ML20235A216

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Ltr Responding to Recipient Concerns Re Radiation Exposure Received on 850301 During Unplanned Shut Down of Plant.Based on Results of Insp,No Person Exposed in Excess of NRC Regulatory Limits.W/O Stated Encls
ML20235A216
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1985
From: Gallo R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Fields G
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20234F407 List:
References
FOIA-87-228 NUDOCS 8707080357
Download: ML20235A216 (2)


Text

- __

.-..m..

...m......

.j g

,c

'r. ?f,f, ?

...ce

.'"'v<".

s, I

-(

l

)

v*.

H. w.:e i.. s 3

l lu lie a r M r. Tieldt-This letter refers to the concerns you have expressed :.orcernir,g the raciation

,.xposure you re:eived on March 1. 1985 during an unplanned shutdown of Peach

.:ottom Unit 3. Our inspection regarding this matter has been completed and our 1

!indings are decu:nented in the enclnsed in<pection report. Based on the results of our inspectier. of this matter, it appears that ne personnel were exposed in

,:xcess of NRC regulatorv limits You were.ireviously given a copy of our report j

1 nuring your riee.ing with the Peach Bottom resident 'aspectors on October 3,

? 'iSS. At that :vetina the inspectors answered the c;es: ions you had regarding the radionuclides present during the Merch 1. 1955 t r.:idert. You were also

~

provioed a copy of Part 24, "pencedures for the Han:1;ng of Discrimination I.cmplaints under Federal Employee Protection Status;" enother copy of. that

.;atute is also enclosed.

4 We believe that our actions in this matter have been responsive to your t.oncerns; however, should you have further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Please be assured that we will continue'to perform inspections to protect the -health and sa fety of-the public. We take our safety responsibilities to the public' very seriously and 1-can assure you that we will cc. inue to do so vigorously within the bou.'ds of our lawful

.:ut ho r i ty.

Sinn. rely.

4

}g

()-

k A._..

Robert h. Gallo, Chief Reactor Projects Section 2A, ORP l

(215-337-5234)

~

l'nclosure s :

As Stated i

information in this recbrd was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Informat' Act. exemptions 4

<l FolA. V ? ~ A Q. y pg 1

8707080357 870701 PDR FOIA RUBINTOB7-228 PDR 3

4 FOLLOWUP CONVERSATION WITH GEORGE FIELDS. BARTLETT NUCLEAR Tom Johnson and Herb W1111ams met with George Fields at 7:00 a.m. on 10/3/85.

Mr. Fields was given a copy of NRC Inspection Report 85-31 dealing with the 3/1/85 incident.

He had questions about fission product daughters Rb-88 and CS-138 and what radionuclides were present in the off-gas tunnel during the incident.

His questions were answered.

He was given Jim Mottan's name and phone number and told to call him if he had any questions about the inspection report.

We gave Mr. Fields information about filing a di scrimination compl aints wi th the U.

S. Dept. of Labor and the address and phone number of the York, PA officc.

We also gave Mr. Fields a copy of Part 24

" Procedures j

for the Handling of Di scri mi nati on Complaints Under Federal Employee 1

Protection Statutes".

We asked Mr. Fields if anyone at the pl ant had tpacifical1y told him that he shouldn't tali to the NRC.

He would not say that anyone told him not to talk to the NRC, although he said that he was diccouraged from talling to the NRC and just thi s weel: another HP said that PECo was going to mal e it hard for him to get another job.

Mr. Fields said he falt like had been penalized for a s t.i n g questions about hi s e::posure during the 3/

85 event and for talking to the NRC.

Mr. Fields was informed that 01 would contact ham an two weels.

His address iG1 t

I 1

L Also, Tom Staf f ord was present durang Mr. Fields' meetangs with the 1icensee.

Note: ' Jack Winrenried (Peach Bottom Supt. of Planh Services) called later today (10/3) to tell the NRC that rumors were going afound that Bartlett HP's wsro going to the NRC.

He wanted to inform us what PECo was doing.

PECo had 93 HP positions authorized and had about l'OO HP (40 PECo, 60 Bartlett).

B2ccuse of decreasing wort: loads they were letting 8 Bartlett HP's go over the naxt three weeks.

These HP's had from 11 to 27 sick days since the first of the year.

(Inf ormation on pl ans to let some Bartlett HP's go because of dccreased workloads was given to the residents about one month ago. )

Information in this record was dc'rtcd in accordance with e freedom of Inform 3 tion Act, exemptions -

F0;A. F 7 - 4L A 9' F/7