ML20204A366
| ML20204A366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle, 05000426, 05000427  |
| Issue date: | 06/20/1973 |
| From: | Harold Denton US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Muller D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197G423 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-663 NUDOCS 8605120127 | |
| Download: ML20204A366 (3) | |
Text
-
+
DISTRIBUTIO i
Docket File L - Rdg.
AD/SS - Rdg.
L:ESB - Rdg.
J3 2 0 W ENVIRop FILE (NEPA)
Docket Nos. 50-424, 425, 426 and 427 D. R. Huller, Assistant Director for Environmer. cal Projects, L C0! RENTS ON PROPOSED DES FOR V0GTLE NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT NAME: Alvin W. Vogtle Plant Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 LICD3 SING STACE: CP
. DOCKET NUMBER:
50-424, -425, -426 and -427 RESPONSIBLE BRANCH: Environmental Projects Branch No. 2 PROJECT HAHAGER:
R. J. Clark DATE REQUEST RECEIVED BY ESB: June 15,1973 REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: Co:sments on Proposed DES REVIEW STATUS: Environraental Specialists Review Completed
<v Enclosed are co::nnents oa the proposed Draf t Environmental Statement for the Vogtle Nuclear Plant. All are suggested drafting changes.'
,f These cocanents were provided informally to the Project Manager on June 18,1973.
Harold R. Denton, Assistant Director for Site Safety Directorate of Licensing cc: w/o encl.
A. Giarabusso
'.l. licDonald w/ encl.
S. llaaauer J. tiendrie C. r'. Dicker R. J. Cla rk i
R. tallari C. Lillups 8605120127 860131 '.
L:ESB
!L: d..,'.J.:SS tu)fi d
.cB111ups: tab. RB.11 prep #
Dert6n G
DArE > l 6/ @/ 7 3.j 6/f/ 73 3r/C/73 i
Fvem A8C-Sl4 Rev 9 -)37 AIOf DN)
-G-
- r:1
- .: :: r: :::::.ur~:~~'
'=
- '"'*"'"#'8
" * ^ * ' '
a ENVIRON'IENTAL SPECIALISTS BRANCH CON'IENTS ON DES FOR ALVIN U. VOCTLE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1-2-3-4 Page Section 2-29 2.7.1.1 Soll Characteristics Second and third paragraphs are unclear with a possible cont.adiction in discussion of soil series ou slopes.
"The Lakeland Soils a re at higher elevations; the Fuquay and Lt_y Soils are at lower elevations and on side slopes."
"The major soils on the site are of the Lakeland Series, occurring on slopes that range from 2 to 177..
2-39 2.7.2.3
_renthic Invertebrates Last sentence:
"The majority...uas..."
2-41, 42 2.7.2.4 Fishes This section should be rewritten.
The first two sentences are not needed.
The mention of white mullet is useless without providing tiie additional information given in the applicant's ER.
Last sentence is unclear.
i 3-7 3.3.2.1 Intake Structure r
First paragraph: Clarify the use of stationary i
" fine" screen.
3-9 3.3.2.2 Discharge Structur_e
!! ore uniform discussion for alte rnate dif fuser port design is needed.
Tha folloring section" :hould be reviusd to,upport the ctiff', co,ciusion tiiat a 6-in. diar.2ter port is n e ce s s.t ry.
(1)
- p. v1 Itea 7:
Design of plant "The avere,- niecity...will b-about 11.0 fps..."
(2)
Section 3.3.2.2 (1)
Sec t ion 3. '.. J. 2 - A t rong p i ' cit f o r desi gn chinge should be incle+ d here.
o i
I
- p. 2 Page Section (4)
Section 5.2 (5) Section 5.5.2.4 (6)
Section 9.2.3.3 - The design change is recor= ended in this section but.is transforced to a condition for issuance of license in the summary and conclusions on page vi.
The design change should be put in proper perspective throughout the discussion.
(7) Section 9.4. Iten 7.
3-13 3.4.3.1 Applicant's Analysis of Therrt,1 Dischar!'e into the Savannah River e
Second paragraph, 1st sentence. The use of the word l'aystems" is unclear; it should be replaced by "redels" or the sentence rewritten.
6-5 Section 6.1.3 Thern11 k'hy nonitor "7 niles downriver?"
This review was conducted by C. Billups.
/
1-1.
E 1
i V
t 0.
6
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ -. _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - -