ML20129A072
| ML20129A072 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Salem |
| Issue date: | 09/14/1983 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127A737 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-794 NUDOCS 8506040456 | |
| Download: ML20129A072 (8) | |
Text
m i
7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-272 NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILI'Y OPidsTING LICENSE AND PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS C0flSIDERATION DETERMINATION AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering issuance of amendment to Facility Operating License No. OPR-70, issued to Public Service Electric and Gas Company.(the licensee), for operation of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit flo.1, located in Salem County, New Jersey.
The amendment would, on a one-time basis, extend the 40 t 10 month interval of Technical Specification 4.6.1.2.a during the first 10 year service period to permit the second inservice integrated leak rate test to be performed during.
the fifth refueling outage by adding a footnote to the specification which reads:
"The second inservice Integrated Leak Rate Test shall be performed at the fifth refueling outage," in accordance with the licensee's application for amendment dated July 22, 1983.
Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's regulations.
The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in 8506040456 841108 PIR FOIA ADATD84-794 PDR
e 7590-01
, accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or dif ferent kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a n.argin of safety.
Paragraph 4.6.1.2 of the Salem Unit 1 Technical Specification defines the surveillance requirements for the overall integrated containment leakage rate, including the schedule for coriducting the necessary surveillance test's, to be in confonnance with Appendix J of 10 CFR 50.
Specifically the Technical Specification paragraph states that three Type "A" tests be conducted at 40 t 10 month intervals during each ten year service period, and that the third test of each set be conducted when the plant is shut down for the ten year plant inservice inspections.
The first inservice Type "A" test for Salem Unit I was completed an August 13, 1979. Scheduling of the second Type "A" test at the maximum limit of the 40110 month duration from the August 1979 date would require the test be conducted in October 1983.
Because of the unforeseen delays encountered during the restart of Salem Unit I from its fourth refueling outage, scheduling of the test in October 1983 would require a four to five week shutdown of the plant for the single purpose of perfonning the test, af ter only approxi-mately 5 months of operation.
Acceptable integrated leakage tests have been performed for both the pre-operational Type "A" test and for the first Type "A"
retest.
The preoperational Type "A" test resulted in a total leakage at the 95% confidence level of 0.718 La; where La is defined as 0.1 percent by weight of the containment air per
F -
7590-01 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at design pressure (47.0 p'sig).
The first Type "A" retest resulted in a total leakage at the 95% confidence level of 0.62 La.
These results indir: ate a trend towards a more leak tight containment structure.
This is due to the effectiveness of the licensee's local leak rate test program since the most likely leakage paths through the containment are the penetrations.
A complete local leak rate test program was completed on all penetrations and i
valves requiring Type "B' and "C" testing during the most recent refueling outage. At the end of that outage, the combined leakage from all Type "B" and "C" penetrations and valves was well within the allowable limit of 0.6 La. Further, Unit No.1.has not experienced any unusual temperature or pressure excursions within the Reactor Containment Building since the last Type "A" test and we, therefore, have no reason to suspect that the containment liner integ-rity has in any way been reduced.
-In addition the following compensatory actions will be taken by the licensee.
Surveillance will be increased for those containment isolation valves that can be tested during plant operation and which have exhibited high or moderately high leakage during previous local leak rate testing.
This includes valves IVC-1, IVC-2, IVC-3, IVC-4, IVC-7, IVC-8, IVC-9, and IVC-10.
Valves which are testable during plant operation will be tested when the earliest c,ppor-tunity arises, e.g., unscheduled cold shutdowns with affected portions of the system drained.
This includes valves 12 CS-2,11 CA-330,12 CA-330, ICC-136,.lCC-215, ICV-71, 1FP-147, and IFP-148.
Surveillance will be increased by reducing the scheduled intervals from once every 24 months for valves IVC-7 through -10 and from 6 months for valves IVC-1 through -4, to once every three months.
7590-01
. On these bases, the staff proposes to determine that the application dues not involve a significant hazards consideration.
The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed determination.
Any comments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination. The Commission will not normally make a final determination unless it receives a request for a hearing.
Comments should be addressed to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20555, Attn: Docketing and Service Branch.
By OCT 21
,1983, the licensee may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facs ity operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written petition for leave to intervene.
Request for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2.
If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appro-priate order.
7590-01 4 As required by 10 CFR 52.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following factors:
(1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which my be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest.
The petition should also identify the specific aspect (s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a pu-ty may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, g
f but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above.
X Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter, and the bases for each contention set forth with reasonable specificity. Contentions chall be limited to matters within the scope of the amendment under consideration. A petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
7590-01 r Those permitted to intervene, become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene. and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final determination
~
on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
If the final determination is that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the amendment and make it effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance of the amendment.
