ML20141E558
| ML20141E558 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1997 |
| From: | Tom Ryan, Sheppard P NORTHEAST UTILITIES |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141E505 | List: |
| References | |
| CK-MP3-04-03I, CK-MP3-4-3I, NUDOCS 9707010100 | |
| Download: ML20141E558 (3) | |
Text
_. - _ _. - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ - _ _. ~
N:rtheast Utilities CK-MP34443H Millstone Alt 3 Licensi:3 Documents Sheet of Change Procedust Implementation Checklist Programmatic Review Checklist CK-MP3-04-03H
.Channe Procedure Imniementation l
Licensing Document:
Change No.:
Date ofRevision/ Change -
1.
l Licensina Document Chane 1.
For Unit 3, the Fire Protection and Evaluation Report (FPER) is the Unit 3 Operating License Submittal for the Fire Protection Plan and, as such, is l
considered part of the UFSAR. Were changes to the FPER, resulting from l
corresponding changes to the UFSAR, submitted to Nuclear Licensing on Final Safety Analysis Change Requests (FSARCRs) or Notification of Suspected Errors (NOSES) (Ref. NGP 4.03, sections 1 and 4.8)?
yes no n/a i
2.
Has any change to the UFSAR received either a 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluation l
(SE) per NGP 3.12 or a Stand Alone FSARCR 10 CFR 50.59 SE Screening Form (Ref. NGP 4.03, section 6.1 and Figure 7.5)?
yes
'no n/a 3.
Were proposed FSARCRs written to the degree ofdetail of the existing UFSAR sections being changed unless justification is provided in support ofincreased or decreased detail (NGP 4.03, section 6.2)? Note: reduction in the level ofdetail may only bejustified for a UFSAR change related to a facility modification or procedural method described in the UFSAR.
yes no n/a 4.
A NOSE (Notification of Suspected Error) shall be initiated if an error exists, or an error is suspected, in the UFSAR or there is a conflict with plant conditions or other UFSAR sections, or ifinformation needs to be added or clarified, or a correction to spelling, typographical errors, punctuation, or grammar it, identified.
When the NOSE resolution was an intent change requiring a 10 CFR 50.59 SE, was an Adverse Condition Report (ACR) initiated (Ref. NGP 4.03, sections 6.2 and 6.3.4.2)? Intent change is defined as a change to infonnation such as a Technical Specification limit, responsibility, numerical value, design bases, system i
description, etc., whereas a Non-Intent change is a correction to spelling, l
typographical error, punctuation, grammar, or to provide clarification (Ref. NGP l
4.03, 4.9).
j yes no n/a 97o7o10100 970627 l
PDR ADOCK 05o00423 p
PDR (CK.MP34443H Rev.o Pase2) ciCK403H. DOC
- ~.
i l
Northeast Utilities CK-MP344-03H Millstone Unit 3 Licensing Documents Sheet of Change Procedure Implementation Checklist 5.
Has the Primary Responsible Discipline and any other additional reviewers designated by the Manager, Nuclear Licensing Services, signed block 14 of the FSARCR (Ref. NGP 4.03, section 6.4.10)?
yes no n/a 6.
Has the Manager, Plant Engineering, signed block 15 of the FSARCR for changes to the plant, procedures, related Technical Specifications, or analyses (Ref. NGP 4.03, section 6.4.12)? This manager does not need to sign for changes to the UFSAR due to errors or conflicts in the UFSAR.
yes no n/a 7.
Has the Station / Unit Director signed block 18 of the FSARCR thereby approving the change (Ref. NGP 4.03, section 6.4.18)?
i yes no n/a
{
8.
Has the Primary Responsible Discipline or Originator signed block 19 of the FSARCR for changes other than UFSAR errors or conflicts (Ref. NOP 4.03, 6.4.20)? This is to be done within thirty days ofimplementation or turn over/ release to operations, yes no n/a Comments For any "no" Items, provide the reason andany appropriate discussion. For any "no" items which are determinednot to be a discrepancy, provide the basis.
Item Ng Discussion l
l 1
(CK.MP34443H Rev.O,Page3)
CTK403H. Doc
t Northeast Utilities Millstone-Unit 3 I
Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) l Programmatic Review Checklist CK-MP3-04-031, Rev. O i
Channe Procedure Imniementation Vendor Manuals Prepared by:
P. Shecoard
- 8. / Mhi Name ~
4 v/o, Signature [/ ~
~
Date
/'
Approved by: T. J. Ryan 4
7 7
Name Si ure[
Ddite /
IMPLEMENTATION Change Process:
Verified By:
Date:
l Concurrence By:
Date:
l (CK-MP34403, Pagel)
CTK4031. DOC Sheet I of
\\
=_-.-
N rtheasti)tilities Millstm U11t 3 CK-MP344431 Vsid:r M= al
=
Sheet of Change Procedure Implementation Checklist i
Programmatic Review Ches klist l
CK-MP3-04-031 Change Procedure Implemen ration l
Vendor Manual
Title:
Vendor Manual No.:
Date of Change Vendor Manuals i
Note: Chapter 8 of the NUC DCM, Revision 05 (effective 5/7/97) titled " Engineering Vendor Interfaces" does not supersede unit procurement guidelines, procedures or contractual commitments for vendor interfaces.
- 1. Reviews of vendor design documents, including vendor technical manuals, which reveal any design or licensing basis issues are to be documented and communicated to Design Engineering and/or Licensing. A Condition Report (CR) may be warranted based on the significance of the issue (Ref. DCM, Chapter 8,4.3.4 and following note). Were any design or licensing basis issues identified during the review of the veudm manual?
yes no n/a i
i
- 2. If vendor technical manual provides directions for maintenance which affects nuclear safety, has the manual received at least a 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation (SE) i screening and an environmental screening (Ref. DC 1,1.7.8.b and 1.11.13)?
(
yes no n/a
- 3. Have personnel competed a "New Manual Review and Approval Checklist" or a
" Vendor Technical Manual Change Request", as applicable (Ref. DC 6, Attaciunents 7 and 8)?
yes no n/a
- 4. Have procedures been included for installation and operation, e.g., start-up, shutdown, maintenance troubleshooting (Ref. Attachment 7 to DC 6)?
yes no n/a
- 5. Has a Department Manager or Designee approved the voiding of any vendor technical manuals (Ref. DC 6,1.22.4)?
yes no n/a I
(CK.MP3-04-03. Rev. O. Page2)
CrK4031 DOC I
N:rtheast Utilities Millst:ne Uzit3 CK-MP3-04431 Veld:r Mmal Sheet et Change Procedure Implementation Checklist
- 6. If the vendor technical manual gives direction for maintenance under the NUQAP Topical Report, has there been any assessment of the need for training (Ref. DC 1, )?
yes no n/a l
- 7. Were any necessary changes made to vendor drawings included in the vendor l
technical manual (Ref. DC 6,1.21.1.a)?
l yes no n/a For any "No" items, provide the reason and any appropriate discussion. For any "No" items, which are determined not to be a discrepancy, provide the basis.
1 l
l Comments Item No.
i Discussion 1
I l
I l
l (CK41P3-04-03. Rev. O. Page3)
CrK4031 doc l
,