Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:NRC TECHNICAL REPORT
MONTHYEARML20151S1471988-06-30030 June 1988 Rept of 861001 Interview of P Childs by JW Mcmahon & Rc Kazmar Re Use of Computerized Electronic Ofc Sys for Handling Safeguards Info & Related NRC Regulations at Plant ML20151S0691988-06-30030 June 1988 Rept of 860925 Interview of D Balent by Rc Kazmar Re Use of Comprehensive Electronic Ofc Sys for Safeguards Info at Plant ML20151S0601988-06-30030 June 1988 Rept of 880624 & 1002 Interview of J Korte by Rc Kazmar Re Use of ADP Sys at Plant for Handling Safeguards Info ML20151P3451988-06-30030 June 1988 Rept of 860616 & 0930 Interview of C Lary by Rc Kazmar Re Use of ADP Sys at Util for Handling Safeguards Info ML20245J8661988-05-18018 May 1988 AEOD Technical Review Rept AEOD/T806, Recent Operational Experience Trends at Fermi 2 ML20148B3291988-03-14014 March 1988 Headquarters Daily Rept for 880314 ML20196H6351988-03-0808 March 1988 Headquarters Daily Rept for 880308 ML20151S2491986-06-25025 June 1986 Rept of 860625 Interview of J Conen by Jn Kalkman & Rc Kazmar Re Use of Plant Comprehensive Electronic Ofc Sys for Processing Safeguards Info ML20211P8191985-07-31031 July 1985 Partially Deleted Ofc of Investigations Program Review of Fermi Safeteam. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20136C7301955-07-21021 July 1955 Rept of Subcommittee of ACRS on Detroit Edison Reactor 1988-06-30
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217N4381999-10-25025 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 17 to License DPR-9 ML20217P3551999-10-22022 October 1999 LER 99-S01-00:on 990922,loaded 9mm Handgun Was Discovered on Truck Cargo Area of Vehicle Inside Protected Area.Caused by Inadequate Vehicle Search.Guidance in Procedures & Security Training to Address Multiple Vehicle Searches Was Provided NRC-99-0095, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0067, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0065, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0088, Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with1999-06-30030 June 1999 Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with NRC-99-0064, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0062, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20206J9301999-05-10010 May 1999 SER Concluding That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Requested in GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Powered-Operated Gate Valves ML20206G5081999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Approving Request for Relief PR-8,Rev 2 on Basis That Licensee Committed to Meet All Related Requirements of ASME OM-6 Std & PR-12 on Basis That Proposed Alternative Will Provide Acceptable Level of Safety NRC-99-0022, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20205Q7141999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 16 to License DPR-9 ML20205P9721999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20204E0371999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request for NRC Approval of Alternative Rv Weld Exam,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) for Plant,Unit 2 for 40-month Period ML20204D0361999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20198S3341999-01-0606 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 15 to License DPR-9 NRC-99-0005, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20207B7491998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Operating Rept for Fermi 2 ML20205Q9621998-12-31031 December 1998 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-99-0021, 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with NRC-98-0153, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With NRC-98-0160, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20154R2331998-10-21021 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 13 to License DPR-9 ML20154L1031998-10-14014 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of Residual Heat Removal Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode NRC-98-0139, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With ML20154H8161998-09-30030 September 1998 Rev 0 to COLR Cycle 7 for Fermi 2 ML20153B8811998-09-18018 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Relief from Certain Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,For Plant,Unit 2 ML20151X0651998-09-11011 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program Relief Request VR-63 for Plant NRC-98-0111, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20237E1171998-08-25025 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Relief Requests for First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Nondestructive Exam Program ML20236X8611998-08-0505 August 1998 SER Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to Facility Operating License NPF-43,Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC-98-0109, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20236K3261998-07-0101 July 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to License NPF-43 for Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 2 NRC-98-0097, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2 NRC-98-0127, Annual Rept for Period 970701-9806301998-06-30030 June 1998 Annual Rept for Period 970701-980630 NRC-98-0079, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0076, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 21998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0072, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 21998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0050, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 21998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0019, Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 21998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20198L4241998-01-0808 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Rev 2 to Relief Request VR-51 Under Fermi 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) for First 10-yr Interval NRC-98-0015, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20217N3821997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Operating Rept for 970101-1231 NRC-98-0053, 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company1997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company ML20205Q9601997-12-31031 December 1997 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 NRC-97-0141, Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility1997-12-23023 December 1997 Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar NRC-97-0131, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 21997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20248H1151997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to Colr,Cycle 6 for Fermi 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
_ - _ - _ . -.
