ML20095D498

Amend 4 to Environ Rept - OL Stage (Filed in PDR Category C)

ML20095D498
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	08/31/1984
From:	Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Shared Package
ML20095D473	List: ML20095D469 ML20095D498 ML20264D948 ML20264D949 ML20264D951 ML20264D953 ML20264D955 ML20264D956 ML20264D958 ML20264D960 ML20264D962 ML20264D964 ML20264D965 ML20264D967 ML20264D969 ML20264D971 ML20264D973 ML20264D974 ML20264D976 ML20264D978 ML20264D980 ML20264D982 ML20264D983 ML20264D985 ML20264D987 ML20264D989 ML20264D990 ML20264D992 ML20264D994 ML20264D996 ML20264D998 ML20264D999 ML20264E001 ML20264E003 ML20264E005 ML20264E006 ML20264E010 ML20264E012 ML20264E014 ML20264E016 ML20264E017 ML20264E019 ML20264E021 ML20264E023 ML20264E024 ML20264E025 ML20264E026 ML20264E027 ML20264E028 ML20264E029 ... further results
References
ENVR-840831, NUDOCS 8408230365
Download: ML20095D498 (65)

Text

HCGS OLER 8/84

, -ss HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION CONTROLLED COPY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OPERATING LICENSES STAGE NO.

AMENDMENT 4 PAGE CHANGES The attached pages, tables, and figures are part of your controlled copy of the Hope Creek Generating Station ER-OLS.

This material should be incorporated into your ER-OLS by following instructions below.

REMOVE INSERT VOLUME 1 Page 2.2-15 Page 2.2-15 Page 2.6-2 Page 2.6-2 Table 2.6-1 (1,3,5,6 of 6)

Table 2.6-1 (1,3,5,6 of 6)

Figure 2.6-1 Figure 2.6-1 Page 3.1-2 Page 3.1-2 Figure 3.3-l' Figure 3.3-1 Table 3.4-5 Table 3.4-5 Table 3.4-9 Table 3.4-9 Page 3.5-23(a)

Page 3.5-23(a)

Table 3.5-7 (page 5 of 5)

Table 3.5-7 (page 5 of 5)

Table 3.5-11 Table 3.5-11 O

Table 3.5-12 Table 3.5-12 Table 3.5-17 (pages.1 through 3)

Table 3.5-17 (pages 1 through 3) i Table 3.5-18 (pages 1 and 2)

Table 3.5-18 (pages 1 and 2)

Table 3.5-19 (pages 1 and 2)

Table 3.5-19 (pages 1 and 2)

Table 3.5-26 (page 1 of 7)

Table 3.5-26 (page 1 of 7)

Figure 3.9-5 Figure 3.9-5 VOLUME 2 Page 5.1-3 Page 5.1-3 Table 5.2-2 Table 5.2-2 Table 5.2-3 Table 5.2-3 Table 5.2-4 Table 5.2-4 Page 8-il Page 8-11 Page 8.1-3 Page 8.1-3 Page 8.1-4 Page 8.1-4 Page 8.1-5 Page 8.1-5 Table 8.1-5 Table 8.1-5 Table 8.1-6 Page 8.2-2 Page 8.2-2

( )

M P84 126/02 1-mr Amendment 4 8408230365 840820 hDRADOCK 05000354 PDR

HCGS OLER 8/84

.O N--

AMENDMENT 4 PAGE CHANGES (CONTINUED)

REMOVE INSERT VOLUME 3 Page E291.ll-1 Page E291.ll-1 Page.E291.22-1 Page E291.22-1 Page E310.4-1 Page E310.4-1 Page E310.6-1 Page E310.6-1 Page E310.8-1 Page E310.8-1 Page EP2-3 Page EP2-3 Page EP2-8 Page EP2-8 Page EP3-1 Page EP3-1 Page EP3-2 Page EP3-2 Page EP3-3 Page EP3-3 Page EP3-4 Page EP3-4 Page EP3-5 Page EP3-5 Page EP3-6 Page EP3-6 Page EPS-3 Page EP5-3 Page EP8-1 Page EP8-1 O

Page EPQ-1 Page EPQ-1 Page EPQ-2 Page EPQ-2

~*

l HCGS OLER

~8/84-Abundance declines during late September, October and

}

November,,as the decreasing water temperature ini,tiates emi-1

gration.to overwintering areas ~downbay.and/or offshore.-

Perhaps more'in= response tollowering salinity than to tempera-ature, white perch move. into the area f rom upriver in the fall.

Conversely, progeny of Atlantic. croaker migrate into the area

during.the f all, and utilize it as a -nursery _until. minimum i

water-temperatures-(January or-February). prompt their return downbay, to warmer: water.. During winter, ~ variety within the

~1ocal'ichthyofaunal community is lowr.only white-perch, hog-choker and silvery minnow are common.

Low water temperature limitsfactivity as metabolism slows, and restricts the distri-bution of these fish to the deeper waters..

2.2.3 ENDANGERED AND' THREATENED SPECIES

~

The -shortnosed sturgeon, ' Acipenser brevirostrum, has been i

found in the Delaware River; it-is listed as endangered by-

~

both the Fish and Wildlife Service (50 CFR 17) and the state of.New Jersey _(NJR 7:25-11.1).

From 1950 through June 1982 a total-of l49 incidental captures -have occurred in the Delaware River drainage area. ~Five specimens were captured in the vicinity of Artificial Island.

Of these, two were found'in

~

either a gill 1 net or 4.5-meter trawl, and the remaining three

~

were found at a cooling water intaker two having died prior to arrival and one,was. damaged.

Brundage (Reference 2.2-17) 4 provides a discussion of all captures.

Masnik-(Reference 2.2-18) discusses the impactLof the operation of FCGS.

i Sea turtles have also been observed within the Delaware Bay,-

including the Atlantic loggerhead, Caretta carettar Kemp's u-Atlantic Ridley, Lepidochelys kompiir and green sea, Chelonia mydas.

The loggerhead and green sea turtle's are threatened and the Ridley is endangered (50 CFR 17).

The state of Dela-ware. maintains a list of ~ incidental sea turtle captures.

Be-tween 1978 and 1980 a total of eight loggerheads and-three Ridley's were listed.

In addition, during the current study, fourteen turtles were captured in bottom trawls or on an intake structure's trash bars.

Ten of these' turtles were loggerheads; seven of the ten-were dead, and three were alive, and were released.

Three Ridley's were foundt one live and 4

two dead.

One live green sea turtle and one unidentified live turtle were also found.

All live turtles were released.

During the current study, most dead turtles were confirmed as having been dead prior to reaching the intake structurer these were disposed of in accordance with National Marine Fisheries

' Service (NMFS) directions.

Terrestrial endangered and threatened species within the vicinity. of the site included the peregrine falcon (federally

. listed as endangered) and the bald eagle and osprey (listed by the State as endangered).

O

~M'P84 132/12 1-srd 2.2-15 Amendment 4

HCGS OLER than aquicludes) of Cretaceous, Tertiary and Quaternary ages underlie the Coastal Plain.

River bed sand and gravel compose the first aquifer encountered, which is called the " shallow" aquifer.

Grayish-brown clay belonging to the Kirkwood Forma-tion underlies the river bed sand and gravel.

The Kirkwood clay is underlain by a second aquifer, composed of the basal sand of the Kirkwood Formation, all of the Vin-centown Formation, and the upper sands of the Hornerstown Formation.

A direct hydraulic connection exists from one sand layer to the next; therefore, for analytical purposes, the combination of these three sand units is referred to as the Vincentown (or

" deep") Aquifer.

The Mount Laurel and Wenonah sands, referred to herein as the Mount Laurel-Wenonah aquifer, are separated from the overlying Vincentown Formation by a 12 meter (40 foot) thick aquitard, consisting of the Hornerstown and Navesink Formations.

Underlying the Mount Laurel-Wenonah aquifer are the Marshall-town Formation; the Englishtown sand, the Woodbury clay; the Merchantville clay; and the Raritan and Magothy Formations.

From this group, only the Raritan and Magothy Formations con-stitute a significant aquifer at the site.

The remaining for-mations are aquitards and aquicludes.

See Section 2.4, for details.

In the strictest sense of the word, all of the soil formations underlying the HCGS site are hydraulically connected with each o ther, as none of the confining layers which separate the aquifers is completely impermeable.

Whereas permeabilities are about 21 cubic meters per day per square meter (524 gallons per day per square foot) for the shallow aquifer, five cubic meters per day per square meter (124 gallons per day per square foot) for the Vincentown aquifer, and 4 cubic meters per day per square meter (100 gallons per day per square foot) for the Mount Laurel-Wenonah aquifer, the permeabilities of the confining beds are significantly less.

The estimated vertical permeability for the Hornerstown and Navesink For-mations is 0.02 cubic meter per day per square meter (0.4 gallon per day per square foot), and the Kirkwood clay is estimated at less than 0.2 cubic meter per day per square meter (5 gallons per day per square foot).

Thus, the confin-ing beds act as aquitards, and allow some leakage to occur be-tween aquifers whenever there is a vertical hydraulic gradient between adjacent aquifers separated by an aquitard.

Section 2.4 gives a brief description of the major aquifers encountered at the site.

O M P82 131/01 16-mlp 2.5-16

i HCGS OLER l

_/

2.6 REGIONAL HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, ARCHITECTURAit SCENIC, CULTURAL AND NATURAL FEATURES HCGS is located in an area which is rich in history.

Both Salem County, New Jersey and New Castle County, Delaware were among the first reg ions in the country to be settled.

Although a considerable amount of cultural resource survey data are available for New Castle County (References 2.6-1 and 2.6-2), less is available for Salem County (Reference 2.6-3).

A Stage I Cultural Resource Survey for Fort Mott, located approximately 16 kilometers (10 miles) north of HCGS in Lower Pennsville, New Jersey, was completed in 1979 (Reference 2.6-4).

A recently released report concerns the restoration of Fort Mott (Reference 2.6-5 ).

An archaelog-ical excavation undertaken in the city of Salem uncovered no cultural resources (Reference 2.6-6).

The plant site is located on Artificial Island, which was created early in the twentieth century from the deposition of dredge material by the U. S.

Army Corps of Engineers; therefore, the site property holds no archeological significance.

Salem County's original inhabitants were the semi-nomadic, agriculturally oriented Lenni-Lenape indian tribe.

Since there was no established settlement in the vicinity of the

,-~

site, traces of their existence are limited to artifacts.

John Fenwick, a Quaker who purchased the land from Lord Berkeley, one of New Jersey's first proprietors, founded the city of Salem in 1675 (Reference 2.6-7).

It was once a bustling port area, whose economy centered around the Delaware River and the fertile farmland.

Caspar Wistak of Philadelphia introduced the first glassworks to the area in 1738; this industry has continued to be prominent to this day.

The Salem area was of significance during the Revolutionary War.

General George Washington dispatched General "M ad Anthony" Wayne to Salem (Fenwick's Colony) to obtain food for the starving Continental Army at Valley Forge.

The local residents were extremely generous in supplying the troops with the needed provisions.

The British retaliated by sending troops into the Salem County area to quell local resistance.

The Tory troops captured a contingent of local patriots and massacred all but two of them in the William Hancock House (Reference 2.6-8).

,n\\

)

M P82 136/13 1 -srd 2.6-1

HCGS OLER 8/84 Of hit torical interest are the twenty-nine remaining eighteenth-century brick dwellings and meeting houses with patterned or decorated gable ends (Reference 2.6-9).

Nea r-est to the site is the Chambless House, located on the east side of Alloways Creek Neck Road, approximately 6.2 kilo-meters (3.9 miles) f rom the station.

Built in 1730, it is one of the oldest examples of this architectural style (Reference 2.6-10).

The Chambless House is not presently lived in or maintained.

The Hancock House in Hancocks's Bridge, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is said to have been patterned after the Chambless House.

Pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Park Service annually lists properties on the the National Register of Historic Places.

Listed properties have met the criteria for inclusion on the Register. Addi-tional properties, determined by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to be eligible for inclusion in the Register, are also listed annually by the National Park Service.

Many of these properties are already listed on state registers.

Table 2.6-1 contains properties, listed on the National Reg-ister of Historic Places, that are located within a 16 kilo-meter (10 mile) radius of HCGS (References 2.6-11 and 2.6-12).

For the locations of these properties, see Figure 2.6-1.

The following districts and sites in New Castle County, Delaware, are listed as eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places (Reference 2.6-12):

a.

Delaware City Historic District b.

St. Georges Historic District c.

Townsend Historic District d.

Reedy Island Range Rea r Lighthouse There are no sites in New Jersey within a 16 kilometer (10 mile) radius of HCGS that are listed as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (Reference 2.6-3).

However, the Broadway Historic District in Salem City is pending nomination to the State and National. Registers of Historic Places (Reference 2.6-13).

Table 2.6-2 identifies historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places within 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) l1 of either side of the Salem - Deans transmission line por-tion (see Figure 3.9-3).

There are no sites classified as eligible for inclusion on the Register ( Reference 2.6-3).

