ML20195B464
| ML20195B464 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 03/15/1986 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-2395, NUDOCS 8605290335 | |
| Download: ML20195B464 (23) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,,. t'84- 2 3U
/[%e 6sa.sth LPDR
- @ f W 2
CERTIFIED COPY i
g g gg ,g l DATE ISSUED: March 15, 1986 MINUTES ACRSMEETINGONDAVISBESSE(RESTART)
WASHINGTON, D. C.
FEBRUARY 6, 1986 A meeting was held by the Davis Besse Subcommittee (Restart). Notice of the meeting was published in the Federal Register on January 21, 1986 (Attachment A). The schedule of items covered in the meeting is in Attachment B. The list of attendees is in Attachment C. A list of the meeting handouts is in Attachment D. The handouts are filed with the office copy. H. Alderman was the designated ACRS Staff Member. The meeting was convened at 8:30 a.m.
Principal Attendees ACRS Toledo Edison T6rFest Remick J. Wiiliams C. P. Siess R. Peters J. C. Ebersole W. Olan D. Ingmire Bechtel J. Woods E. Roy S. Smith E. Thomas J. Hirsh J. Fay T. Meyers S. Jaim Baccck & Wilcox S. Qwennoz J. Pearson B. Dunn MPR Associates R. Kennedy P. Hildebrandt Potomac News NRC P. Shortt J. Stolz K. Coleman C. McCrackon eAgado 0605290335 860315 PDR ACRS 2395 PDR Mua,ulcW ,t , dia . L .. .!*
,a g{f }t*0 }; _m my W b
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 2 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 Opening Statement - Subcommittee Chairman, F. Remick Dr. Remick noted the purpose of the meeting was to review the restart activ-ities for the Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station that have taken place since the June 9th,1985 loss of feedwater event.
He asked the Subcommittee for any comments. There was no response. He then called upon Mr. John Stolz as the lead presenter.
J. Stolz - NRC - Overview Mr. Stolz stated that there were a number of open items that need to be resolved prior to restart. He remarked that the principal open issues are the maintenance programs and the systems review a'nd test programs.
t The Staff will visit the site in mid-March for the maintenance review and the final SER will be issued in mid-April.
Following the final SER, a Commission meeting will be,needed. Mr. Stolz projected late April would be the time when the Staff would get approval for plant restart. ,
Dr. Remick asked if the staff would have .their final position ready by the April ACRS meeting. Mr. Stolz replied that it was possible that the final
e-MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 3 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 positions would be ready for the April meeting. He noted that the final SER would not be issued in time for the April ACRS meeting.
J. Williams, Senior Vice President, Toledo Edison Mr. Williams discussed the programmatic actions to assure that Davis Besse would operate at a level of excellence when operating.
He noted that a new position entitled Information Management Director had been established to control documents, correspondence, and computer control.
The engineering organization was centralized under a new nuclear engineering general manager.
The Babcock & Wilcox Owner s Group has many programs going on concerning Davis Besse. Mr. Williams noted there are about 15 subcommittees doing work under the B&W Owners Group.
Dr. Remick asked if any mechanical aptitude testing is used in the screening process for new personnel.
4
- - - - ----------r-- e.--e , ,. ,, - - - - -g.. -
n- - -
7 MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 4 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1966 Mr. Storrs replied that they are planning to implement the Edison Electric Institute Test Program. Toledo Edison is beginning negotiations with the labor relations organization and have plans for putting that in place.
Dr. Remick asked if this was the POSS Test. The reply was yes.
Dr. Remick asked Mr. Storrs if he had any feeling for the percentage of people screened out due to drug testing or to psychological testing.
Mr. Williams replied that during each " career day" they have had one to three people that decline to participate for the entire process. He noted that they haven't rejected anyone that was tested but have had people that declined to participate.
Mr. Ebersole asked of all the many people looking at the plant, what percent-age of those really understand the plant on a integral basis.
Mr. Williams replied that the systems engineering group has cognizant engi-neers responsible for each system, and they will gain a very thorough under-standing of the systems.
Mr. Ebersole asked about the intersystem relationships.
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 5 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 Mr. Wood replied that the Systems Group has divided the plant into six major areas of responsibility. In addition, Mr. Jaim' s group will do PRA studies to determine what are the shortcomings in the system integration area, what modifications are necessary to address the shortcomings, and to evaluate transients that may have occurred in light of systems integration.
