ML20154P579

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1987 Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept
ML20154P579
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 12/31/1987
From:
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
References
NUDOCS 8806030387
Download: ML20154P579 (172)


Text

_ _ _ _ - _ .

+

l l

l 1987 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 0

Prepared by OYSTER CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS V GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION O

8806030387 '371231 PDRADOCK0500g4 R

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTE'.4TS i ,

LIST OF TABLES 11.  !

LIST OF FIGURES lii

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Characteristics of Radiation 3 Sources of Radiation 8xposure 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE OYSTER CREEK SITE 8 General Information 8 Climatological Summary - 1987 8 EFFLUENTS 13 Limits 13 Sources of Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Ef fluents 17 Radioactivity Removal f rom Liquid and Gaseous Wastes 17 Effluent Data 19 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENIAL Mot:ITORING 21 Program Design 21 I Quality Assurance Program -

34 l

DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING 38 J i

l Sample Collection and Analysis 38 Results 39 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE 7.NALYSIS RESULTS 41 Sample Collection 41 Sample Analysis Results 41 RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF OYSTER CREEK OPERATIONS 148 APPENDIX A: Sampling and Analysis Exceptions - 1987 150 APPENDIX B: Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) Exceptions - 1987 154 APPENDIX C: Reporting Level Violations - 1987 13, APPENDIX D: 1987 EPA Cross-Check Results 158 APPENDIX E: 1987 Annual Dairy Census 165 l

APPENDIX F: 1987 Annual Garden Census 167

.t_

-. . - . .- -l

I LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 1 Common Sources of Radiation 5 2 OCNGS Effluent Technic 61 Specification Limits 14 1

3 1987 OCNGS Plant Operations Summary 20 4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring 25 Program Sampling Locations 5 Oyster Creek Analysis Specifications 33 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 6 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station 35 Station QA Sampling Program 7 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station -37 Duplicate Analyses by Media for 1987 Performed by Primary Laboratory 8 Gamma Dose to the Environment (mR/std. month) 39 as measured by Thermoluminescent Dosimeter - 1987 9 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 43 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station January,1987 through December,1987 10 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 44 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station January, 1987 through December,1987 Annual Summary 11 Annual Dose Equivalent for the Period f rom 149 January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1987 A-1 Sampling and Analysis Exceptions - 1987 151 D-1 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station 159 U.S. EPA Cross-Check Program 1987 (JAN - OCT)

Comparison of EPA and Contractor Laboratory Results D-2 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station 164 U.S. EPA Cross-Check Program 1987 (OCT - DEC)

Comparison of EPA and Contractor Laboratory Results

LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE 1 Oyster Creek REMP Stations (Ocean County) 9 2 Monthly Precipitation Oyster Creek - 1987 11 3 Oyster Creek REMP Stations - 2 mile radius 23 I

J l

-111-

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The operation of a nuclear power plant results in the release of small amounts of radioactive materials to the environment. A radiological environmental monitoring program (REMp) has been established to monitor radiation and radioactive materials in the environment around the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS). The program evaluates the relationship between amounts of radioactive material released in effluents to the environment and resultant radiation doses to individuals. The radiological environmental monitoring performed by the GPU Nuclear Environmental Controls Department for 1987 is discussed in this report. Summaries and interpretations of the data are published annually. Additional information concerning releases of radioactive materials to the environment is contained in the Semiannual Effluent Reports submitted to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

During 1987 the radioactive liquid and gaseous ef fluents associated with OCNGS were a small fraction of the applicable federal regulatory limits and have not had significant or measurable effects on the quality of the environment.

Estimated radiation doses to the public attributable to 1987 operations at OCNGS were well below all applicable regulatory limits and were significantly less than doses received from common sources of radiation. Similar conclusions were reached in previous reports.

Because most of the radioactive materials considered in this report are nornally present in the environment, either naturally or as a result of l non-OCNGS activities such as atmospheric nuclear weapon testing, measurements made in the vicinity of the site were compared to background measurements. l Samples of air, surface water, soil and sediment, shellfish, fish, vegetation, j groundwater, and precipitation were collected. External penetrating radiation dose measurements also were made in the vicinity of OCNGS. Samples were analyzed for radioactivity including tritium (H-3), gross beta and gamma-emitting radionuclides. The re ults of environmental measurements are used to assess the environmental impact of OCNGS operations, to demonstrate i compliance with the Technical Specifications and applicable federal regulations, and to verify the adequacy of containment and radioactive effluent control systems. The data collected by the REMP provide a historical 1 i l

record of the levels of radionuclides and radiation attributable to natural causes, worldwide fallout from prior nuclear weapons tests, the Chernobyl incident, and OCNGS operations. Radiological impacts in terms of radiation dose as a result of OCNGS operations were calculated and also are discussed.

The. results provided in this report are summarized in the following highlights.

, During 1987 there were over 3350 samples taken from the aquatic, atmospheric, and terrestrial environments around OCNGS. More than 4275 analyses were performed on these samples.

In addition to natural radioactivity, low levels of fission products such as cesium-137 were detected in various media and were attributed to fallout f rom prior nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. Clam and sediment samples also located in and immediately downstream of the Oyster Creek discharge canal contained low levels of manganese-54, cobalt-60, and zinc-65, as documented in previous semiannual reports.

, Dose rates measured with TLDs around OCNGS were consistent with historical natural background radiation. Background stations TLD's ranged f rom 3.3 to 5.6 mrem per standard month and indicator station TLD's ranged f rom 2.9 to 7.0 mrem per standard month. l J

, All radioactive effluent releases were small fractions of the federal regulatory and Technical Specification limits. The predominant radionuclides released were xenon-135 (Xe-135) in gases and H-3 in liqpids.

I l

i

, Operations at OCNGS during 1987 caused radiation doses to the public well below all applicable regulatory limits, and significantly less than doses received from other common sources of radiation. The maximum hypothetical whole body exposure potentially received by an 1

individual from liquid and gaseous effluents was conservatively l calculated to be about 0.17 mrem total. The maximum hypothetical l whole body dose to the surrounding population f rom liquid and airborne effluents was conservatively calculated to be 15.2 person-Rem. This is 1,766 times lower than the doses that the total population in the Oyster Creek area receives from natural background sources.

2 l

INTRODUCTION Background information is provided on basic radiatidn characteristics, plant operations, radioactive effluent controls, and environmental monitoring to assist the reader in reviewing this document.

Characterist'.cs of Radiation Atoms whose nuclei contain an excess of snergy are called radioactive atoms. They release this excess energy by expelling electromagnetic or particulate radiation from their' atomic centers to become stable (non-radioactive). This process is called "radioactive decay."

Electromagnetic radiation is x-rays and gamma rays and is similar in many ways to light waves, microwaves, and radiowaves. particulate radiation may be either electrically charged such as alpha and beta particles or have no charge (neutrons). The term "half-lif e' reters to the time it takes for one half of a given amount of a radionuclide to decay. Some radionuclides have a half-life as short as a fraction of a second while others have half-lives as long as millions of years. Each radionuclide has unique decay characteristics in terms of its energy, the types of radiation emitted, and its half-life. Radionuclides may decay directly into stable elements or may undergo a series of decays which ultimately reach a stable element. Radionuclides are found in nature (e.g. U-235, Th-228, and K-40), and may also be produced artificially such as with accelerators and nuclear reactors (e.g., I-131, Cs-137, and Co-60 ) .

The activity of a radioactive source is the number of nuclear disintegrations (decays) of the source per unit of time. The unit of activity is the curie. A one-curie radioactive source undergoes 2.2 trillion disintegrations per minuter but in the realm of nuclear power plant effluents and environmental radioactivity, this is a large unit.

So, two fractional units--the microcurie and the picoeurie--are more commonly used. The microcurie is one millionth of a curie and represents l

2.2 million decays per minute. The picocurie is one millionth of a microcurie and represents 2.2 decays per minute. The mass of a l radionuclide corresponding to one curie is directly proportional to the 1

3 b

half-life and the atomic weight of the nuclide. For example, uranium-235

.(U-235) with a half-life of 7810 million years requires about 465,000 1

grams to obtain an activity of one curie. The mass-activity relationship for I-131 with a half-life of 8.0 days requires about 8 millionths of a gram to produce a curie.

Any mechanism that can supply the energy necessary to ionize an atom, ,

break a chemical bond, or alter the chemistry of a living cell is capable of producing biological damage. Electromagnetic and particulate radiation can produce cellular damage by any of these mechanisms. In assessing the biological effects of radiation, the type, energy, and amount of radiation must all be considered.

Total body radiation involves exposure of all organs. Most background exposures are of this form. When radioactive elements enter the body through inhalation or ingestion, their distribution is not uniform. For example, radioiodine selectively concentrates in the thyroid gland, whereas radiocesium collects in muscle and liver tissue and radiostrontium in mineralized bone. The total dose to organs by a given radionuclide is also influenced by the quantity and the duraticn of time that the radionuclide remains in the body. Owing to their rapid radioactive decay as well as their removal f rom the body, certain radionuclides stay in the body for very short times while some remain for years.

The amount of radiation dose which an individual receives is most f requently expressed in rem. Since human exposure to radiation usually involves very small exposures, the millitem (mrem) is most commonly used (1 mrem = 1/1000 rem). Sometimes, it is desirable to express the collective radiation dose to a population. Such a collective dose is I

expressed in person-rem, which is calculated by adding up each individual l

dose (e.g., 1 rem to each of 100 persons = 100 person-tem).

Sources of Radiation Exposure i

Life on earth has evolved amid the constant exposure to natural radiation. In fact, the single major source of radiation to which the J

4

general population is exposed comes from natural sources. Although everyone on the planet is exposed to natural radiation, some people receive more than others. Radiation exposure f rom natural background has three components (i.e., cosmic, terrestrial, and internal) and varies with altitude and geographic location, as well as with living habito.

For example, cosmic radiation originating from deep interstellar space and the sun increases with altitude, since there is less air which acts as a shield. Similarly, terrestrial radiation resulting from the presence of naturally occurring radioauclides in the soil varies and may be significantly higher in some areas of the country than in others.

Even the use of particular building materials for houses, cooking with gas, and home insulation affect exposure to natural radiation.

The presence of radioactivity in the human body results f rom the inhalation and ingestion of air, food, and water containing naturally occurring radionuclides. For example, drinking water contains trace amounts of uranium and radium and milk contains radioactive potassium.

Table 1 summarizes the common sources of radiation and their average annual doses.

TABLE 1 Sources and Doses of Radiation

  • Natural (82%) Man-made (18%)

Radiation Dose Radiation Dose Source (milli rems / yea r ) Source (milli r ems /ye a r )

Radon 200 (55%)**

Cosmic rays 27 (8%) Medical X-rays 39 (11%) ,

Terrestrial 28 (8%) Nuclear Medicine 14 (4%) l Internal 40 (11%) Consumer products 10 (3%) i Other Less than 1 ( 1%)

(Releases from nat. gas, phosphate mining, burning l of coal, weapons fallout, l

& nuclear fuel cycle) l APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE TOTAL 300 TOTAL 63 l

l

Reference:

NCRP 93, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, 1987.

l

    • Percentage contribution of the total dose is shown in parentheses.

5 l

l

The average person in the United States receives about 300 millirems (0.3 rem) per year from natural background radiation sources. This estimate was revised from about 100 to 300 millirems because of the inclusion of radon gas which has always bee present but has not previously figured in the calculations. In some regions of the country, tha amount of natural radiation is significantly higher. Residents of Colorado, for example, receive an additional 60 millirems per year due co the increase in cosmic and terrestrial radiation levels. In fact, for evety :.00 feet above sea level, a person will receive an additional 1 millirem per year from cosmic radiation. In several regions of the world, high concentrations of uranium and radium deposits result in doses of several thousand millirems each year to their residents.

Reference:

CRC Handbook, Radioecology: Nuclear Energy and the Environment, E. Ward Whicker, Vincent Schultz, Vol. 1, 1982.

Recently, public attention nas focused on radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas produced from uranium and radium decay. These elements are widely distributed in trace amounts in the earth's crust. Unusually high concentrations have been found in certain parts of eastern Pennsylvania and northern New Jersey. Radon levels in some homes in these areas are hundreds of times greater than levels found elsewhere in the United States. Howeve r ,

additional surveys are needed to determine the full extent of the problem nationwide. Radon is the largest component of natural background radiation and may be responsible for a substantial number of lung cancer deaths annually. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measuremento (NCRP) estimates that the average individual in the United States receives an annual dose of about 2,400 millirems to the lung from natural radon gas. This lung dose is considered to be equivalent to a whole body dose of 200 millirems. The NCRP has recommended actions to control indoor radon sources ,

and reduce exposures.

1

Reference:

NCRP 93, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of  ;

the United States, 1987.  !

l When radioactive substances are inhaled or swallowed, they are distributed within the body in a nonunifor.n fashion. For example, radioactive iodine selectively concentrates in the thyroid gland, )

radioactive cesium is distributed throughout the body water and muscles, l

l l

\ l 6

(

I l

and radioactive strontium concentrates in the bones. The total dose to organs by a given radionuclide is also influenced by the quantity and the duration of time that the radionuclide remains in the body, including its physical, biological and chemical characteristico. Depending on their rate of radioactive decay and biological elimination f rom the body, some radionuclides stay in the body for very short times while others remain for years.

In addition to natural radiation, we are exposed to radiation from a number of man-made sources. The single largest of these sources comes .

from diagnostic medical x-rays, and nuclear medicine procedures. Some 180 million Americans receive medical x-rays each year. The annual dose a to an individual from such radiation averages about 53 millirems. Much smaller doses come f rom nuclear weapons f allout and consumer products such as televisions, smoke detectors, fertilizers. Production of nuclear power and its associated fuel cycle contributes less than 1 millicem to the annual dose of about 300 millirems for the avecage individual living in the United States.

Fallout commonly refers to the radioactive debris that settles to the surface of the earth following the detonation of nuclear weapons. It is dispersed throughout the environment either by dry deposition or washed down to the earth's surface by rain or snow. There are approximately 200 radionuclides produced in the nuclear weapon detonation process; a number l of these are detected in fallout. The radionuclides found in fallout which produce most of the fallout radiation exposures to humans are iodine-131 (I-131), strontium-89 (Sr-89), cesium-137 ( Cs -137 ) , and strontium-90 (Sr-90). There has been no atmospheric nuclear weapon testing since 1980 and many of the radionuclides have decayed significantly. Consequently, doses to the public from fallout have been decreasing.

As a result of the nuclear accident at Chernobyl, USSR, on April 26, t

1986, fallout waa dispersed throughout the environment and detected in various media such as air, milk, and soil.

7

. _ , _ _ ,_ , . . _ _ - _ _ - _. _ ~

i Description of the Oyster Creek Site l

General Information The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS) has generated electricity since December, 1969. The operating license permits station operation up to a power level of 1930 megawatts (thermal) at a levelized, installed annual capacity of 620 megawatts (electrical).

The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station is located in Ocean County, New Jersey, 2 miles inland f rom Barnegat Bay (Figure 1 - page 9). The 1416-acre site is owned by Jersey Central power & Light Company.. It is situated partly in Lacey "ownship and, to a lesser extent, in Ocean Township. The site is about 60 miles South of Newark, 9 miles south of Toms River and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. The Garden State Parkway bounds the site on the west. Overland access to the site is provided by U. S. Route 9, passing through the site and separating a 661-acre eastern portion from the balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about 1/4 mile west of the highway and 1-1/4 miles east of the Parkway. The site property extends about 3-1/2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile.

Figure 1, page 9, relates the site to the more pertinent features of the county, as well as indicating the locations of some of Oyster Creek REMP ststions in Ocean County.

The site location is part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands. The south branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site, and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side. The region adjacent to the bay is one of the state's most rapidly developing areas. In addition to the resident population, a sizeable seasonal influx of people occurs during the summer. This influx resides almost

. exclusively along the waterfront.

Climatological Summary For the first half of 1987 the predominant winds were divided into two pe ri od s. From Janua ry through March, the predominant Wind directions 4

8 ,

l FIGURE 1 OYOTER CREEK REMP STATIONS (OCEAN COUNTY),

/*f \ '

/ (,

uo uouti.

)./ \.

.s 3

a j e

( }

CD gi4

./ ..,4

/

./ w'  ;- .sy s ,T./ }

.t' . . . , , .

f ,.! .

'y

'C \

/. oeao ~ ,

E

,=" #

% j, g, ~ ..'" " : 'sc . ' - )" L. ' , '

- p;..\' f as '

g., . e' **.. <J

\ . .a:,f,-v '.,.,

. f '

\ T

?.

/ d , ,i m

\

f ,.c. .

' " ~ ,,'

\, _,"*"':

, s. .

,a **r,sl.l 1 *c

\, =

~**

\,A 2.-#I

/ 92 m ,. . ---

_. f % . . . , - -

Il3

8. . .

/ .

. - . . ~

..a-1

,. n

/4./ ,,. :

eva v=or ~

\ u~g ' cat-

',a

%, 4..g ); y s ,;,.--- ' % ., .

'om '

9 , _

ll l 3 y ,

ossite casta *veaan wt ,,,;,,., j  ;

\, '

/ ",,,

[ .

89 [

s

' y(. . . ! F. .

l"Yf,

' - }' ' . . . 1

. g, 4

...d u,.,. . . ,u.,.,

\

1 9 TI.D STATIONS !

% /

81 A REMP STATIONS * /

4-Q4'%. , .

- aua.

l ***

. U l \;.' .

6  %

l ,

'g?ugs,[ '

[ 9

/ ! '

, /

u ..~

/

./ .s, A

Ag ~

sassissirsasas 0 '00 0 20 "

/ 8 t ti a rtAmtsc ' .*

t .1 -

-9_

were from the northwest and west-northwest. The normal northwest wind direction is expected as the winter months are dominated by Canadian air masses. From April through June, the wind directions were evenly divided between the northeast / east-northeast and southeast / south-southwest sectors. This defines the second half of the period as the transition months between the winter and summer seasons. Summer months usually have the predominant wind direction from the southwest and south. During the July through September period, the predominant wind direction was from the west, southwest, and south. Winds from the west are characteristic of a modified continental polar air mass that follows cold frontal passages. Winds from the southwest are usually associated with maritime tropical air normally present prior to cold frontal passages. The most frequent wind direction was from the south and is the end result of the sea-breeze phenomenon. At the height of this mesoscale effect (approximately 2:00 to 4:00 in the af ternoon) the wind will parallel the coast - the result created from uneven heating between land and sea coupled with the natural rotation of the earth. The period f rom October throu?h December is usually described as a transition period between the previously described summer patterns and those found in winter (winds from the west-northwest and north). However, the entire second quarter was slightly cooler than usual and represents those conditions found during the winter months. The predominant wind direction during the latter three months was f rom the northwest.

Other characteristics for the second half of 1987 include a small maxima of wind direction from the northeast, especially from October through December. This is due to the airflow around large high pressure systems. Periods with this onshore fetch have characteristic low clouds, drizzle and fog (stable atmospheres).

A total of 51.19 (water equivalent) inches of precipitation fell during l 1987, which amounts to approximately 8 inches above the annual average.

Near normal precipitation levels were recorded during the first three I months of the reporting period (Figure 2, page 11). The reference data were obtained from the closest and most accurate National Weather Service

- station located in Atlantic City, NJ. Recent comparison studies have )

l l

i 10 l

l ~

Monthly Precipitation Oyster Creek 1987 y_

S!

LOCATION $x a Oysler Creek oN Ex m

a) NG

_C 8- e Atlantic City o 5 .o

o i C pyy m~~

L .C %38 7 ads 8 6 -- udm l s "e

g

.S UU

.4 E g j 8 4- 45

^

f

) o- , , , , , , , , , , ,

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC l Month d

r

. ~ - .- - . . - - - - . . - . - - - __ -. ..

l l

shown close similarities of hourly meteorological data between the Oyster Creek and Atlantic City sites. For the period of April through June, l April and May were the wettest' months (10.95 and 10.04 inches, j respectively).

