ML20138D661
| ML20138D661 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | Pearce L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| LWP-97-045, LWP-97-45, NUDOCS 9705010203 | |
| Download: ML20138D661 (150) | |
Text
._.
Onnm<mweahh hhson Company
{
Quad Cities Generating Station 22710 2(6th Asenue North Cordos a, 11.61212 9740 1 ci.<o94,s 12211 LWP 97-045 April 28, 1997 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Station P1-137 Washington, D.C. 20555 Attn:
Document Control Desk
Subject:
Quad Cities Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, DocketNumbers50-265and50-294']
25 Enclosed is the Quad Cities Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
This report contains the results of the radiological, environmental and meteorological monitoring programs for the 1996 calendar year. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report was submitted under separate cover.
,q Two copies of the report are provided for your use.
Respeftf ally, J
c N
0h%
L.)W. Pearce Station Manager i
Quad Cities Station i
l LWP/plm Enclosure i
cc:
Robert Pulsifer, Quad Cities Station Project Manager, U.S. NRC A. Bill Beach, Regional Aaministrator, NRC Region III (2 copies)
Tom Kozak, Chief, Plant Support Branch 2, NRC Region III Chris Miller, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Quad Cities Station
(
h kDO 4
n a
STMOR\\04597.L%T
![S ll[{l[{ll {lUl,l} lllll),l,l A l'nionn (;ompany
e,
.a 4
4
.s,nr a aua O
QUAD CITIES STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1996 O
9 9
APRIL 1997 O
m TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
Ease INT RO D UCTI ON...........................................................................................1
SUMMARY
2 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere..................................................
3 1.2 Liquids Released to Mississippi River...
3 2.0 SOLID R ADIOACTIVE WASTE................................................
3 3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseou s E f fl uent Pa thways.............................................................
3 3.1.1 Nobl e G a ses...................................................................................3 3.1.1.1 Ga mma Dose Ra tes.........................................
3 3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Rates...............................................
4 3.1.2 Ra dioactive Iod ine........................................................................
4 3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air.............................................
4 3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid......................................................
4 3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air.............................................
4 3.2 Liqu id Effluent Pa thways..................................................................
5 3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public.............................................
5 4.0 SITE M ETEO RO LOGY.................................................................................
5 t
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING a
j 5.1 G a mma Ra d i a tion.....................................................................................
6 5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity..............................
6 5.3 A q u a tic Ra d io a ct ivi ty.........................................................................
6 5.4 Milk...........................................................................................................
7 5.5 S a m ple Coll ectio ns.............................................................................
7 5.6 Listing of Missed Samples......................................................................
7
{
5.7 Program Mod ifica tions.........................................................................
7 4
4 6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES....................................
7 7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS..........................
8 8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS.................................................................
8 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS......................
8 10.0 ERRATA............................................................................................................
8
..u
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
/';
V g
APPENDIX I - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES..
1-1 Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Effluents Summation of all Releases..
1-2 Table 1.2-1 Liquid Effluents Summation of all Releases.
1-4 Table 2.0-1 Solid Radwaste Annual Report...
I-6 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours...
1-26 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases...... I-30 Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Effluents....
. I-34 Table 3.3-1 10CFR20 Compliance Assessment..
1-36 Environmental Monitoring Figure 5.0-1 Inner Ring TLD Locations......
. 1-40 Figure 5.0-2 Fixed Air Sampling Sites and Outer Ring TLD Locations....
1-41 Figure 5.0-3 Milk, Fish, Water, and Sediment Sample Locations.........
1-42 Table 5.0-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations...
1-43 O
Table 5.0-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program V
Sampling Locations, Sample Collection and Analyses....
1-44 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Quarterly Summary...
1-51 Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation measured in mR by TLDs...
I-56 APPENDIX II - METEOROLOGICAL DATA..
I1-1 APPENDIX III - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES.
111-1 APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS.
IV-1 APPENDIX V - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS.
... V-1 APPENDIX VI - ERRATA DATA...........
.. VI-1 n
(
}
v kk I
L
INTRODUCTION Units 1 and 2 of the Quad Cities Station, located near Cordova, Illinois next to the Mississippi River, are 2511 MWth boiling water reactors, similar in design to Dresden Units 2 and 3. The station has been designed to keep releases to the environment at levels below those specified in 1
the regulations.
Liquid effluents from Quad Cities are released to the Mississippi River in controlled batches after radioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay to permit decay of short-lived (noble) gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of grab samples of noble gases as well as continuously collected composite samples of iodine and particulate activity sampled during the course of the year. The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required per Technical Specifications. Airbome concentrations of noble gases, l-131, and particulate rac ioactivity in offsite areas are calculated using isotopic composition of effluent and meteorological data.
Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and control (background) locations in the vicinity of the Quad Cities station to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity levels that may be attributable to station operations. If significant changes attributable to Quad Cities are measured, these changes are correlated with effluent releases.
External gamma radiation exposure from noble gases and internal dose from I-131 in milk are the most critical pathways at this site; however, an environmental monitoring program is conducted which include these and other pathways.
O 1
SUMMARY
Gaseous and liquid effluents for the period contributed to only a small fraction of the Quad Cities Technical Specification limits. Calculations of environmental concentrations based on effluent and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption by the public of radionuclides attributable to Quad Cities Station does not exceed the regulatory limits.
Radiation exposure from radionuclides released to the atmosphere represented the caitical pathway for the period with a maximum individual dose estimated to be 4.47E-04 mrem for the year, when a shielding and occupancy factor of 0.7 is assumed. The assessment of radiation doses are performed in accordance with the Comed Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).
The results of these analyses confirm that the station is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix I,10CFR20 and40CFR190.
O O
2
i 1.0 EFFLUENTS O
1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosohere V
Measured concentrations and isotopic composition of n+1e gases, radioiodine, and particulate radioactivity released to the atmosphere ang the year, are listed in Table 1.1-1. A total of 2.78E+01 curies of fission and activation gases was released with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 1.62E+00 pCi/sec.
A total of 8.79E-04 curies of I-131 was released during the year with a maximum j
quarterly average release rate of 8.78E-05 Ci/sec.
A total of 2.09E-02 curies of beta-gamma emitters was released as airborne particulate matter with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 2.31E-03 pCi/sec. A total of 5.16E-06 curies of alpha emitters was released during the year.
A total of 5.18E+01 curies of tritium was released with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 2.84E+00 pCi/sec.
1.2 Liquids Released to the Mississioni River A total of 7.00E+06 liters of radioactive liquid waste (prior to dilution) containing 2.52E-02 curies (excluding tritium, noble gases, and alpha) was discharged from the station. These wastes were released at a maximum quarterly average concentration of 1.85E-09 pCi/ml. No alpha radioactivity was detected in the liquid waste. A total.of 2.21E+01 curies of tritium was released at a maximum quarterly average concentratica of 9.83E-07 Ci/ml. Quarterly release estimates and principal Q
radionuclides in liquid effluents are given in Table 1.2-1.
L) 2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped to Barnwell, South Carolina and various processors. The record of waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1.
3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.
3.1.1 Noble Cases 3.1.1.1 Gamma Dose Rates
)
Offsite gamma air and total body doses are shown in Table 3.1-1 and j
were calculated based on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the noble gases, and average meteorological data for the period.
1 Isodose contours based on concurrent meteorological data for gamma dose are shown in Figure 3.1-1.
Based on measured effluents and average meteorological data, the maximum total dose to an individual
[
)
would be 4.47E-04 mrem for the year, with an occupancy or shielding v
3
I l
factor of 0.7 included and based on measured effluents and concurrent meteorological data would be 8.26E-03 mrem. The maximum gamma (n*
air dose was 5.91E-04 mrad based on measured effluents and average O
meteorological data and 9.19E-04 mrad based on concurrent meteorological data.
3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Dose Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on the order of a few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents may be l
considered " infinite" for purpose of calculating the dose from beta radiation incident on the skin. However, the actual dose to sensitive skin tissues is difficult to calculate due to the effect of the beta particle energies, thickness of inert skin and clothing covering sensitive tissues.
For put oses of this report the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7.0 mg/cm and an occupancy factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose from beta and gamma radiation for the year was 4.92E-04 mrem.
The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the offsite receptor j
locations are given in Figure 3.1-2. The maximum offsite beta air dose for the year was 5.07E-05 mrad.
3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine 1
The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radiciodine,I-131, released during routine operation of the station, may be made available to a person resulting in a dose to the thyroid.
(C ')
The principal pathway of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radiciodine in milk by an infant.
3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air The calculated concentration contours for iodine in air are shown in Figure 3.1-3. These calculations include an iodine cloud depletion factor which accounts for the phenomenon of elemental iodine deposition on the ground. The maximum offsite concentration is 3
estimated to be 6.36E-05 pCi/m for the year.
3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant living near the station via ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionuclide considered was I 131 and the source of milk was taken to be the nearest dairy farm with the cows pastured from May through October. The maximum infant's thyroid dose was 2.61E-02 mrem during the year (Table 3.1-1).
3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air Concentration contours of radioactive airborne particulates are shown in Figure 3.1-4. The maximum offsite average level is estimated to be 3.62E-04 3
pCi/m,
O 4
f 3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathway.s (q
The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to d
man from liquid waste are ingestion of potable water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while walking on the shoreline. Not all of these pathways are significant or applicable at a given time or station but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree of use of the aquatic environment. NRC developed equations
- were used to calculate the doses to the whole body, lower G1 tracts, tayroid, bone, skin; specific parameters for use in the equations are given in the Comed Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.
The maximum whole body dose for the year was 4.53E-04 mrem and no organ dose exceeded 6.59E4)4 mrem (Table 3.2-1).
3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public During the period January to December,1996, Quad Cites Station did not exceed the following limits as shown in Table 3.1-1 and Table 3.2-1 (based on yearly average meteorological data), as shown in Figure 3.1-1 (based on concurrent meteorological data), and as shown in Table 3.3-1:
The RETS limits on dose or dose commitment to an individual due to radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each reactor unit (3 mrem to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 6 mrem to the whole body or 20 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).
The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents
/D to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for gamma V
radiation or 10 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).
The RETS limits on dose to any individual due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released from each reactor unit (7.5 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).
The RETS 40CFR190 limits for total body dose or any organ (except l
thyroid) is less than 25 mrem annually for radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents. The thyroid is limited to 75 mrem over 12 consecutive months.
The 10CFR20 limit on Total Effective Dose Equivalent to individual members of the public (100 mrem).
4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY I
A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each quarter of the year f
is given in Ap pendix II. The data are presented as cumulative joint frequency distributions of tae wind direction for the 296' level and wind speed class by atmospheric
(
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev.1).
1 l
5 l
i l
stability class determined from the temperature difference between the 296' and 33' levels.
Q, Average data recovery for all measurements on the tower was about 98.8% for 1996.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table 5.0-1 provides an outline of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) as required in current Technical Specifications. Table 5.0-2 identifies the sampling locations, sample collections and analyses for each location. This program went into effect in November 1977 and differs from previous programs in the number and types of analyses performed. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 summarize data for the year. Tabulated results of these analyses are not included in the annual report. All data tables are available for inspection at the Station.
5.1 Gamma Radiation 4
External radiation dose from onsite sources and noi,le gases released to the atmosphere was measured using CaSO4:Tm thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
A comparison of the TLD results for control stations with onsite and offsite indicator stations is included in Table 5.1-1. The quarterly average external radiation dose for the year was 15.6 mR at the indicator locations and 15.9 at the control locations. TLD results are listed m Table 5.1-1 and locations are shown in Figures 5.0-1 and 5.0-2.
Quarterly average of e. ternal radiation dose (including background) at sixteen air 4
sampling locations averaged 14.8il.2 mR and was similar to levels measured in 1986 (13.5 mR),1987 (14.1 mR),1988 (13.4 mR),1989 (14.5 mR),1990 (14.6 mR),1991 (15.8 A
mR),1992 (14.7 mR) and 1993 (14.1 mR),1994 (14.1 mR) and 1995 (15.0 mR). The V
differences are not statistically significant.
5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity Locations of the air samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-2. Airborne I-131 remained 3
below the LLD of 0.10 pCi/m throughout the year.
3
~
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.002 to 0.055 pCi/m and averaged 0.022 3
(
pCi/m3 and was similar to overall average levels in 1985 (0.024 pCi/m ),1986 (0.025 3
pCi/m, except for the period from May 17 through June 7 when it was influenced by 3
3 the nuclear reactor accident at Chernobyl),1987 (0.023 pCi/m ),1988 (0.030 pCi/m ),
3 3
1989 (0.028 pCi/m3),1990 (0.020 pCi/m ),1991 (0.022 pCi/m3),1992 (0.021 pCi/m ),
3 3
1993 (0.021 pCi/m3),1994 (0.022 pCi/m ) and 1995 (0.022 pCi/m ),
No radioactivity attributable to station operation was detected in any sample.
5.3 Aouatic Radioactivity Water samples were collected daily and composited for analysis weekly from the Station's Intake and Discharge Canal. These cooling water samples were analyzed weekly for gross beta concentrations. Annual mean gross beta concentration in the intake and discharge canal water samples averaged 3.5 and 4.7 pCi/L, respectively.
The results were similar to those obtained in 1986 (4.7 and 5.1 pCi/L),1987 (3.5 and 3.5 pCi/L),1988 (3.6 and 3.4 pCi/L),1989 (3.9 and 3.7 pCi/L),1990 (4.1 and 3.8 6
pCi/L),1991 (4.0 and 4.3 pCi/L),1992 (3.9 and 3.4 pCi/L),1993 (3.9 and 3.5 pCi/L),
g 1994 (3.9 and 5.5 pCi/L) and 1995 (4.0 and 5.1 pCi/L).
Samples were collected weekly from the East Moline Water Works and Davenport Water Works. These samples were composited monthly for each location and analyzed for gamma emitters. All samples analyzed were below the limits of detection for the program indicating no measurable amount of radioactivity was found due to station operation.
Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish were measured and found in all cases to be below the lower limit o! detection for the program. One upstream and one downstream sediment ', ample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry. All gamma-emitters were below the limits of detection indicating that no radioactivity was found due to station operation.
Water, sediment, and fish sample locations are shown in Figure 5.0-3.
5.4 Milk Milk samples were collected monthly from November through April and weekly from May through October and analyzed for I-131. Sampled locations were the Musal Dairy, located 6.0 miles west southwest of the station and the Bill Stanley Farm located 3.5 miles east northeast of the station.
1-131 remained below the detection limits of 5.0 pCi/L during the non-grazing period (November through April) and 0.5 pCi/L during the grazing period (May through Octcber).
, O V
Milk sample locations are shown in Figure 5.0-3.
5.5 Sample Collections All samples were collected as scheduled except those listed in the Listing of Missed Samples, Appendix III. Sample collection anomalies are also included in the Listing of Missed Samples.
5.6 Program Modifications No modifications to the program were made in 1996.
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Procedures used during the period covered in this report remain unchanged. A summary of the procedures is given in Appendix VI of the 1993 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
O V
7
7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS A census of milch animals and nearest livestock was conducted around the station by G.
Kreuder. The survey was conducted on August 25,1996.
Milch animal and nearest cattle census results are presented in Appendix IV.
8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS A census of the nearest residences within a 6.2-mile radius was conducted on August 25, 1996 by G. Kreuder.
The nearest residence census results are presented in Appendix IV.
9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS Teledyne's Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presented in Appendix V.
10.0 ERRATA DATA Errata data is presented in Appendix VI.
O 8
l
7--..-.
...... -. ~.... -. -
\\
\\
i a
i i
3 a
\\_
i 1
4 i
i i
i 1
i i
APPENDIX I i
l i
DATA TABLES AND FIGURES I.
i i
e 1
1-1
cos QCCP 100-16 WIT 1(2)
TABLE 1.1-1 REVISION 0 ATTACHMENT A (Page 1 of 5) f EFFLUENT & WASTE BISPOSABLE SEMI ANNUAL REPORT GASEOUS EFFLUEtrtS SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES 4
Period: January through June 1995 FIRST SECOND Est.Tctal A. PIS3 ION & ACTIVATION GASES UNIT,
QUARTER QUARTER Error %
- 1. Total Release Ci 1.27E+01 2.30E00 12.4 4
- 2. Average release rate for the period pCi/sec 1.62500 2.938 01
- 3.
- Percent of ODCH limit Chimney &
5.72E 03 9.60E-04 Stack 2.32E 04 4.43E 05 B.
- 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 6.90E 04 3.10E-05 40.0 4
- 2. Average release rate for the period pCi/sec 8.78E 05 3.94E 06 i
~
C. PARTICULATES a
- 1. Particulates with half-lives >8 days C1 1.82E-02 1.01E 03 39.1
- 2. Average release rate for the period pCi/sec 2.31E 03 1.28E 04
(
- 3. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci 5.17E-06
< LIE l
D. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release C1 2.23E+01 6.63E00 8.0
- 1. Average release rate for the period pCi/sec 2.84E00 8.43E 01 j
E. Iodine 131 & 133,Tritit.un & Particulate
^
- 1. Percent of ODO( limit Chisiney & Stack 1.86E 01 7.68E 02 i
- NOBLE GAS GA M / NOBLE GAS BETA DOSE LIMITS cm.mnqnn OV.
I-2
ewwuartmMr$5mm&M UNIT 1(2)'
~
REVISION 3 ATTACHMENT A (Page 1 cf 5)
EFFLUENT & WASTE DISPOSABLE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT e
i l
GASB003 IFFIUBNTS - SUMMkTIOtt OF ALL RELEASSS g
Period: July through December iggg TN14D Fountu tot.fotel 1
A. fissteu a ActivAttow sAses unit auAntra euAsten gerer s i
- 1. fetat selease i
Cf 3.60E00 9.16f00 12.4 l
- 2. Averese release rete fee the perled sCf/sec 4.53t 01 1.15t00 t
i
- 3.
- Percent of cool llelt Chieney &
2 1.52t-03 3.63t 03 Stock 6.71t 05 1.ME M t
4
- 8. ICCINE
- 1. totet fedine.131 l
)
Cl 5.72t 05 1.01E 04 40.0
- 2. Average reteese rate for the period sti/sec 7.19t 06 1.271 05 i
1 1
C. P4aflOAAttS
- 1. Particulates with half tives >$ days Cf 9.07t 04 7.81E 04 39.1 l
- 2. Average reteese rate fee the perled sCf/eee 1.14t 04 9.83E 05
)
- 3. Groes etphe redleectivity CI
<tta
<tt.s i
1 q
O. 18 1114 '
,1. tetet meteese l
ci s.77tc0 1.41e.41 s.0 j
- 2. Averste release rete for the perled pCf/sec 1.10E00 1.77E00 s
i t.ledine 131 & 133.fritius 4 Particulate l
- 1. Percent of 1901 llelt thlmey & Stack 1
1.40E 01 1.03( 01
{
- Nostt GAS GAlesA/u0BLt CAS NTA DOSE LIMITS l
l l
i l
a I
I i
i OMM\\3471'RS6 O
I-3
M QCCP 100 16 TABLE 1.2-1 UNIT 1(2)
REVISION 0 i
ATTACHMENT A (Page 4 of 5)
QQ EFFLUENT & WASTE DISPOSABLE SEMI ANNUAL REPORT LIQUID EFFLUEtrTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES FIRST SECOND Est. Total A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES UNIT QUARTER QUARTER Error 4
- 1. Total Release (not including tritium, Ci 9.91E 03 1.06E 02 5.5 gases & alpha)
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pCi/mL 1.85E 0.9 1.30E 09 batch discharges for the period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit
- 1.31E 02 8.14E 03 5.98E 03 3.652 03
- 4. Maximum diluted concentration during pCi/mL 3.79E-09 3.29E 09 batch discharges B. TRITION
- 1. Total Release Ci 5.28E00 7.18E00 4.0
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pCi/mL 9.83E-07 8.80E 07 batch discharges for the period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit 4
3.28E 02 2.93E-02 C. DISSOLVED & EtrTRAINED GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci
<LLD 5.19E-04 5.5
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pCi/mL
<LLD 6.36E-11 batch discharges for the period l
- 3. Percent of applicable limit t
N/A 3.18E 05 D. GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release Ci
<LLD
<LLD 14.5
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pCi/mL
<LLD
<LLD batch discharges for the period E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (prior to Liters 1.96E+06 2.27E+06 j
dilution)
F. VOLUME OF DIIHFION MATER USED Liters 5.37E+09 8.16E+09 DURING BATCH DISCHARGES i
G. Tt7FAL VOLUME OF DIIRTION Liters 2.34E+11 2.27E+11 WATER USED DURING PERIOD (quarter)
- Whole Body / Organ (ODCM) l cnnengrus LJ.
l 1-4
- ~- ~ ~ ~
~
~
.M (coniinsid)~
~ ~ BW 1 W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
REVISION 3 ATTACHMENT A (Pgge 4 cf 5)
EFFLUENT & WASTE DISPOSABLE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT LIQUID EFFIDElfr$
SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES
'IMIRD FOURTM Est. Total A. FISSION & ACTIVATIOst GASES UNIT grrwrER
- MER Irror 4
- 1. Total Relcase (not including tritius, Ci 2.865 03 1.80E 03 5.6 gases & alpha)
- 2. Average dilsted concentration during pCi/mL 3.015 10 1.905 10 batch discharges for the period
- 3. Percent or applicable limit
- t 6.725 03 2.295 03 3.185 03 9.44E 04
- 4. Maximum diluted concentration during pC1/mL,
2.70E 09 4.945 10 batch discharges E. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release Ci 3.33500 6.32300 4.0 l
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pCi/mL 3.50E 07 6.66E 07 batch discharges for the period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit 4
1.17E 02 2.22E 02 C. DISSOLVED & ElfrRAINED GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci 1.60E 04
<LIA 5.6 l
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pCi/mL 1.68E 11
<LLD i
batch discharges for the period 1
- 3. Percent of applicable limit t
8.40E 06 NA
,D. GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release ci
< Lim
< Lla Mk
- 2. Average diluted concentration during pC1/mL
<LLD
<LIA batch discharges for the period 1
ummusuminusuum um E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (prior to Liters 1.46E+06 1.31E+06 dilution)
F. VOLUME OF DILUTIOtt WATER USED Liters 9.51E+09 9.49E+09 DURINO RATCH DISCHARGES G. 'IOTAL VOLUME OF DILUTICII Liters 3.55E+11 3.86E+11 WATER USED DORING PERICE) (quarter)
- Whole Body / Organ (ODQt)
CHEM \\34QFFR96 O.
I-5
i TABLE 2.41 l
NRC R:g. Guido 1.21 Rapsrt l
Report Date : 04/01/96 Pego
.1 cf 16 solid waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
' ()
- During Period From 01/01/96 to 07/01/96 **
~
Waste Stream : Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms RADMAN Waste Type (s):
PR-D-NA COND 215 PR-D-NA RWCU 120 BR-D-NA NSRT 215 PR-D-NA RWCU 120
- BR-D-NA-DEC 120 PR-D-NA COND 179 CF-D-MA 215 FEXM
- BR-D-NA NSRT 170 CF-D-NA 120 MTIF *.
PR-D-NA COND 170 PR-D-NA COND 120 Wasta Volume Curies Class Fta3 M*3 Shipped A
2022.8 57.2 3.82E+02 P
1576.2 44.6 7.71E+02 C
326.1 9.2 2.69E+01 All 3925.1 111.1.
1.18E+03
- -Combined Waste Type shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown O
NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 2 of 16 Solid Waste Shipped of fsite for Disposal
- During Period From 01/01/96 to 07/01/96 **
Wasta Stream : Dry Active Waste RADMAN Waste Type (s):
DAW-U-NA 8x8x20 DAW-C-NA 55 DRUN DAW-U-NA 8x8x40 DAW-U-NA ALARON CF-D-NA FG Box DAW-U-NA B25 Box DAW-U-NA OVRPAK
- DAW-U-NA 55 Drum DAW-U-NA OIL PKS DAW-U-NA B25 Waste Volume Curies
- Class Fta3 M*3 Shipped A
48242.7 1365.3 1.80E+01 8
.0
.0 0.00E+00 C
.0
.0 0.00E+00 0
1;
- m~7E m;r 8-Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown 1-6 3
NRC Reg. Guido 1.21 Report t
Repcrt Dato : 08/01/96 Pcgo 3 of 16 Solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
- During Period From 01/01/96 to 07/01/96 **
f-sg Waste Stream : Irradiated Components RADMAN Waste Type (s):
None Selected.
Waste Volume curies Class Ft*3 M*3 Shipped A
.0
.0 0.00E+00 B
.0
.0 0.00E+00 C
.0
.0 0.00E+00 All
.0
.0 0.00E+00
- -Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown
/\\
k/
NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 4 of 16 s
Solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
- During Period From 01/01/96 to 07/01/96 **
Waste Stream : Other Waste RADMAN Waste Type (s):
None Selected.
Wasta Volume Curies class Ft'3 M*3 Shipped A
.0
.0 0.00E+00 B
.0
.0 0.00E+00 C
.0
.0 0.00E+00 4..
All
.0
.0 0.00E+00
- -Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown
(
I-7
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
HRC R:g. Guide 1.21 Rspart R2p;rt Dato 08/01/96 Pcge 5 of 16 solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
- During Period From 01/01/96 to 07/01/96 **
Waste Stream : Sum of All 4 Categories l
RADMAN Waste Type (s):
DAW-U-NA 8x8x20 4
DAW-C-NA 55 DRUM i
PR-D-NA COND 215 DAW-U-NA 8x8x40 DAW-U-NA ALARON PR-D-NA RWCU 120 l
CF-D-NA FG Box i
BR-D-NA NSRT 215 3
DAW-U-NA B25 Box i
PR-D-NA RWCU 120
- DR-D-NA-DEC 120 PR-D-NA COND 179 CF-D-NA 215 FEXM
- i DAW-U-NA OVRPAK j
DAW-U-NA 55 Drum BR-D-HA NSRT 170 4
CF-D-NA 120 MTIF
- PR-D-NA COND 170 4
PR-D-NA COND 120 I
DAW-U-NA OIL PKS DAW-U-NA B25
+
1 Wasta Volume Curies
)
{
Class Ft*3 M*3 shipped O
I A
50265.5 1422.5 4.00E+02 B
1576.2 44.6 7.71E+02 I
C 326.1 9.2 2.69E+01 All 52167.8 1476.3 1.20E+03 l
- -Combined Wasta Type Shipment, Major volume Waste Type Shown t
e I
l J
d i
9 O
I-8
~ ~
TABLE 2.H (continued)
^
^ ^ ^ ~ ~ ' - ~
~
~
NRC Rsg. Guid3 1.21 Rspart Report Dato 08/01/96 Pago 6 of.
