ML20127J847
| ML20127J847 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1985 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dewitt R CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127J714 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-92-252 NUDOCS 9301250274 | |
| Download: ML20127J847 (17) | |
Text
--
f%
- w~
,\\-:
W4 tad STAttf
-- 0 j
HocLEAA Mtout.ATOAY Cosmett A i
1
- nsom a Poe mooegyeu none'l L E88 8 L LV81 IL Lasong se53 -
- i NC'/ C bn y,~....
$5 Ji _, [
N'-:.h Consumers Power Cocoa g
g ATTM: Mr. A. 8. De tt l
A D
Vice Prest t
muclear O' rations Mrum&
4j 212 West Michi n Av nue ty g 1
Jackson,-MI 201 Gentleren:
-i This confirms a telephone convers tion between Mr. K. terry of your staff and Mr. D. Boyd of this office on Noverber 18, 1985, in dich -it was confirmed i
that an Erfortecent Conference between Consurers Pcwer Corpany and the
-l U. S. Muclear Regulatory Ctenission will be conducted starting at 9:15 4.n.
on Thursday, Cecerter 5,1985, at the NRC Regfonal Office in Glen Ellyn ; Illinois. :
The purpose of this seeting is to address concerns re9arding.'an apparent -
breaEdenen 19. management control cf plant work activities.
,)
j We will gladly discuss any questions you r.ay have corarning this matter.
S i nc e rely,-
n
-,w
/
f j
Charles E. krelius, Director H
Division of Reactor Projeets I
J
I E
cc:
- 0. J. VandeValle, Director
,.. f,'g [ )
Muclear Licensing
.i D. P. Hof fman, Plant -
Supertetendent.
h
-0
-k-DCS/R$8 (RIDS)-
!- g[/ ' i Licensity fee Management Branch il
- p Lesider.t Inspector, RIt!-
A
{p g
Ronald Callen Michigan p/(g Pubile service Ocessission
/y ' l-Muclear Facilities and Envirom. ental Ponitoring
[.
=-
Section M d.' M Y yyed+0 9301250274 921013
- PDH-FOIA1
-.TUTAK92-262'
.POR
L PmSONAL / CON 71DEllilAL s
/
DPB BR24 W 1 ( see,r.,
N hen.tr.e..e co. con e 2 0
- $ VN A '** ** " ww se 201
- IS m ha.ms
[
c er e r o " a.=s t
p p-I C
j g
M. arch 22, 1937 3
{
t-of^
h)
, f,/
o f
t-3 Mr Dale E Seil I
I' Michigan State Utility Vorkers
', /
I A [/2 Ccuncil. AFL-CIO 8
110 Vest Lenavec lansing, Mi 68933 PRES',DENTI A1 FEARING GRIEVANCE N;87-107 On March IS, 19E7 represented V T McCorraici, Jr at a Presidential Hearing to review the called :nder/t t.cle l'1, Section 8 of the Vorking Agreement A i s A s :.;e a ' { ?G.:CI tY'MD' E d*sW Q$Q,yy,$13&?:'&Q fijY,)Mts*.M d4MWi&%C vas di c'arged f r verbal and written threats made or or about
)
Februr ? 7 1%7 while v c'r i n g a t the Big Roc k Point Suc' eat Plant.
The alleged threats occurred in connection with reassign:ent ofMr@
fromthe'[
Big Reck Te.nt '. : lear Plant to the F.arn 1 and : Flatt as a result o1, his havicg reached h.s maxing: administrative quarterly allowable radiation exposure.
"he threats were against indiv. duals and the plant.
(
The verbal t> rtat s, which occurred on Februarv 5,1987, vere conf irred at the
~ hearing by *: h.! ecd.DQgBT%id7ee%3CC)@tM$t3(MMer@?#MTMi.Atr,)nl Mr ET<&
I'flJf2ME*MW6pN@k8$((
and were not contested by the nion.
The written threats, which vere disco red on February 7 and 9,1987, were found inside and outside the recirculating pucp room.
