ML20237K859
| ML20237K859 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/31/1987 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I02, NUREG-0750-V24-I02, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I2, NUREG-750-V24-I2, NUDOCS 8708270324 | |
| Download: ML20237K859 (100) | |
Text
_.
s-
- ' ._ _. . ,r ,,c vW
+ .
Vol. 24 index 2
??YW gvj.y .
x.p [f,7.gl'Q;R*gR$lf' lm .:s f Q .*L.m ,<; p f ; 3 .,y &. N.:R
~. :4gg'
. A 2.m g;.,~ . . . . . , .. . .,;gp . ,
y' ',% ,8
{# "$
q
,,,[
.f
- 1
, f f ,' ', j' '
- I i, 6
.. , z
' * ' , . .e, e
...p. y e ,,g g .. j . .
4
,. 3. .. , . -
- { ' ' *
.i a '
4, x . '. J 4
3e
. i:' i
)
. p 4
0 ' b i
e - ' 3. ' 1
., j
.M..
~
,'..N .
U.
, ' NUCLEAR REGOLATORY COMMISSIOf)J P~ ."j' f'gy]M K , f W T{,,' ' ' ,
)! : .. .^; . . . . ' : [;.' Y $
c '.f . ~',p 4
- n. .y
.. u
,.a g74 9 y .
8708270324 870731 PDR NUREQ 0750 R PDR
, i l NUREG-0750 Vol. 24 Index 2 INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES I
July - December 1986 V
l U. S. NQCLEAR REGbl4 TORY COMMISSION i l
l 1
l 1
I
q :g.
Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commissica (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisionr (DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented in this document. .
These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. ) 1 r
'I
[ Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: -]
Case name(owner (s) of facility)
Full text reference (volume and pagination)
Issuance number Issues raised by appellants Izgal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)
Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter ofissues and/or rulings .
j Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating license, etc.) l Type ofissuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).
These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:
- 1. Case Name Index l The case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the ;
issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type ofissuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.
the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and IJcensing Appeal Panel (ALAB),
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (AIJ), the Directors'. Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for 1 Relemaking.
The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date ofissuance, and type ofissuance.
The digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.
iii
______._____mm_____m__m__._.__-_--__
l
'? '
- l l
l
- 3. LegalCitsticasindex This index is civided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or j alphanumerical anangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These ]
citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and Statutes ij may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.
The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the pr.rticular ,
issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text /
reference.
- 4. Subject Index I Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues l and subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by l phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.
- 5. Facility index q This index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of )
issuanca, issuance number, and full text reference. l
- }
)
iv l
l l
l
-_-mm_--___ __
t R cA CASE NAME INDEX AMERICAN NUCLEAR CORPORATION, et al.
MA'!T. RIALS UCENSE MODIHCATION; DECISION; Docka No. 4 44492 (50 Fed. Reg. 46,370);
CU-8623,24 NRC 704 (1986)
ARIZONA PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY, et al.
REQUEST IOR AC!lON; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 62.206; Docket Na 50 529; DD 868, 24 NRC 151 (1986) ,
REQUEST FOR ACnON; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFA 52.2ft Docket Na 50 528; $
DD-8618,24 NRC 762 (1986)
BABCOCK AND WIILOX MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; DECISION; Docket Na 743%MIA (ASLBP No. 315-51101-ML); LDP-8640. 24 NRC 841 (1986)
CAROUNA POWER & UOllT COMPANY and NORDI CAROUNA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY OPTRA'nNO UCENSE: DECISION; Docket No. 50 40')04 AIAB-843, 24 NRC 200 (1986);
ALAB.852,24 hTC 532 (1986); ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSt; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Na 544040L; CU-86-24,24 NRC 769 (1986)
REQUEST IOR ACHON; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 52.206; Docket Na 50400; DD 8615,24 NRC 618 (1986)
CLEVE!AND ELECIRIC I! LUMINA 11NG COMPANY, et al.
OPERATINO UCENSE; DECISION; Dockes Na $4440 01. 50 44101.4 ALAB 841,24 NRC 64 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Docks Nos. 54440-OL,50441-Oh ALAB-844, 24 NRC 216 (1986); CU-86 20, 24 NRC 518 (1986); CU-86 22, 24 NRC 685 (1986)
COMMONWPALTil EDISON COMPANY OPERATINO UCENSE: ORDER; Docket Nos. 50 4560L,54457-OL; CU-86-21,24 NRC 681 (1986)
OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Authorizing Fw:1 Landmg and Precriticahty Testmg); Doact Nos. 50 45&OL. 50 457 OL (ASLDP Na 79410 03-OL); LBP-86 31, 24 NRC 451 (1986) i CONSUMERS POWER COMPAhT l
CONSOUDATED CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MODIHCATION AND OPERATING UCENSE; l MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nm 54329 CP, OM&OI,50 334CP, OMAOL ALAB-842,24 NRC 197 (1986)
CONSOUDATED CONSTRUCTION PERMTT MODIFICATION AND OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Mouan to Disnsss/Ternunate Proceedmgs); Docket Nos. 54329 OIAOM,54330{JL&OM (ASIEP Nos. 78 389-03-OL, 8443942-SP); LBP B&33, i
24 NRC 474 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Authoruing Withdrawal of Operating 12 cense Apphesuon and Dunussing Operaung License Proceeding) Docket Nas. 50-329-OL, 54330-OL (ASLBP No. 78 389-03-OL); LBP-8639,24 NRC 834 (1986)
DETROIT EDISON COMPANY, et at REQUEST IOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISIO.N' UNDER 10 C PA 52 206; Docket Na 50-341; DD 8610,24 NRC 174 (1986)
EDWARD WALLACE SPECIAL PROCEEDINO; DECISION; Docket No. 50 21.9-EW; ALAB-850,24 NRC 526 (1986) 1
. , j I
l l
)
s CASE NAME INDEX SPECIAL PROCEEDINO; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TERMINA11NO PROCEEDINO AND REMOVINO NORFICADON REQUIREMENTS AS TO EDWARD WALLACE; Dhcket No. 54289 EW tASLBP No. 86532 04 SP); AU463,24 NRC 321 (1986)
FLDRIDA POWER & UGTT COMPANY OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMEND MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Dodtet Nos. 502540LA 1, 54251 OIA 1 (Vessel Flus Reductionh ALAB446,24 NRC 409 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Dodtet Nos. 5425401A-3, 54251 Olk3 Oncreased Post Ennslunat); ALAB-848,24 NRC 434 0986)
OPET:ATINO UCENSE AMENDMENh INIRAL DECISION; Docka Nus. 54250 OLA 1,
- OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Oranting Summary Disposition Motion and Terminatmg Proceeding); Docket Nos. 54250 OIA-3,50 251 OLA 3 (ASLDP No. 84-505-08.IA) Oncrossed 1%et Emichenet); GP4627,24 NRC 255 (1986)
CENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 4 REQUEST FOR ACTION; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION PURSUANT TO 10 C F.R 62.206; Dodset Na 741113; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 0986)
OENERAL ELECTPJC COMPANY'S BO!UNO WATER REACTORS REQUEST IOR ACT10N DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R.12.206; DD4&l6,24 NRC l 747 (1986)
OENERAL PUBUC UlTLTIIES NUCMAR CORPORATION OPERATINO UCENSB AMENDMENT; ORDER (Granung Ucensee's Motion to Defer llearing Schedule); Ducka Nos. 54289.Othl. 54289-OLA 2 (Stearn Generster Plugsms Cnteria);
LBP46 26,24 NRC 149 0956)
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et aL OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka Nos. 54424-OI. 50-425 014 ALAB-851,24 NRC 529 0986)
OPERATING UCENSE; PAKr[AL INITIAL DECISION; Docket Nos. 54424-OL,50 425 OL (ASLBP No. 84-49F01-OL); GP4628, 24 NRC 263 (1986)
OPLRATINO UCENSE; CONCLUDINO PARTIAL INmAL DECISION: Docket Nos 544M-OI.
' 54425-OL (ASLBP No.84-499 01 OLk LBP4641,24 NRC 9010986)
HOUSTON UOlfr!NO AND POWER COMPANY, et al.
' OPERATINO UCENSE: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka Nos. 54498-01, 50499-OL; ALAB-849,24 NRC SD 0986)
! OPERAUNO UCENSE; PAKTIAL INITIAL DEUSION; Docket Nos. STN 50-498 OL, SIN 50-499-OL (ASLBP No. 79 4214TF OLk LBP4429,24 NRC 295 (1986) i JOHN F. DOltERTY
! DENIAL OF PETmON IOR RULEMAKINO; Docka Na PRM 50-40; DPRM-86-3. 24 NRC 629 0 986)
LILUAN McNAl1Y DENIAL OF PETT!10N FOR RUGMAKINO; Docket Na PRM 50 37; DPRM466,24 NRC 671 (1986) 1DNG ISLAND UGTTINO COMPANY OPERATINO UCENSE; DECISION; Docka No. 543220L 3 (Dnergmey Planning); AIAB-847,24 NRC 412 0956); AIAB 855,24 NRC 792 0986k CU.8&t3. 24 NRC 22 0986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 54322-OL 3; CU 8&l4 M NRC 36 0986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka No. 54322-015 (Emergency i Planning Exermseh CU4616. 24 NRC 405 0986) 3 OPERATINO UCENSE; CLARIFYINO DECISION ON REMAND (Manitanng of Evscuees); Docket
! No. 54322 0L 3 (ASLBP No. 8&533 01 OLk LBP4636,24 NRC 561 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling on FEMA's Maum for Reconsideration of and Intervmon' Obpetians to October 3,1986 Preheanns Conference Order);
Docka Na 54322-01,5 (ASLBP No. 86533 014L) (EP Exercise); GP 8638A. 24 NRC 819 (1986) 2
, 4 a
f l
4 i
l CASE NAME INDEX l l
NUCLEAR UT!UTY BACKFITTINO AND REJORM OROUP f DENIAL IN PART OF PERTION POR RULEMAKINO; Dodet No. PRM 50 36; DPRM-8&4,24 NRC 635 (1986)
PACIFIC OAS AND ELnCIRIC COMPANY OPERAMNO UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50 2754IA, 54323-OIA; CU-861124 NRC 1 (1986)
REQUEST ICR ACnON; DIRECTOR *S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 5226; Dodet Nm 54275, 54323; DD-8< 24 NRC 483 (1986)
PIIILADFLPHIA EECIltIC COMPANY OPERAUNO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka Nos. 54352 OI, 50-353 04 ALAS 440,24 NRC 54 (1986)
OPERAUNO UCENSE; DE0310N; Docks Nos. 54352 O! 50 353 014 ALA3445,24 NRC 220 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka Nos. 54352, 54353; CU-8&l8, 24 NRC 501 (1986)
OPERATING LICENSE; SUPPLEMENT TO TIIIRD PARTIAL INIHAL DECISION (On Offsite Emersancy P1 arming Contemions); Docket Nm 50 352-OL,54353-OL; 2P 863% 24 NRC 459 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; SUPPLEMENT TO DIE ICURril PARRAL INIDAL DECISION RELAUNO TO T!!E REMANDED CONTENTION REGARDING MANPOWER MOBIUZATION AT THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTIIUr10N AT GRATERFORD; Docket Nos. 50 3524L, 54353 04 LBP-8633,24 NRC 731 (1986)
REQUEST FOR ACHON; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 62.206; Docket Na 54352; DD-8&l4,24 NRC 609 (1986)
PolltfilON AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS,INC.
DENIAL OF PETInON IUR RUIE.MAKINO; Docks Na PRM-516; DPRM 862,24 NRC 193 (1986)
PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF INDIANA. INC, and WABASH VAILEY POWER ASSOCIATION, INC OPERARNO UCENSE: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TERMINATING OPERATING UCENSE PROCEEDING: Dockat Nos. 54546 OL, 54547 OL (ASGP Na 13 487 02 OL); LDP 8537, 24 NRC 719 (1986)
PUBLIC SERYlCE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSI1 IRE, a at OPERATINO UCENSE: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Daciet % 54443-01, 54444-OL (Offsite Emeramcy Planning); ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; DECISION; Docka Nos. 54443-01,1, 54444-Ob1 (Onsus Emergency i Planning and Safety issues); ALAB-853,24 NRC 711 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka Nos. 54443-01,1, 50 444 OL 1 (Onsite Emergency Planrang and Safety Issues); AIAB 854,24 NRC 783 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling on NIPS Monon to Withdraw Centention NH-10, and on Applicams* Motion to Smke SAPL's Objection to Motaan to Withdraw);
Docket Nm 50443-Obl. 54444 OI,1 (Onsus Emergency Planning and Safety issues); GP-8&2%
24 NRC 1(D (1986)
OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Riings on Applicants' Motice of June 17, 1986, on TIPS Motion of June 23, 1986, and so Heating Mauers); Docket Nos. 5044341 1 54444 01,1 (Onsiis Emergency Ptsnmns and Safery Issues); GP-8&24,24 NRC 132 (1986)
OPERAUNO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Massachamas' 10 C.F.R. 62.758 Petition). Dockei Not 5444341,1. 54444 01,1 (Onsite Emergency Plannmg sad Safety Issues);
OPERAMNO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denyms in Thrt and Granting in Part Applicems' Motion for Surnmary D2sposuion of SAPL s Supplernernal Comentim 6); Docket Nom 50-443-Olet. 54444-01-1 (ASLBP Na 82471024L) (Onsite Emergency Phnung and Safety Issues); LDP.8630, 24 NRC 437 (1986) 3
t ,-
l
-I I
i CASE NAME INDEX OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM 'AND ORDER (Graming Applicants' Motion for Authanmian to lasus License to Conduct PuelImad and Pacnticality Tening); Docket Nos. 54443-OL 1,50444 01,1 (AS2P h 82-471024L) (Onsite Emer8ency Planrung and Safety j Issues); D?-8634,24 NRC 549 (1986)
RADIOIDGY ULTRASOUND NUCMAR CONSULT NTS, P.A. - l
. MA1T.RIAIJ UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMOR @UM AND ORDER (Requesting SpeciAcatian of 1 Clairsa); Docket Na 3412688-MLA (AS!JP Na 87 542 01 MLA); LBP-8635,24 NRC 557 (1986) l SEQUOYAll FUEIJ CORPORATION i MATEll,IALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; ORDER Docks, Na 448027 MLA; CU 8617,24 NRC 489 (1980); CU E19, M NRC 508 (1986)
I RF40EST POR ACITON; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. $1206; Docket Na 4 4 8027; DD 8613,24 NRC 587 (1986)
STATE OF WISCONSIN
, DENIAL OF PLTTITON IOR RULEMAKINO; Dodet Na PRM 7110; DPRM-E5,24 NRC 647 i (1986)
SLTPOLK COUNTY AND STATE OF NEW YORK M0110N TO RESCIND RECONSTTIVTION OF '
BOARD BY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CUITER OPERATING UCENA; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ASIEP Na 87 54341 Misc.; 12P 8&37A.
24 NRC 726 (1986)
TEXAS LTI1UTIES ELEC11UC COMPANY. et al CONSTRUC110N PERMTT AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-445-CPA; CU-8615,24 NRC 397 (1986)
CONSTRUCIlON PERMTT AMENDl/f.NT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Motion to Admit New Contentions or for Reconside ation); Docket No. 50445 CPA (ASLBP Na 86-528 02-CPA);
LDP4636A,24 NRC 575 (1986)
TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY REQUEST IOR AC110N; DIFECIDR'S DECISION PURSUANT TO 10 CFA 52,206; Docket -
Na 54346; DD-8617,24 NRC 753 (1986)
WISCONSIN ELECIRIC PL7hER COMPANY RBQUEST IOR AC110N; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR. 62.206; Dodet Ncs. 50 266, l 54301: DD 069,24 NRC 168 (1M4) i .
't i
4 d
, e DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CLI-8612 PACIFIC GAS AND FIECTRIC COMPANY (Dublo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), Dodtet Nos. 54275 OLA, 50 323-OLA; OPERA 11NO LICENSE AMENDMFNT; July 22, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDf'R A The Commission suys, pending completion of the ongomg hcense amendment hearmgs and nuual "i
Licmsmg Board decision, that portion of the amendment wtuch authorizes, on an immediately effccuve basis, Applicant to store in excess of the origmally authenzed 270 spmt fuel assemblies in eiLher of the two pools at Diablo Canyon. The Commission canarms Staff's findmg of a "no sigm6 cam hazards consideradon" with scapect to replacement of the exisung bolted storage racks wuh high density, freestanding storage racks, and therefom demes peutionm' request to stay that poruon of the heense amendment.
B The absence of any aght to ducctly appeal to the Commission does not divest the Commisen of its mherent authority to exercise its discretionary supervisory authority to say Staff's acuans. His is true even when the stay aquest invoNes a Staff"no sigmficant hazards considerauon" findir,g.
C What may appear to ratse a signanca,t hazards consideration at one ume may, at some subsequent uma and in light of technological advances and funher study, be determmed to present no sig 26 cant hazards considerzuon. In recogmtion of this, Congress chose not to specify in the Sholly amendments to ll89a of the AEA the spectne amendments that would, or would not, always present sigmficant hazards consideradons. Rather. Congresa assigc ad to be Comnussion, the expert agericy charged to regulate, license, and monitor canmercial nuclear encra, the responsibility and authonty to make the technical judgments underlying a "no sigm6 cant hazards *.msideradon" (mding.
D The Nuclear Waste puhey Ai does na provide local populadons a veto power over NRClicensmg decisions. Such a mading of the NWPA would conflict direrLly wah the Commission's statutory role as the nadonal regulator of nuclear energy and render nugstory the principal direcuve in $ 132 of the NWPA to
" encourage and expedne the effecuve use of . . necessary additional [ spent fuel) storsge."
E The Nuclear Waste Pblicy Act does not requus the Commission to grant it ervenors a pm.
amendment hearing. Nothmg in i134 of the NWPA ameias the Shally amendments to i189a of the Atomic Energy Act which allow the Staff to issue an immediately effecdve license amendment following a "no sigruncam hazards consider uon" nndmg. See 50 Fed. Reg.41,662,41,667 (Oct.15.1985).
F in order to challenge Staff's environmental evaluauon, requirad by the Nauonal Environmental Pbhcy Act, interveners must allege some speci6c deficiency in the evaluauan itself, not just a generalized failure to prepare an Environmental Impact Statemem m a generalized disagreement with the Staff's conclusion that serackmg does oct pose a "sigmficant impact" to the envuonment Township of Lower Alloways Cnek v. Public Servue Electnc and Gas Co.,667 F.2d 732,746-48 (3d Cir.1982).
CLI 8613 LDNO ISLAND LIGirI1NO COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Umt 1), Docket Na 54322-01 3 (Emergency Planrung); OPERATING LICENSE, July 24,1986; DECISION A in hs review of ALAB-818, the Commission reverses and remands to the Licensmg Board for funher evidenuary heanngs on (1) the adequacy of Applicant's offsite ernergency response plan, assummg some %st effort" governmernal response in the event of an emergency; and (2) the hkely effect of the lack of State and local cooperauon in emergency planung on emergency response.
B The NRC ts legally obhgated to ccmsider whether a utility plan, prepared without government cooperauon, can pass muster. Commission regulauons provide for licensmg notwuhstanding noncomphance wuh the NRC's detailed planning standaNs: (1)if the defects are "not sagmficant"; (2) if there as " adequate uncrim compenasung acuans"; or (3) if there are "other compelling reasons." 10 C.F.R. 6 50.47(c).
S
- - - - - - - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^^
- s i
]
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSION C Where State and local governments refuse to coopents in ame gency plaming, and where licaise applicaras are prohibited from perfomung scene emergency functiras usually performed by the governmental authorides, the plan is not necessanly fauS defectm. Rather, the plan is to be as==d pursuant to 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(cX1). l D h fundamental emergency planning licensing standaniis the provision in 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(a) thal ;
"no operating license , , , will be issued unless a finding is made by NRC that them is reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken L the event of a radiological emergenew" h '
! sigm6cance of "defecu"in ernergency plans, and adequacy of inserim compensatirig actions, are measured hbmed i E State law prohibits applicams froen performing some emergency planning functions which are J fundamental to emergency planning, e.g.," making decisens and to ommendadons to the pblic concerning
! proteotbe actions."Ilowever, in the evem of a serious accidet u Shoreham requinas consideration of protecuve actions for the public, State and County of5cials wat61 be obligated to asmat,both as a maner I of law and as a mauer of dischargmg their public teost See N.Y. Exec, Law art. 2 B, 6 25.1. See aho
, ILR. Rep No. 212,99th Cong., la Sess.,131 Cons Rec. 15,358 (1985).
F he adesluacy of applicant's offsite emergency response plan should be measured against a standard I that would sequire protective maapures generally comparable to what might be accomplished, assurmng a "best effon" goverrenantal aspese.
O Although some amargency planning rnessures are not explicitly mentimed in NAC's emergen y i planning regulations, such measures rnay novenholess be sequued in order to provide reasonable assurunco of adequate protecuve measums in the event of a radiological energency.
CU.8614 IDNO ISLAND LIGIITING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), Docket L i No. 50w322 OL.3; OPERATING LICENSE; January 30,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A '
N Comrmasim denies imervanors' motion to cancel a scheduled exercise of the utility's emergeicy papandness plan for Shoreham. N Commission recognizes that while the utility cannot j lawfully implernera all aspects of its emergmcy plan, conduct of the exercise is necessary because it is expected: (1) to previde informadon as to whether lack of cooperation bi emerg,ency planning by the I
State and local govemments resuhs in "signi$ cant" defects under NRC's emergency planrung standards; and (2) to test the utility's ability to accommodate ad hoc goverruneraal pani:ipation in the event of an actual emergency.
! 8 Eve though it may not be possible to test all aspects of an emergency plan, an exercise is j i '
not naasesarily uselesa. The esercise can assist in determming whetha any defects that exist as a result
! of "limitatims of {the utihty's] plan when executed under . , stase and county astrictions , . ." are signiAcant under 10 C.F.R, I 50.47(cX1). i i C h Conumssiun 6nds propostanwe the implication that pblic arnployees would not use a utility plan even if they knew that use of the plan would best protect the public.
D A plan is not totally ad hoe merely because it is not known exactly what pblic ofBcials will do '
in an emergency. A plan may be designed to accommodate an ad hoc asponse by public of5cials.
CLI.8&l5 TEXAS LTillJrIES ELECTRIC COlLE'ANY, et al. (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 1), Docket Na 50445-CPA; CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EXTENSION; September 19,1986; MEMO.
RANDUM AND ORDER A h Comminion offers guidance on the admissibility of a contention into the construction permit exter,sion preaading, h Comnussion holds that if a permutes is seekms a construction permit extension because of delays associated with the need to ccrrect safety problans, any dtlays ansing therefrorn would be " good cause" for an allowance of more time for plant completion. In this cimtext, a contennon directed only at permause's past conduct would not be sufactes to defeat a construction permit extensiert B A perminee may demonstrate " good cause" for a ecnsanction perma extension in one of two i ways. A perminae may demonstrate that there was good cause for the past deley in plam completion, or a permines may show that its cummt and future actions are " good cause" for an allowance of more time for Pl am completion.
C Where the pernunse asaans the need for more time to correct safety dcaciencies, the Licensmg Board should not look to past conduct to orderrmne " good cause" for the extension.
l l '
- .i--
s I
l k
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE NUCIEAR REGULATORY COMMLSSION CU 8&l6 IDNO ISLAND UGIfrING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Statim, Unit 1), Docket Na 50 322 0L.5 (Emergency Planning Exercise); OPERATING UCENSE; September 26,1986; MEMO-RANDUM AND ORDER A The Canmission denies Intervenous' motion dananding terminadon of h adjudicatory proceeding on the asuhs of Licensee's energency planning exacise. De Comnusamn finds that while the stams of a miocanon comer in Uamsee's plan is not ennrely clear due to its loss rf the facility as which it had imended to aly, the angcang hearing should proceed because it can lead to maalution of issues that involve funct ons not dependent on the relocanon center. hrthermore, the Conumssion determmes :st the State's enactment oflegialadon for the creanun d a maicipel pows authority anpowered to purchase Licenses does not oder a sound basis on whicn to terminate the hearing since the potental takeover is subject to many ocaningencies.
CU 8617 SEQUOYAll FUELS CORPORADON (Sequoyah UF 6 so UF4 Facihty), Docket Na 48027 MLA: MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; October 3,1986; ORDER A The Comnussion declines to accept the presiding officer's recommendation to convert an ongoing, informal materials hcense adjudicatory proceedmg irno a formal, trial 4ype adjudicadon.
B Consutadonal due process is not violated in a materials license amendmera proceeding if there is no demonstration of spect5c basith, safety, or anvumil concerns that consututa a depnysuon of liberty or property; the factualissues involved are of a technical nature and can be evaluated fbily and fairly wahout a trist type presentation; and additional procedures att unlikely to aid the factfinding process, but ather would create an increased gum nners burden.
C Unhka the Commusim's pavious ermronnusual reguladons,10 Cf.R. I5 L52(b)(1) (1983), the current ermronrnental agulations contain no duection about whu type of hearing need be held for any Staff envirannental finding regarding a materials licensing action.10 Cf.R. I51.104 (1986).
D The Comnussion sees no rww! to exacase its discrenan under the pubbe interest standards of 10 I CSA ll2.lN(s) and 2.105(aX7) and invoke femal procedures to govern a proceedmg whm the central factor that intervenom susseet compels the Cannussion to use a anal-type adjudication has hule diact relevance to that pr-*wimr CU 86-18 PHILADElflilA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Lunens.t Omarming Statial. Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50 352,54353; OPERATINO UCENSE; October 16,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A The Cornrn-a vacates ALAB-840 (24 NRC 54 (1986)) in whidi the Appeal Board denied Intevenors' aiouan to disqualify Licensee's cr=1 and to reopen the record on offsite anergency r
planning. De '~ " "- concludes that the Appeal Board lacked junsdiction to address the merits of the ansion. The Comm-a further rules thas b cruaris required to reopen the record have not been saus6ed and that Peutwners have not demonstrated disquahlication of counsel is warranted. Accordmaly,it dmies IntWvtsia1' model.
B Where the Appeal Board has issued its opinion on a conmutet, it lacks jurisdiction to consider a subsequently Aled enouon socking relief based on allegations that the process leading to the Appeal Board nding was tauuod. Only the Commusion has junsdicuan to rule on the motion under those circumstances.
C Under 10 Cf.R. $ 1780(c) if an ex parta filing is received by an adjudicatory oMctal, the normal remedy is to serve the document on the other parues to ths proceeding. In cases where there have been egregious ex parte communications, sancuans against a pazty, or its represemauve, may be imposed under 10 Cf.R. I 2.713, or an order to show cause under 5 U.S.C. I 557(dXIXD) may be issued diracung the party to emplain why its party's claim ar irserest in the proceeding should not be chmied or otherwise adversely affected.
CU.8619 SEQUOYAH PUELS CORPORATION (UF 6 Pmduction Facility), Docket No. 48027-MIA; MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; October 30,1986; ORDER !
A The Conurussion danes pennons by several groups and individuals for a hearing on an order of f
the NPC Office of Inspection and Enforcemord which modines the existmg license for the facility, but i which ow. not authorize restart, on the ground that the petinons present concerns outside the scope of the proceedings a dc6ned by the enforcernant ordar.
B De Conurussen acts well within the range of discretum afforded it by 6189e of the Atomic Energy Act in dachnmg to afford a hearing with respect to an enforcemers order m issues stanng to the 7
I I
i
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - - - - - ----0
a .
(
l I
l k
1 i
1 i
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Ti!E NUCMAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l 1
i i
adequacy of the order to address any pese ved problems or relating to the implementatim of the order's terms. Belloni v. NRC,725 F.2d 1380 (D.C, Cir.1982),
i C no Canrmssion may limit the issues in enforcement proceedings to whahar the requinments t
imposed in an enforcement order are supported by the fectual fmdings made in the order.
D Under the terms of an enforcernent mder providing that an independent third-party organization can make operadonal recanmmdatims to the lismace, zMch retains full responsibility for safe facility operation, the organization,in performing survedlance and inspectaan functions with residual power to hah operatiers if it finds hashh and safety problems, does not take operational control over the facihty a require licctaing by the egnecy. i CU 8620 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC !!1UMINATING COMPANY, et at (hrry Nucliar Power Plant Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 544400L,50441014 OPERATINO UCENSE, October 30,1986t MEMORAN-DUM AND ORDER A The Cornaussion dernes the State of Ohio's pentim to intervene as a nonparty interested State in tra licensing proceedmg after closing of the adjudicatory record.
B A state has no right to participate in admuustrative appeals when it has not participated in the underlying heanng. See, eg., Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear pbwer Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 583,11 NRC 447 (1980).
3 C A state or party seeking to enter a proceeding must take the proceeding as it 6nds iL See, eg.,
Pacific Oss amd Electric Cct (Diablo Canym Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2), ALAB-600,12 NRC 3, 8 (1980).
D After closing d the adjudicatory record, a nonparty intemsted State which has paitioned to intervene under 10 C.F.R. (2.715(c) "to introduce evidence (and) imermgide witnesses"can participate in the formal adju,licatory proceeding only ifit can meet the stringent standards for reopening the record and filing late- j filed contentions See, e.g., Pacific Oss and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-728,17 NRC 777,80102 (1983).
CU-86-21 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2),
Docket Nos. 50456 0L,50 457-OL; OPERA'llNO UCENSE; November 6,1986; ORDER A The Commission points out that summary denial of Applicant's " motion for reformation" of a Cournission decisie denying review of an uppsal board order would be justifiable, since in wality the motion is one for reconsideration, and as such expressly barred under Corarnissim mlea. Howowr, the Consmasion addresses the merits of the petition to ensure that an irdustice did not asuh from ha order denying myiew and because Applicant appears to have leamed nothing fnnn sadier Comnussion admorutions I in the croceedmg. no Commission finds that Applicant's "rnation for reform tim"is deficient both on the i law anf a the facts, and denies it. i B a "matra for reformation" of a Commission order whidi rapiests deletion of 40% of the order, !
including the Conunission's rationale for its denial of review of an appeal board decision, is in reality a motion for reconsideration and thus barred under Commission rules.
C If the Cunnission has comnuned a serious injustice in an adjudicsiory order,it should be willing to consider reedfyms that injustice, even if an occasimal enemision from its rules is required.
D Speeraation that a Commiesim wder may harm a party in fbture proceedings before a state regulatory body is ncs a basis for seeking Comrtission revision of that order.
CU.8422 CLFVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et al. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), Delet Nos. 504001, 5041-OL: OPERATINO UCENSE; November 6,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A no Commission autlwrius the issuance of a full-powerlicense for the Perry Unit 1 nuclear facility, based on (1) the resuhs of the formal adjudicatory prazeding which resolved contested mauers relating to licase isniance; and (2) the omclusion that vanous weentested issues considered outside of the formal proceeding have been resolved in favor of the plant's operation.
B At the conclusion d an operating hcense proceadmg, board darems in favor of a plant's operatton become effetive without the Comnussux conduedng an "immediate effectiveness" review under 10 C.F.R. 6 2.764 and wnhout the Commission issuing any orders agarding those decisiana.
g i
W
I t l
l DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Ti!E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION C As a m. suer of policy the NRC Staff does not issue full-power licenses without Commusion approvs! on uncontested as wil as mntested issues. See 46 Fed Reg. 47,906 (Sept. 30,1981).
O In order for an operating license to issue, the Commission's regulations require that there be
" reasonable assurance that adequats protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergmcy" 10 C.FA 5 50.47(a).
E The Canta W's standards for reopening a closed proceedmg set a high, although not insuperable, barrier to reopeing. His policy is fully consistent with the appmsch taken by the Suprene Court and the Couns of Appeals that favors finahty in administrative pmceedings. See, e.g., Bowman Transponation, Inc. v. Arkansas-&st Fmight Systems,Inc.,419 U.3,281,296 (1974); Interstide Commerce Commission
- v. Jersey City,322 U.S. 503, 51415 (1944); Oystenhall Albance v. NRC,800 F.2d 1201 (D.C. Cir.1986).
F ne Commission's policy on seopming closed records recognizes that once the adamustrative record has closed, NRC resources should not be diverted from conducting relevant safety studies into properation fcr reopened hearings unless there has been a strong showius that neopemng is justifled O In accord wuh its policy on reaperung, the Corrmission has on several occasions stepped into adjudicatory pmceedings before its subordinate boards to ccurect, sua sponte, ptocedural scnre involving i the subnussion of new contentions. See, e.g., Commonweshh Edison Co (Braidwood Nuclear Pbwer Station, Units I and 2), unpublished order of March 20,1986, and CU-86 8,23 NRC 241 (1986); United States Energy Resean b and Development Admuustration (Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant), CU 7613,4 NRC 67 (1976).
"H When the Appeal Board finds itself 4:nable to grant a motion to swpen on the basis of the pleadings, it should deny the mouon rather than order an exploratory hearing that wmdd further exped the resources of the NRC Staff on haanngs rather than on technical safety study and reviews.
I Cammission regulations provide that the NRC will base its findings on offsite preparedness on s ;
soview of FEMA's finding {s] and de " 10 C.FA 6 50.47(a)(2).
J At issue in a licensing decision is not whether contumed iy.m . ; in an emergency plan ne a useful goal, but whether tSete is ressmable assurance that adequate protective steps can and will be takm in the event af a radiological emergency. See 10 C.FA i Sa47(s).
K Whne there is reasenable assurance that adequate protective rnessures can be taken in the event of a radiological anergency,it is neuher necessary na appropriate to postpme the issuance of an operating license on the busis of prehminary state concerns that are being considered outside of a concluded formal adjudicscory paceedms, Withots a detailed techucal and factual basis, the concerns cannct be satisfauenly evaluated; thus, the Commissias is unwilling to delay hecmse issuanca L The Corranission finds it necessary ami appropnate to contiraie to rely on the "tectome province" approach with regard to a plara's seimnic desigrt, where an earthquako has occurred in the viciruty of a plant that is located in a reston of the country with no idanufkd " capable faults" on which easthquake predictions can be based and where it is unlikely that the fault that caused the earthquake can be identdied.
M The following technicalissues are discussed Safe Shutdown Eaithquake, Seismic Design Criteria, Response Specuum, and liigh Frequency Accelerations.
CU-86 23 AMERICAN NUCLEAf4 CORPORATION, et al. (Revu. ion of Orders to Modify Source Mate-rials licenses), Docket No. 40 4492 (50 Fed. Reg 46,370); MA7ERIALS UGNSE MODIFICA110N; November 17,1986; DECISION A The Comunasion terminates a hearing concenung the irrposnian of smund water detection license condaicos on the licenses of elewn mill owners. The Commasion detennmes that the hcensees, who together challenged the license conditions, sought to litigate genanc mauers alzady resolved in rulemaking and thus are bened fran "collaters!!y attacking" those rulse in an adjudication, he Ccanmission therefore makes the licese cmdations effecr eve.
B Where an ideunical license cmditim is imposed indi.vidually on all of a group of licensees, the condaion is subjecs to individual chaDenge by each licassa. For this reason, each separsie order modifying 1 a milllicenses's source matenal licenes includes the opportunity to request a hearing. See 10 C.FA 12.204. I C la the Comnussion's view the headmg er title of a regulatim is not impanant; what is impanant j is what issues did the prior regulation addreu and resolve. By raising only those generic issues that the l Comnussicn has consi,*: red and decided in rulemak2ng, a licenses has presaned no case other than one i barred by the collateral anack rule.
l 9
t a DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TifE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D The Commisamn may regulate by rulemaking or adjudicadon. Paci6e Oas at Flectric Co. v. Federal Power Commissim,506 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir.1974).
E The Corrassion adhe to the fundamental principle of admunstrunve law that its rules are not subject to colheral attack in adblicatory pmceedings.
CU.8624 C#XOUNA POWER & UGIfr COMPANY and NOlUH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant), Docket No. 50-400 Ola OPERATINO UCENSE:
Decenbar 5,1986: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A no Canmission deias Petitioners' request for a hearing on Applicant's request for an exemption from the NRC's emergency ; , - - = exercise requimnet 10 CJA Part 50, Appendix E,l!VF.1, that a furrscale emergency planning exercise be held 1 year prior to issuance of a full-power operating license. The Commission 6 ads that Petitimers have failed to mise any materialissue of fact with respect to whether Applicant has met the exemption standards of 10 CSA 150.12.
B The standards to be met unda 10 CEA 9 50.12(sXI) and (2) for a grant of an easunptim imm the NRC's licenstna requiremmts are as foDows:
(1) the exempnon must be authonzad by law, not present an undue nsk to the public heahh i and safety, and be cornistant with the common defmse and secunty; and {
(2) "special ctrcurrvemaces" must be present.
C De Comnnssim may reject nonresponsive pleadmgs and may and parties that c,msisternly ignore Commissim distive to be in default. Statement of Policy on Conduct of Licensing Pmceedings, CU-81 8, 13 NRC 452,454 (1982). Metropolitan Edison Co. (Ilues Mile Island Nuchar Staum, Unit 1), CU 85-2, 21 NRC 282,286 37 (1985).
D Since adjudicatory heannas are intended only for the reschrb of disputed issues of matajal l
fact, a person seeking a haanns must meet the threshold requirement at .r uenng suf6cient information to j establish that there an .eaterialissues of fact that warrara a hasnng. /
E no Cormussim has the legal authonty to grant extrnptions frorn its licensing requirements. See L 50 Fed. Res. 50,764, 50,766-67 (Dec.12,1985), citirig United Stake v. Allegheny-Ludlurn Steel,406 f U.S. 7421(1972), and Alabama Power Co. v. Castle,636 F.2d 323,357 (D.C. Cir.1979), f F The appropriate method for seeking a waavts or an easmpnon fran Comnussion regulations depends on the cucumstances of each cua If an exemption request reganting whether anexher fuB-panicipat ion exercise must be held prior to licensing is not duectly related to a contention in the operating license proceeding, there is no requirement that the exemption request be addsssed under 10 CSA 5 2.758. Sea, e.g., C!sveland Eleetne Illuminaung Ca (Ps:ry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), LBP-85-33,22 MRC 442 (1985), aff'd, ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) 0 l When a pmposed graet of an exenption is based on a 6pding that the requirements of 10 )
CEA 55al2(a)(1) and (aX2Xii) have been mut, a person seeking a hearing on the exemption request !
must demonstrate that there exists a material issue of fact regarding the appropriate application of either of those two subsecums.
H Staff review of exeresse resuhs is cmnstant with the predicuve nature of emergency planning, and is restacted to determming if the exercise revealed any dc6cieucies that preclude a 6nding of masonable assurance that pnaective measures can and will be taken, i.e., fundamental flaws in the plan, Long taland Lighting Ca (Shortham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), CU-8611,23 NRC 577,581 (1986).
I Commission regulations do not require public pardcipation in emergency preparedness exer-cism. See 10 CIA Part 50, Appendix E, l!VE.1.
I l
f 10 i
~
l l
l
e 8 L'
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Ti!E ATOMIC SAFETY AND UCENSING APPEAL BOARDS ALAB-839 PUBUC SERY!CE COMPANY OF !iEW IIAMPSIURE, et al. (Sesbrook Stanan, Units I and 2),
Dociet Nos. 5444341 50-444-OL (Offsite Emergency Plannmg); OPERATING UCENSE; July 3,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A The Appeal Board grania an antervenor's pounan for directed ceruficadon of the Licensing Board's .
d denial of a monon to amend the tran unpt of a preheanns conference, vacates the ruling, and orders the transenpt corrected.
B Appeal boards employ their directed ceruncation authonty only where a licensmg board nnling either thmatens the party adversely affected by it wuh imnudiate and senous irreparable irnpset that, as a - .I pracdcal matter, could not be alleviated by a later appeal, or affects the basic strucuire of the proceeding in .
a pervasive or unusual manner. ALAB-838,23 NRC 585,592 (1986)(cinns Pubhc Service Ca of Indiana -
(Marble Ilill Nuclear Genernung Station, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-405,5 NRC 1190 1192 (1977)).
C The Comnussion's regulanans and policy guidance mandate that a verbaum transcnpt of proceed-ings be prepared.10 Cf.R. 2.750(a) and 10 Cf.R. Part 2. Appendta A. V(a)(1).
D The Rules of Pracuce aquire that any issues pienanted on appeal be supponed by the precise poruon of the record relied ars 10 CJ.R. 2.762(d)(1).
E It is the wunen transcnpt Aled in the docket and available for inspecuan at the Public Document Roorp - not any undedying stenosype notes, tapes or other memonals - that consututes the official record. See 10 Cf.R. 2.750. See also 5 U.S.C. 556(e).
I F An incomplete or inaccurate transcnpt comptonuses later appeusta review and is thus auf6cient to jusdfy intadocutory inlief. National Farmer's Orgaruzauen, Inc. v. Oliver, 530 P.2d 815, 81617 (8th Cir.1976).
l 0 The Comrmazion's regulauons provide that a haanns will be reported by the ofncial reporter under the supervision of the presidmg of6cer and that "[tlhe transcnpt prepared by the reporter shall be the sole ofScial transcnpt of the proceedmg." 10 CJ.R. 2.750(a). ne regulauons spectScally authonze a presiding ofncer to order or approve correction of the official transcnpt. Correcuans are to be made by the ptesidmg ofAcer in the mr,ner provided in 10 C.F.R. 2.750(b), i.e., in a way that also preserves the traasenpt as l cngmauy recerded.
il If confronted by a manon to correct the transenpt, a licertsms beard is duty-bound to make some i
good faith effon isi ascertain whether the transcnpa is accurata 1 l'he regulaums penmt, but do not require, the stenographic reporting of preheanns conferences. See l
10 Cf.R. 2.751 (c) and to Cf.R. 2.752(b). When such reposun;is used, the rules penaimns to stenographic transenpts apply to prehearms conferences See generally Nonhern Indiana Public Service Ca (Bailly Generaung Stanan, Nuclear 1) LDP.8422,12 NRC 191,193 94, aff*d, ALAB-619,12 NRC 558 (1980)
(Licensing Board decimes to approve or rely on transcnpt of prehcanng conference because of its peor quality).
J he requirernent that a bcensms board senausly emertain rnouans to correct in order to entute an accurate transcnpt does not imptnge upon a presidmg of5cer's authonty to regulate the conduct of a proceedmg, includmg the authonty to "stnks" matenal fnrn the record.
K A bcensms board may propedy " strike" material from the record dunns the course of a pmceed-irs. Such "atnkteg" is noted in the transenpt and the material is not relied on for decisional purposes. As wuh a conecuan of the transcrix the record must nonetheless preserve what was stncken so that a reviewmg inbunal can decide whether the board's acuan was proper. Except perhaps an highly unusual cucumstances 11
- e I
l 4
l l
l 1
DIGESTS l ISS!!ANCES OF TliE ATOMIC SAFETY AND UCENSING APPEAL BOARDS l 1
f and with appmpriate safeguank, the stricken matenalis not to be physically excluded or espunged from the reward. Cf. Maropolitan Edison Co. (Three Mile !aland Nuclear Statim, Unit No.1), AIAB-807,21 ]
NRC 1195,1214 (1985). Strilung material from the record contrasts with an "off-the record" discussion, which must be idatiSed as such at the outset.