16 i
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
4 f-~g Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 % Cutoff.,
l Waste Nuclide Percent Curles l
Class Name Abundance A
Co-60 60.766%
2.32E+02 Fe-55 17.715%
6.76E+01 Mn-54 10.909%
4.17E+01 j
Cs-137 6.120%
2.34E+01 Cr-51 1.336%
5.10E+00 Zn-65 1.133%
4.33E+00 Co-58
.741%
2.83E+00 l
.522%
1.99E+00
{
Fa-59
.461%
1.76E+00 Sb-125
.134%
5.10E-01
^
.048%
1.85E-01 Sb-124
.032%
1.22E-01 i
.014%
5.51E-02 l
Pu-241
.005%
2.09E-02 i
.005%
1.77E-02 An-241
.000%
3.10E-04 Pu-238
.000%
2.38E-04 i
Cm243/44
.000%
2.04E-04 Cm-242
.000%
1.67E-04 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 i
Hi-59
.000%
0.00E+00
!O 4
,i i
I, 4
S O
e
. 8 9
I-9
TABLE 2.0-1 (contin 4)
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 Rsport Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 7 of 16
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
O Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent curies 4
class Name Abundance B
Co-60 65.274%
5.03E+02 Fe-55 14.5814 1.12E+02 Mn-54 10.516%
8.10E+01 Cs-137 6.080%
4.69E+01 Zn-65 1.4174 1.09E+01 Co-58 1.118%
8.62E+00 Ni-63
.588%
4.53E+00 Cr-51
.297%
2.29E+00 C-14
.067%
5.18E-01 Ag-110m
.019%
1.45E-01 H-3
.012%
9.61E-02 Sr-90
.003%
2.55E-02 Pu-241
.003%
2.16E-02 Sr-89
.001%
4.44E-03 Ce-144
.000%
2.90E-03 An-241
.000%
9.27E-04 Cm-242
.000%
2.51E-04 Ca243/44
.000%
2.49E-04 Pu-238
.000%
1.26E-04 Pu239/40
.000%
8.07E-05 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 O
Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 I-10
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 R3part i
Report Date 08/01/96 Page 8 of 16 i'
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
Waste Strean: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 % Cutoff.
j Waste Nuclide Percent curies l
Class Name Abundance C
Co-60 49.071%
1.32E+01 Fe-55 42.193%
1.14E+01 Mn-54 6.071%
1.63E+00 l
Cs-137 1.767%
4.75E-01 i
.612%
1.64E-01 i
.230%
6.18E-02 Co-144
.073%
1.96E-02 Pu-241
.057%
1.54E-02 f
.024%
6.48E-03 An-241
.014%
- 3. 64 E-03 Cm243/44
.009%
2.34E-03
~
Cm-242
.001%
3.44E-04
.001%
.001%
1.77E-04 4
Pu239/40
.001%
1.46E-04 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 i
.000%
- 0. 00E+00 I
Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 9 of 16
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
O\\
Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abundance All Co-60 63.445%
- 7. 4 8E+02 Fe-55 16.225%
1.91E+02 Kn-54 10.542%
1.24E+02 Cs-137 5.9944
- 7. 07 E+01 En-65 1.292%
1.52E+01 Co-58
.970%
1.14E+01 Cr-51
.627%
- 7. 39E+00 Ni-63
.567%
- 6. 69 E+ 00 re-59
.149%
1.76E+00 C-14
.060%
7.10E-01 Sb-125
.043%
5.10E-01 l
.018%
2.13E-01 Ag-110m
.012%
1.45E-01 Sb-124
.010%
- 1. 2 2 E-01 Pu-241
.005%
5.79E-02 Sr-90
.004%
4. 3 4 E-02 te-144
.002%
2.25E-02 An-241
.000%
4. 87 E-03 Sr-89
.000%
4. 4 4 E-03 Cm243/44
.000%
2. 79 E-03 Cm-242
.000%
7. 63 E-04 Pu-238
.0004 6.66E-04 Pu239/40
.000%
2. 27 E-04 I-129
.000%
- 0. 00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Mb-94
.000%
- 0. 00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
- 0. 00E+00 I-11
TABLE 2.01 (continued)
NRC Rsg. Guid3 1.21 Rspsrt Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 10 of 16 j
O
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Dry Active Waste with 0 % Cutoff.
Wasta Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abundance A
'49.235%
8.87E+00 Fe-55 41.572%
7.49E+00 Ni-63 3.076%
5.54E-01 Mn-54 1.944%
3. 50 E-01 Cs-137 1.771%
3.19 E-01 Co-144 1.238%
2.235-01 Pu-241
.547%
- 9. 8 5 E-02 C-14
.404%
7.29E-02 H-3
.152%
2. 7 3 E-02 Cm243/44
.005%
9.20E-04 An-241
.002%
3.91E-04 Pu-238
.001%
.001%
- 9. 67 E-05 cm-242
.000%
9. 58 E-07 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 11 of 16
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Wrate class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Dry Active Waste with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent curies Class Name Abundance All Co-60 49.235%
8.87E+00 Fe-55 41.572%
7.49E+00 Ni-63 3.076%
$.54E-01 Mn-54 1.944%
3.19E-01 Co-144 1.238%
2.23E-01 Pu-241
.547%
9.858-02 C-14
.404%
7.29E-02 H-3
.152%
2. 7 3 E-02 Ca243/44
.005%
- 9. 2 0E-04 An-241
.002%
3.91E-04 Pu-238
.001%
2. 69 E-04
.001%
- 9. 67 E-05 Cm-242
.000%
9.58E-07 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00
[V)
Hb-94
.000%
- 0. 00E+ 00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 1-12
TABLE 2.01 (continued)
~
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 R: port Rep 3rt Dato 08/01/96 Pego 12 of 36
- Estimates of Najor Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
f-s Waste Stream: Sun of All 4 Categories with 0 % Cutoff.
- b)
(
Waste Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abundance l
A Co-60 60.246%
2.41E+02 i
Fe-55 18.790%
7.51E+01 Mn-54 10.506%
4.20E+01 Cs-137 5.924%
2.37E+01 Cr-51 1.276%
5.10E+00 f
Zn-65 1.082%
4.33E+00 Co-58
.708%
2.83E+00 Ni-63
.637%
2.55E+00 Fe-59
.440%
1.76E+00 Sb-125
.128%
5.10E-01 C-14
.065%
2.58E-01 Co-144
.056%
2.23E-01 Sb-124
.031%
1.22E-01 Pu-241
.030%
1.19E-91 H-3
.021%
8.24E-02 Sr-90
.004%
1.78E-02 Cm243/44
.000%
1.12E-03
/
An-241
.000%
7.01E-04 Pu-238
.000%
5.07E-04 l
Cm-242
.000%
1.68E-04 I-129
.000%
P,00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 13 of 16
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Sum of All 4 Categories with 0 4 Cutoff.
Wasta Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abundance B
Co-60 65.274%
5.03E+02 Fe-55 14.581%
1.12E+02 Mn-54 10.516%
8.10E+01 Cs-137 6.080%
4. 69 E+ 01 Zn-65 1.4174 1.09E+01 Co-58 1.118%
- 8. 62 E+ 00 Ni-63
.588%
4.53E+00 Cr-51
.297%
2.29E+00 C-14
.067%
5.18E-01 Ag-110m
.019%
1.45E-01 H-3
.012%
9.61E-02 Sr-90
.003%
2.55E-02 Pu-241
.003%
2.16E-02 Sr-89
.001%
4.44E-03 Ce-144
.000%
2.90E-03 An-241
.000%
9.27E-04 Cm-242
.000%
2.51E-04 Ca243/44
.000%
2.49E-04 O
.000%
1.26E-04 Pu239/40
.000%
8.07E-05 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
9.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 I-13
I TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) l NRC Rsg. Guid3 1.21 Rsport i
Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 14 of 16
)
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
i Waste Stream:Sua of All 4 Categories with 0 % Cutoff, i
i Waste Nuclide Percent curies Class Name
' Abundance 1
C Co-60 49.071%
1.32E+01 Fe-55 42.193%
1.14E+01 Mn-54 6.071%
1.63E+00 Cs-137 1.767%
4.75E-01 Ni-63
.612%
1.64E-01 H-3
.230%
6.18E-02 4
Co-144
.073%
1.96E-02 I
Pu-241
.057%
1.54E-02 C-14
.024%
6.48E-03 I
An-241
.014%
3.64E-03 Ca243/44
.009%
2.34E-03
(
Cm-242
.001%
3.44E-04 I
.001%
3.01E-04 f
.001%
1.77E-04 l
Pu239/40
.001%
1.46E-04 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 j
.000%
- 0. 00E+00 i
Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 15 of 16 O
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Sum of All 4 Categories with 0 4 Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent Curles class Name Abundance All Co-60 63.231%
- 7. 57E+02 Fe-55 16.607%
1.99E+02 Mn-54 10.413%
1.25E+02 Cs-137 5.931%
7.10E+01 En-65 1.2734 1.52E+01 Co-58
.956%
1.14E+01 Cr-51
.617%
7.39E+00 Ni-63
.605%
7.24E+00 Fe-39
.147%
1.76E+00 C-14
.065%
7.82E-01 Sb-125
.0434 5.10E-01 Co-144
.021%
2.46E-01 H-3
.020%
2. 40E-01 Pu-241
.013%
1.56E-01 Ag-110m
.012%
1.45E-01 Sb-124
.010%
1.22E-01 Sr-90
.004%
4. 35E-02 An-241
.0004 5.26E-03 Sr-89
.0004 4. 4 4 E-03 Cm243/44
.0004 3.71E-03 Pu-238
.000%
9. 34 E-04 Cm-242
.000%
- 7. 64 E-04 O
Pu239/40
.000%
2.27E-04 I-129
.000%
- 0. 00E+ 00 Tc-99
.000%
- 0. 00E+ 00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
- 0. 00E+ 00 1-14
Y TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
]
i NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report J
Report Date : 08/01/96 Page 16 of 16 IOV
- " Solid Waste Disposition Summary "*
During Period From 01/01/96 to 07/01/96 j
\\
Number of Shipments Mode ofTransportation Destination l
I 30 TRUCK Barnwell
- l d
30 TRUCK Processors 4
i l
i l
i
)
2 i
J' e
O I-15
(..
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) 4 1
NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report 4
j Report Date 02/26/97 Page 1 of 18 l
solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal l
- During Period From 07/01/96 to 12/31/96 **
l Waste Stream : Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms q
RADMAN Waste Type (s):
j PR-D-NA COND 215 PR-D-NA RWCU 120 j
BR-D-NA NSRT 215 PR-D-NA RWCU 120
- l BR-D-NA-DEC 120 i
PR-D-NA COND 179 CF-D-NA 215 FEXM
- BR-D-NA NSRT 170 I
CF-D-NA 120 MTIF
- i PR-D-NA COND 170 j
PR-D-NA COND 120 j
Wasta Volume Curies Class Ft*3 M*3 Shipped A
1354.9 38.3 1.53E+03 i
B 120.3 3.4 4.80E+02 l
C
.0
.0 0.00E+00 I
t j
All 1475.2 41.7 2.01E+03 1
j
- -Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown S
~
l NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 2 of is i
Solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
- t During Period From 07/01/96 to 12/31/96 **
)
4 l
Waste Stream : Dry Active Waste RADMAN Waste Type (s):
DAW-U-NA 8x8x20 DAW-C-NA 55 DRUM DAW-U-NA 8x8x40 3
DAW-U-NA ALARON CF-D-NA FG Box i
DAW-U-NA B25 Box i
DAW-U-NA OVRPAK *-
l DAW-U-NA 55 Drum i
DAW-U-NA OIL PKS j
DAW-U-NA B25 DAW-U-NA BOX I
DAW-U-NA FG Box l
Wasta Volume Curies
).
Class Ft*3.
Ma3 shipped A
35851.9 1014.6 4.56E+00 l
B
.0
.0 0.00E+00 C
.0
.0 0.00E+00 i
l All 35851.9 1014.6 4.56E+00 l
- -Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major volume Waste Type Shown I-16 i
- - ~..
t TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
NRC Reg. Guido 1.21 Roport
]
Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 3 of 18 i
-s Solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
)
- During Period From 07/01/96 to 12/31/96 **
y Waste Stream : Irradiated Components RADMAN Waste Type (s):
IC-D-NA THRAM IC-D-NA THRAMINS IC-D-NA 41 VL's Waste Volume Curles Class Fta3 M*3 shipped A
.0
.0 0.00E+00*
5 14.6
.4 4.43E+03 C
367.2 10.4 4.50E+04 All 381.8 10.8 4.94E+04
- . Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown i
()
NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 4 of la Solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
- During Period From 07/01/96 to 12/31/96 **
Wasta Stream : Other Waste RADMAN Waste Type (s):
None Selected.
Waste Volume Curies Class Fta3 M*3 Shipped A
.0
.0 0.00E+00 B
.0
.0 0.00E+00 C
.0
.0 0.00E+00 All
.0
.0 0.00E+00
- -Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown S
e o
I-17
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 Rap 3rt Ropart D:to 02/26/97 Pcgo 3,0f 18 Solid Waste Shipped offsite for Disposal
- During Period From 07/01/96 to 12/31/96 **
C Waste Stream : Sum of All 4 Categories RADMAN Waste Type (s):
DAW-U-NA 8x8x20 DAW-C-NA 55 DRUN PR-D-NA COND 215 DAW-U-NA 8x8x40 DAW-U-NA ALARON PR-D-NA RWCU 120
- CF-D-NA FC Box BR-D-NA NSRT 215 DAW-U-NA B25 Box PR-D-NA RWCU 120
- BR-D-NA-DEC 120 PR-D-NA COND 179 CF-D-NA 215 FEXM
- DAW-U-NA OVRPAX
- DAW-U-NA 55 Drum BR-D-NA NSRT 170 CF-D-NA 120 NTIF
- PR-D-NA COND 170 PR-D-NA COND 120
. DAW-U-NA OIL PXS DAW-U-NA B25' DAW-U-NA BOX DAW-U-NA FG Box IC-D-NA THRAM IC-D-NA TNRAMINS O
IC-D-NA 41 VL's Wasta Volume Curies Class Fta3 M*3 shipped A
37206.8 1053.0
- 1. 54 E+ 03 B
134.9 3.4 4.91E+03 C
367.2 10.4 4.50E+04 All 37708.9 1067.2 5.14 E+ 04
- -Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Wast.. aypw onown D
e e
O' I-18
j TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
I KRC R:g. Guido 1.21 R2pcrt R port Dato : 02/26/97 Page 6 cf 18
)
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
i Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 % Cutoff.
i Waste Nuclide Percent curies Class Name Abundance i
A Co-60 72.008%
1.10E+03 i
Fe-55 15.7974 2.42E+02 1
Mn-54 9.621%
1.48E+02 Cs-137 1.083%
1.66E+01 En-65
.8084 1.24E+01 Ni-63 570%
8.74E+00 Co-58
.088%
1.35E+00 l
i C-14
.058%
0.88E-01 4
Ag-110m
.027%
4.18E-01 j
.0034 5.21E-02 i
.002%
3.47E-02 i
Pu-241
.001%
2.23E-02 1
Sr-89
.001%
1.66E-02 l
Ce-144
.000%
3.03E-03 An-241
.000%
6.99E-04 l
Cm243/44
.000%
6.58E-04
)
.000%
5.17E-04
)
Pu239/40
.000%
1.37E-04 1
i Cm-242
.000%
1.35E-04 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 l
l i
.000%
0.00E+00 l
Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%-
0.00E+00
~
i NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report l
Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 7 of 18 1
i
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
l Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent Curies l
Class Name
, Abundance 1
B Co-60 72.500%
- 3. 4 8 E+02
~
Fe-55 14.854%
7.13 E+01 Mn-54 10.292%
- 4. 94 E+01 in-65 1.5964 7.66E+00 Cs-137
.469%
2.25E+00 l
.308%
1.48E+00-
)
i S'. -9 0
.016%
- 7. 67 Er02 Pu-241
.006%
2.67E-02 C-14
.004%
1.71E-02
)
.001%
5.71E-03 An-241
.000%
- 1. 2 2 E-03 l
Cm243/44
.000%
1.15E-03
{
.000%
,9. 04 E-04 9
Pu239/40
.000%
4.08E-04 i
i Cm-242
.000%
- 8. 9 6 E-05'
~
I-129
.t00%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 j
Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 i
i j
I-19 i
i 1
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 Rap 3rt i.
Rsport Dato : 02/26/97 Pago 8 of 18 4
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, & Evap Bottoms with 0 4 Cutoff.
O 1
Wasta Nuclide Percent curies Class Name Abundance All Co-60 72.125%
1.45E+03 Fe-55 15.572%
3.14E+02 Mn-54 9.781%
1.97E+02 En-65
.996%
2.00E+01 Cs-137
.936%
1.89E+01
)
.508%
1.02E+01 l
'Co-58
.067%
1.35E+00 C-14
.045%
9.05E*01 Ag-110m
.021%
4.18E-01 l
.006%
1.29E,01 4
Pu-241
.002%
4.90E-02 i
.0024 4.04E-02 Sr-89
.001%
1.66E-02 Ce-144
.000%
3.03E-03 An-241
.000%
1.92E-03 i
Cm243/44
.000%
1.81E-03 Pu-238
.000%
1.42E-03 Pu239/40
.000%
5.45E-04 l'
Cm-242
.000%
2.24E-04 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 l
Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00
~
NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report i
Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 9 of 18 i
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
l Waste Stream: Dry Active Waste with 0 4 Cutoff.
Waste Nuclids' Percent curies Class Name Abundance
- l i
A Co-60 53.147%
2.43E+00 i
Fe-55 36.000%
1.64E+00 i
'Cs-137 3.853%
1.76E-01 Ni-63 2.662%
1.22E-01 Mn-54 2.589%
1.18E-01 Ce-144
.916%
4.18E-02 Pu-241
.453%
2.07E,02 C-14
.349%
1.59E-02 H-3
.130%
5.92E-03 cm243/44
.005%
2.35E-04 An-241
.003%
1.38E-04 Pu-238
.002%
1.01E-04 Sr-90
.002%
7.96E-05 Sr-89
.001%
5.09E-05 Pu239/40
.000%
8.18E-07 Cm-242
.000%
8.05E-07 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%
0.00E+00 Kb-94
.000%
6.00E+00 O
Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 1-20
_ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _. _. _ TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) i j
NRC R:g. Guida 1.21 R2 port l
Rsport D:te 02/26/97 Paga 10 of 18 i
- Estimates of Najor Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
j Waste Stream: Dry Active Waste with 0 % Cutoff.
1 Wasta Nuclide Percent curies Class Name Abundance o....
l All Co-60 53.147%
2.43E+00 i
Fe-55 36.000%
1.64E+00 Cs-137 3.853%
1.76E-01 Ni-63 2.662%
1.22E-01 Mn-54 2.589%
1.18E-01
)
Co-144
.916%
4.18E-02 i
l Pu-241
.453%
2.07E-02 l
4 C-14
.3494 1.59E-02 j
H-3.
.130%
5.92E-03 j
Ca243/44
.005%
2.35E-04 An-241
.003%
1.38E-04 Pu-238
.002%
1.01E-04 Sr-90
.002%
7.96E-05 Sr-89
.001%
5.09E-05 Pu239/40
.000%
8.18E-07 Cm-242
.000%
8.05E-07 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Tc-99
.000%~
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00 NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report O.-
Report Date 2 02/26/97 Page 11 of 18
- Estimates of Najor Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Irradiated Components with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abund nce B
Fe-55 48.533%
2.15E+03 Co-60 46.275%
2.05E+03 Ni-63 2.844%
1.26E+02 Mn-54 1.968%
8.72E+01 Cr-51
.184%
4.15E+00 Co-58
.065%
2.86E+00 Ni-59
.016%
6.87E*01 C-14
.004%
1.65E-01 H-3
.000%
5.08E-03 Nb-94
.000%
3.30E-03 Tc-99
.000%
6.62E-04 Fe-59
.000%
2.55E-05 Pu-241
.000%
1.05E-05 An-241
.000%
8.93E-07 Ca243/44
.0004 5.83E-07 Pu-238
.0004 3.17 E-07 Cm-242
.000%
1.71E-07 Pu239/40
.000%
1.59E-07 Cs-137
.000%
0.00E+00 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 Sr-90
.000%
0.00E+00 1-21
NRC R2g. Guido 1.21 Rsp3rt Raport Dato : 02/26/97 P293 12,cf 18 4
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
j Waste Stream Irradiated Components with 0 % Cutoff, s) i waste Nuclide Percent Curies cines Nagg gbggdaggg C
Fe-55 49.936%
2.24E+04 i
Co-60 44.963%
2.02E+04 Ni-63 2.640%
1.19E+03 Mn-54 2.360%
1.06E+03 Cr-51
.098%
4.40E+01 Co-58
.056%
2.53E+01 Ni-59
.015%
6.53E+00 1
.004%
1.61E400 l
Co-144
.001%
2.57E-01 Pu-241
.000%
2.09E-01 Cs-137
.000%
1,33E-01 j
.000%
1.12E-01 Hb-94
.000%
3.78E-02 j
~
Cm-242
.000%
3.44E-02 l
j Pu-238
.000%
1.26E-02 I
Cm243/44
.000%
5.53E-03 l
.000%
5.38E-03 l
An-241
.000%
7.31E-04' Pu239/40
.000%
5.57E-04 I-129
.000%
2.42E-05 e
)
An-243
.000%
1.31E-05 i
Np-237
.000%
1.47E-06 Pu-242
.000%
1.10E-06 Sr-90
.000%
0.00E+00 NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 13 of 18,
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Wasta Class and Stream **
4 with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Stream: Irradiated Components Waste Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abundance 4
All Fe-55 49.810%
2.46E+04 Co-60 45.080%
2.23E+04 Ni-63 2.658%
1.31E+03 Mn-54 2.325%
1.15E+03 Cr-51
.106%
5.21E+01 Co-58
.057%
2.81E+01 Ni-59
.015%
7.21Et00 C-14
.004%
1.77E+00 Ce-144
.001%
2.57E-01 Pu-241
.000%
2.09E-01 Cs-137
.000%
1.33E-01 H-3
.000%
1.17E-01 Nb-94
.000%
4.11E-02 Cm-242
.000%
3.44E-02 Pu-238
.000%
1.26E-02
}
000%
6.04E-03 Ca243/44 000%
5.53E-03 An-241 000%
7.32E-04 1
Pu239/40
.000%
5.57E-04 l
f
Fe-59 000%
2.55E-05 I-129 000%
2. 4 2 E l An-243 000%
1.31E-05 Np-237 000%
- 1. 47 E-06 Pu-242 000%
1.10E-06 Sr-90 000%
0.00E+00 1-22
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 R0 port Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 14 of 18 i
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream **
1 Waste Stream: Sum of All 4 Categories with 0 % Cutoff.
Wasta Nuclide Percent Curies Class Name Abundance A
Co-60 71.952%
1.11E+03 Fe-55 15.857%
2.44E+02 Mn-54 9.600%
1.48E+02 Cs-137 1.091%
1.68E+01 Zn-65
.805%
1.24E+01 Ni-63
.577%
8.87E+00 Co-58
.088%
1.35E400 C-14
.059%
9.04E*01 Ag-110m
.027%
4.18E-01 Sr-90
.003%
5.22E-02 Ce-144
.003%
4.48E-02 Pu-241
.003%
4.30E-02 J
.003%
4.06E-02 Sr-89
.001%
1.67E-02 Cm243/44
.000%
8.93E-04*
An-241
.000%
8.37E-04 Pu-238
.000%
6.18E-04 Pu239/40
.000%
1.38E-04 cm-242
.000%
1.35E-04 I-129
.000%
0.00E+00 i
.000%
0.00E+00 Nb-94
.000%
0.00E+00 Ni-59
.000%
0.00E+00
(
NRC Reg. Guide 1.21 Report Report Date : 02/26/97 Page 15 of 18
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
Waste Stream: Sum of All 4 Categories with 0 4 Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent curies Class Name Abundance B
Co-60 48.839%
2.40E+03 Fe-55 45.240%
2.22E+03 Mn-54 2.782%
1.37E+02 Ni-63 2.596%
1.27E+02 Cr-51
.166%
8.15E+00 Zn-65
.156%
7.66E+00 Co-58
.058%
2.86E+00 Cs-137
.046%
2.25E+00 Ni-59
.014%
6.87E-01 C-14
.004%
1.83E-01 Sr-90
.002%
7.67E-02 Pu-241
.001%
2.67E-02 H-3
.000%
1.08E-02 Nb-94
.000%
3.30E-03 An-241
.000%
1.22E-03 Ca243/44
.000%
1.15E-03 Pu-238
.0004 9.04E-04 Tc-99
.000%
6.62E-04 Pu239/40 *
.0004 4.08E-04 O
Cm-242
.0004 8.98E-05 Fe-59
.000%
2.55E-05 1-129
.000%
0.00E+00.
I-23
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 R: port Rap 3rt Dato 02/26/97 Pego 16 of 18
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste class and Stream **
]
Waste Stream: Sum of All 4 Categories with 0 % Cutoff.
Waste Nuclide Percent duries Class Name Abundance i
C Fe-55 49.936%
2.24E+04 i
Co-60 44.963%
2.02E+04 Ni-63 2.640%
1.19E+03 j
Mn-54 2.360%
1.06E+03 l
Cr-51
.098%
4.40E+01 Co-58
.056%
.2.53E+01 j
Ni-59
.015%
6.53E+00 C-14
.C04%
1.61E+00 Ce-144
.001%
2.57E-01 Pu-241
.000%
2.09E-01 l
.000%
1.33E-01 H-3
.000%
1.12E-01 i
Nb-94
.0004 3.78E-02 Cm-242
.000%
3.44E-02 Pu-238
.000%
1.26E-02 Cm243/44
.000%
5.53E-03 Tc-99
.000%
5.38E-03 An-241
.000%
7.31E-04 Pu239/40
.000%
5.57E-04 i
I-129
.000%
2.42E-05 An-243
.000%
1.31E-05 Kp-237
.000%
1.47E-06 Pu-242
.000%
1.10E-06 Sr-90
.000%
0.00E+00 O
1-24
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) 4 NRC Rsg. Guido 1.21 Raport j
Rsport Dato 02/26/97 P go 17 of 18
- Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Strema **
l Waste Stream:Sua of All 4 Categories with 0 % Cutoff.
Wasts Nuclide Percent curies i
class Name Abundance j
All Fe-55 48.468%
2.49E+04 i
Co-60 46.1404 2.37E+04 Mn-54 2.617%
1.35E+03 Ni-63 2.574%
1.32E+03 Cr-51.
.101%
5.21E+01 i
co-58
.0574 2.95E+01 En-65
.039%
2.00E+01 i
.037%
1.92E+01 N1-59
.014%
7.21E+00 3
.005%.