Dr. Remick asked where does the training department report on the orga-nization chart.
Mr. Williams replied that they report to him.
Mr. S. Smith, Assistant Plant Manager for Maintenance Mr. Smith discussed the Maintenance Improvement Program. He noted they had implemented changes in organization and staffing, training, maintenance activities, spare parts and materials control, engineering interface and support, and maintenance facilities.
Mr. Smith mentioned two new positions - one was training foremen, and the second was a senior supervisory person to assure the plant is clean and well maintained.
Dr. Remick asked what relationship will the training foreman have to the training programs. Would this person be responsible for on-the-job training
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 6 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 or how will he be integrated with the overall training organization. Mr.
Smith replied that the training foreman controls the pace of the quali-fication program, schedules training, and chairs training councils in each group.
Dr. Siess asked about how many man-hours are involved in a work order. Mr.
Smith replied the average corrective maintenance work order requires 35 man-hours for completion. He also noted that for modification work orders there are about 130 man-hours per work order.
Mr. Ebersole asked what explicit instructions and protective actions will be taken to prevent creating a transient.
W. O'Connor replied that there are detailed requirements when instrument and control mechanics are working on reactor protection system channels and the anticipatory reactor trip system. In addition they are only allowed to work on one channel at a time.
W. O'Connor, Assistant Manager for Plant Operations Mr. O'Connor discussed the operational and procedural changes that have been implemented or are in the process of change prior to restart. He noted that formalized training has begun for all shift operators emphasizing the very strict adherence to procedure set points even when drastic actions are
l MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 7 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 required. He noted they have pre-startup training for high priority, infrequent operator actions. He remarked that the operating philosophy now requires that the reactor operator inform the Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) of his intent to manually actuate any safety system.
Dr. Remick asked regarding manual actuation by the operators; where do you draw the line when you do it exactly according to procedure and when you're permitted to anticipate. Mr. Williams responded that those automatic initiations that he can foresee are going to happen, he has permission to do it manually in advance provided he tells the SR0's what he is going to do.
Mr. O'Connor added that the cperator has to be able to think based upon the conditions that are going on. If he gets an actuation of some safety and it isn't exactly correct, its his job to actuate that system and try and get it in its correct mode.
Mr. Ebersole asked about the new motor driven feedpumps. He noted they are capable of being started from the control rocm but the procedures had a remark about manually starting an oil pump. Mr. O'Connor replied that the only time that is done is when one of the essential busses is lost, then the feedpumps can be remotely transferred from the control room but the oil pump has to be manually transferred.
Mr. O'Connor noted that the training of the STA's as interim emergency duty officers has been completed.
6
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 8 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 The shift supervisors and assistant shift supervisors have the primary responsibility as interim emergency duty officer. In the absence of these two, the STA assumes the responsibility until they arrive.
Mr. O'Connor noted that in about 2 years the STA's will be qualified as SR0's.
John Wood, Nuclear Plant Systems Director Mr. Wood noted that during the June 9th event there were a number of equip-ment malfunctions. Toledo Edison undertook a very detailed equipment inves-tigation program. The scope of the investigation covered some 13 areas of concern and involved seven systems.
One of the major issues is the auxiliary feed pump turbines which tripped an cverspeed shortly into the event. The root cause was established as long cold inlet lines that accumulated condensation. The corrective action was to install new steam admission valves much closer to the turbines. In addition a new governor has been installed on auxiliary feed pump turbine number 1.
The trip throttle valve reset capability has been improved.
Regarding the pilot-operated relief valve, Mr. Wood noted during the June 9th event the pilot-oper6ted relief valve opened twice and reseated and opened
~l
~
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 9 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 the third time and did not received properly. A pilot-operated relief valve of similar design was subjected to testing at the Marshall facility and the overall reliability of the design was confirmed. The concern regarding the pilot operated relief valves is that although the PORV is highly reliable, the plant must be designed to accommodate the case when it does not close.
Mr. O'Connor noted that the post accident monitoring panel has been placed so that the operator has better information available to him in order to take the proper action should the PORV not seat properly.
