ML20151P674
| ML20151P674 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1987 |
| From: | Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151P557 | List: |
| References | |
| CPP-027, CPP-27, NUDOCS 8804260226 | |
| Download: ML20151P674 (17) | |
Text
.
Pcgs 1 of 12 e
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION O,
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN VII.a.9 FOR 13FORMATl0N ONLY PROCEDURE NO: CPP-027 REVISION: 3 ISSUE DATE:
10-23-87 REINSPECTION / DOCUMENTATION REVIEW OF PURCHASED SAFETY-RELATED MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT Prepared by:
Date:
/# 22* 8 7
't J Approved by:
Date: /8 522 -N On-SiteQARp'esentative Approved by:
us.[
Date:
/o E 3 87 l
/ C R'eview Team' Leader
/
/
V lO I
G804260226 880415 PDR ADOCK 05000445 A
^
e CPP-027 Rsvision:
3
^
Ll 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure describes the development of the reinspection / documentation review checklists, the preparation and
)
assembly of verification packages, and the performance of the equipment / material reinspections and/or documentation reviews required by Issue-Specific Action Plan VII.a.9.
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure is applicable to purchased safety-related equipment and material received and QC-accepted at Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1, 2 and Common.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 CPP-006, "Sample Selection."
3.2 CPP-012 "QA/QC Interface with Constructor and TUGCO."
3.3 CPP-010. "Preparation of Deviation Reports."
3.4 CPP-020, "Out-of-Scope Observations."
p 4.0 GENERAL, V
Verification packages are prepared for equipment and material items selected for evaluation.
The verification packages include a reinspection / documentation review checklist which identifies the attributes and accept / reject criteria to be verified for each selected equipment / material item. The results of the reinspection / documentation review are documented on these checklists. This procedure ensures that the results of each reinspection / documentation review are documented, reviewed and approved.
Furthermore, any item which deviates from the established acceptance criteria is uniquely identified and controlled.
4.1. Responsibilities 4.1.1 ISAP Issue Coordinator The Issue Coordinator is responsible for the following:
Review and approval of verification packages Assignment of identification numbers to verification packages.
Review and validation of deviation reports and program deviation reports.
2
4 CPP-027 R3 vision:
3 Interface with constructor and TUGCO.
j-f l-Final acceptance of completed verification package.
Control of verification package and accumulation of records.
4.1.2 ISAP QA/QC Engineers The engineers are responsible for the following:
Preparation of the verification package for
~
each item included in the evaluation.
Interface with QC Inspector to resolve problems and provide technical guidance.
Review of deviation reports and program deviation reports.
Review of verification package for accuracy and completeness 4.1.3 QA/QC Inspection Supervisor f'T The QA/QC Inspection Supervisor ensures that
(_)
verification packages are assi ned to qualified 8
inspectors and reinspection / documentation results are reviewed, and returned to the ISAP Issue Coordinator.
4.1.4 QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspector The QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspectors receive and assign verification packages.
The Level III Inspectors review completed packages for accuracy, ce npleteness, consistency and proper documentation of deviations, approve the completed package and document their transmittal in accordance with this proced.2re.
4.1.5 QA/QC Inspector The inspector is responsible for performing the reinspection / documentation Review, and comp.!.eting the specific checklist attributes contained in each reinspection / documentation review verification package.
4.2 Policy Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the CPRT Program Plan, ERC Management Program Plan, and Issue-Specific Action Plan VII.a.9.
O The ISAP Issue Coordinator and the QA/QC Inspection Supervisor 3
CPP-027 Rsvision:
3 I.
may perform all activities designated to an individual under jem()
his or her supervision. The only exception being those activities under the supervision of the OA/QC Inspection Supervisor that are required to be performed by an individual certified as defined in ISAP VII.a.9.
Should an activity be designated as the responsibility of the l
Issue Coordinator or QA/QC Inspection Supervisot, it may be delegated by the Issue Coordinator or the QA/QC Inspection Supervisor to an individual under his or her supervision.
4.3 Conflicts l
In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.