2.69E+00 i
Ag-110m
.001%
4.38E-01 i
Co-144
.001%
3.02E-01 Pu-241
.001%
2.78E-01 H-3
.0004 1.63E-01
[
.000%
1.29E-03 2
Nb-94
.000%
4.11E-02 Cm-242
.0004 3.46E-02 Sr-89
.000k 1.67E-02 l
.6004 1.41E-02 Cm243/44
.000%
7.57E-03 Tc-99
.000%
6.04E-03 An-241
.000%
2.79E 03
[
Pu239/40
.000%
1.10E-03 Fe-59
.000%
2.55E-C5 j
I-129
.000%
2.42E-05
- )
An-243
.000%
1.31E-05 Np-237
.000%
1.472-06 i
Pu-242
.000%
1.10E-06 i
i 1
J l
a i
e i
"* Solid Weste Disposiuon Sunmary
- During Period Fruen 07/01/96 through 12/31/96 Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation DeeUnation it TRUCM Bernwell 24 TRUCK Processore O
I-25 9
i
'o[
=..
FIGURE 3.11 n
Estimated Cumulative Gamma Dose (in mrem)
V from the Quad Cities Station for the period No,
January. December 1996 l
EL SE i
i o
g j) lsooleth Labels poi y Small figure multiply by 105
/
e 3
4 2
t.arge figure muftiply by 10 250 SCALC j
' u,us
/,
f o
e e
3 s..
==w 9
t.as g
g i
..en s
e s
C L
I N
T O
N
{
i
=
e s
oc d
25 funen
?
I
+
p Clinton.
g vs
[
'\\
s, y'J) l 1
- can.
F" I
us wm i
y4'*
uorud T
I eache 4
t
/
L I
N O
I S
I h
W i
V,
'/
a t
t D
,,,,,, ) W ITES 0 E,. '
2so
'*r.
50
,,,y.,
(
s w
I T.
i S C 0 T R O C K 4
m..
., o,,/
i u.n..e.
7 ISLA q
t 6'
(M j
.m.,
d it,'h'* U-H E
N R
Y
~
4*-s[
g s.UA A
s..., }-
L SCALC 4
to sists I
b d
1 4
4 to 29 30 rs a
e I-26 J
i "6 o hi.y o
FIGURE 3.1-2 too,
6
.Os Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCilm3)
- j
\\
e of Noble Gases from the Quad Cities Station e
for the period J6auary-December 1936 s
RELE SE FrJIN j Isooleth Lahtd1
/
Small figure multiply by 10-8 200 Large figure multiply by 10'8
~
e SCALE es'Lil
/,
o e
3
_ su LYa'e' g
I' a
'.s
.s C
L 1
N T
O N
{ *'
23 Y
. e.
p
[
j vs W 7,,,
_g
~
u......
oj %
O
,e i
\\
s I
c he V
\\
l L
I N
I S
f f
g m.
{"'p 4S C
O T
O C K cf,
- u.w.
Y e,,.
g YI
~
~~
D
)
a
^ t, N'*a [ y
25
,'- ! s en.
Kh* fH E
N R
Y 1.
y e....
aun
>A
.so "
SCALE 9
t fo"us e..
's so es w su I-27
/
[
FIGURE 3.13 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) 2
),
of lodines from the Quad Cities Station for the period January December 1996 RELE SE po/
Isooleth labels 3
Small figure - multiply by 10#
s Large figure multiply by 10 SCALE
/,
I mests o
e s
s f
^ 88 t.6.
e a
,,a i 4 y
C L
I T
O N
I e
a e,
Wilen
+
y Clinton 4
U s So
. De W P
y my,jit m
Morris 3
Comanche s
s.
nos,,,*'*.
I a*
2 a
l
\\
i k
A; L
L N
O I
S,f 0h i
1 a
m
'g 22' W H I T E I O E,.
e=,,'.
1 d+,
,,,y..
- , d i;
T.
'trie i
S C
0 T
Rp% n
,,/
l f
w on...
j '. e,.
t..o g
i ISLA 7
R L
I
/
,~
L p
f
'q
)
a
- ,t' s
4 N
_s a
lief **
H E
N R
Y
/....
Ye e
s Gr ee. her.t h
so
- t i
SCALE y
9 9
4 to witts
- . __.. e 9
4 ao es so su i O 1-28
m a i.,.
FIGURE 3.1-4 Estimated Tota 1 Concentrations (in pCi/m3) of Particulates from the Quad Cities Station for the period January December 1996 R
As P NT Isooleth labels 4e 2m 4
i 3
Small figure - multiply by 104 Large figure - multiply by 10 l
2 e
sCALC I
/,
Mit t s lau
$"ie' f.[
=
9.-
C i
o
^'
vit
+
y Clinton 3
0 v s so
. oe Witt
,~a-
/" 25 7
aw i
c...
~
uare sd %
p Como suu
)
s
,,s
)
a eo..***.
\\
1 I
Oh A
L L
N O
I e
IT SIO E
5e =,,,
, y g)W 10 f
T.
R O C
et,
C O T
s
.n...
l Were*
- t. ee I$LA
- ,.. /
'Tgil*"
H E
N p*
d4 *s/
A. i...
SCALC 9
t 9
es to me.ts 8.
.t 9
'S 80 25 80 su O
1-29
._..,._.____..-__-____-...__..__-.._.._...__._,.____.-___._m__
l 4
I-l
)
<. O c~
TABLE 3.1-1 l
1 QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT ONE i
ACTUAL 1996 4-MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 04/07/97 INFANT RECEPTOR t'
1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH i
TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL i
JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC I
GAMMA AIR 1.52E-04 0.00E+00 2.06E-05 8.25E-05 2.55E-04 (MRAD)
(NNE )
(
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
BETA AIR 1.12E-05 0.00E+00 1.58E-06 7.26E-06 2.00E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(
)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 1.56E-05 6.22E-05 1.93E-04 (MREM)
(NNE )
(
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
1 SKIN 1.25E-04 0.00E+00 1.70E-05 6.85E-05 2.11E-04
.(MREM)
(NNE )
(
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
ORGAN 7.08E-03 1.94E-03 1.92E-03 2.17E-03 1.31E-02 i
i (MREM)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD-QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 I
TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.03 15.0-0.09 LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THU.O*D
)
RESULTS BASED UPON:
.ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I-30
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 04/07/97 ADULT RECEPTOR f
1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 7'
TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER A!.'NUAL i
JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.52E-04 0.00E+00 2.06E-05 8.259E-05 2.55E-04 (MRAD)
(NNE )
(
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(1:NE )
1 BETA AIR 1.12E-05 0.00E+00 1.58E-06 7.26E-06 2.00E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(
)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 1.56E-05 6.22E-05 1.93E-04 (MREM)
(NNE )
(
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
SKIN 1.25E-04 0.00E+00 1.70E-05 6.85E-05 2.11E-04 i
(MREM)
(NNE )
(
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
ORGAN 5.86E-03 2.83E-03 3.24E-03 2.33E-03 1.38E-02 (MREM)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
4 i
O GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI 8-
)
TMIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR i
l
% OF APP I.
]
1 QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD).
5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 4
BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 j
SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.08 0.03 0.04 0.03 15.0 0.09 GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 Jar.uary 1995
- O I-31 4
i 4
(O V
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued) 4 1
4 QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 04/07/97 INFANT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.34E-04 4.80E-05 5.56E-05 9.88E-05 3.36E-04 (MRAD)
(NNE )
(N
)
(N
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
BETA AIR 1.02E-05 4.43E-06 5.13E-06 9.16E-06 3.07E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 1.01E-04 3.63E-05 4.20E-05 7.46E-05 2.54E-04 (MREM)
(NNE )
(N
)
(N
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
SKIN 1.12E-04 4.00E-05 4.65E-05 8.25E-05 2.81E-04 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
ORGAN 6.86E-03 1.75E-03 2.10E-03 2.42E-03 1.30E-02 (MREM)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I
)
INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY iST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.01 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.09 0.02 0.03 0.03 15.0 0.09 LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID
\\
RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 O
I-32
~ ___ _
i k,
i TABLE 3.1-1 (continued) i i
QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 04/07/97 ADULT RECEPTOR a
e 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 1
l GAMMA AIR 1.34E-04 4.80E-05 5.56E-05 9.88E-05
- 3. 3 6E-04 (MRAD)
(NNE )
(N
)
(N
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
BETA AIR 1.20E-05 4.43E-06 5.13E-06 9.16E-06
- 3. 07 E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 1.01E-04 3.63E-05 4.20E-05 7.46E-05.
2.54E-04 (MREM)
(NNE )
(N
)
(N
)
(NNE )
(NNE )
SKIN 1.12E-04 4.00E-05 4.65E-05
&.25E-05 2. 31 E- : '
(MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE 1 ORGAN 5.73E-03 1.92E-03 3.54E-03 2.86E-03 1.41E-02 (MREM)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_.LLI THYROID GI LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.01 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.08 0.03 0.05 0.04 15.0 0.09 GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI THYROID GI LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 Janua;y 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I-33
._m._._
t I
l
. TABLE 3.2-1 l
QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM AQUATIC EFFLUENTS l
PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 04/07/97 ADULT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH i
l DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC l
TOTAL 1.02E-04 6.44E-05 7.94E-05 1.47E-05 2.60E-04 l
BODY l
INTERNAL 1.52E-04 9.22E-05 1,15E-04 1.91E-05 3.79E-04 ORGAN LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 l '
l COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I f
% OF APP I.
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 3.0 0.01 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER l
RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 t
ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l
ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l
i I-34 i
'u TABLE 3.2-1 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM AQUATIC EFFLUENTS 4
I PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 04/07/97 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC TOTAL 9.37E-05 5.78E-05 2.14E-05 1.96E-05 1.93E-04 i
BODY INTERNAL 1.41E-04 8.24E-05 3.05E-05 2.62E-05 2.80E-04 ORGAN LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER I
THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 O
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I V
-------- % OF AP P I.
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.01 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0 00 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 O
I-35
~....
l l0 TABLE 3.3-1 QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 01/17/97 i
1.
10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) Compliance j
Total Effective Dose Equivalent, mrem /yr 6.56E-01 10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 0.66
^
f Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 i
ist 2nd 3rd 4th
% of Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Li:.it
]
TEDE 3.21E-01 1.89E-03 5.71E-02 2.76E-01 0.66 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l
t i
G
- V I-36
U)
("
TABLE 3.3-1 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 01/17/97 2.
10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance Dose Limit
% of (mrem)
(mrem)
Limit Whole Body Plume 1.93E-04 (DDE)
Skyshine 2.74E+00 Ground 6.40E-03
[}
Total 6.52E-01 25.0 2.61 V
Organ Dose Thyroid 4.77E-03 75.0 0.01 (CDE)
Gonads 4.72E-03 25.0 0.02 Breast 4.65E-03 25.0 0.02 Lung 4.94E-03 25.0 0.02 Marrow 4.67E-03 25.0 0.02 Bone 4.64E-03 25.0 0.02 Remainder 4.86E-03 25.0 0.02 CEDE 4.77E-03 TEDE 6.56E-01 100.0 0.66 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
{s s--)
i I-37 I
. ~..
O TABLE 3.3-1 (continued) l QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT TWO 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 01/17/97 1.
10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) Compliance Total Effective Dose Equivalent, mrem /yr 1.45E+00 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 1.45 1
l O
V Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 l
1st 2nd 3rd 4th t of Qtr.
Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit TEDE 7.42E-01 3.25E-01 1.33E 01 2.54E-01 1.45 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOF'IWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 O
I-38
.l
\\~ \\)
TABLE 3.3-1 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION UNIT TWO 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 01/17/97 2.
10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance Dose Limit
% of (mrem)
(mrem)
Limit Whole Body Plume 2.54E-04 i
(DDE)
Skyshine 6.82E+00 Ground 6.53E-03 Total 1.45E+00 25.0 5.80 Organ Dose Thyroid 4.82E-03 75.0 0.01 (CDE)
Gonads 4.76E-03 25.0 0.02 Breast 4.69E-03 25.0 0.02 Lung 4.99E-03 25.0 0.02 Marrow 4.71E-03 25.0 0.02 Bone 4.69E-03 25.0 0.02 Remainder 4.90E-03 25.0 0.02 CEDE 4.81E-03 TEDE 1.45E+00 100.0 1.45 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.8 JUNE 1996 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
[v I-39
t i
FIGURE 5.01 O
/ '" h.m
//
w,,,, N(
f I
L k.
Y l
- -/,, -
g, j
}/>
I r ' " > '
//
!s l
t
//.
V /ie fs s i.e.:
comaache
// -
/*'
su+
i ll e
l o,a-g y / 4 Y"
g.1 ) g. $$,
g tie.t l
\\
j'
.f ' l
}
y
= ' * * '
/
j.J e 3
\\
/%.i 3 Q ;j i, w l
I i
-).1 puta /
Quad =
sei.s j
[
,ocittee I
Station
- s. ^./
/
N s
.) /,{,, _\\
>1,,
f~~}
\\
m.
i O
/
s k#
"'1' l
/
\\
in.:
I
,)
ce,sen
.... t,. ;p_., e j
t i
g
"** aL I
8
/
l 1
,)/
.I io..
l,1,4 f
einiad f
4
_J
- 5 t
Y 1*
i QUAD CITIES STATION INNER RING TLD LOCAT10NS O
I-40
1 i
I FIGURE 5.02
- O 4
I N
J 4
w.., e j
f i
l 1
p futton 15 #
7 g
18e wwi me 4
8 1,%,h 8 i Si Il,',a JH lillnois
'l *H i
. 2tJa
-47 l*.,es 1
14 e n>i 4
i *
'it,'%
1 3
(/
sine j
el em
,..ie,y, "s tn,k~~),L*")
i g
f I
i O
i
,,__ _._n I
}
41
=
i l l
- Air Samphag S4 i
5 Ovier 8the TLD Location to 68
- _t 9
9 8' mas t,,
e 9
4 4
W N
Mu QUAD CITITES STATION i
F1XED AIR SAMLING SITES AND OUTER RING TLD LOCATIONS 4
Q01 Onsite Na l' Q49 Erie Qat Onsite Na 2 Q10 Hillsdale QG3 Onsite Na 3 Ott Fort Byron Q44 Nitrin Q12 Bettendorf 1
Q45 Saddle Cub Dairy Ol3 Frinceton Q46 Fairbanks Q14 Utica R;dge Road QW Ointon Q15 DeWitt i
Q48 Sikkema Farm Q16 Low Moor I-41 4
i
i l
4 FIGURE 5.0-3
, o
.... v...t m,
>a CIInto i
1 k
'0*a'M
.5 el
\\s==
Clinton j
1 o.we a.s.
w..m f
beman he
.- Morrison
)
44 4 l
I
- 'lk lilinois g!
j f o**
whitesid.
CNfov sit 28 (l
4 e
.w fuset 8*
j Scd
..a..
_+w
,s
-T s.
i.i.e. 3-o.,,n,o,,
~j,4..[
i um n.n,,
'E^.!
a caips A
\\
I, + m a
e Sampimg Station f
$649 t..,,!
?
'*Y VW t....f Y
Y Y
Y Y
QUAD CITIES STATION MILK, FISH, WATER, ANDSEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS 1
l Q18 Musal Dairy Q19 East Moline Water Works i
Q20 Davenport Water Works Q21 Intake Canal Q22 Discharge Canal Q24 Pool #14 of Mississippi Rker Q26 Bill Stanley Dairy Q27 Albany, Upstream on Mississippi River Q28 Cordova, Downstream on Mississippi Rn er Q29 Mississippi River, Upstream l
O-1-42 4
e
i TABl.E 5.0-1 i (
A E
i R
Quad Cities Station I
t Radiological Environmental Monitoring
.I g
3 j
i locations 1
3 j
2 3
s ga E
y g
7 y
E O
~x
.c 5
- E 2
e a
5 h
a 5
c 2
H v
E c
2 J,
a o
n Q41 Onsite No.1 0
0 Q-02 Onsite No. 2 0
0 Q43 Onsite No. 3 0
0 Q44 Nitrin 0
0
.j-Q45 Saddle Club Dairy Farm 0
0 0
0 Q46 Fairbanks 0
0 t
Q-07 Clinton Q-08 Sikkema Farm 0
0 Q-09 Erie 0
0 Q-10 Hillsdale 0
0 0
0 i
Q 11 Port Byron Q-12 Bettendorf 0
0 0
0 Q-13 Princeton Q-14 Utica Ridge Road 0
0 Q-15 DeWitt 0
0 Q-16 low Moor 0
0 0
Q-18 Musal Dairy 0
Q-19 East Moline Water Works 0
Q 20 Davenport Water Works 0
Q-21 Intake Canal Q-22 Discharge Canal 0
i G.
Q-24 Pool #14 of Missippippi River 0
0 Q-26 Bill Stan! Dairy 0
Q-27 Albany, stream on Mississippi River O
Q-28 Cordova, wnstream on Mississippi River 0
Q-29 Mississippi River, Upstream CENSUS Datry Residence 1.ivestock O
I-43
t i
i i
TABLE 5.0-2 q
- Q QUAD CITIES STATION 3
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM,SAMPLI!4G LOCATIONS
- 1. AIR SAMPI ERS Distance Direction i
s Site Codea Location (mdes)
(01,
Q-01 Onsite No.1 0.5 7
QO2 Onsite No. 2 0.5 70
)
Q-03 Onsite No. 3 0.6 177 Q-04 Nitrin 1.5 40 Q05 Saddle Club Dairy Farm 1.8 175 Q-06 Fairbanks 1.8 340 l-Q4)7 (C)
Clinton 9.0 40
]
Q-08 (C)
Sikkema Farm 7.0 70 Q-09 (C)
Erie -
13.0 110 Q-10 (C)
Hillsdale 10.0 130 Q-11 (C)
Port Byron 8.0 170 Q-12 (C)
Bettendorf 13.0 210 i
Q-13 Princeton 4.8 220 Q-14 (C)
Utica Ridge Road 11.0 270 Q-15 (C)
DeWitt 13.0 300 Q-16 Low Moor 6.0 330 0
2.
ILRs a.
Same as No. l.
b.
SpecialTLDlocations Distance Direction Site Code (mdes)
(0)_,,
inner Ring Q-101 1,2 0.7 4
Q102-1,2 1.7 21 Q-1031,2 1.2 58 Q-104-1 1.1 60 Q-104-2 1.0 77 Q-105-1,2 0.8 91 Q106-1 0.7 109 Q106-2 0.7 118 Q-1071 0.7 128 Q107 2 0.7 137 Q-1081,2 0.9 155 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
O I-44
l TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
O QUAD CITIES STATION V
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS 2.ILDs
- b. SpecialTLDlocations (continued)
Distance Direction Site Code
{ miles)
( 0)_.
Q-109-1,2 0.9 176 Q-111-1,2 2.6 230 Q-112-1,2 2.4 246 Q-1131,2 2.5 264 Q-114-1,2 2.6 286 Q-115-1 2.0 310 Q-115-2 2.3 310 Q-116-1,2 2.2 339 Outer Ring Q-201-1,2 4.0 356 Q-202-1 4.4 17 i
Q-202-2 5.0 17 Q-203-1 45 34 Q-203-2 5.0 34 i
3 Q-204-1 45 61 Q-204.2 4.0 61 Q-205-1,4 45 83 O
Q-2061,2 4.8 113 Q-207-1,4 4.8 133 Q-208-1 4.4 158 Q-208-2 5.0 158 Q-209-1,4 4.8 179 Q-210-1,4 4.4 210 Q-211 1,2 4.5 223 Q-212-1 5.1 242 Q-212 2 45 242 Q-213-1 4.3 265 Q-213.2 5.2 265 Q-214-1,2 4.8 310 Q-215-1 4.8 316 Q-215-2 4.0 316 Q-216-1,2 4.5 333
- 3. MILK Distance Direction i
Site Codea Location (mild
()-
Q-18 MusalDairy 6.0 240 Q-26 Bill Stanley Dairy 3.5 120 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
O I-45
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 4. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY Distance Direction l
Site Codea Location (mdes)
(OL l
Q19 East Moline Water Works 16.0 206 Q20 Davenport Water Works 18.0 219 l
- 5. COOLING WATER Distance Direction I
Site Codea Location (mdes)
(oL Q21 (C)
Intake Canal At Station l
Q22 Discharge Canal At Station 6.ElSli Distance Direction (mdes)
(O L Site Codea J ocation Q24 Pool #14 of Mississippi River 0.5 330 1.0 240 Q-29 (C)
Mississippi River, Upstream 7.
SHORELINE SEDIMENTS Distance Direction (mdes)
(0)
Site Codea 1& cation Q27 (C)
Albany, Upstream on Mississippi 5.5 35 River Cordova, Downstream on Mississippi 3.3 205 Q28 River a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
I i-t
- O I-46 i
1
(
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION
- RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES imeinn Collection Type of Frequency Sample Media Code Site Frequency Analysis of Analysis Remarks a
1.
Airbome Onsisv and Near Field Contmuous Cross Beta Weekly On all onsite and near field samples.
Particulates operata Q411 Onsite No.1 for one week Gamma isot.
If gross tvta in a sampic exceeds SX the average concentration of the precedmg QO2 Onsite No. 2 calendar quarter for the sample location.
Q 03 Onsite No. 3 Gamma isot.
Quarterly On Quarterly composite from each locatkm.
Q-04 Nitrin Q-05 SaddleG4 Dairy Alter Weeldy Farm Exchange Q06 Fairbanks FarField Contir uous Cross Beta Weekly See footnote "b."
operation Q-07 !C)
Clinton for one week Gamma isot.
See footnote "b" Q-06 (C)
Sikkema Farm If gress beta in a sample exceeds SX the a-=
1 Q4)9 (C)
Erie Filter weekly average concentration of the preceding N
Q10 (C)
Hillsdale Exchange calendar qua ter for the sample location.
Q11 (C)
Tort Byron Q12 (C)
Bettendorf Q13 Princeton Q14 (C)
Utica Ridge road Q15 (C)
DeWitt Q16 low Moor 2.
Airbome Sare as 1.
Continuous I-131 Beweekly On all samples from onsite and near held; lodme operation for far field samples, see footnote "b."
for two weeks 3.
AirSampling Same as 1.
Test and Weekly On allsamplers.
Train Maintenance
- Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C"in this column. All other locations are indicators.
b Far-field samples are analyzed when near-fr#d results are inconsistent with previous measurements and radioactivity is confirmed as having its origin in airborne effluents released from the station or at the discretion of the Radiation Protection Director.
a l')
(m~)
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
QUAD CITIES 3 TAT 10N RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND AN ALYSES 12 ration Collection Typeof Frequency Sample Meda Code
- Site Frequency Analysis of Analysis Re<* arks 4.
- a. Same as 1.
Quarterly Gamma Quarterly Two sets of 1 LD's at all air sampler locations. All wts read Quarterly.
b.
Q-101-1,2 Inner Ring Quarterly Gamma Quarterly AllTLDs are read Charterly.
102-1,2 103-1,2 104-1,2 105-1,2 106-1,2 107-1,2 108-1,2 109-1,2 111-1,2 112-1,2 113-1,2 114-1,2 115-1,2 7
116-1,2 s
CS Q-201-1,2 Outer Rang 202-1,2 203-1,2 204-1,2 205-1,4 236-1,2 207-1,4 208-1,2 209-1,4 210-1,4 211-1,2 212-1,2 213-1,2 214 1.2 215-1,2 216-1,2 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C"in this column. All other locations are indicators.
u
-.- - -. - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ ^ - - - - ' - - - - -
~~~~
r3 O
b k.
b TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
QU ADDITIES STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES Location Collectmn Type of Frequency Sample Meds Code Site Frequency Analysm of Analysis Remarks a
5.
Milk GIS Musal Dairy Weekly:
I-131 Weekly:
On all samples. LLD: 0.5 pCi/L while Q26 BillStanley Dairy May thniugh May through on pasture October October Monthly:
1-131 Monthly:
On all samples. LLD-5.0 pCi/L while November November not on pasture through Apnl through Apnl 6.
Pubhc Water Q19 East Molme Water Wekly Gamma Imt.
Monthly Oa monthly composte from each location.
Works Q20 Davenport Water Works 7.
Cooling Water Q21 (C)
Intake Canal Weekly Gmss Beta Weekly On all samples.
Q22 Discharge Canal 8.
l'ish Q24 Pool #14 of Mississippi Semiannually Gamma Isot.
Semiannually On edibleportionsonly. Atleast River two species.
Q29 (C)
- -a Upstream e
9.
She eline Q27 (C)
Albany, Upstream on Annually Gamma Isot.
Annually On all samples.
Sediments Mississippi River Q28 Cordova, Downstream on Mississippi River 10.
Land Use Census
- a. Enumerationby Annually Durmg grazing season.
Milch Animals
- a. Site boundary to 2 miles a door-to-door or equivalent counting technique.
- b. 2 miles to 5 miles
- b. Enumeration by Annually Dunng grazing season.
using referenced information from county agricultural agents or ether reliable sources.
a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" in this column. All other locations are indicators.
~
(
l
?
l TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
QUAD CITIES STATION i
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALEES l
I =*
- Collection Type of Frequency
{
Sarnple Media Code Site Frequency Analysis of Analyses Remarks 10.
Land Use Census (continued)
Milch Animals
- c. At dairies hsted in Item 5.
- c. Inquire as to Annually During grazing season.
feeding practres:
j i
- 1. Pasture only.
- 2. Feed and chop only.
- 3. Pasture and feed:if both, ask farmer to estimate fraction of food from pasture:
[
w
<25% 25-50% 50-75%
o ot >75%
Nearest In all16 sectors up to 5 miles
- d. Door-to doorsurvey or Annually Residence other rehable methods.
Census i
I i
5 l
h t
i f
4 I
i t
i f
r
?
. mm
..m
_m.m_,-
.m
~.. -. _ -..
I h
C i
ALE 5.0-3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Ouad rdies Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254.50-265 f
locaten of Fachty Rnck w.~4. itthe Reporting Period 1st Ouarter 1996 E
(Camnty, State) f i
6 Sample Type and Indicator Location with Eghest Control Number of l
Type Number of locatums Ouarterly Mean Ixcations Non-nmtme
[
a a
Resuhs (Units)
Analyses LLD Mean Mean Mean Range Location Range Range j
i Air Particulates '
Gruss Beta 78 0.01 0.024 (78/78) 003, Onsite No. 3 0.025 (13/13) 0 3
(pCi/m )
(0.010-0.043) 0.6mi S 177*
(0.015-0.043) f Gamma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD 0
l Airbornelodine I-131 36 0.10
<LLD 0
3 (pCi/m )
i Us b
18.6 (1/1) 16.4 (16/16) 0 Gamma Background Gamma Dose 94 9.7 15.6 (78/78)
Q201-2 w
+
(II.Ds) (mR/Qtr.)
(13.5-18.6) 5.0 mi e 17 (13.1-18.9)
Milk I-131 6
5
<LLD 0
(pCi/L)
{
l Cooling Water Gross Beta 26 5
7.0(4/13)
Q22. Discharge 4.9 (13/13).
5.8 (2/13) 0
(
(pCi/L)
(5.2-9.6)
Canal at Station (2.9-9.6)
(5.44.1) i
,t Public Water Gamma Spec.
