2000, and may be characterized as a declining rural population with a few small communities scattered through the area. As shown in Figure 2.1-27 and Table 2.1-39, the bulk of the population was located in the WSW, NNE, NE, SE, N and SSE sectors (Ref. 2.1-4 and 2.1-12). Seasonal population data were included in this table and figure. These sectors contain all or part of several small communities (Table 2.1-40); however, none of these communities exceeded 25,000 people, and none qualifies as a population center (10CFR100) (Ref. 2.1-1).
The rest of the area is agricultural; however, the number of farms between 1969 and 1997 declined by 26% for Luzerne County and 32% for Columbia County (Ref. 2.1-12). This decline combined with a decline in farmland (24% for Luzerne and 22% for Columbia) indicates a decline in agriculture in the vicinity of the site (Ref. 2.1-13).
Population projections for the area from 0 to 10 miles from the site for 2010 and 2020 are given in Tables 2.1-35, 2.1-37 and Figures 2.1-23, 2.1-25. Between 2010 and 2020 there is a projected decline in population of approximately 2,500 people.
2.1.3.2 Population Between 10 and 50 Miles As shown in Figure 2.1-28 and Table 2.1-41, the major focus of the population between 10 and 50 miles is in the NE and SE sectors. Seasonal population data were included in this table and FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-4
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 figure. The cities contained in these sectors (Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, and Hazleton) form the nucleus of the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton Metropolitan Area. Between 1990 and 2000 the population decreased from 734,175 to 624,776 in this metropolitan area (Ref. 2.1-14).
Population projections for the area from 10 to 50 miles from the site for years 2010 and 2020 are given in Tables 2.1-36, 2.1-38, and Figures 2.1-24, 2.1-26. These projections are based on the 1990 Census since new projections are not available. After a slight increase in projected population from 2000 to 2010 there is a moderate but steady decline in population between 2010 and 2020.
2.1.3.3 Transient Population Between 0 and 50 Miles The transient population around the site are of three types:
- a. Seasonal
- b. Daily
- c. Transportation A seasonal population is dependent upon the time of year. Examples of seasonal dependency are tourists at resort areas and migrant workers. Commuters, a daily population, for example, may be present in an area 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> out of the 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> in a week. Another example of a daily population is the visitors to the mountains or beaches for the day. Finally, a transportation population is associated with some mode of transportation. For example, several thousand vehicles pass a particular location on a highway during a day; however, the persons in these vehicles may be in the site vicinity a few minutes only. Furthermore, many of the vehicles counted may be those of local residents going to and from work, or running errands. The seasonal and daily populations are of interest to the location of a nuclear power station and are discussed in more detail below.
2.1.3.3.1 Seasonal Population Between 0 to 50 Miles Within a 30-mile radius of this site there are all or part of eleven counties (Table 2.1-42). Table 2.1-42 lists current population (2000), seasonal potential population and seasonal population.
Luzerne and Columbia Counties have a seasonal population of 8,586 or less than 2.2% of the seasonal potential population in these two counties (Ref. 2.1-14). Within 10 miles of the station assuming seasonal population is 2.2% of the total population then there are approximately 1179 people who are considered seasonal.
From 30 to 50 miles the seasonal population maintains the same general concentration as it does within 30 miles. Table 2.1-42 shows that Pike, Sullivan, Monroe and Wayne counties have rather high concentrations of seasonal population. These counties are NW, NE, and E of the site. The seasonal population for the area defined by a 50 mile radius from the site was weighted and incorporated in the Population Distribution (Tables 2.1-39 and 2.1-41 and Figures 2.1-27 and 2.1-28) and Projections (Tables 2.1-35, 2.1-36, 2.1-37, 2.1-38, and 2 Figures 2.1-23, 2.1-24, 2.1-25, 2.1-26), Ref. 2.1-15.
