ML20197J012

Partially Deleted e-mail Discussing 10CFR2.201 Which Provided Requirements for Responses to Novs.Agrees That 60 or 90 Days,Ok,As Long as Response Requested within Certain Time Frame & Not Leave Open Ended

ML20197J012
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	07/25/1997
From:	Lesser M NRC
To:	Williams J NRC
Shared Package
ML20197H447	List: IA-98-330, Partially Deleted Response to TVA Ltr Dtd 980403 Re Implementation of Maint Rule at Browns Ferry,Unit 1 ML20197H442 ML20197H454 ML20197H650 ML20197H723 ML20197H778 ML20197H885 ML20197H901 ML20197H915 ML20197H934 ML20197H951 ML20197H978 ML20197H989 ML20197H995 ML20197J012 ML20197J024 ML20197J033 ML20197J057 ML20197J063 ML20197J399
References
FOIA-98-330 2.201, NUDOCS 9812140230
Download: ML20197J012 (1)

Text

I

)U l i;,

.,j I

J 4

From:

Mark Lesser To:

WND2.WNP3(JFW1) /

2 Date:

7/25/9712:52pm j

Subject:

Browns Ferry Unit 1 Maintenance Rule -Reply -Reply -Reply

Joe, 10CFR2.201 provides requirements for responses to NOVs, orders, DFis etc. Yrsd specifies a res onse within 20 days or other specified time. The regions give 30 days for NOVs.

$.(

i I agree with you i

that 60 or 90 days is as ng as we request a response within a ce ain time frame and not leave it open ended.

>>> Joseph Williams 07/25/9710:08am >>>

h l

Mark, V

Is there a procedural requirement for a response within 30 days? I don't rnind specifying a response time, but there really isn't any rush associated with this item. IR

{

97-04 said what TVA was doing was technically adequate, and Unit 1 isn't going l

anywhere for awhile. I think 60 or 90 days would be OK under the circumstances.

I l

Joe e

13. :.

i.. r.

9812140230 981202 PDR FOIA LOCHBAU98-330 PDR t