ML20234F556

Submits Followup Actions & Details of Allegation RI-85-A-0103 Discussed at Allegation Panel 851002 & 09 Meetings Re Exposures Received from 850301 Incident W/Unit 3 Offgas Sys.Resident to Recontact Alleger on 851003

ML20234F556
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	10/15/1985
From:	Gallo R, Shropshire A, Starostecki R NRC
To:	NRC
Shared Package
ML20234F407	List: IA-87-228, Informs That Oeld Intends to Develop Written Analysis of Ofc of Investigations 860508 Rept 1-85-019 Re Alleged Threats to Employees to Prevent Disclosure of Possible Overexposure to NRC ML20234F404 ML20234F455 ML20234F481 ML20234F556 ML20234F589 ML20235A001 ML20235A061 ML20235A091 ML20235A124 ML20235A155 ML20235A186 ML20235A216 ML20235A258 ML20244D901
References
FOIA-87-228 NUDOCS 8707080259
Download: ML20234F556 (2)

Text

r i

\

PANEL. MEETING 1: ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS Priority: Low by the OAC on 10/2/85.An allegation panel met on 10/2/85 ved' regarding RI-

\

Those in attendance were: R. Starostecki Panel Chairman S. Collins Branch Chief R. Gallo T. Johnson Action Office Contact B. Letts Sr. Resident, Peach Bottom Shropshire OI:RI Investigator

...............................A............................... Office Al legation Coordinator FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS: ..................

1)

Inspection Report 85-31 to the individual. Resident to reco Question the individual their discussion.to learn exactly what PECO managers told him and if an 2)

AOC to contact J. Kottan and advise him that his assistance may be 4

3) required to Reconvene explain panel E to the alleger that no overexposure occurred .

. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . .( . .CO 10/3 /8 5 ) .

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: ..................................................

A. Shropshire, OAC; R. Gallo, AOC; R. Starostecki, Panel Chairman Priority: _ Low PANEL MEETING 2:

An allegation panel reconvened on 10/9/85 regarding RI-85-A-0103 .

Those in attendance were: R. Starostecki R. Gallo Panel Chairman J. Kottan Action Office Contact Radiation Specialist R. Matakas Investigator: OI:RI Shropshire

....................A.......... Offi

...............ce Allegation Coordinator FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS: .......................

1

1) OI:RI to interview the alleger (ECD 10/16/85)

Q-1-85-019). Request for 01 Assistance No. RI-85-006 dated 9/13/85 (O .

2)

, 3) AOC to send letter to alleger referring him to DOL (ECD 10/11/85) .

the exposure he received both orally and through report that followed up on this allegation conducted by J. Kottan.

Branch Chief concurrence

.......................... required for closecut. \

...................................... ............. {

w ..

A. Shropstf re, OAC ~

R. Gallo, AOC lolro[gr cc: R. Starostecki l o- u-M~ l Panel Chairr--

J. Allan J. Gutierrez R. Gallo R. Christopher, 01:RI R. Bellamy S. Collins W. Pasciak Allegation File 87070B0259 070701 F6" 77-sjn' Sg h1N -228 PDR i

ALLEGATION DESCRIPTION peach Bot %cm 2 & 3 50-277 & 50-278 (Site or Licensee) (Docket No.)

Allegation RI-85-A-0103 was received on 10/2/85 at 0700 by J. Williams.

Characterization of the 1 concern:

Concerned about fired for talking to the NRC about exposures received from 3/1/85 incident with Unit 3 offgas system.

Confidentiality: No Name: George Fields Employer: Bartlett Nuclear Address:

Fosition: H. P. Technician Phone:

Type of Regulated Activity: Reactor Functional Area (s): Onsite Health & Safety DETAILS: (Timeframe of Allegation: March 1, 1985)

The alleger believes he is being fired because PECo thinks he talked to NRC about an incident that occurred on March 1, 1985. The alleger stated the reason PEco gave for firing the alleger was for taking too much sick leave (alleger has taken 18 days since first of year). Five days were taken due to an automobile accident and the alleger had sick leave approved two weeks before having wisdom teeth pulled (information volunteered by alleger). Another person is being fired at the same time for the same reason and four new H.P.'s are being hired. The alleger's last scheduled work day is 10/4. The alleger stated that other H.P.'s attendance records are much worse and are still working.

The alleger is still concerned about exposures received during the 3/1/85 event. The alleger's exposure concerns appear not to have been adequately discussed with the alleger (NRC IR 85-31 covers incident and a copy will be given to the alleger on 10/3/85).

The a11eger said that about 2 weeks ago, Allen Hilsmeier and Jack Winzenreid spoke to the alleger about going to the NRC. The alleger was told not to go to t.he NRC with the concerns.

(The worker is on the midnight to 7:00 shift; resident told the alleger he would be in contact at 7:00 on 10/3).