Other sources of seasonal populations are daily visitors to attractions such as parks, wildlife refuges and national forests. It is difficult to weigh the population due to these attractions since the length of stay is usually unknown. Furthermore, persons who visit a park and hike or swim for the day are often from within the study area. Thus, instead of there being a net increase of FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-5
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 persons in the study area, there may only be a redistribution of persons. The station recreation area is estimated to have a peak daily attendance of 1,000 persons and a daily average of 300 persons according to recreation personnel. The nearest recreational area of a significant size is Ricketts Glen State Park, located approximately 15 miles north-northwest of the site and Nescopeck State Park about 12 miles east both in Luzerne County. (Ref. 2.1.16). Attendance at these parks was not included because of possible counting of local residents who visit the parks.
2.1.3.3.2 Daily Transient Population Persons who work at locations which are different than their residences constitute shifts in population during working hours. Especially large employers or urban centers can result in substantial shifts in local population. The Susquehanna site experiences daily shifts in population both into and away from the site area. However, the resident population presents a conservative (high) estimate of the distribution of persons in the vicinity of the station since employment opportunities away from the site area (i.e., further than 5 miles) are greater than those within it. Population shifts into the area occur as workers commute to the 13 industries which occur within 5 miles of the site. These industries employ a total of 1,746 persons some of whom would be expected to reside in the site area (see Table 2.1-43, Ref. 2.1-17). When one weighs the proportion of working hours to total hours in a week (40/160) the residential population increased by only 437 persons.
Daily shifts in population away from the site would be expected to be greater than noted above due to the presence of a number of urban areas located nearby. In Luzerne County, the City of Wilkes-Barre, located 21 miles to the northeast, is a major urban and employment center.
Valmont Industrial Park, located near the City of Hazleton 15 miles southeast of the site, is another important employment center. In Columbia County, Berwick Borough, located 5 miles to the southwest, and the Town of Bloomsburg, located approximately 18 miles to the west-southwest, are the major employment and urban centers.
2.1.3.3.3 Low Population Zone The distance of the Low Population Zone (LPZ), established for the Susquehanna SES in accordance with 10CFR100, is a three-mile radius from the center of exclusion area. Radiation dose limits at LPZ are regulated by 10CFR50.67, Accident Source Term. The estimated population in the LPZ in 2000 was 2,133 (Table 2.1-39). Projected and existing population distribution data for distances up to 50 miles from the plant are on Tables 2.1-36, 2.1-38, and 2.1-41, and Figures 2.1-24, 2.1-26 and 2.1-28.
No schools, hospitals, state or municipal parks are located within the LPZ. The plant recreation area is within the LPZ. Five industrial plants, Leggett and Platt, Castek, PMC Lifestyle, and MP Metals and Tech Packaging are located within the LPZ. These plants employ a total of 254 persons who would contribute to the peak daily transient population. Seasonal population and daily transient populations are discussed in Subsection 2.1.3.3.1.
Some of the facilities and institutions beyond the low population zone within five miles of the station which because of their nature, may require special consideration when evaluating emergency plans include: campgrounds, at state gamelands, public schools, municipal buildings, swimming and boating operations, a miniature golf course, and a number of FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-6
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 industries. Industries within five miles are identified in Table 2.1-43. The State and county emergency management agencies have plans for notification of facilities and institutions within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) in the event of an emergency. Also, State and local police departments will direct traffic in the event of an emergency. It should be noted that portions of communities outside this 10-mile EPZ are included in emergency planning evacuation plans.
2.1.3.4 Population Center The nearest population center as defined in 10CFR100 is the City of Wilkes-Barre, located about 21 miles northeast, which had a 1980 population of 55,551 and a 1990 population of 47,523 and a 2000 population of 43,123 (Ref. 2.1-4). It is part of the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton Metropolitan Area. See Section 2.1.3.2 for additional information.
Subsection 2.1.3.3 discusses transient population.
Tables 2.1-35, 2.1-36, 2.1-37, 2.1-38 and Figures 2.1-23, 2.1-24, 2.1-25, and 2.1-26 show population projections for the population around the Susquehanna site.