L in ruling on a motion to correct the transcnpt, a heensing board may take mto accent its own recollections. See generally Umted States v. Snuth,562 F.2d 619,620-21 (10th Cir.1977).
i AIAB-840 PHILADELPIUA E!.ECI'RIC COMPANY (Limendt Generacing Station, Unns 1 and 2), Docket i
Nos. 50 352 OL,50-353-OL; OPERATING UCENSE; July 18,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A '!he Appeal Board dmies joint interveners' peution to reopen the record on offsite emergency 8
planning and disqualify applicars's counsel and law Arm concluding that, irrespective of whether applicant's j ca.amsal had, as Alleged, made an en pane cornmumcatim, the aquested reliefis not warranted.
B {'
"Every snbunal - whether judicial or admimstrative - possessce the inherent right (indeed, the duty) to determine in the fbst instance the bounds of its own jurisdictiart" Duke Power Co. (Perkins l
Nuclear Station, Units 1,2 and 3), AIAB-591, !! NRC 741,742 0980)(citing United States v. United l Mine Workers,330 U.S. 258,292 n.57 0947)).
C In general, once petitions for review of an Appeal Board decision on cartain issues have been Aled l with the Commission, the Appeal Board no longer has jurisdiction over three issues. See ALAB-823,22
! NRC 773,775 0985).
I ;
D Where a question has been raised about the unegrity of the decisionmaking process, the deci-i stonmaker necessarily retains residual power to address such matter when requested, notwnhstanding that I junsdiction over the underlying substantive claims thernaelves now lies elsewhertw Cf. Massachusats Iby l Talacasters, Inc. v. Federal Commumcations Commission, 261 F.2d 55,67 (D.C. Cir.1958), modified on other smunds,295 F.2d 131, cert. denied,366 U.S. 918 (1961).
. E The Comnussion's reguladors prohitst any party to a proceding for the issuance of a license or any representative, or any other pason directly or indirectly actmg in behalf thereof from submitting off the record to Comnussiones or such staff members, of5cials, and employees, any evideru., explanation, i analysis, or advice, whether wone or oral, regarding any substantive matter at issue in a proceecimg j cst the record then pendmg before the NRC for the issuance of a license.10 C.FA 12.780(a). See also Admuustrative Procochue Act (as amended in 1976 by the Governmers in the Sunshine Act) [haent.or, I
"APA"),5 U.S.C. Il 55104k 557(d)0).
I F I
Comnussion regulations direct that any wrinen sa pane carnmmucation be placed in the public document roots and served by the Secretary "on the communicator and the partiat to the puceeding '
involved." 10 C.FA 6 2.780(b).
i G Any party or its reprenantadve who fails to comply with an order or is "guihy of diswJerly, j disruptive, or - , - = conduct" may be sepnmanded, censured, or suspended frorn participation "if t {
necessary for the orderly conduct of a proceeding." 10 C.FA 5 2.713(c). See also Professional Air TrJe j j Contmilers Organization v. Federal labor Relations Authority, 685 F.2d $47,564 n.30 (D.C. Cir. ' <2)
[hereafter, "PATCO"). !'
H The APA authorizes an adjudicator, to the extern casisters with the imerests of just'ce and the
' policy of the underfymg statute, to require a party that has submined an ex parte commumcation to show cause why its clann or interest in the proceeding should not be disnussed, derned, disregarded, or otherwise l adversely afecsed on account of such violation. 5 U.S.C. 6 557(d)0)(D).
I Charges that raise quesnons about the ethics of counsel "shcaild only be filed after carefbl research and deliberation." Cincinnati Gas and Electne Co. (William H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit Na 1),
'. CLI-82 36.16 NRC 1512,1513 n 1 (1982).
J Dasquahtication of the cammurucate is not the struedy speci6ed in the Comnussion's regulatims j for a violation of the -"ex parte commumcation rule. For this peahy to be exacted, "disomerty, disrup- '
! tive, or -- . behavior that threates the caduct of the pro ~=dme, must be dernonstrated.10 l C.FA 51713(c).
{ K in deciding whether to void an esmey decizia that has been blemished by es parte communications.
l a court must consider whether, as a resuh of the improper communication, the agency's decisionmaking l process was inevocably taused so as to make the ultimate judgment of the agency unfair, either to an !
innocess party er to the public traerest that the agency was obliged to protect. In making this deterrainatiosi, N
i l
l 1 ,
.- -_ ____.m. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
8 e
(
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS a number of cesiderations may be relevant: the gravity of the sa parte communication; whether the cornact may have influenced the agency's ultimate decision; whether the party making the improper catact benefited frtzn the agmey's ultimata decision; whether the content of the comnusucanon was unknown to oppoeng parties, who therefore had no apparumity to respond; and whether vacation of the agency's (
decision and romand for new proceedings would serve a useful purpose. PATCO,6g5 F.2d at 564-65. See also Braniff Master Executive r hd of the Air Line Pilots Association International v. Civil Aarenautics Bonal,693 F.2d 230,227 (D.C. Cir.1982).
ALAB.841 CIEVEIAND ELECTRIC ILHTMINKIING COMPANY, et at (Perry Nuclear Pmver Plant, Units I and 2), Dockst Noe. 54440 OL,544410L; OPERATING LICENSE; Ady 25,19866 DECISION A N Appeal Board affirms, subject to two additimal license conditions, the seruit reached in the Licensing Bosni's concluding panial irutial decision authorizing the issuance of licenses for the operation of Units I mui 2 af the Perry Nuclear Pbwer Plant B To obtain a Adi-power operating license, the Comrmssion's hydrogen tule,10 Cf.R. 50.44, requises tbs utility to submit an analyns to the NRC staff that, among other things, provides an evaluation of the hydrogen generation and combusuon during staff. accepted severe accident scenarios. This subminal need not, however, be a completed "Enal" analysis. Instead, all that is rapured at the operating license stage is "a prehnunary analysis wluch the staff has deterrmned pnwides a satisfactory basis for a decimon to support intana operanon at full power until the final analyns has been completed." 10 CIA 50.44(c)(3)(vii)(B).
C la is plam frorn the terms of the hydrogen conual rule,10 CFA 50.44, that the Comnussion was fully prepared to Isave it to the staff to decido nich of the vast number of possible hydrogen generation scenarios should be analytod. Without deciding that the sacretse of the staff's btond discreuen in that regard is nwiewable at all, an inservenor seeking to challenge the chaise of scenanos must do snuch more than amply allege that there are other scenarios that the staff might appropriately have insisted be factored into the analysia: it mum also allege and establish that, without the inclusion of the addttional scenarios, the analyns could not fulAll its inumded purpose.
D The Stateners of Consideranon accompanying the prurnulgation d the hydrogen coreal rule 10 t
1 CSA $0.44, indicates a Comrrussian intant to allow a hydrogen bum analysis for one facility to make use d e pievums and staffwcepted analysis fa assher mmilar facility. Ses 50 Fed. Ras 3502 (1985).
E Gomesal Desiepi Cruanan 17, in 10 CEA Pan 50, Appendix A, requires a nuclear plant to include, iniss alia, e reliable onaus electsio power sysiam to permit the factioning of aquigues needed to maunam the plant in a safe conditice in the eve.s of the less of other sources of power.
F The Geeral Demon Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants, contained in Appendix A to 10 C.FA Part 50,"estabhah muumum 5 --- : for the prmcipal desisi critana for water cooled r-1= power plants aimilar in design and location to piams for which cmstrucuan pernuts have been issued by the Commissioit" O Them is nothing in Appendix B to 10 CFA Part 50 (the quality assurance criteria for nuclear power planta) that places either an express or an implied limitation upon who may prepare a quality assurance plan. Rather, such a plan can be formulated by any annty or organization and then,inespective of its source, is judged on its own snents.
H 16 is part of the staff's ongoing susponsibility during operation d a nuclear power plars to review the success of varias gungrams that are under way at the plant i One of the staff's major conunuing responsitalitice is to monitor the operanon of all nuclear power facilities and, thus, to avwn au proposed changes in existing inspecuan, tesung, and n+-- programs at such facilinas.
J A pany opposing a motion for sununary disposinon is obliged to set fonh in its anseer " specific facts," by aff.dsvts or other appropnate rneans, to establish that "than is a genuine issue of fact." 10 C.FA 2.749(b).
K Unless properly contravened, the Comnuasion's negolations specify that "[ apt material facts set fosth in the statement requued to be served by the . . pany (moving for summary disposition) will be deemed to be admiusd . . ." 10 CSA 2.749(a). See llouston Lighnng & Pcmar Ca (Allens Creek Nur: lear Generating Stacian, Unit No.1), ALAB-629,13 NRC 75. 78 (1981).
L Regulatary guides and the Standard Review Plan do not have the stans of Canmismon regulations and are subject to changes by the staff.
13
t a DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND 12 CENSING APPEAL BOARDS M Inasmuch as scheduling is a maner of Ucensing Board discredan, appeal teards do not ir@ct I thanselves into acheduling cetroversies, absent a '"truly exceptional situation.' More panicularly, [aweal boards] ' enter the scheduling thicket cautiously' and that only 'to entertam a claim that a (licensing] bmrd abused its discrenan by setting a beanng schedule that deprives a party of its right so procedural das
- process.'" Virginia Flacszie and Power Co. (North Anna Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2), AIAB.
$84,11 NRC 451,467 (1980) (quoung Public Service Ca of New Hampshire (Seabmok Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 293,2 NRC 660,662 (1975), and Public Service Co. of Indians (Marble Hill Nuclear Omariting Station, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-459,7 NRC 179,188 (1978)).
N A party seeking summary disposidan on a parucular maner has the burden d establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists on that maner. ALAB 443,6 NRC 741,753 (1977).
O [IJudicial pr== tar and long-standing Comnusman practice cannrm that, within the confines saf 3
carrying cut ha paramount respmaibihty ta, protect public haahh and safety, [the Cornmissionj may cmaider
[
economic factos in its decision making? 50 Fed. Res. 50,764,50,767 (1985).
l P ne following technicalissues are discussed: Hydmgen sacration, hydrogen control systan, non- I inerted comainmas (10 C.FA 50.44), hydmsm contml analysis accident scenarios, contamment response to hydrogm combusson, CLASIX 3 computer code, release of combustible gases frorn heated electric cable {t insulation, equipment survivatality; General Design Criterim 17. Appendia A,10 CSA Part 50 (ansite emergmcy power supply), dices", generator reliability, diesel generator foundation (chodt plates), cylinder
(
block cracking (ligsman and stud 40 stud cracks), cylinder block inspection interval; Standby !Jquid Control Systan; Turbine missiles, entical crad size, uubine inspection, tesung, and -" program, turbine inspectim interval: Degradaden of polymers used in safety-related equipman, survedlance and meintename program for polymer degradation; Containment air lock testmg.
ALAB 842 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Midland Plant, Units I and 2) Docket Nos. 50-329-CP, OMAOL,50 334CP, OMAO!4 CONSOLIDATED CONS'IRUCTION PERMIT MODIFICATION AND OPERATLNO UCENSE; August I,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A Upon information from the applicant that it wishes to withdraw its application for an extension of the Midland consuuction permits and for operaung licatsas for the facihty, the Appeal Boazd, on mootness smunds, withdraws its junsdicdon, retained in the consuuction permit proceedmg, over the issue of the environmental signincance of the radon 222 anissions occamoned by the mining and milling of uranium I fuel no Bosal also vacates the Licensing Board's partial ininal decision on remedial soils issues in the casolidated constructed permit modiacadon and operaung license proceeding, the sua sponte review of '
which the Appeal Board had been holding in abeyancsL AIAB-843 CAROUNA POWER & UGirr COMPANY and NORTH CAROUNA EAS'1TRN MUNICIPA POWER AGENCY (Shearm Harris Nuclear Power Plant), Dockat No. 50-400 0L; OPERATING UCENSE; August 15,1986; DECISION A no Appeal Board af6rms the Licensing Board's third panial initial d=*% in this operating license proceeding, WIP 85-49,22 NRC 899 (1985).
B A person who is not an suorney cannot represent in NRC licensing proceedings any otherindividual or any orgarnwW in which he does not hold -W 10 C.FA $2.713(b).
C A party has no standing to raise on appeal possible grievance of other pames that have not perfected their appeals. See AIAB-837,23 NRC 525,543 n58 (1986); Houston Lighting & Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Gennraung Stanon. Unit No.1), ALAB 631,13 NRC 87,89 (1981); Puget Sound Power and i Li,8ht Co. (Skaga Nuclear Power Project, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-556,10 NRC 30,33 (1979). Cf. Houston l
Ughting & Power Co. (South Texas Project Units 1 and 2), ALAB 799,21 NRC 360,383 (1985). j D no Commission's Rules of Practice require that an appellant's brief cleady idenufy the ermrs of l
fact or law that are the subject of the appeal, and that for each issue appealed, the precise portion of the l record relied upon in support of the assertion of enor be set ow 10 CIA $1762(d)(1). lloreover, the brief must contain suf5cias information and cosas argumas to alett the other parues and the appeaste tnbunal to the precise nature of and suppen fa the appellara's claims. See Public Service Co. of Oklahams (Black rux Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-573,10 NRC 775, 805 (1979), vacated in pan and remanded, CU.848,11 NRC 433 (19801 E In appeahng a parucular Board ruling,it is not enough for an appellant simply to declare flatly that
{
the ruling was in enu. Rather, it is incumbent on the appellars to confront directly the reasons assigned !
1 14
~
l
l 8
l L
l DIGESTS
!$SUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL DOARDS l
for the challenged sling and to identify wnh particularity the innranties purportedly inherent in those reasona. Duke Power Co. (Catawts Nuclear Stanan Units 1 and 2), AIAB-813,22 NRC 59, S4 n.128 0 985).
F An appeal that la inadequately triefed is subject to dismissal. See Cleveland Electric D1urninating Co. (Perry Nuclear Pt.wer Plant, Unus 1 and 2). ALAB 841,24 NRC 64,69 0986); Pennsylvania Pbwer and Usht Co, (Susquehanna $ seam Electne Statiet, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-693,16 NRC 952,956 57 09821 O lasues en appeal that an inadequately briefed are considered waived. See Cleveland Electric 111uminaung Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2), ALAB-802,21 NRC 490,496 n.30 (1985);
Wisconsin Electric Power Co. (Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1), ALAB-696,16 NRC 1245,1255 0982); !
Susquehanna,16 NRC at 954-57; Duke Power Co. (Catawbs Nuclear Stanan, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-355, 4 NRC 397,413-14, reconsideration denied, ALAB459,4 NRC 619 0976).
II The Commissaan's regulations dictate that a range of protective actions be developed for the plums l exposure pathway emergency plamung tona 10 C.P.R. 650.47(b)(10).
I The t'"-"'s basic guidance documers on emergency planning, NUREG 0654/ FEMA-REP-1, " Cataria for Preparancsi sad Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Pmer Plants," (Rev.1, November 1980), like the Regulatory Guides, serves as guidance and does not prescribe agulatory mu ._.: It simply serves as a rnethod of moedng the applicable regulatory .4._ . philadelphia Electric Ca (Umerick Ocnerating Station, Units 1 and 2),
AIAB-819,22 NRC 681,710 (1985), aview denied, CU 86 5,23 NFC 125 0986); Metropohtan Edison Ca (Ihree Mile faland Nuclear Station, Unit Na 1), ALAB-698,16 NRC 1290,1298-99 0982), rev'd in part on other smunds, CU 83 22, !8 NRC 299 (1983).
J A pany is bound by the literal terms of its own contentions. Philw1n1phia Electric Ca (Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2), ALAB-836,21 NRC 479,505 0986); id., ALAB 819,22 NRC 681, 709 0 985).
K An appeal board will overturn a hcensing board's 6ndings of fact atly whom it is " convinced that the reca:J cenpels a diffemra result" Niagara Mohawk Power Carp. (Nme Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2), ALAB-264,1 NRC 347,357 0975). See ALAB-837,23 NRC at 531.
L lt is not the licensmg board's fLmedan to act as an intervenor's advocate and prepare its case.
AIAB-844 CGVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et al. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, U:iits 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50 44ML,54441014 OPERATINO UCENSE; August 18, 1986; MEMORAN.
DUM AND ORDER A The Appeal Board daties an intervenar's pension for reconsuleration of persons of the Board's earlier decision, ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986), affirming the Ucensing Board's concluding partial initial decision authonzing the issuance of heenses for the operauon of Uniin 1 and 2 of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant AIAB-845 PilILALEU'lIIA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50 352-OL,50 353-OI4 OPERATINO UCENSE; August 28,1986; DECISION A The Appeal Board affirms the Licer.sms Board's concluding pardalirstial decision in this operating license pmceadms, I.BP 85-25, 22 NRC 101 (1985), involvmg the emergency respanas plan for a pnsun located within the plume emergency planning zone of the Limerick facility. The Appeal Board also affirms the Ucensing Board's rejection of several proffered contenuens concermng the plan, but reverses the Board's rejection of anather curuention and rernands for funhar action.
B Appeals that am not bricfad are considered waived. See ALAB-836,23 NRC 479,485 n.2 0986).
C '!he Canrmasion's Rulse of Prection,10 Cf.R. 4 2.714(b), require interveners to set forth the bases for each contenuan with " reasonable spectncity."
D 1here is no easy femula for deternuning what are " basis" and tessonable spectficay" Such judgment ntust be exercised case by-case, with the undedying purpose of this requiremera in mmd. One such purpose is to help assure at the pleadmg stage that the hearing pmcess is not improperly invoked -
for example, by challengmg statutmy requiremerus or the basic strucnus of the Commission's segulaury process Philadelphia Electnc Co. (Peach Bauarn Atenic Power Station, Unisa 2 and 3), ALAB-216,8 AEC 13,20 (footnote arruner), modified on other smunds, CU-74 32,8 AEC 217 (1974). Other purposes are to 15 I
+
e .
(
DIGESTS ISSUANCE 5 OF TifE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS put the parues on nauce d what issues they wiu have to defend or oppose, and to amure the issues mised ase appmpriais for heigenan in the panicular proceediner 14. at 2421.
E la esercising the "canaderable amoist of discation"it has in determuung the adnusednhty of a consenuan, a baand must be conful not to susch the monts. Id. at 21,20; Houman IJahtes and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Gunsreung Sution, Unh 1), AIAB.590,11 NRC 5d2,547-49 (1980).
P Section 50.47(bX5) of the Comnussion's regulations aquuss the establistument of psoccdums "for nouncanon of emergency pamannel by all organaannens"(emphasis adde.f). See also NUREG.0654 NEMA.
REP 1, Rev.1 "Canana for Paparation and Evalumnae of "" . Ernergency Respenas Plans and 7, in Support of Nuclest 7bwer Plams" (1980) (basenhar "NUREG.0654") at 43 (Caiserian E.2). knplicit in this standard - which must be met as part of the overall *-ble esaurenes" Anding squimd by 10 Cf.R. $ 50.47(aXI)-is that mudi namincene pr-a-h should be adequais to serve their intended purpane, La., eventual maWiiMaa of neomsery emergency washese.
G Secuan 50.47(b)(5) of the P
's : . does nas specify or prehibh any petticular meshed of naufying smargency pareannel Some nonen of adequacy, however, must be and into the secuan. Cf. lang Island lighung Ca (Shasehem Nuclear Pbwer Siemen, Unit 1), CU.86-13,24 NRC 22,32 (1986)(specino emergency plemung measures nas explickly manuaned in the agulations may nevenbelaus be sequued for mesanable assurance).
II Secnan 50.47(bX6) of the Comnusman's seguisnans concerns pranpa canonuniastians among principal response argrusanans to emergency personnel and to the public. A principal espanse organization is one that has a major or lead role in emergency planrung and propsedness. NUREG.0654 et 5.L See Seuihern Cahfarnia Edison Ca (San Onofs Nuclear Generanns Stanan, Unha 2 and 3), AIAB-717,1]
NRC 346, 37b78 (1983), aff*d, Carmens v. NRC, 742 F.2d 1546 (D.C. Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. I136 (1985).
! . Under secdon 50.47(c)(1) of the Comrmasion's seulations, faihus to mest the opplicable asandards set fanh in secuan 50.47(b) may result in the Comnusman's dochnag to issue an opmoting license; however, the applicent will have an opportunity to demonstrsas to the satisfaanan of the t' ' - that deAmancias in the plans am not siemAcers for the plant in questian, that adequus inserirn onmpensedag actions have i
been er win be taken pumptly, er that thee aso other onenpelling sessens to peruut plant opmmuan.
J Any penampant in an energency nupanas activhy should be adequately lofarmed as to the nanus of las or her suspanabilities.
i K The Canonissian's aplanans aquhe that the basis for a esmannan be supphed in the -==n-i itself- not developed at a hasrms. See 10 CIA 12.714(b). -
i L Argionems and issues not seised below asanes properly be passed inkinDy on appenL ALAB-836 -
23 NRC at 496 a.28.
r
' i M The Conunisman's " Statement of Policy an Emergency Planene Standard to CI.R 50.47(b)(12),"
t 50 Fed. Ret 20,892 (1985), panams to those amations whee samal dancunees in needical artengements have been idanuAnd and a paeaa thus has arisen as to the peupnety of license issuance pumuent to 10 CEA G 50.47(c)(1), notwithaanding the densaancy.
N Section 50.47(bX14) of the Camnussian's segulauans sequuss pasiodic saerases to evaluses major ponions of emergency sepanse capabiliuss, periodio dnlis to develop and maannam key skills, and the carmenon ofidanuned danciencies-0 NUREG.0654 mmply serves as guidance for the staff's soview of emagency plans and does not pnmeribe segulaiary equuumanis. A1AB-819,22 NRC 681,710 (1985), review dochnod, CU.86 5,23 NRC 125 (1986).
P Fedwal Emegency Management Agency (FEMA) Andings ceaernas emergency propandness cassoass are only rebuttablo pesumpnans in NRC r. .- But befase a party can enescise its right to challenge a FEMA Anding at a hemang,it must proffer a contenuen that sationes the bees and spacincity sequirernents for adnuamble Q Nothing in Union of r'aaa-ned Scientims v. NRC,735 F.2d 1437 (D.C. Cir.1964), can. denied, 469 U.S.1132 (1985), suggesis that h was intended to overide the fundamanial e preregiusnes far the adjudicauon of c-R Discovery begins only aner the idennAcation d the manors in consnwersy -La., the admission d comanuans.10 CIA 5 2.740(b)(1).
I 1
16 i
l l'
a s
l l
I DIGESTS ISSUDCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFITY AND IJCENSING APPEAL BOARDS 5 Intervenom are bound by the lucrai terms of their own cantantions. AIAB.836,23 NRC at 505 (ciung AIAB419,22 NRC at 709).
T The Commisaiun's emergency planning reguladons require an evacuadan time esumate (L'E) for various sectors and distances wdhin the plume exposure pathway emergency planning sane for transtant and ]
pinanent populauons.10 CSA Part 50, Appendia E, l!V, No parucular time 1muu are estabhshed for I an evacueuan; rather, the analysia is inlanded to soflect a reshsde uma far completing an evacuauan. Thus, tv using the ETE, emergency coordmators can then decide what protective actions (e.g., shchering or evacuatioS) are warranted in the circumstanom,if a radiological emergency occurs. AIAB-836,23 NRC at j 486., 491. Een also NUREG 0654, Appendix 4. l U %e fact that informatum cantamed in an enhilst admined into evidence at an earher stage of dar 1 I
pmcer<ims tasy be supeseded by more curnus information elsewhere in the recard does not deprive the exhibh of he status as evidencs of record.
V An ETE abauld not renact a " worst case"acmiana It is intended to be rgresentadvs and seasonable so that any gmascuve scuan based on hs enumstas will saflect realisur condadons. On the other hand, an E1T, should take accoum of a wide range of seasmal, weather, and other condaians. AIAB 836,23 NRC at 491. See NUREO.0654, Appendia 4.
W The Comnussion's regulatirra requus the ETEa for special facihues to be included in the applicant's emergency plart See 10 CSA Part 50, Appendia E, iIV ("Coment of Emergency Plans"). See also 10 Cf.R. I 50.47(bX10); NURLG-0654, Cruanan Lt.
X Dasists the lack of a specinc regulanon prescribing h. ETEa nexassrily must be readily avads51.
Cogically as an addendurn to the ruliological emergery suspanse plan) to all those decuionmakers whom the E'IT:a am to and in docuhrs what protecuve actions to order.
Y Motions for disquah6 canon under 10 CSA 52.704(c) must be fund as soon as passible after j ostensible grounds for such action arise. Public Service Co. of New flampshue (Seabrook Stanon, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB-749,18 NRC 1895,1198-99 (1983)
Z To preserve for appeal a claim that a subpoena was improperly issued, a puny is obliged to sack salief nat from the 1.icensing Board by rooving to quash the subpoenn. See 10 CFA 5 2.720(f).
, AA A beant on im own may interrupt or cut off a waitness' u,stimony where the board beheves the
- testimony strays beyond the inauss in htigation. This action is impheuly, if nos expucitly, wuhin the board's i authceuy "to take apprapnats acuan to avoid delay," to "recesve ovulence " to "[rlegulate the courne of the hearing," and to "telaamme wtinesses." 10 CIA 52.718. See also 10 CFA 9 2.757.
mB Where the -_. -- warrars is the Commissian's seguladans clearly permit the adjudicatory boards to shonen the tima periods otherwue authanved for discovery and for subnutung pre 81ed tesumony and pmposed 6ndmga of fact and conclusions oflaw. See, e-g.,10 CIA fl2.711(a),2.754(a). See also Staternas of Policy an Ccnduct of Exnsing Pmceedmga, CU-818,13 NRC 452,453 (1981).
CC Expedinan of a pmceeding should not be at the espense of fairccas. Claims of Lutfai: mesa, however, must be supponed by evidence of specific harm. ,
DD If a party agrees to a schedule set by a hcoming board, h cannat later complain on appeal that the achedule was unfair. Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Statim, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 813,22 NRC 59, 74 & rL69 (1985).
EE If an appellem fails to respond to an appe!! ant's bnsf,it is in defauh so far as that parucular appeal is cancerned. See 10 CFA 92.707.
FF Only aggnewed parues may appeal decisions adverse in thent Virginia Dactnc and Power Co. (North Anns Power Station.Unus 1 and 2), AIAB-790,20NRC 1450,1453 (1974). A party cannat be legally "aggnewed" fcr the purpose of appealms an adverse deciaian ifit did n.x meaningfully parucipais in the procesa dat led to the objecuanable decision. Ses Ps:n6c Gas and Docuic Ca (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Piars, Unus I and 2), AIAb-583,11 NRC 447,448 (1980). See also id, at 448-49. Cf. Camhna Power and lists Ca (Shearon Hams Nuclear Power Piars), ALAB 837,23 NRC 525,542-43 n.58 (1986).
00 Unless a licensms boant arders the submissum d pinpased findmgs of fact and canchsians of law, a pany falung to do ao is fase to pursue on appnal all issues in which it pani.xpated below. Deuch Eduan Ca (Ennco ferud Ausraic Pbwer Plant, Unit 2), AIAB-709,17 NRC 17 (19831 IDI Whether an intervenar has the rigin io pursus a parucular issue cm appeal is a funcuan af ths lermd d inteams capressed by the intervens in such maus throughona the cowse of the proceedmg, See Northern 17
e , 1 DIGESTS f I
ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND IJCENSING APPEAL BOARDS l
States Power Co. (Praine Island Nuclear Gcneanns Plant. Umu ! and 2), ALAB 244,8 AEC 857. 863 A a9,870 n.19 (1974), remnsiderauon derned, AIAB 252,8 AEC 1875, aff'd, :2J 75-1,1 NRC 1 (1975).
H Oral argument is a maner solely utdun the Appeal Board's ducreua:L 10 CJA 92.763; ic CIA Part 2. Appendam A, IIX(e) Thus, the Board can obviously set reasonable ganad rules for parncipauan, such as requinns the parues' representatives to be an tuns.
ALAB-846 FIDRIDA POWER A UOffr COMPANY (Tudtey Point Nuclear Generanns Plant, Uniu 3 and d), Dodist Nos. 54250 0LA 1, 542510LA-1 (Vessel Flus Reduenan); OPLRA11NO UCENSE AMENDMENT, Septenbar 16,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A Upon sanducung fu sus spume review of the Licanang Board decision that disposed of ans of the two adnuned comanuma in stus hesnas amendman proceedma, the Appen! Board Enda no enas that warrant conecuve acLen.
B If a daarnunauan is made, pumuers to 42 U.S.C. 2239(s)(2)(A), that a proposed licanas amendment involves "no maru5 cant hazards," the Comnussion may issue the amendmars and make it insnedutely effective actwahatanding any sequest for a heanns. %e beanng, however, nuy take place after issuance of de - Mstropahtan Edaan Co. (Thme Mde Island Nuclear Stataar, Una No.1), AIAB-807,21 NRC 1195,1200 n.12 (1985).
C When no appeals as inken frain a saviewsble hcenans based decirian, an appeal baard will review that decman sus spame. See Ofrahare Power Sysums (Manufactunns Lismas far Plosung Nuclear Power 11a. ras), ALAB-689,16 NRC 887,89491 A nA (1982).
D Appeal boarda generally do not review licanams board daarmumtions that do nec constitute a Snal reschiuan an the mertu. See llouston Lighung A lbwer Co. (Sauth Tsaas Project. Urur I and 2).
AIAB-791,21 NRC 360,369 0985).
ALAD-847 IDNQ ISLAND Wolf!1NO COMPANY (Sinscham Nuctsar Power sianan. Unit 1), Docket Na 54322-OL 3 (Emergency Planmns); OPERATINO UCENSE; September 19,198&, DECISION A b Appeal Board decadme the remasung partions af the applicant's sweal af twoIJoanains board docuiana in the emergcncy plamung phase of this aparating licensa pmceedms, LDP-8512,21 NRC 644 (1985), and LBP-85 31,22 NRC 410 (19851 b Board romanda two af the thres issues appealed far funhar clan 5caban by the Ucerning Board, and avverses the Ucoming Board's determmation on the third.
B A nuclear power plant is ont a!! owed to operate at levels above $wo pescent of its mind power i
urdess the NRC fads, in accanience wuh 10 CIA 50A7(a), that them is senamable assurance that adequsu measures far the praracuan of the public hashh and safay can and wi!! be taken. Among other things, emergency Jesponso plannmg fremt make provusan for the can af persons sumoved barn the plume emergency plamung ses (plume EPZ) should - -- nMais an suscuaum.
C b Communen's regulausu govermns operanns licarme pmesadurgs generally limit an a&di-catory board's Endags to the issues put in contest by the pernes.10 CIA 2.760s. See also Pacdic Can sad Flervar Ca (Dublo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unlu I and 2), AIAB-728,17 NRC 777,8M, avww dochnad, CU-83-32,18 NRC 1309 (1983).
D A licensing board may rsue and resnive, aus sparne, "a senaus safety, -.. - ( ar common defenas and sessanty maner," shnuld it deternuns such a senaus issue exists, f ==ria Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Elsetne Stauan, Unit 3), AIAB-732,17 NRC 1076,1112 (1983). It may do so, however, only afterinvaking certam special procedurea. Cevaland Electnc Blumuunng Co (Perry Nuclear Power Ptarn, Unica I and 2), AIAB475,15 NRC 1105,1115 (198D.
E Bah the Commaaman's regulataana and planmng guidance sasign somrnand and ennual aspm-nihihan Io licanans passannel. Perhaps most important, the iruual daerrrunanan of whether and when to alan pubhc of5culs to en semigency stuanan resis wuh the utihty.10 CIA 50.47(b)(5); 10 CIA Part 50, Appendas E, ilIV.D.1,IV.D.3.
F Liaansees have pareary suspensibility for acciders assammoent, includans the enhuman af posen.
tial nak to the pubhc haahh and safety and the preparauan of recommendabans canournmg protective measures. Sao Criier.s for Prepamban and Evaluauan of Radiodagical Emargency Response Piar.a and P - in Support af Nuclear Power Plama," NUREG-0654#T.MA-REP-1 (Rev.1)(1980), GUI O b NRC Inaden Response Plan prendes t'at a linesse "has the immedmie and pumary cantmuang responsibility for huuung the eunsequences of an incidant as a nuclear power resclar."In fact, a licenase is empowemd to take "whatever octaan is deuned -ry to hunt the consequences to pubhc 18
I (
4- .e e
DIGESTS -
ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND UCENSING APPEAL BOARDS bankh and safety, even if that senan violaims the NRC license technical spacincadans." "NRC Incident Rampanse Plan," NUREG 0728, Rev.1 (1983) at 4. And utility personnat am responsible for determb4 whe: mfonnamon is given to ywenunent d6cials. Cf. Y , ' - Edison Cc6 Olmos Mileistand Nuclear Station, Unit Nc61), /,1ABale7,16 NRC 1265,1269 70 0982); id., ALAB-698,16 NRC 1290,1312-13 (1982), aff'd in perunes pan, CU 83 22,18 NRC 299,310 (1983). .
H . The NRC taaid-a Raspese Plan espnsaly insuuses hosneses that "D]hniting the consequences
- to public henhh and arfery abould take cisar , over lind6s flam-t loss or advesse publio-
, ; hy." NUREG-M26 =M .
l .I De Car =enisbien's scgulaties requbt that utilities establish a four-tier id-r cleamfientim schema. In the event of an amusency, th annst advise gavenuness of6cials of the mapiitude of the =aaid-r and offer sesomr==daniasis an what psenactive menswes should be taken. See Thms Mk Island, A1AB 697,16 Mtc at 1269-70.
J- .
Emergency planmas roles h.ve always been assigned to re'less ths &nies and , '
- of the individual panicipeam Govenenenial antitini wees given emerency ia=pa== solas h=- they had the lagst euthesity and *ty ftr auch seaponse, not because the Canumssim distnuted the objectivity of licasess. nos 35 FM Peg.19.567-68 0970). .
K De NRC staff has largely an advisory and monitoring solo in emergency planning, al' haugh it may,in sans circumssaarna also take dhoot acnan, such as making hs own psetective action recommand*
tiens. See " Agency Ptooedures for ths NRC Incident Response Plan," NUREG-0845 (1983) et II-12-II-13,
!UREG-0728 at 4 4; Cf. %:es Mile Island, ALAB-698,16 NRC at 131213.
1, De .T' and applicable naulatory guidancs offensively rebut the netion that stility af6cials must be cassgoncaDy escluded from exercising any command and control emergency aspansibihties.
M Whose aunphanos with each of the 16 mpiums cuitaria of 10 C.FA 5a47(b) is abears, the Camrmasion may novenheless issue an operating license if the applicant can demonstrate "that danciencies -
in the plans ase not signi6 cant far the plan in question, that adequate intarim compensating actions have been or will be taken pnunptly, or that these ese other compelling umsons to pennit plant aparation." 10 C.PA 50.47(cXI).
N - Sessian 50.47(b)(1) d the C 's sayiletians sequises that offsite emessmey uspmos plans include an appenpasses ma=g-a== of respa=ihili ties to the liemses and assis and local emergency asponsa argsmaanans. Similady, NURE04654, which is the pri T=1 amargency plemung studance h===s pupmed jointly by tha NRC and the Fedess! Emergency " . - Agency (FEMA), pamdes for the asagnment af emergency response duties to the licenses and mais and local orgamusei==
0 Whee, "far wheasvar masen" a particular jurisdiction has not complesed an emergency plan or same pastian af h, an "apphaset [may] show that, because of other compensating factos, public heekh and safssy will be edaquessly presacted becauss of other plans er evidence of , , --" Union of Cancerned Sri-e== DPRM 83-1,17 NRC 719,726 0983). Cf. C==amtated Edison Co. of New Yank (Indian Pbut, Unis No. 2), CLI-83-16.17 NRC 1006,1C13 (1983).
P A utility plan cannot be deemed to have shancormnss simply because a governmanal body may perform varicus undamenbed functions not required by the regulaties. Mosuover, the suf6ciency of " interim compensatory actions" designed to accommodsis for ds6ciencias auch as the lack of a aats plan need not necessarily pawide pacisely the same level of ptosecuan that total conection of the deficiencies would offor. Indian Paint, CU-8316,17 NkC at 1010. See also CU 8613.-24 NRC 22,30 0936).
ALAB-848 FLORIDA POWER & UOHT COMPANY Gurkey Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4), Dockan Nos. 50 250 OLA 3, 54251 OtA-3 (Increased Puel Enrichment); OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; Sepumber 24,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A Upon con &acung ins sua sponse noview, the Appeal Boesd af8nns the f ta-a ig Bount's mano.
==A=a and esder that summarily disposed af the only conianiina adrasised far hansoon in this openenne lisense ain-d==== psosomhns.
B When no appeals ass taken inun a soviewable liesneng banni darunan an appeal baard will review
, that decision sus spessa. See Florids Power A Usht Co. Rusey Paus Nucleare L-; Plais. Units 3 and 4), ALAB 846,24 NRC 409 0956).
C The folkrains technical issues em h
- Neuman muhipiiraia= faster Oteff)', O uneau P moderatie.
19 1
1
__________.___J
I I
1 l
l DMESTS ]
ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS 1 ALAB-849 IlOUS70N UGIrrING AND POWER COMPANY, et at (South Texa.s Project. Units I and 2), I Docket Nos. 50 498-OL,50499-OL; OPERATING UCENSE; October 8,1986; MEMORANDUM AND i ORDER l 4 A Finding no errors that warrant corrective action, the Appeal Board affirms en sua sponte review two partialimtial decisions that found that the spplicants possess adequne manageria1 character and competenc resolved certain safety issues in the applicants' favw, and, as a consequence, authanzad issuance of operst
]
licenses for Units 1 and 2 of t! e South Tetas Project.
B When no appeals are taken frorn a reviewable licensing board decision, en appeal board will review I
that decision sua spare. See Florida Pbwer & Light Co. (Turkey Poirs Nuclear Gensruting Plant, Units 3 and 4), A1AB 846,24 NRC 295 (1986).
C q As appeal board's affirmance on sua spute review of a iicensing teard decision atly connotes agreernent wi:b the u,umate resolution of those issues crucial to the result reached. See Consumers Power q Co. (Big Rock Point P! ara), ALAB 795,21 NRC 1 (1985); Arizons Public Serviac Co. (Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1,2 and 3), ALAB-713,17 NRC 83 (1983).
AIAB-850 EDWARD WALLACE (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1) Docket No. 50289-EW; SPECIAL PROCEEDINO; October 9,1986; DECISION J j
A Finding that the capress terms of the Cornmission's notice of bearing establishing this special j proceeding dicuted the result reached, the Appeal Board af6sms the order of the Adnurustrative Law <
Judge. Dat onier terminated the proceeding and removed an existing requiremers that the cunent holder J of the operating lice we for Unit I of the hree Mile Island Nuclear Stauon naufy the Comnussion before returning the subject employee to a responsible position at that facility.
AIAB-851 GEORGIA POVrER COMPANY, et al. (Vogtle Electnc Cenerating Plant, Units I and 2), Docket Nos. 50 424 OL,50425 OL; OPERATING UCENSE; October 16,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A
De Appeal Board grants the applicants' motion to dism.ss an intervanor's appeal in this operating license proceeding because that intervenor had earlier withdrawn from the proceedings and had thus waived its appeal rights.
B Parues may not dart in and out oflicensing proceedings on usir own terms and at their convenience and stiB expect to enjoy the beno6ts of full participation wuhout the insponnbilities. Consumers Power j Ca (Midland P1 ara, Units I and 2), AIAB 691,16 NRC 897,907 (1982), review declined, CU 83-2,17 i NRC 69 (1983) Cf. Philadelphia Electric Ca (Lirnanck Generating Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-845, !
24 NRC 220, 252 (1986) Once a party effectively withdraws fiorn a pmceeding, its appeal rights are I waived. Midland,16 NRC at 907.
ALAB-852 CAROUNA POWER & UGiff COMPANY and NORG CATOUNA FA5TEAN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (Shearon Hams Nuclear Power Plant) Docket No. 50-4040L; OPERATING UCENSE; October 31,1986; DE '!SION A ne Appeal Board affirms the Lacensmg Board's concluding decisim in this operating license proceeding, LDP 86-11,23 NRC 294 (1986), but wuhholds affirmance of the Ucenstng Board's operating license authonzation pendirg consideration of the interveners' appeal from the second partialinitial decision.
B A party's failure to bnet an issue on appeal adequately "is tantamount to [its} sbandonmart." Duke Power Ca (Catawbs Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), AIAB 355,4 MRC 397,413, reconsiders an denied, AIAB 359,4 NRC 619 (1976). Accord Ibnsylvama Power and 1)ght Ca (Susquehanna Steam Elecuic Station, Uniu I and 2), ALAB-693,16 NRC 952,956 57 (1982).
C 11is the Ucensing Board's ptoper role to weigh and consider all the record evidence.
D j ne prassibility that incnemstent or even contrary inferences could be drawn frorn an caport witness' l
tesumony if the views of the opposiuon's experts are accepted does not prevent a Scenams board's fmdings from being suppated by substanual evidence. Northern Indiana Wblic Service Ca (Bailly Generating Stauon, Nuclear 1), AIAB 303,2 NRC 858,866 (1975).
E An ameal board will overurn a licensing board's 6ndings of fact only where it is "cormnced that :
the record cornpels a different resuk," Niagars Mohawk Power Corp. (Nins M's Pomt Nuclear Station, i Unit 2), AIAB 264,1 NRC 347,357 (1975) See AIAB-843,24 NRC 200,209 n.38 (1986); AIAB-837, 23 NRC 525,531 (1986).
I 20 {
1 1
\
l l
I i
.1
_ _ ___d
1 .. l DIGESTS 1 ISCI'ANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND IJCENSING APPEAL BOARDS F .. .The Canamasson's :==ilmeMs requie that an appliant's quality asemanos payam povide "adequais conftha" that thans synams, mruaurus and sampansuus having safety-related funcdons.
"will perfonn satisfactonly in service." 10 CEA Pan 50, Appen tis B. Introduction. Ses Duke Pbwer -
Co. (Catawba Nacasar Station, Units 1 and 2), AIJ4813,22 NRC 59,64 (1985). ..
O NUREG 0654, FEMA REP 1,"Cntens for Propersuan and Evalusion of Radiological Emergency Masponse Plans and . , - in Supper, d Nuclear Power Planas," (nsv.1, November 1980) is not a Consnassaan myladen that aampels ahti-= Rather,it serves as pidanos, seeing fanh but ans method for snesting the applicable regulasary seguimmense. AIAB443,24 NRC at 205 n.13; Phundelphia Elecede Co. Hkaarisk Osnauting Station, Unies 1 and 2), ALAB-819,22 NRC 681,710 0985), soview W CLI46 5,23 NRC 125 (1986). In other wasds, thath "is unmasal simply as evidenas oflegitunate insens for oneplying w' h naulatory sequuumums " " , Edison Co. (Thres Mile Island Nuclear Stadan, Unit Na 1), AIAB4P8,16 NRC 1290,1298-99 (1982), aff'd in part on other grounds, CLI-83-22, 18 NRC 299.
H It is well-senlad that in a C . A aparating licanes proereding a pany is bound by the literal terms ofits own e. - Ses AIAB-843,24 NRC as 208; PhilaMpha Fiersae Ca Q.anensk C' _.
Station Units ! and 2), AIAB.836,23 NRC 479,505 (1986).
I. Unless a licensing board raises an issue sus spessa,it is ausharised to decide only these menes put in canuommy by the panies. Ses 10 C.FA 12.760s.
