ML20210F016
Text
-___________ ,
~
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE CPSES PAGE MANUAL NO. ECE-AD-1 12
- 12/22/86 1 0F 35 2 _ ,
(V) ORGANIZATION PREPARED BY ,. , U APPROVED
//
-w 1.0 GENERAL b 1.1 35 1195 h PURPOSE CONTROL
[
The purpose of this procedure is to defJ wt 1 Engineering organization at Comanche Pea Station (CPSES) and to establish a stand team 'e&t)ri f met o for interface control between TUGCO Engineeri E) and Lead Contractors (LC), and Lead Contractor Contractors (OC) by means of a Task Descriptid @MYDP'forh9p design, engineering, and construction of CPSES.
1.2 SCOPE The scope of this procedure is:
- a. To define the responsibilities of the site engineering organizations.
(~ b. To establish requirements for interface control.
V
- c. To outline the requirements of a Task Description.
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES .
- a. The Vice-President, Engineering and Construction, (VP, E & C), or his designee, has overall responsibility for this organization and implementation of this procedure.
- b. The Director, Engineering, or his designee, shall I be responsible for engineering and design delegated to other engineering contractors.
- c. VP, E & C, or his designee, shall approve in writing all matters affecting scope of other contractors activities, including procurement.
1.4 DEFINITIONS The following definitions _are prov_ided to amanro a unifoim undusatanaln re used in this prosegre; * *gP of p Dselect
terms
? asP!they a o Rb L L N e t.h !Njs 1IV f)IA u ogLy
$of A
TUCCO ENGINEERINC PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PACE
,. CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 2 0F 35 12/22/86 O,3 Design - Technical and management processes which commence with identification of design input and which lead to and include the issuance of design output documents.
Design Input - Those criteria, parameters, bases or other design requirements upon which detailed final design is based.
Design output - Documents such as drawings, specifica-tion, calculations and other documents defining
, technical requirements of structures, systems and components.
External Design Interface - Relationship between design groups from different organizations. '
Internal Design Interface - Relationship between design groups within the same organization.
()
'J Task Description (TD)
. The TD initiated by TE, or by the Lead contractor or Supporting Contractor shall describe the task in sufficient detail for the contractor to plan and execute the task. The level of details in the TD shall be as per ECE-AD-1-1. ,
Work Instruction (WI)
. The WI, initiated by Lead contractor or by the I Supporting contractor and/or other contractor, is a detailed plan to execute the task described in the TD.
Several WI's may be developed for one TD.
Summary Scope and Schedule (SSS)
The SSS provides an overview of the contractor's plan to execute a task described in a TD and/or WI.
TUGCO ENGINEERING (TE)
The Engineering Department of the Engineering and Construction Group which is assigned the responsibilities and functions defined in NEO 1.01.
O
TUGC0 NEERING FROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PACE ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 3 0F 35
()
The engineering contractor designated in writing as having primary responsibility for work defined by a TD.
Supporting contractor (SC)
An engineering contractor providing support to a Lead Contractor for work defined by a TD.
Other Contractor (oc)
An engineering contractor having a contract directly or indirectly with CPSES.
2.0 SITE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATIONS The site engineering organizations (Figure 1) having
~
overall responsibility for the design, engineering, and construction activities at CPSES consist of TUGCO
() Engineering and the following Lead Contractors:
Stone and Webster Engineering Corp., (SWEC)
(SWEC - Corrective Action Project)
(SWEC - Pipe Support Engineering)
Gibbs & Hill (GH)
Westinghouse (W)
Ebasco (EB)
Impell (IM)
Bahnson Service Company (BSC) and
. Grinnell Fire Protection System Company (GFPS)
Engineering Planning and Management, Inc. (EPM)
A description of each organization's structure, functions, and responsib,lities as they relate to CPSES activities is detailed in the following sections of this procedure.
2.1 TUGCo ENGINEERING The Department of Engineering (TUGC0 Engineering) within the Division of Engineering & Construction is organized into seven sections either by engineering discipline or support activity (Figure 2). The Director of Engineering is directly responsible for management of the department and reports directly to the O Vice-President, Engineering & Construction.
TUCCO NEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 4 0F 35 12/22/86 A brief description of each Engineering section's work scope follows.
- a. Mechanical Engineering The Mechanical Engineering Section (Figura 3) under the direction of the Manager, Mechanical Engineering, conducts a program of activities in Mechanical and Piping & Support Systems Engineering to implement plant betterment, internal engineering, and other projects in support of project engineers and other disciplines in accordance with priorities set by the Director of Engineering. This program includes appropriate codes and standards that relate to mechanical equipment and components, systesa interaction, and piping & support analysis, nuclear plant safety, and interfaces with both on-site and off-site organizhtions. The program also implements applicable corporate and NEO policies with respect to engineering activities at CPSES.