Berwick, Pennsylvania is not likely to exceed 25,000 people and become the population center within the next 40 years. Using population figures provided by the Columbia County Planning Commission (Ref. 2.1-18), Berwicks population is projected to decrease by 1,071 persons between 2000 and 2020 (Table 2.1-44). The 2000 projection of 10,395 was within 379 people according to the 2000 census.
2.1.3.5 Population Density Tables 2.1-45 and 2.1-46 show the comparison of cumulative population for the initial year of operation and final year of operation versus a cumulative population from a uniform population density of 500 people/sq. mile and 1000 people/sq. mile respectively.
2.
1.4 REFERENCES
2.1-1 Code of Federal Regulations, 10 Energy Part-100. The Office of Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration, January 1, 1990.
2.1-2 Pennsylvania State Data Center. Historical Population Counts for Pennsylvania Counties, 1790-1980. October 24, 1997. Web Site:
http://www.mnsfld.edu/depts/lib/ref/stats/pa-demog.txt 2.1-3 Pennsylvania State Data Center. Pennsylvania County Profiles. October 24, 1997.
2.1-4 Pennsylvania State Data Center. Pennsylvania County Profiles. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
2.1-5 The Center for Rural Pennsylvania. A legislative Agency of the Pennsylvania General Assembly, Harrisburg, PA. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002. Web site:
http://www.ruralpa.org/rural def/
FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-7
SSES-FSAR Text Rev. 59 2.1-6 Johnson, Jonathan, The Center for Rural Pennsylvania. Personal Communications with J. S. Fields, PPL Susquehanna, LLC. October 30 and November 6, 2002.
2.1-7 U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970 Census of Population Numbers of Inhabitants, Pennsylvania, PC (1)A-40, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1971.
2.1-8 Projections of the Population of the United States, by Age and Sex, 1975 to 2000, with Extensions of Total Population to 2025, Population Estimates and Projects, Current Population Reports No 541. U.S. Department of Commerce, February, 1975..
2.1-9 U.S. Bureau of the Census. U.S. and Pennsylvania Population Data, 1980 and 1990 (Fax). Philadelphia, PA.
2.1-10 Vital Statistics Report, Annual Summary for United States 1974, Volume 23.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Rockville, MD.
2.1-11 Regulatory Standard Review Plan, Section 2.1.3 Population Distribution, Directorate of Licensing, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, October 1974.
2.1-12 Census 2000 including seasonal population. AccuData America, 2003. Fort Myers, Florida.
2.1-13 Census of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. The Center for Rural Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, PA. 2002. Web site:
http://www.ruralpa.org/2002profiles/luzerne.html (or columbia).
2.1-14 Pennsylvania State Data Center. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics:
2000, Table DP-1. US. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
2.1-15 U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing 1990, 1980:
Summary Tape File 1 and 3, The Pennsylvania State Data Center, Penn State, Harrisburg, 1990.
2.1-16 Fridman, John, PPL Services. Personal Communication with J. S. Fields, PPL Susquehanna, LLC. November 11, 2002.
2.1-17 Berwick Area Chamber of Commerce, 2000 Report and Personal Communication with T. V. Jacobsen, Ecology III on October 16, 2002.
2.1-18 Columbia County Planning Commission. Personal Communication with J.R. Schinner, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, June 12, 1998.
~--------1 End Historical FSAR Rev. 67 2.1-8
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2.1-33 PAST POPULATION CHANGES OF COUNTIES WITHIN 20 MILES OF THE SITE"
% Change 199010 County 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2000 Luzerne 392,241 346,972 341,956 343,079 328,149 319,250 -2.7 Columbia 53,46() 53,489 55,114 61,967 63,202 64,151 1.5 Sullivan 6,745 6,251 5,961 6,349 6,104 6,556 7.4 Schuylkill 200,577 173,027 160,089 160,630 152,585 150,336 -1 .5 Carbon 57.558 52,889 50,573 . 53,285 56,846 58,802 3.4 Total 710,581 632,628 613,693 625,310 606,886 599,095 -1 .3 Source: Refs. 2.1-2 and 2.1-3 and 2.1-4 r Population includes entire county even area outside 20 mile radius from site.
FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. O TABLE 2. 1-34 POPULATION BY RESIDENCE FOR COUNTIES WITHIN 20 MILES OF THE SITE 1980 TO 2000 1980 1990 2000 County Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Luzerne 253,336 89,743 239,215 88,834 254,164 65,086 Columbia 23,576 38,391 23,418 39,784 35.730 28,421 Sullivan 0 6,349 0 6,104 0 6,556 Schuylkill 76,995 83,675 63,560 89,025 95,497 54,839 Carbon 30,665 22,620 29,795 27,051 29,109 29,693 Source: Ref. 2.1-5 and 2.1-6
.I FSAR Rev . 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2.1-35 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2010 0-10 Miles Distance (Miles)
Sector 0-1 . 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10 Mile Total . I N 40 15 48 1,112 2,157 1,200 4.572 NNE 0 75 29 0 0 1,600 1,704 NE 0 0 162 191 369 9,000 9,722 ENE 0 15 37 67 94 1,600 1,813 E 0 56 22 41 72 1,200 1,391 ESE 24 26 63 175 172 2,300 2,760 SE 44 245 147 143 13 3,000 3,592 SSE 40 154 37 89 46 3,700 4,066 s 36 147 29 137 10 1,900 2,259 SSW 4 245 44 83 120 1,000 1,496 SW 4 15 335 89 1,520 2,000 3,963 WSW 4 60 331 111 4,073 12,700 17,279 w 4 30 59 92 182 1,500 1,867 WNW 12 41 44 99 260 700 1,156 NW 16 72 92 0 94 800 1,074 NNW 70 19 15 0 23 1,000 1,127 TOTAL 298 1,215 1,494 2,429 9,205 45,200 59,841 CUMULATIVE TOTAL 298 1,513 3,007 5.436 14,641 59,841 Source: Refs. 2.1-8 and 2.1-10*
FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. O TABLE 2.1-36 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2010 0-50 Miles Distance (Miles)
Sector 10 Mile Total 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50 Mile Total N 4,572 3,700 1,800 7,700 4,800 22,572 NNE 1,704 17.200 17,100 20,100 8,900 65,004 NE 9,722 75,200 101,000 164,800 40,900 391,622 ENE 1,813 30,200 34,800 12,000 9,600 88,413 E 1,391 12,500 1.400 7,900 33,700 56,891 ESE 2,760 11,600 3,100 7,900 32,600 57,960 SE 3,592 37,200 26,500 34,600 211,500 313,392 SSE 4,066 10,700 23,400 11.500 57,400 107,066 s 2,259 9,000 28,300 38,200 31,100 108,859 SSW 1,496 5,200 42,200 12,600 21,500 82,996 SW 3,963 1,700 18,400 23,700 14,700 62,463 WSW 17,279 21,000 23,200 27,700 40,900 130,079 w 1,867 4,400 4,700 20.500 16,300 47,767 WNW 1,156 4,000 2,300 8,900 43,600 59,956
- NW 1,074 1,600 1,500 2.000 1,900 8.074 NNW 1,127 1,500 800 3,000 7,500 13,927 TOTAL 59,841 246,700 330,500 403.100 576,900 1,617,041 CUMULATIVE TOTAL 59,841 306.541 637,041 1,040,141 1,617,041 Source: Refs. 2.1-8 and 2.1-10 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2.1-37 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2020 0~10 Miles Distance (Miles)