Precipitation during this latter half of the second quarter was primarily  ;

due to thundershower activity. Other rainfall activity did not reach the site due to the stabilizing eff ect of the sea-breeze, common in the month of June and throughout the aummer. Due to this highly stable viather phenomenon, showers build up to the west, move east-northeastward, then become stagnant and eventually decay up to 15 miles inland.

t For the period of July through December, precipitation was below normal (15.12 inches) . The six-month average total from the Atlantic City e

1 National Weather Service historical record is 22.0 inches. During summer i months precipitation is generally characterized by events of short duration but strong intensity (convective showers). With this type of precipitation event, there-will be increased particulate fallout j (washout) from the atmosphere, which has implications for radionuclide {

i deposition. Curing the summer, marine air, which is stable, will generally suppress these convective-type storms and decrease l j precipitation at most coastal locations. The sea-breeze can produce the

! same result. This effect can occur along the coast up to 12 miles inland.

Rainf all events during the six-month period were, for the most part, due to extratropical storms of licht to moderate intensity and long duration, especially during the second quarter.

For a more complete meteorological summary refer to the Semiannual l

Effluent Release Reports for 1987. l 1 i i

)

i l I

l i

a l

i 1 1

1 12 m

I EFFLUENTS Limits I

I Radioactive effluent releases at OCNGS are under the jurisdiction of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). Since its inception, the USNRC (previously known as the Atomic Energy Commission -

AEC) has depended upon the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) established in 1928, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) established in 1929, and since 1959, the Federal Radiation Council (FRC)

(incorporated in the U..ited States Environmental Protection Agency in j 1970) for basic radiation protection standards and guidance. These i guides and recommendations form the basis for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's regulation in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations  ;

Part 20, (10 CFR 20), ' Standards for Protection Against Radiation" used in the regulatory program for the commercial nuclear power industry. One recommendation of the ICRP, NCRP, and FRC is that radiation exposures should be maintained at levels which are as low as reasonably achievable

( ALARA) commensurate with the societal benefit derived from the activities resulting in such exposures. This philosophy was incorporated into the numerical guidelines of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 and was adopted by GPU Nuclear.

Technical Specifications imposed by the NRC as a condition of the operating license, govern the operating requirements of the plant including the effluent control program. These requirements include operation of gaseous and liquid processing systems, installation and operation of radiation monitoring systems, establishment of an inplant and environmental sampling and analysis program, establishment of a quality assurance program for effluents, procedures covering all aspects of effluents, and calculation of doses to the public.

Table 2 (page 14), outlines the OCNGS effluent technical specifications.

13

TABLE 2 OCNGS EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMITS

1. Tech. Spec. Limits
a. Fission and Activation Gases:

Technical Specification 3.6.E.1 The gross radioactivity in noble gases discharged f rom the main condenser air ejector shall not exceed a 0.21/E Ci/sec af ter the holdup line where E is the average gamma energy (Mev per atomic transformation).

Technical Specification 3.6.K.1 The dose equivalent rate outside of the EXCLUSION AREA due to radioactive noble gas in gaseous effluont shall not exceed 500 mrem / year to the total body or 3000 mrem / year to the skin.

Technical Specification 3.6.L.1 l The air dose outside of the EXCLUSION AREA due to noble gas released in gaseous effluent shall not exceed:

5 mrad / calendar quarter due to gamma s ndiation, 10 mead / calendar quarter due to beta radiation, 10 mead / calendar year due to gamma radiation, or 20 mead / calendar year due to beta radiation.

Technical Specification 3.6.N.1 The annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to radiation and radioactive material in effluents f rom the OCNGS outside of the EXCLUSION AREA shall not exceed 75 mrem to his thyroid or 25 mrem to his total body or to any other organ.

l 14

i l

l

b. Iodines and Particulates l'

Technical Specification 3.6.K.2 l

l l The dose equivalent rate outside of the EXCLUSION AREA due to .

H-3, I-131, I-133, and to radioactive material in putticulate having half-lives of 8 days or more in gaseous effluents shall not exceed 1500 mrem / year to any body organ when the dose rate due to H-3, St-89, St-90, and alpha-emitting radionuclides is .

averaged over no more than 3 months and the dose rate due to other radionuclides is averaged over.no more than 31 days.

4 Technical Specification 3.6.M.1 The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC f rom iodine-131, iodine-133, and from radionuclides in particulate form having half-lives of 8 days or more in gaseous effluents, outside of the EXCLUSION AREA shall not exceed 7.5 mrem to any body organ per calendar quarter or 15 mrem to any body organ per calendar year.

c. Liquid Ef fluents:

Technical Specification 3.6.I.1 i The concentration of radioactive material, other than noble gases, in liquid ef fluent in the discharge canal at the Route 9 bridge shall not exceed the concentrations specified in 10CFR 1

i Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.

1 1

Technical Specification 3.6.I.2 i'

The concentration of noble gases dissolved or entrained in liquid effluent in the discharge canal at the Route 9 bridge l

~

shall not exceed 2 x 10 microcuries/ milliliter.

I J

i ,

i i

15

i

~

1 -Technical Specification 3.6.J.1 ,

The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to radioactive material in liquid effluents beyond the outside of the EXCLUSION AREA 4 shall not exceed:

1.5 mrem to the total body during any. calendar quarter,

) 5 mrem to any body organ during any calendar quarter, i i

f' 3 mrem to the total body during any calendar year, or  !

' 10 mrem to any body organ during any calendar year..

I i

.fi

  • 1 C 5

I 4

i f

4 l

l l

! l

.1 l l 1

i e

! l i

! 16

l k l l l

Sources of Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Effluents \

l

! At the Oyster Creek Nuclear' Generating Station, most of the fission i f

products are retained within the fuel and fuel cladding. However small amounts of radioactive fission. products are able to diffuse or migrate

!, through the fuel cladding and into.the reactor coolant. Trace quantities

of the component and structure surfaces which have been activated, also get into the reactor coolant water. Many of the soluble fission and activation product levels such as radioactive iodines, strontiums,  ;

cobalts, and cesiums are greatly reduced by demineralizers in the j

purification system of the coolant. The noble gas fission products have ,.

a very low solubility in the coolant and cannot be removed by the demineralizers. Instead they are given off as gas when the coolant is i depressurized and are collected by a system designed for gas collection, 4 '

holdup and emission. This represents the principal source of gaseous effluents.

J l Minute drainage of radioactive liquids f rom valves,_ piping, and/or ,

equipment associated with the coolant system may occur in the Reactor, I and/or Turbine Buildings. The noble gases become part of the gaseous wastes while the remaining radioactive liquids are collected in floor and  ;

equipment drains and sumps and are pumped to and processed in the O Radwaste Building. Water processed in the radwaste facility that does not meet strict chemical specifications for primary system reuse becomes I the source of liquid effluents.

l Radioactivity Removal f rom Liquid and Gaseous Wastes 4

l At the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, radioactive liquid and I gaseous wastes are collected, stored, and processed through processing

} systems to remove ot reduce most of the radioactivity (exclusive of 4

tritium) prior to reuse within the plant or discharge to the l en vi ro r.me nt . These processing systems are required by the Technical

)

Specifications to be installed and operable and help to ensure all j releases of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents are as low as

! ceasonably achievable.

I i

4 17 l

A

The liquid waste processing system receives water contaminated with radioactivity and processes it by filtration, demineralization, and distillation. Purified radwaste water is recycled to the plant.

Occasionally, it is necessary to discharge this purified water to the environment. Contaminants removed during the purification process are disposed of via the solids disposal systems. When purified water is discharged to the environment, it is first sampled, analyzed, assigned a release rate, and then discharged to a receiving stream which has a flow rate of 460,000 to 960,000 gallons per minute.

Reactor of f-gas, consisting primarily of hydrogen and radioactive non-condensable gases, is withdrawn from the reactor primary system by steam jet air ejectors. These air ejectors drive the process stream through a 60 minute holdup pipe at approximately 110 cubic feet per minute and then into the Augmented Of f-Gas ( AOG) System. The holdup pipe allows radionuclides with short half-lives to decay. The Augmented Of f-Gas System is a gaseous processing system which provides hydrogen conversion to water via a catalytic recombiner, removes the water (vapor) f rom the process stream, holds up the process stream to allow further decay of short-lived nuclides, and filters the off-gas using charcoal beds and High Efficiency Particulate (HEPA) filters prior to discharge to the stack.

Once the process stream enters the stack, it is diluted by building ventilation, which averages 200,000 cubic feet per minute, is monitored and sampled, and then J.s discharged out the top of the 368-foot stack.

The Augmented Of f-Gas System is a series of complex smaller systems whico, when operating at optimum, reduce radioactive off-gas emission to near background. A single component failure within the AOG can cause system isolation which results in reactor off-gas being discharged from the end of the holdup pipe to the stack. When AOG isolation occurs, the activity released out of the stack increases. The Augmented Of f-Gas System is typically valved in and out of the reactor gaseous process stream during startups and shutdowns at approximately 40% power.

l l

18

Ventilation f rom two buildings ( AOG and turbine) does not discharge to the elevated stack and exhausts to the environment via roof vents. These systems are designed to maintain suitable ambient conditions for personnel and equipment. Each vent is monitored for noble gas, iodine, and particulate activity using in-line monitors and grab samples.

Ef fluent Data Radioactive liquids and gaseous releases from OCNGS did not exceed Federal regulatory and Technical Specification limits during 1987.

Radiological releases f rom OCNGS are calculated f rom installed plant ef fluent monitor readings and sample analyses for gaseous and liquid discharge points. These methods provide a means for accurate determination of the type and quantities of radioactive matarials being released to the environment.

Ten radioactive liquid releases totalling 199,207 gallons were made from the OCNGS in 1987. The total radioactivity released to the environment was 0.00663 curies of fission and activation products, 1.96 curies of Tritium and 0.00284 curies of dissolved and entrained gases. Gaseous releases during 1987 resulted in 3,391 curies of fission and activation gases, 0.085 curies of Iodine-131, 0.020 curies of particulate nuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, and 7.86 curies of Tritium being discharged to the environment. For each category, these releases were well within the regulatory limits specified in sections 3.6 and 4.6 of the OCNGS Technical Specifications.

Table 3 (page 20), presents a brief operations summary for 1987. 1 l

1 1

I l

l l

)

l l

19

TABLE 3 1987 OCNGS PLANT OPERATIONS

SUMMARY

January 1, 1987 Aeactor Shutdown January 6, 1987 Reactor Start-up January 7, 1987 Generator On Line January 15, 1987 Generator on line at 63% Rated Power Janua ry 16, 1987 Reactor Scram January 19, 1987 Reuctor Start-up January 20, 1987 Reactor Shutdown Reactor Start-up January 21, 1987 Generator On Line January 31, 1987 Gene rator on line at 96% Rated Power February 14, 1987 Reactor Scram February 18, 1987 Reactor Start-up Jebruary 19, 1987 Reactor Shutdown Februa ry 28, 1987 Reactor Shutdown March 9, 1987 Reactor Start-up March 10, 1987 Generator On Line March 15, 1987 Generator on line at 100% Rated Power March 31, 1987 Gene rator on line at 100% Rated Power April 15, 1987 Generator on line at 93% Rated Power April 24, 1987 Reactor Shutdown April 30, 1987 Reactor Shutdown May 14, 1987 Reactor Start-up May 16, 1987 Genera'or On Line May 31, 1987 Generator on line at 100% Rated Power June 15, 1987 Generator on line at 100% Rated Power June 30, 1987 Generator on line at 99% Rated Power July 15, 1987 Generator on line at 85% Rated Power July 30, 1987 Reactor Scram August 4, 1987 Reactor Startup ,

August 5, 1997 Generator on line i August 15, 1987 Generator on line at 95% Rated Power August 31, 1987 Generator on line at 95% Rated Power l September 9, 1987 Reactor Shutdown l September 15, '987 Reactor Shutdown September 30, 1987 Reactor Shutdown October 15, 1987 Reactor Shutdown j October 31, 1987 Reactor Shutdown November 15, 1987 Reactor Shutdown November 20, 1987 Reactor Startup November 24, 1987 Gene rator on line I November 30, 1987 Generator on line at 100% Rated Powe r l December 15, 1987 Generator on line at 100% Rated Power )

December 31, 1987 Generator on line at 99% Rated Power f

20

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Program Design The radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) was established at Oyster Creek to monitor radiation and radioactive materials in the environment and to evaluate the relationship between amounts of radioactive material released in effluents and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. The Oyster Creek Technical Specifications require this program to be implemented. The Oyster Creek REMP meets all these requirements and in most cases far exceeds them.

The Oyster Creek REMP was designed on the basis of USNRC regulatory guides along with the USNRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring. The important objectives of the REMP aret

, assessing dose impacts to the public from OCNGS operations

, verifying in-plant controls for the containment of radioactive materials

, monitoring to determine buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environment and changes in background radiation levels

, providing reassurance to the public that the program is capable of adequately assessing impacts and identifying noteworthy changes in the radiological status of the environment.

Published inf ormation concerning amounts of principal radionuclides released to the environment in liquid and gaseous effluents and data on distribution of radionuclides in environmental media can be used to l

determine the population critical exposure pathways that should be monitored and to identify media in which there is potential for long-term buildup of radioactivity.

21 J

The program consists of collecting samples from the environment, analyzing them for radiation and radioactivity content, and interpreting the results. With emphasis on the critical pathways to man, sampling consists of five general types of monitoring: atmospheric-radiation, fallout, domestic water, surf ace water, and marine life. These samples include, but are not limited to, air, soil, surface water, fin fish, shellfish, marine sediment, vegetables, groundwater, and precipitation.

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are placed in the environment to measure ambient gamma radiation levels. The Oyster Creek Technical Specifications Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and recommendations from the scientific staff at Oyster Creek Environmental controls Department specify the sample types to be collected and appropriate analyses.

Sampling locations have been established by considering meteorology, population distribution, hy.drology, and land use characteristics of the local area. The sampling locations are divided into two classes, indicator and background. Indicator locations are those which are expected to show that plant effects, if any, exist. These locations were primarily selected on the basis of where the highest predicted environmental concentrations would occur. While the indicator locations are typically within a few miles of the plant, the background stations are generally at least 10 miles from the plant and some as far away as 35 miles. Therefore, background samples are collected at locations which should be unaffected by plant operations. They provide a basis on which to evaluate fluctuations at indicator locations relative to natural background radiation and radioactivity and fallout from prior nuclear weapon tests. Figures 1 (page 9) and 3 (page 23) show the sampling locations of the Oyster Creek REMP, while a description of each location is outlined in Table 4, page 25.

In addition to specifying the minimum media to be collected and the minimum number of sampling locations, the Technical Specifications also specify the frequency of sample collection, the types of analyses to be l performed, the analytical sensitivity (detection limit), and r eporting levels. Tables 5, page 33, and 6, page 35, provide a summary of the l

l 22 I

FIGURE 3 OYSTER CREEK REMP STATIONS 2-MILE RADIUS

/  ? 7 0 it ,_ agy%'7Zs- =4 v

e

,-f J ,

  • 4 * ,

g'*** e ,,g c

e 44 'a2k3,, a

~-

! ts q

( chg..b,, 3p'}#>t ,,

r 3

,9 #

- e.; *>

_ , 3 . f &,s w

  • i'% z'o ',

8 w

! sg to .,

12 23

, t -.. a. ~

g

~

q y,

{* Q 11

  • ;'wg' *sbh-c .

~

y . g ss k - - l [. % , _~, 4 U g' 4 Y.. -

\ % eo .v,,

t, #S y,

,. ~ 3 ._' *

,7 -

,p @

~_

,_y2 m ig,E'6*.'  ? *f.$ l K gw. *a - t,# ,, i ,

4 g  : ,;g *p;ny u en _

~

u yn ,

e 56 A 31 ~

- ,, .

  • Y'M

4 21 33 24 /

l 1 t1 kJ.' .'

N T tt* j, l

-_,,W' I' jfY .

t

\ 're g A' ' -

Off

. >n  : -: U' l ',1

,# V A gY i

s i

tu*

.t l

-* 4((,@.

6 ,

> ..+, - -

V -

$* ~
} P

! O TLD STATIONS ,

g . A REMP STATIONS r

% e.A,j - ' 5t

sample type, analyses performed, collection frequency, number of sampling locations, and type of analysis. Table A-1 in Appendix A, page 151, presents problems encountered in the sample collection process. Sample analyses which did not meet the required analytical sensitivity are presented in Appendix B, page 155. Reporting level violations are rep'rted o in Appendix C, page 157.

The analytical results are routinely reviewed by environmental scientists at Oyster Creek to assure that sensitivities have been achiaved and that the proper analyses have been performed. Investigationa are conducted when activities fall outside ranges previously deter-!nad based upon historical data or when anomalous values are disco - These ranges are purposely set narrow so that corrective action m '.e initiated before a reporting level is reached.

Procedures were written and approved by Environmental Controls, Quality Assurance, and the Contractor laboratories to cover all aspects of the radiological environmental monitoring program. These procedures cover such areas as sample collection, sampling equipment calibration and maintenance, laboratory analysis, and data review.

{

Because of low radionuclide concentrations in environmental media, j special analysis techniques have been developed. Analytical laboratories l contracted by GPU Nuclear use state-of-the-art laboratory equipment designed to measure the types of radiation emitted (beta and gamma) and meet the required analytical sensitivities. Examples of laboratory j equipment used are germanium detectors with multichannel analyzers for  !

specific gamma emitting radionuclides, liquid scintillation detectors for tritium, and low level beta counters. Computer hardware and software l used in conjunction with the counting equipment perform calculations, data analysis and provide data management.

l The base REMP program analytical laboratory responsibilities were transferred on October 15, 1987 from Teledyne Isotopes, Inc., Westwood, 7

New Jersey to the GPU Nuclear Corporation Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The QC REMP program analytical laboratory responsibilities were unaffected and remained with Teledyne Midwest Laboratories, Inc., tb rthbrook, Illinois. l 24 i

A TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • S t a t io_n_ (miles) (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description 1- 0.3 226.5 SW Air Iodine N Oyster Creek fire pond Air Particulate N Precipitation N TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-qua rte rly Y 0.1 180.0 S Well Water N Oyster Creek pretreatment building lab 3 6.1 94.0 E Air Iodine N Island Beach State Air Particulate N Park; near Coast Guard -

Precipitation N station TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-quarterly Y 4 4.7 21 5.0 SSW Air Iodine N Rt. 554 and Garden Air Particulate N State Parkway, I Precipitation N Barnegat  !

TLD-monthly N )

TLD-Panasraic Y TLD-quarterly Y 5 5.2 355.0 N Air Iodine N Garden State Parkway Air Particulate N service area; Forked Precipitation N River TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-qua rte rly Y 6 2.2 14.0 NNE TLD-monthly N Forked River, Lane TLD-Panasonic Y Place, behind St.

TLD-qua rte rly Y Pius Chu rch 7 1.8 110.5 ESE TLD-monthly N Bay Parkway, Sands TLD-Panasonic N Point Ha rbo r, TLD-quarterly N Watetown (QC Station) l 8 2.3 180.0 S TLD-monthly N Waretown ; Rt. 9 at l- TLD-Panasonic N Waretown substation TLD-qua rte rly N

  • Required by Technical Specifications l

N = No Y = Yes 25

TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS -

. Distance Azimuth Sample Tech *.

Station (miles) (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description 9 2.0 230.0 SW TLD-monthly N Waretown, Rt. 532 and TLD-Panasonic N Garden State Parkway TLD-quarterly N A 31.1 25.0 NNE Air Iodine N Allenhurst; JCP&L Air Particulate N office in parking lot Precipitation N -next to substation TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-quarterly Y C 35.1 309.0 NW Air Iodine Y Cookstown; JCP& L Air Particulate Y office in rear Precipitation N parking lot TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-quarterly Y H 35.0 248.0 WSW Air Iodine N Hammonton; Atlantic Air Part i1ulate N Electric office Precipitation N TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic N TLD-qua rte rly N 10 10.2 21.0 NNE TLD-monthly N Toms River; Rt. 37 E.