(,_\
s/
m The section maintains engineering expertise in the areas of:
mechanical systems (fluid and NVAC),
mechanical components, equipment stress analysis, chemistry and materials, thermal-hydraulic analysis, radiation and radiological issues, nuclear safety issues, risk and availability issues, pipe break analysis, seismic qualification analysis and testing, containment analysis, subcompartment analysis, effects of external events, missile generation, piping and support analysis, systems interaction analysis, fire protection analysis. ,
O V
TUGCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE AD.1 12 12/22/46 5 0F 35 h,
The section provides engineering services such as:
specification, technical review, support for field activities, calculations, documentation, including design basis documents, specifications, and drawings, evaluation, detailed design, and procurement.
The section administers on-going programs in the
't areas of:
fire protection, fire safe shutdown, industrial safety assessment, environmental assessment, 7,\ coordination of changes to the CPSES Final
- Safety Analysis Report, (FSAR) and the
\-J Technical Specifications, participation in Westinghouse owners', Group programs and activities, -
risk and availibility assessment, and -
independent review of plant changes (10CFR50.59). ,
- b. Electrical Engineering The Electrical Engineering Section (Figure 4) under i
the direction of the Manager, Electrical Engineering, conducts a program of activities in Electrical and Instrumentation & Control Engineering to support project engine 2rs and other requesting components of Nuclear Engineering and operations in the specification technical review, evaluation, design and procurement of plant systems, apparatus services and materials in accordance with priorities set by the Director of Engineering. This program provides for engineering i
criteria and designs for electrical apparatus, wiring, controls, and instrumentation for both NSSS and BOP
(, applications and for the development and maintenance of internal and external interfaces. The program also
(T implements applicable corporate and NEO policies
(_,/ with respect to engineering activities at CPSES.
t TUGC0 ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES q, ,0ECANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 6 0F 35 N~-
,N
\
The section provides for program implementation in the areas of electrical engineering, electrical equipment & materials, equipment qualification, process instrumentation, plant controls, and computer applications.
- c. Civil Engineering il The Civil Engineering Section (Figure 5) under the direction of the Manager, Civil Engineering conducts a program of activities in Civil and Structural Engineering to support project engineers and other requesting departments of l Nuclear Engineering and Operations in the specification,' technical review, evaluation, design and procurement of plant structures, systems components, services and materials in accordance
- with priorities set by the Director of Engineering.
l This program provides for engineering and design i
activities relating to the geotechnical,
/\ architectural, civil and structural areas of l\ portions of the water resources and environmental l areas for both safety related and non-safety related plant applications and for the development and maintenance of internal and external interfaces. The program also implements applicable corporate and.NEO policies with respect to engineering activities at CPSES. 1 o I The section provides technical support for !
activities such as: )
- Static & Dynamic Analysis of Structures i
- Containment Structures - Analysis &'
Design ,
- Building Design 1
- Design of Building Elements & Components 1
- Geological Studies !
- Site seismicity l
- Structural Analysis and Design of
- Cable Trays
- Cable Tray Supports .
- Conduit I
- Conduit Supports
- HVAC Ductwork r~s - HVAC Ductwork Supports 1
(_) s - Equipment Sup'p orts ;
i
i i
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 7 0F 35 12/22/86 QJ:
- Analysis & Design of Anchorage or Attachment to Structures (Local)
Analysis & Design of Containment Liners &
Linear Penetrations
- Analysis & Design of Refueling Cavity &
Fuel Pool Liners & Penetrations
- Coordination-of Site Development
- Establishment of Dam Maintenance
& Safety Program
- Soil slope Stability Studies
- Hydraulic Analysis & Design of Intake
& Discharge Structures
- Hydraulic Studies
- Hydrology and Flooding Studies
- Design of Finish Grading
- Design of Plant Roads, Railroads and Walkways ,
- Establishment of Reclamation &
Restoration Requirement
() The section also provides for the maintenance of Design Basis Documents, resolution of FSAR and Licensing Issues, procurement of material,
- installation and services and field support for l construction and Quality Assurance activities cited above.
'd. Engineering Assurance The Engineering Assurance Section (Figure 6) under the direction of the Manager, Engineering Assurance, conducts a program of activities to l
ensure that engineering activities for both TUGC0 Engineering and its engineering contractors are performed in accordance with applicable regulatory and quality requirements and to ensure timely, l technically accurate, and unified responses to l
outside regulatory agencies. This program includes the review and control of TUGCO Engineering procedures and instructions, training of Engineering personnel, technical evaluation and i surveillance of engineering activities, preparation l
and coordination of responses to regulatory j
compliance issues, and primary site interface responsibility to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The program also provides for the coordination and implementation of applicable l coporate and NEO policies with respect to l engineering activities at CPSES.
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 8 0F 35 12/22/86 g-
- e. Operations Support The Operations Support Section (Figure 7) under the direction of the Manager, Operations Support, conducts a program of activities in the areas of procurement and operation support. This program includes engineering support for the technical, quality assurance, and documentation aspects of the procurement-program, spare parts, vendor document control, specification review, Q-List administration, commitment tracking and compliance issues. The program also provides for the implementation of applicable corporate and NEO policies with respect to engineering activities at CPSES.