Sector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10 Mile Total N 41 15 47 1,056 2,010 1,200 4,369 NNE 0 . 76 29 . 0 0 1,400 1,505 NE 0 0 160 181 359 7,400 8.100 ENE 0 15 36 - 63 92 1,600 1,806 E 0 57 22 39 70 1,200 1,388 ESE 24 26 62 166 168 2,400 2,846 SE 45 246 145 136 13 3,100 3,685 SSE 41 155 36 84 44 4,000 4,360 s 37 147 29 130 10 1,800 2,153 SSW 4 246 44 78 117 1,000 1,489 SW 4 15 330 84 1,480 2,000 3,913 WSW 4 60 327 106 3,966 12,100 16,563 w 4 30 58 88 177 1,500 1,857 WNW 12 42 44 94 L54 700 1,146 NW 16 72 91 0 92 800 1,071 NNW 20 19 15 0 22 1,000 1,076 TOTAL 252 1,221 1,475 2,305 8,874 43,200 57.327 CUMULATIVE TOTAL 252 1,473 2,948 5,253 14,127 57,327 Source : Refs. 2.1-8 and 2.1-10 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. O TABLE 2. 1-38 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2020 0-50 Miles Distance (Miles)
Sector 10 Mile Total 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50 Mile Tota I N 4,369 3,600 2.000 8,200 41500 22,669 NNE 1,505 18,300 18,800 21,400 9,900 69,905 NE 8,100 65,600 91.200 151,700 37,400 354,000 ENE 1,806 29,200 31 t700 13,600 9,800 86,106 E 1,388 14,800 11500 8,900 35,600 62.188 ESE 2,846 11,000 .3,100 8,300 33,700 58,946 SE 3,685 32,500 23.600 34,700 225,600 320,085 SSE 4,360 9,600 21,200 12.000 62,700 109,860 s 2,153 7,900 25,200 38.600 33,700 107,553 SSW 1,489 4,800 37,800 11,800 21,600 77,489 I SW 3,913 1,600 17,000 20,700 13,900 57,113 WSW 16,563 21,400 22,800 25,900 43,600 130,263 w 1,857 4,400 4,700 19,200 16,600 46,757 WNW 1,146 4,000 2,100 8,700 42,100 58,046 NW 1,071 1,500 1,400 1,900 1,800 7,671 NNW 1,076 1,500 700 2,700 7,500 13,476 TOTAL 57,327 231,700 304,800 388,300 600,000 1,582,127 CUMULATIVE TOTAL 57,327 289.027 593,827 982,127 1,582,127 Source: Refs. 2.1-8 and 2.1-10 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 1 TABLE 2.1-39 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2000 0-10 MILES DISTANCE (MILES)
Sector 0-1 Miles 1-2 Miles 2-3 Miles 3-4 Miles 4-5 Miles 5-10 Miles 10 Mile Total N 12 29 49 711 937 1,575 3,313 I NNE 13 28 46 176 83 3,460 3,806 I NE 17 28 46 64 126 3,347 3,628 I ENE 16 28 46 67 133 1,840 2.130 I E 14 27 66 109 139 1,552 1,907 I ESE 16 35 79 111 142 2,288 2,671 I SE 22 34 77 111 144 3.873 4.261 I SSE 29 48 61 90 161 2,505 2,894 I S 30 70 61 85 122 1,076 1,444 I SSW 30 88 69 85 110 1,015 1,397 I sw 30 89 120 418 1,043 771 2,471 I wsw 30 89 143 403 3,583 12,590 16,838 I W 29 54 63 137 167 2.019 2.469 I WNW 16 29 48 67 105 822 1,087 I NW 13 I ,2g I LIB I 67 I 86 1,077 1,320 I NNW 12 29 48 67 91 1.384 I 1.631 I TOTAL 329 734 I 1.070 2.768 7.172 I 41.194 I 53.267 I 53,267 329 1,063 2,133 4,901 12,073 53,267 I Ref. 2.1-4 and 2.1-12 FSAR Rev. 60 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2.1-40 COMMUNITIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE, 2000 POPULATION DIRECTIONAL RADIAL %
COMMUNIT1Es< 11 1990 2000 SECTOR DISTANCE CHANGE Shickshinny 1,108 959 N 5 to 10
- 13.45 Briar Creek 616 651 WSW 5 to 10 5.68 BeTWick 10,976 10,774 WSW 5 to 10 *1.84 Nescopeck 11651 1,528 SW 5 to 10 -7.45 Conyngham 2,060 1,958 SE 5 to 10 -4.95 Source: Ref. 2.1-3, 2,1-4, and 2.1-12 NOTES: <1>soroughs *.
FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2.1-41 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2000 0-50 MILES DISTANCE (MILES)
Sector 0-10 Miles 10-2'0 Miles 20-30 Miles 30-40 Miles 40-50 Miles 50 Mile Total N 3,314 4,953 2,440 5,990 8,071 24,768 NNE 3,806 18,285 13,505 18,818 11,110 65,524 NE 3,629 119,400 78,944 147,035 40.712 389,720 ENE 2,130 13,926 5,178 21,330 35,341 77,905 E 1,909 8,346 7,131 35,232 52,694 105,312 ESE 2,671 13,938 17,073 27,333 56,689 117,704 SE 4,260 36,774 27,237 36,858 230,006 335,135 SSE 2,895 7,229 14.821 14,120 62,753 101,818 s 1,444 14,507 43,974 27,178 24,875 111,978 SSW 1,396 4,018 28,353 15,335 16,925 66,027 SW 2,470 3,511 21,747 18,465 15,064 61,257 WSW 16,839 25,498 18,138 34,811 38,435 133,721 w 2,470 5,868 6,089 27,774 23,573 65,774 WNW 1,086 4,040 4,437 16,797 57,231 83,591 NW 1.318 3,510 2,156 3,354 3,888 14,226 NNW 1,630 3,843 2,524 5,352 10.376 23,725 TOTAL 53,267 287,646 293,747 455,782 687,743 1,778,185 CUMULATIVE 53,267 3'10,913 634,660 1,090,442 1,778,185 TOTAL Ref. 2. 1-4 and 2. 1-12 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev, 0 TABLE 2.1-42 SEASONAL POPULATION OF COUNTIES IN STUDY AREA, 2000 Seasonal I Current Potential I Seasonal %
Counties Within 30 M!les of Site Population Population
- Population Seasonal Wyoming 28,080 30,892 2.812 9.1 Sullivan 6,556 12,672 6,116 48.3 Monroe 138,687 176,579 37,892 21,5 Lackawanna 213,295 217,984 4,689 2.2 Carbon 58,802 70,044 11,242 16 Schuylkill 150,336 152,745 2,409 1.6 Luzerne 319,250 325,270 6,020 1.9 Columbta 64,151 66,717 2,566 3.8 Montour 18,236 18,464 228 1.2 Northumberland 94,556 95,175 619 0.7 Lycoming 120,044 124,865 4,821 3.9 SUBTOTAL 1,211,993 1,291,407 79,414 Counties Within 50 Miles of Site Susquehanna 42,238 51,108 8,870 17.4 Bradford 62,761 68,602 5,841 8.5 Wayne 47,722 72,509 24.787 34.2 Pike 46,302 80,804 34,502 42.7 Northampton 267,066 268.478 1,412 0.5 Lehigh 312,090 313,040 950 0.3 Berks 373,638 375,326 1,688 0.4 Lebanon 120,327 121,253 926 0.8 Dauphin 251.798 253,278 1,480 0.6 Snyder 37,546 38,617 'i,071 2.8 Union 41,624 43,763 2,139 4.9 SUBTOTAL 1,603,112 1,686,778 83,666 TOTAL FOR ALL COUNTIES 2,815,105 21978,185 163,080 Source: Ref. 2.1-4, 2.1-12 and 2.1-15 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2 .1-43 I