H e Company, fro its investigation of the threat s, d e te rmined that onlyMth and a fsfg$csR fi'7sp.;3FrfddTId's]had been inside the recirculating pump rocra betvan 1330 curs on Februar. 6, 1987 and 1145 hours0.0133 days <br />0.318 hours <br />0.00189 weeks <br />4.356725e-4 months <br /> on February 9,1987 vhen the written threats in that area vere discovered. The "nion, using the control room lug of those to whoe keys had been issued. ary:cd that many others could have been in the area.
The Companv argued that a second log of those who actually enter the recirculatir; pump roca is required. That logshovedonlythe@
peopic censioned abene being. in that area during the period noted.
I a= satisfied that the Campany has sustained its position that Mrh(vas the only petson R who had the opportunity to write the threats in the recirculating pump room: (
AstowhetherMr(Eggd3wasthepersonwhoactuallywrote the threats, the Company contracted vit. an expert document xaminer who stated that it vas his opinion that theknownprintingofMr@
and the printing on one of the threats was the sane. The Union did not rebut this infornation,i Finally,'t e
'nion argued that th %%f@rdil$47451@@@$$$$idWMfdS% who implicatel Mr 8 2tm. had done so un er threat of no further work for Consumers Power Ccapany.
indicated that the g M b,6lMQ3g r
2 42fdI@@MIA)vasnot restricted in the future f roa vorking at either Consumers over Company nuclear plant.
Based on the evidence presented to me, Mr@%did make verbal and written)/
threats against individuals at the plant and also threatened retaliatory measures against the plant.
In discussing the disciplinary action taken in this case, the Company cited $
the response of the Nuclear Regulatory Coc: mission (NRC) to a pt for case of i
graffite on the containcent building sphere.
They indicated the seriousness vith which the NRC viewed t!.at matter.
Thev further indicated that both plant
~
management and the NRC consider the situation _ involving Mr to be more serious because it involved threats to both people and plant equipment.
In the Company's view the threats had the potential for intertupting the operation /
l of the Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant and jeopardizing the Company's license to "
l operate the plant.
The Union related the current action to the prior case j
vhich resulted in a 30-day disciplinary layof f rather t han discharge.. They l
also indicated that graf fite on the valls dated back to 1967 was coe:=en and had been pretty much ignored.
In my jud p nt the potential harm te the Company Iron Mr $$$Qverbal and vittten threats is so serious as to varrant the action ta en by management.
Accordingly, I support the discharge.
Y f
/Z /
t/
,n. n - /;o.. 4,,
c l
Cc W;"'
f' t'-
I l-L l
b1 3
h' ;a e Wht ' h i
g l
l i
.s h< /E ykC4pNJ ~ (f iU$v(2
$4J.wl4.Y<r NIO
.Nrv
/Il ?.'t o' 5 i' ' -
i
- lt UE 4t.sishtblf,'-JtA}~
/
s
' /U bT11M
)?f U '2-b
" '/// 4 } 'fjb. '
o PRESIDENTI Al. HEARINC
,MDdM@
Date of D]ischarge - February 20, 1957 The issue before you. Mr Spring, involves the discharge of Mr (@st;ipit$
s for making verbal and written threats while working at the Big Rock Point Nucle,r Yever Plant on February 5, 6 and 7,1987.
(Exhibit #1, Discharge Letter.)
The following is,a history of the grievant's employment with Conrum-ers Pever Cocpany:
QV.,$5Et?ld Ytg%M4 1
l
&&N$$
&$l&&&tt2M%$.h&WW40m i
d[khdk' d dWi%fA M $$1d d dhhb MtMI NiNd[it h 33 M '$$E % [i%
i a &hh (h$W5k%-($!W$$$$$!$MWrWbkWdj$%'EMiBRI
'vmF41W 2/20'/87 Ps l oy:.ent tereinated At the tice of the events which led to the grievant's terminstion, the griev-ant was 4,seigned to the Big Rock Point Fuclear Power Plant outage on the C Shift (the C Shif t was 1700 tours to 0330 hours0.00382 days <br />0.0917 hours <br />5.456349e-4 weeks <br />1.25565e-4 months <br />), As dictated b-feder 1 lav. Coneuners Pever Comtany monitors radiation dhsage each eeployee is exposed to on a quarterly basis at the cuclear pover plants.
