ML20214U882

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to TVA Employee Concerns Special Program, Administrative Policy
ML20214U882
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/1986
From: Bateman R, Russell J, Stewart D
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20214G966 List:
References
WP-14, WP-14-R01, WP-14-R1, NUDOCS 8612090436
Download: ML20214U882 (5)


Text

,

t 3

l TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT N'MBER: WP-14

.\\

J SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE: Welding Project REVISIdN NUMBER: 1 TITLE: Administrative Policy RhASON FOR REVISION: N/A SWEC

SUMMARY

STATEMENT: N/A PREPARATION PREPARED BY:

Original Signed By R. M. Bateman 08-25-86 SIGNATURE DATE REVIEWS PEER:

Original Signed By J. E. Rose 08-25-86 SIGNATURE DATE TAS: TECHNICAL REVIEW ONLY ll l$ $$

SIGNATUPE DATE CONCURRENCES Original Signed By CEG-H:

L. E. Martin 09-12-86

//-20-86 SRP:

w SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE

  • DATE APPROVED BY:

.i N/A ECSP KANAGidl DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)

  • SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are in flies.

2242T kCK05000327 36 861124 R

P PDR

O t

WELDING PROJECT _

GENERIC EMPLOYEE CONCERN EVALUATION REPORT REPORT NUMBER: WP-14-SON R1 DATE 08-26-86

SUBJECT:

ADMINISTRATIVE PCLICY l

CONCERN (S) CONSIDERED:

IN-86-047-001*

IN-86-158-006

  • ALSO CONSIDERED IN WP REPORT WP-01-SQN I

a5 %

, OC, WP N.

3 PREPARED BY EIM64

, OC, WP E.

REVIEWED BY g

  1. i[

8!ZI 84

, QA, Wp REVIEWED BY

/

G f

1

/

8

, CEG-H, WELDING

'/,

REVIEWED BY 7/

~

APPROVED BY t>

s.

g i

b,,PROGRANMANAGER M

\\

q>,,

Revision 1 was issued to incorporate conunents made by the Senior Review Panel 1

on 8/19/86 to clarify the justification of these concerns being administrative i

[

la nature.

1 i

00330 f

(

I

i

~

GENERICEMPLOYEECOIeCERN J.

i O,

SUMMARY

SHEET 9

Aeport Number: WP-14LSON. R1

, Report.

Title:

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY'

\\

/

i 4

i i

I.

CONCERNS CONSIDERED:

IN-86-047-001*

IN-86-158-006

  • Also considered in WP Report WP-01-SQN.

i II.

ISSUES INVOLVED 3

f' e

1.

A system is needed which will provide the welder a receipt to prove welding material was correctly returned to the rod issue centers.

2.

TVA does not allow apprentices to weld.

III. STATEMENT OF CONCERN / ISSUE VALIDITY Validity: Y Z

,N

, Substantiated: Y

,N X

IV.

EFFECT ON HARDWARE AND/OR PROGFAM n

'(

None V.

JUSTIFICATION:

i s

These iss'ues are administrative in nature. They have no quality

.r -

Implication.

c VI.

RECOMMENDATION AND/OR CORRECTIVE ACTION NEEDED None VII. REINSPECT ON NEEDED: Y

,N X

Ou VIII. ISSUE CLOSURE By this, report.

IX.

ATTACHMENT c

1.

Text of Employee Concerns 0~,

Page 1 of 1 00330 l

GENERIC EMPLOYEE CONCERN wi Report Number: WP-14-SON R1 Report

Title:

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY I.

SCOPE OF EVALUATION This engineering analysis covers the following WBN concerns determined to have possible generic implications at SQN:

IN-86-Ot7-001*

IN-86-158-006

  • Also considered in WP Report WP-01-SQN.

II.

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY CONCERN Each concern was analyzed to determine the issues voiced by the concerned individuals. These issues are as follows:

-* 1.

A system is needed which will provide the welder a recolpt which can prove welding material was correctly returned to the rod issue centers.

2.

TVA does.not allow apprentices to weld, h

III. CONCERNVApIDITYORSUBSTANTIATION Issueenel*]savalidsuggestionandobservationconcerningaperceived l

need to provide individual protection and proof of procedural compliance.

l Providing Nelders with a receipt of returned electrodes would not enchance lR1 the elsetrodo control program and is not necessary.

l Issue two[?is; a.' general statement of a perceived ' olicy. Apprenticos that have l

p received training and certification in appropriate welder qualification tests

  • lR1 are allowed to weld.

l The two issues addressed in these concerns have no quality or technical basis.

They affect only administrative policy.

Based on the foregoing analysis, they are to be closed due to their administrative nature.

The issues in these concerns are to be closed based on this report.

D Page 1 of 1 00:30

7 43/5N'/8Q ttnetuicc tunucanas

. nu m.. os i

,';rl:Q9:22 LOC *' STATUS RESP

-OTC-PPP CFR INSP,TC ------CONCERN-------

PROBLEM

a ID 7+g._

DO..

SR IN-8S-ISS-DOS WCPTI 3

KEYWORDS:

OUALIFICATION' CRAFTSMAN APPRENTICE X: W Y: C 2: N UNTIL'1973 TVA DID NOT LET THEIR APPRENTICESHIP PEOPLE WELD. DURING THAT YEAR, EVEN WITH TWO OR THREE MONTHS EXPERIENCE, AND BE ABLE TO WELD IN THE. FIELD. THE SYSTEM HAS WORKED THAT WAY EVEN SINCE 1973. CONST. DEPT. CONCERN. C/I HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.

TECHNICAL COMMENTARY:

ISSUE CONSIDERED: TUA DOES NOT ALLOW APPRENTICES TO WELD.

LOC STATUS RESP

-OTC-PPP CFR INSP TC ------CONCERN-------

PROBLEM ID L2 SR IN-8S-047-001 WCPME

XEYWORDS:

ELECTRODE IMPLEMENTATION CONTROL ACCOUNT X:

W.

Y: C 2: N

'A SYSTEM IS NEEDED THAT UERIFYS THAT THE WELDER DID RETURN THE UNUSED WELD ROD RND STUBS AND WILL PROVIDE THE WELDER A RECEIPT SO THAT THE WELDER CAN PROVE HE DID RETURN THE MATERIAL.IN CASE AN ERROR WAS MADE. CI HAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.~ CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT.

TECHNICAL COMMENTARY:.,

. ; z,'

~

(5'.IE CONSIDERED: ELECTR. ODE ACCOUNTABILITY.

.)

N

,s,y

    • [.

' '} b.

  • 'l.].\\

. \\ N... *

~:.;

i 1

f. - l ' \\

l C

--P---T

_