ML20107E622

Annual Environ & Effluent Release Rept for 1995

ML20107E622
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	12/31/1995
From:	CENTERIOR ENERGY
To:
Shared Package
ML20107E599	List: ML20107E622
References
NUDOCS 9604220026
Download: ML20107E622 (115)

Text

.

'=

,.,. ;4j q ' <:y ,

,.,n'4fg;p-.',,;,,9:-;F;-

, c ,

!?

QQt <

e vy ' , , . , .

n try;@1 ucle.. ar Power Plant e1995' ;4 fx^ t e

fb

)  ?

2

, 75 t -- .

O i? s

p It u. -

4 y; ps 2O?

')

5[

gw 't

. v}If !__

9604220026 960417 DR ADOCK0500g0

.c- s.

4'- gpr; g g, .,

=3 p .-:..rg&q  %!,%,

~

@,UgL.,y y g$ffft$i?

m. ,.e; ,.'; q ;,

~g ;py yy NLwmv W f8yfe ' ,

v. .,;Q,$.. )!

. x; .., x

&; J hh f ?Nh0kh.hh/ I ;Y ?

??y_ g N;[ $l}{l%dpjyn!' (7'-

hh hih jQ ff ~

h

~IW Y

%[99..[M,lk;g M jd r 4;g y7gg 3y .:g ' wi s - -.s W c,,%,

, g: p: :43-

' h.w-lTh>'

< w.

tgqglr,; (y p , _ ;; 5,,;,

' ," ._ s

• " N ;i E ' [  ;

hr j,7 -

v rg 'M' :,' > #

h.s,. , f s ,

l $ M.r @ i

)7*.c.7 k k,:w o , 'Ih }

a ~cL <; s g%Q g;gj,%lQ ~

. , .. t o-Q Cf

> ;Q f.4 s < %M W :% * / ' l h.k: J

g gMw,  %

4; e 2

sg,

<;eg 6 d,g<sPaMQgsh.:

g4

.q gj >- <

$;0 hk kNid%- kN Yd d {[fy bWNlk$NON ,. Yj ' $;W hh: pl \

}

y .gp 4 sg hN m gjpW@kbkfhhi

. .e4 h; @&y?l0?)grfLY, g .hh

i yu ;y gp - > -

%,m; ,,w

,,m %w;_

g,1

~,c x .

w;,m.

i g .y,

v. +. aw~.

3 p;%, y s

@: u$. . ' - l 'i .u ?%5?,lv; '

.s %.  :

$WO 45, Ar ,/

Ib '

v 2 x f.tp A, m r.

M t 2 -;

.' , ng- ' 4 g- e u

4* .- p .; . .y w, .

g- ,

"v;<,o O3((<gu u a

~%

a >

4@% q7 g; m mF n%p' .- e ' ,

<-,A a- <

gg;j,:p ~ ggp/g$

-i t, ,

k.(I,k , e

~*

[3;t ~ 1 9

1. ' h h ,e "'4 d E 4[ I h b?

k SM 16 '

g _

8 h

-9604220026 960417' O PDR.:ADOCK 05000440 -PDR-

g. 1 .

f

{

l ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT FOR PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT JANUARY 1,1995 To DECEMBER 31,1995 PREPARED BY:

RADWASTE, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND CHEMISTRY SECTION PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY PERRY, OHIO APRIL 1996

1995 Annuol Environmental And Erituent Release Report

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS . . . .. m. _ -. . ~ ........... .. .. ..I ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES - .

1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM.. =1 j LAND USE CENSUS .. ... ..... . 2 i CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING. . 2 HERBICIDE USE . . . . . .3 SPECIAL REPORTS-- :3 INTRODUCTION .. -..- - - ~ .- ~ ~... 5 RADIATION FUNDAMENTALS = .

=5 RADIATION AND RADIOACTIVITY.. ... 5 UNITS OF MEASURE . =6 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION _6 BACKGROUND RADIATION .

. .. 7 ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES. ._ . . . . 9 INTRODUCTION - . =9 RELEASE

SUMMARY

:11 METEOROLOGICAL DATA - .. 16 DOSE ASSESSMENT... .

- 17 ABNORMAL RELEASES.- .

19 PROGRAM CHANGES AND NONCOMPLIANCES= 19 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM . .. 21 INTRODUCTION - . . . . =21 SAMPLING LOCATIONS- =21 SAMPLE ANALYSIS.. .

- 23 1995 SAMPLING PROGRAM - .

27 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM . -34 CONCLUSION - . . . . . . . . . .

-35 l

LAND USE CENSUS --

_ . 39 INTRODUCTION . .

..... 39 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS.... .

-.39 CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING . . . . _ . 41 INTRODUCTION - . _ _4 I CORBICULA PROGRAM-- . . . . . . . .. _41 DREISSENA PROGRAM  :: . _ _42 HERBICIDE USAGE- 45 SPECIAL REPORTS .

. 47 NONCOMPLIANCES ....... .. . . . . . . . ........ . . 47 UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS - . :47 NONROUTIME REPORTS.. ...... .... .. . . . . . . . . . =47 APPENDIX A: ADDENDUM TO 1994 EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 49 APPENDIX B: 1995 REMP DATA

SUMMARY

53 APPENDIX C: 1995 REMP DATA -

... 55 Table of Contents

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report

(

(-

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The Annual Environmental and Effluent Release Report details the results of environmental and effluent monitoring programs conducted at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) from January I through December 31,1995. This report meets all of the requirements in PNPP Technical Specifications, Appendix B of the PNPP Operating License (the Environmental Protection Plan, or EPP), and Regulatory Guide 1.21. Report topics include Annual Effluent Releases, Radiological Environmental Monitoring, Land Use Census, Clam / Mussel Monitoring, lierbicide Use, and Special Reports.

On November 27,1995, an amendment to the PNPP Technical Specifications became effective. The amendment moved the requirements that pertain to effluent releases and radiological environmental monitoring from the Technical Specifications into the PNPP Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

{ (ODCM). The move did not change any of the requirements for the programs detailed here. Since the requirements for these programs were included in both the PNPP Technical Specifications and the ODCM during 1995, both are referenced throughout this report.

The results of the Environmental and Effluent Programs for 1995 indicate that the operation of the PNPP did not result in any significant environmental impact.

ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES g During the normal operation of a nuclear power plant, small quantities of radioactivity are released to

[ the environment in liquid and gaseous effluents. Radioactive materials are also released as solid waste.

PNPP maintains a comprehensive program to control and monitor the release of all radioactive materials from the site. All releases are strictly regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

{

The radioactivity released in the plant's liquid and gaseous effluents was well below applicable federal regulatory limits. The dose from plant effluents to the public was also below the applicable regulatory limits. The calculated hypothetical maximum individual dose potentially received by an individual resulting from PNPP liquid effluents was 0.004 mrem (0.12% of the applicable limit). The hypothetical maximum individual dose potentially received by an individual resulting from PNPP f gaseous effluents was 2.00 mrad (20% of the applicable limit). The summation of the hypothetical maximum individual dose from effluents in 1995 is equivalent to less than one percent of the dose that an individual living in the PNPP area receives from all sources of radiation.

Shipments of solid waste consist of waste generated during water treatment, radioactive material ,

generated during normal daily operations and maintenance, and irradiated components. PNPP complied with all regulations governing radioactive shipments in 1995, making 37 shipments of solid radioactive waste to a licensed burial site.

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established in 1981 to monitor the 1

radiological conditions in the environment around PNPP. The REMP is conducted in accordance with PNPP Technical Specifications and the ODCM . This program includes the collection and analysis of environmental samples and evaluation of results.

The REMP was established at PNPP six years before the plant became operational. This preoperational program was designed to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity Summary and Conclusions Page 1

1995 Annual Environmental And Efnuent Release Report i

normally present in the area. PNPP has continued to monitor the environment during plant operation by collecting and analyzing samples of air, precipitation, milk, fish, produce, soil, grass, water and sediment as well as by measuring radiation directly.

l Over 1300 radiological environmental samples were collected in 1995 and over 1600 analyses for radioactivitv were performed. The results of the REMP indicate the adequacy of the control of the release of radioactivity in effluents from PNPP. These results also demonstrate that PNPP complies with all applicable federal regulations. Results are divided into four sections: atmospheric monitoring, terrestrial monitoring, aquatic monitoring and direct radiation monitoring.

o Samples of air and precipitation (rain and snow) are collected to monitor the radioactivity in the atmosphere. The 1995 results are similar to those observed in both preoperational and operational programs from prior years. Only background environmental radioactivity was detected and only at g expected levels.

E o Terrestrial monitoring includes analysis of milk, produce, vegetation, and soil samples. The results of the sample analyses indicate concentrations of radioactivity similar to that found in previous years. For example, the average concentration of cesium-137 in soil was 250.14 pCi/kg in 1995, which is at the low end of the range of 208.5 to 1104.05 pCi/kg observed during the past eleven years. Analyses of other terrestrial samples also detected concentrations of radioactivity similar to those observed in previous years, and indicate no build-up of radioactivity attributable to the operation of PNPP.

o Aquatic monitoring includes the collection and analysis of water, fish, and shoreline sediments.

The 1995 analyses results for water and fish sample results showed normal background i concentrations of radionuclides. The results of sediment sample analyses indicated concentrations i of radioactivity similar to previous years. The average concentration of cesium-137 was 517.66 pCi/kg, which is well within the range of up to 864 pCi/kg established since 1981. I o Direct radiation measurements showed no change from previous years. Indicator locations 3

averaged 54.84 mrem / year and control locations averaged 55.70 mrem / year. This shows that, in gi 1995, radiation in the area of PNPP was the same as radiation at locations greater than 10 miles away from the Plant.

Based on these results, the 1995 operation of PNPP resulted in no significant increase in the l

concentrations of radionuclides in the environment.

LAND USE CENSUS in order to estimate radiation dose attributable to the operation of PNPP, the potential pathways through which public exposure can occur must be known. To identify these exposure pathways, an l Annual Land Use Census is performed as part of the REMP. During the census, PNPP personnel travel every public road within a five mile radius of the plant to locate key radiological exposure E pathways. These key pathways include the nearest resident, garden, and milk animal in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. The information obtained from the census is entered into a computer 3

program which is used to assess the hypothetical dose to members of the public.

CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING Clam and mussel shells can clog plant piping and components that use water from Lake Erie. For this reason, sampling for clams and mussels has been conducted in Lake Erie in the vicinity of PNPP since 1971, specifically for Corbicula (Asiatic clams) since their introduction into the Great Lakes in 1981, and for Dreissena (zebra mussels) since their discovery in Lake Erie 1989.

Summary and Conclusions Page 2

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Since no Corbicula have ever been found at PNPP, routine Corbicula monitoring provides data to determine when and if this pest species will arrive in the vicinity of PNPP. The D eissena program includes both monitoring and control and is directed at minimizing the mussel s impact on plant operation. As in past years, this program has successfully prevented Dreissena from causing any operational problems at PNPP in 1995.

IIERBICIDE USE I The use of herbicides on the PNPP site is monitored. This ensures compliance with Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) requirements and protects the site's natural areas. Based on the results of surveillance's of herbicide applications on site and weekly general site inspections, nerbicide use has not ho f negative impact on the environment around the plant.

SPECIAL REPORTS Significant environmental events (for example, spills, releases), noncompliance with enviromnental regulations (for example, OEPA discharge limits), and changes in plant design or operation that affect the environment are reported to regulatory agencies as they occur. These special reports are also I summarized annually in this report. Five special reports were submitted in 1995.

I I

I I

[

[

[

[

Summary and Conclusions Page 3

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report INTRODUCTION RADIATION FUNDAMENTALS Atoms are the basic building blocks of all matter. Simply described, atoms are made up of positively and negatively charged particles, and particles which are neutral. These particles are called protons, electrons, and neutrons, respectively. The relatively large protons and neutrons are packed together in the center of the atom called the nucleus. Orbiting around the nucleus are one or more smaller electrons: one electron for each proton in the nucleus. Due to their dissimilar charges, the protons and electrons have a strong attraction for each other, which helps hold the atom together.

Atoms with the same number of protons in their nuclei make up an element. He number of neutrons in the nuclei of an element may vary. Atoms with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons are called isotopes. All isotopes of the same element have the same chemical properties and many are stable or nonradioactive. An unstable or radioactive isotope of an element is called a radioisotope or radionuclide. Radionuclides contain an excess amount of energy in the nucleus, which is usually due to an excess number of neutrons.

Radioactive atoms attempt to reach a stable, nonradioactive state through a process known as radioactive decay. Radioactive decay is the release of energy from an atom's nucleus through the emission of radiation. Radionuclides vary greatly in the frequency with which their atoms release radiation. The length of time an atom remains radioactive is defined in terms of half-life. Half-life is the time required for a radioactive substance to lose halfits activity through the process of radioactive decay. Half-lives vary from millionths of a second to millions ofyears, ne typical half-life for radionuclides released from the plant is approximately five years.

RADIATION AND RADIOACTIVITY Radioactive decay is a process in which the nucleus of an unstable atom becomes more stable by spontaneously emitting energy. Radiation refers to the energy that is released when decay within the nucleus occurs. His section includes a discussion on the three main forms of radiation produced by radioactive decay: alpha particles, beta particles, and gamma rays.

Alpha Particles Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons and have a positive charge. Because of their charge and large size, alpha particles do not travel very far when released (one to eight centimeters in air). They are unable to penetrate any solid material, such as paper or skin, to any significant depth.

However, if alpha particles are released inside the body, they can damage the soft internal tissues because they deposit all their energy in a small area.

Beta Particles Beta particles are essentially electrons and usually carry a negative electrical charge ney are much smaller than alpha particles and travel at nearly the speed oflight, thus they can travel for longer distances than alpha particles. Beta particles have a similar ionizing effect as alpha particles, but since they are smaller, faster and have less charge, they cause less concentrated damage when interacting with tissue. External beta radiation affects primarily the skin. Because of their electrical charge, beta particles can be stopped by paper, plastic or thin metals.

Introduction Page 5

.. . . . ~

1995 Annual Environmental And Efflurnt Release Report Gamma Rays l

l Gamma rays are bundles of electromagnetic energy called photons which behave as though they were l particles. They are similar to visible light, but of a much higher energy. Gamma rays can travel long I distances in air and are often released during radioactive decay along with alpha and beta particles.

{

Potassium-40 is an example of a naturally occurring radionuclide found in all humans that decays by emitting a gamma ray.

I Interaction With Matter  !

When radiation interacts with other materials, it affects the atoms of those materials principally by knocking the negatively charged electrons out of orbit, nis causes an atom to lose its electrical neutrality and become positively charged. An atom that is charged, either positively or negatively, is called an ion.  ;

1 UNITS OF MEASURE Some of the units of measure used in this report require explanation.

l

\

Activity I Activity is the number of atoms in a material that decay per unit of time. Each time an atom decays, radiation is emitted. The curie (Ci)is the unit used to describe the activity of a material and indicates the rate at which the atoms are decaying. One curie of activity indicates the decay of 37 billion atoms per second.

Smaller units of the curie are often used in this report. Two common units are the microcurie (pCi),

one millionth of a curie, and the picocurie (pCi), one trillionth of a curie. The mass, or weight, of radioactive material which would result in one curic cf activity depends on the disintegration rate. For example, one gram of radium-226 is one curie of activity, but it would require about 1.5 million grams of natural uranium to equal one curie since radium 226 decays more energetically than natural uranium.

Dose Biological damage due to alpha, beta, and gamma radiation may result from the ionization caused by l these radiations. Some types of radiation, especially alpha particles, which can cause dense local ionization, can result in much more biological damage for the same energy imparted as do gamma or X rays. Herefore, a quality factor must be applied to account for the different ionizing capabilities of l

E various types ofionizing radiation. When the quality factor is multiplied by the absorbed dose, the result is the dose equivalent, which is an estimate of the possible biological damage resulting from exposure to any type ofionizing radiation. The dose equivalent is measured in rem (roentgen equivalent man). In terms of environmental radiation, the rem is a large unit. Herefore, a smaller unit, the millirem (mrem) is often used. One millirem is equal to 1/1000 of a rem.

LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION Sample results are often reported as below the lower limit of detection (LLD). The LLD is the smallest amount ofradioactive material that will show a positive result for which there can be confidence that radioactivity is present. His statistical parameter is used as a measure of the sensitivity of a sample analysis. When a measurement is reported as less than the LLD, it means that Introduction Page 6

1995 Annuil Environmental And Efiluent Release Report no radioactivity was detected and that had radioactivity been present at (or above) the stated LLD value, it statistically would have been detected. The NRC established values for the LLDs for environmental and effluent sample analysis.

BACKGROUND RADIATION Background radiation includes the decay of radioactive elements in the earth's crust, a steady stream of high-energy particles from space called cosmic radiation, naturally occurring radioactive isotopes in the human body like potassium-40, decay of radioisotopes used in medical procedures, man made phosphate fertilizers (phosphates and uranium are often found together in nature), fallout from nuclear weapons testing, and even household items like smoke detectors. In the United States, a person's average annual exposure from background radiation is 360 mrem, from sources shown in the Background Radiation Chant (Table l) [ Source: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements).

Table 1: Background Radiation Chart Natural Sources Man Made Sources Radon 55 % Medical /X-rays 11 %

Cosmic 8% Nuclear Medicine 4%

Terrestrial 8% Consumer Products 3%

Internal 11 % Other (1) <!%

(1) - Other includes 0.3%from occupationalsources, <0.3%fromfall out, <0.1%from the nuclear fuel cycle, and 0.1%from miscellaneous sources.

Many radionuclides are present in the environment due to sources such as cosmic radiation and fallout from nuclear weapons testing. These radionuclides are expected to be present in many of the environmental samples collected in the vicinity of PNPP. Some of the radionuclides normally present include:

o beryllium-7, present as a result of the interaction of cosmic radiation with the upper atmosphere.

o potassium-40, a naturally occurring radionuclide normally found in humans and throughout the environment, and o fallout radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing, including tritium and cesium-137. These radionuclides may also be releesed in minute amounts from nuclear facilities.

Beryllium-7 and potassium-40 are especially common in REMP samples. Since they are naturally occurring and are expected to be present, positive results for these radionuclides are not discussed in the section on 1995 Sampling Program results. However, the data on these radionuclides are included in Appendix C: 1995 REMP Data.

Introduction Page 7

i 4

19n Annual Environmtntal And Emuent Release Report ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES l

INTRODUCTION The source of radioactive material in a nuclear power plant is fission product generation (for example, iodines, noble gases and particulates), or neutron activation of corrosion products and water (for example, cobalt and tritium, respectively). The majority of the fission products generated remain 1

within the nuclear fuel and fuel cladding. He majority of the fission products which do escape from l fuel cladding as well as the majority of the activated corrosion products are removed by plant processing equipment.

During the normal operation of a nuclear power plant, small amounts of these radioactive materials are released as liquids, gasses and solids. PNPP was designed and is operated in a manner which controls and monitors these effluent releases. Emuents are controlled to ensure radioactivity released to the l

environment is minimal and does not exceed regulatory limits. Eftluent programs include the

, operation of monitoring systems, in-plant sampling and analysis, quality assurance, and detailed procedures covering all aspects of effluent monitoring.

3 He main objective of controlling releases is to ensure that doses are kept As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). The ALARA principle applies to reducing radiation dose both to the individuals working at PNPP and to the general public. " Reasonably achievable" means that exposure j reduction is based on sound operating practices and economic decisions. By practicing ALARA, I PNPP minimizes health risks and possible environmental impact, and ensures that doses are

! maintained well below regulatory limits.

si 1

i ne liquid and gaseous radioactive waste treatment systems at PNPP are designed to collect and

! process the wastes in order to remove most of the radioactivity. Monitoring systems are used to

provide continuous indication of the radioactivity present and are sensitive enough to measure several orders of magnitude lower than the release limits. Instruments are equipped with alarms and indicators i

in the plant control room. He alarms are set to provide wamings to alert plant operators when radioactivity levels reach a small fraction of actual limits. In addition, waste streams are sampled and analyzed to identify and quantify radionuclides being released. Analysis results are used with flow measurements to calculate the composition and concentrations of radionuclides in effluents.

Gaseous effluent release data is coupled with on site meteorological data to calculate dose to the I public. In areas surrounding the plant, devices maintained for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program constantly sample the air in the surrounding environment. Frequent samples of 4

other environmental media are also taken to determine if any radioactive material deposition has occurred. His program is described in detail in the next section.

Generation of solid waste is' carefully monitored to identify opportunities for minimization. Limiting i

the amount of material taken into the plant, sorting material as radioactive or nonradioactive, and

shredding and compacting waste once it is identified all help to lower the volume of radioactive solid waste. Solid waste is shipped to a licensed burial site.

j REGULATORY LIMITS

(

1 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission limits for liquid and gaseous effluents were incorporated into the j PNPP Technical Specifications, and subsequently into the Off Site Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). Rese limits prescribe the maximum doses and dose rates due to radioactive effluents resulting from operation of PNPP. He limits are defined in several ways to limit the overall impact on

Annual Effluent Releases Page 9

.+ - . ~ . , . .

1995 Annud Environm:ntal And Emuent Release Report i

\

persons living near the plant. The limits are described below. None of these limits were exceeded in 1995. l l

l Gaseous Effluents '

I. Dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous emuents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:

Noble gases:

Less than or equal to 500 mrem per year to the total body, and l Less than or equal to 3000 mrem per year to any organ )

Iodine 131, iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with halflives greater ,

than eight days:

)

Less than or equal to 1500 mrem per year to any organ II. Air dose due to noble gases to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:

During any calendar quaner:

Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation Less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation During any calendar year:

Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation Less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation III. Dose to a member of the public from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with halflives greater than eight days in gaseous emuents released to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:

Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ per any calendar quarter Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ per any calendar year.

He PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM does not contain a concentration reference for gaseous emuents. For this reason, maximum permissible concentrations are not used to calculate maximum release rates for gaseous emuents.

Liquid Effluents I. The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid emuents to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the concentrations specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR), Part l 20 (Standards for Protection Against Radiation), Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides 5 other than dissolved or entrained noble gases, as required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2.0E-4 pCi/mi total activity. Rese values are the maximum permissible concentrations.

I Annual Emuent Releases Page 10 '

4 1995 Annual Environmtntal And Effluent Release Report II. The dose or dose commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the following:

l During any calendar quarter: '

I Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body Less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ a

During any calendar year:

Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body Less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ l RELEASE

SUMMARY

I Effluents are sampled and analyzed to identify both the type and quantity of radionuclides present.

This information is combined with effluent path flow measurements to determine the radioactive composition and concentration of effluents.

} Liquid Effluents The PNPP liquid radioactive waste system is designed to collect and treat all radioactive liquid waste l produced in the plant. The treatment used for the liquid depends on its physical and chemical

properties. It is designed to reduce the concentration of radioactive material in the liquid. Liquids are i filtered to remove suspended solids, and demineralized to remove dissolved solids.

i l 1

Liquid effluent releases may be required after collecting water from small leaks within the plant or to reduce the volume of stored water in plant systems. In both cases, the water is first processed through l a liquid radioactive waste treatment system. Dose calculations are performed prior to discharge of this

? processed water to the lake to ensure regulatory compliance and that ALARA is maintained.

