ML20210U442
| ML20210U442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1997 |
| From: | Neri A, Yassin S NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210U355 | List:
|
| References | |
| CK-MP3-03-10, CK-MP3-3-10, NUDOCS 9709190168 | |
| Download: ML20210U442 (34) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ .
H.,
k i s one - it3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) hiodification Review Checklist
! CK. hip 3 0310, Rev. I Electrical Equipment Oualification Review Checklist wn/
Prepared by: S. /A $5f d Name Sion ~ is 9/l0[TJ Date .
Approved by: _ A 4 M6/El ( FILE) / i7 Name MGTe Date IhiPLEhiENTATION System
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~
hiodification No. / Rev. No. " ~~~
Verified by:
Date:
SRG Concurrence by: Date:
O (ChatP3 0310, Ret 1, Page 1)
C:CK34310 IXX' nlw 9709190168 970917 PDR ADOCK 05000423 P, PDR J
1
'4 N:stbetst Utilitics CK MP3413 to Millstone U lt 3 S)st:m Modification No.
Sheet of Electrical Equipment Qualification Retiew instnietions This checklist shall be used for the design process document resiew process described in PI MP3 02 and for the modification review process desenbed in PI MP3 03.
I, The Lead Verifier shall enter the S) stem, and if applicable, the Modification Number / Description, on the checklist cover sheet.
- 2. llf reviewing a modification, the Lead Verifier or Discipline Verifier shall first determine whether the modification includes the addition of electrical components subject to Equipment Qualification requirements.
If no such components are ty:ing added by the modification Attachments A through F are not applicable, and the Verilier shall complete Attachment O only. For all other modifications, and for the system resiew, Attachments A through F shall be cornpleted (as applicable) as instructed below.1 The Lead Verifier or Discipline Verifier shall determine w hich electrical components in the System or Modification are subject to emironmental qualification, and shall list those components on Attachment A of this checklist. (Note that components which are identical or similar may be grouped on Attachment A, such that the emironmental qualification resiew may cover a group of components. Grouping in this fashion should be based not only on component similarity, but also on the Millstone emironmental qualification documentation.) All components listed on Attachment A shall be reviewed using, as a minimum. Attachment B of this checklist, entitled
{ "Emitonmental Qualification Resiew of Class IE Equipment." In addition, specific categories of electrical components shall also be reviewed using the specialized checklists in Attachment C, D, E. or F, as follows:
Component Catecory Use Attachment B nlus Cable & Splices C Electrical Penetrations D Valve Actuators E AC Induction Motors F Attachment G shall be completed for all modifications.
Use of one of the additional checklists shall be indicated on Attachment A in the space prmided. When Attachment A has been completed for the applicable System or Modification, print, sign, and date the bottom of Attachment A.
3.
Based on Attachment A, the Lead Verifier or Discipline Verifiers shall complete Attachment B for all components and Attachments C, D, E, or F for specific categories of components, as required. The checklists shall be numbered sequentially within each category, i.e., Attschment B checklist numbered I through x, etc.,
with the last one identified as " Final." When filling out the Attachments, the following shall be observed:
a-An answer shall be provided to each question, no questions are to be left blank.
b.
Not Applicable (N/A) shall only be used w here an "N/A" blank is prmided in the checklist.
c.
Wheneser the answer to a question is *No" meaning that the emitonmental qualification aspect being reviewed is unsatisfactory, a Comment No. shall be entered in the right hand column of the checklist, and a comment shall be entered on the Comment Sheet, provided at the end of the Attachment. Comments shall be numbered sequentially within an individual attachment.
tCIMIP3-0310, Ret 1. Page 2)
CTK34310 DOC nlw
}
N:rthe:st Utilities CK.MP3-0310 Millstone U:it 3 System
'~ Modifleation No.
Sheet of _
Electrical Equipeneet Qualification Review in addition, for each unsatisfactory response, the preparer shall initiate a Discrepancy Report (DR) in !
accordance with Pl MP3.II. The DR number shall be referenced in the comment.
- d. When the Attachment has been cornpleted, the preparer shall print, sign, and date at the end of the document in the space provided.
- 4. When all of the individual attachments have been completed for a System or Modification, they shall be assembled together with Attachment A and the main checklist CK MP3 0310 for the Lead Verifier to review. The Lead Verifier shall then print, sign and date the CK MP3 03 10 cover sheet to signify that the Electrical Equipment Qualification Review has been completed for the applicable System or Modification.
O O _,,,_,...c.,
CTK34310 IXX' nlw
- J
4 I N:rthe:st Utilities CK MP3-0316 Millstone U it 3 S3stem
( -g: , Modification No.
i Sheet of l
Attachment B I Reglen of EQ for Class IE electrical Equipment Attachment B Special Attachment Component EQ l Checklist No. and Checklist No. No. (s) Zone Description l
No.
l l
linclude additional sheets as necessary, sign and date final sheet of Attachment A only.]