- f. Engineering Projects The Engineering Projects Section (Figure 8) under the direction of the Manager, Engineering Projects, conducts a program of' activities to ensure that O- necessary engineering resources are available for
, satisfactory completion of defined plant betterment projects, internal engineering project, and special engineering studies, manage and control CPSES design basis documentation, provide engineering computer graphics /information systems and support personnel necessary for the conduct of engineering business. This program also provides for the implementation of applicable corporate and NEO
. policies with respect to engineering activities at
j g. Work Tracking i
The Engineering Work Tracking Section (Figure 9) under the direction of the Manager, Work Tracking, provides for tracking and coordinating the processing of engineering documents within TUGCO Engineering and between TUGCO Engineering and its l Lead Contractors. ,
i lO
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION -ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES .
ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 9 OF 35 12/22/86 f
2.2 LEAD CONTRACTORS
- a. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
- 1. Corrective Action Project (CAP):
SWEC shall develop and implement corrective action to document design adequacy for mechanical, electrical, structural, and instrumentation and controls areas.
'l Concerns to be addressed are derived from CPRT "Self-Initiated" issues, " External Sources" issues (TRT, ASLB, NRC, IAP, etc.), and additional items identified by SWEC. SWEC shall analyze these issues and determine the generic implications in order to ascertain whether any additional design efforts might be deficient for similar reasons.
i Based on the analysis of design adequacy, SWEC shall develop and implement a corrective action program to review and upgrade CPSES plant O' documentation and hardware, as required, to meet Comanche Peak design safety criteria.
Some of specific activities in support of this l portion of SWEC's scope are; 1
Assessing the design basis of the applicable disciplines. This effort shall include development of design criteria and system descriptions in the form of Design Basis Documents.
Reviewing appropriate calculations against the documented design basis.
Evaluating key engineering diagrams, drawings, and specifications for conformance to design basis documentation.
Revising existing and/or generating new calculations and key design documents, as required.
Providing sufficient documentation to support the conclusion of design adequacy, in the form O of Generic Issue Reports.
TUGCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 10 0F 35 SWEC is also responsible for general construction completion design activities and technical liaison with the TUGCO startup test organization as assigned by TUGCO. This includes design development, design changes and licensing support resulting from corrective action activities or as assigned by TUGCO.
SWEC is responsible for all civil / structural design and engineering activities including embedient load evaluation, CPRT issue resolution, NCR dispositioning, design change implementr' ion, and licensing support.
SWEC is responsible for all electrical design and engineering activities and all Instrument and Control design and engineering activities including CPRT issue resolution, NCR dispositioning, design change implementation, licensing support, O construction support and interface with other design contractors.
SWEC is responsible for all mechanical design and engineering activities including CPRT issue resolution, NCR dispositioning, design change implementation, licensing support, construction support and interface with other design contractors
In the area of pipe support qualification, SWEC has been contracted to provide design and engineering
- services for the qualification of the structural i aspects of piping and pipe supports. These activities are performed by SWEC personnel in accordance with SWEC program requirements and procedures. Site issued pipe support design changes are approved by SWEC. The specific site interface for these activities are detailed in the procedures and instructions ECE-AD-4-5, AD-5-2, DC-7-3, DC-12, DC-21, DC-21-1, DC-22 and DC-24-1.
l l
O
TUGCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 11 0F 35 G:-
x-
- b. Gibbs & Hill (G&H)
G & H has been contracted to provide general, project and specific technical assistance to Procurement Engineering in the area of vendor document review. Site activities will be performed in conformance with TUGCO Engineering procedures.
- c. Westinghouse (W)
Westinghouse has been contracted to provide the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) by conducting engineering design of both systems and components, procurement, fabrication and associated QA services; provide the initial fuel supply; and assist in the installation, erection, licensing, testing, and operation of the NSSS.
Ongoing Westinghouse Activities Include:
Review of design changes that impact completed l)\
\_ Westinghouse designs including but not limited to: NSSS systems designs, RCS components supports design, Westinghouse supplied steel; Westinghouse designed supports, nozzle loads l on Westinghouse supplied equipment, FSAR j analyses.
1 Performance of Class 1 stress analysis activities and providing technical assistance as required.
Class 1 stress analysis activities are performed at the Westinghouse Generation Technology Systems Division (GTSD) in Pittsburgh. Activities are conducted in accordance with approved program requirements and procedures. Although a formal interface agreement has been issued, the specific site interface for these activities are detailed in ECE-DC-24-1.
l V(~T 1
1
- ^
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD 1 12 12 0F 35 12/22/86
(
Additional current work of significance:
NSSS Design Basis Documentation (DBD)
Westinghouse is developing a program to supply TUGCO with NSSS Design Basis Documents.. The i intent of the DBD package is to establish the original design basis of the Comanche Peak plants and then to compare this to the current plant configuration.
The basic outline of each module is as follows:
- 1. Document Basis
- 2. Introduction
- 3. Codes and Standards
- 4. Design Basis and Functional Requirements
- 5. System Description and operation
- 6. Instrumentation and Control Systems i
() 7.
8.