J These is no agulasary requirernent that theFederal Emergency Manssanent Agency (FEMA) sinn teses er nndiny be cornplesed price to a lacenang boasd's authanannan of en aparating licanas.
K It is well-esalad that the issusace of FEMA's Anal Ending as the adequacy of offsise emergency plans and , . - is not a prenspesus to the authansation of a full-power operating liomas. Rather,
" ' , PEMA soviews and inseren fmdings pressoiad by FEMA witnesses at licensing hesony are sufHeient as long as sedi informauen pennies the Ilesnaps Board to conclude that offsus emergency psovides reasonsbis assumace that adequais pnnenave messums can and will be taken in the event of a r=aatarwal energency. Catawbe, AIAB-813,22 NRC at 78.
L 1he Commussim's rules clearly panhibit the poetice of sinspiy sufsmas to ane's psoposed 6adings as suppent for an asseruan of enor en appeal. Ses Public Servios Co. of Oklahoma (Bladt Fos Station.
Units 1 and 2), ALAB-573,10 NRC 775,805 (1979), vacated in part and p=====t-i CJ-80 8,11 NRC 433 (1980). . _
M la is clear from the Cannusman's segulanes that an operating liaanse may be ==haa*= t befse compiesia of the agency's haarnal appellets praeres. See 10 CFA 42.764(f).
AIAB-853 PU8iJC SERVICE COMPANY Ol' NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. (Sembramit Simian, Units 1 and 2), Docks Nos. 50 443 OL 1,50 444-Olet (Onsiis Emergency Plamung and Safety Issues); OPERA'11NO LICENSES Novunbar 20,1986; Dar3310N A . The Appeal Band denies ths Massachuseus Ausraey Omeral's appeal from a Iacensing Based arder LBP-86-34, 24 NRC 549 (1986), autharung the haa, of an operating licenes allowmg fuel landing and pr aaatiey testing at the $mbrook facility.
B 1he submissian of stans and locai r=Aatarcat emergency sospense plans is not a precandidan to grant of a licanas mathermag only fr4 loading and peeriticality issung. See 10 CEA 50.47(d).
C Section 50.57(c) acknowleds-s that different considerations may as relevant to an aushanzatim for low-power as opposed to fuu-power opersaart D Senden 50.47(d), which deals with energency plans, espassly canAnes any emananstian of emergency , , in ' with a low power liomas to an ========= af the appbcent's ansite emergency plans.
E An apesung lia=== - is a "living, t andsing" denument, subjast to diesgo at least undl full pomer aparanen is a=ha ==8 See 10 CSA 50.30 and 50.57.
F The purpme d 10 CEA 50.57(c) is to aesent an apphoems an gpetunity to obtain a liamse
, sushamung low-power opermost so is can test the famility even if issues unratsud to low-power opassies have not yet been menived.
O Section 50.47(d) gives unqualised sahansation to issue a low-power liamse in the absmus af Nuclear Reptalary Camra==hm er Federal Emersoney " _ - Agency appsval of an offsins energency plan as long as other prereqmmiss, menudang an adequate stats of ansias amersecy ,.
21
l i
l DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND UCENSING APPEAL BOARDS me met. Lang Island ughnng Co. (Shurehr s Nuclear Pbwer Station, Unit 1), CU-83-17,17 NRC 1032, 1034 (1983).
II Not every hashh and safety regulatiat, regardless of its purpees or terms, amat be deemed fdy applicable to fuellandmg and to every phase oflow-power opendon. Each regulauan must be examined to determine its application and effect for fuellandmg and fa each phans of low-power operation. Simple log's and cununna sense indicate that same regulations should, by their own terms, have no applicadon to fuel losaing er same phaeas of low-power operadan. Iong Island Lightmg Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Ibwer Statim, Unit 1), CU 84-21,20 NRC 1437,14s0 (1984).
ALAB 854 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, et at (Seabrook Stasiari Units 1 and 2), Do Las Nea. 50 443-OL.1,54444-01,1 (Onsite Emergency Plannmg and Safe y Issues); OPERATING UCENSE; December 8,1986; DECISTON A h Appeal Board af6rms the Ucensing Board's memoundum and order, LBP 86 34,24 hTC 549198th authorizing the issuance of a license allowing fust loading and preendcality testing.
B Saction 50.57(c) of the conomsnion's regulations permits an applicent in an operating licanas proceeding to make a motion in wnting for a licose authmizing low-power testing (operation at not more than 1 potent of full power for the purpose of testus the facility), and funhar operations short of full power. It also establishes the cnteria for sedan on sus motion by the presuhng ofHeer.
C Lico1 sing Boani ruling dismissing comanuana and paving the way far issunnos of a licess is monediately ayealable to an appeal board. Philadelphia Electric Ca Olmerick Generanns Station, Umts 1 and 2), AIAB 765,19 NRC 645,648 al (1984), aff'd mem., Anthony v. NRC,770 F.2d 1066 (34 Cir.1985).
D An oppment of a licensing bosni order authonzmg the issuance of a licesise allowmg fuelloading and preenticality testing may challenge the licensing board's summary disposition ofissues relevant to fuel landing or practinuality testing in cenecdon with its attack upon the order authorizing issuknce of the license.
E An applicant for an operating license need on!.* demonscruta, and a licensing bosni need only find, that there is reasonsbie assuranos that a reactor will operate as propaaed. Philadelphia Electric Ca (Limerick Generating Station, Usits 1 and 2), AIAB419,22 NRC 681,7410985), myiew dochned, CU-86 5. D NRC 125 (1986); Commonweshh Edison Ca (Zion Statim, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-616,12 NRC 419,421
- 0980%
F Commasian regulations requira each plant to have a dmht security plan to pnnect against external and imernal sabotage 10 C.FA Part 73. The theoreocal poenbility of saboings cannot jusufy the denial of a license for fuel landing and prem*wality tearing. Cf. Philadelphia Electric Cc6 (Umerick Gensruting Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-819,22 NRC 681,699 701 (1985).
O Secuan 5447(d) requins that the Camr9saina be sans6ed regardmg the state of onsits muergency preparedness before a low-power license may be issued but does not aangn the responsibility for that deternunation to any component within the agency. Section Sa47(c) requires the Ucensing Board to make Andmas with respect to comested issues while the NRC staff nest make all other necessary determinations. See Consolidated Ed. son Ca af New Yosk (Indian Point Unite 1,2 A J), A1AB-319, 3 NRC 188,190 (1976).
H h distinction set out in 10 C.FA 50.57(c) between the =;- hof a licensing board and j the NRC staff in granung a low power license redects well-established NRC pmcedme in operates licanae 1 cases. See, tar example,10 C.FA 2.760s,10 C.FA 2.104(c) and 10 C.F.R. Part 2. Appendia A, VIII(b). I I h following techrucal issue is chacussed. Prevenuen of Unmteded Cnac.lity.
ALAB-855 IDNO ISLAND UGifrING COMPANY (Shorehsin Nuclear Power Stasian, Unit 1) Docket Na 54322OL 3 (E:negency Pla'msng); OPERATING UCENSE; December 12,1986; DECISION A h Appesi Board af6rms the panian of the Licensing Board's deciman in LBP-85 31,22 NRC l 410 (1985), aqmring the applicant, in formuisting its emergency response plan far Shoreham, to estimate )
and plan (in aMairst to planning for the number af evacuses likely to seek abaharing) fu the saimber of evacuses likely to came to the designated relocanan camer fa radiological memtenng and decantanunation alme in the evens of a radiological emergency at the plant-i i
1 22 l
l l
t
,- e ,
l t.
L
)
l 1
DIGESTS a ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND IJCENSING APPEAL BOARD 8 B NURPG-0654 (a jout issuance uf the Nuclear Regulassy Comnussion and the Federa1 Emergency Manageners Assney ==tiad "Criissia for Preparation and Evalumuon of Radiological Emergency Response
, Plans and ." , in Support of Nrclear Power Planis)is a genera!!y i=ad guidance documma used to evaluate the adequacy of emergency , at snacisar power plant snes.
C' Manisonng and daaamamunenen services ese within the "rsnge of pinesotive actions" that 10 C.FA 50.47(b)(10) requises be developed far an unenbars d the public within ths Ernessency Planung zone. -
, D NUREO.0654 lesves room *er satisfying regulasary requuemmes in ways other 6mt those specif- j imaUy set fanh in that doannant as guulanos.
, ALAB 856 CAROUNA POWER A UGiff COMPANY and NORTH CAROUNA EAS'IERN MUNICIPAL
, POWER AGENCY (Shmann Hanis Nuclear Power Plant), Decket No. 50 400 OL4 OPERATING UCENSE; i l
December 31,1986; DECISION .
A N Appen! Board afnrms the I.acenang Baerts -d penial initial decision in this opereung th piensedma, LBP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985). The Appeal Boemt also afntms the loser Baard's J liaanse authanzation grensed in iu initial deciman, IEP-85-11,23 NRC 294 (1985), aff'd, ALAB-85124 j NRC 532 (1986), whuh afArmation the Appeal Board had withheld pomhng completion of seriew of this q da maa B A party's faihus to submit a basf cansaaning sufScent information to anow an appeal board to make an inialtiym d==pa=ieim af the issues remed "is tansamount to their ebendonment." Duke Ptmer
- Co. (Caiawba Nuclear Scacaun, Unins 1 and 2), ALAB 355,4 NRC 397,413, recanaderation denied, AIAB.
359,4 NRC 619 0976).See Pennsylvania Power and Light Cet (Susquehanna Siese Elecinc Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-693,16 NRC 952,956 57 (1982).
C The C "o Rules of Practice require that the appeDams "cleady identify the arras of fact or law that ass the subject of the appeal" and "the precise poman of the tosard relied upon in suppast of the aussenen of enor." 10 C.FA $ 2.762(d)(1)
D h Iia ===ar Baud's disnussel of the appenants' - fu ther faihus to suspend to decovery requess was an actaan woD wishin the Usensing Based's ==haavy and not an abuse of discretaan in ihn = See 10 C.FA 52.707; Sistemssa of Policy en Conduct of lacenans ." - ..
CU-81-8,13 NRC 452,454 (1981).
E. An appeal band wiu caly ovunura a lower tment's femual andings when it is "conymeed that the secasd canpels a diffusent resuh." Niagers MahawL Power Corp. (Nins Mile Paint Nuclear Station, Unit 2), ALAB.264,1 NRC 347,357 (1975). Ses A1AB-837,23 NRC 525,531 (1986).
F The t'a===ien's Rules of Pacces psovide that, in a prossedag whose the NRC staffis a peny, the assney win make eveilable one or mee wha === demanated by the Enscutive Dueciar far Operations to tasufy an the immes invahed.h Ruhss Auther disase that the"amd=aan and testimany of. . . named NRC pareannel . . rney not be sequised by the psumams of6cer, by subpoens or otherwise, . [eacept]
upon a showing af exceptional circumstances." 10 C.FA 52.720(h)(2)(i)
O h appenams' newly aseened groand was never presensed to the Licanang Board so the appeal board may ner ensanam it for the Erst tune an appent Ses Duke Power Corp. (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-813,22 NitC 59,82-83 0985).
H hC 's ' -
10 C.FA H 20.4(b),(c) deans unas of radiation dose, not in terms of abschus values, but as a meestene of the dass suceived: "the rad . . is a measuse of the dose of any larhing rechatian to body tissues in tarens of the energy absorbed per umt mass of the tissus*; and "[t]hs nun
. . is a messun d the dame af any imuzing radianan to body tissues in tarns of its estimated inological efect missive to a dass of one sesagen (r) of X.mys." (Emphasis added.] See also 10 C.FA 6 20.4(d). h is thus appenas that the Cemsmanan's . . in seems dass lisses, speak in terms of mnemund deses, not *hi absehnen, i
23
i m.
V e
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS i
LDP 8622 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW IIAMPS1HRE, et al. (Seabrook Stadon, Umts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-443-OL 1,50444-OL-1 (ASGP Na 8247102-OL)(Onsite Emergency Planmns and Safay lasues); OPERATING UCENSE; July 21,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A in this Memorandum and Order, the Ucensing Board granu an uurvenor's motion to withdraw iu comendon, but permits a joun intervenor to have the withdrawn contandon replaced by its own identical g contention.
LDP-8623 FIDRIDA POWER AND UGirl' COMPANY (Turkey Pom Nuclear Generadng Plant Units 3 --
arW 4), Dodet Nos. 56250-OIA 1,50 251-OLA.1 (ASLBP Na 84-496 03 LA)(Vessel Flua Reduenon);
OPERAlING UCENSE AMENDMEN1'; July 24,1986; INT!1AL DECISION A In this Inidal Decision, the Board resolves the one remairung contendon in Ucensee's favor and orders that licasse amendments issued by the Office of Nuclear Reector Reguladon at December 23, 1983, remam in full face and effect without modincanon. De Board 6nds that the Licensee's analysis of DNBR performed using NRC Staff-approved methodology and compensanng for appropriate uncensinties demonstrates at a 95% probability at a 95% con 6dence level that the hottest rod will not undergo DNB, and contrary to Interveners' assertion, the margm of safety for the operation of the Turkey Point Plant has not been reduced by the issuance of the contested amendmertts.
' B In view of the informauan provided to the Board in Board Nou5 canon BN 8&l7, %:sd June 30, 1986, regardmg 1rarvenors' Cetenuan N se to which the Board in an earher Order had granted Licensee's Mouan ior Summary Disposium o Nm! retains juttsdiction in this maner pending receipt of informauen of any further actions by the hst LDP-8624 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NLW llAMPSIURE, es al (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 5G443-OL 1,50444-OL 1 (ASDP Na 82 47102-01J (Onsite Emeriency Planzung and Safety lasues); OPERATINO UCENSE; July 25,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A In this Memornndan and Order, the Ucensmg Board peniaUy grams Appbcants' mouon by that, in a partial imtial decision, it will ecide, inter sha, whether or not to authorize issuance of a low power operaung beense up to 5% of rated power. he Board proceeds to set a schedule for discovery and for the hearing.
B flavir: status under 10 C.F.R. I 2.715(c) does not make an irnerested municipality the spokesman for other parues or parucipants in this proceeding. See Puget Sound Power and Ught Ca (Skagit Nuclear Power Ptosect, Umts 1 and 2), AIAB-556,10 NRC 30,33 (1979); llouston Ushung and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Genernung Stadon, Unit 1), AIAB 544,9 NRC 630,632 (1979).
C no .mrd is not the proper forum because it has neither the junsdicuan nor authonty either to consider challenges to the Comnussion's interpretation of its own regulations or to consider challenges to a Comrrussion reguladon on the ground that it is contrary to the Atonne Energy Act.10 C.FA 12.758(a);
see Potomac Electric Power Ca (Douglas Pous Nuclear Generstmg Station, Units 1 and 2), AIAB 218,8 AEC 79, 89 (1974). -
LBP-8625 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSIURE, et al. (Seabrenk Staumt, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-443-OL 1,50444-OL-1 (ASLBP Na 8247102-OL) (Onsite Emergency Plannmg and Safay Issues); OPERATINO UCENSE; July 30,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A In this Memorandum and Order, the Ucmsmg Board denies uninterested State's petiden requesting that the applicauen of 10 C.F.R. ISO 47(d) be waived or an eacepden be made in this procanding. The e
i 25
s e DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TFIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS Lica smg Board derues the peuuan because the Interested State had not made a pnma facte showing that !
the application of the segulauon in this pmceedmg would not serve the purpose for which it was adopted, B With respect to all ofits argumams, the Imerested State failed to comply with 10 C.P.R. (1758(b)
-it did not specify the special cucumstances with respect to the subject matter of this panicular proceeding, which are such that applicanon of the regulsJon would not serve the purgmse for which the regulation was
, adopted. The ha- advened to in diese argumems were generic in nature and were not unique to this proceeding, C ne Interested State's seemd argaaent, which assated that low-power testmg would sigm6cantly and irreversibly affect the envimament, was reje.:ted by the Commission in Img Island Ughting Co. (Share-i ham Nuclear Power Station), CU-8512,21 NRC 1587,1590 (1985). With respect in the Interated State's third argument, which asserted that low-power testing raised the ask of offsite cmm in Img Island Ughting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Umt 1), CU-83-17,17 NRC 1032,1034 (1983), the Corn-iniaina indicated that it ' nad adopted 150.47(d) because it had determined that fuelloading and low-power 3
operaticet do not pose signiDeant asks to public heahh and safety.
' LBP 8626 GENERAL PUBUC UTIIIITES NUCLEAR CORPORATION (11tres Mile Island Nuclear Station.
Unit 1), Docket Nos. 54289-OIAl,54289-OLA-2 (Steam Generator Plugging Criteria); OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; July 30,1986; ORDER A In an Onier, absent objections, the Ucensmg Board grams the Licensen's motion to defv the Maring schedule.
LBP-8627 110RIDA POWER AND UGifT COMPANY (Tutiey Point Nuclear Genersting Plant, Units 3 and
- 4) Dociet Nos. 54254OLA 3,542510LA 3 (ASLSP No. 84-505-08-LA) (Increased Puel Enrichment);
OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; August 25,1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LBP 8628 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et at (Wgtle Electric Genernur: Plant, Units i and 2), Docket Nm. 50424-OL,504254L (ASLBP Na 84499 010L); OPERAllNG UCENSE; August 27. 1986; PARTIAL INTf1AL DECISION A In this.Panial Iniual Decision, the facensmg Board Ends that Applicants have provided adequate assurance that public ground water supplies wtfl not be contammated by an accidental spill of radioactive water, and that censin polymer matenals to be employed in plant components that perform safety related j' functions are amronrnentally quahned.
LBP-8629 HOUS1DN UGifrING AND POWER OMPANY, et al. (South Teams Project, Units I and 2),
Docket Nos. STN 54498-01. STN 50499-OL (ASLBP No. 79421-074L); OPERATING UCENSE; i August 29,1936: PAR 11AL INTTIAL DECISION l A The Ucensma Bosni issues a Partial Initial Decaston that resolves an issues not decided by the I
Board's two previous partial initial densions and authenzos operating licenses (subject to further Staff and Comrr-aa revsw). The Board daarmines that, because of the estranely low probatality of signi5 cant l damage fran a hurncans missile strike, portions of three structures need not be designed to wahstand such l l' imsailes.
B
(
That sciast6c studies were not perfwmed by NRC does not per se undermine their acceptability. j C Under the Comnussion's Policy Statemera on Safety Goals for the Operations of Nuclear Power l Plan:s, deternumstic licensing cruena are to be observed as the pnmary basis for regulation, but probabilitia I cf signincant damage may be considered as me factor in the licennns decision.
D (
Where the pmbsHhty of sismAcant damage from an eaternal hazard is suf$ciently low, a failure to conform to otherwwe applicable segulator! x{uunmerns may be regarded as de mininus and accepted i' on that basis.
E in an operstmg heense proceeding, a liamsms board is required to give limited consideration to certain unruolved genera issues, as weu as other uncornested safety and amronmental issues.
P A licensms board has jurisdicucn to caduct the requisite review of unresolved generic issues j sad other contened safety and A _ I issues, notwithstanding that it did not espressly reserve such !
junsdzuon in a prior panaal irutial decision which resolved most (although not all) renaming contested j issues.
l O The fonowing techrucal issues are hw Eaternally generated missiles, Probabilistic risk l ==mant Safety goals.
1 i
i i
e
. ,- .e-k' DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFET1f AND LICENSING BOARDS s
LBP-8630 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSlHRE, et al. (Seabinak Station Units 1 and .
- 2) Dneket Nas. 50443 01-1,50444 OL 1 (ASIEP No. 8247102-OL)(Onsite Emergency Planmns and Safety issues); OPERA 11NO UCENSE; Sapasmber 15,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A 1he f haiang Board putially denies and partially grams Applicanss' motion for msnmary disp mains of an inservaar's -6 and ades that wnnan tassimony be presented upon the survwing issue. '.
B. If a medan for sununary d'*r'"6 is Sled shanly befase the heuing is to scannensa and ths r-d= does not === plana that it would be aquired to divers =h====1 sesmuass inun the hearing in esder to maped adequessly, and, in fast, does Ale a respares, the ile=amar Board is not causd upon to
! canader whosher to sur===dly disadas the motion.
t C Section 2.749(a) of 10 CFA anly permits a mapanse to asw facts and argumens pras-aad in a sma==a Aled in support of a masian for sununary _ , .
D . Whos it is the movent, not the appoang peny, which has the burden of showing the absenos of a genuine innse as to any nietssiel feat, if the masian for munniary d=pa=a= is psoperly supporad, the appasusun may not met upon runs allegsmans or deniah; rather, the answer must set farth spesinc facts showma shat these is a genuine issue of fact. Cleveland Electric Blumanstang Co. (Psery Nuclasr Power Plant, Unias I and 2), ALAB-443,6 NRC 741,753 (1977); Virginia Elssaic and Power Cow (Noah Anna Power Station. Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB 584,11 NRC 451,453 (1980).
E Subansmans to the licensing board must be complare and the beard wal ant, and cannat be expected to, sendt for lefaria=haa ,'"y g,ven, or saferenomd, by any pany.
F '!he fouowns induusal issues an d-==d th=it-i Contral Room Desian Review; Safety Paremstar Display Symem.
LBP 8631 COMMONWEAL 111 EDISON COMPANY (Braidwood Nuclear Power Stasian, Uniu I and 2),
Doaket Nos. 504560L,5M57-OL (AS12P No. 79410 03-OL); OPERATING UCENSE; September 18, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A 1 ==amar Banniissues a Mamasunden sad Order amharmns theissumace of a license to Appliams i
so load fuel and oeuhact annain ptearmoslity testing upon a slurvmg that the facility wi11 remain subcrincal without any aliance en ats enemical sysimas thct is in issue in the pr a adear
- B .
Under 10 C.FA 95037(a), e liamme pennamng eenvities shast of Ann-power operanian may be
'l C issued noi Where an
- the pendancy of a osassmed operenne lismiss praa==diap
- ' - far a $50J7(e) license is oppesad, the Lamang board naast deternuns whether any of the contemans abundy adnuned in the penosahng are nievent to the aquened tia=== ud, if they are, make Sadiny under $ 50.57(a) on menes as to whidi thsee is a conmoversy D Where o Ikensing boasd Ands that airsedy ad ==-t cara-naam ase not relevant to the aquested less than-fun-power licanas. the beeni does not make 65037(a) Andings, but autherians the Duecter of Nuciser Reemar Regalauan to do seu E Where; . make no showmg that any schtuned cara-man mens a astery msnar wittt regard to ths aquested fballoedmg and pienriticahty teming license, they have failed to establish that the contention is selevant beennas they have not raised any manars an whidi the beant can make 6ndiny under i 5037(a) adverse to applicant.
LBP 8632 PfDIADEU4HA EU!CIRIC COMPANY (Iarnanck Omnerming Sinnan. Units 1 and 2), Dacket Nos. 50-352-01. 563534X.s OPERATINO UCENSE; Septernbar 5,1986; SUPPII. MENT 10 TitIRD PARTIAL INTTIAL DECISION A In this Supplanes to im Third Pastial Initial Demmon, the Ucensing Bosat resolves a remanded issue conosenrag seasonable assuresas of the avaDahility of bus deven to evacusse studanas in the event cf a radiological maassacy B Liesness's anangernanas fe =====*==g s Pool of 200 or amase bus driven to assist in an ev===aa=
d ihn enhaal dismias, in omny- wnh plans and -- abusdy in plass that would be utilized by
., county and school disaies authoniks, rosas the requusmans of 10 C.PA $ 50.47, and Appendix E to 10 C.FA Part 50, as well as the casaria af NUREO.0654, and sovids i russmeble assuance ihat adequate pnmective messmus for thans school distrias een and will be takan in the event of a radiological 3 amargency j 27
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICI'NSING BOARDS LBP-8633 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Mulland Plars, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 54329 OtAOM, 5433401.AOM (AS!.BP Nos. 78-389-034I. 80 439 02 SP); CONSOUDATED CONSTRUCTION PER.
MIT MODIFICATION AND OPERATING UCENSE; September 26,1986; MEMORANDUM AND OR-DER A Upon monon by Consumers Pbemr Campany to dismiss the operating license (OL) pmceedmg and to terminate the Order of MadiAcanon (OM) pmceeding, the licensing Board Amm== the OM proceeding as moot (subject to a condinen) and defors action an the manon insofar as it seeks daarussal of the OL pear-dias, pending psoperanan by the Staff of an environmersa! and consideration of that
- by pernes and the Board.
B After issuance of a Nonce of Hearing in a pieceedms, e licensing board may knpass terras or canditions on the withd:nwal of an application and dismissal af a pmceeding. Where no hearing is requemed on an application, withdrewel of that applicanon is within thejunsdicucn of the Staff.10 C.PA 62.1M(a).
C The NRC Staff amat prepare an T..A ' Assessment pumuant to 10 C.FA 151.21 on the 4
squested withdrawalef an operating licase applicatiert D A pmesa.hng involving the proposed enforced modi 8 cation of consuuenan permits becomes neat when the NRC Staff 0he party imtially seeking alist under a Modincaden Order) and other panties no longer seek further relief under suda order.
LBP-8634 PUBUC SERY!CE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSIIIRE, et al. (Seabreak Station. Units 1 and 2), Dacket Nos. 50 443-01 1,50 444.OfA (ASIEP Na 82-471-02 OL) (Onsite Emergency Planmns and Safety Issues); OPERA 11NO UCENSE: October 7,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A The Ucanning Board granu Applicams' motion for authorization to issue a license to conduct fuel loading and precnncality testing and authorizes the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to raake appropriate Andings en the manars spect6ed in 10 C.FA 450.57(a) and e issue the requested license.
B An intervencr's status as a pany to the prara=43 does not of itself make it a spokesman for others. Puget Sound Power and Light Co. (Skagit Nuclear Power Project Units 1 and 2), ALAB 556,10 NRC 30,33 (1979).
C Section 50.57(c) at to C FA calls for a one-step procedure - Lo., the Board should consider the position of any party to the estats that his contenuans are islavaat to the activity to be authenzed, and, prior to taking any actimi e a motion. should make 6ndings upon certain mattes set fonk in 10 C.FA 6 50.57(a) as to which thus is such a relevant issue in controvemy.
D A motion Bled by an applicant pusuant to 6 50.57(c) does not p.-w.ny present en opportunity to Als new careenuens (i.a. conunuons not previously $1ed in respa ne to the Comminian's original natice d opportunity for hearing) speciacaDy aimed at low power ,esting PadAc Ons and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Uniu 1 and 2), CU 815,13 NRC 361,362 0981); Paci5c Oss and Ehetric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nucisar Power Plara, Units : and 2), AIAB 728,17 NRC 777,801 n.72 (1983). Any submissica pmposms late-Ela1 contentims must addams certain factors.
LBP-8635 RADIOLOGY ULTRASOUND NUCLEAR CONSULTANTS. PA (Stmnnurn 90 Applicator),
Dacket No. 3412688 MLA (ASLBP Na 87-54201-MIA); MATERIAIJ UCENSE AMENDMENT; October 23,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
, A In a materials license proceeding where the Commissaan authorized an informal hearing on the NRC Staff's denial of an application, the Pasiding OfAcer requests (1) the NRC Staff to make available canain documerns to the Applicant, and (2) $e Applicant to povide a statemas of the claims it seeks to adjudicate.
B Even though a particular informal hearing is not governed by the cornention requuements set in 10 C.FA 12.714(a), an applicara should be guided by those requiremares in somns fonh the claims it seeks to litigata.
LBPLl&36 IDNO ISLAND UOllTING COMPANY (Shorehsen Nuclear Power Statim, Unit 1), Dacket Na 50 322 01 3 (ASLBP Na S&533 01 OL); OPERATING UCENSE; Oc6.er 29,1986; CIARIFYING DECISION ON REMAND A In suspanse to the mmsed of the Appeal Bosni,in ALAB447,24 NRC 412 (1986), the Ucmising Ikard clan 6es its daria-t an the omrutaring of evacuses in IJP 85 31,22 NRC 410 (1985), reaching the same decasum, that the acond is unclear as to how the mospam center can --- ' te the evacuees of the 28 i
L*
, . si -f ,
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND IJCENSING BOARDS I
yeaal popdanan who will ensk mantenna and pmcasang and this a==ia== a defoot in the Applicant's emaryncy plan. .
1 LBP.8636A 1EXAS Ul1IJTIES EI2CTRIC COMPANY, et al (Comanche Peak Sisse Dectne Station, Unit 1). Dadet No. 50445-CPA (ASIEP No. 8652842 CPA); CONS 1RUCTION PERMTT AMENDMENT; i October Sn.1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER .
A The 1 L===r Board adenes a ==a-naa Sind in napane to a C_ - damsimi =p1==uas a as" Pancqpis sevennas pennit ===a= cases. .
l B In a enestrucnan permit =amaia= pmessding, e omaannon that aDays hath that Apphcants l
wiBfuDy fausd to omnplats their plant en time without a valid papass and that they have not A=a==t-i and :=paa e-I heirt policy,is ena==*ively admissible. ,
C When huerveness had made tirnely aft r== and had then Elad a new womie of thans .n.g.n-. .
in suspense to a t'a==- decision that explained a new legal penciple, this new vession is timely and
.Aa a.i.
~
'D The Bond mfused so admit a -a==<= differing bese an =A-=~i ~==esaa only in that u sisand the party's position about sous ; I suliny.
E % Based innsepas Comnusman pmoodsat ca==enssa the - ' 1. of a-=a-na= in con-annacuan pennit en==ian praa==tiar P It is proper so litients en =11=r=*ia= that Apphemes have failed to repmbans an ausend psior policy to delay ' witheir. a valid n=- pupass.
O Since the needy evadable in a comanucnen pennit case is diffsent fmm thaj in an opnating L==
case and since the ; ' ' pasuus of the two cases also is diffmans, a comentian may be adnuned in a construction permit extenman cans even if a simuar ~===iae is litigabis in the related operating license case.
. LBP-8637 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OFINDIANA,INC., and WABASII VALI2Y POWEk ASSOCI-ATION,INC. (Marble Hin Nucisar Osnamung Staien, Unies I and 2), Dadat Nas. 50 5d60L,50 5474L (ASL3P Na 83 48742 0L); OPERATINO UCENSE; November 3,1986; MEMORANDUM AND OR. ':
DER TERMINA11NO OPERATING LICENSE PROCEEDINO A Whose an Ananis Sefesy and 1 namaanny Band has beam d=r==lt o rule an penniens forlesse to knarvene in a hessing en en - " fer a facGity apeeang license, to issue any notias of hearing as ths
- apphemman, and to paeside cier any sudt hearing; and whose p=aa== to inserwes have been fund but have not been gassed by the Ucsanns Boasd pending a decision en ths --af aemasibis ===='a==; and whee a notino of hearing has not ben issued at the tims tbs apphcant moves to terrmans the opermang license Mr a licensing bend has nol under 10 C.F.R. 6 2.107(a) to ass ibe tenns en the wuhdrawet of the appiumsian for an opmanns liamsm LBP.8637A SUPf0UC COUNTY AND STATE OF NEW YORK MOTION 1D RESCIND RECONFITTU-110N OF BOARD BY OHEP ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE COTTER (Shossben Nuciser Power Station.
Unit 1), A312P No. 87 54341 Misc 4 OPERA 11NO UCENSE; Nevernbar 7,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A In this Memoranden and Oraer, the Chief f ' _ Judge of the Asarnic Safety and i ta==gs Board Penal denies Imarvenam' manian to y=riadt he =~==ianiant of a Liamens Board.
B h Chid Admuustranve Judge is responsible for appaumang a new member to a licanning board when a anning member beanness unavailable, whether å er aAsr a hearing, and the isnn "unevailabis" applies when a board member's obliganans to a case candict internauy er wah the n==h=r's obligenans to another essa C The desisica is a board or cases a new cas hi an peacular case is solely a maner d
, agency h Absent sans evid===, of an impseper sancise of that dismenen, the desimien is simply ,
not ope to goesnaa j LBP.86 38 PHILADEUHIA EGCIREC COh@ANY (!Junenct r' . Semaism. Units 1 and 2), Desket !
Nos. S3520L,50 353-014 OPERA 11NG UCENSE; Nevernbar 10, 1986; SUPPLEMENT TO THE IOUltDI PARTIAL INT!1AL DECISION RELA 11NG TO THE REMANDED CONTENIION REGARD-
_ . _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ __ a
m I
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS INO MANPOWER MOBIUZATION AT Tl!E STATE CORRECHONAL INST!Tifr!ON AT ORATER-ICRD A In this Supplement to the Fourth PartialInitial thaa, the L!aensing Board resolves a remanded issue in favor of the Applicant, fading that arrangemess in place at the State CanectionalInstitutices at Orsierford for the notincsLion and mobaisation of off-duty correctaanal of6 cam in the event of a indiological emergency at the Ilmend Osnerstag Station axe adequase and mest the requuements of NRC regulations, LBP 86 38A IDNO ISLAND UOffrING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Statica, Unit 1), Docket Now 50 322 Ob5 (AS!JP No. 86 53341-OL) (EP Isemise); OPERATING UCENSE; na-h- 11 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A ' In the proceedms oncerning the essscise of the Applicant's affaias energency maponse plan.
IJcensing Baant rules an a inesian for res===darsuon Aled by PEMA obractma to the acope of the psoceeding, objections to the denial of censin comannens filed by Innerveness, esules diffuseness of opinion among the panies omarmns which cenersions had been admiusd, and denies Imarveness' motion that it i lads cannpseance to make the above rulings.
B ne fact that a hemising baard has been noenstuuted dass not render the bond : to
, ads an objections to an anler issued prior to roomstuution. While the new membas of the boent connat ;
I '
know what was in the minds of the formerinaces, the reconstunted board remains lessay P to decide au manas within hs junsdictaan.
C Whsse a party maintains that en emannse of an anws%*lan was the "fWl-participation saarcias" called far by 10 C.P.R. Pan 50, Appendia E, S IV.P 1, '
Aes that the scope of the exercise was too linused to mest that requuernent are admissible.
LBP-86 39 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Midland Plant, Units and 2), Docket Nas. 50 329 OL, 543340L (ASLBP Na 78-389 00 OL); OPERATING UCENSE; December 17,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A no Ucensing Board authansas the NRC Staff to permit Consumes Power Co, to withdrew its '
application for operstag licenses, and dannusses the aparating license pseaadmg B De following uchnicalissue is d-ad R ' imrects of withdrawal of OL applice-tian.
12P-840 BABCOCK AND WI1rOX (Pasha Township, Pennsylvania, Volume I aduccan Pecuity), Dodet
& 74364 MLA (ASLBP h 815 51101 ML); MA1ERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; December 23, 19ll6; DECISION A In this Demmen in an informal hearing involving an appliestian far an aW to a meterials liaanse to authense the aparanen of a Volunw Reduction Servisca liscility (VRSP) teilizing a high-fonce compostar and an iaana=sier to reduce the vahune of nanamnbusuble and combusabh low-level reAa=Mvo womes gasensed by medical facGisies, ressandiir-aa= industry, and nuclear power planas, the Preadmg Ofscar enhannes inanadiese issuance of the liaanse amendman to allow opension af the esmpaner, but
' nales that the NRC Staffis enhensed to issue the licanes amendmars to allow at==*iaa of the iariaarstar -
anly after canain condmans have been met, the rnast significas of whidiis that additional testing naast demonstrate clearly that the incinerator will perfonn to the mandants adapted by the Usenses to protect the public henhh and safety.
B The following technicalissues are discussed: Operstian of compactor and incinarstar, release of.
aritium, carbon-id, and I 125 by the VRSP and their heshh effects; release af dionins by the incinarster and their henhh effecis; penfarinance of the scrubben, IIEPA Alters, and chascoal adsarber in the incinerator exhaust stack; accidents that could accur wuh the incinerstar and their conesquences; and amargency plan of the Lacenses.
LBP 841 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et aL (Vasde Elecane Generstmg Plant, Uniu ! and 2), Docket Nos. 54424-0I 54d25 OL (ASLBP No. 54 499-01 OL); OPERATING LICENSE; December 23,198(4 CONCLUDING PARTIALINf!IAL DECISION
, A In this concluding petialinitial decision 6ading that Ha== amhermng opersums of the Vogde i me Osnmuting Plus should be imund, de Board ands thm Applicans have provided assursace that cannin models of solenced valves that me used to perform safety related funcuans are amruunentaDy
? quahAed.
t 33 I
DIGESTS ISSUANCE OF TIIE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDOE AIJ-86 3 EDWARD WALLACE (Three Mae taland Nuclear Staum, Umt 1), Docket Na 50-289-EW (ASIEP Na 86 531&SP); SPECIAL PROCEEDINO; August 19, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND OR-DER TERMINAL?'O PROCEEDING AND REMOVINO NOURCATION REQUIREMENTS AS TO EDWARD Wall.AG M.
31
.._...m_ . . _ . . - -
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS DD-16 8 ARIZONA PUB 1JC SERVICE COMPANY, et at (141o Verde i4. Hest Oeneredng Stadon, Unit 2), Docket No. 54529; REQUEST FOR ACTION; Ady 1,1986: DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA 6 2.206 A The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Reguladon dcnies the Peuuon subrniued by Barbara S. Bush and Myron L Scott on behalf of the Coalition for Responsible Energy Educadon asserdng that there caists at Palo Verde Nuclear Genersdng Sianon (PVNGS) a condmung panern of managenaUnmmpetence and administradve failures that will adversely affect safe conduct of the operauon of PVNGS Unit 1 B SAIS reports roudnely iderdify denciencies in the performance of construcuan, pre operations, and operadons acuvincs at nuclear power plants and the mere idenuncadon of a need for increased attendon to specine denciencies does not necessarily give rise to sigmacant safety concerns. licensees do not have bad SAIP ratsgs and the SALP report dc6ciencies relied upon by Poutioner accordingly do not provide a basis for estabhshmg management incompetence by Licensees, C There is insuf6cient evidence to support Petitioner's claim that the vanous rate proceedings, audits, reviews. and lawsuits currently affecting PVNGS will produce unsafe condiuons. Utilities are typically
, involved in per'ceedings of this natum,
, D Oiven the magnitude of construction, pre-operadons, and operations acuvities associated with-completing, testv4, and opersung three nuclear power plaras (one in construcson, one in startup, and one in operation), the brnited nurnber of danciencias cited by Peunoner does not give rise to sigmficant safety concerns.
DD86-9 WISCONSIN ELECTRIC FOWER COMPANY (Pbm Beach NuclearPlant, Units 1 and 2) Docket
, Nos. 54266, 50401; REQUEST FOR ACTION; July 14, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA i1206 A The Acting Dutctor of the Office of Nuc! car Reactor Reguladon denies the petition of the Wisconsin Envuonmemal Decado asserung that there were a number of alleged dc6ciencies at the Point Beadi Nuclear Plant of the Wisconsm Electnc Pbwer Company associated with envuunmental quahncadon of electncal equipment that represented a hazard to condnued safe operadon of the facihty.
B The Licens a's program for environmental qualincauan of electncal equipmera complies with the requusments of 10 C.F.R. 6 50.49. Pmposed resoludans for each of the environmental de6ciencies idanuSed are acceptable. The Licentm has completed implernentadon of its program and followup inspecunns have con 6rmed this fmding.
DD-86-10 TIIE DETROfr EDISON COMPANY, et al. (Enrico Fermi Atornic Power Plant, Unit 2),
Docket No. 54341; REQUEST ICR ACTION; July 29, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA 6 2.206 A The Director of the Of6co of Inspecdon and Enforcanent denice a peution Sled by Jennifer Puntenney en behalf of the Safe Energy Coalidon of Michigan. The petition requested that the Canmission ukis immediate action to require Licenses to show cause why its license should not be revoked in light of the allegadens set forth in the paidort.
B The choice of remedice for detfing wuh violations of reguladons amilicense requuemerna rests wahin the sound discrenan of the Nuclear Regulatory Comnussiert.
D&8611 GENERAL EECTRIC COMP /.NY (Wilmington, North Camlina Factlity), Dncket No. 741113; REQUEST FOR ACTION, August 29,1986; PAR 11AL DIRECTOR'S DECISION PURSUANT TO 10 CFA (1206 33
s l
l l
DIGESTS '
ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS -
A 1he Duector, Of5ce of insperden and Enforaurnent, dames in part a g=u Aled pumannt to 10 C.FA $ 1206 by Vere M. English (Petationer). -
B The Putinaner, in part, repassed the Ntclent Ragatsna=y Camemasion (NRC) to impone a:ivil
! penalues against then====t Electna Canyany (GB er Licenses) for alleged senaus violations occuning at ins Wilniington, Nesth Carolane fuel fabriostaan facility. SpamAcally, ths Paationer aufesed to NRC inspection repens and argued that certain e=eh== in thans sepans wose in enor.1he Petitioner requested that the try= *i- supets be wishdown and be :=ia===t with the apprapnais Nations of Violation and Proposed Impeastian of Civi1 Panakies.1he Petitimer also reipesand that a hearing be odiothdad to inquise
! inna these meners.
C . The Direeter sowiewed menenes inspasman supet Andings and =td=1 aHagemens sessnhng public health and safety and aanstuded that the alief aquested in the Pentian with repud to than was inappropriate, f D Caamid==*iaa of senein other " . yaany =11=gan== af wrongdoing by the IJeanses i and aDegenens that the 13esness Am=====ned against the Patsioner and athan la violatie af I 210 of the
'l Energy " _ : Ast dIF14, as ==== lad, have been defened estu the NRC's OfBee afInvestigations e
and the U1 Depenness of labor aangisis their eview of the issues mined.
f E 1he NRC and the P o
- fIAber have egned to ceanknees and soaperste semaerning the i enplayne peasacam pnmaans of $210 of the Energy Rampaa-ei= Act of 1974. Osneauy, when a cianplaint has been Aled with the Depanema of Labor aussing discununenen by an NRC lienness, the NRC defes comederation af the inauer until the P, of labor has acted.
I I: TJnder ths NRC Enfesonnant Policy, civil penaines are not poposed for Severity isvel !Y violanens j unless sudi violances ese similar to psevious vicindens for which the th has failed to take effectiva
, conostive action er ase wtDAd.
I O CivH penskans ase not proposed for Severity level V viatanaam in the a8==a= af wiufulness.
DD.M 12 PAC &lC OAS AND ELPA.TRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plat, Uniis ! sad 2),
D.det Nos. 54275,50 323; REQUEST JOR AC!lON; Seposenbar 30,1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.P,R. 52.206 A The Duestar of Nuclear Reacter Reedecnan denies a sequest by the Government a-==bility i Projast. Aled an behalf of Timothy J. O'NeG1 and James L. McDonnea, that Auther tia==eing actions -
! be defened or the tienness be ==p==4d for the Diablo Canyan facilines pendans s==ataaaa af numeaus at1=g=== af 'a=d=& design, esmarumaan, and man =r==== af the feedities and inanadanas af p==aaa=1
. by Unises menessmess. -
l DD 8613 SEQUOYAH PUEIA CORPORATION (Ome, Oklahoms Encility). Docdist No. 448027; RE.
l QUEST IUR ACf1Cf 4; thaahar 15,1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA (2.206
- A The Dunstar ofib Of5ao ofInspasman and Enfusannes danes pennens Alad by the Government i t A-==Mi y Pmject a beunit of Native A- far a Clean Envumusant Client CaecG and cshess, A kansas Punos Canser, the Nananal Wasar Camar, and t'iei====' Aanon far a Safe L _ . sepasung enforcement action by the NRC assinat Sapoyah Punis Capasstion. The Petitiones based their requeses for
! salief upon issues aneing fourn en annident that acconed at the Sequoyah Psals facuity in Ome, Oklahana, en January d.1986, rad upon issus associsted with the history of the facuity and the f le===='s daspamaan
! cf hs weste produces. In denyms the sequested miiaf, the Direciar desarmaned that the actions neoussary to protect the public hashh and safety already have been taken and that the IJcensse's dispostian of hs wastes
} and its asnarat history do not seSect an inabili y to comply with regulatory sequirunents or provide a basis for granting the specinc requested relief.