s .h UNITED STATES -
p i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, $ .f OFFICE oF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE RE0loN ill
..... EL LL i 137 REPORT OF INTERVIEW Interviewee Location Paul CHILDS Detroit, Michigan On October 1,1986, NRC:01 Investigators John W. McMahon and Richard C. Kazmar interviewed Paul CHILDS, who is currently assistant to the Vice President of Nuclear Operations at the Detroit Edison Company (Deco). Present at the interview was Deco Attorney John H. FLYNN. CHILDS is a degreed mathematician with an emphasis on computer science.
In 1985, CHILDS stated that he was the Supervisory Engineer of the Process Control Computer Division, and during 1985 became involved with the final stages of the implementation of DECO's Computeri:ed Electronic Office (CEO),
CHILDS stated that he has a working knowledge of CEO software and is fully aware of procedures for handling Safeguards Infomation and related NRC regulations.
CHILDS was shown a DECO memorandum dated July 1,1985, from Stuart LEACH, Director of Nuclear Security Administration (Attachment A)(.DNS), to James CHILDS recalled PIANA, seeing the memo, Director of Nuclear which had been brought to his attention by one of his subordinates, and which indicated that certain members of the Nuclear Security (NS) staff thought the CEO system may not adequately protect inputted Safeguards material. CHILDS stated that at the time he saw the memo, he was not surprised as to the concerns raised.
CHILDS recalls having a conversation with Sam THOMPSON, Assistant DNS, about CEO and Safeguards Infomation some time after the July 1 memo, but could not recall any specifics, CHILDS stated that during the time period of about July through November 1985, that terminals with access to information inputted at CEO tenninals at Fenni cxisted at three locations at the Deco building in downtown Detroit. CHILDS elaborated, saying that a CEO terminal existed on each of the following offices: Chuck HEIDEL's office, President of Deco; William PENCE, Vice President of Operations (retired); and Ann POUGE, Comunications Engineer.
CHILDS was shown a CEO printed message (Attachment B) and he explained that to him it meant that Joseph KORTE, a Nuclear Security Specialist, who had transmitted a memo (Attachment C) to Wayne HASTINGS, DNc on September 30, 1985, at 12:23 p.m., had been entered into HASTINGS' account and had been called up and viewed at 5:09 p.m. by HASTINGS or some person using HASTINGS' password, CHILDS reviewed Attachment C, which is the memo referred to in the preceding paragraph and which had been sent by KORTE to HASTINGS on September 30, 1985 via CEO. CHILDS stated that he agreed with each item and in addition, stated that in regards to item 5, he is not satisfied that a line by line deletion would completely destroy the contents of the memo, but suspects that the EXHIBIT - /O Case No. 3-86-006 1 PAGE- I OF O _ PAGES) 8908150085 E00600 PDR F01A MAXWELLBO-227 PDR
//
l i
t i
l
' l document could still be recalled unless a complete memory dump was performed.
CHILDS also stated that in his opinion, the CEO should not be used for i Safeguards Information handling under any circumstances, including as a '
word processing system, due to existence of offsite access. CHILOS commented that to his knowledge, the CEO system can be accessed not only from offsite terminals, but from other terminals using KACPAC, a separate Deco computerized information system.
CHILDS stated that in his opinion, he felt HASTINGS would be knowledgeable of l offsite access to CEO, since HASTINGS had been Director of Computer Services ;
at some time period before assuming his position as DNS. !