Name Signature Date (CKalP3.0310, Res.1. Pete 4)
CTK34310 (XE nlw
s N:sihe:et Utilities CK MP3-0310 Millstone Unit J Syrem 4, Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment B
\ Resiew of EQ for Class IE Electrical Equipment Spec No and
Title:
Vendor:
Equipment Name/
Description:
l Equipment Model Number (s):
Qualincation Report No., Title, Revision. and Date:
Qualification Report Status: O Approsed by Vendor O Not Approved by Vendor Source for Emironmental Conditions:
A. CONCLUSION OF REVIEW D Accepted C Rejected Comments:
H. METHOD OF OUALIFICATION O Type Testing O Analysis O Operating Experience O Other:
C. INSTRUCTIONS Cl. Review all reports against Section B, D, and E and (depending on the qualification method shown in B) against the applicable Section(s) F, G, and/or it
- C2, in the space provided for comments after each question, (a) If the answer to the question is "yes", reference the report section where the information can be found.
(b) If the answer to the question is "no", indicate if the exclusion of information is acceptable or unacceptable and state the basis for the decision (attach justification, if necessary).
O (CK.MP3 0310, Res.1. Pare 5)
CaCK3 0310.IX)C nlu
Nrribeast Utilities CK MPJ41316 Millstone U:lt J Splem
,, Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment B Review of EQ for Class IE electrical Equipment (c) If the answer to the question is *not applicable", explain the basis for the decision.
C3. If a component unique checklist is used for this review.
Sections F through I of this checklin may not be required and Section D3 must identify the unique checklist C4. For equipment located in mild emironments, use only the applicable sections of tlus checklist.
'The reviewer twed not provide spectic references rar each question in order to satisfy (ak (bk and (c) requirements wherwver, in his judgment. such information is nas recessary.
D. REFERENCES Dt. IEEE 323 (1974) "lEEE Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations."
D2, NUREG41588 (July 1981) " Interim Staff Position on Emironmental Qualification of Safety Related Electrical Equipment "
D3. Other. Specify m . <__ e o E. EOUIPMENT DESCRIPTION El, lias all the equipment in the report been identified by manufacturer and model number?
E2. Is the equipment listed in the report identical to that being ,,_
supplied under the specification? _
F. OUALIFICATION BY TYPE TESTING Fl. Performance Reauirementt Does the report outline the equipment and characteristics needed tojudge performance
[Refs. D1: Sec. 6.3.1 l(6) and D2: Sec. 2.2(7)7 F2, Acceptance Criteria; Based on the identified performance measurements, does the report identify the limiting values of these measurements uhich would constitute failure [Refs DI: 6.31.l(9) and D2: Sec. 2.2(1)l?
4 O (COMrJ43.lo, Res. I, Page 6)
C:CK3 0310..tXC nlw
N:rtheat Utilities CK MP341316 Millstone U:lt 3 Spt:m
. Modification No, !
Sheet of p)
(
Attachment il Review of EQ for Class IE electrical Equipment
{
j j
H.S hD Cwntnent
- O F3. Test Srquingt lias the equipment been tested to the following required sequence: inspection of equipment for damage, performance measurements, aging (wear, thermal, I radiation) DB A exposure, performance measurement, and inspection? (Refs. DI: Sec. 6.3.2 and D2: Sec. 2.3)
F4. Actual Troe Testine Use the following
References:
Aging, DI: Sec. 6.3.3 and D2: Sec. 4 0; Quantities, Dl: Sec.
6.3.1. l(2); Mounting DI: Sec. 6.3.1.2; Connections, Dl: 1 Sec. 6.3.1.3; DBA, Dl: Sec. 6.3.2(6) and D2: Sec. 2.2.
F4.1 Ihermal Acinc:
F4.1.1 Does the report identify the rember of samples of _ _
equipment to be thermally aged?
F4.1.2 Does the report describe how the equipment is mounted _ _
during thermal aging?
O F4.1.3 Does the mounting descn,ntion provided in the report reflect _._ _
the installation design?
F4.1.4 llave the accelerated aging parameters been identified (time _ _
and temperature)?
F41.5 llaw the equivalent real time ad temperatures been _ _
identified?
F4.16 If an activation energy is used for determining accelerated _ _
parameters, is a reference provided identifying the source of the activation energy salue?
F4 1.7 If a regression line is used for determination of accelerated values, are the following provided?
a Test points identified on the line _ _
F4.18 Was the equipment operated during thermal aging? _ _
F4 2 Badiation Acine:
F4 21 Does the report identify the number of samples of _ _
equipment to be irradiated?
O k
((UtP3 0310, Res,1, Page 7)
C ClJ40 to IXK' nlw
4, Ntrtbe:st Utilities CK.MP3 0316 Millm me U 6t3 S3 stem
' Modification No, j
Sheet of-Attaebment B Review of EQ for Class lE electrical Equipment l l
M @ Corrunent
- D F4.2.2 Does the report identify the test radiation source type? ,,__,
F4.2.3 is the exposure dose acceptabic?
_ i F4.3 Cvelle or Wear Agint F4.3.1 Does the report identify the number of samples of ,_
equipment to be cycle aged?
F4.4 Does the report address qualification to the normal operating conditions of ambient humidity and pressure (these items may be addressed through a LOCA or IIELD test)?
F4.5 Does the report describe loads (or load combination) applied ,___
to the equipment during testing?
F4.6 Does the applied loads tellect normal operating conditions?
F4.7 Syncreistic Effects: (Ref. D2: Sec 4.3r F4.7.1 Does the report address synergistic effects?
F4.8 D.BA F4.8.1 Does the report identify the number of samples of ,_,_
equipment to be typed tested?
F4 8.2 Was the equipment operated throughout its range of ,,,,,_
anticipated input power requirements? (E g., voltage, current, power, frequency, pressure, etc.)
F4 8.3 Were performance measurements taken before/during/after .,__
DBA exposure?
F4.8.4 Does the report include qualification of equipment for the ,_,,_
specified post DBA time periad? Post DBA is considered to be the extended time period (e g., time period cut to onc year or 100 days) following the exposure to elevated temperature and pressure.
F4 8.5 Was chemical spray and'or demineralized water spray _,,
introduced during LOCA exposure? _
F4.9 Setsmic. Were seismic tests performed on aged samples?
(CK41P343-10, Rn.1, Page 8)
C:CK3.o310 DOC nlw
N:rtheist Utilities CE MP34316 Millrone U:lt 3 S3 st:m Modification No.
Sheet of
T Attachment il (V Review of EQ for Class IE cicetrical Equipment j
ns so canment = n F410 Anomalies: Were any anomalies identified in the report? _ _
F5. Senict_Cpplitions, i
' F5.1 Does the report identify values for the normal plant service conditions for which the equipment is qualified? -
F5.2 Do these test values (in F51) outlined in the report envelope _ _
the specified requirements?
F5.3 Identify the type of DBA tested for in the report:
O LocA O HELD D Combination LOCAAIELB O seismic COther: (list in Comments Section)
F6. hingi ;ltFor all service conditions, does the report address
( and identify the degree of applied margin? Refs D1: Sec.
] 6.3.1.5 and D2: Sec. 3.
(O F7. SMstittntt; Does the report qualify the equipment for _
long term submergence? _
F8. EmironmentaLVariables: Does the report identify the environmental variables monitored to simulate the service conditions?
F9. Egquipment, F9.1 Does the report outline the test equipment (meters, volt meters, etc.) used during testing?
F9.2 lias e test equipment accuracies and latest date of cahbration been documented? _
F10. hst Results and_
Conclusions:
Have the results of all type tests been identified? lias a conclusise statement been made regarding the equipment's qualified life?
Fil, hlqifittance and Inspection: Do the maintenance and inspection requirements consist of nondestructive tests and realistic requirements for inspection?
Q O
usiemio a... . r.,, ,,
C CK3.o3 to LXX' nlw
Nenberst Utilities CK MP3-0310 Millstone U:lt 3 s3ng:n s
Modification No.
i Sheet of Attachment B Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Equipment Comment Sheet 1
Cornment No. Comrnent 1
i I
(Attach additional sheets as necessary, sign and date last sheet only.)
Prepared by:
Name Signature Date 4
((%MP3-03-10, Ret. I, Page 10)
C CK34310.[XX' tilw
\\
s N:rthe:st Utienties CK MP3 0310 Millstone Utit 3 S) stem
~ Modification No, Sheet of Attachment C Reglew of EQ for Class lE Electrical Cables and Splices Checklist No. Component No(s)-
Specification Number: ,,._,_
Qualification Report No, Titic, Rev., & Date:
A. BEFERENCES l
In addition to References Di and D2 in Attachment B, the following documents were used as a basis for developing this qualification checklist:
Al, IEEE 383 (\(1974) . *lEEE Standard for T)pe Test of Class IE Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Nuclear Power Generating Station."
A2. ICEA S-68 516 (1984) . "lCEA/ NEMA Standards Publication for Ethylene. Propylene Rubber Insulated Wire and Cable?
A3. ICEAS 66 524 (1984) . "lCEA/ NEMA Standards Publication for Cross-Linked Thermosetting Pol3 cthylene insulated Wire and Cable."
A4. AEIC CS6 82." Specifications for Ethylene Propylene-Rubber Insulated Shielded Power Cables Rated 5 through 69kV." 4th Edition.
A5. AEIC CS$ 82 " Specifications for Thermoplastic and Cross-Linked Polyethylene lasulated Shielded Powe' Cables Rated 5 =
through 69 LV " 8th Edition.
A6. 1978 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Parts 39 & 40 Electrical Insulation.
A7. 1977 Annual Book of ASTM Standards . Copper and Copper Alloys.
A8. U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1,131
- Qualification Tests of Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Light-Water cooled Nuclear Power Plants"(8/77).
(CK.ht P3-oL10. Res, l. Page 11)
C:<'KLo310 tKK' nlw v -
i.
No 1 beast Utilities CK.MP341310 Millstone Utit 3 Sntem
' Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment C Meview of EQ for Class IE Electrical Cables and Splices XII ED Conunent a ti.A I B. OUALIFICATION BY TYPE TESTING !
Bl. Identification. Does the report identify the following?
Bl.1 Conductor (Refs. A2, A3, and A6)
Material, Size, Stranding, Coating - -
Bl.2 Insulation (Refs. A2, A3, and A4).
Material. Thickness -
Bl.3 Assembly (for multiconductors only)(Refs. A2 and A3). ,_
Number and arrangement of conductors.
Bl.4 Shielding (Refs. A2 and A3).
Bl.$ Jacket (Refs. A3 and A3).T 3pe, Thickness B l .6.1 Rated voltage / current B1,6.2 Operating temperature rating (Refs. A4 and A5).
- 82. Testing to Qualify for Normal Operation B2.1 Does the report cover the temperature and moisture resistance?