TLD-Panasonic N near Eastern Off-Rd TLD-qua rte rly N Supply 11 8.3 155.5 SSE TLD-monthly N Harvey Cedars; 80th &

TLD-Panasonic N Anchor Sts @ water TLD-qua rte rly N tower 12 9.4 192.0 SSW TLD-monthly N Cedar Run; Atlantic TLD-Panasonic N Electric substation TLD-qua rte rly N access road l 13 8.3 344.5 N TLD-monthly N South Toms River; Dover TLD-Panasonic N Road, next to last TLD-quarterly N pole traveling west l

l 14 18.0 1.0 N Air Iodine N Lakewood; Larrabee Air Particulate N substation on Precipitation N Randolph Rd TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic N TLD-qua rte rly N

  • Required by Technical Specifications l N = No Y = Ye s I

i 26

[

TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • Station (miles) (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description 15 19.0 309.0 NW TLD-monthly N New Egypt; Rt. 539, TLD-Panasonic N last pole on' south TLD-quarterly N side across from BOMARC site 16 18.0 271.0 W TLD-monthly N Intersection of Rts.

TLD-Panasonic N 563 and 72, 2 poles TLD-qua rte rly N south 17 19.0 214.0 SW TLD-monthly N New Gretna; Rt. 563, TLD-Panasonic N 2 miles north at high TLD-quarterly N voltage line 18 1.7 42.0 NE Well Water Y Townsend's Marina, Eacey Rd., Forked River 19 1.6 73.0 ENE Well Water N 1015 Inland Rd.,

Forked River Beach 20 1.0 80.0 E Well Water N Finninger Farm at Environmental lab 0.7 93.0 E Air Iodine N Finninger Farm on Air Particulate N south side of access Precipitation N coad; pole BT17 TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic N TLD-qua rte rly N 21 1.0 115.0 ESE Well Water Y 215 Dock Avenue, Waretown 22 1.6 146.0 SE TLD-monthly N 27 Lon; John Silver TLD-Panasonic N Way, Skipper's Cove; TLD-qua t te rly N pole BT152 ON Well Water Y 23 4.0 63.0 ENE Aquatic Sediment N Barnegat Bay off Clams N Stouts Creek 400 yds Surface Water N SE of FL 1 24 2.0 104.0 E Aquatic Sediment F Barnegat Bay 250 yds Clams Y SE of FL*3' Surface Water Y

  • Required by Technical Specifications ]

N = No Y = Yes 27

7 TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • Station' (miles) (degrees) 'setor Type' Spec Location Description

> 25 1.8 127.0 SE Aquatic Sediment N Barnegat Bay off Clams N Holiday Harbor, 200 Surface Water N yds SE of lagoon mouth 31 10.5 183.0 S Aquatic Sediment N Manahawkin Bay 25' yds Clams N SE of C '23' and N Surface Water N '24" 32 1.9 98.0 E Aquatic Sediment N mouth of Oyster Creek Surface Water N discharge canal 33 1.1 104.0 ES E Aquatic Sediment Y 1200 yards east of Blue Crab N Rt. 9 bridge; Fish Y Discharge Canal Surface Water N 35 0.4 110 ESE Vegetation Y East of Rt. 9 and North Soil N of Discharge Canal 36 24 315 NW Vegetation Y DeWolf s U-Pick Farm, Soil N New Egypt, NJ 51 0.4 358.0 N TLD-monthly N access road to Forked TLD-Panasonic Y River site, north TLD-quarterly Y sector )

52 0.4 340.0 NNW TLD-monthly N access road to Forked '

TLD-Panasonic Y River site, NNW sector TLD-qua rte rly Y 53 0.3 310.0 NN TLD-monthly N Energy Spectrum TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-quarterly Y 54 0.3 294.0 WNW TLD-monthly N access road to Forked TLD-Panasonic Y River site, WNW sector-TLD-qua rte rly Y 55 1.5 273.0 W TLD-monthly N pole next to basin il j TLD-Panasonic Y on Forked River site TLD-qua rte rly Y 56 1.1 258.0 WSW TLD-monthly N siren pole in building

, TLD-Panasonic Y 12 parking lot, Forked l TLD-qua rte rly Y River 1 57 0.2 203.0 SSW TLD-monthly N Oyster Creeks south TLD-Panasonic Y access road; pole l TLD-qua rte rl y Y BT375 L j

  • Required by Technical Specifications I N = tb Y = Ye s 28 1

.m---. . . ~ ,

1 I

l 1

i TABLE 4 j RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • Station (miles) (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description j 58 0.4 180.0 S TLD-monthly N Oyster Creek; south TLD-Panasonic Y access road; pole TLD-qua rte rly Y' JC-7-L 59 0.3 163.0 SSE TLD-monthly N Oyster Creek s south TLD-Panasonic Y access road on gray TLD-qua rte rly Y post 60 0.4 136.0 SE TLD-monthly N Oyster Creeks south i TLD-Panasonic Y access road entrance- {

TLD-qua rte rly Y 61 0.3 116.0 ESE TLD-monthly N Rt. 9 south of plant ,

TLD-Panasonic Y main gate entrance; TLD-qua rte rly Y pole BT1458 l

62 0.2 98.5 E TLD-monthly N Rt. 9, access road l TLD-Panasonic Y to main gate - pole TLD-qua rte rly Y BT-61 63 0.2 70.0 ENE TLD-monthly N Rt. O at north gate TLD-Panasonic Y entrance to plant; TLD-qua rte rly Y pole BT 14D63 ,

I 64 0.3 48.0 NE TLD-monthly N Rt. 9 north of main j TLD-Panasonic Y gate entrance on pole TLD-quarterly Y JC407X 65 0.4 22.0 NNE TLD-monthly N Rt. 9, NNE sector on TLD-Panasonic Y pole JC406L at intake TLD-qua r te rly Y canal bridge 66 0.5 127.0 SE Air Iodine Y East of Rt. 9 and Air Particulate Y couth of Discharge Precipitation N Canal inside fence TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y

, TLD-qua rte rly Y Vegetation Y

, Soil N 67 1.0 161.0 SSE TLD-monthly N Rt. 9 on west side TLD-Panasonic N at Waretown Plaza TLD-qua rte rly N V

69 1.3 70.0 ENE TLD-monthly N Chesapeake Dr. and TLD-Panasonic N Buena Vista Rd., FR; TLD-qua rte rly N pole JC1347L

  • Required by Technical Specifications N = N3 Y = Ye s 29

TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • Station (miles)- (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description

! 70 1.6 183.0 S TLD-monthly N Rt. 532 3/4' mile west l TLD-Panasonic N of Rt. 9 in f ront of TLD-quarterly N Martin residence l

l 71 1.7 165.0 SSE Air Iodine Y Rt. 9 and 532 at Air Particulate Y- Waretown Municipal Precipitation N b1dg TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic Y TLD-quarterly Y 72 1.9 27.0 NNE Air Iodine Y Forked River, Air Particulate Y Lacey Township Precipitation N Community Hall 73 1.8 110.5 ESE Air Iodine Y Bay Parkway, Sands Air Particulate Y Point Harbor, Precipitation N Waretown TLD-monthly N TLD-Panasonic N TLD-quarterly N 74 2.0 90.0 E TLD-monthly N Orlando Dr. & Penguin TLD-Panasonic N Ct., Forked Rivert TLD-qua rte rly N pole JC6472L 75 2.0 69.0 ENE TLD-monthly N 1225 Beach Blvd. and TLD-Panasonic N Maui Drive, Forke,d TLD-qua rte rly N River 76 1.7 50.5 NE TLD-monthly N Lacey Rd across f rom TLD-Panasonic N Captain's Inn TLD-qua rt e rly N Restaurant 77 1.5 26.0 NNE TLD-monthly N Forked River, State TLD-Panasonic N Marina parking lot TLD-quarterly N 78 1.8 2.0 N TLD-monthly N Forked River, corner 0 TLD-Panasonic Y of Ariant and TLD-qua rte rly Y Whitcomb Roads 79 2.9 161.0 ESE TLD-monthly N Barnegat Bay and TLD-Panasonic Y Bonita Drive; TLD-qua rte rly Y pole JCl33 ON

  • Required by Technical Specifications N = No Y = Yes 30

TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITO9ING PROGRAM S AMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • Station (miles) (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description 80 3.1 38.0 NE TLD-monthly. N Lanoka Harbor; Riviera TLD-Panasonic Y Dr. and Dewey Dr.;

TLD-quarterly Y pole BT787 81 4.6 192.0 S TLD-monthly N Barnegat; east of Rt 9 TLD-Panasonic Y at Brook & School TLD-qua rte rly Y Sts.; pole JC257BGT 82 4.4 38.0 NE TLD-monthly N Lanoka Harbor; Bay TLD-Panasonic Y Way & Clairmore Ave; TLD-qua rte rly Y pole JCl273L 83 5.8 28.5 NNE TLD-monthly N Berkeley; Rt. 9 and TLD-Panasonic Y Harbor Inn Road; TLD-qua rte rly Y pole BT666B 84 4.8 339.0 NNW TLD-monthly N Lacey Road, 1.3 mi .

TLD-Panasonic Y west of GSP on siren TLD-qua rte rly Y pole ; Lacey Twp.

85 3.8 253.5 WSW TLD-monthly N Rt. 532 west, just TLD-Panasonic Y before landfill; pole TLD-qua rte rly Y BT 354; Ocean Twp.

86 4.8 226.0 SW TLD-monthly N Rt. 554, 1 mile west TLD-Panasonic Y of Garden State l

TLD-qua rte rly Y Parkway; Barnegat l

87 7.2 143.0 SE TLD-monthly N Loveladies; north of TLD-Panasonic N Seaview Drive on i TLD-qua rte rly N siten pole 88 6.6 126.5 ESE TLD-monthly N Barnegat Light; TLD-Panasonic N Eastern End of TLD-qua rte rly N 3rd Street 89 6.2 110.0 ES E TLD-monthly N Island Beach State TLD-Panasonic N Park; Job Francis TLD-qua rte rly N residence 90 6.6 74.0 ENE TLD-monthly N Island Beach State TLD-Panasonic N Park; parking lot A-5; TLD-qua rte rly N pole JC181

  • Required by Technical Specifications N = No Y = Yes 31

TABLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM S AMPLING LOCATIONS Distance Azimuth Sample Tech

  • Station (miles) (degrees) Sector Type Spec Location Description 91 9.5 4.0 N TLD-monthly N Toms River s . Horner TLD-Panasonic N St. , near Lobste r TLD-qua rte rly N Shanty restaurant 92 9.2 48.0 NE TLD-monthly N Island Beach State TLD-Panasonic N Park; guard shack at TLD-qua rte rly N toll booth 93 0.1 205.0 SSW Aquatic Sediment N OC discharge canal; Blue Crab N between point of Fish N discharge and Route 9 Surface Water N 94 21.8 201.0 S Blue Crab Y Great Bay, adjacent to docks of Cape Horn marina 21.8 201.0 S Aquatic Sediment Y Great Bay, mouth of Clams Y Jimmies Creek west of Fish Y channel marker 1 Surface Water Y discharge and Route 9 ,

l 95 2.5 243.0 WSW TLD-monthly N Waretown at Ocean TLD-Panasonic N County VoTech School l TLD-qua rte rly N on siren pole 96 1.1 15.0 NNE TLD-monthly N Route 9 north of plant TLD-Panasonic N across from Oyster Bay TLD-quarterly N Restaurant at pumping station 97 1.3 43.0 NE TLD-monthly N Forked River at Twin TLD-Panasonic N Rivers pumping station TLD-qua rte rly N Tl 0.2 228.0 S.' TLD-monthly N Oyster Creek fire TLD-Panasonic N pond; on east side of TLD-qua rt e rly N building i

  • Required by Technical Specifications l

N = No Y = Yes l

32

TABLE 5 OYSTER CREEK ANALYSIS SPECIFICATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM S AMP LING NO. OF l MEDIA ANALYSIS FREQUENCY SAMPLING STATIONS Air Particulate Gross Beta weekly 13 Gamma weekly

  • 13 Air Iodine I-131 weekly 13 Precipitation H-3 MC 13 Gamma MC 13 Surface Water Gamma monthly 8 H-3 monthly TLD Immersion Dose monthly 65 quarterly 65 Well Water Gamma monthly 6 3-3 monthly Clams Gamma monthly' 5 Fish Gamma monthly 3 Blue Crab Gamma monthly 3 Soil Gamma quarterly 3 (only when vegetables collected) j i

Sediment Gamma monthly 8 Vegetables Gamma monthly 3 (when available)

MC = monthly composite j

  • Monthly composite af ter October 15, 1987.

L 33

Quality Assurance Program The quality assurance program associated with the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) at the OCNGS is governed and l documented by written policies, procedures and records in accordance with Regulatory Guide 4.15, "Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring

. Programs". All procedures associated with sampling, packaging, shipment and storage of samples were developed to ensure sample integrity from the time of collection to the time of analysis. Each laboratory which provides analytical services maintains a quality assurance program in accordance with the requirements of Reg. Guide 4.15. Each laboratoty submits a quality assurance program document with revisions as necessary to the OCNGS Environmental Controls Department for review to ensure that program requirements are satisfied.

The Quality Assurance Program is composed of the following:

REMP QA SAMPLING PROGRAM The number and f requency of REMP quality control samples collected in 1987 are listed on Table 6, page 35. Each of these samples, with the exception of the TLD's, are divided into three equal subsamples with two samples forwarded to the primary contractor laboratory for analysis having one designated as a blind sample. The other subsample is forwarded to the independent QA contractor laboratory for analysis. ,

i Analytical results f rom each laboratory are evaluated to determine acceptable agreement. If evaluation results in the determination that the results are in non-agreement, then reanalyzing or recounting the samples may result. This system of dividing each sample into three l 1

subsamples provides both intralaboratory and interlaboratory comparison. l l

I 1

1 34

l TABLE 6 l

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION QA SAMPLING PROGRAM l

NUMBER OF REGULAR NUMBER OF QA SAMPLE REGULAR SAMPLING COLLECTION QA COLLECTION MEDIUM LOCATIONS FREQUENCY LOCATIONS FREQUENCY Precipitation 13 MONTHLY l QUARTERLY WHEN AVAILABLE Surface Water 8 MONTHLY l QUARTERLY Well Water 6 MONTHLY l QUARTERLY Clams 5 MONTHLY 1 QUARTERLY Soil 3 QUARTERLY WHEN 1 QUARTERLY WHEN VEGETATION AVAILABLE VEGETATION AVAILABLE Sediment 8 MONTHLY l QUARTERLY Vegetables 3 MONTHLY WHEN 1 QUARTERLY WHEN AVAILABLE AVAILABLE TLD . 65 MONTHLY AND 2 MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY QUARTERLY

)

I l

)

t 35

INTRALABORATORY ANALYSES The primary analytical labotatory performed duplicate analyses on every tenth sample prior to October 15, 1987 and every twentieth sample after October 15, 1987. The number of duplicate analyses performed during 1987 are listed by media on Table 7, page 37. Intralaboratory. analysis of both blank and spiked samples also are performed on a routine basis. The results of all of these analyses are reported on a bimonthly basis as well as results of detector backgrounds and ef ficiencies. Review of data produced by this program and the REMP QA Sampling Program discussed above indicate sacisf actory performance by all laboratories during 1987.

US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM Each laboratory providing analytical services participates in the EPA's Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies (Cross-Check) Program. Results of this program are included as Appendix D, page -

158. l l

l AUDITS l l

Each contracted Izboratory is audited by GPUN personnel on a routine basis to ensure compliance with contractual, procedural and regulatory requirements.

l r

i I

f

! 36

TABLE 7 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DUPLICATE ANALYSES BY MEDIA FOR 1987 PERFORMED BY PRIMARY LABORATORY j GAMMA GROSS

' l SCAN 3 ETA Sr-89 Sr-90 I-1 31 Ra-226 Uranium! H-3 K-40 l APT 54 61 l

AIO 61 RWA 15 14 WWA 8 1 9 SWA 8 2 1 10 AQS 11 1 1 1 1 CLAM 5 1 1 VGTN 2 SOIL 1 1 FISH 1 2 1

APT = Air Particulate AIO = Air Iodine l RWA = Precipitation i WWA = Well Water SWA = Surface Water AQS = Aquatic Sediment CLAM = Clame VGTN = Vegetation SOIL = Soil FISH = Fish f  !

l

)

f 37

DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING Dose rates from external radiation sources were measured at a number of locations in the vicinity of OCNGS using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Naturally occurring sources, including radiation of cosmic origin and natural radioactive materials in the air and ground, as well as fallout from prior nuclear weapons testing, resulted in a certain 4

amount of penetrating radiation being recorded at all monitoring locations. Indicator TLD'. were placed systematically in sectors of predominant wind direction at the site boundary,1 mile, 2 miles, 5 miles, and 8 miles distant from the site. Backgro'and TLDs were located in locations typically greater than ten miles distance from OCNGS. The results of their exposure are shown in Table 8, page 39.

Sample Collection and Analysis A state-of-the-art thermoluminescent dosimeter is used in Oyster Creek's REMP. Thermoluminescence is a process in which ionizing radiation, upon l

interacting with the sensitive material of the TLD (the phosphor or l

' element') causes some of the energy deposited in the phosphor to be stored in stable ' traps' in the TLD Material. These TLD traps are so l stable that they do not decay appreciably over the course of months or even years. This provides an excellent method of integrating the exposure received over a period of time. The energy stored in the TLDs as a result of interactions with radiation is removed and measured by a controlled heating process in a calibrated reading system. As the TLD is heated, the phosphor releases the stored energy as light. The amount of light given off is directly proportional to the radiation dose the TLD received. The reading process ' zeros' the TLD and prepares it for l

reuse. During 1987, TLDs were collected on a monthly and quarterly basis f rom locations shown in Figures 1, page 9, and 3, page 23, and described in Table 4, page 25. The results of the quarterly TLD's are listed on Table 8, page 39.

l l

38

1 1

TABLE 8 GAMMA DOSE TO THE ENVIRONMENT (mR/STD. MONTH)

AS MEASURED BY THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER - 1987 DOSE COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE

'ATION COLLECTION DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE A l 25 PEB 87l 4.0 l 21 MAY 87l 4.3 l 11 AUG 87l 4.2 l 02 NOV 87l 4.2 l 25 JAN 88l 3.9 l C l 24 FEB 87\ 3.6 l 18 MAY 871 4.2 l 10 AUG 87l 4.5 l 02 NOV 87l 3.9 l 25 JAN 88l 4.7 a i 24 PEB 87l 3.4 l 18 MAY 87l 4.4 l 10 AUG 87) 3.7 I 02 NOV 87l 3.6 l 25 JAN 88l 4.0 l 1 1 26 FeB 87! 3.7 l 20 MAY 871 4.1 l 12 AUG 87] 5.2 l 02 t10V 87 l 4.1 l 25 JAN 88l 4.7 3 \ 25 PEB 87 I 3.6 l 19 MAY 87l 3.9 l 11 AUG 87l 3.9 l 02 NOV 87l 4.2 l 25 JAN 88l 3.3 1 4  ! 24 eEB 87i 3.5 I 21 MAY 87l 3.7 l 10 AUG 87l 4.5 l 02 NOV 87l 3.6 l 25 JAN 88l 4.3 5 l 25 FEB 87l 4.2 l 19 MAY 871 4.0 l 11 AUG 87l 4.0 l 02 NOV 87l 3.7 l 25 JAN 88l 3.5 6 l 25 FEB 87\ 4.3 l 21 MAY 87\ 3.8 l 13 AUG 87] 4.5 l 03 NOV 87l 3.8 l 25 JAN 88l 3.4 7 l 26 PEB 87\ 4.7 l 20 MAY 87l LOST l 12 AUG 87 l 3.4 l 02 NOV 87l 3.6 l 25 JAN 88l 3.2 8 l 26 FEB 871 4.2 \ 20 MAY 87l 4.0 l 12 AUG 87\ 3.6 I 03 NOV 87l 3.6 l 26 JAN 88l 3.4 9 l 24 PEB 87l 4.3 l 21 MAY 87l 3.9 l 14 AUG 87l 3.8 l 03 NOV 87l 4.0 l 26 JAN 88l 3.4 10 I 25 FEB 871 4.4 l 19 MAY 87 l 3.9 l 11 AUG 87 l 3.7 l 03 NOV 87l 3.6 l 25 JAN 88l 3.4 11 1 26 FEB 871 3.3 l 20 MAY 87) 3.7 l 12 AUG 87l 4.5 l 04 NOV 871 3.5 l 26 JAN 88l 5.5 12 l 24 FEB 871 3.7 l 18 MAY 87l 4.0 l 10 AUG 87l 4.4 l 02 NOV 87l 3.8 l 25 JAN 88l 3.4 l 13 l 25 FEB 87I 3.5 1 19 MAY 87I 3.7 l 11 AUG 87l 4.3 1 03 NOV 87! 3.4 l 25 JAN 88l 4.2 14 l 25 eeB 87l 4.2 l 19 MAY 87l 4.9 l 11 AUG 87] 5.0 l 02 NOV 87l 4.5 l 25 JAN 88l 4.1 15 l 24 FEB 87] 3.6 l 18 MAY 87! 4.1 l 10 AUG 87\ 4.8 l 02 NOV 87l 3.9 l 25 JAN 88l 3.3 i 16 l 26 FEB 871 3.3 l 20 MAY 87l 3.7 l 12 AUG 87l 3.4  ! 04 NOV 87l 3.6 l 26 JAN 88) 3.0 l 17  ! 24 FEB 87! 3.5 l 18 MAY 87l 4.0 l 10 AUG 87l 3.6 l 04 NOV 87l 3.6 ! 25 JAN 88l 3.3 20 1 27 FEB 871 3.5 l 20 MAY 87l 3.8 l 12 AUG 87l 3.6 l 02 NOV 87l 4.8 l 25 JAN 88l 3.2 '