4.4 Definitions 4.4.1 Verification Package A group of documents including, as required, the verification package contents list, the applicable reinspection / documentation review checklist, implementing inspection instructions, drawings, documents, etc. which have been collected to enable the Inspector to perform and to document the reinspection / documentation review of a given item.
4.4.2 Checklist A tabulation of attributes including accept / reject criteria to be used to document the reinspection / documentation review of a piece of l
equipment or material.
l 5.0 PROCEDURE l
5.1 Preparation of Reinspection and Documentation Review Checklists for Equipment and Katerial Reinspection and documentation review prepared checkliste are l
assembled by the ISAP QA/QC Engineer for each evaluation item, 5.1.1 Responsible ISAP QA/QC Engineers will obtain from TUGC0 a copy of the applicable design drawings including all authorized change documents, also a copy of the design I
specification and amendments in effort on the date the applicable CPSES Receiving Inspection Report w.ns signed. Discussions will be held as required, with Texas Utilities Generating Company Project Support personnel to obtain information and/or interpretation of design and fabrication documentation, and with the QOC QA/QC Reinspection personnel as to the feasibility O
of inspecting identified attributes. The purpose and 4
CPP-027 Ravicient 3
~'
results of these discussions will be documented and 1
/T 5- /
maintained as memoranda in the ISAP working files. The ISAP Issue Coordinator will review each memoranda and provide his concurrence by signature on the memoranda.
5.1.2 The ISAP QA/QC Engineer utilizing the above information will develop a checklist (Attachment 6.1) for the attributes that require reinspection and/or verification through documentation review.
In some cases a piece of equipment selected for reinspection will have multiple occurrences of an attribute such as electrical terminations, bolting, etc.
In these cases the ISAP Issue Coordinator may elect to-employ statistical sampling in lieu of reinspection of each occurrence in a selected piece of equipment.
Statistical sampling when performed will be as defined in accordance with Appendix D of the CPRT Program Plan and Reference 3.1.
The ISAP Issue Coordinator will approve each proposed use of statistical sampling.
Those physical characteristics (attributes) defined in the applicable design specification and/or TUGCO/ vendor design drawings that are not included in the checklist will be identified, including the justification for exclusion (i.e., inaccessible, does not affect the O
equipment (s) ability to perform its intended safety function, etc.), on a memorandum. These memoranda will be prepared by the ISAP QA/QC Engineer and approved by the ISAP Issue Coordinator and maintained in the l
ISAP working file.
The ISAP QA/QC Engineer will also prepare any required implementation instructions (Attachment 6.2) to aid the QA/QC Inspector in the performance of the reinspection or documentation review.
5.1.3 After preparing the checklist and implementation instructions the ISAP QA/QC Engineer will prepare a memorandum to the ISAP Issue Coordinator including as attachments:
The Reinspection Checklist, and any implementing instruction.
A list of the source documents (including revision numbers) for each attribute included; and O
5
CPP-0271 Revicion:
3 The memoranda written in accotdance with
{}
5.1.1 and 5.1.2 above.
NOTE:
The documentation review of materials may include or be limited to on-site construction testing as the basis for determining material acceptability.
If thie is the case the ISAP QA/QC Engineer will document the following:
basis of need to use the on-site testing as verification of the materials compliance with procurement / design requirements.
Explanation of the construction test (s),
including the parameters of the procurement design requirements specified, identification of the point in the construction process testing was performed, and a description of how discrepancies were identified, documented and resolved.
The documentation review checklist attributes to be verified by the QA/QC inspector.
)
5.1.4 On receipt of the memorandum, the ISAP Issue Coordinator will review the documents for accuracy, completeness and conformance with this procedure. The ISAP Issue Coordinator will review the checklist and exclusion memorandum to determine that the attributes selected for review will provide reasonable assurance that the physical characteristics of the equipment / material comply with the applicable design specification and TUGCO/ vendor design drawings. Upon satisfactory review the ISAP Issue Coordinator will l
sign the transmittal memorandum, the checklist and implementing instruction. The original documents will be filed in the ISAP working file and copies of the checklist and implementing instruction-(identified as "Verification Package Copy") will be returned to the l
ISAP QA/QC Engineer for inclusion in the verification package.