Individus1 acniroring devices n:ust be vorn each day by all plant eeployees vbile on'the Pitnt site. The taximum allovable administrative quarterly dosege per empicy-ce while working at the Big Rock Point Nuclear Paver Plant is 2,400 millircas.
~
2 On February 5, 1987, ir was detereined that the grievan' was close to tee.ching his maxirum administrative quarterly allevable radiation exposure; therefore, he was scheduled te rotate out of the Big Rock Point Suclear Pever Plant and reassigned to the Kart I and 2 outage in progress in Essexv111e Michigan.
On February 5, 1987, after learning that he vould be transferred to the Karn riant eitage, the grievar. tera:e very upset. Heappicathedh(?
and coeplained that the transfer would cost I
t it money. The grievant stated "I don't (tind picking up at11 trees like everyone else but I don't like it when t'ey start t ak ing mcmey away f roc ee.
We stil re: ester this high dose the nest tite ve cone here to work. Ve eight t ak e longer to do the job or forFet this tool or that tool."
The grievant was encouraged to talk with his supervisot abcut hia diosstisfaction.
electedtodiscussthematterwithMrhh On that same day, the grievant
% DECO!$$T %$%DA tiEMikT WTICMG4pdQKng,@'.t v5o vas in tharge of thehl y[U0id erev during the Big Rock Point outage.
L-J According t(
r Q
the grievant was visibly upset when he entered the
'r h and stated "the
- d/DCitj,
office, ne grievant stood clone tc J
employees eming here to replace me had bet ter receive the same atoont of radiation exposure." The prievant stated et Mt r y:
"...you are screwing me f
out of $h000 c,d if I don't get it back through a grievance. I will get it
u 3
back s ee s ether way."
The grievact shouted at Nr @$
"I know how to prease /
3 Mr fA ft3)M1 M M 18 @ @n$ $e the bat when it comes to butt fucking."
%h*rq$lpgTfMSMM338ifIIS vas in the of fice area and vitnessed the entire conversa t ion.
((,v l
O
The grievant, on Tebruary 5, at approxizately 1830 hours0.0212 days <br />0.508 hours <br />0.00303 weeks <br />6.96315e-4 months <br /> had words withy 4
Mr C/54 WMl(($fgMlG,3f3@dh ig Rock foint Nuclear Pever Plant, in
$ K,I the isnt eachine she p.
Af ter expressing his anger at being transferred out a
of the Big Re,ck Point Fir.nt at a personal cost of thousands of dollars of told M* h@, "Vait til next outage - J n t vait."
When incese, the Fr tevant Mr
@ taed his what he reant, the grieva'st turred and walked away.
C o F eb ru e r e fa, 1387, during tne C Shift, the grievant and Mrh!$$i$17,4lgh h $fd M $ydQQf;qi; @ vere assigned to work in the recirculating pump L t ooe in the cont aineett building at the plant. This assignment involved a r
repair to cont rol valve (,T-4050.
This control valve vould supply Itquid poisou (t nautron absother) to the reactor in the event of an einergency. The repair required that a 1/4" pipe plug be removed, the hole redrilled to 3/8" and a nev 3/S" pipe plug be installed.
The j ob wa s e s t ir.a t ed t o t ak e two hours. The maintenance order did not require any disassembly of the valve or operator aui valve operability was not to be affected (Exhibit 2 - Maintenance Order 87-LPS-0007). This pump rove is ecnsidered a vital area in the nuclear plant because the ecJipment located within the recirculating pump room is critical to the nuclear saf ety of the P l a r.t.