M P84 80/03 1-dh 2.6-2 Amendment 4 L

i HOGS OLER 8/84

_r3

(

1 2

TABLE.2.6-1 HISTORIC PROPERTIES LISTED ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF. HISTORIC PLACES AS OF FEBRUARY 7, 1984 4

WITHIN 16 KILOMETERS (10 MILES) OF HCGS i

DATE ADOPTED TO

' NATIONAL REGISTER 1

' LOCATION OF HISTORIC PLACES i

SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Elsinboro Township 1.

HOLMELAND et (Benjamin Holme's. House), Fort Elfsborg Hancocks Bridge Road 08/31/78 2.

SAMUEL-AND SARAH NICHOLSON HOUSE (1752),

Amwellbury Road 02/24/75 Lower Alloways Creek

(

3.

HANCOCK HOUSE (1734)

Hancocks Bridge, Locu'st Island Road 12/18/70 Pennsville Township 4.

FINN'S POINT REAR RANGE LIGHT (1876)

Intersection of Fort Mott and Lighthouse Roads 08/30/78

'5.

FORT MOTT-AND FINN'S POINT NATIONAL CEMETERY DISTRICT (1865)

On the Delaware River at Finn's Point 08/31/78 Salem City 6.

MARKET STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT (18-19th Century)

Area includes 9-119 Market Street, and East Broadway 04/10/75 CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Greenwich Township v)

M P84 10/02 1-dh Amendment 4

HCGS OLER 8/84

((i.

'~

TABLE 2.6-1 (Continued)

DATE ADOPTED TO NATIONAL REGISTER LOCATION OF HISTORIC PLACES 16.

PHILIP READING TANNERY 201 East Main St..

04/26/78 17.

ST. JOSEPH'S CHURCH, 15 West Cochran St.

02/17/78 Middletown vicinity 18.

ARNOLD S. NAUDAIN HOUSE South'of Middletown on DE 71 04/24/73 19.

NOXONTOWN South of Middletown off DE 896 07/02/73 20.

OLD ST. ANNE'S CHURCH South of Middletown off DE.71 03/07/73 I0

21. ~ACHMESTER North of Middletown on SR 429 12/28/79 Odessa 22.

APPOQUINIMINK FRIENDS MEETINGHOUSE Main.St.

12/04/72 23.

CORBIT-SHARP HOUSE Southwest corner of Main and 2nd Sts.

12/24/67 24.

ODESSA HISTORIC DISTRICT Bounded roughly by Appoquinimink Creek on southeast, High St. on northeast, 4th St. on northwest and Main St. on southwest 06/21/71 25.

OLD DRAWYERS CHURCH 02/06/73 U.S.

13 25a. OLD ST. PAUL METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH 05/13/82 4

High St.

Odessa vicinity 26.

DUNCAN BEARD SITE 12/18/73 n

-v M P84 80/02 2-dh Amendment 4

• k HOGS OLER 8/84

, \\

. +

)

- '% / I TABLE 2.6-1 (Continued)

DATE ADOPTED TO NATIONAL REGISTER LOCATION OF HISTORIC PLACES Smyrna Vicinity-39.

BRICK STORE East of Smyrna'on DE 488 08/14/73 40.

CLEARFIELD FARM North of Smyrna on DE 485 03/20/73 I.

41.

FLEMING HOUSE Northeast of Smyrna on DE 9 01/31/80 St. Georges 42.

BLOOMFIELD U.S. 13 04/08/82 43.

ROY HOUSE 04/08/82 44.

SUTTON HOUSE Broa6 and Delaware Sts.

04/24/73 44a. VERNACULAR FRAME HOUSE Delaware ~St.

04/08/82 l4 St. Georges Vicinity 45.

BIDDLE HOUSE South of St. George on U.S.

13 12/08/78 4

46.

W.

CASEPERSON HOUSE Kirkwood Rd.

04/08/82 47.

LINDEN HILL 0.8 kilometers (0.5 miles) north on U.S.

13 04/08/82 48.

MCCOY HOUSE 2.2 kilometers (1.4 miles) west on DE 407 04/08/82 O

M P84 80/02 3-dh Amendment 4

HCGS OLER 8/84 s

7^K J'

TABLE 2.6-1 (Continued)

DATE. ADOPTED TO NATIONAL REGISTER LOCATION OF HISTORIC PLACES 49.

ST. GEORGE' S CEMETERY AND CARETAKER'S HOUSE 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) west on DE 409 04/08/82 49a. STARL HOUSE U.S.

13 04/08/82 4

Taylors Bridge Vicinity 50.

HART HOUSE East of Taylors Bridge on DE 453 03/20/73 51.

HUGUENOT HOUSE (HOMESTEAD FARM, NAUDAIN HOUSE)

West of Taylors Bridge on DE 9 03/20/73

)

52.

LISTON HOUSE East of Taylors Bridge on DE 453 03/26/73 Kirkwood Vicinity 53.

Dragon Run Farm 1.9 Kilometers (1.2 miles)

West on DE 4027 04/08/82 KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE Woodland Beach Vicinity 54.

THOMAS SUTTON HOUSE (NEWBERRY) DE 79 Within Woodland Beach Wildlife Area 04/11/73 A

k s) m M P84-80/02 4-dh Ardendment 4

k E

N 4

gS Ng 5

12 4s

~,

ELAWARE CITY 10 6

4

,A 3

4

- 4A 46

~V 48 f

~

1 2

13 3

45 38 37 3

35 D

f 4

I 31 21 uinot!yowf,0 8

W 22-25A ODESSA If"13-17 l 26 27

(

• g 0 51

',8 4.

20 f

89 p

8 W

/

(

l

\\

@4 41 4

'k 5

30 I

40 6

Sag

,gos MM gus)

\\

\\

MRE g

REFERENCE:

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM A PORTION OF THE f

FOLLOWING U.S.O.S. MAP: WILMINGTON, DELAWARE,1966 l

=

i HISTORIC FEATURE @ LISTED ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES

1. HOLMELAND

31. MONTEREY

2. SAMUEL AND SARAll

32. POR1 PENN NICHOLSON HOUSE HISTORIC DISTRICT

3. HANCOCK HOUSE

33. ASHTON HISTORIC DISTRICT

4. FINN'S POINT

34. AUGUSTINE BEACH HOTEL

(

REAR RANGE LIGHT

35. DILWORTH HOUSE

5. FORT MOTT AND FINN'S POINT

36. HAZEL GLEN h

NAT'L CEMETERY DISTRICT

37. LISTON RANGE

6. MARKET ST. HISTORIC DISTRICT REAR LIGHT STATION

7. THOMAS MASKEL HOUSE

38. JOHN B. NELSON HOUSE

8. OLD UNION METHODIST CHURCH

39. BRICK STORE

9. CHELSEA HOUSE

40. CLEARFIELD FARM

10. EASTERN LOCK OF THE

41. FLEMING MOUSE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL

42. BLOOMFIELD

11. FAIRVIEW

43. ROY HOUSE I

12. FORT DELAWARE ON

44. SUTTON HOUSE 48 16 PEA PATCH ISLAND 44A. VERNACULAR FRAME HOUSE

13. GREENLAWN (OUTTEN DAVIS HOUSE:

45. BlDDLE HOUSE WILLIAM BRADY HOUSE)

46. W. CASEPERSON HOUSE

14. MIDDLETOWN ACADEMV

47. LINDEN HILL

15. MIDDLETOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT

48. MCCOY HOUSE

16. PHILIP READING TANNERY

49. ST. GEORGE'S CEMETERY

17. GT. JOSEPHS CHURCH F 18. ARNOLD S. NAUDAIN HOUSE AND CARETAKER'S HOUSE 49A. STARL HOUSE

]

20. OLD ST. ANNE'S CHURCH SO' HART HOUSE 21.ACHMESTER

51. HUGUENOT HOUSE E

22. APPOQUINIMiNK FRIENDS (MOMESTEAD FARM, MEETINGHOUSE NAUDAIN HOUSE)

23. CORBIT-SHARP HOUSE

52. LISTON HOUSE

24. ODESSA HISTORIC DISTRICT

53. DRAGON RUN FARM

25. 0LD DRAWYERS CHURCH

54. THOMAS SUTTON HOUSE 25A. 0LD ST. PAUL CHURCH (NEWBERRY)

26. DUNCAN BEARD SITE dlso AvaHable On

27. HELL ISLAND SITE

28. COMDR. THOMAS MACDONOUGH HOUSE Aperture @

N

29. SERECK SHALLCROSS HOUSE 4

30. WILLI AMS HOUSE g

D WISTORIC SITES ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HOTORIC PLACES A.

DELAWARE CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT B. ST. GEORGE'S HISTORIC DISTRICT C. TOWNSEND HISTORIC DISTRICT

[

D. RANGE REAR LIGHTHOUSE b

er 1

0 1

2 3

i HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION MILES j-ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT 1

1 0

1 2

3 OPERATING LICENSE STAGE i

KILOMETERS HISTORIC SITES i

WITHIN 10 KILOMETERS (16 MILES) OF SITE FIGURE 2.6 - 1 AMEND.4 6/84 i

8408230305-01 i

=~

HCGS OLER

[ D-CHAPTER 3

\\_ /

THE STATION 3.1 EXTERNAL APPEARANCE 3.1.1 PHYSICAL APPEARANCE PSE&G discussed the external appearance of the station during the construction permit stage.

The external appearance was also described in the FES.

The most significant appearance change to date has been the elimination of the Unit 2 cooling tower and the reactor building containment.

The following section is a combination of updated information and relevant material previously reported.

The station consists of one 1,067 megawatt nuclear generating unit with associated facilities.

Figure 3.1-1 shows an cblique graphic repr'esentation of the completed station.

Figures 3.1-2 and 3.1-3 show the of f-site appearance of the station from two accessible areas:

from the intersection of the Artificial Island access road with Alloway Creek Neck Road, and from the Delaware River shipping channel

[s')

approximately 1.6 kilometers (one mile) off shore,

\\d respectively.

The principal building at the station is a rectangular turbine building approximately 111 meters (364 feet) long in a north-south direction and 59 meters (195 feet) wide in an east-west direction.

The building extends approximately 29 meters (96 feet) above grade.

The turbine building is adjoined by the former Unit 2 turbine building, a portion of which is utilized as the administration facility, and the auxiliary building.

The T-shaped auxiliary building is subdivided into a radwaste/

service area and a control / diesel generator area.

The rad-waste / service area is a rectangular structure approximately 168 meters (550 feet) long in a north-south direction and 27 meters (88 feet) wide in an east-west direction.

The rad-waste / service area extends approximately 21 metcrs (69 feet) above grade.

The radwaste/ service area is adjoined by the control / diesel generator area, reactor building, administra-tion facility and turbine building.

The control / diesel gen-erator area is approximately 73 meters (241 feet) long in an east-west direction and 50 meters (165 feet) wide in a (Of M P8 2 - 8 3/0 6 1-cag 3.1-1

HCGS OLER 0/04 north-south direction.

The building extends approximately 29 meters (96 feet) above grade.

The control / diesel generator area is adjoined by the reactor building, the radwaste/ service area and the former Unit 2 reactor building.

The reactor building has a diameter approximately 50 meters (165 feet) across, extends 61 meters (200 feet) above grade, and is 59 meters (193 feet) wide in a north-south direction and 68 meters (224 feet) wide in an east-west direction.

The reactor building is bounded by the control / diesel generator area and the radwaste/ service area.

The rectangular service water intake structure extends 34 meters (112 feet) in a north-south direction and 23 meters (75 feet) in an east-west direction.

It rises approximately 11 meters (35 feet) above grade, and is located approximately 244 meters (800 feet) west of the reactor building.

The intake structure is bordered on each side by a cellular cofferdam extending 15 meters (50 feet) to the south and 30 meters (100 feet) to the north.

The hyperbolic natural draft cooling tower is the most promi-nent feature on Artificial Island.

Its base diameter and height above nominal plant grade are approximately 132 meters (432 feet) and 157 meters.(516 feet), respectively.

The switchyard, which is located approximately 107 meters (350 feet) east of the turbine building, measures 966 meters (600 feet) in a north-south direction and 229 meters (750 feet) in an east-west di ection.

The auxiliary boiler building is 30 meters (100 feet) long in the east-west direction and 28 meters (93 feet) long in the north-south direction.

The main portion of the building ex-tends approximately 7 meters (23 feet) above grade.

The auxiliary boiler building lies 91 meters (300 feet) north of the administration facility.

The Emergency Operation Facility (EOF) is located offsite at 4

the Nuclear Training Centor. Salem, New Jersey.

Access to HCGS is achiered by an 8.5 kilometer (5.3 mile) road that connects with Alloway Creek Neck Road about 4.8 kilo-meters (three miles) east of the site.

A main gate and guata-l house ~ facility at the intersection of the fence area with the l

access road controls entry to station.

h MP84 62/15 2 3.1-2 Amendment 4

t.