B2.2 Long term thermal aging properties:
B2.2.1 Does the report identify the number of samples used for evaluating the long term thennal aging properties?
B2.2.2 Have the long term thermal aging parameters been identified (time (s) and temperature (s))?
B.2.2.3 Was the equipment operated during the collection of thesc parameters?
B2.2.4 have the equipment real time and temperature been identified? _
B2.2.5 If an activation energy is used for detennining acceleration _,,
parameters. is a refetence provided identifying the source of (CE4tP3-03-10, Res, t, Pase 12)
C CK3-0310.tXW nlw
N:sthe:st Utilities CK4tP3 03-10 Millrone U lt J 53stem Modification No.
Sheet of s
3 Attachment C
/ Retiew of EQ for Class IE Electrical Cables and Splices the activa.:en energy value?
B2.2.6 If a regression line is used for determining acceleration values, are the following provided?
Test points identified on the line? - -
B2.3 Thermal and radiation egosure:
B2.3.1 Does the report identify the number of samples that reccised thermal and radiation aging?
B2.3.2 Does the report identify the tirne and temperature used for thermal aging? _
B2.3.3 Was the equipment operated during the thermal aging?
B2.3.4 Does the report identify the test radiation source type? ,_
B2.3.5 is the exposure dose acceptable?
B2.4 Do the parameters in B.2. and B2.3 meet the specincation requirernents? _
B2.5 Syncigistic etTects B2.51 Does the report address synergistic effects?
B3. Senice Conditions:
B3.1 Does the report identify values for the normal plant senice conditions for u hich the equipment is quali0ed?
B3.2 Do these test values (in B3.1) envelop the speci0 cation requirements? _
B4. Testing for Operation During DBA.
B4.2 Identify the type of DBA tested for in the report.
O LOCA O HELD 0 Combination LOCA/HELB D Seismic O Other: (List in Comment Section)
B4.3 Does the report identify values for the DBA testing __ _ _
conditions for w hich the equipment is qualified?
o (CKalP34310. Pw.1 Page 13)
CTK34310 IKK' nlw
N rthe:st Utilities CK.MP3 0310 Milletone U:lt 3 5)st:en Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment C Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Cables and Splices UJL EQ Cw=nt
- h.a B.4.4 - Post LOCA simulation (Reg. Al):
B4.4.1 Voltage withstand test.
B4.4.2 Insulation resistance.
B4.5 Do the test parameters in B41 through B4.4 meet the specification requirements?
B4.6 llave the type tests been rerformed in accordance with the following sequence: T*.crmal, radiation aging, and DBA7 B$ Flame Tests (Res. Al) Vertical Tray.
BS1 Does the report identify the following:
B$. l .2 Evaluation.
D5.1.3 Test specimen data.
B5.2 Do the test parameters in B5.1 meet the specification requirements? _
B6. Margin: For all service conditions, does the report address and identify the degree of applied margin?
B7. Test Equipment: Does the report ot'tline the test equipment used (meters, volt meters. etc.), accuracies and latest date of calibration?
B8 Minntenance and laspection: Do the maintenance and Ins. ection requirements consist of nondestructive tests and realistic requirements ofinspection?
O (UK.M P3-03-lo, En, I, l' age 14)
CnCK34310 DOC nlw
N:rther_1 Utilities CK MP3-0310 Mill;:ene Ucit 3 53stem Modification No.
$heet of
/
()) Attachment C Reglew of EQ for Class IE Electrical Cables and Splices l
Comment Sheet Comment No Comment N
(Attach additional pages as necessary, sign and date last shet only.)
Prepared by:
Name Signature Date (CK41P341310, Res.1. Page 15)
C30 0 0310IKX' nlu
l Noetheast Utilities CK.MP34310 Millstone U::lt 3 S)st:m
,. Modification No, Sheet of O Attachment D Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Penetration Checklist No. Component No-(s)
Speelfication Number:
Qualification Report No.,
Title, Rev., & Date:
A. REFERENCES -
In addition to References D1 and D2, the following documents were used at a basis for developinr this qualification checklist:
A1, *!EEE 317 (1983) . IEEE Standard for Electric Penetration Assemblics in Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Generating Stations."
A2. U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.63 . " Electric Penetration Assemblies in Containment Stmetures for Light Water Cooled Nuclear Plants" (Revision 2, July 1978)
A3. ANSI C961 1964 . " Temperature Measurement Thermocouple" A4. ANSI K63.21 1965. " Method of Test for Flammability of Self Supporting Plastics"(ASTM D635 68).
A5. ANSI K65.12001971. " Method of Test for flammability of Flammable Plastics"(ASTM D568-69).
A6. ANSI N45.2.2 1972 . " Packaging. Shipping. Receiving Storage and ilandling of items for Nuclear Power Plants (During the Construction Phase)."
A7. IEEE 98 (1984) . " Guide for the Preparation of Test Procedures for the Thermal Evaluation and Establishment of Temperature Indexes of Solid Electrical Insulating Materials "
AS. IEEE 10191972) .
- Guide for the Structural Analysis of Thermal Life Test Data."
A9. IEEE 336 (1985) . " Installation. Inspection, and Testing Requirements for Instrumentation and Electric Equipment -
During the Construction of Nuclear Power Generating A10. IEEE 383 91974) . " Standard for type Test of Class IE Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (for pigtail and socket connections).