Description Electrical Systems Description Unit 1/ Unit 2 Differences l 9. System Interface
- 10. Equipment Description j 11. References . -
Comanche Peak Fire Protection Program i t i The objective of the Comanche Peak Fire Protection Program is to assist TUGCO in the evaluation, definition and justification of the minimum set of
- plant systems and equipment required to achieve a
, safe hot standby condition and subsequent cold shutdown condition following a control room or cable spreading room fire.
l '
, The program includes operational and analytical l evaluations of the Comanche Peak Plant relative to
! the assumptions and requirements of the Fire
, Protection Program. Thermal hydraulic analysis of ;
i plant response to reactor trip and subsequent operator actions to achieve hot standby and cold l
O :
TUGC0 ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION . ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 13 0F 35
(
shutdown is analyzed using the TREAT computer code.
The analysis is used as the basis for the development of operational guidance for plant operators to control the plant following the initiating fire, and to achieve cold shutdown conditions. Program deliverables include an analysis basis document and an operational basis document.
Consulting Consulting with TUGCO Engineering, SWEC and Gibbs &
Hill on such issues as Structural Engineering Questions, Design Criteria Lists, etc.
Various Engineering Activities under G.O.
CPF-12344-S (DA-79053) Blanket Order
- 1. Review attachments to Westinghouse steel
- 2. Drawing transmittals
- 3. Licensing reviews
, 4. S/G Upper Lateral Support Beam s- 5. DCA reviews
- 6. System Interaction Program Reviews
- 7. Respond to SWEC concerns
- 8. Audits -
- 9. Design Criteria Review as prepared by TERA
- d. EBASCO EBASCO has been contracted to provide general project and specific technical assistance in the areas of System Interaction Program, cable tray supports and safety related Trains A and B and Train C over 2 inch diameter conduit supports, protective coatings, and KVAC systems.
Tasks regarding general assistance are specified by formal purchase order and supplements. These activities, ranging from ASLB support to specific jobsite assistance, are used in the engineering / construction effort or as design inputs to the established design control programs.
O
TUGC0 ENGINEERING FROCEDURE REVISION . ISSUE j cesEs PAGE
, {
4 ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/96 14 0F 35 .
(
l Ebasco is responsible for those activities.
[ associated with the completion and maintenance of i- Unit 1 and Unit 2 System Interaction Program (SIP) . -
!. .These activities include the identification and j'
evaluation of interactions that may result from i
pipe break events, missiles and seismic induced failures. In addition, Ebasco will perform walkdown and analysis services related to other activities as identified by the TUGCO Vice President, Engineering and Construction. All these activities will be performed in accordance with -
, TUGCO Engineering procedures. The specific site interfaces for these activities are detailed in procedures ECE-DC-4 and ECE-DC-35. Ebasco will 4
appoint a System Interaction Program Manager (SIPM)
! who will be responsible for scheduling and
! administrative management of,the systems j Interaction Program. The SIPM will report to the j-j Ebasco Project Engineering Manager who in turn will ,
j-
-. report to the Ebarco Vice President. Ebasco is responsible for providing qualified personnel to i perform the assigned activities.
I, l -
Ebasco is responsible for the structural activities j associated with completion and maintenance of the !
' Unit 1 and Unit 2 cable tray hanger systems. These activities include: preparation of an initial set of hanger drawings' representing the intent of design; walkdown and as-builting of each individual l support and cable tray spans between supports, redlining of individual hanger drawings, j preparation of "as-built" drawings for each hanger, and in Unit 1 of the cable tray spans; design !
verification of the system (hanger and tray) with the exception of the Unit 1 portion of the system within the Safeguard and Reactor Building, which are responsibility of IMPELL. Ebasco is also responsible for the performance of.any tests required to support the above activity, resolution r of field problems for any new hangers being l designed; resolution of NCR's for specific !
problems; backfit problems associated with craft and/or inspection, and preparation of footprint--
load forms (FPL's) utilized for the evaluation of ,
embedded plates to which the hangers attach. '
()
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE AD-1 12 15 0F 35 12/22/86 (Q.
V Ebasco is responsible for the structural activities associated with completion and maintenance of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 conduit systems including Trains A and B and Train C conduits over 2 inches in diameter. These activities comprise: design verification and reissue of the design documents governing the design and installation of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 systems. These are respectively the S-0910 & S2-0910 documents; design of modified and individually engineered supports; walkdown and preparation of conduit isometrics for Unit 2 and the Unit 2 conduits within the Unit 1 boundary and common areat design of supports to replace selected UNISTRUT member supports of Unit 1, walkdown and isometric preparation of selected conduits in Unit 1 and common collection of pertinent junction box data; design of any new seismic supports and preparation of loads for assessment of embedded plates.
() Ebasco is also responsible for the performance of any test required to support the above activities; resolution of field problems with any modified or j individually designed supports; resolution of NCR's and backfit problems associated with craft and/or
- inspection.
' I
, Work associated with the cable tray and conduit I system activities is performed at the site and at
. Ebasco home offices. The former is performed under <
i -
the direction'of two supervisory engineers, responsible respectively for Unit 1 and Unit 2 activities. They report to the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager. The latter is performed by i
Ebasco personnel using Ebasco procedures prepared
- in accordance with the contract program
, requirements. Scheduling and administrative j management are provided by the Ebasco Project
- Manager, New York Office who reports to the Project
, Engineering Manager of Ebasco on site.
lO t
}
l I
TUGC0 ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 16 0F 35 12/22/86 h
a The site activities are performed by Ebasco personnel and personnel from other companies.