Error is inherent in any analytical process. Error may be due to differences in analysis results of split samples, or may be attributable to the precision limitations ofinstrumentation. An estimate of total i error associated with different parameters is shown in Table 1.

i i Table 1: Error associated with liquid effluent processes

Parameter  % Error

Gamma analysis 10 Tritium analysis 8

! Strontium 89/90 analysis 10

. Iron 55 analysis 10 l Gross alpha analysis 10 4

Dilution volume 31 Discharge volume 25

Liquid waste volume 1 4

j Liquid effluents are released intermittently and are considered " batch" releases. Table 2 provides information on the number and duration of these releases for 1995.

l i Table 3 provides information on the nuclide composition for all liquid releases. If a radionuclide was i

not present at a level greater than the LLD, then the value is expressed as "less than (indicated by <),

LLD". In all cases, LLDs met or were below the levels required by the Technical 4

Specifications /ODCM.

a J AnnualEffluent Releases Page11 i

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Table 2: Liquid batch releases item Value Number of batch releases 97 Total time period for batch releases (minutes) 1.965E+4 j Maximum time for a batch release (minutes) 434 l Average time period for a batch release (minutes) 202.6 Minimum time for a batch release (minutes) 2 Average stream flow during periods of release of effluent into a flowing stream 2.09E+5 (liters / minute)

Table 3: Summation of all liquid effluent releases I Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Est. l 1 2 3 4 Total Error, A. Fission and activation products

1. Total releases (not Ci 4.63E-3 4.53E 3 5.68E-3 1.50E-2 1.00E+1 including tritium, gases, g alpha) 3

2. Average diluted pCi/mi 9.31E-9 5.82E-9 336E-9 IJ2E-8 concentration during period l

3. Percent of applicable limit % NA NA NA NA l "NA "- This item is Not Applicable. The TechnscalSpect/ications/0DCM do not have a hmttforfission and activation products.

B. Tritium

1. Total release Ci 1.55 E+0 2.31E+0 3.03E+0 3.53 E+0 1.00+E1

2. Average diluted pCi/ml 3.11E-6 2.97E-6 1.79E-6 3.10E-6 concentration during period

3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.104 0.099 0.0597 0.103 C. Dissolved and entrained gases

1. Total release Ci 8.18E-4 3.49E-3 7.07E-3 6.86E-3 1.00E+1

2. Average diluted Ci/ml 1.65E-9 4.49E-9 4.18E-9 6.04E-9 concentration during period

3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.000823 0.00224 0.00209 0.00302 D. Gross alpha radioactivity

1. Total release Ci 4.58E-5 <LLD <LLD <LLD 1.00E+1 E. Volume of waste released (prior to dilution) liters 1.59E+6 2.30E+6 4.25E+6 3.05E+6 1.00E+0 g g

F. Volume of dilution water liters 4.97E+8 7.78E+8 1.69E+9 1.14E+9 2.80E+1 g used during period g Annual Efiluent Releases Page 12

1995 Annual Environmental And Efnuent Release Report The total number of curies of each nuclide present in liquid efDuent releases for each quarter are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Nuclide composition ofliquid efnuents Nuclides Released Unit Quarter l Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 tritium Ci 1.55 E+0 2.31 E+0 3.03E+0 3.53E+0 chromium-51 Ci 8.49E-4 1.49E-4 9.79E-4 5.79E-3 manganese-54 Ci 1.82E-4 1.29E-4 8.97E-5 4.49E-4 iron-55 Ci 5.88E-4 3.06E-4 7.42E-4 7.34 E-4 cobalt-58 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 1.04 E-4 cobalt-60 Ci 1.74E-3 2.04E-3 2.43E-3 2.22E-3 zinc-65 Ci 4.59E-4 1.00E-3 9.3 8 E-4 4.33 E-3 strontium-89 Ci 3.76E-5 4.72E-4 1.13 E-4 1.39E-5 strontium-90 Ci <LLD 1.85E 5 1.05 E-6 <LLD molybdenum-99 Ci 2.84 E-4 <LLD <LLD <LLD technetium-99m Ci 1.05 E-4 <LLD <LLD <LLD iodine-131 Ci 9.65E-5 2.69E-5 <LLD <LLD iodine-133 Ci 5.64 E-5 <LLD <LLD <LLD xenon 133 Ci 7.04 E-4 3.40E-3 6.75E 3 6.59E-3 xenon-133m Ci <LLD <LLD 1.31 E-4 1.03 E-4 cesium-134 Ci 2.65E-5 1.08E-5 1.19E-5 <LLD xenon-135 Ci 1.14E-4 8.71 E-5 1.93 E-4 1.75 E-4 cesium 137 Ci 9.37E-5 7.46E-5 2.49E-4 <LLD lanthanum-140 Ci 1.16E-4 2.69E-4 1.25 E-4 1.25 E-3 cerium-141 Ci <LLD 2.93 E-5 <LLD 7.38E-5 Total for period Ci 1.55E+0 2.31 E+0 3.03E+0 3.54E+0 Gaseous Effluents Gaseous efnuents are made up of noble gases, iodines and particulates. The noble gas releases are primarily a result of containment purge operations, small steam leaks and off gassing during plant start up and shut down operations. The iodine and particulate releases are primarily a result of small steam leaks. Gaseous effluents from PNPP exit the plant from one of four efnuent vents. Each of the four effluent vents contains radiation detectors that continuously monitor the air to ensure that radioactivity release levels are well below regulatory limits. Samples are also collected and analyzed on a routine basis to ensure regulatory compliance and that ALARA is maintained. All gaseous efnuent released from PNPP are considered continuous and at ground level.

A small amount of error is inherent in any analytical process. Error may be due to differences in analysis results of split samples, or may be attributable to the precision limitations ofinstrumentation.

An estimate of total error associated wit b different parameters is shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Error associated with gaseous ;ffluent processes Parameter  % Error Noble gas analysis , 11 Particulate analysis 9 lodine analysis 12 Tritium analysis 8 Strontium-89/90 analysis 10 l

Gross alpha analysis 10 i

Sample flow rate 4 Efiluent flow rate 4 Annual Effluent Releases Page 13

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report If a radionuclide was not present at a level greater than the LLD, then the value is expressed as "less I

than (indicated by <), LLD" In all cases, the LLDs met or were below the levels required by the Technical Specifications /ODCM.

Table 6: Summation of all gaseous effluent releases Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Est.

I 2 3 4 Total Error.

A. Fission and activation gases

1. Total release Ci 8.01 E+ 1 1.03 E+2 1.42 E+2 2.06E+2 1.00E+1

2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 1.03 E+ 1 1.31 E+ 1 1.79E+1 2.59E+ 1 period

3. Percent of Technical  % NA NA NA NA Specification limit "NA " ihu stem ss Not Apphcable. lhe lechnscal Spec $cationWUDCAf do not have a itmstforfission and actnution products.

B. lodines

1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 1.24 E-2 7.49E-3 5.51E 3 1.87E-3 1.00E+ 1

2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 1.59E-3 9.52E-4 6.93 E-4 2.36E-4 period

3. Percent of Technical  % NA NA NA NA Specification limit "NA "- Thu stem ts Not Apphcable. Ihe TechmcalSpec@cationWODCAldo not have a hmntforfission andactivation products.

C. Particulates

1. Particulates with half-lives Ci 3.51 E-3 1.61 E-3 2.28E-4 2.98E-4 1.00E+1

>8 days

2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 4.49E-4 2.07E-4 2.87E 5 3.75E-5 E period g

3. Percent of Technical  % NA NA NA NA Specification limit

4. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci 5.78E-6 2.71 E-5 2.77E-5 1.1 l E-6 "NA " - Thu stem u Not Apphcable. The TechnscalSpec$ cation 20DCAt do not I. ave a hmitforfusion and activation products.

D. Tritium

1. Total release Ci <3.0E 10 4.52E-1 2.05 E-I <3.0E-10 1.00E+ 1  !

2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 0 5.75E-2 2.58 E-2 0 period

3. Percent of Technical  % NA NA NA NA Specification limit "NA " - 1 hts stem os Not Apphcable. The Techmcal bpecificationWODChido not have a hm.tjorfission and activation products.

I Annual Effluent Releases Page 14

c%.

1995 Annual Environmrntal And Effluent Release Report Table 7: Nuclide composition of gaseous effluents - ground level release, continuous mode Nuclides Released Unit Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 -

1. Fission gases tritium Ci <LLD 4.52E-1 2.05E-1 <LLD krypton-85 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 3.%E+0 i krypton-85m Ci 1.51E-2 2.92E-1 5.25E-1 1.58E-1 l krypton-87 Ci <LLD 3.92E-1 3.15E-1 3.98E-3 krypton-88 Ci <LLD 3.64E-1 3.78E-1 4.76E-2 l xenon-131m Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 2.05E+0 l xenon-133 Ci 6.87E+0 1.28E+1 4.22E+1 1.35E+2 xenon 133m Ci 4.14E-2 3.43 E-1 1.43E+0 1.86E40 xenon-135 Ci 1.58E+1 2.68E+1 4.60E+1 2.18E+1

,,, xenon-135m Ci 5.52E+1 5.00E+1 4.65E+1 4.24E+1 xenon-137 Ci <LLD 1.03E+0 8.08E-1 <LLD xenon 138 Ci 2.16E+0 1.08E+1 3.78E+0 <LLD Total for period Ci 8.01E+1 1.03E+2 1.42E+2 2.06E+2 l

2. Iodines iodine 131 Ci 1.24E-2 7.49E-3 5.51E-3 1.87E-3 ,

iodine 133 Ci 3.52E-2 1.37E-2 1.09E-2 2.56E-3 iodine-135 Ci 2.79E-2 1.02E 2 2.84E-3 1.42E-3 Total for p6riod Ci 7.55E-2 3.14E-2 1.93E-2 5.85E-3

3. Particulates manganese-56 Ci 2.03E-4 <LLD <LLD <LLD cobalt-56 Ci 3.35E-4 2.28E-4 <LLD <LLD ,

cobalt-60 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD - 7.21E-7 rubidium-88 Ci ' <LLD 4.57E-5 <LLD 3.34E-4  ;

rubidium-89 Ci 7.01E-4 <LLD 3.83E-5 4.93E-4 strontium-89 Ci 7.91E-4 4.15E-4 1.69E-4 2.21 E-4 strontium-90 Ci 2.48E-6 1.60E-6 6.88E-7 7.27E-7 l

strontium-91 Ci 3.50E-3 1.28E-3 1.44E-4 2.38E-4 i strontium-92 Ci 1.23E-3 3.64E-4 <LLD <LLD '

molybdenum-99 Ci 3.41E-4 <LLD 4.4E-12 4.4E-12 technetium-99m Ci 3.43E-5 <LLD <LLD <LLD technetium-104 Ci 3.07E-6 <LLD <LLD <LLD cesium 138 Ci 1.60E-2 9.14E-3 3.67E-3 4.03E-3 barium 139 Ci 2.35E-2 1.43E-2 4.69E-3 5.65E-3 barium-140 Ci 2.38E-3 9.67E-4 5.79E-5 7.57E-5 lanthanum-140 Ci 1.81 E-3 7.04E-4 5.90E-5 7.16E-5 h Total for Period Ci 5.09E-2 2.74E-2 8.83E-3 1.11 E-2

l'

Solid Waste 4

! 1 j nirty seven shipments of radioactive waste were transported from PNPP for disposal in 1995.

Shipments were delivered to the State of South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control disposal facility in Barnwell, South Carolina. In addition, PNPP waste was sent to the Barnwell disposal facility from Scientific Ecology Group in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as partial i shipments in conjunction with other utilities. He waste total in Table 8 below includes these

shipments from Scientific Ecology Group. No irradiated fuel was transported from PNPP in 1995.

Annual Effluent Releases Page 15 i

1995 Annual Environmental And Eftluent Release Report Table 8: Solid waste and irradiated fuel shipments

1. Solid waste shipped off site for burial or disposal Type of Waste g

Unit Annual Value Est. Total g Error, %

a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m' 188.2 25 Ci 532.0

b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, m' 32.5 25 etc. Cl 1.6

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m' 0 Ci 0

2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste)

Type of Waste Radionuclide  %

l B

Est. Total Error, %

a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. Fe-55 39.9 Co-60 29.1 Zn-65 22.8 25 Cs 137 3.3 Mn-54 1.5

. Cs 134 1.1 4

b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, Co-60 50.9 etc. Fe-55 38.4 Zn-65 5.0 25 l Mn-54 1.4 l Cs-137 1.0

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. None

3. Solid waste disposition i

Number of Shipments (1) g Mode of Transportation Destination g 37 Truck Barnwell, South Carolina (1) Additionalshipments were made combined with wastefrom other utslottesfrom Scient;/ic Ecology Group in Oak Ridge, g i Tennessee.

l

4. Irradiated fuel shipments (Disposition) l Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 0

l

=

METEOROLOGICAL DATA i

ne meteorological monitoring system at PNPP consists of a 60 meter tower equipped with two independent systems for measuring wind speed, wind direction, and temperature at both 10 meter and 60 meter heights. He tower also has instrumentation to measure dew point and barometric pressure.

Data is logged from the tower instrumentation into the Meteorological Data Processing System. This system compiles the data and calculates a variety of atmospheric parameters, communicates with the g Meteorological lnformation Dose Assessment System, and sends data over communication links to the g plant control room.

All meteorological data is maintained at PNPP and is available upon request.

I Annual Efiluent Releases Page 16

l 1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report DOSE ASSESSMENT ne maximum concentration for any radioactive release is controlled by the limits set forth in the Code p of Federal Regulations, Title 10 Part 20 (10CFR20). Compliance with these concentration limits is ensured by sampling, analyzing, processing, and monitoring the effluent stream. Dose limit compliance is verified through periodic dose assessment calculations. Some dose calculations are I conservatively performed for a hypothetical individual who is assumed to reside on the site boundary at the highest potential dose location all year. His person, called the " maximum individual", would incur the maximum potential dose from direct exposure (air plus ground plus water), inhalation, and ingestion of water, milk, vegetation, and fish. Because no one actually meets these criteria, the actual dose received by a real member of the public is significantly less than what is calculated for this hypotheticalirdividual.

Dose calculations for this maximum individual at the site boundary are performed for two cases. First, they are performed using data for a 360

• radius around the plant site (land and water based meteorological sectors), even though some of this area is over Lake Erie, which has no permanent I residents. The second calculations are performed considering only the areas around the plant that are not over Lake Erie (land based meteorological sectors), in which people reside. Tables 9 and 10 provide the calculated hypothetical maximum site boundary dose values to either the total body or I worst case organ considerina all meteorological sectors. Table 11 provides the calculated hypothetical maximum site boundary dose values considering only the land based sectors.

If any radionuclide was not present at a level greater than the LLD, it was not used in dose I calculations.

Table 9 1995 Site boundary dose to maximum individual considering all sectors I Efiluent Organ Estimated dose (mrem) Limit  % oflimit Liquid Total body 3.59E-3 3.0E+0 0.12 Liquid Liver 6.69E 3 1.0E+1 0.07 Noble gas - gamma NA 2.00E+0 (mrad) 1.0E+1 20.0 Noble gas - beta NA 1.23E+0 (mrad) 2.0E+1 6.2 Noble gas Total body 1.09E+0 5.0E+0 22.0 Noble gas Skin 2.07E+0 1.5E+1 14.0 I lodine & particulates n yroid 1.41E+0 1.5E+1 9.4 Table 10: 1995 Population dose considering all sectors I Effluent Organ Estimated Population Dose (person-rem)

Liquid Total body 2.4E-1 Liquid I Gaseous n yroid 4.3E-2 Total body 5.lE-2 Gaseous n yroid 5.4E-1 Table 11: 1995 Site boundary dose to maximum individual considering sectors on land Effluent Organ Estimated dose (mrem) Limit  % oflimit Liquid Total body 3.59E-3 3.0E+0 I Liquid Liver 6.69E-3 1.0E+1 0.12 0.07 Noble gas - gamma NA 1.99E-1 (mrad) 1.0E+1 2.0 Noble gas - beta NA 1.32E-l (mrad) 2.0E+1 0.66 Noble gas Total body 9.78E-2 5.0E+0 2.0 Noble gas Skin 1.86E-1 1.5E+1 1.2 lodine & particulates n yroid 2.33E-1 1.5E+1 1.6 Annual Effluent Releases Page 17

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report I' Other dose calculations are performed for a hypothetical individual who is assumed to be onsite for '

some specified amount of time. This person would receive the maximum dose during the time spent on site. Because no one actually meets the criteria established for these conservative calculations, the g actual dose received by a real member of the public is significantly less than what is calculated for this g hypothetical individual. His dose is assessed relative to the offsite dose, and considers dilution, dispersion, and occupancy factors, ne highest hypothetical dose from liquid effluents to a member of the public onsite is to a person who is fishing on Lake Erie from the shore on PNPP property. He calculations assume that person spends 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> per year fishing, and the dilution factor is 10. Ratioing this exposure pathway to doses g calculated for offsite locations yields the dose values shown in Table 12, below. 3 Table 12: Maximum onsite dose from liquid effluents Quarter / Annual Total Body Dose (mrem) Organ Dose (mrem)

First Quarter 1.09E-4 1.24E-4 Second Quarter 1.18E-4 1.38E-4  ;

nird Quarter 1.24E-4 1.45E-4  ;

Fourth Quarter 1.26E-4 1.49E-4 ,

Annual 4.71E-4 5.52E-4 (

l Although several cases were evaluated to determine the highest hypothetical dose from gaseous I effluents to members of the public on site (including traversing a public road within the site boundary, l shoreline fishing, non-plant related training, car pooling, and job interviews), the onsite activity with the highest dose potential is also shoreline fishing (assuming 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> per year fishing). De g) g i calculations account for this and the difference between annual average dispersion values for the onsite I point of concern,6.6E-5 s/m3. The maximum onsite dose values generated are shown in Table 13.

Table 13: Maximum onsite dose from gaseous effluents Quarter / Annual TotalBody Dose (mrem) Organ Dose (mrem)

First Quarter 2.16E-2 9.74E-2 Second Quarter 4.09E-2 1.12E-1 l

=

nird Quarter 4.95E-2 1.50E-1 Fourth Quarter Annual 1.96E-2 1.18E-1 4.38E-2 3.74E-1 gl g

Average total body dose to individual members of the public is determined by combining the dose g from gaseous effluents to the population that lives within 50 miles of PNPP (2,420,000 people), with g the dose from liquid effluents to the population that receives drinking water from intakes within 50 miles of PNPP (18,200,00 people). The results are shown in Table 14.

Table 14: Average individual total body dose (mrem)

Quarter / Annual From Gaseous Effluents From Liquid Effluents First Quarter 3.80E-6 2.53E-5 Second Quarter 5.37E-6 2.31E-5 nird Quarter 8.26E-6 3.19E-5 Fourth Quarter 3.22E-6 5.33E-5 Annual 2.11E-5 1.32E-4 I

Annual Effluent Releases Page 18

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report ABNORMAL RELEASES There were no abnormal releases in 1995.

PROGRAM CHANGES AND NONCOMPLIANCES Program Changes Both the Process Control Program and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual were revised in 1995. The revision incorporated information from the License Amendment Number 72 that moved environmental and effluent program requirements from the Technical Specifications to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

Noncompliances There were two incidents when liquid effluent monitoring instruments were inoperable for greater than the 30 day limit:

The radioactive waste high flow discharge header monitor was not operable for 40 days (4/28/95 to 6/6/95) due to thu unavailability of repair parts.

The radioactive waste low flow discharge header was not operable for the last 37 days of 1995 (11/24/95 to 12/31/95). This monitor is not used. Removing it from operation is being considered in 1996.

Corrections to 1994 Data Some data from the 1994 Annual Effluent Release Report was amended after the report was submitted.

The corrected data is included in this report in Appendix A: Addendum To 1994 Effluent Release Report.

Annual Effluent Releases Page 19

1995 Annual Environmenal And Effluent Release Report RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM INTRODUCTION ne radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) was established at PNPP for several reasons. First, it verifies the adequacy of plant design and operation to control radioactive materials and limit effluent releases. Second, it assesses the radiological impact, if any, that the plant has had on the surrounding environment. nird, it ensures compliance with regulatory guidelines. De REMP is conducted in accordance with the PNPP Operating License, Appendix A, Technical Specifications and the ODCM. REMP requirements were established by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

A wide variety of samples is collected as part of the PNPP REMP. The selection of sample types, sampling locations, and sample collection frequency are based on many things. Potential pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to humans, sample availability, local meteorology, population characteristics, land use and NRC requirements are all considered.

To ensure that the REMP data are meaningful and useful, detailed sampling methods and procedures are followed. Thi:: ensures that samples are collected in the same manner and from the same locations each time. All samples are packaged on site, then shipped to an independent vendor laboratory for analysis. The vendor laboratory analyzes the samples and reports results to the PNPP Environmental Unit staff, the Lake County General Health District, and the State of Ohio Department of Health.

The REMP began in 1981 with 24 direct radiation monitoring locations, four sediment locations, and two fish sampling locations. In 1982, collections of air, water, milk, food products, and feed / silage were added. Precipitation and soil were added in 1985. Although these last two media were not required by the NRC, they were incorporated into the program to establish baseline data. In 1993, feed / silage sampling was dropped from the program based on the past ten years of data. For the same reason, all strontium analysis was deleted from the program in 1994, and gross beta and tritium were deleted from precipitation analyses in 1995. Also in 1995, the frequency for collecting soil samples was changed from quarterly to biannually.

SAMPLING LOCATIONS REMP samples are collected at numerous locations, both on site and up to 22 miles away from the plant. Sampling locations are divided into two general categories: indicator and control. Indicator locations are those which would be most likely to display effects caused by plant operation. ney are relatively close to the plant. Control locations are those which are considered to be unaffected by plant l operation. Typically, they are a greater distance from the plant, in the least prevalent wind directions.

1 Data obtained from the indicator locations are compared with data from the control locations. His comparison allows naturally occurring background radiatbn to be taken into account when evaluating any radiological impact PNPP may have had on the enviroenent. Table I and Figures 1,2 and 3 identify the PNPP REMP sampling locations.

Many REMP samples are collected in addition to those required by the PNPP rechnical Specification /ODCM. In some cases (precipitation and soil, for example), the sample type is not required to be collected at all. In other cases (air sampling and direct radiation monitoring, for example), the PNPP REMP includes more locations than are required. The Technical Specifications /ODCM requirements for each sample type are discussed in more detail below. Sample types and locations that are required by the Technical Specification /ODCM are shown in BOLD in Table 1.