B A squest for a soview of NRC regulanens to doesnruns the sufAciency and adequacy of regulatory
, canarons at a liamised lesility fans outside of the scope of mauses usunUy cosidend under 10 C.FA 51206.
C Mamme that as the subjaat of admanasustive prossedings are not appsopnose for annedmetian in a 6 2.206 prousedms Masenver, the 61206 pseneshim is not evealahne to seek reliefin a mener whose another fanen is evenable even if de p=*na=== ase not pernas in the psonemhng in the other fanen.
D Whsse no spanina fasanal basis is psovided by p=an==== to suppost a clairn. Auther inquiry nesd not be made.
E Sections 2.109 and 40A3(b) af 10 C.FA provide that in any case in which a f h==== bas Aled an - - for renewal of he licamme at least 30 days prior to the empisation of the L-== such licensa e
ss w-__._ad.__- .--.u-- _ - - m-_ _.-- - - - - -
e DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS 8
sha!! aun aspire until applicadon for nnewat has fmally been determmed by the Comndasian. This is in accordance with the pnxecuans affonied by 6 9(b) of the Admuustrative Procedure Act,5 U.S.C. 9558(c).
F h is within the Staff's enforcemera discreden to detennine that funher effort to pursue the issue of a material false statement is not wananted where the statement was made 16 yeam earlier and there was a lack of reliance upon the statement by the NRC.
O Absent a aquest fm a hearing e a matter other than a facility consuuction permit application, there is no regarement that me be held.
H Not every violade of the Comnusabr/s regulanons or licenses canpels suspesim or revocation of alicensa 1 A hearing is not required as a maner d right where a licmseo agrees to suspend hcra,ed operations. Nor is thes a right to a hearms on lifting a suspension.
DD 8&l4 PIIILADELPl!IA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1), Docket Na 50-352; REQUEST ICR ACTION; October IA 1986; DIRECTOR'S DEC1110N UNDER 10 CSA 52.206 A Re Duector d the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation declines to take action based upon the aneged failure by Philadelphia Electric Company (Licmsee) to comply with certain __.a.111 cess condaions imposed on the Ucenson's Limerick Generating Stanon, Unit 1. On March 5,1986, Robert L Anthony (Peutimer) requested that the NRC suspend the operating licanas for the Umcrick facility, alleging that the facility milinA cooling wata frorn the Schary1 kill River in violation of the facility's Envummental Protection Plan (EPP). Findmg that the Petitimer did not provide facts or specific informauen that showed that the Licenses failed to undertake its obliganons in this regard, the Duector denied relief.
DD-8&l5 CAROUNA POWER & UGiff COMPANY and NORTil CAROLINA EASTEILN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (Shearon llams Nuclear Power Plant), Docket Na 54400; REQUEST FOR ACHON; October 15,1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CIA $2.206 A Re Duects of Nuclear Reactor Regulation denies a request by the Coalitian for Alternatives to Shearon llams (CASit) that he initista a show-cause pt== ding pursuant to 10 CSA 41202 to require Carabna Ibwer & Ught Company to address a number of issues before issuana of the operaur a license for the Shearm flams facility.
B Partise to an operating license proceedmg may not use 10 CSA 51206 petitions to recmader issues previously decided or to avtad an susting forurn wbme they are more logicaDy pesented General Publie Util2ies Nuclust Corp (Thres Mile taland Nuclear Statim Umts 1 and 2; Oysrer Creek Nuclear Gmeranns Station). CU-85-4,21 NRC 5610985).
C The Pouuoners' assertions about the suitability d the 10-mile EPZ, wuhout any reference to specific facts or circumstances mique to the Shearm flams facility, are essentially a thaDanse to the Commission's amargency plamring mgulauons, and a painaa under 10 CSA 61206 fm enfortxrnas actum cannot be used as a substitute is a peution for rulemaking. General Electric Co. (Vaneciaos Nuclear Carner), DD 79 9, 9 NRC 744,753 (1979); Conn.onweahb Edism Ca (Laf ane County Station, Units I and 2), DD'84-6, 19 NRC 891,897 (1984). De spropsata vehicle to seek a change to the. Commission's requirements is a petitims fm rulamaking filed in accordance with 10 CSA I 2.802.
D The following technical issue is discussed: Inserves inspectmn of reactor coolars pipmg welda.
DD-8616 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY'S BOIUNO WATER REACTORS; REQUEST ICR AC-110N; November 6,1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CfA 12.206 ;
A The Duector of Nuclear Reactor Regulation denice a request by Mr. Marvm Lewis that au boihng j water reactor plants be shut down until resoluuan of all remdual heat removal (RFR) system problerns j described in four Commissim documana.
B To warrant sa eder shmung down all boilms weier reacices pending resolution of four surelated RHR system probierns at omtain plants, aabstanual health or safety probierns affecting au such plants mum be raised Consobdated Edison Co. af Now York naha Point, Uruts 1,1 and 3), CU-75-8,2 NRC 173, 176 (1975); Washington Public Pbwer Supply Systen (WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2), DDL84-7,19 NRC 599,923 09841 C The following tectuucal issue is d-W: Residual Heat Ranovel (RHR) Systems.
DD.86-17 1DLEDO EDISON COMPANY (Dsvis Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), Docks No. 50-346; REQUEST POR AC!1ON; November 19, 1986; D[ RECTOR'S DECISION PURSUANT 1010 CfA $2.205 38 i
l l
l I
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS A The Director of the Of5ce of Inspection and Enforcemers declines to take action based upon he alkand failure of the Toledo Edisen Company (Ucensee) to comply with the Nuclear Regulatory-Carradssion's (NRC) emergency planning regulations with regard to the DevwBessa Ni:x. lear Power Sta*m.
B Two petitions was canadered by the Director. Do Aret pension was submiusd on October 24, 19H, by the State of Ohia h second pention was submiaed on October 28,1986, by the Toledo Coalitim for Safe Energy and Susan A. Carter. Both petaians opposed restart of the Davis-Besse facility whids was then shut down far faciuty modt6catims.
!' C The Dunctor seveswed the oversu state of emergeiey planning for the Davis-Besse facility including j the speciAc concerns raised by the Patmanass. h Andmas of the Fedeel Emergency t' .
- Agency (FEMA) with regasd to Devis-Besse wee also canadaed. De Duector concludsd that, based upon the
{ lengthy overmals and review of emergency planning effons at Davis-Bases by bath the NRC and FEMA.
1 including oansideration of the issues raised in the peritions, energency preparedness planning for the facility is adequais.
! D While thee can be danciencias in the energency planning and preparadama associated with a nuclear facihty, there must be sufRcient compliance to 6nd that thee is ressanabl.a assurance that adequate
- I protecdve measuses can and wiH be taken in a radiological emagency.
DD.86-18 ARIZONA PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY, et al. (Palo Verde Nuclear (knerating Station, Unit 1),
Docket Na 54528; REQUEST IOR ACITON: Navernher 20.1984 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA 62.206 A The Dunctor of the Of6ce of Nus' car Reactor Regulatian daties the petition of the Coalitiert far Responsible Energy Education (CREE) ausging that the integratnd lesk-rate ters (ILRT) performed for the containmora at Unit 1 of the Palo Verde Nuclear Gena 3 ting Station (PVNGS) was de6cient The petition sought relief in the farm of service w the Arizona Public Service Company of an Order to Show Cause, pursuant to 10 C.FA 12.206, why the operating licanas fa PVNGS Una 1 should not be suspa ded and the PVNGS Unit I containment orected immediately rossied in accordance wuh federal regulations. The Director concluded that the anegations raised by CREE were cat valid and that the PVNGS Unit I test was successfully performed in accordance with the Commission's requimments.
,i s
l 4
J l
1
^) ,
__._.._______._________________________m___ J
v ,
E
?
DIGESTS ISSUANCE OF DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEMAK!NO DPR.4862 POIllmON AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBILMS, INC., Docket No. PRM-516; June 20, 1986; DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING A The Comnussion denies a peuuan for rulemaking which requested that the Commission amend its envuonmattal pmtecdon regulauons for domeanc licanamg and related agulatory functions to require the preparadon of an ermronmental impact steusnent on the genanc environmanalimpacts of high-burnup nuclear fuel as used in caner.rcial neclear reactus, stored in spent fuel pools or cooling racks, or potentially as proccued in sepincessing plants or disposed of in permanait waste disposal s.tes. De peution is derned because the requested a nendment is unnecessary smce the regulations already p ovide an adequate basis for the preparnuon of an environmental impact statement.
B De followmg technical issue is discussed: ILgh-burnup nuclear fuel.
DPRM-86 3 JOf fN F. DOIIEKrY, Docket Not PRM 5440; June 20,1986; DENIAL OF PETrrION FOR RUIIMAKING -_
A The Nuclear Regulatory Comnussion (NRC) denies a petition fw ruinnaking filed by John F. Doherty, he Poutioner requested that the Commission arnax!its regulancas so require that, foUowing a power reactor trip, a licenses, if unable to determine the cause of the reactor tnp in I hours, be reqtured to place the reactor in cold shutdown pending funher suady of the avait. De pension is denied because issues raised by the Petiuoner are bems resolved as a result of accons already taken by the NRC.
DPRM-86 4 NUCLEAR tmLrrY BACKITrl1NO AND REFORM OROUP, Docket No. PRM 5436; October --
3,1986; DENIAL IN PART OF PETmON IOR RULEMAKING A ne Nuclear Regulatory Cornmission is deny.ng in part the petition for rultaruking filed by the Nuclear Unlity Badditting and Reform Group that petitions the h1C to modify repwting requimments imposed on its licensees and arplicants for nuclear power plant consuuction pernuts. De peution discusses eight issues of concern that would require amendments to 10 CSA Parts 50 and 73. Two of the Pee:ioner's emcean have been granted and two others are bang daued The rematrung four are being constdered and wiu be addressed in pendmg pmposed rulemakings.
B Changes to secunty or safeguards e6scuveness plans can have a signdicant impact on the ,
=
pubbe hulth and safety. The subminals of these changes to the Commission wiu remain pursuant to 10 CSA $ 50A6(p), mdun 2 months of the change beug made.
C Pursuant to 10 CSA 6 50.54(q), licensece may not implement proposed changes that decrease the effecuveness of approved emergui.cy plans mthout the Commission's approval Changes that do not decrease the effecuveness of these plans may be made mthout approval, provided that the NRC is informed of the change mdun 30 days after i: is made.
D Pursuant ta 10 CIA 150.55(e), holders of consuucuan permits must neufy the NRC within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of each deficiency in design and constructam which, if it were not corrected, would adversely affect dw safety of operauons anyume diroughout the espected hfeums of the plant. Followup of thy inidal rm$ cation in wnung is required within 30 days.
E ne seporung requimnents imposed by 10 CSA 5 50.59(b) enable the Commissinn to perform reviews of the changes to a facihty and to deterrrate if these changes adversely impaa the pubbe health and safety. Reliance on submittals under 10 CEA 150.71 whkh requires a licensee periodica2y to update the Final Safety Analysis Report, would not allow a conunual review of the safety ranufwsuons caused by these changes and hence could adversely affect the public health and safety.
37
i e-- ,,
'J 3
11; l
' DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING l
I F . Pusuant to 10 C.F.R. 6 73.71, heensees must (de a wntten report of unaccounted-for shipmans, j suspected thefts, unlawful diverson, radiological sabotage, or events that signiAcandy threaten or lessen the effectiveness of safeguards, within 15 days after the intual verbal report.
DPRM-865 Tile STN!E OF WISCONSIN, Docket Na PRM 7110; October 10, 1984 DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING
! A The Nuclear Regulatory Canunission (NRC' denies a petition for rulemaking (ded by the State of Wiscanan. De Penrieer requemed that the NRC espand the scops of its agulations pertaining to spent ,
nuclear fuel transport"to answo that both the need for and the safety and omrt.tmetal canesquences of psopaned stupmeras have been canadered in a public fonun prior to approval ofihn shipment and route? ne NRC concludes that the new pr-h mquested in the peution is not justified by the arguments presmued in the petition when canadered togssher with the views and argumems of ciher pemens who commented on l the potation and in light of sapariance, testing, analysis, and other information. %e Comnussion concludes
{ that its esisting regulation d the - ,
- of spent -tane fuel, when viewed in the consent of the
-l cambmed psogreens of the NRC, the t' . of Transportation (DOT) and Energy (DOE), the Federal
{ Emergency Managenent Agency (FEMA), and the States,is sufficient to provide adequais assurance assinst
- unressanable risk to the hashh and safasy of die public.%e Comnussion also tencludes that the procedures l suggested in the petiden would net significantly serve to improve the protection of the public against j teuessonable risk frasi tin teenspostation of radianctive materials.
DPRM 86-6 LIL11AN McNALLY, Dodet Na PRM $437; October 20,1984 DENIAL OF PEITTION FOR .
! RUIIMAKINO A %e Executive Dire:ter far Operations (EDO), awns under the authority of $1A0(o) d da Commissian's regulations, denies the peution submitted by Ms. f ittima McNally which requested (1) removal of deutenum (hydrogen isosape of mass 2) and tridum (endicactive bydrogen isotope of mass 3) from reactor sysians and (2) termination of the recombination of hydrogen and oxygen in reactor systens.
i B The petition is denied w= (1) deuterium present in the reactor coolant is act the major soun:o 1 of tridum in light-water-coolnd nuclear reactors. Q) tatium releases to the environment imm nuclear power plants are already es low as is asesonably achievable u defined by Appendia I to 10 C.FR. Part 50, and Q) recornbination of hydrogen and osygen is necreaary to reduce waste gas volumes and reduos the potential for hydmgan-oxygen empkave reactions.
C The Nadanal P*== Discharge Ehnunauen System, esented by the Federal Water Pollution Caned Act Amenenenas of 1972, does not deal with tritionwa=== that substance is agulated under the - 6 Atarnie Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
-$l D De phrase "Q) attain the widmet angs of benancial uses of the u without degrada.
J tien, risk to hashh at asfety, or other undesunble and smhuanded canesquence . " ($ 101(b)Q), 42
{ -
E U.S.C. Id331(b)Q)) repneenes a nadatal goal, not a statusary requinsnent.
Under l!.dO(o) of 10 C.P.R. Pan 1 "Statemes of Organias.lan and General information," die j l Executive Dueciar for Cpassions has euthanty to deny any petition for rulemaking of a atmar or nonpolicy '
l nature when the grounds for denial do not substenia!!y modify an exisung p-i F Discharges of tritium from operating nue' ear power resciam are "as now as is reasonably achievable" as evidenced by (1) the low individual dases from truium, (2) the low collective (population) dames associated I i with the tntium ralenses, and Q) the inability to justfy use of addnianal control tedinology to reduce tridum i
effluents. Canesquandy, the Petinanor's ruques for funhar aducuans is not considered to be " reasonably achievable" O Section II.D cf Appendia I requires addidonal efflues conmd technology to be added if the added )
l cost of contral divided by the magnanada of the anticipstod redactaan in collecuve (populaticei) dose does not exceed $1000 per parenn-sun noused. De most cost effeedve techmque for intium contml has a cost af $5300 per persea-run reduced and, ahhough not requued under Appeedia f.,is passendy used in canain pressurized weier maceas, 11 %e P=**===r's request to tarannais the practice of - . hydenenn and amygen was darued boosues (1) the uneenbined hydrogen and asyge am pan ==11y emplosive and Q) the incmased gas volumes that would susult if thsee gases wese not recambined could adversely afect the heidup and decay of esher redinactive gases and inemass the alense of these gases to the a L
.4 I
i
.h i 3e l
i t . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ . _ - - - - _
l
- , ; e 11 DIGESTS . 'l IS$UANCES OF DENIAL OF PPTITION FOR RULEMAKING
(> ~ Tririated water is controlled by existing NRC regulations because it can be a beahh concern in adicient quantisis.
J Deuiarimu is naisher sowne, special nuclear, nor bypeduct material segulated by the NRC under -
the Atomic Energy Act. h NitC could, however, insulate this substance under its anneal authority to
segulate , ' " and unhah face'Aias.
d 5
i
~l I
S l
I l,
l N
1
_m____.____ _mm__ -_________. _ _ - _ _ _m_ _ _ _ _.__ _ _ _
o i
S.
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Alabams Pbwer Co. v. Cosda,636 F.2d 323,357 (D.C. Cir.1979)
Commission authonty to grant esempuans from reguladas; CLI 8&24,24 NRC 774 n.10986)
Amencan Mming Congress v. nornas,772 F.2d 617, cert denied. 54 U.S.LW,3790 (June 2 1986) conformance of NRC requirements to EPA standards; CL1-8t>23,24 NRC '/07 n.3 (1980 ;2s Amencan Mming Congress v. nomas,772 F.2d 640 (10th Cir.1985), cert. derdad 54 U.SLW. 3??0 (June 2, er'+
1986) cmformance of NRC requiremanu to EPA standards; CW.86-23,24 NRC 707 n.3 0986)
Artzona Public Semco Co. (Palo Verde Nuclear Gcnerating Stanon, Uruts 1,2, and 3), AIAB 711,17 Ni ;
0 983) cannotadon of appeal board affirmance on sua sponto review; AIAB-849,24 NRC 524 0986)
Babcock & Wilcon (Parks Township, Pennsylvania, Volume Reducson Facihty), LBP.8619, D NRC 825,842 (1986) type of oral presentations allowed in informal proceedmas; CLI.8&l7,24 NRC 497 n.5 (1986)
BAM liiatone Disinct Ass'n v. Koch,723 F.2d 233,237 (2d Cir. It'83) constitutionally protected irserests relevant to materials license arnendment: CLI-8617,24 NRC 496 0 986)
Boston Edison Co. (Pilgnm Nuclear Power Statim), CLI-8216,16 NRC 44,4546 (1982), aff'd, Belloni
- v. NRC,725 F.2d 1380,1382 (D.C. Cir.1982) scope of adjudicatory proceedma relating to enforcement action: CL18&l9,24 NRC 512,514 (1986) l
' Bowman Transportadon,Inc. v. Arkansas Best Fright Systems,Inc.,419 U.S. 281,296 0974) reason for sinngency of Comrrussim standards for reopenmg; C1186 22,24 NRC 691 n.3 (1986)
BPI v. AEC,502 F.2d 424 (D.C. Cir.1974) heanns rights on iequests for caempuans from reguladons; C1186-24,24 NRC 774 (1986)
Bradley v. Richmond School Board,416 U.S. 696,711 (1974) catena for detenrunmg mouans to reopen; CLI.8618,24 NRC 506 0986)
Braniff Master Esecuuve Council of the Air Line Pdots Ass'n Int'l v. CAB,693 F.2d 220,227 (D C. Cir.1982) consicHrations m determmmg penahy for sa par,e communicadori; ALAB 840,24 NRC 62 0986)
Carolina ber & Ught Co. (Shearon Ilarns Nuclear Power Plant), ALAB.837,23 NRC 525,5310986) i l
appellate standard fw ovenurnmg a lacensms board's findings of fact; ALAB-843,24 NRC 209 (1986);
! AIAB.856,24 NRC til (1986)
Camlina Power & Ilght Co. (Shearon llarns Nuclear Power Plant), ALAB.E37, M NRC 525,542 n.58 (1986) rists of one intervenor to appeal njecuans of another vuervmor's cornennons; AIAB-856,24 NRC 805 (1986)
Carolina her & Ught Co. (Shearon Harns Nuclear Power Piant), AIAB.837,23 NRC 525,54243 n.58 (1986) parues who may appeal decisions adverse to them; ALAB-845,24 NRC 252 0986) standing of individual to raise gnevances of ciiher parues on appeal; ALAB.843,24 h1C 203 n.3 0986)
Carolins Power & Ught Co. (Shearon llarns Nuclear Power Pant) AIAB.843,24 h7C 200,203 n.3 (1986) right d one unervenor to appeal rejecums of another imervenor's contenuans; AIAB.856,24 NRC 805 098?)
41
- e I.
i i
l l
l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES 1
Carolina Power & IJaht Co. (Shearon !!arns Nuclear Poww Plam), LBP-8549,22 NRC 899,90810 (1985),
i aff'd, ALAB 843,24 NRC 200 0986) j extent d de6ciencias in emergency prepandassa necessary to bar esemption from requirement for fuu-panicipatim emergency esercue: CLt4424,24 NRC 775 n.6 0986)
Oncinnad Oss and Electric Ca (William IL Zimmer Nuclear Power Staden, Unit 1), AIAB-727,17 NRC 760 (1983) i litigability of adequacy of commercial telephee circuita during an emergency; ALAB-845,24 NRC 230 l l
l (1986) j t
Cincinnad Oss and Electric Ca (William IL Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Unit 1), CU 82 36,16 NRC 1532, )
- l. l 1513 n.1 (1982)
I support needed for charges of ethics violations; ALAB 840,24 NRC 610986) ]
City of New Yom v. Depanment of Transportation 715 F.2d 732,740 (2nd Cir,1983), cert. denied,104
[ S. Ct.1403 0984)
! Cleveland Electric Illurnicating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 443,6 NRC 741,753 1 i
! 0 977)
! 1 bunien on movent fa stenmary disposition; GP-8&30,24 NRC 445 (1986) l Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2), AIAB-443,6 NRC 741, 753 54 (1977) similarity between 10 C.FA 2.749 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; LBP-86-27,24 NRC 257 n.1 (1986)
, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unita 1 and 2), ALAP-675,15 NRC !!05, 1115 (1982) scope of licensing board sua spente authonty; ALAB-847,24 NRC 420 n.16 (1986)
Clevels: d Electric Ilhuninating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-802,21 NRC 490,496 n.30 0985) i pealty for party's failure to adequately brief issues on appeal; ALAB-843,24 NRC 205 (1986) i Cleveland Electric Illuminaung Ca (Perry Nuctaat Power Plant, Unita 1 and 2), ALAB-841,24 NRC 64,69
) 0 986) j penalty far party's failure to adequately brief issues en appeal; ALAB-843,24 NRC 204 0986)
Cleveland Electric %=iasting Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-841,24 NRC 64,82 )t l (1986) 1 acceptability of probability analyses that were not performed by NRC, Staff; L'JP 86-29,24 NRC 304 I
' 0 986) 1 Cleveland Electric Illurrunating Co. (Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), DD-85-14,22 NRC 635,642
! n.4 0985)
, litigability of sequests involving inicial licensing under 10 C F.R. 2.206; DD 8615,24 NRC 620 n.1
! 0 986) ;
- Cleveland Electric niununating Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plaat, Unhs 1 and 2), LBP-83-46,18 NRC 218 I 0983) use of probability analyses to deternune hazards from hurncane generated missiles; 2P-86 29,24 NRC 6
306 0 986) l Cleveland Electric !!!urninsting Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Un ta 1 and 2), LBP 85-33,22 NRC 442 0985), aff'd, ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) governmg regulatim for requests for caemption from ibil-parucipauen ernergency caercises; CU-8624, l
, i 24 NRC 774 L5 0986) i Commonwashh Edison Co. (Braidwood Nuclear Fbwer Station Units I and 2), CLI-868,23 NRC 2410986)
, r-sua sparea authonty to cursect board procedural errors: CU 86-22,24 NRC 691 n.3 0986) i
'i Commonwealth Ediaan Co. 04 Sane County Siacian, Umts 1 and 2), DD-84-6,19 NRC 591,894 (1984)
[
use of:==-W ' or volume wetshied mean ternparature in leek rate testing; DD 8418,24 NRC 766 j l 0 986)
{
Commonweahh Edison Ca G4Sa!!e County Statim, Units 1 and 2), DD 84-6,19 NRC 891,897 (1984)
J l use of 2.206 petitions as subentuss for peution for rulemakms; DD 8615,24 NRC 627 (1986) l l
4 ;
43 1
l 1
- i. l
,. . a.
t
+
l
- l. <
l LEGAL CITATIONSINDEX CASES I
l CanunanwealA Edison Ca (Zian Statim, Unit 1), DD-85-10,22 NRC 143,145 0985)
! use of =c.= . . ' ar . . ' mean temperanno in leak reis tesdng; DD-86-18,24 NRC 766 l 0 986)
I.
Cansnouweshh Edison ca (Zion Statian, Unim 1 and 2), ALAB416,12 NRC 419,421 (1980) bunden on applianos for law power tienne; ALAS 454,24 NRC 789 0986) hw Edison Co. af New Yosk Ondian Point, Unit 2), CU-74 23,7 AEC 947,95152 (1974) -
sape d issues that osa be isA for pass-hsering -ahm w ALAB-843,24 NRC 208 (1986)
Caesalidsend Edison Ca af New Yank Ondian Phins, Unit 2), CU4316,17 NRC 1006,1010,1013 0983) j means for ensunns adequais ensagency , , - when a penscular jmNiction is not paracipating in l.
I t energsnay plannsng; ALAB-847,24 NRC 431 n.68,432 n.69 0986) i Car N Edison Co. af New Yask (Inaan Point Unin 1,2, er.d 3), ALAB 319,3 NRC 188,190 0976) disnimation betwema _ , of a haemns board and those af the NRC Staffin erassing a low-power lisense; ALAB-854,24 NRC 7910986)
ConsSw man Co. af New Yesk Ondian Pbisa. Unin 1,1 and 3), CU 754,2 NRC 173,175 (1975) basis , far 1206 pennens: DD-8617,24 NRC 760 (1986)
. Consolidated Edison Co. d New Yank Ondian Pbins, Unim 1,1 and 3) CU-75-8,2 NRC 173,176 0975) grauals for lastinaian of show-cause , . . DD4617,24 NRC 7761(1986) grounds far shutdown of boiling weser naciars; DD4616,24 NRC 748 (1986)
!, Consolidated X-Ray Sevise CasP., AL1-83117 NRC 693,705 (1983) saape d NRC Aa*==iaa to inssiane enfarassment action:DD 611,24 NRC 336 (1986)
Conseners Power Ca (Big Rock Paun Plant), ALAB 725,17 NRC 562 0983)
Insissbility of aptunwn vnuderation in spent fuel psals; IBP-84 27,24 NRC 260 n.7 (1986)
Consumers Power Ca (Big Rock Point Plant), A1AB 725,17 NRC 562,564 n.1565 0983) adetian d neutson nualtiplicatim fassor lienit an sensage of new fuel af inciensed annciunma; ALAB 848, 24 NRC 435 (1986) -
Conseners Power Ca (Big Rock Peint Plant), ALAB-725,17 NRC 562,568 0983)
. weighs given to Sintf pidence and asaspianos cruenan in standard swdow plan for spent fuel pool 3
n=tity;IBP46 27,24 NRC 259 a.3 (1986)
Conseness Pbwer Ca (Big Rask Point Plant), A1AB-795,21 NRC 1 (1985) l espa amaa of appeal bened af8rmanos an sua spense variew; ALAB-849,24 NRC 524 (1986)
Consenese Power Ca (pataad Plans, Unies 1 and 2), ALAB-691,16 NRC 81rl,907 0982), soview declined,
, CU 83-2,17 NRC 69 0983)
- effect of a pony's wuhdrewel fran a peanendans e its appeal ighas; A1AB451,24 NRC 530 non6)
, Camde % Paci8e Imgal Poundsuan,445 U.S.198,214 0980)
. hessing righss an sequeses for exemptians funn agulations; CU46 24,24 NRC 'f14 (1986)
Detrcut Edison Co. (Enrico Fermi Asamic Power Pisa, Unit 2), ALAB-709,17 NRC 17 0983)
W , of party's Aling af proposed Andings of feat to its ab0ity to pureus issues e appeal; AIAB445,24 NRC 252 0986)
Detuas Edison Ca (Enrico Fenni Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2), DD4411,19 NRC 1108,1110 n.2 0984)
Lingsbility of sequests involving inasial lisensing under 10 C.F.R. 2.206: DD46-15,24 NP.C 620 n.1 0986)
Duke Pbwer Ca (Casawba Nucieer Station, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB-355,4 NRC 397,41314, reaansidsrutim demad, ALAB-359,4 NRC 619 (1976) pensky for peny's failum to adequately brist issues en appeal; ALAB-843,24 NRC 205 0986);
AIAB452,24 NRC 537 0986); AIAB456,24 NRC 805,809 (1986)
Duke Power Ca (Caswbs Nucient 5:stian, Unin 1 and 2), ALAB-813,22 NRC 59,64 0985) siendani for dessmannung adequacy of quality - -my canuel pregam; ALAB 852,24 NRC 541 0 986)
Duke Power Ca (Caswba Nuclear Station, Unies 1 and 2), ALAB-813,22 NRC 59,74 & n.69 0985) tims lirait an Aling claims of boent unfairness and peniality in scheduling AIAB-845,24 NRC 251 0986) 43
~
I
I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES l
I 4
Duke Power Ca (Catawbe Nudear Station, Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB 813,22 NRC 59,78 0985) odequacy of mobile rouis alaning as a camponent of emergency nad5 cation systems: ALAB-852,24 NRC 545 (1986)
. need for Anal FEMA andings paar to autharuation of operating licones: AIAB-45t 24 NRC 546 (1r24 Duke Power Ca (Catawbe Nuclear stataan. Unhs 1 and 2), AIAB-813,22 NRC 59,79 0'45) reliability of diesel gesrators for providing ansite sinctric poesr; AIAB-841,24 NRC 810986)
Duke Power Ca (Catawbe Nuclear Sution, Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB-813,22 NRC 59,82 83 0985) twaanant ofintervenar's sequest far subpoma of Staff wimme made for the Arnt time en appeal; ALAB 856,24 NRC 812 (1986)
-l Duke Power Ca (Catawbs Nuoleer Sution, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB-813. 22 NRC 59,84 n.128 0985) 1 support required for allegenans in appellate briefs; AIAB-843,24 NRC 204 0986)
Duke Power Ca (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), CI18319,17 NRC 1041,1044 0983) availability of emeryoney plan at beguunna of a licensing Was AIAB-853,24 NRC 717 (1986)
Duke Power ca (Catawbe Nuciser Sution, Uniu 1 and 2), CU 83-19,17 NRC 1041,1045 0983) criuria to be addressed for adnusnan oflate 6 led corsentions; LBP-8&22,24 NRC 105 a3 (1986) test for adunsaan of lats 81ed cementians addressing applicant's request far low-power licarms; GP 86 34,24 NRC 554 a6 0985)
Duke Power Ca (Catawba Nuclear station, Uniu I and 2), DD 84-16,20 NRC 161,164 n.3 0984) litigsbdity of adequacy of agulatory contrais for fuel fabrication facility under $2.206; DD-8613,24 NRC 590 rL3 (1986) litigability of interna 1 NRC personnel meners ur.Jur 10 C.PA 2.206; DD-Se 11.,24 NRC 3310986);
, DD-861124 FRC 487 (1986)
Duke Power ca (Catawba Nuclear Station, Uniu 1 and 2), LBP-83-56, is NRC 421,430 (1983) burden an appanses of summary disposition rnation; GP-8627,24 NRC 257 (1986)
Duke Power Ca (Podtins Nuclear station, Umts 1,1 and 3), ALAB 591,11 NRC 741,742 0980) board authonty to determine the bounds ofits own jurisdiction; A!AB 840,24 NRC 58 n.2 0986)
Duke Power Ca (Pedtina Nuclear Statiart, Units 1,1 and 3), AIAB 615,12 NRC 350,352 0980) criteta to be addressed for adnneman oflate-Eled - : GP-8622,24 NRC 105 n.3 0986) test for adnusman af late Aled contentaans addressing applicem's aquest for low power licanes; LBIL86-34,24 NRC 554 a6 0986)
Final Rule en Pmercancy Planeng, CU-80 40,12 NRC E36,638 0980) paesniago of pesans within EPZ to be nonAed within 6rst 15 minutes of an emergency; AIAB-852,24 NRC 542 (1986)
Florida Pbwer and Light Co. (St. Imcie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2), CU-41 12,13 NRC 438, 843 44 0981) usa d probability analyses to determans hanrds fmn humcans-genanted missues; GP 8629,24 NRC 306 0 986)
Florida Power and Lght Co. (nukey Point Nr.clast Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4), AIAB-846,24 NRC 409 0 986) appropriate far appellate sua spete review; ALAB-849,24 NRC 524 0986) scopa of rppellate sua sponte authonty; ALAB448,24 NRC 435 (1986)
Florids Power and Light Ca (Turkey Pamt Nuclear G== ns aianon, umts 3 and 4), LBP-79 21,10 NRC 183, 191 92 (1979) need for hearing an use of treated liquid waste as ferti'izer, DD-8613,24 NRC 605 a19 0986)
General Electric Ca (Vallecitae Nuclear Camer) DD-79 9,9 NRC 744,753 (1979) use of 1206 petitions as substitute for petition for rulemaking; DD4&l5,24 NRC 627 0985)
General Public Utilities Nucicer Corp. (Tlues Mile Island Nuclear stadon, Uniu 1 and 2; Oystar Creek Nuclear Generating Station), CU-85-4,21 NRC 5610985) improper ness of 2.206 penuans: DD4&l5,24 NRC 624 n.3 0986)
Osnaral Public Utilities Nuclear Corp. Ghree Mile Island Nuclear station, Uniu 1 and 2; Oymer Creek Nucient Generating Station), CU-35-4,21 NRC 561,563-64 0985) litisabuity of issues that the subject of admuusustive procandanas under 10 C.FA 2.206; DD 8613,24 NRC 590 n.3 0986) 44
bi' 'O LEGAL CITATIONSINDEX i
CASES Ouard v. NRC,753 F.2d !!44 (D.C. Cir.1985) applicability to arrangemeras far tresunent of affsite individuals who an injured as well as contaminated; 12P 86 38A,24 NRC 829 0986)
Gulf States Utilides Ca (River Band Station, Uniu 1 and 2), LBP-75-10,1 NRC 246,248 (1975) burden on opponent af sunenary __, ' - madon; IEP46 27,24 NRC 257 (1986)
Haunan Ughsing & Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Onnemting Station, Unit 1), ALAB-544,9 NRC 630, 632 0 979) scope of ;" ', -rights aanfened by 10 C.F R. 2,715(c); LBP-86 24,24 NRC 135 n.3 (1986)
Hauman Lighung & Power Ca (ADens Cmak Nuclear Genenting Stadan. Unit 1), AIAB 590,11 NRC 542, i 547-49 0 980) !
9 af a cornenuan; AIAB445,24 NRC 230 31 (1986) scope of baard dasaeaan in determieng Haunan Ushnng & Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear C - . Station, Unit 1), AIAB429,13 NRC 75, 77 78 (1981) i burden an apponent af sunenery disposidan macian; AIAB-841,24 NRC 93 (1986); LBP-86 27,24 NRC 257 0 986) .
i Houston Lighung & Power Ca (Ausns Creek Nuclear r - _ Staden, Unit 1), A!AB 632,13 NRC 87,89 0 981) right of oneimervenor to appent rejections of anodier innervenar's comenties; ALAB-843,24 NRC 203
.s.3 0986); ALAB456,24 NRC 804 0986)
Haunan Ughting & Power Ca (South Texas Projaa, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 799,21 NRC 360,369 0985) appellate noview policy an licanang bosni deterpunaums that do not consutute a Snal mealution an the merus; ALAB 846,24 NRC 411 n.6 0986)
Haunan Ughung & Power Ca (South Texas Projas, Units 1 and 2) AIAB-799,21 NRC 360,383 0985) standing af individua1to raise gnavances of adaer parties an appeal; ALAB-843,24 NRC 203 a3 0986)
Lusstate Carnmaros Carranission v. Jerssy City,322 U.S. 503,51415 (1944) reason for sinngency d Carceai=w tandanias for reopening; CU46-2L 24 NRC 691 n.3 (1986) lawa Electria Ligh & Power Co. (Duane Amaid Energy Caser), AIAB-108,6 AEC 195.196 a4 0973) eaceas of judges replacmg other board membes to lirnised appearance statemensa; 12P-86 37A,24 NRC l 729 n.3 0986)
Kansas Oss and Elastric Ca (Wolf Creek Generating Station Unit Na 1), AIAB-462,7 NRC 320,338 0978) l l burden an proponent d matica to roupen; AIAB-841,24 NRC 86 0966) faihus ofimerveness to supply asounds for reverens licawing board's denial of subpoena request; AIAB-856,24 NRC 812 (1986)
Kassel v. thaumad Freislaways Corp of Delavam,450 U.S. 662 (1981) need far spent Aael: , to justify shipnents; DPRM 86 5,24 NRC 659 0956)
KareMaOne Corp. (West Qticago Ram Eanha Facility), CLI-82 2,15 NRC 232 0982), aff'd, West Chicap
- v. NRC,701 F.2d 632 Oth Cir.1983) factam gavenung hearing rights on rasterials license amendment proceedings; CU-8617,24 NRC 495 (1986)
KereMcGee Corp. (West Chicago Ram Eanha Facility), CLI42115 NRC 212,257 58 (1982), aff'd, West Chicago v. NRC,701 F.2d 632 Oth Cir.1983) applicability of fifth ammulment protecums to indimet adverse effects of g~ -' action; CU-8617, !
24 NRC 496 (1986)
Long Island Ushung Ca Gamespost Nuclear Power Sution, Units 1 and 2), AIAB428,13 NRC 24 0981) vacation af d-imaa on remedial sails an maamses grounds; AIAB,84% 24 NRC 199 0986)
Long taland Ushting Ca (Shareham Nuckar Power Station, Unit 1), AIAB-743,18 NRC 387,404 n.10983) appeDais policy in overnsung a hamnans board's factual Aadiap AIAB-855,24 NRC 797 0986) ,
IAng laland Ushting Ca (Shareham Nuclear Power Station Unit 1), AIAB-788,20 NRC 1102,1146 (1984) i u-m of safety Endmes based an appbcant's premise to comply; AIAB-843,24 NRC 2110986)
Long Island Lishung Ca (Sharshern Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), AIAB-832,23 NRC 135,143 0986) bydiogen genesation dusing lessf coolars accident; AIAB441,24 NRC 70 (1986)
{
l 45 I
o .
l a
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES lang Island IJahung Ca (Sharsham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), ALAB-832,23 NRC 135,143-45 0986), I review peneng, CU-86-11,23 NitC 577. 579 0986) eine and conAgwation of energency planmns senes; ALAB-M5,24 NRC 228 n.10986)
Les Island Ushting Ca (Sharsham Nuclear Power Stasian, Unit 1), QJ 8317,17 NRC 1032,1034 (1983) inissp==i of 10 C.F R. 50.57(c) and 5033(a) re need for sulnaiamaa of ensim ernergency plans prior to issuanas oflow power license; ALAB-853,24 NRC 717 0986) siaks fines fuel leading and low-power aparanon; 1AP425,24 NRC 146 (1986)
Imag Island Lishung Ca & Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), CUM 8,19 NRC 1154 0984) shesnes neessaary to pseshade giuns of liasme so lsed ibel and conduct , , anning; LBP431, 24 NRC 457 0986)
Imns Island Lighting Ca (Shareham Nualser Power Station, Unit 1) CUM 21,20 NRC 1437,1440 (19M) fasses applied in desanmuung assy sequens; CU412,24 NRC 5 (1986) benkh and safety imanes appliashie to low-power aparemen; ALAB453,24 NRC 718 0986)
Imag taland Ughsing Ca (Sheehses Nusteer Power Saanien, Unit I), CU 8512,21 NRC 1587,1590 (1985) i beens af endy low power operation; 1AP425,24 NRC 145 0986) l
' Imag Island Lighting Ca (Sheeham Nusleer Power Sistian, Unit 1), CU#11,23 NRC 577,5810986) !
esima af h in unsrgmoy , asosasary to bar sempiian fran muisenant for Adi-pap-p=== emergamey eneroase; QJ#24,24 NRC 775 n.6 0986)
"fundenness! Asw" asandard for a&nission af aEsite unagency response oamanianr, ALAB-M3,24 NRC 215 a.710986) purpass of soviews of enuranscy enecise results; CU#24,24 NRC 777 0986)
Lang Island Ushting Ca (Sheeham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), CU413,24 NRC 22,32 0986) i litigsbGity of adequacy of means for amifying enersecy waskers; ALAB-M5,24 NRC 231 n.8 0986) i Lang Island Ushting Ca (Sheeham Nuclear Power Stasian, Unit 1), IAP457 ? NRC 445,571. 510 0983) i- . o f design respones spectra; CU422,24 NRC 698 0986)
Lang Island Lightang Ca (Sheeham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), LBP-8518,21 NRC 1637,1646 0985) dunnouan betwasa mad-toetud and hamment credia in diesel genaniass; ALAB-841,24 NRC 23 a75 0 986) t meaan power & Light Co. (Watadasd Sesem Elecezic Stasian, Unit 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076,1096 n.30 0 983) sight of intervenes to pumus their assa on the basis of : - - _ -
-alsne; ALAB-855,24HRC797 m16 (1986)
T ==== Power & Light Ca (Wesafond Sesem Elesuie Stasian, Unit 3), A1AB-732,17 NRC 1976,1105 (1963) soape of immes that aan be len ibr pamphemming tasaluman; AIAB-M3,24 NRC 208 0986)
Iminimaa Power & Light Ca (Wassfasd Seesm Elecuic Sission, Unit 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076,1105 0983) insames an which pendictive 6adings will adRas far operatag Ha==a authanzauan; AIAB-852,24 NRC 546 0 986)
T ==ana Power & Usht Ca (Waisefend Simern Elemaic Station, Unit ?), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076,111012 (1983) board soview of unconteered issues; LBP429,24 NRC 307 (1986) t ==ms Power & Light Ca (Waterfand Sisem Electric Station, Unit 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076,1112 i.
0 983) eaape oflicanang beant sus spose ausharuy; ALAB M7,24 NRC 420 n.16 (1986) i=h Power & Ught Ca (Weissfasd Seemm Elssaid Station, Unit 3) QJ41 23 NRC 10986) shamna nesessry to seapes a senord; CU-86 22,24 NRC 6910986) I E==d- Boy Telemestes,luo. v. KX:,261 F.2d 55,67 (D.C. Cir.1958), mad nad i on cabar grounds 295 l F.2d 131, amt daaiad 366 U.S. 918 0961) J jur-de whose integrity d ' :- process is q-maaad ALAB-840,24 NRC 59 0986);
- QJ418,24 NRC 504 (1986)
I as 1
l
.-h
e
- l
)
i l
l 4 I
[
l l
l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Mathews v. Eldridge, J24 U.S. 319,335 (1976)
.l faccom governmg beanns rights on mananals license amendmera proceedings; CU-8&l7,24 NRC 495.