DELAWARE RIVER SCREEN AND STRAINER WASH Ak Ak Ak Ak AL V

SACS / RACS h

SERVICE WATER INTAKE HEAT EXCHANGER 0 DE-ICING LINE 2

COOLING TOWER BL

'JL JL Ak TURBINE /REACTCR 4 CONDENSATE STEAM CYCLE STORAGE r

TANKS JL Akh 3

JL V

3 h

LIQUID MAKEUP 2

JL RADWASTE DEMINERALIZEF PROCESSING SYSTEM o

z h

5 h

Ak o

I o

2

{

O AREA, BU'LDING g

y AND EQUIPMENT DRAINS V

jg z

E m

2 V

h LOW VOLUME WASTE SYSTEM db Q'-

SEWAGE TREATMENT 4

SYSTEMS (3) v 2

OADM STORM DRAINS 2,

Jk STATION j

f SETTLING POND

o 6

,4<~

' ~ ~'~, < n

~

em

/

EVAPORATION

h A

f,ND DRIFT

1. yes ch@

i l

TO INTAKE (de-icing)

NATURAL CIRCULATING DRAFT WATER r

COOLING TOWER SYSTEM DOWN@

2 l

N

\\ DECHLORINATION

• 1 MAKEUP Q

WATER STORAGE 4

DEMINERALIZER 4

TANKS (for fire and 4

E FEED TANK

,2 potab!e use) h

)

SYSTEM y

L SSES AUXILIARY DOMESTIC WATER RAGE BOILERS TANKS (2)

V Q'

POTABLE WATER SYSTEM NB0Av Q 3,gg 4

4 M

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION f

ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE STATION WATER USE h

!{

FIGURE 3.3 - 1 AMEND. 4 6/84 rvun aS2Wh S 8 5 -(TL

.O

HCXE CER 8/84 TABM 3.4-5 SERVICE ETER INEAKE SITUCIURE FEATURES PARAMETERS AT CP STAGE AT OL STAGE (1) Ntsnber of structures One No change (2) Incation Shoreline - west of Iso change reactor building (3) Service To cool RACS and SACS No change heat exchangers and provide cx3oling tower makeup (4) Dilution bypass Portion of service Eliminated water (approximately 40%) which bypasses the E291.4 SWS and is used for dilution of discharge (5) Service water pumps Eight (8) pungs (4 per Four (4) pumps rated at unit) rated at 56,800 62,450 liters / minute liters / minute (15,000 (16,500 gallons / minute)

O gallons / minute)

(6) Flow rate per unit 160,900 liters / minute 124,400 liters / minute (42,500 gallons / minute)

(32,860 gallons / minute)

(7) Traveling screens Eight (8) vertical screens Four(4)verticIlscreens Through-screen 0.15 meter /second 0.12 meter /second 4

water velocity (0.50 foot /second)

(0.40 fcot/second)

Wire mesh size:

0.95 centimeter x 1.27 centimeter x 0.95 centimeter 0.32 centimeter (3/8 inch x 3/8 inch)

(1/2 inch x 1/8 inch)

(8) Deicing capability None As described in Section 3.4-1 (9) Fish return system None As described in Section 3.4-1 l

l l 0 '

M P84 123/08 1-snw Amerxhent 4 l

-HCGS OLER 8/84 TABLE 3.4-9

,ry C/

DISCHARGE WATER SYSTEM FEATURES PARAMETER AT CP STAGE AT OL STAGE (1) Discharge point-300 meters (1000 feet) 160 meters (460 feet) upstream of intake structure (2)-Discharge point 60 meters (200 feet) 3 meters (10 feet) off shoreline (3) Discharge pipe 1.4 meters (4.5 feet) 1.2 meters (4.0 feet) diameter E291.4 (4) Blowdown rate 45,200 liters / minute (l) 79,400 liters / minute (per unit)

(12,000 gallons / minute)

(21,360 gallons / minute)

(5) Average discharge.

Winter 6.2*C (ll.2*F) 14.4*C (26.4*F) water temperature Summer 3 to 7'C (6.6'F) 3.0*C (5.2*F) 4 rise (6) Discharge velocity 260 centimeters /second 110 centimeters /second (8.5 feet /second)

(3.5 feet /second)

(two units)

(7) Discharge water 7.8'C (14*F) 19.6 C (35.5'F) temperature rise

~(coldest month)

(1)

Plus bypass flow of approximately 18,500 gallons / minute per unit

( ): P84 123/16-sed Amendment-4

i k

HCGS 0LERT 4/84-j

~

w -

Table'3.5-7 gives the assumptions and parameters used to. cal-

~

7I h \\--).

culate ;the yearly. activity. releases.- The yearly-activity re-w leases for-each waste stream and the total appear in Table.

o 3.5-17.1

_i The processed liquid radwaste that is not recycled _in the

- plant is. discharged into the cooling tower blowdown line on a batch basis, at flow rates _of upLto 666 liters.per minute ~(176 gallons per. minute) for the low purity waste processing sys-tem,E and 95 -liters per minute (25 gallons per minute) for the laundry drain waste processing. system.

No pump:rlows are given_for. discharges from.the;high purity, chemical or regene-rant waste subsystems'since'it is;not planned to actually dis-

.l3 charge 'any of those_ streams.

Flow is controlled by a flown control valve; therefore, the actual-flow could be substan-tially_less.

The minimum monthly-total cooling tower blowdown flow of 72,000 liters _per minute.(19,000 gallons per minute) dilutes the above discharge rates by at least a factor of 100 for. the low purity waste, and.by 750 for the laundry waste streams.

The instrument-used to measure the cooling tower blowdown" flow

- is an ultrasonic level gage. located near the cooling ' tower

)

- basin weir._

The level gage measures the level in the basin.

and ~ converts the height aboire-the weir -into : cooling tower blowdown flow.

This signal is transmitted to the.LR-RMS local-radiation processor where it is combined with the measurement from the radiation element in the LWMS discharge.line to 3

i

. calculate the final diluted concentration.

When the cooling tower blowdown flow is below the minimum ~setpoint, the signal-initiates the closing of the LWMS discharge line-isolation valve.

This dilution occurs within the site boundary; the

_ dilution is used in determining specific activity concentra-l tions for the releases.

These concentrations and a comparison-to 10 CPR 20 limits appear in Table 3.5-18.

J~

No actual leak detection methods have been employed. but several design measures have been implemented to preclude leakage or the consequences of any leakage.

These measures include:

the use of stainless steel piping, sampling the rad-waste tanks prior to discharge-and discharging only neutral 2

(pH.7 to 10): liquids to minimize the internal pipe corrosion process, hydrostatically testing the pipe prior to burying-it, burying the pipe in. granular bedding or sanderete, and supply-

. ing the piping with impressed-current cathodic-_ protection to preclude external galvanic type corrosion.

M P84 61/01 10-gs 3.5-23 Amendment 3 I

c

%d y

)

-w.

Ly...,

y p:,

,,.s

,m r

,....m, m

mom,_.m_.,,_~.,,,.._.,_m,,,

HCGS OLER 8/84 3.5.2.4 Estimated Doses To ensure compliance with Appendix I of 10 CFR Part 50, dose calculations, based on the liquid source terms described above, are performed in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.109 1

by use of the USNRC computer code LADTAP II.

For these pur-poses doses are calculated for a maximum individual consuming aquatic biota and receiving shoreline exposure at the edge of the initial mixing zone.

There is no potable water or irriga-tion pathway for liquid effluents from HCGS.

Table 3.5-19 gives input data for these calculations.

The calculated doses are 0.0265 mrem per year to the total body of an' adult and 1

4 0.383 mrem per year to the bone of a child.

These doses are well within the Appendix I design guides of 3.0 and 10.0 mrem per year to the total body and any organ, respectively.

Total man-rem and man-thyroid-rem dose to the 80 kilometer (50 mile) population from liquid effluents from Hope Creek Gen-erating Station are estimated to be 0.255 and 0.754, respec-4 tively.

Using ti!e methodology presented in Regulatory Guide 1.110, additional equipment can be justified if its total annual cost is less than one thousand 1975 dollars per man-rem I

or man-thyroid-rem saved.

The smallest total annual cost per I

man-rem or man-thyroid-rem saved (even assuming that the equipment would totally eliminate all 80 kilometer (50 mile) 2 population doses) is estimated to be S14,500 (1975).

Since this is greater than S1,000 (1975), it is concluded that no additional equipment can be justified.

Thus the li' quid waste management system is judged to be designed in accordance with the applicable position of Appendix I to CFR 50.

3.5.3 GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEMS The gaseous waste management systems include all systems that process potential sources of airborne releases of radioactive l

material during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences.

Included are the offgas system and various ventilation systems.

These systems reduce radioactive gaseous releases from the plant by filtration or delay, which allows decay of radioisotopes prior to release.

M P84 112/12-1-mw 3.5-23(a)

Amendment 4

~

o

.o U-HQIS OLER 8/84 TABLE 3.5-7 (Continued)

(. Page 5 of,5)

ITEM

' VAWE OR REFERENCE SOURCE s

' LIQUID GALE CARDB 2-0.632 0.333 2.0 1.0E-25 092382 1 0 0 CARD 1 NAME NAPE OF REACIOR: HOGS-TYPE = BWR-CARD 2 PONI11

'niERMAL POWER LEVEL (MEGAWATIS) 3458-CARD 3 G'lO

'1UTAL STEAM FIIM (MILLIm IBS/HR)

14.0 CARD 4 WLIO MASS OF WATER IN REACIOR VESSEL (MILLION IBS) 0.38*

CARD 5 GDE CLEAN-UP DEMINERALIZER FIIM. (MILLIm IBS/HR) 0.13 CARD 6 REGENT CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER REGENERATION TIME (DAYS) 30.0 CARD 7 FFCDM FRACTION FEED WATER 'HIROUGH OJNDENSATE DEMIN 1.00 4

CARD 8 HIGi PURITY WASTE INPtrr 32359. GPD AT.136 ICA i

CARD 9 DFI = 1.0E02DFCS = 1.0E01DFO = 1.0E02 CARD 10 COLLECTION 0.761 IRYS PROCESS 0.0895 DAYS FRACT DISCH-0.01:

I CARD 11 LOW PURITY WASTE INPUT 5700.

GPD AT.001 CARD 12 DFI = 1.0E02DFCS = 2.0000DF0 =.1.0802 2

CARD 13-COLLECTION 2.105 DAYS PROCESS 0.0718 DAYS FRACT DISOi 0.5 CARD 14 OIEMICAL WASTE INPUT 600.

GPD AT.02 PCA CARD 15 DFI = 1.OE00DFCS = 1.OE00DFO = 1.0000 3

CARD 16 COLLECTION 2.667 DAYS PROCESS.655 IRYS FRACP DISCH 0.1 CARD 17 REGENERATIm SOL' INS INPtTT GPD 6285.0 CARD.18-DFI = 1.0E03DFCS = 1.OE04DFO = 1.OE04 CARD 19 COLLECTI m 3.18 DAYS PROCESS.437 DAYS FRACr DISol 0.)

i-CARD 20 GGS GLAND SEAL STEAM EIDW ('HiOUSAND IBS/HR) 0.0 CARD 21 TIM 3 GIA?O SEAL HOLDUP TIME (HOURS) 0.0 CARD 22 TIM 4 AIR E3ECIOR OFEGAS HOLDUP TIME (IKXJRS)

,0.17 CARD 23 00NTAINMENT HLDG. CHARCOAL 00.0 HEPA?99.0 CARD 24

'IURBINE BLDG.

OiAROOAL 00.0 HEPA?00.0

}

CARD 25 FIL3 GLAFO SEAL VENT, IODIPE PF 00.0 i

CARD 26 FIL4 AIR E3ECIOR OFFGAS IODINI: PF 1.0 I

CARD 27 AUXILIARY BLDG.-

OiAR00hL 00.0 HEPA?99.0 CARD 28 RADWASTE HLDG.

CHARCOAL 70.0 HEPA?99.0 CARD 29 KOIAR CHARCOAL DELAY SYSIEM 0=NO,1=YES,2= CRYOGENIC DISTIII

-1.0 CARD 30 KKR

' KRYPION DYNAMIC ADSORPTION 00 EFFICIENT (CM3/GM).

-18.5 i

CARD 31 ~'KXE XENON UfNAMIC ADSORPTIm COEFFICIENT (CM3/GM) 330.0 CARD 32 KMASS MASS OF Q1AR00AL ('n100 SAND IRS) 322.0 CARD 33 PFIAUN DETERGENr WASIE DECONTAhlNATIm FACIOR 1.0 MP84 95 15 3-vw Amendment 4 i

l

HCGS OLER 8/84

./

(

)

TABLE 3.5-11

(/

EXPECTED HOLDUP TIME FOR COLLECTION, PROCESSING AND DISCHARGE USED FOR EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPENDIX I OF 10 CFR 50 k

Process Holdup Time-(Days)

J I.

HIGH PURITY WASTE SUBSYSTEM a.

Collection 0.761 b.

Processing 0.0895 c.

Discharge Time 0.0 d.

Total 0.851 II.

LOW PURITY WASTE SUBSYSTEM a.