I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 21 l

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Table 1: REMP sampling locations

1. Description Miles Direction Media (1) 1 Hainea Rd. 3.4 ENE TLD, AIR TLD l

2 Site Boundary 0.7 E E 3 Meteorological Tower 1.0 SE TLD, AIR, PR, SOIL 4 Site Boundary 0.7 S TLD, AIR, PR, SOIL 5 Quincy Substation 0.6 SW TLD, AIR 6 Concord Service Center 11.0 SSW TLD, AIR, PR, SOIL, VG 7 Site Boundary 0.6 NE TLD, AIR, PR, SOIL, VG 8 Site Boundary 0.8 E TLD 9 Site Boundary 0.7 ESE TLD, SOIL 10 Parmly Rd. 0.8 SSE TLD 11 Parmly Rd. 0.6 SSW TLD 12 Site Boundary 0.6 WSW TLD, PR, SOIL l 13 Madison-on-the-Lake 4.7 ENE TLD l 14 Hubbard Rd. 4.9 E TLD

15 Eagle Substation 5.1 ESE TLD 16 Dayton Rd. 5.0 SE TLD 17 Chadwick Rd. 5.2 SSE TLD 18 Blair Rd. 5.0 S TLD 19 Lane Rd. 5.3 SSW TLD

20 Nursery Rd. 5.3 SW TLD 21 Hardy Rd. 5.1 WSW TLD l 22 Main St. 6.9 SW TLD l 23 High St. 7.9 WSW TLD l 24 St. Clair Ave. 15.1 SW TLD i 25 Offshore - PNPP discharge 0.6 NNW SEDIMENT, FISH 26 Offshore - Redbird 27 4.2 ENE SEDIMENT g Offshore - Fairport Harbor 7.9 WSW SEDIMENT g 28 CEI Ashtabula Plant intake 22.0 ENE WATER i

29 River Rd. 4.3 SSE TLD 30 Lane Rd. 4.8 SSW TLD 31 Wood and River Rd. 4.8 SE TLD l 32 Offshore- Mentor 15.8 WSW SEDIMENT, FISH 33 River Rd. 4.5 S TLD 34 PNPP Intake 0.7 NW WATER 35 Site Boundary 0.6 E TLD, AIR, PR, SOIL, VG 36 Lake County Water Plant 3.9 WSW TLD, WATER 37 Gerlica Farm 1.5 ENE FOOD PRODUCTS 41 Clark Rd. 1.1 SW TLD

42 Parmly Rd. 0.8 S TLD,VG l

2 43 Parmly Rd. 1.0 SSE TLD E 45 Clark Rd. 0.9 SSW TLD 51 Rettger Milk Farm 9.6 S MILK 53 Neff Perkins 0.5 WSW TLD 54 Hale Rd. School 4.6 SW TLD 55 Center Rd. 2.5 S TLD g 56 Madison High School 4.0 ESE TLD g 58 Antioch Rd. 0.8 ENE TLD 59 Lake Shoreline at Green Rd. 4.0 ENE WATER 1

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 22

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report  !

1. Description Miles Direction Media (1) 60 Lake Shoreline at Perry Park 1.0 WSW WATER 61 Keller Milk Farm 7.4 SE MILK 62 Shreve Farm 1.2 ENE FOOD PRODUCTS 63 Minor Stream Mouth 0.08 NNE SEDIMENT 64 Northwest Drain Mouth 0.09 NW SEDIMENT 65 Major Stream Mouth 0.18 W SEDIMENT 70 H&H Farm Stand 16.2 SSW FOOD PRODUCTS 71 Mosley Farm 7.9 SE MILK 77 Orosz Farm 1.2 E FOOD PRODUCTS (1) AIR = Air Iodine and Particulate VG = Vegetation PR = Precipitation TLD = nermoluminescent Dosimeters SAMPLE ANALYSIS r

When environmental samples are analyzed for radioactivity, several types of measurements are performed to provide information about the types of radiation and radionuclides present. He major analyses that are performed are discussed below.

Gross beta analysis measures the total amount of beta emitting radioactivity present in a sample. Beta radiation may be released by many difTerent radionuclides. Since beta decay results in a continuous energy spectrum rather than the discrete energy levels or " peaks" associated with gamma radiation, identification of specific beta emitting nuclides is much more difficult. Therefore, gross beta analysis only indicates whether the sample contains normal or abnormal concentrations of beta emitting radioactivity; it does not identify specific radionuclides. Gross beta analysis primarily acts as a tool to identify samples that may require further analysis.

Gamma spectral analysis provides more specific information than does gross beta analysis. Gamma spectral analysis identifies each radionuclide present in the sample that emits gamma radiation, and the amount of radioactivity associated with it. Each radionuclide has a very specific " fingerprint" that allows for accurate identification.

Iodine analysis measures the amount of radioactive iodine present in a sample. Some media (for example, air sample charcoal cartridges) are analyzed directly. With other media (for example, milk),

iodine is extracted by chemical separation.

Tritium analysis measures the amount of the radionuclide tritium (H-3) present in a sample. Tritium is an isotope of hydrogen that emits low energy beta particles. Tritium occurs naturally and is also man-made.

Gamma doses received by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) while in the field are determined by a special laboratory procedure. Thermoluminescence is a process by which ionizing radiation interacts with the sensitive phosphor material in the TLD. Energy is trapped in the TLD material and can be stored for months or years. This provides an excellent method to measure the dose received over long periods of time, ne amount of energy that was stored in the TLD as a result ofinteraction with radiation is released by a controlled heating process and measured in a calibrated reading system. As the TLD is heated, the phosphor releases the stored energy as light. He amount oflight is directly proportional to the amount of radiation to which the TLD was exposed. He reading process also zeroes the TLD and prepares it for reuse.

I l Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 23 1

s. - #

h-w' g h[pxs g;g;g

'i,

' 3'3 je g"g w . ~,

aw n " aa 'y;' 1NE f e

y: Nmgp W emqu M a " Q yg. g.; ' a W1g#FS ygQ ' ,ww y -

E $1:i Tgte bOf

• i WND1? MSN S? -

~

gi x

9 p y 3 y gM

@i , _ u.t ' "

g n .,,,. ^, ; g'~ pg wM ;a ,

c -

%g rp

"~..

4 yra R .1: 4

-'7, g q; ,g -gj -

.w. gi ~ a., +;_ ":i;g -;; u _

73 g (~ 9 4:: --

y:- , .

x.-'-

m's ., p ~

>:As..

4

-. 4 i _. -

en Nw w

- - . s .

p x-

^. ,y . ~

a,

c .. -a r e-n

, ;E G e

3a4. #15

e w, %w ,;, tackwooa n. - -

/c m;g ce;

m. 37, t

g

?PE . 62; 1 ?' '

9 - %y; . 27 I i n: .E; "

L ;m

{ ';s;?.,/ . y: i o

W m[kk Kiq&m${

~. .~*J e.-

y- ;W@hYL;"' $] e

=

E a og, ). <~'- lk;;,iG Q _p;, ; ', E o . _

, , V y U ...

{ > ;' .l[

~

, Y" m -a ~.

r. ._y C-a ~

m4 - ,

-, m g- - - . . ., y ,

a a

k

+ > '

v. .; -

E

^ ,

i g 3:

8 x mA ,

m E' -

g m

,;.W

._ v::.gil r> i

~

ifg 2.

- _ f, -'

7

y. , _.

. W. , gl; ,g, , -

_n "g

.~

Y-a

,f Qo y ;y nll j

-e

.  :.'nQn .

e

g

.; , t. , :s 1

.; g 1 ,. +  ? -- '

.i 3c . ,J- . .

{ g;ty.c 3 -

4 g;K.' , -

p+ "m

• 2 S 0 n + - w

• I i~f Oss i GJ , SET: m ~

liE REMP sampling locations within two miles of the plant site.

NW NNW N NNE NE

' 8' MILES 7

6 5

wNw 4

/

,f' ENE -

26 a I ( 3 9 2

~

. s1 . 3 1 4  : - 8; 1Y -

g to 1nu s f , / =

$ M o

. 6o .

1

.A f _

$^ [ '

f i

A) e4 s .2 -

• "  ! x e

2. 27 2 c  : 9 T

j r WSW 3% 1

ESE E 0 ,* 2: 22 _ _ _ . - -

17 . L=

" u 90 f

. Ps ha .

\pmmpson 4 -

e -  ;

l 8a h/ ) / / -

k l u sw SSW S SSE SE O 1 2 3 4 5 10 MILES REMP sampling locations between two and eight miles from the plant site.

l

NW NNW N NNE NE l WNW ENE 2' (

htab . ,

\v LAKE E - $

3

_Jm y 20

<ip i W Miles to 9 7

, Miles , _ _ .

uw. j ,,

E; g 5

9-I ver r ,-- F- gg hr~.a N

JcKe==

a i.

,GiddQ E

i e

~

3 g2

't;~ e smA mm E; N i g

3 .n, g..a.u N S ** g a a .

g

"'a T

[ si 1t28 d WSW '*" y 6,

. e, .,

imm 3

g. sue 70 j s '

n n.,m., ,s r

s.-

,p g,3yq ESg g j l y Os g,, a *

,;31;,,, "g

? 2mier field

[

W

$ G s (H s.Mayfield

$ $ w/ k"*Q *' NNw-GE O g_ L

""*"f

, n ..

aa.

_r__ _ g, 5 SW SSW S SSE SE 5 0 5 10 15 20 MILES E EE M m REMP sampling locations greater than eight miles from the plant site.

1995 Annual Envircamental And Effluent Release Report Table 2 provides a list of the analyses performed on environmental samples collected for the PNPP REMP in 1995.

Table 2: Analyses performed on REMP samples.

Sample Type Frequency Analyses Performed Atmospheric Monitoring Airborne Particulates Weekly Gross Beta Quarterly Gamma Spectral Airborne Radioiodine Weekly lodine-131 Precipitation Monthly Gamma Spectral Terrestrial Monitoring Milk Bi/ Monthly Gamma Spectral, lodine-131 Food Products Monthly Gamma Spectral Vegetation Monthly Gamma Spectral Soil Biannually Gamma Spectral Aquatic Monitoring Water Monthly Gross Beta, Gamma Spactral Quarterly Tritium Fish Biannually Gamma Spectral Sediment Biannually Gamma Spectral Direct Radiation Monitoring TLD Quarterly Gamma Dose Annually Gamma Dose Sample results are often reported as below the lower limit of detection (LLD). The LLD is the smallest amount of radioactive material that will show a positive result for which there can be confidence that radioactivity is present. This statistica! parameter is used as a measure of the sensitivity of a sample analysis. When a measurement is reported as less than the LLD, it means that no radioactivity was detected and that had radioactivity been present at (or above) the stated LLD value, it statistically would have been detected. The NRC established values for the LLD: for REMP sample analysis. The vendor laboratory was able to comply with those values in 1995 wi% the exception of three precipitation samples. Two were from Location 3 during the months of February and July. The third was from location 35 during February. The LLDs were not met due to low sample volume (due to lack of precipitation).

1995 SAMPLING PROGRAM The contribution of radionuclides to the environment resulting from the operation of PNPP is assessed by comparing results from the 1995 program with preoperational data (i.e., data from before 1986),

operational data from previous years, and control location data. The results for each sample type are discussed below and compared to historical data to determine if there are any observable trends. All results are expressed as concentrations. Refer to Appendix B: 1995 REMP Data Summary and Appendix C: 1995 REMP Data, for detailed results. The NRC requires special reporting if sample analysis results exceed set limits. No values exceeded these reporting levels in 1995.

Program Changes There were several changes to the program in 1995. These chr. ges include the addition and deletion ofsample locations as follows:

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 27

1995 Annual Environmental And Efnuent Release Report February After establishing permanent agreements with two produce growers close to the plant site in 1994, Location 39 was the last produce sampling location to be dropped from the program. No samples were collected there in 1994 or 1995.

March Location 47, Zoldak Milk Farm, dropped out of the milk sampling program.

Location 37, Gerlica Farm, was added to supplement the two primary food product sampling locations.

May Location 44 on Parmly Rd. was deleted as a grass sampling location. Construction in the vicinity eliminated the grassy area that had been sampled.

Location 42 on Parmly Rd., was added as a grass sampling location to replace the loss of Location 44.

Missed Samples On occasion, samples cannot be collected. This can be due to a variety of events, including equipment malfunction, animal husbandry practices, lost shipments, or vandalism. Table 3 provides information on samples missed in 1995. I i

Table 3: Missed REMP samples,1995 l Media Location Date Reason Missed Air 6 Mar. 22 - 29 Sampler not turned on Food Products All Apr. - Jul. Vegetables not ready for harvest l Food Products 37 Aug. Vegetables not ready for harvest j Food Products 37,62 Oct. Vegetables past harvest Grass All Apr. Insufficient growth to harvest Grass 6 Sep. , Oct. Insufficient growth to harvest g Lake Water 59,60 Feb. Lake shoreline covered with ice g !

Milk 61 Jan., Feb., Mar., Nov., Dec. Drying period for goats (1)

Precipitation 6 Jun. Insufficient rainfall Precipitation All Aug. Insufficient rainfall TLD $8 2nd qtr. Lost in the field (2)

TLD 42 3rd qtr. Lost in the field (2)

TLD 55 4th qtr. Lost in the field (2)

TLD 24,42 Annual Lost in the field (2)

(1) The dryingperiodfor goats is an annual occurrence. Goats, unlike cows, cannotproduce milk allyear.

(2) Missing TLDs can be the result ofvandalism. At locations where vandalism has been identified as a recurringproblem, the TLD is relocated. Loss of the TLDs listedabove was unusual; they were not relocated as a result of this single event.

Events may also occur which prevent a sample from being collected in the normal way, or prevent a complete sample from being collec J. The following is a discussion of these events for 1995.

Food in September, only one food product was collected from Locations 37 and 70; In October, only two were collected from Location 70. This was due primarily to differences in panting and harvest schedules among the three produce growers and for different crops.

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 28

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Milk During the first bimonthly collection in June, the farmer at location 51 did not provide a sample during the scheduled period of June 8 - 12. The sample was collected June 13.

His was due to a scheduling problem with the farmer.

Air During the week of July 26 - August 2, power to the air sampler at Location 3 was shut off for approximately one hour during repairs being made to a nearby traffic light.

During the week of August 9 - 16, Location 7 experienced power outages due to severe localized storms.

On October 25, a substation was taken offline, disrupting power for approximately two hours to Locations 1,3,4,5 and 35.

Water One of the weekly grab samples could not be collected from Location 59 in January due to ice on the shoreline.

In February, samplers at both Locations 34 and 36 had low sample volumes. No reason i was discovered for this event.

March samples from Locations 59 and 60 consisted of one grab sample rather than four weekly grabs. His was due to ice on the shoreline.

In October, a grab sample was collected at water sample Location 28. The automatic sampler had malfunctioned. It was repaired and returned to service later that day, in December, a partial grab sample was collected r.t water sample Location 36. The automatic sampler had malfunctioned during the month and did not obtain a sufficient volume. The balance of the volume was made up via a grab sample.

Also in December, two of the weekly grab samples from Locations 59 and 60 could not be collected due to ice on the shoreline.

j l - Atmospheric Monitoring L

AIR Air sampling is conducted to detect any increase in the concentration of airborne radionuclides. Five j locations (four indicatc,r and one control), are required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM.

l Air sampling pumps are used to draw continuous samples at a rate of approximately one cubic foot per  ;

minute. The air is drawn through glass fiber filters, to collect particulates, and charcoal cartridges, to adsorb iodine. The samples are collected on a weekly basis, $2 weeks a year, from each of seven air sampling stations. Six of the locations are within four miles of the plant site; the seventh is used as a control location and is eleven miles from PNPP.

j Air samples are analyzed weekly for gross beta, iodine, and by gamma spectral analysis (quarterly). A l total of 370 of each type of air sample (particulate and iodine) was collected in 1995.

Gross beta activity was detected in all air samples and ranged up to 0.04 pCi/m3. The annual average concentration of gross beta at both indicator and control locations was 0.02 pCi/m3. Historically, the

, concentration of gross beta in air has been essentially identical at indicator and control locations, as shown in Figure 5.

1 l Except for naturally occurring beryllium 7, no radionuclide was identified in the gamma spectral

analysis above the LLD. Iodine-131 was not detected in any sample above the LLD of 0.05 pCi/m3.

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 29

1995 Annual Environmental And Eftiuent Release Report 0.03 0.025 R

l E

0.02 - - - - _ .

Hiidic~a~yt 0.015 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

scontroij

] 0.01 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

E 0.005 _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

0 =

U m

N a $$E a S

a E

a E

a h5 0$$$

Year Figure 5: Annual average concentration of gross beta in air.

PRECIPITATION Precipitation sample analysis allows us to detect radionuclides deposited from the atmosphere.

Precipitation in the for.n of rain, snow, sleet or hail provides a way to wash airborne radionuclides from the atmosphere. Although not required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM, samples are collected from six locations using passive collection containers. Containers are removed monthly or when full, strained to remove debris, and shipped to the laboratory for analysis, here are five indicator locations within one mile of PNPP and one control location, which is located eleven miles from PNPP.

Precipitation samples are analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. A total of 65 precipitation samples were collected in 1995. De results ofgamma spectral analysis were all below LLD.

Terrestrial Monitoring Collecting and analyzing samples of milk, food products and vegetation provides data to assess the build-up of radionuclides that may be ingested by humans. The data from soil samples provides infonnation on the deposition of radionuclides from the atmosphere. Neither vegetation nor soil samples are required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM.

MILK Samples of milk are collected once each month from November through March, and twice each month from April through October. Sampling is increased during the summer because animals usually feed outside on pasture and not on stored feed. De PNPP REMP includes three milk locations (two within five miles of the plant, and one control). Since the milk sampling locations did not meet the requirements of the Technical Specifications /ODCM, food product sampling (discussed below) was g perfonned. Milk was collected from the available locations even though they did not meet the 3 Technical Specifications /ODCM requirements. If new locations that meet the Technical Specification /ODCM nequirements are identified in the future, they will be added to the program.

Milk samples are analyzed fc-iodine and by gamma spectral analysis. A total of 52 milk samples were collected in 1995. lodine was not detected above the LLD of 0.75 pCi/l in any of the samples.

He concentrations of all radionuclides except naturally occurring potassium-40 were below LLDs in all samples collected. The results for potassium-40 were similar at indicator and control locations, as expected.

I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 30

f l

l 1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report FOOD PRODUCTS Food products can provide a direct pathway to humans by ingestion. They can absorb radionucfides from atmospheric deposition on soil or from irrigation water drawn from a lake or pond receiving airborne or liquid effluents. Also, radionuclides in the soil may be absorbed by the roots of the plants and become incorporated into the edible ponions. Because there is not a sufficient number of milk sampling locations, the PNPP REMP is required to include two food product indicator locations and one control location. Food products are collected monthly during the growing season from three farms in the vicinity of PNPP. The control location for food products is 16.2 miles from PNPP.

A total of 22 food product samples were collected in 1995 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis.

Six food products were collected, including cabbage, broccoli, eauliflower, dill, beet greens and turnip greens. Beryllium-7 and potassium-40, naturally occurring radionuclides, were found in several samples, as expected. No other radionuclides were detected above the LLDs.

VEGETATION Vegetation (grass) was collected monthly during the growing season from four locations (three indicator and one control) in 1995. Grass is clipped from open areas using standard lawn trimming equipment. The control location for vegetation is eleven miles away. A total of 22 grass samples were collected in 1995 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Two naturally occurring radionuclides were detected: beryllium-7 and potassium-40. No other radionuclides were detected above the LLDs.

l SOIL Soil samples are collected biannually from seven locations (six locations and one control). The control location is eleven miles away. Only the top inch of soil is sampled in an effon to identify possible trends in the local environmental radionuclide concentrations.

Fourteen soil samples were collected in 1995 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Two naturally occurring radionuclides, potassium-40 and radium-226 were detected in the samples, as expected.

Cesium-137 activity was detected in all samples and ranged from 55.00 - 400.0 pCi/kg. The annual average concentration of cesium-137 was 259.00 pCi/kg at the indicator locations and 197.00 pCi/kg at the control location. For all sample sites, the annual average concentrations were similar to those measured in previous years (Figure 6). The downward trend apparent in the figure represents the decrease in cesium-137 deposition from atmospheric weapons testing in the 1960's and

'70's.

1 1200 1000 y 800 _ __ ___

g, 600 - -

aindrator 3 Control 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.a n a n n y -

g g E - E - E -  !  !  ! - J Year Figure 6: Annual average concentration of cesium-137 in soil Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 31

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report The difference between indicator and control location results is not surprising since the presence of <

radionuclides in soilis so dependent on site-specific factors such as soil type and drainage. These  ;

factors determine the ability of the soil to attract ions. For example, differences in soil types at the six I indicator locations in 1995 resulted in cesium 137 concentrations ranging from 55.0 pCi/kg to 400.0 PCi/kg.

Aquatic Monitoring l l Radionuclides may be present in Lake Erie from many sources (other than PNPP) including i atmospheric deposition, run-off/ soil erosion, and releases of radioactivity in liquid effluents from

]

hospitals, universities or other industrial facilities. These sources provide two forms of potential radiation exposure, external and internal. External exposure can occur from contact with water or I shoreline sediments. Internal exposure can occur from ingestion of radionuclides, either directly from E drinking the water, or as a result of the transfer of radionuclides through the aquatic food chain to the E eventual consumption of aquatic organisms, such as fish. To monitor these pathways, PNPP samples water, shoreline sediments, and fish.

WATER Water is sampled from five locations along Lake Eric in the vicinity of the PNPP as required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM. Samples from three locations are collected using composite sample pumps. The pumps are designed to collect water at regular intervals and composite it in a sample container. The containers are removed monthly and the samples shipped to the laboratory for analysis. Samples from two locations are collected weekly and combined. Each month the combined sample is shipped for analysis.

gl 3 ii Fifty-eight water samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta activity and by gamma spectral analysis in 1995. From these, monthly samples were composited into quarterly samples and analyzed for tritium. Gross beta activity was detected in all samples collected and ranged from 1.30 - 3.60 pCi/1.

The annual average concentration of gross beta was 2.32 pCi/l at the indicor locations and 2.18 pCi/l ,

at the control location. For all sample locations, the annual - ta.r,c concentrations were similar to l those measured in previous years (Figure 7). '

The significant difference between pre 1988 data and post 1988 data has been attributed to a change in E

vendor laboratories in 1987/1988. A comprehensive explanation is provided in the 1988 Annual g Environmental Operating Report.

to 9 E 8 E

~ 7 6 -

k dmor p 5 -

a control g4 __ _

< 3 _ _ _ _ _ -

2 -

t. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

0

$$$$$N$$$5 0$$$

Figure 7: Annual average concentration of gross beta in water Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 32

1995 Annual Environmental And Efflueat Release Report No radionuclides were detected by gamma spectral analysis above the LLD. Tritium was detected in ten of 20 samples and ranged from 155.00 - 263.00 pCi/l. The annual average concentration of tritium was 201.25 pCi/l at the indicator locations and 227.00 pCill at the control location. These results are well within the range of those measured in previous years which have ranged frem below the lower limit of detection to 2,200 pCi/1.

SEDIMENT Sampling lake bottom sediments can provide an indication of the accumulation of undissolved radionuclides which may lead to internal exposure to humans through the ingestion of fish, through resuspension into drinking water, or as an external radiation source from shoreline exposure to fisherman and swimmers. Although only one location is required by the PNPP Technical Specification /ODCM, sediment is sampled twice each year from seven locations, two of which are also fish sampling locations. Sediment samples from offshore are collected using a hand dredge. Near shore samples are collected using a scoop. Fourteen sediment samples were collected in 1995 and annyzed by gamma spectrometry. He predominant radionuclide detected by gamma spectral analysis was potassium-40, which is naturally occurring. Potassium-40 has been detected in all samples since the program began in 1981. Cesium 137 was detected in eight samples and ranged from 211.5 -

1,354.9 pCi/kg. The annual average concentration was 405.37 pCi/kg at the indicator locations and 854.55 pCi/kg at the control location. Rese are within the range of concentrations measured in previous years (Figure 8).