(C%hlP3 0310, kes.1 Pete IO CTK3 o310.lXX' nlw
! Northeast Utilities CK.MP3-0310 Millstone U:it 3 Splem Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment D Reslew of EQ for Class 1E Elcetrical Penetration 113 hg comment a n All. IPCEA S.19 81 (NEhiA WC4) .* Rubber Insulated Wire and Cable for the Transmission and Distribution of Electrical !
Energy" 91984) !
Al2. AShfE Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section ill, Subsection NE; 1974 Edition.
B. OUALIFICATION BY TYPE TESTINQ l
Bl. Quantitles Does the report identify the quantity of __, .,_,
penetration assemblies or feedthroughs for each phase of type testing?
B2. Mount'ng. ,
82.1 Does the report describe the mounting of the penetration ,_, ,,,,.
assemblics during each phase of type testing 7 i
B3. Esternal Connections.
B3.1 Does the report describe how external connections are made .
to the penetration assemblies during each phase ofi>pe testing?
B4. Performance Requirements, Does the report consider and identify the following characteristics / Ratings needed to judge performance?
Temperature Voltage, Continuous Current, Short Time Current and duration, hiaximum Gas Leakage Rate,
~
hiaximum Duration of Rated Short Circuit Current -
B5. Acceptance Criteria Based on the identified performance ,_,
characteristics, does the report identify the limiting values of the measuremet:ts uhich would constitute failure / acceptance for the following tests?
B5.1 Insulation type tests.
Dielectric strength test (each mtsium voltage power conductor must be given an impulse withstand test) asulation resistance test Partial-discharge (Corona) test (medium voltage power (CK-htP3-0310, Rev, I, Page 17)
C:CK3 0310.IXX' nlw
4 Northeast Utilities CH MP3-0310 Mill ome U::lt 3 S)st m Modification No.
Sheet of Attachement D Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Penetration conductors only)
B$.2 Continuous current rating test.
B$.3 Short time overload (STOL) cunent rating and duration test.
B5.4 Short circuit current rating and duration test.
B$.5 kated maximum duration of rated short circuit current test. _
B5 6 Pneumatic pressure rating test.
F,5.7 Maximum gas leakage rate test.
- B6. Type Tests. Were the following performed?
B6.1 Gas leak rate test (may be combined with pneumatic pressure ,
test).
B6.2 Pneumatic pressure test (may be combined with gas leak test).
B6.3 Conductor continuity test.
B6.4 Dielectric strength test.
B6.5 Impulse test (for medium voltage power conductors only).
B6.6 Insulation resistance test.
B6.7 Partial discharge (Corona) test (medium voltage pow er conductors only).
B6.8 Rated continuous current test.
B6.9 Cycling and aging tests.
Shipping and storage simulation _ _
Installation welding test - -
Thennal cycle test - ~
Thermal aging (simulation er normal senice conditions)
Radiation aging (normal senice emironment exposure)
(CK-Alr3 03 to,kes 1.Page 18)
C:t'K34310 DOC nlw
l 4
N:stheant Utilities CK MP3-0310 Millstone Util 3 System Modification No.
Sheet of.
- Attachment D
. Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Penetration .
I i
i j 1.f3 EQ Cannsatt h,3
! B610 Acceptance tests.
3
~
Oas leak rate test
- ~ ~~ ~
Dielectric resistance test
~
! Insulation resistance test ~
Conductor continuity test - -
B6.ll Synergistle effects:
! B6.l l,1 Does the report address synergistic effects?
i B6.12 Rated short time overload (STOL) current test. _
i B6.13 Short circuit current and duration test. _ _
B6.14 Seismic testing.
B6.15 Rated continuous current test. _ _,,
I
- B6.16 Design Basis Event tests i ,_, _
j B6.17 Rated maximum duration of rated short circuit current test. ,,
l 4
B6.18 A final gas leak rate test.
B6.19 Was the test sequence of B6.1 through B6.18 followed?
B7. Se:Tice Conditions:
B7,1 Does the report identify values for the normal and abnormal senice
~ -
conditions for which the penetration assemblic are qualified?
B7.2 Identify the type of DBA tested for in the report.
O LOCA O HELB O Combination LOCA/HELB D Seismic 0 Other:(List in Comment Section)
B7.3 Do the service condition parameters (in B7.1) envelope the .__ _
specification requirements?
B8. Material tests:
(rK MP3 03.lo, Ra. t. Pere 19)
CEK3 o310. DOC nlu
Ntribeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-10 Milletone Unit 3 System i Modification No, Skeet of Attachment D Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Penetration YII tig Canment
- n B8.1 Time and temperature aging.
B8.1.1 Have the acceleration aging parameters been identined (times and temperatures)? _
B8.1.2 - Have the equivalent real time and temperatures been identined?
B8.1.3 If an activation energy is used for determining acceleration parameters, is the source of the activation energy value identified?
B8.1.4 If a regression line is used for determining acceleration valtes, are the following provided?
Test points idenafied on the line?
B8.2 Radiation:
B8.2.1 Does the report identify the test radiation scurce type? _
B8.2.2 is the exposure rate provided?
BT 3- Fire resistance.
B8.3.1 Have the insulated conductors been qualined in necordance with Ref. A107 B9. DBA Testing:
B9.1 Does the report identify values for the abnormal plant senice conditions for w hich the equipment is qualined?