The door is locked and an alarm goes of f in the centrol room vben the door is opened and all entries are
4 entered in the control room log book.
(Exhibit 3 - Conttol Poom 1,og Book).
A daily entry log is also kept outside of the locked door. F.ach tiec-an employ-ee enters, log entry nrast be made indicating the tiee in and time out of the t oo:n. (Exhibit 4 - Daily Entry 1.og) ve e escot ted by Mrhf$gyggG2ff t%CC753Ml The grievant and Mr ?
m Off{T Y 95$$Mj$ $ $e9.[h 3 @ IU 9[ 9 Ih.v5J6(, foutside contraetor)f,during
~p
~
v the "C" 1hift.
ne grievaat entered and exited the rectreulating puep room two times between 2057 hours0.0238 days <br />0.571 hours <br />0.0034 weeks <br />7.826885e-4 months <br /> on February 6, 1987 to 0023 hours2.662037e-4 days <br />0.00639 hours <br />3.80291e-5 weeks <br />8.7515e-6 months <br /> on February 7, 1957. During this period. Mr ($ remained outside of the recirculating pump ro m. as a door vetch.
(Exhibit 5, Diagram)
Early on tte "A" shift (0001-0800 hours) on February 7,1987, Mr TSE2Lket f5.MRFyTMfyit{t was reaking his rounds it, the plant and noticed that a
~
message had been printed on the vall at the frisker station outside the personnel lock. D e cest. age read, " Hey, Hoffmer, get ready! Next outage."
During the lat ter portion of the "A" shif t on Tebruary 7, M Mf$MN
,f.; W 2 p M $ ifs TA) in me ing his rounda in the plant, also noticed the
)
mesuge 'a t the f risk e r staticm.
On February 9,1987, at 1130 hours0.0131 days <br />0.314 hours <br />0.00187 weeks <br />4.29965e-4 months <br />,; MSayM7WWMdA34WJ#?@FfrX6 prior to his entry into the recirculating pump roce, along with Mr(f;j{M5 discovered a threatening message it. side of the HP storage cabinet
- door, it stated, "Hofiman, wait til next outage High Dose 87."
J
5 Upon entering the recirci'Inting pump room at 1145 hours0.0133 days <br />0.318 hours <br />0.00189 weeks <br />4.356725e-4 months <br />, Mr 75 discovered threatening vritten cessages on the valls, ceiling and doors and vere recorded so follows:
" Rey Hof fuso, RE sez U sucks."
" Hey, J Vhite, we will butt fuck you real good and hard next tinct
.H i gh Dose
'87."
"Behind your back White *.nd Hof fman."
" Hey, J White and Hof fets, be ready. Ve don't forget, $S-Wes. High Dove '87."
These messages were vrhten with what apperad to be a f elt tip earker with the largent of the resanges appearing in a two foot equare area.
NOTE: W David P Hoffman is the B'lg Rock Point Nuclear Plant Superintendent.
q During the ineestigation, it was deterstrad tha Mr $ % and the grievant were the($gs$feployees to enter the recirculating pump room during the C Shift at February 6 and the first part of the 7th during their normal C Shift schedule.
.\\
d@fidd%3and Mr hNM$%TTd45dEIk%'liltllhidt4@fL Mr Consumers Tover Company, Jackson, Michigan, were in the recirculating punp 1330 hours0.0154 days <br />0.369 hours <br />0.0022 weeks <br />5.06065e-4 months <br /> (the B Shif t) on February 6,1987 and did not see any roce at vrftten threats.
li
~
l l
6 As verified by the evntrol roar. log, no one entered the recirculating pump.
room on Februarv 8, 1987.
C*n Februarv 9, 1987, Fr 1% g in a discussion with Mr ( M "]
implicated I
.s t'.ie grievant as the person responsible for writing the threats in the punp Mr(pfe;&)old Mr(USGE'Jef.M@jffhjgglgg roce. On Feb rt.a ry 10, 1987 (7 M.),gjjf 2 I2?MnlandMrhS[.5,Jhat the threats were not vrittee in the putp roem before he and the grlevant entered and ' hat the the. person who vrote the threat s signed 'ais initials.