The changes in cesium-137 concentration from year to year may be related to the movement of sediment on the lake bottom. Wave action and currents can cause significant sediment movement between sample collections. For this reason, it is unlikely the same bed of sediment is sampled at each collection. His would contribute to inconsistent data, as Figure 8 demonstrates.

900 800

, 700--

$ 600 _

f 500 _ . . . _ _

aindicator p 400 _ _ _ _

ac ontrol j 300 _ _ _ __ _ _

< 200 _ _ _ .

1 _. _ _ _ _ _"__ -. _. _.

To aGm ;5 $ 8 ea "

a m a a e a m $ '~8 m M 8 g* 8 Year Figure 8: Annual average concentration of cesium-137 in sediment FISH Fish are analyzed primarily to quantify the dietary radionuclide intake by humans, and secondarily to serve as indicators of radioactivity in the aquatic ecosystem. Fish are collected from two locations, twice each year as required by the Technical Specifications /ODCM. Important sport and commercial species are targeted, and only the fillets are sent to the laboratory for analysis. A scientific collecting permit is obtained annually from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources for fish sampling.

Twenty-five fish samples were collected in 1995 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Twelve species of fish were represented, including walleye, drum, smallmouth bass, carp, white sucker, white perch, yellow perch, redhorse sucker, white bass, take trout, steelhead, and rockbass. As expected, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 33

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report naturally occurring potassium-40 was found in all samples. Cesium-137 was detected in one fish (a walleye from Location 25). No other radionuclides were detected above the LLD.

Direct Radiation Monitoring TliERM0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS g Environmental radiation is measured directly at thirty-nine locations around the PNPP site (the REMP g is required to include 28 locations, two of which are control locations). The locations are positioned in two rings around the plant as well as at the site boundary. The inner ring is within a one mile radius of the plant site; the outer ring is four to five miles from the plant. Control locations are over ten miles from the plant in the two least prevalent wind directions. Each location is equipped with three l thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Two are changed quarterly and one is changed annually. l A total of 346 TLDs were collected and analyzed in 1995. This includes 309 collected on a quanerly basis, and 37 collected annually. In 1995, the annual average dose for all indicator locations was 54.84 mR, and 55.70 mR for all control locations. The TLD results are higher prior to 1988 due to a change in vendor laboratory services. A comprehensive explanation of the difference is provided in the 1988 l Annual Environmental Operating Report.

l 20 a

15 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

$ 10 _ 6 "W l

E 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

o l 5$$$$$$$$$5$$$$

Year Figure 9: Average dose per quarter INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM l

The purpose of the Interlaboratory Cross-Check comparison program is to provide an independent check on the vendor laboratory's analytical procedures. Samples with a known concentration of specific radionuclides are provided to the vendor laboratory. The vendor laboratory measures and reports the concentration of specified radionuclides. The known values (EPA values) are then compared to the vendor results. Results consistently outside established acceptance criteria indicate a need to check instruments or procedures.

In 1995, the vendor laboratory analyzed 26 samples of water for this program. All results were within 5 the acceptable range. The results of this program are shown in Table 4. Results are expressed in pCi/1. g In addition to their participation in the EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program, the vendor laboratory periodically conducts an internal cross-check program for dosimeters. No dosimeters were submitted for cross-check in 1995.

I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 34

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report The vendor laboratory routinely monitors the quality of their analyses by analyzing " spiked" samples (samples with a specific quantity of radioactive material present in them. The quantity is not known I by the sample analyst). Table 5 shows the results of this program for 1995. Two samples were outside the acceptable range; they are shown in bold. All results are expressed in pCi/l except air filter results, which are in pCi/ filter.

I Table 4: 1995 EPA Cross-Check Intercomparison Program results.

Date Sample Type J Analysis Vendor Result EPA Value Acceptable Range I Jan. Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Gross Alpha 17.7 1.5 13.7 0.6 4.3 0.6 20.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 6.3 - 23.7 f

5.0 5.0 0.0 - 13.7 I Feb. Water Gross Beta I-131 Ra-226 4.7 0.6 99.0 4.4 19.2 0.4 5.0 .5.0 100.0 .10.0 19.1 2.9 0.0 - 13.7 82.7 - 117.3 14.1 - 24.1 I Mar. Water Ra-228 Uranium H-3 19.2 2.0 24.9 0.2 7460.0 + 87.2 20.0. 5.0 25.5 3.0 7435.0 + 744.0 11.3 - 28.7 20.3 -30.7 6,144.2 - 8725.8 I 11.0 0.6 Pu-239 11.I 1.I 9.2 - 13.0 Apr. Water Gross AIpha 41.7 0.6 47.5 11.9 26.9 - 68.1 Ra-226 13.4 0.5 14.9 2.2 11.1 - 18.7 Ra-228 13.1 2.4 15.8 4.0 8.9-22.7 Uranium 9.5 0.6 10.0 3.0 4.8 - 15.2 Co-60 29.0 1.7 29.0 5.0 20.3-37.7 Cs 134 17.3 1.2 20.0 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 I Cs-137 Gross Beta Sr-89 11.0 1.0 74.8 3.2 11.0. 5.0 86.6 10.0 2.3 - 19.7 69.3 - 103.9 l

17.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 11.3 -28.7 '

I Jun. Water St90 Ra-226 Ra-228 12.7 1.2 14.7 0.3 11.9 0.6 15.0 5.0 14.8 2.2 6.3 - 23.7 11.0 - 18.6 15.0 3.8 8.4 -21.6 I Jul. Water Uranium Gross Alpha Gross Beta 13.9 0.3 16.4 2.4 16.8 1.0 15.2 3.0 27.5 6.9 19.4 5.0 10.0 - 20.4 15.5 - 39.5 10.7 -28.1 Aug. Water H-3 4773.7 49.9 4872.0 487.0 4027.1-57

16.9 CONCLUSION

No unusual radionuclide concentrations or exposure levels were detected during 1995. Atmospheric monitoring resuhs were consistent with past results. The prevalent radionuclide in air was beryllium 7 I which is naturally occurring. Naturally occuning potassium-40 was detected in all terrestrial samples, as expected. Cesium-137 was detected in soil and is the result of fallout from weapons testing. The concentrations were similar to those measured in previous years and are not related to plant operation.

I There was no significant change in radionuclide concentrations at indicator locations for aquatic samples in 1995. Cesium-137 was detected in sediment. Results were within the range of past data.

I Finally, direct radiation measurements are consistent with past data.

I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 35

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuint Release Report Table 5: 1995 Vendor " spiked" sample results Date Sample Analysis Result Known Value Acceptable Range Jan. Milk Cs 137 51.2 7.5 49.4 39.4 - 59.4 Sr-89 19.4 3.4 23.1 13.1 - 33,1 Sr-90 26.2 1.3 25.1 18.1 - 38.1 1 131 80.3 1.4 86.0 68.8 - 103.2 g 1 131 84.8 10.4 86.0 51.6 - 96.0 g Air Filter Cs 137 2.2 0.0 1.9 1.2 - 2.7 l 131 2.2 0.0 1.9 1.2 - 2.7 Gross Beta 7.5 0.0 8.1 0.0- 18.1 Water H-3 40929.9 5594.5 40871.0 32696.8 -49045.2 Co-60 250.5 14.1 247.5 222.8 - 272.3 Cs-134 290.5 14.4 321.3 289.2 - 353.4 Cs-137 387.7 21.2 394.3 354.9 - 433.7 CharcoalCanister 1 131 2.9 0.1 2.5 1.5 - 3.4 Feb. Vegetation 1-131 1.9 0.1 1.9 1.1 - 2.6 Water Ra-226 6.9 0.I 6.9 4.8 - 9.0 l

=

Ma r. Water Sr-89 0.9 3.9 42.7 32.7 - 52.7 (1)

Water Sr-90 31.4 1.8 39.1 31.3 - 46.9(2)

Water Gross Alpha 88.5 3.7 82.9 41.5 - 124.4 Water Gross Beta 83.0 2.3 87.2 77.2 - 97.2 Apr. Air Filter Gross Beta 7.5 0.0 8.1 0.0 - 18.1 g Cs-137 2.3 1 2.1 1.9 1.2 - 2.7 5 Water H3 9656.2 291.8 9333.0 7466.4 - 11199.6 Co-60 23.8 2.4 24.8 14.8 - 34.8 Cs-134 29.3 2.3 30.8 20.8-40.8 Cs-137 42.3 3.9 40.9 30.9-50.9 Gross Alpha 88.0 3.8 82.9 41.5 - 124.4 Gross Beta 79.6 + 2.3 87.2 77.2 - 97.2 Milk Cs-134 37.0 1.8 40.7 30.7 + 50.7 Cs-137 62.4 3.1 54.5 44.5 - 64.5 Sr-89 32.6 3.3 36.5 26.5-46.5 Sr-90 25.611.6 24.9 14.9 - 34.9 May Water Fe 55 2033.7 500.2 2274.0 1819.2 - 2728.8 Gross Alpha 17.3 1.4 20.7 10.4 - 31.1 Gross Beta 21.2 1.0 21.8 11.8 - 31.8 Sr-89 18.7 2.4 21.2 11.2 31.2 Sr-90 21.2 1.I 23.2 13.2 - 33.2 Fish Cs-134 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1-0.2 Cs 137 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 - 0.2 Soil Cs 134 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 - 0.4 Cs 137 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.3 - 0.7 E

g Jun. Water 1 131 78.8 2.3 85.5 68.4 - 102.6 1131 48.2 1.9 46.8 34.8 - 58.8 l-131 34.9 0.5 39.5 27.5- 51.5 Charcoal Canister 1-131 2.2 0.1 2.3 1.4-33 Vegetation 1131 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.3 - 0.8 Milk 1-131 38.5 0.5 39.6 27.6 - 51.6 Jul. Vegetation 1131 1.1 0.0 1.0 0.6 - 1.4 Milk Cs-134 31.5 2.5 34.4 24.4 - 44.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 36

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report Date Sample Analpis Result Known Value Acceptable Range Cs 137 $0.2 4.0 43.4 33.4 - 53.4 1131 44.7 5.4 45.6 27.4 - 55.6 Sr90 28.0 1.4 27.9 17.9 - 37.9 Air Filter Gross Beta 7.3 0.0 8.1 0.0 18.1 Cs 137 2.3 0.0 1.9 1.2 - 2.7 Water H3 25806.9 447.7 26669.0 21335.2 -32002.8 Fe-55 2.3 0.4 2.1 0.0 22.1 Sep. Water Sr-89 34.6 4.9 39.0 29.0-49.0 Sr-90 20.3 1.3 20.0 10.0 -30.0 Oct. Charcoal Canister 1131 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.5-1.1 Fish Co-60 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.5-1.1 Cs-134 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.3-0.8 Cs-137 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.5-1.2 l Nov. Air Filter Gross Beta 7.3 0.0 8.0 0.0 - 18.0 l Water H3 27963.4 445.5 29315.0 23452.0 -35178.0 Gross Alpha 75.3 3.2 82.8 41.4 - 124.2 l

Gross Beta 86.9 2.5 86.3 76.3 - 96.3 j (1) (2) The raw data was reviend andfound to befree oferrors. The sample was repeated with similar results. An investigation was conducted to determine the cause ofthis deviation. No apparent cause wasfoundfor this discrepancy. It was determined the " spiked" sample was preparedimproperly. Another " spiked" sample waspreparedandar.ulvzed Nofurther action isplanned Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 37

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report LAND USE CENSUS INTRODUCTION Each year a land use census is conducted to identify the locations of the nearest milk animal, garden (of greater than 500 square feet), and residence in each of the meteorological sectors that is over land.

The Land Use Census is required by the PNPP Off Site Dose Calculation Manual, Section 3/4.12.2.

He information gathered during the Land Use Census is used for off-site dose assessment and to update sampling locations for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, ne Land Use Census is conducted by traveling all roads within a five-mile radius of the plant site, and recording and mapping the location of the nearest resident, milk animal, and vegetable garden in each of the meteorological sectors that is over land. The 1995 Census was conducted August 17 23.

The information has been tabulated below; garden, residence and milk animal locations are plotted on the map in Figure 1. Note that the W, WNW, NNW, NW N, and NNE sectors extend over Lake Erie and therefore were not included in the survey.

s DISCUSSION AND RESULTS In general, the predominant land use within the census area continues to be rural / agricultural.

Here were no changes in nearest residences within five miles of the plant in 1995. Table I lists the nearest residence by sector. A milk animal (cow) was identified during the 1995 census. He owners of the animal did not choose to participate in the 1995 sampling program. Information on the milk animal is shown in Table 2. There was one change to nearest gardens recorded during the 1995 census. Table 3 lists the nearest gardens that occupy at least 500 square feet, nere was one milk animal (goat) identified during the 1994 census. He goat died prior to participating in the milk samp'ing program. For this reason, the location was not added to the REMP.

Table 1: Nearest residence by sector Sector Location Address Miles from PNPP Map X/Q Value (Sec/m3) Locator #

NE 4385 Lockwood 0.8 2.17E-6 1 ENE 4502 Lockwood 1.0 1.13E-6 2 E 2684 Antioch 1.1 6.77E-7 3 ESE 2774 Antioch 1.2 4.44E-7 4 SE 4495 N. Ridge 1.2 3.89E-7 5 SSE 3119 Parmly 0.9 1.89E-6 6 S 3121 Center 0.9 2.25E 6 7 SSW 3850 Clark 0.9 1. I 1 E-6 8 SW 3440 Clark 1.2 4.98E-7 9 WSW 2815 Perry Park 1.0 1.72E-6 10 Table 2: Milk animal Sector Location Address Miles from PNPP Map Locator #

S 3588 River 4.8 18 Land Use Census Page 39

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report Table 3: Nearest garden by sector Sector Location Address Miles from D/Q Value per m2 Map PNPP tocator #

NE 4398 Lockwood 0.8 1.09E-8 11 ENE 4650 Lockwood 1.2 4.1IE-9 12 E 1740 Antioch 1.2 4.56E-9 13 ESE 2774 Antioch 1.2 3.41E-9 4 SE 4679 Middle Ridge 1.9 1.31 E-9 14 SSE* 3288 Call 1.4 2.30E-9 15 S 3121 Center 0.9 1.31 E-8 7 SSW 3515 N. Ridge 1.7 1.19E-9 16 SW 3440 Clark 1.2 2.24 E-9 9 WSW 2975 Perry Park 1.2 2.31 E-9 17

• -Indicates a newlocationfor 1993 I

I I'

I tane use c_s Pa,e 40 g

LMD USE CEXSUS MAP,,,,, ..e n. &

W SW w

w^

a _

af s w

%4J, g s 8 g #

t

• g ,

fL 20 $ 8 k20 g 8 NARRowSRD 20 gv s- g% 4 4

g 2

}

==

-_f

~ .g, a e

% r. $y e fj sw ' ~ co -s__ ef 's 8 l

[

~

~ ~son

~ goix a_ _$b ' -

,,' [

=

~

~. f so mainosan f~~, I

,, g. 34 p 3 v 3 Se

• S M ll'e ;

% g i 84 Land Use Census Map

1995 Annut! Environmental And Efflurnt Release Report CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING INTRODUCTION Sampling for benthic macroinvertebrates (clams and mussels) has been conducted in Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) since 1971, The clam / mussel program currently focuses on two species: Corbiculafluminea (Asiatic clam) and Dreissenapolymorpha (zebra mussel).

CORBICULA PROGRAM Monitoring specifically for Corbicula was initiated in response to an NRC bulletin and concerns of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. The current monitoring is part of the Environmental Protection  :

Plan (Operating License Appendix B). The program consists of periodic sampling of areas at both the i PNPP and Eastlake Power Plants. Its purpose is to detect Corbicula, should it appear in the study area.

)

I No Corbicula have ever been found in any sample collected from PNPP or from Lake Erie in the  ;

vicinity of PNPP. Two Corbicula were found in a sample collected from the Eastlake plant in June, j 1987. No Corbicula have been found in any other sample collected since that time. A more detailed

{

program history can be found in the 1986 and 1987 PNPP Annual Environmental Operating Reports. j Monitoring I i

i Samples were collected quarterly in 1995 from the service water and emergency service water pump  ;

houses at PNPP, and semiannually from Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Power Plant. Sample collection dates are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: 1995 Corbicula sampling dates and locations Date Sample Location 1/23 Service Water (SW) and Emergency Service Water (ESW) Forebays and trash baskets 4/7 SW and ESW Forebays and trash baskets 6/19 Lake Eric in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant 7/13 SW and ESW Forebays and trash baskets 9/5 Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant 10/27 SW and ESW Forebays and trash baskets Weekly Inspections of PNPP property shoreline, weather permitting All samples were collected by Ponar hand dredge, hand scoop, or scraper. They were examined for bivalve shells and fragments, which were then identified to the lowest possible species.

In addition to sample collections, plant components that use raw water are inspected whenever opened for maintenance or repair. Also, active communications were maintained with other agencies involved in benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring on Lake Erie. Several publications developed and distributed specifically for the purpose of providing information on bivalves are used as resources.

Results No Corbicula were found in any sample collected during the 1995 monitoring program. All bivalves collected are listed in Table 2.

Clam / Mussel Montioring Page 41

j 1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Relecse Report I!1 Table 2: Bivalves collected during the 1995 Corbicula monitoring program 1 Species / Location PNPP Eastlake Dreissena polymorpha X X Dreissena bugensis X X Physa sp. X X Pisidium sp. X X Pisidium adamst X l

g Pisidium casertanum X Pisidium compressum X l Pisidiumferrugineum X Pisidium tilljeborgi X Pleuroceridae X ,

Sphacridae X l Sphaerium corneum X Sphaerium striatinum X Sphaerium transversum X Valvatidae X X Conclusions ne collection in June 1987 was the only indication of Corbicula in the vicinity of PNPP. However, it has not been demonstrated that the presence of these clams is creating any operational problems at the Eastlake Power Plant or at PNPP.

DREISSENA PROGRAM Zebra mussels were first discovered at PNPP in September 1988. The initial collection of 19 mussels was made as part of the Corbicula monitoring program. The Dreissena program began in 1989 with B

monitoring and testing. The current control program was designed and implemented in 1990. 5 Monitoring in addition to visually inspecting plant raw water systems when they are opened for maintenance or repair, monitoring methods include the use of commercial divers, anificial substrates, sidestream monitors, and plankton nets.

Commercial divers monitor mussel infestation when they are inspecting forebays, basins, and the intake and discharge structures. Hey have also been used to take underwater videotapes of the water basins and intake tunnel. Artificial substrates include concrete blocks suspended by rope into the plant service water basin. The substrate is removed weekly for inspection for settlement.

Sidestream monitors are flow-through containers that receive water diverted from plant systems.

PNPP used them in three in-plant locations during the mussel season, May through October. Hey are fitted with slides and inspected weekly for veliger settlement. A plankton net is used to obtain weekly samples ofincoming service water that are subsequently examined for veligers.

Treatment Chemicals used for mussel control in 1995 included chlorine and a commercial molluscicide. He I

system provides chlorine to plant service water, emergency service water, and circulating water I

cl_,m_l monemg Page m g

I l

1995 Annu11 Environmental And Effluent Release Report 1

systems. Sodium sulfite is added to plant discharge water to dechlorinate it before discharge to Lake l Erie.

He use of commercial molluscicides requires approval of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). De chemical selected for use at Perry Nuclear Power Plant in 1995 was didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride. One treatment was applied near the end of the settlement period. De active ingredients were detoxified by adsorption onto bentonite clay prior to discharge into Lake Erie.

j Results ne effectiveness of the intermittent chlorination treatment has been determined in several ways. First, visual inspections of raw water system components are conducted when systems are open during maintenance or repair. In addition, settlement monitors were inspected weekly for new settlement. No .

live settlement has been found in any plant component to date.

The effectiveness of the application of the commercial molluscicide was measured by observing mortality of mussels placed in a flow-through container placed in plant service water and subjected to the chemical treatment. Mortality observed in the flow through container was 100%. To date, PNPP has had no problems related to zebra mussels.

1 I Conclusions I Perry Nuclear Power Plant has taken the approach that the best method for avoiding problems with  ;

zebra mussels is preventive treatment of plant water systems. He current program of monitoring and  !

j chemical treatments will be continued to minimize the possibility that PNPP will experience future

]

problems due to zebra mussels. )

I f

i l l

i l l

l Clam / Mussel Montioring Page 43

1995 Annual Environmental And Erfluent Release Report HERBICIDE USAGE Herbicides are used sparingly on the PNPP site. An application must be made to the PNPP Environmental Programs Unit prior to spraying to ensure that only approved chemicals are used, and .

only in approved areas.

l Table I provides a compilation of herbicide usage at the PNPP for 1995. All usage was in compliance with Ohio Environmental Protection Agency regulations. No adverse environmental impacts as a result i of this usage were noted during weekly site environmental inspections. Surflan AS and Round Up were used in equal portions to make up the total quantity except where noted.

Table li Herbicide usage Date Applied - Location Acres Gallons 6/22/95 Misc. Gravel areas 0.5 1.0 7/5/95 E filed and outer perimeter 3.86 7.45 9/26/95 Parking area 3.0 6.0 l I

l Herbicide Usage Page 45

1995 Annuti Environmental And Effluent Relene Report

[ SPECIAL REPORTS NONCOMPLIANCES NPDES Permit Noncompliances ne National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, or NPDES permit, is issued by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). It establishes monitoring requirements and limits for discharges from the plant. It also specifies the locations from which the plant is allowed to discharge.

There were two notification made to the OEPA in 1995.

On February 9,1995, the two hour time limit for discharge of total residual chlorine was exceeded by fifteen minutes. This incident was reported to the OEPA on February 10,1995 and was followed with a confirmation letter on Febmary 13,1995 (PY-CE!/OEPA-0214L).

On March 23,1995, the two hour time limit for discharge of total residual chlorine was exceeded by 21.47 hours5.439815e-4 days <br />0.0131 hours <br />7.771164e-5 weeks <br />1.78835e-5 months <br />. This incident was reported to the OEPA on March 23,1995 and was following with a confirmation letter on March 27,1995 (PY-CEI/OEPA-0128L).

( EPP Noncompliances

[ The Environmental Protection Plan, or EPP, is a part of the PNPP Operating License. It requires non

( radiological environmental monitoring programs and reporting. Two were EPP noncompliances identified in 1995.

f During a self-assessment of EPP programs, it was discovered that changes to the plant NPDES Permit had not been reported to the NRC within 30 days following the date the changes were approved. All permit changes not previously submitted were sent to the NRC (PY-CEI/NRR 1906L).

During the same self-assessment, it was discovered that sets of color transparencies of aerial remote sensing photomissions had not been submitted to the NRC. All color transparencies were submitted to the NRC (PY-CEl/NRR 1907L).

UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS All proposed changes in plant design or operation, as well as tests or experiments conducted during 1995 were reviewed for potential environmental impact in accordance with the EPP and administrative quality assurance procedures. He reviews ensured that no changes were performed which could cause f an adverse environmental impact. Herefore, there were no potentially significant unreviewed environmental questions in 1995.

{ NONROUTINE REPORTS nere was one nonroutine report in 1995.

On December 31,995, approximately 10 - 15 gallons of trichloroethylene leaked from a pressurized system into a plant building. Although approximately five gallons were recovered, the remaining volume volatized, nis incident was reported to the OEPA on December 31,1995 and was followed with a written confirmation letter on January 10,1996 (PY-CEI/OEPA-0238L).