22 l 26 FEB 87! 3.5  ! 20 MAY 87\ 3.8 I 12 AUG 87l 4.5 l 03 NOV 87l 4.6 l 26 JAN 88l 4.1 51 l 27 FEB 87I 4.5 l 21 M AY 87 ! 5. 4 l 13 AUG 87l 4.9 l 05 NOV 87l 4.7 l 27 JAN 88l 4.7 l 52 1 27 eEB 871 5.0 l 21 MAY 87l LOST l 13 AUG 87! 5.4 l 05 NOV 87l 5.3 l 27 JAN 881 6.5 53 1 27 FEB 87l 4.1 l 21 MAY 87l 4.7 ! 13 AUG 87l 5.5 l 05 NOV 87\ 4.3 l 27 JAN 88l 6.2

! 05 NOV 87l 3.9 l 27 JAN 88l 3.7 54 1 27 FEB 87I 3.7 l 21 MAY 87l 5.2 l 13 AUG 87\ 4.6 55 l 27 FEB 871 4.4  ! 21 MAY 87l 4.5 ! 13 AUG 87 l 5.0 l 05 NOV 87! 4.0 l 27 JAN 88l 3.4 56 l 27 FEB 87} 4.2 l 21 MAY 871 5.3 l 13 AUG 871 4.6 l 05 NOV 87l 4.4 I 27 JAN R8l 3.9 57  ! 27 FEB 87l 5.4 l 21 MAY 87l 7.0 l 13 AUG 87! 5.4 l 05 NOV 37l 4.8 l 27 JAN 88l 4.5 58 l 27 FEB 87\ 3.7 l 21 MAY 87! 5.4 l 13 AUG 871 5.2 l 05 NOV 87l 3.9 l 27 JAN 88l 4.0 59  ! 27 FEB 87! 4.3 l 21 MAY 87l 5.7 l 13 AUG 87l 5.2 l 05 NOV 87l 4.8 l 27 JAN 88l 4.2 60 l 27 FEB B7) 5.6 l 21 MAY 87! 4.9 l 13 AUG 871 4.8 l 06 NOV 87l LOST l 27 JAN 88l 4.5 5

61  ! 27 FEB 871 4.5 l 21 MAY 871 4.3 l 13 AUG 87l 5.0 l 05 NOV 87l 4.0 l 27 JAN 98l 4.6 62 l 2 7 F EB 87l 3.7 l 21 MAY 8 7l 4.9 l 13 AUG 8 7l 4.1 l 05 NOV 87l 3.9 l 27 JAN 8 8l 4.5 39

l TABLE 8 (Cont'd) l GAMMA DOSE TO THE ENVIRONMENT (mR/STD. MONTH)

AS MEASURED BY THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER - 1987 l i

COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE COLLECTION DOSE j STION DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

'63 l 27 FEB 87l 4.7 l 21 MAY 87l 5.6 l 13 AUG 87l 4.2 l 05 NOV 87l 4.2 l 27 JAN 88l 3.8 l64 l 27 FEB 87l 3.5 l 21 MAY 87l 5.2 \ 13 AUG 87l 3.9 l 05 NOV 87l 3.8 l 27 JAN 88l 3.3 65 l 27 FEB 87l 3.6 l 21 MAY 87l 5.1 l 13 AUG 87l 4.4 l 05 NOV 87l 3.9 l 27 JAN 88l 3.3 l66 l 26 PEB 87l 3.4 1 20 MAY 87l 4.0 l 12 AUG 87l 4.5 l 02 NOV 87l 3.9 l 25 JAN 88l 4.4 l67 l 26 FEB 87l 3.7 l 20 MAY 87l 5.1 l 12 AUG 87l 3.8 l 03 NOV 87l 3.9 l 26 JAN 88l 4.2 69 l 27 FEB 37l 4.4 l 21 MAY 87 l 5. 3 l 13 AUG 87l 3.6 l 04 NOV 87l 3.7 l 27 JAN 88l 3.2 70 l 24 FEB 87\ 4.4 l 21 MAY 87\ 4.7 l 10 AUG 87l 3.6 l 03 NOV 87l 5.4 l 26 JAN 88l 2.9 71 l 24 FEB 87\ 4.3 l 21 MAY 87! 5.0 l 10 AUG 87l 3.7 l 02 NOV 871 4.8 l 25 JAN 88l 3.1 73 l 26 FEB 87l 4.3 l 20 MAY 87l LOST l 12 AUG 87I 3.5 l 02 NOV 87l 3.6 l 25 JAN 881 3.0 74 l 27 FEB 87\ 4.7 l 21 M AY 871 5. 4 l 13 AUG 87\ 3.7 I 04 NOV 87l 3.9 l 27 JAN 88l 3.3 75 l 27 FEB 87! 3.5 l 21 M AY 87 l 5. 2 l 13 AUG 87! 3.9 l 04 NOV 87l 4.2 l 27 JAN 88l 3.5 76 l 27 FEB 87l 3.4 l 21 MAY 87l 5.3 l 13 AUG 87l 4.9 l 04 NOV 87! 3.6 l 27 JAN 88l 3.2 77  ! 27 FEB 87l 3.4 I 21 MAY 87! 3.8 l 13 AUG 87! 3.7 l 04 NOV 87l 3.8 l 27 JAN 881 3.2 78 l 25 FEB 87l 5.0 l 19 MAY 87l 4.2 l 13 AUG 87l LOST l 03 NOV 87l 4.0 l 25 JAN 881 3.5 79 l 26 FEB 87} 3.3 l 20 MAY 87l 3.7 l 12 AUG 871 4.2 \ 03 NOV 87l 4.3 l 26 JAN 88l 3.6 80 l 27 FEB 87l 3.4 1 21 MAY 87l 3.9 I 13 AUG 87\ 3.8 l 05 NOV 87l 3.8 l 27 JAN 88 l 4.3 81 \ 26 FEB 87l 4.0 l 20 MAY 87l 5.7 l 12 AUG 87l 4.1 l 03 NOV 87! 4.2 l 26 JAN 88l 4.2 '

82  ! 27 FEB 87! 3.9 l 21 MAY 87! 5.8 l 13 AUG 87l 4.2 l 05 NOV 87l LOST l 27 JAN 88l 4.9 83 l 27 FEB 87! 4.7 l 21 MAY 87) 4.0 l 13 AUG 87l 3.8 l 05 NOV 87l 4.6 l 27 JAN 88) 3.3 84 l 24 PEB 871 3.9 l 18 M?.Y 87l 4.4 l 10 AUG 87! 4.2 l 02 NOV 871 5.1 l 25 JAN 88l 3.4 85 l 24 PEB 87! 5.0 l 21 MAY 87\ 4.1 l 14 AUG 87\ 4.6 l 03 NOV 87l 6.2 l 26 JAN 88l 4.2 86 l 24 FEB 87l 4.3 I 21 MAY 871 3.9 l 10 AUG 87\ 4.7 ! 03 NOV 87! 4.6 l 25 JAN 88l 3.2 87 l 26 FEB 87l 5.1  ! 20 MAY 87I 4.6 l 12 AUG 871 5.1 l 04 NOV 87l 4.3 ! 26 JAN 88! 3.6 88  ! 26 FEB 87! 4.3 l 20 MAY 87l 3.8 ! 12 AUG 87l 3.5 l 04 NOV 87l 3.5 l 26 JAN 881 3.0 89 l 25 FEB 871 4.0 l 19 MAY 87I 3.8 I 11 AUG 87! 3.4 l 02 NOV 87l 4.4 ! 25 JAN 88I 3.0 l 90  ! 25 FEE 871 3.2 l 19 MAY 87\ 3.8 I 11 AUG 87! 3.4 l 02 NOV 87l 4.7 l 25 JAN 88l 2.9 91 l 25 FEB 87! 3.6 I 19 MAY 87\ 4.3 l 11 AUG 87! 3.7 l 03 NOV 87) 4.7 l 25 JAN 88l 3.1 92 l 25 FEB 87) 4.1  ! 19 MAY 87I 5.0 l 11 AUG 871 4.8 I 02 NOV 87l 4.5 l 25 JAN 88l 5.0 l 21 MAY 87\ 4.0 l 14 AUG 871 3.8 l 03 NOV 87l 5.1 ! 26 JAN 88l 4.2 95 l 24 FEB 87l 3.4 96  ! 27 FEB 87l 3.8  ! 21 M AY 87 l 4. 5 l 13 AUG 87l 4.1 l 04 NOV 81l 5.2 } 27 JAN 88 ! 4.5 l 97 l 27 FEB 87] 4.3 l 21 MAY 871 4.2 l 13 AUG 87! 4.4 l 04 NOV 871 5.4 l 27 JAN 88' 3.2 T1 l 26 PEB 87l 3.6 l 20 MAY 87l 4.4 l 12 AUG 87\ 4.9 l 02 NOV 87l 4.2 l 25 JAN 88f 3.7 l

40 l l

Environmental Sample Analysis Results Sample Collection Sample types described previously at locations in Figures 1 (page 9) and 3 (page 23) are shipped to the radioanalytical laboratory upon collection.

Samples are analyzed using procedures approved by GPU Nuclear and in keeping with guidelines established in USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.15. For a more detailed description of the media, sampling locations, collection frequencies, and analyses performed, refer to the section on Program Design described earlier (page 21).

Sample Analysis Results Results of sample analyses are summarized for the reporting period in the format of NRC Regulatory Guide 4.8 in Table 10, page 44. A statistical analysis was performed on each analytical result according to sample type, station, and analysis to determine which results, if any, were outside the normal or expected range of environmental activities. These ranges were based upon historical data amassed frF Oyster .eek's Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program surveys for past years. While these "higher-than-expected" results are somewhat elevated, they are in no way considered to be abnormal.

Except where noted, elevated results were not attributed to plant effluents and were, in most cases, naturally occurring isotopes. A discussion of the l

elevated results follows.

l Many naturally-occurring isotopes (e.g. Be-7, K-40, etc.) were detected in i some environmental media, as evidenced in previous Semiannual Reports.

Additionally, some site-specific nuclides f rom past f acility discharges, as documented in previous Semiannual Reports, were detected (Mn-54 and Zn-65 in Aquatic Sediment). Fission products (Cs-137) f rom nuclear weapons testing and the 1986 Chernobyl accident were also detected in small concentrations in one clam and two aquatic sediment samples. Slightly elevated Tritium results were also detected in five precipitation samples and one well water sample.

41

Although these results were found to be higher-than-expected, they remain well within tha ranges considered normal for this region of the United States.

In conclusion, with the exception of the historically found facility-specific nuclides, no concentrations of radioactivity in the environs of Oyster Creek were found to be abnormal during the reporting period.

42 ,

)

u

~

TABLE 9 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR G"_NERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 THE FOLLOWING PAGES ARE A SUPMARY OF REMP DATA FOR THE SCHEDULED COLLECTION PERIOD JANUARY,1987 THRU DECEMBER.1987. DATA ARE SUPMARIZLO ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, WHERE 1.) XXX--MEAN(N/ TOTAL); MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON RANGE DETECTABLE ACTIVITIES OF  ;

ALL XXX STATIONS 2.) XXX-BACKGROUND OR INDICATOR STATIONS 3.) (N/ TOTAL)= FRACTION OF DETECTABLE ACTIVITIES /

TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSES PERFORMED 4.) STATION-STATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN 5.) BACKGROUND STATIONS USED ARE.

STATION A.C.H,14 31,94 18/36 SAMPLE TYPE AIR PARTICULATE SEDIMENT WELL WATER /

AIR IODINE CLAMS VEGETABLES PRECIPITATION SURFACE WATER SOIL FISH (")

BLUE CRAB (")

6.) *=NO DATA SAMPLEC ; "-STATION 94 ONLY 1

43

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION E NUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICJ. TOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA 676 2.48E-03 1.56E-02 (466 /468 ) 1.59E-02(208 /208 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) ( 2.53E 3.50E-02) ( 5.03E 3.37E-02) 66 '71 72 73 4 1.58E-02(52 /52 )

( 6.03E 3.50E-02)

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CE-144 572 2.02E-02 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA AG-110M 39 4.76E-03 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA TE-129M 39 9.55E+01 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CS-134 572 3.84E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CO-58 572 3.93E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

44

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPtMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA MN-54 572 3.59E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA FE-59 572 9.37E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CS-136 26 8.03E-03 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /8 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /2 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA TE-132 39 3.69E-02 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA ZN-65 572 8.37E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CO-60 572 4.07E-03 < LLD (0 .'3 % ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

45

~ - _

I TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUre%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY.1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUPSER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA K-40 572 8.23E-02 2.75E-01 (4 /3% ) 2.65E-01(2 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) ( 1.00E 4.40E-01) ( 1.30E 4.00E-01) 66 71 72 73 71 4.40E-01(1 /44 )

( 4.40E 4.40E-01)

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA BE-7 572 5.54E-02 1.53E-01 (370 /396 ) 1.56E-01(169 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) ( 3.60E 3.50E-01) ( 6.59E 3.20E-01) 66 7s 72 73 72 1.68E-01(38 /44 )

( 5.90E 3.00E-01)

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA 2R-95 572 8.24E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA N8-95 572 4.19E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA $8-125 39 1.19E-02 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CE-141 572 6.68E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) .1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

46

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPT %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY.1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA RU-103 572 4.72E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CR-51 39 4.04E--02 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA BA-140 572 2.63E-02 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA LA-140 572 1.23E-02 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 .

(PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA I-135 13 2.61E42 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /1 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA AC-228 39 2.02E-02 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

47

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AIR PARTICULATE GAtmA RA-224 26 1.00E+00 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /8 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /2 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA RA-226 572 6.20E-02 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/n3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA TH-228 533 6.03E-03 < LLD (0 /369 ) < LLD (0 /164 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /41 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA I-131 572 2.12E-02 < LLD (0 /396 ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA NA-22 26 4.45E-03 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /8 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /2 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA NP-239 13 8.04L-02 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /1 )

48

TABLE 10 RADIDLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9tARY

- OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUtt1ARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA RU-106 572 3.23E-02 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CD-109 13 9.67E-02 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /1 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CO-57 39 2.44E-03 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M1 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA I-133 39 2.19E+02 < LLD (0 /27 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA CS-137 572 3.94E-03 < LLD (0 /3% ) < LLD (0 /176 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /44 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA CE-144 162 3.34E+01 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

49 l

w -- - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MCIITORING PROGRAM Supt %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL SumARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE PRECIPITATION GAMMA AG-110M 36 5.83E+00 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAMA TE-129M 36 1.45E+04 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5-(PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA CS-134 162 4.88E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA CO-58 162 4.59E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 ,

(PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA m-54 162 4.39E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 j (PCI/L. ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA FE-59 162 9.67E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

i 50

r l

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPetARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROLQt DECEMBER,1987 ANMJAL SUPetARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICA!0R-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE PRECIPITATION GAMMA CS-136 26 8.60E+00 < LLD (0 /17 ) < LLD (0 /9 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA TE-132 36 2.50E+01 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4-5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA ZN-65 162 9.71E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA CO-60 162 4.75E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMR K-40 162 7.31E+01 < LLD (0 /110 ) 1.50E+02(1 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) ( 1.50E+02 - 1.50E+02) 66 71 ~72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA BE-7 162 4.91E+01 7.26E+01 (30 /110 ) 8.12E+01(17 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) ( 4.50E+01 '.40E+02) ( 4.70E+01 - 1.40E+02) 66 71 72 73

, 72 8.67E+01(4 /9 )

( 6.30E+01 - 1.40E+02) i 51

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPfRRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEfeER 1987 ANNUAL SUPf%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE P2ECIPITATION GAMMA ZR-95 162 9.29E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA I48-95 162 4.91E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA 58-125 36 1.58E+01 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA CE-141 162 9.45E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA RU-103 152 5.56E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA CR-51 36 5.26E+01 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

52

TABLE 10  ;

RADIOLOGICAL EN'/IR0fetENTAL MONI10GING PROGRAM 9#9tARY -

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATTE STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 APMUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMEER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) W KC'.00ND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS liSED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE PRECIPITATION GAPMA BA-140 162 2.36E+01 < LLD (0 /110 1 < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

l PREC:PITATION GAMMA LA-140 132 8.91Edd < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLO (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 j (PC'/L 2 66 71 72 73 73 < LLO (0 /11 )

~

PRECIPITATION GAfftA I-135 11 1.73E+13 < LLD (0 /8 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /1 )

PRECIPITATION GAPMA AC-228 36 2.3f.E+01 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCs,i ) 66 71 73 i 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAP 9tA RA-224 26 4.99E+02 < Ll.D (0 /17 ) < LLD. (0 /9 ) 1. 20 3 4 5

(PCI/L ) . 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 ) .

D PRECIPITATION GAfr.t RA-226 152 1.04E+02 1.50E+02 (1 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) .1 20. 3 .'4' 5 3 (PCI/L ) ( 1.50E+02 - 1.50E+02) 66 71 72 73 5

73 1.50E+02(1 /11 )

i

( 1.50E+02 - 1.53E+92).

a 4

e 0

1 6

53

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPE %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GFNERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBEF.,1987 ANNUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE PRECIPITATION GAMMA TH-228 126 8.63E+00 < LLD (0 /86 ) < LLD (0 /40 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /8 )

PRECIPITATION _ GArtu I-131 162 1.39E+01 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 -

73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA NA-22 26 7.11E+00 .< LLD (0 /17 ) < LLD (0 /9 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA NP-239 11 6.39E+02 < LLD (0 /8 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /1 )

PRECIPITATION GAMMA RU-106 162 4.0SE+01 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) F4 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION GAPPA CD-109 11 1.41E+02 < LLD (0 /8 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /1 )

i 1

54

w - - - .