(The initials appeared in the writtee threat, "F ey, Hof f man, F E se z you sucks.")
The written threats discovered on February 9 in the recirculating pump roce t ear a strS ing rese:bisece to on1 state:ents cade by the grievant on Febrwa t 5.
As vou will recall, the grievant said to Mrd$$il, "We vill r
retenber the high dose the next t i ce we cer.e he re t o work. ToMrhwM]the
<.sid, "I kncv how to grease the bat when it cores to butt fucking."
gttevert AndtoMrk the grievnnt uttered, "Vait til next outage - just vait."
A picture of the vritten threat found at the frisker station was taken to a Docu ent Examiner, M.r MMeST Consurers rever Co:pany contracted Mr hyffi,T21 privately._ He is a detective working for the Michigan State Policherlee lab. He has aerved as un expert vitness in court as a document examiner. (Exhibit 16 - Photo)
Samples of the Frievant's handwriting, as veil as Mr Mil?Id and Mr C M d were also provided to Mr
$1@
The
l
\\
f 7
examiner stated that it was his opinion that the kncvn printing of the griev-ants and the ycinting on the, four questioned photographs vere printed by one and the same person.
(Exhibit #7 - March 12, 1987 Letter fror. ggg*SitadS Based on the evidence presented, the Cottpany hss concluded that the grievant e
made verbel and vritten threats against Mrh$$$, Mr hQp and, also, threatened retaliatory v.essures sgainst the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant owned by Consu:ers Power Ccepary.
A su:: nary of those threats is provided belov.
SL*MMARY Of I:GF_ATS Time of Occurrence /
Locat ion of Vrit ten Threats identification ecirculation pue; (RCi) room.
2/6/S7 late "C" shif t /discevered
- r door, valls and ceiling later by varleus todividuals
- C ab in e t on vall to RC? race Discovered by(t'WMMh on 2/9/87 "B" shift access riiscovered by y during
- Ilealth Physics cabloct near access to FCP room 2/9/87 "B" shi t
- Fricker cutside of containeect Discovered byhh during Buildfug pereennel lock 2/7/87 "A" shift and others Time of Occurrence /
identification Ogturrences of Verbei Threats To f M$h%f Aih?82^ STh and 2/5/87 late "B" Shif t 1" NEE 55 To{BjfMMJ5$3532iGTd[
7/5/87 Beginning of "C" shift To h$#d$ES]
2/5/87 "C" shift
' On February 5.1981, Mrh$@ f aced the grievant, who was verv ans;ry over being transf erred out of the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant anC allegedly
)
~
8 losing money. In a raised voice, f ace to face with Mr the grievant vcved te get his money back through a grievance or
"...I will get it back some other way."
This conf rontation with the grievant was very upsetting to Mrh@if) On February 9, af ter the discovery of the written threats in the plant, " Hey, 8 @s M ve'll butt fuck you real good and hard next tine," and "Behind your back, k' hit e and Hof f man," e t c. Mre*6[
fully realized the depth of the grievaat's hostilities toward him.
Mrhf?
thispointMrh at fett that Ia vas under a threat of physical hare and that the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant was also being put on notice by the grievant.
/
Furthermore, it was determined af ter the grievant's discharge that he may have already carried out er.e of the threats of retaliation against the Plant. The work assigned to the grievant on Februar y 6, 1987 (see Exhibit 2) was reviewed as part of normal esintenance order closecut.
Because of a potential defect in the valve bcdy, another e,intenance order was initiated to perform a nondes t ructive examination of the vs1ve.
k* hen this examination was attempted, the technician assigned was unable to complete the work because the valve was too vet.