Special Reports Page 47

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Relecse Report 1

APPENDIX A: ADDENDUM TO 1994 EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT Appendix A: Addendum to 1994 Efiluent Release Report Page 49

=.

1993 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Solid Waste Sixteen shipinents of radioactive waste were transported from PNPP for disposal in 1994 to the State of South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control disposal facility in Barnwell, South Carolina. No waste was shipped for burial from 6/30/94 through 12/31/94. No irradiated fuel was transported from PNPP in 1994. Table 1 provides information on total volume, waste streams and radioactivity.

Table 1: Solid waste and irradiated fuel shipments

1. Solid waste shipped off site for burial or disposal Type of Waste Unit Annual Value Est. Total Error. %

a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m' 50.5 25 Ci 341.0

b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, m' 132.9 25 etc.

Ci 150.9

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m' 0 Ci 0

2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste)

T)pe of Waste Radionuclide  % Est. Total Error, %

a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. Fe-55 22.6 Co-60 11.7 Zn-65 52.4 25 Cr-SI 8.6 Mn-54 1.9 C0-58 1.4

b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, Co-60 23.8 etc.

Fe 55 66.1 Mn-54 3.3 25 Zn-65 6.4

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. None

3. Solid waste disposition Number of Shipments (1) Mode of Transportation Destination 16 Truck Barnwell, South Carolina (1) Addittonalshipments wie made combined with wastefrom othcr utshtiesfrom Scienti/ic Ecology Group in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

4. Irradiated fuel shipments (Disposition)

Number of Shloments Mode of Transportation Destination 0

l l

Appendix A: Addendum to IM4 Effluent Release Report Page 50

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report Liquid Effluent Releases Tables 2 -4 provide information on the nuclide composition and annual site boundary dose for all liquid releases in 1994. If a radionuclide was not present at a level greater than the LLD, then the value is expressed as "less than (indicated by <), LLD". In all cases, LLDs met or were below the levels required by the Technical Specifications /ODCM.

Table 2: Summation of all releases Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Est.

I 2 3 4 Total Error, A. Fission and activation products

1. Total releases (not Ci 4.78E 2 2.62E-2 1.70E-2 8.72E-3 1.00E+1 including tritium, gases, alpha)

2. Average diluted pCi/ml 3.01 E-8 8.07E-8 1.17E-8 8.07E-9 concentration during period

3. Percent of applicable limit % NA NA NA NA "NA " Thu trem is Not Apphcable. The TechmcalSpecifications'0DCM do not have a hmitforfusion and activation products.

B. Tritium

1. Total release Ci 3.54E+0 1.52E+0 2.34E+0 1.88E+0 1.00+E l

2. Average diluted pCi/mi 2.23 E-6 4.70E-6 1.60E-6 1.74E 6 concentration during period

3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.074 0.157 0.054 0.058 C. Dissolved and entrained gases

1. Total release Ci 5.09E 3 0 4.89E-3 1.16E-2 1.00E+1

2. Average diluted Ci/mi 3.20E-9 0 3.36E-9 1.07E-8 concentration during period

~

3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.002 0 0.002 0.035 D. Gross alpha radioactivity

1. Total release Ci <LLD <LLD 4.44E-5 <LLD 1.00E+1 E. Volume of waste released liters 4.34 E+6 4.01 E+6 5.43 E+6 2.79E+6 1.00E+1 (prior to dilution)

F. Volume of dilution water liters 1.59E+9 3.25E+8 1.46E+9 1.08E+9 1.00E+1 used during period I

Appendix A: Addendum to 1994 Effluent Release Report Page 51

1995 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Table 3: Nuclide composition ofliquid effluents f Nuclides Heleased Unit Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 tritium Ci 3.54E+0 1.52E+0 2.34 E+0 1.88E+0 chromium 51 Ci 7.62E-3 3.58E 5 6.62E 5 2.44E-4

( manganese-54 iron-55 Ci 1.65E-3 1.65E-3 9.69E-4 5.04 E-4 Ci 5.64 E-3 3.0$ E-3 2.31E 3 2.67E-4 manganese 56 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 5.55E-5

( cobalt 58 iron 59 Ci Ci 2.76E-4 3.39E 5 1.27E-5

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD cobalt-60 Ci 9.84E-3 1.14 E-2 7.26E-3 3.75E-3 zinc-65 Ci 1.84E-2 9.60E-3

( strontium-89 Ci 6.90E-5 4.89E-5 5.06E-3 2.99E 5 1.69E-3 2.85E-5 strontium-90 Ci 5.47E-6 <LLD <LLD <LLD g yttrium-93 Ci <LLD <LLD 2.63E-5 <LLD L zirconium-95 Ci 1.18E-4 <LLD <LLD <LLD niobium-95 Ci 1.76E-4 <LLD <LLD <LLD technetium-99m Ci 1.62E-4 <LLD 6.54E-6 5.31E 5

[ technetium 101 Ci 2.52E-5 <LLD <LLD <LLD ruthenium-103 Ci 1.33 E-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD silver-110m Ci 2.74E-4 8.45E-5 <LLD <LLD f antimony-124 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 6.18 E-6 antimony-125 Ci <LLD <LLD 1.17E-4 2.93 E-4 iodine-131 Ci 6.26E-5 <LLD 4.73 E-4 3.92E-4

( iodine-133 xenon-133 Ci Ci 1.55E-05 3.25E-3

<LLD

<LLD 1.30E-4 3.57E-5 4.36E-3 1.00E-2 xenon-133m Ci <LLD <LLD 1.07E-4 1.65E-4 iodine 134 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 9.32E-5

[ cesium-134 Ci 4.75E-5 5.84E-5 7.74E 5 4.70E-5 xenon 135 Ci 1.84E-3 <LLD 4.28E-4 1.37E-3 cesium-137 Ci 7.66E-5 1.89E-4 2.71 E-4 1.55 E-4

[ cesium-138 Ci <LLD <LLD 7.16E-5 4.31 E-5 barium 139 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD 4.08E-5

[ lanthanum-140 Ci 1.61E 3 <LLD 1.16E-4 9.97E-4 L cerium 141 Ci 2.75E-4 4.24E-5 <LLD 2.94E-5 cerium 144 Ci 7.69E 5 <LLD <LLD <LLD neptunium-239 Ci 1.7FE-5 <LLD <LLD <LLD

{ Total for period Ci 3.60E+0 1.55E+0 2.35E+0 1.90E+0 Table 4: Annual site boundary dose to maximum individual considering all sectors f Efiluent Organ Estimated dose (mrem) Limit  % oflimit Liquid Total body 3.20E-2 3.0E+0 1.1 Liquid Liver 6.48E-2 1.0E+1 0.7 Appendix A: Addendum to 1994 Effluent Release Report Page 52

a j

1995 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report APPENDIX B: 1995 REMP DATA

SUMMARY

i-

?

i

,i 1

t' 4

l 1

s i

h 1

i I i

f f-i

.i ,

a l 3

I a

i' l

i

?

i i

I i

4 i

e-1 1

2 j

i 4

i i.

j Appendix B: 1995 REMP Data 'ummary Page 53 i

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Location of Pacility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Air- Gamma spec s...

...._..._+.........+.......+.........----_.......-.+_.. ... _..-.........+...............-.........-..+.. ......__.-........+

Type and Location with Highest All Annual Mean Madium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All and Analysis Limit +---.---+..-.----.-.....-...-+ All (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locatiens Maasurement l Performed (LLD) Mean (1) ' Range) Mean (1) l Direct [ (Range) e..._........_+.........+.......+ ..........--... ......+........... .(Range) l Mean (1) (Range)

APTG BE.7 NA 0.07

......._,--.....+.....-.....__._-.__.+........... .........,

0.07 35 0.08 0.07 PCI/CU.M. 28 (0028/0028) (0024/0024) 0.6 0.05 0.11 (0004/0004) 40004/0004) 0.05 0.11 E 0.05-0.11 0.05-0.09 CO.58 NA 28 LLD . . . -

l CO.60 NA 28 LLD - . . -

CS-134 .037 28' LLD . . -

1 CS.137 .045 28 LLD - . . .

I e........._...+-._......+---....+.__.....__..-_......-+.....................+.......+..........._......._+...............__...+

1 . The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD . Lower Limit of Detection.

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.

• 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Air- Gross beta e_..._________+..... ...+............________......____.s .___._.__..____.___.s...... .___._. ...... ..___.s....__.___....____.__.

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Madium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +....---+-__-..--_ ___....__-+ All and Analysis Limit l (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations MaaGurement Performeds (LLD) l Mean (1) (Rangel Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range)

...________...........__..._____+____.......__..._____.

APTB G. BETA .0075 0.02

+-_.____.....____..___..____..._____.______....__._..___...________._____.

0.02 4 0.02 0.02 PCI/CU.M. 370 (0370/0370) (0318/0318) 0.7 (0053/0053) (0052/0052) 0.01-0.04 0.01-0.04 S 0.01 0.04 0.01-0.03 l

..____._______.__...__..+_.___._+...________..__...........___..___.__...__.............____....___..__.....__...__.___...........

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lcuer Limit of Detection.

M M M '

a P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWEF PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/50 441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Ak-Iofne Type and All Location with Highest Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations Annual Mean and Analysis All + ------+ .------------------+

Limit (Indicator & Control) All Measurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations

+._.............. ....._+.......+-. Mean (1) (Range) l Direct

..------.--(Range)..-------+-..........---.......+-...--..l....-...ge)

(Ran l Mean (1) (Range)

AI I.131 .05 ..................................

PCI/CU.M. 370 LLD - -

i l

i I

l l

l t i i

1 i

l l

1

+.....__....................................___.......__.... ____,,,,,

LLD 1 .- The Lowerratio Limit of ofpositive results Detection. to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

l

-.. ..~. . . . - - _ .. . _-.. . _ . ._ . . . . _

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGPAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Chio Reporting period 9500 Precipitation -Gamma spec I

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +.-..---+..-...---...-...-- -+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Measurement Performed i (LLD) Mean (1) ' Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) s.......--....+-.....---+-------+..--.--.....---------.-+----------..................+...------------..........--................

PNG BA-140 45 l

• PCI/L 65 LLD - . - -

CO-se 11 65 LLD - . - -

CO-60 11 65 LLD - . . -

1 CS-134 11 65 LLD . - - -

CS-137 13 65 LLD . . . .

FR-59 22 65 LLD - - - .

LA-140 11 65 LLD . . . .

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD ~ Lower Limit of Detection.

E E E

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 002 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. 50-440/50 441

! Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period a 9500 Precipitation . Gamma spec Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Madium T o r. . (n) Lower Locations All +...----+----..----..-. -....+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Maesurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Rangel Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) 1 PRG MN-54 11 PCI/L 65 LLD - . . -

NB.95 11 65 LLD - . . .

EN 65 22 65 LLD . . . _

ER-95 22 65 LLD - _ _ .

i I

1 . The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

_ _ . m_ , _ _ . . . . . - . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .. . . . _ . _

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 9500 Milk Gammaspec Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +.---.--+--..-_-.-.--.- .....+

and Analysis 3.imit All (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Hean (1) l Control Locations Haasurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) (Range) a__........__.+...__.._.+..._...+......._.................___... ___..___..._.l Direct l l Mean (1) (Range)

._.....+__..___..____... __......___.____..........

MLKG BA.140 45 PCI/L 52 LLD . . . .

CS-134 11 52 LLD - - . .

CS.137 13 52 LLD - . . -

K-40 NA 1502.69 1520.30 61 1814.29 52 1472.11 (0052/0052) (0033/0033) 7.4 (0014/0014) (0019/0019) 950.00-2080.00 950.00-2080.00 SE 1380.00-2080.00 1240.00 1670.00 LA.140 17 52 LLD . - . .

.........__.__+.........+_....._+-__..........-_......_.+.._-_...............+.__....+..___...__...__..._,_....__..___.___..__.,

1 . The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD . Lower Limit of Detection.

M E E E E

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGEt 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ' Docket no. -

50 440/50 441 Location of Facility  : Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 9500 Milk-Iodme e__ ...............__.........._.___.............__.._.........._......__............._....._..._.__..................._... ._.....

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +--.-...+....--......-.......+ All and Analysis Linit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations Dist. l Mean (1) Control Locations l

Maasurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Ran e.............+........4.............................._+......._-___.........+........_.__...................__...._.___.ge) ......

MLKI I-131 .75 PCI/L 52 LLD - . . .

l 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

P24001 RACIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Nace of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. t 50-440/50-441 .

Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Food Products- Gamma spec e__........___.__..____.......__.....____..._____........_______....____.........___..._____...____.....__....__.....__.___... __.

I Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +-----..+.--------...------..+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Maecurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) e.._____.................___..__..__...._____.............__.___.....__....___...___........______..____.__.____..___..._________.

PP BE-7 NA 387.20 387.20 77 387.20 0.00 PCI/KG(NET) 22 10005/0022) (0005/0016) 1.2 (0005/0009) (0000/0006) 176.00 650.00 176.00-650.00 E 176.00-650.00 0.00-0.00 CO-58 NA 22 LLD - - - .

CO_60 NA 22 LLD . - - -

CS-134 45 22 LLD _ _ - .

CS-137 60 22 LLD - . . .

I-131 45 22 LLD . . . .

K-40 NA 4453.91 4884.06 62 5101.00 3306.83 22 (0022/0022) (0016/0016) 1.2 (0006/0006) (0006/0006) 1786.00 8918.00 2310.00-8918.00 E 2702.00-8918.00 1786.00-5136.00 1 . The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD _ Lower Limit of Detection.

E E i E E E E '

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/50 441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Grass. Gamma spec e.............+..............-- +_.......--..........-_.+-..-..............--.+..--..............-_...-_...+... ........_.-_.....+.

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Madium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +.----.-+-.-.......--...-....+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations s.............+.-----_.+.......+..............-..-....+........-.....--.----+--....-+......--.--........+----............ge)

Maasurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Rangel ] Mean (1) (Ran

....-+

FP BE.7 NA 2694.41 2729.50 7 3417.17 2536.50 PCI/KG(NET) 22 (0022/0022) (0018/0018) 0.6 (0006/0006) (0004/0004) 590.00-5477.00 590.00 5477.00 NE 1013.00-4966.00 1835.00-3193.00 CO-58 NA 22 LLD - - . .

CO-60 NA 22 LLD - . - -

CS-134 45 22 LLD . - . .

CS-137 60 22 LLD - - . .

1-131 45 22 LLD . - - -

K.40 NA 6174.86 5784.17 6 7933.00 7933.00 22 (0022/0022) (0018/0018) 11.0 (0004/0004) (0004/0004) 2626.00 11604.00 2626.30 11092.00 SSN 5281.00 11604.00 5281.00 11604.00

+.............+.........+-.....-+.......................+-..................-........+....-..........._-._,_................._..,

1 . The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD . Lower Limit of Detection

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50 440/50 441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Soil- Gamma spec e.......................s__......................................_..._______...__.__ ...__.... .__._____.. . ___...___...___..___.

. .l Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Madium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +- .--..+_..-..--- __.-------+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Mscourement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) e.......__........__.__.s.__..._+-._-_....._____....._-_+__---.....__....... .+.......+.........._.....-- _+....__....___. ....__.

SOIL CO.58 300 PCI/KG(DRY) 14 LLD . . . .

CO.60 40 14 LLD . . . .

L CS-134 60 14 LLD - - - _

CS.137 80 250.14 259.00 7 359.50 197.00 14 (0014/0014) (0012/0012) 0.6 (0002/0002) (0002/0002) 55.00-400.00 55.00-400.00 NE 319.00-400.00 190.00-204.00 K-40 NA 12519.86 11960.83 6 15874.00 15874.00 14 (0014/0014) (0012/0012) 11.0 (0002/0002) (0002/0002) 9914.00-17391.00 9914.00-17254.00 SSN 14357.00-17391.00 14357.00-17391.00 RA.226 NA 1453.50 1356.08 6 2038.00 2038.00 14 (0014/0014) (0012/0012) 11.0 (0002/0002) (0002/0002) 993.00 2331.00 993.00-1956.00 SSN 1745.00 2331.00 1745.00-2331.00

......_.................+.___. _+............................__......._............. ...__....... ....__.__,......________. ___...

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

E E E E E E E '

b 6

I i

t P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 1

Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50 440/50-441 ,

F Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Water- Gamma spec

...--......-.-+..... . . . . + . . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . - + . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . - - . - - . . . . . - - - - - . . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . .

Location with Highest

• Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +..-- ..+...........-.------.+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Maasurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) i

+.............+.---.....+.......+...................--..+- .................. +.......+---- ----...........+.........-- .........+

WTRG BA.140 45 PCI/L 58 LLD . . . .

CO.58 11 58 LLD - - - .

CO.60 11 58 LLD . . - .

CS.134 11 i 58 LLD - . . .

CS-137 13 58 LLD - . . -

FE.59 22 '

58 LLD - . . -

LA-140 11 i 58 LLD - - - -

i

+.............+.......-.+.......+---.....--.--...-----.-+.-........--......... -......+--....-........---. +......---......-...-_+ .

i 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD . Lower Limit of Detection.

r a

b

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ =

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 002 Namt of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility  : Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Weer. Gamma spec

. . . - - . . . . . . . - - , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . - . . . . . - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . - + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . - - _ - - _ . - . _ - - - - - _ ,

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +------.+-.+...--------------+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Controll Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Maasurement Performed 8LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range)

, - . . . _ _ - - - . _ , - - - . . . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + - - - - . . . . . - - - . . . - . . . . + . - . . . . + . . . - - . . . . . . - - - - - _ . - . . - - - - - - . . . . . - - . . . - - - . . .

DTRG MN.54 11 PCI/L 58 I LLD - . - -

NB.95 11 58 LLD - . . .

ZN.65 1 22 58 LLD . . - -

ER-95 22 58 LLD - . . -

+........--...+.........+----s..+........... ....

-...--+-------------..----..+.---...s.-----------..-.....+--........---. ......,

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD . Lower Limit of Detection.

i i

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

. PAGE: 001

.Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. 50-440/50 441 Location of Facility - Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 9500 ,

t Water- Gross beta

,.............+......................... ....__...................-_........................ .............__....._........._ ...

w Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Madium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +-..--.-+.----.-----......-..+ All and Maasurement Analysis Performed Limit (LLD)

(Indicator & Control)

Mean (1) (Range)

Indicator Mean (1) (Range)

Locations lDist. l Mean (1)

(Range) l Control Locations l Direct l l Mean (1) (Range)

UTRB G.8 ETA 3  ; 29 2.32 60 2.57 2.18 PC1/L 58 (0058/0058) (0046/0046) 1.0 (0011/0011) (0012/0012) 1.30-3.60 1.50 3.60 WSW 1.70-3.60 1.30-2.90 I

1 . The ratio of po r * *.1ve results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. t 50 440/50 441 Location of Facility Lake County Ohio Reporting period 9500 Water-Tritium

...........__....-.......................______-.......+--_....__..__..._-.......-__.--_.........__..-_,.__.....--..__.--....

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +-----..+----...--....-----__+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. Mean (1)

Mansurement . Performed l l Control Locations (LLD) Mean (1) (Range)

......__--...............____.--_____......---_-...._,....--....-.....................____....._........l......-......(Range)

Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) Mean (1)

TRITIUM H3 1500 206.40 201.25 28 227.00 227.00 PCI/L 20 (0010/0020) (0008/0016) 22.0 (0002/0004) (0002/0004) 155.00 263.00 155.00-262.00 ENE 191.00-263.00 191.00-263.00

..-...........+.........s...-___+............---........+--...-.._--..-_----_s.___.._+....................+__.___.-........__...,

1 - The ratio of positivt results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD . Lower Limit of Detection.

M E E E E E E E

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM.

SUMMARY

- PAGE : 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANY Docket no.  : 50 440/50 441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period a 9500 Fish . Gamma spec e.................---.......--..................--.-.....-.....---..--..............----_.-......_.._---..............._.....__..+

1 i Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Medium Tot. (a) Lower Locations All +.-....-+..---.-.-----......-+- All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator. Locations ]Dist. Mean (1)

Maapurement Performed l l Control Locations (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) Mean (1) (Ran

....-.........+--.......+.......+............-...-----..+.------.............-+----...+-.......--..-.. -...l.........----...ge) l

.....+

FSH CO.58 97 PCI/KG(NET) 25 LLD - - . .

a CO-60 97 25 LLD - - . -

CS.134 97 25 LLD - - - .

CS-137 112 28.90 28.90 25 28.90 0.00 25 (0001/0025) (0001/0015) 0.6 (0001/0015) (0000/0010) 28.90-28.90 28.90-28.90 NNN 28.90 28.90 0.00-0.00 FE.59 195 25 LLD - - - .

E-40 NA 2382.16 2363.40 32 2410.30 2410.30 25 (0025/0025) (0015/0015) 15.8 (0010/0010) (0010/0010) 1588.00 3611.00 1588.00-3252.00 MSN 1708.00-3611.00 1708.00-3611.00 MN.54 97 25 LLD - . . .

s---...-......+...-..-..+..,...-+-.-.--.------..........+-

..-......-... ..---+--.....+--.......--.........+.......---...----.-..+

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 002 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility Lake County Ohio Reporting period 4 9500 Fish - Gamma spec Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean M3dium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +.--.---+---....-_----...--..+ All cnd Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Mansurement Performed *LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) s......______.+_....... +...____+-.. ______________.....s--___________.__.._-_+_.___- +-._______.....____._+.. ___..___._________s FSH EN-65 195 PCI/KG(NET) 25 LLD - - - -

I i

i

+-...__.____._+___......+....... __.....______.____.....,_______. ........____,_______,_.___________.....__,__...______________._,

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

E E '

E E E E E E E

I P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGEt 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. +

50-440/50-441 Location of Facility +

Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 9500 Sediment- Gamma spec

+. .---. .--..+.........+-...--.+---.,--- --- --.--....-+-...... -....-------.+.......--.....-----.--.-.---+..-._-------.--...-.-+

Type and Location with Highest All Annual Mean i Medium Tot. (n) Lower Locations and All +-------+-------.-- ----..-..+ All Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control)

Measurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range)

Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations

+-............+........-+...--..+--.--- ----.-- --.....-+.--..----..--(Range)

Mean (1) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range)

SED CO - S fs 50 -------.+-------+-----------. ..-----+-- ----............--+

PCI/KGtDRY) 14 LLD - - .

CO.60 to 14 LLD - -

l CS.134 112 14 LLD - - -

l l

CS-137 135 517.66 405.37 32 14 854.55 554.55 (0008/0014) (0006/0012) 15.8 (0002/0002) j 211.50 1354.90 211.50-714.30 WSW (0002/0002) 354.20 1354.90 354.20-1354.90 K 40 2A 15543.93 14610.00 32 14 21147.50 21147.50 (0014/0014) (0012/0012) 15.8 (0002/0002) 9352.00 27933.00 9352.00-22837.00 (0002/0002)

WSW 14362.00-27933.00 14362.00-27933.00

+-............+----....-+ .-----+...---........-...--..-+---..- .----------.--+.---- .+---------------..---+----. ... ---...--.---+

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. e 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period e 9500 TLD. Quarterly Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Msdium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +------_+---_-----_.--_--_---+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Meacurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) s......-.....-+........-..-_----.....-....----

Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range)

.......--+-------__.-.......---+..-----+...---..._--_---..-_+

l ...............ge)

Mean (1) (Ran TLD DIRECT NA 14.89 14.85 18 23.02 15.59 MR/91 DAYS 154 (0154/0154) (0146/0146) 5.0 (0004/0004) (0000/0008) 10.60-24.10 10.60-24.10 S 21.30-24.10 13.90-17.10

,--..--...._--.....-............-..-------......--_--+..-...----..............--.._.........-....---_-.+...__....--.--..-_--_.