If the final determination is that the amendment involves a significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expir-ation of the 30-day notice period.
However, should circumstances change during the notice 7ariod such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Comission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final determination will consider all public and State comments received.
Should the Commission take this action, it will publish a notice of issuance and provide for opportunity
7590-01 for a hearing after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very infrequently.
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C., by the above date. Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at (800) 325-6000 (in Missouri (800) 342-6700). The Western Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number 3737 and the following message addressed to Steven A. Varga, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing:
petitioner's name a d telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant name; and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Executive Legal Director, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
- 20555, and to Conner and Wetterhahn, Suite 1050, 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C.
20006, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions, supplemented petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board designated to rule on the petition and/or request, that the petitioner has made a substantial showing of good cause for the m
J e
5 1590-01.
granting of a late petition and/or request; that determination will be based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment which is available for public inspection at the Comission's Public Document Room,1717 il Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at the Salem Free Library,112 West Broadway, Salem, New Jersey 08079.
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 14th day of Septemb'er 1983.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
w yarga, Steven A.
h ef Operating Reactor ranch No. I Division of Licensing
r s
7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY 00'KET Hl. 50-261 C
NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION Of ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE AND Pa'0 POSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION A?D OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) is considering.
issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-23 issued to Carolina Power and Light Company (the licensee), for operation of the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2 located in Darlington County, South Carolina.
The amendment would change Technical Specification requirements as follows:
1.
One change would incorporate Section 4.05 of the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specification requirements regarding testino requirements of Section XI of the ASME code and deleting the detailed requirements covered by Section XI.
2.
One change would change nomenclature to be consistent with HBR-2 FSAR and plant conditions with regard to turbine trip setpoints.
3.
One change adds limitations not currently included in the Technical Specificatior, but included in Section 7.2.1.1.1 of the FSAR with regard to Steam Flow /Feedwater Flow Mismatch.
4.
One change would reinstate the frequency for testing prior to startup which was contained in the Technical Specification prior to Amendment 65.
5.
One change would revise Technical Specification Table 4.1-3 to achieve consistency within the specification.
A o a o g *? (A 14 c C -
0 J s- %
r l**
c
o t
7590-01.
The Commission has made a proposed detemination that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the Comission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the' proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any..
accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The proposed changes 1, 2 and 5 are administrative in nature, i.e., corrections of typographical errors, changes to achieve consistency throughout the Technical Specifications, title changes and reference corrections. The amendment request is similar to example (i) of the examples of amendments that are considered not likely to involve a significant hazards consideration (see example (1) in 48 FR 14870, April 6,1983).
Another example of actions involving no significant hazards considerations relates to changes that constitute an additional limitation, restriction, or control not presently included in the Technical Specifications. Changes 3 and 4 specifically add additional licensing limitations and restrictions not currently included in the Technical Specifications.
The Comission is seeking public coments on this proposed detemination.
Any coments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination. The Commission will not normally make a final determination unless it receives a request for a hearing.
Coments should be addressed to the Secretary of the Comission, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington. D.C.
20555, Attn: Docketing and Service Branch.
i 7590-01
. By December 21, 1983
, the Itcensee may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject factitty operating license and any person whose interest may be af fected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file awrittenpletitionforleavetointervene. Request for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2.
If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is flied by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the Commtssion or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensin, Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and L,feensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appro-priate order.
As required by 10 CFR {2.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding.
The petition should speciffcally explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following factors:
(1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financf al, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may he entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest.
The petition should also identify the spectfic aspect (s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wf shes to intervene. Any person who has i
Y 7b90-01 4-filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party I
may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the fi~rst prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above.
Ne later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference schei in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter, and the bases for each contention set forth with reasonable specificity. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the amendment under consideration. A petitioner who falls to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the p
opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, including
)
the opportunity to present evidence and' cross-examine witnesses.
If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration.
The final determina-tion will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
i
(
7590-01 4
-S-If the final determination is that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the amendment and make it effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place af ter issuance of the amendment.
If the final determination is that the amendment involves a significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
i Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expir-atton of the 30-day notice period. However, should circumstances change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Commission may issue the lice'nse amendment before the expiration of the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that the amendmeist involves no significant hazards consideration. The final determination will consider all public and State comments received.
Should the Commission take this action, it will publish a notice of issuance and provide for opportunity for a hearing af ter issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very infrequently.
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
..---.L.
7590-01 6-Was.hington 0.C. 20555 Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 1717'H' Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C., by the above date.
Where petitions are filed during the i
last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so iriform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at (800) 325-6000 (in Missoui1 (800) 342-6700).
