ML20141E575

Rev 0 to CK-MP3-04-07, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Programmatic Review Checklist, Ncr/Ewr Review

ML20141E575
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	06/13/1997
From:	Tom Ryan, Sheppard P NORTHEAST UTILITIES
To:
Shared Package
ML20141E505	List: ML20141E501 ML20141E506 ML20141E522 ML20141E528 ML20141E534 ML20141E539 ML20141E547 ML20141E551 ML20141E558 ML20141E561 ML20141E566 ML20141E570 ML20141E575
References
CK-MP3-04-07, CK-MP3-4-7, NUDOCS 9707010109
Download: ML20141E575 (4)

Text

._ _ _ _ .. _- -.

, .I 1

e1 I l l

i l

Northeast Utilities Millstone - Unit 3 l

l l Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) 1 Programmatic Review Checklist l

l CK-MP3-04-07, Rev. 0

, NCR/EWR REVIEW '

{

l Prepared by: P. Sheooard Name ~

8. I wh '

t[2 7 Sigr/dre ' '

bate Approved by: T J. Ryan ~

h 4 S//7 Name

[Si e / / Date IMPLEMENTATION Channe Process:

Verified By: Date:

Concurrence By: Date:

(CK-MP344-07. Paget)

CKK0407. DOC Sheet 1 of 9707010109 970627 PDR ADOCK 05000423 P PDR ,,,.

! i Northeast Utilities

!- *# CK-MP3-07 00 -

Millstone Unit 3 NCR/EWR l d {

Sheet of )

l , NCR/EWR Review Checklist t i

i I

Programmatic Review Checklist I

, CK-MP3-04-07 NCR/EWR Review i

NCR or EWR

Title:

NCR/EWR No.:

General Review Questions

' Ihese questions should be answeredfor Engineering Work Requests (EWRs) undNon-Conformance Reports (NCRs), either ofwhich have been dispositioned "use-as-is".

Checklist CK-MP3-04-01 a.idresses the evaluation ofcorrective actions, including l

nonconformances dispositioned "use-as-is". In the case ofNCRs, only Question 10 of this checklist and the questions on CK-MP3-04-01 need be answered '

(ifa question is not applicablefor the particular NCR/EWR, indicate the reason)

1. Is the reason for the proposed EWR stated?

yes no n/a

2. If the reason for the proposed EWR is a nonconformance or a degraded condition in important-to-safety equipment, has the nonconformance or degraded condition i

been entered into a corrective action system for correction or resolution? NRC Generic Letter 91-18 defines a degraded condition as a condition of a structure, system or component in which there has been any loss of quality or fanctional capability.

yes no n/a

3. If the proposed EWR involves equipment within the scope of the maintenance rule (10 CFR 50.65), whether the equipment is within the scope of Northeast Utilities Quality Assurance Program (NUQAP) Topical report or not, it may still need to be entered into a corrective action system. If the EWR is proposed because l

maintenance goals required by 10 CFR 50.65 are not being met, or because a repetitive maintenance preventable functional failure occurred, or where a clearly I

declining trend in equipment performance or condition is indicated, has the root cause been identified (this cause analysis can be a range of depths) and has reasonable corrective action been taken or proposed?

yes no n/a l

(CK-MP344-07. Rev. O. Page2)

CZK0407. DOC

- ,. -.. .--- - . . . ~ . _ . - . . . . . - - - _ - - ~ - . . ~ . - - . . . .- . - . _ - ~

__ Noetheast Utilities l-

• Millstone Unit 3 - CK-MP347-80

.)

NCR/EWR' Sheet er, NCR/EWR Review Checklist L 4. If the EWR is proposed to improve the plant, has the decision not to install the EWR considered the safety implications, e.g., effect on the plant probabilistic risk g assessment?

yes no n/a 5.

If the resolution of the proposed EWR is "use-as-is", i.e., do not install the EWR, i-has a safety evaluation screening and environmental screening evaluated leaving the plant in this condition? This may be addressed in the screening for the EWR or an initiating nonconformance provided the screening scope is sufficiently broad.

yes no n/a l ' 6.

Has the decision not to install the EWR considered the effect on the Security Plan? -

yes no n/a l .7.

Has the decision not to install the EWR considered the effect on the Emergency Plan?

yes no n/a -

8.

Has the decision not to install the EWR considered the effect on the Inservice Inspection Program and the Inservice Test Program?

yes no n/a 1

i 9.

Have any analysis required by ASME Section XI, such as IWB-3600, to suppon the "use-as-is" decision been performed and has the analysis been reviewed by de required authorities, e.g., the NRC7 yes no n/a

10. Is the engineering assessment technically adequate?

yes no n/a l

i I

i 4

1 (CI'.-MP3 44-07. Rev. O, Page3)

CM K0407. doc

Northeast Utilities . CK-MPk$7 80 Millstone Udt 3 i el NCR/EWR i Sheet of l NCRTEWR Review Checklist l

l For any "No" items, provide the reason and any appropriate discussion. For any "No" items, which are determined not to be a discrepancy, provide the basis.

1 l

Comments '

i

! Item No. Discussion 1

)

i i l

l l

l 1

l l

l i

i e

(CK-MP3-0447. Rev. O. Page4)

C:CK0407. DOC