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detaction.

4 E E E E E

1 l \ > \ r Q L 1 - t r- m m m l

l i

)

P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period a 9500 RD- Quarterly

................... .....______ I ..._-.__.......______-... ......_-._______....._______-..____..___. .______...____-__..__- ______.

L I

Type and 3 Location with Highest All Annual Mean Medium and Tot. (n) l Lower Analysis I Limit Locationte All +--.----+---.------..---.----+ All (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) Control Locations Performed 8 (LLD) l

....................._--+........-.--.---....__-......-_....___..-__ge)

Measurement Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Ran l Direct ( (Rangel { Mean (1) (Range)

TLD DIRECT t NA 14.34 14.29 18 MR/91 DAYS 155 3 l 22.02 15.34 (0155/0155) (0147/0147) 5.0 (0004/0004) l 10.80 23.b0 10.80 23.50 (0008/0008)

S 19.60-23.50 14.50-16.30 i

4 1

a

?

4 1

I l

l l

l 1 - The ratio of posicive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

l i

e P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no.  : 50-440/s0-441 Location of Facility - Lake County Ohio Reporting period a 9500 TLD - Annual 4-.---.-----.-+---......+-- ----+--------.--------------+.--------....---.....+-- .....---..--.......--....+-------..--......--..,

Location with Highest Type and All Annual Mean Madium Tot. (n) Lower Locations All +----.--+---------- ----..---+ All and Analysis Limit (Indicator & Control) Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations Measurement Performed (LLD) Mean (1) (Range) Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range)

+...--........+--------.+-------+....----.---- ---..----+---------------------+-----..+ .-------- ---.-----+-------......--......+

TLD DIRECT NA s4.87 54.84 18 8s.30 ss.70 MR/36s DAYS 37 (0037/0037) (0036/0036) s.0 (0001/0001) (0001/0001) 43.50-es.30 43.50-es.30 s es.30 es.30 ss.70 ss.70 l

e-...--....--.+-...-----+. ----.+---------...--------.--+-----...------------ +-------+---------.---.----..+------ .--...--.-----+

1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest.

LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.

1995 Annual Environmental And Ernuent Release Report APPENDIX C: 1995 REMP DATA i 1

1 i

i i

l I

s i l

4 l

1 l

)

i i

Appendix C: 1995 REMP Data Page 55

CLEVELAED'EL2CTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 R3MP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEE-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF APTG SAMPLE F28QUENCY IS: QUARTERLY A*-r h p RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA STATIO3 . SAMPLE COLLECTION BE-7 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LCCATICN TYPE DATE 01 AIR 941228/950329 .073+/ .016 LLD LLD LLD LLD 01 AIR 550329/950628 .076+/ .016 LLD LLD LLD LLD 01 AIR 950628/950927 .066+/ .019 LLD LLD LLD LLD 01 AIR 950927/960103 .063+/ .015 LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 AIR 941228/950329 .070+/ .019 LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 AIR 950329/950628 .083+/ .016 LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 AIR 950628/950927 .071+/7 015 LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 AIR 950927/960103 .055+/ .012 LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 AIR 941228/950329 .081+/ .017 LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 AIR 550329/950628 .086+/ .021 LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 AIR 950628/950927 .074+/ .014 LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 AIR 950927/960103 .060+/ .010 LLD LLD LLD LLD 05 AIR 941228/950329 .089+/ .023 LLD LLD LLD LLD 05 AIR 950329/950628 .076+/ .015 LLD LLD LLD LLD 05 AIR 950628/950927 .069+/ .016 LLD LLD LLD LLD 05 AIR 550927/960103 .058+/ .015 LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 AIR 941228/950329 .087+/ .019 LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 AIR 950329/950628 .085+/ .013 LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 AIR 950628/950927 .072+/ .015 LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 AIR 950927/960103 .054+/ .016 LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 AIR 941228/950329 .066+/ .014 LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 AIR 950329/950628 .077+/ .018 LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 AIR 950620/950927 .071+/ .018 LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 AIR 950927/960103 .053+/ .010 LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 AIR 941228/950329 .086+/ .019 LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 AIR 950329/950628 .071+/ .012 LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 AIR 950628/950927 .106+/ .018 LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 AIR 950927/960103 .053+/ .009 LLD LLD LLD LLD

1 I'

I A

w O

M e

I b

M t ow oM

==

MM CH 44 l

&Q 1

\

l

.... W.. . ..... .... mmmmm .m.m .... ....m ocoo oooo ococo oooo ocoo ococo ocoo ocoo ococo ooo... '

o. c. o. o o. c. o. o o o. c. c o.

. . . . c o. o. c. o.

. o c. o o o c o. o o o c c. o

. . . . . o. o o.

e e e e e e e e e . e 4 . e e i e e e e e e l e e e . e e 4 . . e e i e . e e .

%%%%  %%%N NNNNN %%%% NNNNN NNNN NNNN NNNNN %%%

+ +++ emgo owed

+ + ++wmmmm +++++ ++++ +emmmH emme + + ++mHeM ++++ wemm ++++ +wNoNw ++++ +wme ++

m MNHM MNNN MMNNN HMHH oMNMN MMHH MMNM NMNNH NMH o coco ococo occo oooco cooo ooono ooo

. . . o. c. o o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o o. o. o.

i b wwww wwww wwmvv vmem mmmmm 2 mmvm vvvw wwwem vvv

& 4 oooo oooo ocoo ococo oooco cooo oooco cooo oooo ococo coo o o. o. o cooco ococo ooo E . . . . . . . . . . o c o o. . . . . o. c. o. o. o. c. o. o . . . . . . . .

o O e e e e a a e e e e a e e a e e e e i e i e e e e e e a e e e e e o e e e e M NNNN  %%%% NNNN% NNNN NNNNN  %%%% NNNN  %%%%% NNN m m + + emwm + + +meewm + + + +++++ ++++ + + ++N +Ho ++++ ++++ +++++ +++

l O

U HN E

O v onom MNNM mwwe owNom enoN mmmew mee MNNN NwNNo MNMo MMNdo McNH MMNN NwNwd NNM H4 M o ocoo ocoo cooco .coco oooco ocoo cocco coo O

2 WW e OM%

H 4

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c.ooo. . . . . . . .

M &M+ U N MS O 4 N

• A DE =E MM m . E vvvv vwww vemm mmmm EN www99 mmMNN mmmm mmmmm mmm MD o ocoo ocoo ococo ocoo oooco ocoo oooo cocco coo De O M ocoo oooo oooco cooo oooco coo i

a> ks H o c u o.

. . . . o. o. o. o o. . . . . . . . o. c o o. . . . . .

Am UM 4 # e e e e e e e e i e e a e e e e e e e e e e e e o e e a e e i e a e e e e M 20 N  %%%N NNNN  %%%NN, %%%% NNNNN  %%%%  %%%%

Ud O NMb MD I e 1

+ ++ +mMee ewes + + ++ mmHHm

+++++memo ++++ enowe

+ + + ++ edNH

+ +++ mewo

++++NNNNN Newmm

+++++ %%% +++

MM 402 m Nem I NNMM MNNN MMNNM MMMM OMNdo MMMM M MNN NMNMM NdM mW MM o oooo. . oooo. .ococo. . ocoo Hu 4g . . o. o o .c. o o c o o. ocoo ooooo ooo U4 Hbu . .

Mu M H JH mMJ M eAD

& Chm QE EM ewww wwww ee,we vmem mmmmm mmem meww wwwem

!! M WW 4m m oooo oooo ocoo cooco ocoo ococo ocoo ocoo cooco ooowww a . . . . o c o o. o c. o c o c o c. o. o o. c c. o o c o o. o c o. o. oco.co c o. o M e e e e e e e e e a e e e e e e e e s e a e e a e e e e e

> e a e e a e e e

%%%%  %%%%  %%%%%  %%%% NNNNN  %%%%  %%%N  %%%%%  %%N M

4 + + ++ + + ++

mmmM econ

+++++ ++++ +

NMomo eHme

+ +++ mono mmHeo

+ +++ enge

++++ +Nwmop + +++ +++

U H Noe MNMo MNNN MMNNN MNMo OMNMH MMNN oHMN NNNNM NNM o oooco oooo oocco cooo ooo

o. o .o .o. o. .c o o. . . . . e e . . . . . . . c o. o o.

. . . . . o c o. c. o.

e . . .

wHem HEWN demNm WNew moPWM hwHe WNmW Nmemo wMo oMHN coHN coHNN oNNN OMdNM oHMM oMMN ooNNm oHN MMMM NNNN mmmmm evww mmmmm Wwww ocoo ocoo ococo ooo mme mesme bpMP ocoo mmmm mmmm ocoo mmmmm ococo ocoo WWWW cocco mmmmm mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmm mamm mmmm mmmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmm Amme mmmmm mmm 0000 0000 00000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 000 O HHHH HHHH HHHHH HHHH HHHHH HHHH HHHH HHHHH HHH O mwde mdem MMemN mmNm wmohw Newd emNm WNewm owm M NoMM Nood NooHN NoNH NoHNN M

ModN NoHM NooMN mom M

NMMH MNNN NMMmm meww wmmmm meww wbMP Meeme emm Hooo cooo ococo ocoo ococo coco ooco ococo ouc

& wemmmmmm mamm mmmm mmmmm mmmmm mmmm PMem mmmmm mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmm mmmmm mamm mmmm mmmmm mmm o O

$ M H

U E N N M > E A O b M 4 M 4 h 4 D D D M O 4 m b E 4 E  %  % 4 m a

e O

.h U

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 R J' M P TRACKINO SYSTEM DAT3s 14-FEB-96 G-BETA AIR REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: WEEKLY M.g g RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 01 03 04 05 950920 TO 950927 .017+/ .104 .019+/ .003 .020+/ .004 .019+/ .004 OCT 950927 TO 951004 .034+/ .004 .035+/ .004 .037+/ .004 .037+/ .005 951004 TO 951011 .014+/ .004 .013+/ .003 .011+/ .004 951011 TO 951018 .023+/ .004 .013+/ .004

.027+/ .004 .028+/ .004 .028+/ .004 951018 TO 951025 .022+/ .004 .018+/ .004 .022+/ .004 .023+/ .004 NOV 951025 TO 951101 .020+/ .004 .019+/ 004 .022+/ .004 .019+/ .003 951101 TO 951108 .020+/ .004 .023+/ .004 .020+/ .004 951108 TO 951115 .018+/ .004

.017+/ .004 .017+/ .004 .018+/ .004 .020+/ .004 951115 TO 951122 .017+/ .004 .021+/ .004 .018+/ .004 951122 TO 951129 .023+/ .004 .018+/ .004

.021+/ .004 .020+/ .004 .025+/ .004 DEC 551129 TO 951206 .023+/ .004 .028+/ .004 .024+/ .004 .026+/ .004 951206 TO 951213 .023+/ .004 .022+/ .004 .021+/ .004 951213 TO 951220 .024+/ .004

.025+/ .004 .028+/ .005 .020+/ .004 .023+/ .004 951220 TO 951227 .013+/ .004 .017+'/ .004 .014+/ .004 .015+/ .004 JAN 951227 TO 960103 .027+/ .004 .029+/ .004 .022+/ .004 .026+/ .004 l

I l

l l

i l

Il l

1 m

o I m 1 M 1 b

M e og OM

]

=m 1

MM l OH 44 hQ 1 A

h vvvv vvvv vvvvv wmwm mmmmm mmmm mmwm mmvmm vwm 2

& 4 oooo oooo cooco ocoo oooco oooo oooo ocoo cocoo oooo oooo oooo cocco oco x o. o. o o . . . . . . . . . . o.o. o. .c o . . . . . . o. o. o. o o.

. o. o. o.

e 0 e e a e e e e e e e e e a e e e e e e e e i e e e e e e e e e i e e e e e M  %%%% NNNN  %%NNN NNNN %%%NN  %%%% NNN%  %%%%% NNN m m ++ + + memw ++++ +++++ ++++epbe+++++ + + ++ + + ++ +++++ + ++

O R mewM NmNoN mmmeo vemN Meem NwMow Moe U HN O m MNMM MMNN MMNNM MMMo oMNMH MMMM MMMM NNNNM NNM o

HJ gk i M

H

'm ocoo ocoo. . .

cocoo oooo ococo ocoo coco ococo coo R OW% 4 M hw6 U H MS O 4 K

• A ME MM m" E. R vvvv vvvv vvvww weem mmmmm mmmm mmew emvom wwm EH MD O ocoo ocoo ococo ocoo oocco ocoo ocoo ococo oco DM U M ocoo ocoo oocco ocoo cocco ocoo. . coco ococo 4H H% H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o c o.

4M UM 4 e e e e s e e e e e e e e e e e a e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e a e e M 2U H NNNN  %%%%  %%%%N  %%%%  %%%%%  %%%%  %%%%  %%%%N  %%%

O WMb e ++++ ++++ +++++ ++++ +++++ + + ++ + +++ +++++ +++

UE MD ewoo emMM wmMcM even omNmc mMme memo ONMme omm MM 40R e MNMM MMNN MMNNM MMMM NMNMM MMMM MMNN NNNMM NMM NM MM o ocoo oooo ococo oooo cooo cooco ooo HU (M . . . . . . o. c o. .o. o o. o o o . . . . . . . . . . .

U4 Hbm MM M N 4H mMJ 3 eJD

& Ohm QE EM ewwm veww wwww wwwm mmmmm mmmm mm,w wmvwm vwm Ru (M ocoo ocoo coco ocoo cocco occo occo ococo ooo MU M a o c. o. .o o o o. o.

. c. o. o. o. c o. o o o o. .o. o. o.

. . o. o. o o o c o. o.

. . o. c. o.c o.

. o o. o.

M e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e a e e e e a e e e e e e e e H NNNN  %%%% NNNN  %%%%  %%%%%  %%%% %%%% %%%%% %%%

M ++++ ++++ +++ + ++++ +++++ + ++ + + +++ +++++ +++

4 memo movw wwNM wmwe owneo MMwm Mwem mMNee omm U w MNMM MNNN MMNN MMMo MMNMM MMMM MMNN NNNMM NMM I o oooo como ocoo oooo oooo ocooo ooo \

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . o. o. o. o. .o o o. o o.

l l

WHem MeWN MemNm WNew moegM ewMe mNew Newmo wmo OMMN coMN coMNN OMMM OMMNM oMNN DMMM ooMNM oMN MMMM NNNN mmmmm evvv mmmmm wwww embe ememe mem oooo oooo oooco oooo ococo oooo oooo ococo ooo meme mmmm mmmmm meme mmmmm emem meme mmmmm mmm memm emmm mamme mmmm mmmmm meme memm mmmmm mem i i

0000 0000 00000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 000 Q HHHH HHHH HHHHH HHHH HHHHH HHHH HHHH HHHHH HHH O evMe mMem NMemn mmMm emoee MewM eene wNewm own M NoMM NooM MooMN NoMM NoMMM moMN NoMM NooMN mom i M NMMM MNNN Nmmmm meww wemmm meww weep emese emm M l Mooo oooo ooooo oooo ooooo cono oooo ooooo ooo

& wemm mmmm mmmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmm mmmm mmmm mamme mmmm mmmmm emme meme i

i R

mmmmm mem '

l O '

H \

U R m W W H E 4 0 &

M 4 M 4 h 4 D D D M '

4 m b E 4 E 4 4 4 M O a  !

O

.D

t f 1 r7 rm m m m

) CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - P2PP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACEING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 C-BETA AIR REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: WEEKLY Air- Gross beta RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 06 07 35 950920 TO 950927 .017+/ .003 .016+/ .003 .014+/ .003 OCT 950927 TO 951004 .032+/ .004 .036+/ .004 .036+/ .004 951004 TO 951011 .012+/ .003 .012+/ .004 .014+/. 004 951011 TO 951018 .027+/ .004 .029+/ .004 .026+/ .004 951018 TO 951025 .021+/ .004 .020+/ .004 .020+/ .004 NOV 951025 TO 951101 .020+/ .003 .014+/ .003 .019+/ .004 951101 TO 951108 .021+/ .004 .018+/ .004 .019+/ .004 951108 TO 951115 017+/ .003 .017+/ .003 .017+/ .004 951115 TO 951122 .017+/ .004 .016+/ .004 .017+/ .004 951122 TO 951129 .023+/ .004 .024+/ .004 .022+/ .004 DEC 951129 TO 951206 .026+/ .004 .025+/ .004 .025+/ .004 951206 TO 951213 .021+/ .004 .019+/ .004 .023+/ .004 951213 TO 951220 .027+/ .004 .025+/ .004 .026+/ .005 951220 TO 951227 .014+/ .004 .011+'/ .004 .014+/ .004 JAN 951227 TO 960103 .024+/ .004 .026+/ .004 .023+/ .004

.._= _ _ _ _ - __ - _ .

CLEVELA%D ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-95 I-131 AIR REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: WEEKLY Air- Lmiine RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA CCLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 01 03 04 05 JAN 941228 TO 950104 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950104 TO 950111 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950111 TO 950118 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950118 TO 950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD FEB 950125 TO 950201 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950201 TO 950208 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950208 TO 950215 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950215 TO 950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD MAR 950222 TO 950301 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950301 TO 950308 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950308 TO 950315 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950315 TO 950322 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950322 TO 950329 LLD LLD LLD LLD APR 950329 TO 950405 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950405 TO 950412 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950412 TO 950419 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950419 TO 950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD MAY 950426 TO 950503 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950503 TO 950510 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950510 TO 950517 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950517 TO 950524 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950524 TO 950531 LLS LLD LLD LLD JUN 950531 TO 950607 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950607 TO 950614 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950614 TO 950621 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950621 TO 950628 LLD LLD LLD LLD JUL 950628 TO 950705 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950705 TO 950712 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950712 TO 950719 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950719 TO 950726 LLD LLD LLD LLD AUG 950726 TO 950802 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950002 TO 950009 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950809 TO 950816 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950816 TO 950823 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950823 TO 950830 LLD LLD LLD LLD SEP 950830 TO 950906 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950906 TO 950913 LLD LLD LLD LLD 950913 TO 950920 LLD LLD LLD LLD M M M M M M M M M M M M

CLEVELAND-RL2CTRIC TLLUMINATIEG CO. - P2PP. PAGE '002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FED-95 I-131 AIR REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: WEEKLY Air-losme RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 01 03 04 05 950920 TO 950927 LLD LLD LLD LLD OCT 950927 TO 951004 LLD LLD LLD LLD

'951004 TO 951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951011 TO 951018 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951018 TO 951025 LLD LLD LLD LLD NOV 951025 TO 951101 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951101 TO 951108 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951108 TO 951115 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951115 TO 951122 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951122 TO 951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD DEC 951129 TO 951206 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951206 TO 951213 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951213 TO 951220 LLD LLD LLD LLD 951220 TO 951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD JAN 951227 TO 960103 LLD LLD LLD LLD

i CLEV2 LAUD ELECTRIC ILLUMI2ATIEG CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 l

I-131 AIR REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: WEEKLY i Ak-Iodhe RESuLTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA l

! COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS l

06 07 35 l

1 JAN 941228 TO 950104 LLD LLD LLD 950104 TO 950111 LLD LLD LLD 950111 TO 950118 LLD LLD LLD 950118 TO 950125 LLD LLD LLD FEB 950125 TO 950201 LLD LLD LLD

[

950201 TO 950208 LLD LLD LLD r 950208 TO 350215 LLD LLD LLD 950215 TO 950222 LLD LLD LLD MAR 950222 TO 950301 LLD LLD LLD 950301 TO 950308 LLD LLD LLD 950308 TO 950315 LLD LLD LLD 950315 TO 950322 LLD LLD LLD 950322 TO 950329 LLD LLD APR 950329 TO 950405 LLD LLD LLD 950405 TO 950412 LLD LLD LLD 950412 TO 950419 LLD LLD LLD 950419 TO 950426 LLD LLD LLD MAY 950426 TO 950503 LLD LLD LLD 950503 TO 950510 LLD LLD LLD 950510 TO 950517 LLD LLD LLD 950517 TO 950524 LLD LLD LLD 950524 TO 950531 LLD LLD LLD JUN 950531 TO 950607 LLD LLD LLD 950607 TO 950614 LLD LLD LLD 950614 TO 950621 LLD LLD LLD 950621 TO 950628 LLD LLD LLD JUL 950628 TO 950705 LLD LLD LLD 950705 TO 950712 LLD LLD LLD 950712 TO 950719 LLD LLD LLD 950719 TO 950726 LLD LLD LLD AUG 950726 TO 950802 LLD LLD LLD 950802 TO 950809 LLD LLD LLD 950809 TO 950816 LLD LLD LLD 950816 TO 950823 LLD LLD LLD 950823 TO 950830 LLD LLD LLD SEP 950830 TO 950906 LLD LLD LLD 950906 TO 950913 LLD LLD LLD 950913 TO 950920 LLD LLD LLD E E E E N E E E

w m

e a

M ise N 8 Ow OM

.e M ed OH 44

0. Q c.

a.

2 Ce dC E

• O M

e to m O 2 O >N O len O C000 0DQ00 0000 Q F >J M N 4 .3 >J .3 eJ eJ eJ .4 >J .4 .4 eJ >J >J .4 0 at M s H .3 eJ J 4 .3 .4 .J .4 .J .J .J .J >J .4 .4 E OMN sel M Os M + 0 H NB C 4 m e 4

2E MN m" E. x EH MD 0 D to O M 4> HN H

>J m OM at M 20 H O M N As to Um MD MM c! O R N O QC00 QQQQQ QQQQ Q WW WM O .3 .2 .3 >J .4 .J .3 e4 .J >J .4 J .4 .4 .3 HU M ~4 .J .4 4 3 .4 J 3 >J e4 .4 .4 .3 *J .4 O sel et is. m W et N N

.3 H M M .4 M a eJ D

e. M Os M QE EM 2 es c1 m dC oc to e4 M

M

>J O w Q QQQQ 000QQ QQQQ Q O e4 .3 3 e3 .4 *J e4 4 .3 .J J .J .3 .4 e.J

.3 .3 >J .3 4 >J .4 .3 .4 .2 J .4 4 .3 .4 m e og a e ce e in N m oNOe N N O M v4 N OOMNN O e4 N N O m OOOO e4 e4 e4 M e4 NNNN et O e4 M e4 M e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 et O m m In en In m eninentR nn in en in 40 m mamm mmmmm mmmm &

O 0000 00000 0000 O Q

N HHHH H H e* H H HHHH H O O n w ee e an et e ln N mwNO >

M N N O e4 e 4 NOOMN NOe4N N N m mOOO O et e4 e4 e4 e4NNN N 80 O O es e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 e4 et e4 .4

9. en en in in en inin menin Inenenin in R

a mmma emmmm mmmm e O

M U

.E U N > U E N O O <

g-

.3 a

O m M

Q o e

O O

.bl

I i CLEVELAND EL2CTRIC ILLUMINATICG CO. - PEPP. PAGE: 001 l REMP TRACKI"G SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF PRG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY Prec.ipitation - Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA l

l STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION TYPE DATE PE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NB-95 ZN-65 ZR-95 l_  :

03 PR 941228/950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950125/950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950222/950329 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950329/950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950426/950531 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950531/950628 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD ,

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950628/950726 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950830/950927 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 950927/951025 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 951025/951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 03 PR 951129/951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 PR 941228/950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 PR 950125/950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 PR 950222/950329 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 PR 950329/950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD M M M -

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC' ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 082 REMP TRACKIgG SYSTEM DATS: 14-FES-96 GAMMA APEC REPORT OF P3G SAMPLE F2EQU32CY IS: MODTHLY Precipnation - Gamma spec RESULTs IN PCI/L ./- 2 sIcMA I

STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-150 CO-58 CO-60 LCCATION TYPE CS-134 CS-137 DATE FE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NB-95 ER-95 2N-65 04 PR 950426/950531 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 84 PR 950531/950628 LLD LLD LLD j

LLD LLD '

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 PR 950628/950726 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD-LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 04 PR 950830/950927 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i 04 PR 950927/951025 LLD LLD LLD l

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i 04 PR 951025/951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD  !