CHILDS stated that when HASTINGT assumed duties as DNS, his management style was dif ferent than LEACH. CHILDS elaborated, saying that LEACH sought the advice not only from his staff, but was willing to interface with NRC Inspectors in order to get a "calibration" in regards to NRC regulations, whereas HASTINGS' approach was not to seek input from his staff and by innuendo, did not want any "calibration" by the NRC, and had an attitude described by "let's see what we can get away with."
i i
I I
i l
l l
f i
EXHIBIT IO -- l PAGE dk OF ES -PAoE(s) l Case No. 3-86-006 2
g@1 9
Date: July 1, 1985
#13-85-0096 To:
James L. Piana Director-Nuclear Admi istratisn From:
Stuart B. Le M Director-Nulcear ecurity
Subject:
CEO - Protection of Safeguards Information 1 Certain members of my staff have expressed a concern er the ov possibility of Safeguards Information and other confidential material being inputted into the CEO System.
Preliminary reflect this nature.deficiencies in adequately protecting mate Please contact me as I would appreciate your assist ance in I researching this matter more extensively. (
SHL/as cc: L. Wayne Hastings EXHIBIT de 5-86-006 PAGE O OF M PAGES)
Enclosura 3
%marr A pty.[(.R.()C6.9 * '
Kort?, Joe T
5 :im: Bastings, Wayne -
taark Sep 39,85 5:09 PM tus: Previously read
*iect: Bastings, Wayne has seen, SMB3UP$DS No (E0
.ge:
2he above inessage which you sent Sep 39,8512:23 PM was seen by Bastings, Wayne l
1 EXHIBIT - fO ,
3-86-006 PAos- 4 OF b - PAGE(S)
Annenmeer e
WAYNE, PER YOUR REQUEST KATE AND I HAVE INVESTIGATED THE POSSIBLE USE OF SO FOR HANDLING SAFEGUARDI ii (S.I.). WE TOOK INFORMATION FROM NUREG-8794,'NFORMATION PROTECTION OF l .
UNCLASSIFIF.D EAPEGUARDS TMPORMATION. NRC INSPECTION AND ,
l l ENFORCEMENT INSPECTION PROCEDURE 81813, PHysicAr. PROTECTION
?
SAI2 GUARDS INPORMCIQi, AND NOIP 11.888.114. % !
, WE HAD A CONVERSATION WITH J. CREED AND T. MADEDA CONCERNING THE MATTER, AND TALKED WITH COMPUTER SERVICES PERSONNEL.
AFTER RESEAkCHING THESE SOURCES AND TALKING WITB THE NRC, WE HAVE THE FOLLOWING REASONS WHY WE COULD NOT USE CEO FOR HANDLING SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION. I 1.
THE SYSTEM IS NOT SELF-CONTAINED WITHIN THE PACILITY. WE-HAVE FOUR LINES THAT GO DOW% TOWN. -
2 THE LINES ARE UNPROTECTED PHONE LINES BECAUSE THEY ARE MOT PROTECTED BY ANY KIND OF ENCRYPTION DEVICE.
3 PERSONNEL, "SUPER USERS' HAVE THE AVAILABILITY TO GAIN ACCESS TO ACCOUNTS OTHER THAN THEIR OWN. b 4.
DOCUMENTS DISCARDED INTO THE WASTEBASKET ARE STILL AVAILABLE TO ANYONE GAINING ACCESS TO THE ACCOUNT UNTIL THE JANITOR CLEANS THE ACCOUNT.
5.
THE POSSIBILITY WAS RESEARCHED. OF CREATING A SAFEGUARDS DOCUMENT ON CEO ,
THE ONLY SAFE WAY TO DISPOSE OF THE !
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT IS TO DELETS THE DOCUMENT ONE LINE AT A TIME. KATE SURVEYED. LAURA PIMPSON, KAREN HARBAUGB, DOROTHY BALENT, AND JAN SYPE, EACH OF THEM g STATED THAT IT POULD TAKE MORE TIME TO CREATE THE DOCUMENT ORDER TO PRINT IT AND THEN HAVE TO DELETE EACP LINE THAN IT WOULD TAKE TO TYPE THE DOCUMENT ON THE TYPEWRITER.
6.
IN CONJUNCTION WITH NUMBER 5, IF THE DOCUMENT HAD TO BE EDITED Arc WAS FTORCD FOR A PERIOD OF TIME DURING PROOF READING, THE DOCUMENT WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE FOR THIS PERIOD.
d H k ]F 3-86-006 EXHIBIT r PAGE b - OF $ - FAGE(S)
A au u man- A}}