ML20140G487

Comments on Rev 1 to Task A-39, Determination of Safety/ Relief Valve Pool Dynamic Loads & Temp Limits for BWR Containments. Recommends Phrase Pure Forcing Function Be Changed to Appropriate Forcing Function

ML20140G487
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/27/1977
From:	Shao L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Teh-Chiun Su Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20140F372	List: ML20140F369 ML20140F376 ML20140F419 ML20140F423 ML20140F429 ML20140F449 ML20140F485 ML20140F505 ML20140F512 ML20140F516 ML20140F522 ML20140F533 ML20140F546 ML20140F559 ML20140F580 ML20140F593 ML20140F603 ML20140F628 ML20140F657 ML20140F670 ML20140F689 ML20140F695 ML20140F706 ML20140F724 ML20140F750 ML20140F770 ML20140F788 ML20140F807 ML20140F950 ML20140F981 ML20140G002 ML20140G018 ML20140G028 ML20140G040 ML20140G069 ML20140G098 ML20140G110 ML20140G170 ML20140G175 ML20140G183 ML20140G188 ML20140G195 ML20140G202 ML20140G208 ML20140G215 ML20140G221 ML20140G226 ML20140G231 ML20140G236 ML20140G241 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665, REF-GTECI-A-39, REF-GTECI-CO, TASK-A-39, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8604020428
Download: ML20140G487 (1)

Text

.____

. e..+ c.;,.:.q,:. <.... e. ;,

~., J. ;a ;., ;4.... <. -

,. a.

.o;_.

___u

.a s.

s.i

'O O

~

t

. g'.

/ ~\\

united STATES i

I'J;.,

8 g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

q t

-g wasmNGTON. D. C. 20555 j

...f h,***.*/

h 1

-. >o%

':41.52

\\

..e., y l

.:l MEMORANDUM FOR:

T. M. Su, Task Manager (A-39), Containment Systems l

.. 7 7 Branch, DSS g

• yT?s

%%2f..

g FROM:

L. C. Shao, Chief. Engineering Branch, D0R 7'

.c..h gjjj]

SUBJECT:

, - COPHENTS ON REVISION 1 TO TASK A-39 A

.,?{p The Engineering Branch, Division of Operating Reactors, has reviewed d.

93, your proposed Revision 1 to Category A Task A-39, " Determination of

y. ' &

Safety / Relief Value (SRV) Pool Dynamic Loads and Temperature Limits

.t ;

for BWR Containments." As a result of our revies, we reconinend that

., M.. a on page 18, under the statement of Engineering Branch, DOR involvement

'in Tasks lb and 2c, the statements that a " pure forcing function"

. 4@p?

. to account for FSI effects will be obtained be changed such that it

?,d

". f

$' W,(.'f.-;.y :of FSI effects, can be obtained.2g.%. is stated tha

- l

?-

.f

-?

4 At this time, we are not sure that a " pure" forcing function, void Therefore, a representative forcing

g ?;

%y;Q ' ' ^ ^

- function may have to be detennined instead.

(

g. q,,,

)

g.

i,,. f.pg.CSB DSS==i '

pg

,hD

'M

. s, m e

.. - n.: ~. n.

x...,,

~.

.x

.a

.,. : *a..w r s e :.... y w.?.

- 1 i fB DEC 7710122

'E, e) ' g 1

' / U C. Shao, Chie by.EngineeringBranch y. :n M'

e yVv

.g#

f.

.(-

p ';f G,. [;-. m' ' d '

Q.*

4 Division of Operating Reactors

.m gw

,,;. p # rf 4:.-r.:;Qy's$...?Q.

y!.

yh.h.' Contadt:* K. Herring, q f w : w h {R M N C P ' y.7..

M f

a Qv k 2!8060.Q hke IE Nd

'NN N. M '

.C.dMr. cc:. D. E1 e h t

?

,1r,g

• R.-Cudlin E#.

% % 5 6 6 4 & $ O M E n..

~

l

.. p

x. o -

JF Guibert W"~ W WMC J M

• W M

..y

!QQy?

g ; Knight ~ ?"

'3*

E

.I'b'fTS'.N'W.,J'Y

fM4Q G -

em,

w R; Mattson 4

3

"'W.Noonan'".ll.).

' y DMENM$.7 j ~

[

. ~.

E

W 1.;y? %;2 f' ".L.

Av

.q'/

e R.' Stuart ': f;*.,

g?.

?

i-

\\

R.' LaGrange #

S;Hosford u

.n:

@MdfS %.

I N,p..,,'g + h

,, o K.' Wichman 1,d. * [J

• yi jN.!M[(.:

eg If

?.

y,, M'.4 ' ^

..x 9:tif& C W W A/

J.*.'Zudans

?

W/M6W*M...t A sa

- Qi.

- uw N.iX Herring ?.k fE'?

'v

: Y

't I

't A'

1. /%.@Yp6"pd O 'r[dQ.'$6 e.N.,M,d&M,% '.A

. g' i

h

, mm ma;r4h'

,'.g y

-m m' e

y u.....

y

. ~lk%g..

X8

• rN: *T

-c ; s'.,

{ :Y *.

>=.5

., f.l h... <..fl '

.e.

~. Y

'Ld.b.m.

i.

r z

' " ' ' ' 'z,..r:~

n...,..;ni e.h-f i$<,y.;,,,_. ~,*i ;' '.' ':< d.rh, W;. '

~ ' ' ' '. '!)4 2

v A ?. O.,. [f f W( P f 4 l.t 8604020428 860114 3

> c." J T*., '.

~ ~ '

c f~

PDR FOIA

' bl 'Cf?'. L f,"

5-665 PDR v "*9-