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD l LLD 04 PR 951129/951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 06- PR 941228/950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 PR 950125/950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i 06 PR 950222/950329 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD I LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD US PR 950329/950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 PR 950426/950531 LLD

• LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 PR 950628/950726 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 PR 950830/950927 LLD 'LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 86 PR 950927/951025 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD g - _ _

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 003 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF PRG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY Precipitation - Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA

-N STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION TYPE DATE PE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NS-95 EN-65 ER-95 06 PR 951025/951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 06 PR 951129/951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 941228/950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950125/950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950222/950329 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950329/950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950426/950531 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950531/950628 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950628/950726 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950830/950927 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 950927/951025 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 951025/951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 07 PR 951129/951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 941228/950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 950125/950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD E E E E E E E

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIEATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 004 REMP T2ACKIEG SYSTEM DAT3 14-FES-96 CAMMA SPEC REPO2T OF PRG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY

.hp RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATIOT S4MPLE ' COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION FYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 MM-54 NB-95 2N-65 ZR-95 12 PR 950222/950329 LLD LLD LLD .LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 950329/950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD. LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 950426/950531 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 950531/950628 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i LLD i 12 PR 950628/950726 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 950830/950927 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 950927/951025 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 951025/951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 12 PR 951129/951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 941228/950125 LLD LLD LLD LLD' LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950125/950222 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950222/954329 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950329/950426 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950426/950531 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD. LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950531/950628 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - P2PP. PAGE: 005 I REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 l

GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF PRG

, SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY

, RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA Precipitation - Gamma spec l STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 l

LOCATION TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NB-95 ZN-65 ZR-95 l

l 35 PR 950628/95072E LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950830/950927 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 950927/951025 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD >

LLD 35 PR 951025/951129 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 PR 951129/951227 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD

+

M M M M M E E E E E

U k C CLEVELA!D ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. -

P"PP. PACE: 001 REMP TRACKICG SYSTEM DATER 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF MLlO SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: BI-MONTHLY / MONTHLY Milk - Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA ETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CS-134 CS-131 LOCATION TYPE K-40 LA-140 DATE 51 MILK 950106/950109 LLD LLD LLD 1340.0+/-170.0 LLD 51 MILK 950203/950206 LLD LLD 51 MILK LLD 1420.0+/-100.0 LLD 950303/950306 LLD LLD LLD 1350.0+/-100.0 51 MILK 950407/950410 LLD LLD LLD LLD 1600.0+/-170.0 LLD 51 MILK 950421/950424 LLD LLD 51 LLD 1490.0+/-150.0 LLD MILK 950505/950508 LLD LLD LLD 51 MILK 950519/950522 LLD LLD 1410.0+/-170.0 LLD 51 MILK LLD 1450.0+/-150.0 LLD 950608/950613 LLD LLD LLD 1500.0+/-170.0 LLD 51 MILK 950623/950626 LLD LLD LLD 51 MILK 950707/950710 LLD 1620.0+/-170.0 LLD LLD LLD 1630.0+/-170.0 LLD 51 MILK 950721/950724 LLD LLD LLD 51 MILK 950804/950807 LLD 1540.0+/-170.0 LLD LLD LLD 1520.0+/-170.0 51 MILK 950818/950821 LLD LLD LLD LLD 1490.0+/-130.0 LLD )

51 MILK 950908/950911 LLD LLD 51 MILK LLD 1420.0+/-100.0 LLD l

950922/950925 LLD LLD LLD 1240.0+/-110.0 LLD {

51 MILK 951006/951009 LLD LLD 1 51 MILK LLD 1440.0+/-120.0 LLD 951020/951023 LLD LLD LLD 1670.0+/-120.0 LLD 51 MILK 951110/951113 LLD LLD 51 LLD 1460.0+/-80.0 LLD MILK 951208/951211 LLD LLD LLD 1300.0+/-120.0 LLD 61 MILK 950407/950410 LLD LLD 61 MILK LLD 1650.0+/-110.0 LLD 950421/950424 LLD LLD LLD 1920.0+/-130.0 LLD 61 MILK 950505/950508 LLD LLD 61 MILK LLD 1870.0+/-70.0 LLD 950519/950522 LLD LLD LLD 1700.0+/-220.0 LLD 61 MILK 950608/950612 LLD LLD 61 LLD 1990.0+/-180.0 LLD MILK 950623/950626 LLD LLD 61 MILK LLD 1750.0+/-130.0 LLD 950707/950710 LLD LLD LLD 1880.0+/~210.0 LLD El MILK 950721/950724 LLD LLD 61 MILK LLD 2080.0+/-200.0 LLD 950804/950807 LLD LLD LLD 1860.0+/-180.0 LLD 61 MILK 950818/950821 LLD LLD G1 MILK LLD 1910.0+/-18P.0 LLD 950908/950911 LLD LLD LLD 1780.0+/-140.0 LLD El MILK 950922/950925 LLD LLD LLD 61 MILK 951006/951009 LLD LLD 1380.0+/-120.0 LLD 61 MILK LLD 1790.0+/-120.0 LLD 951020/951023 LLD LLD LLD 1840.0+/-210.0 LLD 71 MILK 950106/950109 LLD LLD 71 LLD 1190.0+/-120.0 LLD MILK 950203/950206 LLD LLD LLD 71 MILK 950303/950306 LLD LLD 1300.0+/-140.0 LLD LLD 1410.0+/-110.0 LLD 71 MILK 950407/950410 LLD LLD 71' MILK LLD 1310.0+/-140.0 LLD 950421/950424 LLD LLD LLD 1290.0+/-100.0 71 MILK 950505/950508 LLD LLD LLD LLD 1400.0+/-170.0 LLD f 71 MILK 950519/950522 LLD LLD 71 MILK LLD 1270.0+/-130.0 LLD 950608/950612 LLD LLD LLD 71 MILK 950623/950626 LLD LLD 1380.0+/-140.0 LLD LLD 1440.0+/-180.0 LLD 71 MILK 950707/950710 LLD LLD LLD 71 MILK 950721/950724 LLD LLD 1300.0+/-150.0 LLD LLD 1280.0+/-150.0 LLD

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP T2ACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF MLEG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: BI-MONTHLY / MONTHLY Milk- Gamma spec RESULTS In PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATIO2 SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CS-134 CS-137 K-40 LA-140 LOCATION TYPE DATE 71 MILK 950804/950807 LLD LLD LLD 950.0+/-120.0 LLD 71 MILK 950818/950821 LLD LLD LLD 1260.0+/-140.0 LLD 71 MILK 950908/950911 LLD LLD LLD 1390.0+/-150.0 LLD 71 MILK 950922/950925 LLD LLD LLD 1060.0+/-140.0 LLD 71 MILK 951006/951009 LLD LLD LLD 1130.0+/-160.0 LLD 71 MILK 951020/951023 LLD LLD LLD 1640.0+/-170.0 LLD

'71 MILE 951110/951113 LLD LLD LLD 1380.0+/-140.0 LLD 71 MILK 951208/951211 LLD LLD LLD 1390.0+/-160.0 LLD E E

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 RENP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 I-131 MILK REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: DI-MONTHLY Mik -Idne RESULrS IN PCI/L ./- 2 SIoMA j l

l COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 51 61 71 l

JAN 950106 TO 950109 LLD l LLD FEB 950203 TO 950206 LLD LLD I MAR 950303 TO 950306 LLD LLD APR 950407 TO 950410 LLD LLD LLD 950421 TO 950424 LLD LLD LLD MAY 950505 TO 950508 LLD LLD LLD 950519 TO 950522 LLD LLD LLD JUN 950608 TO 950612 LLD 1

LLD 950608 TO 950613 LLD 950623 TO 950626 LLD LLD LLD JUL 950707 TO 950710 LLD LLD LLD 950721 TO 950724 LLD LLD LLD LUG 950804 TO 950807 LLD LLD LLD 950818 TO 950821 LLD LLD LLD l

SEP 950908 TO 950911 LLD LLD LLD 950922 TO 950925 LLD LLD LLD OCT 951006 TO 951009 LLD LLD LLD 951020 TO 951023 LLD LLD LLD NOV {

951110 TO 951113 LLD LLD DEC 951200 TO $51211 LLD LLD 1

1 l

I l

I l

CLEVELAND QLECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACEING SY3 TEM DATER 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF FP SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY Food Products - Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/EGtwET) +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BE-7 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION TYPE DATE I-131 E-40 37 CABBAGE 950912/950912 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2310.0+/-324.0 62 CABBAGE 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2702.0+/-327.0 62 BROCCOLI 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4281.0+/-365.0 62 BEET GREENS 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 7166.0+/ 496.0 62 BROCCOLI 950912/950912 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4128.0+/-389.0 62 CABBAGE 950912/950912 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3411.0+/-363.0 62 BEET GREENS 950912/950912 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 8918.0+/-370.0 6 70 BROCCOLI 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4095.0+/-454.0 70 CAULIFLOWER 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2720.0+/-352.0 70 CABBAGE 950008/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1786.0+/-223.0 70 CABBAGE 950912/950912 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2734.0+/-336.0 70 CABBAGE 951017/951017 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3370.0+/-459.0 70 BROCCOLI 951017/951017 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5136.0+/-650.0 77 DILL 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5690.0+/-362.0 77 BEET GREENS 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4085.0+/-394.0 77 TURNIP GREENS 950808/950808 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3158.0+/-323.0 77 EEET GREENS 950912/950912 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 8202.0+/-593.0 77 TURNIP GREENS 950912/950912 176.0+/-92.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4665.0+/-615.0 77 DILL 950912/950912 453.0+/-209.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4703.0+/-487.0 77 DILL 951017/951017 650.0+/-150.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5380.0+/-441.0 77 REET GREENS 951017/951017 308.0+/-144.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5412.0+/-474.0 77 TURNIP GREENS 951017/951017 349.0+/-142.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3934.0+/-295.0 m M

a CLEVELLND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRLC213G SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF FP SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY

, RESULTS IN PCI/KG(NET) +/- 2 SIGMA STQTION SAMPLE COLLECTION BE-7 CO-58 CO-60 LOCATION TYPE CS-134 Ce-137 DATE I-131 K-40 06 GRASS 950516/950516 3193.0+/-346.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 9143.0+/-582.0 06 GRASS 950613/950613 2012.0+/-338.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 11604.0+/-738.0 OG GRASS 950718/950718 1835.0+/-162.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5281.0+/-295.0 OG GRASS 950815/950815 3106.0+/-284.0 LLD LLD j

LLD LLD LLD 5704.0+/-486.0 07 GRASS 950516/950516 4966.0+/-317.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6360.0+/-462.0 07 GRASS 950613/950613 1013.0+/-240.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 7758.0+/-615.0 07 GRASS 950718/950718 4170.0+/-451.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6213.0+/-708.0 07 GRASS 950815/950815 2211.0+/-275.0 LLD LLD )

LLD LLD LLD 5049.0+/-467.0 07 GRASS 950912/950912 4689.0+/-334.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 7331.0+/-504.0 07 GRASS 951017/951017 3446.0+/-360.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3349.0+/-474.0 35 GRASS 950516/950516 5477.0+/-427.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4706.0+/-625.0 35 GRASS 950613/950613 1572.0+/-409.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD I LLD 7664.0+/-776.0 35 GRASS 950718/950718 1760.0+/-280.0 LLD LLD i LLD LLD LLD 5792.0+/-510.0 l 35 GRASS 950815/950815 1697.0+/-289.0 LLD LLD j LLD LLD LLD 5201.0+/-609.0 i 35 GRASS 950912/950912 1371.0+/-259.0 LLD LLD i

LLD LLD l LLD 7211.0+/-628.0 35 GRASS 951017/951017 5220.0+/-427.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3285.0+/-405.0 42 GRASS 950516/550516 590.0+/-130.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5380.0+/-340.0 42 GRASS 950613/950613 3105.0+/-563.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 11092.0+/~1060.

43 GRASS 950718/950718 2964.0+/-324.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4957.0+/-537.0 42 GRASS 950815/950815 1902.0+/-231.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4194.0+/-449.0 42 GRASS 950912/950912 881.0+/-342.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5927.0+/-590.0 42 GRASS 951017/951017 2089.0+/-276.0 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2626.0+/-382.0

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FES-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF SOIL SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: SEM-ANNUAL

-G ma p RESULTS IN PCI/racDRr> +/- 2 SIcMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 K-40 LOCATION TYPE DATE RA-226 03 SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 253.0+/-24.0 11490.0+/-372.0 1608.0+/-241.0 03 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 349.0+/-49.0 13716.0+/-838.0 1956.0+/-396.0 04 SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 105.0+/-26.0 17254.0+/-134.0 1748.0+/-300.0 04 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 55.0+/-28.0 12211.0+/-613.0 1188.0+/-377.0 06 SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 204.0+/-46.0 17391.0+/-669.0 2331.0+/-334.0 06 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 190.0+/-25.0 14357.0+/-533.0 1745.0+/-299.0 07 SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 400.0+/-44.0 12552.0+/-625.0 1632.0+/-370.0 07 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 319.0+/-16.0 11831.0+/-323.0 1352.0+/-188.0 CS SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 346.0+/-33.0 11065.0+/-562.0 1186.0+/-296.0 09 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 312.0+/-21.0 10398.0+/-428.0 1054.0+/-224.0 12 SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 298.0+/-27.0 11671.0+/-452.0 1417.0+/-320.0 12 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 310.0+/-32.0 10152.0+/-539.0 993.0+/-328.0 35 SOIL 950314/950314 LLD LLD LLD 181.0+/-23.0 11276.0+/-494.0 1108.0+/-281.0 35 SOIL 950908/950908 LLD LLD LLD 180.0+/-26.0 9914.0+/-517.0 1031.0+/-281.0 g 'g g -

M E E E

- - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - ~ -- -~-

w e

e a

M b

d e ow e on me ww

== a i QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ HH OH wn AA AA AA AA AA AA da Ad AA AA AA AA AA Ad AA UH AA AA Ad Ad AA AA Ad ad AA AA AA AA AA AA AA 44 bc w

I mm we e o QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ 00 mM AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA Ad AA AA AA UK AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA Ad AA AA AA 6

& og 2 wm b e e QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ 00 QQ QQ 00 QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ OE AA AA Ad AA AA AA AA AA AA AA Ad AA AA AA AA t

UE AA AA AA AA AA Ad MA AA Ad AA AA AA AA AA AA O

U O

2 M

H d 4 RE ONE o MM NAU ew EN N lC 6

• mM Du zHe e o QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ A> E 04 AA AA AA AA AA QQ QQ Ad AA QQAA QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ Am LON UA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AJ AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA M OE O e UE Ha%

MM NM+

NW OM HU b A Ud M>%

HN NUM AH EU M UM&

& MD o OE h0B wem MM MMM Mme MN N e e e A 4k% 4MN Q000000000D000Q000000000000000000000 000000D0Q AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA M E H

> EMA abH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA M 4AD w m o e m e e H e e o A CAM N N m N a w m o N N N m N N m N N U EM d N m w m w e e a w N M (N 2 o o o N w N m o o o o o o o H d H o o o M O m m m m e a m e m e m m M m e e m m m e e m e m e e m m m m m H  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  %

UM m w m  %

o e m a e N w w o a w m WH N N N m M N N N m N N m N A4 N H N m N N w m w e e o o H n H N AQ H o o o o o o o o M M N N o o O w m m m' m m m m m m m m U m m e w m m e a e e a e e e e e m e M

AM Eb 4H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m M M M M M M M M M M M M N M M M H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Q E 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8

mo a a = z z = = z a a a a 4

a 4

=

4 z

OM D MH Y H4 WU e e e e e o e e h HO nA N N N N N N N N e

N e

N e

N a

N w

m w

m w

m

CLEv2 LAUD ELECTRIC ILLUMINATIEG CO. - PNPP. PAGEs 002 R"MP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FES-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF WTRG SAMPLE PREQUENCz IS: MONTHLY Water- Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION SA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NB-95 ZN-65 ER-95 34 WATER 950330/950427 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 WATER 950427/950525 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 CATER 950525/950629 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 UATER 950629/950727 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 WATER 950727/950831 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 CATER 950831/950928 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 EATER 950928/951026 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 CATER 951026/951130 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 34 CATER 951130/951228 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 UATER 941229/950126 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 UATER 950126/950223 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 CATER 950223/950330 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 CATER 950330/950427 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 KATER 950427/950525 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 UATER 950525/950629 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD m m m m m M M M M M M M M M

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 003 REMP TRAC 2ING SYSTEM DATE: 10-FEb-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF WTRG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY Water- Gamma spec RESuLTs IN PCI/L ./- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 LOCATION TYPE CS-134 CS-137 DATE FE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NB-95 2R-95 2N-65 36 WATER 950629/950727 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 WATER 950727/950831 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 WATER 950831/950928 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 WATER 950928/951026 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 WATER 951026/951130 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 WATER 951130/951228 LLD LLD LLD l

LLD LLD '

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 59 WATER 941229/950119 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 59 WATER 950330/950330 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 59 WATER 950330/950427 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD SD CATER 950427/950525 LLD LLD LLD I

LLD LLD j LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD  !

SD DATER 950525/950629 LLD LLD LLD I

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD

)

LLD l 59 CATER 950629/950727 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD SD DATER 950727/950831 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 59 DATER 950831/950928 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 59 WATER 950928/951026 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP, PAG 2 004 REMP TRACKIEG SYSTEM DATER 14-FES-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF WTRG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY Water- Garnma p RESULTs IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 MN-54 NS-95 EN-65 ER-95 59 WATER 951026/951130 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 59 WATER 951130/951207 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 941229/950119 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 950330/950330 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 950330/950427 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 950427/950525 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 950525/950629 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 40 WATER 950629/950727 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 950727/950831 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 50 WATER 950831/950928 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 50 WATER 950928/951026 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD de WATER 951026/951130 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 60 WATER 951130/951207 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD m m m m m -

m m m m m m m m m m m

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 C-BETA NATER REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: MONTHLY

- Ge h RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIcMA COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 28 34 36 59 60 JAN 941229 TO 950119 941229 TO 950126 2.10+/ .70 2.20+/ .50 1.30+/ .70 1.80+/ .70 2.00+/ .70 FEB 950126 TO 950223 2.10+/ .60 2.20+/ .60 2.40+/ .60 MAR 950223 TO 950330 1.40+/ .50 1.90+/ .50 2.20+/ .60 950330 TO 950330 2.90+/ .60 2.30+/ .60 APR 950330 TO 950427 2.60+/ .60 2.10+/ .60 2.40+/ .60 2.60+/ .60 2.70+/ .60 MAY 950427 TO 950525 2.40+/ .70 2.50+/ .70 2.60+/ .60 2.10+/ .60 2.50+/ .80 JUN 950525 TO 950629 2.90+/ .60 2.70+/ .60 2.40+/ .60 2.80+/ .60 3.30+/ .60 JUL 950629 TO 950727 2.60+/ .60 2.20+/ .50 2.40+/ .60 2.10+/ .60 2.30+/ .60 AUG 950727 TO 950831 2.10+/ .50 1.60+/ .50 1.80+/ .50 1.50+/ .50 1.70+/ .50 SEP 950831 TO 950928 2.00+/ .60 1.90+/ .60 2.50+/ .60 2.20+/ .60 2.20+/ .60 OCT 950928 TO 951026 2.00+/ .60 1.90+/ .60 951026 TO 951026 2.10+/ .60 2.40+/ .60 2.10+/ .60 NOV 951026 TO 951130 2.60+/ .60 2.60+/ .60 2.30+/ .60 2.90+/ .60 3.10+/ .60 DEC 951130 TO 951207 951130 TO 951228 2.70+/ 60 3.60+/ .70 2.10+/~.60 2.10+/ .60 1.90+/ .60

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATENG CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACEING SYSTEM DATER 14-FED-96 H3 WATER REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD STATION LOCATIONS 28 34 36 59 60 MAR 941229 TO 950330 LLD LLD 262.00+/-98.00 LLD LLD JUN 950330 TO 950629 LLD LLD LLD 226.00+/-90.00 LLD SEP 950629 TO 950928 263.00+/-87.00 195.00+/-84.00 LLD 204.00+/-85.00 155.0C+/-82.00 DEC 950928 TO 951207 194.00+/-84.00 LLD 950928 TO 951228 191.00+/-83.00 210.00+/-84.00 164.00+/-82.00 t

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRAC 2ING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GQMMA SPEC REPORT OF FSH SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: SEM-ANNUAL

_ RESULTS IN PCI/KG(NET) +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION CO-58 CO-60 LOCATION TYPE CS-134 CS-137 FE-59 DATE K-40 MN-54 ZN-65 25 WHITE PERCH 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2373.0+/-348.0 LLD LLD 25 NALLEYE 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD 28.9+/-15.7 LLD 3252.0+/-309.0 LLD LLD i 25 ROCK BASS 950522/950523 LLD LLD i LLD LLD LLD 25 2371.0+/-305.0 LLD LLD NHITE SUCKER 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1769.0+/-413.0 LLD LLD 25 3 MALL MOUTH BASS 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2479.0+/-282.0 LLD LLD 25 REDHORSE SUCKER 550522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3148.0+/-435.0 LLD LLD 25 CARP 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1588.0+/-224.0 LLD LLD 35 NHITE SUCKER 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD j LLD LLD '

2074.0+/-402.0 LLD LLD 35 SMALLMOUTH BASS 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2443.0+/-303.0 LLD LLD 25 ROCK BASS 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2449.0+/-595.0 LLD LLD 25 DALLEYB 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 25 2606.0+/-377.0 LLD LLD REDHORSE SUCKER 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2317.0+/-359.0 LLD LLD 35 LAKE TROUT 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD I LLD LLD '

1769.0+/-324.0 LLD LLD 35 CHITE BASS 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2437.0+/-288.0 LLD LLD 35 STEELHEAD TROUT 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2376.0+/-265.0 LLD LLD 32 YELLON PERCH 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1700.0+/-343.0 LLD LLD l 32 WALLEYE 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3611.0+/-434.0 LLD LLD 33 WHITE SUCKER 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2587.0+/-433.0 LLD LLD 32 DRUM 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2552.0+/-258.0 LLD LLD 33 CARP 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2310.0+/-323.0 LLD LLD 32 DHITE PERCH 950522/950523 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2130.0+/-263.0 LLD LLD 32 REDHORSE SUCKER 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1712.0+/-332.0 LLD LLD 32 CALLEYE 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2426.0+/-13.0 LLD LLD