Further examination by a plant maintenacce supervisor disclosed that the valve packing E and bolts and nuts were backed of f to the point where the l
nuts vere just started on the bolt threads and the packinF F and was just l
laying on the packing. Aleo, two bolts that held the valve stem and operator
@[A e Ji h,
stem in place were loose. A esintenance order was issued to correct these problems.
f Prior to the time that the grievant worked on CV-4050, the valve van function-ing properly and the only deficiency was the leaking pipe plug (the valve
9 packing was not l e ak ing). The deficien:les found during post enintenance review of the grievant's assignment shot 1d have been t eccgnized and corrected by the grievant.
As a minimum, it is a requirement of all nuclear plant workers to identify deficiencies. This should have been noted on the mainte-nance order assigned to the grievant or repcrted to his supervisor. As a result of the corrective actice noted above, repair workers and technicians received signific ant amount of radiation exposure, ne grievant also made an unspecified threat for the future against the Big Reck Point Socleac Fever Plant t o Mr kh "'a'ait til the next outage - just wate."
Within the last two years, the Big P.ock Point Suclear Fever Plant received a citation and a threat of a fine f rce the Nuclear Fegulatory Coe:sission follev-
/*
m ing an incident where severa1(D[MM :mployees were implicated in a ' drawing s
of obscerities on the dece of ti e containment building. The Noelear Regula-tory Commission felt that the actions of th( employees shoved a lack of cannecent control. Furthermore, this inc ident ly the grievant is considered more sericus by Plant management and the Nuclear Regulatory Ccomission because it involves threats to Plant employees and equipment.
(Exhibit 8 - 11of fman Letter.)
The verbal and vritten threats of reta11ation by the griavant against the Big Rock Foint Nucleer Pcs'er Plant have a double impact on Constrzers Pcver Company.
The ttreat of sabotage puts the safety of plant employees and the public in jeopardy. Even if the grievant claites that he did not intend to retaliate 1
10 against the Sig Rock Point Nuclear Tower Plant, his written threats and verbal utterances put Minagement on notice.
These threats had to be considered by.
Consumers Power Company as serious and dangerous in nature.
i-These incidents had all of the potential of Interrapting the operations of the nuclear power plant. More important, the grievant's actions have the real l
potential to put Consu=ers Pever Cc pany's license to operate a nuclear f acility in peril.
Cocsumers Pcuer Company vill not tolerate this tvpe of behavior by the griev-l ant.
A supervisor's daily deciviens af fecting the operation of a plant and.
l I
departcent cacnot be held up f or ransoe by -a disgnmtled eeployee's threats.
More basic that this, no supervisor needs to be put in such fear, which vill last a considerable period of time, not kncving when and if the grievant eny I
carry out such threats.
@ Consumers Power Company subscribes to a policy of constructive M
discipline (Eth ibit 9).
In the case presented to you today, the serions of miaconduct by Mr k are of such a nature that c ons t ruc t ive, progressive s
l discipline steps to rehabilitate are inappropriate.
M-73 actions on February 3, 6 and 7,1987, constitute cause for discharge on :he first occasion.
l For these reasons, we urge that you sustain the decision of Consu=ers Pcver CeepanytodischargeNrhgg f.
L -
Big Rock Point Plant Draft Plant Review Cces=ittee Meeting Minutes Special PRC Meeting 4-87 Ma rch 2 and 5,1987 Members present:
Others present:
t
+
A quorum of members was present.
1.
Reactor Depressurization System 2.
Use of Graffiti During the 1987 Refueling Outage During the refueling outage an incident occur red relating to the writing of graffiti in the plant.
Due to concerns raised that plant equipment may have been damaged, the Plant Review Committee was asked to review the incident.
An investigation has been held by both plant and General Office personnel. Disciplinary action is in progress.
Draft FRC heeting Minutes 4-87 2
The individual involved appeared upset about losing overtime when he was told he would be returned to his bendquarters as he had reached the administrative qua rterly limits for exposure.
Investigations have identified that the graf fiti was written on one particular shif t and that only one iodividua1 $$i7g' fit @if.*gr%'$$741dFJ/jf.iWig'DIR va s invo1;ed.