6 f
(pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
t Cs-137 10
<tLD
<LLD 0
[
i' Ot.xr Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
i
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
b Q201-2, Q211-2 and Q215-2 had identical means of 18.6 mR. Only Q201-2 is detailed in this summary, a
p
_____m_._
-.- ~ -- - - - - - "** - ~~ ~'""~ "" '
~'
OBLE 5.0-4 v
i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name td Facility Ouad Ch* Nuclear Power h%
Dxket No. 50-254.50-265 I
t Location of Facility Rock Island. Illmois Reporting Period _ 2nd Ouarter 1996 (County, State) l 4
Sarnple Type and indicator i
Location with Highest Contnd Number e4
[
Type Number of Locations Guartertv Meae (Umts)
Analpes LLD Locations Non-routme y,,,a Mean Mean Results a
Range location Range Range i
i
' Air Particulates Gross Beta 77 0_01 0.018 95/77)
Q-05. Saddle Club 0 020 (13/13) 0 l
l 3
(pCi/m )
(0.011-0.054)
Dairy Farm.
(0.012-0 054)
.1.8 mi e 175*
)
Gamma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD 0
?
i Ai.hm lodine I-131 42 0.10
<tLD 0
3 (pCi/m )
I Gamma Background Gamma Done 94 9.7 t
4 (TLDs)(mR/Qtr.)
14.6 98/78)
Q-211-1, 17.6 (1/1) 14.6(16/16).
0
'i (12.6-17.6) 45 mie 22Y M
(11.8-16.5)
Milk 1-131 20 (pCi/L) 5.0/03b
<LLD 0
Cooling Water Gross Beta 26 5
7.7 (9/13)
Q-22, Dahcarge 6.5 (13/13) 5.4 (2/13) 1 (pCi/L)
?
(6.1-10.2)
Canal at Station (2.7-10.2)
(5.1-5.7)
Public Water Gamma Spec.
6
?
(pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
I Other Gammas 20
.<LLD
<LLD 0
Feh Gamma Spec.
9 (pCi/g wet)
Cs-134 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD
<LLD 0
t
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only.. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
b November - April LLD=io ; May - October LLD=05.
i
,e..-w
......._.~..- ~...
..~.- -...
_- ~.
....~...~._-.
O T
LE 5.0-5 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMM ARY Name of Facility Ouad rien N-I=ar Power Ca**%
Docket No. 50-254. % 265 Location of Facility Rnrk
- i-a m.*
Reportmg Period 3rd Ouarter 19%
(County State)
Sample Type and Indicator location with thghest Control Number id t
Type Number of Locations Ouarteriv Mean lecations Non-routme M
(Units)
Analyses LLD Mean*
Mean M, n*
Location Range Range Range Air Particulates Grams Beta 78 0.01 0.023 (78/78)
QM, Fairbanks, 0.024(13/13)
O v
3
@01MS) 1.8 mi e 340" (tt016-0 055)
{
(pCi/m )
Gamma Spec-6 0.01 (LLD 0
i.
Airbome Iodine I.131 36 0.10
<LLD O
3 (pCi/m )
a 1
Gamma Background Gamma Dose 94 9.7 15.6 98/78)
Q.216-2, 19.9 (1/1) 16.1 (16/16) 0 7
(ILDs)(mR/Qtr.)
(12.9-19.9) 45 mie348*
(13.0-18 5) i t
us i
Mdk 1-131 26 05
<LLD
<LLD 0
i W
I (pCi/L)
}
I CoolingWater Gross Beta 26 5
8.3 (2/13)
Q-22, Discharge Canal 4.2 (13/13) 5.6 (2/13) 0 (pCi/L) 90-9.6) at Station (2.7-9.6)
(5.34.0)
Public Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
j Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
i Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
i
)
i Bottom Sedinwnts Gamma Spec.
2 i
(pct /g dry)
Cs-134 0.2
<tLD-0 Cs-137 0.2
<LLD 0
1 Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD 0
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractitms indicated in parentheses.
f i
m
.. m
....m -
m
.m m
o..
m
balLE 5.04 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONTTOkING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMM ARY Name of Facility Ouad Cihen Nuclear Power he =
Docket No. 50-254.50-265 1mcationof Facihty Rack b'-u tlli-Reporting Permd 4th Ouarter 1W6 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator Location with Rghest Control Number of Type Number of Locations Guarterly Mean locations Nem-routme (Units)
Analyses LLD Mean Mean Mean" b'I
8 Range Imcation Range Range Air Particulates Cross Beta 78 0.01 0.025 (77/78)
Q06. Fairbanks 0.026(13/13) 0 3
(pCi/m )
(0.017-0.037) 1.8 mi e 340*
(0.017-0.034)
Camma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD 0
Airbomelodine I-131 42 0.10
<LLD 0
3 (pCi/m )
Gamma Background Gamma Dose 94 9.7 165 (78/78)
Q-211-2 19 5 (1/1) 16.6 (16/16) 0 (TLDs) (mR/Qtr.)
(14.7-19 5) 45 mie 223*
(13.9-18.7) b
<LLD 0
Mik 1-131 12 5.0/0.5 (pCi/L)
Cooling Water Gross Beta 26 5
5.0 {1/13)
Q-22 DischargeCanal 3.2 (13/13)
<Lt.D 0
(pCi/L) at Staton (0.9-5.0)
Pubhc Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 to
<LLD
<LLD
-0 Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Hsh Gamma Spec.
8 (pCi/g wet)
Cs-134 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Cammas 02
<LLD
<LLD o
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements emly Fractions indicated in parentheses.
b November-April LLD=5.0; May - Octotober LLD=0.5.
.. -=
-,.. ~.
k TABLE (continued) l i
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
i Name of Facility Ouad cities Nwlear PowerStation Docket No 50-254.54 265 location of Fanlity Rark Wad 11tannes Reporting Penod 4th Ouarter 1%
{
(County, State) i 1
i Sainple Type and Indicator Location with Eghest Control Number of Type Number of Locations Ouarterly Mean Locations Non-routine 7
a Rmsh a
Mean Mean (Umts)
Analyses LLD Mean location Range Range l
Range f
Bottom Sediments Gamma Spec.
2 j
(pCi/g dry)
Cs-134 0.2
<tLD 0
i I
Cs-137 0.2
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD 0
l t
i i
- Mean and range based on detectable ts only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
D I
i i
6 r
I
[
D
b i
L r
L h
t 4
m
.m
-~.
1 i
l TABLE 5.1 1 4
\\
t 1
1 Commonwealth Edison Company Environmental Site Report f or Quad Cities Pages a
Dates 21-FES.97 Gamnia Radi ation Me asured in mR by TLDs f
Quarter i Owarter 2 Ouarter 3 Ovarter 4 08te Description 1994 1996 8996 3996 i
3' 1
- 1. INDICATOR LOCATIONS
- a. Air semplers (2 TLDs per locatient e
16.9 14.1 14.6 17.4 8-C3 ONSITE NO. 1 15.6 13.9 14.4 16.1
@-Og ONSITE NO. 2 14.8 13.3 13.8 15.7 1
3-03 ONSITE No. 3 14.4 12.6 32.9 34,3 i
8-06 NITRIN 15 2 14.3 14.0 16.3 j
6-06 SADDLE CLUS 16.1 14.0 14.6 16.3
+
@-06 FAIRSANKS 14.9 13.2 13.9 15.4
@-13 PRINCETON 14.9 13.5 14.3 35.3 i.
%,$-16 LOW MOCR 15.4 s'0.8 13.6 a 0.4 14.1 a 0.4 14.0 s 0.6 d
Air Sampl?r Mean a S.D.
14.s e 3.g Annual Air Sampler Mean a S.D.
1 t
l
- b. Inner Ring 1800 Series) 14.2 13.5 33.4 15.3
@-101-1 14.4 13.8 15.0 15.6 C-101-2 16.7 15.7 15 6 87.5 3 102-1 15.0 13.8 14.5 8 15.4 g.303 3 13.8 13.5 13.7 15.1 a
9-103-1 14.1 13.3 13.0 18.3 l
@-103-2 13.8 13.4 13.5 17.2 G-104-1 14.2 13.9 13.9 33.3 C-104 3 14.2 13.6 13.6 15.2
+
6-106-8 13.8 13.0 33.7 33.4
.i g-106-2 14.5 13.5 14.3 35.5 a
l g-god.g 14.2 13.6 14.0 15.0 C-104-2 14*3 13.4 33.7 34.7 g-107-1 13.5 13.0 33.5 34.3 C-107-2 14.3 13.5 13.7 35.0 8-108-1 14.2 13.4 83.3 15.3 i
0-108-2 14.9 14.4 13.7 15.7 g.109 1 14.5 13.4 33.6 34.9 i
g.309 3 16.7 15.2 35.9 17.5 g.ggg.g 14.8 14.1 14.5 85.9 l
c.333 2 14.4 13.'
34.4 15.1 l
g.112-1 16.1 85.1 16.0 36.3 g.333 2 14.7 13.1 13.7 15.0 g.gg3 1 14.4 13.1 13.0 85.3 g.3g3 2 14.3 12.6 14.3 34.9 g.gg4 3 j
l I-56 4
9 i
4
A m
m a
e.a.-
a 4
_.1_
J g-_~
A
.a
-4a
.e a_,
d j
TABLE 5.1-1 (continued)
>(
i i
i i
Environmental $6te Report for Quad Citlel Pages 2
Dates 28-FES 97 Quarter !
Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Cuarter 4 l
Site Description 1996 1996 8996 3996 1
j
- b. Inner Ring (100 Seriet) 14.2 14.6 16.6 17.5
@-314 2 34*3 14.1 14.1 16.8 0-!!5-1 17.0 15.7 16.1 16.9 0-115 3 16.3 15.3 35.3 17.5 j
0-116 3 15.9 16.5 17.0 17.9 t
0-186-2 inner Ring Mean a 5.0.
14.8 a 1.0 13.9 a 0.0 14.4 e tel 15.9 a 1.0 i
14.7 e 1.2 inner Ring Mean i S.D.
Annual
- c. Outer Ring (200 Seriest 14.5 16.2 17.4 17.5 15.3 17.0 17.1
@-201-1 18.4 j
f% C-201-2 14,7 12.9 13.9 14.7 f
6-202*1 14.5 13.8 14.7 15,0 4
6-202-2 16.0 14.0 15.7 15.9 6-203-1 17.3 16.3 10.1 13.3 G-203-2 16.7 15.6 37.2 18.1 6-204-1 17.2 14.8 18.0 13.3
@-204 2 16.5 15.3 16.8 17.0 j
^
S-205-1 17.1 16.4 17.7 33.4 S-205-6 14.7 14.8 15.6 16.1 l
g-206-1 15.4 14.2 15.4 14.1 6-206-2 15.0 15.6 17.3 17.3 G-207-1 14.5 14.5 15.5 16.3
$=207-4 15.5 14.J 14.3 14.4 l
8-200 1 17.1 16.3 16.9 13.3 0-200 2 14.3 14.9 15.9 16.3 s
6-209-1 15.4 14.9 17.1 16,0
@-209 4 15.7 14.2 16.5 17.3 6-210-1 16.2 14.9 17.5 16.6 0 280-4 10.4 17.6 19.2 19.4 1
0-21t=1 18.6 16.8.
19.7 19.5 0-281-2 17.9 16.2 17.5 is.g 0-212-1 15.7 14.3 15.3 16.0 i
0 212-2 14.7 14.4 16.5 16.3 0-213-1 14.4 13.0 14.8 15.0 0 213-2 17.9 16.5 19.2 38.0 0 214-1 17.0 16.5 Is 9 13.3 4
0 214-2 18.3 14.0 17.4 16.7 0-215-1 10,6 17.0 13.2..
. 13.3 0-215 2 16.9 15.7 13.1 16.5 0 216-1 18.3 16.9 19.9 33.9 e 0-284-2 f
16.5 s 1.4 15.4 e 1.2 17.0 a 3.5 37.1 s 3.3 i
Outer Ring Mean a S.D.
J
.- -.. 36.5,a 8.5 Annual Outer Ring Mean a S.0.
i 15.6 e 1.4 14.6 a 1.3 15.6 4 1.8 14.5 s 3.3 IN0lCATOR LOCAT10N MEAN a S.D.
~' 'li5$4' a l'.4
~
~' Annual INDICATOR LOCA110N MEAN e S.D.
- -.. ~......
I-57 A
r
TABLE 5.1-1 (continued)
O
'g i
1 1
1 Dates 21-FES-97 Erivironmental Site Report for Quad Cities p.3,,
3 i
Site Description Quarter 1 Ouarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 1996 1994 1994 1994
!!. CONTROL. LOCATIONS (2 TLDs per locatient 0-C7 CLINTON 15.7 13.7 14.7 17.2 17.2 15.3 14.5 16.8
]
9-04 SIKKEMA FARM i
6-09 ERIE 15.7 14.4 le.1 15.8 l
C-10 HILLSDALE 17.0 15.2 16.4 16.1 C-15 PORT SYRON 18.2 16.4 17.7 13,7
@-12 SETTENDORF 18.9 14.5 18.5 13.$
0-14 PIONEER VILLAGE 15.5 13.8 15.7 15.4 0-15 DEWITT 83.1 13.8 13.0 13.9 CONTROL LOCATION Mean a S.D.
14.4 a 1.8 14.6 e 1.6 16.8 a 1.7 14.4 e 1.4, Annual CONTROL LOCAfl0N Mean & S.D.
15.9 e 1.C location) glit. SPECI AL INTEREST LOCAfl0NS (1 TLD per
-301-1 PUSLIC OSSERVATION TOWER 47.'4 27.3 32.9 43,4 6-302-1 VISITORS CENTER 40.3 29.0 31.9 35.4
@-302*2 FIRE TRAINING SUILDING 17.2 13.5 15.3 16.5 6-302-3 SIMULATOR SUILDINS 24.1 17.6 20.1 24.7 6-305-3 WAREHOUSE ON UPPER ACCESS ROAD 22.3 14.5 17.5 28,0 0-307-1 NORTH OF DAW 13.4 11.9 1a.4 14,3 6-307 2 EAST OF DAW 15.1 13.6 P.1.0 13.3
@-307-3 SOUTH OF DAW 15.8 14.0 10.0 24.6 6-307-4 WEST OF DAW 15.8 13.6 15.3 18.2
$ 307-5 TELEPHONE POLE / SOUTHEAST OF DAW 15.4 13.5 14.7 20.2 6-340-1 RESTRICTED AREA FENCE / WEST Of" DAW 16.4 12."
I4.4 13.3 SPECIAL INTEREST LOCAtl0N Mean e S.D.
22.1 211.3 16.5 e o.9
!$.8 e 7.0 24.3 slo.O Annual SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATION Mean a S.D.
20.4 e t.1 vCNTSs *** Indicates f est des 6 meter. A portlen of the Dese was estimated.
'O' Indicates edited desleeter. The original Dese was replaced with an estimated value.
l w
1-58 h
)
j
\\
f
\\
l
(
4 i
i 1
1
]
1 1
1 i
i d
4 1
4 4
i J
i i
1 1
J l
APPENDIX II d
l 4
,i METEOROLOGICAL DATA l
k
.i 1
i t
t 1
I i
I l
ii I
i 1
1 i
4 1
(
1 ei 4
i i
i 1
i
}
i i
4 i
1 1
4 4
l I
i i
II-1 l
l 4
4 OUA0 CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION J
PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET r
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
1 1
2 4
NNE O
O O
O O
O O
l NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
T E
O O
O O
O O
O
)
ESE O
O 2
1 0
0 3
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
7 1
0 8
4 j
1 S
0 0
0 5
0 0
5 1'
i SSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 SW 0
0 2
0 0
0 2
WSW 0
0 1
1 0
0 2
W 0
0 1
5 3
0 9
4 I
WNW 0
0 0
1 1
0 2
NW 0
0 2
8 1
0 11 NNW 0
0 1
5 1
0 7
i VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
[
TOTAL 0
0 9
33 8
1 51 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
i 4
I I-2 2
I i
n
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION 4
PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 i
O STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
- C/
WINOS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
2 0
2 NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
4 4
E O
O 2
0 0
0 2
j ESE O
O 5
2 1
0 8
SE O
O O
2 1
0 3
f SSE O
O 4
3 0
0 7
?
S O
1 1
1 0
0 3
SSW 0
0 0
1 1
0 2
SW D
0 0
4 0
0 4
- f WSW 0
0 2
2 0
0 4
i W
O O
1 9
1 0
11 WNW 0
0 2
2 1
2 7
NW 0
0 6
2 2
0 10
{
NNW 0
0 3
10 2
0 15 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
l TOTAL 0
1 26 38 11 2
78 0
Hours of calm in this stability c1 ass:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
O I I-3
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION 8
PERIOD OF BECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 l f STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) i DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
1 5
5 1
12 l
NNE O
O O
O 3
0 3
i NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
1 0
3 0
0 4
i E
O O
4 0
0 0
4 i
ESE O
O 3
0 1
0 4
SE O
O 1
1 0
0 2
SSE O
O 2
2 0
0 4
S 0
1 4
2 1
0 8
SSW 0
1 2
1 0
0 4
SW 0
0 0
5 0
0 5
WSW O
5 4
4 0
0 13 W
0 1
6 7
4 0
18 WNW 0
0 2
8 5
3 18 NW 0
0 5
3 1
0 9
NNW 0
1 9
6 1
0 17 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
10 43 47 21 4
125 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
7 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
6 O
I I-4
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
O WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTICN 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 7
16 36 17 6
82 NNE 1
10 22 16 17 0
66 NE O
7 20 38 18 3
86 ENE 1
1 19 29 0
0 50 E
1 5
17 8
2 0
33 ESE 4
1 14 13 7
2 41 SE O
2 9
22 15 2
50 SSE O
4 16 18 12 0
50 S
O 2
7 11 8
1 29 SSW 2
3 6
8 10 6
35 SW 0
1 12 28 4
4 49 WSW 0
3 15 19 1
2 40 W
0 7
14 28 20 28 97 WNW 0
4 32 46 39 49 170 NW 1
1 21 78 34 4
139 NNW 0
1 11 36 14 0
62 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 10 59 251 434 218 107 1079 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
65 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
O I I.
5
d QUA0 CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
1 2
10 29 5
0 47 j
NNE 1
3 10 5
2 0
21 j
NE O
1 7
3 0
0 11 a
ENE O
2 10 4
1 0
17 E
O 2
12 6
1 0
21 l
ESE 1
2 7
19 14 0
43 SE O
1 4
13 5
0 23
.i J
SSE O
1 7
23 16 17 64 S
O 1
2 17 8
8 36 4
f~
l
(
SSW 0
1 7
10 11 3
32 j
SW 0
2 5
27 2
2 38 WSW 0
1 4
16 4
0 25 W
0 1
14 22 20 0
57 WNW 0
4 18 15 3
0 40 i
i NW 0
2 9
24 0
0 35 i
NNW O
1 14 22 2
0 39 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 3
27 140 255 94 30 549 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 4
15 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
11-6 1
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 i
(DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET I
WIND SPEED (in mph) e DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND N
2 0
4 3
1 0
to T
NNE O
O 5
5 0
0 10 1
NE O
O 2
0 0
0 2
ENE 1
0 2
1 0
0 4
I E
O 1
5 1
0 0
7
?
ESE O
1 2
5 2
0 10 4
SE O
O 3
8 2
0 13 l
SSE O
O 4
20 0
0 24 J
S 0
0 3
20 3
0 26 1
SSW 0
1 8
6 3
1 19 SW 0
0 6
6 0
0 12 l
WSW 1
0 0
1 1
0 3
1 W
0 2
2 0
0 0
4 WNW 0
1 5
5 0
0 11 1
NW 0
0 3
1 0
0 4
i
)
NNW 0
2 4
0 0
0 6
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 4
8 58 82 12 1
165 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
2 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
O 11-7
~_. _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _,,
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 O
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND.
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
1 0
0 0
0 1
NE O
1 0
0 0
0 1
i ENE 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
E O
1 2
0 0
0 3
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
1 0
1 0
0 2
SSE O
1 2
3 0
0 6
S O
O 1
3 0
0 4
SSW 0
0 3
9 2
0 14 1
SW O
2 0
1 0
0 3
WSW O
O O
O O
O O
W O
O 2
0 0
0 2
WNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
j NW 0
0 4
0 0
0 4
NNW 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
I VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 1
8 14 17 2
0 42 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
O I I-8 m
e-c a
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 4
(DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT) l STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET j
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL 1
1 N
O O
1 0
0 0
1 NNE O
O O
1 0
0 1
NE O
O 2
1 0
0 3
ENE O
O 2
2 0
0 4
i I
E O
O 2
0 0
0 2
ESE O
O O
1 0
0 1
i i
SE O
O O
O 1
0 1
i SSE O
O 2
7 4
0 13 S
0 0
0 2
7 0
9 SSW 0
0 4
6 4
2 16 SW 0
0 3
2 1
0 6
WSW 0
0 4
1 0
0 5
f 1
W O
O 6
2 0
1 9
WNW 0
0 2
2 7
0 11 i
NW 0
0 1
6 5
0 12 NNW 0
1 7
2 0
0 10 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
1 36 35 29 3
104 0
Hours of calm in this stsbility class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
stability classes:
45 Hours of missing stability measurements in all AU I I-9
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINOS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WINO SPEED (in mph) 4 WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 2
3 0
1 0
6 NNE O
1 2
0 0
0 3
4 NE O
4 4
1 0
0 9
j ENE O
1 8
2 0
0 11 l
E O
O 1
0 0
0 1
ESE O
2 3
1 0
0 6
i' SE O
1 2
1 0
0 4
l 4
J SSE O
O 2
1 2
0 5
i 1
S 0
1 1
0 1
0 3
SSW 0
0 10 5
3 1
19 SW 0
1 5
6 0
0 12
~
4 WSW 0
0 2
4 0
0 6
W 0
2 4
3 0
0 9
WW 0
1 1
4 1
1 8
l
]
NW 0
4 7
5 2
0 18 NNW 0
4 13 5
0 0
22 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
24 68 38 10 2
142 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
Hours of missing stability measurement s in all stability classes:
45 O
II-10
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION 1
PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET 4
WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND j
N O
1 5
5 0
0 11 NNE O
1 1
0 1
0 3
t l
NE O
2 2
1 0
0 5
I ENE O
1 5
0 0
0 6
E O
3 2
1 0
0 6
j ESE O
1 1
0 0
0 2
SE O
1 1
1 0
0 3
SSE O
O 3
0 1
0 4
S O
O 1
0 2
0 3
SSW 0
1 4
4 3
1 13 SW 0
1 2
4 3
1 11 WSW 0
0 3
3 2
0 8
W 1
1 2
2 0
1 7
WNW 0
4 3
4 1
0 12 NW 0
5 2
3 2
0 12 NNW O.
4 7
5 0
0 16 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 1
26 44 33 15 3
122 0
Hours of calm in this stability class: Hours of missing wind measure 0
stability classes:
45 Hours of missing stability measurements in all OV I I-11
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRALWINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET O
WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIRECTION O.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND N
O 14 11 28 13 0
66 i
NNE 1
7 24 25 7
0 64 NE 2
6 24 28 8
4 72 ENE 2
7 16 28 42 9
104 i
E O
19 47 38 12 2
118 ESE O
12 16 5
2 3
3,8 SE O
7 16 6
9 0
38 SSE O
O 11 11 4
1 27 S
O 2
16 7
1 1
27 SSW 0
12 13 16 6
4 51 SW 3
6 9
8 12 5
43 WSW 1
5 19 14 7
3 49 W
2 11 17 21 11 17 79 WNW 2
11 13 31 17 4
78 NW 0
11 15 22 9
0 57 NNW 9
13 18 22 14 2
71 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 15 143 285 310 174 55 982 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: H 45 I I-12 l
n
9 k
OUA0 CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 e
STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (0!FF TEMP 296-33 FT)
'(
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET i
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
2 3
6 9
0 0
20 4
d l
NNE O
3 14 8
0 0
25 NE O
8 12 15 5
2 42 l
ENE O
7 12 17 2
1 39 i
E 1
11 22 12 1
0 47 l
ESE O
3 7
9 0
1 20
~
SE O
2 10 15 2
0 29 5
SSE O
+5 13 15 10 0
43 S
O 4
17 10 10 6
47 SSW 0
4 13 23 21 9
70 SW 0
4 6
17 15 2
44 i
WSW 0
1 8
20 2
0 31
/
W 0
4 8
12 4
0 28 4
/.
WNW 0
3 16 16 2
0 37 i
NW 0
3 3
2 0
0 8
NNW 2
4 12 3
0 0
21 t
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
1 TOTAL 5
69 179 203 74 21 551 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
45 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
O I I-13
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996,_
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) 4.