The Western Union operator should be given Datagram '!dentification, Number 3737 and the following message addressed to Steven A. Varga, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch, Division of Licensing; petitioner's name and telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant name; and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy' of the petition should also be sent to the Executive Legal Director, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.
- 20555, aad to George F. Trowbridge, Esquire, Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge, 1800 M Street, i..W., Washington 0.C.
20036.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petttions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board designated to rule on the petition and/or request, that the petitioner has made a substantial showing of good cause for the granting of a late petition and/or request.
That determination will be based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v) and 2.714(d).
1.
. s 7590-01
- i
.7 -
For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Docuraent Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at the Hartsville Memorial Library, Home and Fifth Avenues, Hartsville, South Carolina 29535 Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 14th' day of November 1983.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f1 i
neven arga lef Operating Reacto s ranch No. 1 Division of Licensing
~
O F
6 e
a 9
7590-01 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-261 NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE AND PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS
CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING' The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) is considering issuance of' amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-23, issued to Carolina Power and Light Company (the licensee), for operation of the H. B.
Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2 located in Darlington County, South Carolina.
The amendment would provide a temporary revision to license condition 3 F.,'
Physical Protection, to Operating License DPR-23.
The licensee, by application for amendment ' dated October 25, 1983, as supplemented by letter dated March 5, 1984, proposes to devitalize all areas 'except the fuel building while the plant is under construction for replacing major sections of the steam generator.
During the construction program, the plant will be in cold' shutdown, the reactor defueled, and all fuel secured in the fuel building.
Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Comission will have made findings required by the Atomic E.rergy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Comission's regulations, q q $$_Qhlik
(
7590-01
. :The Commission has made a proposed determination that the request for amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
Under the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or-(2) create the possiblity or a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
This is a safeguards action, therefore, does not specifically fit guidance concerning the application of the standards in 10 CFR 50.92 by the examples provided by 48 FR 14870.
The applicant has requested a temporary revision in their Physical Protection pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55. - The plant will be in cold shutdo.wn and the reactor fuel secured in the. fuel building while the construction program is underway.
The licensee will, maintain an adequate level of security.and implement measures necessary to protection p
against radiological sabotage or_ theft of special nuclear reactor material.
On the basis the Commission proposes to determine that the request for the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination.
The Commission will not normally make a final determination unless'it receives a request for a hearing.
f_,
]
7590-01 i
- Comments should be addressed to the Secretary of the Comission, li.S.
~ Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.
20555, Attn: Docketing and Service Branch.
By April 3, 1984
, the licensee may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written petition for. leave to intervene.
Request for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the~
Comission's " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2.
If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene I
is filed by the above date, the Comission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by t,he Comission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR Q2.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding.
The-petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be peinitted with particular reference to the following factors:-(1) the nature of the petiticner's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the
a 7590-01 -
possible effect of any order which may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify the specific aspect (s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted 'as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above.
Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter, and the bases for each contention set forth with reasonable specificity.
Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the amendment under consideration. A petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at.least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to. any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the 1
opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, inclucing the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
o
+
7590-01 If a hearing is requested, the Comission will make a final determination on th: issue of no significant hazards consideration.
The final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
If the final determination is that the-amendmen.t request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Comission may issue the amendment -
and make it effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing.
Any hearing held would take place after issuance of the amendment.
If the final determination is that the amendment involves a significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expiration of the 30-day notice period. However, should circumstances change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely way would result in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Comission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.- The final determination will consider all public and State comments received.
Should the Comission take this action, it will publish a noti'ce of issuance and provide for opportunity for a hearing after issuance.
The Comission expects that. the need to take this a'ction will occur very infrequently.
7590-01
- A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20555, Att:
Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C., by the above date.
Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union operator at (800) 325-6000 (in Missouri (800) 342-6700).
The _ Western Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number 3737 and the following message addressed to Steven A. Varga, Branch Chief, Operating Reactors Branch No. 1, Division of Licensing: petitioner's name and telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant name; and publication date and page number of the FEDERAL REGISTER notice.
A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Executive Legal Director, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20555, and to George F. Trowbridge, Esq.,
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, 1800 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20036, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer
~
-or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board designated to rule on the petition and/or request, that the petitioner has made a substantial showing of good cause fu the granting of a late petition and/or request; that determination will be based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v) and 2.714(d).
7590-01
, For further details with respect to this action, s.ee the application for the amendments which is available for.public inspection at' the Commission's Public Document 2com, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.,
and at the Hartsville Memorial. Library, Home and Fifth Avenues, Hartsville, South Carolina. 29535.
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 3rd day of April 1984.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0
l dVwc%% iCh Steven A. Varga, Ch e Operating Reactors B No. 1 Division of Licensing
-er
. _.., _ _. - __. --,_