B9.2 Were insulation resistance for Class IE conductors and _
pressure and temperature of the assembly monitored periodically during the DEA testing to verify specified performance?
B9.3 Was the equipment exposed to the entire tirae frame of the accident as called for in the specification? _
B9.4 Does the report include qualification of equipment for the specified post-DBA time period? _
(CK MP3-03-10, Kev. I, Pate 20)
CaCK3 0310.tXX' nhv
- . - - - . - . - - . . - . . - - -= -- - . . - . - . _
N:rtbe:st Utilities CK MP3-0310 Millstone Uzit 3 S)st:m
,. Modificction No, Sheet of Attachment D Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Penetration IfJi EQ CmunsnLt E3 ,
- . Blo. Margint B10.1 Were the following minimum test margins applied to the senice conditions for which the electric penetration is qualified?
+5% of rated current values - -
+10% of rated voltage values -
a
~ ~
+8'C (+ 15'F) 4 l
~
+10% of gauge pressure, but not more than 7x10'Pa 2
(10lbf/in ) - -
4 +10% added to the acceleration of the response spectrum at l the mounting point of the penetration assembly _ _
4
+10% radiation (on accident dose) - _
B10.2 - If the qualification testing were conducted under saturated ,_, _
4 steam conditions, was the temperature margin such that the
,. test pressure did not exceed the saturated steam pressure
! (corresporiding to peak see. ice temperature) by more than 7x10*Pa (10lbf/in')?
8 Bil. Environmental Variables. Does the report identify the _ _
emironmental variables monitored to simulate the specified i senice conditions?
, B12. Test Equipment:
!=
B 12.1 Does the report outline the test equipment (meters, _ _
voltmeters, etc.) used during testing?
1 B12.2 Have test equipment accuracies and latest date of calibration _ _
been documented?
B 13. Test Results and Conclusions. Have the results of all type ___ _
l tests been identified? Has a conclusive statement been made regarding the penetration's qualified life?
l B14. Maintenance and Inspection. Do the maintenance and _ _
- hispection requirements consist of nondestructive tests and realist requirements for inspection?
I (CK41P3 03 3 0, Rev.1. Page 21)
COCK 3-0310 IXX:
nlw
No 1 beat Utilities CK MP3 0310 Millstone Uzit 3 - Syst:m Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment D Review of EQ for Class IE Electrical Penetration Comment Sheet Comment No. Comment i
W s
(Attach additreu! pages as necessary, sign and date last sheet only.)
Prepared by:
Name Signature Date (CK MP3-03-10, Res,1.Page 22)
C:'CK3 0310. DOC nlw
Ntrtbe:st Utilities .
CK MP3-03-lo Mllist:1e Uxit 3 S3 stan Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment E Reglew of EQ for Class IE Electric Valse Actuators Checklist No. Component No,(s)
Specification Number; Qualification Report No.,
Title. Rev., & Date:
A. REFERENCES In addition to References D1 and D2 in Attachment B, the following documents were used as a basis for developing this qualification checklist:
nft hg Comment
- E6 B. EOUlPMENT IDENTIFICATION B1. Does the qualification report identify the samples and the bases on which samples were selected to represent a generic actuator group?
B2. Is the equipment listed in the report identical to that is being supplied under the specification? _
B3. Does the report include the document requirements specified in Ref. Al, Sec. 7.2 and 7.37 _
C. OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS Does the analysis include the following details?
C1. Identification of Valve Actuators' performance requirements.
C2. A listing of qualified senice conditions.
C3. Do the senice conditions envelop the plant operating conditions? _
C4. Do the mounting method and external connections of the Valve Actuator in the repon simulate plant conditions? _
C5. Mathematical Model:
C5. I Description of mathematical model (a regression analysis is considered a mathematical model).
C5.2 Principles by which model was developed (e g., standards, (CKatP3-03-t o, Rn 1. Page 23)
CnCK3 o310. DOC nlw
Nir1heast Utilities -
CK MP3-0316 Millstone UKit 3 Syst:m Document No.
Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment F Review of EQ for Class 1E AC Induction Motors test data operating exp:rience).
C5.3 A listing of the emironmental variables monitored which aflect equipment performance.
C5.4 Justification for any emironmental variable not listed in C5.3. _
C5.5 Model identified such that equipment performance is a function of time and variables as listed in C5.3.
l C6. Extrapolation of the Model:
C6.1 Identification of postulated equipment failure modes.
C6.2 The postulated failure modes for the equipment should be shown to be the same as those produced by the model.
C6.3 The extrapolation of the model to the desired life must be justified by using: -
- a. Confidence bounds.
- b. Thermal testing of a component based on the aging rate of
- the regression line and to same failure critena.
c, Through surveillance requirements. -
- d. Other (Ust in Comment Section)
C6.4 Description of Analytical Methods. A written explanation of _,_,
how the model was selected to represent a generic actuator group and the parameters on which the selvtion was based.
C7. A comparison of the Valve Actuator to be qualified to the qualified generic Valve Actuator: _
C8. Determination of qualified life. The model must demonstrate that the equipment performance exceeds requirements for an emironment as severe as that anticipated in sersice.
C9. Maintenance. A description of periodic maintenance ad replacement requirements, _
(CK-MP3 0310. Res.1. Page 24)
CSCK3t0310.DCC nlw
N:rtheist Utiliti-s CK-MP3-03-10 Millstone U14t 3 Syst:m Modification No.