Collection 2.105 b.

Processing 0.0473 c.

Discharge Time 0.0245 (1) d.

Total-2.177 III.

CHEMICAL WASTE SUBSYSTEM

[

')

a.

Collection 2.667 4

Ad b.

Processing 0.655 c.

Discharge Time 0.0 d.

Total 3.322 4

IV.

REGENERANT WASTE SUBSYSTEM a.

Collection 3.18 b.

Processing 0.437 c.

Discharge Time 0.0 d.

Total 3.62 (1) NUREG-0016, Rev. I recommends the use of T = (T proc-essing + 1/2 T discharge) for the sum of processing and discharge time entry.

This value of 0.0245 for dis-charge is 1/2'T discharge.

()

MP84 95 15 2-vw Amendment 4 a

HO3S OLER 8/84 TABLE 3.5-12 AVERNE-DAILY INPUTS AND ACTIVITIES 'IO THE LIOUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Expected Daily Input-Fraction of Primary Source Flow Rate (gal / day)

Coolant (PCA) (1)

I.-

HIGH PURITY WASTE SUBSYSTEM Equipnent Drains

- Drywell 3400(1) 1.00

- Reactor Building 3700(1) 0.1

- Radwaste Area 1100(1) 0.1

- Turbine Building 3000(1) 0.001 Ultrasonic Resin Cleaner 10212 0.05 Resin Rinse 8979 0.002 4

Clean-up Phase Separator 640(1) 0.002 Radwaste Demineralizer Regeneration 1328 0.003 Total 32359 0.136 4

II.

IIM PURITY WASTE SYSTEM Floor Drains

- Drywell 700(1) 0.001

- Reactor Building 2000(1) 0.001

- Radwaste Area 1000(1) 0.001

- Turbine Building 2000(1) 0.001 Total 5700 0.001 1

III. CHEMICAL WASTE SYSTEM Lab Drains 500(1) 0.02 Chemical Lab Waste 100(1) 0.02 Total 600 0.02 IV.

REGENERAMr WASTE SYSTEM 6285 (2)

V.

DE*rERGENT WASTE SUBSYSTEM 1000(1)

(1) Obtained fran NUREG-0016 Revision 1.

(2) Calculated by the GALE Code.

s.-)

MP84 95 15 1-vw Amendment 4

n.

(

~

Q/

GI O

l HOGS OLER 8/84 TABLE 3.5-17 (Page 1 of'3)

EXPECTED YEARLY ACTIVITY RELEASED FW)M LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SUBSYSTEMS FOR EVAI11ATIm OF COMPLIANCE WI'111 APPENDIX I OF 10 CFR 50 (C1)

High Purity Iow Purity

' Waste Waste Chemical Waste Processing Processing Processing Adjusted Detergent Stream Stream Stream Subtotal Total Wastes Total CDRHOSIN AND ACTIVATION PRODUC7S Na-24 3.5E-3 1.3E-4 2.4E-3 6.0E-3 9.3E-3 0

9.3E-3 P-32 1.18-4 6.9E-6 3.4E-4 4.6E-4 7.0E-4 0

7.0E-4 Cr-51 3.4E-3 2.1E-4 1.1E-2 1.SE-2 2.38-2 0

2.3E-2 Mn-54 3.9E-5 2.6E-6 1.5E-4 1.9E-4 3.0E-4 1.0E-3 1.3E-3 Mn-56 3.4E-3 8.9E-5 6.8E-5 3.5E-3 5.4E-3 0

5.4E-3 Fe-55 5.6E-4 3.7E-5 2.2E-3 2.8E-3 4.3E-3 0

4.3E-3 Fe-59 1.7E-5 1.lE-6 6.0E-5 7.8E-5 1.2E-4 0

1.28-4 Co-58 1.1E-4 7.2E-6 4.lE-4 5.3E-4 8.2E-4 4.0E-3 4.8E-3 4

Co-60 2.3E-4 1.5E-5 8.8E-4 1.lE 1.7E-3 8.7E-3 1.0E-2 Ni-65 2.0E-5 5.3E-7 3.9E-7 2.18-5 3.2E-5 0

3.2E-5 Cu-64 9.7E-3 3.5E-4 5.6E-3 1.6E-2 2.4E-2 0

2.4E-2 2n-65 1.lE-4 7.3E-6 4.3E-4 5.5E-4 8.5E-4 0

8.5E-4 2n-69m 6.7E-4 2.5E-5 4.2E-4 1.1E-3 1.7E-3 0

1.7E-3 2n-69 7.lE-4 2.6E-5 4.5E-4 1.2E-3 1.8E-3 0

1.8E-3 Zr-95 0

0 0

0 0

1.4E-3 1.4E-3

~Nb-95 0

0 0

0 0

2.0E-3 2.0E-3 W-187 1.2E-4 5.5E-6 1.3E-4 2.6E-4 4.lE-4 0

4.lE-4 Np-239 3.5E-3 1.9E-4 6.4E-3 1.0E-2 1.5E-2 0

1.5E-2 FISSION PRODUCTS Br-83 2.3E-4 6.0E-6 3.5E-6 2.4E-4 3.6E-4 0

3.6E-4 4

Br-84 8.8E-6.

3.6E-7 1.3E-13 9.lE-6 1.4E-5 0

1.4E-5 Sr-89 5.7E-5 3.7E-6 2.0E-4 2.6E-4 4.lE 0 4.lE-4 Sr-90 4.0E-6 2.6E-7 1.5E-5 2.0E-5 3.08-5 3.0E-5 Y-90 4.5E-7 6.2E-8 8.9E-6 9.4E-6 1.4E-5 1.4E-5 Sr-91 1.lE-3 3.5E-5 4.4E-4 1.6E-3 2.4E-3 0

2.4E-3 Y-91m 7.0E-4 2.2E-5 2.8E-4 1.0E-3 1.5E-3 0

1.5E-3 MP84 95 15 6-vw Amendment 4

EKIE QER 8/84 TAB [E 3.5-17 (Q:ntinued)

(Page 2 cf 3)

High Purity Iow Purity Waste Maste Olenical Waste Processirg Processirg Processirg Adjusted Datergent Strean Strean Systen Subtotal

'Ibtal Mastes

'Ibtal FISSIOi PIGUCIS (Contirued)

Y-91 3.1E-5 2.2E-6 1.4E-4 1.70-4 2.60-4 0

2.60-4 Sr4 2 7.2E-4

1. % 5 1.8E-5 7.6e-4 1.2B-3 0

1.20-3 Y-92 1.7E-3 4.4E-5 1.7E-4 1.9E-3

2. % 3 0

2. % 3 Y-93 1.1E-3 3.7E-5 4.9E-4 1.78-3 2.68-3 0

2.6B-3 2r4 5 4.58-6 2.9E-7 1.60-5 2.10-5 3.3E-5 0

3.30-5 tb-95 4.5E-6 2.9E-7 1.7E-5 2.2E-5 3.4E-5 0

3.40-5 Nb-98 2.8E-5 9.4E-7 3.4e-10 2.9E-5 4.50-5 0

4.58-5 Mar-99 1.00-3 5.6E-5 2.0E-3 3.lE-3 4.7B-3 0

4.70-3 m

4.48-3 1.50-4 2.6E-3 7.1&-3 1.1E-2 0

1.1E-2 1e-103 1.lE-5 7.2E-7 3.9E-5 5.lE-5 7.9E-5 1.4E-4 2.20-4 3

%-103m 1.1E-5 7.2e-7 4.00-5 5.1B-5 7.9E-5 0

7.9E-5~

'Ib-104 8.3E-6 5.38-7 1.5E-19

8. % 6 1.4E-5 0

1.4E-5 lb-105 2.8&-4 7.3E-6 2.7E-5 3.lE-4 4.8E-4 0

4.8E-4 Rh-105m 2.8E-4 7.38-6 2.7E-5 3.1E-4 4.8E-4 0

4.80-4 Rh-105 9.40-5 5.3E-6 1.80-4 2.8E-4 4.3E-4 0

4.30-4 lb-106 1.7e-6 1.lE-7 6.5E-6 8.30-6 1.30-5 2.49-3 2.48-3 Rh-106 1.78-6 1.1E-7 6.5E-6 8.30-6 1.30-5 0

1.30-5 Ao-110n 5.6E-6 3.6E-8 2.2E-6 2.8E-6 4.2E-6 4.4E-4 4.48-4 4

'Ib-129m 2.2E-5 1.4E-6 7.8E-5 1.0E-4 1.6B-4 0

1.68-4 Te-129 1.4E-5 9.2E-7 5.0E-5 6.50-5 1.00-4 0

1.0s-4 Te-131m 4.4E-5 2.10-6 5.7E-5 1.0E-4 1.6E-4 0

1.6E-4 "Ib-131 8.1E-6 3.8E-7 1.00-5 1.9E-5 2.98-5 0

2.9E-5 I-131 9.9E-3 6.lE-5 6.6e-2 6.7E-2 1.00-1 6.2B-5 1.00-1 Te-132 5.1E-6 2.9E-7 1.1E-5 1.6E-5 2.5E-5 0

2.5E-5 I-132 2.lE-3 5.7E-5

3. % 5 2.2E-3 3.48-3 0

3.4E-3 4

I-133-1.0E-2 4.38-4 1.8E-2 2.9E-2 4.40-2 0

4.4 E-2 I-134 5.8E-4

1. % 5 1.00-8 6.0E-4 9.1E-4 0

9.1E-4 M P84 112/14 1-nw Anendnent 4

O O

O HWS GER

'8/84-TABtE 3.5-17 (Otmtinued)

(Page 3 of 3)

High Purity Iow Purity l

Waste Waste

. Onnical Miste Processing Processing Processing Adjtsted Detergent Stream Strean Systen 9 *t<*al

'Ibtal Mustes

'Ibtal FISSIOi Pf0DJCIS (dNTINAD)

Cs-134 1.7E-4 5.5Fr5 5.7Fr5 2.80-4 4.38-4 1.38-2 1.38-2 I-135 5.7E-3 1.6B-4 1.3Fe3 7.lE-3 1.1B-2 0

1.1E-2 Cs-136 4.4Fr4 1.4Fr4 1.2B-4 7.0E-4 1.lE-3 0

1.10-3 Cs-137 1.1Fr4 3.7E-5 3.8E-5 1.9E-4

2. % 4 2.48-2 2.4E-2

' Ba-137hi 1.10-4 3.4E-5 3.68-5 1.88-4 2.79-4 0

2.7B-4 Cs-138 1.6B-4 3.4E-5 3.19-13 2.0E-4 3.0E-4 0

3.00-4 I

Ba-139 2.2E-4 6.50-6

1. % 7

2. 3B-4 3.58-4 0

3.50-4 Ba-140 2.2Fr4 1.4Fr5 6.6Fr4 9.0B-4 1.4B-3 0

1.48-3 ta-140, 3.9E-5 4.90-6 4.3Pr4 4.7E-4 7.3Pr4 0

7.3E-4 La-141 1.0E-4 2.7E-6 7.5Fr6 1.lE-4 1.7E-4 0

1.7Fr4

' Ce-141 1.9E-5 1.2Fr6 6.7E-5 8.6B-5 1.3B-4 0

1.30-4 4

. Ia-142 1.6Fr4 4.6D-6 2.7E-7 1.7Fr4 2.5E-4 0

2.58-4 Ce-143 1.4E-5 6.6E76 3

1.9E-5 3.3B-5 5.00-5 0

5.0B-5 Pe-143 2.2Fr5 1.4E-6 7.10-5 9.5E-5 1.50-4 0

1.50-4 Ce-144 1.7Fr6 1.lE-7 6.5B-6 8.3B-6 1.3B-5 5.28-3 5.28-3 Pe-144 1.7Fr6 1.lE-7 6.50-6 8.3E-6 1.39-5 0

1.3B-5 '

NL (Ti1ERS 1.4E-5 1.4Fe6 1.3E-5 2.8Fr5 4.30-5 0

4.30-5

'IUTAL (Except 5.9E-2 2.6Fr3 1.3E-1

1. % 1 2.90-1 6.28-2 3.5B-1 Trititsn)

Trititan Helease 26 M P84112/14 2-nw Amerdnent 4 e

HCGS OLER~

_8/84 TABLE 3.5-18--

'(Page 1 of 3)

EXPECTED ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS(uCi/ml)

N FOR EVALUATION OF RADIOACTIVE RELEASES TO THE DELAWARE RIVER MPC (uCi/ml) 10CFR20

' Concentration

. Table II, Fraction Isotope (uCi/ml)(1)

Col.'2 of MPC Na-24 4E-9' 2E-4 2E-5 4-P-32 2E-10 2E-5 lE-5 Cr-51

'8E 2E-3 4E-6 4

l: -

Mn-54

-4E lE-4 4E-6 Mn-56 2E-9 lE-4 2E-5 4

Fe lE-9 8E-4 lE-6 Fe-59 4E-11 6E-5 7E-7

-Co-58 2E-9 lE-4 2E-5 Co-60 3E-9 SE-5 6E-5~

l Ni-65

-lE-ll lE-4 lE-7 4

Cu-64 8E-9 3E-4 3E Zn-65 3E-10 lE-4 3E-6 Zn-69m 6E-10 7E-5 9E-6 O

Zn 6E-10 2E-3 3E-7 W-187 lE-10 7E-5 lE-6 Np-239-SE lE-4 SE-5 4

Br-83 lE-10 3E-6 3E-5 Br-84 SE-12 3E-6 2E-6 4

'Sr-89 lE-10 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 lE-ll 13E-7 3E-5 Y-90 SE-12 2E-5 3E-7 1

_Sr-91 8E-10 7E-5 lE-5 Y-91m SE-10 3E-3 2E-7 4

Y-91 9E-ll 3E-5 3E-6 Sr-92 4E-10 7E-5 6E-6'

.Y-92 lE-9 6E-5 2E-5

'Y-93 9E-10 3E-5 3E-5 4

2r SE-10 6E-5 8E-6 hb-95 7E-10 lE-4 7E-6 Nb-98 lE-11 3E-6 3E-6 4

'Mo-99 2E-9 2E-4 lE-5 4

(1)See page 3.