Dr. Remick asked if Toledo Edison was considering the possibility of addi- '
tional PORV's for feed and bleed capability. Mr. Wood responded that they were still being considered as a long term item.
Mr. Wood mentioned that one of the worst significant items found during the review of the June 9th event was motor operated valves. Two valves on the discharge of the auxiliary feedwater system did not open after the operator had inadvertently closed them by pushing the wrong button.
The investigation found the limit switches were coming into the circuit too early. The corrective action has been to use the M0 VATS test equipment to check the entire motor-operated valve inventory for proper limit switch torque adjustment.
N!tillTES/ DAVIS BESSE 10 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 Mr. Wood discussed the environmental qualification effort. He n.oted that the ,
qualification files had to be reviewed and upgraded t6 inake them audit 1ble. .
The Environmental Qualification Haster List had to be reviewed and reissued.
Procedures are being developed to maintain co~ntrol of the environmentally qualified equipment.
At this point in time, Dr. Remick closed the seeti.ng to discuss security i
concerns regarding the June 9th event. Following the security discussion the meeting reconvened in Room 1167. The air conditioning was inoperative in
[
Room 1046.
S. Jaim, Improvement in the Decay fieat Removal System Mr. Jaim discussed the heat reliability improvement program that Toledo-Edison has undertaken to improve the decay heat removal systems.
Following the June 9th event all systems used for removal of decay heat, ;
i.e., the main feed and steam system, the auxiliary feedwater system, the startup feedpump system that existed at the time, the steam and feed rupture control system and the primary side feed and bleed mechanisms were reviewed. .
The overall goal was to come up with equipment modifications that would bring about reliability improvement commensurate with the standard review plar, elaborated criteria for the auxiliary feedwater system.
m
4 MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 11 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 Several modifications were identified. The first was to reduce the spurious initiators for the auxiliary feedwater system. The modification chosen was to filter the steam generator level signal so that the spurious oscillations are not detected or are damped out on the system by a filter.
Doe cther problem with the SFRCS in the past was spurious trips occurring bec'euse of high temperature in the SFRCS cabinets. The modification to improve this situation was to provide improved cooling for the power supplies within the cabinet.
In the previous logic, under a low level condition, all main feed was isolat-ed frca both steam generators so that isolation of SFRCS low level resulted in a lots of main feedwater This modification results in feed water for only ore steam generator being cut off and preserved the primary means of decay heat removal from the steam generator.
Another potential spurious means of actuation of the SFRCS during low power o.yeration end reactor power runbacks was the close proximity of the SFRCS low level trip setpcint to the Integrated Control System (ICS) low level limit duricg Icw pcwer operation or during power runbacks. To minimize such spurious challenges to the auxiliary feedwater system, the ICS low level is befn; raised.
" MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 12 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 One of the causes of the overspeed trips during the June 9th event of the auxiliary feed pump turbines was the condensation in the long cold steam lines. The modification to overcome this is to provide hot steam lines to the auxiliary feedpump turbines.
One of the major modifications has been the installation of the motor-driven feedwater pump which provides more than 100 percent capacity auxiliary feedwater flow. During normal full power operation the discharge of the pump will be aligned to the auxiliary feedwater headers. The suction will be from the condensate storage tank. The pump has the capability of being started from the control room and the motor can be supplied from either diesel generator.
P. Hildebrandt - System Review and Test Program Mr. Hildebrandt noted that he was going to discuss the system review and test program, how the program works, the independent process review Committee, what has been found in the program, and the testing. He noted the objective of this work is to identify those important recurring design basis and operations problem, to determine whether corrective actions are required prior to restart or can be taken over the longer term. Other objectives are to evaluate the scope of existing surveillance or other forms of periodic testing, to identify whether any additional testing needs to be performed to i
demonstrate functions or is the present body of testing adequate and then to
l MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 13 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 l
conduct a test program to demonstrate that these systems are functional and operable using these test procedures. i Some of the problem areas found in the system review were:
o The power operated relief valve was not operationally qualified for the environment that's expected during feed and bleed.
o The control room emergency ventilation system for practical pur-poses is inoperable over a range of climatic conditions and its capacity was inadequate.
o The auxiliary feedwater discharge piping had been overpressurized during the June 9th event when the auxiliary feedwater pump turbine had oversped.
o There is a potential for undetected flooding of the pit containing decay heat removal valves.
o There was inadequate ventilation in the service water pump rooms.
o The installation of dampers locsted in through wall ducts was found to be improper was based upon Appendix R requirements.
f , - .- - ----m-, . . - e . - -. , - e
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 14 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 o There were widespread station and instrument air system leaks.