WIND l
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
4 6
0 0
10 J
NNE 1
0 1
0 0
0 2
a i
NE 1
5 3
0 0
0 9
ENE O
1 8
0 0
0 9
l t
1 E
O 2
7 3
0 0
12 1
ESE O
O 3
2 1
0 6
i f
SE O
1 9
15 3
0 28
]
SSE O
1 3
12 0
0 16 S
O O
5 8
0 0
13 l
s SSW 0
2 9
15 3
0 29 SW 0
4 3
5 0
0 12 i
i i
WSW 0
3 4
3 0
0 10 I
W 0
1 4
2 0
0 7
l l
WNW 0
1 3
6 0'
O 10 f
W 0
2 0
1 0
0 3
g NNW 0
1 3
1 0
0 5
5 i
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
i TOTAL 2
24 69 79 7
0 181 e
0 Hours of calm in this stability class:
O Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
45 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
j l
ilO II 14
1 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET s
WIND SPEED (in mph) e DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 6-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND 1;
N O
O O
O O
O O
NNE O
O
'O O
O O
O NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE 1
1 1
0 0
0 3
j E
O O
O O
O O
O i
i ESE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
}
SE 1
0 0
2 1
0 4
l SSE O
O O
2 0
0 2
i' S
0 1
0 2
0 0
3 O
SSW 1
2 9
4 2
0 18 SW 0
1 4
2 0
0 7
WSW 0
0 1
2 0
0 3
W 0
1 4
1 0
0 6
WNW 0
0 3
0 0
0 3
NW 0
1 2
0 0
0 3
NNW 0
0 3
1 0
0 4
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 3
7 28 16 3
0 57 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability clas 45 O
I1 15
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND N
O O
1 5
0 0
6 NNE O
O 1
3 0
0 4
NE O
O O
9 0
0 9
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
S 0
0 3
0 0
0 3
SSW 0
0 1
6 0
0 7
SW 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
WSW 0
1 2
3 0
0 6
W 0
0 2
1 0
0 3
WNW 0
0 2
8 5
0 15 NW 0
0 7
6 0
0 13 NNW 0
0 7
13 0
0 20 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
1 27 55 5
0 88 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability 122 O
II 16
E OUAO CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORO: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 i
(DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE WINOS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
OIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND
\\
]
N O
O 2
1 0
0 3
NNE O
1 3
2 0
0 6
NE O
3 2
3 0
0 8
ENE O
4 0
0 0
0 4
)
E O
2 2
0 0
0 4
ESE O
2 2
1 0
0 5
i SE O
2 0
0 0
0 2
SSE O
O 4
0 0
0 4
S o
1 6
1 0
0 8
SSW 0
2 13 2
1 0
18 SW 0
1 3
0 1
0 5
l WSW 0
1 3
1 0
0 5
W 0
1 6
5 0
0 12 f
l WNW 0
2 4
7 0
0 13 i
NW 0
2 11 5
1 0
19 i
NNW 0
4 1
7 0
0 12 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
28 62 35 3
0 128 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability cl 122 i
I I-17
..=
~
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 j
i (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET l
i WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND l
)
i O
6 2
2 1
0 11 N
J NNE O
4 3
1 0
0 8
NE O
4 3
2 0
0 9
l ENE 1
2 2
1 0
0 6
E O
7 1
3 0
0 11 ESE O
3 2
3 0
0 8
SE O
7 7
1 0
0 15 SSE O
4 3
0 0
0 7
j i
i S
O 1
4 3
0 0
8 e
l SSW 0
7 6
2 0
0 15 f
SW 0
4 0
0 0
0 4
WSW 0
8 3
2 1
0 14 j
W 0
11 6
3 1
0 21 WNW 0
11 4
3 4
0 22 NW 0
10 6
8 1
0 25 NNW 0
4 4
6 0
0 14 f
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
i TOTAL 1
93 56 40 8
0 198 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability clas a
122 jv I l-18
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (OIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 29f> FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
3 3
7 6
1 0
20 NNE O
6 2
7 0
0 15 NE 1
7 6
9 1
0 24 ENE 3
14 23 11 0
0 51 E
1 12 10 4
0 0
27 ESE 2
10 15 15 9
0 51 SE 4
13 12 9
0 0
38 SSE 5
17 13 0
0 f
35 S
4 7
3 13 3
0 30 O
V SSW 3
9 14 9
2 0
37 SW 1
14 11 13 1
0 40 WSW 5
11 12 9
2 0
39 W
1 16 11 15 2
0 45 WNW 6
9 11 11 3
0 40 NW 7
9 15 16 3
0 50 NNW 0
7 15 6
0 0
28 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 46 164 180 153 27 0
570 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 0
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes:
122 O
.II 19
. _ -~ _. __ -
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 1
(DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY. CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE i
WINOS MEASURED AT 296 FEET
-1 4
WIND SPEED (in mph) i DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL I
WIND i
J i
N 1
8 16 14 0
0 39 NNE 1
6 7
10 0
0 24 NE O
5 8
7 0
0 20 J
ENE 4
5 10 3
0 0
22 E
O 11 7
5 0
0 23 ESE 2
2 13 11 1
0 29
}
SE 1
6 7
15 5
0 34 4
SSE O
5 16 15 4
0 40 i
1 3
9 11 5
0 29 S
i (%
SSW 0
2 11 22 1
0 36 l
SW 2
3 12 17 6
0 40 i
WSW 0
0 25 15 0
0 40 i
W 0
3 15 17 2
0 37 WNW 0
7 11 35 0
0 53 f.
I NW 2
9 16 16 0
0 43 NNW 2
10 22 17 2
0 53 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
i 1
I TOTAL 16 85 205 230 26 0
662 l
i 0
2 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
l 122 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
2 i
i O I I-20 i
~_
l OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND N
1 4
10 1
0 0
-16 NNE 1
4 3
1 0
0 9
NE 3
5 15 7
0 0
30 i
ENE 4
7 8
3 0
0 22 i
E 4
9 9
6 0
0 28 f
ESE 2
10 7
8 2
0 29 SE 1
6 10 15 2
0 34 SSE 1
5 12 7
0 0
25 S
1 2
15 13 4
0 35 O
SSW 2
3 9
11 0
0 25 SW 0
1 3
3 2
0 9
WSW 0
7 4
5 0
0 16 W
0 11 7
1 0
0 15 1
WNW 3
3 2
0 0
0 8
NW 3
4 12 1
0 0
20 NNW 0
5 10 9
0 0
24 l
VARIABLE 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
TOTAL 28 86 136 91 10 0
351 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
O Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class 122 O
II-21
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION i
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) l DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL WIND N
3 5
0 0
0 0
8 1
NNE 1
2 0
0 0
0 3
1 NE O
6 1
0 0
0 7
]
ENE 3
2 6
0 0
0 11 1
E 4
4 2
0 0
0 10 I
ESE O
2 15 1
0 0
18 l
SE O
14 10 5
0 0
29 SSE O
2 11 3
0 0
16
!j 5
S 0
6 10 5
1 0
22 SSW 0
5 8
0 0
0 13 i
f i
SW 2
8 8
0 0
0 18 WSW 0
6 2
0 0
0 8
W 1
7 1
0 0
0 9
I WNW 2
2 1
2 0
0 7
i NW 0
3 3
0 0
0 6
NNW 0
1 0
1 0
0 2
i VARIABLE 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
f 1
TOTAL 18 75 78 17 1
0 189 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class 122 f
O I I-22 f
-~
I OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 l
PERIOD OF RECORD:
l (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLEWINDS MEA i
f i
WIND SPEED (in mph)
OIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL a
WIND i
)
l N
O O
O O
O O
O l
NNE O
O O
O O
O O
i i
O O
1 0
0 0
1 NE ENE O
O O
O O
O O
j E
O O
O O
O O
O ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
1 0
0 1
SSE O
O O
O O
O O
l S
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 SSW 0
0 2
10 1
0 13 SW O
O 3
2 0
0 5
i i
3 WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
i W
0 0
1 0
0 0
1
?
WNW 0
0 0
1 0
0
.1 l'
w 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l NNW 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
1 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
0 0
7 16 2
0 25 f
TOTAL L
0 Hours of calm in this stability clast:
l 0
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stabilit 0
i i O II 23 l
l
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION i
PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND 2
DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
1 0
0 0
1 1
NNE O
O 1
1 0
0 2
NE O
1 3
0 0
0 4
4 l
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
\\
l E
O O
O 1
0 0
1 ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
3 1
0 4
1 SSE O
O O
2 0
0 2
S 0
0 2
1 0
0 3
f SSW 0
0 5
7 1
0 13 SW 0
0 0
3 0
0 3
3 WSW 0
0 1
2 0
0 3
4 W
0 0
3 4
0 0
7 j
WNW 0
0 2
2 4
1 9
I NW 0
0 5
3 1
0 9
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
j TOTAL 0
1 23 29 7
1 61 l
0 Hours of calm in this stability class:
l 0
Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class:
O Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
l.
- O I I-24
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _... _. _ _. _. -. _. _. _ _.. _ _ _ _... _. _..... _ _ _ _... _. ~. _ _
1 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 1
STABILITY. CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) 4 1
i WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL 2
N O
O O
O 1
0 1
NNE O
O 5
0 0
0 5.
1 NE O
2 3
0 0
0 5
i ENE O
2 1
0 0
0 3
t
}
E O
O O
O O
O O
i ESE O
O 2
2 0
0 4
SF 0
0 0
3 3
0 6
3 SSE O
O 1
6 1
0 8
1 S
O O
5 2
0 0
7 SSW 0
1 5
1 0
0 7
SW 0
0 2
2 0
0 4
I WSW 0
0 1
2 0
0 3
I i
W 0
1 3
6 3
0 13 i
I WNW 0
0 1
5 7
3 16 NW 0
2 3
4 1
0 10 i
i NNW 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
1 2
I i
TOTAL 0
8 32 33 18 3
94 1
0 4
Hours of calm in this stability class:
6 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
stability classes:
0 i
Hours of missing stability measurements in all i
lO I I-25 I
i r-
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF PECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 (OIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL WIND 3 MEASURED AT 296 FEET WINO SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
1 6
18 26 4
0 55 NNE O
7 19 12 0
0 38 NE O
G 20 29 5
1 63 ENE 1
16 18 12 8
0 54 E
2 11 32 8
0 0
53 ESE 1
17 5
9 5
3 40 SE 2
10 15 15 8
1 51 SSE 4
8 15 21 10 5
63 S
O 6
12 24 12 4
58 SSW 2
7 3
15 14 0
41 SW 0
10 3
11 0
0 24 WSW 0
9 9
14 2
3 37 W
3 18 28 75 47 18 189 WNW 1
11 28 63 60 17 180 NW 1
13 70 71 19 0
174 NNW 2
9 18 21 3
0 51 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL
'20 165 311 426 197 52 1171 0
. Hours of calm in this stability class:
76 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 11-26
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORO: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT) i WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET 4
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND OIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 4
2 3
0 0
9 NNE O
2 5
4 0
0 11 NE O
4 8
6 0
0 18 ENE O
3 6
8 2
0 19 E
1 1
8 5
0 0
15 i
i ESE 3
3 7
24 5
1 43 SE O
5 13 31 14 0
63 i
SSE 1
4 14 17 23 6
65 1
i i
i S
0 8
20 35 15 6
84 SSW 0
4 12 43 8
4 71 SW 0
2 7
20 0
2 31 1
WSW 0
1 0
6 1
0 8
W 1
2 5
34 5
0 47 WNW 0
1 16 12 3
0 32 NW 0
1 14 6
0 0
21 NNW 0
2 5
11 0
0 18 VARIABLE 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
TOTAL 7
47 142 265 76 19 556 O
Hours of calm in this stability class:
9 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
II-27
QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 i
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET L
WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIR T ON 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL i
N O
1 2
0 0
O 3
~
NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O 1
1 0
0 2
ENE O
1 3
4 0
0 8
E O
O 1
2 0
0 3
ESE O
2 4
8 2
0 16 SE O
O 4
12 5
0 21 SSE O
2 9
6 0
0 17 S
O 1
6 18 2
0 27 SSW 0
0 3
16 1
0 20 SW 1
2 2
3 0
0 8
WSW 2
2 1
1 0
0 6
W 0
1 1
2 0
0 4
WNW 1
0 3
3 0
0 7
NW O
1 2
0 0
0 3
NNW I
1 1
0 0
0 3
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 5
14 43 76 10 0
148 0
Hours of calm in this stability class:
8 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
O II 28
OUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION 7
PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 296-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 296 FEET I
WIND SPEED (in mph) 4 WIND DIRECTION 0.9-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 1
0 0
0 0
1 I
NNE O
O 1
0 0
0 1.
l NE 1
1 0
0 0
0 2
4 I
ENE O
2 2
0 0
0 4
.i E
O O
O O
O O
O
]
j ESE O
O O
O O
O O
i i
SE O
1 1
5 4
0 11 I
SSE O
O O
4 0
0 4
)
S O
1 1
4 0
0 6
(
l SSW 0
2 4
3 0
0 9
i SW 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I i
WW 2
2 0
0 0
0 4
NW 0
0 2
0 0
0 2
t' NNW 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 3
10 13 16 4
0 46
\\
0 Hours of calm in this stability class:
8 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability v. asses:
O II-29
A l
i 4
t
- i 4
4 l
.?
i APPENDIX III 1
i l
LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES I
d 1
d i
1 t
G e
III-l
i QUAD CITIES (h
1.0 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES LJ Expected Location Collection Reason Sample Type Code Date A/1 Q-06 05-03-96 Sample location inaccessible due to flooding.
2.0 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMAllES L cati n Collection Reason Sample Type Code Date TLD Q-03-1 02-10-96 TLD found on ground; reattached TLD to air station.
OQ A/I Q-05 05-03-96 Volume low due to pump malfuntion; installed replacement pump.
A Q-01 05-10-96 Volume low; no electricity; air station struck by I
I lightning.
A Q-04 05-10-96 Volume low; no electricity.
A Q-05 05-10-96 Volume low; no electricity.
A Q-06 05-10-96 Volume high; unable to replace filter and cartridge on previous week due to flooding.
A Q-01 11-23-96 Filter very light; sample train found disconnected.
l l
ll Ill - 2
. ~
- - ~. ~.. - - -...
1 i.
1 4
1 4
i 1
4 1
i l
t 4
1 1
f h
8 APPENDIX IV l
MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND i
1 i
NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS l
I i
IV-1 i
l
l QUAD CITIES i
O MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1996 l
A.
There are four dairy farms within a 5-mile radius of Quad Cities Station.
l l
B.
Sampling Locations l
Q-18 Musal Dairy Farm-l 6.0 miles @ 240 Number of cows - 90 i
Diet consists of: 40% pasture 60% hay, silage and supplement Q-26 Bill Stanley Dairy 3.5 miles @ 120 Number of cows - 24 l
Diet consists of: hay, grain, and supplement None Julie DePauwa 6.3 miles @ 135 Nunser of cows - 100 Diet consists of:
10% pasture i
90% chop and feed Carl Ottea 6.0 miles @ 275 Number of cows - No Data Available 1
Diet consists of: No Data Available l
a Non-participating.
i Census conducted by G. Kreuder on August 25,1996.
l
'O IV-2 l
i
i QUAD CITIES O(%
i NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS,1996 Nearest livestock of the Quad Cities Station within a 5-mile radius.
4 Sector Direction Distance 1
J A
N 2.5 miles 2
B-NNE None
{
A, C
NE None D
ENE 3.0 miles E
E 2.2 miles F
ESE 3.1 miles G
SE None H
SSE 3.5 miles J
S 1.5 miles K
SSW None L
SW 3.5 miles M
WSW 4.5 miles N
W 4.5 miles P
WNW 3.5 miles Q
NW 4.5 miles R
NNW 2.3 miles O
Census conducted by G. Kreuder on August 25,1996.
IV-3
... ~...
.. - - - = -.
QUAD CITIES l
l NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1996 Nearest resident of the Quad Cities Station within a 5-mile radius.
Sector Direction Distance i
A N
0.5 miles B
NNE 0.8 miles l
C NE 2.8 miles D
ENE 1.3 miles E
E 2.3 miles F
ESE 3.0 miles G
SE 2.5 miles H
SSE 1.0 miles J
S 0.8 miles
(
K SSW 3.0 miles L
SW 3.0 miles M
WSW 2.0 miles l
N W
2.3 miles P
WNW 2.3 miles l
Q NW 2.3 miles l
R NNW 2.0 miles Census conducted by G. Kreuder on August 25,1996.
O IV-4 1
ro..,,,a,.
s m.4 a sw n,<~+a s----
,La u4,sa.,i_6A g.m--ea.
.in_A g
A 66-A Em,'..s3 a
-A4 4
--.s w
-443-.r eJ AMA4.-AAk At 6 s t
- es,Asws-ga Q waa
-n.
4 s
6
-m.a~r0,_21 I
t 1
I 4
1 k
l 1
APPENDlX V i
i l
INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS 4
s
(
i l
1 V-1
(
i Apoendir V Interlaboratorv Comnarkon Pmeram Results O
Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest laboratory (formerly Teledyne isotopes and Hazelton Environmental Services) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December 1971. These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides know to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible problems.
Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control ilmits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
The results in Table A 1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the current year. This program is conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Developement National Exposure Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-Las Vegas, Nevada.
Table A-2 lists results of the analyses on in-house " spiked" samples.
Table A-3 lists results of the in-house " blank" samples.
Table A-4 lists results of the in-house " duplicate" program.
Table A-5 list results of the mixed analyte performance evaluation program.
Table A4 list results of the Environrnental Measurement laboratory Quality Assessment Program.
Out-of-limit results are explained directly below the result.
O V-2
Table A 1.
US. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown l
Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest laboratory results for various sample media'.
1 f
Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results d
Code Type Collected Analyslo 1s, N =1 Limits i 2 Sigma j
STW-752 Water Jan,1996 Gr. Alpha 12.115.0 3.4 - 20.8 19.511.5;2.8 S M 75?.
Water Jan,1996 Gr. Beta 7.0 i 5.0 0.0 15.7 7.9i0.7;1.4 i
STW453 Water Feb,1996 I131 67.0170 54.9 79.1 70.7i1 5;7.2 S1W-761 Water Mar,1996 H-3 22002.0
- 2200.0 18185.1 - 25818.9 22776.7 i 185.0;3103.1 Results were indavertently not reported due to administrative error in laboratory.
STW-762 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Alpha 74.8118.7 42.4 107.2 63.8 i 2.4;8.1 STW-762 Water Apr,1996 Ra-226 3.0io.5 2.1 3.9 2.910.1;03 STW 762 Water Apr,1996 Ra 228 5.0i1.3 2.7 - 7.3 4.610.2:0.5 STW-762 Water Apr,1996 Uranium 58.415.8 48.3 - 68.5 57.910.5;5.8 S1W-763 Water Apr,1996 Co40 31.0 i 5.0 22.3 39J 32.7i0.6;4.7 STW-763 Water Apr,1996 Cs 134
. 46.0 i 5.0 373 - 54.7 43.011.0;6.3 STW 763 Water
,Apr,1996 Cs-137 50.0 i 5.0 41.3 - 58.7 52.312.1:7.8 STW-763 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Beta 166.9
- 25.0 123.5 - 210 3 154.9 1 6.8;24.8 STW-763 Water Apr,1996 Sr-89 43.015.0 34 3 - 51.7 42.013.6;5.5 SIW-763 Water Apr,1996 Sr-90 16.0 i 5.0 7.3 - 24.7 15.3i2.9:3.3 STW-764 Water Jun,1996 Ba-133 745.0 i 75.0 614.9 875.1 745.0f 19.5;109.0
$1W-764 Water Jun,1996 Co40 99.0 i 5.0 90.3 - 107.7 97.013.6;14.4 S1W-764
'.later Jun,1996 Cs 134 79.0 i 5.0 70.3 87.7 72311.2;10.5 STW-761 Water Jun,1996 Cs-137 197.0 i 10.0 179.7 - 214.3 201.3123:29.1 STW-764 Water Jun,1996 Zn45 300.0 1 30.0 248.0 - 352.0 298.01 6.2;43.4 STW-765 Water Jun,1996 Ra 226 4.9i0.7 3.7 - 6.1 4.810.1:0.5 STW-765 Water Jun,1996 Ra-228 9.0 t 2.3 5.0 - 13.0 8.710.5;1.0 STW-765 Water Jun,1996 Uranium 20.2.1 3.0 15.0 25.4 20.4i 0.8;2.2 STW 767 Water Jul,1996 Sr-89 25.0 i 5.0 16.3 33.7 24.012.0;3.1 STW-767 Water Jul,1996 St-90 12.0 i 5.0 33 20.7 11.311.2;1.6 STW-768 Water Jul,1996 Gr. Alpha 24.4 f 6.1 13.8 35.0 20.112.0:3.1 STW 768 Water Jul,1996 Gr. Beta 44.8 i 5.0 36.1 - 53.5 40.413.2;7.0 V-3
US. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA cnd Teledyne B Table A 1.
Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest laboratory results for various sample media'.
4 Concentrationin pCi/L' i
lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results d
_ #e Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits i 2 Sigma ST Y 774 Water Sep,1996 Ra 226 14.012.1 10.4 - 17.6 13.610.4;1.4 STW-774 Water Sep,1996 Ra 228 4.7 t l.2 2.6 - 6.8 5.410.4;0.6 STW 774 Water Sep,1996 Uran!um 10.113.0 4.9 - 15.3 10.010.2;1.0 STW 775 Water Oct,1996 I131 27.016.0 16.6 - 37.4 26.7123:3.5 STW-778 Water Oct,1996 Gr. Alpha 10.3 i 5.0 1.6 - 19.0 10.2 i 2.1;2.4 l
STW 778 Water Oct,1996 Gr. Beta 34.615.0 25.9 - 43.3 32.0 i 1.6;5.2
- Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest laboratory as a participant in i
the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of
}
Research and Developement National Exposure Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-tas i
Vegas, Nevada.
- All results are in pCl/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L; air (ilter samples, which are in pCl/ filter; and food products, which are in uCi/kg.
- USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, I determinatio and controllimits as dermed by the EPA.
' Unless otherwise indicated, the TBEESML results are given as the rnean i 2 standard deviations for three determinations. 'Ihe numbers after the sem!-colon are the Total Propagated Uncertainty of the result.
(]
%)
I O
V-4
i Tcble A 2. In-house " spike" samples.
Concentrationin pCi/1.'
m
'IVEESML Results Accepted Krown Lab Sample Date Code Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Limits
- 2s, n=1' SPCH-607 Charcoal Feb,1996 I 131(g)
A 03 0.2 - 0.3 0.310.0;0.0 Canister SPAP-609 Air Filter Feb,1996 Cs 137 A
1.9 1.5-23 2.210.0;0.2 SPAP-611 Air Filter Feb,1996 Gr. Beta A
8.0 6.59.5 6.810.0;0.7 SPW-621 Water Feb,1996 I-131 A
95.9 77.7 114.1 86.210.7;8.6 SPW-621 Water Feb,1996 I-131(g)
A 95.9 75.6 - 116.2
%.214.7;10.7 SPW-622 Water Feb,1996 Gr. Alpha A
82.8 62.8 - 102.8 96.426.6;11.7 SPW422 Waen Feb,1996 Cr. Beta A
85.7 68.1 1033 83.7133;9.0 SPW-623 Water Feb,1996 H 3 A
17833.0 14185 3 21460 7 18228.7 i 391 3;1864.4 SPW-624 Water Feb,1996 Co60 A
2393 188.1-290 3 231.0 1 143;27.3 SPW424 Water Feb,1996 Cs 137 A
4283 336 3 - 520 3 4283 t 24.1;49.1 SPMI-625 M11k Feb,1996 Cs-137 A
53.5 41.1 - 65.9 63.113.2;7.1 SPM1425 Milk Feb,1996 1 131 A
48.0 38.3 - 57.6 47.810.7;4.8 SPMI-625 Milk Feb,1996 I-131(g)
A 48.0 37.6 - 58.4 48.012.9;5.6 SPVE 1068 Vegetation Feb,1996 I 131(g)
A 0.8 0.6 - 0.9 0.810.0;0.1, SPMI 2217 Mlik Apr,1996 Cs-134 A
37.1 29.1 - 45.1 35.412.5;4.3 SPMI 2217 Milk Apr,1996 Cs 137 A
106.6 83.1 130.1 117.2 i 5.4;12.9 SPW 2219 Water Apr,1996 Co-60 A
23.4 16.3-30.0 26.0 i 3.4;4.2 SPW-2219 Water Apr,1996 Cs 134 A
37.1 28 1 - 45.5 36.112.9;4.6 SPW-2219 Water Apr,1996 Cs 137 A
106.6 82.6-130.6 117.1 i 6.4;13.4 SP W 2221 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Alpha A
82.8 64.7 - 100.9 76.916.1;9.8 SPW-2221 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Beta A
136.8 109.0 164.6 132315.0;14.2 SPW-2223 Water Apr,1996 H 3 A
17937.0 14354 4 21520 4 17538.9 1 354.1;17893 SPW-2283 Water Apr,1996 1129 A
14.9 113 18.6 15.711.4;2.1 SPW-2285 Water Apr,1996 Fe-55 A
1.1 0.5-11 1.210.5;0.5 SPW-2287 Water Apr,1996 Tc-99 A
66.0 48.8 83.2 70517.9;10.6 SPW-2289 Water Apr,1996 Am-241 A
82.8 66.8 - 98.8 77.4 i 0.4;73 SPW-2289 Water Apr,1996 Cm-244 A
36.4 28.6 - 44.2 37.911.7;4.2 SPW 2291 Water Apr,1996 Th-230 A
45.0 35.9 - 54.1 41.6 i 1.9;4.6 SPW-2292 Water Apr,1996 U 238 A
45.4 35.8 - 55.0 46.212.0;5.0 SPF-3420 Fish May,1996 Cs-137 A
0.1 0.1 - 0.1 0.110.0;0.0 SPW-3439 Water May,1996 I-131 A
25 3 20.2 30.4 23.910.8;2.5 SPMI 3441 Milk May,1996 I-131 A
25 3 20.4-30.2 23.5 i 0.5;2.4 SPMI -
Milk Jun,1996 Cs.134 A
31.3 243 383 28.1 i 2.6;3.8 SPMI-Milk Jun,1996 Cs-137 A
42.5 323 - 52.7 47.0i 3.7;6.0 SPMI -
Mlik Jun,1996 1131(g)
A 40.4 31.0- 49.8 39.4 i 3.6;5.3 SPMI-4054 Milk Jun,1996 Cs-134 A
31.3 24.3 - 38.3 28.1 i 2.6;3.8 y-5
- -.. - ~.
_ ~
l Table A 2. In-house " spike" sartples.
Concentrationin pO/if l
tab Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESM1. Results j
Code Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Umits' 2s, n=1' l
SPMI-4054 Milk Jun,1996 Cs.137 A
425 32.3-52.7 47.0f 3.7;6.0 l
SPM1-4054 Milk Jun,1996 1131 A
40 3 32.7 - 47.9 35.710.6 3.6
?
SPMI4054 Milk Jun,1996 I 131(g)
.A 40.4 31.0 49.8 39.4 i 3.6;5.3 j
SPW-4246 Water Jun,1996 Gr. Alpha A
82.7 66.6 98.8 70.013.6;7.9
]
SPW.4246 Water Jun,1996 Cr. Beta A
136.1 108.1 164.1 140.5 i 3.2;14.4 SPAP-4750 Air Filter Jul,1996 Cs-137 A
1.9 1.52.3 2.210.0;0.2 4
l SPW-4936 Water Jul,1996 Co40 A
112.6 82.7-142.5 105.7115.4;18.7 j
SPW-4936 Water Jul,1996 Cs 134 A
135.2 104.9-165.5 127.1110.9;16.7 l
SPW-4936 Water Jul,1996 Cs-137 A
211.9 160.8-263.0 220.2120.2;29.9 SPMI 4938 Milk Jul,1996 Cs-134 A
135.2 104.4 - 166.0 130.4 111.4;17.3 j
SPMI-4938 Milk Jul,1996 Cs-137 A
211.9 159.2 - 264.6 229.2 i 21.6;31.5 l
SPW-4942 Water Jd.1996 Fe-55 A
1.8 1.0- 2.5 2.0103;0.6 SPP-4996 Pish Jul,1996 Cs-137 A
0.1 0.1 - 0.1 0.110.0;0.0 j
SFAP-5669 Air Filter Jul,1996 Gr. Beta A
7.8 6.3 - 9.3 7.010.0;0.7 l
SPW-5700 Water Aug,1996 H 3 A
51058.0 40958.4 - 61157 4 49589.0 i 5895;4993.8 l
SPM1-7384 Mlik Oct,1996 I 131 A
39.9 323 - 47.5 35.010.9;3.6 f
SPMI 7385 Milk Oct,1996 Cs-134 A
21.4 16.2 26.6 19512.4;3.1 i
SPMI 7385 Mlik Oct,1996 C4137 A
24.1 17.0- 31.2 26.013.9;4.7 l
SPMI-7385 Milk Oct,1996 1131(g)
A 114.1 893 - 138.9 117316.4;13.4 f
SPMI 7444 Milk Oct,1996 I 131 A
79.9 56.1 - IM.7 64.5 i 14.4;15.8 SPW-7444 Water Oct,1996 1131(g)
A 79.9 53.7-106.1 82.2116.2;18.2 i
SPMI 7445 Milk Oct,1996 1131 A
199.7 156.0- 243.4 235.5 1 2.8;23.7 SPW-7445 Water Oct,1996 I-131(g)
A 199.7 156.0- 243.4 190.9114.1;23.7 SPMI-7685 Milk Oct,1996 1131 A
114.1 92.2 - 136.0 103.61 1.5;10.5 l
SPAP-2 Air Filter Oct,1996 Gr. Beta A
6.0 4.87.2 6.0f 0.0;0.6 SPSO-2478 Soll Oct,1996 Cs 134 A
0.2 0.1 0.2 0.210.0;0.0 l
SPSO-2478 Soil Oct,1996 Cs 137 A
0.4 03 0.5 0.510.0;0.1 l
SPCH 747 Charcoal Oct,1996 1131(g)
A 0.4 03-0.4 0.410.0;0.0 i
l Canister SPCH-747 Charcoal Oct,1996 I 131(g)
A 0.5 0.40.6 0.510.0;0.1 l
Canister l
SPAP-7476 Alr Filter Oct,1996 Cs 137 A
1,9 1.5 - 2.3 2.110.0;0.2 l
SPW-8734 Water Nov,1996 Co40 A
43.0 30.3 - 55.7 42.417.2;8.4 l
SPW-8734 Water Nov,1996 Cs-134 A
30.1 19.9-40 3 29.0 i 6.6;7.2 l
SPW-8734
' Water Nov,1996 Cs-137 A
31 5 183 - 44.7 35.119.5;10.1 l
5 SPW-8740 Water Nov,1996 H 3 A
25075.0 19992.4 30157 4 25383.5i 4335;2575.1 j.'
