Similar Documents at Maine Yankee |
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARML20236T4711998-07-14014 July 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 209,amending TS to Revise Liquid & Gaseous Release Rate Limits to Reflect Replacement of Former 10CFR20.106 Requirements W/Existing Requirements ML20216F8831998-04-13013 April 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 208,revising TS to Base LCO for Fuel Storage Pool on Revised Analysis for Fuel Handling Accident & on New Analysis for Radiological Shielding During Movement of Fuel ML20212A6021997-10-20020 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed TS Change 207,reflecting Permanently Defueled Status of Plant ML20211H6691997-09-30030 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,eliminating Conditions,No Longer Appropriate in Permanently Defueled Condition ML20210M5801997-08-15015 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of TS Change 206,revising TS Re Facility Staffing & Training ML20136B5161997-03-0505 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,requesting Approval of Alternative Sleeving Repair Process for SG Tubes at Plant ML20134J6551997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed TS Change 203 to License DPR-36,revising TS Pages 3.12-1,3.12-2 & 3.12-3 Re 115 Kv Offsite Power Requirements ML20134J6261997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed TS Change 204 to License DPR-36,requesting one-time Extension of SG Tube Surveillance Interval as Specified in TS 4.10.C.2 ML20133A7011996-12-19019 December 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,requesting Rev to Boronometer Operability Requirement & Reactor Coolant Boron Sampling ML20127P2191993-01-25025 January 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed TS Change 177 to Allow Increase in Number of Spent Fuel Assemblies Stored in Spent Fuel Pool from 1,476 to 2,019.Rev 0 to Licensing Rept... Encl ML20126B6821992-12-15015 December 1992 Proposed TS Change 176 to License DPR-36,modifying TS 3.19 & 4.6 for Consistency W/Change in Normal Operating Position of LPSI motor-operated Isolation Valves from Closed to Open ML20198D0701992-05-0808 May 1992 Proposed TS Change 166 to License DPR-36,revising Section 1.4 to Eliminate Ref to Containment Air Recirculation Sys from TS 1.4.D, Containment Purge Sys ML20141M1121992-03-24024 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of TS Proposed Change 165,revising Fuel Enrichment Limit & Allowing Radial & Axial Zoning of Enrichment Up to 3.95 Weight Percent U-235 ML20062D2801990-11-0505 November 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 151 Re Removal of cycle-specific Limits in Response to Generic Ltr 88-16 ML20058B5941990-10-15015 October 1990 Proposed Change 156 Requesting Amend to License DPR-36, Modifying Tech Spec 3.22, Feedwater Trip Sys, by Adding Exception Specifically Addressing Operation of Emergency Feedwater Sys During Plant Startups & Shutdowns ML20058L9271990-07-30030 July 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 154,revising Page 5.2-2 Re Manager Qualification Requirements for Operations ML20055G3101990-07-10010 July 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Tech Spec Change 155 Re Safety Injection Actuation Sys ML20055E0951990-07-0505 July 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 154,modifying Tech Specs Re Qualification Requirements for Operations Manager ML20235H5401989-02-15015 February 1989 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 146,amending Tech Spec Sections 3.9 & 4.1 to Add Primary Inventory Trend Sys for Reactor Vessel Level Indication & Core Exit Thermocouples Channel Operability ML20196B5261988-11-22022 November 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-34,consisting of Proposed Change 134 Re Main Steam Excess Flow Check Valve. Amend Modifies Tech Spec 4.6 Re Periodic Testing by Extending Specified Surveillance Testing Interval ML20206F2281988-11-0808 November 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Spec 1.1, Fuel Storage. Fee Paid ML20205T2091988-11-0202 November 1988 Application for Approval to Leave Inplace,Slightly Contaminated Soil Next to Reactor Water Storage Tank. Radiological Assessment Encl.Fee Paid ML20206C2571988-10-26026 October 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,amending Tech Spec Section 5.2 to Delete Offsite & Facility Organization Charts,Per Generic Ltr 88-06.Fee Paid ML20205M9611988-10-18018 October 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 133,modifying Specified Surveillance Interval for Control Element Assembly Partial Movement Test from Once Every 2 Wks to Monthly.Fee Paid ML20150E8971988-06-30030 June 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 141,revising Tech Specs to Reflect Cycle 11 Operation.Cycle 11 Core Performance Analysis Rept Encl.Fee Paid ML20150E4071988-03-24024 March 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,increasing Max Nominal Fuel