ML23292A194

1 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Questions and Response 361.1 Through 361.5-1

ML23292A194
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	10/12/2023
From:	Susquehanna
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML23291A105	List: ML23291A113 ML23291A342 ML23291A343 ML23291A344 ML23291A369 ML23291A370 ML23291A371 ML23291A372 ML23291A373 ML23291A374 ML23291A375 ML23291A376 ML23291A377 ML23291A378 ML23291A379 ML23291A380 ML23291A381 ML23291A382 ML23291A383 ML23291A384 ML23291A385 ML23291A386 ML23291A387 ML23291A388 ML23291A389 ML23291A390 ML23291A391 ML23291A392 ML23291A393 ML23291A394 ML23291A395 ML23291A396 ML23291A397 ML23291A398 ML23291A399 ML23291A400 ML23291A401 ML23291A402 ML23291A403 ML23291A404 ML23291A405 ML23291A406 ML23291A407 ML23291A408 ML23291A409 ML23291A410 ML23291A411 ML23291A412 ML23291A413 ML23291A414 ... further results
References
PLA-8081
Download: ML23292A194 (1)

Text

SSES-FSAR QUESTION 361.1 map showing earthquake epicenters and province boundaries out FSAR Figure 2.5-8 is unclear. Provide two new maps: (1) one to their maximum extent for provinces coming within 200 miles of the site {no geologic symbols) and (2) a second map showing only earthquake epicenters (no geologic symbols or province boundaries) within 200 miles of the site. The earthquake symbols should be changed to better differentiate epicentral intensities on the maps.

RESPONSE

boundaries for provinces coming within 200 miles of the site. Figure 2. 5-Sa shows earthquake epicenters and tectonic province Figure 2.5-8b shows earthquake epicenters wi~hin 200 miles of the site. On both maps, earthquake symbols have been changed to better differentiate epicentral intensities.

Rev. 46, 06/93 361.1-1 SSES-FSAR

QUESTION 361. 2 Since the design response spectra for the OBE and SSE deviate from those suggested in Regulatory Guide 1. 60, provide and compare graphs showing both the design response spectra and the Regulatory Guide 1.60 spectra for the OBE and SSE.

RESPONSE

The comparison is given in revised Subsection 3.7b.l.l.

Rev. 46, 06/93 361.2-1 SSES-FSAR QUESTION 361.3

discussion of these lineaments and their relationship to the FSAR Figure 2.5-11 depicts the regional landsat lineaments. A regional geology has not been provided in the FSAR text.

Provide a detailed discussion of the lineaments. Include in this discussion the relationship of lineaments as proposed by Saunders and Hick, 1976 to the regional geology.

RESPONSE

The response to the question is provided in Subsection 2.5.1.1.3.5.

Rev. 46, 06/93 361.3-1

SSES-FSAR

QUESTION 361. 4 Discuss the potential for and hazards resulting from subsurface gas and waste storage in the local geologic structures in the near site vicinity.

RESPONSE

This response to this question is provided in Subsection 2.2.3.1.7.

Rev. 46, 06/93 361.4-1 SSES-FSAR QUESTION 361.5 FSAR Figures 2.5-18 and 2.5-19 are blurred. Please provide legible copies of these figures.

RESPONSE

FSAR Figures have been revised.

Rev. 46, 06/93 361.5-1