Because of the graffiti implied a threat to plant equipment and actually }
occurred in the plant recirculation pump room, a tour of the area was made by the Operations Supervisor to determine whether any damage had taken I
place to plant equipment.
Equipment that was vulnerable to damage was visually inspected or retested.
This included a valkdown of the lines fot the core spray system as we'I as an inspection of the poison system and the control rod drive systec.
Also, the particular work that the repair-worker was assigned to has been reviewed.
As a result of all investigations it is believed that there was no actual damage to sa fety-related equipment.
The Plant Review Coccittee made no further recoe.nen*ations.
Based on the result s of t he ir.spect ion pe r formed by t.he Ope rat ions Supervisor, it is dete rmined that other than the graf fiti rio c.t he r datage exi s ts.
Resolution This item is closed froe the minutes.
4
b, p 1
,,94>
J m
e 4
A-4 4-e
.6-,
,A
& ka s.
a h
)
E6 M k( P Y O O + t
,f" h'q I
3 17 fE~n
]4,;gs#jg',g, Lhs R. E, 5e2 a
acyp/.
wt v>///
AHY bcd yok Yt d,
W4,it,
r a ccod J
uard nof s e!
e o
I
\\
05'd N
2d nc imk wb.h + yo%,
y S
m.
WlJfe o nt 6 ff num
/2u/y 7 Aa L e {rms f 4
l, base "z7 "
we p
3 I
d 4
5 4
-e* s e
e
,w m
,,6~i---
,, - -, ye
.ey-,.,a t
.-.-..._...~.-_..,.....u,,
... g/ym...
,8 peg 70 '9 Q
1
.,B DLAPHRAGM CONTROLS
- "3':
d s
. 'An / 43.$.o -%$@pp..ep.f$.
gMM TYPE 7019, SERIES 1
.H w.M7?eY4hh ANGLE YALYE i
,w, i
I ey
- A DN5T ING SCE E*
'g.
SPRim BARREL
?%
'~'
TH205T BE ARitC TEMPE RED STEEL $PRING dg@
- PRECISION CALIBRATED cyp
- lTH s M
}
}
$,.T N
OfWD PtATE b
[
g ALLOY STEEL BOLT 5 g
k C -[?>
NYLON REINFOPCED 4
~ Ct AN P AGM
(
pt(>I ll
-f'
~
<g_ *"["13 Btri,A W MA T E RI A L C A0 ulUM PLA 1(D-r.
f
('
51 E E L BDL 15 f
p gigg7g.
..mi
~ ~ ~
f M*VIl blO
'I 4
d.
INST R Uu f N1 b<.
h; y'
\\1[j,Ii j --,
A1R CC*4NE CT10'4
.o
[
',)
~
b Q;.1, b
r-CJ 5KE T ---
-l \\
o* Risc
~
-g.
y l
kk
'}/ ( l'
%2; l#FER51Ew Alst 303 51 Altt Ess ST E E L
-W d
/
TR AVEL SCALE;3g gt.
j 5 TEM CONNECTOR -
-p : ':= "
=
9 LO* E R ST E M
~
0 I
Q A-
\\'
/2 M-
-HOL000.'4 PLATE j
'o '
it i
PACKitG FOLLCNE R-s~
/
il [.$
W l
f
-Q
(
p" 8
P 4" Kit +3
' gtL
'3 [f
- tq
)
i u
LANT ERN RINO b
i M
m[VE BONNET v; w g4.,49 ff,)
i.
~' '
- t
,c
,4 f
x 1.]
FLOAT RitG k
h VALVE BODY f
f.;
a[=p g%
cutet swmc fr -"
+-
INNER VALVE l
8 ll f
,k f
s J iy-?sx]' M ff""""
9 t
q Q
h SEAT RING i
m g
7""'ItR
- l (1,adM i
l Fig. 5 - Id. mil. cation of Peru
'a
.