- INDUSTRIES WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE SITE 2000 I Distance (miles) and Number of Industry Direction from the Site Employees Products I Riverview Vibrated Block Co. 4.0 WSW 5 Concrete Block and Brick I Crispin Multiplex Mfg. Co . Inc. 4.75 WSW 45 Valve Tech Packaging 1.5 WSW 130 Packaging Material RAD Woodwork Co., Inc. 4.5 SW 60 lumber Mill Zeiser Vault Co . 4.25 SW 15 Concrete Products Cooks Wholesale Food , Inc. 5.0 WSW 8 Package Food Products Leggett & Platt 1.25 NNE 57 Carpet Underlay Berwick Industries, Inc. 3.9 WSW 1300 Decorative bows and ribbons Castek , Inc. 1.5 WSW 10 Plastic/Cement PMC Lifestyle 1.5 SSW 55 Foam Products MP Metals 2.5 SW 2 Metal Scrap Oyco 4 .5 SW 59 Packaging Machines Audimation 3.2 s 4 Stereo Amplifiers Source : Ref. 2.1-17 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. O TABLE 2.1-44 POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR BERWICK, PENNSYLVANIA Historical Year Trend 1 1970 12,274 1980 11,850 1990 10,976 2000 10,395 2010 9,845 2020 9,324 1
Calculated by TtNUS based on 1970-1990 population data supplied by the Columbia County Planning Commission (Ref. 2.1-8). Extrapolation based on 1970 to 1990 trend.
FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. 0 TABLE 2.1-45 CUMULATIVE POPULATIONS FOR 1990 AND 2000 Distance (mi) 1990 2000 500#/mile(sq)*
1 124 329 1.570 2 820 1,063 6.280 3 2,243 2,133 14 ,135 4 4,573 4,901 25,130 5 12,006 12,073 39,265 10 51,528 53,267 157.079 20 341,058 340,913 628,515 30 610,710 634,660 1,413,715 40 1,020,502 1,090,442 2,513 ,270 50 1,616,658 1,778,185 3,926,990 This is the population that would occur if 500 per-sons per square mile were uniformly distributed over the study area.
Source: Refs. 2.1-12 , 2.1-14 and 2.1-16 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
SSES-FSAR Table Rev. O TABLE 2.1-46 CUMULATIVE POPULATIONS FOR 1990, 2000, 2010 AND 2020 Distance (miles} 1990 2000 2010 2020 1000/m?*
1 124 329 289 252 3.140 2 820 1,063 1,513 1,473 12,560 3 2,243 2,133 3,007 2,948 28.270 4 4,573 4,901 5,436 5,253 50,260 5 12,006 12,073 14,641 14,127 78,530 10 51,528 53,267 59,841 57,327 314,159 20 341,058 340,913 306,541 289,029 1.256,630 I
30 610,710 634,660 637.041 I 593,827 2.827.430 40 1,020,502 1,090.442 1,040,141 982,127 5,026,540 50 1,616,658 1,778,185 1,617,041 1,581,127 7)853,980
- This is the population that would occur if 1000 persons per square mile were uniformly distributed over the study area.
Source: Refs. 2.1-12, and 2.1-14 and 2.1-16 FSAR Rev. 59 Page 1 of 1
Security-Related Information Figure Withheld Under 10 CFR 2.390 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SITE VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2.1-21
Security-Related Information Figure Withheld Under 10 CFR 2.390 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SITE AREA MAP FIGURE 2.1-22
~~'l'I- *
- -"'"'tz I ,./
I
\
~<
~-~
~~/
/
/
1,000 1,200 1
TR UE NORTH t';h i?y;b
~\ 800 p~ I
/I W,
\ ~
\, 12,,00/ --~/~~~
1/
~ __ :::;;;,*I.