5.1.5 Changes to approved checklists and implementing i
instructions require the approval of the ISAP Issue l
[
j Coordinator. The method of effecting a change to the verification package is judgemental based on the complexity of the change; provided the chosen method a
enables a clear understanding of the scope of the change and the 6
d
CPP-027 Ravisien:
3 justification.
If the change is extensive enough that
,_s l
')
a change by lining-thru, initialing & dating will not
\\~ /
provide the required clarity, the applicable individual pages will be revised as shown in Section 5.3.1. below.
The revisions shall be processed in the same manner described in paragraph 5.1.3 above.
In addition, the memoranda shall state the reason for revision and what effect the change will have on the reinspection effort (i.e., Redo completed reinspection).
If the page to be revised contains information previously entered by the QA/QC Inspector and this information is not affected by the revision, the information will be transferred to the revised page by the original QA/QC inspector and approved by the QA/QC Issue Engineer.
If the original QA/QC Inspector is not available to make this transfer of information, the information will be transferred by the QA/QC Issue Engineer and reviewed and approved by the ISAP Issue Coordinator.
5.3 Preparation of Material / Equipment Verification Packages Verification packages are prepared by the ISAP QA/QC Engineer for each evaluation item.
5.3.1 The ISAP Issue Cor.rdinator will establish a unique number for each mat.erial/ equipment verification N
package. The verification number is determined as in the example below.
I-M-VII.a.9-001
- A three (3) digit unique number The ISAP number Discipline
- Type of checklirt Discipline: M = Mechanical E = Electrical S = Structural C = Civil W = Welding O
7
CPP-027 R visicn:
3 Type of Checklist:
/}
I = Equipment k--
D = Material The ISAF Issue Coordinator will maintain a log of verification packages numbers issued.
Revisions of individual pages of the verification packages will be identified as in the example below.
I-M-VII.a.9-001-01 A two (2) digit suffix indicating the number of the revision to the originally issued page.
5.3.2 The ISAP QA/QC Engineer assembles the Verification Package which includes a Verification Package Contents Form (Attachment 6.3) listing the documents needed to perform the reinspection and/or documentation review (see Attachment 6.3).
Such documents shall be included or, for records other than those retained in the Permanent Plant Records Vault, their location specified in the Implementing Inspection Instruction.
5.3.3 The ISAP Q/./QC Engineer obtains the documents necessary 3
to be in the verification package, assembles the s,)
package and forwards the assembled verification package to ISAP Issue Coordinator for review.
5.3.4 The ISAP Issue Coordinator reviews the verification package for completeness and accuracy, and approves the package, if satisf actory, accepts the package by signing the Verification Package Contents Form.
5.3.5 The ISAP Issue Coordinator transmits the approved Verification Packages to the QA/QC Inspection Supervisor. The ISAP Issue Coordinator documents the transmittal in a memorandum which specifies:
The Verification Package Number; The Unit designation; and The equipment tag / spin number.
O 8
CPP-027 Revision:
3 5.4 Performance of Reinspections and Documentation Reviews (m) 5.4.1 Upon receipt of the Verification Package, the QA/QC Inspection Supervisor ensures that the verification packages are logged and then forwarded to the responsible QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspector. The QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspector confirms that any necessary equipment and/or services requested per Reference 3.2 have been provided and assigns the package to an QA/QC inspector.
5.4.2 The responsible QA/QC inspectors perform the field reinspections and/or documentation reviews, using the checklists and implementing instructions in tho verification package.
As required, the QA/QC inspector denotes the completion of the documents used to record the results of the reinspection / documentation review by signing and dating the forms included in the verification package.
The Inspector also completes the Verification Package Contents Form by entering the date he or she completed the forms in the "DATE" column.
5.4.3 When inspection tools and measuring devices are used for reinspection, the inspector (s) will do the following:
Use commercial, off-the-shelf tools and measuring devices, unless special tools or devices are specified by the ISAP QA/QC Engineer in the implementing instructions.