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL P'd)NITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR EfNERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL SUPMA5Y SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-! TAN (N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE l PRECIPITATION GAmA CO-57 36 4.30E+00 < LLO (0 /24 ) < LLD (0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 l (PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAPMA I-133 36 1.02E+04 < LLD (0 /24 ) < LLD -(0 /12 ) 1 20 3 4 5 4PCI/L ) 66 71 73 73 < LLD (0 /3 )

PRECIPITATION GAPMA CS-137 162 4.71E+00 < LLD (0 /110 ) < LLD (0 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /11 )

PRECIPITATION TRITIUM 166 9.66E+01 1.18E+02 (34 /114 ) 1.19E+02(9 /52 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/L ) ( 5.44E+01 - 3.12E+02) ( 6.82E+01 - 2.88E+02) 66 71 72 73 5 1.68E+02(3 /13 )

( 7.17E+01 - 3.12E+02)

AIR IODINE 1001NE-131 676 1.91E-02 < LLD (0 1468 ) < LLD (0 /208 ) 1 20 3 4 5 (PCI/M3 ) 66 71 72 73 73 < LLD (0 /52 )

CABBAGE GAMMA CE-144 12 1.12E+02 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 {

(PCI/KG(WET)) -l 66 < LLD (0 /5 )

55

l TAB'. 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUNO-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CABBAGE GAMMA AG-110M 6 2.62E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

. CABBAGE GAMMA TE-129M 6 8.05E+04 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(VET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

CABBAGE GAPMA CS-134 12 2.09E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMP% CO-58 12 2.01E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMMA PM-54 12 1.92E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMMA FE-59 12 4.67E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

56

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUNO-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGF CABBAGE GAMMA CS-136 4 2.90E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

CABBAGE GAPMA TE-132 6 9.47E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

CABBAGE GAMMA ZN-65 12 5.04E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMMA CO-60 12 2.24E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAPMA K-40 12 3.90E+02 4.27E+03 (9 /9 ) 3.83E+03(3 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 2.90E+03 - 6.60E+03) ( 3.46E+03 - 4.23E+03) 66 4.58E+03(5 /5 )

( 2.90E+03 - 6.60E+03)

CABBAGE GAMMA BL-J 12 1.64E+02 2.65E+02 (8 /9 ) 5.60E+02(1 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 2.03E+02 - 3.40E+02) ( 5.60E+02 - 5.60E+02) 35 3.09E+02(3 /4 )

( 2.70E+02 - 3.40E+02) 57

TABLE .0 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM StMMRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SIM MRY l

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CABBAGE GAMM 2R-95 12 3.73E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMMA NB-95 12 2.01E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 ,

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAmu 58-125 6 5.44E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

CABBAGE Gaff % CE-141 12 3.12E+01 < LLD (0 /9 )- < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAe9% RU-103 12 2.15E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMMA CR-51 6 1.81E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

4 58

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPT %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL SUre%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CABBAGE GAPen BA-140 12 9.00E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMPE LA-140 12 3.02E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

I 66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAPtn I-135 3 1.58E+10 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

CABBAGE GAMA AC-228 6 8.56E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 iPCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

CABBAGE Gaff % RA-224 4 2.75E+03 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

CABBAGE GAMMA RA-226 12 3.65E+02 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

59

_ ~

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SupetARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEleER,1987 ANNUAL SUte%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CA8BAGE GAMMA TH-228 6 3.27E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

CABBAGE GAPeu I-131 12 4.39E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

  • 66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CABBAGE GAMMA NA-22 4 2.25E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

CAB 8 AGE GAMMA NP-239 3 8.02i+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ,

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

CAB 8 AGE GAMMA RU-106 12 1.64E+02 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) _35 '66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

CAB 8 AGE GAMMA CD-109 3 5.00E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

9

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR00 MENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9ERY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP9MRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUNO-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATIOM M.AN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CABBAGE GAMMA CO-57 6 1.43E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLO (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

CABBAGE GAMMA I-133 6 1.02E+05 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

CABBAGE GAMMA CS-137 12 2.06E+01 3.64E+01 (6 /9 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 2.17E+01 - 5.20E+01) 66 3.72E+01(3 /5 )

( 2.17E+01 - 5.20E+01)

KALE GAMMA CE-144 4 1.14E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) "

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAMMA AG-110M 2 3.71E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) "

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALC GAMMA TE-129M 2 3.00E+04 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(" /" ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

i 61

TABLE 10 RADIOLGGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Supe %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 ThT4tK;H DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE KALE GAlem CS-134 4 2.03E+01 < LLD <0 /4 ) (* /" ) 35 66

( * - " )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAptu CO-58 4 2.20E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) =

(" /" ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAlem PW-54 4 2.09E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAMMA FE-59 4 4.99E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) "

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WEl)) ( " - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAMMA CS-136 2 4.14E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GAMMA TE-132 2 9.86E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) "

(" /" ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

62

m - -

TABLE ID RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9MRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL SUP9ERY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(Pf/ TOTAL)

RANGE KALE GAftu ZN-65 4 5.34E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAttu CO-60 4 2.28E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAptu K-40 4 2.95E+02 4.05E+03 (4 /4 ) (* /" ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 2.86E+03 - 5.50E+03) ( * - " )

65 5.07E+03(2 /2 )

( 4.64E+03 - 5.50E+03) 4

  • KALE GAMMA BE-7 1.85E+02 6.23E+02 (3 /4 ) (* !" ) 35 66
  • - =

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( 3.18E+02 - 8.20E+02) ( }

66 7.30E+02(1 /2 )

( 7.30E+02 - 7.30E+02)

KALE GAMMA ZR-95 4 3.85E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAftu NB-95 4 2.24E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(" /* ) 35 66

PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

63

m TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROPMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANMJAL SUPfMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUPSER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) ~ STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE KALE GAren 58-125 2 7.36E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GAten CE-141 4 3.08E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - " ) -

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

a KALE GAPMA RU-103 4 2.23E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) (* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAMMA CR-51 2 2.33E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - " )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GArtn BA-140 4 9.47E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) '

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

LA-140 4 3.56E+01

  • KALE GAMP% < LLD (0 /4 ) (* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

a

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9MRY l

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP9mRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOT *L) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) SIATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICAf0R MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE KALE GAffu AC-228 2 1.20E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GAP 9% RA-224 2 2.26E+03 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (FCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GAMPH RA-226 4 3.89E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - = )

65 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAMPE TH-228 2 2.15E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GAMPE I-131 4 4.86E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) =

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAMMA NA-22 2 3.43E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(" /* ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

65

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL DNIRONMENTAL MONITORING PkOGRAM SUP9%RV OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPT %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE KALE GAPeu RU-106 4 1.76E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 35 66

(

  • - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

KALE GAren CO-57 2 1.86E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 35 66

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )  ;

KALE GAPfu I-133 2 7.13E+03 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 35 66

{ * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

KALE GAP 9% CS-137 4 1.85E+01 1.09E+02 (2 /4 ) (* /* ) 35 66

( 9.90E+01 - 1.20E+02) ( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

35 1.09E+02(2 /2 )

( 9.90E+01 - 1.20E+02)

SURFACE WATER GAMMA CE-144 102 2.97E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAPeu AG-110M 24 3.43E+00 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

66

- ~ _ . _ . _ _ . ._ . .. . __. - .

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SU MARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SURFACE WATER GAMMA TE-129M 24 6.68E+03 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SURFACE WATER GAmA CS-134 102 3 89E+00 < LLD (0R8) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAMMA CO-58 102 3.81E+00 < LLD (0 #8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAMMA MN-54 102 3.59E+00 < LLD (0 #8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAMMA FE-59 102 8.35E+00 < LLD (0 R8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAHMA CS-136 16 5.30E+00 < LLD (0 /12 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /2 )

t

}

i i

i 67

- - ~~ .- -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPetARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMIER,1987 l ANNUAL SUPetARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(NA0TAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(NA0TAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR hEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-NEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SURFACE WATER GAletA TE-132 24 1.66E+01 < LLD (3 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SURFACE WATER GAletA ZN-65 102 7.98E+00 < LLD (0 n8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GApetA CO-60 102 3.90E+00 < LLD (0 H8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/I ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURrACE WATER GAMMA K-40 102 7.45E+01 1.%E+02 (67 R8 ) 2.46E+02(22 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) ( 9.10E+01 - 2.53E+02) ( 1.70E+02 - 3.50E+02) 93 25 2.23E+02(11 /13 )

( 2.00E+02 - 2.46E+02)

SURFACE WATER GAMMA BE-7 102 3.78E+01 < LLD (0 #8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAMMA ZR-95 102 7.80E+00 < LLD (0 #8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

68

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPemRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPE %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/IOTAL)

RANGE SURFACE WATER GAP 9% NS-95 102 4.13E40 < LLD (0 #8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAPtu 58-125 24 9.61E+00 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SURFACE WATER GAPeu CE-141 102 8.71E+00 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAMPm RU-103 102 4.82E+00 < LLD (0#8) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER Gidtu CR-51 24 3.33E+01 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SURFACE WATER GAMHA BA-140 102 2,16E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

69

TABLE 10 RADICLOGICAL ENVIR00 MENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THRGUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) .

RANGE SURFACE WATER GAPm4 1.A-140 102 8.23E 40 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAMMA I-135 8 6.09E48 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SURFACE WATER GAMMA AC-228 24 1.43E+01 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SURFACE WATER GAHM4 RA-224 16 4.19E+02 < LLD (0 /12 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /2 )

SURFACE WATER GAPMA RA-226 102 8.80E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAPMA TH-228 78 7.98E+00 < LLD (0 /60 ) < LLD (0 /18 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /10 )

70

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY.1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 APMUAL St# MARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NLMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED 5TATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SURFACE WATER GAPMA I-131 102 3.84E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAPMA NA-22 16 3.99E+00 < LLD (0 /12 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /2 )

SURFACE WATEP GAMMA NP-239 8 1.23E+02 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SURFACE WATER GAPmt. RU-106 102 3.33E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER GAPMA CD-109 8 1.04E+02 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

JURFACE WATER GAPMA CO-57 24 3.13E+00 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

71

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR00 MENTAL MNITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECDEER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SURFACE WATER GAtmA I-133 24 3.42E+03 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SURFACE WATER GAtmA CS-137 102 3.87E*00 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) 91 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

SURFACE WATER TRITIUM 102 9.20E+01 1.10E+02 (15 /78 ) 1.18E+02(6 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/L ) ( 6.10E+01 - 2.59E+02) ( 6.24E+01 - 2.73E+02) 93 23 1.39E+02(3 /13 )

( 6.43E+01 - 2.59E+02)

SWISS CHARD GArmA CE-144 2 1.23E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(= /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAtmA AG-110M 1 2.47E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

=

SWIS's CHARD GAMMA TE-129M 1 2.42E+04 < LLD (0/1) (* /* ) 66 iPCI/KG(WET)) {

  • - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 ) .

72

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENW'ROPMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK MJCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED 5TATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SWISS CHARD GAPMA CS-134 2 2.17E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (" /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

l 66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAPMA CO-58 2 2.26E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAPMA MN-54 2 2.17E+01 < L LD (0 /2 ) "

(* /" ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAPMA FE-59 2 5.26E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

i 66 < LLD (0 /2 )

l SWISS CHARD GAMMA TE-132 1 7.61E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 66 '

l (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

I 66 < LLD (0 /1 )

l SWISS CHARD GAP 9% ZN-65 2 5.43E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(" /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

73

--___________________m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ---

v ~

TABLE ID RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPenRY OYSTER CREEK 3RJCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPeMAY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR PEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SWISS CHARD GApen C0-60 2 2.85E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GApen K-40 2 4.70E+02 6.33E+03 (2 /2 ) (* /* ) 66

( 6.26E+03 - 6.40E+03) ( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 6.33E+03(2 /2 )

( 6.26E+03 - 6.40E+03)

SWISS CHARD GAMPm SE-7 2 1.50E+02 2.62E+02 (2 /2 ) (* /* ) 66

( 2.20E+02 - 3.04E+02) ( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 2.62E+02(2 /2 )

( 2.20E+02 - 3.04E+02)

SWISS CHARD GArem ZR-95 2 3.HE+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 ) .

SWISS CHARD GArtu NS-95 2 2.25E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHfJtD GArem 58-125 1 5.98E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

74

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL Slf9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUPSER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SWISS CHARD GAft% CE-141 2 3.40E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAf9E RU-103 2 2.13E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAP 9m CR-51 1 1.91E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SWISS CHARD GAMMA BA-140 2 9.40E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAf9E LA-140 2 3.10E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAMPH I-135 1 5.94E+09 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

75

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONNENTAL MDNITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK PAJCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOIOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) SACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SWISS CHARD GArmA AC-228 1 1.01E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) (* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SWISS CHARD GAPMA RA-226 2 3.83E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

( * /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAMPtA TH-228 1 3.30E+01 < LLO (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) G6 (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SWISS CHARD GApeK I-131 2 4.10E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 )

SWISS CHARD GAPMA NP-239 1 8.70E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SWISS CHARD GAPMA RU-106 2 1.83E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

( * /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

66 < LLD (0 /2 }

76

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SlM ERY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES l

l PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) l RANGE l

l l

SWISS CHARD GAMMA CD-109 1 E.41E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) (* /* ) 66

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

( 66 < LLD (0 /1 )

(0 /1 ) 66 SWISS CHARD GAP 9% CO-57 1 1.61E+01 < LLD (* /* )

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SWISS CHARD GAMMA I-133 1 5.63E+03 < LLD (0 /1 ) (* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

l 66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SWISS CHARD GAP 9% CS-137 2 2.58E+01 3.20E+01 (1 /2 ) (* /* ) 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 3.20E+01 - 3.20E+01) ( * - * )

66 3.20E+01(1 /2 )

( 3.20E+01 - 3.20E+01)

SPINACH GAMMA CE-144 1 3.50E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

(* /* )

(

  • - * )

SPINACH GAP 9m CS-134 1 5.70E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

{

  • _ = }

77 l

l TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIROMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMARY l

I OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN l ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SPINACH CAMMA CO-58 1 5.40E+00 =

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( = _ = )

SPINACH GAM A 191-54 1 5.10E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(FCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( * - * )

SPINACH GAlem FE-59 1 1.40E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

(

  • - * )

SPINACH GAMA ZN-65 1 1.40E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( = _ = }

SPINACH GApetA CO-60 1 5.60E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( = _ = )

78

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIROMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNmRY OYSTER CREEK WCLEAR GENERATING STATION

! JANUARY,1987 ThROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANWAL SUMMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGEDUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED l

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN l ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE 1

5.50E+03(1 /1 )

~

SPINACH GAmu K-40 1 3.50E+02 (* /* )

( * - * ) ( 5.50E+03 - 5.50E+03)

(PCI/KG(WET))

(* /* )

( - _ - )

SPINACH GAmu BE-7 1 5.50E+01 (* /* ) 1.30E+02(1 /1 )

( * - * ) ( 1.30E+02 - 1.30E+02)

(PCI/KG(WET))

(* /* )

( = - = }

SPINACH GAME ZR-95 1 1.000+01 (" /* ) < LLD (0 /I )

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

(* /* )

( * - * )

SPINACH GAN% NS-95 1 5.50E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( * - * )

SPINACH GAmu CE-141 1 8.90E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

79

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL E WIROIMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM $UM MRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GUIERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 AleRML SUPE %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF IULY,E RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFDICJD STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SPINACH GAmu RU-103 1 5.00E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( * - * )

SP!hACH GAMM BA-140 1 1.90E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

{

  • - * ) _

SPINACH GApeu LA-140 1 5.70E+0J *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

(

- _ = }

$PINACH GAMM RA-226 1 1.10E+02 (* /* ) < LLD (0/1)

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( = _ = }

SPINACH GANu TH-228 1 9.30E+00 (* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

80

_m ---m v_ --- _ ,-_ _ - - - + _ _ _ - _ _ - v- - -_ __ - w- - + m e -ec , - -*vr-. , - ~ -

e--% ,

  • w---- --- _

w w u-m - A table 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK !JUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE A!Ma.YSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEANIM/10TAL)' STATIONS USED BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

CF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEpA ANALYSES FERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE

s. ,

-s s - -

'. SPI!ACH GAMMA I-13? I 9.10E+00 *

(* /* ) < L LO (0 /1 ) .

2

(%I/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

'. N u* '-('- /* )

-

  • 1

' SPINACH GAffM RU-106 1 4.50f+01 * (* /* ) , .; : * < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(VFi)) ( * - * ) - .

I *

'(* /* )

l

( * - * )

SPIMACS GAMMA CS-137 1 5.00E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD- :(0 /! ) -

(PCI/nG(WET)) ( - " )

l *

( * <

  • 3. , t

( .- )

COLLARD GAMMA CE-144 17 8.88E+01 < LLU (G /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ' '

66 < LLD (0 /5 ) I COLLARD GAlNA AG-110K 5 2.05E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ') 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

j 66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA TE-129M S 1.73E+05 (0 /3 )

< LLD < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < :.LD (0 /1 )

l l

I' 81

w w w - - '

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPT %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPfMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEJJd(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE COLLARD GAMMA 17 1.45E+01 CS-134 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

I 66 < LLD (0 /5 )

( COLLARD GAMMA CO-58 17 1.45E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 I (PCI/KG(WET))

i 66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA MN-54 17 1.37E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA FE-59 17 3.46E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

l 66 < LLO (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMru CS-136 4 3.02E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GPMMA TE-132 i .32E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

82

w u u - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MCAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-NEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE 1

COLLARD GAMMA ZN-65 17 3.55E+01 < LLO (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GANMA CO-60 17 1.54E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) 3.40E+01(1 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 3.40E+01 - 3.40E+01) 66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GANNA K-40 17 3.97E+02 4.49E+03 (11 /11 ) 4.39E+03(6 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 2.30E+03 - 7.40E+03) ( 2.90E+03 - 5.60E+03) 66 5.23E+03(5 /5 )

( 3.75E+03 - 7.40E+03)

COLLARD GAMMA BE-7 17 1.35E+02 2.77E+02 (6 /11 ) 5.10E+02(1 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.50E+02 - 3.90E+02) ( 5.10E+02 - 5.10E+02) 35 2.79E+02(5 /6 )

( 1.50E+02 - 3.90E+02)

COLLARD 17 2.79E+01 GAMMA ZR-95 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD 17 1.49E+01 GAMMA NB-95 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

83

w w w -- -- .

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGFAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY 1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUre%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGt RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE.