Enrichment from 3.5% to 3.7% U-235.Fee Paid ML20147G8921988-03-0101 March 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Spec 5.2 to Reflect Successional Change in Offsite Corporate Organization & Associated Changes in Functional Reporting Structure.Fee Paid ML20235A6781988-01-0606 January 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 135,revising Offsite & Facility Organizational Charts.Fee Paid ML20236G4941987-07-30030 July 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 132,replacing Tech Specs Page 3.10-4 Re Core Operation Increase Flexibility When Incore Monitoring Sys Inoperable.Fee Paid ML20216B8301987-06-23023 June 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 131,revising Tech Specs Page 5.8-1 Re Process Control Program.Fee Paid ML20212K9831987-02-24024 February 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 130,reflecting Revised LOCA Limits.Fee Paid ML20212D9141987-02-24024 February 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 126,changing Tech Specs 5.9.1.6 & 5.9.1.7 Re Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Repts & Special Repts,Respectively.Fee Paid ML20212L1511987-01-13013 January 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Suppl 1 to Proposed Change 113,revising Tech Specs Re RCS Emergency Vent Sys,Per NUREG-0737,Item II.B.1 ML20207P5151987-01-12012 January 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 128 to Tech Specs Supporting Cycle 10 Operation.Significant Hazards Consideration & Summary Description of Tech Spec Changes Encl.Fee Paid ML20215C2321986-12-0808 December 1986 Addendum to 860207 Application for Amend to License DPR-36, Consisting of Suppl 1 to Proposed Change 109 Re Limiting Overtime of Staff Personnel ML20214N0101986-11-25025 November 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 125,revising Tech Specs to Increase Max Nominal Fuel Enrichment from 3.30 to 3.50 Weight % U-235. Significant Hazards Evaluation Encl.Fee Paid ML20212C0211986-07-29029 July 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 124,revising Tech Specs Re Reporting Requirements for Primary Coolant Sys Iodine Spikes,Per Generic Ltr 85-19.Related Info Encl.Fee Paid ML20203F1251986-07-16016 July 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 119,revising Tech Specs to Remove Cycle Reload Specific Parameters & Introducing Peaking Factor Limit Rept.Fee Paid ML20203Q3031986-05-0505 May 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,incorporating Proposed Change 122,revising Tech Specs Turbine Valve Test Frequencies.Supporting Documentation Encl.Fee Paid ML20204A3771986-05-0505 May 1986 Suppl 2 to Proposed Change 114 to License DPR-36,revising Tech Spec 3.11.5 to Add Five Manual Isolation Valves to List of Manual Containment Isolation Valves That May Be Respositioned W/O Implementing Compensatory Measures ML20151U4501986-02-0303 February 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Suppl 1 to Proposed Change 109,adding Administrative Controls on Limiting Overtime of Personnel & Removing Offsite & Onsite Organizational Charts from Tech Spec 5.2 ML20137Q8991986-01-29029 January 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 115,adopting Model for LER Reporting Requirements Re Iodine Spikes in Primary Coolant,Per Generic Ltr 85-19.Fee Paid ML20138M5891985-12-16016 December 1985 Application for Amend to License NPF-36,consisting of Suppl 2 to Proposed Change 120,revising Tech Specs to Incorporate Limiting Condition for Operations for turbine-driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML20138P6271985-12-13013 December 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Suppl 1 to Proposed Change 110,revising Tech Spec Pages 4.6-1,4.6-3 Through 4.6-6 & 4.1-9 Re Emergency Feedwater Sys ML20138H0631985-12-0909 December 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 118,allowing Consideration of Fire Hazards in Vicinity of Affected Penetration When Determining Level of Compensatory Fire Protection.Fee Paid ML20133K5741985-10-16016 October 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 121,deleting Present Tech Spec Requirement for Emergency Diesel Generator Testing in Event That Any Component in One Train of Cooling Sys Inoperable.Fee Paid ML20133F4301985-10-0707 October 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 114,Suppl 1,changing Tech Spec Pages 3.11-2 & 3.11-5 Re Containment Isolation Valves Under Administrative Controls ML20133C2051985-10-0303 October 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Suppl 1 to Proposed Change 120,replacing Pages of Tech Specs Re turbine-driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML20205C7821985-09-12012 September 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Suppl 2 to Proposed Change 81,revising Tech Specs Re Shock Suppressors ML20135E0251985-09-0606 September 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 120,changing Tech Specs to Require Turbine Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Be Operable During Facility Operation.Fee Paid 1998-07-14
