ML20141E561

Rev 0 to CK-MP3-04-03J, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Programmatic Implementation Review Checklist,Change Procedure Implementation Like-For- Like Replacements

ML20141E561
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	06/24/1997
From:	Tom Ryan, Wrona S NORTHEAST UTILITIES
To:
Shared Package
ML20141E505	List: ML20141E501 ML20141E506 ML20141E522 ML20141E528 ML20141E534 ML20141E539 ML20141E547 ML20141E551 ML20141E558 ML20141E561 ML20141E566 ML20141E570 ML20141E575
References
CK-MP3-04-03J, CK-MP3-4-3J, NUDOCS 9707010101
Download: ML20141E561 (3)

Text

.- . .- .

a Northeast Utilities Millstone - Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) i I

Programmatic Implementation Review Checklist i i

CK-MP3-04-03J, Rev. O <

j Channe Procedure Implementation LIKE-FOR-LIKE REPLACEMENTS Prepared by: Stan Wrona Name

, m 6-ff-f7 Signature Date Approved by: TT Na#  % ~(

Name (/ a ff 6ad i

i IMPLEMENTATION Change Process; Verified By:

Date:

Concurrence By:

Date:

(CK-MPJMG3, Page 1)

Sheet 1 of 3 9707010101 970627 PDR P ADOCK 05000423 PM .

m ,. _ - -

! N:rth:ast Utilities l

Millston: UIlt 3 CK-MP3-04-03J Rev. 0 ChInge Process: Liki-Fer-Like R-:;' -- -ts Sheet 2 of 3 Change Process Review Checklist i

Programmatic Review Checklist CK-MP3-04-03J Like-For-Like Replacements l Replacement:

i Change No.:

Date ofRevision / Change:

l

1. Has the change been evaluated, and the evaluation documented, to determine that a _. _

Design Change Record or Minor Modification is not required?

Yes No N/A O Comment

2. Has the change been prepared in accordance with controlled procedures, and verified and approved by personnel independent of the preparer?

Yes O No N/A Comment 1

3. Has the change been subject to an appropriate, documented interdisciplinary review (both internal and external)?

Yes No N/A O Comment O 4.

Does the documentation identify all potentially affected departments, organizations and groups?

4 Yes O No O N/A Comment O

5. Is the basis for acceptability of the item identified?

Yes O No O N/A O Comment 0 i

6. Has the change been subjected to an equivalency evaluation, and is the evaluation '

documented?

Yes No N/A O Comment 7.

Does the documentation of the replacement item include QA Category and/or any special requirements (EQ, seismic, or other qualification) which apply?

l I

l Yes No N/A O Comment l

(CK-MP3-04-03, Rev.1, Page2)

. - . . ~- . - . . - - - - - -

N rthust Utiliti:s CK-MP3-0443J, Rev. 0 l ,_ Millstone UIit 3 Change Process: Like-For-Like Replaceme;ts Sheet 3 of 3 Change Process Review Checklist i

Channe Procedure Implementation -LIKE-FOR-LIKE REPLACEMENTS Comment Number Comment l

l l

(CK-MP3-o&O3, Rev. I, Page3)