MP84 95 15 4-vw Amendment 4

HCGS OLER 8/84 f}

TABLE 3.5-18-(Continued)

(Page 2 of 3)

%l MPC (uCi/ml)

'10CFR20 Concentration Table II, Fraction Isotope (uCi/ml)(1)

Col. 2 of MPC Tc-99m 4E-9 6E-3 7E 4 Ru-103.

7E-11 8E-5 9E Rh-103m 3E-ll lE-2 3E-9 4

-Tc-104 SE-12 3E-6 2E-6 Ru-105 2E-10 lE-4 2E Rh-105m 2E-10 3E-6 7E-5 Rh-105 lE-10 1E-4 lE-6 Ru-106 8E-10 lE-5 8E-5 Rh-106 4E-12 3E-6 IE-6 Ag-110m lE-10 3E-5 3E-6 Te-129m SE-11 3E-5 2E-6 Te-129 3E-ll 8E-4 4E-8 Te-131m SE-ll 6E-5 8E-7' 4

Te-131 lE-ll 3E-6 3E-6 I-131 3E-8 3E-7 lE-1 p

Te-132 8E-12 3E-5 3E-7 I-132 lE-9 8E-6 lE-4 I-133 lE-8 lE-6 lE-2 4

I-134 3E-10 2E-5 2E-5 Cs-134 4E-9 9E-6 4E-4 I-135 4E-9 4E-6 lE-3 Cs-136 4E-10 9E-5 4E-6 4

Cs-137 8E-9 2E-5 4E-4 Ba-137m 9E-ll 3E-6 3E-5 Cs-138 lE-10 3E-6 3E-5 Ba-139 lE-10 3E-6 3E-5 Ba-140 SE-10 2E-5 3E-5 4

La-140 2E-10 2E-5 lE-5 La-141 6E-ll 3E-6 2E-5 4

Ce-141 4E-ll 9E-5 4E-7 La-142 8E-11 3E-6 3E-5 4

Ce-143 2E-ll 4E-5 SE-7 Pr-143 SE-ll SE-5 lE-6 t-Ce-144 2E-9 lE-5 2E-4 Pr-144 4E-12 3E-6 lE-6 All Others lE-11 3E-8 3E-4 3

4

.H3 9 E-- 6 3E-3 3E-3 Total lE-7 lE-1 3

2 M P84 112/13 1-mw Amendment 4

HCGS OLER 8/84 f%

7q,)

TABLE 3.5-19 (Page 1 of 4)

INPUT DATA FOR AQUATIC DOSE CALCULATIONS HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION - LIQUID DOSE CALCULATIONS 1

4:2.3 1.0 0

1 5.97E06 HCGS SOURCE TERM - ONE UNIT WITH MULTIPLIER OF 1.0 H3 26.0 NA24 0.093 P~32 0.00070 CR51 0.023 MN54 0.0013 MN56 0.0054 FE55 0.0043 FES9 0.00012 C058 0.0048 CO60 0.01 NI65 0.000032 CU64 0.024 ZN65 0.00085 O

ZN69M 0.0017 i

ZN69 0.0018 W 187 0.00041 2

NP239 0.015 BR83 0.0003.6 BR84 0.000014 4

SR89 0.00041 SR90 0.000030 Y 90 0.000014 2

SR91 0.0024 Y 91M 0.0015 Y 91 0.00026 SR92 0.0012 Y 92 0.0029 Y 93

'0.0026 ZR95 0.0014 NB95 0.002 NB98 0.000045 MO99 0.0047' TC99M.

0.011 RU103 0.00022 RH103M. 0.000079 TC104 0.000014 RU105

-0.00048 RH105M 0.00048 RH105 0.00043

{'N RU106 0.0024 x,)

RH106 0.000013 M P84 112/12-2-mw Amendment 4

1 HCGS.0LER-8/84 f/-$;

1ABLE 3.5-19 ~ (Continued)

(Page 2 of 4)

[}

AG110M 0.00044

-TE129M 0.00016'

TE129 0.000100 TE131M 0.00016' 1TE131 0.000029 I 131 0.100'

TE132 0.000025 I 132

~0.0034

'I 133 0.044 I 134 0.00091 CS1341 0.013

'I 135

.0.0011' CS136 0.0011 CS137 0.024 4

BA137M 0.00027 CS138 0.00030 BA139 0.00035

- BA140-0.0014 LA140 0.00073 LA141 0.00017 CE141 0.00013 LA142 0.00025 CE143 0.000050 O-PR143 0.00015 CE144 0.0052 PR144 0.000013 1

0.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 21.0

-5.0 0.0-0.0 12.0 100.0 100.0 16.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 67.0 100.0 100.0 6.9 1.7 0.0 0.0 14.0 100.0 100.0 1862.0 33820 206.7 3453.0 147.0 160.4 a

4522.0 101.0 122.5 6118.0 11.0 66.5 9310.0

- 3. 9 22.3 11704.0 3.5 16.9 19950.0 6.0 47.4 46284.0 74.0 100.8

- 77938.0 2289.0-164.0 84854.0 1175.0 232.9 5530.0 33820.0 206.7 10270.0 147.0-160.4 13430.0

'101.0-122.5 18170.0 11.0 66.9 27650.0 3.9 22.3 f'~h' X--l.

~MP84 95 15 5-vw-

'Amendmental-L

'HCGS OLER'-

I8/84

-\\

^

~

[

TABLE 3.5-26

-(Pa'ge 1 of 7)

INPUT' DATA FOR ATMOSPHERIC DOSE CALCULATIONS HOPE-CREEK GENERATING STATION-AIR DOSE CALCULATIONS 4l 3..

^

640.0 0.5 0.66 0.5-0.33 8.0 YEAR 2010 POPULATION DNTA POR H03S-(HCIS ESAR)-

6-10-N 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 455.0 4

97200.0 111400.0-117600.0 320500.0 NNE 0.0 0.0 '

O.0 0.0' 36.0 9802.0 22600.0 148800.0 1198200.0 1306900.0

{. T NE

~

53000.0 389200.0 602800.0-t 8800.0.

.0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 357.0 2268.0 ENE 0.0-

-0.0 0.0-62.0 89.0 1205.0 7400.0 35300.0 71700.0 47500.0 E'

O.0 -

0.0 0.0 0.0 -

0.0 1062.0 4

24400.0 59100.0 48300.0 28100.0 ESE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 509.0 13400.0 19800.0' 12700.0 27900.0 SE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 1100.0 1200.0-0.0 33800.0 1.

SSE 0.0 0.0

~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 191.0 0.0 200.0 700.0 22000.0 S

0.0-

' 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 369.0 13500.0 39100.0 13600.0 4800.0 D

SSW 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 229.0 23900.0 14700.0 27200.0 15600.0 t

SW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 691.0 4

25700.0 5900.0 15400.0 8700.0 F

WSW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 1151.0 l

20100.0 3300.0 10000.0 10500.0 W

0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 38.0 4065.0 16900.0

'1300.0 49500.0 259400.0 WM 0.0 0.0 0.0 129.0 30.0 534.0 i

21400.0 23700.0- 46400.0 18100.0 WW-0.0 0.0 0.0 99.0 220.0 915.0 67400.0 30100.0 16400.0 31500.0 NNW-0.0 0.0 0.0-4.0 296.0 2424.0 62400.0 118700.0 49700.0 41300.0 HGIS AREA MIIX PRODUCTION - DRESDNER 1982 SURVEY 6.

10 --

N 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

{.

2.43E6 1.96E6 2.90E4 4.90E4 NNE.

-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.40E4 2.15E6 8.10E6 3.73E6 2.00E3 4.00E3 NE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.00E3 1.71E6 8.10E6 2.93E6 1.30E6 2.50E6 4

ENE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.83E6

\\

5.55E6 4.55E6 1.36E6 2.98E6

'l

.l b

M P82 142/15'27-11.

Amendment 4

_.,. _, _. -. _ = _ _ _ _..... _ _,

f n

1 rx SITE BOUNDARY l

HOPE CREEK - K (SALEM - KEENEY,

COOLING TOWER HOPE CREEK - NEW FREli l

l (SALEM - NEW FREEDOM' TURBINE BUILDING

('

AUXILIARY BUILDING HOPE CREEK 500KV SWITCHYARD L_

\\

E m

i rM,",,,,,O p

?,

D*}

i #

l t

3 REACTOR BUILDING MAIN TRANSFORMER l L

)

/,

a a..:

SALEM 500KV SWITCHYARD a :.

/

s, s

,g

.h5g },

.vi

>l/

.....~

4 mu 4

&Q l l.-. _ -

0***~~n_,

t

\\

ff

,,.***/

(

I l

/

... /

!l s.t 9#

i p,*...*pg#

O

/A k :

. /

T1 p

'... ',.. */s/p/

/

APEltT M cAltD.

f

\\

/

. /

\\

./

IENEY LINE f

uME)

/

Also Available On

/

ape,u

/

A V

D3M LINE

/

NERTH LINE)

LEGEND 2

/

/

f HOPE CREEK p/

/

TRANSMISSION LINES

[,.*'

/

~"""' TR N MISSION LINES l

[,.*

,,,,,, HOPE CREEK-SALEM TIE LINE

[

/

PREVIOUS ROUTES

'[

/

OF REROUTED LINES l

- SALEM - DEANS LINE h

l

(

) PREVIOUS NAMES (NEW LINE)

OF REROUTED LINES l

lN PARENTHESIS h

HOPE CREEK - SALEM TIE LINE soo o

soo 1200 l

(NEW LINE)

' FEET 1s2 n

1a2 364 i

i i

METERS 8408230365 -03 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION fee.3gE

4. TD O g,

EMOWEMAL WOM M

OPERATING LICENSE STAGE

SALEM - NEW FREEDOM SOUTH LINE HOPE CREEK - SALEM L

(NO CHANGE)

TRANSMISSION FACILITIES l

l FIGURE 3.9 - 5 AMEND. 4, 8/84 i !

[

HCGS OLER

-8/84 Withinceach'three-monthLseason, the month that contained the worst: case condition. represented that. season in the

? "'j ~1

' simulation.

1 J

e 1

-Stationfdischargeftemperatures_ expected to be exceeded.less lthansfive percent of:the time were used, along with-a cool-

-ing-tower dissolved solids concentration factor'of 1.8, g

1

- which is above_ anticipated monthly concentrations.

Each-simulation 7 assumed a. constant. discharge of 87,000 liters per b

minute.(23,000 gallons per minute).

Maximum river current velocity _ values of 0.54 meter per i:

lsecond (1.76 feet per second) at maximum flood, and 0.56

- meter per second-(1.84 feet per second) at maximum ebb, were selected to approximate the. frictional drag ~effect of the shoreline.~ Delaware River mainstem average. maximum velocity b

in the vicinity is 0.8 meter.per second (2.6 feet per

. second) at maximum flood and 1.0 meter per second (3.2 feet per second) at maximum ebb (Reference 5.1-3).

Section 3.4 presents' blowdown discharge characteristics for temperature,- dissolved solids and flow.

Section 3.4 also

~

provides maximum expected temperatures (to_be exceeded less than.five-percent of the time), ambient temperature and cycles of concentration in the cooling _ tower blowdown.

Each seasonal simulation was performed for a complete tidal cycle; the resulting_ thermal plume was plotted for the four.

2:

E tidal stages (low slack, maximum flood,-high slack and maxi-mum ebb).

Model results~ indicate that the HCGS discharge is-predominantly negativaly buoyant.

In those cases where the near-field analysis results indicated that the discharge plume would stratify, surface and bottom cross sections were I

generated. :The summer simulation proved the plume to be below mid-depth; therefore, an ' additional mid-depth cross 4

section was generated.

During winter (February), at high slack tide, a distance of 680 meters (2230 feet) is required for mixing in order to meet.the 2.2*C (4'F) maximum temperature limitation.

This distance is well within the DRBC's 1070 meters (3500 feet) mixing zone requirement.