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARML20206H1521999-05-0505 May 1999 Amend 164 to License DPR-36,deleting License Conditions 2.B.6.c,2.B.6.e,2.B.6.f,2.B.6.g,2.B.7(a) & 2.B.7(b) Which Are No Longer Applicable Due to Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Condition of Plant ML20206G5681999-05-0303 May 1999 Amend 163 to License DPR-36,revising Liquid & Gaseous Release Rate Limits to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20, Stds for Protection Against Radiation ML20204C4561999-03-16016 March 1999 Amend 162 to License DPR-36,revising App a TS of License DPR-36 to Change Limiting Condition for Operation for Fuel Storage Pool Water Level from 23 Feet to 21 Feet ML20236T4711998-07-14014 July 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 209,amending TS to Revise Liquid & Gaseous Release Rate Limits to Reflect Replacement of Former 10CFR20.106 Requirements W/Existing Requirements ML20216F8831998-04-13013 April 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 208,revising TS to Base LCO for Fuel Storage Pool on Revised Analysis for Fuel Handling Accident & on New Analysis for Radiological Shielding During Movement of Fuel ML20217H4991998-03-30030 March 1998 Amend 161 to License DPR-36,replacing App A,Ts to License DPR-36 in Entirety ML20202D3121997-11-26026 November 1997 Amend 160 to License DPR-36,revising Selected Portions of Plant TS 5.0 to Define Facility Staffing & Training Requirements for Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Facility ML20212A6021997-10-20020 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed TS Change 207,reflecting Permanently Defueled Status of Plant ML20211H6691997-09-30030 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,eliminating Conditions,No Longer Appropriate in Permanently Defueled Condition ML20210M5801997-08-15015 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of TS Change 206,revising TS Re Facility Staffing & Training ML20216F1291997-08-0808 August 1997 Amend 159 to License DPR-36,revising TS 5.5.B to Designate President of Maine Yankee as Responsible Official for Matters Re Nuclear Safety Audit & Review Committee ML20141G6301997-05-19019 May 1997 Amend 158 to License DPR-36,revising TS to Permit Use of 10CFR50,App J,Option B,performance-based Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20138G3401997-05-0202 May 1997 Amend 157 to License DPR-36,revising TS 3.12, Station Svc Power, to Require Both 115 Kv Power Circuits to Be Operable When Reactor Critical ML20136B5161997-03-0505 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,requesting Approval of Alternative Sleeving Repair Process for SG Tubes at Plant ML20134J6551997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed TS Change 203 to License DPR-36,revising TS Pages 3.12-1,3.12-2 & 3.12-3 Re 115 Kv Offsite Power Requirements ML20134J6261997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed TS Change 204 to License DPR-36,requesting one-time Extension of SG Tube Surveillance Interval as Specified in TS 4.10.C.2 ML20133A7011996-12-19019 December 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,requesting Rev to Boronometer Operability Requirement & Reactor Coolant Boron Sampling ML20058E2561993-11-0505 November 1993 Amend 143 to License DPR-36,modifying TS 4.6.A Re Safety Injection & Containment Spray Sys,To Require Quarterly,Vice Monthly,Testing of Automatic Core Flooding & Containment Spray Valves ML20056G9321993-09-0101 September 1993 Corrected TS Page 4.5-1 to Amend 140 to License DPR-36 ML20056F7821993-08-23023 August 1993 Amend 142 to License DPR-36,deleting Surveillance Requirements for Environ Monitors from TS ML20127P2191993-01-25025 January 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed TS Change 177 to Allow Increase in Number of Spent Fuel Assemblies Stored in Spent Fuel Pool from 1,476 to 2,019.Rev 0 to Licensing Rept... Encl ML20127D4881993-01-11011 January 1993 Amend 136 to License DPR-36,modifying Remedial Action Requirements of TS 3.6.B & 3.6.C,by Deleting Alternate Train Testing Requirements ML20126H6071992-12-29029 December 1992 Amend 135 to License DPR-36,making Two Corrections to Core Operating Limits Presented in TS 5.14.1 ML20126B6821992-12-15015 December 1992 Proposed TS Change 176 to License DPR-36,modifying TS 3.19 & 4.6 for Consistency W/Change in Normal Operating Position of LPSI motor-operated Isolation Valves from Closed to Open ML20126C0981992-12-0909 December 1992 Errata to Amend 134 for License DPR-36,correcting Item 2 to Page One ML20198D0701992-05-0808 May 1992 Proposed TS Change 166 to License DPR-36,revising Section 1.4 to Eliminate Ref to Containment Air Recirculation Sys from TS 1.4.D, Containment Purge Sys ML20141M1121992-03-24024 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of TS Proposed Change 165,revising Fuel Enrichment Limit & Allowing Radial & Axial Zoning of Enrichment Up to 3.95 