Personnel, however, perform work under direct Ebasco supervision, utilizing TUGCO Engineering or Ebasco project specific procedures as applicable.
Scheduling and administrative management as well as technical direction are provided by the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager who reports to the Ebasco Vice President.
Ebasco provides program development and maintenance field inspection and documentation, engineering and technical support and document review for all protective coatings at CPSES. Protective coatings are here defined as specialized coatings required to minimize the potential for radioactive contamination in addition to provide the required corrosion protection. In this Ebasco is also responsible for the coatings paper flow group which develops, maintains, statuses and processes the travelers. Finally Ebasco is responsible for the Os development and supplementation of pre and post operational testing and surveillance program for protective coatings. The protective coatings work is under the direction of a supervisor who will report to the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager.
To provide QA interface, to track critical path t
items, and to track and update resolution to SDAR's, NCR's, TDDR's, RFI's, and CAR's, Ebasco has established a site quality analysis team which is directed by a supervisor reporting to the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager.
EBASCO is responsible for HVAC systems and duct and duct support structural adequacy verification.
These activities include: HVAC systems engineering / design including site support, HVAC duct and duct support As-Builting and CADD drawing 1 preparation, and HVAC duct and duct support structural design verification and site support.
I O
TUCCO NEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE i
, ORCANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 17 0F 35 d.
- e. IMPELL Impell Corporation has been contracted to provide technical assistance in the areas of cable tray supports and non-safety related (Train C) conduit supports (2" and smaller diameter), fire protection (FP), seismic and environmental equipment qualification (EQ), NVAC supports and Cable Slack evaluation.
Unit 1 Cable Tray activities consist of a technical review of cable tray supports in specific areas of Unit 1:
- 1. The support evaluation criteria, methodologies and procedures developed by G&H', TE and Ebasco were reviewed by Impell. Impell subcequently developed criteria, methodology and procedures consistent with the G&H, TE and Ebasco criteria documents.
U'~%
- 2. Perform technical review in accordance with the Impell developed criteria, methodology and procedures on as-built documents resulting in a single support drawing which is developed by Ebasco personnel.
- 3. Included in this technical review is the qualification of embedded plates to which cable tray supports are attached.
- 4. Results of the technical review are recorded in the form of individual as-built drawings approved by Impell.
The Unit 1 & 2 Train C conduit support (less than or equal to 2" diameter) consist of:
- 1. The support evaluation criteria provided by &H and the results of the target evaluations performed by Ebasco are reviewed and new methodology criteria and procedures for evaluation of supports are developed by Impell; O
TUCCO NEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE p ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 18 0F 35 v
- 2. Implementation of the new criteria and procedures by Impell;
- 3. Design change on supports not meeting the criteria developed is performed by Impell;
- 4. Design of several non-typical Unit 2 Train C conduit supports by Impell
- 5. Footprint loads developed by Impell for Train C supports welded to embedded plates are transmitted to the SWEC WEB group for plate qualification:
- 6. The results of (3) rework and (4) design are transmitted to craft by Impell for support ,
construction and rework. '
Impell is responsible for all site EQ related
(~]
(_,/
activities and functions. Work is being performed under Impell project instructions.
Technical assistance under HVAC work scope currently consists of supporting the:Bahnson organization's design verification walkdown effort.
Work is performed to Bahnson procedures and instructions.
The cable slack technical assistance currently consists of supporting the Gibbs and Hill program.
The program is designed to assure adequate cable slack exists for conduit, cable tray, and equipment transitions. The work is performed in accordance with Impell project instructions and Quality Assurance manual.
- g. Bahnson_ Service company (BSC)
(
BSC has been contracted to provide materials, equipment, tools, labor, supervision and all other items (except specifically provided by others) required for the supply, fabrication, installation, testing, and balancing of all ducts, louvers, hangers, plenums, and accessories. BSC is also responsible for detailing Unit 2 duct, plenum, and g-~)/.
q, support fabrication / construction drawings.
l l
TUCCO ENGINEEllING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 19 0F 35 A
(_J - l BSC is responsible for furnishing the final "As Built" drawings for the Unit 2 duct systems and their supports.
BSC provides technical assistance to the Owner, when required, and all work activities are conducted within Owner approved program requirements and procedures.
BSC interfaces with TUGCO Engineering, EBASCO, Subcontracts Administration, TUGCO QA/QC, Building Management, Paper Flow Group, and TUGCO Engineering Document Control.
- h. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company has been contracted to provide design, material, tools, labor, supervision and all other items (except those specifically provided by others) required for h'r the supply, fabrication, installation and testing of the fire protection systems for Unit I and Unit II. ,
Current Grinnell Fire Protection Systems efforts include the items listed above along with inspection, documentation, quality assurance /
control, final as-built drawings and hydraulic calculations.
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems provides technical assistance to TUGCO when required. All work activities are conducted within TUGCO approved programs and procedures.
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems interfaces with TUGCO Engineering, Sub-Contracts Administration, Building Management and TUGCO-QA/QC.