I COLLARD GAMMA 58-125 5 4.53E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(VET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD ~MMA CE-141 17 2.56E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD < -) /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/.(G(WET))

66 < LLD (6 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA RU-103 17 1.61E+01 < LLD' (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA CR-51 5-1.58E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA BA-140 17 7.43E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA LA-140 17 2.54E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

i 84

w w w -- w ~ .-. - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPT %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL SUPE %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-11EAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE COLLARD GAMMA I-135 2 2.21E+10 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 (PCI/KG(WET))

l i

35 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD Gaff % AC-228 5 7.78E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA RA-224 4 3.42E+03 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0,/1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) '

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA RA-226 17 2.75E+02 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA TH-228 12 2.38E+01 < LLD (0 /8 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /4 )

COLLARD GAMMA I-131 17 4.16E+01 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

85

w w u- w  % -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROMtENTAL N)NITORING PROGRAM SUNMRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEM ER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE COLLARD GAMMA NA-22 4 1.95E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA NP. "9 2 8.42E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 (PCI/KG(WET))

35 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA RU-106 17 1.21E+02 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /5 )

COLLARD GAMMA CD-109 2 4.18E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 (PCI/KG(WET))

35 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA CO-57 5 1.20E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

COLLARD GAMMA I-133 5 2.30E+05 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 35 66 L

(PCI/XG(WET))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

l 86

w w w -w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM StM1ARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD STATIONS USED INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE I COLLARD SAMMA CS-137 17 1.45E+01 3.74E+01 (5 /11 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 2.00E+01 - 5.10E+01) 35 3.74E+01(5 /6 )

( 2.00E+01 - 5.10E+01)

WELL WATER GAMMA CE-144 77 3.23E+01 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA AG-110M 18 4.58E+00 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22

( PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 )

WELL WATER GAMMA TE-129M 18 3.12E+03 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CS '3< 77 4.51E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CO-58 77 4.17E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

l 87

w w w -- - w - ._ __ '

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENiAL MONITORING PROGRAM SumARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SumARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE

WELL WATER GAMMA MN-54 77 3.91E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LED (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA FE-59 77 9.00E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 I (PCI/L ) l 22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CS-136 13 6.93E+00 (0 /11 )

< LLD < LLD (0 /2 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /2 )

WELL WATER GAMMA TE-132 18 1.47E+01 (0 /15 )

< LLD < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 )  ;

WELL WATER GAMMA ZN-65 77 8.% E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CO-60 77 4.30E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

88

u > w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE "JMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR HEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED $TATION STATION-MEAN(H/ TOTAL)

RANGE WELL WATER GAMMA K-40 77 6.40E+01 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

l 22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER BE-7 77 4.10E+01 GAMrM < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER ZR-95 77 8.58E+00 GAMMA < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA 77 4.53 E+00 NB-95 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL VATER GAMMA 58-125 18 1.32E+01 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CE-M1 77 9.27E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LID (0 /12 )

l l

89

ww w w ,

TABLE 10 RxDIOLOGICAI. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9tARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP91ARY

^

SAM *LE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION $TATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WELL WATER GAMMA RU-103 77 5.18E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CR-51 18 4.36E+01 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 ) '

WELL WATER GAMMA BA-140 77 2.21E+01 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA LA-140 77 8.53E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

. WELL WATER GAMMA I-135 6 1.85E+09 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 1 19 20 21 22

) (PCI/L )

i 22 < LLD (0 /1 )

WELL WATER GAMMA AC-228 18 1.82E+01 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

j 22 < LLD (0 /3 )

1 f

90

s - w w --w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUttiARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JAWARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1937 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES I

PERFORMED STATION $1ATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WELL WATER GAMMA RA-224 13 3.57E+02 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /2 )

WELL WATER GAMMA RA-226 77 9.76E+01 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA TH-228 59 8.29E+00 < LLD (0 /49 ) < LLD (0 /10 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /9 )

WELL WAiER GAMMA I-131 77 3.70E+01 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA NA-22 13 5.88E+00 < LLD (0 /11 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /2 )

WELL WATER GAMMA NP-239 6 1.74E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /1 )

91

w v u w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONIT0 DING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEM8ER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-NEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WELL WATER GAMMA RU-106 77 3.69E+01 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLO (0 /12 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CD-109 6 9.58E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /1 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CO-57 18 4.31E+00 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 )

WELL WATER GAMMA I-133 18 7.72E+02 < LLD (0 /15 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /3 )

WELL WATER GAMMA CS-137 77 4.29E+00 < LLD (0 /64 ) < LLD (0 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L )

22 < LLD (0 /12 )

WELL WATER TRITIUM 77 9.04E+01 1.22E+02 (6 /64 ) 1.43E+02(2 /13 ) 1 19 20 21 22 (PCI/L ) ( 7.95E+01 - 1.83E+02) ( 1.15E+02 - 1.72E+02) 19 1.83E+02(1 /13 )

( 1.83E+02 - 1.83E+02) l i

l 92

< t >

w w - m-TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUttiARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/T0iAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES -

PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE i i

l BLUE CRAS GAMMA CE-144 19 9.79E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 n )

BLUE CRAB AG-110M 6 2.83E+01 GAMMA < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAS TE-129M 6 3.58E+05 GAMMA < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA CS-134 19 1.78E+01 < LL D (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 n )

BLUE CRA8 GAMHA CO-58 19 1.67E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 n )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA MN-54 19 1.56E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 n )

93

w w o -- w - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROG"AM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGi DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUE CRAB GAMMA FE-59 19 3.99E+01 (0 /14 )

< LLD < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 17 )

BLUE CRA8 GAMMA CS-136 4 6.28E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 33 93

( PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA TE-132 6 2.71E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRA8 GAMMA ZN-65 19 4.07E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA CO-60 19 1.70E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 l

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRA8 GAMMA K-40 19 2.98E+02 2.61E+03 (14 /14 ) 2.89E+03(5 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.95E+03 - 3.30E+03) ( 2.60E+03 - 3.20E+03) 93 2.73E+03(7 /7 )

( 2.20E+03 - 3.30E+03)

I 94

w r #

1 r- -w m m -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL NDNITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMPER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUE CRAB GAMMA BE-7 19 1.50E+02 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA ZR-95 19 3.25E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA NS-95 19 1.80E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(VET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA 58-125 6 7.50E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA CE-141 19 3.04E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA RU-103 19 1.95E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

1 95

y , t i u- y , m- ---

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUtt%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

I SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUE CRAB GAMMA CR-51 6 2.80E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAB 19 1.05E+02 GAMMA BA-140 < LLO (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(UET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA 19 3.81E+01 LA-140 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAB I-135 GAMMA 2 4.35E+15 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 33 (PCI/KG(WET))

33 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA AC-228 6 1.20E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAS GAMMA RA-224 4 6.84E+03 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

l l

i 96

t i r r w- p w _-

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MCrtITORING PROGRAM SUtf%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUtfMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLO INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMEG STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE

( BLUE CRAB GAMMA RA-226 19 3.11E+02 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

43 < LLD (G /7 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA TH-228 13 1.68E 41 < LLD (0 /10 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA I-131 19 6.82E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUE CRAS GAMMA NA-22 4 4.13E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRA8 CAMMA NP-239 2 2.71E+03 < LLD (0/1) < LLD (0 /1 ) 33 (PCI/KG(VET))

33 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA RU-106 19 1.39E+02 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

l 93 < LLD (0 /7 )

97

w w 1 . r-- w , _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYDE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE I

BLUE CRAB GAMMA CD-109 2 4.75E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 33 (PCI/KG(WET))

33 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA CO-57 6 2.02E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA I-133 6 5.14E+05 ( LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 33 93 (FI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUE CRAB GAMMA CS-137 19 1.67E+01 < LLD (0 /14 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WFT))

93 < LLD (0 /7 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA CE-144 8 7.40E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA AG-110M 1 1.93E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) =

(= /= ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

l l

98

w r i u--- w m m --

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPetARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUEFISH GAMMA TE-129M 1 5.01E+05 < LLD (0 /1 ) "

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(W'iT)) ( = - = )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA CS-134 8 1.2SE+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA CO-58 8 1.26E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA MN-54 8 1.16E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA FE-59 8 3.28E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA TE-132 1 2.36E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( = _ a )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

l 99 l

w w w - numme TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUtt1ARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUttiARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR HEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUEFISH GAMMA ZN-65 8 2.89E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH (0 /5 )

GAMMA CO-60 8 1.17E+01 < LLD < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA K-40 8 4.41E+02 3.91E+03 (5 /5 ) 33 93 3.60C+03(3 /3 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( 3.60E+03 - 4.10E+03) ( 3.40E+03 - 3.90E+03) 33 3.95E+03(2 /2 )

( 3.90E+03 - 4.00E+03)

BLUEFISH (0 /5 )

GAMMA BE-7 8 1.22E+02 < LLD < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA ZR-95 2.58E+01 (0 /5 )

8 < LLD < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH N8-95 (0 /5 )

GAMMA 8 1.35E+01 < LLD < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

l l

l 100

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 AMUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR 6 (N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN i

ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUEFISH GAMMA $8-125 1 4.01E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 93

(

  • - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUEFISH GAMfu CE-141 8 2.33E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93

(PCI/KG(WET))

i 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

[ BLUEFISH GAMMA RU-103 8 1.56E+01 < LLO (0 /5 ) < LLO (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLO (0 /3 )

BLULFISH GAMMA CR-51 1 1.67E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) =

(* /* ) 93 1 (PCY/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

. 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA BA-140 8 8.19E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 3 (PCI/KG(WET))

! 93 ( LLD (0 /3 )

{

BLUEFISH GAMMA LA-140 8 2.81E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93

! (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

i 4 ,

i 3

101

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUEFISH GAMMA I-135 1 8.80E+16 < LLC (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93

(

  • - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

stuEFISH GAPMA AC-228 1 6.95E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA RA-226 8 2.09E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAPNA TH-228 7 1.97E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA I-131 8 5.81E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA NP-239 1 4.91E+03 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

102

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP91ARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED

' 0F RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN J. ANALYSES

. PERFORMED 5TATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE BLUEFISH GAMMA RU-106 8 1.03E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

BLUEFISH GAMMA CD-109 1 3.69E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

! BLUEFISH GAMMA CO-57 1 1.17E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 93

! (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

I 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

j BLUEFISH CAMMA I-133 1 1.07E+06 < LLD (0 /1 ) "

(" /* ) 93

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

l BLUEFISH GAMMA CS-137 8 1.38E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) 1.6SE+01(2 /3 ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.60E+01 - 1.70E+01) 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CE-144 7 8.19E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 l

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

i

[ 103

VABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SLM ERY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SLM%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUNO-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATIO' M (N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA AG-110M 1 3.22E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA TE-129M 1 8.16E+05 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93

! (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CS-134 7 1.27E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 a (PCI/KG(WET))

l 93 < LLD (0 /5 )

l SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CO-58 7 1.32E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

l 93 < LLD (0 /5 )

S!MtER FLOUNDER GAMMA tW-54 7 1.20E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

l SUPf1ER FLOUNDER GAMMA FE-59 7 3.50E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 j (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

i 4

104

w w w - ummuur w TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMEN'T AL MONITORING PROGRAM SUmARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUNMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED

, OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN l

ANALYSES PERFORMED $TATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA TE-132 1 3.80E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLDUNDER GAMMA ZW-65 7 3.27E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CO-60 7 1.49E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA K-40 7 3.7tE+02 3.98E+03 (5 /5 ) 4.05E+03(2 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 3.50E+03 - 4.30E+03) ( 3.80E+03 - 4.30E+03) 93 3.98E+03(5 /5 )

( 3.50E+03 - 4.30E+03)

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA GE-7 7 1.21E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA ZR-95 7 2.71E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(*4ET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

105

w t .. 1 w --- w - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EINIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPHARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTUPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA NS-95 7 1.46E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA $8-125 1 7.45E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CE-141 7 2.55E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(VET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA RU-103 7 1.57E+0? < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CR-51 1 3.03E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93

( PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

S*JMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA BA-140 7 8.63E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

l l

\

l l

j 106 l

l

w u w - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUrtiARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEM8ER,1987 l ANNUAL SUttiARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SU M FLC.,GER GAMMA LA-140 7 3.19E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93

'PCI/KGIWET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA  ?-135 1 1.25E+17 < LLD (0/1) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) {

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA AC-228 1 1.40E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA RA-226 7 2.32E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GA5tMA TH-228 6 1.64E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA I-131 7 5.67E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

107

w w w === amme TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EfNIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THR'XJGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUtt%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE iE M ER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-NEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA NP-239 1 8.33E+03 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA RU-106 7 1.09E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93  !

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CD-109 1 6.52E+02 < LLD (0/1) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CO-57 1 2.14E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA I-133 1 1.69E+06 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 i (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * ) 5 93 < LLD (0 /1 ) (

SUMMER FLOUNDER GAMMA CS-137 7 1.49E+01 1.4SE+01 (2 /5 ) 1.60E+01(1 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.30E+01 - 1.60E+01) ( 1.60E+01 - 1 60E+01) 93 1.45E+01(2 /5 )

( 1.30E+01 - 1.60E+01) l l

108

n m m ' '~ 5*

I I

TABLE 10 1

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONIl0 RING PE.0 GRAM Sl#91ARY

{ OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL SUPNARY SAMPLE TYPE ANAL (SIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAh(k/ TOTAL)

RANGE

^'

y a j '

N.

CLAMS GAMMA CE-144 63 8.08E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD /?4 7 23 24 25 l (PCI/KG(WET))

l 25 < LLD (0 /13 ) -

CLAM 3 GAMMA AG-110M 15 1.56E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 -

(PCI/KG(WET)) -

s 25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAMMA TE-12?M 15 4.84t+04 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25

^

(PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAMMA t3-154 o3 1.2SE+01 ( LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 2.i s (PCI/KG(UET))

__ 25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA CO-58 63 1.24E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 15 (PCI/KG(WuT))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA tN-54 63 1.13E+01 < Lt.D (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

l l

109

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPmARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPmARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STt.TIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN-ANALYSES PERFORMED $9 TION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CLAMS GAMMA FE-59 63 2.92E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA CS-136 10 2.55E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 C LLD (0 /2 )

CLAMS GAMMA TE-132 15 7.86E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAMMA ZN-65 63 2.79E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAtmA CO-60 63 1.36E+01 1.60E+01 (1 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.60E+01 - 1.60E+01) 24 1.60E+01(1 /13 )

( 1.60E+01 - 1.60E+01)

CLAMS GAPMA K-40 63 2.75E+02 1.16E+03 (39 /39 ) 1.29E+03(24 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 6.50E+02 - 1.80E+03) ( 5.33E+02 - 2.10E+03) 25 1.19E+03(13 /13 )

( 6.56E+02 - 1.80E+03) 110

w u w -- t_.__/ -- u -- w - _ _ _ .

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION .

JANinRY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED-0F RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ,

ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CLAMS GAMA BE-7 63 1.18E42 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA ZR-95 63 2.46Ed1 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 ,

(PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA N8-95 63 1.31Ed1 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25

(PCI/KG(WET))

T 25 < LLD (0 /13 )

4 CLAMS GAMMA 58-125 15 3.95Ed1 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25

! (PCI/KG(WET))

A 25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAMMA CE-141 63 2.59E41 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 l (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA RU-103 63 1.50EA1 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KGtWET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

4 l

111 w -- --,e

w u w- ummer -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SLM %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CLAMS GAMMA CR-51 15 1.35E+02 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAMMA BA-140 63 8.41E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS 63 3.28E+01 GAMMA LA-140 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA I-135 5 2.84E+12 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /1 )

CLANS GAMMA AC-228 15 6.39E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS 10 1.65E+03 GAMMA RA-224 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /2 )

112 s

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CLAMS GAMMA RA-226 63 2.36E+02 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 }

j CLAMS GAP 9% TH-228 48 1.95E+01 < LLD (0 /30 ) < LLD (0 /18 ) 23 24 25 J

(PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /10 )

CLAMS GAMMA I-131 63 6.57E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /13 )

CLAMS GAMMA NA-22 10 2.01E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /4 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /2 ) .

CLAMS GAMMA NP-239 5 1.22E+03 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 23 ' 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /1 )

CLAMS GAP 9m RU-106 63 9.91E+01 < LLD (0 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25

  • I (PCI/KG(WET))

i 25 < LLD (0 /13 )

4 T

113

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR00etENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPeuRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPT %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE CLAMS GAMMA CD-109 5 3.54E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /1 )

CLAMS GAMMA CO-57 15 1.08E+01 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAMMA I-133 15 3.24E+04 < LLD (0 /9 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET))

25 < LLD (0 /3 )

CLAMS GAmA CS-137 63 1.23E+01 1.60E+01 (1 /39 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.60E+01 - 1.60E+01) 23 1.60E+01(1 /13 )

( 1.60E+01 - 1.60E+01)

TAUTOG GAtttA CE-144 8 1.08E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAtem AG-110M 2 2.89E+01 < LLD (0 /1 1 < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

, 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

(

I 114 i

'MV w~ ~u w ~ - - ,

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPfMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE TAUTOG GAMMA TE-129M 2 6.45E+05 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GArtn CS-134 8 1.84E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUT 0G GAftu CO-58 8 1.83E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA MN-54 8 1.73E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA FE-59 8 4.52E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA CS-136 2 5.85E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

115

w w w - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUtt%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SudMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOT /L) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED CF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANSE 1

TAUTOG GAMMA TE-132 2 3.57E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GAMMA ZN-65 8 4.41E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA CO-60 8 1.88E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA K-40 8 4.4GE+02 4.18E+03 (4 /5 ) 4.03E+03(3 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 3.40E43 - 4.60E+03) ( 3.90E+03 - 4.20E+03) 93 4.18E+03(4 /5 )

( 3.40E+03 - 4.60E+03)

TAUTOG GAMMA BE-7 8 1.71E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCT /KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAU 10G GAMMA ZR-95 8 3.73E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

l l

9 116

u u w- - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM StPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 APMJAL SUPEARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED 5TATION $TATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE TAUT 0G GAMMA NB-95 8 1.99E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA 5B-125 2 7.77E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PC1/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GAmA CE-141 8 3.58E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMA RU-103 8 2.19E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA 2 CR-51 2.93E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GAMMA BA-140 8 1.30E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

117 l

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9MRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE TAUTOG GAMr% LA-140 8 4.75E41 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUT 0G GAMMA AC-228 2 1.22Ed2 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GAP 9E RA-224 2 7.47E43 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GAMMA RA-226 8 3.64E42 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GAMMA TH-228 6 2.45E41 < LLD (0 /4 ) < LLD (0 /2 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

TAUTOG GAMMA I-131 8 8.95Ed1 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

118

L_ I L__. r w w u- , _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9ERY OYSTER CREEK MJCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP9MRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE TAUTOG GAP 9% NA-22 2 3.47E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUT 0G GAMMA RU-106 8 1.55E+02 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/kG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

TAUTOG GArtu CO-57 2 1.78E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUT 0G GAMMA I-133 2 1.10E+06 < LLD (0 /1 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

TAUTOG GAMPu CS-137 8 2.00E+01 < LLD (0 /5 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /5 )

WHITE PERCH GAMPu CE-144 3 5.13E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 .

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

119

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUt9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

,lANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECFMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STAfl0N-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WHITE PERCH GAMMA CS-134 3 7.23E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(" /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMA CO-58 3 7.27E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(" /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

W91TE PERCH GAMMA M-54 3 7.13E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMMA FE-59 3 1.73E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(" /" ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMA ZN-65 3 1.49E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) =

(" /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

VdITE PERCH GAMMA CO-60 3 7.00E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) "

(" /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

120

- v 1 r- , , amy. ,

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Sutt%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD l INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN l ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION 5TATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WHITE PERCH GAMMA K-40 3 2.10E+03 6.60E+03 (3 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 4.50E+03 - 1.00E+04) { * - * )

93 7.25E+03(2 /2 )

( 4.50E+03 - 1.00E+04)

WHITE PERCH GAtt% BE-7 3 7.17E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAtt% ZR-95 3 1.61E+02 . LLD (0 /3 )

  • 33 93

(* /* )

(PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMMA NB-95 3 8.33E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMMA CE-141 3 1.70E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH RU-103 GAMMA 3 9.37E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( = _ = }

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

l 12i

u , ,___ _ _ - _ _ _ _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUle%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY.1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUNO-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WHITE PERCH GAMMA BA-140 3 5.23E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) "

(" /* ) 33 93

( " - " )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

=

WHITE PERCH GAP 9% LA-140 3 2.13E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) (" /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH Gaff % RA-226 3 1.41E+03 < LLD (0 /3 ) (" /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMMA TH-228 3 1.32E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(* /* ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

I 93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAMMA I-131 3 4.60E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(" /" ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WHITE PERCH GAP 9% RU-106 3 5.97E+02 < LLD (0 /3 ) =

(* /= ) 33 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

l 122

_ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . - _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ =

r- v_ f- 1_ 1 u u -- u --- -

~ _- _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SL49%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROU N (N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED l

OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN l

ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE

=

WHITE PERCH GAfem CO-137 3 7.73Ed1 < LLD (0 /3 ) (* /* ) 33 93

( " - " )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

SOIL GAKM CE-144 9 9.14Ed1 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GAMMA AG-110M 3 2.81E41 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL GAMMA TE-129M 3 1.35E47 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL GAMMA CS-134 9 1.63E41 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL Gaff % CO-58 9 1.28E41 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (3 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

123

1 v -_

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THponyy nrrrMBER,1987 ANh0AL SUPMARY LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(ad/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SOIL GAMMA m-54 9 1.21E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) 1.30E+01(1 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 1.30E+01 ".30E+01) 66 < LLD (0 /? J SOIL GAMMA FE-59 9 3.10E+01 < LLD (G /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GAMA CS-136 3 4.29E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (FCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL GAMMA TE-132 3 1.17E+03 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL GAMMA IN-65 9 3.22Ee01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (3 /3 )

SOIL GAMMA CO-60 9 f.23E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

124

--u wa r , , - -.