497 n.4 (1986)
Metropolitan Edism Co. (Duce Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unh 1), A!AB-697,16 NRC 1265,1269-70 (1982) j responsibility for deternunung what information is given to government officials in an emergency '
situadon; AIAB-847,24 b7C 427 (1986)
, Metropolitan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unh 1), ALAB-698,16 NRC 1290,1298-99 (1982), aff'd in part on other grounds, CU-83 2118 NRC 299 (1983) regulatory assus of NUREGs; AIAB-843,24 NRC 205 (1986); AIAB-852,24 NRC 545 0986)
Meuupolhan Edism Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unis 1), ALAB-698,16 NRC 1290,131213 (1982), aff'd in perunent part, CU 83-22,18 NRC 299,310 (1983)
NRC Staff ---h during an anergency situation; ALAB-847,24 NRC 428 n.54 (1986) ;
responsibuity for deternuning what information is given to govemment officials in an enarrgency situation; AIAB-847,24 NRC 427 (1986) ]
Moumpothan Edison Co. (Dues Mile Island Nuclear Stadon, Unit !), ALAB-807,21 NRC 1195,1200 n.12 (1985) i hearing rights after issuance of operating license amendmet; ALAB-846,24 NRC 410 n.2 (1986)
Metropohtan Edison Ca (Dune Mile Island Nuclear Statun, Uen 1), ALAB-807. 21 NRC 1195.1214 (1985) manner for striking tesumony frun a transcript; AIAB-839,24 NRC 52 (1986) 1 Meunpohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Unit 1), CLI44-11,20 NRC 1,9-10 0984) use d probabihty analyses to determino hazards from hurncane. generated missiles; LDP-8&29,24 h7C 306 (1986)
Metropolitan Edison Ca (Duee Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unh 1), CU.85-2,21 NRC 282,28687 0985) utstrnent of omrespanave bnefs challenging requests fer eacmptions; CLI-8624,24 NRC 772 n.3 0986)
Metropolaan Edson Ca (Dune Mile Island Nuclear Statim, Uma 1), CU-85 2,21 NRC 282,296-306 0985) d pesalties incuned by new managanent of nuclear power plant for numakes of its p. - - . CU 8615, f 24 NRC 4010986) l 1 Meunpobtan Edison Ca (fhree Mile taland Nuclear Stadon, Unit 1), CLI 85-9,21 NRC 1118,1135 40 (1985) J paauw= incurred by new management d nuclear pner plara for mistakes of its prh~r, CU-8615, ]
24 NRC 4010986) l Meuupohtan Edison Co. v. People Agamst Nuclear Energy,460 U.S.166,1(D 5. Ct.1556 (1983) need for NRC to consider whether risk of accident causes psychological distress in residents of area surrounding nuclear plant; DD 8615,24 NRC 627 0986) ;
IWaissippi Power and Light Ca (Grand Gulf Nuclear Stauan, Units I and 2), A1AB-130,6 AEC 423,425 n.4 l (1973) burden on opponent of summary disposition motion; AIAB 856,24 NRC 809 m32 (1986)
Nadanal nrmers' Orgamzadon, Inc. v. Oliver,530 F.2d 815,8I&l7 (8th Cir.1976) incomplete record as jusuficatim for interlocutory rehef; ALAB.839,24 NRC 50 (1986)
New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution v. NRC,522 F.24 87 (1st Cir.1978) responsibihty for appoinung new member of heensing board when strung manber becomes unavailable; LBP 86-37A,24 NRC 729 0986)
Niagarn Mohawk Power Corp. (Niue Mile Poira Nuclear Stauan, Unit 2), AIAB-264,1 NRC 347,357 (1975) appellate standard for ovenurrung a licatting board's f!ndmss of fact; ALAB-843,24 NRC 209 (1986);
AIAB 852,24 NRC 537 (1986); ALAB-856,24 NRC 811 (1986)
Northern Indiana Public Savia Ca (Bailly Generating Station, Nuc! car 1), ALAB 303,2 NRC 858,866 (1975) support necessary to establish etw in board's jodgman; ALAB-85124 NRC 537 n.13 (1986)
Nonhern Indiana Public Service Ca (Bailly Generating Station, Nuclear 1), LBP 80-22,12 NRC 191,193-94, aff'd, ALAB-619,12 NRC 558 (1980)
Licensing board obligatim to ascertain accuracy of a transenpt; AIAB 839,24 NRC 52 0986)
Nonhern Indiana Public Service Ca (Bailly Generating Statim, Nuclear 1), LBP 82-29,15 NRC 762 (1982) need for bearing to daarmine extent of size restoration required, LBP 8&37,24 NRC 722 0986) i 47
__---.__m_-__.m.-._-. __
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Nonhorn States Power Co. (Praine Island Nuclear Gmeraung Plant, Units 1 and 2), A1)_B-244,8 AEC 857 (1974), reconsideradon denied, ALAB-252,8 AEC 1175, aff'd, CU 75-1,1 NRC 10975) parties who may appeal decuions adverse to them; ALAB 845,24 NRC 252 (1986)
Nonhern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Ocnerating Plant, Unita 1 and 2), A1AR 288,2 NRC 390, 392rL60975) right ofinterveness to cross exanuno on a witness
- testimony; LBP 8&22,24 NRC 105 0986)
O'Banrux v. Town Court Nursing Canier,447 U.S. 773 (1980) applicability of Afth amendmera pmtecttons to indirect adverse effects of governmental actiat; CU-8&l7, 24 NRC 496 0986)
Offshore Pbwer Systems (Manufacnaring License for Hosting Nuclear Power Plarms), ALAB489,16 NRC 887, 890 91 & n.4 (1982)
Commission authonty to defer sua sparus review; ALAB 846,24 NRC 4110986)
Offshore Power Systems (Manufacturing Ucense for Plasting Nuclear Power Plants),IRP-82-49,15 NRC 1658, 1722 23 (1982) use of probability analyses to desernune hazards frarn humcane-generated missiinr, IRP 8629,24 NRC 306 (1986)
Olun v. Wakinekana,461 U.S. 238,250 c12 (1983) consntuhanally pmtected liberty irserusts relavant to matenals licanas amendment: CU-86-17,24 NRC 496 n.3 (1986)
Oysiarshall A1 hance v. NRC,800 F.2d 1201 (D.C. Cir.1986) masan far stnngency of Commission standants for moperung; CU-8622,24 NRC 691 n.3 (1986)
Pacific Gas & PJactnc Ca v. State Energy Resources Conservadon a*nd Development Canm'n,461 U.S.190, 221 22 (1983)
NRC authonty over econanne docunans made by utilides in transporting spent nuclast fuel; DPRM-8&5, 24 NRC 6610986)
Pacific Gas and Flede Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umis 1 and 2), ALAB-580,11 NRC 227 (1980) means for preserving protected nanus of security plan when it is incorporated into thi seconi of a pracaaen g; ALAB-845,24 NRC 249 0986)
Paci6c Gas and Elecuse Ca (Diablo Canymi Nuclear Power Plant, Urnts 1 and 2), AIAB 583,11 NRC 447 (1980) right of state to participate in adnumstrative appeals when h has nns parucipsied formally in underlying haanng; CU-8&20,24 NRC 519 (1986)
Paci6c Gas and Elecuic Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts 1 and 2), AIAB 583,11 NRC 447,
, 448 0 980) standant for judgmg whether a party is legally aggnewed far purpose of appealing an adverso decision; ALAB 845,24 NRC 252 0986)
Pacinc Gas and Electric Ca (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts 1 and 2) AIAB 600,12 NRC 3,8 0980) burden on party entering a pmceeding late; CU 8&20,24 NRC 519-20 (1986)
Pactnc Gas and riede Co. (Diablo ('anycn Nuclear Power Piant, Umts 1 and 2), A!AB-728,17 NRC 717, 801 n.72 (1983)
{
litigation opparustities offered by 10 C.F.R. 50.57(c) motion; LBP-8631,24 NRC 455 (1986); j lap-86-34,24 NRC 553 0986) {
Pacinc Gas and Elecuic Ca (Diablo Canyan Nuclear Power Plant, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-728,17 NRC 777, i 801-02 0 983) !
standard for sinie panicipadan late in adjudicatory procmeding; CU 8620,24 NRC 520 0986) j Pacine Gas and Elecuic Ca (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts 1 and 2), AIAB 728,17 NRC 777, !
807, review dechned, CU-83-32, !8 NRC 1309 (1983) f issues that are litigable in opersung license pmceedmgs; ALAB-847,24 NRC 420 n.16 (1986)
{
Pacdic Gas and Elecuic Ca (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Piarn, Unus 1 and 2), ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983) ,
1 l
l l
I 4s '
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -- ^
g l < $.
ii LEGAL CITATIONS LNDEX
- i ' CASES uns of mini-hnaring appiendt to decide wbsther safety-m8pinosas issus is W by naasian to seapan; CU422,24 NRC 702 0986)
Pasi6e Gas and he Ca (Diablo Canyan Nucasar Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLt 815,13 NRC 361,362 (lyst) lisi8stian apporonines assied by 10 CJA 50J7(c) motion; IAP431,24 NRC 455 (1986);
i 1AP-86-34,24 NRC 553 0986) i Pasiac Gas and he Ca (Diablo Canyan Nasisar Power Plant Unim I and 2), CLI-814,13 NRC 443,444
! 0 981) i hastabGisy ofissues that N subjset of man -e=sive pseeerdiny moder 10 C.FA. 2.206; DD413,24
~
NRC 590 a 3 0986)
PeniSe Oss and 31ssuic Ca (Diablo Canyan Nacisar Pouer Plant. Uniu I and 2), CU43-27,18 NRC !!46, 1149 0 983) suissemos of safety perunsser display sysian during fast landing and pasositissnity asseing 12P B6 34,24 NRC 553 a4 (1986)
PosiAs Gas and Elesuso Co. (Diablo Canyan Nanser Pseur Plani. Uniss I and 2) CLI-83-27, !8 NkC i146,
!!49 50 0 983)
, " ' y far making 30 C.FA 50.57(a) Andings assessary for nest land and pescsiticality insang; 1 AIL 86-31,24 NRC 454 0986)
Pasino Gas sad FM Co. (Diablo Canyon Nucisar Power Plant,Uniu 1 med 2), C'JM14,20 NRC 285, 286 0 984) emergency suspese massing basis and spesi6 city w; AIAB445,24 NRC 233 0 986)
Pasine Oss and he Ca (Disblo Canyan NucNr Power Pleas Umas 1 and 2),IAP-815,13 NRC 226,233
, 0 981) suspensibahey for ansking 10 CJA 50.57(a) Andings assassary far fuellanding and ps-==ria=Ing insting; IAP-86 31,24 NRC 454 55 0906)
Pasi6e Oss and Elesuie Co. v. PPC,506 F.2d 33,38 (D.C. Cir.1974)
C- daemunen to sheems rit===h=9 er ' so segulass; CU-86 23,24 NRC 708,109 n.6 0 986) '
Pennsyluuma Pouer & Li81s Ca (" Seemn El=== Sessim, Unks I and 2), ALAB493,16 NRC
' 952, 954-57 (1982) pealsy for party's fsGuss to adequessly buist issess an appeal; AL4843,24 NRC 204-05 (1986);
l ALAB 852,24 NRC 537 (1986); A1AB456,24 NRC 805,809 (1986)
Pauuylvania Power & Light Ca f - Samme he Siemen, Uniss 1 and 2),IAP 79-31,10 NRC 597, 806 (1979) ahaiy=eiani afinserveur to ==p==4 t o : . abana - that it is nas spanesens; 12P 86-22,24 NitC 105 0986)
Posisian for Einergency and Remedial Acnon, CU 7d>6,7 NRC 400,405-06 (1978) need far suspensam ar suvassaan of lia=== for stulaiary violanens; DD-8613,24 NRC 6(n (1986)
Petician far Emergency and awal Acesen, CU-78-4 7 NRC 400,40MU 0978) r==p===ibility for abanung sunsdass for th valamans of NRC -rat =' DD#10,24 NRC 177 (1986)
Phn="rh== Elessnc Ca n h==aa n=====r Smaien. Unis 1 and 2), ALAB 765,19 NRC 645,648 m.1 (1984), af'd namn., Anshany v. NRC,770 P.2d 1066 (3d Cir.1985)
. af susumery " dommens; AIAB-854,24 NRC 787 0986)
, appelines palisy in evenunung a hessang bessd's fasant Sadiny; AIAB-855,24 NRC 797 0986)
- PhnMa Elastric Ca aa==* % Sessias Unins I and 2), AIAB-804 21 NRC 1183,1186 87
, 0 985)
- ased for subnussim of audss emergency pisse prior to issummes oflow-power lissuse; AIAB-853,24
, NRC 717 a10 0956)
MiGadelplus Fl=ree Ca (Lausnak Ossershng Bisman, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-819,22 NRC 681,109 0985) .
ImssbGiny of issues beyond abs tussal terrns of e - =a==== ALAB 843,24 NRC 208 0986) de
f'
- 4 I
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES N1adelphia Elecinc Ca Omeruk Generanns Stanan. Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB-819,22 NRC 681,709-10 (1985), review dachamt CU 865. 23 NRC 125 0986) purpose of NUREO-0654; AIAB 855,24 NRC 799 (1986) regulatory statua naarded to NUREOs; ALAB-843,24 NRC 205 (1986); ALAB-852,24 NRC 544 0956)
N1adelphia Electric Ca Gmenck Generating Sunan, Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB-819,22 NRC 681,7410985),
moview dachned, CU 8&5,23 NRC 125 0986) burden an applionet far law-pawer license; ALAB-854,24 NRC 789 0986)
IWladelpina Electric Ca (Umarid Generanna Station Uniu 1 and 2) AIAB-836,23 NRC 479,505 0986) bounds an issues litigable in opesanns license ,. ; ALAB-843,24 NRC208 0986); ALAB-852, i
24 NRC 545 0986)
Philadelphia Electric Ca (IJmerid Generating Station, Umm 1 and 2) ALAB-845s 24 NRC 220,24142 0 986) scope of appeal baeni saamination of contentiarm to desarrams their applicability in reopened prweedmg, ALAB-847,24 NRC 4210986)
N1adelphia Electric Ca OJmend Genessung Stacian, Unite 1 and 2), A' AB-845,24 NRC 220,252 (1986) effect of a party's withdrawal fnun a pmosedmg at is appeal rights; ALAB-851,24 NRC 530 0986)
Philadelphia Electric Ca (Lirnand Generanna Statiun Urem 1 and 2) DD-8511,22 NRC 149 0985) need fa factual baas to maammtate allegations in 2.206 pentiano; DD.8613,24 NRC 598 n.10 (1986)
Philadelpina Electric Ca (Limanck Generating Station. Uniu 1 and 2), DD 8511,22 NRC 149,154 0985) basis requuements far 2,206 pennena; DD-8617,24 NRC 760 (1986)
Philadelphia Electric Ca (Limand Genersung Station, Uniu 1 and 2), DD-8511,22 NRC 149,161 n.7 (1985) quality of carstrucnan requued for apeuting license issuanos; DD 868,24 NRC 166 (1986)
Phundalphia Electric Ca (Peach Banoen Ausnic Power Stauan, Uniu 2 and 3), AIAB 216,8 AEC 13,20, nuwined on other smunds, CU 74-32,8 AEC 217 0974) purpass of basia-with-specincity requiament for minusman of card ===u; ALAB-845,24 NRC 230 0 986)
Philadelphia Elecizio Ca ONech Bauan Atarnic Power Station, Uniu 2 and 3), ALAB-701,16 NRC 1517 0 982) maruncence of human haahh eff as of annual fuel cycle redan m1:asse; ALAB-842,24 NRC 198 a.4
, 0 986)
Pordend General Einsens ca. (Pobbie Sprines Nuclear Plass, Uniu 1 and 2), CU-76-27,4 NRC 610,61617 (1976) appsopuisseness d hearing en ' " of third peny ivaa progran; CU 8619,24 NRC 516 0966)
Panland Consen1 Electric Ca Urojan Nuclear Plass), LBP 78 32,8 NRC 413,429-33 (1978), aff'd, !
l AIAB431,9 NRC 263,27677 0979) .
- noe d #haiiy anai,ess io determ h.sa,* f,.n huoi= ; c inisaoas; tBP u 29.24 NRC 306 0 986)
Potomac Electric Power ca (Douglas Pbian Nucisar Geneating Station, Umta 1 and 2), AIAB-218,8 AEC 79, 89 0 974) i licensing boand jurisdiction or aushanty to consider challenges to Comnusman interpretatimt af its own regulations; LBP'86 24,24 NRC 138 0986) f J
Power Authmuy of the State af New Yank v. FERC,743 F.2d 93,110 (2d Cir.1984) j simatian in which penahy far ex pane conmuuncation is not imposed; ALAB-840,24 NRC 62 (1986)
Professional Air Tragic Centraums Organization v. Federal Labar Relations Amhwity,685 F.2d 547,564-65 '
i (D.C. Cir.1982) i factas eval ===l in deaermaung whether en as pane -nicatian has taissed the ' "--:=;-
process; CU-8618,24 NRC 506 0986)
Professional Air Tranic Castranse Organaration v. Federal Labor Relations Authatuy,685 F.2d 547,564-65, 572 & L30 (D.C, Cir.1982) penhy far sa pans tians; ALAB 840,24 NRC 6662 0986)
, ~
)
- k c4 !
i
i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX
[ CASES Project Managesnent Corp. (Clinch River Brander Reactor Plant), AIAB-354,4 NRC 383 0976) procesare by whicis a state may take an adversarial position in s proceedms; ALAB-850,24 NRC 527 a.3
. (1986)
Public Service Co. d Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generating stasian, Uniu 1 end 2), AIAB-316,3 NRC 167, 170 (1976) ,
- to onier sue testaastion; GP 8637,24 NRC 725 0986) 1 Public Semco Ca af Indians (Marble Hill Nuclear Generenns Stanan, Unies 1 and 2), AIAS405,5 NRC
!!90,1192 (197/)
standa d for appeal board exercise of d rected certiAcation authority; ALAB-839,24 NRC 50 (1986)
Puh Servios Co. af Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generanns Sianan, Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB-459,7 NRC 179, i 188 0 978)
- standasd fm appeal of licensing bosni scheealing decisies; AIAB-841,24 NRC 95 (1986)
Public Service Ca af Indians (Marble Hill Nuclear Generaang Station, Uniu I and 2), CU-80-10,11 NRC 438 (1980) exters of ocastruction permit candinens imposed by Modiacation Order whee no heenna is requened.
GP 86 33,24 NRC 474 (1986) need for a haanns where a licenses has voluntarily suspended licensed opeutions; DD-8613,24 NRC 608 n.25 0986) -
Public Service Co. af Indias (Marble Hill Nucleu Genersting Stanan Uniu I and 2), CLI-8010, !! NRC 438, 441 42 (1980) .
. scape of adjudicatory prosseding alating to enforcement action; CLI-8619,24 NRC 512 (1986)
Public Semos Co. of New Hampshine (Sembrook Station, Unit 2), CLI-84 6,19 NRC 975,978 (1984) ways to demonstrate good cause far construction pumit extension; CLI-8615,24 NRC 400 (1986)
Public Semce Ca of New Hampshire (Seebreak Sianan, Units I and 2), AIAB-293,2 NRC 660,662 0975) standasd for appeal of liaanang board adeduling decisions; ALAB-841,24 NRC 95 0986)
Public Service Ca of New Hampshas (Seabreak Sinnen, Units 1 and 2), AIAIL749,18 NRC !!95, !!98-99 (1983) tiens tenit for Aling seasians for Aapwaiian; AIAB-845,24 NFC 250 0986)
Public Service Co. of Oklahoma (Black Paa Station, Umm I and 2), ALAB473,10 NRC Je. arri 09%
weaed in part and semanded, CLI-80 8,11 NRC 433 0980) speciacity sequued af appellste bnefs; ALAB-843,24 NRC 204 0986) support nonemanry for alleganans of based serar. AIAB-852,24 NRC 547 (1986)
Public Samme Co. af Oklahcena (Black Paa Station. Uniis 1 and 2), LBP-83-10,17 NRC 410 0983) need far hearing to deternune enunt af aus ressaration requind; GP 8&37,24 NRC 722 (1986)
Public Servios Electne and oss Ca (Hope Creek Osnerating Station, Uniu I and 2), ALAB-394,5 NRC 769, 770 0 977) support squired for silegations of dsAciencies in applicant's QA programs; ALAB-843,24 NRC 211 (1986)
Public Service Electnc and oss Ca (Salem Nuclear Generating Stanan, Unit 1), ALAB-650,14 NRC 43,47 n.2 (1981), aff'd, Township of Loeur Alloway Creek v. Public Serv. Elen. and Oss Co.,687 F.2d 732 (3d Cir.1982) function of boson in tenctor coolant; ALAB-854,24 NRC 788 (1986)
Puget Sound Poeur & Ught Co. (Skagit Nuciser Power Ptoject, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-556,10 NRC 30,33 07/9) c sta af one intervener to spank far anaiher, GP-8634,24 NRC 550 n.1 (1986) saape af perncipation nghis conferred by 10 C.F.R.1715(c); GP.8624,24 NRC 135 nJ (1986) standing of irdividual to reise gneveness of asher pernes on appeal; ALAB-843,24 NRC 203 n.3 0786)
, San latis Obispo ivlashers for Peaco v. NRC,751 F.211287,1314 (D.C. Cir.1984), vensted in part an aiher grounds and reh's grained,760 P.2d 1220 (1985), Vf'd an reh's,789 F.2d 26 (1986) need for a heanns when a licenses has volutard suspended licensed operations; DDL8613,24 NRC 608 n.25 0986) l 51 s
i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Silk wood v. Kerr McOse,464 U.S. 238,78 L. Ed. 2d 443,104 S. CL 615 (1984) mischaracterization of ALARA as a standard; DD-8&ll. 24 NRC 341 (1986)
Silk wood v. Kerr McGee,485 F. Supp. 566 (1979) mischaractenzation of ALARA as a standant; DD 8611,24 NRC 341 (1986)
Southern Calitarrna Edison Ca (San Onofre Nuclear Osnarating Station, Unit 1), CU.85-10,21 NRC 1569, 1575 n.7 (1985) need far a beanng wLere a licases has voluntanly suspended licensed opersucas: DD4613,24 NRC 608 n.25 (1986)
Southern California Edison Ca (San Onofro Nuclear Generating Station, Uniu 2 and 3), ALAB-717,17 NRC 346, 369 (1983) adequacy of raabile route alerting as a carnpmt of emergency notifk atan systems; ALAB45% 24 NRC 545 (1986)
Southern California Ediaan Ca (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Stat %e, Unia 2 and 3), ALAB-717,17 NRC 346,377 78 (1983), aff'd, Carstena v. NRC,742 F.2d 1546 (D.C Cir.1984), cert. denied 471 U.S.1136 (1985) defuution of principal emergency asponse organization; A1AB.845,24 NRC 231 n.9 r1986)
Southern Califarnia Edison Ca (San Onorm Nuclear Genersung Station, Uniu 2 and 3), CU.8310,17 NRC 528. 530 (1983) arrangement that must be made for treanne it of offsiis individuals who am injured as well as
. contaminated; LBP.86 38A,24 NRC 829 (1986)
Southern California Ediaan Ca (San Onofro Nuclear Generating Stauan, Units 2 a.d 3), CU4310,17 NRC 528,535 (1983), rev'd in part on other grounds, OUARD v. NRC,753 P.2d 1846 (D.C Cir.1985) number ofindividuals espected ro be injured and contaminated dures a radiological emerscncy; A1AB445,24 NRC 236 (1986)
Southern California Edison Ca (San onafra Nucluer Gensruing Station, Uniu 2 and 3), CU4310,17 NRC 528,536 n.12 (1983), sv'd in past on oit er grounds, Gaani v. NRC,753 F.2d !!44 (D.C Cir,1985) interpretauan of Planmns Standani 5.12 of NUREG 0654; ALAB-855,24 NRC 7s9 (1986)
Statement of Policy on Conduct of Licensing Pmceedings, CU418,13 NRC 452 (1981) mspansibility for appaanung licumns beants: UIPM.t7A,24 NRC 728 (1986)
Sutement of Policy a Conduct of Usensing Paceedings, CU414,13 NRC 451453 (1981) e board authonty to shorten time for diacowery and 61ing of tatimany and Andnas and ""
A1AB445,24 NRC 2$1 (1986)
Sutemmit of Policy an Condast of Licensing .- . . CU-814,13 NRC 451454 (1981) liansms baani aushanty te dinmiss coniar.tims because of inservenrs/ failum to respond to discovery mpasts: ALAB.856,24 NRC 810(1986) treatment of nonsuspensive briefs challengmg requesu far enerrpuans; CU.8624,24 NRC 7/2 n.3 (1986)
Staternant of Policy em Conduct of Ucensing Pmceedmga, CU414,13 NRC 452,456 (1981) i ceru6 cat on of questian to Commissian agardir.g d:manaratian of stood cause far construckn perrait i emension; CLI46-15,24 NRC 398 (1986) l Tenrossee Va' J ey Authority (Hassville Nuclear Plant, Unita IA and 2A), AIAB 783,20 NRC 543 (1984) I widuirewal af resemian of junadacuan an maatness grounds; ALAB44L 24 NRC 198 0986) l' Termessee Vailey Authority (Haruvilla Nucicur Plant, Unita 1A,2A,1B, and 2B), ALAB-554,10 NRC 15,20 n.17 (1979) similanty between 10 CF.R. 2.749 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; LBP46 7?. 24 NRC 257 n.1 (1986) !
Texas Utilities Eleeuic Co. (Camandia Peak Siesta Electnc. Station. Unit 1), CU-864,23 NRC 313 (1986) I
, nght af utility to resunect is expired cardrucuan pasmits; UIP.86 33,24 NRC 480 81 (1986)
Toledo Edison Ca (Devia Bessa Nuclear Power Sianon, Unus 2 and 3), ALAB42112 NRC 667 (1980) mthdowal of retentim of junsdicucas an mouserm smunds; ALAB44124 NRC 198 0986) ;
Toledo Edinn Ca (Devu Basse Nuclect Power Stanon, Uma 2 and 3), AIAB452,14 NRC 627 (1981) ;
need tar haanns su deternune suent of site rescretion mquired; 12P-86 37,24 NRC 722 (1986) ;
, Towr. ship of lower Alloweys Cresit v. Public Sevice Electric and Osa ca. 667 F.2d 73174648 (3d l
l' Cir.1982) i 52
l 1
1 I
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES pleading sunderd for challeriges to Staff "no sigmacent hazards determumtions*; CU-8612,24 NRC 12
. 0986)
Union Doctric Co 'Ca11 sway Plant Unit 1), ALAB 740,18 NRC 343,345 0983) quality of consuuction sequimd for operating licanas issuance; DD 86-8,24 NRC 166 (1986) .
I? nim of Cecerned haim v. NRC,711 F,2d 370,382 (D.C. Cir.1983). -
naps of NkC discismen to institues enforcement action: DD 8611,24 NRC 335 n.1 (1986)
Union of Cancerned Scianuses v. NRC,735 F.2d 1437 (D.C. Cir.1984), cast. denied,105 5. Ct. 315 0985) edsor.acy of "4 ble top" emergency onescises; ALAB-845,24 NRC 238 (1986)
[- i lirigability of 3.ahs o,' emergency onescises:LBP-86 38A,24 NRC 820 (1986) -
post hsesing :=h==aa of conmand issues by Suff; ALAB-M1,24 NRC 86 0986)
Union of Concerned Scw= m DPRM-831,17 NRC 719,726 (1983) means for ensunns adequase emergency ; .r whee a pasticular jurisdiction is om panacapsting in emergency planning; ALAB-847,24 NRC 431 n.68 0986)
United States Depanment of Energy (Clinch River Smeder Reactor Plant) ALAB-755,18 NRC 1337 0983) vacation af si=aiaiaa on temedaal sails on mootness grounds; ALAB-842,24 NRC 199 (1986)
United Sunes Energy Resenedi and L - Adminisuosion (Chach River Brceder Resciar Plant),
CU-7613,4 NRC 67 0976)
Commission sus spense authority to carrect baard procedural eners; CU 86-22, M NRC 691 n.3 0986)
Unised States v. A11asheny-Ludlum Sient,406 U.S. 742 (1972)
Commassion authority to grant - - from regulations; CU-86 24,24 NRC 774 n.5 0986)
United Stasas v. Carter,347 F.2d 220,221, Gi Cir.), cart, denied,382 U.S. 888 0965) licensing bosni obligation to encenaui seguacy of a transcrips; ALAB-839,24 NRC 52 0986)
United S'.aies v. Morgan,313 U.Ss 409,421 (1941) effect of media views an smclear poser an adjudiasuny decisimunaking process; ALAB.840,24 NRC 6" 0 986)
United States v. Smith,562 F.2d 619,620 21004 Cir.1977) bees for licensing board to resolve conskis about o&ial treneenpt; ALAB-839, M NRC 53 0986)
Unised Sia:es v. 'Jssised base Woutme,330 U.S. 253,292 n.57 0947) board suenanny to determme the bounds d is own parisdiaimi; ALAB-NO,24 NRC 58 n.2 0986)
Virguda Beatne and Power Ca (Nonh Anna Pourz Susi<m, Units I and 2), ALAB-491,8 NRC 245 (1978) t,med seniew of uncontested issues; LBPL8629,24 NRC 307 0986)
Virginia Eminc and Power Ca (Nech Ann. Ibeer Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-584,11 NRC 451,453,455 (1988) bunion an opponent of summary dispessuan manian: LBP-86 27,24 NRC 257 (1986); LBP 86-30,24 NRC 445 (1986)
Virginia Elecanc and Pownr Co. (Nanth Anna Ibwer Station, Urnes 1 and 2), ALAB-584,11 NRC 451,467
(:980) mandard fu appeal of licansi:4 board schedulin8 decisims; ALAB-841,24 NRC 95 0986)
Vir inia Bactr3 and Powr Co. (Nonh Anna Ptmar Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-676,15 NRC 1117 I118-20,1130 (1982) <
causes of taubine generate breakup and mGile genention; ALAB 841,24 NRC 90 0986)
Vaginia Doctru, and Power Co. (Nonh Anns Ibwer Stasian, Umse I rad 2), ALAB-790,20 NRC 1450,1453 l (1984) panies who may appeal decisians advesse to them; ALAB-845,24 NRC 252 0986) i behingtan Public lbwer S, apply Symon (WPPSS Nuclear P:ojes Na 2), ALAB 712,17 NRC 546,551 (1983) ways so deme nstrais good cause far conste permit extension; C118615,24 NRC 400 0986)
Waabingem Public Jbwer Supply Sysian (WPPSS Nuclear Project Na 2), DD 84-7,19 NRC 899,923 0984) smunds for betinumn of showcase , . . DDM17,24 NRC 7761(1986)
I. smunds far stml.mn of boiling water asectors; D48616,24 NRC 748 (1986) l S3 l
LEGAL CITATIONSINDEX CASES Ndngum 1%blic Pbwer Supply 5ymem (WPPSS Nuclear Project Nas. I and 2), CLI-82-29,16 NRC 1221 1230 31 (1982) admissibility of e-ans in canarucuan perant extensian prMng; LBP-8636A,24 NRC 577 0 986) demonaradon af pad cause fu consuuction permit omsension; C1J-8615,24 NRC 399 (1986)
West Chicap v. NRC,701 F.2d 632,64145 Odt Cir.1983) bensing risins an maanrials license ; CU 8617,24 NRC 495 (1986)
West Oscar v. NRC,701 F.2d e2,645 Oth Cir.1983)
- concerns that ano subject to due pecess panscuans in materials license amenuirnent pmoundas,
- CU4617,24 NRC 491 -(1986)
! Wiscesin Beatric Pbwer Co. (Ibint Band Nuclear Plant, Unit 1), AIAB-696,16 NRC 135,1255 (1982) '
peelty for peny's failuso to adequainly brief issues at appeal; AIAB-843,24 NRC 205 (1986)
Wisconsin Elecens Pbwer Co. (Point Beach Nuclear P. ant, Unas 1 and 2), ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 (1983) probability of snultiple steem generate tube failure; ALAB443,24 NRC 212 (1986) e e
f e
1 k
i 1
- j l '
i i
54 l
l I
a F.,
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 C.FA 1.11 responsibility for appomung licensms boards; ISP-8637A, 24 NRC 728 (1986) 10 CFA Part 2 heanns rights on cmstruaion permit extension; CU 8&l5,24 NTC 398 (1986) 10 CFA Part 2, Subpart 0 e procedures applicable to materials licmse amendment proceedmgs; CU-8617,24 NRC 495,499 (1986) 10 CFA 1104(a), 2.105(aX7) -
Canmission discrenan to convene formal proceeding a matenals license amendment; CU-8&l7, 24 NRC 499 (1986) due process implicauons of decision favonna mfortnal proceeding for ruoludon of materials license amendrnet conarns; CU 8&l7,24 NRC 497 n/ (1986) 10 C.FA 2.104(c) distincuan between responsibilities of a hcensms board and those of the NRC Staff in granung a lowpower heense; AIAD-854,24 NRC 791 (1986) 10 CFA 1105(e)(2) insponsibility for designaung members of stenuc safety and licensms boards; LDP-8637,24 NRC 724 (1986) 10 CFA 1107(a) applicat ility of already iswed construcuan permits; LBP-86-37, 24 NRC 722 23 (1986) board c,maiderauona in decidmg wahanwalAerminanen motions; LBP 8633, 24 NRC 477 (1986) condinons for wuhdrawal of operstarg license applicauons; LDP 8639,24 NRC 835 (1986) 10 CFA 1109 effect of appbcanon for bconse tenewal on emparauon of canent license; DD 8&l3,24 NRC 603 ral7, 604 n.18 (1986) estarit of construction pernut conditions impoacd by Modificauan Order where no heanns is requested;
!.BP 86-33,24 NRC 478 (1986) 10 CFA 2.201 acuan required for violauons of NRC requiremems; DD-86-8,24 NRC 156 (1986) 10 CFA 1201(b) interpretsuon of licensee's admission of a violanon; DD-86-il, 24 NRC 368 (1986) 10 CFA 1202
, need for enforcement acuan where beensee has volumanly agreed to suspend opersuons; CU 8&l9, 24 NRC 510 (1986) 10 CFA 2.204 classtncaum of OM proceedms; LDP 8633,24 NRC 478 (1986) hearing nahts on identical condinons imposed individuaDy on au of a group of licensees; CU-8623,24 NRC 700 (1986) 10 C.FA 1206 adequacy c( emergency planmng for Davis Besse facility; DD-8&l7,24 NRC 754 (1986) adequacy ci residual heat removal systerns at GE boiling water reactors; DD-8&l6, 24 NRC 748 (1986) dernal in part of peudon requesung imposinon of penalnes for violauons at fuel fabncauon facihty; DD-8&ll, h NRC 326 (1986)
- e LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REG 11AT10NS denial of peution alleging danciennes in pping and barossman of employeas; D1kB612,24 NRC (V j i
(1986) denial of peutian essemns de6aancass in ...;. 'l quahnandan af elrM w *gupment; DD-86-9, 24 NRC 169 (1985) denial of pontion asserung pauern of mannsenal incan& and adads 4 e. failures: DD-86-8, 24 NRC 1510986) denial of sequest for lisense suspension because of vialstimi of facuity's e.v. + aantal gameasuan plan; DD 8614,24 NRC 609 0986) denial of sequest far setief sekuve to naniian hasanuaride cylinder repuna, faccity history, and weets i A=pa=h ;i DD 8613,24 NRC 589 (1986)
! . forum for sentating ' , af , program; CU-8619,24 NRC 513 0986) fanen for reisang cancern about wvisians to inspectaan, tesdng, or mairesnance programs at nuclear i l
, posur idwaa; ALAB-841,24 NRC 93 (1986)
! knpoper uses of 2.206 patinans; DD 8615,24 NRC 624 nJ,626 27 0986) l liugability of adequacy of sepulatory conunis far fuel fabricacian facility under. DD 86-13,24 NRC 590
. under, DD413,24 NRC 590 n.3
' htigebility of issues that the subject of edemnastrative ;
0 926) l htigsbGity M NRC employee sanduct maners in 1206, ,. DD 8611,24 NRC 331 (1986) litigability of mquess involving initial licensing ur.dar. DD 8615,24 NRC G20 a.1 (1986)
- validity of
- ' - leeknie test for Phlo % de Unit 1; DD-86-18, 24 NRC 762 0986) 10 CFA 1704 responsibility for appenting bcomas boards; LBP-E37A,24 NRC 728 0986) t 10 CFA 1704(c) 3 tune limit for 61ing monians far disquah8 cation; ALAB-845,24 NRC 250 0986) 10 CFA 1704(d) (1986)
- responsibGity for appanting new menbar of licensing beesd when muing member becomes unavailable;
(
i l LBP437A. 24 NRC 729 0986) 10 CFA 1707 heansing boasd ' authority to dismiss .. because of a " faDuse to suspand to discovery
{ sequesis; AIAB-456,24 NRC 810 0986) g pensky for fsaias to Sie aply so intervenor .it.g.n : witit die m bessel; MM 24 NRC 58 n2 0986) senah d party's fsDes to ==ra-I to appeDate bnet ALAB-845,24 NRC 251 n.35 (1986) i 10 CFA 170$(b) .
l eine Imr an appellais briefs; ALAP 443, 24 NRC 204 n.7 (1986) 1 10 CFA 1710 f desdhne far rephas to inetians to saihe; AIAB-851,24 NRC 530 n.2 (1986)
! 10 CFA 1710 and 1711 I
estensions of time for Aling staternents in informal proceedings; LBP435,24 NRC 558 n.2 0986) 10 C.FA 1711(a)
{ baani authunty to shanan tune for discovery and Eling of testanony and 6ndangs and conclusions; i
ALAB-845. 24 NRC 251 (1986) j 10 CFA 1712(d)(3)
M= for supues to macians to saike; ALAB-851,24 NRC 530 n.2 0986) 10 CFA 1713
, a- for es pene commeurasians; CU 8618,24 NRC 505 (1986) 10 CFA 1713(b) nananarney , of ory.=wiaa by an indiviskaal who is nas a member of that organnation; AIAB-843,24 NRC 203 n.3 0986) 10 CFA 1713(c) .
penalty for % pena . ^ tiene; A1AB-840,24 NRC 60 61 (1986)
$6 i
o.
, o l
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX t
REGULA110NS i
(- !
10 CFA 1714 Canuniasion aview of cometness of licensing board's application of five-factor test; CU-86-21,24 l NRC 682 (1986) i 10 CFA 1714(a) !
adnussibility of laie $ led containans in construction permit earension proceeding; IEP-8636A 24 NRC 579 0 986) applicability to informal ; _-. u;P 8635,24 NRC 558 0986) pmeedues by whidi a maae may take en advueenal pa=W in a peaceedes; AIAB450,24 NRC 527 a.3 (1986) 10 CFA 1714(a)0)
I cruana to be addseemed for ' af late 6 led consenuans; LBP-8622,24 NRC 105 n.3 (1986) test for adnessian of late Eled careenuens addressing applicant's request far low-power license; LBP 8634,24 NRC 554 n 6 0986) 10 CFA 1714(b) bens wishapecinen* aquumenant for adnusman of . ALAB441,24 NRC 69 (1986) means for satisfyi as bees and specincity requunnenss for contensians; ALAB 845,24 NRC 238-39 0 986) piesding standants for affaite emersency response consonnons; AIAB443,24 NRC 215 a710986) 1 sterJant for detennining whether a consension's basis and speca6 city a-2 "assanable"; ALAB445,24 NRC 230 0986) tirse that bens far a coreannan noia be supplied; ALAB445,24 NRC 235 0986) 10 CFA 1714e Y appestability of deciman ternunaung operaung license proceedms; IEP-8637,24 NRC 725 (1986) 10 CFA 2.715 access of judges aplacmg other board mornbers to limited appearsaco statements; LBP-8637A,24 NRC 729 n.3 0986) 10 CFA 1715(a) public sinisments in informal ; _ . LBP-8635,24 NRC 559 0986) 10 CFA 1715(c) asement af pena far leswo to parnespeas as an insmened Sines ALAB450,24 NRC 527 rL3 0986) !
! esepe d ,-- ' ' _ _ under; IEP-8624,24 NRC 135 m3,139 0986) i sutus oceanled siste penopanon in NRC proceediny; CU4620,24 NRC 519,520 210986) j 10 CFA 1717(a) terminanimi af heenans board Junehw= la construcnan permit phens of a proceedms; LBP4637,24 NRC 720 0986) 10 CFA 1718 scope of board saharity to naulaae beanny; AIAB-845,24 NRC 250 0986) 10 CFA 1718(f) scope of board aushanty concerning mnt i ons to withdrew conianuans; LBP4622,24 NRC 105 0986) 10 CFA 1718(i) (1986) carn 6 cation of question to Camnusman nesrding --e af gaad cause for consuucuan permit extensian: CU4615,24 NRC 398 (1986) 10 CFA 1720 board authesity to ensure wuness auandance; ALAB443,24 NRC 215 (1986) 10 CFA 1720(f) burden an party clanning has mens duecung wimmes to appear at : time; AIAB445,24 NRC 250 09se) 10 CFA 1720(h)(2)(i) nopensibility of hcenema board in weighing and caneidenns evidence; ALAB-856,24 NRC til (1986) 10 CFA 1721(a) authority to designate psumidmg of6 cess of sternic safety and licensing boards; UIP46 37,24 NRC 724 (1986).
s7 1
a
- i. LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS I
10 C.FA 2.730 soone of board authanty concermns mauons to withdrew - . LBP-8622,24 NRC 105 0986) 10 CF.A 1730(c) deadline for replies to manms to strike; ALAB451,14 NRC 530 n.2 (1986) 10 CF.R. 2.733 scope af crosseaninanan by expen huerrogstor; LBP4623. 24 NRC 11415 0986) 10 CFA 1734 cn:ena inr desemumns motions to reopax CLI-8618,24 NRC 505 (1986) cnieria for isoprains a scord wtwre samt en decisionnuking process k alleged; AI.AB 840,24 NRC 62 n.10 (1986) faihue of ia to supply grour.ds for reversing licensing board's dersal of subpoens request; ALAB 856,24 NRC 812 (1986) require.nents for manans to reopen a scord; LBP-86 41,24 NRC 927 0980 10 CFA 2.740(b)(1) use of discovery to make contentions more speciac; ALAB40,24 NRC 2410986) 10 CFA 2.743 I
standard for admission of addicianal wraan tuatimany after desdhne for pre $ ling testimony has passed; LDP-86-23,24 NRC 115 0984) 10 CFA 2.743(b) espansion of oral testimony after deadline for preR1ing issumuny; LBP4&23,24 NRC 115 0986) 10 CFA 2.743(c) bens for heensing board rejection of an exhibit; ALAB-845,24 MRC 245 n.28 0986) .
standant for adnussibility of evidence in licensir4 proceedmas; ALAD 845,24 NRC 235 (1936) 10 CFA 2.749 sinulanry to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; LBP'8677,24 NRC 257 (1966) 10 CF.R.1749(a) burdas an movant far summary disponnian; LBP-8627,24 NRC 257 0986) burdai on opponent of senmary dispomuon motion; ALAB-841,24 NRC 93 0966); ALAB-856, 24 '
. NRC 809 n.32 0986) respanses to statements supponmg sueur.ary _ _ " matuns; 13P'8630,24 NRC 439 n.10986) 3 10 CFA 2.749@)
burden on appones of summary disponuan motian; ALAB 641,24 NRC 93 0986); ALAB 856,24 NRC 809 a.32 (1986); LBP46 27,24 NRC 257 (1986) dispannan of f sunenary disposiaan maticn; LBP4&27,24 NRC 258 0986) 10 CFA 2 749(c) standaid for grant d addinanal time for response to sunenary disposisian mesian: A1AB 841,24 NRC ,
94 (1986) 10 CFA 2.749(d) standasd for grant af stsumary disposition motion; LBP4627,24 NRC 258 (1986) 10 CFA 2.750(s) aone official transenpa of a proceeding; ALAB439,24 NRC 49-51 (1986) 10 CFA 1750(b) manner of conecung a transcrip4 ALAB-839,24 NRC 51 n.19,53 0986) 10 CFA 1751a(c) rules arPlicable to stenographically reported transcripts of preheering conferences; ALAB-839,24 NRC 51 0 986) 10 CFA 1752(b) sulas applicsble to stenographically reported transenpts of preheenns conferenas; ALAB-839,24 NRC 51 (1986) 10 CFA 2.754 determinant of pany's need to file proposed Endings of fact and conclusions af law; ALAB445,24 NRC 252 n.37 0966) 38
a
- LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 CFA 1754(a) ,
boani authority to shorten time for discovay and Aling d tesumeny and Andings and conclusiano; I AIAB 845, 24 NRC 251 (1986) !