Weight Percent U-235 ML20062D2801990-11-0505 November 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 151 Re Removal of cycle-specific Limits in Response to Generic Ltr 88-16 ML20058B5941990-10-15015 October 1990 Proposed Change 156 Requesting Amend to License DPR-36, Modifying Tech Spec 3.22, Feedwater Trip Sys, by Adding Exception Specifically Addressing Operation of Emergency Feedwater Sys During Plant Startups & Shutdowns ML20059D0381990-08-30030 August 1990 Amend 117 to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Spec 3.14, Primary Sys Leakage, by Deleting Current Limit of 1.0 Gpm from All Steam Generator Tubes & Establishing 0.15 Gpm from Any One Steam Generator ML20058L9271990-07-30030 July 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 154,revising Page 5.2-2 Re Manager Qualification Requirements for Operations ML20055G3101990-07-10010 July 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Tech Spec Change 155 Re Safety Injection Actuation Sys ML20055E0951990-07-0505 July 1990 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 154,modifying Tech Specs Re Qualification Requirements for Operations Manager ML20246L4291989-07-14014 July 1989 Revised Pages 3.10-16 & 3.10-17 to Amend 107 to License DPR-36,correcting Typos ML20246F6231989-07-10010 July 1989 Amend 113 to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Specs to Reflect Operating Limits for Cycle 11 Operation ML20245D4451989-04-24024 April 1989 Amend 111 to License DPR-36,changing Moderator Temp Coefficient Limit in Tech Specs Between 0% & 30% Power Levels ML20245D4341989-04-24024 April 1989 Amend 112 to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Spec Table 3.9-3, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation & Table 4.1-3 to Add Primary Inventory Trend Sys for Reactor Vessel Level Indication & Core Exit Thermocouple Channel Operability ML20235H5401989-02-15015 February 1989 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 146,amending Tech Spec Sections 3.9 & 4.1 to Add Primary Inventory Trend Sys for Reactor Vessel Level Indication & Core Exit Thermocouples Channel Operability ML20196B5261988-11-22022 November 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-34,consisting of Proposed Change 134 Re Main Steam Excess Flow Check Valve. Amend Modifies Tech Spec 4.6 Re Periodic Testing by Extending Specified Surveillance Testing Interval ML20206F2281988-11-0808 November 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Spec 1.1, Fuel Storage. Fee Paid ML20205T2091988-11-0202 November 1988 Application for Approval to Leave Inplace,Slightly Contaminated Soil Next to Reactor Water Storage Tank. Radiological Assessment Encl.Fee Paid ML20206C2571988-10-26026 October 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,amending Tech Spec Section 5.2 to Delete Offsite & Facility Organization Charts,Per Generic Ltr 88-06.Fee Paid ML20205M9611988-10-18018 October 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 133,modifying Specified Surveillance Interval for Control Element Assembly Partial Movement Test from Once Every 2 Wks to Monthly.Fee Paid ML20207L6021988-10-11011 October 1988 Correction to Amend 106 to License DPR-36,replacing Tech Spec Page 3.12-1 ML20155B4501988-09-27027 September 1988 Amend 107 to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Specs to Reflect Operating Limits for Cycle 11 Reload Core ML20154A1311988-09-0707 September 1988 Amend 106 to License DPR-36,modifying Tech Spec 3.12 Re Station Svc Power by Prohibiting Reliance on 115 Kv Suroweic Line Unless Addl Justification Provided to NRC ML20150E8971988-06-30030 June 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,consisting of Proposed Change 141,revising Tech Specs to Reflect Cycle 11 Operation.Cycle 11 Core Performance Analysis Rept Encl.Fee Paid ML20196G6801988-06-23023 June 1988 Amend 105 to License DPR-36,changing Max Nominal Enrichment of Fuel Allowed to Be Used in Reactor Core for Operating Cycle 11 & Beyond from 3.5 to 3.7% Nominal Weight U-235 ML20151W5731988-04-26026 April 1988 Amend 104 to License DPR-36,revising Tech Spec Figures 5.2-1 & 5.2-2 to Reflect Successional Change in Offsite Corporate Organization & Associated Changes in Functional Reporting Structure ML20150E4071988-03-24024 March 1988 Application for Amend to License DPR-36,increasing Max Nominal Fuel Enrichment from 3.5% to 3.7% U-235.Fee Paid 1999-05-05
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
MaineVankee naamt i Dacre sca vu.s s o ,e9 ,
EDISON ORtVE AUGUSTA. MAINE 04330 (200 f/.74868 i
November 2, 1988 '
MN-88-107 G0H-88-297 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission :
i- Washington, DC 20555 t Attention: Document Control Desk
Reference:
License No. OPR-36 (Docket No. 50-309) :
i j
Subject:
Request for In-Place Disposal of Slightly Contaminated Soil in [
Accordance with 10CFR20.302(a)
Dear Sir:
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (Maine Yankee) requests NRC approval !