I Grinnell Fire Protection Systems quality assurance
- and quality control responsibilities are audited and monitored by TUGCO Corporate Quality Assuranco and Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Corporate Quality Assurance.
O
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE.AD-1 12 12/22/86 20 0F 35 e :
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems work is further outlined in contracts CP-0702, CP-0740 and subsequent supplements to these contracts.
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems works under the direction of Sub-contracts Administration in accordance with the above contracts, MS-98, MS-38C, MS-38E and MS-73A. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems design is based on these specifications in conjunction with flow diagrams (M-225 series) and the fire hazard analysis (DBD-SY-1).
1 1. Engineering, Planning and Management, Inc. (EPM)
EPM has been contracted to provide specific engineering and licensing assistance in the area of fire safe shutdown analysis (FSSA), and engineering assistance in the utilization of the cable and raceway schedule (CARDS), plant data (PDS), and
()
fire protection data systems (FPDS).
. Tasks regarding the above services are specified in formal purchase orders and supplements.
EPM is responsible for those activities associated with the completion and maintenance of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Fire Safe' Shutdown Analyses (FSSA).
These activities includes the engineering evaluations and calculations to define a baseline of systems, components, and related design documents that are the basis for demonstrating and maintaining fire protection compliance against the requirements set forth in 10CFR50, Appendix Rt the
! development of procedures and work instructions to administer the performance of the engineering evaluations; the fire protection licensing engineering support for future NRC audit (s) and compliance against NRC Generic Letter 86-10; the engineering support to ongoing Fire Hazards Analysis (FHA) activities performed by Impellt the development and maintenance of a computer software database to store and administer the baseline of r
systems and components of the FSSA; the performance of impact assessments of the effect of fire scenarios on the configuration baseline of systems O and components; the determination of the adequacy
, TUGC0 g NEERING FROCEDURE REVISION ' ISSUE PACE ORGANIZATION ECE.AD-1 12 21 0F 35
- 12/22/46 of the installed and/or proposed raceway fire '
protection coatings (thermolag); the determination of required operational requirements for syste.as and components based on the impact assessments, including development of operational guidelines; the determination of regulatory deviations required and the adequacy of existing deviations; and the documentation of the final results of the impact assessments.
EPM is also responsible for providing maintenance, validation, and control of the 10CFR 50 baseline database, including the induction of the FHA data into a common fire protection compliance database. i i
EPM is responsible for providing FSSA design input to Impell and SWEC in support of their activities ',
and in accordance with their Lead Contractor l responsibilities. !
O EPM is also responsible for assisting TUGCO engineering and SWEC in the utilization of the engineering computer data bases for the cable and raceway schedule (CARDS) and related FSSA activities (FPDS and PDS), including: software and data validation, software and data administration procedures, and training.
All the above activities will be performed in accordance with EPM /QA procedures in accordance with specific site interface procedures.
3.0 , INTERFACE CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 TUGCO ENGINEERING RESPONSIBILITIES TE is responsible fort
- a. Review and approval of TD initiated by LC according to ECE-AD-1-1.
- b. Developing TD as per ECE-AD-1-1, if applicable.
- c. Designating a Lead Contractor in writing for each approved TD either initiated by TUGCO Engineering or by LC.
TUCCO ENGINEERING FROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
. CPSES caGANIEATION ECE-AD 12 12/22/84 22 0F 35
- d. Engineering Management, Design control, Administration of Engineering and design work performed in accordance with approved TD for CPSES.
- e. Ensuring that all engineering work performed for CPSES is completed in accordance with approved engineering schedules.
- f. Providing administrative support to the LC in the fulfillment of document control activities as specified in TUGC0 Engineering Procedures.
- g. Ensuring that the LC's are controlling the interface between other contractors involved with design, engineering, and construction of CPSES activities such that the continuity 'of design is maintained.. .
- h. Monitoring the LC's performance and adherences to the approved TD.
- i. Ensurin design,gengineering, adherence to andregulatory requirements construction of CPSES.in
- j. Coordination and overview of contractor's resolution of engineering and construction quality deficiencies as identified by the TUGC0 QA, TUCCO Engineering Asadrance and/or the NRC.
3.2 . LEAD CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES LC is responsible fort
- a. Developing a TD and/or Work Instruction (WI) for all new tasks, and existing tasks as required by TUGC0 Engineering to clarify the assignments or to reassign portions of the work among other contractors.
- b. Obtaining approval from TUGC0 Engineering on all TD, WI and Summary Scope schedules (ssa) before initiating.
O
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
. CFSES ORGANIZATION ECE AD.1 12 12/22/86 23 0F 35
\ t
- c. Establishing procedures for documentation control with other contractors and with supporting contractors, if applicable, as well as -
documentation control within his organization.
- d. Developing project procedures / instructions to control the design interfaces between contractors.
NOTE: These procedures shall be signed by all interfacing contractors and approved by the Director of Engineering.
- e. Developing project procedures and/or instructions referenced in the Task Description and/or Work Instruction for concurrence by TUGCO Engineering.