Some of the things found in the test review were:
o Inadequate performance testing requirements for safety-related heat exchangers o Lack of a performance basis for the acceptance criteria for safe-ty-related pump testing.
o Inadequate leak check requirements on some of the check and iso-lation valves, both in terms of the testing method and the accep-tance criteria.
o Incomplete acceptance testing for the RCS hot leg level instrumen-tation.
Each of the items above, in test review, will be corrected before restart.
A. DeAgazio, Davis Besse Project Manager, NRC Mr. De Agazio noted that the Safety Evaluation Report that was provided to the committee members was in draft form, and was not complete. He noted that evaluation was continuing on various items. This includes:
' MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 15 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 o Evaluation of the motor operated valve corrective program o The safety features actuation system policy on modification o Main steam head pressure control o Systems review and test program o Single failure evaluation of the reactor protection system.
Mr. DeAgazio commented on open items to be resolved before startup. These include:
o Resolution of the event specific problems. The NRC Staff has completed evaluation of all but the motor operated valve problem and the steam header control problem.
o A substantial portion of the review and test program will be complete before restart.
o Installation of the motor-driven feedpump is a requirement.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 p.m.
}
MINUTES / DAVIS BESSE 16 RESTART, FEBRUARY 6, 1986 The next scheduled meeting of the Davis Besse Subcommittee (Restart) will be at 1:.30 p..m., April 9, 1986.
NOTE: Additional meeting details can be obtained from a transcript of this meeting available in the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H St.,
NW., Washington, D. C., or can be purchased from ACR-Fedral Reporters, 444 North Capitol Street, Washington, D. C. 10001.(202) 347-3700.
4 i
L
I -
., 2773 l'ederal Register / Vol. 51, No.13 / Tuesday, January 27,1988 / Notices
.I*
schedule does not work any hardship on (Docket No. 50-289(CH), ASLBP No. 85- views regarding matters to be thz rec ional staff.In addition, exercises 514-02-0T) considered during the balance of the bild during the early part of each meeting.
calrndar year will avoid conflict with '"'
the hurricane season. T tee e a nd ce r la!on rdt The Subcommittee wi!! then hear No.1; Further Notice of Prehearing presentations by and hold discussions Conference with representatives of the Toledo IV.
Edison Company, NRC Staff, their Based on the above, the staff january 14.1980. consultants, and otherinterested Pursuant to the Order of December 6, persons regarding this review.
concludes that scheduling the Turkey 1985, notice is hereby given that the Further informa tion regarding topics Point Plant emergency preparedness initial prehearing conference scheduled to be discussed, whether the meeting cxercise for January 22-23,1960, will not for February 19,19805 will commence has been cancelled or rescheduled. the cdversely affect the overall state of that day at 9 30 a.m., local time,in th'e
' Chairman's ruling on requests for the emergency preparedness at the Turkey Commonwealth Court, Courtroom No. 2, opportunity to present oral statements Point site. In addition, the permanent 5th Floor, South Office Building, and the time allotted therefor can be shift of the annual exercises to the early Commonwealth Avenue.liarrisburg, obtained by a prepaid telephone call to p:rt of each calendar year on a Pennsylvania. The prehearing the cognizant ACRS staff member. Mr.
continuing bases will benefit all parties conference will continue on the Iferman Alderman (telephone 202/634-concerned with hurricane planning and following day if necessary. 1414) between 8:15 AAt. and 5.00 Pat.
possible conflicts with the hurricane It is so Ordered. Persons planning to attend this meeting season.Therefore. the requested Dated at Bethesda Maryland. this 14th day are urged to contact the above named cxsmpt:on from the schedular of January,1986. Individual one or two days before the f requirements of 10 CFR Part 50. Morton B. Margulias, scheduled meeting to be advised of any l
Appendix E,Section IV F for the AdministataeIm/udge. changes in schedule, etc., which may g November 1983 exercise to be held in
[FR Doc. 86-1:06 Filed 1-17-86: 8 45 arn}
jinusry 1986, and establishing the early ow.a coog 75 ,_. De ted: lanuary 14.1986.
