ML20112E138
| ML20112E138 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/23/1982 |
| From: | Hafner B AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Joshua Wilson NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20105B226 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-250, RTR-NUREG-0420 NUDOCS 8501150038 | |
| Download: ML20112E138 (2) | |
Text
O Bill Hafner 5h Robinwood Street Mastic, NY 11950 21 July 1982 Robert Gilbert, P.E.
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SUBJ: technical inquiry for Shoreham unit 1 RE: my letter of 07 Nhrch 1082 (Bool Dynamic loads / Reactor changes )
my -letter of 08 March 1082 ( Apendix G,10 CFR 50 )
my letter of 10 Fhy 1c82 (MSIV) my _ letter of 23 May 1082 (varicus topics )
RE: our telecon in June on above correspondence
Dear Mr. C11bert,
As we discussed in our last telecen many of the inquiries I had addreened to the NRC were alec a?.drecced to Lilco with the hopec that many would be answered relieving NRC stafr of further paper-work.
Uafortunately, as of this date all such inquiries directed at ccmpany officals have not been answered in any shape, manner, er f e rr..
Regretably, therefore, several of these questions are re-directed at the NRC with an answer requested as soon as possible. However, the large majority of the questions previously asked can be tem-poryily defered which should make the pap (erwork burden somewhat less troublesome. Of the four questions attached ) three are rel-atively direct and should be answerable in a few words or less and only one will probably require a mere lengthy answer.
As stated in previous letters if a telecen reply will be more advantageous to you or the staff please feel free to call during normal business hours :
(516) 261-6046 Thank you, Sincerely,,
{
s EN. (1) as. stated
}
B501150038 840510 PDR FOIA BELAIR84-250 PDR
PAGE T40 Hafner/SNPS ATTACHMENT SUBJ: MSIV leakage for SNPS ni: HURIG-0420, section 6.7, pages 6-53 and 6-54 1/
In the above referenced publication, the applicant (Lilco ) had proposed two changes for technical specs pertaining to the MSIV (1) that the MSIV technical specification leakage rate be increased from 11.5 standard cubic feet per hour (per valve ) to 100 standard cubic feet per hour.
(2 ) that MSIV-leakage rate verification testing frequency be every 18 months during refueling or cold shutdown.
- What was the apolicants stated reason for requesting such changes ?
2/
What was the original suppression pool volume (at the 5ko M'd level) prior to the decision in 1C68 to increase power to the present 620 M4 level?
3/
4 hat should the pool volume be for a 820K4 Mark II reactor of Ehorehan 8s type ? In other words, if it was going to be redesigned what pool volume would be recc= mended.
4/
Generally what hardware and/or systen mods are necessary to increase the power of a reactor such as was done in the Shoreham esse? Hhve there been any other reactors (ocerating and/or under construction )
which hate under6cr.e s i n i l a r cl.a n g s ?
~
t m