/
_A \ MIFFLINVILLE \
1 MILE 2,000 \
SCALE
\'c
'2,\~ FSAR REV. 65
~\ff\ 1,000
\1g SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION g\ UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
___ r---~_::,
\\
'" ,~~-
.S.s/1i ;--:-:_-~-
~<s< HAZLETON \ - - ~ \ C POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 0-10 MILES, 2010
/ sc1-111il(fl.1. Co-*- -
s- --10M1- -------- ---~
FIGURE 2.1-23, Rev 1
/
AutoCAD: Figure Fsar 2_1_23.dwg
-:\ 1.. ,.,
~"~*
r?'I'"'
y 9,600,r \
__ *._ - ~ E CO_
~ oe.O)
I
---0.-0,,0_,-
wI1- _,,,---
~
Y 1s,3oo 1,
STA n.JTEMILES
-- .J 1p XA I E r --
)i FSAR REV. 65 r SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2
'. _.,..c,O FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-,~,y.
- f':/
} "'"
~ **i~'b
'\'* --
s1,4oo/
I ~ 'q,* , -\, V '/' POPULATION DISTRIBUTION e:
. ~ ,tf) /- 0-50 MILES, 2010
/ '
~ -
31 ,100
- s - SOMl __ _ -- --f:/2,< ',
LFIGURE 2.1-24, Rev 1 AutoCAD: Figure Fsar 2_1_24.dwg J
N
~~~ - - Ntvf I
\
~~/
/
/,
1,000 1,200 t
TRUE NORTH
~I fl W,
\ 12,100/
3/41
~~
~ - ----_-*1 /'.~
~~~
y/
1 MILE 2,000 SCALE
\'c
';\'ti\ FSAR REV. 65
£.\'¥. 1,000 ij;\~
- O SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
'6\ UNITS 1 & 2
\ ,/
____ J ------" "- FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
',"'---s~------ \ ~~
) Sci-," " S ,O Ml HAZLETON \
--"\ . ;**
~ ::) -
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 0-10 MILES, 2020
/- Vi.Jo1_i.Co--- ---
FIGURE 2.1-25, Rev 1
/
AutoCAD: Figure Fsar 2_1_25.dwg
- t
!\~ -- 'f{f'~ ~
/?e:focO
)
. .oo,r \
-. . - - -~ 11<,EC:O_
- ~ OEOO L~;/
\
- STATUTE MILES 0
'f FSAR REV. 65 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
' ~
, ,"~/'t
. . -:.< / ' /
-~
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 0-50 MILES, 2020
""~' /&
,/
I /
/ / ~ FIGURE 2.1-26, Rev 1 I
./
__.,-**SSfc-
- ,\ AutoCAD: Figure Fsar 2_1_26.dwg
~~~-
I
\
\
~ ('.
'o-~
~~/
/ /
1384 1575 1
TRUE NO RTH
~~/:"
?'c,\'o 1077 0\
I
- /
ii I
/
W, 2019
--- BER
\\ 1258.r
_:7/'
~K~~
~
7 <MIFFLINVILLE/
1 MILE 771 SCALE
\'c FSAR REV. 65
",\\;\
,s>~
~\l i 10
,o,s SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
~,o UNITS 1 & 2 i\ r--- --""'---*:::,
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-, '""- \\ --- SEASONAL POPULATION
- -~ ~ / HAZL ETON\ - - - * \ ~- 0-10 MILES, 2000 JANUARY 15, 2003
~ :~-- s - --
10 M\. ---~
FIGURE 2.1-27, Rev 1
/ Sc1i_fkfl_[ Co-- *-. '
/ --- AutoCAD: Figure Fsar 2_1_27.dwg
ti_ ---
'Yzy_~
8,071 11,110
)'
-:\ i ~,-
"'""~
i?, P. e,-0
-~:r\
. , ..! - _:'>.c-~.:._:jad;" co I I
-~ -
\
STATUTE MILES 5 0
'f FSAR REV. 65 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
)'\_**._
'-,'-_ /2*.g'
' <V/ SEASONAL POPULATION
~
0-50 MILES, 2000 t JANUARY 15, 2003 24,875 FIGURE 2.1-28, Rev 1 AutoCAD: Figure Fsar 2_1_28.dwg
~ . s SOML