V6 1
i 4,
3 i
Table A 2. In house' spike' samples.
i, Concentration in pCl/L'
/
bb Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results l
t%4.
Type Collected Analysis Relected Activity Control umits' 2s, n=1' All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental po:s sium (K) data in milk, wNch are in mg/L.; air filter samples, c
which are in pCl/ filter; and food products, which are ir, uCi/kg.
j Controllimits are based on the known value i 10%+TPU (where all parametric uncertainties, other than counting statistics, are less thar. 5%).
- All samples are the results of single determinations.1he result is reported in the fo!!owing format:
Activity i Countisig Error ; Total Propagated Uncertainty.
NO'IE: For fish, Jelle is used for the spike matrix. For vegetation, sawdust is used for the spike matrix.
i I
l i
4 4
4 i
i i
1 l
1 1
I e
i a
e V-7
Table A 3.
In. house " blank'sarnples.
Concentration pCl/L*.
Teledyne Results Acceptance (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria lab Sample Sample Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity'
- (4.66 Sigma)
SPW-7 Water Jan1996 Ra 226
<0.02 0.02 10.13;0.13
< 1.0 SPW-2 Water Febl996 Ra-226
<0.02 0.01 f 0.02;0.02
< 1.0 SPCH 408 Charcoal Feb l996 1131(g)
<2.7 0.10 11.63;1.63
<9.6 Canister SPAP410 Air Filter Febl996 Co40
<4.1 3.461339:3.41
< 10.0 SPAP410 Air Filter Febl996 Cs 134
<3.6
-0.25f 2.94:2.94
< 10.0 SPAP410 Air Filter Febl996 Cs 137
<2.4
-0.31f 2.53:2.53
<10.0 SPAP412 Air Filter Febl996 Gr. Beta
<0.4 03210.29;0.29
< 3.2 SPW-627 Water Feb l996 Co40
<3.0 1.7011.60;1.62
< 10.0 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Cs 134
<2.5
-036i1.66;1.66
< 10.0 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Cs-137
<3.2 03311.60;1.60
< 10.0 SPW 627 Water Febl996 Gr. Alpha
<1.0 0.20 1 0.93;0.93
<1.0 SPW-627 Water Feb1996 Gr. Beta
<3.2 2.2611.76;1.80
< 3.2 SPW-627 Water Febl996 I-131
<0.4
-0.21*032;032
<0.5
$PW 628 Water Febl996 Co40
<2.6
-13812.18;2.19
< 10.0 SPW-628 Water Feb1996 Cs-134
<3.1 0.95 i 2.11;2.11
< 10.0 SPW-628 Water Feb i996 Cs-137
<3.8 055f231;2.31
< 10.0
$PW-628 Water Feb l996 1131
<0.5
-0.181035;035
<0.5 SPW-629 Water Feb l996 H3
<197 12.47197.17;97.18
< 200.0 SPMI430 Milk Febl996 Co40
<3.5 1.2611,79;1.80
< 10.0 SPMI430 Milk Febl996 Cs 134
<2.5 0.12 1 1.53;1.53
< 10.0 SPMI430 Milk Febl996 Cs-137
<2.6 0.22 1 1.44;1.44
<20.0 SPMI430 Milk Feb l996 1-131
<0.3 0.0710.24:0.24
< 0.5 SPMI430 Milk Febl996 Sr-89
<0.9
-0.20 11.27;1.27
<5.0 l
SPMI433 Milk Febl996 Sr-90 N/A 1.48 10.40:0.42
<1.0 law level of Sr.90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCl/L) is not unusual.
SPVE-1069 Vegetation Feb l996 1431(g)
<0.012 0.001 0.01;0.01
< 20.0 SPW-3 Water Mar 1996 Ra-226
<0.06
-0.00 1 0.04:0.04
< 1.0 SPW-3 Water Mar 1996 Ra 228
<0.9 0.471 0.75;0.75
< 1.0 SPW-4 Water Apr1996 Ra-226
<0.06 0.09 1 0.04:0.04
< 1.0
<4.8 23212.62;2.64
< 10.0 SPM14218 Milk Apr1996 Cs 134 SPMI 2218 Milk Apr1996 Cs437
<5.4 4.42 i3.00;3.06
< 10.0
<2.9 0.95 fl.58:1.59
< 10.0 SPW-2220 Water Apr1996 Co40
<2.7 1.47 11.64;1.65
< 10.0 SPW-2220 Water Apr1996 Cs 134 SPW-2220 Water Apr1996 Cs-137
<1.9
-1.28 1 1.72;1.73
< 10.0 SFW-2222 Water Apr1996 Gr. Alpha
<0.2 0.21 10.97;0.97
< 1.0 s.
V-8
Table A-3.
In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L*.
O Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity *
(4.66 Sigma)
SPW 2222 Water Apr1996 Gr. Beta
<2.8 2.26 *1.57;1.61
< 3.2 SPW 2224 Water Apr1996 H 3
<151
-101.30 170.18;71.52
< 200.0 SPW-2284 Water Apr 1996 I 129
<1.4 0.22 10.84;0.84
< 1.5 SPW 2286 Water Apr1996 Fe-55
<0.7 0.07 10.43;0.43
< 1000.0 SPW-2288 Water Apr1996 Tc 99
<4.2 0.55f 2.2);2.29
< 10.0 SPF-3421 Fish May1996 Co40
<0.010 0.00 10.01;0.01
< 10.0 f
SPF-3421 Fish May1996 Cs 134
<0.014
-0.00 10.01;0.01
< 10.0 SPF-3421 Fish May 1996 Cs 137
<0.015 0.01 1 0.01;0.01
< 10.0
~
SPW-3440 Water May19961131
<0.1 0.04 10.20;0.20
<0.5 SPMI-3442 Milk May 1996 I 131
<0.1
-0.07 10.20;0.20
< 0.5 i
SPW-6 Water Jun1996 Ra-228
<1.0 0.73 11.05;1.06
< 1.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Co40
<8.7 2.51 14.51:4.52
< 10.0 SPM1-4055 M11k Jun1996 Cs-134
<6.1 1.8713.37;338
< 10.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Cs 137
<5.3 1.82 11.80;11.80
< 10.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 I131
<0.3 0.2110.24:0.24
<0.5 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 St89
<0.8 0.57 1 1.83;1.83
< 5.0 SPMI 4055 Milk Jun1996 St90 N/A 1.49 10.44;0.46
< 1.0 low level of Sr 90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is riot unusual.
SPW-7 Water Jul1996 Ra-228
<0.8
-0.05 1 0.70;0.70
<1.0 SPAP-4751 Air Filter Jul1996 Co40
<2.7 1.2611.44;1.45
< 10.0 SPAP-4751 Air Filter Jul1996 Cs-134
<4.8 1.50 11.80;1.80
< 10.0 SPAP-4751 Air Filter Jul1996 Cs-137
<2.4 0.63 i 1.49;1.49
< 10.0 SPW-4937 Water Jul1996 Co40
<4.5
-0.2513.27 3.27
< 10.0 SPW-4937 Water Jul1996 Cs-134
<5.5 0341339;339
< 10.0 SPW-4937 Water Jul1996 Cs-137
<5.7
-03513.43;3.43
< 10.0 SPMI-4939 Milk Jul1996 Co40
<8.0 1.13 i 4.73;4.73
< 10.0 SPMI-4939 Milk Jul1996 Cs-134
<7.2 1.80 15.18;5.19
< 10.0 SPM1-4939 M11k Jul1996 Cs-137
<5.8 1.04 1 3.77;3.77
< 10.0 SPW-4943 Water Jul1996 Fe 55
<0.6 0.181035;035
< 1000.0 SPP-4997 Fish Jul1996 Co40
<0.006 0.0010.00;0.00
< 10.0 SPF-4997 Fish Jul1996 Cs 134
<0.006
-0.00 1 0.01;0.01
< 10.0 SPF-4997 Fish Jul1996 Cs-137
<0.009 0.01 1 0.01;0.01
< 10.0 SPAP-5670 Air Filter Jul1996 Gr. Beta
<0.4 0.801032;033
< 3.2 SPW-8 Water Aug1996 Ra-226
<0.04 0.16 i 0.03:0.03
< 1.0 SPW-8 Water Aug1996 Ra 228
<1.0 0.44 1 0.79;0.79
< 1.0 SPW-9 Water Sep 1996 Ra-226
<0.05 0.01 1 0.03:0.03
< 1.0 V-9
i i
Table A 3.
In-house 41ank" samples.
i Concentration pC1/11.
f Teledyne Results Acceptance (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria f
4 tab Sample Sample Activity' (4.66 Sigma) i Code TYDe Date Analysis LLD f
k SPW-7013 Water Sep 1996 St-89
<1.8
-0.73 f l.10;1.10
< 5.0 SPW 7013 Water Sep1996 Sr 90
<0.5
-0.05 1 0.21:0.21
< 1.0 l
SPW 10 W ater Oct1996 Ra 228
<1.0 0.80f0.57;0.58
< !.0 4
SPMI 7382 Milk Oct1996 Cs 134
<3.1
-0.2512.62;2.62
<10.0 SPMI 7382 Milk Oct 1996 Cs 137
<4.8 0.15 12.68;2.68
< 10.0 I
f SPMI.7382 Milk Oct 1996 I131(g)
<3.7
-1.61 13.28;3.29
< 20.0 l
SPMI-7383 Milk Oct1996 Cs-134
<5.7 0.28 i 3.68:3.68
<10.0 l
SPMI-7383 Milk Oct1996 Cs-137
< 4.1
-1.83 1 3.63:3.64
<10.0 l
SPMI 7383 Milk Oct 1996 1131
<0.4 0.18 10.23:0.24
< 0.5 SPMI-7383 Milk Oct1996 I-131(g)
<6.8 1.19 1 4.06;4.08
< 20.0 l
SPMI-7443 Milk Oct 1996 I131
<0.4
-0.060.17;0.17
< 0.5 l
SPCH 7475 Charcoal Oct1996 1131(g)
<2.8
-1.58 1 12.74;12.74
< 9.6 j
Canister l
SPAP-7477 Air Filter Oct1996 Cs-137
<2.2 0.00 1 0.00;0.00
<10.0 l
j SPSO-7479 Soll Oct 1996 Cs-134
<0.011 0.00 1 0.00;0.00
< 10.0 SPSO-7479 Soil Oct1996 Cs-137
<0.007 0.00 1 0.00;0.00
< 10.0 SPAP 7527 Air Filter Oct 1996 Gr. Beta
<0.7 0.10 10.45;0.45
< 3.2 j
SPF-7505 Fish Oct1996 Co40
<0.016
-0.00 1 0.01:0.01
< 10.0 SPF-7505 Fish Oct1996 Cs-134
<0.017
-0.01 10.04;0.04
< 10.0 f
SPF-7505 Fish Oct1996 Cs-137
<0.016
-0.00f 0.01;0.01
< 10.0 l
SPW-8735 Water Novi996 Co40
<6.0
-0.1410.10;0.10
< 10.0 j
SPW 8735 Water Nov i996 Cs 134
<4.7
-0.53 17.69;7.69
< 10.0 i
SPW-8735 Water Nov 1996 Cs-137
<8.2 2.09 14.63;4.64
< 10.0 i
SPW-8735 Water Nov1996 Cr. Alpha
<0.3 0.15 1 0.21;0.21
< 1.0 SPW 8735 Water Nov 1996 Cr. Beta
<0.8
-0.41 i 0.52;0.53
< 3.2 SPW 8739 Water Novi996 H 3
<158 104.99 i 82.93;84.15
< 200.0
- Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/ Uter, alt filter sample results are in pCi/ fil results are in pCl/ charcoal, rnd solid sample results are in pCi/ kilogram.
)
- 'Ihe activity reported is the net activity result.
4 t
i lO V-10
_ Table A-4.
In house " duplicate" program Concentration in pCIA' Second lab Accepted' First Collected Analysis Cudd Re}ected Result Result Date Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CF 20,21 A
7.110.2;0.8 6.910.1;0.7 Jan,1996 K 40 CF 20,21 A
3.710.4;0.5 3.7*0.1;0.4 Jan,1996 - Sr-89 CF 20,21 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jan,1996 St90 0 20,21 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 t0.0;0.0 Jan,1996 Cs 137 M1 47,48 A
-1.7i4.1:4.1 2.813.4;3.4 l
Jan,1996 1131 MI 47,48 A
0.1
- 0.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 l
Jan,1996 Co40 LW - 103,104 A
03i1.7;1.7 1.112.2;2.2 Jan,1996 Cs 134 LW - 103,104 A
0.411.5;1.5 1.012.4;2.4 l
Jan,1996 Cs 137 LW 103,104 A
0.711.6;1.6 0312.2;2.2 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta LW 135,104 A
2.210.5;0.6 2.210.6;0.7 Jan,1996 I131 LW 103,104 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.1i0.3;0.3 Jan,1996 I131(g)
LW - 103,104 A
-3.9f 6,3;63 1.4112.0;12.0 Jan,1996 K 40 LW - 103,104 A
78.6 i 353;36.2 99.4 i48.5;49.5 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CW 132,133 A
1.711.3;1.3
-0.3 f l.1;1.1 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CW 132,133 A
5.Sil.7;1.8 3.Sil.6;1.6 Jan,1996 Co40 M1-70,71 A
1.2 i4.3;4.3 1.7i4.1;4.1 Jan,1996 Cs 137 MI-70,71 A
0313.3:3.3 2.413.4;3.4 Jan,1996 Co-60 MI 154,155 A
1.612.6;2.6
-0.513.3;3.3 f
Jan,1996 Cs 134 MI-154,155 A
0.1 f 2.2;2.2
-2.312.6;2.6 f
Jan,1996 Cs 137 MI-154,155 A
-0.7f 2.0;2.0 0.712.9;2.9 i
Jan,1996 I-131 MI-154,155 A
-0.010.3;0.3 0.010.2;0.2 Jan,1996 I-131(g)
MI-154,155 A
1.2 i3.4;3.4 0.113.9;3.9 Jan,1996 K-40 MI-154,155 A
1,521.1 1 89 3;225 3 1,628.4 1122.0;252.8 Jan,1996 Sr-89 MI 154,155 A
-0.510.8;0.8
-0.710.8;0.8 Jan,1996 Sr-90 MI-154,155 A
0.8103;0.3 1.0103;0.3 Jan,1996 I 131 WW - 180,181 A.
0.010.2;0.2
-0.110.2;0.2 Jan,1996 I-131 M1-298,299 A
0.110.2:0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Jan,1996 K-40 MI-298,299 A
1,579.0 i 177.0;278 3 1,551.7 i 168.0:269.7 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 355,356 A
0.111.0;1.0
-0.310.9;0.9 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 355,356 A
2.4 f t.3;1.3 2.111.3;1.3 Jan,1996 Co40 SW 436,437 A
0.1 f t.1;1.1 0.711.9;1.9 Jan,1996 Cs-137 SW 436,437 A
0.111.2;1.2 1.611.9;1.9 Jan,1996 H-3 WW - 500,501 A
21,035.6 1 418.5;2,144.8 20,597.l i414.4;2,101.0 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta SWT - 554,555 A
2.910.5;0.7 3.110.5;0.7 Jan,1996 K-40 SW - 841,842 A
65.0 i 283;29.0 118.9 157.7;58.9 Feb,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 479,480 A
6.7i 1.0;1.4 7.811.3;1.8 Feb,1996 Co40 M1-521,522 A
-1.112.9;2.9 0.115.0;5.0 Feb,1996 Cs 137 M1-521,522 A
-0.8 i 2.8;2.8
-0.413.4;3.4 O
V - 11
k Table A.4.
In. house " duplicate
- program.
i Concentration in pCi/L' l
Lab Accepted' First Semnd Date Collected Analysis CMa=*
Rejected Result Result Feb,1996 I131 MI-521,522 A
0.1i0.3;03 0.210.3;0.3 Feb,1996 Co40 MI-580,581 A
-0.8 i 2.7;2.7 1.711.5;1.5 Feb,1996 Cs-137 M1-580,581 A
0.6i2.3;2.3 0.411.3;1.3 Feb,1996 Gr. Alpha LW - 709,710 A
0.110.4;0.4 0.510.4;0.4 f
Feb,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 709,710 A
1.710.4;0.5 2.010.4;0.5 l
Feb,1996 H3 LW -709,710 A
37.4 174.3;74.5 84.4 176.4;77.3 Feb,1996 I131 M1-603,604 A
-0.910.4:0.4
-0.2f 0.3:0.3 Feb,1996 K-40 MI-603,604 A
1,382.9 1115.0:220.4 1,3353 1175.0;252.2 Feb,1996 1131 W W 648,649 A
-0.110.3;03
-0.110.3:03 Feb,1996 I131 M1 - 674,675 A
-0.810.4;0.4
-0.110.4;0.4 Feb,1996 K-40 MI-674,675 A
1,390.4 174.0;257.0 1,493.6 166.0:2623 Feb,1996 I131 WW - 865,866 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Feb,1996 Co-60 PW -932,933 A
0.511.5;1.5 0.412.4;2.4 Feb,1996 Cs-137 PW - 932,933 A
0.111.7;1.7 0.7i3.0;3.0 Feb,1996 Co40 SW - 911,912 A
-1.8 i 3.3;3.3 1.011.5;1.5 Feb,1996 Cs 137 SW - 911,912 A
-0.313.6:3.6
-0.9 f l.8;1.8 Feb,1996 Gr. Beta SWT - 953,954 A
2.510.5;0.7 2.210.5;0.6 Feb,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 1037,1038 A
2.810.5;0.7 3.1 i0.5;0.7 Feb,1996 H-3 LW - 1037,1038 A
36.5 1 94.7;94.9 116.8 198.0;993 Mar,1996 Gr. Beta CW 977,978 A
0.711.2;1.2
-0.111.0;1.0 Mar,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 977,978 A
3.911.6;1.6 3.111.5;1.5 Mar,1996 H-3 SW - 1467,1468 A
130.3 i 81.1;83.1 1303 181.1;83.1 Mar,1996 Sr-89 SW - 1467,1468 A
-0.112.0;2.0
-1.111.9;1.9 Mar,1996 Sr-90 SW - 1467,1468 A
0.6f0.3;0.3 0.910.3;0.4 Mar,1996 I131 MI-1058,1059 A
-0.3
- 0.4;0.4
-0.010.4;0.4 Mar,1996 K-40 MI-1058,1059 A
1,500.0
- 157.0;257.4 1,549.0 1156.0;262.1 Mar,1996 Sr-89 MI-1058,1059 A
0.610.9;0.9
-1.5
- 1.3;1.3 Mar,1996 Sr-90 M1-1058,1059 A
1.510.4:0.4 2.410.5;0.6 Mar,1996 I131 MI-1152,1153 A
0.410.6;0.6 0.210.6;0.6 Mar,1996 K-40 MI-1152,1153 A
1,5243 i157.0;260.0 1,358.8 1172.0;252.5 Mar,1996 H-3 P -1175,1176 A
160.81825;853 151.8182.1;84.6 Mar,1996 Gr. Beta LW -1213,1214 A
2310.6;0.7 2.710.6;0.7 Mar,1996 H-3 LW -1213,1214 A
92.4 197.1;98.0 29.5194.6;94.7 Mar,1996 H3 SW - 1282,1283 A
82.4 196.2;96.9 36.9194.4;94.5 Mar,1996 Co-60 LW -1309,1310 A
3.0i4.7;4.7 4.112.5;2.6 Mar,1996 Cs 134 LW -1309,1310 A
-0.2 i3.6;3.6 2.214.4;4.4 Mar,1996 Cs 137 LW -1309,1310 A
-4.813.9;4.0
-1.114.2;4.2 Mar,1996 Gr. Beta LW -1309,1310 A
2.610.5;0.7 2.910.5 0.7 O
V - 12
Table A4. In house duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCl/L' Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Cads =*
Rejected Result Result Date Mar,1996 1131 LW - 1309,1310 A
0.410,5;0.5 0.110.5;0.5 Mar,1996 1131(g)
LW - 1309,1310 A
1.015.5:5.5
-0.715.3;5.3 Mar,1996 K-40 LW - 1309,1310 A
1041 1 51.7;52.8 85.6156.5;57.1 Mar,1996 H3 LW - 1362,1363 A
162.9 199.9;102.3 108.0 197.7;98.8 Mar,1996 Sr-89 LW - 1362,1363 A
1.010.9;0.9 0311.4;1.4 Mar,1996 Sr-90 LW - 1362,1363 A
0.710.3;0.3 0.010.5;0.5 Mar,1996 Co40 F - 1446,1447 A
0.0i0.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cs 134 F 1446,1447 A
0.010.0 0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cs-137 F - 1446,1447 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cr. Beta F - 1446,1447 A
2.010.1;0.2 1.810.1;0.2 Mar,1996 I-131(g)
F - 1446,1447 A
0.110.4;0.4 0.710.5;0.6 Mar,1996 K-40 F - 1446,1447 A
2.0i0.3;0.4 2.010.4;0.4 Mar,1996 H-3 SW - 1537,1538 A
141.6196 7;97.8 175.2 198.1;99.6 Mar,1996 Co40 LW - 1612,1613 A
3.513.1:3.1 0.7tl.6;1.6 j
Mar,1996 Cs 134 LW - 1612,1613 A
1.4 f 2.7;2.7 1.6t2.0;2.0 j
I Mar,1996 Cs 137 LW - 1612,1613 A
4.713.0;3.1 1.312.4;2.4
)
Mar,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 1612,1613 A
2.610.5;0.7 3.010,5;0.7 l
Mar,1996 I-131 LW - 1612,1613 A
0.3io.2;0.2 0.110.1;0.1 i
Mar,1996 I-131(g)
LW - 1612,1613 A
0313.7;3.7 0.712.9;2.9 Mar,1996 K 40 LW -1612,1613 A
61.2 1 33.1;33.7 983 131.4;32.9 s
Mar,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 1709,1710 A
4.511.7:1.8 3.6 fl.7;1.7
~
j Mar,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 1709,1710 A
0.411.5;1.5 0.311.5;1.5 Mar,1996 Sr-89 AP -2140,2141 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.0f 0.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Sr90 AP - 2140,2141 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0f 0.0;0.0 l
Mar,1996 Co40 WW - 1659,1660 A
0.213.2;3.2 2.2i2.5;2.5 l
Mar,1996 Cs-137 WW - 1659,1660 A
-1.913.3:3.3 23t2.4:2.5 j
Mar,1996 H-3 WW - 1659,1660 A
995.8 1 117.5;154.0 1,1153 1121.1;164.6 Mar,1996 H3 PW-1757,1758 A
88.61119J;1203 68.9 *119.1;119.4 Mar,1996 Co40 AP - 2547,2548 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cs-137 AP - 2547,2548 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.0f 0.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Co40 AP - 2568,2569 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cs-137 AP-2568,2509 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Apr,1996 I131 MI-1778,1779 A
0.210.2:0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Apr,1996 K-40 MI-1778,1779 A
1,390.4 1 98.1:213.0 1,426.0i144.0;24L6 Apr,1996 Sr-89 MI-1778,1779 A
-3.1 i 2.1;2.2
-1.4 i2.0;2.0 Apr,1996 St90 MI-1778,1779 A
2.210.5;0.6, 2.010.4;0.5 Apr,1996 Co40 MI-1799,1800 A
0212.7;2.7 1.914.6;4.6 Apr,1996 Cs 137 MI-1799,1800 A
2.lf 2.4;2.4 1.813.2;3.2 V - 13 4
~
i i
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/11 1
Date Lab Accepted' First Second j
Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result j
Apr,1996 1131 MI 1799,1800 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.110.2:0.2 j
Apr,1996 1131 MI 1843,1844 A
0.010.2;0.2 0.110.2:0.2 l
Apr,1996 K 40 M1 1843,1844 A
1,429.1 193.2:2153 1,6303i1434;263A Apr,1996 Co40 LW -1913,1914 A
2.210.8;0.9 1.213.2:3.2 Apr,1996 Cs.134 LW -1913,1914 A
0.410.8;0.8
-0.813.1;3.1 l
Apr,1996 Cs 137 LW 1913,1914 A
0.510.9;0.9 0.5 f 3.1;3.1 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 1913,1914 A
3.010.5;0.7 2J10.5;0.7 l
Apr,1996 1131 LW 1913,1914 A
0.110.2:0.2 0.110.3;0.3 j
Apr,1996 I131(g)
LW 1913,1914 A
0.211.7;1J
-1.715.4:5.4 Apr,1996 K-40 LW - 1913,1914 A
39.4117.4;17.8 86.9 143.4;44.3 Apr,1996 Cs-137 S O 1946,1947 A
0.210.0;0.0 0.210.0;0.0 j
Apt,1996 K-40 S O - 1946,1947 A
10.510.5;1.2 10.510.4;1.1 l
Apr,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 1991,1992 A
3.9i1.7;1.8 4.611.7;1.9 l
Apr,1996 Gr. Beta CW 1991,1992 A
-0.311.4;1.4 0311.5;1.5
{
Apt,1996 Co-60 WW - 1890,1891 A
1.611.8;1.8 0.2 i2.2;2.2 j
Apr,1996 Cs-137 WW - 1890,1891 A
-0.611.7;11 0.1 i2.5;2.5
]
Apr,1996 H3 WW - 1890,1891 A
538.2 1 97.1;121.6 6013 199.4;128.7 l
Apr,1996 Gr. Deta WW - 2063,2064 A
6310.8:1.2 6310.8:1.3 l
Apr,1996 H-3 WW - 2063,2064 A
69.5178.1;78J 26.8176.2;763 i
Apr,1996 I131 MI-2089,2090 A
0.210.3;0.3 0.210.2;0.2 l
Apr,1996 K-40 M1-2089,2090 A
1,3383 11804;256.0 1,456.51160D;254.6 i
Apr,1996 Co40 LW - 23(0,2304 A
1.913.0;3.0 1.S f 3.0;3.0 Apr,1996 Cs 137 LW - 2303,2304 A
0.812.7;21 1.013.0;3.0
)
Apr,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 2303,2304 A
3J113;1.4 4.111.3;1.4 l
Apr,1996 1131 MI-2418,2419 A
0.210.4;0.4 0.210.3;03 i
Apr,1996 K-40 MI-2418,2419 A
1,418.9 i l204:227.2 1,477.5 1182.0;271.1 l
Apr,1996 Gr. Alpha SS 2442,2443 A
3.613.9;3.9 0312.7;2.7 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta SS - 2442, 2443 A
5.513.1;3.1 8.613.3;3.4 l
Apr,1996 K 40 SS - 2442,2443 A
7.510.2:0.8 7310.3;0.8 j
Apr,1996 Sr 90 SS - 2442,2443 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Apr,1996 Cs-137 SL-2589,2590 A
0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 i
l Apr,1996 K-40 SL 2589,2590 A
4.110.5;0.6 3310.5;0.6 Apr,1996 H-3 WW - 2700,2701 A
-13.9 1 73.4;73.4
-31.2 1 72.6;72.7 Apr,1996 Co40 SW - 2675,2676 A
-1.9 i 1.9;1.9
-1.212.9;2.9 i
Apr,1996 Cs 137 SW - 2675,2676 A
-1012.2;2.2 3.012.6;2.6 Apr,1996 K 40 SW - 2503,2504 A
95.9 i 47.8;48.8 71.0136.8:375 1
Apr,1996 Co-60 LW -2777,2778 A
3.1131:3J 1.9f 2.8;2.8 Apr,1996 Cs-134 LW -2777,2778 A
-1.112.5;2.5
-1.512.5:2.5
)O i
V 14 i
r,
Table A.4.