10 CFA 1757 smpe of baard authorny to regulate beannss; ALAB445,24 NRC 250 (1986) 10 CFA 1758 appbcability to requests for exemption fiorn full participatim anergency sanrcise mm.aa, CU4624,24 NRC 774 n.5 (1986) breadth of Comnussion's bar against coDateral attadt en its regulations in NRC proceedmas; CU4&23, 24 NRC 708 (1986) ancepnens to 10 CFA 50.47(d); LBP4&25,24 NRC 142,147 (1986) 10 CFA 1758(a) litigabiluy of postulated enwgency core cooling system failure; AIAB441,24 NRC 101 (1986) waivers or saceptims to 10 CFA 50.47(d) and 50.57(c); LBP-8624,24 NRC 13638 (1986) 10 CFA 1760s acceptability of licensee arrangancrus for maintaining a pool of bus drivers to assist durma a radiological ernergency; LBP 8&32, 24 NRC 472 (1986) boani cesideration of uncontested issues; LbP46 29, 24 NRC 298,308,309 n.8 (1986) danncuan between issponenbilities of a licmams board and those of the NRC Staff in granting a lowpmer heense; AIAB454,24 NRC 791 (1986) issues that are htigable in opunung hcense proceedings; AIAB-847,24 NRC 420 n.16 (1986) sonpa of issues that can be addressed by a licensms board; ALAB-852,24 STC 545 (1986) 10 CFA 2.762(d)(1) conters of appellate beefs; AIAB-856,24 htC 805,809 (1986) need for secord support in appe!! ants' briefs; AIAB439,24 NRC 50 (1986); AJAB443,24 NRC 204 (1986) support necessary for alleganons of board artor; ALAB452,24 NRC 537 (1986) 10 CFA 1763 scope of bosni autherny to sa ground rules for partmpanon; AIAB445,24 NRC 254 n.38 (1986) 10 CFA 1764 effecuveness of board decisions favonns operatiert; CU 86 22,24 NRC 688 (1986) 10 CFA 2.764(f) authanzation of operating hcense before complation of appellate process; AIAB452,24 NRC 548 n'5 (1986) 10 CFA 2.764(f)(2) timing of Comnussion imrnediais effectiveness reviews: LBP4629,24 NRC 319 (1986) 10 CFA 1780(a) '
factors assessed in daternuning whaher a docunent is an as pane communicanun; ALAB-840,24 NRC 60 (1986) working paper en emergency planning, authored by utihty counsel, cited as sa parte ccenmissauon:
AIAB440,24 NRC 57 (1986) remedy for es pane communications; ALAB440,24 NRC 60 (1986) {
I 10 CFA 1780(c) I remedy for es pane communicanons; CU 86-18,24 NRC 505 (1986) 10 CFA 1786(b)(7) har against motions for reconsideration of appeal board docums; CU4&21,24 NRC 683 (1986) j 10 CFA 1788 factors appbed in determming stay requests: CU4612,24 NRC 5 (1986)
)
parinderim to hear stay request: CU-86-12,24 NRC 4 (1986) 10 CFA 1790(d) i information regarding facility physical protection or mawial control and accountmg that is disclcsable; DD4611,24 NRC 366 (1986) l l
l 59 l
- e LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGtAATIONS 10 CFA 2.802 apprapnme vehicle far challenging Commassion agulanens; DD-8615,24 NRC 627 0966) imum far changing nasincation rupuremmes for spas ibel aiupments: DPRM-865,24 NRC 654 098G forum for seeking evacenen or suspensian af paitia== IEP-8625,24 NRC 143 (1986) 10 CIA Past 1 Appendix A, at 120 (1986)
. _ . , "y for appanung b===ag boards; 12P 86 37A, 24 NRC 728 0986) 10 CEE 1 Appendix A. HI(b) -
acams of judges supisang other based a==h== to limised appeannes sistamanu; 12P 8637A,24 NRC 729 n.3 (1986) 10 CJA Past 1 Appendia A. V(s)O) of5aial transcript af a pMar AIAB-839,24 NRC 50 (1986) 10 CFA Part 2, Appendia A, VE(b)
Am==- between :==p==ibnities d a hasnams board and those of the NBC Staff in stensing a j low power license; ALAB-854, 24 NRC 791 (1986) -
10 CFA Past 1 AppenJia A. IX(e) !
soupe af beant ausharity to ses gnmed sules for , ; ALAB-845,24 NBC 254 a.38 (1986) 10 CFA Pwt 2, Appendix C adequacy d seventy levels nationed to violanans as fuel fabncauan facility; DD-8611,24 NRC 327 0 986) responsibility for choosing somedies fw licenses violations d NBC regulations; DD 8610,24 NRC 171 i 0 966) 10 CFA Ptat 2 Appendix C,III !
evaluenan of asterity level af violation; DD-8611,24 NRC 395 0986) I 10 CFA Part 2, Appendia C IV enfaseemble sequusmanis for which a Nazias of Wlanens may be issued; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 336 (1986) j an==i==d fat damernumns action to take for violanau of NRC regulations: DD 8611,2d NRC 335 0 986) i 10 CFA Past 2. Appendia C. V3 I aggregnung violanees far purpeem of asaamns severity level; DD 8&ll,24 NRC 395 0986) t 10 CFA 19.11(4 (b) - j pennes negaremenu for h= wbese vahone of aaa===a= is palabitive; DD 8611,24 NRC 380 1 (1986) j 10 CFA 19.11(c), (d) j right d h===== amployees to talk pnystely and can&dennaBy wish NRC ic=p==== DD-8611,24 NRC j 349 0 986) q 10 CJA 19.12 '
adequacy of training at fuel febncenan facility; DD 861t,24 NRC 346 (1986) informanan reganhng fea0ity physical pasecuan or maaerial canaal and accounung that is disclosable; j DD 8611,24 NRC 366 0986) '
l quahncanans and taining a-- y for adiarian pnmaction todanmaar DD 8&!l,24 NRC 371 (1986) 10 CFA 19.13 relation af Nuclear Safety Instrusnan E-tLO to; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 351 (1986) 10 C.FA 19.15(s), (b) w=*i- of privees esmouhations between ih employees and NRC inopsetas; DD 8611,24 NRC 349 0 986) 10 CFA 19.15(b) seape af emplayum concerns thus ano r=pa==m under; DD 86-!!,24 NRC 379 0986) 10 CFA Part 20 edvane effeas from esses buried from 1970 through 1981; DD 8613,24 NRC 605 0986) smatret besween NRC and EPA total body dame limits; L3P 8640,24 NRC $67 0986) impact of tntiurn migation inno smund water at Vogtle sine dunns panut- e u 12P-86 28,24 NRC 284 0956) l l
l 0
l l
I l
l l
l l
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS trinum levels allowed in liquid ofnueras; DPR1486 6, 24 NRC 675 (1986) use of admuustrative controls to lunit ansanans of 11-3, C 14, and I 125 isotopen in incinerator o&gss ofnuems; LDP-8640,24 NRC 856 (1986) 10 CFA 20.1(c) odgin and meaning cf ALARA: DD-8611,24 NRC 340-41 (1986) l 10 CFA 20A(b)-(d)
' unerpretation of radiatim dose; Al>S-856,24 NRC 814 (1986) 10 CFA 20.101 need far licenses employens to wear persmal radiauan monitoring devices; DD-8611. 24 NRC 351 (1986) 10 C.FA 20.101(a) interpretation of radiation dose; ALAB-856,24 NRC 813 (1986) 10 CFA 20.103 means for keeping quantuy of inhaled uramum within regulatory limits; Da8&l3,24 NRC 602 n.16 0 986) 10 C.FA 20.1(D(a)(1) nsk to etnployees fmn apan cooling of uranium sintered pellets: DD.8&ll,24 NRC 374 (1986) 10 CFA 20.103(a)(1), (2) reportsbility nf radioactive spin where no uptake of radioactive material by employees accurn; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 363,370 (1986) to C.FA 20.103(sX3) seversy level IV violatim issued for air sampling violations; DD 8611, 24 NRC 376 (1986) 10 CFA 3).103(b)(2) requirements for hcesees to schieve expesures AIARA; DD 8611,24 NRC 341,369-70 (1986) )
10 CFA 20.106 measursenent of radioactive telesser fam .intaneratar furnace vera at site boundary rarher than at vern; 12P-8640,24 NRC 858 (1986) 10 CFA 20.202(a) suspensibGity of licensee to supply personal marutaring equipment; AIAB 856,24 NRC 814 (1986) 10 CFA 20.202(b)(1) deAninen of pomanal avantcsing : ALAB 856,24 NRC $14 (1986) 10 CFA 202G3(aX2) need to past warning signs around radioscovo siens; DD-8613,24 NRC 600 (1986) 10 CFA 20.206 qualiacations and training necessary far radiation pnmactaan techmcians; DDw8641,24 NRC 10 CFA 20311(d)(4)-(8) vaham redniction facility's proceduto for chedung waste stupments; LBP 8640,24 NRC 854 (1986) 10 CFA 20.401(aX2) deportability of radioscuve saleases from incinerator off-gas discharge stack; 13P-8640,24 NR (1986) 10 CFA 20.407 tras:pretation of radiatica d9se; ALAB-856,24 NEC 813 -(19W) 10 CFA 20.408 right of ernployees to chtain sucord of radiation exposure; DD-8&l5,24 NRC 623 (1986) 10 CFA 20A08(b) faihus of licenses to furtsh NRC with employee terminatim repsrt; DD 8&Il. 24 NRC 351 (1986) 10 C.FA Past 20, Appendia B psoceduus for d= rems radioactive anussions in incmaritar ofLass dracharge stadt; L3P 855 0 986) tritium levels aDowed in liquid oth=r DPRM-866,24 NRC 673,675 (1986) 10 CFA Put 20 Appendix B, table 1, set. I bens far NRC linws on concentrates aubana urannan; DD-8&l3, 24 NRC 602 n.16 (1986) risk 10 employees fan cpan cooling of uramum smuned pellers: DD-8611,24 NRC 373,375 (19 61
e .
l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 CFA Pan 20, Appedia B, table II expected LBP 8640,rxecentrauans 24 NRC 868 (!*86) of affluent ndioisotopes in air at site boundary of volume re need fw real-time continuous monittmng in incinerator off-gas discharge stack; LBP-86 0 986) 10 CFA Part 21 10amendment CFA Part 40 of criteria ud procedures for reporting defects; DPRM 864,24 NRC 640 {1986 i reporting requirements for radioactive arnasians frorn incinerator cff gas discharge st NRC 855 0986) 10 CFA 40.43 a
effect of application for licanas renewal on expiration of cumen license: DD 8613,2 604 n.18 0986) 10 CFA Part 40. Appendix A, Critanon 5 conformance d NRC requinrnents to EPA standarda; CU-8&23,24 NRC 707 (1986) 10 CFA Part 50 request fe st.mdment to modify reporting requirements to reduce regulatory burden on hee applicanta: DPRM-86 4, 24 NRC 636, 640 (1986) 10 CF.R. 50.1 regulations applicable to utilization facilities; LBP 8634,24 NRC 554 (1986) 10 CFA 50.10(s) agulations applicable to utilization facilities; LBP-8634,24 NRC 554 0986) 10 CFA 50.12 content of briefs challengmg requais far exemptions; CLI-8624,24 NRC 772 n3 (1986) 10 CFA 50.12(a) excmption from tesung af comainment aidock; AIAB-841,24 NRC 98 0986) 10 CFA 50.12(aXI) burden m opponent of request fe essmption frorn regulations: CU 8624,24 NRC 77 10 CFA 50.12(aX2)requiremmes for grant of exempoons frorn regulations; CU-8624,24 r
10 CFA 50.12(aX2Xii)requuements for grant of exempoons fran reguistions; CU 8624, burden on opponers of request for exemptim frorn regulations; CU 16-24,24 NRC 775 undedying 0 986) purpose of regulation for full participation emergenc/ exermso CU 8624,24 NR 10 CFA 5030 chugtng nature of gersung license application; ALAB 853,24 NRC 716 n.4 (1986) 10 CFA 50.3Ma) need for utility to file un&ological emergency response plan for unus plume EPZ before issu low power license; ALAB-853,24 NRC 71318 0986) 10 CFA 5034(aX1) 10odequacy CFA 50,36 of geological / hydrological exploration of Vogtle site; LDP 8628,24 NRC 269 fmdings 0 986) neccesary for license to land fuel and conduct precnticality testms; LBP-8&31.
10 CFA 50.40(b) scope of NRC Staff review of applicara's managerial 24 NRC 164 0984) PM-H and manpower allacanons; DD-868, 10 CFA 50.44 nature of corarols required to prevent excessive hydrogen generation dunngALAB-841, reactor accident:
24 NRC 710986) 10 CFA 50.44(cX3XivXB)(1) way for deraansusting structural integnty d == - -- , AIAB 841, 24 NRC 78 (1986) 62
I
. j t
l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGOLAMONS to CF.R. 50.44(cX3XvXA) capabilines required of safe shutdown systems arui compeents; ALAB-841,24 NRC 71 (1986) 10 CFA 50.44(cX3XvXB) amount of hydrogen that control systems must bs capable of burning; ALAB-841,24 NRC 71 (1986) 10 CFA 50.44(cX3XviXB) applicant responsibility to evaluate conseqtumces of hydrogen generation and combustion for severe-accident scenarios; AIAB-841,24 NRC 71 (1986) 10 CFA 50.44(cX3XviXBX3) scope of hydrogen generation analysis requued of appbcarus at operating license stage; AIAD 841,24 NRC 74 (1986) to CFA 50.44(cX3XviX11X5)(1) way for demonstranns sauenaral insegnty of ~ a ": AIAB-841. 24 NRC 78 (1986) 10 CFA 50.44(cX3XviiXB) scope of hydrogen generstaan analysis requand of applicants at operating licensa stase; ALAB-841 NRC 71 (1986) use of equipment survivability analysis of one facility to danonsuste structural integnty of another facility; AIAB-841,24 h1C 80 (1986) to C.FA 50.46 adequacy of BART and FLEClf!' coaslations in emergency cose cooling system evaluation model:
LBP.86 23, 24 NRC 130 (1986) limus on hydrogen generation dunns reactor accident; ALAB 841,24 NRC 70 rL6 (1986) 10 CFA 50.46(bX3) limits on hydrogen generation dunns reactor accident; ALAB 841,24 NRC 70 a6 (1986) 10 CFA 50.47 seceptability of licenses arrangements for maintaining a pool of bus dnvers to assist dunns a radiological emergency; LDP 8632, 24 NRC 472 (1986) adorpacy of energency plan that lacks agreement far relocttian ceter, CU 8616,24 NRC 406 (198 effect of anergency planning de6ciencans on plant operaunn; DD 8617,24 NRC 754 (1986) guidance for implementing emergmcy plans: DR8&l7,24 NRC 755 eL2 (1986) requirement far esatise of emergency plan; CU-8&ld,24 NRC 37 (1986) 10 CFA 50.47(s) emergency preparedness 6ndings necessary is aparating license issuance; CU.8622,24 NRC 689,694 (1986)
' Endings - y to rmA= power plant operstism above 5%; AIAD-847. 24 NRC 419 (1986) measures of signincance and adequacy of amargency plans; CU-8613,24 NRC 29 (1986) purpons of inquirement for full-panicipation emergency caercise; CU-8624,24 NRC 775 n.8 (1986) 10 CFA 50.47(aX1) ;
scuans affecung fmdmg of reasonable assurance that emersucy response plan can be carried aus; DD 8615,24 NRC 620 (1986) ernwgency planning danciencies necesntating licase su:yension; ALAB-845,24 NRC 234, D7 (1986) litigability of adequacy of canmarcial aclephone cucutts dunns an emergency; ALAB 845,24 NRC 51 (1986) 10 CFA 50.47(sX2) bsats far NRC Andings en offsite emergency preparedness; CU-8&22,24 NRC 693 (1986) >
I effect of lack of state energency plan e adequacy c(licensen's anergency plan; ALAB 847,24 NRC 430 a63 (1986) 10 CFA 50.47(b)
~
effect of deficiencies in emergency plamms en operstmg license issuances ALAB-847,24 NRC 429-30 (1986) need tw governmental cooperation wuh utility to comply wi2 anergency plaming .
CU-86-13,24 NRC 29 (1986) status of NUREG-0654, A1AB-855,24 NRC 798 n.22 (1986) !
1 l
t
" l l
1 i
i
I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS l j
10 C.FA 50A7(bXI) l assigenen of emeramey suspame nepansibuides; ALAB-847. 24 NRC 429 0986) 10 CFA 50A7(bX5) '
litigsbility 0 906) d adequacy er commamal islaphans emuuins doing on muerymey; ALAB
.I need for baaimp fe ---
S telephone lines to mobihas energency suspones pesenal; AIA&S 24 NRC 229 0906) mgnuunnes for 'f insponsdality for 'nasi6 satan af populace with plane EPZ; ALAB-852,24 NRC 541 (1986) {
AIAB 847,24 NRC 427 0966). ; whether and when to elan public of5eials to an a
~
10 C.FA 50.47(b)(6) ausd im bookup sammunicaties syman to h enagency nepenas organiandens; AIAB
' NRC 229 30 31 & n.9 0986) 10 CFA 50A7(b)(8), (10) odequacy of Ulf0 seleceuen ommer and services for eveauess; AIAB 855,24 NRC 79 10 CFA 50A7(b)(10) need to lac 1=a= esecuation time estimsse in emergency plans; ALAB-845,24 NRC 248 psessesive estians As must be developed for phune EPZ; AIAB 843,24 NRC 205 0986) range af preessaise sciians to be included in energmey mapame plans; AIAB-855,24 NRC 798 0986); CU.86-13, 24 NRC 25 0906) aus of phene espasme pathway energency planning sans; AIAB 852,24 NRC 5410986) 10 CFA 50A7(b)(12) standant for judging a medical facGiny's adequecy for nesting conianunsied irsused individuals ALAB 845,24 NRC 237 rLl9 0986) 10 CIA 50A7(b)04) pupass of emergency esacises; ALAB-845,24 NRC 239 0986) 10 CFA 50A7(b)(15)
' mening to be pnsraded to smagency maesess; ALAB445,24 NRC 242 a.26 0986) 10 CFA 50A7(c)
- band abhannen to consider inili; -
plan proposed wishout mass gemanunams aaarden; CtJ 86-13,24 NRC 29 0906) 10 CSA 50A1(c)(1) enest of % in emagemey planung an opanang lisense issunnes; AIAB-847,24 NRC 429 0 906) fanum of utility spamesed anagency pian to peeride adequais bassim emnpassung man CLI-8613,24 NRC 25 (1986) need far license suspenman for emagency asponse alencienmer, AIAB-845. 24 NRC 233 usefulname of canagency enemses when all d the plan's elemanas cannes be tasted; CU NRC 39 0906) .
10 CFA 50A7(c)(2) sise and --i . _ of emmasacy pienning monas; AIAB 845,24 NRC 228 n.1 (1986); AIAB-852, 24 NRC 541 (1986) 10 CFA 50.47(d) anergency yeupasahases $ndings sequimd prior to 4 oflow-power operasmg lisanes; AIAB-854, 24 NRC 787,790 910986); LBP-8634,24 NRC 5510986) haeans nebes en ensins emagency , . .12P 4625,24 NRC 144 0906) need for unilasy to Ble r=Aaaar==t emergency suspense plan for entire phune EPZ before iss low power liesnes; ALAB-853,24 NRC 715-17 0986) 10waiver, CFA 50A9 or careptians to; LBP 8624,24 NRC 136-38 0986); LBP-8625,24 NRC 14347 0 liennese appuoseh to resolving .;
mismas for snesting sequimmems for -
- quah6 cation
- deAcamcies; DD-8G9,24 NRC 1710986) psogium for safesy relatal apupmans, LBP'86-28,24 NRC 292 0986) 64
_,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - ^ ~ ~
7, .*
l l'
l l
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS purpass of and mquirements for environmental quahncation d elecinc equipment impanant to safety; LBP-8628,24 NRC 288 (1986); GP 86 41,24 NRC 906 (1986) 10 CFA 50.49(cX8) margins in quahnostian testing; 12P-86 41,24 NRC 920 0986) 10 CFA 50A9(fX2)
Why of qualifyms,g by emilarity, almenneal eqmpment impanant to safety; ALAB-856,24 NRC
' 816 (1986) 10 C.FA 50.49(j)
Staff verinostian of .m tal quahncataan of electric eqmpmars imponant to safety; LBP-86 41,24 NRC 916 0986) 10 CFA 5034(f) louer used as basis for 2.206 request for acuan; DD 86tQ,24 NRC 176,172,180-82,18485 0986) 10 CFA 5034(o) 6 sequuemeras for intagmed leak reas tesung; DD 8618,24 NRC 764 (1986) 10 C.FA 50.54(p) psoposed amendment of reponmg squusments no that danpas sa security er safspanis effectiveness plan can be reponed annually; DPRM-864,24 NRC 63718,642,646 0986) 10 CFA 5034(q) paposed amendment so that energency plan danses can be reputed annually; DPRM-86-4,24 NRC 638, 642, 646 0 986) 10 CFA 50.54(q) and (s) responsibility for energency plans: DD 8617,24 NRC 755 (1986) 1 10 CFA 5034(s)(2)(ii) . '
need to shut down facility because of emergency planning danciencies; DD 8617,24 NRC 758 0986) 10 CFA 50.55(b) (1986) .'
burden an applicent far - permi extension; CL18615,24 NRC 398,400 (1986) 10 CFA 50.55(e) I psoposed asioideness of suposang mqm:sments so ali-inne 24haar natancatim aquusment for design I i and seasouction de6cumanes; DPRM 864,24 NRC 639,646 (1986) i 10 CFA 5037 )
changma nanno af apaesing 1i=== applicacian; ALAB-853,24 NRC 716 a4 (1986)
' 3 10 CFA 50.57(s) . i
, 6edings necessary for 3- af low-power license; 2P-8631,24 NRC 453 57 0986); 12P 8634, j
, 24 NRC 553 0986) 10 CFA 5037(c) boasd desarrrunanans that must be made when license to land fuel and conduct procriticality testing is opposed; LBF-8&31,24 NRC 453 57 0986) issues that are litigable relevent to issuance of low-power license; LBP-8634,24 NRC 55156 0986) j need far utiliry to Ale radiological emergency response plan far entus plume EPZ before issuance of low-power bcense; ALAB-853,24 NRC 71415,717 (1986) -
requuements far obtaining low po*er license; ALAB-854, 24 NRC 786,790 (1986) I waives or easepuarw to; LBP-8M4. 24 NRC 137 38 0986) 10 CF.R. 50.58(b)(6) (1986), as amended in 5i Fed. Reg. *f744,7765 (Mar. 6,1986) authonty to soview Staff *no sigru5cers hazards considerstaan" Anding; CU 86-12,24 NRC 4 0986) 10 CFA 50.59 Staff n
- ties to sview pasran revisicas at nuclear power facili0s: ALAB 841,24 NRC 93 0 986) 10 CFA 50.59(b) pmposed amendens to dange tune innervals far reponing of changes to a facili:y or procedmus demonbod in F5AR; DPRM464,24 NRC 64442,646 (1986) iD CFA 50.59(c) need for license amendmes for freestandias rather than behed-down spent fuel pool rackr, CU-8612 -;
24 NRC 17 n.10986) 65 l
1 k
w__ _ -
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 CFA 50.62 plants requuud w have standby hquid control systarns; ALAB-841,24 NRC E7 (1986) 10 CFA 50.71 satisfaction of 50.59(b) repreung requirements by cornpliance with; DPRM4&4,24 NRC 640 42 (1986) 10 CFA 50.72(a) pmposed amendmsra to eliminale duplicate repomns requuemets; DPRM 864,24 NRC 644,646 (1986) 10 CFA 50.73 amendment to extend time period for reporting occurrences relevers to techmcal speci5 cations; DPRM464,24 NRC 644-46 (1986) documcrastion of donctancies in licenses's regulatory pedormance; DD 86-10,24 NRC 176 (1986) separting, snquuemenis under, DD-86-11,24 NRC 335,363 (1986) 10 C.FA 50.91(s)(4) effecuveness of licensa emendments concerning vessel flux reduction; 1.BP 8623,24 NRC 109 (1986) 10 CFA 50.92(c) spent fuel pool rarstiiny requirms "significant hazard consideration"; CLI-8612,24 NRC 7 (1986) 10 CFA Pan 50, Appendix A fmdings necessary for license to load fuel and conduct precriticahty testing: LBP 8&31,24 NRC 456 (1986) standard of performance rogsdred of ernergency systems; ALAB444,34 NRC 219 (1986) 10 C.FA Part 50, Appendia A, GDC 1,4 purroso of and requusmems fa envuonmental quah6 cation of alectric equipment important to safety; LDP.8528,24 NRC 28b (1986); IEP-8641,24 NRC 906 (1986) 10 C.FA 5 e 50. Appedia A. GDC 3 purposes i.4 aucisar power plant fue pnxecuen pmgram; A1AB443,24 NRC 208 (1986) 10 CFA Pan 50, Appedix A. GDC 4 adequacy of South Texas Project cirucuuss to withstand hurricano-generated missiles; LBP-8029,24 NRC 299 (1986) 10 CFA Pan 50, Appendix A, GDC 10 timit on departure fran nucleate boiling entio; LBP-8623,24 NRC 119 (1986) 10 CFA Pan 50, Appendix A, GDC 17 sequuements for onsite elecmc power sysurrr, ALAB-841,24 NRC 81 (1986) 10 CFA Pin 50, Appendix A. GDC 19 22 adiequacy of Sealwook control room design; LBP-8622,24 NRC 104 (1986) 10 CF.R. Part 30, Appendix A. GDC 62 adequacy of Tudsey Ptaru neutron muluphcation factor of .95; LBM&27,24 NRC 259-61 (1986) <
10 CFA Pan 50, Appedia B timisation on who may prepare a nuclear power pla:a quahty assurance plan; AIAB441,24 NRC 82 (1986) 10 C.FA 50, Appendia B, Inunducuan standant for determimns adequacy of quahty assurance /quahty ccatrol progam; ALAB-852,24 NRC 541 (1986) j 10 CFA Part 50 Appedia B. III, XI, and XVII !
purpose of and sequuements far envuonmental quahncadan of electnc eqmpment important to safety; LBP46 28,24 NRC 288 (1986); LEP 8641,24 hT4 906 (1986) 10 CF.R. Pan 50, Appendix E saceptability of licensee arrangements for maintastrs i a poal of bus dnvers to assist during a radiological ernergency; LBP-86-32,24 NRC 472 (1986) ;
need far governrnental cooperation with utility a ramply wah emergency plano 20 requimme.iis; I CLI-8613,24 NRC 29 (1986) )
requirement for exercise of emagency plan; CL14614,24 NRC 37 (1986) !
10 CFA Pan 50, Appendix E,IV )
avamation ume asumate to be included in emergency plans; AIAB445,24 NRC 244,248 (1986) ]
)
u
, .=
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGllLATIONS need to pmvide for offsiis ndialogical pasonnel monitoring in emergency response plans; AIAB 855, 24 NRC 798 (1986) 10 CFA Pan 50, Appedia E, IV.D.1, IV.D.3 nsponsibility for determining whether and when to alert public ofEcials to an energency situadon; ALAB 847,24 hRC 427 (1986) 10 CFA Pan 50, Appedia E, IV.D.3 design objective of pearnpt pubbe nott$ cation systan; AIAB-852,24 NRC 5410986) 10 CFA Part 50, Appendia E. IV.F.1 esemption faarn requirunent for full-panicipatim anergary exercise within 1 year before fuD-power licenas issuances CL1-8622,24 NRC 693 rL5,694 0986); DD 86-15,24 NRC 620 (1986) litigsbility of emtentions citing danciacies in emergency exercises; LBP 8638A,24 NRC 824, 826 (1986) need fa public panacipadon in arnersecy ensacises; CU-8&24,24 NRC 780 0986) ,l 4.- for full t anticipation emergery exemses; CU-8624,24 NRC 771 (1986) 10 CFA M 50, Appedia E, n.4 dannitim of full-participatim exercise; CU-8624,24 NRC 771 n.1 (1986) 10 CFA M So, Awa dix E. Y pmposed amendment to specify "thmshold of signiScance" for reporting changes to ernergency plans; DPRM-854, 24 NRC 64243, 646 (1986) 10 CFA Part 50, Apredix !
criteria for determimng practicability of additional reductions in radioactive efnuents from nuclear power reactors; DPRM-866,24 NRC 677 78 (1986) 10 CFA Part 50, Appasdia J validtty of contamment leak rate test far Palo Verde Unis la DD 86-18,24 NRC 764 66 (1986) 10 CFA h 50, Appaidia J. H.A ,
reason fa requiremes that reactor contamment be leakproof; ALAB441,24 NRC 98 0986) ;
10 C.FA Pan 50. Appedia J, Ill.D.2(b) t eacmptum imm requiremmt for contamman aidock tasting; ALAB-f41,24 NRC 98 (1986) 10 CIA Pan $0, Appendix K adequacy of BART and FLECifT correlaticas in anagency case cooling system evalustian model;
, LEP 86 23,24 NRC 130 (1986) limiss an hydrogen generation durms muctor socident. ALAB-841, 24 NRC *)0 iL6 (1986) 10 CFA Part 50, Appendia R purposes of nuclear power plant 6:s pnxecunn pmgram; ALAB-843,24 NRC 208 (1986) ,
, 10 CFA Pan 51 !
NRC respannibilities to consider avuonmentalirnpacts of withdrawal of operstmg liwus application; LBP'8639,24 NRC 835 (1986) request far amendrnent sequiring fuu EIS to aaver generic environmersal impacta of high btornup nuclear fuel; DPRM-36% 24 NRC 194 (1986) 10 C.FA 51.5(c) need fw envimamental appraisal when EIS is not needed; DPRM-8&2,24 NRC 195 (1986) 10 CFA 51.20 need fw EIS for use of high-burnup fuel; DPRM-8&L 24 h1C 195 (1986)
LO CFA 51.20(a)-(c) adequacy of geologmal/hydmiogical exploratsm of Vogtle sitr; LDP-8628,24 h1C 269 (1986) 10 CFA 51.20(aX1) companson with 10 CSA 51.5(a)(10); DPRM-862,24 NRC 195 (1986) 10 CFA 51.20(bX13) compenson with 10 CJA 51.5(aX10); DPRM-8&t 24 NRC 195 0986) 10 CFA 51.21 need far environrnental asseestrass fw withdrawn! of opernung licerne appbcauan; IEP 8633,24 NRC 478, 481 0 986) 67 l
[
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGll1A710NS referral of scnon an aquest fw withdrawal of apmenns Ucense applicane pendmg seasipt of Siaff environmental aseeeement; LBP-86 39,24 NRC 835 (1986) requimmanu of; DPRM-86 2,24 NRC 195 (1986) 10 CFA 51.25-51J5 (1986) need fw EIS on assacking of spent fuel pool; CU 8612,24 NRC 12 0986) 10 CFA 51J2(b)(1) (1983)
L' homens rigins en proposed maisnais limmens eenen when EIS is segund; CU-8617. 24 NRC 498 .
(1986) 10 CFA 51J2(b)(1), (d) type of henang sequued far matadals lisense : CU-8617,24 NRC 498 (1986) 10 CFA 51.92 erheria for papension of suppw.i EIS; DD 8615,24 NRC 627 (1986) 10 CFA 51.108 0986) type of heedna sequued for snaissians licana amenenent; CU 8617,24 NRC 498 (1986) 10 CFA Past 53 Comnneman pufmemos for maiu mange ehernadve to spent fuel shipmmes; DPRM-86 5,24 NRC 660 (1986) 10 C.FA Part 70 repornns requirements for radianctive smasmans from incmarator off-gas discharge stadt; IEP-86 40,24 NRC 855 (1986) 1G CFA 70.22(i) use of mector fuels cuiside the rescia case; 12P 86-34, 24 NRC 554 (1986) 10 CFA 70.24 heigability of licensee's caanpnan fmm, misvent to request for low-power license: LBP4&34. 24 NRC 553 0 985) 10 CFA 70.34
, licenses oblipnen to submit revuians to Ibadamental Nuclear Maianal Canuel plea to NRC; DD 8611,24 NRC 355 0986) 10 CFA 70.55(c)(3) ennent of NRC iv=' esames to liseness facihnes; DD-8611,24 NRC 349 0986) 10 CFA 70.57 need for lisenses to know metal isapuruy eenient of UO 2 ; DD4611,24 NRC 352 (1986) 10 CFA 70J7 and 70.58 esiset of NRC soview of demu===.i- of ediesenve wees abim DD-8611,24 NRC 352 0986) 3 10 CFA Put 71 i seed for spent fuel shippsns casks to somet aineens -d wish histaricany bened, sust-world accidanu; DPRM-86 5,24 NRC 661. 664 (1986) 10 CFA Part 71, bu'apest H .
quality assurance for transport of licensed maionals; DD46 il,24 NRC 358 0986) 10 CFA 71.0(d) quality assurance requimmanu for transpat of licanand maissials; DD-8611,24 NRC 358 0986)
]
10 CFA 71.97 extent of pnar naadicaties auquimd for spent fuel shipmenu; DPRM465. 24 NRC 654 0986) 10 CFA 71.113 desumentatkri requuumeme for transpas d licensed ra==.h; DD4611,24 NRC 358 0986) 10 CFA Part 73 papened amendment to modify sepanmg sequuseums so reduce segulatory burden an heensees and applicants: DPRM-864,24 NRC 636 0986) themencel passibihty of -wp. as coues for wuhholdag usuance of low-power opeanng license; ALAB454,24 NRC 789 (1986) i 10 CFA 73.37 ]
wi-o of ureguare, infarnenen reianns to span a.m shipmem; DPRM-c55,24 NRC 665-66 (1986)
)
68
,, e:
4 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 CFA 73J7(b)p)
NRC Staff evww of th's phyniasi pnnacuan psopam for spera fuel tansportanan; DPRM-865 24 NRC 666 (1986) 10 CFA 73.71 psoposed amendenes to saied period for fouowup wiinan spans; DPRM SM 24 NRC 643 (1986)'
10 CFA ha f 00 l' casenen apphenble to - of bassids from hannosswgenereind amissGm; ISP-8629,24 NRC 4 300, 303, 314, 317 0 946) l- 10 CFA '100.10(c)(3)
I adequacy d ;
- J V , __ _ ' espiarsdan of Vagde siae; IM86 28,24 NRC 269 0086)
' 10 CFA 100. Appendix A. M(g) chmecianssias af e apable fauk; CG8622,24 NRC 695 m 6,697 0986) 10 CFA 100. Apr==di= A. 20s) de6nition d a tesianic psovince; CG8622,24 NRC 695 is7 (1986) 10 CFA 100, Appeda A. VI(a)
_ _ . , : of design aspense specia; CG8622,24 NRC 698 (1986) 40 CFA ha 61 sasarest.between NRC and EPA total body dose li. nits; L3P 8640,24 NRC 867 (1986) ees of adownstrative canuals to limit emissions af H4. C 14, and I-125 insiopes in incinerator off-gas ehmes; LBP se 40. 24 NRC 856 0986) 40 CFA his 141 antium levels aDowed in dnnlung water, DPRM-866,24 NRC 673 0986) 40 CFA Parts 172, Subpan C.173 '
volume eduction facility's psooedum far chedung wease shipmems; LBP-8640,24 NRC 854 0986) 40 CFA het 190 appilosbGity of ediation panection sea =6d= far inanens to biens; LBP 8640,24 NRC $73 0986) aahii=a-d doses no sendues classsa to vahans seducman fachity; LBP 8640,24 NRC 869 0906) .
use of admsmstenovo cantmis to limit annasians of H 3, C 14, and I 125 isosapes in incineraser cif tas
! efRusses; LBP-86 40,24 NRC 854 0986) 40 C.FA 192 34(a)(2)
===a= snill owness' liosuses ennenened to requim '
- af ground weier mamaanns program; CU-86 23,24 NRC 706 0984) 44 C.FA 350 i FEMA , '" -- far ensemang ===y= icy plans; DD-8617, 24 NRC 755 n.3, 756 (1986) need far Gnal FEMA Andiny pnar to authanzadan d ap==mg haunes; ALAB-852,24 NRC 546 0 946) soaps of reviews conducied en amargency plans; CU-8622,24 NRC 695 (1986) 44 CFA 351 training pmgrams for emergency asponse pesannel who deal wish transpanation acculents involving radiascuvo material; DPRM-865. 24 NRC 655 (1986) 49 CFA 174 safety aquummeras far spent nuclest fuel shipmerns by rail; DPRM-865,24 NRC 6510956) 49 CFA 177.825(c)-(d) emergency action unining sequimmaus far cemen of spars nuclear fuel: DPRM 865. 24 NRC 656 (1986) l 68 i
n
- LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES Admuustranve Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 551(14),557(d)(1) factors assessed in determinmg whaher a document i, an en pans communicauen; AIAB-840, 24 NRC 60 (1986)
Administradve Procedure Act,5 U.S.C. 553 ,.
pmcass of imposing ngulatory inquircrnents for licensecs CU.8&23,24 NRC 708 (19R6) M' Administrauve Procedure Act,5 U.S.C. 556(e) oflicial transenpt of a pmceedmg; ALAB-839, 24 NRC 50 (1986)
Admuustranve Procedure Act 5 U.S.C. 557(dXI)(A) person ogsmst whom the ban against submuung en pana communicadons applies; CU.86-18,24 NRC i 505 rLI (1986) l Adnunistranve Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 557(d)(1)(D) fmdmg necessary to impose sanc6an for en pane communicadon; C1J-8618,24 NRC 505 (1986) penahy for ca pane canmumcations; ALAB440,24 NRC 60 (1986)
Administranve Procedure Act,9(b),5 U.S.C. 558(c) effect of application for license renewal on empiranon of cunent license; DD.8613,24 NRC 603 n.17 l (1986) l Admuustrudve Proceduis Act,5 U.S.C. 702 challenges to agulations in individual pmcerdings; CU-8623, 74 NRC 708 (198o)
Atomic Energy Act,11,42 U.S.C. 2014(cc) status of facility whos cartstruaion never progressed far enougn to permit use of special nuclear material; LBP-8637,24 NRC 723 (1986)
Atomic Energy Act, 81,161(b), (o)
NRC authorny to enforce EPA's ground water standanis; CU.8623,24 NRC 706 (1986)
Atomic Energy Act, 84a(1)
NRC authonty to address genenc issues on a case.by case basis; CU-8623,24 h7C 706 (1986)
Atomic Energy Act,103,42 U.S.C. 2133 status of facility wher, construction never progressed far enough to permit use of special nuclear matenal; UIP-86 37,24 NRC 723 (1986)
Atonue Energy Act,103d,161c, 42 U.S.C. 2132(d), 2201(c) necessity of emergency exercises when all of the plart's slanents cannot be tested; CU 8&l4,24 NRC 41 n.2 (1986)
Atomic Energy Act,186e,42 U.S.C. 2236(a) responsibility for choosmg remedies for licensee vtalanuns of NRC regulauons; DD 8&lo,24 NRC 177 (1986)
Atonue Energy Act,189a,42 U.S.C. 2239(s) adequacy of informal procedures for addressms concerns about materials license amendment; CU-8&l7, 24 NRC 498 (1986)
Commission discreuan so lima issues to be heard in enforcement pmceeding; CU 8&l9, 24 NRC 514 (1984) consutuuonally pmrected mterests relevant to m .:#.9 Ocense amendment; CU-8&l7,24 NRC 496 (1986) heanng rights un requests for escrnpuons from reguladons; CU 8624,24 NC 774 (1986) 71
I 1
i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATLfTES :
)
haanns rights en offsite emersecy preparedness; LBP-86 25,24 NRC 144 (1986) l
, pom hearing Mmaa of contested issues by Staff; ALAB 841,24 NRC 86 (1986) pm-amendment hearing rights an spent fuel pool rurackms: CLI-86-12,24 NRC 6 (1986) j Atomic Energy Act,189a(1) need far hastmg en operedng liccase application; LBP-86-37,24 NRC 73 0986)
Asanne Faergy Act,189s(2)(A),42 U.SA 2239(a)(2XA)
Staff "no siy6Acans hazards determinanan" on serading of spans fuel pool seen as violane of; C1186-12,24 NRC 3-6 0986)
Atomic Energy Act, 274(!)
informal parucipation by a staia; C1186-20,24 NRC 519 0986) l
- Asamic Energy Act 715 l NRC authority to condinan uraniwa miit owners' licenses to requis implemersation of ground water t monitoring program; C1186 D,24 NRC 706,707 n.3 (1986)
Energy Reorsemantian Aa of 1974,202,42 U.SA 5842 NRC authority over DOE activities. DPRM-86 5,24 NRC 666 (1986) l' Energy * - _ 2an Aa of 1974,210,42 U.SA 5851
,4 aussauans of apnaals asainst whisdebloweis: DD-8611,24 NRC 328 (1986) cooperation between NRC and Departmars of Labor concermns employee prosecuan provisions;
.t DD-8611,24 NRC 33132 (1976)
I Iow-level Radioactive Wame Policy Act of 1980,42 U.SA 2021b et seq.
, Commisman pohey on compactim and incmeratian of low-level wome; LBP-86-40,24 NRC 850 0986)
- N.Y. Ezecutive law, art. 2 B, 25 i ,- for mats respanae to radidogical emergency; CU-86-13,24 NRC 27,31 (1986)
Nadanal En _. --' Pbbey Act,101(bX3),42 U.SA 4331(b)O) i interpretation of radiation protecticn goals; DPRM 864 24 NRC 674 (1986) l 1 National En ;
- Policy Act. 42 U.SA 4332 Staff "no signiacans hazards desernunaue" on raraciung of spat fuel pool asen as violation of; l CLI 8612,24 NRC 6 (1986).