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL Supe %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN l ANALYSES

! PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/TOIAL)

RANGE 1

l j

SOIL GAMMA K-40 9 2.10E+02 1.33E+03 (6 /6 ) 6.77E+03(3 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 7.00E+02 - 2.10E+03) ( 4.71E+03 - 8.00E+03) l l 66 1.52E+03(3 /3 )

( ( 8.60E+02 - 2.10E+03) l SOIL GAMMA BE-7 9 1.37E+02 5.08E+02 (5 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 l

(PCI/KGiDRY)) ( 1.50E+02 - 1.10E+03) l 66 6.13E+02(3 /3 )

( 3.40E+02 - 1.10E+03) i SOIL GAMMA ZR-95 9 2.80E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GAMMA N8-95 9 1.69E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 l (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GAPeu 58-125 3 4.48E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /t ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL Gape % CE-141 9 3.26E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

l l

l l

l l

125

TABLE 10 Rt.DIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEPEER,1987 AleiUAL SUP9%RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMFD STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SOIL Gaff % RU-103 9 1.69E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

'66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GApt% CR-51 3 2.07E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL Gde% BA-140 9 1.24E+02 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 '

(PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GAMPH LA-140 9 4.91E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

SOIL GAP 9% AC-228 3 2.60E+01 2.72E+02 (2 /2 ) 7.33E+02(1 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 2.46E+02 - 2.98E+02) ( 7.33E+02 - 7.33E+02) -

35 2.98E+02(1 /t )

( 2.98E+02 - 2.98E+02)

SOIL GAMMA RA-224 3 2.19E+04 3.86E+X (1 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 3.86E404 - 3.86E+04) 35 3.86E+04(1 /1 )

( 3.86E+04 - 3.86E+04) 126

_ = __ _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0lelENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SupeMRY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERA 11NG STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RNiGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR NEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SOIL GAffu RA-226 9 1.66E+02 7.65E+02 (6 /6 ) 2.08E+03(3 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 5.10E+02 - 9.80E+02) ( 1.90E+03 - 2.20E+03) 66 8.53E+02(3 /3 )

( 7.80E+02 - 9.80E+02)

SOIL GAPMA TH-228 6 3.15E+01 2.82E+02 (4 /4 ) 9.45E+02(2 /2 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 2.40E+02 - 3.50E+02) ( 9.10E+02 - 9.80E+02) 66 3.15E+02(2 /2 )

( 2.80E+02 - 3.50E+02)

SOIL GAffu I-131 9 9.70E+01 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 66 ,

(PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

50ll GAftu NA-22 3 1.86E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL GAMMA RU-106 9 1.06E+02 < LLD (0 /6 ) < LLD (0 /3 ) 35 65 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /3 )

50Il GAren C0-57 3 1.50E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

127

w t i t___/ - ummus -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPT 1ARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEM8ER 1987 ANNUAL SUmARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/40TAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SOIL GAMMA I-133 3 2.52E+08 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY))

66 < LLD (0 /1 )

SOIL GWA CS-137 9 2.20E+01 1.89E+22 (6 /6 ) 2.02E+02(3 /3 ) 35 66 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 4.90Ft07 - 4.00E+02) ( 1.17E+02 - 2.80E+02) 66 2.21E+02(3 /3 )

( 1.22E+02 - 4.00E+02)

SEA BAb GAMMA CE-144 6.40E+01

  • 1 (* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

SEA BASS GAMMA CS-134 8.80E+0A

  • 1

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( * - * )

SEA BASS Gaff % CO-58

  • 1 9.00E+'JO (* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

{ ) -

SEA BASS GAMMA Pf4-54 7 00E*00

  • 1

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

l l

l l

l 128

n r u u m. v ~

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SupetARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987

. ANNUAL SUPMARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-NEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR I101CATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SEA BASS GAMMA FE-59 1 2.30Ed1 *

(" /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

(" /* )

( - - - )

SEA BASS GAMMA 2N-65 1 2.20E41 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - " )

(* /* )

( - _ - )

SEA BASS GAMMA CO-60 1 8.90E40 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( * - * )

SEA BASS GAMMA K-40 1 4.00E42 *

(* /* ) 3.80Ed3(1 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * ) ( 3.80E43 - 3.80E43)

(* /* )

( * - = )

SEA BASS GAMMA BE-7 1 8.80E41 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

(* /* )

( * - = )

129

- - - - - m , w u-

~ ' ~O'a rwm r ~ ..

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECDBER,1987 ANNUAL Supe %RY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SEA BASS GAPTM ZR-95 1 1.90E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

(* /* )

( - - - )

SEA BASS GArmA NS-95 1 9.30E+00 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(

  • - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

(* /* )

( - _ - )

SEA BASS GAtmA CE-141 1 2.00E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(

  • - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

(* /* )

= _ -

( )

SEA BASS GAMMA RU-103 1 1.10E+01 (* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

SEA BASS GAtmA BA-140 1 5.40E+01 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

130

v-- \ __ r- u m. rm . r-,.. m _ _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0 MENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SIM ERY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEfeER,1987 ANNUAL SU MARY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SEA 8 ASS GAMA LA-140 1 1.90E+01 *

(" /* ) < LLD 'O /1 )

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

(" /* )

( " - " )

SEA BASS GAMMA RA-226 1 1.70E+02 *

(* /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - * )

(" /" )

( - - - )

SEA BASS GAMMA TH-228 1 1.50E+01 (" /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - * )

(* /* )

= - -

( ) >

SEA BASS GAMMA I-131 1 4.10E+01 (" /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( )

(* /* )

( * - * )

SEA 8 ASS GAMMA RU-106 1 7.20E+01 (" /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( )

131

U w w t____/ w -1 m TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPE %RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 Af8AJAL St#fMRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUh0-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE SEA BASS GAtem CS-137 1 8.70E+00 *

(" /* ) < LLD (0 /1 )

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

(* /* )

( - _ = }

WEAKFISH GAMMA CE-144 2 1.21E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMMA CS-134 2 1.74E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMMA CO-58 2 1.65E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMMA MN-54 2 1.63E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 -

(PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMMA FE-59 2 4.20E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) =

( * /* ) - 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

132

___ ___m-- - . . - - _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2. +__-r- 1**-w- w+ - - -

e+ e i

TABLE 10 l RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0PetENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL SUPE %RY ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-ME4N(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED SAMPLE TYPE OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR PEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE 1

l WEAKFISH GAMPM ZN-65 2 3.65E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 l (

  • - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GANu CO-60 2 1.51E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 ) ,

  • 93 WEAKFISH GAP 9% K-40 2 5.85E+02 3.60E+03 (2 /2 ) (* /* )

( 3.00E+03 - 4.20E+03) ( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 3.60E+03(2 /2 )

( 3.00E+03 - 4.?0E+03)

WEAKFISH GAMPM BE-7 2 1.49E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAP 9% ZR-95 2 3.55E+01 < LLD (0 /I ) (* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAP 9% N8-95 2 1.92E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

l i

l l

l l 133 i

l

~ W L -_J- UW _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR00 MENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9mRY 9YSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION j

' JANtRRY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 ANNUAL SuffmRY SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUNO-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WEAKFISH GMeu CE-141 2 3.70E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAf9% RU-103 2 1.92E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAP 9H BA-140 2 1.0SE+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GM9m LA-140 2 4.10E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMPu RA-226 2 3.00E+C2 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAf9M TH-228 2 2.95E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

134

DMuww - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL DNIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECueER,1987 ANNUAL SU MARY LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) 8ACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WEAKFISH GAMA I-131 2 8.60E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93

{

  • - * )

(KI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMMA PU-106 2 1.34E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WEAKFISH GAMMA CS-137 2 1.72E+01 < LLD (0 /2 ) (* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /2 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA CE-144 4 8.25E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMA AG-110M 1 2.27E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( }

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA TE-129M 1 3.57E+04 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

= _ * }

93 < LLD (0 /t )

135

uwuw w-- t m _

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0 MENTAL PONITORING PROGRAM St#9%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING $1ATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECDBER,1987 ANNUAL SUP9%RY LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGR0tmD-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA CS-134 4 1.46E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) (* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GArmA CO-58 4 1.39E+01 < LLD (O /4 ) (* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( )

93 < LLD (0 /4

  • dINTER FLOUNDER GAP 9% P98-54 4 1.36E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA FE-59 4 3.51E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /* ) 93

( * - * )

(PCI/KG(WET))

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAP 9% CS-136 1 3.93E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93

  • - =

(PCI/KG(WET)) ( }

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAP 9% TE-132 1 8.41E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 .l (K!/KG(WET)) ( * - * }

l 93 < LLD (0 /1 )

i 136

u w u - -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUtf%RY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATINC STATION JAPNARY,1s.97 THROUGH DECEPIER,1987 -

ANN R

SUMMARY

' ~

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS IMT0pE NUMBER LLD M

INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) ~ BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED s-0F RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAff A*:ALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION MEAN(N/ TOTAL) s RAF.GE WINTER FLOUNDER GAhMA ,~ ZN-65 4 3.63E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(" . 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * -

  • i 93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER wW CHO 4 1.50E+0 h < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /= } 93 m (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER {tiaJNDER GAMMA K-d') 4 3.09E+02 4.34E+03 (4 /4 ) *

(= /a ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) - ( 4.00E+03 - 4.60E+03) { * - * )

' ~~

93 4.34E+03(4 /4 )

~ ( 4.00L+03 - 4.60E+03)

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA BE-7 4 l'.24E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) =

(= /= } 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) -

( ", - = } ,

~

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER ' AK%

C ZR-95 4 2.59E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) __ (= /* ) 93 ,

(PCI/KG(WET)) , ( * - a

)

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

  • WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA NB-95 4 1.54E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(a /a ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4-) -

s

~

b-

- w'

,w w

137 ' l r- - w

w w w m m TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANAt.YSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WINTER FLOUNDER GAMM"58-125 1 6.28E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) =

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA CE-141 4 2.47E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) =

93

(" /* )

(PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA RU-103 4 1.54E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) =

(= /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

  • - " )

93 s LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA CR-51 1.60E+02 < LLD (0 /1 )

1 =

(* /= ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA BA-140 4 7.95E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) =

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA LA-140 4 2.73E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(* /d ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) { * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

138

w v. > w m m TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER.1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA AC-228 1 1.05E+02 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA RA-224 1 1,95E+03 < LLD (0 /1 ) "

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) (

" - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA RA-226 4 2.48E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) "

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA TH-228 3 1.87E+01 < LLD (0 /3 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /3 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA I-131 4 5.26E+01 < LLD (0 /4 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLGJNDER GAMMA NA-22 1 3.75E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(= /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - " )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

l 139

u w w - -

l TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEM8ER,1987 l ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA RU-106 4 1.15E+02 < LLD (0 /4 ) "

(* /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( * - * )

93 < LLD (0 /4 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA CO-57 1 1.41E+01 < LLD (0 /1 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( " - a )

93 < LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA I-133 1 9.81E+03 < LLD (0 /1 ) "

(* /" ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( = - * )

93 . LLD (0 /1 )

WINTER FLOUNDER GAMMA CS-137 4 1.38E+01 1.30E+01 (1 /4 ) *

(" /* ) 93 (PCI/KG(WET)) ( 1.30E+01 - 1.30E+01) ( * - * )

93 1.30E+01(1 /4 )

( 1.30E+01 - 1.30E+01)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT Ga1A CE-144 102 1.01E+02 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY))

93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA AG-110H 24 2.10E+01 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY))

93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

I 140

w w u w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECLMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN g ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA TE-129M 24 9.98E+06 (0 /18 )

< LLD < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CS-134 102 1.72E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CO-58 102 1.55E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA MN-54 102 1.44E+01 9.70E+00 (1 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 9.70E+00 - 9.70E+00) 93 25 9.70E+00(1 /13 )

( 9.70E+00 - 9.70E+00)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA FE-59 102 3.99E+01 < LLD (0 n8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CS-136 21 3.43E+01 < LLD (0 /16 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

l l

l I 141

w w w w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA TE-132 24 4.27E+02 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA ZN-65 102 3.71E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA C0-60 102 1.68E+01 1.15E+02 (33 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 8.00E+00 - 3.20E+02) 93 33 1.94E+02(12 /13 )

6.00E+01 - 3.20E+02)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA K-40 102 4.44E+02 6.44E+03 (77 /78 ) 1.31E+04(24 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 3.30E+02 - 1.70E+04) ( 5.17E+03 - 1.90E+04) 93 33 1.37E404(13 /13 )

( 7.50E+03 - 1.70E+04)

AQUATIC SE3IMENT GAMMA BE-7 102 1.62E+02 4.46E+02 (37 /78 ) 5.89E+02(14 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 7.20E+01 - 4.00E+03) ( 1.02E+02 - 3.10E+03) 93 32 1.36E+03(4 /13 )

( 3.05E+02 - 4.00E+03)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA ZR-95 102 3.57E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 .

93 < LLD (0 /13 )

142

w w w w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUttiARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DFCEMBFR,1987 ANNUAL SUMMAP.Y SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMiti NS-95 102 1.93E+01 3.60E+01 (1 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 3.60E+01 - 3.60E+01) 93 23 3.60E+01(1 /13 ) )

( 3.60E+01 - 3.60E+01)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA $8-125 24 4.62E+01 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CE-141 102 3.75E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA RU-103 102 1.99E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CR-51 24 1.75E+02 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA BA-140 102 1.52E+02 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

143

u w w w -

TABLE 10 j

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

I OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR HEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA LA-140 102 5.68E+01 < LLD (0 /78 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA I-135 3 3.57E+13 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 24 32 (PCI/KG(DRY))

32 < LLD (0 /1 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA AC-228 24 5.00E+01 4.01E+02 (18 /18 ) 5.76E+02(6 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 1.03E+02 - 6.25E+02) ( 3.24E+02 - 9.39E+02) 93 33 6.03E+02(3 /3 )

( 5.86E+02 - 6.25E+02)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA RA-224 21 1.14E+04 2.39E+04 (3 /16 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 7.34E+03 - 4.75E+04) 93 33 4.75E+04(1 /3 )

( 4.75E+04 - 4.75E+04)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA RA-226 102 2.78E+02 1.01E+03 (77 /78 ) 1.22E+03(24 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 1.90E+02 - 2.80E+03) ( 6.31E+02 - 2.01E+03; 93 33 1.49E+03(13 /13 )

( 1.10E+03 - 2.10E+03)

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAHMA TH-228 78 3.86E+01 5.38E+02 (60 /60 ) 7.89E+02(18 /18 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 1.20E+02 - 1.80E+03) ( 3.40E+02 - 1.20E+03) 93 33 7.44E+02(10 /10 )

( 4.30E+02 - 1.10E+03) l 144

w w w w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPEARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/IOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORNED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) '

RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA I-131 102 1.52E+02 < LLD (0n8) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 ?S 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 ( LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA NA-22 21 2.20E+01 < LLD (0 /16 ) < LLD (0 /5 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA NP-239 3 2.12E+03 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD .(0 /1 ) 24 32 (PCI/KG(DRY))

32 < LLD (0 /1 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA RU-106 102 1.21E+02 < LLD (0 R8 ) < LLD (0 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /13 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CD-109 3 5.61E+02 < LLD (0 /2 ) < LLD (0 /1 ) 24 32 (PCI/KG(DRY))

32 < LLD (0 /1 )

AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CO-57 24 1.52C+01 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) g3 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

l 1

w w w - --

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUtt1ARY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JA E RY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

l SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION STATION-MEAN(N/ TOTAL)

RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA I-133 24 6.51E+08 < LLD (0 /18 ) < LLD (0 /6 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) 93 93 < LLD (0 /3 )

f l

146

w w w w -

TABLE 10 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPftARY l OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JANUARY,1987 THROUGH DECEMBER,1987 ANNUAL

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE ANALYSIS ISOTOPE NUMBER LLD INDICATOR-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) BACKGROUND-MEAN(N/ TOTAL) STATIONS USED OF RANGE RANGE FOR INDICATOR MEAN ANALYSES PERFORMED STATION $TATION-MEAN(N/is.AL) I RANGE AQUATIC SEDIMENT GAMMA CS-137 102 1.78E+01 9.92E+01 (69 /78 ) 9.10E+01(19 /24 ) 23 24 25 32 33 (PCI/KG(DRY)) ( 9.20E+00 - 4.10E+02) ( 1.10E+01 - 1.90E+02) 93 33 2.60E+02(12 /13 )

( 1.10E+02 - 4.10E+02) 147

RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF OYSTER CREEK OPERATIONS Two principle exposure pathways, inhalation and ingestion, are available to gaseous and liquid effluent isotopes, respectively, in the vicinity of Oyster Creek. Ir. takes via the inhalation pathday are from gaseous effluents, while the ingestion pathway is via consumption of shellfish from Oyster Creek's discharge canal and Barnegat Bay as well as the consumption of garden vegetables. Additionally, a third means of ecposure is from direct radiation from Oyster Creek effluents. For purpose of this report the maximum hypothetical annual dose due to radioactive effluents foc liquids and gases is determined as per OCNGS Technical Specification 4.6.N. Maximum exposure due to gaseous pathways (inhalation, ingestion, and direct radiation) would depead on the predominant wind direction and the location of persons living in a particular sector near the plant. The hypotbetical maximum exposure location due to gaseous effluent is 966 meters to the southeast. The maximum liquid exposure receptor is located approximately 400 meters to the southeast (discharge canal bridge).

Table 11, page 149, represents the offsite dose summary for the annual period f rom January through December of 1987. The information provided was calculated using the models and methodology outlined in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 and proposed NRC Regulatory Guide 1.111. The analysis herein represents the maximum hypotnetical annual whole body, thyroid and organ doses for both h liquid and gaseous pathways combined. Also included are the dose limits as given in the Oyster Creek Technical Specifications (4.6.N) and the percent of these technical specification limits. The maximum hypothetical annual population dose (in person-Rem) was calculated for the annual period.

According to the results in Table 11, page 149, Oyster Creek was well within 40 CFR Part 190.10a limits for whole body, thyroid and any other organ for any J member of the public as the result of exposures to planned discharges of radioactive materials te the general environment. The maximum hypothetical annual population dose for the aforementioned period was 15.2 person-Rem.

This result was based on population data for the year 1985.*

Reference:

1985 Population Estimates, OCNGS Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ, Prepared by Dresdner Associates, Jersey City, NJ, October 1986.

148

TABLE 11 Maximum Hypothetical Annual Dose Equivalent for the ,

Period from January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1987 APPLICABLE MAXIMUM TECH SPEC PERCENT ORGAN HYPOTHETICAL LIMIT TECH. SPEC ANNUAL DOSE (mrem)

(mrem)

WHOLE BODY .17 25 .68 THYROID .17 75 .23 SKIN .17 25 .68 1

]

149

APPENDIX A Sampling and Analysis Exceptions - 1987 J

/

TABLE A-1 Sampling and Analysis Exceptions - 1987 Scheduled Tech. Spec.

Collection Date Station Media Reason Required January 13, 1987 33 FISH No catch YES*

January 14, 1987 1 WWA Sampled at Incorrect NO Location January 15, 1987 94 FISH No Catch YES*

February 11, 1987 1 WWA Sampled at Incorrect NO Location Feb rua ry 11, 1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

February 13, 1987 94 SWA, AQS No Collection - YES AOL, FISH Bay Frozen February 24, 1987 71 APT, AIO Sampler Not Running YES Power Outage Februa ry 27, 1987 82 Monthly TLD LOST NO February 27, 1987 83 Monthly TLD LOST NO March 6-15, 1987 93 CRAB No catch NO March 10-13,1987 31 , 94 SWA, AQS No Collection - YES AQL, FISH Inclement Weather March 11, 1987 1 WWA sampled At Incorrect NO Location March 11-13, 1987 22 WWA No Sample Collected YES Homeowner Not Home March 14, 1987 31, 94 SWA, AQS Boat Was Out YES AQ L, FISH of Service March 24, 1987 78 Monthly TLD LOST NO March 27, 1987 80 Monthly TLD LOST NO April 6, 1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

April 8, 1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

April 8, 1987 1 WWA Sampled at Incorrect NO Location April 9, 1987 94 FISH No Catch YES*

1 51

TABLE A Continued Sampling and Analysis Exceptions - 1987 Scheduled Tech. Spec.