Ensure that if a specific degree of measurement accuracy is required by the checklist and/or implementing instruction, appropriate measuring devices are used.
Ensure that special measuring devices and devices whose indicated measurements are subject to change have received specified calibration.
NOTE:
When such deviceu are used, the QA/QC Inspector will record in the remarks section of the checklist, the device serial number and the calibration due date.
9
CPP-027 R vision:
5 In some cases it may be necessary to verify
- (,)
an attribute by such methods as field u/
surveys, UT results, Hi-Pot /Meggar Test, etc.
which are provided by TUGCO. When such methods are used, the results are documented and included in the verification package as supportive evidence of the conclusions reached.
5.4.4 Inspectors record the result of the reinspection and/or documentation review on the checklist.
Based upon each accept / reject criterion, the Inspector denotes the equipment / material acceptability by initialing the appropriate "Accept" or "Reject" column on the checklist and dating the annotation. When a condition on the equipment / material being evaluated is checked rej ect, the Inspector will initiate a Deviation Report
(
(DR) in accordance with Referen:e 3.3, and will do the following:
l Enter its number in the remarks column of the checklist.
File it in the verification package.
Enter the DR number and "Deviation Report" on i
the Verification Package Contents Form, then s
it initial and date the entry.
NOTE:
Enter "NA" in the "DATE" column when the DR is superceded prior to being (in) validated by the second reviewer (see Reference 3.3) and indicate that it is "Superceded".
If in the course of performing a reinspection / documentation review where the applicability or accessibility of an attribute is questioned by the QA/QC Inspector, the QA/QC Inspector will bring this question to the attention of the applicable QA/QC Engineer.
If the QA/QC Engineer agrees that the attribute, portion of the attribute, or inspection point is not applicable or is inaccessible, he will mark the attribute appropriately (NA or INACC.), initial and date the entry, revise the l
exclusion letter to reflect the non-applicable attribute, and obtain the necessary signatures on the exclusion letter.
(This does not constitute a revision to the package).
For any other changes to the package, the QA/QC Engineer will revise the checklist in accordance with paragraph 5.1.5 above.
l l
10
w CPP-027 R;vicions 3
5.4.5 The QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspector or Inspection s
_(
j Supervisor reviews the verification package to ensure
's that reinspection / documentation review results are clear and complete.
Upon completion of each satisfactory review, the QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspector or QA/QC Iaspection l
Supervisor signs and dates the checklist in the appropriate block and forwards it to the responsible ISAP QA/QC Engineer via the QA/QC Inspection Supe rvisor.
The QA/QC Discipline Level III Inspector or QA/QC Inspection Supervisor documents the transmittal in a l
memorandum which includes:
Verification package number.
Inspector's initials.
Date the reinspection / documentation review was completed.
5.4.6 The ISAP QA/QC Engineer will review the verification package to ensure that the reinspection / documentation review was conducted in accordance with the checklist
/~'g and implementing instructions.
(j The ISAP QA/QC Engineer will evaluate each DR written against a verification package to determine which of the following are applicable:
The identified deviation was the result of an authorized modification (NCR, DCA, etc.) that was not identified at the time the verification package was prepared; or The identified deviation can reasonably be attributed to on-site construction or testing activities; or The deviation most likely existed at the time of receipt and was not detected and corrected during manufacturing inspection, vendor surveillance, and receipt inspection.
The ISAP QA/QC Engineer will invalidate (in accordance with Reference 3.3) those DRs that identify deviations that were previously authorized. The DR including the justification for invalidation will be submitted to the ISAP Issue Coordinator for approval. The ISAP Issue Coordinator will indicate his approval of the 7-s invalidation by co-signing the appropriate block on the
( j DR with the ISAP QA/QC Engineer.
11
CPP-027 R vision:
3
.ji, The QA/QC Issue Engineer will document those
' (--}
deviations determined to be the result of on-site construction or testing as "Out of Scope" (in accordance with Reference 3.4).
The ISAP Issue Coordinator will indicate his approval by co-signing the appropriate block on the DR with the ISAP QA/QC Engineer.