Nuclear Wome Policy Act of 1982,132(5) 42 U.Sc 10,1520) authoney of loost populaties to voto NRC licensing decimans; CU 8612,24 NRC 1411 (1986)
- Nucler Wases Pulicy Act of 1982,132,134,42 U.SA 10,152,10,154
- Staff "no signinces hasards desarm%ation" m ruraciung of spans fuel put aman as violation of; C118612,24 NRC 5-6,14110986)
Nuclar Wame Pblicy Act of 1982,134,42 U.Sc 10,152(5) heanns righas an amendment aDowing zeraciang of apont fW pool; CU-Bo 12,24 NRC 110986) e Nuclear Waste Pbhcy Act of 1982,137,42 U.SA 10.157 use of pnvas for transparsation of spent nuclest fuel; DPRM-86 5,24 NRC 666 0986) l Water Polluuan Cararol Act Amendmarus of 1972,402,33 U.SA 1151 regulation of tritium m1 eases to the omronmara; DPRM 86 6,24 NRC 675 (1986)
I t
I I
~
l \
)
o a,
e I
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX OTIIERS Black's Law Dstionary 288 (5th ed.197'd defuution of cornernpt; ALAB-840. 24 NRC 61 (1986)
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 similaviiy io 10 C.F.R. 2.749; IEP-86 27, 24 NRC 257 n.1 (1986) s 7s IL Rep. No. 212, 99th Cmg.,1st Sess.,131 Cong. Rec. 15.358 (1985) ,.
adequacy of utility sponsored emnergency plan based on presumpuw that state and local governments -
will fulAll legal duuss to pmtect the public; CU.8G 13, 24 NRC 27 n.7, 31 (1986)
- 11. Rep. No.184, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 37-38 (1982) smpe of Commusam safety deternunaden ngardmg license amendment fo: spent fuel pool serickmg; CU-86-12,24 NRC 18 (1986)
Nuclear Pouerplars Ucensing Delays and the Impact of the Shelly Versus NRC Decision: lleerings Before the Subcomnt on Nuclear Reguladon of the Senate Comm. on Environment and Public Works, 97th Cong.,1st Sess. 138,149,156 (statements of Joseph IIendrie, Qiairman, NRC) meamns of "no signincant hazards consideration"; CU 86 It 24 NRC 1819 (1986)
Nuclear Regulatory Commissica Operating Ucensing Process: Oversigit lleanns Before em Subccmnunce on Energy and the Environment of the House Comnunes on Imerior and Insular Affairs,97th Cong., M ist Sess. 30,32,75 (1981) (statements of Joseph Hendrie, Chairman. NRC) basis for "sigmAcant hazards considersdans"; CU-8&l2, 24 NRC 18 (1986)
- 5. Rep No,113, 97th Cmg.,1st Sess. 14 15 (1981) scope of Commission safety deternunation aganding license amendment for spent fuel pool seracking:
C1186-12,24 NRC 18 (1986)
"no sigmacant hazards consideration" for spent fuel pool seracking: CU 8&l2,24 NRC 16 (1986)
Webster's nird New International Dict,anary (Unabndged,1976) defundan of " subsumed" relevant to one contatim wnhin another, LBP 8638A,24 NRC 823 (1986) 73
SUBJECT INDEX ACCELERATION See itigh-Frequency Accolreation ACCIDEN~S consequences of fire in off gas system at mlume reduction facilay: LBP-86-40, 24 NRC 841 (1986) criticabiy, from increased ennchment of fuel, ALAB 848,24 NRC 434 (1986); LBP 8&27,24 h1C 255 (1986) _,
involving transponation of radioscuve matenals, amargency plaruung for; DPRM-865,24 NRC 647 W*
(1986) toss of coolant, imm leamage into low pressure residual heat removal system: DD 8&l6, 24 NRC 747 (1986) opumum moderadon in spat fuel pools; ALAB448,24 NRC 434 (1986); LDP 8627,24 NRC 255 (1C86) rupture of overfilled uranium hexant.onde transportauon cylinder, CLJ 8617,24 NRC 489 (1986);
CLJ-8619,24 NRC 508 (1986) uramum hexanuande cyhnder rupture; DD4613,24 NRC 587 (1986)
See also Chernobyl Accident; Post-Accident Samphng System
, ADJUDICATORY BOARDS authonty to expedite a proceeding; ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986) authority to interrupt or cut off a witness's teaumany; ALAB-845, 24 NRC 220 (1986) authonry to shonen time periods for discovery and for subnutung prefiled testimacy and proposed findings and conclusions; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) limit on findings by; ALAB 847,24 NTC 412 (1986) naht to deternune bounds of their own junsdiction; ALAB 840,24 NRC 54 (1986)
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT treatment of party subnutung an ex parte communicauan; ALAB-840, 24 NRC 54 (1986)
AIR MONfrORING nouse of violauan issued for dencimcies in; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 325 (1986)
AIR SAMPLER level of violauon assigned for impmper locauan of; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 325 (1986)
ALARA discharges of snuum from operaung nuclear power reacters; DPR4866, 24 NRC 671 (1986) origin and meaning of; DD 8511,24 NTC 325 (1986)
AMENDMENT of transcrip, directed cerufication of licensing board dertal of motion for, ALAB 839, 24 NTC 45 (1986)
See also Materials License Amendment: Operating License Amendment ANTICIPATED TRANSIENT WfrilOUT SCRAM 1983 Salen event; DPRM 863,24 IGC 629 (1986)
APPEAL BOARDS coune when no appeals are taken frorn a reviewable licensing board decision; ALAB 849,24 NRC 523 (1986) discretim to allow oral argument; ALAB-845, 24 NRC 220 (1986) 75
I o .
SUBJECT INDEX jurisdiction to addrums mems of modon for disqualincation of licanaes's counsel and to scopen record .
en offsite emergency plannes; Q18618,24 NRC 501 (1986)
NRC policy on suo-d== dan of d==~is ef; CU-8621,24 NRC 6810986) scops of appellass review by; ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986) standani for evenurmng a lower board's factual Andmss; ALAB 856,24 NRC 802 0946) sus spame owiew ausharky of; ALAB-846,24 NRC 409 0986); ALAB-848,24 NRC 434 0986) .
APPEALS
.,, of reemd omnesman esdess; ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 (1986) i et claim that s=hpa-a was impsopedy issued; AIAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) of h-ala of . AIAB 854,24 NRC 783 (1986) of snevances of other penia; AIAB-843,24 NRC 200 0986) !
of sciseduling d==== AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 0986) of StaK no sismAcent hamuds haion Anding: CLt 8612,24 NRC 10986) et senmary dispeammi d===aaa AIAB-854,24 NRC 783 (1986) perdcipation rishas of nonparty humessed sians; CU 86 20L 24 NRC 518 (1986) .
! rights of huervenor mio has withdrawn; AIAB 851,24 NRC 529 0986) i f tressment af inadequately bnefed issues on; ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 (1986); ALAB-845,24 NRC 220
. 0 986) j Ses also Review, AppeDase ATOh0C ENERGY ACT headas rights an enforcement actian; CU-8619,24 NRC 508 0986) hasons rights an facility license renewal application; DD-8613,24 NRC 587 0986) l- licammas standsnis under. IAP 8629,24 NRC 295 (1986)-
! no siguncess hasards consideratiorm under, CU-861124 NRC 10986) j zelation to federal Water Pollution Control Aes; DPRM-866,24 NRC 6710966)
ATObDC SAPE'IY AND UCENSING BOARDS
, "y far appenting rnambass and posiding ofneur: IJP 8637,24 NRC 719 0986) i =y==hhey for roomastitution et, LBP-8637A, 24 NRC 726 (1986)
I
- See also Uemaning Basids AUXIUARY BUIUMNO Fermi 2, oversnessed piness in: DD 461P. 24 NRC 174 (1986)
( AIDGLIARY PRESSURI2ER SPRAY SY3'ITM i at Palo Vade, ACRS onneures abeus; DEM&8,24 NRC 151 (1986)
BIAGOUT
! See Sessian Bleaksaa i BOARDS .
u See Adjudicessy Baands; Appeal Bouds; Aisnic Safay and Lionnens Boards; taosanns Boards i
! BOtWNO WATER REACIDRS edequacy of zumidual heat removal symems in: DD 8&l6,24 NRC 747 0986)
BORON concentration in teactor coolant system throughout fuel landing and piecnticahty testing; ALAB-854,24 NRC 783 0986)
BRIEFS l sppellant's, faihus of appeDes to suspand to; AIAB 845,24 NRC 220 0986)
} support sequised for; 13P 8630,24 NRC 437 (1986)
{ BRIEFS, APPEUATE .
consent ef; ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 0986) 1 panaky for ia data in AIAB 852,24 NRC 532 0986); ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986) reoned suppet inquised Yor, ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 0986); ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 0986) ;
{- '
suppet needed far . nag =*= in; AIAB 856,24 NRC 802 0986)
BUIUXNOS l Sao Amauiary Buildms; Ranciar Building I
76
at .e-SUBJECT INDEX CABMS l See Elecuic Cable Insulation
! CARBON 14 rulerses by volume seducuan semcas facility; LBP-8640,24 NRC 841 (1986)
CA2KS ,
S. spent het shipping Cads CEKIECATION See Duecied Ceru8cetion CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT offest en emergency planning CLI-8622,24 NRC 685 (1986) need for suppiamsmal EIS on basis ar; DD46-15,24 NRC 618 (1986)
QREF ADMINISTRA11VE RJDOS respansibilitans af; IEP 86 37,24 NRC 719 (1986); LBP 8637A. 24 NRC 726 (1986)
COMMUNICATION 5 anums pnnapal emusency response arganiastians; AIAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986)
See also En hne C COMPACIOR opersuan af, far low-level rs&ametive wasta reducuan; LBP 8640,24 NRC 841 (1986)
COMPETENCE See Managemers Campstence COMPUTER SECURITY seculators impurements far DD-8611,24 NRC 325 (1986)
CONDITIONS j See License Can&tions !
CONFIDENT!AIITY of allegess in NRC law = sepana; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) i CONFUCT OF INTEREST I in utiliry anployees occupying command and contrat pamuens during a raeolopcal smergency; j ALAB 847,24 NRC 412 (1986)
I CON 81RUCTION
- "' of comientians canernas delay in completian ce LBP-86-36A 24 NRC 575 (1986) dancianmes, proposed amen &nent to change time pened for aparung
- DPRM-864,24 NRC 635 (1986) i CONSTRUCTION PERMTT EXTENSION estabbahing seed asues for delay in aanstsucuan completian in anler to obtain; CU 86-15,24 NRC 3F1 (1986) '
withdmoel of aprliestian far; ALAB-842, 24 NRC 197 (1986)
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EXTENSION PROCEEDINGS admissibility of contentions in: CU-8615,24 NRC 397 (1986); IEP 8636A 24 NRC 575 (1986)
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS modi 6 cation of; IEP-8633, 24 NRC 474 (1986)
CONTAINERS ~ l for transiemns samples within fuel fabrication facility; DD4611,24 NRC 325 (1986) ,
See also Spent het Shipping Casks ;
CONTAINMENT '
airlosk tasting; ALAB 841,24 NRC 64 (1986) demonsaadan af sometual intagnty of; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) l imagray, beesches af, at Fanni-2; DD-8610,24 NRC 174 (1986) auspense to hydrogen _ use of CIAS!X 3 computer code to analyse; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 '
(1986) !
aprey availabuity, need to annader effect af nation h== an; ALAB-844, 24 NRC 216 (1986)
CONTAMINA110N Ses Radianctive Cantanunscian 4
)
4 i
I
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ l
SUBJECT INDEX CONTENITON5 adnessibilhy in -- permh eatensen proceedmes; CU 8615,24 NRC 3F7 0986);
LBP 86 36A,24 NRC 575 0956) adnensian reqmssensus for; AIAB-MS,24 NRC 220 0986) app ==1=Mi*y of dasmussels ef; AIAB-854, 24 NRC 783 (1986) boasd disasution la deternusung - ' . d; ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986) beimds an luisable issues enablished by: AIAB-H3,24 NRC 200 (1986)
- basis and -hl= spes Achy far, ALAB-845. 24 NRC 230 0986)
I dienassel of, far failuss to suspend no essevery sagemas; ALAB 856,24 NRC 802 0986) lais Alsd, test far asnasmen af; LDP 86 22. M NRC 103 (1986) need to subnut basis widi - ; ALAB M5,24 NRC 220 (1986) en amargamey emessises, _ ; af; LBP&38A,24 NRC 819 0986)
W=I ar8unimus in; 13P-8636A 24 NRC 575 (1986) selevant to aquest for low-power license; IEP-86-34,24 NRC 549 0986) sequuemmes for informal preeyr LBP-8635,24 NRC 557 (1986) tunalansas of new veman of, IJP 86-36A. 24 NRC 575 0986) withdawn, repleosment wim idanucal conianuan sponsased by another intervenor, LBPL86 22. 24 NRC 100 0 956)
CON 11tOL ROOM detailed desien review, need far, pner to fuel loe&ng; UIP-8622, 24 NRC 103 0986); LBP 86 30, 24 i NRC 437 0986) management weakneans in opersaan et, at Fermi-2; DD-8610,24 NRC 174 0986)
COOLANT Ses Cooling Weser, Ranciar Coolant; Resciar (bla.* Symems COOUNO POND ,
envuorunmaal knpocis of other uses followns rididreast of aparatang license application; 12PM39, 24 NRC 334 0986)
- 1. COOUNO WAlliR immpersume and dassolved anysun luruistians in river weier withdowel fer, DD 8614,24 NRC 609 (1986)
See also Tamargsmsy Coaling Weser Reserver CORE See Rensent Case COUNSBL h '
af CU-8618,24 NRC 201098d) seenhsd for disquali6eesian of; ALAB-840,24 ARC 54 0956)
( GTI1CALTlY '
l' incsesse of neuuan nuhiptiostien factor fut 495 to 0.98; ALAB-MS,24 NRC 434 (1986);
LBP-86 27,24 NRC 255 (1986) <
'/'
CROSS-EXAMINATION on a wuness's insumany missed to mava placed in conuoversy tiy another pany; LBP 86-22,24 NRC 103 0986)
- 1. -
during hydrogen combustaan; AIAB 841,24 NitC 64 (1986) l Sao also Residual Heat Removal Systems DaCrew bisumahad by en pene oanunmusstums, voeding d; ALA3 p0,24 NRC 34 (1986)
- i
- kisuisine, vue power of lueel papai- over, CU 160. 24 NRC 1 (1986) ..
j D000PfrAMINA110N ' i of evestems duras rd%I emergency, sumpunkhty far, ALA&&l7. 24 hE 412 (1986)
DEPICIENCLIM {
'( -;
masseeney P:enning, effect an plus apuncion; Dh864L 24 NRC 753 (1986t 78 4
[
i SUBJECT INDEX q in desip and - papesad smandmem se disnas time period for repoeng; DPRM-864,24 l NitC 635 (1986)
DE1AYS IN CONSTITUTION COMPtEDON
""; ef m- emissnung: LBP'86-36A. M NRC 575 0956) de-g sand cause for purpass of abismuns pened ensamen; CU 8615,24 NBC 397 0986)
, assemns of 'disassend and spudisisd" missive to lissness nussendust in; IAP 5636A,24 NRC 575 -
i 0 906) i DEPANIMENT OF ENEROY I ansps of NRC sambassy eser, DPRM 865. 24 NRC 647 0986)
DEPARTMIDff OF 1 ABOR esupusman baseman NRC sad, for supoyas posessaan; DD46 il,24 NRC 325 0906)
DEPARTUIRE PROM NUCLEATE DOILINO RATIO of I 17, esmeerus arish; 1AP 8625, 24 NRC 10s 0906)
DESIGN i de8sensass, posposed smandesnt to obeny sismo pened far apaans; DPRM-86-4,24 NRC 635 0966) desumanness, h in, et Fernw2; DD4610,24 NitC 174 0986) of emuseums to wuhsised hmmemus and humoses gunsumed nussinas; IAPL86 29,24 NBC 295 0986)
Ses mise Sessnas Danip DE810N RESPONSE SPECTRUM fu sumund monian et Pasry plant, assunenes of senhapaaks sanseding; CLI-8622,24 NRC 685 0986)
DElffERIUM NitC sudianty to seculses; DPRM-864,24 NRC 6710906)
DICHROMATE TITRATIONS omside a hood, safssy of, DD46 II. M NitC 325 0 906) napsm. GENERATORS mhshiluy ef; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 0966)
DIOKINS
' miesses by vehmus messess insility h, pensenal far. IAP 8640,24 NitC 5410906)
! DERBCDID GRATIFICATION of bassang husal's desist er snesues no amend menssapt d psahasung ausfammes; AIAB 839,24 NItC f 45 0 906)
DISC 1DgURE f of emesspendense and spans salmed se phymsel sesunny er massnel sammel and sessmens pagem.
DD 86 II, M NRC 325 0906)
' DISCOVERY hugueung of, ALAB-445. N NRC 220 0906) based sushoney to shenen tisse period far; ALAB-M5, M NitC 220 0986) d==1 of somsmuens for faihas to mapand to sequeses for. ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986)
DISQUALIFICATION of counsel, siendssd far; AIAB-840,24 NRC 54 0906) of lismesss's enunsel for es pans annu====naa CLI 86-18. M NitC 5010986) tens limit for Sling inssion far, AIAB445,24 NitC 220 (1986)
DOCUMENTATION damp, as Foun-2, h in: DD461% 24 NitC 174 (1986)
DOCUMENTS
. Ses Paming of W dog 5 ANALYSES fassen used in, far valusse sedusenen fasGisy; 12P4640,24 NRC M10906)
Ses also ad- Dass dos!MFIEltS Ses Thannehenanesessa th-DRUG ABUSE si h=== Hams plass, snamn of; AIAB-852, M NIIC 532 0966)
E N
I : .
-g
,y l
e.
I !
SUBJECT INDEX M
1
' :' $* DUE PROCESS .e "
z*
E
- consdational projections relevant to materials lionne amenda,a, CGSM 24 NRC 489 (1986)
% See also Hearing Rights YARnlQUAKES j Otno 0986); CG8622,24 NRC 685 0986) g See also Safe Shuidown Eanhquake l
1 EFFLUEi
- CONTROL TEGINOIDGY i NRC - , _ _ for addition of; DPRM-866,24 NRC 6710986)
ELECIRIC POWER SYSTEM 1 * '
, wi armine,la npresation af regulation somrmns; ALAB441,24 NRC 64 0986h
.( EUCIRICAL CABM INSULATION .
patentis: /Imr selease of combustible asses during a hydrogen burn; AIAB44A 24 NRC 64 (1986) 21JiCTRICAL EQUIPMENT '
envbi,rmwmial qualincation; DD 869, 24 NRC 168 0986) .
knpanant to asfety, envimamenial quahacetian by anularuy; ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 0986)
EMERGENCIES See Radiological Erwsencias i EMERENCY COOIDlO WATER RESERVOIR regulasary suspannbility for in caos of site abandonmerm LBP46-39,24 NRC 834 (1986)
EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SERVICE WATER SYSTEM penahy for failure to provide a Bow path for, DD4&l0,24 NRC 174 (1986)
, EMERGENCY PLANNING .,
+ cndeinn of NRC's sequinenents for, by applicant's coinsel; AIAB-840, P NRC 5v 09%) .
m def.ciencies, effect on plant operanon; DD4617, /NRC 753 0986) I for transportanon accidsrus involving radioactive manerm 'DPRM465,24 NRC 647 0986) l need fw Enal FEMA 6ndings pris to suiharizacm of openiting licarns; /1AB-852,24 NHC 532 (1986) 1%
NRC Ssaff solse in: ALAB 847,24 NRC 412 0986) ^
\ pedictive nature of; CL34624,24 NRC 769 0986)
+
7 regulatiana, diallenger ter DD 8615,24 NRC 618 0986) , ,F reguiasasy smdsnoe for; AIAB43,24 NRC 792 0986) a 1'
requiremeras for an opersans liosme AUQ-847,24 NRC 412 0986) 1 ww sales of sians and local goveiawmas: ALAB447,24 NRC 412 0986)
J weight given to FEMA fadiras: A!AB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) W EMERGENCY PLANNINO 20NS U adequacy of, in light of Chernobyl accident; DD8615,24 NRC 618 0986)
EMERGENCY PLU;d s -
y T
',I commmucations amargJerincipal response organizations; ALAB445,24 NRC 220 (1986) cantant rJeling paenso -ms: ALAB443,24 NRC 200 0986) -
densat4m of sursciency rt, ALAS 445,24 NRC 220 0986) eveaution tune stunatas; AtAB445,24 NRC 220 0986) %.
- (~
far a purn; AIAB445, M NRC 220 0986) w far volume seductos facPd LBP4640,24 NRC $410986)
' b lack d asais pee <W << AIAli447,24 NE 412 0986)
= linertung mandard swinfie es C1J4613,24 MRC 22 0986) >
r medical servious sen,ase.eus; AIAB-845,24 NRC 233 0986) manuanns, +-=Wre, sad shah,ile.g of summ r_ _ , " **y far, ALAB447, 24 Kn 412 j
- 4 +- '
( 0 986) vaScenan of onegancy permane!; ALtJ-845,24 NRC 220 0986) '
nonAcetiat seguid =ne AIAktB47,24 NRC 412 0986) .
s . a offsise, dnWo of respoisidities in; AIA0441,24 NRC 412 0986) p essite, utilig t an / as subwes for mais and local government partacaperion; AL/JI447,24 NRC 412 (1986); QJ46-13, '48 ttBC 22 0966); CG8614,21 NRC 36 0956, - ,
4 l 8 x l~ S
% % l l P. ,
%* k l j
)
l
'% p.
A w (-
k '
se k_. .
3 . , _ - . - -- --_ L----
- A.,a . lpp y x-
~%
9 "
SUBJECT INDEX opereung license issusace in span of de6cienaies in: ALAB-H7,24 NRC 412 (1986) papased amendams to change tune period for separuns changes in; DPRM 86 4,24 NRC 635 (1986) responsibility for desennining what information is given to gowrnrnant of5cials; ALAB M7,24 NRC
'_412 (1986) .
saaedaad for measunns adequacy of, CLI-86-13,24 NRC 22 0986) stais law pahibiting applacenas fann pasforming asposts af; CLI-86-13,24 Nik. 22 0966)
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS andings sequised for issuense af low-paner th ALAB-853,24 NRC 711 (1986); ALAB-854,24 i NRC 783 (1986); lap 86 34, 24 NRC 549 0986) !
mensmry for aparating lisenes issuenos; CU-86 22,24 NRC 685 0986)
{ . offsine, hans .for NRC f.ndings on; CU-86 2124 NRC 685 0986) 1
. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISES
"; af ====ians an; GP 86 34A,24 NRC 819 0986) esempsian fnun requuemma for, CLI 86 24,24 NRC 769 (1986) i ful14cale, need for 1 per prior to t-un8; DD-8615,24 NRC 618 (1986)
'need for hearing ai, when manus of relecsuan eenier is unmanam; CU-8616,24 NRC 405 0986)
. public participesian in: CU-86-24,24 NRC 769 (1986) equisemess fce; ALAB 845, 24 NRC 220 (1986) usefulness whee utility cannat lawhdly implement all aspects: CU-8614,24 NRC 36 (1986)
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZADONS :
4-= amans; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986)
- EMERGENCY WORKERS
,y con 8icas in simpansibilities af; GP 86 32,24 NRC 459 0986) 4 ,' neu6cetion of; ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 0986) a- % requirement to inform of suspanabihties; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) time mspanse estunases far, LAP 86-32,24 NRC 459 (1986)
EMPLDfEES .
See 1- Employeen ENEROY 1
Ser Deparanus af Energy 1 ENFORCEMENT ACTION 4
haanns risins an; CU-86-19,24 NRC 508 0986)
- sanpo of . _ . CU 8619,24 NRC 508 (1986) l FXmRCEMENT POUCY 4
seculatory waagen of; DD8611,24 NRC 325 0986)
ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDING charactenzation of Order af Madiaceiian praesedmg as: IEP-86 33, 24 NRC 474 (1986)
DXIINEERING DISCREPANCIES See Human Engmeering C 'as ENGINEERING REVIEWS -
- at Fermi 2, inadequacies in: DD-86 lo,24 NRC 174 0986)
, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS challensac to; CU 8612,24 NRC 10986) need far, when operating liennes applicaisen is wuhdrawn; LBP 86 33,24 NRC 474 (1986)
, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT i en impeens of high burnup malear hael; DPRM 86-2,24 NRC 0986)
,,' --' need far, a bens of Chernobyl ==i=s DD 8615,24 NRC 618 0986) 4 ENVIRONMENTAL D4 PACTS
' ' i of wishdowel of spumans lisenes applicensa; LBP 86 39,24 NRC 834 0986) i ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECHON AGENCY sepalsnous, Canenassian mahariry to : .- CU-86 25,24 NRC 704 (1986)
. Mch ,,,. 4
~$ f.A}
.-_,, 81
.?.
e
I 4
l.
t SUBJECT INDEX
, . ENVIRONMENTAL PR(yTECilON PL.AN to nperates and disse.tved <mygen Ermtauens in awr waw withdrawal fa Umanck cooling water, DD 8&id,24 NRC 609 (1984)
ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION
' .' by similanty, of elecincal equipnent impartent to aafecy; AIAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986)
_-_ ' of elecmcal equiprners; DD 869,24 NRC 168 0986) of polymer materials at Vag:le plant; LBP-8628,24 NRC 263 0986) et solenoid valves use to perform safety-related functiars; LBP 8641,24 NRC 9010986) i EQUIPMENT survivability analysis for one facility applimi io ammher facility; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 0986)
See also Elecincal Equiprient; Emergency Equipment Service Water Sysiern
. EVACUATION
, of school district, sangassy of licensee arnmgeneras for bus driver far,13P-8632,24 NRC 459 0986) I
, , cf state convectional insutution in the event af radiological enersecy; LDP-8638. 24 NRC 731 (1986)
EVACUATION '!1ME ESTIMATES effect of nati6 cation end mobahzation of prison correctional omaars oe; GP-8638,24 NRC 731 (1986) for special facilitier; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) requiremen.s and basis far, AIAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986)
EVACUEES during radiological emergency, planning basis for. IBP-86-36,24 NRC 5610986) esumation of number to be accommodated at relocadon cerner, AIAB455,24 NRC 792 (1986)
EVIDENCE nos supported by sciend6c studies, acceptability of; LBP-8629,24 NRC 295 0986) status of exhibits as; ALAB445,24 NRC 22G (1986)
EX PAR 111 COMMUNICA110NS as basis far recps ting a seemd: ALAB-840,24 NRC 54 0986)
Cameruxion tresunent of ALAB-843,24 NRC 54 (1986) i remedies far, CLI4618,24 NRC 501 (1986)
EXFCtf!1VE DIRECTOR FOR OPERA 110NS i authonty to deny penders; DPRM-864 24 NRC 671 (1986)
EXEMirllONS bwden an opponers of request for; CU-8624,24 NRC 769 0986)
, fran emergency preparedness exercise requunment; CU4624,24 NRC 769 (1986) i fmn regulations to rectify injustice in adjudicatory onkr, CLI 862?,24 NRC 6810986)
EXERCISlJ Soo Emersmcy Preparedness Exercises EXPERT WTINESSES ability to drew contrary inferences fran tesumany of as basis far asseruon of board error, AIAB-852, 24 NRC 532 0986) qualdications of; LBP 86 23,24 NRC 108 0986)
EXTENSIONS OF TIME far Sling statements in infannat hearings; ISP-8635,24 NRC 557 0986)
FALSE STATEMENTS Saw Matenal Tsise Staternent FAULTS capable, chwacterisdcs at: CU 8622, 24 NRC 685 0986)
FEDERAL EMEROENCY MANAOEMENT AOENCY Andings necessary for issuance of low-power license; GP4634,24 NRC 549 (1986)
Andings necessary for operUng license authorir.atian; ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 0986) responsibility for assessing emergency pla:is; D&8&l7,24 NRC 753 (1986) weght given to emergency preparedness nadings of; AIAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986)
.m__.____._. - _____-__________._________________._____ __..______.__ ____.____-_______________._.__________.______m. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __-_m.__________ _m_
i i
SUBJECT INDEX ,
1 l
FINAL SAFE'IY ANALYSIS REPORT ,
adequacy of unsuners of spread of nre at Shaaran Hams; AIAB-843,24 hE 200 0986) i updaung of as a subsumis for $50.59(b) reparung requunnants; DPRM464,24 NRC 635 (1986)
FINDINGS OF FACT affect of fadure v, Ale; ALAB445,24 NRC 220 0986) licensms board, basis for overturmng; ALAB452,24 hE 532 (1986); ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986) psoposed, board aushoney to ahonen time for suhnumng; ALAB445,24 NRC 220 0956)
- standasd for appausse senew of; AI AB 843,24 hE 200 (1986)
FIRE PRUIT:CTION MA " of fbe bemers with respass to 6ss in cabis trays; AIAB-843,24 NRC 200 (1986) h Sg Final Safety Analysis Rapost FUEL spphcabihty of WRB-1 concal heet Aus corselstaan in 15 x15 OFA con 6guration; LBP 8623,24 NRC 108 0 986) chanos of cruicality =~idam fan increased annchrners of; ALAB-848,24 NRC 434 (1986) chanos of criticality socir! ant fran increased annchment of, GP-8&27,24 NRC 255 0986) high-burmp, need for EIS on; DPRM-8&2,24 NRC (1986) opunuzad fuel asserablyAow parasius trammre, thennal hydadic behavior of; GP 8623,24 NRC 108 0 986)
FUEL FABRICATION FAC!!JIT pmducuan pensures in; DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0986)
FUEL ROD bow phancunena; GP-8623,24 NRC 108 0986) pug errar, penahy faa; DD 8610,24 NRC 174 (1986)
. FUEL SHIPMENTS swweyms and labshng of; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 325 0986)
See also Spent Ibel Shipnnenes GENERATORS See Dismet Osmarssos; Sinem Omaratar Tubes
, GENERJC ISSUES hnpWy d, in beansma prey; GP-8625, 24 NRC 141 (1986)
GROUND MOT 10N vibratory, ocrausamos of earthquaks Mas design susperme spectrwn fa at Ferry plans; CL1-8621 24 NRC 685 0986)
GROUND WAIT.R inannoring, NRC authorsy to condiuan licerises for; C1J4623,24 NRC 704 (1986) poussial for corsarrunauen by an accidental spiD of r=du=rrive water at Vogda plant; GP.8628, 24 NRC 263 (1986)
IIEALTH EFFECTS of tntiums, carbor>14, iodine-125, and diaun releases fan volume seduction facihty: GP 86 40,24 NRC 841 (1986)
HEARING RIOffTS hcesss's, en enaserials hoanas amendment; CIJ4621,24 NRC 704 0986) on enfoscuanens actuma; C12-8619,24 NRC 50f 0985) on facihty hommae renewal appi . DD4&l3, 24 NRC 587 0966) as manana lissues semandenes C118617. 24 NEC 489 0986) en opesmans lacense
- AIAS446,24 NRC 409 0986); CLI461124 NRC 1 (1986) on naquesas for exempename fuman annerpacy , , saarcias requi:wurs; C1J 8624,24 NRC 769 0 986)
Sam anno Das Process 83
- - - - - - - _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ ___________m___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
SUBJECT INDEX IEARINGS
. emptoratory, to daarnuns whedser to grant anode to reopen, ^ - policy o~. CU-86-22,24 NRC 685 (1986)
Informal, contenuan nquieness far; ISP-86-35,24 NRC 557 0966) respuransnis when liaanese vahmuarily agrees to suspend opesenans; DD 8613,24 NRC 587 0986) dueshold requirunesta for. CIJ-86 24,24 NRC 769 0966)
IEAT REMOVAL See Decay Hast Removal; Residual Host Removal Systems ,
IIIGH-FREQUENCY ACCEERA110N !
due to - "- "- . damage paianual of; CU 8622,24 NRC 685 (!986)
IIUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES need for evaluation and identiAcetion pnar to fuelloading; LBP-86-22,24 NRC 103 (1986); LBP 86-30, 24 NRC 437 (1986)
HURRICANES f
design and construaian of structuns to wid stand; LBP-8629,24 NRC 295 0986)
HYDROGEN COMBUSTION use d CLASIX-3 computer code to analyse contauenent respanse to; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986)
HYDROGEN CONIROL need to addrums issues boycid Staff appmved accident acenarios; ALAB-844,24 NRC 216 (1986)
HYDROGEN CONIROL RUG mierpretation of; ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986); AIAB444,24 NRC 216 0986)
IIYDROGEN CENERA110N NRC Staff discretion in deciding scenarios to be analyzed; ALAD 841. 24 NRC 64 (1986)
HYDROGEN RECOMBINATION denial of request to isnninais practice of; DPRM 866,24 NRC 6710986)
HYDROGEN RECOMBINER penalty far faihus to perforra leakage tests on; DD 8610,24 NRC 174 (1986)
IMMEDIATE EFFEC 11VENESS REVIEW J
, need far, far board decsuans favming plant openrdan; CU-8&22,24 NRC 685 (1986)
INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN acope of Lcensee's autharuy ader. ALAB-847,24 NRC 412 (1986)
See also Emergency P.ans I INCINERATOR operation of, for low level .tediomasive weste reduction: LBP 864,24 NRC 841 (1986)
INCINERATOR EX11AUST STACK performance of scrubbers, HEP % Alters, ami charcoal adsorber in: ISP 86 40, 24 NRC 8410986) .
INSPEC110N REPORTS NRC practice in refacing to allegers in; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 0986)
INSPECTORS See NRC Inspectors INSU!ATION
{
See Eleenical Cable Insulation j INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTS validity of, for Palo Vude Unit 1; DD 8618,24 NRC 7610986)
INTERESTED STATE denial of petition by, zequesong weiver af 10 C.F.R 50.47(d); IN86-25,24 WRC 141 (1986) nonparty, standard far per:icipatim in licensing pmeseding after closing of adjudicatory reced:
CLI-86 20,24 NRC 518 (1986) right d. to speak far other parties or parimpants in a peceeding; ISP-86-24,24 NRC 132 0986) scope of participadan by; ALAB 850,28 NRC 526 (1986)
INIERVENORS bour.de an issues litigable by; AIAB445,24 NRC 220 0986) right an one to speak for another: LBP 86 34,24 NRC 549 (1986) 54 l
l C _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _
. a, ~
SUBJECT INDEX 10 DINE 125 releases by vahame reductum services facility; LDP-8640,24 NRC 8410986)
ER15DIC1"0N aAer peutums for mview of an appeal board decision have been Aled with the Camnussion: AIAB-840, 24 NRC 54 0986) apneal board, to address merits of motion fw disquahacation of licenses's counsel and to reapon record i on offsias emergency planning; CU4618,24 h7C 5010986) of licensing boanis to casader unresolved genene issues; GP 86-29,24 NRC 295 (1986) right of boards to determuu bounds of; AIAB-840,24 NRC 54 (1986) to consider challanssa to Commissian ugulations; LBP 8024,24 NRC 132 (1986) to haar stay request resaniing epenting licenes amendment; CU-8&l2. 24 NRC 1 (1986) to naaraider dmial of previcualy denied contentions or to admit amended contentions in construction permit saiansion praaaahng; MP-8636A 24 NRC $75 (1986) to set terms on withdmwal of opasting license applicacian; 2P4&37,24 NRC 719 (1986) j whose a questaan has been raised about the irnesnty of the ' - "ia- process; ALAB440, 24 l NRC 54 (1986) withd swal af, on mootness grounds; ALAB-842,24 NRC 197 (1986)
LABOR See Department of labor LEAK RATE ESTS See Integrated laak Rate Tests UCENSE CONDfTIONS i envuimmental, canpliance of Ijmench facility with; DD4614,24 NRC 609 (1986) i UCENSEE EMPLDYEES I cooperstian between NRC arul Department of Labor m protecung; DD.8&ll,24 NRC 325 0986) at Shaaran Hams, diomssal of contantian because of witnuss's inability to appear, ALAB483,24 NRC 200 (1986) ,
interviews with NRC inspecios; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) -
intimidacian and harassment of, at Diablo Canyon; DDwe&12. 24 NRC 483 (1986) -
occupying command and centrol positions during radiological emergency, camaict of interest in; ,
I ALAB-847,24 NRC 412 0986) l referral d quesuans train NRC inspectors to appropriate supervisar; DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0986)
- far personal mesitoring for ndicactive carnanunstian; DD4611,24 NRC 325 (1986) terminatimi esposure sepois far; DD4611. 24 NRC 325 0986)
UCENSEE EVENT REPORTS murnber at Fermi-2; DD 8&l0,24 NRC 174 0986)
UCENSEES cffect of schedular and ecatornic pressures on; DD 864,24 NRC 1510986) r-m- dunna radiological ernergent.ses; AIAB 847,24 NRC 412 (1986) l responsibility far posting documans whee volume is large; DD4&ll,24 NRC 325 (1986) I right to haanns on matanala license ammidment; CU-8&23,24 NRC 704 0986) I right to request that employees refer quesuans frorn NRC inspectors to appropnsis supervisor, l DD-8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) j UCENSINO BOARDS l authority to dismiss . as penalty for irmarvenar's failure to respond to discovery requestr, j ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 0986) l authority to impose terrns er canditions en withdraws! of applicatiat; MP-8633,24 NRC 474 (1986) 1 considerstaan d generie isaws by; LBP-8625,24 NRC 1410986) !
discrenan in deterraming admissibility of contentianr. ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) ]
error, basis far Anding of; ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 0986) j pmadamn or authaney to consider challenges to Caminissica regulations; BP-86 23,24 NRC 132 (1986) juriadwnw= to set terms on withdrawal af operstmg license applicataan; LDP-8637,24 NRC 719 0986) 85 l
l l
l
)
l J
- 4 I
1 l
l 1-SUBJECT INDEX i
reconnituisd, compesmos of; GP-8638A,24 NRC 819 0986) l responsibilities in granting low power license; AIAB-854, 24 NRC 183 (1986) auspansMh in weiglung and considering evidence; AIAB-85124 NRC 532 0986) .
auspensibility for accuracy of uansenpt; ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 (1986) scope af issues to be W by; AIAB 852,24 NRC 532 (1986); GP-8629,24 NRC 295 0986) scope d aus tuview by: A!AB-847,24 NRC 412 (1986)
See also Asamic Safety and ucensing Boards LIMTTED APPEARANCE STATEMENTS 3 in informal proceedmas; GP-8635,24 NRC 557 0986) . _ l status of, and necess of - membem d stamic safay and licanang bosnis to; GP 86-37A,24 NRC 726 (1986)
MAINTENANCE st Fernd-2, ' ' ;-* in: DD 8610,24 NRC 174 (1986) ;
i MANAGEMENT COMPE!ENCE i at Fermi-2; D&8610,24 NRC 174 (1986) at Palo Verde plant, dedal of petition alleging lad d; DD-86-8,24 NRC 1510986)
MANAGEMENT CONTRO1J -
- - in, at Fermi-2; DD-8610, ?4 NPC 174 0986)
MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUF'.fNO PROGRAM ' . . 4 disclosuus of - , and rarts related to; DD8&ll,24 NRC 325 0986)- I MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT NRC Staff dascreuan to pusus issue el; DD 8613,24 NRC 587 (1986)
MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT hearing nahts an; CU 8617, 24 NRC 489 (1986); CU 8623,24 NRC 704 (1986) :
MATERIALS UCENSE RENEWAL '
effect of appliantion for, an espuncion of cunent license; DD-8613,24 NRC 587 0986) .j
. MISSIGS, see %: tune Missiles i MONITORING j ~
! sannd woest, NRC authority to candition licenses far, CU-8623,24 NRC 704 0986) .
of evacuees during radiatariaal emergency, respanability fa ; ALAB-847,24 NRC 412 (1986) J See also Air Marutonns !
MOOTNESS GROUNDS withdowal of junsdicuan on; AIAB-842,24 NRC 197 (1986)
(
, NA110NAL ENVIRONMENTAL POUCY ACT interpatation of goals af; DPRM-866,24 NRC 671 (1986)
NEITTRON MULTIPUCAMON FACTOR ,
. for spera fuel pool with higlHiensity simige raar, CLt 8612, 24 NRC 10986) incessed faam 95 to &98, safmy of; AIAB 848,24 NRC 434 (1986); LBP 8627,24 NRC 255 (1986)
NO SIGNIFICANT IIAZARDS CONSIDERADON
. on ruracking of spas fuel pool with hisNimeity storage acks; CU 8G12,24 NRC 10986) l N011FICATION l of emessency panamel; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) of off duty carmonanal of5 esse far radiological emergency response; LBP-8638,24 NRC 731 (1986)
, public, of radiological energency, dem8n of symem far, ALAB 852,24 NRC 532 0986) l NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS l ennoarning staf6ng af TMI-1; AU 863,24 NRC 321 (1986) concerning the susurn of a speci8c employes to a - , pa=h at TMI Unit 1; AIAB 850,24 q NRC 526 (1986) )
far redicactive spills; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) l in emergency plans; AIAB-847,24 NRC 412 0986) j
-l l
86
^
,. .w I
l l
SUBJECT INDEX r d NRC INSPECTORS soness to nuclear facahmes; DD#11,24 NRC 325 0986) inserviews wish La== - ' ,_. DD 86-11, 24 NRC 325 fl986)
. NRC POLICY ]
on emplessiory haanngs to duermins whether to reopen a recard; CU-862L 24 NRC 685 (1986) 1 NRC STAPF Ca==namaa supemsery authoney to stay estians af; CLI#12,24 NRC 10986) dessesimi in desmhng which sommanos to analyse; AIAB 841, 24 NRC 64 0986) -
diseseman to decide whahar to pesus issue of maurial falso s===are: DD#13, M NRC 587 (1986) litigsbility d h in performance af, seder 2.206, ; DD 86-11,24 NRC 325 0986); -
DD461124 NRC 483 0986)
,- &asing nuclear power plara opastion; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) cr responsibilities in esassing low-paner lissase;' ALAS 454, 24 NRC 783 0986)
, " 7 eencarning issunnes of aparating licenses; CL1-86-21 M NRC 685 0986) seies in emergency pimining; ALAB447,24 NRC 412 0986) subpaans af, ALAB456,24 NRC 802 0986)
NUCLEAR POWER PLAN'3 effect of schedular and esonamic pressures an safe aparation af; DD 868,24 NRC 1510986) susus whos - - never progressed far enough to permit use of special nuclear material; LBP437,24 NRC 719 0986)
NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION aushanty and . , ' W to rnake no sieruncant basanis W finding; CU-861124 NRC 1 0 986) auihoney of Executive Duestar for Operations to deny pesanans; DPRM46,24 NRC 671 (1986) ainhoney over caniens of rs&enctive insterials; DPRM465. 24 NRC 647 0986) authority over scenanno dammans by militi== in transparung spent -6r fuel; DPRM45,24 NRC 647 (1986) -
==i====y to Mh licenses to require yound weser monisaring; CU4623. 24 NRC 704 (1986) outhaney to segulais d==mauni; DPRM 864,24 NRC 6710986)
, ==W to sejset namespenave pleadings; CU424,24 NRC 769 0986) annaderaman d -aa cau== in heensing d=*=<=a AIAB441,24 NRC 64 (1986)
' omr==n == with W d W iii W &,isi M8611, M hT 325 (19%
disanian to ch== % for v at- DD410,24 NRC 174 0986) dmosenas to decline a hessing an an enfora==== anler, CU-86-19,24 NRC 508 (1986) diessataan to dient public , . . C1J417,24 NRC 489 0986) risia to chaams nderanking or adjudicann= to regulaem; CU-86 23, 24 NRC 704 (1986) scope of susharity over Depensaan af Energy actmeans: DPRM-86 5,24 NRC 647 0986)-
sus spanes susharity to eenest pseendural emas d im subanhnsis baants; CU 86-2A 24 NRC 685 (1986) supervisory suthority to suy Staff actions; CU-861% 24 NRC 1 (1986)
NUCMAR WASTE POUCY ACT pre amendment heenns nghis under, CU41% 24 NRC 10986)
NUC2 ATE BO!UNO RATIO .