- f. Developing interface control'(internal / external) to address responsibilities, and lines of communication in accordance with TUGCO Engineering procedures, where applicable.
- g. Developing a monitoring control system for the execution of the task to assure compliance with appropriate procedures, regulatory requirements and approved TD/WI/SSS.
- h. Establishing requirements for maintainance of their training records.
40 INTERFACE CONTROL 4.1 EXTERNAL
- a. Identification of Interface Each Lead contractor shall identify in writing the external interfaces between organizations (contractors and/or TE) performing the work by the LC and shall include those organizations providing criteria, designs, specifications and technical direction. It shall also include those organizations required to receive Design Output from the Lead Contractor or provide design input to the Lead contractor.
(
TUGC0 ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ' ISSUE PAGE
, CFSES ORGANIZATION ECE.AD-1 12 24 0F 35 12/22/86
'v/
- b. Responsibilities Each Lead Contractor shall define and document in sufficient detail in the TD the responsibilities to cover the preparation, review and approval of documents involving all major events as defined in TD/WI/SSS . Responsibilities shall be set forth in
" Interface Responsibility Matrices".
- c. Lines of communication LC shall establish systematic methods for communi-cating with Supporting contractors for all changes during the execution of the TD. Documents shall identify the positions and titles of key personnel in the communication channels and their responsi-
' bilities for decision-making; for resolution of problems, for providing and reviewing information,
, and taking necessary action within the TD scope.
(l' d. Documentation Engineering and LC document interface control shall be addressed by engineering in appropriate' ,
procedures. LC interface shall establish procedures to control the flow of interface information between contractors.- These procedures shall be signed by all interfacing contractors and approved by the Director of Engineering.
Information transmitted from one contractor to another shall be identified and issued by authorized persons. Documentation requesting or providing information or action shall be controlled by a system which assures that the response and the request can be related and verified as being completed and acknowledged by all interfacing contractors. The documentation shall be maintained as a record that the interfaces were properly executed.
O
i TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE
, CPSES ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 25 0F 35
, -~ p
/.
4.2 INTERNAL b
- a. Identification of Interface Each Lead Contractor performing the work shall identify in writing its internal TD/WI/SSS interfaces for managing the flow of task information between organizational units.
- b. Responsibilities Lc shall define for.each organizational unit the preparation, review, approval, distribution and revision of documents involving task interfaces.
- c. Lines of communication Lc shall establish systematic methods for communi-cating needed task information across internal interfaces, including changes to the TD/WI/SSS an
~] work progresses.
~
- d. Documentation Lc shall establish procedures to control the flow of information between the organizational units.
5.0 TASK DESCRIPT' ION l
The TD describes a task to be assigned to a contractor in sufficient detail for the contractor to plan and execute the task. For each TD a control program shall be established and executed in accordance with approved procedures. The Lc shall define the organizational structure within which the TD is to be implemented and shall delineate the authority and reopensibility of the persons and organizations involved in performing the activities as detailed in the TD. The responsibilition and interfaces among the contributing organizations (contractorn), both internal and external, shall be defined. Provisions shall be made in the Work Instruction (WI) for periodic audits, review and ovaluation of the effectivenons of the program in achieving objectiven.
O V
TUCC0 ENGINEERING FROCEDORE REVISION ISSUE PACE
, crsEs ORGANIZATION ECE-AD-1 12 12/22/86 26 0F 35 C'{
\g .
The TD is required for all specialized tasks that need I
detailed instructions and engineering tasks over 100 man hours.
LC shall develop the TD in accordance with Instruction ECE-AD-1-1 and obtain approval from TUGC0 Engineering I before initiating the task.-
1
! 6.0 WORK INSTRUCTION (WI) l WI's shall be developed for each TD using the guidelines stated in Instruction ECE-AD-1-1. l 7.0
SUMMARY
SCOPE AND SCHEDULE (888) l The Summary Scope and schedule shall provide an overview i of the contractor's plan to execute the task described i
in a TD and/or WI. An overall implementing plan shall be developed and used to determine priorities of work in
- order to meet the approved targets.
l0
'f j .
l i
I i
l
\
TUCCO ENGINEERING FROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PACE CPSES
- n. , ORGANIZATION ECEeAD-1 12 12/22/06 27 0F 35
(
t U ,-
FIGURE 1 SITE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION CHAAT rsse nss i
e ud% .
s.sJ
)
fTj.
s ;
v i e, se e e .. ,
1 -
. i i , , .
l I i ! ! I HIM?.:!'s','u n;'.l,: ',',':,' " " * ~ ' n ' ="* = " "'<* ~*
- a "-'" '""
l1..:.'. .*.:.:f P9084$I #40 P40468f968 g,f g g,gg gen,ggg gig g ge g ,40 8 44f 04 f 64 4 048 tisse optg e 849448 f ett tet tel st assa640 # ell $t ti me tall e bft enes6te
. ,, , esam m eesese,muneese.eese.ee seeee.4,hesee M gasesse ge og he es geesegeee g ganses, hoe l
1 l
I 5
3 4
t 4 l
' TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE
, CPSES PACE ORGANIZATION ECE AD-1 12
,~,.. ., 12/22/86 28 QF 35 b('
1 l
FIGURE 2 TUGC0 ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION CNAAT !