Temperature increases above 2.2*C (4*F) at the surface:during these same conditions are con-4

. fined within_180 meters (600 feet) of the HCGS' discharge.

- Under all other.corditions, the thermal plume meets tempera-

[

ture standards at-a mixing zone distance of less than 610 meters-(2000. feet) (see Appendix A).-

Figures-5.1-2 through 5.1-5 depict _the model results that indicate?that the HCGS thermal plume meets the DRBC temperature increase standard of 2.2*C (4'F) from September i.

to May and 0.8'C (1.5'F)~from June to August, or.a maximum 4

of~30*C (86*F) outside-the mixing zone specified in DRBC Docket D-73-193CP,(Revised), April 25, 1984, under all O-conditions simulat'ed.

~

MP84 133 20 1-vw' 5.1-3 Amendment 4

- s

.c.

.a

HCGS OLER Maximum temperature in the summer ( August) at the end of a 1070 meter (3500 foot) mixing zone is 26.9'C (80.4*F), which is within the 30*C (86*F) DRBC standard.

5.1.3 EFFECTS ON AQUATIC ECOLOGY Baseline aquatic studies have identified over 100 genera of phytoplankton, 200 invertebrate taxa and 110 species of fish as existing at least part of the year in the Delaware River in the vicinity of HCGS.

A small portion of each of these populations is affected by the operation of the station's heat dissipation system, due either to the operation of the intake (impingement /entrainment effects) or the discharge (thermal effects).

The cooling system is designed to reduce biotic losses by following the EPA's recommendations for minimizing cooling water system impacts, which involve the control of the design, location and capacity of the heat dissipation system ( References 5.1-4 and 5.1-5).

Section 3.4 provides a complete description of the heat dissipation system.

5.1.3.1 Impingement Small fish are impinged on cooling water intakes, because of tleir presence within that volume of water being withdrawn, or by their attraction to or random movement into the vicin-ity of the intake.

Once in the area of influence, these fish may sw'im free, by employing swim speeds in excess of the intake velocity, or remain in the area to forage.

By remaining in this area to feed, the fishes' energy reserves may decrease, to the point where they may become entrapped because their swim speed can no longer overcome the intake velocity.

Once a fish's swim speed is reduced below the intake velocity, the fish becomes impinged by the hydraulic forces against the traveling water screens within the intake structure.

Mortality may occur due to asphyxiation (by holding the individual against the screen, thereby inhibit-ing proper gill movement, or holding the individual out of the water for a prolonged period of time), descaling (by screen wash water sprays or the flow of water through the screen), exhaustion (from swimming against the intake velocity) or starvation.

The key elements in the design of the HCGS intake which mini-mize impingement losses are:

a.

Closed cycle cooling employing low water makeup requirements:

approximately 2.16 cubic meters per second (76 cubic feet per second) during normal operating conditions, and 3.66 cubic meters per second (129 cubic feet per second) following normal shutdown (see Section 3.3).

This reduces the num-ber of fish susceptible to impingement.

M P82 117/07 4-mw 5.1-4

HOGS OLER 8/84

(

).

TABLE 5.2-2

%./

- ANNUAL MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSE COMMITMENIS DJE 'IO GASEOUS ~

AND LIQUID EFFUJENTS (mrem unless noted)

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES IN GASEOUS EFFIJJENTS

'IUTAL HIGHEST LOCATIm PATHWAY BODY ORGAN

'IHYROID Nearest (1)

Ground deposit 1.27E-3 1.49E-3 (skin) 1.27E-3 farm residence Inhalation 4.64E-4 7.38E-2 (thyroid) 7.38E-2 milk cow and (teen-total body) meat animal (child-thyroid) at 3.5 miles Milk (infant) 3.64E-2 7.69E-1 (thyroid) 7.69E-1 2 E470.4 NW Vegetables (child) 2.38E-2 1.17E-1 (bone) 1.16E-1 Meat (child) 5.41E-3 2.63E-2 (bone) 2.10E-2 Y LAIS LIOUID EFFUJENTS

'1 DIAL BODY BONE LIVER 4

f-Nearest fish Fish ingestion 1.69E-2 2.97E-1~2.81E-2 1

at outfall (adult)

(child) (teen)

NOBLE GASES IN GASEOUS EFFLUENIS

'IUTAL BODY SKIN GAMMA AIR DOSE (mrads) BETA AIR (mrads) 1 2

Nearest 1.03E-1 2.79E-l 1.55E-1 1.79E-1 residence 3.5 miles NW (1)

" Nearest" refers to the location where the highest radiation dose to an individual frcan all applicable pathways has been estimated.

MP84 112 11 1-vw Amendment 4 J

t

-.---,y-y

~

g

4 HCGS OLER-8/84

./

TABLE 5.2 L~ q);

-1 APPENDIX I ANNUAL ' MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL ' AND

--POPULATION DOSE COMMITMENTS (1)

APPENDIX I CALCULATED DESIGN OBJECTIVES DOSES-

-LLiquid Effluents.

Dose to tota 1. ' ody-from '

3 mrem-0.0265 mr,em b

a11 pathways :

Dose to'anyl organ'from

.10 mrem 0.383 mrem l'

4 all pathways (bone)

Noble Gas Effluen'ts (at hnearest actual resident)

Gamma dose'in air-10 mrad' O.155 mrad

-Beta dose in air 20 mrad

'0.179 mrad 1

2' Dose.to total body of an 5 mrem 0.103 mrem individual'

' Dose to skin-of an 15 mrem 0.279 mrem 1

2' individual

'Radioiodines and Particulates(2) n Dose to any organ from all 15 mrem 0.981 mrem

..g

pathways (thyroid) 1-2 POPULATION DOSES WITHIN 80 km (50 mi)

TOTAL BODY THYROID Annual Dose Natural Radiation Background (3) 490000 man-rem Liquid-Effluents 0.255 man-rem 0.754 man-rem

. Noble Gas Effluents 15.3 man-rem 15.3 man-rem Radioiodines and Particulates 1.04 man-rem 15.7 man-rem 1

2 (1).' Appendix-I Design Objectives from' Sections II.A, II.B, II.C and II.D of Appendix I, 10 CFR'Part 50,-considers dose to

-maximum individual and population per reactor unit.

From

. Federal Register, 40, p. 19442, May 5 1975.

( 2 ). Carbon-14 and' tritium have been added to this category.

L(3)

" Natural Radiation. Exposure:in the United States," U.S.

-Environmental Protection Agency, ORP-SID-72-1 (June, 1972);

using the - average terrestrial plus cosmic background (82 mrem per' year for the Hope Creek area) and~ year 2010 projected population of 5970000.

s.,,/

'MFJ4'112'11 2-vw Amendment 4 9-1

,7

$~iw

--+r+yw1

==

==r

""N e

= " - " ~ - - * - ' - ^ * * " ~ "

+

HCGS'OLER 8/84 Cy TABLE 5.2-4 1

i ANNUAL TOTAL-BODY U.S. POPULATION DOSE COMMITMENT l

U.S. POPULATION-DOSE COMMITMENT CATEGORY (man-Rem)

Natural background radiation (l) 28,400,000

_(man-rem /yr)

- General Public Gas and particulates 34.6 2

ELiquid effluents 1.58 1

4 Transportation of fuel 3

and waste-(1)

Using the average U.S. background dose (102 mrem per year) and year 2010 projected U.S. population from "Popula-tion Estimates and Projections," Series II, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Series P-25, No. 541, Februa ry, 1975.

I i

).

wJ MP84 112 ll 3-vw Amendment 4 I

y.-%-ey_

=+--eev m.m e-

+w--v-w ew

i l

HCGS OLER 8/84

-[

CHAPTER 8

'*p/.'

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF STATION CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION TABLES Table Number Title 8.1-1 HOPE CREEK OPERATION NET PRODUCTION COST -

SAVINGS (PENALTY)

-8.1-2 SOURCES OF' REPLACEMENT ENERGY BY FUEL TYPE, AVERAGE HOPE CREEK AND REPLACEMENT PRICES, 1987-1991 8.1-3 PROJECTED PRIMARY MARKET AREA EXPENDITURES, LOWER ALLONAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP AND CITY OF SALEM lE320.2 8.1<-J HOPE CREEK MAINTENANCE DATA 8.1-5 PROJECTED NUMBERS OF OPERATING PHASE WORKERS AT HOPE CREEK E310.7 GENERATING STATION 8.1-6 ESTIMATED GROSS RECEIPTS, FRANCISE l

AND REAL ESTATE TAXES ATTRIBUTED 4

TO HCGS 8.2-1 HCGS DIRECT COSTS 8.2-2 POPULATION CHANGES IN THE PROJECT AREA M P84 77/04 2-mr-8-il Amendment 4 Dd

• e v

---a

+

,y s- - -

g

y-HCGS OLER 8/84 9'

The state distributes this tax revenue to all munici-palities where equipment is located, not just within the utilities' service areas.

b.

Franchise Tax - The franchise tax is a tax paid to the state for the privilege of PSE&G and Atlantic Electric exercising their franchises in the public streets.

It is levied at the rate of five percent on taxable gross revenues (74 percent of total electric gross revenues).

The taxable amount of gross revenues for franchise tax purposes is determined yearly by multiplying total gross revenues by the percentage that the miles of lines located on public property bear to the total miles.

The state then distributes the franchise tax to various munici-palities in the proportion the amount the public value of utility property in a municipality bears to the total public value in the state, within certain statutory limitations.

This tax is paid primarily to municipalities.within the utilites' service areas, although there are few cases where the utilities use public streets outside the service area, and in those cases franchise taxes are distributed to the munici-palities involved.

c.

Surtax - The surtax is equal to 12.5 percent of the t

total gross receipts and f ranchise tax paid; the surtax is paid to the state for general state use.

Based on the above, about 12.5 percent of the revenues pro-duced by the sale of electricity from HOGS would be paid to the state government in Gross Receipts and Franchise Taxes (see Table 8.1-6).

Based on an estimated average price of 4

electricity of 11.8$ per kilowatt-hour in 1987, these taxes for the owners would amount to about S94 million in 1987, and S163 million per year, levelized over the life of the generating station.

The amount of money that any one municipality can receive through these taxes is limited by various constraints, one of which is a cap equal to S700 per capita.

This cap would apply to Lower Alloways Creek, since Salem Generating Station is located in that municipality; therefore, the state would not allocate most of the tax revenue to Lower Alloways Creek, but would channel it into the Municipal Assistance Fund for dis-tribution primarily to the larger inner core cities of Newark, Jerss y City, Camden, Elizabeth, Trenton and Paterson.

MP 84 77/04 4-mr 8.1-3 Amendment 4

HCGS OLER 8/84 Real Estate Taxes Land and buildings, as commonly understood, are subject to

_-property tax.

The Township of Lower Alloways Creek has no local or school tax levies.

A property tax (one of the lowest in the state) is collected to pay Lower Alloways Creek's share of county taxes.

The local tax rate for Lower Alloways Creek is estimated to be $1.23 per $100 of assessed value, in 1987.

Based on this rate, a 1987 land tax of S6581 is estimated for 107 acres at S5000 per acre.

Esti-mating an improvement assessment of $63.6 million, the cor-responding tax would be S782,280.

The total tax revenue for 1987 attributable to HCGS is therefore roughly S789,000.

This figure was assumed to continue annually and was esca-lated at.a GNP deflator rate of 7.0 percent to 1988 and 6.5 percent thereafter (see Table 8.1-6).

Using a 30-year plant E310.4 4

life and an 11.7 percent cost of money, the levelized lifetime property tax revenue to be expected from HCGS is calculated to be about $1.4 million per year.

p Revenues to Lower Alloways Creek Township have increased significantly since 1970, due to construction and operation of the Salem Generating Station.

These increased revenues have enabled the Township to build a new municipal building, new high school, new sewage treatment plant and new recrea-tional facilities.

Operation of HCGS will add to these revenues.

8.1.2.2 Payroll and Employment The Applicant anticipates an operating staff of 397 persons 1

f or HCG S, with an associated payroll of $18.6 million in 1987 (in 1983 dollars).

The payroll will result in federal 4

and state income tax revenues, but no municipal income taxes are collected.

Table 8.1-5 contains the projected number of operating phase workers at HCGS from 1983 through 1987.

E310.7 Approximately 95 percent of the contractor employees (security forces) projected to be onsite will come from the local (within 64.4 kilometers (40 miles) of the site) area, based on hiring experience to date.

E310.6 M P84 77/04 3-mr 8.1-4 Amendment 4 O

~

1

-- ]

r~w HCGS OLER 8/84-

=;

.- V -

8.lk2.3 - -Increase in Primary' Market Area Expenditures

and Generating of Secondary Employment The Primary Market-Area is defined as Lower Alloways Creek Township and:the City of Salem,'for these purposes.

Secondary employment is that which is created in retail and service establishments because of increased demand due to j

new residents and employees.

The City of Salem-has experienced a historical decline in its economic base since it is no longer an: active port.

Its increasingly isolated geographical position has resulted in cout-migration of population and of retail'and wholesale establishments.