In house " duplicate" program.
f Concentrationin pCi/L' O
Lab Accepted
0.413.3;3.3 2.513.1;3.2 f
Apr,1996 Gr. Beta LW 2777,2778 A
2.710.6;0.8 2.210.6;0.7 Apr,1996 I-131 LW 2777,2778 A
0.210.3;03
-0.1104;0.4 Apr,1996 I131(g)
LW 2777,2778 A
2.11103;10.3
-1.8111.5;11.5 Apr,1996 K 40 LW 2777,2778 A
91.l i 43.2;44.1 59.7137.0;373 May,1996 Co40 F -2612,2613 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs-137 F 2612,2613 A
0.010.0:0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Gr. Beta BS - 2654,2655 A
4.7il.8;1.8 6.011.9;2.0 May,1996 K-40 BS 2654,2655 A
6.410.4;0.8 6.710.4;0.8 May,1996 Sr-89 BS 2654,2655 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Sr90 BS - 2654,2655 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Co40 F-2633,2634 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs 137 F-2633,2634 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Co40 MI 2742,2743 A
-1.6f 3.2:3.2 0.212.7;2.7 May,1996 Cs 137 MI-2742,2743 A
0.7
- 2.6;2.6 0.5f 2.3;2.3 May,1996 1131 MI-2742,2743 A
-0.010.2;0.2 0.2 i0.3;0.3 May,1996 Co40 MI-2841,2842 A
2.1 f 3.3:3.4 0.513.6;3.6 May,1996 Cs 137 MI-2841,2842 A
0.412.8;2.8 3313.4;3.4 I131 MI 2841,2842 A
0.4103;0.3 0.010.2:0.2 O
May,1996 May,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 2866,2867 A
6.911.3;1.7 6.911.3;1.7 May,1996 H-3 WW - 2866,2867 A
178.3 187.5;90.8 133.8185.6;87.5 May,1996 Co40 LW -2981,2982 A
1.912.5;2.5 0.8 i2.0;2.0 May,1996 Cs 134 LW -2981,2982 A
0.812.4:2.4 0.212.0;2.0 May,1996 Cs-137 LW -2981,2982 A
2.2 t 2.7;2.7
-0.8i2.2:2.2 May,'1996 Gr. Beta LW - 2981,2982 A
3.710.6;0.8 2.610.6;0.7 May,1996 I-131 LW -2981,2982 A
-0.010.2;0,2 0.110.2;0.2 May,1996 I131(g)
LW -2981,2982 A
1.918.9;8.9 3.017.3;7.3 May,1996 K-40 LW - 2981,2982 A
121.0 1 38.6;40.5 150.7123.3;27.7 May,1996 Co40 F -2887,2888 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.0f 0.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs-137 F -2887,2888 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 M.ny,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 3(D2,3(03 A
3.610.9;1.0 2.510.5;0.7 May,1996 H3 WW - 3(02,3033 A
32.0 i 83.9;84.0 133.6188.2;90.1 May,1996 Cs-137 SS - 2931,2932 A
0.210.1;0.1 0.110.0;0.0 May,1996 K-40 SS - 2931,2932 A
21.411.8;2.8 18.911.0;2.1 May,1996 Gr. Beta CW-2955,2956 A
2.6ft.6;1.6 3.611.6;1.7 May,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 2955,2956 A
-0.3 t1.1;1.1
-0.411.1;1.1 May,1996 Sr 89 MI-3053,3054 A
0.611.5;1.5
-0.612.0;2.0 May,1996 Sr90 MI-3053,3054 A
1.4 i0.4;0.4 1.910.5;0.6 O
V - 15
l Table A-4.
In. house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Accepted' First Semnd Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date May,1996 Co40 MI-3099,3100 A
03 *2.7;2.7 0.314.3;4.3 May,1996 Cs 137 MI-3099,3100 A
-0.612.5;2.5
-0.813.6;3.6 May,1996 I131 MI-3099,3100 A
0.0103;0.3 0.210.2;0.2 May,1996 K 40 F -3251,3252 A
2.610.4;0.5 2.710.3;0.4 j
May,1996 Cs 137 BS 3230,3231 A
0.610.0;0.1 0.610.0;0.1 May,1996 K-40 BS - 3230,3231 A
22.410.8;2.4 21.810.8;2.3 May,1996 I 131 M1 -3344,3345 A
0.2 i0.2;0.2 0.210.3;0.3 May,1996 K 40 MI-3344,3345 A
1,611.2 i 190.0;290.0 1,409.5il57.0;247.8 May,1996Gr. Alpha VE - 3381,3382 A
0.4f0.2:0.2 0.410.2;0.2 May,1996 Gr. Beta VE 3381,3382 A
4.310.2:0.5 4.010.2;0.5 May,1996 K 40 VE 3381,3382 A
4.6i0.3;0.5 4.110.3;0.5 May,1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 3404,3405 A
2.510.5;0.7 3.110.6;0.7 May,1996 H-3 SWU - 3404,3405 A
197.6 i 88.5;92.5 188.4188.1;91.7 May,1996 Co-60 SW - 3677,3678 A
0.512.4;2.4 0.211.8;1.8 May,1996 Cs-137 SW - 3677,3678 A
1.213.4;3.4
-0.712.2;2.2 May,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 3677,3678 A
5.4f t.3;1.5 6.011.3;1.6 May,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 3551,3552 A
2.810.5;0.7 1.910.5;0.6 May,1996 I-131 DW - 3551,3552 A
0.3i0.4;0.4 0.0f 0.4;0.4 May,1996 K-40 DW - 3551,3552 A
113.1147.8;49.1 131.5f74.9;76.0 May,1996 H-3 WW - 3506,3507 A
3.1181.2;81.2
-32.2 i79.6;79.7 May,1996 Co40 PW - 3700,3701 A
0.912.2;2.2
-0.413.1;3.1 May,1996 Cs 137 PW -3700,3701 A
-1.712.5;2.5 0313.2;3.2 Jun,1996 Co-60 MI-3447,3448 A
-0.614.9;4.9
-1.314.8;4.8 Jun,1996 Cs-137 MI-3447,3448 A
0.813.6;3.6 2.613.9;3.9 Jun,1996 I131 MI-3447,3448 A
-0.010.1;0.1
-0.1103;0.3 Jun,1996 Gr. Beta G-3530,3531 A
4.810.1;0.5 4.910.1;0.5 Jun,1996 K-40 G -3530,3531 A
4.910.5;0.7 4.510.4;0.6 Jun,1996 Sr-89 G -3530,3531 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Sr-90 G -3530,3531 A
0.010.0;0.0
~0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 3597,3598 A
2.7f 0.7;0.8 1.710.7;0.7 Jun,1996 H-3 WW - 3597,3598 A
114.9 i 80.8;82.3 107.9180.5;81.8 Jun,1996 K-40 G -3621,3622 A
5.510.2;0.6 5.710.2;0.6 Jun,1996 I131 MI-3642,3643 A
-0.210.3:0.3 0.210.3;0.3 Jun,1996 Cs 137 F - 4452,4453 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 f 0.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Cs-137 F -4452,4453 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0f0.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Gr. Beta F 4452,4453 A
2.110.1;0.2 2.110.1;0.2 Jun,1996 Gr. Beta F -4452,4453 A
2.110.1:0.2 2.lio.1;0.2 Jun,1996 K 40 F 4452,4453 A
1.910.1;0.2 2.0f0.1;0.2 O
V-16
--=
__ Table A.4.
in-house duplicate
- prostram.
Concentrationin pCi/L'
(
lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date Jun,1996 K-40 P 4452,4453 A
1.910.1;0.2 2.010.1;0.2 Jun,1996 I131 M1 3830,3831 A
0.010.5;0.5 0.210.5;0.5 Jun,1996 K-40 MI 3830,3831 A
1,544.7 1 111.0;237.6 1,447.1 1159.0;253.0 Jun,1996 Co40 M1 3773,3774 A
1313.0;3.0 2.513.2;3.2 Jun,1996 Cs 137 Mi-3773,3774 A
3.812.6;2.7
-0.312.6;2.6 Jun,1996 1131 MI-3773,3774 A
0.2103;0.3
-0.110.5;0.5 Jun,1996 Sr.89
' J - 3874,3875 A
-2.1fl.9;1.9
-1.311.9;1.9 Jun,1996 Sr-90 AI-3874,3875 A
2310.6;0.6 2.4i0.6;0.6 Jun,1996 K-40 G 3918,3919 A
6.710.2;0.7 7.1103;0.8 Jun,1996 K-40 G 4045,4046 A
4.710.5;0.7 5.1103;0.6 l
Jun,1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 4092,4093 A
2.410.7;0.8 1.910.6;0.7 Jun,1996 H-3 SWU - 4092,4093 A
208.0184.8;89.4 224.0185.4;90.7 2
Jun,1996 1-131 MI-4071,4072 A
-0.110.6;0.6
-0.110.5;0.5 Jun,1996 K-40 MI 4071A072 A
1,2293 1142.0;219.4 1,512.1 1143.0;250.5 Jun,1996 St-89 MI-4071,4072 A
0311.0;1.0
-0.411.2;1.2 Jun,1996 Sr-90 MI 4071,4072 A
1.0103;0.3 1.310.4;0.4 Jun,1996 I131 WW - 4113,4114 A
0.110.5;0.5 0310.5;0.5 i
13.4 175.4;75.4 6.2175.0;75.1 Jun,1996 H3 PW 4215,4216 A
58.4 180.8;81.2 1043 179.1;80.4 Jun,1996 H3 LW-4259,4260 A
195.8 186.1;90.2 215 3 186.9;91.7 Jun,1996 Co40 PW 4549,4550 A
-0.511.4;1.4
-0.411.5;1.5 Jun,1996 Cs 137 PW 4549,4550 A
-1.111.7;1.7
-0.712.0;2.0 Jun,1996 Co-60 SW - 4406,4407 A
0.912.0;2.0
-0.312.6;2.6 Jun,1996 Cs-137 SW 4406,4407 A
-0.412.4;2.4 2.612.9;3.0 J41996 Gr. Beta E 4284,4285 A
1.010.1;0.1 1.110.1;0.1 j
JA1996 K-40 E - 4284,4285 A
1.1
- 0.2:0.2
.1.210.1;0.2 JA1996 Sr-89 E 4284,4285 A
0.0
- 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 1
Jul,1996 St90 E-4284,4285 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 J 4 1996 Gr. Deta WW - 4305,4306 A
1.2103:0.4 1.2103;0.4 J41996 Co40 MI 4326,4327 A
-0.213.0;3.0
-1.1 f 3.4:3.4 JA1996 Cs 137 MI-4326,4327 A
-0.112.6;2.6 2.013.0;3.0 JA 1996 H3 P 4431,4432 A
24.8 i 71.9;72.0 111.0175.7;77.2 J 4 1996 St-89 AP -4595,45%
A 0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 l
JA 1996 St-90 AP 4595,4596 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 JA 1996 Cod WW - 4375,4376 A
1312.1;2.1 1.212.4;2.4 Jul,1996 Cs 137 WW 4375,4376 A
1.1123:2.3 1.012.9;2.9 JA1996 H-3 WW - 4375,4376 A
-30.8176.9;77.0
-25.4 i77.2;77.2 2
J4 1996 1-131 M1-4503,4504 A
-0.0103:0.3 0.2103;03 V
V-17 1
i j
__ Table A-4.
In. house " duplicate" program.
Concentrationin pCl/L' Lab Acceoted' First Second Collected Analysa Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date J41996 K-40 MI 4503,4504 A
1,287.1 1 161.0;237.8 1,188.3 f136.0;211.2 J41996 Sr 89 MI-4503,4504 A
1.511.0;1.0
-1.8
- 1.2;1.2 J41996 Sr 90 MI 4503,4508 A
1.610.5;0.5 25i0.5;0.6 JA1996 Co-60 MI-4527,4528 A
2.4
- 2.5;2.6 1.2f 2.6;2.6 1
l J41996 Cs 134 MI 4527,4528 A
0.811.9;1.9 1.912.6;2.6 JA1996 Cs 137 MI-4527,4528 A
-0.7
- 2.0;2.0 0.1
- 2.3;2.3 J41996 I131 MI-4527,4528 A
0.2
- 0.5;0.5 0.1 *0.5;0.5 J41996 I-131(g)
MI-4527,4528 A
-0.112.8;2.8 0.113.6;3.6 JA1996 K-40 MI-4527,4528 A
1,419.1 1913:213.5 1,408.6 1107.0;219.4 Jul,1996 Sr-89 MI-4527,4528 A
-0.4 i 1.0;1.0 1.5
- 1.1:1.2 f
J41996 Sr-90 MI-4527,4528 A
1.110.2;0.3 13 f 03;0.3 i~
JA1996 H-3 WW - 4684,4685 A
-30.7 1 76.8;76.9 13.0 77.6;77.7 f
J41996 Gr. Beta WW 4808,4809 A
1.0i1.3;1.3 0.911.2;1.3 l
J41996 H-3 WW - 4808,4809 A
-15.0 i 82.4;82.4
-30.4 172.8;72.9 l
J41996 K-40 G 4762,4763 A
7.0iO.3;0.8 7310.2;0.8 J41996 Co450 LW -4832,4833 A
-1.2 i 1.7;1.7 1.211.9;1.9 JA 1996 Cs-137 LW - 4832,4833 A
1.0
- 1.6;1.6 1.7
- 2.2;2.3 JA 1996 Gr. Beta LW -4832,4833 A
3.5
- 0.7;0.9 3.410.7;0.9 J41996 Gr. Beta LW -4832,4833 A
3.510.7;0.9 3.4 i0.7;0.9 l
JA1996 Gr. Beta LW - 5014,5015 A
2.0f0.6;0.7 2.0f0.6;0.7 l
JA1996 Cs 137 F -5515,5516 A
0.110.0;0.0 0.1i0.0;0.0 l
j d 1996 Gr. Beta F -5515,5516 A
2.510.1:0.3 2.310.1;0.3 I
J41996 K-40 F -5515,5516 A
2.410.3;0.4 2.710.4;0.4 J41996 Gr. Beta CW - 4956,4957 A
2.211.5;1.5 4.011.6;1.7 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta CW 4956,4957 A.
0.6it.2;1.2 0310.9;0.9 l
JA1996 Co4io SW 5248,5249 A
-1.011.9;1.9 0.211.9;1.9 l
JA1996 Cs 137 SW - 5248,5249 A
0.8
- 2.3;2.3
-0.6f 2.4:2.4 J41996 H3 WW-5215,5216 A
183.4 i 91.0;94.3 317.9 196.0;1053 l
JA1996 Codio MI 5081,5082 A
1.2 f 3.1;3.1
-1.7 i4.2;4.2 l
J41996 Cs 137 M1 5081,5082 A
0.512.6;2.6
-2.9133;3.4 l
J41996 I-131 MI 5081,5082 A
0.210.6;0.6 05i0.7;0.7 l
Jul,1996 I131 MI 5081,5082 A
0.210.6;0.6 0.4 f 0.7;0.7 l
J41996 Gr. Beta SWU - 5125,5126 A
4.112.1;2.2 55f 2.3;2.5 j
JA1996 H3 SWU - 5125,5126 A
176.4 1 90.7;93.8 125.71 88.7;90.4 j
JA1996 Gr. Beta VE -5146,5147 A
3.110.1:0.3 3.1
- 0.1;0.3 j
Jal,1996 K-40 VE-5146,5147 A
3.4i0.1;0.4 3510.1;0.4 JA 1996 Gr. Beta DW - 5269,5270 A
6.5i1.4;1.7 6.011.3;1.6 f
J41996 I131 DW - 5269,5270 A
0.2i0.4;0.4 0.010.3;03 O
v - 18 l
~
~
l Table A-4.
In-house duplicate" program.
j Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Accepted' First Seard l
Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date Aug,1996 I131 MI-5168,5169 A
-0.010.4;0.4
-0.60.5;0.5 Aug,1996 K-40 M1-5166,5169 A
1,585.81123.0;248.3 1,534.4 11624;264.2 Aug,1996 I131 MI-5289,5290 A
-0.110.5;0.5
-0.310.6;0.6 Aug,1996 Co450 MI-5190,5191 A
-1.612.8;2.8
-0.214.0;4.0 Aug,1996 Cs 137 MI-5190,5191 A
0.2 i3.1;3.1 0.6 f 3.4;3.4 l
Aug,1996 I131 MI-5190,5191 A
0.2f0.5;0.5 0.410.5;0.5 Aug,1996 Co-60 SL - 5424,5425 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 4
Aug,1996 Cs-134 SL - 5424,5425 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1996 Cs 137 SL - 5424,5425 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 i
Aug,1996 I-131(g)
SL - 5424,5425 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 s
Aug,1996 K-40 SL - 5424,5425 A
1.610.3;03 1.610.2;0.3 Aug,1996 Co.60 MI-5386,5387 A
0.813.7;3.2
-3.414.8;4.9 Aug,1996 Cs-137 MI-5386,5387 A
1.112.6:2.6 1.813.5;3.5 l
Aug,1996 I-131 MI-5386,5387 A
0.00.2;0.2
-0.010.2;0.2 l
Aug,1996 I131 MI-5386,5387 A
0.010.2;0.2
-0.010.3;0.3 i
Aug,1996 Cr. Beta SWU - 5905,5906 A
1.510.7;0.7 2.410.5;0.6 Aug,1996 H3 SWU - 5905,5906 A
257.21843;913 306.61863;95.8
- p Aug,1996 1131 MI-5582,5583 A
0.210.6;0.6
-0.010.6;0.6 j
Aug,1996 K-40 MI-5582,5583 A
1,473.6 i 180.0;269.4 1,459.0 1152.0;250.0 Aug,1996 Co-60 LW - 5606,5607 A
0.7f1.8;1.8
- ).811.5;1.5
~
Aug,1996 Cs 137 LW - 5606,5607 A
0.511.9;1.9
-0.912.6;2.6 4
Aug,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 5606,5607 A
5.4 i1.3;1.5 5311.3;1.5 Aug,1996 Cs 137 SL - 5667,5668 A
0.0100;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1996 K-40 SL - 5667,5668 A
2.4 i0.3;0.4 2.710.3;0.4 i
Aug,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 5759,5760 A
3.711.5;1.6 4.611.5;1.7 Aug,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 5759,5760 A
0.711.1;1.1 0.711.1;1.1 Aug,1996 CcH50 MI-5817,5818 A
-4314.6;4.6 3.714.8;4.8 Aug,1996 Cs-137 MI-5817,5818 A
-0.714.2;4.2 1.413.6;3.6 i
Aug,1996 I-131 MI-5817,5818 A
0.010.1:0.1 0.110.1;0.1 Aug,1996 Gr. Beta SWT - 5884,5885 A
2.710.8;0.9 2.910.7;0.8 Aug,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 5925,5926 A
3.610.6;0.8 3.810.9;1.1 Aug,1996 1-131 MI-5978,5979 A
-0.110.5:0.5 0.4 i0.4;0.4 Aug,1996 K-40 MI-5978,5979 A
1,468.4 1179.0;268.2 1,560.81173.0:273.8 Aug,1996 Co450 VE - 5950,5951 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1996 Cs-137 VE - 5950,5951 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 VE - 6031,6032 A
2.910.1;03 2.710.2;0.3 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta Sep,1996 K-40 VE - 6031,6002 A
3.2 A0.2;0.4 3.4103;0.5 Sep,1996 Sr-89 VE - 6031,6032 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 i
f g
V - 19 l
l Table A 4.
In-house " duplicate
- program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Second Lab Accepted' First l
Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date
{
Sep,1996 Sr 90 VE - 6(B1,6032 A
0.0f0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Co40 LW - 6052,6053 A
0.9 f l.1;1.1 0.5 kl.5;1.5 l
Sep,1996 Cs-134 LW -6052,6053 A
0.311.3;1.3 0.9
- 2.3;2.3 i
l Sep,1996 Cs.137 LW - 6052,6053 A
0.011.3;1.3
-0.111.9;1.9 j
Sep,1996 Gr. Beta LW 6052,6053 A
2.110.7;0.8 3.110.6;0.7 Sep,1996 1131 LW - 6052,6053 A
-0.410.4;0.4 0.010.3;0.3 Sep,1996 I131(g)
LW - 6052,6053 A
1.216.0;6.0 1.7
- 10.1;10.1 l
Sep,1996 K 40 LW - 6052,6053 A
66.8 130.1;30.8 43.6 *27.1;27.4 WW 6181,6182 A
1.6 t0.6;0.7 1.010.6;0.6 j
Sep,1996 H-3 WW - 6181,6182 A
5.4 i 82.7;82.8 62.9 i 85.2;85.6 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta i
l Sep,1996 I131 MI 6006,6007 A
0.110.3;0.3 0.010.3;0.3 l
l Sep,1996 K-40 MI 6006,6007 A
1,472.01166.0;260.1 1,502.9 i110.0;232.1 CW - 6128,6129 A
4.611.6:1.8 4.611.6;1.8 f
j Sep,1996 Gr. Beta j
Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6128,6129 A
4.6 k l.6;1.8 4.6*1.6;1.8 i
Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6128,6129 A
0.2*1.1;1.1 0311.1;L1 Sep,1996 H-3 SW - 6204,6205 A
113.3 1 85.4;86.8 61.4 183.2;83.6
(( O Sep,1996 Co40 MI-6225,6226 A
1.912.9;2.9
-0.612.6;2.6 j
Sep,1996 Cs-137 MI-6225,6226 A
2.812.7;2.7
-0.3 f 2.5;2.5 lD Sep,1996 I131 MI-6225,6226 A
-0.310.4;0.4 03i0.4;0.4 i
Sep,1996 K-40 VE - 6270,6271 A
2.210.3;0.4 2.1103;0.3 l
Sep,1996 H-3 WW - 6331,6332 A
16,801.2 1 999.6;2,494.1 17,111.9 11,006.0:2,535.4 CW 6294,6295 A
4.811.2;1.4 3.911.6;1.7 3
Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6294,6295 A
1.011.2;1.2
-0311.1;1.1 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta j
Sep,1996 K-40 VE - 6379,6380 A
1.710.3;0.3 1.810.2:0.3 Sep,1996 St-89 VE-6379,6380 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.0f0.0;0.0 l
Sep,1996 Sr.90 VE 6379,6380 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
)
Sep,19M Gr. Beta CW 6432,6433 A
3.211.5;1.6 3.211.5;1.6 VE - 6481,6482 A
2.810.1;0.3 2.810.1;0.3 I
Sep,1996 Gr. Beta l
Sep,1996 K 40 VE 6481,6482 A
3.4 i0.2:0.4 3.610.2:0.4
[
223.5 1 90.8;95.7 151.2187.9;90.2 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta SWT - 6545,6546 A
2.710.5;0.7 2.110.5;0.6 Sep,1996 Co40 AP-7220,7221 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs-134 AP - 7220,7221 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs-137 AP - 7220,7221 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 I-131(g)
AP-7220,7221 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 K-40 AP -7220,7221 A
0.0io.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Gr. Alpha DW - 6572,6573 A
1.0f 0.6;0.7 03103;0.3 DW - 6572,6573 A
2.910.8;0.9 2.510.3;0.5 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta V - 20
Table A.4.
In house " duplicate" program.