Sheet of O Attachment E V Review of EQ for Class iE Electric Vahc Actuators Comment No. Comment l
1 (Attach additional pages as necessary, sign and date last sheet only.)
Prepared by:
Name Signature Date (CK-MP3 0310. Rew 1, Page 25)
C:'CK34310. DOC ulw
Nrrtheast Utilities CK MP3-0310 Millstone U:lt 3 System Modification No.
Sheet of p Attachment F Q Review of EQ for Class IE AC Induction Motors Checklist No. Component No.(s)
Specification Number:
Qualification Report No.,
Title, Rev , & Date:
A, REFERENCES In addition to References DI and D2 in Attachment B the following documents were used as a guide in developing this qualification checklist:
Al. IEEE 431974 " Recommended Practice for Testing lasulation Resistance of Rotating Machinery."
A2. IEEE 56-1977 " Guide for insulation Maintenance for Large A!!ernatmg Current Rotating Machinery."
A3. IEEE 62 1978 " Guide for Field Testing Power Apparatus Insulation."
A4. IEEE 98-1984 " guide for the Pieparation of Test Procedures for the Thermal Evaluation and Establishment of Temperature Indices of Solid Electrical Insulation Materials."
AS. IEEE 99-1980 " Recommended Practice for the Preparation of Test procedures for the Thermal Evaluation ofInsulation Systems for Electrical Equipment."
A6. IEEE 101 1972 " guide for the Statistical Analysis of
- Thermal Life Test Data."
A7.' IEEE I171974 " Standard Test procedure for Evaluation of Systems ofInsulating Materials for Random-Wound AC Electric Machinery."
A8. IEEE 275-181 " Recommended Practice for Thermal Evaluation ofInsulation Systems for AC Electric Machinery Employing Form-Wound Preinsulated Stator Coils (machine Rated 6900V and Below."
(CK-MP3 03-10. Rev. I. Page 26)
C:iCK3 0310. DOC nlw
Ntrtheast Utilities CK-MP3-03 16 Millrone Unit 3 System Docuneent No.
Modification No. ,
Sheet of Attachment F Review of EQ for Class IE AC Induction Motors i
1 01 b'Q Comment a Q A9. IEEE 334 1974 .
- Standard for Type Tests of Continuous Duty Class IE Motors for Nuclear Power Generating Standards."
A 10. IEEE 429 1972 .
- Standard Test Procedure for the Evaluation of Scaled insulation Systems for AC Electric Machinery Employing Form. Wound Stator Coils."
Al1. NEMA MG 1 1978 " ANSI / NEMA Standards Publication, Motors and Generators."
B. QUALIFICATION BY TYPE TESTING Bl. Identification. Does the qualification report identify the following?
Bl.1 Coil Construction (check one) _ _
- Bl.2 Insulation Class (Ref. All) - _
For Bl.3 through Bl.7, indicate type and material Bl.3 Temperature Values (Ref. All)
Ambient Temperature _._ _
Temperature rise by resistance - -
B l.4 Lubricant: Manufacturer / Type B1.5 - Bearings Type Bl.6 Seals B l.7_ Auxiliary Desices Space Heaters Stator Resistance Temperature Detectors - -
Bearing Thermocouples - -
(CK-MP3-03-10, Rev.1. Page 27)
Cf,CK3 o310 DOC nlw
N:rthe:st Utilities CK MP3-03-16 Millst:nc Unit 3 Syst:m Document No.
Modification No.
Attachment F Review of EQ for Class IE AC Induction Motors insulated Lugs i Stator Lead Cables - _
Other - -
B2. Regression Analysis B2.1 Motorette Construction: Is the 6 vription or reference in accordance with one of the following:
1-Random Wound (Sec. 2.1, IEEE 429)
! Form Wound (Section 2.1, iEEE 429)
B2.2 Quantities of Motorettes and Test Temperatures Were at least 3 test temperatures used? - -
Were at least 10 metorettes per temperature used? - -
B2.3 Motor Insulation System:
B2.3.1 Motor Insulation: Does the report state that the insulation on the motorettes is the same as the insulation used on actual motors?
B2.3.2 Motor Lead Insulation: Does the report state that the
. insulation on the motorettes is the same as the insulation used on actual motors?
B2.4 Test Cycle and Voltage Checks: Are the test cycle and voltage checks as described or referenced in accordance wit one of the following:
Random-Wound (Test Cycle, Sec. 2.2, IEEE I17)(Voltage Checks, Sec. 2.3, IEEE I 17)
Form-Wound (Test Cycle, Sec. 2.2, IEEE 429) (Voltage Checks, Sec. 2.3, IEEE 429) (Test Cycle, Part 2, Sec. 2, IEEE 275) (Voltage Checks Part 2, Sec. 3, IEEE 275) _ _
B3. Qualification of Equipment:
O Inside Containment O outside Containment (COh!P3 03 lo, Rev.1.Page 28)
C:CK3 0310. DOC nlw
N:rthe:st Utilities CK MP3-03-16 Millstone Uxit 3 Sy st:m Document No.
' Modification No.
