ML20246E092
| ML20246E092 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/20/1986 |
| From: | Norderhaug L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245D534 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-490 NUDOCS 8907120096 | |
| Download: ML20246E092 (2) | |
Text
-
- m..
,,.[
UNITED STATES
/
(.,
NUCCEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
MEGION V l-j j
14f,0 MARIA LANE, sun t its l
WALNUT CRE EK. CALIF ORNIA 946s6
- \\a AUG 2 01986 l
e..'
MEMORANDUM FOR: File, PP-2-1 (SONGS) l James L. Montgomery, Chief THRU:
Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch M. D. Schuster, Chief fpg Safeguards Section L. R. Norderhaug FROM:
Senior Material Control Analyst TELEPHONE CONTACT REGARDING DRUG ABUSE AT SAN ONOFRE
SUBJECT:
l NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SONGS)
On August 13, !!(86, B. Zimmerman asked that I return a call she had taken who had concerns about security at SONGS. In D. W. Schaefer's absence and while acting for M. D. Schuster, I attespted unsuccessfully to from a, make c& tact with the individual who had identif jed, l
On August 18, 1986, 1 spoke to jvhorelatedthe r
following information:
t by(
)althoughinthe past,' grrently employed on siteihas been hired out to the u iis e
'and other i
1.
g
~
service contractors at SONGS.
lbelieves that measures currently in ef fect at SONGS to control 2.
drug abuse (use of urine analyass for pre-employment acreening and
'q recheck af ter a 30-day absence) are largely ineffective - particularly in the service organ,f rations such as health physics, pipefitting, feels that routine urine analysis every thirty and maintenance. (
days for all employees is needed.
identified drug abuse problems among unnamed health l
Wile [ S 3.
physicists, pipefitters, and maintenance staff up to the middle was unaware of such problems among reactor management level, g
operations personnel G
noted that drug abuse (primarily use of amphetamines and j
EN 4.
cocaine) was particularly rampant during periods of high activity j f' and during outages but could not give any specifics regarding
/
direct observation, i.e., names of individuals, or specific times
., a 5
l E$
g or places of such use.
\\
gg
-ycC 5.
W en asked if had shared, concerns with(
tmanagement, l
noted Jreluctance to do so.
Swas unaware of the licensee's' l
%~
syJ HOT!.INE for reporting problems and the confidentiality that could l
When I described the concept of a hotline, E gg be afhroed thereby.
l 3gg brould make use of that avenue to bring i ?=
indicated that j k j,g concerna to the attention of Southern California Edison management.
Q&
G.{
M > 'M ;
ue 8907120096 890710 EDB j of ng,,7g
w
, File, PP-2-1 (SONGS) lindicatedthat would be pleased to cooperate with local law L
enforcementauthorities.(
)
L.
orderhat Senio erial Control Analyst Allegation File RV-86-A-0070 cct O. Shackleton, 01, RV l