See Deparnue from Nucleste Boiling Ratio OPERA'11NO UCENSE AMENDMENT headng faDowns issuanas of, A1AB446,24 NRC 409 0986) involving no ar aa== haamds, effeauvenen af, AIAB446,24 NRC 409 0986) to permit arockwig d spent fuel paal; CU-8612,24 NRC 10986)
I OPERATINO UCENSE APPUCA110NS i
chansens nenne af. ALAB-853,24 NRC 7110986) envisonnessel impaces d widuhamel of; UlP439,24 NRC 834 (1986)
OPERA 11NO UCENSE PROCEEDINGS scopo d issues canadmed in: ALAB45124 NRC 532 0986); LBPM29,24 NRC 295 0986) l
e 4
[
\'
SUBJECT INDEX OPERAMNO UCEN5ES emhansanan before campisaan af agency's inasmal appelisse process; AIAB 852,24 NRC 532 0986) chamusiances appmposis for zuvoastimi af; DD410,24 NRC 174 0986) crnaris for issuenas at; AIAB-854,24 NRC 783 0986) mumgency planung sequuemenes for issuarms af; ALAB-847,24 NRC 412 0956); CU422,24 NRC 685 0 986) issuanas despus h= in enegency plans; AIAB447,24 NRC 412 0986) lissanns beant aushcnisy to ingens ca=A'i- an whhdrawal af apphsamen far, LBP433,24 NRC 474 (1986) ,
NRC Staff _ , "" aaneerning issumnoe of; CU422,24 NRC 685 (1986) pampa ===== af issunnes as basis of stasa annaarns being eassi#ared asesids a Wad adjwlicatory prosenduis; CU422,24 NRC 685 (1986) wishament af , . for. ALAB-842,24 NRC 197 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSES, IDW POWER vph- for. AIAB 854,24 NRC 783 0986)
Am=*a= besween heenans banni and Staff :=Taammdas in armanns; AIAB-854,24 NRC 783 0 986) .
affect of pendency of caenamed opersons licasse ,- ; an issusace of; 12P-86 31, 24 NRC 451 6ndings assessary for i- af; ALAB 853,24 NRC 711 (1986) lingsnan , p-w by applicant's arguest far; 12P434,24 NRC 549 0986) need to campiers au hearings selsses to full-power aparanan befoe issuanos of,12P424,24 NRC 132 0 986) riska fnun; 12P425,24 NRC 1410986) stess of energency , , nansmusry for ismannes d; AIAB-254,24 NRC 783 (1986) theorencal pasabaluy of sabasass as basis far denial af; ALAB-854,24 NRC 783 (1986)
OPERATIONS See Enesuene Dneciar for Operamans; Reessar Opmenans; Suspension ai OP-ORAL ARGUMDfT appeal band dissonan to anow; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986)
ORDER OF MODIPICAMON PROGEDING chasessansseien af.12M4 33,24 NRC 474 0986)
ORDERS beres to party in Anssa piensediry es basis for NRC sovision oc CU421,24 NRC 6810986)
OROANJATIONS Ses Emersmicy Response e.
PENALUES far disentedy, demurirve, or comanpenaus conduct; AIAB-840,24 NRC 54 0986) j far faihus to suspend to disaavery regasses; ALAB456,24 NRC 002 0986) for vicistians of e-- {
susulanans; DD 8613. 24 NRC 587 (1986) 1 PENALMES, CIVIL
{
assamenent for savesity level IV or V vvdar=== DD 86 !!,24 NRC 325 0986) for bunches of annassunas insesrity; DD410,24 NRC 174 0956) l 1
far faihus to perfarut lenksas asses an bydensen renambiner; DD410,24 NRC 174 0956) far fuel sad puu erns; DD 86-10, 24 NRC 174 (1986) far ' , 'It af seen aanier for naciar case isolanan j c spey syssen; DD-8610,24 NRC 174 (1986) ;
fu seemsy vioiseems at Penni-2; DD 8410,24 NRC 174 0986) j PHYSICAL SECURflY '
M - afe- , and repans reisend to; DD.84 It,24 NRC 325 (1986)
POUCY See Enfesase.*s Policy; NRC Phlicy POLYMERS desredsman pansmal at Perry plans; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) 88 j
i l
]
l 4
'i
l O l
I' l l- l 1
l SUBJECT INDEX
.. - 1 qualiacauan of materiale made of; LBP-8628,24 NRC 263 0966)
POST.ACCIDEhT SAMPLINO SYS1EM adequacy af, at Palo Vade plant: D&868,24 NRC 151 (1986) .'
POSTINO OF DOCUMENTS tia===== . where volume is large; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 0956)
PREHEAR.INO CONFERENCES
]
l
_, aparans d; ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 (1986) .
PRES 8URE VESSEL l See Ramonar Piusure Vessel
):
PRESSUK!ZPR SPRAY SYS1EM .
- Ses Auniliary Psmesunmar Spray Symemm PRISON l 1 emergency mapanse plan for AIAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986)
! PRORABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT of damese to nualmar plant fnen ' .
' adssues; 12P-8629,24 NRC 295 0966) g PRODUCTION FAGITY j surv=M- of apssenans by malw third pany; CU-8619,24 NRC 500 0986) i PROTECITVE AC110NS j dunns radiatarwat emsresness, mapasibility for daarmuung; ALAB-847,24 NRC 412 0956) ]
PROTEC11VE C1D11HNO i regulatory aqarements fer, in fuel fatmcation facinty; DD-8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) 1 PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS i htisebuity et,in NRC proceedmas; DD86-15,24 NRC 618 0986)
QUALIFICADON of 6ee bemma wuh respea to 6re in cable says; ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 0986)
Ses :' ._ ' Quahacacian QUALIFICATIONS of radiatian pr==*aa ==ha-; DD 8&ll,24 NRC 325 0986)
QUAIITY ASSURANCE limies on who may pumpen a plan fas: ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) augnaammes for shipmsmas of =.4wve insemial: DD 8611,24 NRC 325 0986)
QUAIJTY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS edequacy of ' , at Diablo Canyon; DD-8612,24 NRC 483 (1986) j at Palo Vade plus, SALP perferrmanos atints of DD 86-8,24 NRC 1510986) i usulsiery aquunnens fac AIAB 852,24 NRC 532 0986)
- RADIA110N DOSE de6nitum d. ALAB-856,24 NRC 302 (1986)
See also Dose Analyses RADIATION EXPOSORE RECORDS anployee right ta; DD 86-15,24 NRC 618 0986)
RADIADON PROIEC110N psosmen, adequacy of at Shearmi Harris; DD 8615,24 NRC 618 (1986) quali8cataans and mainin8 of anchrucians; DD 8&ll,24 NRC 325 (1986) violadans, carasaruanan of; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) l RADIADON SAFETY ad.q y of fiaskins, iminig, omaan nanen mirveys, ed er -ari, at fust fabri non facinrr, DD 8611,24 NRC 225 0986)
RADIOACI1VE CONTAMINADON astian levels; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 0986) enpnoyes . , ?y for passonni waans fac DD 86-11,24 NRC 325 0986)
Innit far isleasing en lima far urosameted use; DD-86-11,24 NRC 325 0986) need to mask areas far DD 8611,24 NRC 525 0986) of ground weiar at Vastle sina, poemmal far,12P 86 28,24 NRC 263 (1986) 89
SUBJECT INDEX j l
1 painting over, DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0986) survey requiremmta; DD4611,24 h1C 325 0986)
RADIOACTIVE MA1T. RIALS .
quality assurance ..p _. for shipments of; DD4&11,24 NRC 325 (1986)
See also Transportation of Radioactive Materials RADICAC11VE REEASES fan vahnne reducuan facility; DP 8640,24 NRC 8410986) in powder or liquid form at fbal fabncaticut facility, reportaW1ity of; DDw8&ll,24 NRC 325 (1986) notification requuements for, DD4611,24 NRC 325 (1986) s RADIOACITVE WASTT3 low level, reducuan utihring high-fcree compactor end incinerator LBP 8640,24 NRC 841 (1986)
NRC review of docurnantauen of; DD4611. 24 NRC 325 0986)
', RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES accidas assessment and protective acr.on recommmdation responsibilities; A!AB-847,24 NRC 412 (1986) command and contml supon*M:; ass during; ALM 447,24 NRC 412 0986)
REACIVR BUI!v!NG Fenni 2, mereened plates in: DD-8&lo,24 h1C 174 (1986)
REACTOR COOIANT boron concentration of, throughout fuel loading and premticality testing; AIAB454,24 NRC 783 (1986, leakago Wo low pressure raidual heat removal system: DD 8616,24 NRC 747 0986)
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEMS potanual for addition of unborated water to: ISP4&34,24 NRC 549 (1986)
REACTOR CORE isolation cooling / spray system, inoperability of room cooler for, at Fermi 2; DD4610,24 NRC 174
'1' i
0 986) thermal hydraulic behavior of OFA/IDPAR mixture of fuel: LBP-8623,24 NRC 108 (1986)
REACTOR OPERATIONS i impiovernent plan at Fermi 2; DD4&lo,24 NRC 174 (1986)
REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL reduction of neutron bombardment and embnalement of; LDP4623,24 NRC 108 0986)
REACTOR TRIP proposed amendment to require shutdown until cause of tnp is doernuned; DPRM-863,24 NRC 629 (1986)
See also Anticipated Tranmas Without Scram REACTORS See Boiling Water Reacema RECEPI10N CENTER A adequacy for monitwing, decornammation, and transfernns to sheltenng facilities during radiological emergency; LSP4636,24 NRC 5610986)
See also Ralocation Center RECONSIDERATION damal of petaion for. AIAB444,24 NRC 216 0986) of appeal board decisions, Commission policy at; CU 8621,24 NRC 681 (1986)
RECORDS of5cial, matsnals comprising; ALAB439,24 NRC 45 0986) staking matenal from; ALAB439,24 NRC 45 (1986)
See also Radiation Exposure Recordr, Reapemns a Record REGUIAT10NS bar en collateral stuc.ka on; CU-8621,24 NRC 704 (1986) board junst.aruce or authoruy to corsidst challenges to; LBP-8624,24 NRC 132 (1986) emergency planmns, proper forum fcr challenges to; DD4615,24 NRC 618 (1986) 90
___.-_____-m_-_-___-__m_ __ _-_- _ _ _ __ _a
.y e
- I l
SUBJECT INDEX 1 I
-.-, -- at pnxection, denial of peude for amendmmt of; DPRM-862,24 NRC (1986) l EPA, Canumssim authority to implement; CU-8623,24 NRC 704 (1986) exemption fmm, to sectify mjusdce in adjudicatory onder, CU 8621,24 NRC 681 (1986) interpretsuon of 10 CSA 20.4; ALAB 856,24 NRC 802 (1986) userpretanon of 10 CSA 50.47(b); ALAB-855,24 NRC 792 (1986) unerpnastion of 10 CSA 50.47(d); AIAB-853,24 NRC 711 (1986) interpretation of 10 CEA 50.57(c); AIAB-853,24 NRC 111 (1986); LBP-8634,24 NRC 549 (1986) {
irserpretation of 10 CIA Part 50, Appedix A. ODC 17; ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986)
, laterpretation of 10 CSA Part 50, Appendia B; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) interpretation of hydrogen carril rule (10 CIA 50.44); ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986); ALAB-844, 24 NRC 216 (1986) method for seeking exemptions fran; CU 8624,24 NRC 769 (1986) 3 need to determine applications and effects fw fut loading and all phases of low power operation: 1 A1AB-853,24 NRC 711 (1986) !'
REGULATORY OUIDES degree to which lacensees ase expected to conform with; ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 (1986) regulatory status ef; AIAB-841, 24 NRC f4 (1986); AIAB-843, 24 NRC 200 (1986); AIAB-845,24 ,
NRC 220 (1986) j REIDCA110N CENTER I lack of, conunuaum of proceedmg in spite of; CU-8&l6, 24 NRC 405 (1986) need for licenson to esumate number of evnauces to be accommodated; AIAB-855,24 NRC 792 (1986)
See also Receptim Center -
REOPENING A RECORD Comnussion standards for, CLI 8618, 24 NRC 501 (1986); CU 8622,24 NRC 685 (1986)
NRC pohey on expearstory heanngs to determme mouens for, CU-8622,24 NRC 685 (1986) on basis of allr.ged es parte commurucadon: ALAB 840,24 NRC 54 (1986)
REPolmNO REQUIREMENTS proposed amendmans to Pasta 50 and 73; DPRM-86 4,24 NRC 635 (1986) i I
REPORTS See Inspection Reports; Licensee Event Reports; SAlf Reports i REPRESENTATION j nonsuorney, of another party; ALAB 843,24 NRC 200 (1986)
RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYTTEMS -
?
falhue of impeller wear rings in: DD-8&l6, 24 NRC 747 (1986) randorn and independent failures of; DD-8&l6,24 h1C 747 (1986)
See also Decay fleet Rernoval i RESPONSE SPECTRUM l See Design Response Spectrum j REVIEW j of appeal board decisions; CU-8621,24 NRC 681 (1986) 4 po^tnp, progiarn description; DPRM-863,24 NRC 629 (1986) l S.ss also Engmeanns Review; Immediate Efectivenesa Review: S;andard Revtew Plan j REVIEW, APPEUATE basu for overturmng a licensing board's fmdings of fact; ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 (1986) of a licenans board's 6ndings of fact, standard for. ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 (1986) of s&ndulms decimens; ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986) operaung licerse authonzation bdore completion of. AIAB-852,24 NRC $32 (1986) pahey on licensing board decisions that do not constitute e Anal insohn.icn m the merits; ALAB-846, 24 NRC 409 (1986) scope of: AIAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986)
Sea also Appeals REVIEW, SUA SPONTE authority of appeal boards; ALAB-846, 24 NRC 409 (1986); AIAB 848,24 NRC 434 (1986) l 91 l
)
l L . .. . . . ... .
. 4-1 i EUBJECT INDFX by heansas bosnis, scope of; AIAB-847,24 NRC 412 0986) of appsat board afArmance on; AIAB 849,24 NRC 523 0986)
RISK ASSESSMENT See Probabdmac Risk A=====r RISKS safety or a _ of spent Aset ahng-a e sounes; DPRM-86 5,24 NRC 647 0986)
See alas Prahahabsue Risk Aasessenes RUMMAKDIO
. petition for saranammt sedan as s substimme far, DD 8615, M NRC 618 (1986) ri 8ht of Canumanian in cheems betwem adjudicoden and; CU-8623,24 NRC 704 0986)
RUMS OF PRACTICE ,
ability to drew contrary inimenses bem expert witness's tesianony es basis for assestaan of bosnt error, ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 (1986) a~yahility of evuisnee not suppaned by acia=aine sadiaa LBP-8629,24 NRC 295 0986) -
admissunlity of omsanians in consuuction permit estension i. ; ; 12P 8636A, 24 NRC 575 (1986) appeal righas of inservenor who has withdrawn; ALAB-251,24 NRC 529 0986) appealabGity of d-===1 of - . AIAB-854,24 NRC 723 (1986) e appaaway of sununary dispanisian decimens; ALAB-854,24 NRC 783 (1986) ,
appeals canesemns improperty issued abpoena; AIAB-MS,24 NRC 220 0986)' !
sppeals of schedubag demeans; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 0986); ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) i appensas aview policy on heensus baand daa- that do not constinate a naal :==ah- en the '
meries; AIAB-846. 24 NRC 409 (1986) bens for an appent bear (s overturning of a hamnens bassd's Andinas of feet; ALAB 852,24 NRC 532 0 986) bens sequuemanas for 2.206 psiinces; DD 8617,24 NRC 753 (1986) beginnmg of disaavery: AIAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) basal right to derennans bounds of hs own jusdicoen; ALAB-840,24 NRC 54 0986) boends an issues liritahia in opereung license , _ : AIAB-843,24 NRC 209 (1986);
ALAB-445,24 NRC 220 (1986); A!AB-852,24 NRC 532 0986) bunism en appansat af s===any dispasman motian; ALAB MI,24 NRC 64 0986); LBp'8630,24 NRC 437 (1986) bunlei ai psopames of ===any ' , - masion; AIAB 841,24 NRC 64 (1986) {
chaueness to Connaissan asuistians; 12P 86 24,24 NRC 132 (1986) l chausname to energency planmes . . . DD 8615,24 NRC 618 0986) eargue that saias questions about the ethics of counsel; AIAB 840,24 NRC 54 0986) coDaseral anack on NRC ngulations; CU-86-23,24 NRC 704 0986)
Commission discumen to direct public ;. . . CU-8617, 24 NRC 489 0986) -
Cannussen ma spanne mahanty to conect pmoedural eens d hs subordinate boards: CU 8622,24 NRC 685 (1986) sanearns subjsst so due pseessa panesmans in meenals licanes amendment pressadas; CU 8617,24 NRC 489 (1986) aanridsrooms in demhng whsiher to vaid en assney deciman biennshed by an sa perm comannucation;
, AIAB 840,24 NRC 54 (1986) ansaast af appsuens brisis; AIAB-843,24 NRC 200 0986) aa=====an esq= - for infannat beennes; 1AP 8635, 24 NRC 557 0986) 4
- adapancy of bens and spamAeity of massutionr, ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) affest of faGum to Als psoposed 6mdings of fact; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) )
l gmunds for show<nues r . . DD.8&l6,24 NRC 747 0986) .
benang sequuemanen far mmerials 1;esame ==-dment: CU-8617,24 NRC 489 0986)'
knpoper ness of 2.206 painaans; DD-8615,24 NRC 618 0986) i insertaamary review of maad cescuan orders; ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 0986) l' l 93
. _wn___ _ _m____-_- ---
L g . .
SUBJECT INDEX
, -" anos paitians far moview of an appeal beant dension have been 81ed with dm C ALAB 840,24 NRC 54 (1986) .
juriad===a where a quesnan has been mised about the irungray of the decisierenaking pecess; ALAB 840,24 NRC 54 0966) late imarunnon by an imasessed maes; C11M 20,24 NRC 518 (1986) licenmag boent ausharity to dismiss om- as panaky for inservenor's failum to mapand to decovery; ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 0986)
- bilgebility of NRC pe==aal maness under 2 206 . DD 8612,24 NRC 483 0986) litigenen opportumnas psmegal by applicant's aquest for low power license; IEP-8634,24 NRC 549
~
1 0 936) .
modiSestian of permies; LBP-86-33,24 NRC 474 0986) seed for basis to support claims made in 2.206 pennana; DD 86-13. 24 NRC 587 0986) on=amney sapresensation of another party; AIAB 843,24 NRC 200 (1986) opereung licanos authamanaa befose completion of agency's internal appausas process; ALAB 852,24 NRC 532 (1986) een! argament on appeal; ALAB-845,'24 NRC E0 (1986) penalnes for disorderly, disrupovo, or consampaws conduct; AIAB-840,24 NRC 54 0986) -
pensky for faihus to bner imuss adequeialy on appeal; ALAB-852,24 NRC 532 (1986); AIAB 845, 24 NRC 220 (1986); AIAB 856,24 NRC 802 (1986) psesentanas of grounds for Sist time an appeal; ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986)
proceduni argenmes in comanians; 12P-8636A,24 NRC 575 0986) prohibition against en pene camnnuncationr; AIAB 840,24 NRC 54 (1986) numsdies far sa pane commununnans; CU-8618,24 NRC 501 (1986)
- for admissian of comannans ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 0986) ,
maponss to appenant's bdef; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986) responses to new facts supparung sununary , motion; LSP-86 30,24 NRC 437 0986) i suspansibilities d parties to psopen their case; AIAB-8d3,24 NRC 200 0986)
- sight d ens imersaner to speak far another
- LBP-86-34,24 NRC 549 0986) '
- acope of menes e===,6=ed under 10 C.FR. 2 206; DD 8613,24 NRC 587 (1986) l standant for appausse soview of a liennens board's Andings d fast; ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 (1986)
- staada=1 for enemise of appausse disented cerane='ai authnety; AIAB-839,24 NRC 45 0986)
- ==adaal for overnmung a lower beeni's faceus! andmas
- AIAB 856,24 NRC 802 (1986)
, standanis far senpemns of pr==adiay; CI18622,24 NRC 685 (1986)
- standing to appeal; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) usanding to raise, on appeal. sneveness of other panier, ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 (1986) .
sisse naht to perncipate in admamstranve appeal when it has not pagncipated in underlyms haanng; CLI-86-20,24 NRC 518 0986) striking massial fmm a record; ALAB 839,24 NRC 45 (1986) subpoenas of Staff witnesser, A1AB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986) support needed for ausgatians in appellais briefs; ALAB 839,24 NRC 45 (1986); ALAB-856,24 NRC 802 (1986); LBo 8630, 24 NRC 437 (1986) support requimd for assenian of board error er appeal; AIAB-852,24 NRC 532 (1986) time for Bling complaints about timing af summary dispamuon mauons; LBP-8630,24 NRC 437 (1986) nme lisait for Aling manans for disqualineation; AIAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) t=aal==a of new version of ===*ian LBP 8636A,24 NRC 575 0986) trennerpt prepantion; AIAB 839,24 NRC 45 (1986) -
SABCyfAGE as Palo Vade plans; DD-86-8,24 NRC 1510966) thearsacel posibility d. as basis far denial d low-power license: ALAB-854,24 NRC.783 0986) itPE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE
, " far desernumns: C1186-22,24 NRC 685 0966)
)
j 8
i SUBJECT INDEX S/FEGUARDS paposed amendmus to change reportes sequinemanas fcr evens that threstan effectiveness af; Df%M-864,24 NRC 635 (1986)
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION en transpanataan of apse fbet, esclosure af; DPRM E5,24 NRC ud7 (1986)
SAPETY See Raestaca Svesy SAPETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM need for insalh=== befass fuel toeding; LBP-8622,24 NRC 103 (1986); IBP-8630,24 NRC 437
, (1986)
SALP REPORTS relianse on, to establish snaang==== incanpassace, DD 868, 24 NRC 151 (1986)
SANCTIONS design of, ao that lienness does not peo6s insa vialsticas; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 0986) l Se also >=ha SECURITY W- at Fermi-2, peatuas hnpased for DD-8610,24 NRC 174 (1986)
See also Campmar Seaway; Physical Searity SECURfrY Pt.ANS peoposed amendment to diange tinse period for reparang changes los DPRM-864,24 NRC 635 (1986)
SEISMIC DESIGN tacionic pamnae appmsch to: CLI 8622,24 NRC 685 (1986)
SERVICE WATER SYSTEM See Panergency Equipment Samos Weser Sysassa SHELTERINO i of evacuses during rahologisel ermorgency, "y far, ALAB-847, 24 NRC 412 (1986)
SHOW.CAUSE PROCEEDINOg l
asumeds far D48&t6,24 NRC 747 (1986); DD 8617,24 NRC 753 (1986) vf= sequess fen; Do8615,24 NRC 618 (1986)
S:11TfDOWN ostd, of sencear fausarias A1WS ussil cause is kason: DPR4863,24 NBC 629 (1986) need far, beseuse of amargensy pisames h DG8&l7,24 NRC 753 (1986)
See also Safe Shusdown Eanhquake
$10NIF1 CANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION See No Sispuncess Hasards ra== %
SIREN SYTTEM accideaal acavanan af; DD-8615,24 NRC 618 (1986)
STIll RESTORA110N heenses boast junsdienon over LBP 8&37,24 NRC 719 (1986)
SPECIAL FACIIJTIES ov==ah tiene estunates for, ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986)
SPENT PUEL POOtJ al*- maderseas assadens ins ALAB-848,24 NRC 434 0966): LBP-8627,24 NRC 255 (1986) remslang wish hisb<ismaasy, ' * ; morass reaks; CLI-8612,24 NRC 1 (1986)
SPENT PUEL SHIPMENTS need for and propassy of; DPRM 865,24 NRC 647 (1986) pampased masadsmars to aDow public impes on appeaset demeans fer, DPRM-865,24 NRC 647 (1986)
SPENT PUEL SHIPPD40 CASKS asemmsmess of accidsms remasense of; DPRM-865,24 NRC 647 (1986)
TTANDARD REVIEW PLAN sessissory sissus ef; AIAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986)
STANDBY UQUID CON!1tOL SYKTEM seassnanc, seessars requiring; ALAB 841,24 NRC 64 (1986) i I
94 4
s ..
+
SUBJECT INDEX STANDINO right d as inuevene to speak *ar another, IEP 86-34,24 NRC 549 (1986)
~
to appent; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986)
STA110N BIACKOUT need to consider effest af, on hydrogen commal; AIM 844,24 NRC 216 0986)
STAY.
fastans appid- to asus et CU 86-12,24 NRC 1 (1986)
, of h smW sunsas in sasses af 270 spent Ibst asseneber, CLI 86-1124 NRC 10986) '
of StaK an*iana Camassaan supamsary autheney far, CU-861124 NRC 10986) 1' STEAM OENERATOR TUBES .
need to eennder -iripAa faihuns of. ALAB-843,24 NRC 200 (1986)
STRESS See Psychstaginst Sunes
- STRONTIUM 90 PLAQUE APPUCATORS use for isomeners d mahpaa== skin lesiens; 13P-8635,24 NRC 557 0946)
SUBPOENAS anpuopady issued. appas! based on; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 0946)
SUMMARY
DISPOSfl10N app =al=Wiey of decimens on; A1AB-854,24 NAC 783 0986) bunism an appaans at. ALAB 841,24 NRC 64 0986); IEP-86-30,24 NRC 437 (1986)
In8st sunderds far, LBPL8627,24 NRC 255 (1986) msponses to near fases suppanang ownans for, IEP-86 30, 24 NRC 4'l7 (198/1) time for Aling aanplases about tirning of nanions for, IEP-8630, 24 NRt.' 437 (1986)
SURVEILLANCE of , : facility apmanans by upw thisd party; CU 8619,24 NRC 508 (1986)
SUSPENSION OF OPERATIONS vehmisry by 1- hearing rialus on; DD 8613,24 NRC 587 0986)
SYFTEM REUABIUTY f!UDY r at Palo Verde, ACRS conseres abeus: DIA868,24 NRC 1510946)
SYSTEMS See Aunniary Puenniner Spesy Sysion; Elesuis Power Sysion; Emessensy Eqmpmus Servios Wour l' Syssen; Rassear f'salass Systems; Resuksel Hess Removal Syseens; Safssy Psammer Display Systass: Sundby 11gaid Castsel Sysesm: Talsphens Systems TEIIPHONE SYSTEM 8 adequacy of, for naunceman of smargesey nopense orgsmastians; IEP 8638,24 NRC 7310906) 1ERMINATION OF PROCEEDINO l suse's enaceness of lar=1=*= for omstion of amnicipal power authonty empowned to purcheos limness as basis far, CU-8&l6,24 NRC 405 0986)
TESTIMONY board aushoney to irmanups or cut off; ALAB-845,24 NRC 220 (1986) pionned, basal ausharity to shcstan tons for subnaining; AIAB-845,24 NRC 220 0986)
TES11NO
^ sirladt; ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 (1986) l af employees for rs&ascave amparamus== si fust fabdcation facility, adegumey of; DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0 986) -
i See also Innegreemd lask Rams Tests 111ERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIME1ERS m af; A1AB-856,24 NRC 810986)
TIME EFFIMAlBS See Einasade 11 mis Esemste TRAININO anagency suspense, for aa-6==== isral ing ^ - d radioactin maserials; DPRM-865,24 NRC 647 (1986) 98
SUBJECT INDEX of radiation preaction technmans: DD-8511. 24 NRC 325 (1986) redisden safety at fuel fahncatan facility; DD-8&ll,24 NRC 325 (1986)
TRANSCRIFT of pnhasnns . conecuan af ALAB-839,24 NRC 45 (1986)
TRANSPORTADON OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS NEC aushoney over, DPRM-865,24 NRC 647 (1986)
- peeposed enh to allow public inpia en appemet decimens far, DPRM-865,24 NRC 647 (1986) 2 Ses also Spera Rael Slaipmans TRf!1UM j d% fnun operadas nuclear poner nasciare; DPRM-866,24 NRC 6710986) imisases by vehuns seduccian services facility; LBP-8640,24 NRC 8410986)
! TURBINE MISSIUES i poinnual danger to Perry facility fnun; ALAB-841,24 NRC 64 0986) i URANIUM IEXAFLUORIDE canvasien to ==i- instelhaarids; CU-86-17,24 NRC 489 (1986)
URANIUM MIILS smud esser naamsenns program requuud for, CU 8623. M NRC 704 (1986) '
URANIUM SINUiRED PEL!ETS safesy of open cooling af; DD-86-11,24 NRC 32$ (1986)
VACATION OF DECSION denying mesian to disqualify licensas's counsel and to roepen the sesord on osaise amarguncy planning;
. CU-86-18,24 NRC 5010986) on remedist soils inues; ALAB-842,24 NRC 197 (1986)
VALVES salsnaid, used to pasfann safety relatui funcuans, environmanial - "" A of. LBP-86 41, 24 NRC -
901 0 986)
VIOLATIONS sagressaian and charecimatat- of seventy of DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0986) faihus to provide e Sow pelb for the energency =re service water syman: DD-86-10,24 NRC -
174 0 986) .'
haplicanian of willfulness la licenseo admusman af; DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0956)
NRC dismanan to chness rumsdies far; DD 8&lG,24 NRC 174 (1986) radiation preiscuan, r==8a-ada et. DD-8611,24 NRC 325 0966) red pull enor DD 8&lo,24 NRC 174 0986) sesunny, at Fenni 2; DD4610,24 NRC 174 0986) . .
seventy level IV and V, p=aaldaa for, DD 8611,24 NRC 325 (1986)
See also De6ciencies WA!YER of 10 C.F.R. Sa47(d), denial of request for, IEP-8625,24 NRC 141 (1986)
See also Emanpuans WASTE Ses Radioactive Wasse WATER inussed NRC centrols ai; DPRM-86-6,24 NRC 6710986)
See also Omund Weser, Cooling Water, Emergency Cooling Water Reservoir. Emersancy Fqmpment Servios Water Syeism; Ground Water WATER Pol 1UDON CONTROL ACT relausa cf Asamic Energy Act to; DPRM 86 6, 24 NRC 671 (1986) '
WEIDS edequacy of r,larusanio ' , - at Shnenn Hams: DD 8615,24 NRC 618 0986) '
pipe hange, adequacy of, at Shemen Hanis; ALAB 843,24 NRC 200 0986)
" l
~
t 4
i
_ , _ , . , _ . . . = - . . . _ - - . . . - . - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- ---~i '
.y. ~a SUBJECT INDEX 1
J WTDIDRAWAL
. from proceeding, sfract an busivener's appent nahss ALAB 851,24 NRC 529 (1986) of OPerums license applantion, junadiction to set serms an; LBP-86-37,24 NRC 719 (1986) of opersung hoanans appifcation, envuonmental impacu of; IEP-8639,24 NRC 834 (1986)
WTINESSES Ses Expert Witnesses WORKERS
'i ' See Emergamey Weekas l ZONE 5
- Se Enersecy Plannes Zans l
l I
i i
i I
j i
4 97 1
1
- j l
1 l
g u FACILITY INDEX BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Umts 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 544560L, 50 4574L OPERATINO UCFNSE; Septernbar 18, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Authorinns Fue) loading end Procriticality Testing); 12P-8631,24 NRC 451 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; November 6,1986; ORDER; CU-86-21,24 NRC 681 (1986)
COMANOIE PEAK STEAM LurTRIC STATION, Uma 1; Docket No. 54445-CPA CONSTRUC110N PERMIT EXTENSION; September 19. 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-8&l5,24 NRC 397 (1986)
CONSTRUCTION PERMTT AMENDMENT; October 30,1986; bEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Motim to Admit New Contamions or far Reconsideratim); LBP-8636A. 24 NRC 575 (1986)
DAVIS BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Umt 1; Docket Na 54346 REQUEST FOR AC!10N; November 19, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DEOSION ETSUANT TO 10 C.FA (1206; DD-8&l7,24 NRC 753 (1986)
DtABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, Units ! and 2; Docket Nm. 50-275, 54323 REQUEST FOR ACTION; Septernber 30,1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA 52.206; DD-86-12,24 h%C 483 (1986)
DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, Units I and 2; Docket Nos. 54275-OIA, 543D OLA OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; July 22, 1986, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CU 8612, 24 NRC 1 (1986) .
ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT, Umt 2: Docket No. 54341 REQUEST IOR ACTION; July 29, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DECSION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 62.206; DD 8&l0,24 NRC 174 (1986)
OORE, OKLAHOMA FACUTY; Docket Na 44 8027 REQUEST FOR ACTION: October 15, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DECSION USVER 10 CF.R. 62.206; DD 8&l3,24 NRC 587 (1986)
UMERICK GENERATING STATION, Unit 1; Docket Na 54352 REQUEST POR ACTION; October 16, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DECSION UhDER 10 C.F.R. 62.206; DD-8&I4,24 NRC 609 (1986)
UhERICK GENERARNO STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 54352, 50 353 OPERATING UCENSE; July 18, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: ALAB-840,24 NRC 54 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; August 28, 1986; DECISION; ALAB 845,24 NRC 220 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE: September 5,1986; SUPPLEMENT TO DURD PAR 11AL IhTTIAL DECISION (On Offsite Emergency Planmns Comentions); IEP.A&32,24 NRC 459 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; October 16, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: CU 8&l8,24 NRC 501 (1986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; Novernbar 10, 1986; SUPPLEMENT TO TIE FOURTH PAR 11AL INTTIAL DECSION RELATING TO THE REMANDED CONTENTION REGARDINO MANPOWER MODIUZATION AT DE STABI CORRECTIONAL INSITIUTION AT ORATERFORD; LBP-8638,24 NRC 731 (1986)
MARBIE 1011 NUCLEAR GENERATLNG STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 5454&OL, 54547-OL OPERATING UCENSE; November 3,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TERMINARNO OPERATINO UCENSE PROCEEDING: LBP-8637, 24 NRC 719 (1986) 99
l s =* e 5
1 FACILITY INDEX -
MIDIAND PLANT, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nus. 54329{P, OM&OL,543%CP, OMAOL CONSOUDATED CONSTRUC!10N PERMTT MODE 1CARON AND OPEllATING UCENSE; August 1,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-842,24 NRC 1M (1986)
CONSOUDATED CONSTRUC'!10N PERMTT MODIFICADON AND OPERARNG UCENSE;
. Septembw 26,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Motion to Dumtes/ Terminate Pmonedmas);
IEPLt433,24 NRC 474 (1986)
MIDLAND Pt., W. Uniu 1 and 2; Donket Nes. 54329 OL, %3%OL
. OPERAUNO UCENSE; D-h- 17,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Authorizing Withdrawal af Operating IJoense Application and Disnesang Opemems License ." 2 12P 86 39,24 NRC 834 (1986)
PALO VERDE NUCULAR GENERr'ING STATION, Unit 1; Docket & 50 528 REQUEST POR ACTION; July 1,19% DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 Cf.R. 62.206; DD-86 8,24 NRC 1510986)
REQUEST POR ACTION; Novenabar 20,19% DIRECTOR'S DPEISION UNDut 10 CSA $2206; DD 8618,24 NRC 762 0986) i
! PARKS TOWNSHIP. PENNSYLVANIA, VOLUME REDUCHON PACIIITY; Docks W 74364 MIA }
PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 54440 OL,54441 OL OPERATING UCENSE; July 25,19% DECISION; ALAH441 24 NRC 64 0986)
OPERATINO UCENSE; August 18,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB 844,24 NRC j 216 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; October 30,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-86 20,24 NRC
, 518 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; November 6,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-86 22,24 NRC
.l 685 0 986)
POINT BEACH NUCU!AR PLANT, Units 1 and 2; Dados Nos. 50 266, 50 301 REQUEST POR ACTION; July 14, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 Cf.R.12.206; DD-46 9,24 NRC 168 (1986) t SEABROOK STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 54443-OL,544440L (Offsite Emessency Planning)
J l OPERATINO LICENSE; July 3,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; AIAB-839,24 NRC 45
?
~
0 986) .
SEABROOK STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docks Nos. 54443-OL 1,50444-OL 1 (Onsite Emergewy
- Planning and Safety issues) 3 OPERATING UCENSE; July 21,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruhng an NH's Motion {
to Withdaw Cea==== NH-10, and on Appliments' Mation to Strike SAPL's Objarriaa to Motim l to Withdrew); 12P-84 22,24 NRC 103 0986) .
OPERAMNO UCENSE; July 25,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rulings en Applicants' Motion of June 17, 1986, on TH's Motion of June 23, 1986, and on Heuing Manem);
IJP-86-24,24 NRC 132 (1986)
OPERARNO UCENSE: July 30,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Massachusens' 10 C.FA 12.758 Petition); LBP 8025,24 NRC 1410986)
OPERAUNO UCENSE; September 15,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying in Part and Omning in Part Applicants' Motion far Summary Disposition of SAPL's Supplemental Contention 6); LBP 86-30,24 NRC 437 0986)
OPERATING LICENSE; OcteSer 7,19% MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Granung Applicants' Motion far Anthorisation to lasue IJoense to Conduct Puel Imed and Prennucality Teting);
12P 86-34,24 NRC 549 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; November 20,19% DECISION; AIAB-853,24 NRC 7110986) 4 OPERA 11NO UCENSE; December 8,1986; DECISION; AIAB-854,24 NRC 783 (1986) 1 SEQUOYAH UFg to UF 4 FACIU1Y; Docket No. 40 8027 MIA l MATERIALA UCENSE AMENDMENT; October 3,19% ORDER; CU 8&l7,24 NRC 489 0986)
I l
i 180 1
l
- e. +s* -
9 4 a ,.
1 e 1 d e.,
y l
FACILITY INDEX j i
SIIEARON IIARRIS NUCLEAR POWER P! ANT; Docket No. 54400 OPERATINO UCENSE August 15, 1986; DECISION; AIAB 843,24 NRC 200 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; October 31, 1986; DECSION; ALAB-652,24 NRC 532 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; December 5,1986; M2MORANDUM AND OPSER; CU-86 24,24 NRC 769 (1986) .
OPERATING UCENSE; December 31, 1986; DECSION; ALAB 856,24 h1C 802 (1986)
R5 QUEST FOR ACTION; October 15, 1986; DIRECTOR'S DEOSION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 42.2%; <
DD-8615,24 NRC 618 (1986) 51DRDIAM NUCIEAR POWER STATION, Una 1; ASLBP No. 87 54341 Misc.
OPERATINO UCENSE; Noenbcr 7,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 8637A,24 NRC 726 (1986)
SIIORD{AM NUGEAR POWEh STATION, Unit 1; Docket No. 50 322-OI 3 OPERATING UCENSE; Jarmary 30, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-8614,24 NRC 36 0986)
OPERATING UCENSE; July 24, 1986; DEQSION: CU 8613,24 NRC 22 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; September 19, 1986; DECSION; AIAD 847,24 NRC 412 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE: October 29, 1986; CLARIFYING DECSION ON REMAND (Manitoring of Evscuocs); 12P,C6-36, 24 NRC 561 (1986)
OPERAUNU LICENSE; December 12, 1986; DEQSION; A1AB 855,24 NRC 792 (1986)
SIIORDIAM NUQ2AR POWER STATION, Unit 1; Docket Na 54322-OL 5 (EP Exercise)
OPERATING UCENSE; September 26, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-8616,24 h1C 405 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE; December.it,1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruhng on FEMA's Maion for Reconsideratie of and Intervenen' Objecuans to October 3,1986 Prehearing Conference Order); LBP-863SA,24 NRC 819 (1986)
SOUTII TEXAS PROJECT, Units 1 amt 2; Docket Nos. 54498-01, 54499-OL ]
OPERATING UCENSE; August 29, 1986; PARTIAL INTITAL DECISION; LBP 86 29, 24 NRC 295 0 986)
OPERAUNG UCENSE; October 8,1986; MD,f0RANDUM AND ORDER; AIAB 849,24 NRC 523 (1986)
TIIREE MIM ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Unit 1: Docket No. 54289-EW SPEGAL PROCEEDINO; August 19, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TERMINATING PROCEEDING AND REMOVING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS TO EDWARD WAUACE; AU-853,24 NRC 321 (1986)
SPECAL PROCEEDINO; October 9,1986; DECISION; ALAB-850,24 NRC 526 0986) j TIIREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Unit 1; Docket Nos. 54289-OLA 1, 54289-OIA 2 (Steam Genersior Pluggmg Criscria)
OPERAUNG UCENSE AMENDMENT; July 30, 1986; ORDER (Granung Licensee's Motion to Defer IIcanns Schedule); LBP-8626,24 NRC 149 (1986)
TURKEY POINT NUQ4AR GENERATING PLANT, Units 3 and 4; Docket Noe. 54250-OIA 1, 542514tA 1 (Vassel Flus Reducuen) i OPERAUNO UCENSE AME!:DMENT; July 24, 1986; INITIAL DECSION; LBP 8623, 24 STC l 108 (1986)
OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; September 16, 1986: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:
AIAB-846, 24 NRC 409 (1986) 1URKEY POINT NUCIIAR GENERATING PIANT, Units 3 and 4; Docket Nos. 54250-OIA 3, 54251 OIA 3 (lacreased Fuel Ennchment) r
]
' OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; August 25,1936; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Cannting Summary Duposium Motion and Terminating Proceeding); IJP 8627,24 hTC 255 0 986)
OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; Septernber 24, 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:
AIAB-848,24 NRC 434 0986) 181 I
L 1
- _ _ _ _ _ --J
- I j
l l
FACILITY INDEX UF6 PRODtCJON FACHITY; Docket No. 448027-MIA MATERIAIJ IJCENSE AMENDMENT; October 30.1986; ORDER; CU-86-19,24 NRC 508 (1986)
VOGI1E. ELECT 4.. GENERATING PLANT. Umts I and 2; Docket Nos. 544240L 544254L OPERATING U.1NSE; August 27, 1986; PARTIAL INTTIAL DECISION; 13P-8628,24 NRC 263 (1986)
OPERATING UTENSE; Ocwber 16. 1986; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-851,24 NRC 529 (1986)
OPERATING IJCENSE; Decernbar 23, 1986 CONCLUDING PARRAL INITIAL DECISION; LBP 8641,24 NRC 901 (1986)
WILMINGTON, NORDI CAROUNA FACKITY; Docket No. 7 4 1113 REQUEST FOR AC!10N; Augua 29, 1986; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION PURSUANT TO 10 Cf.R. 62.206; DD 8611,24 NRC 325 (1986) eU.S. G.P.O. 1987 181 677:60005 102 a_mm- ... __. ....