Since the economic base-is limited, only the basic needs,'e.g., foodx services, some clothing and sup-plies, can belmat in Lower Alloways Creek Township and the

. City of Salem.

Therefore, much of the disposable income generated by plant employment will be spent at urban centers outside the.immediata area, especially-for major purchases.

It is estimated that approximately 35 percent of income is spent on non-auto-related goods and services (Reference 8.1-1).

In this instance, the capture tato for residents is O-about 60 to 70 percent.

The capture rate for the operations workers who are not residents is estimated at 10 to 15 per-cent (see Table 8.l'-3).

The projected increase in local ex-penditures and services due to the operations employees is 1

approximately 6.6 percent.

Public Service Electric and Gas-Company plans to purchase goods and services within and beyond the 80-kilometer (50-mile) area referred to in the question.

The 50-mile radius includes the major metropolitan areas of Philadelphia, Cam-den,'Wilmington and Baltimore.

Major suppliers of indus-trial equipment, spare parts, etc., may be reasonably ex-pected to exist in these areas, as are sources of craft E310.8 labor, etc., for assistance during outages.

Based on 4

present PSE&G expenditures, the projected expenditures for such-goods and services purchased from local businesses, for Hope Creek Generating Station in 1987, is between approx-imately 5 and 10 million dollars (in 1984 dollars).

How-ever, efforts are made to purchase goods and services from the lowest qualified bidder, regardless of location, unless time of' delivery is a factor, in which case local sources might-be given priority.

t n

^

MP84 62/15 3 8.1-5 Amendment 4

~

I

HCGS OLER 8/83 0

8.1. 2. 4 Improvement of Local Roads and Transportation Facilities The intersection of Hancocks Bridge Road and Alloway Creek Neck Road in Hancocks Bridge has been improved, and plans are currently underway to widen Lower Alloways Creek Neck Road for a distance of approximately six kilometers (four miles).

8.1.2.5 Research, Environmental Monitoring and Environmental Education PSE&G is currently conducting numerous environmental studies involving water chemistry, thermal data, and aquatic and terrestial biological monitoring programs.

These areas will be studied throughout the operating life of HCGS.

The knowledge gained from these programs will contribute to the understanding and prediction of environmental interrelationships.

9 M P83 91/17 05-sw 8.1-6 Amendment I h

1

1 HCGS OLER 8/84 l

(

\\

TABLE 8.1-5

. s,_) L 1

PROJECTED tidMBERS OF OPERATING

[--

PHASE-WORKERS AT. HOPE CREEK

~

G ENERATING - STATION (1)

UTILITY EMPLOYEES:

1983 1984 1985 1986 1987~

Management 13-20 21~

22 22 (Administrative and Secretarial

-Workers)

Operation 70 92 101 102 102 Technical 80 92 97 97 97 E310.7 Maintenance 67' 108 129 129 129 Radiation Protection 24 33 41 47 47 Subtotal 254 345 389 397 397

()

CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES Security 100 110 120 130 140 4

Total 354 455 509 527 537 (1)

These projected numbers do not include construction personnel.

1 l

i l

-s V

M P84 77/03 1-mr Amendment 4 a

HCGS OLER ~

8/84 TABLE 8.1-6

,,)_

. ESTIMATED GROSS RECEIPTS,- FRANCHISE, AND

(

V

REAL ESTATE TAXES ATTRIBUTED TO HCGS (Millions of Dollars) e A

(1)

(1)

GROSS RECEIPTS REAL ESTATE.

- YEAR-AND FRANCHISE TAX TAX i

- 1987 94-0.789-1988 100 0.844 1989 97 0.899 4

~

1990 116 0.958

. 1991 110 1.020 1992 117

- 1.086 O

- (l)

Figures given in each year's dollars J

l f

j '

MP 84 77/03'2-mr Amendment 4 b,

q f

+,.c.e.-

.,,y,u v.,4.+-..w.

y e.e.

---

s...,m-.4,-.mr%.,- - -.,--

HCGS OLER A

i 8.2 COSTS 8.2.lf DIRECT COSTS-(INTERNAL COSTS)

Direct costs associated with HCGS include variable costs, which are documented in-Section 8.1.1,c and fixed costs not re-lated'to production levels, but incurred as a result-of HCGS operation.

Table 8.2-1. documents variable and fixed costs for HCGS, presenting total lifetime costs, first year costs and levelized lifetime annual costs.

A 30 year operational life is assumed.

Annual variable costs are shown as mills per kilowatt-hour, and fixed costs are expressed annually as dol-lars per kilowatt of installed capacity.

An 11.7 percent cost of money was used to determine present worth and levelized.

values.

Variable costs-are fuel costs and those operation and mainten-ance costs that vary with the amount of energy produced.

Total lifetime fuel cost is estimated to be Sl.049 billion (1987 dollars), or $127 million per year (levelized).

Vari-able operation and maintenance costs are estimated at $371 million (1987 dollars), or S45 million per ye7r.

Levelized costs per unit of production are 20.5 mills per kilowatt-hour for fuel and 7.3 mills per kilowatt-hour for variable O&M.

t

(,f Fixed costs are independent of production levels.

Table 8.2-1 describes fixed costs in dollars per kilowatt based on a generating capacity of 1067 megawatts for HCGS.

Fixed operat-ing and maintenance costs, as shown, include a number of an-nual costs necessary for the operation of HCGS, but not determined by level of output.

These includa:

a.

Minimum staffing and services required to perform such activities as environmental surveillance, secur-ity, health physics, and other requirements for operating and maintaining HCGS regardless of output level.

The estimated' total lifetime (30 year) cost is S878 million- (1987 dollars), or a levelized annual cost of $107 million.

b.

Annual NRC fees for routine inspections and facility license amendments.

Based on the current fee struc-ture and estimated cost escalation rates, the total lifetime' cost would be S2.3 million (1987 dollars),

or.a levelized annual cost of $276,000.

A) iv M P82 151/03-df 3.2-1

HCGS OLER 8/84 c.

Liability, property and energy replacement insur-ance.

Based on currently available insurance, esti-mated lifetime costs are S122 million (1987 dollars),

or a levelized annual cost of $14.8 million.

d.

Property taxes.

Total lifetime cost is estimated to be $12 million, or Sl.4 million per year levelized cost.

This figure does not include gross receipts and franchise taxes collected in lieu of property taxes and based on total revenues.

Other fixed costs, not incurred annually, are documented separately.

These include:

a.

NRC operating license fee.

The fee for this license is currently $1,024,500, or $1.6 million in 1987 dol-

-lars.

This corresponds to a levelized annual cost of S190,000.

b.

Unit decommissioning costs upon retirement.

See Section 5.8 for an estimate of decommissioning costs.

8.2.2 INDIRSCT COSTS (EXTERNAL COSTS)

Population Changes and Housing Demand Population increase due to in-migration of operations workers should be minimal, especially in view of the fact that out-migration of construction workers who relocated to the project area most probably will occur at the end of the construction phase.

Population has decreased within the last ten years in the City of Salem, and increased in Lower Alloways Creek Town-ship (see Table 8.2-2).

The demand for housing in the project area (Lower Alloways Creek Township and the City of Salem) should increase mini-mally.

Based on recent experience with the relocation of Nuclear Department Staff to Artificial Island, the 397 workers projected for Hope Creek Generating Station in 1987 should reside in the following areas: eastern Delaware (10 percent),

4 Salem County (20 percent), Gloucester County (30 percent),

Cumberland County ( 5 percent), Burlington County (20 percent),

Camden County (10 percent), and Other (5 percent).

The single f amily residences which have been converted to multi-family apartments and boarding houses during the con-struction phase will provide lower income housing when the construction workers leave.

This type of multi-unit housing was almost non-existent prior to construction of Salent l

Generating Stat!on and HCGS.

MP 84 77/03 3-mr 8.2-2 Amendment 4

-HCGS OLER 8/84

+-

D 0UESTION-E291.ll-(Section.13.4)

LProvide a_ copy'ofLthe Salem Generating Station 316(b)-

demonstration at the time it is-submitted to the NJDEP (scheduled. for -June 15, 1983).

RESPONSE

A copy :of - the Salem Generating Station-316(b). demonstra-tion was provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on 4

March 5, 1984.

1 4

1 O

f' i

f 4

O s

'MLP84 77/02'l-mr' E291.ll-1 Amendment'4

. ~-.

..c i.

i i

'F

^

HCGS OLER 8/84 OUESTION E291.22 Provide'a' copy'of-the-NPDES-permit renewal application when.

j submitted to the.-state.

i 1

RESPONSE' A. copy of'the NPDES permit renewal application was provided to-the Nuclear' Regulatory Commission-in June 1984.

4 S

1.

l 4

t e

i i

i 1

i i

i j

i i!.

t V

[.

v

- M P84 77/02 2-mr E291.22-1 Amendement 4 w.,--

~

.---.~,-,._.,e-,,

_.4-,,..,,

---

na,-.ie.,-4.,_s_,,v-,

c-,e-.,-,.

-,wnr.,%.wn,cy-,--,---

,.--e w-,~,,-,=,--.ey e w e-

I

- i HOGS OLER 8/84 N

QUESTION E310.4 (Section 8.1.2.1)

What assumptions were made in deriving the levelized life-

-time estimate of? local?real estate taxes (Section 8.1.2.1)?

1

RESPONSE

The total tax revenue-for 1987 attributable to HCGS is roughly S789,000.

This figure was assumed to continue annually and was escalated at a GNP deflator rate of 7.0 percent to 1988 and 6.5 percent thereafterJ(see Table 4

8.1-6).

Using a 30-year plant-life-and an 11.7 percent cost of money, the levelized. lifetime property tax revenue to be expected from HOGS is calculated to be about Sl.4 million per year.

O b

1 9

O M P84.77/02 3-mr E310.4-1 Amendment 4

~

y w

wm w

-r-e t-g--arerrw aw Mp-

• -~sP W-eew--way

-eeser-,9-N

-dem-

-mm+e-?W%ey 4wM-g-ry-e P

->"*Mve-r-y

--+y

--g8-

~

HCGS OLER 8/84

'I-A)

\\ /

QUESTION E310.6'(Section 8.1.2.2)

The operating staff for HCGS is' estimated to be 378 persons

( Section 8.1.2. 2)., Does'this figure' include security forces-and other' contractor employees who would regularly be

' employed at the HCGS site?

If not, the applicant should provide data on such employment and its contribution to local. payroll.

4-

RESPONSE

The operating staff for Hope Creek Generating Station, as distinguished from construction personnel, is projected to be approximately 397 persons in 1987, not 378 as originally reported.. The operating staff for HOGS is projected to be 4

254 persons in 1983 and 345 persons in 1984.

These numbers do not include approximately 100 and 110 contractor employees, respectively, who are projected to be on site in support of operations.

The payroll projections for contractor employees (in this case security guards) for the-fiscal years:

6/17/83 - 6/17/84 is approximately S2,000,000

' O 6/17/84 - 6/17/85 is approximately S2,000,000 g

(Projections beyond 1985 are not available.)

Since approximately 95% of the contractor employees will be local (within 64.4 Kilometers (40 miles) of the site) 4 residents, their contribution to the local payroll is estimated to be S1,900,000 for each fiscal year.

)

{

}

A M P84 77/04 1-mr E310.6-1 Amendment 4

, - ~,,,

=. - - -..

~

.,,--n r

- r~N-HCGS OLER 8/84-(

).

\\m/

OUESTION E310.8 (Section 8.1.2.3)

Does the applicant intend to purchase goods and services from suppliers in-the local (within 50 miles) area?

If so, the applicant ~should indicate the kind and amount of such purchases.

RESPONSE

Public Service Electric and Gas Company plans to purchase goods and services within and beyond the 80-kilometer (50-mile) area referred to in the question.

The 50-mile' radius

-includes the major metropolitan areas of Philadelphia, Cam-den, Wilmington and Baltimore.

Major suppliers of indus-

-trial equipment, spare parts, etc., may be reasonably ex-pected to exist in these areas, as are sources of craft labor, etc., for assistance during outages.

However, ef-forts are made to purchase goods and services from the lowest' qualified bidder, regardless of location, unless time of delivery is a factor, in which' case local sources might be given priority.

Based on present PSE&G expenditures, the projected expenditures for such goods and services, pur-4 chased from local business, for Hope Creek Generating Sta-O

. tion in 1987 is between approximately 5 and 10 million dollars (in 1984 dollars).

1 3

h MP84 62/15 1 E310.8-1 Amendment 4

c

G HCGS OLER 8/84 L'

CHAPTER 2 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page-T= Table Amendment F= Figure-Number F 2.1-20 0

F 2.1-21 0

F 2.1-22 0

F 2.1-23 0

F 2.1-24 0

F 2.1-25 0

F 2.1-26 0

F 2.1-27 1

2.2-1 1

2.2-2 1

2.2-3 1

2.2-4 1

2.2-5 1

2.2-6 1

'0 2.2-6(a) 1 2.2-6(b) 1 2.2-7 0

2.2-8 1

2.2-9 0

2.2-10 0

+

2.2-11 0

2.2-12 0

2.2-13 0

2.2-14 0

2.2-15 4

2.2-16 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

Gh 3 1

T 2.2-1 0

• 2.2-2 0

T 2.2-3 1

T 2.2-4 1

F 2.2-1 0

F 2.2-2 0

F 2.2-3 0

F 2.2-4 0

F 2.2-5 0

F 2.2-6 0

{

F 2.2-7 0

2.3-1 0

+

2.3-2 0

M P84-132,13 1-srd EP2-3 Amendment 4

.HCGS.OLER.