l p rt of each calendar year for the Morton W. Libarkin, annual exercises on a countinuing basis Assistant En ecutive Directorfbr Pm/ect is reasonable and should be granted. Advisory Committee on Reactor Reviem Accordingly, the Commission has Safeguards; Subcommittee on Davls- (FR Doc. 85-1262 Filed 1-17-86; 8.45 aml determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR Besse Nuclear Station Unit 1 (Restart); sumo cooe neo coas 50.12(a), the exemption requested by the Meeting licensee's September 6,1965, letter is The ACRS Subcommittee on Davis- Advisory Committee on Reactor authorized by law and will not endanger Besse Nuclear Station Unit 1 life or property or the common defense Safeguards; Proposed Meetings (RESTART) will hold a meeting on and security and is otherwise in the February 8.1986 Room 1048,1717 ff In order to provide advance public interest. Therefore, the requested Street, NW, Washington, DC. Information regarding proposed public sxemption which authorizes the licensee To the extent practical, the meeting meetings of the ACRSSubcommittees 13 conduct the annual Turkey Point will be open to public attendance, and meetings of the full Committee, the Plant emergency exercise and related however, portions will be closed to following preliminary schedule la drills in January 1986, with annual discuss material related to plant published to reflect the current situation, exercises held during subsequent safeguards and security. taking into account additional meetings c:lendar years. The agenda for the subject meeting which have been scheduled and Pursuant to lo CFR 51.32, the shall be as follows: meetings which have been postponed or Commission has determined that the Thursday. February 6,1986-6.J0 AJf. cancelled since the las t list of proposed issuance of the exemption will have no ""#lI #A' CO#CI"#mn of busine,sz meetings published December 16.1985 significant impact on the environment The Subcommittee will review restart (50 FR 51313). Those meetings which are, W FR % for Davis.Besse. definitely scheduled have had, or will For further details with repsect to this Oral statements may be presented by have, an individulal notice published in r.wmbers of the public with the the Federal Register approximately 15 action. see the licensee's request dated
< concurrence of the Subcommittee days (or more) prior to the meeting. It is September 6.1985, which ia available for Chairman; written statements will be expected that the sessions of the full
, public inspection at the Commission accepted and made available to the i public Document Room.171711 Street. Committee meeting designated by an Committee. Recordings will be perrnitted asterisk (*) will be open in whole or in i NW., Washington, DC and at the only during those portions of the part to the public. ACRS full Committee Environmental and Urban Affairs rneeting when a transcript le being kept, meetings begin at 8:30 a.m. and Library, Florida Intemational University, Miami, Florida 33199. and questions may be asked only by~~ Subcommittee meetings usually begin at members of the Subcommittee,ita 8:30 a.m. The time when items listed on D;ted at Bethesda. Marytand, this 9th day consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring the agenda will be discossed during full orjanuary toes to make oral statements should notify Committee meetings and when For the Nuclear Regulatary Commission. .
- '#""' "" """ *"" E' ""
far in advance as is practicable so that published prior to each meeting.
Staen A. Verga
- appropriate arrangements can be made. Information as to whether a meeting has A. fmg Director. Division o/PWR lwensins- During the initial portion of the been firmly scheduled, cancelled. or i Office o/Nuc/cor Reactar Regulown. meeting. the Subcommittee, along with rit Doc. s6-1:59 FHed 147-86, a a am) rescheduled, or whether changes have any of its consultants who may be been made ist the agenda for the une coes n a, present. may exchange preliminary. February 193* \CRS full Committee
AW/tZWM17vrf TENTATIVE SCHEDULE DAVIS BESSE RESTART MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1986 s WASHINGTON, D. C., ROOM 1046 Speaker 8:30 a.m. Introductory Remarks - Subcommittee Chairman Overview C. McCracken, NRC 8:40 a.m.
Toledo Edison Presentation 8:50 a.m. Management Changes J. Williams 9:10 a.m. Maintenance Activities S. Smith 9:30 a.m. Summary of Event Investigation J. Wood 9:50 a.m. Auxiliary Feedwater Modification S. Jain and Decay Heat Removal
- BREAK 10:50 a.m.
11:00 a.m. Security -- CLOSED 11:15 a.m. Operational Activities W. O'Connor 11:30 a.m. Independent Process Review P. Hildebrand Committee 12:00 N00N System Review and Test Program J. Lingenfelter 12:30 p.m. LUNCH NRC Presentation C. McCracken 1:30 p.m. Management and Programmatic Aspects 2:00 p.m. Plant Review 2:30 p.m. Improvement Programs and System -
Modifications 3:00 p.m. System Reviews and Test Procedures 3:30 p.m. Evaluation of Decay Heat Removal Reliability and Capability 4:00 p.m. BREAK 4:10 p.m.- Conclusion 4:30 p.m. Subcommittee Discussion 5:00 p.m. ADJ0 URN
H. ALDFa n d177hCH-Mnvrc
. ACPS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON DAVIS-BESSE LOCATION ROOM 1046, 1717 H St. hW DATE FEBRUARY 6, 1986 ATTENDANCE LIST PLEASE PRINT:NAME AFFILI ATION FW AnK J- La kcdC C- % , AcA 5
// WW] pc/U
- f. Ar e c /M/tv nAC
/ O,/*Ss'7n 4AC nl SVD L ? 'A C
,/- i,,///i n s to t & ?.'b 2 @ d c a S ,6s. W7J ft, f F D 6 F7Ssa
~
H. ALDE101AN i
-. SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON ,.
i._ DAVIS-BESSE
. 1 10CATIO:1: Room 1046, 1717 B St. , hW, Washington, D. C.
, DATE: Feb. 6, 1986 g -77'//7,/fW'fr/FC---.
ATTENDANCE LIST
-PLEASE PRINT:
NAME BADGE NO. AFFILIATION ther M-%6s TOTeh b Thho~ Cn O btd $ ,
ld ll o- y_ / Q ( L L= o z as' E/afo (R.q G 400 5 /- .5rdit 7-- Eo 965'~ TW-elo 2d< n. Q, DAv!D B. /N&Ati#L 6022-t 7&tsc Epissa('Atc()
6 ~3~-le1E 5 3 M' L= -017 y TECH TtL Euccm-.c L) h u s G o99L 3EcwTu_
3 % k- M-<l . E-09t7 RB~c(+W i/ F' & cd/i dr a D750 2/M/
b.Yocauw G- Oslo G moi? Assecsms k' (Doc)D /E-ni 7.5 M LFDo EDis&
6.5 $ , Y'd 5 699'? G /r f$bs')
L.Co m o ~
E -cos' GKn T. Sito. rt 6 - 0 9 3 z. n , u m c. Ncas b(.sbWW 0 ~0114 I fok%', r3QtM$
h Hnfk c-om Kkf slilni17/ //its/A G o ei4 jNido [danc Olm Anwunit 2 0 'is-9 /]r10 c<.nino Air <rv Ted /L en t -on G (cle<00 f4am a
TMuo c 2.
ca > Cm L C JAu) C-ou7 -
5 G4 vu, x G 926 Nu.S G tt qsNr- * *> s o insoo s.o ts oa (be E o95 W G%L
. ' 0al7M)Vh v G of2t 4vW .
8 KXenes, ,
sonn -
~W:e
3r.~MMDiaWJ ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON LWIS-L. 3SE LOCATIOl: Room 1046, 1717 5 St. , hh', h'ashington, D. C.
DATE: Feb. 6, 1986 g$4//A47UK ATTENDANCE LIST PLEASE PRINT:
NAME BADGE ii0. AFFILIATION le r (1A L e i n ut4 C 5-096.3 T O L, . 20 IS G V A/uxM i k bir47 Et---
] <0 AfYNs c Ir- FoPft/ TJ'/
d-ld - A'/ Lvl E-0946 3 Fl(A)
D $ Srb- k Eb]3 &If~ .
lf _h\ h 0 h 0 b 77* 6 -0 ?bI W. .$ [
O
!I ..
ATTAONEhT D 0
DAVIS BESSE SUBC0ht1ITTEE MEETING (RESTART)
February 6, 1986
- 1. Toledo Edison Discussion
- 2. h?C Staff Discussion c .