ML20128N742

Submits Proposed Revision to Parts 2 & 51

ML20128N742
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/05/1996
From:	Schwartz M NRC
To:	Au M NRC
Shared Package
ML20128N048	List: ML20128N043 ML20128N059 ML20128N095 ML20128N184 ML20128N220 ML20128N266 ML20128N312 ML20128N323 ML20128N336 ML20128N357 ML20128N391 ML20128N427 ML20128N505 ML20128N569 ML20128N580 ML20128N677 ML20128N689 ML20128N698 ML20128N705 ML20128N713 ML20128N729 ML20128N742 ML20128N765 ML20128N781 ML20128N874 ML20128N898 ML20128N955 ML20128P015 ML20128P087 ML20128P096 ML20128P128 ML20128Q192 ML20128Q203 ML20128Q264
References
FRN-61FR43406, FRN-61FR43409, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-51 AF43-2-030, AF43-2-30, NUDOCS 9610170030
Download: ML20128N742 (1)

Text

_,

,y x

F9R

% 7 From:

Maria Schwartz To:

MLA Date:

8/5/9610:32am

Subject:

Pts. 2 and 5?

Mark, My proposed revision to the attachment are as follows:

pf y 1.' The final rule also provides that a licensee responding to a Notice of Violation must state

{f the reasons for admitting or denying a violation.

2. Second to last sentence - Therefore, it is appropriate to require the licensee or other person to state the reasons for denying the violation as well.

9610170030 961009 5

PDR PR 2 61FR43406 PDR

.