pursuant to 10CFR20.302(a) for in-place disposal of residual contaminated !
solls located on-site at the Haine Yankee Atomic Power Station in Hiscassett, l j Haine, as detailed in the attached application. The application specifically t requests hppioval to leave approximately 7,600 cuoic feet of sitehtly contamhated soll, resulting from a Reat. tor Mater Storage Tank (RHST) siphon ;
- heater leak, in the ground within the protected area at Maine Yankee. ;
i Approxitately 600 cubic feet of soil from the immediate area of tne leak has [
, been removed for off-vite disposal as radioactive waste. It is not believed i
! practical to remove the remaining residual contamination due to the volume of !
soil required to be excavated and its proximity to the foundation of the [
RHST. All significant concentrations of radioactive materials which might ;
present an unnecessary risk to the public have been removed. The hole created i by the excavation has been backfilled with clean materials, with the major ;
portion of the surface area paved over with asphalt to minimize the potential
! of translocating the rasidual activity by surface water run off or by winds. 1 1 .
l A radiological assessment based on an estimate of the residual soil activity from the RHST siphon heater leak is detailed in Attachment 1. Based on this analysis, Maine Yankee has determined that the potential radiological impact of any residual activity reaching the tidal waters adjacent to the plant will result in off-site doses to a maximally exposed member of the 4
t general public of less than one mrem / year to the whole body or any organ, ,
This dose which is about 100 times less than natural background radiation and would be indistinguishable from the normal variations in background radiation ;
J' 1evels. It is below all limits currently under consideration by the NRC for !
appilcation to materials which could be classified as Below Regulatory Concern )
(BRC).
[
8811140170 GS1102 FDR ADOCK 0";000309 g[ '
P ppc #f f .f g /%4 N 0595L-DS 4 SC ,
s pl _!
l MaineYankee United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page Two [
Document Control Desk MN-88-107 '
a :
1 r
Maine Yankee has determined that pursuant to 10CFR170.21 a fee of $150.00 l 1s required for this approval. Please find a check for that amount enclosed. (
Very truly your . l I i
- MAINE YA!4KEE I e
jf}N i i G. D. Mbittler. Manager l Nuclear Engineering and Licensing 05:BJP i l Attachment l
c: Mr. Richard H. Messman I l Mr. Milliam T. Russell !
j Mr. Patrick M. Sears j Mr. Cornelius F. Holden i
1 I
- i i
! (
i 1
l i
i 1
l l .
I 1 I l !
l
, 0595L-OS z
MaineYankee
. e i
l l I
i i
i ATTACMMPjL1 :
MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC PONULCOMPANY I APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL TO LEAVI ;
IN-PLACE SL1GlilLY CONTAMINATED SOIL NEXT 10_
TFE REACTOR NATER STORAGE TANC j 1 ,
I J
4 :
a i 1 !
1 t I ;
l !
t i l
! i 1
l ?
! l'
[
t I
- I i
f I i 4
l' I
<1 f
1 ,
l i
i j 0595L-05 l
l, MaineYankee AUACHHENT 1 MAint_YADktt.At_omic Power Cc@pany Application for Approval to LAAte In-Platt Sligttil3_Conta mi n a t e LS atLN tJtt_to the Reatt0LBatiLilotAgt_IAah 1.0 INTR 000CUDN Haina Yankee Atomic Power Company (Haine Yankee) requests approval, pursuant to 10CFR20.302(a) to leave in. place residual radioactive I materia's in soll in the area of the excavation of contaminated soil associated with leakage from the Reactor Hater storage Tank (RHST).
2.0 DEiCRIPl10LQF EVENT CONTAMINATION i
On February 23, 1988, t small outdoor leak at the inlet flange connection l between the RHST siphon heater return litit and Isolation Valve CS-81 was discovered and subsequently contained. It could not be directly determined exactly when the leak had started, nor the actual water volume which had been lost. The leakage gave rise to a concern over possible ground contamination since part of the area below the leak was gravel which could allow radioactivity to seep into the soll below the asphalt pavement. Surveys of the area adjacent to the RHST indicated ground conta*.ination with concentrations as high as 6.6E-03 uC1/gm Cesium-137.
[
As FF t ' contaminated soil was removed from the aree of the RHST and placed i , drums for future disposal off-site as radioactive waste.
