ML20117C559

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Info Re SALP Input for Oct 1982 - Jan 1984
ML20117C559
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Crane
Issue date: 03/29/1984
From: Ronald Bellamy
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Keimig R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20114F930 List:
References
FOIA-84-616 NUDOCS 8505090459
Download: ML20117C559 (3)


Text

?

4

~f MAR 291984 MD10RANDLAl FOR:

Richard R. Keinig, Chief, Project Branch No. 3, DPRP FR0ll:

Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief, Radiological Protection Branch

SUBJECT:

THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 SALP Attached for your information is the SALP input fbr THI Unit 1 (SALP period October 1,1982 to January 31,1984).

01 4

Rona

. Bellamy, Ch ef Radiological Protection Branch Attachnent:

As stated en

[

ch 3/

/84

/

3/n{/84 l

i Og 50 g 9 841002 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY BARFIELB4-616 PDR

\\'

  1. )

THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 SALP 6.

Emergency Preparedness An emergency preparedness inspection (50-289/82-25) was conducted on November 4-9, 1982, to evaluate corrective actions regarding seven items requiring resolution and eight improvement items which had been identified during the emergency preparedness appraisal (50-289/81-20) on July 13-24, 1981. As a result, four items requiring resolution (Appendix A items)'and all improvement items (Appendix B items) were closed. One of the remaining Appendix A items pertain to modifications of the reactor building evacuation alarm and the other two pertain to installation, calibration and procedures for post-accident sampling.

During the November 1982. inspection, the evacuation alarm system was noted as being modified, but performed poorly when tested on November 5-12, 1982.

Another inspection (50-289/83-13) was conducted on May 9-11 and June 29, 1983, to verify completion of the three items that had remained open and to ascertain whether corrective actions regarding deficiencies identified during the emersency exercise (50-289/82-12) conducted on August 11, 1982, had been implemented. The inspectors verified that the three

. Appendix A items were closed.

It is noted that the reactor building alarm system had been modified and acceptably tested.

In addition, the inspectors closed TMI-1 Restart Certification Items 137A and 1378, which are concerned with training of local offsite support groups (e.g.

ambulance service, state police). The inspectors noted that licensee's committments, in a letter dated January 13, 1983 (5211-83-012) to the NRC, pertaining to exercise findings were being actively pursued, but had not been completed. These items included a new Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) and significant modifications to their Technical Support (TSC) and Operational Support Centers (OSC). Other exercise findings which required re-training of observers and exercise participants had been completed.

On November 3-4, 1983, a special inspection (50-289/83-31) of the licensee's

', Prompt Notification Systems was conducted. As a result, the inspector verified that administrative and physical means to alert and provide prompt instructions to the public within the Emergency rianning Zone (EPZ) were in place.

A full scale exercise inspection (50-289/83-35) was conducted on November 15-18, 1983. As a result of the exercise, the inspectors concluded that l

within the limitations of the exercise scenario the licensee's emergency 1

4 4.

e en,

,n,-

,-_.,,-,,,n

-,-,,,,,,..,,,,,,-.,.w.,_,---,--..

.,,.,-_-.,_,,n.--,,,_,..-n-,~-.,,n-

,,,-,,n,,n,n-,.

/

Three Mile Island Unit I SALP 2

response provided adequate protection of public health and safety.

In addition, the licensee's emergency response organization demonstrated acceptable implementation of their Emergency Plan and Emergency Implementing Procedures.

Additionally, the inspectors noted that Emergency Response Facilities (e.g. OSC, TSC and EOF) showed marked improvement over the 5"evious exercise.

New and upgraded facilities (including a new builcing for the EOF) and equipment contributed to a coherent and overall very good accident response.

The licensee has been responsive to NRC initiatives and acceptable resolutions were proposed and implemented on a timely basis.

Summary-of-Rating s

Category 1 e

4 4

--w w