VlW PhkS40tNf*
mCIN6kmNC 4 03NWTAUCTION 69 WCINEEAINC j .
n U d
usMeCOR, W126MICAL D64MWWm4 IseM&CER, ESC?tifAL WC8N84AINC enem a(.t h, DGIN4thlNQ OVit laaM4088, DCINESAING W R6Mff IsaM6Ct R.
OPsaafl0NS 90PP00f WIs thAN4Gth.
DCINathlNQ PADJIETs IEIIBIIIregame GE InAhauth Dunt that tiht. _,
G 94GIEIIBM I
I i
O J
1
TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCEDUM MVISION ISSUE CPSEE PACE ORGANIZATION ECE-AD.1 12 12/22/06 29 0F 35 C'C v
i FIGURE 3 wec.4 5atsmo eea.4 . af e ea af ,
00 totCneacC44 08eessetteste !
l
$Nh Y $$ hh$ 8 88Hbdueteve4 6dPeaf lease 6444 8YlfGut hee 44444 I
i l tagcseedet66 IIWCtt se hetCaesntat het(seedsete4 0f0IGWG ****O l
. Assas ysee essesseeame 0Yo f tut 844mpensef usfgsatf m J
1 i 4
e i
1 4
TUCCO ENGINEERING FROCEDURE REVISION 188U1 CPSES FACE ORGANIZATION ECE AD.1 12 12/22/06 30 0F 35 FIGURE 4 e6:e t=C a6 eneeseens oneama.rien ce.aa r MA8ea444 6,
GLEC f 4 CAL 88e4484A84 GLit f # scat metW4f4fl44 3p. esse 4messe east Cemf 8046 Asessaten 888'8888'*8 haassette O
emm cd ,8=;<a, ik.iC
. - .f ttC AL
<~ . i
- .r. - ,,,,,,,,,
9 e
a f
k
. TUCCO ENGINEERING PROCESURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES ORGANIZATION E;E.AD 1 12 31 or 35 12/22/06 Nj FIGURE 5 CIVIL ENGINEERING ORGANIZAfl0N CHARf MANAGER Of CIVIL ENelNEERING ClVit ENGINEERING MANAGER C,-)
ClViL MYORAULICS CIVIL CIVIL ANO 8TRUCTURES SUPPORT $
ENVIRONMENTAL
- e. .
.* TUCC0 ENGINEERING
' PROCEDURE SEVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES (m ., oncAm!zATIoM Ect.An.1 12 12/22/s4 34 or 35 L:-
. , r FIGURE 8 4
8 Dome 4**4P40A4f8te64dmJAf24Cnedt OP themesame PeeAfft t
l 844404Assee ee0AC f $44ACf goespgggg ;
Atesseet f ea tes Smeestame teenteeste saapm(s name44sg went I esasseese m f3teameeve ese46444 I
V seemesame
- m. s=ome.
. , , . sam, e eno
..e d..et.
poe
..e d..st ca
....e,4 4 s
e
( 1
~/ (
i e
~~
- t. .
o TUCCO ENGINEERING SEVISION ISSUE Crsts PROCEDURE PAGE ORGAN!!ATION ICE AD 1 12 12/22/86 35 0F 35
'v) ' ,. }
,/..
/~.
FIGURE 9 WOAK TAACMING ORGANIZATION CHAAT MANAGER OF WOAM TAACMING W04K ENGINEEAING TAACNING CONSTAucfl0N SUPERVl804 LIASON e
4 e
i
(
p .
~
. TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY
- p. o, sox wee . onzw moss. TsxAs me:
OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Impell Corporation 2 July 86 Mr. Kevin C. Warapius 2345 Waukagan Road -
i Bannockburn, IL '60015 s j
COMANCRE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION PIPE WHIP AND JET IMPINGEMENT LOADS f REF: Impell Corp. memo 80210-040-063, dated 6 June 86 3 1
Dear Mr. Warapius !
In response to your referenced memo, Unit No.1 indeed has cable trays I identified as targets. Cable trays are considered essential tazgets if they - contain.. . cables required to safely shutdown the plant as c result of the initiating pipe break.
O If analysis determines that this interaction is unacceptablaj gither y' the target or source is relocated or a physical modification (e.g.
jet shield)' is installed. All such unacceptable interactions in Unit No.1 have been eliminated by the method indicated above.
Damage Study's original walkdowr. identified Train C raceways as targets, but these were eliminated from '
consideration since they are not required for safe shutdown. . #,
If there are any further questions please contact Robert G. Leo at CPSES, extension 8043.
CRL/RGL/cr er,] ~
C.R. Levine Project Discipline Supervisor Damage study cc: ARMS H.' Harrison J.T. Merritt R.E. Kamp E. Odar D.A. West .
J.L. Natzic !
R. Dickey '
R.C. Iotti-DS FILES .
4 pig 3.wis 9 V ti&* 77.'il N l'T f Lif f f:n e'#.7lf 1 arlf' 4 *t 8 48 F" 6.W F
- , . - - - . - - - . , , - . _ ,