During the contaminated soll removal, a second small leak at the base of ;
the RHST siphon heater return line Isolation Valve CS-81 was also j discovered. The second leak was observed to be cnly a few drops per I
minute and was subsequently repaire). Sarple analysis of the soll [
removed frce the contaminated area also indicated the presence of l
1 MaineYankee Cesium-134, Antimony-125, and Cobalt-60 in addition to the principal radionuclide detected, Cesiun-137. The Cesium-134, Antimony-125, and Cobalt-60 were observed in some samples taken from the excavation to be present in concentrations approximately equal to 1.E-05 uCi/gm for Cesium-134, 2.E 05 uCi/gm for Cobalt-60, and 8.E-05 uCi/gm for Antimony-125. These levels are about two orders of magnitude below the highest Cesium-137 concer.trations as noted above.
Soil in the area of the RHST was excavated between two and five feet deep until the average Cesium-137 concentration had fallen to an equivalent MPC value in water of about 2.0E-05 uCi/ml. Approximately 600 cubic feet of - rth and asphalt that covered the area were removed for off-site raditactive waste disposal.
The hole was backfilled with clean fill and repaved, except for a small gravel area below the siphon heater. This limits the amount of rainfall and snce melt waters which could percolate down through the residual soil column to the grou..d water table. It also limits the potential for airborne transport of residual soil activity off-site, as well as eliminate any significant dose contribution to the plant's employees. l Table 1 lists the estimate of residual activity left in-place within the plant's protected area.
The following sections assess the potential impact associated with the ;
assumption that the residual activity might be released to the off-site !
envit onment. The release pathway postulated consist of the migration !
downward of the residual soil activity to the ground water, with the subsequent transport through the water table to the tidal estuary.
(
, 3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYOROLOGY CONSIDERATI0RS
( The soil at the Maine Yankee site consists of medium soft to medium l stiff silty clays with occasional sandy lenses and pebbly stones. The l soil is characterized as glacial till, with an average depth to bedrock 1
of 15 to 20 feet. The ground water pathway from the RHST location to the
MaineYankee l.
adjacent tidal waters is through this till, and possible in some places through compacted controlled backfill. The depth to groundwater has been conservatively estimated to be about 10 feet below grade. This is about 10 feet above tne adjacent tidal waters.
The flow of groundwater in the vicinity of the RHST is towards the surrounding adjacent tidal waters. There are no potable groundwater wells in the vicinity of the RHST which could be contaminated as a result !
of the RHST related leaks.
The shortest distance between the soil contamination area and open waters associated with the estuary is estimated to be about 117 feet. Figure 1 shows the location of the RHST and adjacent open waters.
4.0 RADIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS Residual Radioactivity: The remaining contamination in the soll was conservatively estimated by determining the average lateral radioactivity reduction factors between soil samples taken approximately 12 and 18 inches apart on the outer edge of the excavated area in all directions moving away from the RHST. Based on the Cesium-137 activity reduction factors, which averaged from about 4 per foot to as high as 106 per foot depending on which lateral direction outward from the trench wall one moved, the average concentration of residual activity is assumed to continue to decrease until an equivalent concentration equal to the Lower Limit of Detection (LLO) for Cesium-137 in sediments for environmental ,
samples, as required by plant Technical Specifications, is reached (i.e.,
1.8E-07 uCi/gm). No credit for reduction of residual activity with depth is assumed, even though the activity levels for Cesium-137 had generally fallen off at the bottom of the excavation to concentrations equivalent to the HPC value in water of 2E-05 uCi/ml. The column of residual activity was therefore assumed to extend down 10 feet from the surface to ground water. The resulting volume of soil containing residual activity L down to the concentration required as mini. mum detectable capabilities is k
~.,,..m.-,-_ , . ~ , . ~ . , , _ - - _ . . , , , - _ - . ~ .._...,._....,.-,,m._ - - , -,.-,. _ , - ..~,_ - - -.,___ ,---
MaineYankee !
l conservatively estimated to be about 7,600 cubic feet. Residual activity concentrations were estimated based on a weighted average of the observed activities for Cesium-137, along the outer edge of the excavated trench.
For Cesium-137, the total activity remaining in the soil is estimated to be about 6.1 mC1, which is contained within the plant's protected area.
Table 1 lists the results of the estimates of residual contamination in soil. l Potential Exoosure: In order to bound the maximum possible dose to an individual, it is postulated that the residual activity in the soil near the RHST will migrate off-site via groundwater.