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINAT2NG CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 i GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF PSH SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: SEM-ANNUAL Fish - Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/KG(WET) +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 FE-59 LOCATION TYPE DATE K-40 MN-54 ZN-65 33 WHITE SUCKER 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2150.0+/-451.O LLD LLD 32 YELLOW PERCH 951010/951011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD l

2917.0+/-602.0 LLD LLD l

t f

m m m m m m m m m m m M m m m M M

, , , - - m - ,

e ,

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TPACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 OAMMA SPEC DEPORT OF SED SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: SEM-ANNUAL Sediment - Gamma spec RESULTS IN PCI/KG(DRY) +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 LOCATION TYPE DATE CS-137 K-40 25 SEDIMENT 950522/950522 LLD LLD LLD 25 SEDIMENT 951010/951010 LLD 569.8+/-24.7 21163.0+/-480.0 LLD LLD 436.9+/-23.7 16765.0+/-434.0 2G SEDIMENT 950522/950522 LLD LLD LLD 3G SEDIMENT 951010/951010 LLD 114.3+/-38.1 22837.0+/-704.0 LLD LLD 211.5+/-19.5 16272.0+/-421.0 27 SEDIMENT 950522/950522 LLD LLD LLD 27 SEDIMENT 951010/951010 LLD 267.5+/-19.9 16491.0+/-485.0 LLD LLD 212.2+/-16.2 15694.0+/-400.0 32 SEDIMENT 950522/950522 LLD LLD LLD 32 SEDIMENT 951010/951010 LLD 354.2+/-21.1 14362.0+/-444.0 LLD LLD 1354.9+/-40.1 27933.0+/-543.0 63 SEDIMENT 950526/950526 LLD LLD LLD 63 SEDIMENT LLD 10931.0+/-606.0 951012/951012 LLD LLD LLD LLD 10117.0+/-300.0 64 SEDIMENT 950526/950526 LLD LLD LLD G4 SEDIMENT LLD 10423.0+/-485.0 951012/951012 LLD LLD LLD LLD 9352.0+/-235.0 65 SEDIMENT 950526/950526 LLD LLD LLD 65 SEDIMENT LLD 15476.0+/-517.0 951012/951012 LLD LLD LLD LLD 9799.0+/-465.0 i

CLEVELATD ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKICG SYSTEM DATE: 14-FES-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY RESULTS IN 91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 01 TLD 950106/950404 10.80+/ 40 01 TLD 950404/950706 13.10+/ .20 01 TLD 950706/951003 11.60+/ .20 01 TLD 951003/960105 14.10+/ .30 02 TLD 95ul06/950404 11.10+/ .20 02 TLD 950404/950706 12.40+/ .20 02 TLD 950706/951003 12.00+/ .30 02 TLD 951003/960105 13.00+/ .20 03 TLD 950106/950404 13.10+/ .30 03 TLD 950404/950706 15.10+/ .40 03 TLD 950706/951003 14.20+/ .20 03 TLD 951003/960105 15.60+/ .50 04 TLD 950106/950404 14.10+/~.20 04 TLD 950404/950706 13.90+/ .20 04 TLD 950706/951003 14.60+/ .20 04 TLD 951003/960105 14.40+/ .20 C5 TLD 950106/950404 14.20+/ .20 05 TLD 950404/950706 12.50+/ .20 05 TLD 950706/951003 14.60+/ .20 05 TLD 951003/960105 14.90+/ .30 06 TLD 950106/950404 15.70+/ .40 06 TLD 950404/950706 14.50+/ .20 06 TLD 950706/951003 16.00+/ .30 06 TLD 951003/960108 15.00+/ .20 07 TLD 950106/950404 14.10+/ .20 r 07 TLD 950404/950706 13.30+/ .20 07 TLD 950706/951003 15.40+/ .40 07 TLD 951003/960105 14.00+/ .30 Os TLD 950106/950404 12.20+/ .30 08 TLD 950404/950706 11.70+/ .20 Os TLD 950706/951003 13.40+/ .20 08 TLD 951003/960105 12.40+/ .20 09 TLD 950106/950404 11.10+/ .30 09 TLD 950404/950706 11.80+/ .20 09 TLD 950706/951003 13.40+/ .20 09 TLD 951003/960105 12.90+/ .20 10 TLD 950106/950404 12.80+/ .40 m m m m m M M M M M M M M M M M M

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DaTE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMQ SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY

@. gg RESULTS IN 91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STQTION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 10 TLD 950404/950706 15.40+/. 30 10 TLD 950706/951003 14.80+/ .30 10 TLD 951003/960105 15.80+/ .30 11 TLD 950106/950404 14.00+/ .20 11 TLD 950404/950706 12.50+/ 20 11 TLD 950706/951003 15.00+/ .30 11 TLD 951003/960105 13.30+/ .20 12 TLD 950106/950404 13.00+/ .40 12 TLD 950404/950706 14.10+/ .20 12 TLD 950706/951003 14.80+/~.30 13 TLD 951003/960105 15.10+/ .20 13 TLD 950106/950404 10.90+/ .30 13 TLD 950404/950706 12.90+/ .30 13 TLD 950706/951003 12.00+/ .20 13 TLD 951003/960105 13.80+/ .20 14 TLD 950106/950404 11.10+/ .30 14 TLD 950404/950706 12.90+/ .20 14 TLD 950706/951003 11.80+/ .30 14 TLD 951003/960105 13.60+/ .20 15 TLD 950106/950404 11.50+/ .40 15 TLD 950404/950706 11.70+/ .20 15 TLD 95c706/951003 12.10+/ .30 l 15 TLD 951003/960105 13.00+/ .20 l

)

16 TLD 950106/950404 14.80+/ .20 1G TLD 950404/950706 18.80+/ .30 16 TLD 950706/951003 16.50+/ .30  !

16 TLD 951003/960105 19.70+/ .40 17 TLD 950106/950414 14.40+/ .30 17 ?LD 950404/950706 16.70+/ .20 l 17 TLD 950706/951003 16.80+/ .20 17 TLD 951003/960105 17.00+/ .20 l j

1Q TLD 950106/950404 21.90+/ .40 1 1Q TLD 950404/950706 23.10+/-1.20 10 TLD 950706/951003 23.50+/ .30 I 18 TLD 951003/960105 19.60+/ .40 19 TLD $~9106/950404 14.20+/ .30 19 TLD 950404/950706 15.00+/ 40 .

1 i

I CLEVELAED ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 003 REMP TRACKICG SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY g, g RESULTS IN 91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 19 TLD 950706/951003 15.20+/ .30 19 TLD 951003/960105 15.20+/ .30 20 TLD 950106/950404 14.80+/ .30 20 TLD 950404/950706 16.70+/ .20 20 TLD 950706/951003 15.80+/ .30 20 TLD 951003/960105 17.30+/ .20 21 TLD 950106/950404 17.30+/ .60 21 TLD 950404/950706 16.80+/ .20 21 TLD 950706/951003 18.50+/ .20 21 TLD 951003/960107 17.50+/ .20 22 TLD 950106/950404 14.40+/ .30 22 TLD 950404/950706 12.90+/ .20 22 TLD 950706/951093 15.70+/ .30 22 TLD 951003/960105 13.70+/ .20 23 TLD 950106/950404 16.60+/ .30 23 TLD 950404/950706 14.70+/ .20 23 TLD 950706/951003 17.90+/ .20 23 TLD 951003/960107 15.40+/ .20 24 TLD 950106/950404 15.30+/ .30 24 TLD 950404/950706 14.50+/ .20 24 TLD 950706/951003 16.30+/ .20 24 TLD 951003/960106 15.40+/ .50 29 TLD 950106/950404 16.10+/ .30 29 TLD 950404/950706 15.60+/ .20 29 TLD 950706/951003 17.10+/ .3G 19 TLD 951003/960105 17.20+/ .20 30 TLD 950106/950404 12.50+/ .40 30 TLD 950404/950706 12.60+/ .30 30 TLD 950706/951003 14.30+/ .30 30 TLD 951003/960105 13.40+/ .20 31 TLD 950106/950404 15.10+/ .30 31 TLD 950404/950706 14.60+/ .20 31 TLD 950706/951003 16.50+/ .30 31 TLD 951003/960105 15.20+/ .20 33 TLD 950106/950404 14.90+/ .30 33 TLD 950404/950706 16.10+/ .20 33 TLD 950706/951003 16.60+/ .50 m W W m m m m M M M M M M m m m M M M

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PaGE: 004 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY RD - Wh RESULTS IN 91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA

_u,

-~~~---

STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 33 TLD 951003/960105 16.60+/ .20 35 TLD 950106/950404 11.90+/ .30 35 TLD 950404/950706 12.90+/ .20 35 TLD 950706/951003 12.50+/ .20 35 TLD $51003/960105 13.50+/ .20 36 TLD 950106/950404 16.10+/ .40 36 TLD 950404/950706 18.40+/ .20 3G TLD 950706/951003 17.40+/ .20 3G TLD 951003/9601C7 19.60+/ .30 41 TLD 950106/950404 12.60+/ .40 41 TLD 950404/950706 14.20+/ .20 41 TLD 950706/951003 14.60+/ .30 41 TLD 951003/960105 13.10*/ .20 42 TLD 950106/950404 11.70+/ .30 42 TLD 950404/950706 13.00+/ .20 42 TLD 951003/960105 13.50+/ .20 43 TLD 950106/95040r 11.80+/ .30 43 TLD 950404/950706 11.20+/ .20 43 TLD 950706/951003 12.20+/ .30 43 TLD 951003/960105 12.70+/ .20 45 ?LD 950106/950404 11.20+/ .30 45 TLD 950404/950706 13.20+/ .30 45 TLD 950706/951003 12.00+/ .20 i 45 TLD 951003/960105 13.70+/ .20 1

l 53 TLD 950106/950404 12.30+/ .30 53 TLD 950404/950706 13.10+/ .20 '

53 TLD 950706/951003 14.20+/ .20 53 TLD 951003/960105 13.80+/ .20 54 TLD 950106/950404 12.30+/ .30 54 TLD 950404/950706 13.90+/ .30 54 TLD 950706/551003 12.10+/ .30 54 TLD 951003/960105 14.50+/ .30 55 TLD 950106/950404 12.50+/ .30 55 TLD 950404/950706 14.40+/ .30 55 TLD 950705/951003 12.40+/ .30 55 TLD 951003/960109 14.70+/ .20 56 TLD 950106s950404 12.80+/ .20

CLEVELADD ELECTRIC ILLUMINATIOG CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 005 REMP TRACKING S7 STEM DATE: 14-PEB-96 CAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY ,

11I)-(Nmnedy RESULTS IN 91 DAYS +/- 2 SICMA  ;

STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 50 TLD 950404/950706 11.30+/ .20 56 TLD 950706/951003 12.50+/ .20 y 56 TLD 951003/96o105 11.90+/ .20 58 TLD 950106/950404 13.00+/ .20 se TLD 950404/950706 13.1o+/ .30 se TLD 950706/951003 13.40+/ .20 9e TLD 951003/96o10s 13.40+/ .30 2

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATI30 CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FED-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY 2 RESULTS IN MR/91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 01 TLB 950106/950404 10.60+/ .30 01 TLB 950404/950706 13.70+/ .20 01 TLB 950706/951003 12.50+/ .40 01 TLB 951003/960105 13.60+/ .20 02 TLB 950106/950404 11.60+/ .30 02 TLB 950404/950706 13.10+/ .20 02 TLB 950706/951003 12.70+/ .20 02 TLB 951003/960105 13.20+/ .20 03 TLB 950106/950404 12.80+/ .30 03 TLB 950404/950706 13.70+/ .40 03 TLB 950706/951003 14.90+/ .20 03 TLB 951003/960105 14.10+/ .20 04 TLB 950106/950404 13.70+/ .20 04 TLB 950404/950706 14.40+/ .20 04 TLB 950706/951003 15.20+/ .30 04 TLB 951003/960105 15.20+/ .20 05 TLB 950106/950404 12.70+/ .20 05 TLB 950404/950706 13.30+/ .20 05 TLB 950706/951003 14.70+/ .30 05 TLB 951003/960105 14.40+/ .20 06 TLB 950106/950404 14.50+/ .20 06 TLB 950404/950706 16.10+/ .20 06 TLB 950706/951003 17.10+/ .30 Os. TLB 951003/960108 16.10+/ .30 07 TLB 950106/950404 14.60+/ .40 07 TLB 950404/950706 14.40+/ .20 07 TLB 950706/951003 17.10+/ .30 07 TLB 951003/960105 14.60+/ .30 08 TLB 950106/950404 11.10+/ .40 08 TLB 950404/950706 11.90+/ .30 08 TLB 950706/951003 13.10+/ .20 08 TLB 951003/960105 11.90+/ .20 09 TLB 950106/950404 11.20+/ .30 09 TLB 950404/950706 12.60+/ .20 09 TLB 950706/951003 13.70+/ .20 09 TLB 951003/960105 13.00+/ .20 10 TLB 950106/950404 15.50+/ .20

__ _ m .

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIDATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FE3-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY 2 RESULTS IN MR/91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 10 TLB 950404/950706 16.10+/ .20 10 TLB 950706/951003 18.30+/ .20 10 TLB 951003/960105 16.90+/ .20 11 TLB 950106/950404 14.40+/ .30 11 TLB 950404/950706 13.20+/ .20 11 TLB 950706/951003 16.90+/ .30 11 TLB 951003/960105 13.60+/ .20 12 TLB 950106/950404 13.90+/ .20 12 TLB 950404/950706 14.50+/ .30 12 TLB 950/06/951003 16.70+/ .40 12 TLB 951003/960105 16.10+/ .30 13 TLB 950106/950404 13.80+/ .20 13 TLB 950404/950706 13.60+/ .20 13 TLB 950706/951003 15.50+/ .30 13 TLB 951003/960105 14.10+/ .20 14 TLB 950106/950404 14.00+/ .30 14 TLB 950404/950706 13.80+/ .30 14 TLB 950706/951003 15.40+/ .30 14 TLB 951003/960105 13.70+/ 20 15 TLB 950106/950404 12.70+/ .70 15 TLB 950404/950706 12.50+/ .20 15 TLB 950706/951003 14.60+/ .30 15 TLB 951003/960105 13.50+/ .20 16 TLB 950106/950404 17.10+/ .30 1C TLB 950404/950706 18.10+/ .30 16 TLB 950706/951003 20.30+/ .30 16 TLB 951003/960105 18.10+/ .20 '

17 TLB 950106/950404 16.60+/ .20 17 TLB 950404/950706 17.30+/ .20 17 TLB 950706/951003 19.20+/ .30 17 TLB 951003/960105 17.20+/ .20 18 TLB 950106/950404 21.30+/ .30 18 TLB 950404/950706 23.60+/ .70 18 TLB 950706/951003 24.10+/ .30 18 TLB 951003/960105 23.10+/ .20 19 TLB 950106/950404 13.70+/ .30 19 TLB 950404/950706 15.60+/ .50 M M M E E E E E E E E E E E E E

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 003 REMP TRAC 2ING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE PREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY 2

, RESULTS IN MR/91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 1D TLB 950706/951003 15.50+/ .40 19 TLB 951003/960105 15.70+/ .30 20 TLB 950106/950404 13.60+/ .20 20 TLB 950404/950706 14.80+/ .40 20 TLB 950706/951003 15.70+/ .20 20 TLB 951003/960105 14.90+/ .20 21 TLB 950106/950404 15.50+/ .40 21 TLB 950404/950706 17.50+/ .20 21 TLB 950106/951003 18.30+/ .20 21 TLB 951003/960107 17.30+/ .20 22 TLB 950106/950404 13.70+/ .20 22 TLB 950404/950706 14.00+/ .20 22 TLB 950706/951003 16.30+/ .20 22 TLB 951003/960105 14.40+/ .30 23 TLB 950106/950404 16.30+/ .30 23 TLB 950404/950706 15.60+/ .50 l j

23 TLB 950706/951003 19.30+/ .20 j 23 TLB 951003/960107 16.00+/ .40 24 TLB 950106/950404 13.90+/ .20 24 TLB 950404/950706 15.10+/ .30 1 24 TLB 950706/9L1003 16.20+/ .30 24 TLB 951003/9+0106 15.70+/ .40 l

2D TLB I 950106/950404 16.10+/ .20 29 TLB 950404/950706 17.30+/ .20 2D TLB 950706/951003 18.80+/ .20 2D TLB 951003/960105 18.00+/ .20 l j

1 30 TLB 950106/950404 12.40+/ .30 30 TLB 950404/950706 13.50+/ .30 30 TLB 950706/951003 14.60+/ .20 1 30 TLB 951003/960105 13.40+/ .20 31 TLB 950106/950404 13.70+/ .20

)

31 TLB 950404/950706 15.30+/ .30 )

i 31 TLB 950706/951003 16.60+/ .30 31 TLB 951003/960105 15.90+/ .30 33 TLB 950106/950404 14.60+/ .30 33 TLB 950404/950706 16.80+/ .20 33 TLS 950706/951003 17.00+/ .40

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PCPP. PAGE: 004 DEMP TRACEIEG SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY 2 RESULTS IN MR/91 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LCCATION TYPE DATE 33 TLB 951003/960105 16.80+/ .20 35 TLB 950106/950404 12.10+/ 30 35 TLB 950404/950706 13.00+/ .20 35 TLB 950706/951003 12.90+/ .30 35 TLB 951003/960105 13.30+/ .20 36 TLB 950106/950404 16.50+/ .50 36 TLB 950404/950706 19.10+/ .30 36 TLB 950706/951003 19.30+/ .30 36 TLB 951003/960107 18.80+/ .30 41 TLB 950106/950404 12.80+/ .30 41 TLB 950404/950706 13.20+/ .20 41 TLB 950706/951003 14.90+/ .30 41 TLB 951003/960105 13.70+/ .20 42 TLB 950106/950404 11.70+/ .40 42 TLB 950404/950706 13.60+/ .20 42 TLB 950706/951003 14.50+/ .20 42 TLB 951003/960105 13.60+/ .20 43 TLB 950106/950404 12.60+/ .30 43 TLB 950404/950706 13.20+/ .20 43 TLB 950706/951003 14.40+/ .20 43 TLB 951003/960105 13.20+/ .20 45 TLB 950106/950404 12.50+/ .50 45 TLB 950404/950706 13.50+/ .20 45 TLB 950706/951003 14.80+/ .30 45 TLB 951003/960105 13.90+/ .20 53 TLB 950106/950404 12.60+/ .30 53 TLB 950404/950706 14.80+/ .20 53 TLB 950706/951003 15.50*/ .4C 53 TLB 951003/960105 15.80+/ .30 54 TLB 950106/950404 11.10+/ 20 54 TLB 950404/950706 14.50+/ .20 54 TLB 950706/951003 12.60+/ .20 54 TLB 951003/960105 14.80+/ .20 55 TLB 950106/950404 13.80+/ .30 55 TLB 950404/950706 15.70+/ .40 55 TLB 950706/951003 14.90+/ 30 56 TLB ,

950106/950404 12.20+/ .40 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIEATING CO. -

P"PP. PAGE: oos REMP TRACEING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FE3-$6 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: QUARTERLY 2

), RESULTS IN MR/s1 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA f

I STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE I

ss TLs sso404/sso70s 12.00+/ .30 ss TLB 95070s/951003 14.00+/ .30 ss TLs $s1003/96010s 11.90+/ .20 ss TLs ssolos/sso404 12.1o+/. 4o  !

ss TLs 95070s/s51003 13.so+/ .20  !

se TLs 951003/960105 12.00+/ .30

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 14-FEB-96 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF TLD SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS: ANNUAL 7y),

RESULTS IN MR/365 DAYS +/- 2 SIGMA STATIOM SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 01 TLA 950106/960105 48.00+/ .60 02 TLA 950106/960105 46.90+/ .60 03 TLA 950106/960105 50.60+/ .60 04 TLA 950106/960105 52.10+/ .60 05 TLA 950106/960105 46.00+/ .60 06 TLA 950106/960108 55.70+/ .90 07 TLA 950106/960105 56.40+/ .80 08 TLA 950106/960105 43.50+/ .80 09 TLA 950106/960105 45.10+/ .60 10 TLA 950106/960105 60.20+/ .80 11 TLA 950106/960105 48.40+/ .90 12 TLA 950106/960105 53.50+/-1.10 13 TLA 950106/960105 51.70+/ .80 14 TLA 950106/960105 49.50+/ .70 ,

15 TLA 950106/s50105 47.60+/-1.00 16 TLA 950106/960105 74.50+/-1.30 17 TLA 950106/960105 64.70+/ .80  ;

18 TLA 950106/960105 85.30+/ .s0 i 19 TLA 950106/960105 56.70+/ .70 1

20 TLA 950106/960105 55.40+/ .70

, 21 TLA 950106/960107 66.90+/ .70 22 TLA 950106/960105 55.90+/ .80 l 23 TLA 950106/960107 58.10+/ .60 1

29 TLA 950106/960105 59.00+/ .60

-^

l i

l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _-____ ____ _ _______ ______

l

[

[<

w e

e 2

M b

N e 09 od MM

[ MW UH 44 60

(

[.

.[

m

[ n&

a 4

{O U 4

E O O E M M M N

[4 RE MM A4#

N EH 44%

De HD+

4H E JM bEm

[ M UW O

04H HM Q 4

MM fi m MM OMm o o HU & w La o o o o o o o o o o o o U4 MHm w w w w w w e w w

(

NH 30% a. e. H . . . . . . . . H AN Es e a e e e a e e e e e s M UME  %%  %%  %-  %  %%%%%  %  %

& MD H + + + + + + + + + + + + +

QE EDE U o om o e o o o o o o o o o o EM MMM M (g g g o. . . o. o o e o w . .e w o w

[4 d b .'A M e w m m m e o a m m e H >

W E H Q W m o W w W m T m m m m f

> EM4 M 44D m m e m > m m m m m m m m 4 Chu o oN o N o No oN oN o o e o o o O EM N N N N N N N H Ag E o o o o o o o o o o o o o

[ M D M

H w

m w w w 2

m m e m w w w w w w m & & M w w w m m m UM w w w w w w w w w w w w w MH o oH o H o Ho oH oH o Ho o oH o o 44 H H H H H H 4D o o o o o o o o o o o o o O

U m

m me me a m a e e m m m m m m m m m a e a m

m a M

4M hk EH 4H O

p E

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

, 30 H H H H H H H H H H H H H 8

L OM h MH H4 40 o H m a w H m e m v m o e HO m m m m m v v v m m m m m M4 1

t- ,

Y  !.;

6 f

p s l.

-ll,

t. ..

j :)

) - .

e .

F g;

l\

[, I[

t 4 i I

[ . .

T.

i la i i- .

.v .l, l-y 4

l.

F ..

iz l,,

L FOR MORE IhdORMATION, WRITE OR CALL:

g g' L

, PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT g il ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT 10 CENTER ROAD P.O; BOX 97-l g, f . PERRY, OHIO 44081 i:

j (216) 280-5512 l

$1-l

~

1

._ '