Concentrationin pCi/L' Lab Accepted' First Seoond Collected Analysis Codes' Rejected Result Result Date 90I0181.4;82.3 Sep,1996 H3 SW 6593,6594 A
58.2 i 80.0;80.4 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6616,6617 A
3.l il.6;1.7 5.011.7;1.9 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6616,6617 A
03i1.1;1.1
-0.3 fl.0;1.0 Sep,1996 H3 PW - 6675,6676 A
21.7180.1;80.2 88.51 83.1;83.9 Sep,1996 Codio AP - 7537,7538 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs-137 AP - 7537,7538 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Co450 VE 6654,6655 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs 137 VE - 6654,6655 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6719,6720 A
3.011.4;1.5 2.1i1.5;1.5 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6719,6720 A
-0.3
- 1.1;1.1 1.111.2;1.2 Sep,1996 CMi0 AP - 7558,7559 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Co450 AP - 7558,7559 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs 137 AP - 7558,7559 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs 137 AP-7558,7559 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 H3 W W 6696,6697 A
313.7 1 99.0;107.8 302.7 198.6;106.8 Sep,1996 Gr. Alpha LW -7118,7119 A
0.010.4;0.4
-0.210.4;0.4 Sep,1996 Cr. Beta LW - 7118,7119 A
2.1*0.4;0.5 1.6i0.6;0.6 Sep,1996 H3 LW - 7118,7119 A
89.3 1 81.1;82.0 92.8i813;823 E - 6783,6784 A
0.910.0;0.1 1.010.0;0.1 O
Oct,1996 Gr. Beta Oct,1996 K-40 E - 6783,6784 A
0.910.1;0.2 1.1 i0.2;0.2 Oct,1996 St-89 E - 6783,6784 A
-0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Sr 90 E 6783,6784 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Oct,1996 H-3 SW - 6877,6878 A
1,223.5*1194 204.9 1,320.2 il22.4;2173 Oct,1996 St-89 AP - 7199,7200 A
-0.0f 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Sr-90 AP-7199,7200 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 I-131 MI-6746,6747 A
-0.1103:0.3 0.1103;0.3 Oct,1996 K-40 MI-6746,6747 A
1,427.9 1180.0;264.8 1,425.3f 208.0;2843 Oct,1996 Co450 F-6824,6825 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs-137 F - 6824,6825 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Co450 W W 6926,6927 A
0.9
- 1.4;1.4
-0.412.8 2.8 Oct,1996 Cs-137 WW - 6926,6927 A
1311.5;1.5 1.8 i3.2;3.2 Oct,1996 H3 W W 6926,6927 A
7.1i783;783
-3.5177.8;77.8 Oct,1996 Co4iG G -7001,7002 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs-134 G-7001,7002 A
0.0f0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs-137 G-7001,7002 A
-0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta G -7001,7002 A
5.2*03;0.6 5.210.3;0.6 Oct,1996 I131(g)
G -7001,7002 A
-0.0f 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 K-40 G 7001,7002 A
6.210.7;0.9 5.510.4:0.7 V-21
Table A 4.
In. house " duplicate" program.
Concentrationin pCi/L' O
Semnd Lab Accepted' First Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date Oct,1996 Cs 137 SS 7024,7025 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta SS - 7024,7025 A
7.7
7.210.6;0.9 6.910.4;0.8 Oct,1996 Co4iG LW - 7045,7046 A
1.613.1;3.1 0.8i2.9;2.9 Oct,1996 Cs 134 LW - 7045,7046 A
0.013.0;3.0 1.9is.1;3.1 Oct,1996 Cs 137 LW - 7045,7046 A
1.0i2.9;2.9 1.913.0;3.0 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 7045,7046 A
2.810.7;0.9 2.910.5;0.7 Oct,1996 1 131 LW 7045,7046 A
0.210.4;0.4
-0.210.5;0.5 Oct,1996 I-131(g)
LW - 7045,7046 A
5.2f 29.9;29.9 5.8127.7;27.7 Oct,1996 K-40 LW - 7045,7046 A
513 i37.9;38.2 34.5133.8;34.0 Oct,1996 K-40 F - 6952,6953 A
2.810.2:0.3 2.710.1;0.3 Oct,1996 CodiO MI 6853,6854 A
-0.8 i4.8;4.8 1.812.8;2.8 Oct,1996 Cs-137 MI-6853,6854 A
1.613.6;3.6
-0.912.4;2.4 Oct,1996 I131 MI-6853,6854 A
-0.1103;03 0.2103;0.3 Oct,1996 Co4io MI-6854,6855 A
1.8 f 2.8;2.8 0.514.9;4.9 Oct,1996 Co 60 MI-6854,6855 A
1.8 f 2.8:2.8 0.514.9;4.9 Oct,1996 Cs-137 MI-6854,6855 A
0.912.4;2.4 1.6133;3.3 Oct,1996 Cs 137 MI-6854,6855 A
-0.9
- 2.4;2.4 1.613.3;33 Oct,1996 I131 MI-6854,6855 A
0.010.2;0.2
-0.2103;03 O-Oct,1996 I131 MI-6854,6855 A
0.2103;03
-0.210.3;0.3 Oct,1996 I-131 MI-6854,6855 A
0.2i0.3;03
-0.210.3;0.3 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta BS - 7138,7139 A
9.6
- 2.5;2.6 7.9123;2.5 Oct,1996 K-40 BS - 7138,7139 A
7.210.4;0.8 7.210.5;0.9 Oct,1996 Cs-137 S O - 7306,7307 A
0.210.0;0.0 0.210.0;0.0 Oct,1996 K-40 S O - 7306,7307 A
9.510.5;1.1 9.510.7;1.2 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta BO - 7747,7748 A
1.7103;0.4 1.5103;03 Oct,1996 K-40 BO - 7747,7748 A
0.7
- 0.2;0.2 0.610.1;0.2 Oct,1996 K-40 F - 7328,7329 A
2.110.5;0.5 1.710.4;0.4 Oct,1996 I-131 MI-7285,7286 A
-0.1 i0.2;0.2
-0.110.2;0.2 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 7176,7177 A
3.1tl.0;1.2 2.211.0;1.1 Oct,1996 Sr-89 MI-7351,7352 A
-0.5*13;1.3
-2.711.2;1.2 Oct,1996 Sr-90 MI-7351,7352 A
1.610.4;0.4 1.610.4:0.4 Oct,1996 K-40 VE - 7425,7426 A
1.9i0.2;03 1.7103;0.3 Oct,1996 Codio MI-7514,7515 A
2.215.1;5.1 5.915.4;5.4 Oct,1996 Co4io MI 7314,7515 A
2.215.1;5.1 5.915.4;5.4 Oct,1996 Cs 137 MI-7514,7515 A
0313.4;3.4 13143;4.3 Oct,1996 Cs 137 MI 7514,7515 A
0313.4:3.4 13i43;4.3 Oct,1996 I-131 MI-7514,7515 A
-0.0103;03 0.010.3;0.3 j
V - 22 j
4
)
In. house " duplicate" program, f
Table A-4.
Concentrationin pCi/L' j
I.ab Accepted' First Second 4
j Collected Analysis Cc h*
Rejected Result Result Date Oct,1996 Co40 F 7584,7585 A
0.0f 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 4
Oct,1996 Cs 137 F 7584,7585 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
)
Oct,1996 Co40 W W 7653,7654 A
0.5i1.7;1.7
-3.112.8;2.8 Oct,1996 Co40 WW - 7653,7654 A
0.511.7;1.7
-3.112.8:2.8 Oct,1996 Cs 137 W W 7653,7654 A
-0.312.0;2.0
-1.413.6;3.6 l
Oct,1996 Cs 137 WW 7653,7654 A
0.312.0;2.0
-1.413.6:3.6 j
Oct,1996 H3 WW - 7653,7654 A
20.6 175.9;75.9 27.1 178.1;78.2 i
Oct,1996 K-40 SS - 8040,8041 A
22.210.8;2.4 23.510.9;2.5 l
Oct,1996 Gr. Beta SWT-7972,7973 A
2.710.5;0.7 2.110.5;0.6 i
Oct,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 7794,7795 A
1.2il.7;1.7 2.4 f l.8;1.8 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 7994,7995 A
1.6i0.5;0.5 1.810.5;0.5 l
64.1 i 81.7;82.1 29.6180.1;80.2 i
Nov,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 8121,8122 A
5.210.8;1.1 4.910.7;1.1 Nov,1996 H-3 WW - 8121,8122 A
49.21 78.3;78.6 25.8 i77.2;77.3 I
i Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 8089,8090 A
2.1
- 1.8;1.8
-0.1 f l.6;1.6 l
Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 8089,8090 A
-0.311.5;1.5 0.0it.6;1.6 l
Nov,1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 8213,8214 A
2.610.6;0.7 2.0i0.6;0.7 j
Nov,1996 H3 SWU - 8213,8214 A
257.9 i 86.7;93.5 234.9185.7;91.5 4'
Nov,1996 K-40 SWU - 8213,8214 A
1093 i41.2;42.6 97.1152.0;52.9 3
Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW 8302,83(B A
0.911.4;1.4 2.111.4;1.5 j
Nov,1996 1131 MI-8337,8338 A
-0.010.2;0.2 0.1i0.2;0.2
}
Nov,1996 K-40 MI-8337,8338 A
1,454.6 1 91.6;218.0 1,365.5 1193.0;267.8 Nov,1996 H-3 WW - 8561,8562 A
4,719.0 1 197.0;671.3 4,718.9 1197.2;671.4 i
f Nov,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 8581,8582 A
2.210.7;0.8 2.5i0.6;0.7 l
Nov,1996 Gr. Alpha WW 8681,8682 A
0.lil.8;1.8
-1.7tl.5;1.6 f
I Nov,1996 Gr. Beta WW 8681,8682 A
2J
- 1.7:1.7 1.311.7;1.7 i
Now,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 8612,8613 A
2.611.5;1.6 1.9 *1.4;1.5 i
Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 8612,8613 A
- 0. lit.1;1.1
-0.811.1;1.1 Nov,1996 Co40 CW -9219,9220 A
0.511.9;1.9
-0.311.7;1.7
{
[
Nov,1996 Cs-137 CW -9219,9220 A
1.4
- 2.0;2.0 0.211.6;1.6 i
Nov,1996 H3 CW -9219,9220 A
2,091.7 1 147.1;320.2 2,206.3 1149.9:335.4 i
Nov,1996 Gr. Alpha CW - 8830,8831 A
0.2i0.3;03 0.410.3;0.3 l
Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW -8830,8831 A
11.110.6;1.8 10.210.6;1.7 Nov,1996 H-3
'CW 8100,8831 A
2,053.5 1 144.0;314.2 2,112.2 145.5;322.0 j
Nov,1996 St-89 CW - 8830,8831 A
-0.310.5;0.5
-0.310.6;0.6 3
l-Nov,1996 Sr-90 CW 8830,8101 A
0.310.3;0.3 0310.4;0.4 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 8635,8636 A
2.510.8;0.9 3.110.8;0.9 i
Dec,1996 K-40 SW - 8635,8636 A
90.1 1 52.8;53.6 90.4 151.9;52.7 i O V - 23 i
4 w
i Table A-4, in-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCl/L' lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis CW Rejected Result Result l
Date Dec,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 8660,8661 A
2.110.6;0.7 1.910.6;0.7 Dec,1996 H-3 DW 8660,8661 A
110.11 83.7;85.0 117.3 1 84.0;85.5 4
Dec,1996 I131 MI-8704,8705 A
-0.310.3:0.3 0.3 i0.3;0.3 i
i Dec,1996 K-40 MI 8704,8705 A
1,301.2 1141.0;2263 1,342.9 1 150.0;236 3 Dec,1996 Co40 MI 8725,8726 A
0.5i2.8;2.8 0.4 i4.4;4.4 l
Dec,1996 Cs 134 M1 8725,8726 A
1.212.3;2.3
-0.613.8;3.8 1
Dec,1996 Cs 137 MI 8725,8726 A
1Ji2.5;2.6 1.113.4;3.4 Dec,1996 I131 MI 8725,8726 A
-0.210.2:0.2
-0.210.2;0.2 i
Dec,1996 I131(g)
MI 8725,8726 A
-1.013.4;3.4 4.514.9;4.9 Dec,1996 K-40 MI 8725,8726 A
1,402.2 1 111 4:220.7 1,297.5 11504;231.6 i
Dec,1996 Sr-89 MI-8725,8726 A
-1.1 i t.0;1.0
-1.01.0;1.0 Dec,1996 Sr90 MI 8725,8726 A
13i0.4;0.4 1.1i0.4;0.4 Dec,1996 Cs-137,
50-8802,88m A
0.510.0;0.1 0.510.0;0.1 Dec,1996 Gr. Alpha SO 8802,8803 A
14.014.3:4.5 13.914.0;4.3 Dec,1996 Cr. Beta SO-8802,88m A
21.4 *3.1:3.8 21.5 *2.9;3.6 Dec,1996 K-40 SO 8802,8803 A
11.110.7;1.3 10.810.6;1.2 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta SWU 9540,9541 A
7.5i0.9;1.5 6.010.8:1.2 H-3 SWU - 9540,9541 A
90.2 1 86.7;87.6 86.5 186.6;87.3 O.
Dec,1996 Dec,1996 Co40 F-9040,9041 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Dec,1996 Cs-134 F 9040,9041 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Dec,1996 Cs 137 F 9040,9041 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta F-9040,9041 A
3.610.1;0.4 3.5i0.1;0.4 Dec,1996 I131(g)
F-9040,9041 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Dec,1996 K-40 F-9040,9041 A
3.310.5;0.6 3.010.4;0.5 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 9109,9110 A
4.111.2;1.4 2.011.5;1.6 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 9109,9110 A
-0.911.3;1.3
-1.1 t 1.3;1.3 Dec,1996 I-131 MI-9197,9198 A
0.110.4;0.4
-0.110.4;0.4 Dec,1996 K-40 MI-9197,9198 A
1,462.6 i 143 4;245.0 1,381.2 1149 4;239.8 Dec,1996 Co 60 WW - 9269,9270 A
-1.1 i 2.3;2.3
-0.3 i2.6;2.6 Dec,1996 Cs-137 WW - 9269,9270 A
-1.212.2:2.2 0.2
- 2.6;2.3 Dec,1996 H-3 WW 9269,9270 A
1,051.l i 1163;184.6 1,126.1 11194;194.0 Dec,1996 Co-60 LW -9291,9292 A
0.2 i2.0;2.0 1.2 i2.3;2.3 Dec,1996 Cs-137 LW -9291,9292 A
4.0i2.2;2.3 0.2i2.8;2.8 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta LW -9291,9292 A
4.911.3:1.5 7.3 tl.4;1.8 Dec,1996 H3 SW - 9743,9744 A
1.2 i 89.8;89.8 51.6191.8;92.1 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 9414,9415 A
4.010.7;0.9 4.610.8;1.0 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta DW 9520,9521 A
6.2
- 1.3;1.6 5.711.2;1.5 Dec,1996 1131 DW 9520,9521 A
03i0.4;0.4 0.2 io.4;0.4 V - 24
i Table A.4.
In. house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentntionin pCi/L' Second Lab Accepted' First l
Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Date Dee,1996 Gr. Beta
- CW - 9383,9384 A
4.811.7;1.9 4.611.6;1.7 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 9383,9384 A
0.611.5;1.5 0.411.5;1.5 Dec,1996 H-3 SW - 9433,9434 A
309.3 191.1;100.3 247.1 188.6;94.8 Dec,1996 H-3 SW - 9497,9498 A
241.0191.9;97.6 126.6 187.3;88.9 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 9564,9565 A
2.0f 0.6;0.7 2.210.6;0.7 H3 DW 9564,9565 A
120.8 f 83.4;85.0 94.2 1 82.2;83.2 Dec,1996
- All concentrations are reported in pCi/L, except solid samples, which are reported in pCi/g reported as ActivityiCounting Error; Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU).
- 1ab codes are comprised of the sample media and the sample numbers. Cllent codes have protect client anonymity.
' Acceptance is based on the difference of the two results divided by the pooled stand two, where the pooled standard deviation is the square root of the surn of the squares of th 1
O 4
i O
V - 25
I Table A.5. Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP),
comparison of MAPEP and Teledyne's Midwest laboratory results for various sample media'.
b Concentrationin Bq/kg tab Sample Date MAPEP Result' Control Teledyne Results 1
Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits
- Standard Deviation' j
SOIL Sep,1996 Am-241 28 1
- 2.8 20.9 - 373 27.0 2.7 f
S'I50-776 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
SOIL Sep,1996 Co40 812.0 i 83.5 568.4 - 1,055.6 879.087.9 S15 0-776 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
SOIL Sep,1996 Cs-137 1,531.0 i 193.4 1,071.7 - 1,990.3 1,716.0 171.6 STSO 776 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
STSO-776 SOIL Sep,1996 Pu-238 15.9 i 1.8 11.1 - 20.7 13.0 1.3 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
STSO-776
' SOIL Sep,1996 Pu-239/240 19.712.0 13.8 - 25.6 18.0 1.8 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
STSO-776 SOIL Sep,1996 St-90 536.0 1 57.1 375.2 - 696.8 441.0 44.1 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
STSO-776 SOlt Sep,1996 U-234/233 63.9 i 7.3 44.7 - 83.1 59.0 5.9 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
STSO-776 SOIL Sep,1996 U 238 64.0 i 6.4 44J 83.2 60.0 6.0 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
- Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Palls, Idaho.
l
- All results are in becquerels per kilogram as requested by the Department of Energy.
- Unless otherwise indicated, the TBEESML results are given as the mean i 1 standard deviations for three determinations.
- MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma,1 determination) and controllimits as defined by the MAPEP.
O V-26
l Table A.6.
Environmental Measurements laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison of EML and Teledyne's Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.
Concentrationin Bq/I
- 4
!ab Sample Date Control d
Code Type Collected Analysis Teledyne RetvJt' EML Result Limits' STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Am-241 0.810.1;0.1 0.8i0.0 0.7-14 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Co40 33.6 i 1.0;4.9 32.8 i 0.6 0.9-1.2
~
STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Cs 137 42.8 i 1.3;6.3 383i0.9 0.9 - 1.3
}
STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Fe-55 109.0 i 21.7;24 3 83.0 i 3.4 03-14 i
STW-755 Water Mar,1996 H 3 434.0 1 34.1;68.2 251.0 i 11.4 0.7-1.9 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Mn.54 41.9 i 1.4;4.4 38.4 i 1.2 0.9-1.2 i
STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Pu-238 0.9 i 0.1:0.1 1.010.1 0.7-13 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Pu-239 0.7 t 0.1:0.1 0.8i0.1 0.6 - 1.4 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Sr-90 2.210.7;0.7 1.510.0 0.7-1.7 STW-756 Water Mar,1996 Gr. Alpha 2,180.0 1 53.5;271 3 1,850.0 1 185.0 0.6-13 STW-756 Water Mar,1996 Gr. Beta 872.0 i 27.0;137.0 744.0 i 74.0 0.8-1.7 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Am-241 6.2 i 2.9;2.9 3.7i 0.5 0.5-2.4 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Cs-137 404.0 1 0.2;40.4 359.0 1 10.0 0.7 - 1.4 STSO-757 Soll Mar,1996 K-40 525.0 i 233;57.4 465.0 i 30.0 0.7-1.6 S' ISO-757 Soll Mar,1996 Pu-238 42 3 i 1.6;4.5 43.0i 2.4 0.2-2.0 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Pu-239 9.010.7;1.1 9.2i03 0.6-2.0 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Sr-90 1,200.0 i 323;124 3 1,340.0 1 113.0 0.6-3.0 Os S' ISO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Uranlurn 68.212.4;7.2 71.7 i 4.2 03-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Am-241 6.li 1.3;1.4 5.610.2 0.6-2.9 STVE 758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Cm-244 6.0i 1.2;1.3 4.4 0.2 0.4-1.9 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Co-60 65.6 i 4.0;9.8 59.711.0 0.6-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Cs-137 1,100.0 i 12.6;150.1 944.0 i 16.2 0.8-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 K 40 1,190.0 i 61.6;134.0 1,030.0 1 33.0 0.5-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Pu-239 9.2 i 1.3;1.6 9.8i1.2 0.6-2.0 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 St-90 1,210.0 i 32.2;125.2 1,300.0 i 52.4 0.5 - 1.4 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Am-241 0.310.0;0.0 0.210.0 0.6-1.9 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Ce-144 23.2i l.0; 2.5 333133 0.6-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Co-57 6.1i 0.1;0.6 8.9i0.9 0.6-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Co40 26.5 i 0.4;2.7 29.512.9 0.7-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Cs-134 12.9 i 0.3;1.3 14.7 i 1.5 0.7-1.2 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Cs-137 6.2 i 0.9;1.1 6.610.7 0.7-1.3 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Mn-54 3.3i 0.4;0.5 3.4i0.4 0.8-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Pu-238 0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0 0.6-14 STAP-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Pu-239 0.110.0;0.0 0.1i 0.0
.0.7-14 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Ru-106 10.2 i l.9;2.1 11.6 i 1.4 0.5-14 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Sb-125 10.110.8;1.3 9.8it.0 0.4-1.4 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Sr-90 1.1i0.2;03 1.1i0.0 0.6-2.3 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Uranium 0.li 0.0;0.0 0.110.0 0.8-2.9 O
V - 27
i l
Table A4. Environmental Measurements laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
^
comparison of EML and Teledyne's Midwest laboratory results for various sample media *.
Concentrationin Bq/1" Control i
Lab Sample Date j
Cah Type Collected Analysis Teledyne Result' EML Result' Limits'
)
STAF 760 Air Filter Mar,1996 Gr. Alpha 2.210.1;0.2 1.6i0.2 0.8-14 STAF 760 Air Filter Mar,1996 Gr. Beta 2.0i 0.0; 0.2 1.8i0.2 0.8-1.9 d
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Am-241 1.310.2;0.2 1.110.0 0.6-1J STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Co40 65.0 i 2.2;9.6 61.110.7 0.9-1.2 l
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Cs-137
%.113.0;14.2 89311.4 0.9-13 l
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Gr. Alpha 993.0 1 12.2;121;8 1,210.0 i l21.0 03-13 2
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Gr. Beta 579.0 i 8.1;89.5 540.0 1 54.0 0.6-1.6 i
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 H3 488.0 1 34.6;74.8 587.0 1 58.0 05-1.9 l
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Mn-54 65.0 i 3.0;7.1 605 i 0.6 0.9-1.2
. Water Sep,1996 Pu-238 1.3i 0.3; 0.4 1.9i0.1 0.7-1.',
l STW 770 An investigation was conducted. No errors in calculations or transcription were noted. He analysis was repeated in duplicate under the observation of the Techalcal Irad. No descrepancies were noted in the j
j performance of the procedum. %e result of the reanalysis was 2.14i0.11 Bq/L No further action is planned STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Pu-239 0.7i 0.2; 0.3 0.8i0.0 0.8-1.4 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Sr 90 3.610.7;0.8 2Ji 0.2 01-1J STW-770 Water Sep,1996 U-234 0.510.2;0.2 0.5i0.0 0.8-13 j
STW-770 Water Sep,1996 U 238 0.410.1;0.1 05i0.4 0.8-1.4 l
STSO-771 Soll Sep,1996 Am-241 15.613.8;4.1 133103 0.5-2.7 l
STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 Co40 4.0
- 2.5; 2.5 2.9i0.2 0.5-1.5 i
l S150 771 Soil Sep,1996 Cs 137 1,750.0 i 24.4;176.7 1,550.0
- 22.2 OA-13 l
STSO 771 Soil Sep,1996 K 40 369.0 i S9.5;70.0 300.0 1 25.0 01-1J STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 Pu-238 0.8i 0.4;0.4 1.1i 0.2 0.4-1.9 i
$150 771 Soll' Sep,1996 Pu-239 24.0 i 1.9;3.1 21.8
- 1.1 OJ - 1.9 i
STSO-771 Soll Sep,1996 St-90 63.6 i 4.0;7.5 69.915.1 0.5-2.8 S13 0-771 Soil Sep,1996 U 234 37.2 i 3.8;5.3 39.2 i 2.4 0.4-13 j
STSO.771 Soil Sep,1996 U-238 40.8 i 4.0;5.7 41.6 i 0 4 0.4-1.6 j
STYE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Am-241 1.5i0.9; 0.9 1.210.4 01-2.8 j
STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Cm-244 0.610.5;0.5 OI,10.1 05-1.7 i
STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Co.60 14.014.4;4.8 10.910.7 0.6-1.4 STVE 772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Cs 137 219.0 1 10.1;31.4 190.0167 0A-1.5 l
S1VE 772 Vegetation Sep,1996 K-40 1,160.0 i 99.4;152.8 992.0 1 29.0 0.8-1.5 STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Sr-90 1,420.0 1 35.1;146 3 1,390.0 1 12.0 05-13 i
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Co-57 11.8 i 0.3;1.2 14.810.8 0.6-1.2 i
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Co.60 9.210.4;1.0 8.6i 0.4 OJ - 1.2 STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Cs 134 9.6i 0.4;1.0 10.8 i 0.4 07-1.2 STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Cs 137 8.7i 0.4; 1.0 8510.4 OJ-13 3
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,196 Gr. Alpha 0.7f 0.0;0.1 1.210.1 OA-1.6 An investigation was conducted and a transcription error while calculating the result was discovered. De recalculated value is 1.15to.01Bq/ filter No further action is planned.
i O Y - 28
-,---,v,
,-y_
l l
l Table A-6.
Environmental Measur:ments bboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison of EML auf Teledyne's Midwest bboratory results for various sample media *.
!p I
Concentrationin Bq/L' Control Lab Sample Date l
Code Type Collected Analysls Teledyne Result' EML Result' Limits' STAP-773 Air Filter Gep,1996 Gr. Beta 0.510.0;0.1 0.5i0.1 0.7-1.8 STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Mn-54 7.110.5;0.8 6.410.3 0.8-1.3 STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Ru-106 11.5 i 3.2;3.4 10.8 t l.1 0.6-1.3 STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Sb-125 12.4 i 1.0;1.6 10.8 i 0.5 0.6 - 1.4
lhe Environmental Measurements uboratory provides the foUowing nuclear species : Air Filters, Soll, Tissue, Vegetation and Water. Teledyne does not partidpate in the 11ssue program.
- Results are reported in Bq/L with the following exceptions: Air filter results are reported in Bq/ filter, Soil results are reported in Bq/kg, Vegetation results are reported in Bq/kg. The results of elemental uranium are reported in uCl/ filter,g,or mL
- Teledyne results are reported as the mean of three determinationsistandard deviation; total promulgated uncertainty.
The EML result listed is the mean of replicate determinations for each nuclideithe standard error of the mean.
d
- The controllimits are reported by EML and are established from percentiles of historic data distributions (1982-1992). 'the evaluation of this historic data and the development of the control limits are presented in DOE report EML.564.
o O
V - 29
)
i l
f i
i W
l i
i l
l APPENDIX VI i
t l
ERRATA DATA i
1 l
l I
b 1
1 l
1 a
f 4;
I i
.i u
VI-l
)
)
1
ERRATA DATA
/']
i 1.0 On b rch 6,1997, during a review of Commonwealth Edison's ODCM, it was discovered that since 1991, when Comed began processing its environmental TLDs in-house, Comed has not been performing an interlaboratory comparison program to assess measurements of environmental radiation for those TLDs. This is required by section 5.3.1 of the ODCM.
Corrective action was begun with the second quarter of 1997, during which Comed populated its stations' direct radiation environmental locations with its own environmental TLDs as well as with TLDs supplied by a vendor. The vendor's environmental TLD program does comply with i
section 5.3.1 of Comed's ODCM. Comed will develop an interlaboratory comparison program for its own environmental TLDs and will commence interlaboratory comparison as soon as its l
program is satisfactorily developed. The TLD records for environmental monitoring will be Comed's TLDs, provided Comed has successfully implemented the interlaboratory comparison program. Otherwise, the vendor's TLDs will be Comed's environmental dose of record.
I 2
1 r~s
(
)
)
U(
VI-2