4 A conservative groundwater /redionuclide travel time analysis was -
performed for a minimum travel distance of about 117 feet from the RHST to the adjacent tidal waters. A groundwater travel time of 255 days was estimated from Darcey's Law for this location. This estimate is based on a soll permeability of 10 gpd/ft ,2a hydraulic gradient of 0.09 ft/ft, and a soi) porosity of 0.25. The analysis also conservatively assumed that tne RHST activity in soll was immediately available to the l
groundwater. However, due to ionic absorption of the radionuclides on l soil particles in the groundwater flow regime, most radionuclides travel at only a small fraction of the groundwater velocity. For the radionuclides present in the RHST rele.:se, retardation coefficients were estimated from data presented in NUREG/CR-3130, NUREG-0440, and NUREG/CR-1596, where the retardation coefficient is defined as the ratio of groundwater velocity to radionuclide velocity. The estimated r retardation coefficients and radionuclide travel times f rom the RHST to
, the tidal waters are summarized in Table 2. The travel time is the product of the groundwater travel time (i.e., 0.7 years) and the <
i appropriate retardation coefficient. I Due to the relatively long travel times for the nuclides listed in Table 2 in comparison to their respective half lives, the only nuclide j which could be expected not to decay away before it could reach tl.o estuary is Cesium-137. As a consequence, only Cesium-137 needs te be l considered in the off-site exposure analysis, i
i n.- - - . . - - _ _ , , , - , - _ - - , , - . . . . . - - + - - , , , . , - , . , , - - - - - . ,- , , - . . - -
MaineYankee !
l .
At the time when Cesium-137 is assumed to reach the estuary, it is postulated that all the residual activity noted in Table 1 is released ,
either to the shoreline sediment, or the tidal waters and aquatic food media. No credit for dispersion of activity through the soil media is taken.
Once the activity is ava'.lable to the estuary system, the exposure pathways of concern are direct radiation from the ground plane to anyone assumed to be working on the mud flats at lov tide, and the ingestion of fish and shellfish taken from the waters adjacent to the plant.
The dose models used in estimating the radiological impacts are taken l from Regula::ory Guide 1.109. For the ingestion pathway, the activity released into the tidal waters is assumed to be diluted in the 25-acre !
surface mixing zone of the Maine Yankee discharge (FSAR Section 2.3.2) and a mean tidal range of about 8 feet (FSAR Table 2.3.2). The volume of j tidal waters available for dilution at high tide is therefore 0 3 7 about 8.7 x 10 ft or about 6.5 x 10 gallons. This dilution volume is conservative in that it accounts for only a fraction of the available tidal waters surrounding the plant.
I Table 3 indicates the liquid release pathway usage factors used in the dose analysis which were taken from the Maine Yankee Off-Site Oose Calculation Manual (00CH). Doses were calculated for the whole body and seven organs to each of three age groups: adults, teens, and children. l t
The resulting maximum potertlal individual doses a:e listed on Table 4. !
Combining all three pathways, the maximum dose over the course of a t year's exposure is calculated to be 0.41 mrem to the whole body, and 0.55 ;
mrem to the liver of an adult, which is about 30 times less than the !
internal exposure one receives from the natural Potassium-40 within our bodies. These doses are well below the "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" l (ALARA) objectives of 10CFR50, Appendix I, and all limits currently under L consideration by the NRC for application to materials which could be ;
classified as Below Regulatory Concern (BRC).
I
1 1
MaineYankee i 5.0 CONCLUS[QM Contaminated soil was located and removed to the extent practical with the residual radioactivity considered to be below any level of regulato y corcern since it presents no significant hazard to either the plant employees, general public, or the environment.
It is not expected that any significant transport of the residual radioactivity to any point off-site will occur. However, if transport were assumed, the dose consequences would be well below the naturally occurring background levels in the environment.
It is concluded that no further action is warranted with respect to the removal of any additional residual soil contamination. Maine Yankee, therefore, requests approval from the Commission to leave in-place the residual soil activity associated with the RHST leak. l I :
1 l
1 l
(
i I l I
MaineYankee TABLE 1 Residual-RHST Soil Activities Heighted Average Total Residual Concentration Activity Nuclide -uCi/gm _ (Curies) {
Cesium-137 1.2E-05 6.1E-03 [
7.4E-05 Ceslum-134 1.5E-07 Antominy-125 3.2E-07 1.6E I Cobalt-60 1.1E-06 5.4E-04 '-
t u
I t
F 5
l
[
l' r
i !
l
[
t i
l :
i I
b i
0595L-DS
MaineYankee TABLE 2 Nuclide Groundwater Travel Times y Retardation Travel Time (year) [
Nuclidt Coefficients in Tidal Waters ,
Cobalt-60 421 295 l Antimony-125 85 60 Cesium-134, 137 113 79 1
I 4
I
(
1 I
J t
1 i i
?
i l
1 0595L-OS 1 ,
, - - - - - .- -.. - -,--.--,.. - _ .- - - - -- - l
MaineYankee TABLE 3
' Maine Yankee Liould Release Pathw&v Usaae Factors Fish Invertebrates Shoreline Agt (ka/vr) ,_(kg/vr) (hr/vr) '
Adult 21 5 334 Teen 16 3.8 67 Child 6.9 1.7 14 Infant 0 0 0 I
4 i
1 l
i l
,i 1
0595L-D3 i
MaineYankee i TABLE 4 Summary of Maximum Potential Doses Maximum Whole Body Dose Maximum Organ Dose in Any Age Group in Any Age Group ,
Pathway (mrem) (mres) i Fish 2.4E-01 3.7E-01 Shellfish 3.6E-02 5.5E-02 Ground Plane 1.3E-01 1.3E-01 f Total 4.1E-01 5.5E-01 (
p Age Group Adult Adult Organ Liver l [
- i.
