ML20141E522

Rev 0 to CK-MP3-04-03B, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Programmatic Review Checklist, Change Procedure Implementation Specs

ML20141E522
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	06/24/1997
From:	Caruso A, Tom Ryan NORTHEAST UTILITIES
To:
Shared Package
ML20141E505	List: ML20141E501 ML20141E506 ML20141E522 ML20141E528 ML20141E534 ML20141E539 ML20141E547 ML20141E551 ML20141E558 ML20141E561 ML20141E566 ML20141E570 ML20141E575
References
CK-MP3-04-03B, CK-MP3-4-3B, NUDOCS 9707010086
Download: ML20141E522 (4)

Text

.

i l

0.

i Northeast Utilities I

Millstone-Unit 3 l

l Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)

I Programmatic Review Checklist I

CK-MP3-04-03B Change.P_ror,M_ ure Imniementation l

SPECIFICATIONS Prepared by:

[MSO k

I Name Signature' bate Approved by:

TJ ae 4 /' f Name f Sifure ba(e IMPLEMENTATION I

Change Process:

NUC DCM CHAPTER 6 SPECIFICATIONS REVISION 5 Verified By:

Date:

Concurrence By:

Date:

l (CK-MP34443. Psee O Sheet 1 of 4 j

CAMILE1DNDCPIDCM6B, DOC l.

9707010086 970627 PDR ADOCK 05000423 P

PDR

Northeast Utilities CK-MP344 43]

Millstone Unit 3 Change Process: f; '

Sheet 2 of 4 Change Process Retiew Checklist Programmatic Review Checklist CK-MP3-04-03B Change Procedure Implementation l

l l

Specification:

l Change No.:

Date ofRevision / Change:

1. Has the Specification been prepared in accordance with identified and controlled format requirements?

Yes No O N/A Comment

2. Has the Specification been reviewed and approved in accordance with documented procedures, and by personnel independent of the preparer?

Yes No N/A O comment

3. Has the Speci6 cation which includes QA items been reviewed by QA in accordance with documented procedures?

Yes O No O N/A O comment O

4. Has the Specification been suoject to appropriate interdisciplinary review (both internal and external)?

Yes O No O N/A Comment

5. Has the document control system been updated including appropriate design change notices?

Yes No N/A O comment O

6. If the Specification is a Design Specification in accordance with AShE Section III, has the specification been stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the appropriate state (s) ?

Yes O No O N/A O comment l

l l

(CK-MP3-04-02. Rev.1. Page 4)

CAMILSTONDCPIDCM6B. DOC

Northeast Utilities l

CK-MP3-04 435 l

Ministone U;it 3 Change Process: SpeelAcasisms Sheet 3 of 4 Change Process Review CheckHat

7. Was a Specification Chance controlled and approved in accudance with the DCN Process?

Yes O No N/A Comment 0 i

l

8. Was a Change Order issued to cover a Specification Chance for QA items?

Yes O No O N/A Comment

9. Was a Soecification Revision rewritten and issued in its entirety?

j Yes O No O N/A O Comment 0

~~~

~"

i l

10. Did a voided Specification receive the same review and approval as the original.

Specification?

' Yes No N/A O Comment l

I i

i l

l

?

\\

2 I

(CK-MP3-0442, Rev.1 Page 4)

C:\\MEETONECPIDCM6B. DOC

l.

Northeast Utilities i

CK-MP344438 i.

Millstone Unit 3 Change Pmcess: Specifications Change Process Review Checklist

\\

i.

Channe Procedure Implementation -SPECIFICATIONS Comment Number Comment i

1 1

)

i l

i

)

i l

l l

(CK-MP344-02, Rev.1. Page 4)

C.WILSTONECPIDCM6& DOC

-