4/84

. CHAPTER'2~

l LIST OF EFFECTIVE'PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment 4-F= Figure

' Number F 2.4-2 0

4 F 2.4-3 0

F 2.4-4 3

F-2.4-4a 1

F 2.4 0

'F 2.4-6 0-F 2.4-7 0

F 2.4-8 0

F 2.4-9 0

F 2.4-10 0

i-F 2.4-11 0

F 2.4-12 0

F 2.4-13 0

F 2.4-14 0

F 2.4-15 0

O:

F 2.4-16 0

i F 2.4-17 0

i F 2.4-18 0

F 2.4-19 0

{

F 2.4-20 0

{~

F 2.4-21 0

F'2.4-22

'0 i

.2.5-1 0

j.

2.5-2 0

2.5-3 0

.2.5-4 1

2.5-5 1

2.5-6 1

2.5-7 1

2.5-8 0

-2.5 0 2.5-10 0

2.5-11 0

2.5-12 0

2.5-13 1

2.0-14 1

2.5-15 1

2.5-16 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

O M P84 61/01 21-gs EP2-7 Amendment 3 f

n

HCGS OLER 8/84 CHAPTER 2 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number F 2.5-1 0

F 2.5-2 1

F 2.5-3 0

2.6-1 0

2.6-2 4

2.6-3 1

Refs.

Sh 1 0

T 2. 6 -l Sh 1 4

Sh 2 0

Sh 3 4

Sh 4 0

Sh 5 4

Sh 6 4

T 2.6-2 1

F 2.6-1 4

2.7-1 0

2.7-2 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

T 2.7-1 0

T 2.7-2 0

T 2.7-3 0

T 2.7-4 0

F 2.7-1 0

M P84 126/11 2-mw EP2-8 Amendment 4

~

HCGS OLER 8/84 CHAPTER'3 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES

--,O A

Page T= Table Amendment

~ F=Fiqure Number 3-1 2

3-11 2

3-111 1

3-iv 1

3-v l-3-vi-0 vii 1

3-viii 1

3.1 -1 0

3.1 -2 4

- 3.1-3 0

l T 3.1-1 F 3.1-1 C

F 3.1-2 0

F 3.1-3 0

F 3.1-4 3

3.2-1 1

3.2-2 0

T 3.2-1 0

F 3.2-1 0

O 3.3-1 0

3.3-2 0

3."-3 0

T :.3-1 2

F 3.3-1 4

t 3.4-1 1

i 3.4-2 1

3.4-3 1

i 3.4-4 0

3.4-5 3

3.4-6 0

3.4-7 1

Refs.

i Sh 1 0

T 3.4-1 1

T 3. 4-l a 3

4 T 3.4-lb 1

T 3.4-2 0

T 3.4-3 0

T 3.4-4 0'

T 3.4-5 4

T 3.4-6 1

a T 3.4-7 1

T 3.4-8 1

T 3.4-9 1

(

F 3.4-1 1

M P84 33/17 1-gs EP3-1 Amendment 4

-,-eg

.-r

,,9.+c,

..-,_.._m.

.-e.r-

,m,..,._,.m_.

HCGS OLER 8/84 CHAPTER 3 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number F 3.4-2 0

F 3.4-3 0

F 3.4-4 0

F 3.4-5 0

F 3.4-6 0

F 3.4-7 1

3.5-1 0

3.5-2 0

3.5-3 3

3.5-4 3

3.5-5 0

3.5-6 1

3.5-7 0

i' 3.5-8 0

3.5-9 1

3.5-10 0

3.5-11 0

3.5-12 0

3.5-13 0

3.5-14 0

3.5-15 0

3,5-16 0

3.5-17 0

3.5-18 0

3.5-19 0

3.5-20 0

3.5-21 0

l 3.5-22 0

l 3.5-23 3

3.5-23(a) 4 3.5-23(b) 2 3.5-24 0

3.5-25 0

3.5-26 0

3.5-27 2

3.5-28 0

3.5-29 0

3.5-30 0

3.5-31 0

3.5-32 0

3.5-33 0

M P84 33/17 2-gs EP3-2 Amendment 4

..~

. ~...

l

./4 HCGS OLER

-8/84 h--) =

n1

. CHAPTER 3

-LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES.(Continued)

Page 3

T= Table Amendment F= Figure.

Number 3.5-34 0

3.5-35 0

n 3.5 0 3.5-37 0

3.5-38~

2

'3.5-38(a) 2 3.5-38(b).

2 3.5-39 3

3.5-39(a)-

2 3.5-39(b) 2 3.5-40 0

3.5-41 3

3.5-42 0

1 3.5-43 0

i 3.5-44 0

3.5-45 0

3.5-46 0

3.5 0 Refs.

l Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

i T 3.5-1

[

Sh 1 0

i Sh 2 0

}-

T 3.5-2 0

i T 3.5-3 0

T 3.5-4 0

T 3.5-5 0

T 3.5-6 0

i T 3.5-7 i

Sh l~

0 l

Sh 2 0

l-Sh 3 0

)

Sh 4 0

Sh 5 4

T 3.5-8 Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

g.

T 3.5-9 i

Sh 1 3

i Sh 2 2

Sh 3 3

2 M P84:126/11 1-mw EP3-3 Amendment 4

HCGS OLER 8/04 CHAPTER 3 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment F=Fiqure Number T 3.5-10 0

T 3.5-11 4

T 3.5-12 4

T 3.5-13 Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

T 3.5-14 Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

l Sh 3 0

l Sh 4 0

T 3.5-15 Sh 1 0

i l

Sh 2 0

l Sh 3 0

l Sh 4 0

l T 3.5-16 sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

Sh 3 0

Sh 4 0

Sh 5 0

i T 3.5-17 sh 1 4

Sh 2 4

Sh 3 4

T 3.5-18 Sh 1 4

Sh 2 4

Sh 3 0

T 3.5-19 Sh 1 4

Sh 2 4

Sh 3 0

Sh 4 0

T 3.5-20 Sh 1 3

l Sh 2 0

l g

l M P84 126/11 6-mw EP3-4 Amendment 4

J r

' ]V

.HCGS OLER 8/84 CHAPTER 3 LIST OF EFFECTIVE-PAGES (Continued)

'Page T= Table Amendment-F= Figure Number

--T 3.5-21 0

T 3.5-22 Sh.1 0

Sh 2 0

Sh 3 0

T 3.5-23 Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

T 3.5-24 Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

Sh 3 0

T 3.5-25 2

T 3.5-26 O

Sh ~1 4

Sh 2 0

Sh 3 0

Sh 4 2

Sh 5. '

2 Sh 6 2

Sh 7 2

T 3.5-27 3

T 3.5-28 0

F 3.5-1 0

F 3.5-2 0

F 2.5-3 0

F 3.5-4A 0

'F 3.5-4B 0

F 3.5-5 0

F 3.5-6 0

4 F 3.5-7 0

F 3.5-8 0

F 3.5-9A 0

F 3.5-9B 0

3.6-1 3

3.6-2 3

-3.6-3 3

3.6-4 2

T 3.6-1 3

O M P84 33/17 3-gs EP3-5 Amendment'4 l

HCGS OLER 8/84 CHAPTER 3 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number 3.7-1 0

3.7-2 0

3.7-3 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

T 3.7-1 0

T 3.7-2 0

T 3.7-3 0

F 3.7-1 0

3.8-1 0

T 3.8-1 0

3.9-1 1

3.9-2 1

3.9-3 1

3.9-4 1

3.9-5 1

Refs.

Sh 1 1

T 3.9-1 0

F 3.9-1 1

F 3.9-2 0

F 3.9-3A 1

F 3.9-3B 1

F 3.9-3C 1

F 3.9-3D 1

F 3.9-3E 1

F 3.9-3F 1

F 3.9-3G 1

F 3.9-4 0

F 3.9-5 4

l l

M P84 126/18 1-mr EP3-6 Amendment 4

i HCGS OLER 8/84

CHAPTER 5 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number

' F 5.1-12 0

F 5.1-13 0,

F 5.1-14 0

4 F= 5.1 0 F 5.1-16 0

F 5.1-17 0

F 5.1-18 1

t-

-5.2-1.

0 5.2-2 0

5.2-3 0

5.2-4

-0

.5.2-5 1

5.2 0 Refs.

Sh 1 0

T 5.2-1 0

4 l

T 5.2-2 4

.T 5.2-3 4

T 5.2-4 4

F 5.2-1 0

F 5.2-2 0

l-F 5.2-3 0

5.3-1 2

5.3-1(a) 3 5.3-2 0

5.3-3 0

F 5.3-1 2

5.4-1 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

i 5.5-1 1

5.5-2 1

j.

5.5-3 1

5.5-4 1

5.5-5 1

5.5-6 3

5.5-7 1

Refs.

Sh 1 1

M P84 126/12-cag EPS-3 Amendment 4 i

\\

\\

i

l HCGS OLER 4/84 CHAPTER 5 l

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Continued)

Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number 5.6-1 3

5.6-2 1

Refs.

Sh 1 0

5.7-1 0

5.7-2 0

5.7-3 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

5.8-1 0

5.8-2 0

5.8-3 0

Refs.

Sh 1 1

T 5.8-1 1

5.9-1 0

T 5.9-1 Sh 1 0

Sh 2 0

l l

.HCGS OLER 8/84-CHAPTER 8 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES page T= Table Amendment 1

F= Figure Number l

8-i 1

8-11 4

8.1-1 1

8.1-2 0

8.1-3 4

8.1-4 4

8.1-5 4

8.1-6 1

Refs.

2 -

Sh 1 0

T 8.1-1 0

.T 8.1-2 0

T 8.1-3

'l T 8.1-4 1

^

T 8.1-5 4

T 8.1-6 4

8.2-1 0

i-8.2-2 4

4 8.2-3 0

i 8.2-4 0

8.2-5 0

8.2-6 0

Refs.

Sh 1 0

T 8.2-1 0

T 8.2-2 0

i 3-i i

LO M P84 123/11 3-mw-EP8-1 Amendment 4 i

L l

HCGS:OLER' 8/84 QUESTIONS

- /'N)

(

LIST OF EFFECTIVE FAGES

' Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number E-i' 1

E-il 2

E-iii 2

E240.1-1 1

E240.1-2 1

E240.2-1 1

E240.2-2 1

E240.2-3 1

E290.1-1 1

E290.2-l' 1

E290.3-1 1

E290.4-1 1

E290.5 1 E290.5-2 1

E290.5-3 1

E290.5-4 1.

E290.6-1 1

E291.1-1 1

O E291.2-1 1

E291.2-2 1

E291.2-3 1

E291.2-4 1

E291.2-5 1

E291.3-1 1

E291.4-1 1

E291.5-1 1

E291.6-1 1

E291.7-1 1

E291.8-1 1

E291.8-2 1

E291.8-3 1

E291.9-1 1

E291.10-1 1

E291.10-2 1

E291.10-3 1

E291.10-4 1

E291.10-5 1

E291.10-6 1

E291.10-7 1

E291.ll-1 4

E291.12-1 1

O M P84 125/11 4-mw EPQ-1 Amendment 4 1

i e -',,-+

--.-w---.

-r-----,

e v-- -, --.

- w

,-we.---w..-*,*,--,v-

~~--,-,e t=-w

.-re,,*,.

..-v-.----w-www--+,.-v,-

e,w w-

HCGS OLER 8/84 QUESTIONS LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Page T= Table Amendment F= Figure Number E291.13-1 1

E291.14-1 1

E291.15-1 3

E291.16-1 3

E291.17-1 2

E291.18-1 1

E291.19-1 3

E291.20-1 2

E291.21-1 2

E291.21-2 2

E291.21-3 2

F E291.21-1 2

F E291.21-2 2

E291.22-1 4

E310.1-1 1

l E310.2-1 1

E310.3-1 1

E310.4-1 4

E310.5-1 1

4 E310.6-1 4

E310.7-1 1

E310.8 4 E310.9-1 1-E311.1-1 1

E311.2-1 1

E320.1-1 1

E320.1-2 1

E320.2-1 1

f E450.1-1 2

E451.1-1 1

E451.2-1 1.

E451.3-1 1

E451.3-2 1

E451.3-3 1

E451.3-4 1

E451.4-1 1

E451.5-1 1

E451.5-2 1

E451.5-3 1

E451.6-1 1

E451.6-2 1

E451.6-3 1

E451.6-4 1

E451.6-5 1

M P84 126/11 5-mw EPO-2 Amendment 4 e