C, '""*' "'
Attachment F Review of EQ for Class IE AC Induction Motors ns Eg canment a b'3 B3.1 Temperature: Is the qualified life statement based on the total temperature (winding temperature rise plus ambient) rating of the insulation class? (If yes, motor is qualified for continuous operation at the qualified life value.)
B3.2 Time and Temperature Aging:
B3.2.1 Have the accelerated aging parameters been defined?
B3.2.3 Are the aging parameters based on regression analysis? ,_,
B3.3 Radiation:
l B3.3.1 Analysis :Are references provided as to the source of the input data used in the analysis?
B3.3.2 Type testing During Regression Development:
Were all motorettes at each test temperature used? - -
Is the radiation source identified? - -
Is the total integrated dose identified? - -
B.3.3.3 Type Testing of New Motorettes and/or Motors:
Is the radiation source identified 9 Is the total integrated dose identified? - -
Was an AC high potential test perfonned at the end of - -
radiation testing?
B3.4 Humidity: Does the report identify level of humidity? _ _
B3.5 Vibration: Does the report identify level of vibration?
B3.6 Seismic: Has the vendor submitted a seismic report for the ,_,
motor?
B3.7 Lubricant:
B3.7.1 Was the lubricant included in a radiation test / analysis?
(CK41P3413 lo, Rev.1. Page 29)
C:\CK3 0310 DOC nlw
N:rtherst Utilitles CK MP3-03-16 Mill;*one UIlt 3 S)st:m Document No.
Modification No.
Attachment F Sheet of Review of EQ for Class IE AC Induction Motors '
ns s canment a u B3.7.2 Was the lubricant included in a thermal aging test /a nal) sis? _ _.
B3.8 Bearings: Has the vendor provided the rating in accordance _ _ !
with the Anti-Friction Bearing Manufacturing Association Standards 91978 and i1 19787 B3.9 Seals:
Were the seals included in a radiation test or analysis? _ _
Were the seals included in a thermal aging test or analysis? - -
B3.10 Test Samples: For the motor to be typed tested, has the following information been prosided?
B3.10.1 Type B3.10.2 Frame Size B3.10.3 Bearing and Lubrication System B3.10.4 Insulation System Classification l
B3.10.5 Total Temperature Rise ('C) by Resistance B3,10.6 Voltage Rating B3.ll Performance Requirements:
Does the report identify the variables that will be monitored - _ _
during testing tojudge performance?
i B3.12 Acceptance Criteria:
I Based on the variables to be monitored, have acceptance - - l criteria been defined?
B3.13 Design Basis Event:
B3.13.1 Was the motor operated during the DBA?
i B3.13.2 Were the voltage and frequency varied?
(CK MP343-10, Res.1, Page 30)
CaCK3 0310. DOC nlw
N:rtbe:st Utilities CK-MP3-G3-15 Millrone U:lt 3 Syst:m Document No, Modification No.
Sheet of
( Attachment F Review of EQ for Class IE AC Induction Motors y.Es tig comment
- E3 B3.13.3 Were performance measurements taken before, during, and _ _
after the DBA7 P,'.13.4 Was chemical spray introduced?
B3.13.5 Does the temperature / pressure profile envelope the plant _
profile? _
B3.13.6 Was the equipment exposed to the entire frame of the accident as called for in the specification?
B3.13.7 Was the exposure at least I hour beyond the equipments' _ _
required operability during a DBA7 B4. Test Equipment:
B4.1 Does the report identify the test equipment used during the p testing?
iV) B5, Test Results and
Conclusion:
Does the report include the tabulated results of the - -
performance measurements?
B6, Maintenance and Inspection:
Have the maintenance and inspection requirements been - -
defined to ensure qualified life?
O (CKalP34310, Rev. t. Page 31)
C9CK3 0310 DOC hlw
N:rthe:st Utilities CK-MP3-03-10 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment F Review of EQ for Clau IE AC Induction Motors Comment Sheet Comment No. Comment G
U (Attach additional pages as necessary, sign and date last sheet only.)
Prepared by:
Name Signature Date (CK-NIF3-03-10, Ret,1 Page 32)
C:CK3-0310. DOC nlw
---_a
N rtbeast Utilitirs CK.MP3-0310 Millstone Urlt 3 System _
Modification No.
Sheet of Attachment G
( Review of Modification for Impact on EQ for Esisting Electrical Components identify potential impact of the modification on equipment qualification of existing electrical components as a result of the modification changing A!!y of the following:
Normal pressure, temperature, humidity or radiation dose / exposure Abnormal (accident) pressure, temperature, humidity or radiation dose / exposure Discuss the specific impact, dilineate how the modification addressed it, and indicate whether it was adequately addressed, and why it is adequate. If it is determined that the impact was agl adequately addressed, initiate a Discrepancy Report (DR) per PI-MP3 il, and include reference to the DR numty:r in this Attachment G. (Use the continuation page as necessary.)
s The effects of the modification on EQ of existing electrical components were adequately addressed.
Yes No Prepared by Date O
O (CK MP3 03-10, Rev.1. Page 33)
CSCK34310. DOC nlw
t Norihnst Utilities CK MP3-0310 Millstone Urit 3 Spt:m Modification No, Sheet of fO Attachment G V Review of Modification for Impact on EQ for Existing Electrical Components (Continuation Page)
/O V
V (Cli-MP3-0310, ites.1, Page 34)
CTK34310. DOC nlw