Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML19342D046, ML20045H049, ML20064B717, ML20065A040, ML20072H397, ML20078H835, ML20083M358, ML20091K242, ML20094H550, ML20094K513, ML20094S337, ML20099F133, ML20100G704, ML20100G719, ML20100G725, ML20101K416, ML20105B980, ML20105C354, ML20128K728, ML20149K214, ML20197D356, ML20211B100, ML20216B539, ML20217F961
|
MONTHYEARML20091K2421992-01-10010 January 1992
Forwards Rev 40 to Security Plan,Addressing Issues Raised in NRC .Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20094H5501992-02-20020 February 1992
Forwards Rev 41 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20094S3371992-04-0303 April 1992
Forwards Rev 42 to Security Plan.Rev in Response to 10CFR73.56 & Reg Guide 5.66.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20101K4161992-06-23023 June 1992
Forwards Rev 42 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20099F1331992-07-28028 July 1992
Forwards Rev 43 to Plant Security Plan,Updating App E & Reflecting Changes Necessary to Facility Improvement Project.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20105B9801992-09-11011 September 1992
Forwards Rev 44 to Security Plan.Rev Adds Alternate Perimeter Alarm Reporting Sys & Redundant Access Control Sys to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20105C3541992-09-17017 September 1992
Forwards Rev 45 to Security Plan.Rev & Addendum Address Concerns Listed in Cd Pederson .Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20128K7281993-02-0404 February 1993
Forwards Rev 46 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20045H0491993-06-17017 June 1993
Forwards Rev 44 to Security Plan Addressing Issues Re Use of Alternate Perimeter Alarm Sys & Redundant Access Control Sys.Rev 44 Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML19342D0461993-10-21021 October 1993
Forwards Rev 47 to LaSalle Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.4.Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20064B7171994-02-25025 February 1994
Forwards Rev 48 to Security Plan,Addressing Issues Identified by Jr Creed,In Response to Rev 47 of Plant Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20065A0401994-03-30030 March 1994
Forwards Rev 49 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20072H3971994-08-22022 August 1994
Forwards Copy of Rev 50 of Facility Security Plan.Rev Addresses Issues Identified in Ja Zwolinski Response of 940426 Re Submittal of Rev 49 of Security Plan
Project stage: Other
ML20078H8351995-01-31031 January 1995
Forwards Rev 51 to Security Plan.Plan Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20083M3581995-05-0505 May 1995
Forwards Rev 52 of Plant Security Plan,Addressing Issue Identified in Rj Caniano Re Rev 48 of Plant Security Plan.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20094K5131995-11-0808 November 1995
Forwards Rev 53 to Security Plan.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20149K2141996-02-15015 February 1996
Forwards Rev 54 of Lasalle Nuclear Power Station Security Plan.Encl Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20100G7191996-02-19019 February 1996
Forwards New Cover Page for Rev 54 of Plant Security Plan. Insert Signed Cover Page W/Rev 54 & Destroy Unsigned Page. Encl Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20100G7041996-02-20020 February 1996
Forwards Rev 55 to Security Plan.Rev Identifies Hand Geometry Biometric Sys Proposed for Implementation at Plant. Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20100G7251996-02-20020 February 1996
Requests Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73.55, Requirements for Physical Protection of Licensed Activities ...Against...Sabotage, to Allow Use of Hand Geometry Biometric Sys.Details Encl.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20211B1001997-09-12012 September 1997
Informs That Revised Security Plan Was Inaccurate Due to Realignment of Nuclear Operating Division Organizational Structure on 970903.Submittal of Current Structure Will Be Made by 971103
Project stage: Other
ML20217F9611997-10-0202 October 1997
Forwards Rev 56 of LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Security Plan Which Reflects Changes in Organizational Structure of Utils Nuclear Security Dept.Plan Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20197D3561997-12-18018 December 1997
Forwards Rev 57 of LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Security Plan Which Identifies Implementation of New Security Computer Sys,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20216B5391998-05-0101 May 1998
Forwards Rev 58 of LaSalle Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
1994-03-30
[Table View] |
Text
.-
~. -.
e jg Commonwcahh Ediw>n Compan)
'lli Somh Llark Street P O ik3x ~6" chiami. n. m,w n,-
i 1
February 15,1996 CERTIFIED Mall d
j U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk I
Washington, DC 20555 q
)
i
Subject:
LaSalle N=_W-- Power Station Units 1 and 2 LaSalle Station Security Plan i
NRC Docket Nos. 50-373-50-374 l
TAC Nos. 65376/65377 j
Enclosed is the original and three (3) copies of Revision 54 of the LaSalle 1
i Nuclear Power Station Security Plan. This submittal contains the following 2
changes:
j i
Chapter 1:
CECO definition changed to Comed Clarifies the training requirements in the watchman category Defines the Vehicle Barrier System Chapter 3:
Reduces the frequency of security patrols p
i i
Chapter 5:
Identifies the Vehicle Barrier System l
Conects a Vital Area door number Eliminates certain security requirements for controlling access of l
personnel and materials into reactor containment in accordance with the deletion of paragraph (d)(8) of 10 CFR 73.55 as published j
September 7,1995 in the Federal Register Figure 5-2 identifies existing Lake Screen House gates and reflects the Service Building now as the Training Building i
l Chapter 9:
i Eliminates the need for an armed member of the security l
organization te process through the firearms detector during the course of official duties subsequent to their initial entry and search.
Chapter 15:
Clarifies the personnel involved in conducting independent security 220076 96oY/2oo42,6021s
/
j</,6; i h
PDR ADOCK 05000373
_f' /
r F
ppg t
y i
M k 2M3snBei A L:nicom Company i
- e U.S.N.R.C.
Page Two Appendix B Eliminates the polygraph examination due to the Access Authorization requirements which have surpassed any benefit received f~)m the polygraph examination. Therefore, the polygraph is considered to be a duplication of effort and no longer provides benefit.
Pursuant to 10CFR 50.54(p), the signed original and three copies of the Security Plan revisions are being provided to your office. A copy of this letter and two copies of the Security Plan revisions are being sent to Region Ill.
We have concluded that these changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the plan. These enclosures contain Safeguards Information which must be protected from public disclosure pursuant to 10CFR 73.21.
Sincerely, C'
y//bilsfJNj &fx v
-fe M. Johnson Licensing Operations Director Enclosures cc:
H. Miller (w/two encls.)
THE ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Upon separation. this paae is decontrolled 3
-
