ML20136F573
| ML20136F573 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1984 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hayes B NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136F578 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-751 NUDOCS 8412100470 | |
| Download: ML20136F573 (1) | |
Text
-
l
', g' icg o j!3,7.[{
NUCL E AR P EGUL AT ORY CO!?!.'!SStON
+
UN:TE D sTA TFs j
,/. E v.t !,-.ac.3TOS D C 70L55 k
'%, lf5
%6et %s.: 50-445 04 El and 50 a46 l
MD':F;'.:U'i FOR:
Een B. Hayes, Cirector i
Office of Investigations FROM:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director i
Division of Licensing t
)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j
SUFJECT:
COMAhCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 -
INTIMIDATION i
It has come to my attention that my memorandum to you dated September 25*, 1984, i
could be misleading with regard to the staff's position on intimidation at Conanthe Feak and EGAG's scope of work on this issue.
(See memorandum enclosed.)
a This memorandum is to clarify that the staff has not taken a position on perva-sive intimidation at Comanche Peak and tc define the overall task EG&G was con-t tracted to perform. The EG&G effort was not directed at an independent assess-ment through interviewing individuals etc., and thus does not constitute, by it-r self, 'an overall assessment of the intimidation and harassment issue for the i
Comanche Peak project. The EG8G report will be used as one input into our i
assessment of widespread intimidation at Comanche Peak.
The EG&G team was ass'embled to investigate and forIn an opinion regarding alle-gations of intimidation of inspection personnel on the part of management at the Comanche Peak power plant. This was to be done by reviewing allegations of intimidation in depositions, several NRC Office of Investigation Reports, a Comanche Peak Special Review Team Report, survey responses from an applicant conducted survey of its 0A/QC personnel, and other reports and data seen as 2
relevant in naking a judgement concerning charges of management intimi,dation.
~
j The basic question the team was requested to attempt to answer was:
Did manage-.
ment by its actions create 'an atmosphere of intimidation for the QA/QC. inspec-tors such that they performed their duties in a way that there is some likeli-i hood of impact on the safety and quality of the plant.
I hope this memorandum has provided the necessary clarification.
i L
[. --
(
/I arrelld.Eisnut', Director f
Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
(
Enclosure:
As stated cc: H enton, NRR D
Hh
}
-