1 ,
)
i i j l 1
)
i i
! i i !
l [
l !
i I !
i i I i
{
1 :
l i
i !
t
, 0595L-DS
. FTf'URE 1 _
e AJ-0 M l NEAREST DISTANCE TO N /
SURFACE WATER - 117 FEET h' je u.N ._.- -
/ ..
s
/ / s w. .
' . ... ...,,-... ][j
/ -: -y_. Nr-f. 7 _ .- . 9'/.0'hj
%n.s.! '3 yN, )
==.:. - ., -
p- n.n-io ivo-i
/ .s
' 8, - -L. _ . % y'j,Q p i$\l( uu s We t._ -: zw mim -
. . - * *L .' ~ -~ &, , +I i ',G .f )(' ,,;I~ '.
c>
\
c._1 -.
3
- s s .- ,,g 1, ,
( -
p / e...%a,..
N
.. w ,,,s, N, ,
\ s\ , W@*rce %
s
,,t - - .
j \\\ ,g^ \ '- ' ' \1..'s h _x_ id _x. .,'f/> (*-' 'A} > D-
.._ _ M or-o)
-~: \g 4 *l.1$
) j%[v\p..,.8
.; 4s_
+as o ' o-i a .
i g ~~ ~ .
', ag rA- w ) "_- m.
y R* _ ji,f t, ,-
,'/. 1%';', / -,
,,.T ,-
[N 'T p/4y i' I ".*j(,'aos'aa
/f/ ,g 2
s~~ l h 'r -
[/h
.O s . . ,N . j', . g f' -
g >. o
'/C,::"/.,*'>==
. y i
f :' 1' gp'/
$" to -
g
.,;-, py .i .ci av.* l c o ,,.7-i, r ,
5 , ,,,,,
l
- :/ ~ '"'
Q -
,,g. ,, ,
p T4 s , g\,/\' =- aw. - ! V-N.k. % / 7 1 'h N * , , ,, , , , , ,, ,
r Mwd Q-
)\~'sj.'6R.@=hs
\
) mue j
Q@ C'...d gg 4 i
-(
g,.p%ekulNg,,
- _a. i . . . = - ; ,,
e' ;
y ,
,, p * ;
S -' 2
-)
~~ ,,,. N N - ,,,a ,t ? r k / /l 1 eravier owtow
(
ll t g
0
.)
- na " a,
[ ""- 4 j
{
- F ll - J Ti
/
Aj g e. ,< c ...,
?,G1
/ /s/ / K.y -i i ,
11 L[ '
", lI
.1 / ', f//
tFtp ru...u c .mtem * <
ru n .v o' ,
- ji l h ' h,%
an P' ' ~ ,/ ,/ / {l [Y_PW % n j .-
m.=
f s upw<u -_ --
i m g.&-o. I "e='
3 *#
/[l/#' /
\
p s "; 'A t P p" -' ~~
To I' l
/ s.,
~ v-i a ,.W........:
, , n, ,, ,n,, .., ., . . . t.
AREA 0F SOIL f,
-\ g /
g, tt ,'s (\ f y' ,-
s ted i N.i
+~
g ,,. ~g g 34"
\
\.% 'o CONTM11 NATION /
, et n 3
O N~ 4 j N r ., . p, jJ E.. e~,a t l t.W _,,, -.<tv,,
l ,, l
, A - T RA PARK
. . },
,i pa.
/ o
-g g
{
E 3
~
k ' I 'd y.g j C -
/ vs l ,,'? , ,,mZ . .=-,T.
M 't G _.I
! - ~'
e ". % -
.c;.\~ ~ ~ -
r .
L- <w owe un n. ,
gem p ,, , f- . . . .
Ftf (f iC#8 08 th88 DL4, c
9 i
W rJ M,'/, >
B e
} 3 [ ~ ,--y**'=
p cp Up.t genes t. 9 f-. gp# %
L7 \ /" M'SW ' ' %
~
,.e aw . _..
%p ~ws.s A ' , ~ % ,/_.
- _\.f,. . ,
.,l
/ A'imc w'
_J ' ,,
. /
-c -.-
_.e t
\