The ISAP QA/QC Engineer will process the remaining DRs in accordance with Reference 3.3 and indicate the date the DR was (in) validated in the "Date" column of the Verification Package Content Form.
5.4.7 Upon completion of each satisfactory review, the ISAP QA/QC Engineer initials and dates the "Accepted by" block on the Verification Package Contents form and forwards the completed verification package to the ISAP Issue Coordinator. The ISAP Issue Coordinator indicates his acceptance of the verification package by signing and dating the "Accepted by" block on the Verification Package Contents form.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 Checklist (Sample)
O)
(
6.2 Implementing Inspection Instructions (Sample and Instructions) 6.3 Verification Package Contents Form (Sample) l l
l l
l l
l
'!O 1
12
6 Attachmsnt 6.1 CPP-027 Revision:
3 Page 1 of 2 l
\\
\\
CHECKLIST F
Co_....u-1.
~;_
m=_
Equipt s Teg No.
Vertfketsm Ptg. ha.
Pete of Attnevse Aue,e ne new am e
5 \\^
MA
\\\\
\\/
,G
^\\h V
(SM V
A N'<
b\\
\\>
A
\\ MX
^
Nh?
~
\\AN V
^
\\v4 F_ \\>
m - 3 lI A
U
{
l Propered W t Aeproved W siAr oa t oc twaeer new -
twisen ceerencer oew I
impeded W:
Approved h I QA9C ameeder osee M >sachne teved a irweeoer oete CP9 427,1 A senseen t I
1 I
' ' ~~~~
>.1 CPP-027 Revision:
3 CHECKLIST (CONTINUATION PAGE)
Comanche Peak Response Team Checklist Continuation Sheet
,htwipment / Tag h Venfkstion Mg. No.
y-w w o~oc i+
..in wi.
au o..
N.
V/.
(O A
\\v/
)
_ \\\\."
/nT W
\\v/
. (\\
\\\\
CA\\\\
\\XW
.RN W
WN
_(&
M" Us' 0)
O
..n.i. mi 2
)
Attechm:nt 6.2 CPP-027 Revision:
3 Page 1 of 2 k)
IMPLEKENTING INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS FORM Coman he Peak Response Team trnple menting inspection instmc$ons venfiuoen Ms. A tquim s fag m I,)
(7)
( ).
(2)
W of.
w w -.av e (3)
(4)
(5)
(5)
/f.
V/.
A
\\#/
\\\\. "
A \\v/
O
\\">
A
\\\\
A\\\\\\
V Ns'\\M A
\\\\N
\\%N "
n
\\"N mv
-g)
V newed by w by:
()
()
(s)
(s) o.w new liAP QAIQC Gagineet tiAs tuwe daereneter 09 027.2 Revis% 1
n-
.}'
Attcchment 6.2 CPP-027-Revision: 3
(
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING CPP-027.2 "IMPLEMENTING INSPECTION INSTRUCTION" ISAP QA/QC Engineer (1). Enter Verification Package number.
(2) Enter equipment mark / tag number.
(3) Enter the applicable attribute number.
(4) Enter the information. As required, indicate where the reinspection / documentation review results associated with the Implementing Inspection Instruction are to be entered on the checklist.
(5) Reference any source documents.
(6) Provide a list of any documents needed to perform the reinspection or document review required by each Inspection Instruction, and indicate their location, i.e., attached or available at (7) Enter page number and total of pages in this instruction.
L (8) Enter signature and date.
Issue Coordinator After ensuring that the Instruction is necessary, complete, clearly understandable, and consistent with this procedure, the Issue Coordinator enters:
' p, (9)
Signature and date.
O 2
Attrchment 6.3 CPP-027 Revision: 3
,cq Page 1 of 1
- x. s VERIFICATION PACKAGE CONTENTS FORM Comanche Peak Response Team Verification Package Contents Verification Pkg. No.
Equipment / Tag No.
Page - of -
Number Document Description Date of Pages (3
I' i
%J Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Approved by:
(N Date Date Date Q
ISAP QA/QC Engineer JSAP QA/QC Issue Coord ISAP QA/QC Issue Coord CPP-027.3 Revision 1