Collection Date Station Media Reason Required April 22, 1987 7 Monthly TLD LOST NO April 22,1987 73 Monthly TLD LOST NO April 22, 1987 79 Monthly TLD LOST - Found on 4/30/88 NO May 7, 1987 1 WWA Sampled at Incorrect NO Location May 8,1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

May 20, 1987 7 Quarterly TLD LOST NO May 20,1987 73 Quarterly TLD LOST NO May 21,1987 52 Quarterly TLD LOST YES May 26,1987 20 APT, AIO Sampler Inoperative - NO Repaired May 27, 1987 June 1, 1987 4 RWA Dead Squirrel Found NO In Funnel June 1, 1987 71 RWA Hole in Collection NO Container June 4, 1987 1 WWA Sampled at Incorrect NO Location June 6, 1987 33 FISH No Ca tch YES*

June 7, 1987 94 CRAB Not Enough Caught - NO None Saved June 10, 1987 A APT, AIO Sampler Inoperative - NO Repaired June 11, 1987 June 17, 1987 81 Monthly TLD LOST NO July 5, 1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

July 14, 1987 78 Monthly TLD LOST NO July 28, 1987 4 APT, AIO Sampler Inoperative - NO Repaired July 29, 1987 July 30,1987 94 CRAB No Catch NO July 31, 1987 33 FISH No Catch Y ES

  • TABLE A Continued Sampling and Analysis Exceptions - 1987 Scheduled Tech. Spec.

Collection Date Station Media Reason Required August 13, 1987 78 Monthly TLD LOST NO August 13, 1987 78 Quarterly TLD LOST YES August 13, 1987 82 Monthly TLD LOST NO August 20, 1987 A AP T, AIO Sampler Inoperative - NO Repaired August 20, 1987 August 26, 1987 73 RWA Hole in Collection NO Container October 19, 1987 72 RWA Station Vandalized NO Sample Lost October 24, 1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

November 5, 1987 82 Monthly TLD LOST NO November 5, 1987 82 Quarterly TLD LOST YES November 6, 1987 60 Quarterly TLD LOST YES November 16, 1987 72 RWA Station Vandalized NO No Sample Collected December 7, 1987 3 APT, AIO Sampler Vacuum Gage NO Repai red December 17, 1987 33 FISH No Catch YES*

December 18, 1987 94 FISH No Catch YES*

December 30, 1987 81 Monthly TLD LOST NO

  • Required Semiannually (when available)

APT = Air Particulate AIO = Air Iodine l RWA = Precipitation

} WWA = Well Water

} SWA = Surface Water AQS = Aquatic Sediment CLAM = Clams VGTN = Vegetation

/

SOIL = Soil FISH = Fish CR AB = Cra b

) 15,

APPENDIX B Lower Liusit of Detection (LLD) Exceptions - 1987

]

154

Lower Limit of Detection Exceptions - 1987 There was one lower limit of detection exception during the reporting period, January 1,1987 through December 31, 1987.

DATE MEDIA COLLECTED NUCLIDE TECH SPEC LLD ACTUAL LLD FOOD 26 AUG 87 I-131 60 pCi/kg (wet) 73 pCi/kg (wet)

PRODUCTS-COLLARDS The I-131 LLD could not be met because only 0.283 kg of sample could be input into a 1-liter Marinelli beaker due to the low density of the sample.

No other lower limit of detection exceptions occurred during the reporting period.

b

]

1 155

APPENDIX C Reporting Level Violations - 1987

)

J 156

Reporting Level Violations - 1987 There were no reporting level violations for the entire reporting period, January 1,1987 through December 31, 1987.

J

) 1s,

APPENDIX D US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1987

) 1se

TABLE D-1 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1987 (JAN - OCT)

COMPARISON OF EPA AND CONTRACTOR LABORATORY RESULTS S AMP LE DATE ANALYSIS TELEDYNE EPA (B) TELEDYNE TYPE COLLECTED MIDWEST (A) WESTWOOD (C)

WATER Jan. 1, 1987 Sr-89 19.7 1 5.0 25.0 1 5.0 22.7 1 0.6 Sr-90 21.0 1 2.0(D) 25.0 1 1.5 26.0 1 0.0 WATER Jan. 16, 1986 Pu -239 17.0 + 2.3 16.7 + 1.7 14.9 + 0.4 WATER Jan. 23, 1987 Gross Alpha 10.3 + 4.2 11.0 + 5.0 18.3 + 1.2(E)

Gross Beta 13.0 + 0.0 10.0 + 5.0 11.7 + 0.6 FOOD Jan. 30, 1987 St-90 36.0 + 4.0 49.0 + 10.0 50.0 + 2.8 I-131 78.0 + 3.4 78.0 + 8.0 74.0 + 1.4 1 Cs-137 89.7 + 3.0 84.0 + 5.0 91.0 + 5.7 K-40 942.0 + 56.0 980.0 + 49.0 984.0 + 67.1 WATER Feb. 6, 1987 Co-60 49.0 1 0.0 50.0 1 5.0 50.3 + 1.5 Zn-65 96.0 1 7.2 91.0 1 5.0 108.3 1 2.5(F)

Ru-106 92.0 + 20.2 100.0 + 5.0 100. 3 + 11. 2 Cs-134 53.0 + 3.4 59.0 + 5.0 62.0 + 5.6 Cs-137 89.3 1 4.6 87.0 1 5.0 92.0 1 3.6 WATER Feb. 13, 1987 H-3 4130.01140.0 4209.01421.0 4100.01200.0 MILK Feb. 27, 1987 I-1 31 10.0 1 0.0(T ) 9.0 1 0.9 8.7 + 0.6 WATER Mar. 13, 1987 Ra-226 7.0 1 0.1 7.3 + 1.1 7.5 + 0.10 Ra-228 7.1 1 2.3(T) 7.5 1 1.1 5.9 1 0.60(G)

WATER Mar. 20, 1987 Gross alpha 3.7 1 1.2 3.0 1 5.0 3.3 1 0.6 Gross beta 11.3 + 1.2 13.0 + 5.0 14.3 + 0.6 WATER Apr. 3, 1987 I-131 8.0 + 0(T) 7.0 + 0.7 6.7 + 0.6 AIR FILTER Apr. 10, 1987 Gross alpha 15.0 + 0.0 14.0 + 5.0 18.3 + 1.2 Gross beta 41.0 + 2.0 43.0 + 5.0 42.0 + 2.6 Sr-90 16.3 + 1.2 17.0 + 1.5 15.7 + 0.6 Cs-137 7.0 1 0.0 8.0 1 5.0 8.0 1 1.0 LAB. PER- Apr. 27, 1987 Gross alpha 30.7 + 1.2 30.0 + 8.0 36.3 + 1.5 PORMANCE Ra-226 3.9 + 0.2 3.9 + 0.6 3.8 + 0.1 WATER Ra-228 4.9 + 0.9 4.0 + 0.6 3.9 + 0.3 U

5.0 1 0.0 5.0 1 6.0 5.0 1 0.0 Gross beta 69.3 + 9.4 66.0 + 5.0 56.0 + 1.7(H)

Sr-89 16.3 + 3.0 19.0 + 5.0 16.3 + 0.6

] St-90 10.0 + 0.0 10.0 + 1.5 9.3 + 0.6 j Co-60 8.3 + 3.0 8.0 + 5.0 8.0 + 1.0 Cs-134 19.0 + 2.0 20.0 + 5.0 15.3 + 1.5 Cs-137 14.7 + 1.2 15.0 + 5.0 12.3 + 1.2 l l l

} 159

TABLE D-1 (Continued)

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1987 (JAN - OCT)

COMPARISON OF EPA AND CONTRACTOR LABORATORY RESULTS SAMPLE DATE ,\NALYSIS TELEDYNE EPA (B) TELEDYNE TYPE COLLECTED MIDWEST (A) WESTWOOD (C)

WATER May 8, 1987 St-89 38.0 + 6.0 41.0 + 5.0 40.3 + 2.3 Sr-90 21.0 + 2.0 20.0 + 1.5 21.3 + 0.6 WATER May 22,1987 Gross alpha 9.0 + 3.4 11.0 + 5.0 9.7 + 0.6 Gross beta 10.3 + 1. 7.0 5 5.0 8.3 + 0.6 WATER Jui. 5, 1987 Cr-51 40.0 + 8.0 41.0 + 5.0 less than 53.3 Co-60 60.3 + 3.0 64.0 + 5.0 63.0 + 4.4 Zn-65 11.3 + 5.0 10.0 + 5.0 less than 9.7 Ru-106 78.3 + 6.4 75.0 + 5.0 72.0 + 11.8 ,

Cs -134 36.7 + 3.0 40.0 + 5.0 34.7 + 1.5 Cs-137 80.3 + 4.2 80.0 + 5.0 79.0 + 4.4 WATER Jun. 12, 1987 H-3 2906.0 + 86.0 2895.0+357.0 2800.0+ 100.0 WATER Jun. 19, 1987 Ra -2 26 6.9 + 0.1 7. 3 + 1.1 7.3 + 0.2 Ra-228 13.3 + 1.0 15.2 + 2.3 17.23 + 0.7

(

MILK Jun. 26, 1987 St-89 57.0 + 4.3(K) 69.0 + 5.0 63.7 + 2.5 Sr-90 32.0 + 1.0(K) 35.0 + 1.5 39.7 + 1.2(I)

I-131 64.0 + 2.0 59.0 + 6. 0 49.3 + 3.2(J)

Cs-137 77.7 + 0.6 74.0 + 5.0 77.0 + 5.2 K 1383.0+ 17.0(K) 1525.0476.0 15 33. 3 + 98. 2 WATER Jul. 24, 1987 Gross alpha 2.3 + 0.7 5.0 + 5.0 6.3 + 0.6 Gross beta 4.0 + 1.0 5.0 + 5.0 6.3 + 0.6 FOOD Jul. 31, 1987 Sr-89 (N) 20.0 + 5.0 18.7 + 1.2 Sr-90 (N) 30.0 + 1.5 31.0 + 1.0 I-131 82.7 + 4.6 80.0 + 8.0 88.0 + 10.6 Cs -137 53.7 + 3.0 '

50.0 + 5.0 57.3 + 5.5(L)

K 1548.0+ 57.0 1680.0+84.0 1603.3+ 201.1 WATER Aug. 7, 1987 I-131 45.7 + 4.2 48.0 + 6.0 58.7 + 0.6(M)

AIR FILTER Aug. 28, 1987 Gross alpha 9.7 + 0.4 10.0 + 5.0 11.0 + 1.0 Gross beta 28.3 + 0.6 30.0 + 5.0 26.3 + 2.9 Sr-90 10.0 + 0.9 10.0 + 1.5 9.3 + 0.6 Cs -137 10.0 + 1.0 10.0 + 5.0 9.0 + 1.0 WATER Sep, 11, 1987 Ra-224 9.9 + 0.1 9.7 + 1.5 9.7 + 0.2 Ra -2 2?-_ 8.1 + 1.4(O) 6.3 + 1.0 8.0 + 0.3(P)

WATER Sep. 18, 1987 Gross alpha 2.0 + 0.6 4.0 + 5.0 2.7 + 0.6 Gross beta 11.3 + 1.3 12.0 + 5.0 13.0 + 1.0 160

TABLE D-1 (Continued)

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1987 (JAN - OCT)

COMPARISON OF EPA AND CONTRACTOR LABORATORY RESULTS SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS TELEDYNE EPA (B) TELEDYNE TYPE COLLECTED MIDWEST (A) WESTWOOD (C)

WATER Oct. 9, 1987 Cr-51 80.3117.5(Q) 70.0 + 5.0 90.7 + 11.6(R)

Co-60 16.0 1 2.3 15.0 1 5.0 16.3 1 0.6 Zn-65 46.3 1 5.6 46.0 1 5.0 50.7 2 0.6 Ru-106 57.3 + 15.4 61.0 + 5.0 55.7 + 4.0 Cs -134 23.7 + 2.5 25.0 + 5.0 25.7 + 0.6 Cs -137 51.7 1 3.2 51.0 1 5.0 54.7 1 2.1 WATER Oct. 16, 1987 H-3 4473.0+100.0 4492.0+449.2 4300.0+100.0 LAB. PER- Oct. 21, 1987 Gross alpha 29.3 + 2.6 28.0 + 7.0 40.7 + 2.l(S)

FORMANCE Ra-226 4.9 + 0.1 4.8 + 0.7 4.8 + 0.2 WATER Ra-228 4.2 + 1.0 3.6 + 0.5 3.3 + 0.3 U 3.0 + 0.1 3.0 + 6.0 3.0 + 0.0 Gross beta 72.3 + 2.7 72.0 + 5.0 72.7 + 1.5 St-89 14.3 + 1.3 16.0 + 5.0 14.7 + 0.6 St-90 9.7 + 0.4 10.0 + 1.5 9.7 + 0.6 Co-60 16.7 1 3.0 16.0 + 5.0 19.3 1 2.5 Cs-134 16.7 + 2.3 16.0 + 5.0 14.3 + 2.5 Cs-137 24.3 + 3.3 24.0 + 5.0 25.0 + 3.6 A. Teledyne Midwest Results - Mean + two sigma for three determinations. All results are in pCi/l except for air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food, which is in pCi/kg. K-40 is in mg/kg.

B. EPA Results - Expected laboratory precision (1 sigma). Units are pCi/l for water, and milk except K !.s in mg/1. Units are total pCi for air particulate filters. Units for food are pCi/kg except K-40 which is mg/kg.

C. Teledyne Results - Average + one sigma. Units are pCi/l for water and milk except K is in mg/1. Units are total pCi for air particulate filters. Units for f ood are pCi/kg except K-40 w'n ich is mg/kg.

D. Teledyne Midwest has no explanation for a low SR-90 result in this sample. All other results for St-90 in water samples analyzed in 1986 and 1987 were within acceptable limits. No other action is planned.

E. No aerosol solution was added to the planchets in the final stages of preparation in order to create a more efficient counting geometry. The technicians in the alpha beta laboratory have been instructed to add the aerosol in accordance with Procedure PRO-031-1.

F. No reason could be ascertained for the high result for Zn-65. Previous results had a normalized deviation from the known of -0.34 (10/10/86) and 0.58 (06/06/86). Therefore this does not appear to be a trend. Further cross-checks will be studied for any problems.

161

TABLE D-1 (Continued)

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION US EPA CR03S-CHECK PROGRAM 1987 (JAN - OCT)

COMPARISON OF EPA AND CONTRACTOR LABORATORY RESULTS G. A new rcdiochemical method is being developed for this analysis which should give more accurate results.

H. The p;evious two EPA beta results are 6 percent low, and our in-house beta spikes are low by about the same percentage. Dr. H. Jeter will re-train the analysts in transferring all sample residue into the planchets.

I. The reported high result was due to the small aliquot available for the Sr-90 analysis. Inadvertently a largar aliquot was used for another analysis leaving 40% of the normal volume for St-90. Additionally, the narrow acceptance limits defined by EPA are particularly difficult to meet. For this analysis 63% of the participants were beyond the + 3 sigma limit.

J. The low result is attributed to the application of the reain method rather than the hydroxide method to this analysis. The resin method is inefficient at absorbing protein-bound iodine thus leading to low results. The results obtained by GeLi were higher.

K. Teledyne Midwest Laboratory had dif ficulty with this milk sample for an unknown reason. Previous analyses of milk samples have indicated no difficulties. No other action is planned at this time.

L. The Cs-137 results in EPA Foodr have typically been biased high. We are in the process of performing our annual calibrations. We are using a new Amersham mixed gamma standard rather than the most recently prepared NBS standard which is now several years old. Based on preliminary results the three Cs-137 values would be 52.1, 50.3, and 50.9, which average 51.1.

M. Erroneously high electrode reading of stable iodide in sample (possibly because of interfering species such as divalent sulfur ion) leading to erroneously low chemical yields. After repeating the electrode read.ng, the calculated average I-131 is 49.6 pCi/1. Technicians have been made aware to be suspicious of high electrode readings. When unusually high readings occur samples will be diluted and/or oxidized and remeasured.

N. Results were not reported because samples were lost in processing.

O. Teledyne Midwest Laboratory attempted a new procedure which had yielded acceptable results with spiked samples. Further experimentation is needed with the new procedure.

P. A new Ra-228 analytical procedure is being evaluated as a corrective action to the variability of results with current method. TI No.12115 and TI No.12116 (there was not sufficient sample for a third analysis) were also analyzed by the new procedure with results of 5.9 to 7.0 pCi/1.

The new methed will be used for the next Radium in Water Cross-check samples.

162

TABLE D-1 (Continued)

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROCRAM 1987 (JAN - OCT)

COMPARISON OF EPA AND CONTRACTOR LABORATORY RESULTS Q. Teledyne Midwest Laboratory had unexplained difficulties with this isotope as did 41 other labs of the 100 participating in the study. EPA no longer spikes water with this isotope.

R. The data for the Cr-51 results were reviewed. The detector ef ficiencies appear to be correct. The other five isotopes measured in this sample were within two standard deviations indicating there is no systematte error. Chromium-51 is difficult to measure at this activity level because of the low branching intensity of the gamma ray and being in the high background region of the spectrum since Cr-51 has a low energy ray.

S. An investigation into the causes of this elevated result was ongoing at the time of this writing.

T. Results within specified EPA expected precision of + 3 sigma, N=3 control limit.

/

}

}

163

TABLE D-2 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ,

US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1987 (OCT - DEC)

COMPARISON OF EPA AND CONTRACTOR LABORATORY RESULTS S AMPLE DATE ANALYSIS GPU NUCLEAR EPA (B) TELEDYNE TYPE COLLECTED ERL (A) WESTWOOD (C)

WATER Oct. 9, 1987 Cr -51 67.0 1 6.2 70.0 + 5.0 90.71 ll.6(D)

Co-60 17.0 1 2.0 15.0 1 5.0 16.3 1 0.6 Zn-65 46.3 + 1.2 46.0 + 5.0 50.7 + 0.6 Ru-106 66.7 + 6.5 61.0 + 5.0 55.7 + 4.0 Cs-134 26.3 + 1.5 25.0 + 5.0 25.7 + 0.6 Cs -137 54.0 1 1.7 51.0 + 5.0 54.7 + 2.1 WATER Oct. 16, 1987 H-3 4 36 6. 0 +115. 0 4 49 2. 0+4 49. 2 4300.0+100.0 LAB. PER- Oct. 21, 1987 Grcss alpha 28.0 1 7.0 40.7 1 2.1(E)

FORMANCE Ra-226 No 4.8 + 0.7 4.8 + 0.2 WATER Ra-228 D 3.6 1 0.5 3.3 1 0.3 U A 3.0 + 6.0 3.0 1 0.0 Gross beta T 72.0 1 5.0 72.7 1 1.5 St-89 A 16.0 + 5.0 14.7 + 0.6 Sr-90 10. 0 + 1. 5 9.7 + 0.6 Co-60 16.0 + 5.0 19.3 + 2.5 Cs-134 16.0 1 5.0 14.3 + 2.5 Cs -137 24.0 + 5.0 25.0 1 3.6 WATER Nov. 20, 1987 Gross alpha 6.7 + 1.5 7.0 + 5.0 less than 1.0 Gross beta 2 3. 0 + 1. 0 19.0 + 5.0 less than 1.0 A. GPU Nuclear ERL result is an average of three measurements 1 one sigma.

Units were pCi/1.

B. EPA Results-Expected laboratory precision (1 sigma) . Units are pCi/l for water, and milk except K is in mg/1. Units are total PCi for air particulate filters. Units for food are pCi/kg except K-40 which is mg/kg.

C, Teledyne Results - Average 1 one sigma. Units are pCi/l for water and milk except K is in mg/1. Units are total pCi for air particulate filters. Units for food are pCi/kg except K-40 which is mg/kg.

D. The data for the Cr-51 results were reviewed. The detector efficiencies appear to be correct. The other five isotopes measured in this sample were within two standard deviations indicating there is no systematic error. Chromium-51 is dif ficult to measure at this activity level because of the low branching intensity of the gamma ray and being in the high background region of the spectrum since Cr-51 has a low energy ray.

E. An investigation into the causes of this elevated result was ongoing at the time of this writing.

164

i

/

. /

)

i i

APPENDIX E Annual Dairy Census - 1987 i

\

t I

i 165 './

Annual Dai ry Census - 1987 The 1987 dairy census concluded that there are no commercial dairy operations or other dairy animals within a 5 mile radius of the plant.

l i

166

APPF21 DIX F Ar.aual Garden Census - 1987

)

) 1e>

Annual Ga rden Census - 1982 The 1987 garden census concluded that there are no commercial farms producing broadleaf vegetation within a 5 mile radius of the plant. Two gardens producing broadleaf vegetation were established near the site boundary in the two sectors with the highest D/Q. The results of vegetable analysis are listed in Table 10, page 44.

168

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . - - _ -